Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 619-630.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2017.7014
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Yue WU1,2, Jing HU1,3, Chen CHEN1, Jiaxing ZHANG1, Wanyuan LI1, Dongnan TANG1, Jun ZHONG1, Bin YANG1, Zhengkang ZHU1, Youli YAO1, Yulong WANG1, Guichun DONG1,*()
Received:
2017-02-06
Revised:
2017-04-02
Online:
2017-11-25
Published:
2017-11-10
Contact:
Guichun DONG
吴越1,2, 胡静1,3, 陈琛1, 张家星1, 李万元1, 唐东南1, 仲军1, 羊彬1, 朱正康1, 姚友礼1, 王余龙1, 董桂春1,*()
通讯作者:
董桂春
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Yue WU, Jing HU, Chen CHEN, Jiaxing ZHANG, Wanyuan LI, Dongnan TANG, Jun ZHONG, Bin YANG, Zhengkang ZHU, Youli YAO, Yulong WANG, Guichun DONG. Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization Characteristics of the Newly Approved Early-Maturity Late japonica Rice Cultivars in Jiangsu Province[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2017, 31(6): 619-630.
吴越, 胡静, 陈琛, 张家星, 李万元, 唐东南, 仲军, 羊彬, 朱正康, 姚友礼, 王余龙, 董桂春. 江苏省早熟晚粳高产水稻新品种氮素吸收利用特征及成因分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(6): 619-630.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2017.7014
Fig. 1. Harvest yield and theoretical yield of different high yielding varieties. The letters A, B, C, D, E,F, G, H and CK represent Wuyunjing 29, Wuyunjing 23, Yang 4227, Tongjing 981, Changnongjing 7, Ningjing 3, Zhendao 16, Nanjing 5055 and Ningjing 1, respectively according to their grain yield order from high to low. The same as in the following figures.
品种 Cultivar | 干物质生产量 Dry matter production | 吸氮量 Nitrogen absorption | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期 | 抽穗后 | 抽穗期 | 抽穗后 | ||
Heading stage | Post-heading | Heading stage | Post-heading | ||
A | 1206.77 | 755.22 a | 16.83 | 4.31 a | |
B | 1203.99 | 743.89 a | 16.91 | 4.20 a | |
C | 1204.00 | 702.99 ab | 16.75 | 3.82 bc | |
D | 1180.68 | 658.75 abc | 16.44 | 3.47 bc | |
E | 1193.98 | 628.74 bc | 16.22 | 3.29 bc | |
F | 1156.14 | 618.95 bc | 16.24 | 3.18 bc | |
G | 1162.03 | 954.63 c | 16.16 | 2.98 c | |
H | 1142.74 | 591.50 c | 16.05 | 2.93 c | |
CK | 1145.73 | 591.80 c | 16.23 | 2.80 c | |
r | 0.535** | 0.808** | 0.592** | 0.718** | |
F值 F Value | 1.023 | 4.265** | 0.687 | 2.381* |
Table 1 Differences of dry matter production and nitrogen absorption at heading and grain-filling period of different high yielding cultivars. g·m-2
品种 Cultivar | 干物质生产量 Dry matter production | 吸氮量 Nitrogen absorption | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期 | 抽穗后 | 抽穗期 | 抽穗后 | ||
Heading stage | Post-heading | Heading stage | Post-heading | ||
A | 1206.77 | 755.22 a | 16.83 | 4.31 a | |
B | 1203.99 | 743.89 a | 16.91 | 4.20 a | |
C | 1204.00 | 702.99 ab | 16.75 | 3.82 bc | |
D | 1180.68 | 658.75 abc | 16.44 | 3.47 bc | |
E | 1193.98 | 628.74 bc | 16.22 | 3.29 bc | |
F | 1156.14 | 618.95 bc | 16.24 | 3.18 bc | |
G | 1162.03 | 954.63 c | 16.16 | 2.98 c | |
H | 1142.74 | 591.50 c | 16.05 | 2.93 c | |
CK | 1145.73 | 591.80 c | 16.23 | 2.80 c | |
r | 0.535** | 0.808** | 0.592** | 0.718** | |
F值 F Value | 1.023 | 4.265** | 0.687 | 2.381* |
品 种 Cultivar | 抽穗期 Heading stage | 全生育期 Whole growth duration |
---|---|---|
A | 159.01 ab | 131.95 a |
B | 161.63 ab | 135.45 a |
