中国水稻科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 628-641.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2023.230403
吴玉红1, 李艳华2, 王吕1, 秦宇航1, 李杉杉2, 郝兴顺1,*(), 张庆路2,*(), 崔月贞1, 肖飞1
收稿日期:
2023-04-10
修回日期:
2023-06-09
出版日期:
2023-11-10
发布日期:
2023-11-14
通讯作者:
*email: 372770515@qq.com;qingluzhang@mail.hzau.edu.cn
作者简介:
第一联系人:#共同第一作者
基金资助:
WU Yuhong1, LI Yanhua2, WANG Lü1, QIN Yuhang1, LI Shanshan2, HAO Xingshun1,*(), ZHANG Qinglu2,*(), CUI Yuezhen1, XIAO Fei1
Received:
2023-04-10
Revised:
2023-06-09
Online:
2023-11-10
Published:
2023-11-14
Contact:
*email: 372770515@qq.com;qingluzhang@mail.hzau.edu.cn
About author:
First author contact:#These author contributed equally to this paper
摘要:
【目的】 研究紫云英稻草联合还田与氮肥减量配施对水稻群体质量、产量、氮素吸收和稻米品质的影响,以期为水稻减肥、增效和提质提供理论依据。【方法】 田间试验于2019-2021年在陕西汉中进行,采用随机区组设计,设置4个处理:1)稻草不还田+常规施氮(GN100);2)紫云英稻草联合还田+常规施氮(GSN100);3)紫云英稻草联合还田+氮肥减量20%(GSN80);4)紫云英稻草联合还田+氮肥减量30%(GSN70)。水稻齐穗期和成熟期调查地上部生物量和籽粒产量,分析地上部含氮量和氮素累积量,测定籽粒外观品质、加工品质、蛋白质含量、直链淀粉含量和胶稠度。紫云英及紫云英+稻草氮素释放特征试验于2021年在水稻季进行,采用尼龙网袋填埋法,在埋设的第9、20、31、40、50、69、87、106、125、146天取样品测定腐解残体全氮含量。【结果】 与GN100相比,紫云英稻草联合还田各处理显著促进水稻齐穗期至成熟期地上部生长,其中群体生长速率显著增加39.83%。与GN100相比,GSN100、GSN80、GSN70处理下稻谷两年平均增产3.08%、7.21%和3.92%。紫云英稻草联合还田处理提高水稻齐穗期和成熟期穗干物质量,促进水稻齐穗期后干物质向穗的转运。与GN100相比,GSN100、GSN80和GSN70处理下齐穗期后干物质对穗的贡献率两年平均增幅分别为1.93%、23.59%和14.43%。紫云英稻草联合处理提高了成熟期茎和穗氮素累积量,与GN100处理相比,GSN100、GSN80和GSN70处理成熟期茎和穗氮素累积量两年平均增幅分别为40.74%和23.20%,且均表现为GSN80最高。稻米品质随着紫云英稻草联合还田年限的增加而明显改善。与GN100相比,紫云英稻草联合还田处理显著降低稻米直链淀粉和蛋白质含量,并能提高胶稠度,其中,直链淀粉降幅为7.54%~17.10%,蛋白质含量降幅为4.28%~5.88%,胶稠度增幅为2.64%~12.51%,且GSN80和GSN70改善效果更佳。同时,GSN80和GSN70显著降低稻米垩白粒率和垩白度。尼龙网袋腐解试验结果显示,紫云英稻草联合还田显著提高水稻生育后期土壤氮素供应水平,在填埋后106~146 d腐解期内氮素累积释放量较紫云英单一还田显著增加11.97%。【结论】 紫云英-水稻轮作下紫云英稻草联合还田,可提高水稻生育后期土壤氮素供应,促进水稻齐穗期后干物质积累、氮素吸收和氮素转运,提高水稻产量,降低稻米蛋白质和直链淀粉含量,增加胶稠度,提高稻米外观品质、加工品质和食味品质,而减氮20%~30%条件下更有利于构建高产群体,实现水稻产量和稻米品质协同提高。紫云英稻草联合还田氮肥减量20%~30%适宜优质籼稻增产、减肥、提质。
吴玉红, 李艳华, 王吕, 秦宇航, 李杉杉, 郝兴顺, 张庆路, 崔月贞, 肖飞. 陕南稻区紫云英稻草联合还田配施减量氮肥协同提升水稻产量与稻米品质[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(6): 628-641.
WU Yuhong, LI Yanhua, WANG Lü, QIN Yuhang, LI Shanshan, HAO Xingshun, ZHANG Qinglu, CUI Yuezhen, XIAO Fei. Improvement of Yield and Quality of Rice by Combining Returning of Green Manure (Astragalus smicus L.) and Rice Straw with Reduced Application of Nitrogen Fertilizer in Southern Shaanxi Province[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(6): 628-641.
年度 Year | 水稻Rice | 紫云英Chinese milk vetch | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
播种时间 Sowing date | 移栽时间 Transplanting date | 齐穗期 Full heading stage | 成熟期 Maturing stage | 播种时间 Sowing date | 翻压期Incorporating date | ||
2019-2020 | 2020-04-10 | 2020-05-26 | 2020-08-10 | 2020-09-23 | 2019-09-28 | 2020-04-24 | |
2020-2021 | 2021-04-10 | 2021-05-27 | 2021-08-05 | 2021-09-20 | 2020-09-30 | 2021-04-26 |
表1 水稻、紫云英主要生育时期
Table 1. Main growth stages of rice and Chinese milk vetch.
年度 Year | 水稻Rice | 紫云英Chinese milk vetch | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
播种时间 Sowing date | 移栽时间 Transplanting date | 齐穗期 Full heading stage | 成熟期 Maturing stage | 播种时间 Sowing date | 翻压期Incorporating date | ||
2019-2020 | 2020-04-10 | 2020-05-26 | 2020-08-10 | 2020-09-23 | 2019-09-28 | 2020-04-24 | |
2020-2021 | 2021-04-10 | 2021-05-27 | 2021-08-05 | 2021-09-20 | 2020-09-30 | 2021-04-26 |
图2 紫云英+稻秆氮素累积释放量的动态变化 方柱上方相同小写字母表示处理间在5%水平差异不显著。
Fig. 2. Dynamic changes of nitrogen release amount from straw-Chinese milk vetch returning. Common lowercase letters above the bars indicate no significant difference among treatments at the 5% level.
