中国水稻科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (5): 425-434.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2020.0106
汪浩1, 刘祥臣2, 张强1,2, 余贵龙2, 张文地1, 黄健1, 朱安1, 刘立军1,*()
收稿日期:
2020-01-18
修回日期:
2020-05-22
出版日期:
2020-09-10
发布日期:
2020-09-10
通讯作者:
刘立军
基金资助:
Hao WANG1, Xiangchen LIU2, Qiang ZHANG1,2, Guilong YU2, Wendi ZHANG1, Jian HUANG1, An ZHU1, Lijun LIU1,*()
Received:
2020-01-18
Revised:
2020-05-22
Online:
2020-09-10
Published:
2020-09-10
Contact:
Lijun LIU
摘要:
【目的】 “中稻+再生稻”组合是豫南稻区新的水稻种植模式,但是头季与再生季水稻产量和稻米品质变化尚不清楚。明确其产量和米质变化规律可为豫南地区高产优质再生稻品种选择提供理论与实践依据。【方法】以两优6326等12个适于单季种植的杂交籼稻为材料,在当地高产栽培条件下,依据头季和再生季两季产量将其划分为两季产量均高(双高)、头季稻产量高再生季产量低(头高再低)、头季稻产量低再生季产量高(头低再高)和两季产量均低(双低)等四种类型,并分析了米质的差异。【结果】 1)与头季稻相比,12个组合的再生季稻米加工品质和外观品质显著改善,蛋白质含量降低,稻米食味品质不同程度变优。2)两季不同产量类型之间比较,除双低类型(仅深两优11号一个品种)外,双高类型和头高再低类型加工品质较优,而头高再低类型的外观品质和蒸煮食味品质较优。蛋白质含量在各产量类型头季稻之间无显著差异,而再生季双高类型较头高再低类型高10.7 %,比头低再高类型低1.75 %。3)齐穗后日平均温度对稻米品质的影响远大于日照时数,再生季齐穗后日平均温度较低是其稻米品质优于头季稻的重要原因。【结论】综合产量及品质,两优6326、天两优616、广两优476和丰两优香1号是适于豫南地区的高产优质再生水稻品种。
中图分类号:
汪浩, 刘祥臣, 张强, 余贵龙, 张文地, 黄健, 朱安, 刘立军. 豫南地区头季和再生季水稻产量与品质差异分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(5): 425-434.
Hao WANG, Xiangchen LIU, Qiang ZHANG, Guilong YU, Wendi ZHANG, Jian HUANG, An ZHU, Lijun LIU. Differences in Grain Yield and Quality in Main and Ratoon Rice in Southern Henan Province[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2020, 34(5): 425-434.
品种名称 Combination name | 播种期 SD | 移栽期 TD | 头季稻MS | 再生稻RS | 全生育期 TGD/d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
齐穗期 FH | 成熟期 MA | 生育期 GD/d | 齐穗期 FH | 成熟期 MA | 生育期 GD/d | ||||
两优6326 LY 6326 | 03-04 | 04-17 | 06-28 | 08-06 | 155 | 09-02 | 10-22 | 77 | 232 |
泸优9803 LY 9803 | 03-04 | 04-17 | 07-12 | 08-17 | 166 | 09-08 | 10-28 | 72 | 238 |
天两优616 TLY 616 | 03-04 | 04-17 | 06-29 | 08-06 | 155 | 08-31 | 10-22 | 77 | 232 |
广两优476 GLY 476 | 03-04 | 04-17 | 07-12 | 08-17 | 166 | 09-13 | 10-28 | 72 | 238 |
丰两优香1号 FLYX 1 | 03-04 | 04-17 | 07-01 | 08-06 | 155 | 09-02 | 10-22 | 77 | 232 |
C两优018 CLY 018 | 03-04 | 04-17 | 07-13 | 08-17 | 166 | 09-09 | 10-29 | 73 | 239 |
两优0815 LY 0815 | 03-04 | 04-17 | 07-11 | 08-17 | 166 | 09-01 | 10-20 | 64 | 230 |
E两优476 ELY 476 | 03-04 | 04-17 | 07-10 | 08-17 | 166 | 09-08 | 10-30 | 74 | 240 |
准两优608 ZLY 608 | 03-04 | 04-17 | 07-10 | 08-17 | 166 | 09-07 | 10-26 | 70 | 236 |
凤两优464 FLY 464 | 03-04 | 04-17 | 07-05 | 08-06 | 155 | 09-02 | 10-22 | 77 | 232 |
德优8258 DY 8258 | 03-04 | 04-17 | 07-02 | 08-06 | 155 | 09-01 | 10-19 | 74 | 229 |
深两优11号 SLY 11 | 03-04 | 04-17 | 06-29 | 08-06 | 155 | 08-30 | 10-17 | 72 | 227 |
表1 供试杂交籼稻组合的生育期
Table 1 Growth duration of various indica rice combinations.