C | 165.01 a | 130.52 a |
D | 158.81 ab | 125.22 b |
E | 150.20 b | 121.79 bc |
F | 159.20 ab | 123.94 bc |
G | 154.85 ab | 120.78 bc |
H | 159.45 ab | 122.06 bc |
CK | 155.04 ab | 119.48 c |
r | 0.448* | 0.971* |
F值F value | 1.262 | 11.681** |
Table 2 Differences with nitrogen absorption rate of different high yielding cultivars. mg·m-2d-1
品 种 Cultivar | 抽穗期 Heading stage | 全生育期 Whole growth duration |
---|---|---|
A | 159.01 ab | 131.95 a |
B | 161.63 ab | 135.45 a |
C | 165.01 a | 130.52 a |
D | 158.81 ab | 125.22 b |
E | 150.20 b | 121.79 bc |
F | 159.20 ab | 123.94 bc |
G | 154.85 ab | 120.78 bc |
H | 159.45 ab | 122.06 bc |
CK | 155.04 ab | 119.48 c |
r | 0.448* | 0.971* |
F值F value | 1.262 | 11.681** |
品 种 Cultivar | 氮素干物质生产效率 Dry matter production efficiency/(g·g-1) | 氮收获指数 N harvest index/% | 氮肥吸收利用率 NRE/% | 氮肥生理利用率NPE/(g·g-1) | 氮肥农学利用率NAE/(g·g-1) | 氮肥偏生产力NPFP/(g·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 92.83 | 69.24 a | 42.90 a | 47.22 | 15.79 a | 39.03 a |
B | 92.30 | 68.58 ab | 42.73 a | 47.68 | 15.77 a | 38.81 ab |
C | 92.73 | 67.17 bc | 41.67 ab | 46.96 | 15.40 ab | 37.26 bc |
D | 92.44 | 66.24 c | 40.74 ab | 46.43 | 14.92 ab | 35.85 cd |
E | 92.99 | 65.34 cd | 40.16 ab | 46.35 | 14.65 ab | 34.98 de |
F | 91.81 | 62.96 e | 39.27 ab | 46.77 | 14.30 a | 34.90 de |
G | 91.76 | 62.98 e | 39.05 ab | 46.33 | 14.17 ab | 34.15 de |
H | 91.20 | 63.89 de | 38.01 b | 46.99 | 14.05 b | 33.62 e |
CK | 91.25 | 62.95 e | 39.21 ab | 44.98 | 13.90 b | 33.44 e |
r吸 | 0.13 | 0.804** | 0.776** | –0.02 | 0.738** | 0.909** |
r籽 | 0.512* | 0.520* | 0.098 | 0.754** | 0.766** | 0.720** |
F值F vaule | 0.673 | 15.239** | 2.001 | 0.143 | 2.205 | 15.875** |
Table 3 Differences of nitrogen use efficiency of different high yielding cultivars.
品 种 Cultivar | 氮素干物质生产效率 Dry matter production efficiency/(g·g-1) | 氮收获指数 N harvest index/% | 氮肥吸收利用率 NRE/% | 氮肥生理利用率NPE/(g·g-1) | 氮肥农学利用率NAE/(g·g-1) | 氮肥偏生产力NPFP/(g·g-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | 92.83 | 69.24 a | 42.90 a | 47.22 | 15.79 a | 39.03 a |
B | 92.30 | 68.58 ab | 42.73 a | 47.68 | 15.77 a | 38.81 ab |
C | 92.73 | 67.17 bc | 41.67 ab | 46.96 | 15.40 ab | 37.26 bc |
D | 92.44 | 66.24 c | 40.74 ab | 46.43 | 14.92 ab | 35.85 cd |
E | 92.99 | 65.34 cd | 40.16 ab | 46.35 | 14.65 ab | 34.98 de |
F | 91.81 | 62.96 e | 39.27 ab | 46.77 | 14.30 a | 34.90 de |
G | 91.76 | 62.98 e | 39.05 ab | 46.33 | 14.17 ab | 34.15 de |
H | 91.20 | 63.89 de | 38.01 b | 46.99 | 14.05 b | 33.62 e |
CK | 91.25 | 62.95 e | 39.21 ab | 44.98 | 13.90 b | 33.44 e |
r吸 | 0.13 | 0.804** | 0.776** | –0.02 | 0.738** | 0.909** |
r籽 | 0.512* | 0.520* | 0.098 | 0.754** | 0.766** | 0.720** |
F值F vaule | 0.673 | 15.239** | 2.001 | 0.143 | 2.205 | 15.875** |
品 种 Cultivar | 茎鞘叶吸氮比例 N in stem and leaf | 穗吸氮比例 N in panicle | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 抽穗期到成熟期的下降值 Decline from heading to maturity | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 抽穗期到成熟期的增加值 Added value from heading to maturity | ||
A | 90.51 a | 30.76 e | 59.75 a | 9.49 b | 69.24 a | 59.75 a | |
B | 90.14 b | 31.42 de | 58.72 ab | 9.86 ab | 68.58 ab | 58.72 ab | |
C | 89.98 ab | 32.83 cd | 57.15 bc | 10.02 ab | 67.17 bc | 57.15 bc | |
