中国水稻科学 ›› 2022, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 65-76.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2022.210315
收稿日期:
2021-03-29
修回日期:
2021-07-05
出版日期:
2022-01-10
发布日期:
2022-01-10
通讯作者:
彭少兵
基金资助:
YANG Chen, ZHENG Chang, YUAN Shen, XU Le, PENG Shaobing*()
Received:
2021-03-29
Revised:
2021-07-05
Online:
2022-01-10
Published:
2022-01-10
Contact:
PENG Shaobing
摘要:
【目的】探明肥料管理、品种及其互作对再生稻头季和再生季产量和品质的影响,为再生稻高产优质育种和栽培提供理论依据。【方法】采用大田试验的方法,以4个华中地区主推的再生稻品种为材料,设置4种肥料管理方法,分别测定水稻的产量和产量构成因素、稻米品质(加工品质和外观品质)、干物质生产及相关农艺性状等。【结果】相比推荐施肥对照(CK),全生育期施用再生稻专用缓释肥(SRF)使两季施肥的次数从5次减少到3次,而且产量在头季和再生季分别达8.86和6.39 t/hm 2,较CK仅降低了6.2%和9.1%。SRF在头季减产主要归因于较低的结实率,而在再生季减产是每穗颖花数和总颖花数共同下降的结果。促芽肥施与不施对再生季产量没有影响。再生稻两季的加工品质和外观品质主要受品种的影响,肥料处理及其与品种的互作影响很小。相比其他3个品种,甬优4949的头季和再生季产量最高,加工品质和外观品质最好。【结论】施用专用缓释肥和省施促芽肥均能够在不大幅损失稻谷产量的同时减少施肥次数促进再生稻轻简化栽培。
杨晨, 郑常, 袁珅, 徐乐, 彭少兵. 再生稻肥料管理对不同品种产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(1): 65-76.
YANG Chen, ZHENG Chang, YUAN Shen, XU Le, PENG Shaobing. Effect of Fertilizer Management on the Yield and Quality of Different Rice Varieties in Ratoon Rice[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(1): 65-76.
处理 Treatment | 肥料 Fertilizer | 头季Main crop | 再生季Ratoon crop | 总施肥量 Total fertilizer amount | 施肥次数 Application frequency | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基肥 Basal fertilizer | 分蘖肥 Topdressing for tillering | 穗肥 Topdressing for panicle initiation | 促芽肥 Bud-promoting fertilizer | 提苗肥 Seedling-promoting fertilizer | ||||
CK | N | 72 | 54 | 54 | 75 | 75 | 330 | 5 |
P2O5 | 92 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 92 | ||
K2O | 72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 72 | ||
ZnSO4•7H2O | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | ||
CK-Nbud | N | 72 | 54 | 54 | 0 | 75 | 255 | 4 |
P2O5 | 92 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 92 | ||
K2O | 72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 72 | ||
ZnSO4•7H2O | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | ||
CK-Nbud+K | N | 72 | 54 | 54 | 0 | 75 | 255 | 4 |
P2O5 | 92 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 92 | ||
K2O | 72 | 0 | 72 | 0 | 0 | 144 | ||
ZnSO4•7H2O | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | ||
SRF | N | 144 | 0 | 94 | 0 | 57 | 295 | 3 |
P2O5 | 36 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 11 | 66 | ||
K2O | 72 | 0 | 56 | 0 | 34 | 162 | ||
ZnSO4•7H2O | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 |
表1 再生稻不同肥料处理的肥料施用量和施用时间
Table 1 Rate and date of fertilizer application for different fertilizer treatments. kg/hm2
处理 Treatment | 肥料 Fertilizer | 头季Main crop | 再生季Ratoon crop | 总施肥量 Total fertilizer amount | 施肥次数 Application frequency | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
基肥 Basal fertilizer | 分蘖肥 Topdressing for tillering | 穗肥 Topdressing for panicle initiation | 促芽肥 Bud-promoting fertilizer | 提苗肥 Seedling-promoting fertilizer | ||||
CK | N | 72 | 54 | 54 | 75 | 75 | 330 | 5 |
P2O5 | 92 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 92 | ||
K2O | 72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 72 | ||
ZnSO4•7H2O | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | ||
CK-Nbud | N | 72 | 54 | 54 | 0 | 75 | 255 | 4 |
P2O5 | 92 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 92 | ||
K2O | 72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 72 | ||
ZnSO4•7H2O | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | ||
CK-Nbud+K | N | 72 | 54 | 54 | 0 | 75 | 255 | 4 |
P2O5 | 92 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 92 | ||
K2O | 72 | 0 | 72 | 0 | 0 | 144 | ||
ZnSO4•7H2O | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 | ||
SRF | N | 144 | 0 | 94 | 0 | 57 | 295 | 3 |
P2O5 | 36 | 0 | 19 | 0 | 11 | 66 | ||
K2O | 72 | 0 | 56 | 0 | 34 | 162 | ||
ZnSO4•7H2O | 23 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23 |
图1 2019年再生稻头季移栽到再生季收割期间日均气温、太阳日照辐射量和日降雨量 图中虚线表示再生稻头季收割期。
Fig. 1. Temperature, daily solar radiation, and daily rainfall during rice growing seasons of the main and ratoon crops at Qichun County, Hubei Province in 2019. The dotted line shows the harvest date of main crop in ratoon rice.
品种 Variety | 头季Main crop | 再生季Ratoon crop | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
播种-移栽 SW-TP | 移栽-幼穗分化 TP-PI | 幼穗分化-齐穗 PI-HD | 齐穗-成熟 HD-MH | 全生育期 Total | 头季收获-齐穗 MH-HD | 齐穗-成熟 HD-RH | 全生育期 Total | |
HHZ | 35 | 44 | 34 | 25 | 138 | 26 | 34 | 60 |
YY4949 | 35 | 41 | 34 | 28 | 138 | 37 | 39 | 76 |
FLYX1 | 35 | 41 | 30 | 30 | 136 | 33 | 39 | 72 |
LY6326 | 35 | 41 | 30 | 30 | 136 | 33 | 39 | 72 |
表2 再生稻四个品种在头季和再生季以及全生长季节内的生育期
Table 2 Growth duration in the main crop and the ratoon crop and the whole season of four varieties. d
品种 Variety | 头季Main crop | 再生季Ratoon crop | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
播种-移栽 SW-TP | 移栽-幼穗分化 TP-PI | 幼穗分化-齐穗 PI-HD | 齐穗-成熟 HD-MH | 全生育期 Total | 头季收获-齐穗 MH-HD | 齐穗-成熟 HD-RH | 全生育期 Total | |
HHZ | 35 | 44 | 34 | 25 | 138 | 26 | 34 | 60 |
YY4949 | 35 | 41 | 34 | 28 | 138 | 37 | 39 | 76 |
FLYX1 | 35 | 41 | 30 | 30 | 136 | 33 | 39 | 72 |
LY6326 | 35 | 41 | 30 | 30 | 136 | 33 | 39 | 72 |
肥料处理 Fertilizer treatment | 品种 Variety | 产量 Yield /(t·hm-2) | 有效穗数 Panicle number per square meter | 每穗颖花数 Spikelet number per panicle | 总颖花数 Spikelets /(×103·m-2) | 结实率 Seed setting rate /% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/mg | 籽粒饱满度 Grain plumpness /% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | HHZ | 10.09 a | 343.2 a | 157.4 b | 53.9 a | 84.7 ab | 20.5 b | 82.1 ab |
YY4949 | 9.66 ab | 236.5 c | 224.2 a | 53.1 a | 87.9 a | 19.7 c | 82.6 a | |
FLYX1 | 8.99 b | 274.0 b | 155.9 b | 42.4 b | 81.2 b | 23.8 a | 80.9 b | |
LY6326 | 9.04 b | 287.0 b | 161.4 b | 46.3 b | 74.3 c | 23.6 a | 80.9 b | |
