中国水稻科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 466-474.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2021.200802
唐先干1,2, 谢金水1,2,*(), 徐昌旭2,*(), 刘佳2, 袁福生2, 刘光荣2, 李祖章2
收稿日期:
2020-08-03
修回日期:
2021-03-17
出版日期:
2021-09-10
发布日期:
2021-09-10
通讯作者:
谢金水,徐昌旭
基金资助:
Xiangan TANG1,2, Jinshui XIE1,2,*(), Changxu XU2,*(), Jia LIU2, Fusheng YUAN2, Guangrong LIU2, Zuzhang LI2
Received:
2020-08-03
Revised:
2021-03-17
Online:
2021-09-10
Published:
2021-09-10
Contact:
Jinshui XIE, Changxu XU
摘要:
【目的】阐明紫云英种植利用后减施化肥对早稻品质、养分吸收及土壤肥力的相互影响,为红壤稻田施肥提供科学依据。【方法】以红壤稻田为研究对象,2015年开始在江西高安大田定位研究种植利用紫云英对早稻生长发育及养分吸收利用的影响。设置6个试验处理:1)不施肥对照处理(CK);2)绿肥处理(G),即紫云英量22 500 kg/hm2;3)100%化肥处理(N100);4)紫云英翻压22 500 kg/hm2+100%化肥处理(GN100);5)紫云英翻压22 500 kg/hm2+80%化肥处理(GN80);6)紫云英翻压22 500 kg/hm2+60%化肥处理(GN60)。【结果】紫云英配施全量及减施适量(20%)化肥能提高水稻产量,保障水稻N、P营养,提高土壤有机质和碱解氮含量。紫云英配施化肥能提高早稻整精米率、垩白与胶稠度但降低蛋白质含量。早稻产量、糙米率、整精米率、垩白粒率、蛋白质与籽粒含N量呈显著正相关,与籽粒含Si量呈显著负相关;籽粒含Mg量与精米率呈显著正相关。籽粒P、Ca、Mg吸收量对碾米品质、蛋白质含量和垩白粒率是正效应,对胶稠度是负效应。土壤碱解氮对籽粒含N量是间接正效应,对籽粒含Si量是间接负效应;碱解氮、有效磷、速效钾对籽粒N、P、K吸收量是间接正效应;pH对籽粒Ca、P含量以及交换性Ca、Mg对籽粒P含量均为间接负效应。【结论】紫云英22 500 kg/hm2还田并减施20%化肥能提高水稻产量,提升稻米品质。
唐先干, 谢金水, 徐昌旭, 刘佳, 袁福生, 刘光荣, 李祖章. 红壤性稻田紫云英与化肥减施对早稻品质与养分吸收的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(5): 466-474.
Xiangan TANG, Jinshui XIE, Changxu XU, Jia LIU, Fusheng YUAN, Guangrong LIU, Zuzhang LI. Effects of Chinese Milk Vetch and Reduced Chemical Fertilizer Application on Quality and Nutrient Uptake of Early Rice in Red Soil Paddy Field[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2021, 35(5): 466-474.
处理 Treatment | 穗长 Panicle length /cm | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(×104·hm-2) | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 每穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle | 2018年实际产量 Yield in 2018 /(kg·hm-2) | 2019年实际产量 Yield in 2019 /(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 17.5±1.2 b | 224.7±48.3 b | 92.2±1.1 a | 25.8±0.6 a | 94.7±11.1 c | 4629±557 c | 4698±470 d |
G | 18.9±0.8 ab | 298.2±25.2 ab | 90.1±1.1 ab | 25.0±0.3 b | 105.9±10.8 b | 5883±196 b | 5989±201 c |
N100 | 19.9±0.3 a | 323.4±37.8 ab | 88.4±1.9 b | 24.9±0.4 b | 129.5±12.6 a | 8214±229 a | 8378±234 a |
GN100 | 20.3±1.2 a | 352.8±31.5 a | 87.3±2.9 b | 24.8±0.3 b | 129.5±6.6 a | 8186±334 a | 8513±287 a |
GN80 | 19.2±0.7 ab | 363.3±56.7 a | 88.6±2.3 b | 24.8±0.3 b | 112.7±8.2 ab | 8254±159 a | 8667±208 a |
GN60 | 19.2±0.8 ab | 340.2±37.8 a | 88.4±2.4 b | 25.0±0.1 b | 113.2±7.0 ab | 7752±235 a | 7558±229 b |
表1 紫云英与化肥减施对水稻产量的影响
Table 1 Effect of Chinese milk vetch returning and chemical fertilizer reduction on rice yield and its components.