图3 紫云英稻草联合还田与氮肥减量对水稻抽穗期至成熟期群体生长速率的影响 GN100-紫云英翻压稻草不还田+常规施氮;GSN100-紫云英稻草联合还田+常规施氮;GSN80-紫云英稻草联合还田+氮肥减量20%;GSN70-紫云英稻草联合还田+氮肥减量30%。Y-年度;N-氮肥;Y×N-年度和氮肥的交互作用。方柱上方相同小写字母表示处理间在5%水平上差异不显著;**, P<0.01。
Fig. 3. Effect of straw-Chinese milk vetch returning and nitrogen reduction on crop growth rate from heading stage to maturity stage. GN100, Chinese milk vetch with no rice straw returning and conventional nitrogen application; GSN100, Incorporating winter-planted milk vetch and rice straw into the field with conventional nitrogen application; GSN80, Incorporating winter-planted milk vetch and rice straw into the field with a 20% reduction in nitrogen fertilizer; GSN70, Incorporating winter-planted milk vetch and rice straw into the field with a 30% reduction in nitrogen fertilizer. Y, Year; N, Nitrogen; Y×N, Interaction between year and nitrogen fertilizer. Common lowercase letters above the bars indicate no significant difference among treatments at the 5% level; **, P<0.01.
图4 紫云英稻草联合还田与氮肥减量对水稻籽粒产量的影响 方柱上方相同小写字母表示处理间在5%水平上差异不显著;**, P<0.01。
Fig. 4. Effect of straw-Chinese milk vetch returning and nitrogen reduction on rice yield. Common lowercase letters above the bars indicate no significant difference among treatments at the 5% level; **, P<0.01.
年度 Year | 处理 Treatment | 齐穗期Full heading stage | 成熟期Ripening stage | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
茎鞘 Stem and sheath | 叶片 Leaf | 穗 Panicle | 茎鞘 Stem and sheath | 叶片 Leaf | 穗 Panicle | ||||
2020 | GN100 | 6.15±0.10 b | 3.63±0.22 a | 1.90±0.18 b | 4.17±0.40 b | 2.86±0.15 a | 8.55±0.33 c | ||
GSN100 | 7.13±0.34 a | 3.60±0.13 a | 2.16±0.13 ab | 4.44±0.37 b | 3.25±0.21 a | 10.46±1.27 b | |||
GSN80 | 6.58±0.07 b | 3.58±0.13 a | 2.41±0.05 a | 5.42±0.16 a | 3.05±0.08 a | 11.88±0.44 a | |||
GSN70 | 7.36±0.09 a | 3.41±0.09 a | 2.17±0.14 ab | 5.07±0.29 a | 3.15±0.34 a | 10.32±0.18 b | |||
平均值Mean | 6.81±0.55 | 3.55±0.10 | 2.16±0.21 | 4.77±0.58 | 3.08±0.17 | 10.30±1.36 | |||
2021 | GN100 | 6.60±0.02 a | 3.29±0.03 b | 1.85±0.06 b | 3.18±0.16 c | 2.37±0.27 a | 10.51±0.13 c | ||
GSN100 | 6.79±0.20 a | 3.98±0.18 a | 2.03±0.10 b | 3.86±0.21 b | 2.07±0.13 a | 11.14±0.15 b | |||
GSN80 | 6.81±0.24 a | 3.82±0.17 a | 2.43±0.17 a | 3.82±0.08 b | 2.18±0.13 a | 12.06±0.15 a | |||
GSN70 | 6.84±0.40 a | 3.72±0.21 a | 2.19±0.19 ab | 4.35±0.03 a | 2.06±0.11 a | 11.34±0.12 b | |||
平均值Mean | 6.76±0.11 | 3.70±0.30 | 2.15±0.21 | 3.80±0.148 | 2.17±0.14 | 11.24±0.78 | |||
F值 F value | |||||||||
年度Year(Y) | 0.12 | 103.99** | 0.01 | 265.65** | 135.13* | 145.65** | |||
氮肥Nitrogen(N) | 10.15** | 2.13 | 8.15** | 18.24** | 0.09 | 18.19** | |||
Y×N | 5.17* | 2.73 | 0.3 | 4.14* | 3.27 | 2.58 |
表2 紫云英稻草联合还田与氮肥减量对水稻不同生育期各器官干物质量的影响
Table 2. Effect of straw-Chinese milk vetch returning and nitrogen reduction on dry weight of each part of rice at different growth stages. t/hm2
年度 Year | 处理 Treatment | 齐穗期Full heading stage | 成熟期Ripening stage | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
茎鞘 Stem and sheath | 叶片 Leaf | 穗 Panicle | 茎鞘 Stem and sheath | 叶片 Leaf | 穗 Panicle | ||||
2020 | GN100 | 6.15±0.10 b | 3.63±0.22 a | 1.90±0.18 b | 4.17±0.40 b | 2.86±0.15 a | 8.55±0.33 c | ||
GSN100 | 7.13±0.34 a | 3.60±0.13 a | 2.16±0.13 ab | 4.44±0.37 b | 3.25±0.21 a | 10.46±1.27 b | |||
GSN80 | 6.58±0.07 b | 3.58±0.13 a | 2.41±0.05 a | 5.42±0.16 a | 3.05±0.08 a | 11.88±0.44 a | |||
GSN70 | 7.36±0.09 a | 3.41±0.09 a | 2.17±0.14 ab | 5.07±0.29 a | 3.15±0.34 a | 10.32±0.18 b | |||
平均值Mean | 6.81±0.55 | 3.55±0.10 | 2.16±0.21 | 4.77±0.58 | 3.08±0.17 | 10.30±1.36 | |||
2021 | GN100 | 6.60±0.02 a | 3.29±0.03 b | 1.85±0.06 b | 3.18±0.16 c | 2.37±0.27 a | 10.51±0.13 c | ||
GSN100 | 6.79±0.20 a | 3.98±0.18 a | 2.03±0.10 b | 3.86±0.21 b | 2.07±0.13 a | 11.14±0.15 b | |||
GSN80 | 6.81±0.24 a | 3.82±0.17 a | 2.43±0.17 a | 3.82±0.08 b | 2.18±0.13 a | 12.06±0.15 a | |||
GSN70 | 6.84±0.40 a | 3.72±0.21 a | 2.19±0.19 ab | 4.35±0.03 a | 2.06±0.11 a | 11.34±0.12 b | |||
平均值Mean | 6.76±0.11 | 3.70±0.30 | 2.15±0.21 | 3.80±0.148 | 2.17±0.14 | 11.24±0.78 | |||
F值 F value | |||||||||
年度Year(Y) | 0.12 | 103.99** | 0.01 | 265.65** | 135.13* | 145.65** | |||
氮肥Nitrogen(N) | 10.15** | 2.13 | 8.15** | 18.24** | 0.09 | 18.19** | |||
Y×N | 5.17* | 2.73 | 0.3 | 4.14* | 3.27 | 2.58 |
图 5 紫云英稻草联合还田与氮肥减量处理下水稻齐穗期后干物质对穗的贡献率 方柱上方相同小写字母表示处理间在5%水平上差异不显著;*, P<0.05。
Fig. 5. Contribution rate of dry matter to panicle after heading under straw-Chinese milk vetch returning and nitrogen reduction. Common lowercase letters above the bars indicate no significant difference among treatments at the 5% level; *, P<0.05.
