Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 631-642.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2017.6168
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Lei TIAN, Yaping CHEN, Jun LIU, Xiaogang MA, Na WANG, Bing YANG, Ying LI, Haidong GUO, Juan LI, Hui HU, Yinxia ZHANG, Peifu LI*()
Online:
2017-11-25
Published:
2017-11-10
Contact:
Peifu LI
田蕾, 陈亚萍, 刘俊, 马晓刚, 王娜, 杨兵, 李莹, 郭海东, 李娟, 胡慧, 张银霞, 李培富*()
通讯作者:
李培富
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Lei TIAN, Yaping CHEN, Jun LIU, Xiaogang MA, Na WANG, Bing YANG, Ying LI, Haidong GUO, Juan LI, Hui HU, Yinxia ZHANG, Peifu LI. Comprehensive Evaluation and Selection of Rice (Oryza sativa japonica) Germplasm for Saline Tolerance at Germination Stage[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2017, 31(6): 631-642.
田蕾, 陈亚萍, 刘俊, 马晓刚, 王娜, 杨兵, 李莹, 郭海东, 李娟, 胡慧, 张银霞, 李培富. 粳稻种质资源芽期耐盐性综合评价与筛选[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(6): 631-642.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2017.6168
编号ID. | 种质资源名称 Name of germplasm | 原产地或来源 Origin | D值 D value | 排名 Ranking | 编号ID. | 种质资源名称 Name of germplasm | 原产地或来源 Origin | D值 D value | 排名Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OB1 | 合江21 Hejiang 21 | 黑龙江 Heilongjiang | 0.235 | 63 | OB33 | 罗平懒汉谷 Luopinglanhangu | 云南 Yunnan | 0.819 | 6 |
OB2 | 吉粳44 Jijing 44 | 吉林 Jilin | 0.540 | 50 | OB34 | Daniela | 巴西 Brazil | 0.961 | 1 |
OB3 | Hungarian No.1 | 澳大利亚 Australia | 0.594 | 45 | OB35 | Arborio | 意大利 Italy | 0.843 | 4 |
OB4 | Banat 725 | 澳大利亚 Australia | 0.709 | 16 | OB36 | 湟罗 Huangluo | 苏联 The Soviet Union | 0.810 | 8 |
OB5 | 东北小粒种 Dongbeixiaolizhong | 黑龙江 Heilongjiang | 0.491 | 56 | OB37 | Gostima | 阿尔巴尼亚 Aerbaerya | 0.868 | 2 |
OB6 | 罗萨马启蒂Rosa Marchetti | 意大利 Italy | 0.715 | 15 | OB38 | Rocca | 意大利 Italy | 0.722 | 12 |
OB7 | 意大利3号Italy 3 | 意大利 Italy | 0.769 | 10 | OB39 | 越光 Koshihikari | 日本 Japan | 0.670 | 27 |
OB8 | Roma | 意大利 Italy | 0.548 | 47 | OB40 | 水原1号 Suwon 1 | 韩国 Korea | 0.719 | 13 |
OB9 | Banat2951 | 澳大利亚 Australia | 0.638 | 35 | OB41 | Rossi | 意大利 Italy | 0.823 | 5 |
OB10 | Cigalon | 法国 France | 0.666 | 29 | OB42 | 京香2号 Jingxiang 2 | 北京 Peking | 0.535 | 51 |
OB11 | Agostono | 意大利 Italy | 0.645 | 33 | OB43 | 幸实 Sachiminori | 日本 Japan | 0.542 | 49 |
OB12 | Rizzotto | 意大利 Italy | 0.521 | 54 | OB44 | 咸南22 Xiannan 22 | 朝鲜 North Korea | 0.698 | 22 |
OB13 | 水原55 Suwon 55 | 韩国 Korea | 0.642 | 34 | OB45 | Hrborio Cyauco | 南斯拉夫 Yugoslavia | 0.851 | 3 |
OB14 | 秋铃 Qiuling | 安徽 Anhui | 0.546 | 48 | OB46 | 新竹8号 Xinzhu 8 | 台湾 Taiwan | 0.684 | 24 |
OB15 | 宁粳16 Ningjing 16 | 宁夏 Ningxia | 0.211 | 64 | OB47 | 镇稻2号 Zhendao 2 | 江苏 Jiangsu | 0.701 | 21 |
OB16 | 嘉南8号 Jianan 8 | 台湾 Taiwan | 0.607 | 43 | OB48 | 嘉农485 Jianong 485 | 上海 Shanghai | 0.299 | 62 |
OB17 | Balilla | 意大利 Italy | 0.610 | 42 | OB49 | YR251 | 澳大利亚 Australia | 0.795 | 9 |
OB18 | 荒木 Araki | 日本 Japan | 0.502 | 55 | OB50 | Calrose | 美国 America | 0.675 | 26 |
OB19 | 加合1号 Jiahe 1 | 浙江 Zhejiang | 0.428 | 58 | OB51 | 山福利亚 Shanfuliya | 西非几内亚 Guinea | 0.705 | 19 |
OB20 | 嘉湖3号 Jiahu 3 | 浙江 Zhejiang | 0.636 | 37 | OB52 | 日本晴 Nipponbare | 日本 Japan | 0.651 | 31 |
OB21 | Cristal | 法国 France | 0.633 | 38 | OB53 | 中花17 Zhonghua 17 | 北京 Peking | 0.623 | 40 |
OB22 | 漾濞光壳陆稻Yangbiguangkeludao | 云南 Yunnan | 0.814 | 7 | OB54 | 早生光头 Zaoshengguangtou | 东北 Northeast of China | 0.603 | 44 |
OB23 | Bertone | 葡萄牙 Portugal | 0.716 | 14 | OB55 | 小白芒 Xiaobaimang | 浙江 Zhejiang | 0.709 | 17 |
OB24 | Farry | 法国 France | 0.528 | 52 | OB56 | 法国稻 Faguodao | 法国 France | 0.637 | 36 |
OB25 | 中花9号 Zhonghua 9 | 北京 Beijing | 0.525 | 53 | OB57 | 陆羽132 Luyu 132 | 日本 Japan | 0.681 | 25 |
OB26 | Amepukahmib | 意大利 Italy | 0.669 | 28 | OB58 | 芦苇稻 Luweidao | 东北 Northeast of China | 0.745 | 11 |
OB27 | Kele (34978) | 孟加拉 Bengal | 0.484 | 57 | OB59 | 红尖 Hongjian | 浙江 Zhejiang | 0.648 | 32 |
OB28 | Galhardo | 葡萄牙 Portugal | 0.706 | 18 | OB60 | 早糯稻 Zaonuodao | 山东 Shandong | 0.702 | 20 |
OB29 | Kele (34979) | 孟加拉 Bengal | 0.629 | 39 | OB61 | 露水稻 Lushuidao | 河南 Henan | 0.570 | 46 |
OB30 | 辽丰8号 Liaofeng 8 | 辽宁 Liaoning | 0.361 | 60 | OB62 | 永德3号 Yongde 3 | 韩国 Korea | 0.611 | 41 |
OB31 | 千重浪 Qianchonglang | 日本 Japan | 0.394 | 59 | OB63 | 新竹4号 Xinzhu 4 | 台湾 Taiwan | 0.685 | 23 |
OB32 | 圭陆1号 Guilu 1 | 云南 Yunnan | 0.660 | 30 | OB64 | ARC7042 | 印度 India | 0.313 | 61 |
Table 1 Origin and names of 64 japonica rice germplasm and their D values, comprehensive ranking.