平均Mean | 9.44 AB | 285.2 AB | 174.7 A | 48.9 A | 82.0 A | 21.9 A | 82.1 A | |
CK-Nbud | HHZ | 9.92 a | 306.8 a | 160.4 b | 49.1 b | 84.1 ab | 20.6 c | 81.9 ab |
YY4949 | 9.87 a | 249.5 b | 223.8 a | 55.8 a | 89.1 a | 19.7 d | 83.1 a | |
FLYX1 | 8.67 b | 281.8 ab | 162.5 b | 45.5 b | 76.5 c | 23.2 b | 80.8 b | |
LY6326 | 9.22 ab | 282.8 ab | 160.7 b | 45.4 b | 78.5 bc | 24.0 a | 80.3 b | |
平均Mean | 9.42 AB | 280.2 B | 176.9 A | 48.9 A | 82.1 A | 21.9 A | 81.5 A | |
CK-Nbud+K | HHZ | 10.07 a | 335.9 a | 151.8 b | 50.7 a | 85.0 a | 20.9 c | 82.2 ab |
YY4949 | 9.97 a | 256.8 c | 216.3 a | 55.5 a | 87.0 a | 19.8 d | 83.0 a | |
FLYX1 | 9.32 a | 280.2 b | 158.2 b | 44.3 b | 73.2 c | 23.4 b | 80.8 ab | |
LY6326 | 9.32 a | 285.4 b | 153.4 b | 43.7 b | 80.0 b | 24.5 a | 80.1 b | |
平均Mean | 9.67 A | 289.6 AB | 169.9 A | 48.6 A | 81.3 A | 22.1 A | 81.5 A | |
SRF | HHZ | 9.24 ab | 376.0 a | 141.2 b | 53.1 ab | 81.2 a | 20.7 b | 82.8 a |
YY4949 | 9.55 a | 275.5 b | 214.8 a | 59.0 a | 80.6 a | 19.4 c | 82.5 a | |
FLYX1 | 8.41 b | 301.0 b | 157.5 b | 47.4 bc | 70.1 b | 23.2 a | 81.6 ab | |
LY6326 | 8.24 b | 284.9 b | 153.3 b | 43.6 c | 67.4 b | 23.9 a | 79.4 b | |
平均Mean | 8.86 B | 309.4 A | 166.7 A | 50.8 A | 74.8 B | 21.8 A | 81.6 A | |
ANOVA | ||||||||
肥料Fertilizer (F) | ns | * | ns | ns | ** | ns | ns | |
品种Variety (V) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ns | |
F×V | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
表3 2019年四个品种头季产量及其构成因素
Table 3 Grain yield and its components of four varieties in main crop in 2019.
肥料处理 Fertilizer treatment | 品种 Variety | 产量 Yield /(t·hm-2) | 有效穗数 Panicle number per square meter | 每穗颖花数 Spikelet number per panicle | 总颖花数 Spikelets /(×103·m-2) | 结实率 Seed setting rate /% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/mg | 籽粒饱满度 Grain plumpness /% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | HHZ | 10.09 a | 343.2 a | 157.4 b | 53.9 a | 84.7 ab | 20.5 b | 82.1 ab |
YY4949 | 9.66 ab | 236.5 c | 224.2 a | 53.1 a | 87.9 a | 19.7 c | 82.6 a | |
FLYX1 | 8.99 b | 274.0 b | 155.9 b | 42.4 b | 81.2 b | 23.8 a | 80.9 b | |
LY6326 | 9.04 b | 287.0 b | 161.4 b | 46.3 b | 74.3 c | 23.6 a | 80.9 b | |
平均Mean | 9.44 AB | 285.2 AB | 174.7 A | 48.9 A | 82.0 A | 21.9 A | 82.1 A | |
CK-Nbud | HHZ | 9.92 a | 306.8 a | 160.4 b | 49.1 b | 84.1 ab | 20.6 c | 81.9 ab |
YY4949 | 9.87 a | 249.5 b | 223.8 a | 55.8 a | 89.1 a | 19.7 d | 83.1 a | |
FLYX1 | 8.67 b | 281.8 ab | 162.5 b | 45.5 b | 76.5 c | 23.2 b | 80.8 b | |
LY6326 | 9.22 ab | 282.8 ab | 160.7 b | 45.4 b | 78.5 bc | 24.0 a | 80.3 b | |
平均Mean | 9.42 AB | 280.2 B | 176.9 A | 48.9 A | 82.1 A | 21.9 A | 81.5 A | |
CK-Nbud+K | HHZ | 10.07 a | 335.9 a | 151.8 b | 50.7 a | 85.0 a | 20.9 c | 82.2 ab |
YY4949 | 9.97 a | 256.8 c | 216.3 a | 55.5 a | 87.0 a | 19.8 d | 83.0 a | |
FLYX1 | 9.32 a | 280.2 b | 158.2 b | 44.3 b | 73.2 c | 23.4 b | 80.8 ab | |
LY6326 | 9.32 a | 285.4 b | 153.4 b | 43.7 b | 80.0 b | 24.5 a | 80.1 b | |
平均Mean | 9.67 A | 289.6 AB | 169.9 A | 48.6 A | 81.3 A | 22.1 A | 81.5 A | |
SRF | HHZ | 9.24 ab | 376.0 a | 141.2 b | 53.1 ab | 81.2 a | 20.7 b | 82.8 a |
YY4949 | 9.55 a | 275.5 b | 214.8 a | 59.0 a | 80.6 a | 19.4 c | 82.5 a | |
FLYX1 | 8.41 b | 301.0 b | 157.5 b | 47.4 bc | 70.1 b | 23.2 a | 81.6 ab | |
LY6326 | 8.24 b | 284.9 b | 153.3 b | 43.6 c | 67.4 b | 23.9 a | 79.4 b | |
平均Mean | 8.86 B | 309.4 A | 166.7 A | 50.8 A | 74.8 B | 21.8 A | 81.6 A | |
ANOVA | ||||||||
肥料Fertilizer (F) | ns | * | ns | ns | ** | ns | ns | |
品种Variety (V) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ns | |
F×V | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
肥料处理 Fertilizer treatment | 品种 Variety | 产量 Yield /(t·hm-2) | 有效穗数 Panicle number per square meter | 每穗颖花数 Spikelet number per panicle | 总颖花数 Spikelets /(×103·m-2) | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/mg | 籽粒饱满度 Grain plumpness /% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | HHZ | 5.66 b | 535.9 a | 69.7 c | 37.4 a | 77.0 b | 17.9 c | 81.8 a |
YY4949 | 7.84 a | 352.6 c | 114.6 a | 40.4 a | 89.5 a | 20.4 b | 79.5 a | |
FLYX1 | 7.25 a | 478.1 ab | 72.0 bc | 34.3 a | 87.9 a | 23.8 a | 78.1 a | |
LY6326 | 7.38 a | 430.2 b | 83.1 b | 35.8 a | 86.8 a | 24.1 a | 79.2 a | |
平均Mean | 7.03 A | 449.22 A | 84.9 A | 37.0 A | 85.5 A | 21.6 A | 77.4 A | |
CK-Nbud | HHZ | 5.60 b | 506.3 a | 60.9 b | 30.5 b | 84.2 ab | 18.0 c | 86.1 a |
YY4949 | 7.69 a | 352.6 c | 108.3 a | 38.4 a | 89.1 a | 20.7 bc | 79.3 b | |
FLYX1 | 6.69 ab | 452.6 ab | 70.8 b | 32.0 ab | 82.8 b | 22.0 ab | 77.9 b | |
LY6326 | 6.84 a | 424.5 b | 75.6 b | 32.1 ab | 84.2 ab | 24.4 a | 78.4 b | |
平均Mean | 6.70 AB | 433.98 A | 78.9 A | 33.2 A | 85.1 A | 21.3 A | 80.6 A | |
CK-Nbud+K | HHZ | 5.67 b | 504.7 a | 71.0 b | 35.4 a | 83.5 a | 18.3 d | 86.0 a |
YY4949 | 7.16 a | 395.3 bc | 92.7 a | 36.5 a | 88.7 a | 20.8 c | 79.0 b | |
FLYX1 | 7.16 a | 465.6 ab | 76.6 b | 35.8 a | 84.6 a | 23.9 b | 78.1 b | |
LY6326 | 6.83 a | 394.8 c | 78.9 ab | 31.2 a | 84.5 a | 24.6 a | 78.1 b | |
平均Mean | 6.70 AB | 440.10 A | 79.8 A | 34.7 A | 85.3 A | 21.9 A | 79.7 A | |
SRF | HHZ | 5.29 b | 522.4 a | 64.8 c | 33.8 a | 81.7 b | 18.2 c | 85.0 a |
YY4949 | 7.07 a | 360.9 c | 98.1 a | 35.3 a | 89.4 a | 21.1 b | 79.6 a | |
FLYX1 | 6.73 a | 453.1 b | 75.9 b | 34.4 a | 88.9 a | 24.3 a | 79.7 a | |
LY6326 | 6.46 a | 427.6 b | 73.6 bc | 31.5 a | 82.6 b | 25.0 a | 79.5 a | |
平均Mean | 6.39 B | 441.02 A | 78.1 A | 33.7 A | 85.6 A | 22.2 A | 80.9 A | |
ANOVA | ||||||||
肥料Fertilizer (F) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
品种Variety (V) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ns | |
F×V | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
表4 2019年四个品种再生季产量和产量构成因素
Table 4 Grain yield and its components of four varieties in the ratoon crop in 2019.