年度 Year | 处理 Treatments | 齐穗期Full heading stage | 成熟期Ripening stage | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
茎氮素累积量 Stem nitrogen accumulation | 叶氮素累积量 Leaf nitrogen accumulation | 穗氮素累积量 Panicle nitrogen accumulation | 茎氮素累积量 Stem nitrogen accumulation | 叶氮素累积量 Leaf nitrogen accumulation | 穗氮素累积量 Panicle nitrogen accumulation | ||||
2020 | GN100 | 37.35±0.42 c | 88.94±8.18 a | 19.50±1.34 b | 16.16±1.06 b | 23.30±1.89 c | 65.42±2.11 c | ||
GRN100 | 50.66±1.89 ab | 81.89±4.67 ab | 23.01±1.52 ab | 23.09±3.53 a | 37.13±2.35 a | 87.80±7.04 ab | |||
GRN80 | 54.21±2.05 a | 80.52±2.14 ab | 25.00±0.59 a | 25.87±0.94 a | 30.75±1.79 b | 94.94±5.00 a | |||
GRN70 | 48.33±2.17 b | 75.09±3.28 b | 23.51±2.06 ab | 25.11±1.12 a | 33.93±3.85 ab | 83.17±6.58 b | |||
平均值Mean | 47.64±7.27 | 81.61±5.70 | 22.76±2.33 | 22.56±4.42 | 31.38± 5.92 | 82.83±12.58 | |||
2021 | GN100 | 43.49±1.70 a | 86.62±0.67 b | 18.66±0.08 c | 19.80±0.37 c | 27.49±3.90 ab | 100.55±3.71 b | ||
GRN100 | 40.24±0.12 b | 91.50±1.27 a | 20.19±1.04 bc | 27.46±0.93 a | 29.66±0.62 a | 115.03±4.72 a | |||
GRN80 | 38.81±0.05 b | 80.53±2.02 c | 21.87±1.23 ab | 25.04±1.07 b | 23.54±0.62 b | 116.89±0.19 a | |||
GRN70 | 36.10±1.34 c | 74.19±2.64 d | 23.04±2.47 a | 23.95±0.37 b | 24.65±2.28 b | 102.64±3.38 b | |||
平均值Mean | 39.66±0.84 | 83.21±7.50 | 20.94±1.92 | 24.06±3.91 | 26.33±2.77 | 108.78±8.37 | |||
F值 F value | |||||||||
年度Year(Y) | 459.98** | 4.91 | 3.76 | 6.85 | 289.20** | 146.04** | |||
氮肥Nitrogen(N) | 15.39** | 8.21* | 6.42** | 40.90** | 10.08** | 27.66** | |||
Y×N | 44.76** | 1.63 | 0.72 | 6.74** | 8.02** | 3.24 |
表3 紫云英稻草联合还田与氮肥减量对水稻不同生育期各器官氮素累积量的影响
Table 3. Effect of straw-Chinese milk vetch returing and nitrogen reduction on nitrogen accumulation in different organs of rice at different growth stages. kg/hm2
年度 Year | 处理 Treatments | 齐穗期Full heading stage | 成熟期Ripening stage | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
茎氮素累积量 Stem nitrogen accumulation | 叶氮素累积量 Leaf nitrogen accumulation | 穗氮素累积量 Panicle nitrogen accumulation | 茎氮素累积量 Stem nitrogen accumulation | 叶氮素累积量 Leaf nitrogen accumulation | 穗氮素累积量 Panicle nitrogen accumulation | ||||
2020 | GN100 | 37.35±0.42 c | 88.94±8.18 a | 19.50±1.34 b | 16.16±1.06 b | 23.30±1.89 c | 65.42±2.11 c | ||
GRN100 | 50.66±1.89 ab | 81.89±4.67 ab | 23.01±1.52 ab | 23.09±3.53 a | 37.13±2.35 a | 87.80±7.04 ab | |||
GRN80 | 54.21±2.05 a | 80.52±2.14 ab | 25.00±0.59 a | 25.87±0.94 a | 30.75±1.79 b | 94.94±5.00 a | |||
GRN70 | 48.33±2.17 b | 75.09±3.28 b | 23.51±2.06 ab | 25.11±1.12 a | 33.93±3.85 ab | 83.17±6.58 b | |||
平均值Mean | 47.64±7.27 | 81.61±5.70 | 22.76±2.33 | 22.56±4.42 | 31.38± 5.92 | 82.83±12.58 | |||
2021 | GN100 | 43.49±1.70 a | 86.62±0.67 b | 18.66±0.08 c | 19.80±0.37 c | 27.49±3.90 ab | 100.55±3.71 b | ||
GRN100 | 40.24±0.12 b | 91.50±1.27 a | 20.19±1.04 bc | 27.46±0.93 a | 29.66±0.62 a | 115.03±4.72 a | |||
GRN80 | 38.81±0.05 b | 80.53±2.02 c | 21.87±1.23 ab | 25.04±1.07 b | 23.54±0.62 b | 116.89±0.19 a | |||
GRN70 | 36.10±1.34 c | 74.19±2.64 d | 23.04±2.47 a | 23.95±0.37 b | 24.65±2.28 b | 102.64±3.38 b | |||
平均值Mean | 39.66±0.84 | 83.21±7.50 | 20.94±1.92 | 24.06±3.91 | 26.33±2.77 | 108.78±8.37 | |||
F值 F value | |||||||||
年度Year(Y) | 459.98** | 4.91 | 3.76 | 6.85 | 289.20** | 146.04** | |||
氮肥Nitrogen(N) | 15.39** | 8.21* | 6.42** | 40.90** | 10.08** | 27.66** | |||
Y×N | 44.76** | 1.63 | 0.72 | 6.74** | 8.02** | 3.24 |
