Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 500-512.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2017.6145
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Na LI, Zhiyuan YANG, Zou DAI, Yongjian SUN, Hui XU, Yan HE, Mingjin JIANG, Tianrong YAN, Changchun GUO, Jun MA*()
Received:
2016-11-01
Revised:
2016-12-28
Online:
2017-10-10
Published:
2017-09-10
Contact:
Jun MA
李娜, 杨志远, 代邹, 孙永健, 徐徽, 何艳, 蒋明金, 严田蓉, 郭长春, 马均*()
通讯作者:
马均
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Na LI, Zhiyuan YANG, Zou DAI, Yongjian SUN, Hui XU, Yan HE, Mingjin JIANG, Tianrong YAN, Changchun GUO, Jun MA. Effects of Water-Nitrogen Management on Root Traits, Nitrogen Accumulation and Utilization and Grain Yield in Rice with Different Nitrogen Use Efficiency[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2017, 31(5): 500-512.
李娜, 杨志远, 代邹, 孙永健, 徐徽, 何艳, 蒋明金, 严田蓉, 郭长春, 马均. 水氮管理对不同氮效率水稻根系性状、氮素吸收利用及产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(5): 500-512.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2017.6145
施氮模式 N management mode | 施氮量及施氮时期 N application rate and stages | 总施氮量 Total N rate/(kg·hm-2) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
基肥 Basal N/(kg·hm-2) | 蘖肥 N application for tillering /(kg·hm-2) | 促花肥 N application for spikelet boosting/(kg·hm-2) | 保花肥 N application for spikelet preserving/(kg·hm-2) | ||
SPAD指导施肥 SPAD-diagnosis N management | 0 | 自移栽后7 d至齐穗期,若叶绿素仪读数SPAD < 37.5,施氮15 kg/hm2,SPAD > 37.5,不施氮。其中,拔节期(倒4叶龄期),若SPAD < 37.5,施氮30 kg/hm2。每周测1 次。 | 120 | ||
优化施肥模式 Optimal N management | 45(30%) | 45(30%) | 30 (20%) | 30 (20%) | 150 |
农民习惯施肥 Farmer’s usual N management | 105(70%) | 45(30%) | 0 | 0 | 150 |
Table 1 N application rate and fertilization stage.
施氮模式 N management mode | 施氮量及施氮时期 N application rate and stages | 总施氮量 Total N rate/(kg·hm-2) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
基肥 Basal N/(kg·hm-2) | 蘖肥 N application for tillering /(kg·hm-2) | 促花肥 N application for spikelet boosting/(kg·hm-2) | 保花肥 N application for spikelet preserving/(kg·hm-2) | ||
SPAD指导施肥 SPAD-diagnosis N management | 0 | 自移栽后7 d至齐穗期,若叶绿素仪读数SPAD < 37.5,施氮15 kg/hm2,SPAD > 37.5,不施氮。其中,拔节期(倒4叶龄期),若SPAD < 37.5,施氮30 kg/hm2。每周测1 次。 | 120 | ||
优化施肥模式 Optimal N management | 45(30%) | 45(30%) | 30 (20%) | 30 (20%) | 150 |
农民习惯施肥 Farmer’s usual N management | 105(70%) | 45(30%) | 0 | 0 | 150 |
品种 Cultivar | 灌溉方式Irrigation pattern | 施氮模式 N management mode | 有效穗数 Productive panicle number/(×104 hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate /% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight /g | 总颖花量 Total spikelet Number/(×106 hm-2) | 产量 Grain yield /(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
德香4103 Dexiang 4103(C1) | W1 | CK | 212.52±1.47 c | 142.58±2.31 c | 90.83±2.01 a | 33.43±0.60 a | 303.01±5.86 c | 9 135±334.75 c |
N1 | 235.10±10.11 b | 211.16±16.46 a | 83.92±0.68 b | 30.56±0.47 c | 496.21±40.90 a | 12 311±266.06 a | ||
N2 | 246.63±7.95 ab | 205.39±4.11 a | 80.74±2.67 b | 30.90±0.55 bc | 506.54±19.50 a | 12 077±114.48 a | ||
N3 | 252.20±4.93 a | 162.49±5.79 b | 90.72±2.80 a | 32.30±0.17 ab | 409.94±20.60 b | 11 500±401.06 b | ||
平均 Average | 236.61 | 180.41 | 86.55 | 31.80 | 428.92 | 11 256 | ||
W2 | CK | 193.72±3.70 c | 138.68±3.16 c | 91.24±2.40 a | 33.63±1.03 a | 268.66±11.11 c | 8 120±365.81 c | |
N1 | 234.15±4.52 b | 190.35±6.44 a | 84.61±2.51 c | 32.78±1.06 a | 445.57±10.86 a | 11 961±283.28 a | ||
N2 | 241.84±10.63 ab | 185.38±13.41 a | 85.76±0.74 bc | 32.82±0.16 a | 447.65±23.56 a | 12 239±341.80 a | ||