品种名称 Combination name | 播种期 SD | 移栽期 TD | 头季稻MS | 再生稻RS | 全生育期 TGD/d | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
齐穗期 FH | 成熟期 MA | 生育期 GD/d | 齐穗期 FH | 成熟期 MA | 生育期 GD/d | ||||
两优6326 LY 6326 | 03-04 | 04-17 | 06-28 | 08-06 | 155 | 09-02 | 10-22 | 77 | 232 |
泸优9803 LY 9803 | 03-04 | 04-17 | 07-12 | 08-17 | 166 | 09-08 | 10-28 | 72 | 238 |
天两优616 TLY 616 | 03-04 | 04-17 | 06-29 | 08-06 | 155 | 08-31 | 10-22 | 77 | 232 |
广两优476 GLY 476 | 03-04 | 04-17 | 07-12 | 08-17 | 166 | 09-13 | 10-28 | 72 | 238 |
丰两优香1号 FLYX 1 | 03-04 | 04-17 | 07-01 | 08-06 | 155 | 09-02 | 10-22 | 77 | 232 |
C两优018 CLY 018 | 03-04 | 04-17 | 07-13 | 08-17 | 166 | 09-09 | 10-29 | 73 | 239 |
两优0815 LY 0815 | 03-04 | 04-17 | 07-11 | 08-17 | 166 | 09-01 | 10-20 | 64 | 230 |
E两优476 ELY 476 | 03-04 | 04-17 | 07-10 | 08-17 | 166 | 09-08 | 10-30 | 74 | 240 |
准两优608 ZLY 608 | 03-04 | 04-17 | 07-10 | 08-17 | 166 | 09-07 | 10-26 | 70 | 236 |
凤两优464 FLY 464 | 03-04 | 04-17 | 07-05 | 08-06 | 155 | 09-02 | 10-22 | 77 | 232 |
德优8258 DY 8258 | 03-04 | 04-17 | 07-02 | 08-06 | 155 | 09-01 | 10-19 | 74 | 229 |
深两优11号 SLY 11 | 03-04 | 04-17 | 06-29 | 08-06 | 155 | 08-30 | 10-17 | 72 | 227 |
组合名称 Combination name | 1–7 d1) | 8–14 d | 15–21 d | 22–28 d | 29–35 d | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
头季稻 MS | 再生稻 RS | 头季稻 MS | 再生稻 RS | 头季稻 MS | 再生稻 RS | 头季稻 MS | 再生稻 RS | 头季稻 MS | 再生稻 RS | |
两优6326 LY 6326 | 27.8 | 25.4 | 24.9 | 22.8 | 30.3 | 22.6 | 32.1 | 21.3 | 28.0 | 20.1 |
泸优9803 LY 9803 | 30.3 | 22.6 | 32.1 | 22.8 | 28.0 | 21.5 | 30.2 | 20.5 | 30.0 | 19.5 |
天两优616 TLY 616 | 27.1 | 26.1 | 25.5 | 22.6 | 31.0 | 23.1 | 32.0 | 21.7 | 27.7 | 20.5 |
广两优476 GLY 476 | 30.3 | 23.2 | 32.1 | 21.8 | 28.0 | 20.5 | 30.2 | 20.0 | 30.0 | 15.9 |
丰两优香1号 FLYX 1 | 26.0 | 25.4 | 26.7 | 22.8 | 32.1 | 22.6 | 30.1 | 21.3 | 28.6 | 20.1 |
C两优018 CLY 018 | 31.0 | 22.8 | 32.0 | 22.6 | 27.7 | 21.3 | 30.5 | 20.1 | 29.3 | 18.6 |
两优0815 LY 0815 | 29.6 | 25.9 | 31.9 | 22.6 | 28.7 | 22.8 | 29.7 | 21.5 | 30.5 | 20.2 |
E两优476 ELY 476 | 28.7 | 22.6 | 31.8 | 22.8 | 29.5 | 21.5 | 29.0 | 20.2 | 30.8 | 19.2 |
准两优608 ZLY 608 | 28.7 | 22.6 | 31.8 | 22.8 | 29.5 | 21.5 | 29.0 | 20.2 | 30.8 | 19.2 |