肥料处理 Fertilizer treatment | 品种 Variety | 产量 Yield /(t·hm-2) | 有效穗数 Panicle number per square meter | 每穗颖花数 Spikelet number per panicle | 总颖花数 Spikelets /(×103·m-2) | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/mg | 籽粒饱满度 Grain plumpness /% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | HHZ | 5.66 b | 535.9 a | 69.7 c | 37.4 a | 77.0 b | 17.9 c | 81.8 a |
YY4949 | 7.84 a | 352.6 c | 114.6 a | 40.4 a | 89.5 a | 20.4 b | 79.5 a | |
FLYX1 | 7.25 a | 478.1 ab | 72.0 bc | 34.3 a | 87.9 a | 23.8 a | 78.1 a | |
LY6326 | 7.38 a | 430.2 b | 83.1 b | 35.8 a | 86.8 a | 24.1 a | 79.2 a | |
平均Mean | 7.03 A | 449.22 A | 84.9 A | 37.0 A | 85.5 A | 21.6 A | 77.4 A | |
CK-Nbud | HHZ | 5.60 b | 506.3 a | 60.9 b | 30.5 b | 84.2 ab | 18.0 c | 86.1 a |
YY4949 | 7.69 a | 352.6 c | 108.3 a | 38.4 a | 89.1 a | 20.7 bc | 79.3 b | |
FLYX1 | 6.69 ab | 452.6 ab | 70.8 b | 32.0 ab | 82.8 b | 22.0 ab | 77.9 b | |
LY6326 | 6.84 a | 424.5 b | 75.6 b | 32.1 ab | 84.2 ab | 24.4 a | 78.4 b | |
平均Mean | 6.70 AB | 433.98 A | 78.9 A | 33.2 A | 85.1 A | 21.3 A | 80.6 A | |
CK-Nbud+K | HHZ | 5.67 b | 504.7 a | 71.0 b | 35.4 a | 83.5 a | 18.3 d | 86.0 a |
YY4949 | 7.16 a | 395.3 bc | 92.7 a | 36.5 a | 88.7 a | 20.8 c | 79.0 b | |
FLYX1 | 7.16 a | 465.6 ab | 76.6 b | 35.8 a | 84.6 a | 23.9 b | 78.1 b | |
LY6326 | 6.83 a | 394.8 c | 78.9 ab | 31.2 a | 84.5 a | 24.6 a | 78.1 b | |
平均Mean | 6.70 AB | 440.10 A | 79.8 A | 34.7 A | 85.3 A | 21.9 A | 79.7 A | |
SRF | HHZ | 5.29 b | 522.4 a | 64.8 c | 33.8 a | 81.7 b | 18.2 c | 85.0 a |
YY4949 | 7.07 a | 360.9 c | 98.1 a | 35.3 a | 89.4 a | 21.1 b | 79.6 a | |
FLYX1 | 6.73 a | 453.1 b | 75.9 b | 34.4 a | 88.9 a | 24.3 a | 79.7 a | |
LY6326 | 6.46 a | 427.6 b | 73.6 bc | 31.5 a | 82.6 b | 25.0 a | 79.5 a | |
平均Mean | 6.39 B | 441.02 A | 78.1 A | 33.7 A | 85.6 A | 22.2 A | 80.9 A | |
ANOVA | ||||||||
肥料Fertilizer (F) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
品种Variety (V) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ns | |
F×V | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
肥料处理 Fertilizer treatment | 品种 Variety | 头季Main season | 再生季Ratoon season | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地上部总干物质量 TDW/(t·hm-2) | 收获指数 HI | 稻桩干质量 DWstubble /(t·hm-2) | 地上部总干物 质量 TDW/(t·hm-2) | 再生季 干物质量 DMratoon/(t·hm-2) | 收获指数 HI | 再生季收 获指数 RHI | ||
CK | HHZ | 18.72 a | 0.50 a | 5.22 a | 12.85 b | 7.64 c | 0.40 b | 0.67 a |
YY4949 | 18.18 a | 0.50 a | 4.30 b | 16.41 a | 12.10 a | 0.45 a | 0.61 b | |
FLYX1 | 18.88 a | 0.45 ab | 5.36 a | 15.44 a | 10.08 b | 0.47 a | 0.72 a | |
LY6326 | 18.34 a | 0.43 b | 5.58 a | 16.22 a | 10.64 ab | 0.46 a | 0.70 a | |
平均Mean | 18.53 A | 0.47 B | 5.11 A | 15.23 A | 10.12 A | 0.44 A | 0.68 A | |
CK-Nbud | HHZ | 15.44 b | 0.55 a | 2.99 b | 11.89 b | 8.90 b | 0.39 b | 0.52 b |
YY4949 | 18.40 a | 0.53 ab | 3.83 a | 15.49 a | 11.66 a | 0.45 a | 0.61 a | |
FLYX1 | 16.94 ab | 0.48 c | 3.81 a | 14.62 a | 10.81 a | 0.43 ab | 0.58 a | |
LY6326 | 17.07 ab | 0.50 bc | 3.63 a | 14.52 a | 10.88 a | 0.45 a | 0.61 a | |
平均Mean | 16.96 B | 0.52 A | 3.57 C | 14.13 A | 10.56 A | 0.43 A | 0.58 B | |
CK-Nbud+K | HHZ | 16.44 b | 0.55 a | 3.25 b | 12.81 b | 9.56 b | 0.42 b | 0.57 c |
YY4949 | 19.29 a | 0.50 bc | 4.36 a | 15.29 a | 10.93 ab | 0.44 b | 0.62 ab | |
FLYX1 | 16.78 b | 0.45 c | 3.93 ab | 15.06 a | 11.13 ab | 0.48 a | 0.65 a | |
LY6326 | 16.34 b | 0.52 ab | 3.30 b | 14.67 a | 11.37 a | 0.44 b | 0.57 bc | |
平均Mean | 17.21 B | 0.51 A | 3.71 BC | 14.46 A | 10.75 A | 0.45 A | 0.60 B | |
SRF | HHZ | 18.24 ab | 0.49 a | 4.08 a | 12.66 c | 8.58 b | 0.40 b | 0.59 a |
YY4949 | 19.04 a | 0.48 a | 4.24 a | 14.90 ab | 10.66 ab | 0.45 a | 0.63 a | |
FLYX1 | 16.62 ab | 0.46 a | 3.65 a | 16.24 a | 12.60 a | 0.46 a | 0.59 a | |
LY6326 | 16.29 b | 0.43 a | 3.87 a | 14.67 b | 10.81 a | 0.44 a | 0.61 a | |
平均Mean | 17.55 B | 0.47 B | 3.96 B | 14.62 A | 10.66 A | 0.44 A | 0.60 B | |
ANOVA | ||||||||
肥料Fertilizer (F) | * | * | ** | ns | ns | ns | ** | |
品种Variety (V) | ** | ** | ns | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
F×V | ns | ns | ** | ns | ns | ns | ** |
表5 2019年四个品种头季和再生季地上部总干质量和收获指数,头季收获后稻桩干质量、再生季当季的干物质积累量和收获指数
Table 5 Total dry weight(TDW) and harvest index(HZ) in the main and ratoon crops, dry weight of stubble after harvesting of main crop(DWstubble), dry matter production and harvest index during the ratoon season (DMratoon and RHI)of four varieties in 2019.