处理 Treatment | 穗长 Panicle length /cm | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(×104·hm-2) | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 每穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle | 2018年实际产量 Yield in 2018 /(kg·hm-2) | 2019年实际产量 Yield in 2019 /(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 17.5±1.2 b | 224.7±48.3 b | 92.2±1.1 a | 25.8±0.6 a | 94.7±11.1 c | 4629±557 c | 4698±470 d |
G | 18.9±0.8 ab | 298.2±25.2 ab | 90.1±1.1 ab | 25.0±0.3 b | 105.9±10.8 b | 5883±196 b | 5989±201 c |
N100 | 19.9±0.3 a | 323.4±37.8 ab | 88.4±1.9 b | 24.9±0.4 b | 129.5±12.6 a | 8214±229 a | 8378±234 a |
GN100 | 20.3±1.2 a | 352.8±31.5 a | 87.3±2.9 b | 24.8±0.3 b | 129.5±6.6 a | 8186±334 a | 8513±287 a |
GN80 | 19.2±0.7 ab | 363.3±56.7 a | 88.6±2.3 b | 24.8±0.3 b | 112.7±8.2 ab | 8254±159 a | 8667±208 a |
GN60 | 19.2±0.8 ab | 340.2±37.8 a | 88.4±2.4 b | 25.0±0.1 b | 113.2±7.0 ab | 7752±235 a | 7558±229 b |
处理 Treatment | 糙米率 Brown rice rate/% | 精米率 Milled rice rate/% | 整精米率Head rice rate/% | 垩白度Chalkiness degree/% | 垩白粒率 Chalky rice rate/% | 粒长 Grain length /mm | 长宽比Length- width ratio | 碱消值 Alkali spreading value | 胶稠度 Gel consistency /mm | 直链淀粉Amylose content/% | 蛋白质Protein content/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 82.5±0.2 b | 69.9±1.6 a | 39.5±3.5 b | 9.3±0.9 bc | 48.7±15 b | 5.8±0.1 a | 2.3±0.1 a | 5.2±0.0 a | 84.3±2.5 a | 27.0±0.1 a | 6.4±0.6 c |
G | 82.7±0.2 b | 70.4±3.3 a | 41.5±6.9 b | 11.4±1.9 a | 64.0±6.2 a | 5.8±0.1 a | 2.2±0.1 a | 5.2±0.1 a | 82.7±3.1 ab | 26.8±0.3 a | 6.5±0.3 c |
N100 | 83.5±0.2 a | 72.4±2.0 a | 45.9±3.0 ab | 8.4±0.7 c | 61.0±9.5 ab | 5.7±0.0 a | 2.2±0.0 a | 5.2±0.1 a | 77.3±4.7 b | 26.7±0.3 a | 7.9±0.3 a |
GN100 | 83.7±0.2 a | 72.7±3.4 a | 53.0±0.5 a | 11.3±1.0 a | 74.7±4.2 a | 5.8±0.1 a | 2.2±0.0 a | 5.2±0.1 a | 82.7±1.5 ab | 26.8±0.6 a | 7.4±0.3 ab |
GN80 | 83.7±0.3 a | 71.1±4.8 a | 53.2±1.1 a | 10.8±0.7 ab | 73.3±2.1 a | 5.8±0.2 a | 2.2±0.1 a | 5.2±0.1 a | 81.0±2.6 ab | 27.0±0.1 a | 7.4±0.3 ab |
GN60 | 83.7±0.4 a | 74.5±0.5 a | 52.6±4.2 a | 10.8±0.4 ab | 71.7±6.4 a | 5.8±0.1 a | 2.2±0.0 a | 5.3±0.1 a | 80.0±4.0 ab | 26.6±0.3 a | 7.0±0.4 bc |
表2 紫云英与化肥减施对稻米品质的影响
Table 2 Effect of Chinese milk vetch and chemical fertilizer reduction on rice quality.
处理 Treatment | 糙米率 Brown rice rate/% | 精米率 Milled rice rate/% | 整精米率Head rice rate/% | 垩白度Chalkiness degree/% | 垩白粒率 Chalky rice rate/% | 粒长 Grain length /mm | 长宽比Length- width ratio | 碱消值 Alkali spreading value | 胶稠度 Gel consistency /mm | 直链淀粉Amylose content/% | 蛋白质Protein content/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 82.5±0.2 b | 69.9±1.6 a | 39.5±3.5 b | 9.3±0.9 bc | 48.7±15 b | 5.8±0.1 a | 2.3±0.1 a | 5.2±0.0 a | 84.3±2.5 a | 27.0±0.1 a | 6.4±0.6 c |
G | 82.7±0.2 b | 70.4±3.3 a | 41.5±6.9 b | 11.4±1.9 a | 64.0±6.2 a | 5.8±0.1 a | 2.2±0.1 a | 5.2±0.1 a | 82.7±3.1 ab | 26.8±0.3 a | 6.5±0.3 c |
N100 | 83.5±0.2 a | 72.4±2.0 a | 45.9±3.0 ab | 8.4±0.7 c | 61.0±9.5 ab | 5.7±0.0 a | 2.2±0.0 a | 5.2±0.1 a | 77.3±4.7 b | 26.7±0.3 a | 7.9±0.3 a |
GN100 | 83.7±0.2 a | 72.7±3.4 a | 53.0±0.5 a | 11.3±1.0 a | 74.7±4.2 a | 5.8±0.1 a | 2.2±0.0 a | 5.2±0.1 a | 82.7±1.5 ab | 26.8±0.6 a | 7.4±0.3 ab |
GN80 | 83.7±0.3 a | 71.1±4.8 a | 53.2±1.1 a | 10.8±0.7 ab | 73.3±2.1 a | 5.8±0.2 a | 2.2±0.1 a | 5.2±0.1 a | 81.0±2.6 ab | 27.0±0.1 a | 7.4±0.3 ab |