D | 90.17 ab | 33.76 c | 56.41 bc | 9.83 ab | 66.24 c | 56.41 cd | |
E | 89.77 ab | 34.66 bc | 55.11 cd | 10.23 ab | 65.34 cd | 55.11 cde | |
F | 90.51 a | 37.04 a | 53.47 de | 9.49 b | 62.96 e | 53.48 ef | |
G | 89.14 ab | 37.02 a | 52.12 e | 10.86 a | 62.98 e | 52.12 f | |
H | 90.31 a | 36.11 ab | 54.20 cd | 9.69 b | 63.89 de | 54.20 f | |
CK | 89.77 ab | 37.05 a | 47.72 de | 10.23 ab | 62.95 e | 52.71 f | |
r吸 | 0.242 | –0.803** | 0.790** | –0.253 | 0.803** | 0.790** | |
r籽 | 0.358 | –0.520** | 0.556** | –0.368 | 0.520** | 0.557** | |
F值F vaule | 1.787 | 15.239** | 9.892** | 1.802 | 15.239** | 13.087** |
Table 4 Differences of nitrogen absorption and distribution ratio of different high yielding cultivars. %
品 种 Cultivar | 茎鞘叶吸氮比例 N in stem and leaf | 穗吸氮比例 N in panicle | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 抽穗期到成熟期的下降值 Decline from heading to maturity | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 抽穗期到成熟期的增加值 Added value from heading to maturity | ||
A | 90.51 a | 30.76 e | 59.75 a | 9.49 b | 69.24 a | 59.75 a | |
B | 90.14 b | 31.42 de | 58.72 ab | 9.86 ab | 68.58 ab | 58.72 ab | |
C | 89.98 ab | 32.83 cd | 57.15 bc | 10.02 ab | 67.17 bc | 57.15 bc | |
D | 90.17 ab | 33.76 c | 56.41 bc | 9.83 ab | 66.24 c | 56.41 cd | |
E | 89.77 ab | 34.66 bc | 55.11 cd | 10.23 ab | 65.34 cd | 55.11 cde | |
F | 90.51 a | 37.04 a | 53.47 de | 9.49 b | 62.96 e | 53.48 ef | |
G | 89.14 ab | 37.02 a | 52.12 e | 10.86 a | 62.98 e | 52.12 f | |
H | 90.31 a | 36.11 ab | 54.20 cd | 9.69 b | 63.89 de | 54.20 f | |
CK | 89.77 ab | 37.05 a | 47.72 de | 10.23 ab | 62.95 e | 52.71 f | |
r吸 | 0.242 | –0.803** | 0.790** | –0.253 | 0.803** | 0.790** | |
r籽 | 0.358 | –0.520** | 0.556** | –0.368 | 0.520** | 0.557** | |
F值F vaule | 1.787 | 15.239** | 9.892** | 1.802 | 15.239** | 13.087** |
品 种 Cultivar | 茎鞘叶吸氮量 N in stem and leaf/(g·m-2) | 穗吸氮量N in panicle/(g·m-2) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 氮素转运量 Nitrogen translocation | 转运率 Nitrogen translocation ratio/% | 抽穗期Heading | 成熟期Maturity | 氮素增加量 Nitrogen translocation | 增加率 Nitrogen translocation ratio/% | ||
A | 15.23 | 6.50 c | 8.74 a | 57.36 a | 14.64 ab | 1.60 a | 13.04 a | 89.10 a | |
B | 15.25 | 6.61 bc | 8.64 ab | 56.65 ab | 14.50 ab | 1.66 a | 12.84 a | 88.58 ab | |
C | 15.07 | 6.75 abc | 8.31 abc | 55.18 abc | 13.81 ab | 1.68 b | 12.13 b | 87.82 abc | |
D | 14.82 | 6.71 abc | 8.10 abc | 54.69 abcd | 13.19 ab | 1.62 c | 11.57 c | 87.70 abc | |
E | 14.55 | 6.77 abc | 7.79 abc | 53.51 abcd | 12.74 ab | 1.67 cd | 11.07 cd | 86.89 cd | |
F | 14.68 | 7.17 a | 7.51 bc | 51.16 cd | 12.26 b | 1.56 e | 10.69 de | 87.25 bcd | |
G | 14.39 | 7.09 ab | 7.30 abc | 50.72 d | 12.06 a | 1.78 de | 10.28 de | 85.27 e | |
H | 14.47 | 6.83 abc | 7.64 c | 52.79 bcd | 12.15 b | 1.58 e | 10.57 e | 87.02 cd | |
CK | 14.56 | 7.03 ab | 7.53 bc | 51.70 cd | 11.99 ab | 1.67 de | 10.32 e | 86.08 e | |
r吸 | 0.609** | –0.317 | 0.667** | 0.622** | –0.060 | 0.959** | 0.946** | 0.692** | |
r籽 | 0.416* | –0.488* | 0.577** | 0.619** | –0.174 | 0.463* | 0.478* | 0.470* | |
F值 F value | 0.823 | 2.031 | 2.261 | 3.616* | 1.275 | 27.359** | 28.639** | 6.481** |
Table 5 Difference of nitrogen translocation at maturity in different high yielding cultivars.