年度 Year | 处理 Treatment | 垩白粒率 Chalky grain rate/% | 垩白度 Chalkiness/% | 出糙率 Brown rice rate/% | 精米率 Milled rice rate/% | 精整米率 Head rice rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2020 | GN100 | 12.01±0.74 a | 3.49±0.21 a | 80.40±0.31 a | 70.51±0.54 a | 64.93±1.11 a |
GSN100 | 10.31±0.57 a | 2.91±0.14 b | 79.72±0.11 a | 69.68±0.50 a | 64.78±1.14 a | |
GSN80 | 11.78±1.53 a | 3.59±0.38 a | 80.12±0.65 a | 70.19±0.54 a | 64.39±0.93 a | |
GSN70 | 12.19±1.67 a | 3.67±0.48 a | 79.88±1.33 a | 69.74±1.66 a | 62.84±2.43 a | |
平均值Mean | 11.57±0.86 | 3.41±0.34 | 80.03±0.30 | 70.03±0.39 | 64.24±0.69 | |
2021 | GN100 | 9.06±0.13 a | 2.46±0.03 a | 80.04±0.50 a | 71.67±0.41 b | 66.75±0.49 a |
GSN100 | 6.87±0.10 bc | 2.26±0.08 b | 79.24±0.20 a | 70.42±0.09 d | 66.32±0.33 a | |
GSN80 | 6.68±0.33 c | 1.85±0.03 c | 79.00±0.21 a | 73.02±0.25 a | 66.12±0.22 a | |
GSN70 | 7.20±0.16 b | 1.85±0.01 c | 78.44±0.20 a | 70.98±0.29 c | 65.26±0.56 a | |
平均值Mean | 7.45±1.09 | 2.11±0.31 | 79.18±0.66 | 71.70±1.12 | 66.12±0.63 | |
F值 F value | ||||||
年度Year(Y) | 79.70* | 116.87** | 18.58* | 100.64** | 15.36* | |
氮肥Nitrogen(N) | 6.44** | 10.69** | 4.66* | 3.91* | 2.16 | |
Y×N | 3.37 | 4.86 | 0.77 | 3.67* | 0.54 |
表4 紫云英稻草联合还田与氮肥减量对水稻外观品质和加工品质的影响
Table 4. Effect of straw-Chinese milk vetch returning and nitrogen reduction on rice appearance quality and processing quality.
年度 Year | 处理 Treatment | 垩白粒率 Chalky grain rate/% | 垩白度 Chalkiness/% | 出糙率 Brown rice rate/% | 精米率 Milled rice rate/% | 精整米率 Head rice rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2020 | GN100 | 12.01±0.74 a | 3.49±0.21 a | 80.40±0.31 a | 70.51±0.54 a | 64.93±1.11 a |
GSN100 | 10.31±0.57 a | 2.91±0.14 b | 79.72±0.11 a | 69.68±0.50 a | 64.78±1.14 a | |
GSN80 | 11.78±1.53 a | 3.59±0.38 a | 80.12±0.65 a | 70.19±0.54 a | 64.39±0.93 a | |
GSN70 | 12.19±1.67 a | 3.67±0.48 a | 79.88±1.33 a | 69.74±1.66 a | 62.84±2.43 a | |
平均值Mean | 11.57±0.86 | 3.41±0.34 | 80.03±0.30 | 70.03±0.39 | 64.24±0.69 | |
2021 | GN100 | 9.06±0.13 a | 2.46±0.03 a | 80.04±0.50 a | 71.67±0.41 b | 66.75±0.49 a |
GSN100 | 6.87±0.10 bc | 2.26±0.08 b | 79.24±0.20 a | 70.42±0.09 d | 66.32±0.33 a | |
GSN80 | 6.68±0.33 c | 1.85±0.03 c | 79.00±0.21 a | 73.02±0.25 a | 66.12±0.22 a | |
GSN70 | 7.20±0.16 b | 1.85±0.01 c | 78.44±0.20 a | 70.98±0.29 c | 65.26±0.56 a | |
平均值Mean | 7.45±1.09 | 2.11±0.31 | 79.18±0.66 | 71.70±1.12 | 66.12±0.63 | |
F值 F value | ||||||
年度Year(Y) | 79.70* | 116.87** | 18.58* | 100.64** | 15.36* | |
氮肥Nitrogen(N) | 6.44** | 10.69** | 4.66* | 3.91* | 2.16 | |
Y×N | 3.37 | 4.86 | 0.77 | 3.67* | 0.54 |
年度 Year | 处理 Treatment | 直链淀粉含量 Amylose content/% | 蛋白质含量 Protein content/% | 胶稠度 Gel consistency/mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020 | GN100 | 19.02±0.29 a | 6.72±0.15 a | 90.67±4.10 a |
GSN100 | 18.63±0.32 a | 6.60±0.40 ab | 85.78±1.02 bc | |
GSN80 | 18.93±0.15 a | 6.18±0.14 b | 83.22±2.46 c | |
GSN70 | 19.16±0.36 a | 6.25±0.18 b | 89.22±1.02 ab | |
平均值Mean | 18.93±0.23 | 6.44±0.26 | 87.22±3.36 | |
2021 | GN100 | 21.35±0.86 a | 8.17±0.05 a | 76.20±2.48 b |
GSN100 | 19.74±0.38 b | 7.69±0.08 b | 78.21±0.89 b | |
GSN80 | 19.21±1.15 bc | 7.69±0.37 b | 80.51±3.86 b | |
GSN70 | 17.70±0.64 c | 7.82±0.13 b | 85.73±2.51 a | |
平均值Mean | 19.50±1.50 | 7.84±0.23 | 80.29±4.04 | |
F值 F value | ||||
年度Year(Y) | 11.74 | 215.32** | 376.03** | |
氮肥Nitrogen(N) | 8.30** | 6.50** | 5.70 | |
Y×N | 10.01** | 7.09** | 1.36 |
表5 紫云英稻草联合还田与氮肥减量对水稻营养品质和蒸食品质的影响
Table 5. Effect of straw-Chinese milk vetch returning and nitrogen reduction on rice nutritional quality and cooking quality.