N3 | 249.09±8.14 a | 155.33±6.66 b | 88.06±1.40 ab | 34.43±1.53 a | 387.21±27.97 b | 11 351±134.61 b | ||
平均 Average | 229.70 | 167.44 | 87.42 | 33.41 | 387.27 | 10 918 | ||
宜香3724 Yixiang 3724(C2) | W1 | CK | 198.03±2.58 b | 131.20±3.42 b | 88.85±1.58 a | 36.34±1.01 a | 259.80±5.30 c | 8 373±147.22 c |
N1 | 235.18±10.44 a | 183.20±14.44 a | 84.48±2.22 b | 33.58±0.02 b | 430.48±32.50 a | 11 977±418.03 a | ||
N2 | 241.37±6.10 a | 178.67±6.04 a | 84.77±2.67 b | 34.42±0.19 b | 431.47±24.29 a | 12 048±200.90 a | ||
N3 | 246.25±10.00 a | 143.43±5.56 b | 89.16±0.61 a | 36.36±0.69 a | 352.91±8.82 b | 11 132±227.75 b | ||
平均 Average | 230.21 | 159.13 | 86.81 | 35.17 | 368.67 | 10 882 | ||
W2 | CK | 190.95±3.65 c | 117.47±2.01 c | 89.62±0.37 a | 36.76±0.53 ab | 224.31±6.59 c | 7 295±124.53 c | |
N1 | 229.79±4.93 b | 179.56±7.94 a | 81.11±1.21 b | 36.66±1.23 ab | 412.36±10.38 a | 11 887±305.06 a | ||
N2 | 238.10±11.19 ab | 175.79±3.66 a | 80.72±3.66 b | 35.33±0.85 b | 418.28±11.19 a | 11 621±233.07 a | ||
N3 | 243.05±11.10 a | 144.32±4.26 b | 88.05±1.68 a | 37.37±2.33 a | 350.94±23.67 b | 11 097±199.41 b | ||
平均 Average | 225.47 | 154.29 | 84.88 | 36.53 | 351.47 | 10 475 | ||
C1平均Average | 233.16 | 173.92 | 86.99 | 32.61 | 408.10 | 11 086.88 | ||
C2 平均Average | 227.84 | 156.71 | 85.84 | 35.85 | 360.07 | 10 678.71 | ||
F值F-value | 品种C | 3.83 ns | 35.53* | 5.66 ns | 3399.64** | 29.55* | 19.65* | |
灌溉方式W | 16.63* | 10.38* | 0.55 ns | 22.24** | 52.69** | 183.26** | ||
施氮模式N | 100.47** | 169.12** | 44.51** | 12.67** | 207.92** | 826.41** | ||
C×W | 0.58 ns | 2.16 ns | 3.71 ns | 0.17 ns | 9.10* | 1.59 ns | ||
C×N | 0.39 ns | 0.20 ns | 0.30 ns | 0.23 ns | 0.09 ns | 4.38* | ||
W×N | 1.19 ns | 0.90 ns | 1.31 ns | 3.02* | 0.89 ns | 13.01** | ||
C×W×N | 0.61 ns | 2.16 ns | 4.79** | 0.77 ns | 0.67 ns | 2.19 ns |
Table 2 Effects of water-nitrogen management on grain yield and its components in rice with different N use efficiencies.
品种 Cultivar | 灌溉方式Irrigation pattern | 施氮模式 N management mode | 有效穗数 Productive panicle number/(×104 hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate /% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight /g | 总颖花量 Total spikelet Number/(×106 hm-2) | 产量 Grain yield /(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
德香4103 Dexiang 4103(C1) | W1 | CK | 212.52±1.47 c | 142.58±2.31 c | 90.83±2.01 a | 33.43±0.60 a | 303.01±5.86 c | 9 135±334.75 c |
N1 | 235.10±10.11 b | 211.16±16.46 a | 83.92±0.68 b | 30.56±0.47 c | 496.21±40.90 a | 12 311±266.06 a | ||
N2 | 246.63±7.95 ab | 205.39±4.11 a | 80.74±2.67 b | 30.90±0.55 bc | 506.54±19.50 a | 12 077±114.48 a | ||
N3 | 252.20±4.93 a | 162.49±5.79 b | 90.72±2.80 a | 32.30±0.17 ab | 409.94±20.60 b | 11 500±401.06 b | ||
平均 Average | 236.61 | 180.41 | 86.55 | 31.80 | 428.92 | 11 256 | ||
W2 | CK | 193.72±3.70 c | 138.68±3.16 c | 91.24±2.40 a | 33.63±1.03 a | 268.66±11.11 c | 8 120±365.81 c | |
N1 | 234.15±4.52 b | 190.35±6.44 a | 84.61±2.51 c | 32.78±1.06 a | 445.57±10.86 a | 11 961±283.28 a | ||
N2 | 241.84±10.63 ab | 185.38±13.41 a | 85.76±0.74 bc | 32.82±0.16 a | 447.65±23.56 a | 12 239±341.80 a | ||
N3 | 249.09±8.14 a | 155.33±6.66 b | 88.06±1.40 ab | 34.43±1.53 a | 387.21±27.97 b | 11 351±134.61 b | ||
平均 Average | 229.70 | 167.44 | 87.42 | 33.41 | 387.27 | 10 918 | ||
宜香3724 Yixiang 3724(C2) | W1 | CK | 198.03±2.58 b | 131.20±3.42 b | 88.85±1.58 a | 36.34±1.01 a | 259.80±5.30 c | 8 373±147.22 c |
N1 | 235.18±10.44 a | 183.20±14.44 a | 84.48±2.22 b | 33.58±0.02 b | 430.48±32.50 a | 11 977±418.03 a | ||