品 种 Cultivar | 茎鞘叶吸氮量 N in stem and leaf/(g·m-2) | 穗吸氮量N in panicle/(g·m-2) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 氮素转运量 Nitrogen translocation | 转运率 Nitrogen translocation ratio/% | 抽穗期Heading | 成熟期Maturity | 氮素增加量 Nitrogen translocation | 增加率 Nitrogen translocation ratio/% | ||
A | 15.23 | 6.50 c | 8.74 a | 57.36 a | 14.64 ab | 1.60 a | 13.04 a | 89.10 a | |
B | 15.25 | 6.61 bc | 8.64 ab | 56.65 ab | 14.50 ab | 1.66 a | 12.84 a | 88.58 ab | |
C | 15.07 | 6.75 abc | 8.31 abc | 55.18 abc | 13.81 ab | 1.68 b | 12.13 b | 87.82 abc | |
D | 14.82 | 6.71 abc | 8.10 abc | 54.69 abcd | 13.19 ab | 1.62 c | 11.57 c | 87.70 abc | |
E | 14.55 | 6.77 abc | 7.79 abc | 53.51 abcd | 12.74 ab | 1.67 cd | 11.07 cd | 86.89 cd | |
F | 14.68 | 7.17 a | 7.51 bc | 51.16 cd | 12.26 b | 1.56 e | 10.69 de | 87.25 bcd | |
G | 14.39 | 7.09 ab | 7.30 abc | 50.72 d | 12.06 a | 1.78 de | 10.28 de | 85.27 e | |
H | 14.47 | 6.83 abc | 7.64 c | 52.79 bcd | 12.15 b | 1.58 e | 10.57 e | 87.02 cd | |
CK | 14.56 | 7.03 ab | 7.53 bc | 51.70 cd | 11.99 ab | 1.67 de | 10.32 e | 86.08 e | |
r吸 | 0.609** | –0.317 | 0.667** | 0.622** | –0.060 | 0.959** | 0.946** | 0.692** | |
r籽 | 0.416* | –0.488* | 0.577** | 0.619** | –0.174 | 0.463* | 0.478* | 0.470* | |
F值 F value | 0.823 | 2.031 | 2.261 | 3.616* | 1.275 | 27.359** | 28.639** | 6.481** |
y | x | 直接通径系数 | x与y的相关系数 |
---|---|---|---|
Indirect path coefficient | Correlation coefficient of x and y | ||
成熟期吸氮量 N absorption at maturity | 抽穗期吸氮量N absorption at heading stage | 0.703 | 0.592** |
抽穗后吸氮量N absorption during grain-filling period | 0.813 | 0.718** | |
成熟期干物质生产量Dry matter productions at maturity | 1.089 | 0.964** | |
成熟期全株含氮率Nitrogen content of whole plant at maturity | 0.320 | –0.183 | |
成熟期单穗吸氮量N absorption per panicle at maturity | 1.640 | 0.807** | |
穗数Panicle number | 1.016 | –0.331 | |
成熟期群体吸氮强度N absorption rate at maturity | 1.024 | 0.971** | |
全生育期天数Days from sowing to maturity | 0.244 | 0.022 |
Table 6 Path analysis for the components determining nitrogen absorption at maturity of different high yielding cultivars.