年度 Year | 处理 Treatment | 直链淀粉含量 Amylose content/% | 蛋白质含量 Protein content/% | 胶稠度 Gel consistency/mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
2020 | GN100 | 19.02±0.29 a | 6.72±0.15 a | 90.67±4.10 a |
GSN100 | 18.63±0.32 a | 6.60±0.40 ab | 85.78±1.02 bc | |
GSN80 | 18.93±0.15 a | 6.18±0.14 b | 83.22±2.46 c | |
GSN70 | 19.16±0.36 a | 6.25±0.18 b | 89.22±1.02 ab | |
平均值Mean | 18.93±0.23 | 6.44±0.26 | 87.22±3.36 | |
2021 | GN100 | 21.35±0.86 a | 8.17±0.05 a | 76.20±2.48 b |
GSN100 | 19.74±0.38 b | 7.69±0.08 b | 78.21±0.89 b | |
GSN80 | 19.21±1.15 bc | 7.69±0.37 b | 80.51±3.86 b | |
GSN70 | 17.70±0.64 c | 7.82±0.13 b | 85.73±2.51 a | |
平均值Mean | 19.50±1.50 | 7.84±0.23 | 80.29±4.04 | |
F值 F value | ||||
年度Year(Y) | 11.74 | 215.32** | 376.03** | |
氮肥Nitrogen(N) | 8.30** | 6.50** | 5.70 | |
Y×N | 10.01** | 7.09** | 1.36 |
[1] | 张爱民, 李欣, 刘冬成, 孙家柱, 阳文龙. 专题导读: 品质支撑农作物产业与未来发展[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(22): 4265-4266. |
Zhang A M, Li X, Liu D C, Sun J Z, Yang W L. Special focus guidance: Quality the future of crop production[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(22): 4265-4266. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 田青兰, 李培程, 刘利, 张强, 任万军. 四川不同生态区高产栽培条件下的杂交籼稻的稻米品质[J]. 作物学报, 2015, 41(8): 1257-1268. |
Tian Q L, Li P C, Liu L, Zhang Q, Ren W J. Quality of indica hybrid rice under the high-yield cultivation conditions in different ecological regions of Sichuan Province, China[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2015, 41(8): 1257-1268. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 龚金龙, 张洪程, 胡雅杰, 龙厚元, 常勇, 王艳, 邢志鹏, 霍中洋. 灌浆结实期温度对水稻产量和品质形成的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32: 482-491. |
Gong J L, Zhang H C, Hu Y J, Long H Y, Chang Y, Wang Y, Xing Z P, Huo Z Y. Effects of air temperature during rice grain filling period on the formation of rice grain yield and its quality[J]. Chinese Journal Ecology, 2013, 32: 482-491. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 龚红兵, 曾生元, 李闯, 左示敏, 景德道, 林添资, 陈宗祥, 张亚芳, 钱华飞, 余波, 盛生兰, 潘学彪. 江苏主栽粳稻品种的遗传与食味结构分析[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42: 1083-1093. |
Gong H B, Zheng S Y, Li C, Zuo S M, Jing D D, Lin T Z, Chen Z, X, Zhang Y F, Qian H F, Yu B, Sheng S L, Pan X B. Genetic analysis and taste quality of main conventional japonica rice varieties grown in Jiangsu Province[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2016, 42: 1083-1093. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 严奉君, 孙永健, 马均, 徐徽, 李玥, 代邹, 杨志远. 不同土壤肥力条件下麦秆还田与氮肥运筹对杂交稻氮素利用、产量及米质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(1): 56-64. |
Yan F J, Sun Y J, Ma J, Xu H, Li Y, Dai Z, Yang Z Y. Effects of wheat straw mulching and nitrogen management on grain yield, rice quality and nitrogen utilization in hybrid rice under different soil fertility conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2015, 29(1): 56-64. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 刘世平, 聂新涛, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲. 免耕套种与秸秆还田对水稻生长和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2007, 21(1): 71-76. |
Liu S P, Nie X T, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K. Effects of interplanting with the zero tillage and wheat straw manuring on rice growth and grain quality[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2007, 21(1): 71-76. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 胡雅杰, 钱海军, 吴培, 朱明, 邢志鹏, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 魏海燕, 许轲, 张洪程. 秸秆还田条件下氮磷钾用量对软米粳稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(3): 817-824. |
Hu Y J, Qian H J, Wu P, Zhu M, Xing Z P, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Wei H Y, Xu K, Zhang H C. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer rates on yield and grain quality of soft japonica rice under straw returning condition[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018, 24(3): 817-824. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 吴玉红, 王吕, 崔月贞, 郝兴顺, 王保军, 田霄鸿, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 轮作模式及秸秆还田对水稻产量、稻米品质及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(11): 1926-1937. |
Wu Y H, Wang L, Cui Y Z, Hao X S, Wang B J, Tian X H, Li X G, Qin Y H. Rice yield, quality, and soil fertility in response to straw incorporation and rotation pattern[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27(11): 1926-1937. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 陆丹丹, 雍明玲, 陶钰, 叶苗, 张祖建. 优良食味水稻品种籽粒蛋白质积累特征及其对氮素水平的响应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(5): 520-530. |
Lu D D, Yong M L, Tao Y, Ye M, Zhang Z J. Characteristics of grain protein accumulation and its response to nitrogen level in good taste rice varieties[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2022, 36(5): 520-530. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 胡静, 陈琛, 张家星, 李万元, 唐东南, 仲军, 羊彬, 朱正康, 姚友礼, 王余龙, 董桂春. 江苏省早熟晚粳高产水稻新品种氮素吸收利用特征及成因分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(6): 619-630. |
Hu J, Chen C, Zhang J X, Li W Y, Tang D N, Zhong J, Yang B, Zhu Z K, Yao Y L, Wang Y L, Dong G C. Nitrogen absorption and utilization characteristics of the newly approved early-maturity late japonica rice cultivars in Jiangsu Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2017, 31(6): 619-630. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 刘秋员, 周磊, 田晋钰, 程爽, 陶钰, 邢志鹏, 刘国栋, 魏海燕, 张洪程. 长江中下游地区常规中熟粳稻产量、品质及氮素吸收性状的相互关系分析[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(5): 904-914. |