凤两优464 FLY 464 | 24.9 | 25.4 | 30.3 | 22.8 | 32.1 | 22.6 | 28.0 | 21.3 | 30.2 | 20.1 |
德优8258 DY 8258 | 25.7 | 25.9 | 27.6 | 22.6 | 32.0 | 22.8 | 29.8 | 24.6 | 28.7 | 20.1 |
深两优11号 SLY 11 | 27.1 | 26.8 | 25.5 | 22.8 | 31.0 | 21.8 | 30.2 | 20.5 | 30.0 | 20.0 |
表2 头季稻和再生季齐穗后不同时间段的日平均温度
Table 2 Average daily temperature at different stages after full heading in main and ratoon seasons. ℃
组合名称 Combination name | 1–7 d1) | 8–14 d | 15–21 d | 22–28 d | 29–35 d | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
头季稻 MS | 再生稻 RS | 头季稻 MS | 再生稻 RS | 头季稻 MS | 再生稻 RS | 头季稻 MS | 再生稻 RS | 头季稻 MS | 再生稻 RS | |
两优6326 LY 6326 | 27.8 | 25.4 | 24.9 | 22.8 | 30.3 | 22.6 | 32.1 | 21.3 | 28.0 | 20.1 |
泸优9803 LY 9803 | 30.3 | 22.6 | 32.1 | 22.8 | 28.0 | 21.5 | 30.2 | 20.5 | 30.0 | 19.5 |
天两优616 TLY 616 | 27.1 | 26.1 | 25.5 | 22.6 | 31.0 | 23.1 | 32.0 | 21.7 | 27.7 | 20.5 |
广两优476 GLY 476 | 30.3 | 23.2 | 32.1 | 21.8 | 28.0 | 20.5 | 30.2 | 20.0 | 30.0 | 15.9 |
丰两优香1号 FLYX 1 | 26.0 | 25.4 | 26.7 | 22.8 | 32.1 | 22.6 | 30.1 | 21.3 | 28.6 | 20.1 |
C两优018 CLY 018 | 31.0 | 22.8 | 32.0 | 22.6 | 27.7 | 21.3 | 30.5 | 20.1 | 29.3 | 18.6 |
两优0815 LY 0815 | 29.6 | 25.9 | 31.9 | 22.6 | 28.7 | 22.8 | 29.7 | 21.5 | 30.5 | 20.2 |
E两优476 ELY 476 | 28.7 | 22.6 | 31.8 | 22.8 | 29.5 | 21.5 | 29.0 | 20.2 | 30.8 | 19.2 |
准两优608 ZLY 608 | 28.7 | 22.6 | 31.8 | 22.8 | 29.5 | 21.5 | 29.0 | 20.2 | 30.8 | 19.2 |
凤两优464 FLY 464 | 24.9 | 25.4 | 30.3 | 22.8 | 32.1 | 22.6 | 28.0 | 21.3 | 30.2 | 20.1 |
德优8258 DY 8258 | 25.7 | 25.9 | 27.6 | 22.6 | 32.0 | 22.8 | 29.8 | 24.6 | 28.7 | 20.1 |
深两优11号 SLY 11 | 27.1 | 26.8 | 25.5 | 22.8 | 31.0 | 21.8 | 30.2 | 20.5 | 30.0 | 20.0 |
组合名称 Combination name | 1–7 d1) | 8–14 d | 15–21 d | 22–28 d | 29–35 d | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
头季稻 MS | 再生稻 RS | 头季稻 MS | 再生稻 RS | 头季稻 MS | 再生稻 RS | 头季稻 MS | 再生稻 RS | 头季稻 MS | 再生稻 RS | |
两优6326 LY 6326 | 2.0 | 4.9 | 0.8 | 2.6 | 8.8 | 1.6 | 10.5 | 5.4 | 4.6 | 7.2 |
泸优9803 LY 9803 | 8.8 | 4.1 | 10.5 | 0.5 | 4.6 | 5.1 | 8.6 | 7.3 | 7.9 | 4.6 |
天两优616 TLY 616 | 1.6 | 3.1 | 1.0 | 3.8 | 10.3 | 0.9 | 9.6 | 4.0 | 5.2 | 7.3 |