肥料处理 Fertilizer treatment | 品种 Variety | 头季Main season | 再生季Ratoon season | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地上部总干物质量 TDW/(t·hm-2) | 收获指数 HI | 稻桩干质量 DWstubble /(t·hm-2) | 地上部总干物 质量 TDW/(t·hm-2) | 再生季 干物质量 DMratoon/(t·hm-2) | 收获指数 HI | 再生季收 获指数 RHI | ||
CK | HHZ | 18.72 a | 0.50 a | 5.22 a | 12.85 b | 7.64 c | 0.40 b | 0.67 a |
YY4949 | 18.18 a | 0.50 a | 4.30 b | 16.41 a | 12.10 a | 0.45 a | 0.61 b | |
FLYX1 | 18.88 a | 0.45 ab | 5.36 a | 15.44 a | 10.08 b | 0.47 a | 0.72 a | |
LY6326 | 18.34 a | 0.43 b | 5.58 a | 16.22 a | 10.64 ab | 0.46 a | 0.70 a | |
平均Mean | 18.53 A | 0.47 B | 5.11 A | 15.23 A | 10.12 A | 0.44 A | 0.68 A | |
CK-Nbud | HHZ | 15.44 b | 0.55 a | 2.99 b | 11.89 b | 8.90 b | 0.39 b | 0.52 b |
YY4949 | 18.40 a | 0.53 ab | 3.83 a | 15.49 a | 11.66 a | 0.45 a | 0.61 a | |
FLYX1 | 16.94 ab | 0.48 c | 3.81 a | 14.62 a | 10.81 a | 0.43 ab | 0.58 a | |
LY6326 | 17.07 ab | 0.50 bc | 3.63 a | 14.52 a | 10.88 a | 0.45 a | 0.61 a | |
平均Mean | 16.96 B | 0.52 A | 3.57 C | 14.13 A | 10.56 A | 0.43 A | 0.58 B | |
CK-Nbud+K | HHZ | 16.44 b | 0.55 a | 3.25 b | 12.81 b | 9.56 b | 0.42 b | 0.57 c |
YY4949 | 19.29 a | 0.50 bc | 4.36 a | 15.29 a | 10.93 ab | 0.44 b | 0.62 ab | |
FLYX1 | 16.78 b | 0.45 c | 3.93 ab | 15.06 a | 11.13 ab | 0.48 a | 0.65 a | |
LY6326 | 16.34 b | 0.52 ab | 3.30 b | 14.67 a | 11.37 a | 0.44 b | 0.57 bc | |
平均Mean | 17.21 B | 0.51 A | 3.71 BC | 14.46 A | 10.75 A | 0.45 A | 0.60 B | |
SRF | HHZ | 18.24 ab | 0.49 a | 4.08 a | 12.66 c | 8.58 b | 0.40 b | 0.59 a |
YY4949 | 19.04 a | 0.48 a | 4.24 a | 14.90 ab | 10.66 ab | 0.45 a | 0.63 a | |
FLYX1 | 16.62 ab | 0.46 a | 3.65 a | 16.24 a | 12.60 a | 0.46 a | 0.59 a | |
LY6326 | 16.29 b | 0.43 a | 3.87 a | 14.67 b | 10.81 a | 0.44 a | 0.61 a | |
平均Mean | 17.55 B | 0.47 B | 3.96 B | 14.62 A | 10.66 A | 0.44 A | 0.60 B | |
ANOVA | ||||||||
肥料Fertilizer (F) | * | * | ** | ns | ns | ns | ** | |
品种Variety (V) | ** | ** | ns | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
F×V | ns | ns | ** | ns | ns | ns | ** |
肥料处理 Fertilizer treatment | 品种 Variety | 糙米率 Brown rice rate/% | 精米率 Milled rice rate/% | 整精米率 Head rice rate/% | 整精米产量 Head rice yield/(t·hm-2) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
头季 Main | 再生季 Ratoon | 头季 Main | 再生季 Ratoon | 头季 Main | 再生季 Ratoon | 头季 Main | 再生季 Ratoon | ||
CK | HHZ | 80.1 a | 79.7 c | 67.9 a | 69.5 b | 52.0 a | 66.7 ab | 5.25 a | 3.77 c |
YY4949 | 80.1 a | 80.2 b | 69.0 a | 72.3 a | 57.8 a | 69.5 a | 5.59 a | 5.44 a | |
FLYX1 | 79.8 a | 80.3 ab | 67.4 a | 70.7 ab | 36.4 b | 65.5 b | 3.27 b | 4.73 b | |
LY6326 | 80.2 a | 80.6 a | 62.7 a | 70.9 ab | 40.9 b | 65.3 b | 3.69 b | 4.83 b | |
平均Mean | 80.0 A | 80.3 A | 66.7 A | 70.9 A | 46.7 B | 66.8 A | 4.45 A | 4.69 A | |
CK-Nbud | HHZ | 80.3 a | 79.5 a | 72.3 a | 70.5 ab | 54.2 a | 67.8 b | 5.37 a | 3.80 c |
YY4949 | 79.5 b | 80.8 a | 68.5 a | 71.9 a | 58.7 a | 70.3 a | 5.80 a | 5.41 a | |
FLYX1 | 80.4 a | 80.0 a | 65.5 a | 70.5 ab | 40.6 b | 65.7 b | 3.52 b | 4.57 b | |
LY6326 | 80.7 a | 79.1 a | 64.5 a | 69.4 b | 39.6 b | 63.0 c | 3.67 b | 4.31 bc | |
平均Mean | 80.2 A | 79.9 A | 67.7 A | 70.6 A | 48.3 AB | 66.7 A | 4.59 A | 4.52 AB | |
CK-Nbud+K | HHZ | 80.2 a | 79.3 a | 67.7 ab | 70.2 a | 55.8 b | 67.3 b | 5.61 a | 3.81 b |
YY4949 | 80.4 a | 80.4 a | 69.8 a | 71.3 a | 61.0 a | 69.7 a | 6.07 a | 4.99 a | |
FLYX1 | 80.2 a | 79.2 a | 69.0 ab | 69.7 a | 36.0 c | 65.2 bc | 3.35 b | 4.58 a | |
LY6326 | 81.1 a | 79.8 a | 63.5 b | 69.7 a | 37.8 c | 64.3 c | 3.54 b | 4.39 ab | |
平均Mean | 80.5 A | 79.7 A | 67.5 A | 70.2 A | 47.6 AB | 66.6 A | 4.64 A | 4.44 AB | |
SRF | HHZ | 80.6 a | 79.8 a | 68.8 a | 70.7 a | 59.9 a | 68.2 a | 5.52 a | 3.61 c |
YY4949 | 80.4 a | 80.9 a | 69.6 a | 71.1 a | 61.9 a | 69.5 a | 5.91 a | 4.91 a | |
FLYX1 | 80.3 a | 79.9 a | 63.8 b | 70.3 a | 40.6 b | 63.3 b | 3.41 b | 4.36 ab | |
LY6326 | 80.5 a | 79.6 a | 62.7 b | 70.0 a | 37.5 b | 63.2 b | 3.09 b | 4.07 bc | |
平均Mean | 80.5 A | 80.0 A | 66.2 A | 70.5 A | 50.0 A | 66.1 A | 4.48 A | 4.24 B | |
ANOVA | |||||||||
肥料Fertilizer (F) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
品种Variety (V) | ns | * | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
F×V | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
表6 2019年四个品种头季和再生季稻米的加工品质的影响
Table 6 Processing quality of four varieties in the main and ratoon crops in 2019.