Liu Q Y, Zhou L, Tian J Y, Chen S, Tao Y, Xing Z P, Liu G D, Wei H Y, Zhang H C. Relationships among grain yield, rice quality and nitrogen uptake of inbred middle-ripe japonica rice in the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(5): 904-914. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 赵其国, 滕应, 黄国勤. 中国探索实行耕地轮作休耕制度试点问题的战略思考[J]. 生态环境学报, 2017, 26(1): 1-5. |
Zhao Q G, Teng Y, Huang G Q. Consideration about exploring pilot program of farmland rotation and fallow system in China[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2017, 26(1): 1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 刘颖颖, 卜容燕, 唐杉, 韩上, 王慧, 李敏, 程文龙, 李晓韦, 武际, 朱林. 连续秸秆-紫云英协同还田对双季稻产量、养分积累及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(6): 1008-1016. |
Liu Y Y, Bu R Y, Tang S, Han S, Wang H, Li M, Cheng W L, Li X W, Wu J, Zhu L. Effect of continuous straw-Chinese milk vetch synergistic return to the field on yield, nutrient accumulation and soil fertility of double cropping rice[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(6): 1008-1016. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 高菊生, 黄晶, 杨志长, 曹卫东, 张会民, 高鹏, 高学成. 绿肥和稻草联合还田提高土壤有机质含量并稳定氮素供应[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(3): 472-480. |
Gao J S, Huang J, Yang Z C, Cao W D, Zhang H M, Gao P, Gao X C. Improving organic matter content and nitrogen supply stability of double cropping rice field through co-incorporation of green manure and rice straw[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(3): 472-480. | |
[15] | 周国朋, 曹卫东, 白金顺, 聂军, 徐昌旭, 曾闹华, 高嵩涓, 王艳秋, 志水胜好. 多年紫云英-双季稻下不同施肥水平对两类水稻土有机质及可溶性有机质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(21): 4096-4106. |
Zhou G P, Cao W D, Bai J S, Nie J, Xu C X, Zeng N H, Gao S J, Wang Y Q, Zhi S S H. Effects of different fertilization levels on soil organic matter and dissolved organic matter in two paddy soils after multi-years’ rotation of Chinese milk vetch and double-cropping rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016, 49(21): 4096-4106. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 高嵩涓, 周国朋, 曹卫东. 南方稻田紫云英作冬绿肥的增产节肥效应与机制[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(12): 2115-2126. |
Gao S J, Zhou G P, Cao W D. Effects of milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus) as winter green manure on rice yield and rate of fertilizer application in rice paddies in south China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(12): 2115-2126. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 周国朋, 谢志坚, 曹卫东, 徐昌旭, 白金顺, 曾闹华, 高嵩涓, 杨璐. 稻草高茬—紫云英联合还田改善土壤肥力提高作物产量[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(23): 157-163. |
Zhou G P, Xie Z J, Cao W D, Xu C X, Bai J S, Zeng N H, Gao S J, Yang L. Co-incorporation of high rice stubble and Chinese milk vetch improving soil fertility and yield of rice[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(23): 157-163. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 张璐, 黄晶, 高菊生, 曹卫东, 高鹏, 杨志长. 长期绿肥与氮肥减量配施对水稻产量和土壤养分含量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(5): 106-112. |
Zhang L, Huang J, Gao J S, Cao W D, Gao P, Yang Z C. Effects of long-term green manure and reducing nitrogen applications on rice yield and soil nutrient content[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(5): 106-112. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 王赟, 徐昌旭, 周国朋, 常单娜, 高嵩涓, 曹卫东. 连续种植翻压紫云英减施化肥对江西早稻产量、品质及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(10): 1735-1745. |
Wang Y, Xu C X, Zhou G P, Chang S N, Gao S J, Cao W D. Effects of long-term incorporation of milk vetch combined with reduction of chemical fertilizer on yield, quality and soil fertility of early rice in Jiangxi[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27(10): 1735-1745. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 王慧, 周国朋, 常单娜, 高嵩涓, 刘蕊, 廖育林, 鲁艳红, 曾闹华, 聂军, 曹卫东. 湘北双季稻区种植翻压紫云英的氮肥减施效应[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28(1): 33-44. |
Wang H, Zhou G P, Chang D N, Gao S J, Liu R, Liao Y L, Lu Y H, Zeng N H, Nei J, Cao W D. Nitrogen reduction effects in double rice by planting and returning Chinese milk vetch to the field in Northern Hunan Province[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2022, 28(1): 33-44. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 王吕, 崔月贞, 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 张春辉, 王俊义, 刘怡欣, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 绿肥稻秆协同还田下氮肥减量的增产和培肥短期效应[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48(4): 952-961. |
Wang L, Cui Y Z, Wu Y H, Hao X S, Zhang C H, Wang J Y, Liu Y X, Li X G, Qin Y H. Effects of rice stalks mulching combined with green manure(Astragalus smicus L.) incorporated into soil and reducing nitrogen fertilizer rate on rice yield and soil fertility[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022, 48(4): 952-961. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 鲁艳红, 廖育林, 聂军, 周兴, 谢坚, 杨曾平. 紫云英与尿素或控释尿素配施对双季稻产量及氮钾利用率的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(2): 360-368. |