GN60 | 83.7±0.4 a | 74.5±0.5 a | 52.6±4.2 a | 10.8±0.4 ab | 71.7±6.4 a | 5.8±0.1 a | 2.2±0.0 a | 5.3±0.1 a | 80.0±4.0 ab | 26.6±0.3 a | 7.0±0.4 bc |
处理Treatment | N | P | K | Ca | Mg | Si |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 7.75±0.55 c | 2.98±0.11 a | 4.63±0.04 a | 0.45±0.08 a | 0.33±0.02 a | 10.76±1.06 a |
G | 8.40±0.80 c | 2.94±0.27 a | 4.31±0.31 a | 0.52±0.09 a | 0.35±0.01 a | 8.36±1.00 b |
N100 | 9.09±0.42 b | 2.84±0.24 a | 4.59±0.36 a | 0.48±0.12 a | 0.37±0.07 a | 7.61±1.61 bc |
GN100 | 10.00±0.60 a | 3.05±0.35 a | 4.56±0.18 a | 0.44±0.07 a | 0.37±0.07 a | 7.21±1.49 bc |
GN80 | 9.35±0.13 ab | 2.79±0.25 a | 4.39±0.28 a | 0.45±0.07 a | 0.34±0.09 a | 5.80±0.40 c |
GN60 | 8.60±0.65 bc | 2.93±0.45 a | 4.45±0.56 a | 0.47±0.13 a | 0.33±0.07 a | 6.87±1.24 bc |
表3 紫云英与化肥减施对早稻籽粒养分含量的影响
Table 3 Effect of Chinese milk vetch and chemical fertilizer reduction on grain nutrient contents. mg/g
处理Treatment | N | P | K | Ca | Mg | Si |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 7.75±0.55 c | 2.98±0.11 a | 4.63±0.04 a | 0.45±0.08 a | 0.33±0.02 a | 10.76±1.06 a |
G | 8.40±0.80 c | 2.94±0.27 a | 4.31±0.31 a | 0.52±0.09 a | 0.35±0.01 a | 8.36±1.00 b |
N100 | 9.09±0.42 b | 2.84±0.24 a | 4.59±0.36 a | 0.48±0.12 a | 0.37±0.07 a | 7.61±1.61 bc |
GN100 | 10.00±0.60 a | 3.05±0.35 a | 4.56±0.18 a | 0.44±0.07 a | 0.37±0.07 a | 7.21±1.49 bc |
GN80 | 9.35±0.13 ab | 2.79±0.25 a | 4.39±0.28 a | 0.45±0.07 a | 0.34±0.09 a | 5.80±0.40 c |
GN60 | 8.60±0.65 bc | 2.93±0.45 a | 4.45±0.56 a | 0.47±0.13 a | 0.33±0.07 a | 6.87±1.24 bc |
图1 紫云英与化肥减施对籽粒N、P、K、Ca、Mg、Si吸收量的影响图中不同字母表示不同处理差异达到5%显著水平。
Fig. 1. Effect of Chinese milk vetch and chemical fertilizer reduction on uptake of N, P, K, Ca, Mg and Si by grain. Different lowercase letters on the bars represent significant difference between treatments(P<0.05).
籽粒养分 Rice nutrient | 糙米率 Brown rice rate | 精米率 Milled rice rate | 整精米率 Head rice rate | 垩白度 Chalkiness degree | 垩白粒率 Chalky rice rate | 碱消值 Alkali spreading value | 胶稠度 Gel consistency | 直链淀粉Amylose content | 蛋白质 Protein content | 产量 Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
籽粒养分吸收Nutrient uptake by grain | ||||||||||
N | 0.910** | 0.380 | 0.720** | 0.160 | 0.788** | -0.110 | -0.420 | -0.180 | 0.773** | 0.966** |
P | 0.874** | 0.508* | 0.671** | 0.170 | 0.776** | -0.100 | -0.487* | -0.190 | 0.726** | 0.898** |
K | 0.878** | 0.440 | 0.697** | 0.030 | 0.702** | -0.130 | -0.460 | -0.180 | 0.769** | 0.947** |
Ca | 0.634** | 0.629** | 0.511* | 0.190 | 0.674** | 0.030 | -0.619** | -0.450 | 0.688** | 0.716** |
Mg | 0.767** | 0.635** | 0.540* | 0.140 | 0.701** | -0.030 | -0.532* | -0.210 | 0.748** | 0.794** |
Si | 0.130 | -0.020 | 0.240 | -0.180 | -0.020 | 0.090 | -0.340 | -0.190 | 0.290 | 0.330 |
籽粒养分含量Grain nutrient content | ||||||||||
N | 0.775** | 0.280 | 0.581* | 0.200 | 0.696** | -0.260 | -0.290 | -0.120 | 0.688** | 0.730** |
P | 0.060 | 0.290 | -0.020 | 0.070 | 0.130 | -0.190 | -0.160 | 0.050 | 0.080 | -0.100 |
K | 0.060 | 0.230 | 0.060 | -0.370 | -0.100 | -0.270 | -0.150 | 0.120 | 0.230 | -0.010 |
Ca | -0.110 | 0.440 | -0.050 | 0.180 | 0.110 | 0.030 | -0.270 | -0.420 | 0.140 | -0.110 |
Mg | 0.280 | 0.596** | 0.110 | 0.110 | 0.340 | -0.030 | -0.380 | -0.100 | 0.410 | 0.230 |
Si | -0.789** | -0.390 | -0.532* | -0.320 | -0.777** | 0.130 | 0.190 | 0.140 | -0.501* | -0.743** |
表4 水稻品质、产量与籽粒养分之间的相关性
Table 4 Correlation between yield, quality and nutrients in rice.