编号ID. | 种质资源名称 Name of germplasm | 原产地或来源 Origin | D值 D value | 排名 Ranking | 编号ID. | 种质资源名称 Name of germplasm | 原产地或来源 Origin | D值 D value | 排名Ranking |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
OB1 | 合江21 Hejiang 21 | 黑龙江 Heilongjiang | 0.235 | 63 | OB33 | 罗平懒汉谷 Luopinglanhangu | 云南 Yunnan | 0.819 | 6 |
OB2 | 吉粳44 Jijing 44 | 吉林 Jilin | 0.540 | 50 | OB34 | Daniela | 巴西 Brazil | 0.961 | 1 |
OB3 | Hungarian No.1 | 澳大利亚 Australia | 0.594 | 45 | OB35 | Arborio | 意大利 Italy | 0.843 | 4 |
OB4 | Banat 725 | 澳大利亚 Australia | 0.709 | 16 | OB36 | 湟罗 Huangluo | 苏联 The Soviet Union | 0.810 | 8 |
OB5 | 东北小粒种 Dongbeixiaolizhong | 黑龙江 Heilongjiang | 0.491 | 56 | OB37 | Gostima | 阿尔巴尼亚 Aerbaerya | 0.868 | 2 |
OB6 | 罗萨马启蒂Rosa Marchetti | 意大利 Italy | 0.715 | 15 | OB38 | Rocca | 意大利 Italy | 0.722 | 12 |
OB7 | 意大利3号Italy 3 | 意大利 Italy | 0.769 | 10 | OB39 | 越光 Koshihikari | 日本 Japan | 0.670 | 27 |
OB8 | Roma | 意大利 Italy | 0.548 | 47 | OB40 | 水原1号 Suwon 1 | 韩国 Korea | 0.719 | 13 |
OB9 | Banat2951 | 澳大利亚 Australia | 0.638 | 35 | OB41 | Rossi | 意大利 Italy | 0.823 | 5 |
OB10 | Cigalon | 法国 France | 0.666 | 29 | OB42 | 京香2号 Jingxiang 2 | 北京 Peking | 0.535 | 51 |
OB11 | Agostono | 意大利 Italy | 0.645 | 33 | OB43 | 幸实 Sachiminori | 日本 Japan | 0.542 | 49 |
OB12 | Rizzotto | 意大利 Italy | 0.521 | 54 | OB44 | 咸南22 Xiannan 22 | 朝鲜 North Korea | 0.698 | 22 |
OB13 | 水原55 Suwon 55 | 韩国 Korea | 0.642 | 34 | OB45 | Hrborio Cyauco | 南斯拉夫 Yugoslavia | 0.851 | 3 |
OB14 | 秋铃 Qiuling | 安徽 Anhui | 0.546 | 48 | OB46 | 新竹8号 Xinzhu 8 | 台湾 Taiwan | 0.684 | 24 |
OB15 | 宁粳16 Ningjing 16 | 宁夏 Ningxia | 0.211 | 64 | OB47 | 镇稻2号 Zhendao 2 | 江苏 Jiangsu | 0.701 | 21 |
OB16 | 嘉南8号 Jianan 8 | 台湾 Taiwan | 0.607 | 43 | OB48 | 嘉农485 Jianong 485 | 上海 Shanghai | 0.299 | 62 |
OB17 | Balilla | 意大利 Italy | 0.610 | 42 | OB49 | YR251 | 澳大利亚 Australia | 0.795 | 9 |
OB18 | 荒木 Araki | 日本 Japan | 0.502 | 55 | OB50 | Calrose | 美国 America | 0.675 | 26 |
OB19 | 加合1号 Jiahe 1 | 浙江 Zhejiang | 0.428 | 58 | OB51 | 山福利亚 Shanfuliya | 西非几内亚 Guinea | 0.705 | 19 |
OB20 | 嘉湖3号 Jiahu 3 | 浙江 Zhejiang | 0.636 | 37 | OB52 | 日本晴 Nipponbare | 日本 Japan | 0.651 | 31 |
OB21 | Cristal | 法国 France | 0.633 | 38 | OB53 | 中花17 Zhonghua 17 | 北京 Peking | 0.623 | 40 |
OB22 | 漾濞光壳陆稻Yangbiguangkeludao | 云南 Yunnan | 0.814 | 7 | OB54 | 早生光头 Zaoshengguangtou | 东北 Northeast of China | 0.603 | 44 |
OB23 | Bertone | 葡萄牙 Portugal | 0.716 | 14 | OB55 | 小白芒 Xiaobaimang | 浙江 Zhejiang | 0.709 | 17 |
OB24 | Farry | 法国 France | 0.528 | 52 | OB56 | 法国稻 Faguodao | 法国 France | 0.637 | 36 |
OB25 | 中花9号 Zhonghua 9 | 北京 Beijing | 0.525 | 53 | OB57 | 陆羽132 Luyu 132 | 日本 Japan | 0.681 | 25 |
OB26 | Amepukahmib | 意大利 Italy | 0.669 | 28 | OB58 | 芦苇稻 Luweidao | 东北 Northeast of China | 0.745 | 11 |
OB27 | Kele (34978) | 孟加拉 Bengal | 0.484 | 57 | OB59 | 红尖 Hongjian | 浙江 Zhejiang | 0.648 | 32 |
OB28 | Galhardo | 葡萄牙 Portugal | 0.706 | 18 | OB60 | 早糯稻 Zaonuodao | 山东 Shandong | 0.702 | 20 |