广两优476 GLY 476 | 8.8 | 0.9 | 10.5 | 3.8 | 4.6 | 6.0 | 8.6 | 5.5 | 7.9 | 3.1 |
丰两优香1号 FLYX 1 | 0.5 | 4.9 | 3.4 | 2.6 | 10.8 | 1.6 | 6.7 | 5.4 | 6.8 | 7.2 |
C两优018 CLY 018 | 10.3 | 2.6 | 9.6 | 1.6 | 5.2 | 5.4 | 8.5 | 7.2 | 7.0 | 3.6 |
两优0815 LY 0815 | 7.9 | 3.5 | 10.6 | 4.1 | 5.1 | 0.5 | 8.2 | 5.1 | 8.5 | 7.3 |
E两优476 ELY 476 | 6.2 | 4.1 | 10.9 | 0.5 | 5.6 | 5.1 | 7.6 | 7.3 | 1.9 | 4.6 |
准两优608 ZLY 608 | 6.2 | 3.8 | 10.9 | 0.9 | 5.6 | 4.0 | 7.6 | 7.3 | 9.1 | 4.6 |
凤两优464 FLY 464 | 0.8 | 4.9 | 8.8 | 2.6 | 10.5 | 1.6 | 4.6 | 5.4 | 8.6 | 7.2 |
德优8258 DY 8258 | 0.0 | 3.5 | 4.7 | 4.1 | 11.2 | 0.5 | 5.4 | 5.1 | 7.6 | 7.3 |
深两优11号 SLY 11 | 1.6 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 3.8 | 10.3 | 0.9 | 9.6 | 3.8 | 5.2 | 6.0 |
表3 头季稻和再生季齐穗后不同时间段的平均日照时数
Table 3 Average sunshine hours at different stages after full heading in main and ratoon seasons. h
组合名称 Combination name | 1–7 d1) | 8–14 d | 15–21 d | 22–28 d | 29–35 d | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
头季稻 MS | 再生稻 RS | 头季稻 MS | 再生稻 RS | 头季稻 MS | 再生稻 RS | 头季稻 MS | 再生稻 RS | 头季稻 MS | 再生稻 RS | |
两优6326 LY 6326 | 2.0 | 4.9 | 0.8 | 2.6 | 8.8 | 1.6 | 10.5 | 5.4 | 4.6 | 7.2 |
泸优9803 LY 9803 | 8.8 | 4.1 | 10.5 | 0.5 | 4.6 | 5.1 | 8.6 | 7.3 | 7.9 | 4.6 |
天两优616 TLY 616 | 1.6 | 3.1 | 1.0 | 3.8 | 10.3 | 0.9 | 9.6 | 4.0 | 5.2 | 7.3 |
广两优476 GLY 476 | 8.8 | 0.9 | 10.5 | 3.8 | 4.6 | 6.0 | 8.6 | 5.5 | 7.9 | 3.1 |
丰两优香1号 FLYX 1 | 0.5 | 4.9 | 3.4 | 2.6 | 10.8 | 1.6 | 6.7 | 5.4 | 6.8 | 7.2 |
C两优018 CLY 018 | 10.3 | 2.6 | 9.6 | 1.6 | 5.2 | 5.4 | 8.5 | 7.2 | 7.0 | 3.6 |
两优0815 LY 0815 | 7.9 | 3.5 | 10.6 | 4.1 | 5.1 | 0.5 | 8.2 | 5.1 | 8.5 | 7.3 |
E两优476 ELY 476 | 6.2 | 4.1 | 10.9 | 0.5 | 5.6 | 5.1 | 7.6 | 7.3 | 1.9 | 4.6 |
准两优608 ZLY 608 | 6.2 | 3.8 | 10.9 | 0.9 | 5.6 | 4.0 | 7.6 | 7.3 | 9.1 | 4.6 |
凤两优464 FLY 464 | 0.8 | 4.9 | 8.8 | 2.6 | 10.5 | 1.6 | 4.6 | 5.4 | 8.6 | 7.2 |
德优8258 DY 8258 | 0.0 | 3.5 | 4.7 | 4.1 | 11.2 | 0.5 | 5.4 | 5.1 | 7.6 | 7.3 |
深两优11号 SLY 11 | 1.6 | 4.0 | 1.0 | 3.8 | 10.3 | 0.9 | 9.6 | 3.8 | 5.2 | 6.0 |
产量类型 Yield type | 组合名称 Combination name | 头季稻产量 Main season yield/(t·hm-2) | 再生季产量 Ratoon season yield/(t·hm-2) | 再生季产量/头季稻产量 Yield ratio of ratoon to main season/% | 两季总产 Total output in two seasons /( t·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