籽粒养分 Rice nutrient | 糙米率 Brown rice rate | 精米率 Milled rice rate | 整精米率 Head rice rate | 垩白度 Chalkiness degree | 垩白粒率 Chalky rice rate | 碱消值 Alkali spreading value | 胶稠度 Gel consistency | 直链淀粉Amylose content | 蛋白质 Protein content | 产量 Yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
籽粒养分吸收Nutrient uptake by grain | ||||||||||
N | 0.910** | 0.380 | 0.720** | 0.160 | 0.788** | -0.110 | -0.420 | -0.180 | 0.773** | 0.966** |
P | 0.874** | 0.508* | 0.671** | 0.170 | 0.776** | -0.100 | -0.487* | -0.190 | 0.726** | 0.898** |
K | 0.878** | 0.440 | 0.697** | 0.030 | 0.702** | -0.130 | -0.460 | -0.180 | 0.769** | 0.947** |
Ca | 0.634** | 0.629** | 0.511* | 0.190 | 0.674** | 0.030 | -0.619** | -0.450 | 0.688** | 0.716** |
Mg | 0.767** | 0.635** | 0.540* | 0.140 | 0.701** | -0.030 | -0.532* | -0.210 | 0.748** | 0.794** |
Si | 0.130 | -0.020 | 0.240 | -0.180 | -0.020 | 0.090 | -0.340 | -0.190 | 0.290 | 0.330 |
籽粒养分含量Grain nutrient content | ||||||||||
N | 0.775** | 0.280 | 0.581* | 0.200 | 0.696** | -0.260 | -0.290 | -0.120 | 0.688** | 0.730** |
P | 0.060 | 0.290 | -0.020 | 0.070 | 0.130 | -0.190 | -0.160 | 0.050 | 0.080 | -0.100 |
K | 0.060 | 0.230 | 0.060 | -0.370 | -0.100 | -0.270 | -0.150 | 0.120 | 0.230 | -0.010 |
Ca | -0.110 | 0.440 | -0.050 | 0.180 | 0.110 | 0.030 | -0.270 | -0.420 | 0.140 | -0.110 |
Mg | 0.280 | 0.596** | 0.110 | 0.110 | 0.340 | -0.030 | -0.380 | -0.100 | 0.410 | 0.230 |
Si | -0.789** | -0.390 | -0.532* | -0.320 | -0.777** | 0.130 | 0.190 | 0.140 | -0.501* | -0.743** |
处理 Treatment | pH值 pH value | 有机质 Organic matter /(g·kg-1) | 全氮 Total N /(g·kg-1) | 全磷 Total P /(g·kg-1) | 全钾 Total K /(g·kg-1) | 碱解氮 Alkaline N /(mg·kg-1) | 有效磷 Available P /(mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K /(mg·kg-1) | 交换性钙 Exchangeable Ca /(cmol·kg-1) | 交换性镁 Exchangeable Mg /(cmol·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 5.55±0.24 a | 24.31±2.95 b | 1.21±0.13 a | 0.48±0.09 a | 18.77±1.88 a | 81.25±6.54 b | 13.27±4.14 b | 57.00±3.00 bc | 2.54±0.30 ab | 0.63±0.11 b |
G | 5.65±0.15 a | 27.84±1.18 a | 1.47±0.34 a | 0.49±0.03 a | 21.48±0.52 a | 80.56±4.30 b | 13.15±3.20 b | 54.00±5.00 c | 2.81±0.03 a | 0.66±0.06 ab |
N100 | 5.90±0.12 a | 24.78±2.51 ab | 1.38±0.03 a | 0.45±0.01 a | 20.33±2.41 a | 84.55±2.87 b | 23.46±9.31 a | 75.33±10.69 a | 2.68±0.44 ab | 0.81±0.04 a |
GN100 | 5.71±0.14 a | 25.59±3.57 ab | 1.23±0.10 a | 0.45±0.11 a | 20.57±0.22 a | 92.31±9.01 ab | 19.69±3.07 ab | 68.00±14.93 ab | 2.35±0.52 b | 0.67±0.07 ab |
GN80 | 5.63±0.15 a | 25.70±1.80 ab | 1.51±0.25 a | 0.56±0.08 a | 21.25±1.37 a | 98.51±6.49 a | 17.71±2.88 ab | 72.00±8.54 ab | 2.04±0.17 c | 0.65±0.09 b |
GN60 | 5.65±0.33 a | 26.52±2.78 ab | 1.29±0.13 a | 0.54±0.04 a | 22.15±1.09 a | 96.13±3.93 ab | 18.55±3.25 ab | 57.33±4.16 bc | 2.00±0.19 c | 0.71±0.09 ab |
表5 紫云英与化肥减施对土壤养分的影响
Table 5 Effect of Chinese milk vetch and chemical fertilizer reduction on soil nutrients
处理 Treatment | pH值 pH value | 有机质 Organic matter /(g·kg-1) | 全氮 Total N /(g·kg-1) | 全磷 Total P /(g·kg-1) | 全钾 Total K /(g·kg-1) | 碱解氮 Alkaline N /(mg·kg-1) | 有效磷 Available P /(mg·kg-1) | 速效钾 Available K /(mg·kg-1) | 交换性钙 Exchangeable Ca /(cmol·kg-1) | 交换性镁 Exchangeable Mg /(cmol·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 5.55±0.24 a | 24.31±2.95 b | 1.21±0.13 a | 0.48±0.09 a | 18.77±1.88 a | 81.25±6.54 b | 13.27±4.14 b | 57.00±3.00 bc | 2.54±0.30 ab | 0.63±0.11 b |
G | 5.65±0.15 a | 27.84±1.18 a | 1.47±0.34 a | 0.49±0.03 a | 21.48±0.52 a | 80.56±4.30 b | 13.15±3.20 b | 54.00±5.00 c | 2.81±0.03 a | 0.66±0.06 ab |
N100 | 5.90±0.12 a | 24.78±2.51 ab | 1.38±0.03 a | 0.45±0.01 a | 20.33±2.41 a | 84.55±2.87 b | 23.46±9.31 a | 75.33±10.69 a | 2.68±0.44 ab | 0.81±0.04 a |
GN100 | 5.71±0.14 a | 25.59±3.57 ab | 1.23±0.10 a | 0.45±0.11 a | 20.57±0.22 a | 92.31±9.01 ab | 19.69±3.07 ab | 68.00±14.93 ab | 2.35±0.52 b | 0.67±0.07 ab |
GN80 | 5.63±0.15 a | 25.70±1.80 ab | 1.51±0.25 a | 0.56±0.08 a | 21.25±1.37 a | 98.51±6.49 a | 17.71±2.88 ab | 72.00±8.54 ab | 2.04±0.17 c | 0.65±0.09 b |
GN60 | 5.65±0.33 a | 26.52±2.78 ab | 1.29±0.13 a | 0.54±0.04 a | 22.15±1.09 a | 96.13±3.93 ab | 18.55±3.25 ab | 57.33±4.16 bc | 2.00±0.19 c | 0.71±0.09 ab |