肥料处理 Fertilizer treatment | 品种 Variety | 糙米率 Brown rice rate/% | 精米率 Milled rice rate/% | 整精米率 Head rice rate/% | 整精米产量 Head rice yield/(t·hm-2) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
头季 Main | 再生季 Ratoon | 头季 Main | 再生季 Ratoon | 头季 Main | 再生季 Ratoon | 头季 Main | 再生季 Ratoon | ||
CK | HHZ | 80.1 a | 79.7 c | 67.9 a | 69.5 b | 52.0 a | 66.7 ab | 5.25 a | 3.77 c |
YY4949 | 80.1 a | 80.2 b | 69.0 a | 72.3 a | 57.8 a | 69.5 a | 5.59 a | 5.44 a | |
FLYX1 | 79.8 a | 80.3 ab | 67.4 a | 70.7 ab | 36.4 b | 65.5 b | 3.27 b | 4.73 b | |
LY6326 | 80.2 a | 80.6 a | 62.7 a | 70.9 ab | 40.9 b | 65.3 b | 3.69 b | 4.83 b | |
平均Mean | 80.0 A | 80.3 A | 66.7 A | 70.9 A | 46.7 B | 66.8 A | 4.45 A | 4.69 A | |
CK-Nbud | HHZ | 80.3 a | 79.5 a | 72.3 a | 70.5 ab | 54.2 a | 67.8 b | 5.37 a | 3.80 c |
YY4949 | 79.5 b | 80.8 a | 68.5 a | 71.9 a | 58.7 a | 70.3 a | 5.80 a | 5.41 a | |
FLYX1 | 80.4 a | 80.0 a | 65.5 a | 70.5 ab | 40.6 b | 65.7 b | 3.52 b | 4.57 b | |
LY6326 | 80.7 a | 79.1 a | 64.5 a | 69.4 b | 39.6 b | 63.0 c | 3.67 b | 4.31 bc | |
平均Mean | 80.2 A | 79.9 A | 67.7 A | 70.6 A | 48.3 AB | 66.7 A | 4.59 A | 4.52 AB | |
CK-Nbud+K | HHZ | 80.2 a | 79.3 a | 67.7 ab | 70.2 a | 55.8 b | 67.3 b | 5.61 a | 3.81 b |
YY4949 | 80.4 a | 80.4 a | 69.8 a | 71.3 a | 61.0 a | 69.7 a | 6.07 a | 4.99 a | |
FLYX1 | 80.2 a | 79.2 a | 69.0 ab | 69.7 a | 36.0 c | 65.2 bc | 3.35 b | 4.58 a | |
LY6326 | 81.1 a | 79.8 a | 63.5 b | 69.7 a | 37.8 c | 64.3 c | 3.54 b | 4.39 ab | |
平均Mean | 80.5 A | 79.7 A | 67.5 A | 70.2 A | 47.6 AB | 66.6 A | 4.64 A | 4.44 AB | |
SRF | HHZ | 80.6 a | 79.8 a | 68.8 a | 70.7 a | 59.9 a | 68.2 a | 5.52 a | 3.61 c |
YY4949 | 80.4 a | 80.9 a | 69.6 a | 71.1 a | 61.9 a | 69.5 a | 5.91 a | 4.91 a | |
FLYX1 | 80.3 a | 79.9 a | 63.8 b | 70.3 a | 40.6 b | 63.3 b | 3.41 b | 4.36 ab | |
LY6326 | 80.5 a | 79.6 a | 62.7 b | 70.0 a | 37.5 b | 63.2 b | 3.09 b | 4.07 bc | |
平均Mean | 80.5 A | 80.0 A | 66.2 A | 70.5 A | 50.0 A | 66.1 A | 4.48 A | 4.24 B | |
ANOVA | |||||||||
肥料Fertilizer (F) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
品种Variety (V) | ns | * | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
F×V | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
肥料管理 Fertilizer treatment | 品种 Variety | 粒长 Grain length/mm | 粒宽 Grain width/mm | 长宽比 Length/width ratio | 垩白粒率 Chalky rice rate/% | 垩白度 Chalkiness/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
头季 Main | 再生季 Ratoon | 头季 Main | 再生季 Ratoon | 头季 Main | 再生季 Ratoon | 头季 Main | 再生季 Ratoon | 头季 Main | 再生季 Ratoon | ||
CK | HHZ | 6.15 a | 6.04 a | 1.96 d | 2.13 a | 3.15 a | 2.89 a | 16.31 a | 7.57 a | 6.53 a | 1.82 a |
YY4949 | 4.84 b | 5.84 a | 2.40 a | 2.26 a | 2.02 c | 2.63 a | 19.68 a | 8.89 a | 7.71 a | 2.07 a | |
FLYX1 | 5.79 a | 6.25 a | 2.17 b | 2.18 a | 2.68 b | 2.89 a | 21.26 a | 10.32 a | 8.87 a | 2.27 a | |
LY6326 | 5.79 a | 6.08 a | 2.12 c | 2.19 a | 2.75 b | 2.81 a | 21.18 a | 7.91 a | 8.92 a | 1.81 a | |
平均Mean | 5.64 A | 6.05 A | 2.16 A | 2.19 A | 2.65 A | 2.80 A | 19.61 A | 8.67 A | 8.01 A | 1.99 B | |
CK-Nbud | HHZ | 6.08 a | 6.07 a | 1.98 c | 2.00 b | 3.09 a | 3.07 a | 18.53 a | 7.14 a | 7.51 a | 1.70 a |
YY4949 | 4.82 b | 6.10 a | 2.39 a | 2.52 a | 2.02 c | 2.50 b | 19.65 a | 7.82 a | 7.21 a | 1.97 a | |
FLYX1 | 5.66 a | 6.20 a | 2.15 b | 2.17 ab | 2.64 b | 2.89 ab | 19.31 a | 9.02 a | 8.21 a | 2.08 a | |
LY6326 | 6.02 a | 6.38 a | 2.14 b | 2.17 ab | 2.82 b | 2.95 ab | 23.71 a | 10.25 a | 10.13 a | 2.52 a | |
平均Mean | 5.64 A | 6.19 A | 2.16 A | 2.21 A | 2.64 A | 2.85 A | 20.30 A | 8.56 A | 8.27 A | 2.07 AB | |
CK-Nbud+K | HHZ | 6.14 a | 6.00 a | 1.96 c | 2.15 a | 3.14 a | 2.83 a | 16.56 bc | 9.91 a | 6.39 c | 2.64 a |
YY4949 | 4.84 b | 5.82 a | 2.40 a | 2.27 a | 2.02 c | 2.61 a | 14.97 c | 8.41 a | 5.46 c | 2.25 a | |
FLYX1 | 5.98 a | 6.13 a | 2.18 b | 2.23 a | 2.76 b | 2.77 a | 20.38 b | 10.84 a | 8.59 b | 2.57 a | |
LY6326 | 5.75 a | 6.13 a | 2.15 b | 2.07 a | 2.69 b | 3.00 a | 24.92 a | 8.58 a | 11.20 a | 2.11 a | |