双高BH | 两优6326 LY 6326 | 8.80 b | 6.62 a | 75.2 d | 15.4 a |
泸优9803 LY 9803 | 8.68 b | 6.09 a | 70.2 f | 14.8 a | |
天两优616 TLY 616 | 8.50 e | 6.38 a | 75.1 d | 14.9 a | |
广两优476 GLY 476 | 8.41 b | 6.57 a | 78.1 c | 15.0 a | |
丰两优香1号FLYX 1 | 8.45 b | 6.19 a | 73.3 e | 14.6 a | |
平均值Mean | 8.57 | 6.37 | 74.3 | 14.9 | |
头高再低HL | C两优018 CLY 018 | 8.53 b | 5.30 b | 62.1 h | 13.8 ab |
两优0815 LY 0815 | 8.26 b | 5.04 c | 61.0 h | 13.3 c | |
E两优476 ELY 476 | 9.00 a | 4.97 c | 55.2 i | 14.0 a | |
平均值Mean | 8.60 | 5.10 | 59.3 | 13.7 | |
头低再高LH | 准两优608 ZLY 608 | 7.59 c | 6.22 a | 82.0 c | 13.8 ab |
凤两优464 FLY 464 | 7.19 e | 6.32 a | 87.9 b | 13.5 ab | |
德优8258 DY 8258 | 6.03 f | 5.87 ab | 97.4 a | 11.9 e | |
平均值Mean | 6.94 | 6.14 | 88.5 | 13.1 | |
双低BL | 深两优11号 SLY 11 | 6.27 d | 3.09 c | 49.3 g | 9.4 d |
表4 不同杂交籼稻组合头季稻与再生季稻产量比较
Table 4 Comparison of grain yields of different indica hybrid combinations in main and ratoon seasons.
产量类型 Yield type | 组合名称 Combination name | 头季稻产量 Main season yield/(t·hm-2) | 再生季产量 Ratoon season yield/(t·hm-2) | 再生季产量/头季稻产量 Yield ratio of ratoon to main season/% | 两季总产 Total output in two seasons /( t·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
双高BH | 两优6326 LY 6326 | 8.80 b | 6.62 a | 75.2 d | 15.4 a |
泸优9803 LY 9803 | 8.68 b | 6.09 a | 70.2 f | 14.8 a | |
天两优616 TLY 616 | 8.50 e | 6.38 a | 75.1 d | 14.9 a | |
广两优476 GLY 476 | 8.41 b | 6.57 a | 78.1 c | 15.0 a | |
丰两优香1号FLYX 1 | 8.45 b | 6.19 a | 73.3 e | 14.6 a | |
平均值Mean | 8.57 | 6.37 | 74.3 | 14.9 | |
头高再低HL | C两优018 CLY 018 | 8.53 b | 5.30 b | 62.1 h | 13.8 ab |
两优0815 LY 0815 | 8.26 b | 5.04 c | 61.0 h | 13.3 c | |
E两优476 ELY 476 | 9.00 a | 4.97 c | 55.2 i | 14.0 a | |
平均值Mean | 8.60 | 5.10 | 59.3 | 13.7 | |
头低再高LH | 准两优608 ZLY 608 | 7.59 c | 6.22 a | 82.0 c | 13.8 ab |
凤两优464 FLY 464 | 7.19 e | 6.32 a | 87.9 b | 13.5 ab | |
德优8258 DY 8258 | 6.03 f | 5.87 ab | 97.4 a | 11.9 e | |
平均值Mean | 6.94 | 6.14 | 88.5 | 13.1 | |
双低BL | 深两优11号 SLY 11 | 6.27 d | 3.09 c | 49.3 g | 9.4 d |