籽粒养分 Rice nutrient | pH值 pH value | 有机质 Organic matter | 全氮 Total N | 全磷 Total P | 全钾 Total K | 碱解氮 Alkaline N | 有效磷 Available P | 速效钾 Available K | 交换性钙 Exchangeable Ca | 交换性镁 Exchangeable Mg |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
籽粒养分吸收Nutrient uptake by grain | ||||||||||
N | 0.250 | -0.040 | 0.030 | 0.000 | -0.050 | 0.613** | 0.508* | 0.590** | -0.380 | 0.280 |
P | 0.060 | 0.160 | 0.050 | -0.030 | -0.010 | 0.577* | 0.507* | 0.410 | -0.480* | 0.140 |
K | 0.200 | 0.140 | 0.100 | 0.040 | 0.010 | 0.610** | 0.617** | 0.533* | -0.380 | 0.250 |
Ca | -0.170 | 0.190 | 0.350 | -0.090 | 0.150 | 0.320 | 0.220 | 0.220 | -0.489* | 0.190 |
Mg | 0.000 | 0.050 | 0.110 | -0.160 | -0.060 | 0.390 | 0.420 | 0.340 | -0.460 | 0.170 |
Si | 0.300 | 0.110 | -0.050 | 0.110 | -0.010 | 0.150 | 0.250 | 0.280 | 0.340 | 0.160 |
籽粒养分含量Grain nutrient content | ||||||||||
N | 0.080 | -0.130 | -0.130 | -0.200 | -0.260 | 0.491* | 0.310 | 0.460 | -0.330 | 0.060 |
P | -0.574* | 0.280 | -0.140 | -0.280 | -0.200 | -0.080 | -0.060 | -0.300 | -0.544* | -0.469* |
K | -0.350 | 0.290 | -0.050 | -0.210 | -0.240 | -0.010 | 0.230 | -0.040 | -0.440 | -0.290 |
Ca | -0.642** | 0.280 | 0.430 | -0.200 | 0.140 | -0.290 | -0.330 | -0.340 | -0.290 | -0.160 |
Mg | -0.360 | 0.080 | 0.090 | -0.330 | -0.150 | -0.070 | 0.090 | -0.070 | -0.460 | -0.130 |
Si | -0.130 | -0.010 | -0.140 | -0.030 | -0.130 | -0.501* | -0.370 | -0.340 | 0.300 | -0.240 |
表6 水稻养分吸收与土壤养分之间的相关性
Table 6 Correlation between soil nutrients and rice nutrient uptake.
籽粒养分 Rice nutrient | pH值 pH value | 有机质 Organic matter | 全氮 Total N | 全磷 Total P | 全钾 Total K | 碱解氮 Alkaline N | 有效磷 Available P | 速效钾 Available K | 交换性钙 Exchangeable Ca | 交换性镁 Exchangeable Mg |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
籽粒养分吸收Nutrient uptake by grain | ||||||||||
N | 0.250 | -0.040 | 0.030 | 0.000 | -0.050 | 0.613** | 0.508* | 0.590** | -0.380 | 0.280 |
P | 0.060 | 0.160 | 0.050 | -0.030 | -0.010 | 0.577* | 0.507* | 0.410 | -0.480* | 0.140 |
K | 0.200 | 0.140 | 0.100 | 0.040 | 0.010 | 0.610** | 0.617** | 0.533* | -0.380 | 0.250 |
Ca | -0.170 | 0.190 | 0.350 | -0.090 | 0.150 | 0.320 | 0.220 | 0.220 | -0.489* | 0.190 |
Mg | 0.000 | 0.050 | 0.110 | -0.160 | -0.060 | 0.390 | 0.420 | 0.340 | -0.460 | 0.170 |
Si | 0.300 | 0.110 | -0.050 | 0.110 | -0.010 | 0.150 | 0.250 | 0.280 | 0.340 | 0.160 |
籽粒养分含量Grain nutrient content | ||||||||||
N | 0.080 | -0.130 | -0.130 | -0.200 | -0.260 | 0.491* | 0.310 | 0.460 | -0.330 | 0.060 |
P | -0.574* | 0.280 | -0.140 | -0.280 | -0.200 | -0.080 | -0.060 | -0.300 | -0.544* | -0.469* |
K | -0.350 | 0.290 | -0.050 | -0.210 | -0.240 | -0.010 | 0.230 | -0.040 | -0.440 | -0.290 |
Ca | -0.642** | 0.280 | 0.430 | -0.200 | 0.140 | -0.290 | -0.330 | -0.340 | -0.290 | -0.160 |
Mg | -0.360 | 0.080 | 0.090 | -0.330 | -0.150 | -0.070 | 0.090 | -0.070 | -0.460 | -0.130 |
Si | -0.130 | -0.010 | -0.140 | -0.030 | -0.130 | -0.501* | -0.370 | -0.340 | 0.300 | -0.240 |
[1] | 曹卫东, 包兴国, 徐昌旭, 聂军, 高亚军, 耿明建. 中国绿肥科研60年回顾与未来展望[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(6): 1450-1461. |
Cao W D, Bao X G, Xu C X, Nie J, Gao Y J, Geng M J. Reviews and prospects on science and technology of green manure in China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2017, 23(6): 1450-1461. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 陈明江, 刘贵富, 余泓, 王冰, 李家洋. 水稻高产优质的分子基础与品种设计[J]. 科学通报, 2018, 63(14): 1275-1289. |
Chen M J, Liu G F, Yu Y, Wang B, Li J Y. Towards molecular design of rice plant architecture and grain quality[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2018, 63(14): 1275-1289. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 张浪周玲红魏甲彬, 成小琳, 徐华勤, 肖志祥, 唐启源, 唐剑武. 冬季种养结合对双季稻生长与土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(3): 226-236. |
Zhang L, Zhou L H, Wei J B, Cheng X L, Xu H Q, Xiao Z X, Tang Q Y, Tang J W. Effects of rice planting combined with chicken raising in winter on double-cropping rice growth and soil fertility[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2018, 32(3): 226-236. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 高嵩涓, 曹卫东, 白金顺, 高菊生, 黄晶, 曾闹华, 常单娜, 志水胜好. 长期冬种绿肥改变红壤稻田土壤微生物生物量特性[J]. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(4): 902-910. |