OB29 | Kele (34979) | 孟加拉 Bengal | 0.629 | 39 | OB61 | 露水稻 Lushuidao | 河南 Henan | 0.570 | 46 |
OB30 | 辽丰8号 Liaofeng 8 | 辽宁 Liaoning | 0.361 | 60 | OB62 | 永德3号 Yongde 3 | 韩国 Korea | 0.611 | 41 |
OB31 | 千重浪 Qianchonglang | 日本 Japan | 0.394 | 59 | OB63 | 新竹4号 Xinzhu 4 | 台湾 Taiwan | 0.685 | 23 |
OB32 | 圭陆1号 Guilu 1 | 云南 Yunnan | 0.660 | 30 | OB64 | ARC7042 | 印度 India | 0.313 | 61 |
NaCl 浓度 NaCl Concentration /(mmol·L-1) | 芽期耐盐性 Salt tolerance | 相对发芽势 Relative germination potential/% | 相对盐害率 Relative salt damage rate /% | 相对芽长 Relative shoot length/% | 相对根长 Relative root length/% | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vigor index | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 d | 10 d | 5 d | 10 d | 5 d | 10 d | 5 d | 10 d | 10 d | 10 d | ||||||
0 | 耐盐 ST | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 14.5±0.1 A | 423.9±8.9 A | ||||
盐敏感 SS | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 14.8±0.3 A | 396.8±39.2 A | |||||
50 | 耐盐 ST | 96.6±2.7 A | 97.8±2.3 A | 3.4±2.7 A | 2.2±2.3 A | 63.7±2.4 A | 68.5±3.6 A | 69.1±1.1 A | 38.0±2.9 A | 14.4±0.4 A | 160.2±19.6 A | ||||
盐敏感 SS | 97.7±2.4 A | 98.2±1.9 A | 2.3±2.4 A | 1.8±1.9 A | 61.3±6.8 A | 62.6±7.8 A | 53.4±11.0 A | 35.5±3.3 A | 14.5±0.5 A | 137.9±11.5 A | |||||
100 | 耐盐 ST | 89.7±3.3 A | 94.8±2.8 A | 10.3±3.3 A | 5.2±2.8 A | 46.9±7.7 A | 24.5±1.1 A | 20.2±1.4 A | 13.0±3.1 A | 13.5±0.2 A | 51.5±12.2 A | ||||
盐敏感 SS | 85.6±5.6 A | 96.4±3.3 A | 14.4±5.6 A | 3.6±3.3 A | 38.4±2.7 A | 23.6±4.3 A | 16.1±2.7 A | 7.8±1.7 B | 13.2±0.4 A | 27.4±4.6 B | |||||
125 | 耐盐 ST | 84.6±4.9 A | 89.3±3.8 A | 15.4±4.9 A | 10.7±3.8 A | 48.5±2.5 A | 27.8±0.4 A | 25.8±1.8 A | 9.9±1.6 A | 13.1±0.4 A | 38.1±6.6 A | ||||
盐敏感 SS | 46.4±10.2 B | 64.2±4.9 B | 53.6±10.2 B | 35.8±5.0 B | 37.3±1.2 B | 20.7±0.6 B | 13.5±1.5 B | 6.4±0.3 B | 8.4±0.8 B | 14.2±0.7 B | |||||
150 | 耐盐 ST | 62.3±4.9 A | 73.4±5.5 A | 37.7±4.9 A | 26.6±5.5 A | 41.3±2.0 A | 27.4±3.3 A | 16.2±1.8 A | 11.0±0.9 A | 9.2±0.1 A | 29.5±1.6 A | ||||
盐敏感 SS | 48.5±9.4 B | 62.0±4.8 B | 51.5±9.4 B | 38.0±4.8 B | 38.0±1.8 A | 22.0±1.9 A | 12.3±0.8 B | 7.2±0.7 B | 7.9±0.5 B | 15.1±1.4 B | |||||
175 | 耐盐 ST | 34.2±4.9 A | 59.6±3.8 A | 65.8±4.9 A | 40.4±3.8 A | 28.7±2.2 A | 21.0±1.8 A | 7.6±2.3 A | 5.3±1.7 A | 6.3±0.7 A | 9.7±2.2 A | ||||
盐敏感 SS | 29.5±4.6 A | 51.4±9.9 A | 70.5±4.6 A | 48.6±9.9 A | 28.4±0.7 A | 18.5±1.7 A | 7.5±1.6 A | 4.7±0.7 A | 5.5±0.6 A | 7.0±2.5 A | |||||
200 | 耐盐 ST | 12.2±2.6 A | 47.4±4.5 A | 87.8±2.6 A | 52.6±4.5 A | 27.2±0.9 A | 20.4±0.6 A | 6.6±1.7 A | 5.2±0.7 A | 3.3±0.1 A | 5.1±0.5 A | ||||
盐敏感 SS | 9.2±3.9 A | 43.8±4.2 A | 90.8±3.9 A | 56.2±4.2 A | 28.1±0.5 A | 17.1±1.4 A | 6.4±0.2 A | 4.5±0.6 A | 3.1±0.2 A | 3.2±1.0 A |
Table 2 Phenotypic values of typical salt-tolerant and sensitive rice germplasm accessions under different NaCl concentrations at seed germination stage.