y | x | 直接通径系数 | x与y的相关系数 |
---|---|---|---|
Indirect path coefficient | Correlation coefficient of x and y | ||
成熟期吸氮量 N absorption at maturity | 抽穗期吸氮量N absorption at heading stage | 0.703 | 0.592** |
抽穗后吸氮量N absorption during grain-filling period | 0.813 | 0.718** | |
成熟期干物质生产量Dry matter productions at maturity | 1.089 | 0.964** | |
成熟期全株含氮率Nitrogen content of whole plant at maturity | 0.320 | –0.183 | |
成熟期单穗吸氮量N absorption per panicle at maturity | 1.640 | 0.807** | |
穗数Panicle number | 1.016 | –0.331 | |
成熟期群体吸氮强度N absorption rate at maturity | 1.024 | 0.971** | |
全生育期天数Days from sowing to maturity | 0.244 | 0.022 |
[1] | 张洪程, 马群, 杨雄, 李敏, 葛梦婕, 李国业, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 高辉, 刘艳阳.水稻品种氮肥群体最高生产力及其增长规律. 作物学报, 2012, 38(1): 86-98. |
Zhang H C, Ma Q, Yang X, Li M, Ge M J, Li G Y, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Gao H, Liu Y Y.The highest population productivity of nitrogen fertilization and its variation rules in rice cultivars.Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38(1): 86-98. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 董桂春, 王余龙, 张岳芳, 陈培峰, 杨连新, 黄建晔. 籼稻品种间氮素吸收利用的差异及其对产量的影响. 作物学报, 2007, 33(1): 43-49. |
Dong G C, Wang Y L, Zhang Y F, Chen P F, Yang L X, Huang J Y.Main index of source and sink in nitrogen use efficiency for grain output in conventional indica rice cultivars.Acta Agron Sin, 2007, 33(1): 43-49. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 陈琛, 王熠, 羊彬, 朱正康, 曹文雅, 罗刚, 周娟, 王祥菊, 于小凤, 袁秋梅, 仲军, 姚友礼, 黄建晔, 王余龙, 董桂春. 株高对遗传群体水稻株系氮素吸收利用的影响.中国农业科学, 2015, 48(22): 4450-4459. |
Chen C, Wang Y,), Yang B, Zhu Z K, Cao W Y, Luo G, Zhou J, Wang X J, Yu X F, Yuan Q M, Zhong J, Yao Y L, Huang J Y, Wang Y L, Dong G C.Plant height affects nitrogen absorption and utilization in rice with similar genetic background.Sci Agric Sin, 2015, 48(22):4450-4459(in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[4] | 董桂春, 王余龙, 张岳芳, 陈培峰, 杨连新, 黄建晔. 影响常规籼稻品种氮素籽粒生产效率的主要源库指标. 作物学报, 2006, 32(10): 1511-1518. |
Dong G C, Wang Y L, Zhang Y F, Chen P F, Yang L X, Huang J Y.Study on the fundamental traits of yield and yield components in conventional indica rice cultivars with different nitrogen use efficiency for grain output.Acta Agron Sin, 2006, 32(10):1511-1518(in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[5] | 薛亚光. 水稻高产与养分高效利用栽培技术及其生理基础的研究. 扬州:扬州大学, 2013. |
Xue Y G.Cultivation Techniques for High Yielding and High Nutrient Use Efficiency in Rice and Their Physiological Bases. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2013. | |
[6] | 郎有忠, 窦永秀, 王美娥, 王美娥, 张祖建, 朱庆森等. 水稻生育期对籽粒产量及品质的影响. 作物学报, 2012, 38(3): 528-534. |
Lang Y Z, Dou Y X, Wang M E, Zhang Z J, Zhu Q S.Effects of growth duration on grain yield and quality in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38(3): 528-534. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 董明辉, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 孟立明. 植物养分利用效率研究综述. 扬州大学学报:农业与生命科学版, 2002, 23(4): 43-46. |
Dong M H, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Meng L M.Research on the nitrogen absorption and utilization of different rice varieties.J Yangzhou Univ: Agric & Life Sci Edn, 2002, 23(4): 43-46 (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 朴钟泽, 韩龙植, 高熙宗.水稻不同基因型氮素利用效率差异.中国水稻科学, 2003, 17(3): 233-238. |
Piao Z Z, Han L Z, Koh H J.Variations of nitrogen use efficiency by rice genotype.Chin J Rice Sci, 2003, 17(3): 233-238(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 董桂春. 不同氮素籽粒生产效率类型籼稻品种的基本特点. 扬州:扬州大学, 2007. |
Dong G C.Basic characteristics of Indica rice cultivars with different types of nitrogen use efficiency for grain output. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2007. | |