N2 | 241.37±6.10 a | 178.67±6.04 a | 84.77±2.67 b | 34.42±0.19 b | 431.47±24.29 a | 12 048±200.90 a | ||
N3 | 246.25±10.00 a | 143.43±5.56 b | 89.16±0.61 a | 36.36±0.69 a | 352.91±8.82 b | 11 132±227.75 b | ||
平均 Average | 230.21 | 159.13 | 86.81 | 35.17 | 368.67 | 10 882 | ||
W2 | CK | 190.95±3.65 c | 117.47±2.01 c | 89.62±0.37 a | 36.76±0.53 ab | 224.31±6.59 c | 7 295±124.53 c | |
N1 | 229.79±4.93 b | 179.56±7.94 a | 81.11±1.21 b | 36.66±1.23 ab | 412.36±10.38 a | 11 887±305.06 a | ||
N2 | 238.10±11.19 ab | 175.79±3.66 a | 80.72±3.66 b | 35.33±0.85 b | 418.28±11.19 a | 11 621±233.07 a | ||
N3 | 243.05±11.10 a | 144.32±4.26 b | 88.05±1.68 a | 37.37±2.33 a | 350.94±23.67 b | 11 097±199.41 b | ||
平均 Average | 225.47 | 154.29 | 84.88 | 36.53 | 351.47 | 10 475 | ||
C1平均Average | 233.16 | 173.92 | 86.99 | 32.61 | 408.10 | 11 086.88 | ||
C2 平均Average | 227.84 | 156.71 | 85.84 | 35.85 | 360.07 | 10 678.71 | ||
F值F-value | 品种C | 3.83 ns | 35.53* | 5.66 ns | 3399.64** | 29.55* | 19.65* | |
灌溉方式W | 16.63* | 10.38* | 0.55 ns | 22.24** | 52.69** | 183.26** | ||
施氮模式N | 100.47** | 169.12** | 44.51** | 12.67** | 207.92** | 826.41** | ||
C×W | 0.58 ns | 2.16 ns | 3.71 ns | 0.17 ns | 9.10* | 1.59 ns | ||
C×N | 0.39 ns | 0.20 ns | 0.30 ns | 0.23 ns | 0.09 ns | 4.38* | ||
W×N | 1.19 ns | 0.90 ns | 1.31 ns | 3.02* | 0.89 ns | 13.01** | ||
C×W×N | 0.61 ns | 2.16 ns | 4.79** | 0.77 ns | 0.67 ns | 2.19 ns |
品种 Cultivar | 灌溉方式 Irrigation pattern | 施氮模式 N management mode | 氮积累量 N accumulation | 氮肥回收率 N recovery efficiency /% | 氮肥农学利用率 N agronomic efficiency /(kg·kg-1) | 氮肥生理利用率 N physiological efficiency /(kg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
德香4103 Dexiang 4103(C1) | W1 | CK | 128.20±6.28 c | — | — | — |
N1 | 204.98±2.88 a | 63.98±4.04 a | 26.47±1.32 a | 41.41±1.95 a | ||
N2 | 205.41±2.56 a | 51.47±4.79 b | 19.61±1.98 b | 38.10±1.40 b | ||
N3 | 193.27±6.20 b | 43.38±5.11 c | 15.76±1.59 c | 36.40±1.21 b | ||
平均 Average | 182.97 | 52.95 | 20.61 | 38.64 | ||
W2 | CK | 112.16±7.42 c | — | — | — | |
N1 | 191.44±5.23 a | 66.07±5.57 a | 32.01±0.73 a | 48.65±3.65 a | ||
N2 | 198.88±4.84 a | 57.82±3.38 b | 27.46±2.31 b | 47.49±2.83 a | ||
N3 | 182.03±6.48 b | 46.58±2.55 c | 21.54±2.62 c | 46.12±3.17 a | ||
平均 Average | 171.13 | 56.82 | 27.00 | 47.42 | ||
宜香3724 Yixiang 3724(C2) | W1 | CK | 111.21±4.03 c | — | — | — |
N1 | 205.43±8.41 a | 78.52±9.97 a | 30.03±4.23 a | 38.21±1.03 a | ||
N2 | 207.89±2.54 a | 64.46±3.29 b | 24.5±2.30 b | 37.95±1.73 a | ||
N3 | 192.74±7.79 b | 54.35±6.04 c | 18.39±1.57 c | 33.92±1.60 b | ||
平均 Average | 179.32 | 65.78 | 24.31 | 36.69 | ||
W2 | CK | 96.44±2.89 c | — | — | — | |
N1 | 199.87±2.84 a | 86.19±4.1 a | 38.26±3.56 a | 44.34±2.17 a | ||
N2 | 192.88±0.84 ab | 64.29±1.82 b | 28.84±2.37 b | 44.81±2.58 a | ||
N3 | 187.39±6.43 b | 60.63±6.04 b | 25.35±2.04 c | 41.86±0.80 a | ||
平均 Average | 169.15 | 70.37 | 30.82 | 43.67 | ||
C1平均Average | 177.05 | 54.88 | 23.81 | 43.03 | ||
C2平均Average | 174.23 | 68.07 | 27.56 | 40.18 | ||
F值F-value | 品种C | 2.71 ns | 13.79 ns | 4.27 ns | 21.35* | |
灌溉方式W | 119.28** | 10.78* | 250.58** | 46.67** | ||
施氮模式N | 888.36** | 107.66** | 171.70** | 12.58** | ||
C×W | 0.69 ns | 0.08 ns | 0.02 ns | 0.61 ns | ||
C×N | 10.68** | 3.09 ns | 1.31 ns | 1.48 ns | ||
W×N | 1.17 ns | 0.21 ns | 0.21 ns | 1.12 ns | ||
C×W×N | 1.62 ns | 2.12 ns | 3.41 ns | 0.12 ns |
Table 3 Effects of water-nitrogen management on N accumulation and utilization in rice with different N use efficiencies.