NaCl 浓度 NaCl Concentration /(mmol·L-1) | 芽期耐盐性 Salt tolerance | 相对发芽势 Relative germination potential/% | 相对盐害率 Relative salt damage rate /% | 相对芽长 Relative shoot length/% | 相对根长 Relative root length/% | 发芽指数 Germination index | 活力指数 Vigor index | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 d | 10 d | 5 d | 10 d | 5 d | 10 d | 5 d | 10 d | 10 d | 10 d | ||||||
0 | 耐盐 ST | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 14.5±0.1 A | 423.9±8.9 A | ||||
盐敏感 SS | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 14.8±0.3 A | 396.8±39.2 A | |||||
50 | 耐盐 ST | 96.6±2.7 A | 97.8±2.3 A | 3.4±2.7 A | 2.2±2.3 A | 63.7±2.4 A | 68.5±3.6 A | 69.1±1.1 A | 38.0±2.9 A | 14.4±0.4 A | 160.2±19.6 A | ||||
盐敏感 SS | 97.7±2.4 A | 98.2±1.9 A | 2.3±2.4 A | 1.8±1.9 A | 61.3±6.8 A | 62.6±7.8 A | 53.4±11.0 A | 35.5±3.3 A | 14.5±0.5 A | 137.9±11.5 A | |||||
100 | 耐盐 ST | 89.7±3.3 A | 94.8±2.8 A | 10.3±3.3 A | 5.2±2.8 A | 46.9±7.7 A | 24.5±1.1 A | 20.2±1.4 A | 13.0±3.1 A | 13.5±0.2 A | 51.5±12.2 A | ||||
盐敏感 SS | 85.6±5.6 A | 96.4±3.3 A | 14.4±5.6 A | 3.6±3.3 A | 38.4±2.7 A | 23.6±4.3 A | 16.1±2.7 A | 7.8±1.7 B | 13.2±0.4 A | 27.4±4.6 B | |||||
125 | 耐盐 ST | 84.6±4.9 A | 89.3±3.8 A | 15.4±4.9 A | 10.7±3.8 A | 48.5±2.5 A | 27.8±0.4 A | 25.8±1.8 A | 9.9±1.6 A | 13.1±0.4 A | 38.1±6.6 A | ||||
盐敏感 SS | 46.4±10.2 B | 64.2±4.9 B | 53.6±10.2 B | 35.8±5.0 B | 37.3±1.2 B | 20.7±0.6 B | 13.5±1.5 B | 6.4±0.3 B | 8.4±0.8 B | 14.2±0.7 B | |||||
150 | 耐盐 ST | 62.3±4.9 A | 73.4±5.5 A | 37.7±4.9 A | 26.6±5.5 A | 41.3±2.0 A | 27.4±3.3 A | 16.2±1.8 A | 11.0±0.9 A | 9.2±0.1 A | 29.5±1.6 A | ||||
盐敏感 SS | 48.5±9.4 B | 62.0±4.8 B | 51.5±9.4 B | 38.0±4.8 B | 38.0±1.8 A | 22.0±1.9 A | 12.3±0.8 B | 7.2±0.7 B | 7.9±0.5 B | 15.1±1.4 B | |||||
175 | 耐盐 ST | 34.2±4.9 A | 59.6±3.8 A | 65.8±4.9 A | 40.4±3.8 A | 28.7±2.2 A | 21.0±1.8 A | 7.6±2.3 A | 5.3±1.7 A | 6.3±0.7 A | 9.7±2.2 A | ||||
盐敏感 SS | 29.5±4.6 A | 51.4±9.9 A | 70.5±4.6 A | 48.6±9.9 A | 28.4±0.7 A | 18.5±1.7 A | 7.5±1.6 A | 4.7±0.7 A | 5.5±0.6 A | 7.0±2.5 A | |||||
200 | 耐盐 ST | 12.2±2.6 A | 47.4±4.5 A | 87.8±2.6 A | 52.6±4.5 A | 27.2±0.9 A | 20.4±0.6 A | 6.6±1.7 A | 5.2±0.7 A | 3.3±0.1 A | 5.1±0.5 A | ||||
盐敏感 SS | 9.2±3.9 A | 43.8±4.2 A | 90.8±3.9 A | 56.2±4.2 A | 28.1±0.5 A | 17.1±1.4 A | 6.4±0.2 A | 4.5±0.6 A | 3.1±0.2 A | 3.2±1.0 A |
发芽时间Germination time/d | 性状 Trait | 分布范围 Range | 均值±标准差 Mean±SD | F值 F-value | t值 t-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 | 相对芽长 Relative shoot length/% | 0.0~76.1 | 31.4±13.1 | 38.867 | 11.874** |
相对根长 Relative root length/% | 0.0~23.1 | 4.6±4.1 | 134.862 | 18.869** | |
相对发芽势 Relative germination potential/% | 0.8~100.0 | 81.0±25.8 | 49.951 | 5.225** | |
相对盐害率 Relative salt damage rate/% | 0.0~99.2 | 19.0±9.4 | – | – | |
10 | 相对芽长 Relative shoot length/% | 7.3~40.7 | 18.1±5.6 | 48.184 | 22.891** |
相对根长 Relative root length/% | 0.6~13.4 | 4.7±2.5 | 77.975 | 30.868** | |
相对发芽率 Relative germination rate/% | 58.9~100.0 | 94.9±7.4 | 21.272 | 4.238** | |
发芽指数 Germination index | 2.1~14.9 | 12.7±3.0 | 39.713 | 5.096** | |
活力指数 Vigor index | 1.7~67.7 | 27.5±15.4 | 73.327 | 30.660** | |
相对盐害率 Relative salt damage rate/% | 0.0~41.1 | 5.1±7.4 | – | – |
Table 3 Performance of salt tolerance-related traits of 64 rice germplasm accessions at seed germination stage
发芽时间Germination time/d | 性状 Trait | 分布范围 Range | 均值±标准差 Mean±SD | F值 F-value | t值 t-value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
5 | 相对芽长 Relative shoot length/% | 0.0~76.1 | 31.4±13.1 | 38.867 | 11.874** |