Lu Y H, Liao Y L, Nie J, Zhou X, Xie J, Yang Z P. Effect of different incorporation of Chinese milk vetch coupled with urea or controlled release urea on yield and nitrogen and potassium nutrient use efficiency in double-cropping rice system[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2017, 23(2): 360-368. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 张磊, 徐昌旭, 刘佳, 李顺, 高嵩涓, 曹卫东. 减施20%化肥下绿肥翻压量对江西双季稻产量及氮素利用的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28(5): 845-856. |
Zhang L, Xu C X, Liu J, Li S, Gao S J, Cao W D. Effects of green manure on yield and nitrogen utilization of double rice under reduced 20% chemical fertilizer input in Jiangxi Province[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2022, 28(5): 845-856. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 卜容燕, 韩上, 李敏, 程文龙, 胡润, 郑仁兵, 王慧, 唐杉, 高嵩涓, 曹卫东, 武际. 安徽单季稻区紫云英翻压的氮肥替代效应[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28(7): 1219-1227. |
Bu R Y, Han S, Li M, Chen W L, Hu R, Zheng R B, Wang H, Tang S, Gao S J, Cao W D, Wu J. Incorporation of milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus) reduces nitrogen fertilizer application rate in single cropping rice region of Anhui Province[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2022, 28(7): 1219-1227. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000. |
Bao S D. Soil and Agricultural Chemical Analysis[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2000. (in Chinese) | |
[26] | 杨丞, 汪洋, 张万洋, 叶廷红, 鲁剑巍, 张赓, 李小坤. 灌溉模式与施氮量互作对水稻茎蘖产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(2): 155-165. |
Yang C, Wang Y, Zhang W Y, Ye T H, Lu J W, Zhang G, Li X K. Effects of interaction between irrigation mode and nitrogen application rate on the yield formation of main stem and tillers of rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2021, 35(2): 155-165. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 陈云, 刘昆, 李婷婷, 李思宇, 李国明, 张伟杨, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 结实期干湿交替灌溉对水稻根系、产量和土壤的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(3): 269-277. |
Chen Y, Liu K, Li T T, Li S Y, Li G M, Zhang W Y, Zhang H, Gu J F, Liu L J, Yang J C. Effects of alternate wetting and moderate soil drying irrigation on root traits, grain yield and soil properties in rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2022, 36(3): 269-277. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 成臣, 曾勇军, 程慧煌, 谭雪明, 商庆银, 曾研华, 石庆华. 齐穗至乳熟期不同温度对水稻南粳9108籽粒激素含量、淀粉积累及其合成关键酶活性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(1): 57-67. |
Cheng C, Zeng Y J, Cheng H H, Tan X M, Shang Q Y, Zeng Y H, Shi Q H. Effects of different temperature from full heading to milking on grain filling stage on grain hormones concentrations, activities of enzymes involved in starch synthesis and accumulation in rice Nanjing 9108[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2019, 33(1): 57-67. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 付景, 王亚, 杨文博, 王越涛, 李本银, 王付华, 王生轩, 白涛, 尹海庆. 干湿交替灌溉耦合施氮量对水稻籽粒灌浆生理和根系生理的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2023, 49(3): 808-820. |
Fu J, Wang Y, Yang W B, Wang Y T, Li B G, Wang F H, Wang S X, Bai T, Yin H Q. Effects of alternate wetting and drying irrigation and nitrogen coupling on grain filling physiology and root physiology in rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2023, 49(3): 808-820. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 杨德生, 黄冠军, 李勇, 黄见良, 王飞. 水稻氮高效栽培技术、品种改良和生理机制研究进展[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2022, 41(1): 62-75. |
Yang D S, Huang G J, Li Y, Hang J L, Wang F. Progress on cultivation technologies, variety improvements and physiological mechanisms of rice with high nitrogen utilization efficiency[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2022, 41(1): 62-75. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | 朱强, 张静, 郭再华, 耿明建. 稻草和紫云英联合还田下施氮水平对水稻产量及土壤氮素形态的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(12): 2177-2183 |
Zhu Q, Zhang J, Guo Z H, Geng M J. Effects of different nitrogen inputs on rice yield and soil nitrogen forms under incorporation of rice straw and Chinese milk vetch[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020, 26(12): 2177-2183. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] | 张济世, 张琳, 丁丽, 刘春增, 吕玉虎, 郑春风, 张成兰, 聂良鹏, 曹卫东, 张玉亭. 紫云英还田与化肥减量配施对土壤氮素供应和水稻生长的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28(10): 1793-1803. |
Zhang J S, Zhang L, Ding L, Liu C Z, Lü Y H, Zheng C F, Zhang C L, Nie L P, Cao W D, Zhang Y T. Effects of Chinese milk vetch incorporation and chemical fertilizer reduction on soil nitrogen supply and rice growth[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2022, 28(10): 1793-1803. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[33] | 张帆. 紫云英与水稻秸秆联合还田下双季稻田土壤氮磷平衡状况及化肥减施策略[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(8): 1376-1387. |
Zhang F. Nitrogen and phosphorus surplus of double-rice cropping system under incorporation of Chinese milk vetch and rice straws[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27(8): 1376-1387. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[34] | 夏琼梅, 胡家权, 董林波, 钱文娟, 何永福, 李贵勇, 龙瑞平, 朱海平, 杨从党. 氮肥减量后移对云南高原水旱轮作下粳稻群体质量及产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(3): 266-277. |