品种 Cultivar | 灌溉方式 Irrigation pattern | 施氮模式 N management mode | 氮积累量 N accumulation | 氮肥回收率 N recovery efficiency /% | 氮肥农学利用率 N agronomic efficiency /(kg·kg-1) | 氮肥生理利用率 N physiological efficiency /(kg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
德香4103 Dexiang 4103(C1) | W1 | CK | 128.20±6.28 c | — | — | — |
N1 | 204.98±2.88 a | 63.98±4.04 a | 26.47±1.32 a | 41.41±1.95 a | ||
N2 | 205.41±2.56 a | 51.47±4.79 b | 19.61±1.98 b | 38.10±1.40 b | ||
N3 | 193.27±6.20 b | 43.38±5.11 c | 15.76±1.59 c | 36.40±1.21 b | ||
平均 Average | 182.97 | 52.95 | 20.61 | 38.64 | ||
W2 | CK | 112.16±7.42 c | — | — | — | |
N1 | 191.44±5.23 a | 66.07±5.57 a | 32.01±0.73 a | 48.65±3.65 a | ||
N2 | 198.88±4.84 a | 57.82±3.38 b | 27.46±2.31 b | 47.49±2.83 a | ||
N3 | 182.03±6.48 b | 46.58±2.55 c | 21.54±2.62 c | 46.12±3.17 a | ||
平均 Average | 171.13 | 56.82 | 27.00 | 47.42 | ||
宜香3724 Yixiang 3724(C2) | W1 | CK | 111.21±4.03 c | — | — | — |
N1 | 205.43±8.41 a | 78.52±9.97 a | 30.03±4.23 a | 38.21±1.03 a | ||
N2 | 207.89±2.54 a | 64.46±3.29 b | 24.5±2.30 b | 37.95±1.73 a | ||
N3 | 192.74±7.79 b | 54.35±6.04 c | 18.39±1.57 c | 33.92±1.60 b | ||
平均 Average | 179.32 | 65.78 | 24.31 | 36.69 | ||
W2 | CK | 96.44±2.89 c | — | — | — | |
N1 | 199.87±2.84 a | 86.19±4.1 a | 38.26±3.56 a | 44.34±2.17 a | ||
N2 | 192.88±0.84 ab | 64.29±1.82 b | 28.84±2.37 b | 44.81±2.58 a | ||
N3 | 187.39±6.43 b | 60.63±6.04 b | 25.35±2.04 c | 41.86±0.80 a | ||
平均 Average | 169.15 | 70.37 | 30.82 | 43.67 | ||
C1平均Average | 177.05 | 54.88 | 23.81 | 43.03 | ||
C2平均Average | 174.23 | 68.07 | 27.56 | 40.18 | ||
F值F-value | 品种C | 2.71 ns | 13.79 ns | 4.27 ns | 21.35* | |
灌溉方式W | 119.28** | 10.78* | 250.58** | 46.67** | ||
施氮模式N | 888.36** | 107.66** | 171.70** | 12.58** | ||
C×W | 0.69 ns | 0.08 ns | 0.02 ns | 0.61 ns | ||
C×N | 10.68** | 3.09 ns | 1.31 ns | 1.48 ns | ||
W×N | 1.17 ns | 0.21 ns | 0.21 ns | 1.12 ns | ||
C×W×N | 1.62 ns | 2.12 ns | 3.41 ns | 0.12 ns |
根系性状 Root trait | 标准回归系数Standard regression coefficient | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期 Jointing stage | 抽穗期Heading stage | 成熟期Maturity stage | |||||||
氮高效HN | 氮低效LN | 氮高效HN | 氮低效LN | 氮高效HN | 氮低效LN | ||||
根总干质量Total root dry weight | -0.0135 | -0.019 | 0.1875 | 0.1056 | -0.0679 | -0.0142 | |||
不定根Adventitious root | |||||||||
0.1110 | 0.0653 | 0.0698 | -0.0331 | 0.2415 | 0.4472 | ||||
0.2074 | 0.0538 | 0.0437 | 0.1587 | 0.0127 | 0.1910 | ||||
-0.1432 | -0.0422 | 0.0019 | -0.006 | 0.1872 | 0.0051 | ||||
粗分枝根Coarse lateral root | |||||||||
长度Length 表面积Surface area 体积Volume | 0.2971 | 0.1153 | 0.2625 | 0.0352 | -0.1532 | -0.0744 | |||
0.1718 | 0.2337 | 0.0138 | 0.0552 | 0.1450 | 0.2821 | ||||
-0.0805 | -0.1707 | 0.1236 | -0.0037 | -0.0953 | -0.2173 | ||||
细分枝根Fine lateral root | |||||||||
长度Length 表面积Surface area 体积Volume | 0.3316 | 0.4615 | 0.0512 | 0.0130 | 0.2036 | -0.2006 | |||
0.1496 | 0.1212 | -0.0216 | 0.3743 | 0.1022 | -0.0281 | ||||
-0.0537 | -0.0096 | 0.0144 | 0.1180 | -0.1059 | 0.0025 | ||||
决定系数Determination coefficient | 0.7204** | 0.6292** | 0.9009** | 0.9028** | 0.4587** | 0.4198** |
Table 7 Ridge regression analysis between grain yield and root traits at different stages in rice with different N use efficiencies.