相对根长 Relative root length/% | 0.0~23.1 | 4.6±4.1 | 134.862 | 18.869** | |
相对发芽势 Relative germination potential/% | 0.8~100.0 | 81.0±25.8 | 49.951 | 5.225** | |
相对盐害率 Relative salt damage rate/% | 0.0~99.2 | 19.0±9.4 | – | – | |
10 | 相对芽长 Relative shoot length/% | 7.3~40.7 | 18.1±5.6 | 48.184 | 22.891** |
相对根长 Relative root length/% | 0.6~13.4 | 4.7±2.5 | 77.975 | 30.868** | |
相对发芽率 Relative germination rate/% | 58.9~100.0 | 94.9±7.4 | 21.272 | 4.238** | |
发芽指数 Germination index | 2.1~14.9 | 12.7±3.0 | 39.713 | 5.096** | |
活力指数 Vigor index | 1.7~67.7 | 27.5±15.4 | 73.327 | 30.660** | |
相对盐害率 Relative salt damage rate/% | 0.0~41.1 | 5.1±7.4 | – | – |
指标 Index | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 1.000 | |||||||
X2 | 0.180 | 1.000 | ||||||
X3 | 0.010 | 0.524** | 1.000 | |||||
X4 | –0.125 | 0.394** | 0.734** | 1.000 | ||||
X5 | –0.011 | 0.510** | 0.978** | 0.816** | 1.000 | |||
X6 | 0.071 | 0.877** | 0.654** | 0.537** | 0.658** | 1.000 | ||
X7 | –0.035 | –0.404** | –0.767** | –0.780** | –0.860** | –0.510** | 1.000 | |
X8 | 0.289* | 0.269* | 0.300* | 0.143 | 0.282* | 0.424** | –0.143 | 1.000 |
Table 4 Correlation matrix of each single index of rice seed germination and salt tolerance score under salt stress.
指标 Index | X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | X8 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
X1 | 1.000 | |||||||
X2 | 0.180 | 1.000 | ||||||
X3 | 0.010 | 0.524** | 1.000 | |||||
X4 | –0.125 | 0.394** | 0.734** | 1.000 | ||||
X5 | –0.011 | 0.510** | 0.978** | 0.816** | 1.000 | |||
X6 | 0.071 | 0.877** | 0.654** | 0.537** | 0.658** | 1.000 | ||
X7 | –0.035 | –0.404** | –0.767** | –0.780** | –0.860** | –0.510** | 1.000 | |
X8 | 0.289* | 0.269* | 0.300* | 0.143 | 0.282* | 0.424** | –0.143 | 1.000 |
主成分 Principal component | 特征值 Eigen value | 贡献率 Contribution/% | 累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution/% |
---|---|---|---|
CI1 | 4.37 | 62.45 | 62.45 |
CI2 | 1.20 | 17.14 | 79.60 |
CI3 | 0.84 | 11.95 | 91.55 |
CI4 | 0.29 | 4.13 | 95.68 |
CI5 | 0.20 | 2.82 | 98.50 |
CI6 | 0.10 | 1.42 | 99.92 |
CI7 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 100.00 |
Table 5 Eigen values and proportion of comprehensive indexes [Clx].
主成分 Principal component | 特征值 Eigen value | 贡献率 Contribution/% | 累计贡献率 Cumulative contribution/% |
---|---|---|---|
CI1 | 4.37 | 62.45 | 62.45 |
CI2 | 1.20 | 17.14 | 79.60 |
CI3 | 0.84 | 11.95 | 91.55 |
CI4 | 0.29 | 4.13 | 95.68 |
CI5 | 0.20 | 2.82 | 98.50 |
CI6 | 0.10 | 1.42 | 99.92 |
CI7 | 0.01 | 0.08 | 100.00 |
X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CI1 | 0.015 | 0.337 | 0.442 | 0.403 | 0.457 | 0.389 | –0.410 |
CI2 | 0.707 | 0.490 | –0.009 | –0.288 | –0.152 | 0.331 | 0.185 |
CI3 | –0.685 | 0.442 | –0.125 | –0.109 | –0.161 | 0.425 | 0.318 |
Table 6 Loading matrix of each component.
X1 | X2 | X3 | X4 | X5 | X6 | X7 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CI1 | 0.015 | 0.337 | 0.442 | 0.403 | 0.457 | 0.389 | –0.410 |
CI2 | 0.707 | 0.490 | –0.009 | –0.288 | –0.152 | 0.331 | 0.185 |
CI3 | –0.685 | 0.442 | –0.125 | –0.109 | –0.161 | 0.425 | 0.318 |
Fig. 2. Morphology indexes of typical salt tolerant and sensitive japonica rice germplasm at germination stage under salt stress. HDG, High D value germplasm; LDG, Low D value germplasm different lowercase and uppercase letters above the bars indicate significant difference at P≤0.01 and P≤0.05, respectively by the LSD test(n=30).