Gao S J, Cao W D, Bai J S, Gao J S, Huang J, Zeng N H, Chang D N, Zhi S S H. Long-term application of winter green manures changed the soil microbial biomass properties in red paddy soil[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2015, 52(4): 902-910. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 杨曾平, 高菊生, 郑圣先, 聂军, 徐明岗, 谢坚, 廖育林. 长期冬种绿肥对红壤性水稻土微生物特性及酶活性的影响[J]. 土壤, 2011, 43(4): 576-583. |
Yang Z P, Gao J S, Zheng S X, Nie J, Xu M G, Xie J, Liao Y L. Effects of long-term winter planting-green manure on microbial properties and enzyme activities in reddish paddy soil[J]. Soils, 2011, 43(4): 576-583. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 王丹英, 彭建, 徐春梅, 赵锋, 章秀福. 油菜作绿肥还田的培肥效应及对水稻生长的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(1): 85-91. |
Wang D Y, Peng J, Xu C M, Zhao F, Zhang X F. Effects of rape straw manuring on soil fertility and rice growth[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2011, 26(1): 85-91. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 万水霞, 朱宏斌, 唐杉, 郭熙盛, 王允青. 紫云英与化肥配施对安徽沿江双季稻区土壤生物学特性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(2):387-395. |
Wan S X, Zhu H B, Tang S, Guo X S, Wang Y Q. Effects of Astragalus sinicus manure and fertilizer combined application on biological properties of soil in Anhui double cropping rice areas along the Yangtze River[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2015, 21(2):387-395. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 周国朋, 谢志坚, 曹卫东, 徐昌旭, 白金顺, 曾闹华, 高嵩涓, 杨璐. 稻草高茬-紫云英联合还田改善土壤肥力提高作物产量[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017, 33(23): 157-163. |
Zhou G P, Xie Z J, Cao W D, Xu C X, Bai J S, Zeng N H, Gao S J, Yang L. Co-incorporation of high rice stubble and Chinese milk vetch improving soil fertility and yield of rice[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(23): 157-163. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 刘春增, 刘小粉, 李本银, 王守刚, 吕玉虎, 潘兹亮, 曹卫东. 紫云英配施不同用量化肥对土壤养分、团聚性及水稻产量的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2013, 44(2): 409-413. |
Liu C Z, Liu X F, Li B Y, Wang S G, Lü Y H, Pan Z L, Cao W D . Effects of applying Chinese milk vetch with different amounts of chemical fertilizer on soil nutrients, aggregation and rice yield[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2013, 44(2): 409-413. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 刘威, 王晓雨, 朱德雄, 詹鹏, 李培根, 戴志刚, 鲁剑巍, 耿明建. 紫云英与化肥配比施用对早稻养分吸收及产量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2017, 56(8): 1438-1444. |
Liu W, Wang X Y, Zhu D X, Zhan P, Li P G, Dai Z G, Lu J W, Geng M J. Effects of combining application of Astragalus sinicus and chemical fertilizer on nutrient absorption and yield of early rice[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 56(8): 1438-1444. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社,1999. |
Lu R K. Analytical methods for soil and agro-chemistry[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 1999. (in Chinese) | |
[12] | 刘世平, 聂新涛, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲. 免耕套种与秸秆还田对水稻生长及稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2007, 21(1): 71-76. |
Liu S P, Nie X T, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K. Effects of interplanting with zero tillage and wheat straw manuring on rice growth and grain quality[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2007, 21(1): 71-76. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 严奉君, 孙永健, 马均, 徐徽, 李玥, 代邹, 杨志远. 不同土壤肥力条件下麦秆还田与氮肥运筹对杂交稻氮素利用、产量及米质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(1): 56-64. |
Yan F J, Sun Y J, Ma J, Xu H, Li Y, Dai Z, Yang Z Y. Effects of wheat straw mulching and nitrogen management on grain yield, rice quality and nitrogen utilization in hybrid rice under different soil fertility conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2015, 29(1): 56-64. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 曾研华, 吴建富, 潘晓华, 石庆华, 朱德峰. 稻草不同还田方式对双季水稻产量及稻米品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(3): 534-542. |
Zeng Y H, Wu J F, P X H, Shi Q H, Zhu D F. Effects of rice straw incorporation on soil physical, chemical and biological properties in double cropping paddy fields[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2013, 19(3): 534-542. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 陈培峰,董明辉,顾俊荣, 惠锋, 乔中英, 杨代凤, 刘腾飞. 麦秸还田与氮肥运筹对超级稻强弱势粒粒重与品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(6): 715-722. |