平均Mean | 5.68 A | 6.02 A | 2.17 A | 2.18 A | 2.65 A | 2.80 A | 19.20 A | 9.44 A | 7.91 A | 2.40 A | |
SRF | HHZ | 6.13 a | 6.10 a | 1.93 c | 2.03 a | 3.18 a | 3.04 a | 11.49 c | 8.59 a | 4.28 c | 2.03 a |
YY4949 | 4.85 c | 6.06 a | 2.41 a | 2.16 a | 2.01 d | 2.84 a | 15.23 bc | 8.38 a | 5.66 bc | 1.96 a | |
FLYX1 | 5.64 b | 6.15 a | 2.16 b | 2.09 a | 2.62 c | 2.99 a | 18.89 b | 9.50 a | 7.88 b | 2.38 a | |
LY6326 | 6.00 a | 6.12 a | 2.15 b | 2.20 a | 2.79 b | 2.82 a | 25.91 a | 9.76 a | 10.95 a | 2.39 a | |
平均Mean | 5.65 A | 6.11 A | 2.16 A | 2.12 A | 2.65 A | 2.92 A | 17.88 A | 9.06 A | 7.19 A | 2.19 AB | |
ANOVA | |||||||||||
肥料Fertilizer (F) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
品种Variety (V) | ** | ns | ** | ** | ** | * | ** | ns | ** | ns | |
F×V | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
表7 2019年四个品种头季和再生季稻米的外观品质的影响
Table 7 Appearance quality of four varieties in the main and ratoon seasons.
肥料管理 Fertilizer treatment | 品种 Variety | 粒长 Grain length/mm | 粒宽 Grain width/mm | 长宽比 Length/width ratio | 垩白粒率 Chalky rice rate/% | 垩白度 Chalkiness/% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
头季 Main | 再生季 Ratoon | 头季 Main | 再生季 Ratoon | 头季 Main | 再生季 Ratoon | 头季 Main | 再生季 Ratoon | 头季 Main | 再生季 Ratoon | ||
CK | HHZ | 6.15 a | 6.04 a | 1.96 d | 2.13 a | 3.15 a | 2.89 a | 16.31 a | 7.57 a | 6.53 a | 1.82 a |
YY4949 | 4.84 b | 5.84 a | 2.40 a | 2.26 a | 2.02 c | 2.63 a | 19.68 a | 8.89 a | 7.71 a | 2.07 a | |
FLYX1 | 5.79 a | 6.25 a | 2.17 b | 2.18 a | 2.68 b | 2.89 a | 21.26 a | 10.32 a | 8.87 a | 2.27 a | |
LY6326 | 5.79 a | 6.08 a | 2.12 c | 2.19 a | 2.75 b | 2.81 a | 21.18 a | 7.91 a | 8.92 a | 1.81 a | |
平均Mean | 5.64 A | 6.05 A | 2.16 A | 2.19 A | 2.65 A | 2.80 A | 19.61 A | 8.67 A | 8.01 A | 1.99 B | |
CK-Nbud | HHZ | 6.08 a | 6.07 a | 1.98 c | 2.00 b | 3.09 a | 3.07 a | 18.53 a | 7.14 a | 7.51 a | 1.70 a |
YY4949 | 4.82 b | 6.10 a | 2.39 a | 2.52 a | 2.02 c | 2.50 b | 19.65 a | 7.82 a | 7.21 a | 1.97 a | |
FLYX1 | 5.66 a | 6.20 a | 2.15 b | 2.17 ab | 2.64 b | 2.89 ab | 19.31 a | 9.02 a | 8.21 a | 2.08 a | |
LY6326 | 6.02 a | 6.38 a | 2.14 b | 2.17 ab | 2.82 b | 2.95 ab | 23.71 a | 10.25 a | 10.13 a | 2.52 a | |
平均Mean | 5.64 A | 6.19 A | 2.16 A | 2.21 A | 2.64 A | 2.85 A | 20.30 A | 8.56 A | 8.27 A | 2.07 AB | |
CK-Nbud+K | HHZ | 6.14 a | 6.00 a | 1.96 c | 2.15 a | 3.14 a | 2.83 a | 16.56 bc | 9.91 a | 6.39 c | 2.64 a |
YY4949 | 4.84 b | 5.82 a | 2.40 a | 2.27 a | 2.02 c | 2.61 a | 14.97 c | 8.41 a | 5.46 c | 2.25 a | |
FLYX1 | 5.98 a | 6.13 a | 2.18 b | 2.23 a | 2.76 b | 2.77 a | 20.38 b | 10.84 a | 8.59 b | 2.57 a | |
LY6326 | 5.75 a | 6.13 a | 2.15 b | 2.07 a | 2.69 b | 3.00 a | 24.92 a | 8.58 a | 11.20 a | 2.11 a | |
平均Mean | 5.68 A | 6.02 A | 2.17 A | 2.18 A | 2.65 A | 2.80 A | 19.20 A | 9.44 A | 7.91 A | 2.40 A | |
SRF | HHZ | 6.13 a | 6.10 a | 1.93 c | 2.03 a | 3.18 a | 3.04 a | 11.49 c | 8.59 a | 4.28 c | 2.03 a |
YY4949 | 4.85 c | 6.06 a | 2.41 a | 2.16 a | 2.01 d | 2.84 a | 15.23 bc | 8.38 a | 5.66 bc | 1.96 a | |
FLYX1 | 5.64 b | 6.15 a | 2.16 b | 2.09 a | 2.62 c | 2.99 a | 18.89 b | 9.50 a | 7.88 b | 2.38 a | |
LY6326 | 6.00 a | 6.12 a | 2.15 b | 2.20 a | 2.79 b | 2.82 a | 25.91 a | 9.76 a | 10.95 a | 2.39 a | |
平均Mean | 5.65 A | 6.11 A | 2.16 A | 2.12 A | 2.65 A | 2.92 A | 17.88 A | 9.06 A | 7.19 A | 2.19 AB | |
ANOVA | |||||||||||
肥料Fertilizer (F) | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | |
品种Variety (V) | ** | ns | ** | ** | ** | * | ** | ns | ** | ns | |
F×V | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
图3 肥料处理对再生稻头季生育中后期SPAD值动态的影响
Fig. 3. Effects of fertilizer treatments on SPAD values in the middle and late growth periods of the main season. Different letters indicate significant difference among fertilizer treatments at 0.05 probability level according to Least Significant Difference (n=16). Different letters indicate significant difference among fertilizer treatments at 0.05 probability level according to Least Significant Difference (n=16).