Fig. 3. Phenotypes of two salt tolerant rice germplasm accessions and two salt sensitive rice germplasm accessions under 125 mmol/L NaCl for five and six days, respectively in germination and seedling stages. A, Seeds of four japonica rice germplasm accessions germinated in the 125 mmol/L NaCl solution for five days; B, Seedlings of four japonica rice germplasm accessions treated with 125 mmol/L NaCl for six days; Scale bar, 0.8 cm (A) and 2.5 cm (B).
[1] | 张翼夫, 李洪文, 胡红, 陈婉芝, 王宪良, 牛琪. 盐碱地后悬挂随动式打孔通气机的设计与试验. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(18): 42-49. |
Zhang Y F, Li H W, Hu H, Chen W Z, Wang X L, Niu Q.Design and experiment on rear suspended passive aerator in saline-alkali land.Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng, 2016, 32(18): 42-49. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | Wang X, Wang J G, Liu H L, Zou D T, Zhao H W.Influence of natural saline-alkali stress on chlorophyll content and chloroplast ultrastructure of two contrasting rice (Oryza sativa L. japonica) cultivars. Aust J Crop Sci, 2013, 7(2): 289-292. |
[3] | 王善仙, 刘宛, 李培军, 吴海燕. 盐碱土植物改良研究进展. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(24): 1-7. |
Wang S X, Liu W, Li P J, Wu H Y.Advances of researches in plant-improvement of saline-alkaline soil.Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2011, 27(24): 1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | Yu J B, Wang Z C, Meixner F X, Yang F, Wu H F, Chen X B.Biogeochemical characterizations and reclamation strategies of saline sodic soil in northeastern China.Clean-Soil, Air, Water, 2010, 38(11): 1010-1016. |
[5] | Tian L, Tan L B, Liu F X, Cai H W, Sun C Q.Identification of quantitative trait loci associated with salt tolerance at seedling stage fromOryza rufipogon. J Genet Genom, 2011, 38(12): 593-601. |
[6] | 曾玲玲, 季生栋, 王俊强, 张成亮, 赵刚. 植物耐盐机理的研究进展. 黑龙江农业科学, 2009(3): 156-159. |
Zeng L L, Ji S D,Wang J Q, Zhang C L, Zhao G.Advances on the mechanism of plant salt tolerance.Heilongjiang Agric Sci, 2009(3): 156-159. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | Wang Z F, Cheng J P, Chen Z W, Huang J, Bao Y M, Wang J F, Zhang H S.Identification of QTLs with main, epistatic and QTL×environment interaction effects for salt tolerance in rice seedlings under different salinity conditions.Theor Appl Genet, 2012, 125(4): 807-815. |
[8] | Ghaffaria A, Gharechahib J, Nakhodaa B, Salekdeh G H.Physiology and proteome responses of two contrasting rice mutants and their wild type parent under salt stress conditions at the vegetative stage. J Plant Physiol, 2014, 171(1): 31-44. |
[9] | Wang Z F, Wang J F, Bao Y M, Wu Y Y, Zhang H S.Quantitative trait loci controlling rice seed germination under salt stress.Euphytica, 2011, 178(3): 297-307. |
[10] | 肖文斐, 马华升, 陈文岳, 裘劼人, 童建新, 郑桂珍, 忻雅, 王淑珍, 方献平, 阮松林. 籼稻耐盐性与稻米品质性状的关联分析. 核农学报, 2013, 27(12): 1938-1947. |
Xiao W F, Ma H S, Chen W Y, Qiu J R, Tong J X, Zheng G Z, Xin Y, Wang S Z, Fang X P, Ruan S L.Correlation analysis of salt tolerance and grain quality traits inIndica rice(Oryza sativa L.). Acta Agric Nucl Sin, 2013, 27(12): 1938-1947. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 郭望模, 傅亚萍, 孙宗修, 郑镇一. 盐胁迫下不同水稻种质形态指标与耐盐性的相关分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2003, 4(3): 245-251. |
Guo W M, Fu Y P, Sun Z X, Zheng Z Y.The Correlation analysis between the morphological indices and salt tolerance in different rice germplasm under the salt stress.J Plant Genet Resour, 2003, 4(3): 245-251. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 贾宝艳, 周婵婵, 孙晓雪, 董立强, 黄元财, 王岩, 王术. 辽宁省水稻种质资源的耐盐性鉴定评价. 作物杂志, 2013, 4: 57-62. |
Jia B Y, Zhou C C, Sun X X, Dong L Q, Hang Y C, Wang Y, Wang S.The evaluation of salt tolerance ability of rice varieties in Liaoning Province.Crops, 2013, 4: 57-62. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | Wang Z F, Wang J F, Bao Y M, Wu Y Y, Su X, Zang H S.Inheritance of rice seed germination ability under salt stress.Rice Sci, 2010, 17(2): 105-110. |
[14] | Chen D F, Li Y L, Fang T, Shi X L, Chen X W.Specific roles of tocopherols and tocotrienols in seed longevity and germination tolerance to abiotic stress in transgenic rice.Plant Sci, 2016, 244: 31-39. |
[15] | Hasthanasombut S, Supaibulwatana K, Mii M, Nakamura I.Genetic manipulation of japonica rice using theOsBADH1 gene from Indica rice to improve salinity tolerance. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult, 2011, 104(1): 79-89. |
[16] | 冯钟慧, 刘晓龙, 姜昌杰, 梁正伟. 吉林省粳稻种质萌发期耐碱性和耐盐性综合评价. 土壤与作物, 2016, 5(2): 120-127. |
Feng Z H, Liu X L, Jiang C J, Liang Z W.Comprehensive evaluation of rice(Oryza sativa japonica) germplasm for alkaline /saline tolerance at germination stage from Jilin province, China. Soil Crop, 2016, 5(2): 120-127. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 朱丽伟, 曹栋栋, 付玉营, 胡琦娟, 利站, 关亚静, 胡伟民, 胡晋. 可溶性寡糖和小分子的热激蛋白与杂交水稻种子成熟过程中发芽能力及种子活力相关. 作物学报, 2016, 42(5): 714-724. |