根系性状 Root trait | 标准回归系数Standard regression coefficient | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期 Jointing stage | 抽穗期Heading stage | 成熟期Maturity stage | |||||||
氮高效HN | 氮低效LN | 氮高效HN | 氮低效LN | 氮高效HN | 氮低效LN | ||||
根总干质量Total root dry weight | -0.0135 | -0.019 | 0.1875 | 0.1056 | -0.0679 | -0.0142 | |||
不定根Adventitious root | |||||||||
0.1110 | 0.0653 | 0.0698 | -0.0331 | 0.2415 | 0.4472 | ||||
0.2074 | 0.0538 | 0.0437 | 0.1587 | 0.0127 | 0.1910 | ||||
-0.1432 | -0.0422 | 0.0019 | -0.006 | 0.1872 | 0.0051 | ||||
粗分枝根Coarse lateral root | |||||||||
长度Length 表面积Surface area 体积Volume | 0.2971 | 0.1153 | 0.2625 | 0.0352 | -0.1532 | -0.0744 | |||
0.1718 | 0.2337 | 0.0138 | 0.0552 | 0.1450 | 0.2821 | ||||
-0.0805 | -0.1707 | 0.1236 | -0.0037 | -0.0953 | -0.2173 | ||||
细分枝根Fine lateral root | |||||||||
长度Length 表面积Surface area 体积Volume | 0.3316 | 0.4615 | 0.0512 | 0.0130 | 0.2036 | -0.2006 | |||
0.1496 | 0.1212 | -0.0216 | 0.3743 | 0.1022 | -0.0281 | ||||
-0.0537 | -0.0096 | 0.0144 | 0.1180 | -0.1059 | 0.0025 | ||||
决定系数Determination coefficient | 0.7204** | 0.6292** | 0.9009** | 0.9028** | 0.4587** | 0.4198** |
氮素吸收利用 N accumulation and utilization | 决定系数 Determination coefficient | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期 Jointing stage | 抽穗期 Heading stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage | ||||||
氮高效HN | 氮低效LN | 氮高效HN | 氮低效LN | 氮高效HN | 氮低效LN | |||
氮积累量 N accumulation | 0.4596 | 0.4945 | 0.6892 | 0.6917 | 0.4036 | 0.4078 | ||
氮肥回收率 N recovery efficiency | 0.3801 | 0.4244 | 0.4491 | 0.5722 | 0.3437 | 0.4308 | ||
氮肥农学利用率 N agronomic efficiency efficiency | 0.3226 | 0.2638 | 0.3451 | 0.4263 | 0.3140 | 0.4197 | ||
氮肥生理利用率 N physiological efficiency efficiency | 0.0720 | 0.1077 | 0.2243 | 0.0928 | 0.2519 | 0.4161 |
Table 8 Ridge regression analysis between root traits at different stages and N accumulation and utilization in rice with different N use efficiencies.