[1] | 朱永川, 熊洪, 徐富贤, 郭晓艺, 张林, 刘茂, 周兴兵. 再生稻栽培技术的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013,29(36):1-8. |
Zhu Y C, Xiong H, Xu F X, Guo X Y, Zhang L, Liu M, Zhou X B. Progress on research of ratoon rice cultivation technology[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2013,29(36):1-8. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | Ray D K, Foley J A. Increasing global crop harvest frequency: Recent trends and future directions[J]. Environment Research Letters, 2013,8:44041. |
[3] | 彭少兵. 对转型时期水稻生产的战略思考[J]. 中国科学: 生命科学, 2014,44(8):845-850. |
Peng S B. Reflection on China's rice production strategies during the transition period[J]. Scientia Sinica Vitae, 2014,44(8):845-850. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | Krishanamurthy K. Rice ratooning as an alternative to double cropping in tropical Asia [C]. Rice Ratooning, Bangalore (India), IRRI, 1989. |
[5] | Dong H L, Chen Q, Wang W Q, Peng S B, Huang J L, Cui K H, Nie L X. The growth and yield of a wet-seeded rice-ratoon rice system in central China[J]. Field Crops Research, 2018,208:55-59. |
[6] | Wang W Q, He A B, Jiang G L, Sun H J, Jiang M, Man J G, Ling X X, Cui K H, Huang J L, Peng S B, Nie L X. Ratoon rice technology: A green and resource-efficient way for rice production[J]. Advances in Agronomy, 2020. |
[7] | Alizadeh M R, Habibi F. A comparative study on the quality of the main and ratoon rice[J]. Journal of Food Quality, 2016,39(6):669-674. |
[8] | 张上守, 卓传营, 郑荣和, 李义珍. 再生稻超高产优化集成技术[J]. 中国稻米, 2007,13(3):44-48. |
Zhang S S, Zhuo C Y, Zheng R H, Li Y Z. Optimization and Integration Techniques for Regeneration Rice with Super-high yielding[J]. China Rice, 2007,13(3):44-48. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | Wang W N, Lu J W, Ren T, Li X K, Su W, Lu M X. Evaluating regional mean optimal nitrogen rates in combination with indigenous nitrogen supply for rice production[J]. Field Crops Research, 2012,137:37-48. |
[10] | 徐富贤, 熊洪, 张林, 朱永川, 蒋鹏, 郭晓艺, 刘茂. 再生稻产量形成特点与关键调控技术研究进展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015,48(9):1702-1717. |
Xu F X, Xiong H, Zhang L, Zhu Y C, Jiang P, Guo X Y, Liu M. Progress in research of yield formation of ratooning rice and its high-yielding key regulation technologies[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015,48(9):1702-1717. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | Wang Y C, Zheng C, Xiao S, Sun Y T, Huang J L, Peng S B. Agronomic responses of ratoon rice to nitrogen management in central China[J]. Field Crops Research, 2019,241:107569-107569. |
[12] | 袁继超, 孙晓辉, 田彦华, 马均. 再生稻需氮特性和分次施氮的研究[J]. 作物学报, 1996,000(3):345-352. |
Yuan J C, Sun X H, Tian Y H, Ma J. Study on nitrogen requirement characteristics and nitrogen split application of ratoon rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1996,000(003):345-352 | |
(in Chinese). (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 徐富贤, 洪松, 熊洪. 促芽肥与杂交中稻再生力关系及其作用机理[J]. 作物学报, 1997(3):311. |
Xu F X, Hong S, Xiong H. Relationship between bud-promoting fertilizer and regenerative ability of hybrid mid-season rice and its mechanism[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 1997(3):311. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 管康林, 陈耀武, 肖耀文. 再生稻生理研究初报[J]. 中国农业科学, 1979,12(3):23-30. |
Guan K L, Chen Y W, Xiao Y W. Preliminary report on physiological study of ratoon rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 1979,12(3):23-30. (in Chinese) | |
[15] | 胡群, 夏敏, 张洪程, 曹利强, 郭保卫, 魏海燕, 陈厚存, 韩宝富. 氮肥运筹对钵苗机插优质食味水稻产量及品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017,43(3):420-431. |
Hu Q, Xia M, Zhang H C, Cao L Q, Guo B W, Wei H Y, Chen H C, Han B F. Effect of nitrogen application regime on yield and quality of mechanical pot-seedlings transplanting rice with good taste quality[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2017,43(3):420-431. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 王强盛, 甄若宏, 丁艳锋, 吉志军, 曹卫星, 黄丕生. 钾肥用量对优质粳稻钾素积累利用及稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2004,37(10):1444-1450. |
Wang Q S, Zhen R H, Ding Y F, Ji Z J, Cao W X, Huang P S. Effects of potassium fertilizer application rates on plant potassium accumulation and grain quality of japonica rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2004,37(10):1444-1450. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 朱庆森, 王志琴, 张祖建, 惠大丰. 水稻籽粒充实程度的指标研究[J]. 江苏农学院学报, 1995,16(2):1-4. |
Zhu Q S, Wang Z Q, Zhang Z J, Hui D F. Study on indicators of grain-filling of rice[J]. Journal of Jiangsu Agricultural College, 1995,16(2):1-4. | |
[18] | 徐富贤, 阎运德, 熊洪, 张林, 郭晓艺, 朱永川, 周兴兵, 刘茂. 冬水田区杂交中稻高产组合的库源特征研究[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2013,15(2):144-152. |
Xu F X, Yan Y D, Xiong H, Zhang L, Guo X Y, Zhu Y C, Zhou X B, Liu M. Studies on sink-source characteristics of mid-season hybrid rice for high yield in winter water logged field[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2013, 15(2):144-152. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 谢华安. 超级稻作再生稻高产栽培特性的研究[J]. 杂交水稻, 2010,S1:17-26. |
Xie H A. Studies on high-yielding cultivation characteristics of super hybrid rice grown as ratoon rice[J]. Hybrid Rice, 2010,S1:17-26. | |
[20] | 胡香玉, 钟旭华, 梁开明, 黄农荣, 潘俊峰, 刘彦卓, 傅友强, 彭碧林. 广东再生稻研究进展与展望[J]. 中国稻米, 2019,25(6):16-19. |
Hu X Y, Zhong X H, Liang K M, Huang N R, Pan J F, Liu Y Z, Fu Y Q, Peng B L. Research progress and prospect on ratoon rice in Guangdong Province[J]. China Rice, 2019,25(6):16-19. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | Ciampitti I A, Vyn T J. Physiological perspectives of changes over time in maize yield dependency on nitrogen uptake and associated nitrogen efficiencies: A review[J]. Field Crops Research, 2012,133:48-67. |
[22] | Ichii M. The effect of light and temperature on rice plant ratoons[J]. Japanese Journal of Crop Science, 1982,51(3):281-286. |
[23] | 熊洪, 冉茂林, 徐富贤, 洪松. 南方稻区再生稻研究进展及发展[J]. 作物学报, 2000(3):297-304. |
Xiong H, Ran M L, Xu F X, Hong S. Achievements and developments of ratooning rice in south of China[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2000, ( 3):297-304. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 刘芳, 梁华东, 刘涛, 张淑贞, 何迅, 贺立源, 徐能海. 湖北省近三十年耕地土壤肥力变化解析[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2016,35(6):79-85. |