Zhu L W, Cao D D, Fu Y Y, Hu Q J, Li Z, Guan Y J, Hu W M, Hu J.Soluble oligosaccharide and small heat shock protein correlated with seed germination and vigor during hybrid rice seed maturation.Acta Agron Sin, 2016, 42(5): 714-724. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 鱼小军, 肖红, 徐长林, 景媛媛, 柴成燕. 扁蓿豆和苜蓿种子萌发期抗旱性和耐盐性比较. 植物遗传资源学报, 2015, 16(2): 405-410. |
Yu X J, Xiao H, Xu C L, Jing Y Y, Chai C Y.Comparative study on drought resistance and salt tolerance ofMedicago ruthenica and Medicago varia at seed germination period. J Plant Genet Resour, 2015, 16(2): 405-410. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 李振, 廖同庆, 冯青春, 张东彦, 王强, 王晓楠, 张琳洁, 王秀. 基于图像处理技术的黄瓜种子活力指数检测系统设计. 种子, 2015, 34(6): 111-115. |
Li Z, Liao T Q, Feng Q C, Zhang D Y, Wang Q, Wang X N, Zhang L J, Wang X.A system design on cucumber seed vigor index detection on based on image processing.Seed, 2015, 34(6): 111-115. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 戴海芳, 武辉, 阿曼古丽.买买提阿力, 王立红, 麦麦提.阿皮孜, 张巨松. 不同基因型棉花苗期耐盐性分析及其鉴定指标筛选. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(7): 1290-1300. |
Dai H F, Wu H, Amanguli M A, Wang L H, Maimaiti A, Zhang J S.Analysis of salt-tolerance and determination of salt-tolerant evaluation indicators in cotton seedlings of different genotypes.Sci Agric Sin, 2014, 47(7): 1290-1300. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 齐国昌, 余春磊, 张鹍飞, 罗小娇, 冯宗云. 青稞苗期耐盐性鉴定及评价. 麦类作物学报, 2014, 37(7): 950-956. |
Qi G C, Yu C L, Zhang K F, Luo X J, Feng Z Y.Identification and assessment on salt resistance of hulless barley at seedling stage.J Triticeae Crops, 2014, 37(7): 950-956. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 管志勇, 陈发棣, 滕年军, 陈素梅, 刘浦生. 5种菊花近缘种属植物的耐盐性比较. 中国农业科学, 2010,43(4): 784-787. |
Guan Z Y, Chen F D, Teng N J, Chen S M, Liu P S.Study on the NaCl tolerance in five plant species fromDendranthema and its relatives. Sci Agric Sin, 2010,43(4): 784-787. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 田蕾, 王娜, 张雪艳, 杨斌林, 孙佳莹, 李敏, 李培富. 盐胁迫下不同粳稻品种的形态和生理特性. 广东农业科学, 2014, 41(23): 1-6. |
Tian L, Wang N, Zhang X Y, Yang B L, Sun J Y, Li M, Li P F.Morphological and physiological characteristics of differentjaponica rice varieties under salt stress. Guangdong Agric Sci, 2014, 41(23): 1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 王娜, 陈亚萍, 田蕾, 张得雯, 王瑞智, 杨苗, 李培富. 粳稻种质资源苗期根系形态特征与耐盐性相关分析. 广东农业科学, 2015, 42(10): 1-10. |
Wang N, Chen Y P, Tian L, Zhang D W, Wang R Z, Yang M, Li P F.Correlation between root morphological characteristics ofjaponica rice germplasm and salt tolerance at seedling stage. Guangdong Agric Sci, 2015, 42(10): 1-10. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | Averinaa N G, Gritskevicha E R, Vershilovskayaa I V, Usatov A V, Yaronskaya E B.Mechanisms of salt stress tolerance development in barley plants under the Influence of 5-aminolevulinic acid.Russ J Plant Physiol-Engl Tr, 2010, 57(6): 792-798. |
[26] | 崔江慧, 谢登磊, 常金华. 高粱材料耐盐性综合评价方法的初步建立与验证. 植物遗传资源学报, 2012, 13(1): 35-41. |
Cui J H, Xie D L, Chang J H.Establishment and verification of comprehensive evaluation method for salt tolerance of sorghum materials.J Plant Genet Resour, 2012, 13(1): 35-41. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 李培英, 孙宗玖. 33 份偃麦草种质芽期耐盐性评价. 草业科学, 2015, 32(4): 593-600. |
Li P Y,Sun Z J.Evaluation on the salt resistance of germplasm resources of 33Elytrigria repens during seed germination period. Pratac Sci, 2015, 32(4): 593-600. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 何晓兰, 徐照龙, 张大勇, 黄益洪, 彭陈, 邵宏波, 王为, 郭士伟. 65个高粱种质萌芽期的耐盐指标比较及其耐盐性综合评价. 植物资源与环境学报, 2015, 24(4): 52-60. |
He X L, Xu Z L, Zhang D Y, Huang Y H, Peng C, Shao H B, Wang W, Guo S W.Comparison on salt tolerance indexes of 65 germplasms of Sorghum bicolor at germination stage and comprehensive evaluation on their salt tolerance. J Plant Resour Environ, 2015, 24(4): 52-60. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 王萌萌, 姜奇彦, 胡正, 张辉, 樊守金, 冯沥, 张海玲. 小麦品种资源耐盐性鉴定. 植物遗传资源学报, 2012, 13(2): 189-194. |
Wang M M, Jiang Q Y, Hu Z, Zhang H, Fan S J, Feng L, Zhang H L.Evaluation for salt tolerance of wheat cultivars.J Plant Genet Resour, 2012, 13(2): 189-194. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 吴家富, 杨博文, 向珣朝, 许亮, 颜李梅. 不同水稻种质在不同生育期耐盐鉴定的差异. 植物学报, 2017, 52(1): 77-88. |
Wu J F, Yang B W, Xiang X C, Xu L, Yan L M.Identification of salt tolerance in different rice germplasm at different growth stages.Chin Bull Bot, 2017, 52(1): 77-88. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | 张银平, 杜瑞成, 刁培松, 杨善东. 山东省水稻免耕旱直播试验及可行性分析. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(12): 24-30. |