氮素吸收利用 N accumulation and utilization | 决定系数 Determination coefficient | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期 Jointing stage | 抽穗期 Heading stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage | ||||||
氮高效HN | 氮低效LN | 氮高效HN | 氮低效LN | 氮高效HN | 氮低效LN | |||
氮积累量 N accumulation | 0.4596 | 0.4945 | 0.6892 | 0.6917 | 0.4036 | 0.4078 | ||
氮肥回收率 N recovery efficiency | 0.3801 | 0.4244 | 0.4491 | 0.5722 | 0.3437 | 0.4308 | ||
氮肥农学利用率 N agronomic efficiency efficiency | 0.3226 | 0.2638 | 0.3451 | 0.4263 | 0.3140 | 0.4197 | ||
氮肥生理利用率 N physiological efficiency efficiency | 0.0720 | 0.1077 | 0.2243 | 0.0928 | 0.2519 | 0.4161 |
[1] | 朱德峰, 程式华, 张玉屏, 林贤青, 陈惠哲. 全球水稻生产现状与制约因素分析. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(3): 474-479. |
Zhu D F, Cheng S H, Zhang Y P, Lin X Q, Chen H Z.Analysis of status and constraints of rice production in the world.Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 43(3): 474-479. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 孙永健, 孙园园, 徐徽, 李玥, 严奉君, 蒋明金, 马均. 水氮管理模式对不同氮效率水稻氮素利用特性及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40(9): 1639-1649. |
Sun Y J, Sun Y Y, Xu H, Li Y, Yan F J, Jiang M J, Ma J.Effects of water-nitrogen management patterns on nitrogen utilization characteristics and yield in rice cultivars with different nitrogen use efficiencies.Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40(9): 1639-1649. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 王绍华, 曹卫星, 丁艳锋, 田永超,姜东. 水氮互作对水稻氮吸收与利用的影响. 中国农业科学, 2004, 37(4): 497-501. |
Wang S H, Cao W X, Ding Y F, Tian Y C,Jiang D.Interactions of water management and nitrogen fertilizer on nitrogen absorption and utilization in rice.Sci Agric Sin, 2004, 37(4): 497-501. (In Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 梁永书, 周军杰, 南文斌, 段东东, 张汉马. 水稻根系研究进展. 植物学报, 2016, 51(1): 98-106. |
Liang Y S, Zhou J J, Nan W B, Duan D D, Zhang H M.Progress in rice root system research.Chin Bull Bot, 2016, 51(1): 98-106. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 魏海燕, 张洪程, 张胜飞, 杭杰, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 马群, 张庆, 刘艳阳. 不同氮利用效率水稻基因型的根系形态与生理指标的研究. 作物学报, 2008, 34(3): 429-436. |
Wei H Y, Zang H C, Zhang S F, Hang J, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Ma Q, Zhang Q, Liu Y Y.Root morphological and physiological characteristics in rice genotypes with different N use efficiencies.Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(3): 429-436. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 戢林, 李廷轩, 张锡洲, 余海英. 氮高效利用基因型水稻根系形态和活力特征. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(23): 4770-4781. |
Ji L, Li T X, Zhang X Z, Yu H Y.Root morphologial and activity characteristics of rice genotype with high nitrogen utilization efficiency.Sci Agric Sin, 2012, 45(23): 4770-4781. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 史正军, 樊小林, D Klaus, B Sattemacher.根系局部供氮对水稻根系形态的影响及其机理.中国水稻科学, 2005, 19(2): 147-152. |
Shi Z J, Fan X L, Klaus D, Sattemacher B.Effect of localized nitrogen supply on root morphology in rice and its mechanism.Chin J Rice Sci, 2005, 19(2): 147-152. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | Fan J B, Zhang Y L, Turner D, Duan Y H, Wang D S, Shen Q R.Root physiological and morphological characteristics of two rice cultivars with different nitrogen-use efficiency.Pedosphere, 2010, 20(4): 446-455. |
[9] | Ju C X, Buresh R J, Wang Z Q, Zhang H, Liu L J, Yang J C, Zhang J H.Root and shoot traits for rice varieties with higher grain yield and higher nitrogen use efficiency at lower nitrogen rates application.Field Crops Res, 2015, 175: 47-55. |
[10] | 顾东祥, 汤亮, 徐其军, 雷晓俊, 曹卫星, 朱艳. 水氮处理下不同品种水稻根系生长分布特征. 植物生态学报, 2011, 35(5): 558-566. |
Gu D X, Tang L, Xu Q J, Lei X J, Cao W X, Zhu Y.Root growth and distribution in rice cultivars as affected by nitrogen and water supply.Chin J Plant Ecol, 2011, 35(5): 558-566. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 曾翔, 李阳生, 谢小立, 肖国樱, 廖江林. 不同灌溉模式对杂交水稻生育后期根系生理特性和剑叶光合特性的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2003, 17(4): 66-70. |
Zeng X, Li Y S, Xie X L, Xiao G Y, Liao J L.Effects of different irrigation patterns on physiological characteristics of root and photosynthetic traits of flag leaf after flowering stage in hybrid rice.Chin J Rice Sci, 2003(4): 66-70. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 刘永霞, 岳延滨, 刘岩, 曹宏鑫,葛道阔,魏秀芳. 不同品种和氮肥条件下水稻根系主要几何参数动态量化. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(9): 1782-1790. |
Liu Y X, Yue Y B, Liu Y, Cao H X, Ge D K, Wei X F.Quantitative research of dynamic models of the main geometric parameters of rice root system of different varieties under different nitrogen conditions.Sci Agric Sin, 2010, 43(9): 1782-1790. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 秦俭, 杨志远, 孙永健, 徐徽, 马均. 不同穗型杂交籼稻物质积累、氮素吸收利用和产量的差异比较. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(5): 514-522. |