[10] | Inthapanya P, Sihavong P, Sihathep V, Chanhphengsay M, Fukai S, Basnayake J.Genotype differences in nutrient uptake and utilization for grain yield production of rain fed lowland rice under fertilized and non fertilized conditions.Field Crops Res, 2000,65: 57-68 |
[11] | 张岳芳, 王余龙, 张传胜, 董桂春, 杨连新, 黄建晔, 龙银成. 水稻的源库关系及碳、氮代谢的研究进展. 作物学报, 2006, 32(08): 1121-1129. |
Zhang Y F, Wang Y L, Zhang C S, Dong G C, Yang L X, Huang J Y, Long Y C. Relationship between N accumulation and root traits in conventional Indica rice varieties (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Agron Sin , 2006, 32(08):1121-1129(in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[12] | Isfan D, Csemi I, Tabi M.Genetic variation of the physiological efficiency index of nitrogen in triticale.J Plant nutr, 1991, 14(12):1381-1390. |
[13] | Tirol-Padre A, Ladha J K, Singh U, Laureles E, Punzalan G.Grain yield performance of rice genotypes at suboptimal levels of soil N as affected by N uptake and utilization efficiency.Field Crops Res, 1996, 46:127-143. |
[14] | 单玉华, 王余龙, 山本由德, 黄建晔, 董桂春, 杨连新, 张传胜, 居静. 不同水稻基因型对氮肥反应的差异及氮素利用效率的研究. 江苏农业研究, 2001, 22(1): 12-15. |
Shan Y H, Wang Y L, Yamamoto Y, Huang J Y, Dong G C, Yang L X, Zhang C S, Ju J.Genotypic differences of nitro gen use efficiency in various types of indica rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Jiangsu Agric Res, 2001, 22(1): 12-15(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 单玉华, 王余龙, 山本由德, 黄建晔, 杨连新, 张传胜. 不同类型水稻在氮素吸收及利用上的差异. 扬州大学学报:自然科学版, 2001, 4(3): 42-45. |
Shan Y H, Wang Y L, Yamamoto Y, Huang J Y, Yang L X, Zhang C S.Study on the differences of nitrogen uptake and use efficiency in different types of rice.J Yangzhou Univ: Nat Sci Edn, 2001, 4(3): 42-45(in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[16] | Singh U, Ladha J K, Castillo E G, Punzalan G, Tirol-Padre A, Duqueza M.Genotypic variation in nitrogen use efficiency in medium- and long-duration rice.Field Crops Res, 1998, 58: 35-53. |
[17] | 董桂春, 李进前, 张彪, 周娟, 张传胜, 张岳芳, 杨连新, 黄建晔, 王余龙. 高氮素籽粒生产效率类型籼稻品种的一些相关性状. 中国水稻科学, 2009, 23(03): 289-296. |
Dong G C, Li J Q, Zhang B, Zhou J, Zhang C S, Zhang Y F, Yang L X, Huang J Y, Wang Y L.Some related traits in conventional Indica rice cultivars with high nitrogen use efficiency for grain yield.Chin J Rice Sci, 2009, 23(03): 289 296(in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[18] | 殷春渊, 张庆, 魏海燕, 张洪成, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许珂, 马群, 杭杰, 张胜飞. 不同产量类型水稻基因型氮素吸收、利用效率的差异.中国农业科学, 2010, 43(1): 39-50. |
Yin C Y, Zhang Q, Wei H Y, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Ma Q, Hang J, Zhang S F.Differences in nitrogen absorption and use efficiency in rice genotypes with different yield performance.Sci Agric Sin, 2010, 43(01): 39 50(in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[19] | 王伟妮, 鲁剑巍, 鲁明星, 李小坤, 李云春, 李慧. 早、中、晚稻施氮增产效应及氮肥利用率研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(3): 545-553. |
Wang W N, Luo J W, Luo M X, Li X K, Li Y C, Li H, Sutdy on effect of nitrogen fertilizer and nitrogen use efficiency of early, mid and late season rice.Plant Nut Fert Sci, 2011, 17(3): 545-553(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 于小凤. 氮素高效吸收型水稻的基本特点. 扬州:扬州大学, 2012. |
Yu X F.Fundamental characteristics of conventional Japonica rice cultivars with high nitrogen uptake efficiency. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2012. | |
[21] | 张岳芳. 不同氮素累积量类型籼稻品种的基本特点及其对供氮浓度的响应. 扬州:扬州大学, 2006. |
Zhang Y F.Fundamental Traits of Indica Rice Varieties (Oryza sativa L.) with Different Nitrogen Accumulation Capacity and Its Responses to Nitrogen Supplying Levels. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2006. | |
[22] | 江立庚, 戴廷波, 韦善清, 甘秀芹, 徐建云, 曹卫星. 南方水稻氮素吸收与利用效率的基因型差异及评价. 植物生态学报, 2003, 27(4): 466-471. |