Chen P F, Dong M H, Gu J R, Hui F, Qiao Z Y, Yang D F, Liu T F. Effects of returning wheat-residue to field and nitrogen management on grain weight and quality of superior and inferior grains in super rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2012, 26(6): 715-722. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 汤文光, 唐海明, 罗尊长, 汪柯, 杨光立, 肖小平. 不同种植模式对稻田土壤重金属含量及晚稻稻米品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(8): 1457-1464. |
Tang W G, Tang H M, Luo Z C, Wang K, Yang G L, Xiao X P. Impacts of winter planting patterns on soil heavy metal content and grain quality in late rice in double cropping rice area[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2011, 37(8): 1457-1464. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 符冠富, 王丹英, 徐春梅, 彭建, 韩博, 陶龙兴, 章秀福. 稻田冬季保护性耕作对土壤酶活性以及稻米品质的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(3): 618-624. |
Fu G F, Wang D Y, Xu C M, Peng J, Han B, Tao L X, Zhang X F. Effect of winter conservation tillage in paddy field on soil enzyme activities and grain quality[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2009, 15(3): 618-624. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 吴关庭, 李旭晨. 稻米食味的研究与改良[J]. 中国农学通报, 2000, 16(6): 21-24. |
Wu G T, Li X C. Research and improvement of rice taste[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2000, 16(6): 21-24. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 杨静, 罗秋香, 钱春荣, 刘海英, 金正勋. 氮素对稻米蛋白质组分含量及蒸煮食味品质的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2006, 37(2):145-150. |
Yang J, Luo Q X, Qian C R, Liu H Y, Jin Z X. Effect of nitrogen on the protein fractions content and cooking and eating quality of rice grain[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2006, 37(2): 145-150. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 谢宏, 原蓼蓼, 李丹丹, 梁婧婧. 含二硫键的稻米蛋白质对米饭蒸煮食味品质的影响[J]. 食品科技, 2012, 37(9): 139-142. |
Xie H, Yuan L L, Li D D, Liang J J. Impacts of proteins on cooking and eating properties of rice[J]. Food Science and Technology, 2012, 37(9): 139-142. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 石吕, 张新月, 孙惠艳, 曹先梅, 刘建, 张祖建. 不同类型水稻品种稻米蛋白质含量与蒸煮食味品质的关系及后期氮肥的效应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(6): 541-552. |
Shi L, Zhang X Y, Sun H Y, Cao X M, Liu J, Zhang Z J. Relationship of grain protein content with cooking and eating quality as affected by nitrogen fertilizer at late growth stage for different types of rice varieties[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2019, 33(6): 541-552. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 商全玉, 张文忠, 韩亚东, 荣蓉, 徐海, 徐正进, 陈温福. 硅肥对北方粳稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2009, 23(06): 661-664. |
Shang Q Y, Zhang W Z, Han Y D, Rong R, Xu H, Xu Z J, Chen W F. Effect of Si fertilizer application on yield and grain quality of japonica rice from northeast China[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2009, 23(06): 661-664. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 蔡德龙. 国内外硅肥研究与应用进展[J]. 磷肥与复肥, 2017, 32(1): 37-39. |
Cai D L. Progress in research and application of silicon fertilizer at home and abroad[J]. Phosphate and Compound Fertilizer, 2017, 32(1): 37-39. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 李祖章, 陶其骧, 刘光荣, 章和珍, 刘益仁. 江西省耕地土壤有效硅含量调查研究[J]. 江西农业学报, 1999, 11(3): 1-9. |
Li Z Z, Tao Q X, Liu G R, Zhang H Z, Liu Y R. Investigation of available silicon content in cultivated soil in Jiangxi Province[J]. Acta Agriculture Jiangxi, 1999, 11(3): 1-9. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 钱永德, 左豫虎, 郑桂萍, 李晓蕾, 马艳, 赵凤亮.氮镁耦合对寒地早粳龙粳20商品品质影响[J].核农学报,2013,27(1):118-125. |
Qian Y D, Zuo Y H, Zheng G P, Li X L, Ma Y, Zhao F L. Effects of nitrogen and magnesium coupling on commercial qualities of the early japonica Longjing 20 in cold region[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 27(1): 118-125. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 马艳, 郑桂萍, 赵洋, 蔡永盛, 李丹丹, 郑悦, 潘世驹, 胡法龙, 李晓蕾.硫酸镁对水稻光合特性和品质的影响[J]. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报, 2014, 26(6): 1-6. |
Ma Y, Zheng G P, Zhao Y, Cai Y S, Li D D, Zheng Y, Pan S J, Hu F L, Li X L. Effects of magnesium sulfate on photosynthetic characteristics and quality of rice[J]. Journal of Heilongjiang Bayi Agricultural University, 2014, 26(6): 1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 徐昌旭, 谢志坚, 许政良, 苏全平, 李水荣, 秦文婧. 等量紫云英条件下化肥用量对早稻养分吸收和干物质积累的影响[J]. 江西农业学报, 2010, 22(10): 13-15. |