Qin J, Yang Z Y, Sun Y J, Xu H, Ma J.Differential comparison of assumilation products accumulation, nitrogen uptake and utilization and grain yield of hybrid Indica rice combinations with different panicle types.Chin J Rice Sci, 2014, 28(5): 514-522. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 孙永健, 孙园园, 徐徽, 李玥, 严奉君, 蒋明, 马均. 水氮管理模式对不同氮效率水稻氮素利用特性及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40(9): 1639-1649. |
Sun Y J, Sun Y Y, Xu H, Li Y, Yan F J, Jiang M J, Ma J.Effects of water-nitrogen management patterns on nitrogen utilization characteristics and yield in rice Cultivars with different nitrogen use efficiencies.Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40(9): 1639-1649. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 顾东祥, 汤亮, 曹卫星, 朱艳. 基于图像分析方法的水稻根系形态特征指标的定量分. 作物学报, 2010, 36(5): 810-817. |
Gu D X, Tang L, Cao W X, Zhu Y.Quantitative analysis on root morphological characteristics based on image analysis method in rice.Acta Agron Sin, 2010, 36(5): 810-817. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 孙永健, 孙园园, 李旭毅, 郭翔, 马均. 水氮互作下水稻氮代谢关键酶活性与氮素利用的关系. 作物学报, 2009, 35(11): 2055-2063. |
Sun Y J, Sun Y Y, Li X Y, Guo X, Ma J.Relationship of activities of key enzymes involved in nitrogen metabolism with nitrogen utilization in rice under water-nitrogen interaction.Acta Agron Sin, 2009, 35(11): 2055-2063. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 孙永健, 孙园园, 刘凯, 张荣萍,马均. 水氮互作对结实期水稻衰老和物质转运及产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(6): 1339-1349. |
Sun Y J, Sun Y Y, Liu K, Zhang R P, Ma J.Effects of water-nitrogen interaction on rice senescence and material transport and yield during grain filling.Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2009, 15(6): 1339-1349. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 黄丽芬, 董芙蓉, 霍中洋, 全晓艳, 魏海燕, 戴其根, 许钶, 张洪程. 氮素水平对不同氮效率基因型水稻的物质生产与分配的影响. 核农学报, 2012, 26(9): 1290-1297. |
Huang L F, Dong F R, Huo Z Y, Quan X Y, Wei H Y, Dai Q G, Xu K, Zhang H C.Effects of nitrogen levels on dry matter accumulation and distribution in rice genotype with different nitrogen use efficiencies.Acta Agric Nucl Sin, 2012, 26(9): 1290-1297. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 朴钟泽, 韩龙植, 高熙宗. 水稻不同基因型氮素利用效率差异. 中国水稻科学, 2003, 17(3): 233-238. |
Piao Z Z, Han L Z, Gao X Z.Variations of nitrogen use efficiency by rice genotype.Chin J Rice Sci, 2003, 17(3): 233-238. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 石庆华, 黄英金, 李木英, 徐益群, 谭雪明, 张佩莲. 水稻根系性状与地上部的相关及根系性状的遗传研究. 中国农业科学, 1997, 30(4): 62-68. |
Shi Q H, Huang Y J, Li M Y, Xu Y Q, Tan X M, Zhang P L.Studies on the heredity of root characteristics and correlation between the characteristics of roots and upperground parts in rice.Sci Agric Sin, 1997, 30(4): 62-68. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 朱德峰, 林贤青, 曹卫星. 水稻深层根系对生长和产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2001, 34(4): 429-432. |
Zhu D F, Lin X Q, Cao W X.Effects of deep roots on growth and yield in two rice varieties.Sci Agric Sin, 2001, 34(4): 429-432. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 刘桃菊, 唐建军, 张佩莲, 戚昌瀚. 水稻根系建成对高产形成的模拟模型与调控决策研究:Ⅰ.水稻根系形态建成参数与产量形成关系的初步研究. 江西农业大学学报, 1998, 20(3): 11-15. |
Liu T J, Tang J J, Zhang P L, Qi C H.A Study on the simulation model and the regulation of rice root growth affecting high yield formation I .A preliminary study on the relationship between the morphological character parameters of root and yield formation in rice.J Jiangxi Agric Univ, 1998, 20(3): 11-15. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 杨建昌, 徐国伟, 仇明, 张文虎, 王志琴, 朱庆森. 新株型水稻生育特性及产量形成特点的研究. 扬州大学学报:农业与生命科学版, 2002, 23(1): 45-50. |
Yang J C, Xu G W, Qiu M, Zhang W H, Wang Z Q, Zhu Q S.Growth and development characteristics and yield formation of new plant type rice.J Yangzhou Univ Agric & Life Sci Edition, 2002, 23(1): 45-50. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | Yang J C, Zhang H, Zhang J H.Root morphology and physiology in relation to the yield formation of rice.J Integr Agric, 2012, 11(6): 920-926. |
[25] | 张传胜, 王余龙, 龙银成, 董桂春, 杨连新, 黄建晔. 影响籼稻品种产量水平的主要根系性状. 作物学报, 2005, 31(2): 137-143. |
Zhang C S, WangY L, Long Y C, Dong G C, Yang L X,Huang J Y. Main root traits affecting yield level in conventional Indica rice cultivars (Oryza sativa L.).Acta Agron Sin, 2005, 31(2): 137-143. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 杨建昌, 王朋, 刘立军, 王志琴, 朱庆森. 中籼水稻品种产量与株型演进特征研究. 作物学报, 2006, 32(7): 949-955. |
Yang J C, Wang P, Liu L J, Wang Z Q, Zhu Q S.Evolution characteristics of grain yield and plant type for mid-season Indica rice cultivars.Acta Agron Sin, 2006, 32(7): 949-955. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | Cassman K G, Dobermann A, Walters D T.Agroecosystems, nitrogen-use efficiency, and nitrogen management.Ambio, 2002, 31(2): 132-140. |