Jiang L G, Dai T B, Wei S Q, GanX Q, Xu J Y, Cao W X. Genotypic differences and valuation in nitrogen uptake and utilization efficiency in rice.Acta Phytoecol Sin, 2003, 27(4):466-471(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 陈琛, 羊彬, 朱正康, 曹文雅, 罗刚, 周娟, 王祥菊, 于小凤, 袁秋梅, 仲军, 王熠, 黄建晔, 王余龙, 董桂春. 影响水稻遗传群体株系氮素高效吸收的主要根系性状.中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(4): 390-398. |
Chen C, Yang B, Zhu Z K, Cao W Y, Luo G, Zhou J, Wang X J, Yu X F, Yuan Q M, Zhong J, Wang Y, Huang J Y, Wang Y L, Dong G C.Root traints affecting nitrogen efficient absorption in rice genetic populations.China J Rice Sci, 2015, 29(4):390 398 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[24] | 王海候. 水稻氮素吸收利用与稻株重要农艺性状的关系. 扬州:扬州大学, 2005. |
Wang H H.Relationship between nitrogen uptake & utilization and important agronomic characters in rice(Oyrza Satvia L.) Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2005. | |
[25] | 董桂春, 于小凤, 赵江宁, 居静, 田昊, 李进前, 张燕, 王余龙. 不同穗型常规籼稻品种氦素吸收利用的基本特点. 作物学报, 2009, 35(11): 2091-2100. |
Dong G C, Yu X F, Zhao J N, Ju J, Tian H, Li J Q, Zhang Y, Wang Y L.General Characteristics of Nitrogen Uptake and Utilization in Conventional Indica Rice Cultivars with Different Panicle Weight Types.Acta Agron Sin, 2009,35(11): 2091-2100. | |
[26] | 周娟, 李进前, 张彪, 张传胜, 张岳芳, 王余龙, 董桂春. 不同氮素籽粒生产效率类型籼稻品种氮素吸收利用的差异. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(36): 15805-15808. |
Zhou J, Li J Q, Zhang B, Zhang C S, Zhang Y F, Wang Y L, Dong G C.Difference of nitrogen uptake and utilization in indica rice cultivars with different nitrogen use efficiency types for grain output.J Anhui Agric Sci, 2008, 36(36): 15805-15808(in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[27] | 王志琴, 李国生, 杨建昌, 刘立军, 郎有忠, 朱庆森. 江苏现用主要粳稻品种对氮素的反应. 江苏农业研究, 2000, 21(4): 22-26. |
Wang Z Q, Li G S, Yang J C, LiuL J, Lang Y Z, Zhu Q S. Responses of the main mid season japonica rice cultivars currently cultivated in Jiangsu to nitrogen applications.J Jiangsu Agric Res, 2000, 21(4): 22-26 (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[28] | 严小龙, 张福锁. 植物营养遗传学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1997: 30-44. |
Yan X L, Zhang F S. Plant Nutrient Genetic.Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 1997: 30-44(in Chinese) | |
[29] | Broadbent F E, De Datta S K, Laureles E V. Measurement of nitrogen utilization efficiency in rice genotypes.Agron J, 1987, 79:786-791. |
[30] | De Datta S K, Broadbent F E.Nitrogetruse efficiency of 24 rice genotypes on N- deficient soil.Field Crops Res, 1990,23:81-92. |
[31] | Ladha J K, Gjd K, Bennett J, Peng S, Reddy C K, Reddy P M.Opportunities for increased nitrogen-use efficiency from improved lowland rice germplasm.Field Crops Res, 1998,56:4-11. |
[32] | Heffer P.. Assessment of Fertilizer Use by Crop at the Global Level:2006/07-2007/08. Paris: International Fertilizer Industry Association.2009. . |
[33] | Ntanos D A, Koutroubas S D.Dry matter and N accumulation and translocation for indica and japonica rice under Mediterranean conditions.Field Crops Res, 2002, 74(1): 93-101. |
[34] | Jiang L G, Dai T B, Jiang D, Cao W X, Gan X Q, Wei S Q.Charactering physiological N-use efficiency as influenced by nitrogen management in three rice cultivars.Field Crops Res, 2004,88(2/3): 239-250. |
[35] | 董桂春, 于小凤, 董燕萍, 李进前, 田昊, 周娟, 王云霞, 杨连新, 黄建晔, 王余龙. 不同库容量类型常规籼稻品种氮素吸收与分配的差异. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(10):3432-3441. |
Dong G C, Yu X F, Dong Y P, LI J Q, Tian H, Zhou J, Wang Y X, Yang L X, Huang J Y, Wang Y L.A Difference in Nitrogen Uptake and Distribution in Conventional Indica Rice Cultivars with Different Sink Potentials.Sci Agric Sin, 2009, 42(10):3432-3441(in Chinese with English abstract). |
[1] | LIU Huimin, ZHOU Jieqiang, HU Yuanyi, TIAN Yan, LEI Bin, LI Jianwu, WEI Zhongwei, TANG Wenbang. Super-high Yield Characteristics of Two-line Hybrid Rice Zhuoliangyou 1126 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(2): 160-171. |