Liu F, Liang H D, Liu T, Zhang S Z, He X, He L Y, Xu H N. Analysis of soil fertility changes of cultivated land in Hubei Province in recent thirty years[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2016,35(6):79-85. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 柳开楼, 韩天富, 黄晶, 李亚贞, 马常宝, 薛彦东, 都江雪, 王远鹏, 李文军, 张会民. 中国稻作区土壤速效钾和钾肥偏生产力时空变化[J]. 土壤学报, 2021,58(1):202-212. |
Liu K L, Han T F, Huang J, Li Y Z, Ma C B, Xue Y D, Du J X, Wang Y P, Li W J, Zhang H M. Spatio-temporal variation of soil readily available potassium and partial factor productivity of potassium fertilizer in rice cultivation regions of China[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2021,58(1):202-212. | |
[26] | 廖育林, 郑圣先, 鲁艳红, 谢坚, 聂军, 向艳文. 长期施钾对红壤水稻土水稻产量及土壤钾素状况的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009,15(6):1372-1379. |
Liao Y L, Zheng S X, Lu Y H, Xie J, Nie J, Xiang Y W. Effects of long-term K fertilizer application on rice yield and soil K status in reddish paddy soil[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2009,15(6):1372-1379. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | Wood R M, Dunn B W, Balindong J L, Waters D L E, Blanchard C L, Andrew John Mawson A J, Oli P. Effect of agronomic management on rice grain quality Part II: Nitrogen rate and timing[J]. Cereal Chemistry, 2020,98(2):234-248. |
[28] | Peng S, Cassman K G, Virmani S S, Sheehy J, Khush G S. Yield potential trends of tropical rice since the release of IR8 and the challenge of increasing rice yield potential[J]. Crop Science, 1999,39:1552-1559. |
[29] | Huang L Y, Yang D S, Li X X, Peng S B, Wang F. Coordination of high grain yield and high nitrogen use efficiency through large sink size and high post-heading source capacity in rice[J]. Field Crops Research, 2019,233:49-58. |
[30] | 王强, 陈雷, 张晓丽, 梁天锋, 高国庆, 莫彬, 吕荣华, 陶伟, 唐茂艳. 华南优质稻花期耐热性鉴定研究[J]. 中国稻米, 2019,25(3):80-82. |
Wang Q, Chen L, Zhang X L, Liang T F, Gao G Q, Mo B, Lü R H, Tao W, Tang M Y. Identification of heat resistance at flowering stage of high quality rice in south China[J]. China Rice, 2019,25(3):80-82. (in Chinese) | |
[31] | 柯海平, 熊之羲. 杂交粳稻甬优4949在大别山区的种植表现及栽培技术[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2017,56(22):4256-4257. |
Ke H P, Xiong Z X. Performance and high-yield cultural techniques of japonica hybrid rice Yongyou4949 in Dabie Mountain area[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2017,56(22):4256-4257. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] | 徐继萍, 周桂香, 张国良. 优质高产两系杂交水稻新组合丰两优香一号的选育及应用[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2008,36(10):4016-4017. |
Xu J P, Zhou G X, Zhang G L. Breeding and application of new rice variety Feng Liang You Xiang No.1 with high quality and yield[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2008,36(10):4016-4017. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[33] | 易镇邪, 周文新, 秦鹏, 屠乃美. 再生稻与同期抽穗主季稻源库流特性差异研究[J]. 作物学报, 2009,35(1):140-148. |
Yi Z Y, Zhou W X, Qin P, Tu N M. Differences in characteristics of source, sink, and flow between ratooning rice and its same-term heading main-crop rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2009,35(1):140-148. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[34] | 林强, 郑长林, 林祁, 朱永生, 王颖姮, 蒋家焕, 姜照伟, 张建福. 再生稻穗茎比与产量及其构成因素的关系[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报: 自然科学版, 2021,49(6):2-12. |
Lin Q, Zheng C L, Lin Q, Zhu Y S, Wang Y H, Jiang J H, Jiang Z W, Zhang J F. Relationships of panicle to stem ratio with yield and its components of ratoon rice[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University: Natural Science Edition, 2021,49(6):2-12. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[35] | 杨惠杰, 杨仁崔, 李义珍, 姜照伟, 郑景生. 水稻超高产品种的产量潜力及产量构成因素分析[J]. 福建农业学报, 2000,25(3):1-8. |
Yang H J, Yang R C, Li Y Z, Jiang Z W, Zheng J S. Yield potential and yield components of super high-yielding rice cultivars[J]. Fujian Agricultural Journal, 2000,25(3):1-8. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[36] | Huang J W, Pan Y P, Chen H F, Zhang Z X, Fang C X, Shao C H, Amjad H, Lin W W, Lin W X. Physiochemical mechanisms involved in the improvement of grain-filling, rice quality mediated by related enzyme activities in the ratoon cultivation system[J]. Field Crops Research, 2020,258. |
[1] | 郭展, 张运波. 水稻对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应及分子调控研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[2] | 韦还和, 马唯一, 左博源, 汪璐璐, 朱旺, 耿孝宇, 张翔, 孟天瑶, 陈英龙, 高平磊, 许轲, 霍中洋, 戴其根. 盐、干旱及其复合胁迫对水稻产量和品质形成影响的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[3] | 吕宙, 易秉怀, 陈平平, 周文新, 唐文帮, 易镇邪. 施氮量与移栽密度对小粒型杂交水稻产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 422-436. |
[4] | 赵艺婷, 谢可冉, 高逖, 崔克辉. 水稻分蘖期干旱锻炼对幼穗分化期高温下穗发育和产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 277-289. |
[5] | 周甜, 吴少华, 康建宏, 吴宏亮, 杨生龙, 王星强, 李昱, 黄玉峰. 不同种植模式对水稻籽粒淀粉含量及淀粉关键酶活性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 303-315. |
[6] | 彭显龙, 董强, 张辰, 李鹏飞, 李博琳, 刘智蕾, 于彩莲. 不同土壤条件下秸秆还田量对土壤还原性物质及水稻生长的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(2): 198-210. |
[7] | 易晓璇, 刘玮琦, 曾盖, 罗丽华, 肖应辉. 灌浆期高温胁迫对早籼稻品质性状的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(1): 72-80. |
[8] | 朱旺, 张翔, 耿孝宇, 张哲, 陈英龙, 韦还和, 戴其根, 许轲, 朱广龙, 周桂生, 孟天瑶. 盐-旱复合胁迫下水稻根系的形态和生理特征及其与产量形成的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(6): 617-627. |
[9] | 吴玉红, 李艳华, 王吕, 秦宇航, 李杉杉, 郝兴顺, 张庆路, 崔月贞, 肖飞. 陕南稻区紫云英稻草联合还田配施减量氮肥协同提升水稻产量与稻米品质[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(6): 628-641. |
[10] | 邹宇傲, 吴启侠, 周乾顺, 朱建强, 晏军. 孕穗期杂交中稻对淹涝胁迫的响应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(6): 642-656. |
[11] | 袁沛, 周旋, 杨威, 尹凌洁, 靳拓, 彭建伟, 荣湘民, 田昌. 化肥减氮配施对洞庭湖区双季稻产量和田面水氮磷流失风险的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(5): 518-528. |
[12] | 肖大康, 胡仁, 韩天富, 张卫峰, 侯俊, 任科宇. 氮肥用量和运筹对我国水稻产量及其构成因子影响的整合分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(5): 529-542. |
[13] | 黄亚茹, 徐鹏, 王乐乐, 贺一哲, 王辉, 柯健, 何海兵, 武立权, 尤翠翠. 外源海藻糖对粳稻品系W1844籽粒灌浆特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[14] | 高欠清, 任孝俭, 翟中兵, 郑普兵, 吴源芬, 崔克辉. 头季穗肥和促芽肥对再生稻再生芽生长及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 405-414. |
[15] | 王文婷, 马佳颖, 李光彦, 符卫蒙, 李沪波, 林洁, 陈婷婷, 奉保华, 陶龙兴, 符冠富, 秦叶波. 高温下不同施肥量对水稻产量品质形成的影响及其与能量代谢的关系分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||