[28] | de Dorlodot S, Forster B, Pages L, Price A H, Tuberosa R, Draye X. Root system architecture: opportunities and constraints for genetic improvement of crops.Trends Plant Sci, 2007, 12(10): 474-481. |
[29] | Walch-Liu P, Ivanov I, Filleur S Y, Gan Y, Remans T, Forde B G.Nitrogen regulation of root branching.Annals of Botany, 2006, 97(5): 875-881. |
[30] | Davies W J.Root growth response and functioning as an adaptation in water limiting soils//In Advances in Molecular Breeding Toward Drought and Salt Tolerant Crops. Springer Netherland, 2007: 55-72. |
[31] | 徐国伟, 吕强, 陆大克, 王贺正,陈明灿. 干湿交替灌溉耦合施氮对水稻根系性状及籽粒库活性的影响. 作物学报, 2016, 42(10): 1495-1505. |
Xu G W, Lv Q, Lu D K, Wang H Z,Chen M C.Effects of wetting and drying alternative irrigation coupling with nitrogen application on root characteristic and grain-sink activity.Acta Agron Sin, 2016, 42(10): 1495-1505. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | GUO Zhan, ZHANG Yunbo. Research Progress in Physiological,Biochemical Responses of Rice to Drought Stress and Its Molecular Regulation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[2] | WEI Huanhe, MA Weiyi, ZUO Boyuan, WANG Lulu, ZHU Wang, GENG Xiaoyu, ZHANG Xiang, MENG Tianyao, CHEN Yinglong, GAO Pinglei, XU Ke, HUO Zhongyang, DAI Qigen. Research Progress in the Effect of Salinity, Drought, and Their Combined Stresses on Rice Yield and Quality Formation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[3] | XU Danjie, LIN Qiaoxia, LI Zhengkang, ZHUANG Xiaoqian, LING Yu, LAI Meiling, CHEN Xiaoting, LU Guodong. OsOPR10 Positively Regulates Rice Blast and Bacterial Blight Resistance [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 364-374. |
[4] | CHEN Mingliang, ZENG Xihua, SHEN Yumin, LUO Shiyou, HU Lanxiang, XIONG Wentao, XIONG Huanjin, WU Xiaoyan, XIAO Yeqing. Typing of Inter-subspecific Fertility Loci and Fertility Locus Pattern of indica-japonica Hybrid Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 386-396. |
[5] | DING Zhengquan, PAN Yueyun, SHI Yang, HUANG Haixiang. Comprehensive Evaluation and Comparative Analysis of Jiahe Series Long-Grain japonica Rice with High Eating Quality Based on Gene Chip Technology [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 397-408. |
[6] | HOU Xiaoqin, WANG Ying, YU Bei, FU Weimeng, FENG Baohua, SHEN Yichao, XIE Hangjun, WANG Huanran, XU Yongqiang, WU Zhihai, WANG Jianjun, TAO Longxing, FU Guanfu. Mechanisms Behind the Role of Potassium Fulvic Acid in Enhancing Salt Tolerance in Rice Seedlings [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 409-421. |
[7] | LÜ Zhou, YI Binghuai, CHEN Pingping, ZHOU Wenxin, TANG Wenbang, YI Zhenxie. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Transplanting Density on Yield Formation of Small Seed Hybrid Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 422-436. |
[8] | HU Jijie, HU Zhihua, ZHANG Junhua, CAO Xiaochuang, JIN Qianyu, ZHANG Zhiyuan, ZHU Lianfeng. Effects of Rhizosphere Saturated Dissolved Oxygen on Photosynthetic and Growth Characteristics of Rice at Tillering Stage [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 437-446. |
[9] | WU Yue, LIANG Chengwei, ZHAO Chenfei, SUN Jian, MA Dianrong. Occurrence of Weedy Rice Disaster and Ecotype Evolution in Direct-Seeded Rice Fields [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 447-455. |
[10] | LIU Fuxiang, ZHEN Haoyang, PENG Huan, ZHENG Liuchun, PENG Deliang, WEN Yanhua. Investigation and Species Identification of Cyst Nematode Disease on Rice in Guangdong Province [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 456-461. |
[11] | CHEN Haotian, QIN Yuan, ZHONG Xiaohan, LIN Chenyu, QIN Jinghang, YANG Jianchang, ZHANG Weiyang. Research Progress on the Relationship Between Rice Root, Soil Properties and Methane Emissions in Paddy Fields [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 233-245. |
[12] | MIAO Jun, RAN Jinhui, XU Mengbin, BO Liubing, WANG Ping, LIANG Guohua, ZHOU Yong. Overexpression of RGG2, a Heterotrimeric G Protein γ Subunit-Encoding Gene, Improves Drought Tolerance in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 246-255. |
[13] | YIN Xiaoxiao, ZHANG Zhihan, YAN Xiulian, LIAO Rong, YANG Sijia, Beenish HASSAN, GUO Daiming, FAN Jing, ZHAO Zhixue, WANG Wenming. Signal Peptide Validation and Expression Analysis of Multiple Effectors from Ustilaginoidea virens [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 256-265. |
[14] | ZHU Yujing, GUI Jinxin, GONG Chengyun, LUO Xinyang, SHI Jubin, ZHANG Haiqing, HE Jiwai. QTL Mapping for Tiller Angle in Rice by Genome-wide Association Analysis [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 266-276. |
[15] | ZHAO Yiting, XIE Keran, GAO Ti, CUI Kehui. Effects of Drought Priming During Tillering Stage on Panicle Development and Yield Formation Under High Temperature During Panicle Initiation Stage in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 277-289. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||