Xia Q M, Hu J Q, Dong L B, Qian W J, He Y F, Li G Y, Long R P, Zhu H P, Yang C D. Effects of reducing and postponing nitrogen application on population quality and grain yield of japonica rice under paddy-upland crop rotations in Yunnan Plateau[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2020, 34(3): 266-277. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[35] | 钱晨晨, 王淑彬, 杨滨娟, 黄国勤. 紫云英与氮肥配施对早稻干物质生产及氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(4): 563-571. |
Qian C C, Wang S B, Yang B J, Huang G Q. Effect of combined Chinese milk vetch and nitrogen fertilizer on nitrogen uptake, utilization and dry matter accumulation in early rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2017, 25(4): 563-571. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[36] | 王慧, 张琳, 常单娜, 周国朋, 高嵩涓, 曾闹华, 聂良鹏, 吕玉虎, 曹卫东. 豫南紫云英水稻轮作区减施不同比例氮肥对水稻养分吸收和转运的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2022, 28(7): 1194-1207. |
Wang H, Zhang L, Chang D N, Zhou G P, Gao S J, Zeng N H, Nei N P, Lü Y H, Cao W D. Nutrient absorption and transport characteristics of rice under different nitrogen reduction ratios in a Chinese milk vetch and rice rotation system in southern Henan Province, China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2022, 28(7): 1194-1207. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[37] | 武云霞, 郭长春, 孙永健, 刘芳艳, 杨志远, 孙园园, 王明田, 马均. 水氮互作下直播稻结实期冠层小气候与米质的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(3): 269-278. |
Wu Y X, Guo C C, Sun Y J, Liu F Y, Yang Z Y, Sun Y Y, Wang M T, Ma J. Relationship between canopy microclimate at grain filling stage and rice quality of directly seeded rice under water and nitrogen interaction[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2021, 35(3): 269-278. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[38] | 汤文光, 唐海明, 罗尊长, 汪柯, 杨光立, 肖小平. 不同种植模式对稻田土壤重金属含量及晚稻稻米品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(8): 1457-1464. |
Tang W G, Tang H M, Luo Z C, Wang K, Yang G L, Xiao X P. Impacts of winter planting patterns on soil heavy metal content and grain quality in late rice in double cropping rice area[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2011, 37(8): 1457-1464. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[39] | 蒙炎成, 唐红琴, 李忠义, 蒲俊宇, 钟菊新, 董文斌, 韦彩会, 莫永诚, 汤海玲, 何铁光. 紫云英还田下氮肥减施对桂南水稻光合特性及产量与品质的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2022(8): 1841-1847. |
Meng Y C, Tang H Q, Li Z Y, Pu J Y, Zhong J X, Dong W B, Wei C H, Mo Y C, Tang H L, He Z G. Effects of Chinese milk vetch returning and reducing nitrogen fertilizer on rice photosynthetic characteristics, yield and quality in southern Guangxi[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2022(8): 1841-1847. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[40] | 唐健, 唐闯, 郭保卫, 张诚信, 张振振, 王科, 张洪程, 陈恒, 孙明珠. 氮肥施用量对机插优质晚稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2020, 46(1): 117-130. |
Tang J, Tang C, Guo B W, Zhang C X, Zhang Z Z, Wang K, Zhang H C, Chen H, Sun M Z. Effect of nitrogen application on yield and rice quality of mechanical transplanting high quality late rice[[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2020, 46(1): 117-130. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 易晓璇, 刘玮琦, 曾盖, 罗丽华, 肖应辉. 灌浆期高温胁迫对早籼稻品质性状的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(1): 72-80. |
[2] | 黄锦文, 李日坤, 陈志诚, 张汴泓, 雷涵, 潘睿欣, 杨铭榆, 潘美清, 唐莉娜. 不同稻草还田技术对烟-稻轮作系统土壤养分、有机碳及微生物多样性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 415-426. |
[3] | 杨晓龙, 王彪, 汪本福, 张枝盛, 张作林, 杨蓝天, 程建平, 李阳. 不同水分管理方式对旱直播水稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
[4] | 杨陶陶, 邹积祥, 伍龙梅, 包晓哲, 江瑜, 张楠, 张彬. 开放式增温对华南双季稻稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(1): 66-77. |
[5] | 景文疆, 顾汉柱, 张小祥, 吴昊, 张伟杨, 顾骏飞, 刘立军, 王志琴, 杨建昌, 张耗. 中籼水稻品种改良过程中米质和根系特征对灌溉方式的响应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(5): 505-519. |
[6] | 张小祥, 邵士梅, 赵步洪, 张耗, 季红娟, 肖宁, 潘存红, 李育红, 吴云雨, 蔡跃, 刘建菊, 吉春明, 张秀琴, 刘广青, 周长海, 黄年生, 李爱宏. 氮肥减施模式对不同穗型迟熟中粳水稻产量及氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(3): 278-294. |
[7] | 杨晨, 郑常, 袁珅, 徐乐, 彭少兵. 再生稻肥料管理对不同品种产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(1): 65-76. |
[8] | 孙园园, 张桥, 孙永健, 唐源, 郭长春, 刘芳艳, 武云霞, 杨志远, 马均. 不同育秧方式下播种量和插秧机具对机插稻氮素利用和产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(6): 595-605. |
[9] | 闫浩亮, 王松, 王雪艳, 党程成, 周梦, 郝蓉蓉, 田小海. 不同水稻品种在高温逼熟下的表现及其与气象因子的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(6): 617-628. |
[10] | 唐先干, 谢金水, 徐昌旭, 刘佳, 袁福生, 刘光荣, 李祖章. 红壤性稻田紫云英与化肥减施对早稻品质与养分吸收的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(5): 466-474. |
[11] | 王亚梁, 朱德峰, 陈惠哲, 张玉屏, 向镜, 王志刚, 张义凯. 籼粳杂交稻精准条播育秧机插减氮增产的效应研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(5): 495-502. |
[12] | 王志东, 陈宜波, 龚蓉, 周少川, 王重荣, 李宏, 黄道强, 周德贵, 赵雷, 潘阳阳, 杨义强, 李晓芳. 优质籼稻剑叶SPAD值与稻米品质相关性研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(1): 89-97. |
[13] | 周娟, 舒小伟, 赖上坤, 许高平, 黄建晔, 姚友礼, 杨连新, 董桂春, 王余龙. 不同类型水稻品种产量和氮素吸收利用对大气CO2浓度升高响应的差异[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(6): 561-573. |
[14] | 文春燕, 熊运华, 姚晓云, 陈春莲, 胡标林, 黄永萍, 吴延寿. 氮肥施用对米粉专用稻产量、米质及加工特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(6): 574-585. |
[15] | 汪浩, 刘祥臣, 张强, 余贵龙, 张文地, 黄健, 朱安, 刘立军. 豫南地区头季和再生季水稻产量与品质差异分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(5): 425-434. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||