Zhang Y P, Du R C, Diao P S, Yang S D.Experiment of no-tillage and drought direct sowing rice and feasibility analysis in Shandong Province. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng, 2016, 32(12): 24-30. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] | Li Z K, Fu B Y, Gao Y M, Xu J L, Ali J, Lafitte H R, Jiang Y Z, Rey J D, Vijayakumar C H M, Maghirang R, Zheng T Q, Zhu L H. Genome-wide introgression lines and their use in genetic and molecular dissection of complex phenotypes in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Mol Biol, 2005, 59(1): 33-52. |
[1] | GUO Zhan, ZHANG Yunbo. Research Progress in Physiological,Biochemical Responses of Rice to Drought Stress and Its Molecular Regulation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[2] | WEI Huanhe, MA Weiyi, ZUO Boyuan, WANG Lulu, ZHU Wang, GENG Xiaoyu, ZHANG Xiang, MENG Tianyao, CHEN Yinglong, GAO Pinglei, XU Ke, HUO Zhongyang, DAI Qigen. Research Progress in the Effect of Salinity, Drought, and Their Combined Stresses on Rice Yield and Quality Formation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[3] | XU Danjie, LIN Qiaoxia, LI Zhengkang, ZHUANG Xiaoqian, LING Yu, LAI Meiling, CHEN Xiaoting, LU Guodong. OsOPR10 Positively Regulates Rice Blast and Bacterial Blight Resistance [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 364-374. |
[4] | CHEN Mingliang, ZENG Xihua, SHEN Yumin, LUO Shiyou, HU Lanxiang, XIONG Wentao, XIONG Huanjin, WU Xiaoyan, XIAO Yeqing. Typing of Inter-subspecific Fertility Loci and Fertility Locus Pattern of indica-japonica Hybrid Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 386-396. |
[5] | DING Zhengquan, PAN Yueyun, SHI Yang, HUANG Haixiang. Comprehensive Evaluation and Comparative Analysis of Jiahe Series Long-Grain japonica Rice with High Eating Quality Based on Gene Chip Technology [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 397-408. |
[6] | HOU Xiaoqin, WANG Ying, YU Bei, FU Weimeng, FENG Baohua, SHEN Yichao, XIE Hangjun, WANG Huanran, XU Yongqiang, WU Zhihai, WANG Jianjun, TAO Longxing, FU Guanfu. Mechanisms Behind the Role of Potassium Fulvic Acid in Enhancing Salt Tolerance in Rice Seedlings [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 409-421. |
[7] | LÜ Zhou, YI Binghuai, CHEN Pingping, ZHOU Wenxin, TANG Wenbang, YI Zhenxie. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Transplanting Density on Yield Formation of Small Seed Hybrid Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 422-436. |
[8] | HU Jijie, HU Zhihua, ZHANG Junhua, CAO Xiaochuang, JIN Qianyu, ZHANG Zhiyuan, ZHU Lianfeng. Effects of Rhizosphere Saturated Dissolved Oxygen on Photosynthetic and Growth Characteristics of Rice at Tillering Stage [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 437-446. |
[9] | WU Yue, LIANG Chengwei, ZHAO Chenfei, SUN Jian, MA Dianrong. Occurrence of Weedy Rice Disaster and Ecotype Evolution in Direct-Seeded Rice Fields [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 447-455. |
[10] | LIU Fuxiang, ZHEN Haoyang, PENG Huan, ZHENG Liuchun, PENG Deliang, WEN Yanhua. Investigation and Species Identification of Cyst Nematode Disease on Rice in Guangdong Province [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 456-461. |
[11] | CHEN Haotian, QIN Yuan, ZHONG Xiaohan, LIN Chenyu, QIN Jinghang, YANG Jianchang, ZHANG Weiyang. Research Progress on the Relationship Between Rice Root, Soil Properties and Methane Emissions in Paddy Fields [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 233-245. |
[12] | MIAO Jun, RAN Jinhui, XU Mengbin, BO Liubing, WANG Ping, LIANG Guohua, ZHOU Yong. Overexpression of RGG2, a Heterotrimeric G Protein γ Subunit-Encoding Gene, Improves Drought Tolerance in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 246-255. |
[13] | YIN Xiaoxiao, ZHANG Zhihan, YAN Xiulian, LIAO Rong, YANG Sijia, Beenish HASSAN, GUO Daiming, FAN Jing, ZHAO Zhixue, WANG Wenming. Signal Peptide Validation and Expression Analysis of Multiple Effectors from Ustilaginoidea virens [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 256-265. |
[14] | ZHU Yujing, GUI Jinxin, GONG Chengyun, LUO Xinyang, SHI Jubin, ZHANG Haiqing, HE Jiwai. QTL Mapping for Tiller Angle in Rice by Genome-wide Association Analysis [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 266-276. |
[15] | WEI Qianqian, WANG Yulei, KONG Haimin, XU Qingshan, YAN Yulian, PAN Lin, CHI Chunxin, KONG Yali, TIAN Wenhao, ZHU Lianfeng, CAO Xiaochuang, ZHANG Junhua, ZHU Chunqun. Mechanism of Hydrogen Sulfide, a Signaling Molecule Involved in Reducing the Inhibitory Effect of Aluminum Toxicity on Rice Growth Together with Sulfur Fertilizer [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 290-302. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||