[2] | Jun YAN, Qixia WU, Jianqiang ZHU, Luping ZHANG. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Rice Photosynthetic Characteristics, Nitrogen Uptake and Grain Yield Formation Under Rainfall-adapted Water Management [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2019, 33(4): 347-356. |
[3] | Yajie HU, Pei WU, Ming ZHU, Zhipeng XING, Qigen DAI, Zhongyang HUO, Ke XU, Haiyan WEI, Baowei GUO, Hongcheng ZHANG. Characteristics of Nitrogen Uptake and Utilization of Mechanically-transplanted Pot-tray-nursed Rice Seedlings [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2018, 32(3): 257-264. |
[4] | HOU Hongqian1,2,3, HUANG Yonglan4, JI Jianhua1,2,3, LIU Yiren1,2,3, LIU Xiumei1,2,3,*, HU Zhaoping5,6. Effects of ControlledRelease Fertilizer Application on Double Cropping Rice Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2016, 30(4): 389-396. |
[5] | Peng-gang PEI, Jun-hua ZHANG, Lian-feng ZHU, Zhi-hua HU, Qian-yu JIN. Effects of Straw Returning Coupled with N Application on Rice Photosynthetic Characteristics, Nitrogen Uptake and Grain Yield Formation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2015, 29(3): 282-290. |
[6] | YE Shi-chao,#,LIN Zhong-cheng,#,DAI Qi-gen,JIA Yu-shu,GU Hai-yan,CHEN Jing-dou,XU Lu-sheng,WU Fu-guan,ZHANG Hong-cheng,HUO Zhong-yang,XU Ke,WEI Hai-yan. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Ammonia Volatilization and Nitrogen Utilization in Rice Growing Season [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2011, 25(1): 71-78 . |
[7] | PANG Jing ,ZHU Jian-guo ,XIE Zu-bin ,LIU Gang ,CHEN Gai-ping. Relations Between Transpiration and N Uptake of Rice Grown in Elevated Air Carbon Dioxide Concentration [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2006, 20(2): 205-209 . |
[8] | OU Zhi-Ying ,LIN Gui-Zhu ,PENG Chang-lian. Response of Flag Leaves of Super High-Yielding Rice Pei′ai 64S/E32 and Liangyoupeijiu to High Temperature [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2005, 19(3): 249-254 . |
[9] | Chen You-ding,Wan Bang-hui,Zhang Xu. Ideal Plant Type at Heading Stage for South China Double Cropping Rice with Super High Yield [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2005, 19(1): 52-58 . |
[10] | JIANG Li-geng,CAO Wei-xing . Physiological Mechanism and Approaches for Efficient Nitrogen Utilization in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2002, 16(3): 261-264 . |
[11] | MA Jun,LI Han-yun,LI Shi-gui,TIAN Yan-hua,MA Wen-bo,GAO Ke-min. Cultural and Physiological Characteristics and Its Cultivation Practice of the Heavy Panicle Type Hybrid Rice Dyou 527 [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2002, 16(3): 231-235 . |
[12] | CHEN Jin-hong,GUO Heng-de,MAO Guo-juan,TAO Zhi-biao,ZHANG Guo-ping,ZHAO Wei-ming . Characteristics of Dry Matter Production and Nutrient Uptake and Utilization of Super High Yielding Japonica Hybrid Rice [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2001, 15(4): 271-275 . |
[13] | YANG Hui-jie ,LI Yi-zhen ,YANG Ren-cui ,JIANG Zhao-wei ,ZHENG Jing-sheng . Dry Matter Production Characteristics of Super High Yielding Rice [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2001, 15(4): 265-270 . |
[14] | Xiao Lirong,Zhang Yuzhu,Ma Guohui,Huang Zuming,He Yinghao,Huang Zhinong. Economic Effect Analysis on High Yielding Rice Cultivation [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 1998, 12(增刊): 77-78 . |
[15] |
Cooperative Groups of Rice Research,Hunan Province.
Year Report for 1996 on Development and Demonstration of Integrated High-Yielding Cultivation Techniques for Large Area in Hunan Province, China [J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 1998, 12(增刊): 1-3 . |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||