Xu C X, Xie Z J, Xu Z L, Su Q P, Li S R, Qin W J. Effects of applying mineral fertilizer reasonably on nutrient absorption and dry matter accumulation of early rice under applying equivalent Astragalus sinicus[J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2010, 22(10): 13-15. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 王建红, 曹凯, 张贤. 紫云英翻压量对单季晚稻养分吸收和产量的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(1): 156-163. |
Wang J H, Cao K, Z X. Effects of incorporation amounts of Chinese milk vetch on nutrient uptake and yield of single cropping late rice[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2014, 20(1): 156-163. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 鲁艳红, 廖育林, 聂军, 周兴, 谢坚, 杨曾平. 紫云英与尿素或控释尿素配施对双季稻产量及氮钾利用率的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(2): 360-368. |
Lu Y H, Liao Y L, Nie J, Zhou X, Xie J, Yang Z P. Effect of different incorporation of Chinese milk vetch coupled with urea or controlled release urea on yield and nitrogen and potassium nutrient use efficiency in double-cropping rice system[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2017, 23(2): 360-368. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 王士梅, 朴钟泽, 李培德, 申广勒. 钙增效剂对稻米中钙等矿质元素积累及稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2007(2): 185-188. |
Wang S M, Pu Z Z, Li P D, Shen G L. Effects of Ca potentiators to Ca contents, mineral elements and quality in rice[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2007 (2): 185-188. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | 刘立军, 常二华, 范苗苗, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 结实期钾、钙对水稻根系分泌物与稻米品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2011, 37(4): 661-669. |
Liu L J, Chang E H, Fan M M, Wang Z Q, Yang J C. Effects of potassium and calcium on root exudates and grain quality during grain filling[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2011, 37(4): 661-669. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 易晓璇, 刘玮琦, 曾盖, 罗丽华, 肖应辉. 灌浆期高温胁迫对早籼稻品质性状的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(1): 72-80. |
[2] | 吴玉红, 李艳华, 王吕, 秦宇航, 李杉杉, 郝兴顺, 张庆路, 崔月贞, 肖飞. 陕南稻区紫云英稻草联合还田配施减量氮肥协同提升水稻产量与稻米品质[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(6): 628-641. |
[3] | 黄锦文, 李日坤, 陈志诚, 张汴泓, 雷涵, 潘睿欣, 杨铭榆, 潘美清, 唐莉娜. 不同稻草还田技术对烟-稻轮作系统土壤养分、有机碳及微生物多样性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 415-426. |
[4] | 杨晓龙, 王彪, 汪本福, 张枝盛, 张作林, 杨蓝天, 程建平, 李阳. 不同水分管理方式对旱直播水稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
[5] | 杨陶陶, 邹积祥, 伍龙梅, 包晓哲, 江瑜, 张楠, 张彬. 开放式增温对华南双季稻稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(1): 66-77. |
[6] | 景文疆, 顾汉柱, 张小祥, 吴昊, 张伟杨, 顾骏飞, 刘立军, 王志琴, 杨建昌, 张耗. 中籼水稻品种改良过程中米质和根系特征对灌溉方式的响应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(5): 505-519. |
[7] | 陈云, 刘昆, 李婷婷, 李思宇, 李国明, 张伟杨, 张耗, 顾骏飞, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 结实期干湿交替灌溉对水稻根系、产量和土壤的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(3): 269-277. |
[8] | 徐青山, 黄晶, 孙爱军, 洪小智, 朱练峰, 曹小闯, 孔亚丽, 金千瑜, 朱春权, 张均华. 低温影响水稻发育机理及调控途径研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(2): 118-130. |
[9] | 杨晨, 郑常, 袁珅, 徐乐, 彭少兵. 再生稻肥料管理对不同品种产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(1): 65-76. |
[10] | 闫浩亮, 王松, 王雪艳, 党程成, 周梦, 郝蓉蓉, 田小海. 不同水稻品种在高温逼熟下的表现及其与气象因子的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(6): 617-628. |
[11] | 柳开楼, 韩天富, 李文军, 余喜初, 胡志华, 叶会财, 胡丹丹, 宋惠洁, 李大明, 黄庆海. 紫云英不同翻压年限下驱动水稻产量变化的土壤理化因子 分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(3): 291-302. |
[12] | 王志东, 陈宜波, 龚蓉, 周少川, 王重荣, 李宏, 黄道强, 周德贵, 赵雷, 潘阳阳, 杨义强, 李晓芳. 优质籼稻剑叶SPAD值与稻米品质相关性研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(1): 89-97. |
[13] | 文春燕, 熊运华, 姚晓云, 陈春莲, 胡标林, 黄永萍, 吴延寿. 氮肥施用对米粉专用稻产量、米质及加工特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(6): 574-585. |
[14] | 汪浩, 刘祥臣, 张强, 余贵龙, 张文地, 黄健, 朱安, 刘立军. 豫南地区头季和再生季水稻产量与品质差异分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(5): 425-434. |
[15] | 陈专专, 杨勇, 冯琳皓, 孙晔, 张昌泉, 范晓磊, 李钱峰, 刘巧泉. Wx与ALK主要等位基因不同组合对稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(3): 228-236. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||