产量类型 Yield type | 品种名称 Cultivar name | 糙米率 Brown rice rate /% | 精米率 Milled rice rate/% | 整精米率 Head milled rice rate /% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
头季稻MS | 再生稻RS | 头季稻MS | 再生稻RS | 头季稻MS | 再生稻RS | ||||
双高 BH | 两优6326 LY 6326 | 82.2 a | 82.6 a | 71.0 a | 76.0 ab | 52.6 b | 67.8 bc | ||
泸优9803 LY 9803 | 81.6 a | 83.2 a | 72.3 a | 76.8 a | 53.4 b | 56.6 d | |||
天两优616 TLY 616 | 81.1 b | 81.9 b | 69.6 c | 75.4 a | 54.4 a | 67.0 c | |||
广两优476 GLY 476 | 80.6 d | 82.3 b | 71.6 a | 74.1 b | 61.3 a | 63.7 c | |||
丰两优香1号FLYX 1 | 81.1 b | 81.7 c | 70.5 b | 75.4 a | 55.8 a | 67.8 b | |||
平均值Mean | 81.3 | 82.3 | 71.0 | 75.6 | 55.5 | 64.6 | |||
头高再低 HL | C两优018 CLY 018 | 81.9 a | 81.2 d | 73.4 a | 75.9 ab | 57.9 a | 76.9 a | ||
两优0815 LY 0815 | 81.5 a | 82.6 ab | 70.9 ab | 76.1 c | 52.5 b | 72.7 b | |||
E两优476 ELY 476 | 81.3 a | 82.0 b | 71.3 ab | 74.5 d | 49.6 c | 51.0 e | |||
平均值Mean | 81.6 | 81.9 | 71.8 | 75.5 | 53.3 | 67.9 | |||
头低再高 LH | 准两优608 ZLY 608 | 80.9 c | 82.0 b | 70.7 a | 74.5 d | 46.2 d | 52.3 d | ||
凤两优464 FLY 464 | 81.9 a | 82.0 b | 71.5 a | 75.9 a | 54.7 a | 65.9 a | |||
德优8258 DY 8258 | 81.1 b | 82.5 a | 68.2 d | 75.3 b | 36.7 e | 64.7 c | |||
平均值Mean | 81.3 | 82.1 | 70.1 | 75.2 | 45.9 | 61.0 |
表5 不同杂交籼稻组合头季稻与再生季稻加工品质比较
Table 5 Comparison of processing quality of different indica hybrid combinations in main and ratoon seasons.
产量类型 Yield type | 品种名称 Cultivar name | 糙米率 Brown rice rate /% | 精米率 Milled rice rate/% | 整精米率 Head milled rice rate /% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
头季稻MS | 再生稻RS | 头季稻MS | 再生稻RS | 头季稻MS | 再生稻RS | ||||
双高 BH | 两优6326 LY 6326 | 82.2 a | 82.6 a | 71.0 a | 76.0 ab | 52.6 b | 67.8 bc | ||
泸优9803 LY 9803 | 81.6 a | 83.2 a | 72.3 a | 76.8 a | 53.4 b | 56.6 d | |||
天两优616 TLY 616 | 81.1 b | 81.9 b | 69.6 c | 75.4 a | 54.4 a | 67.0 c | |||
广两优476 GLY 476 | 80.6 d | 82.3 b | 71.6 a | 74.1 b | 61.3 a | 63.7 c | |||
丰两优香1号FLYX 1 | 81.1 b | 81.7 c | 70.5 b | 75.4 a | 55.8 a | 67.8 b | |||
平均值Mean | 81.3 | 82.3 | 71.0 | 75.6 | 55.5 | 64.6 | |||
头高再低 HL | C两优018 CLY 018 | 81.9 a | 81.2 d | 73.4 a | 75.9 ab | 57.9 a | 76.9 a | ||
两优0815 LY 0815 | 81.5 a | 82.6 ab | 70.9 ab | 76.1 c | 52.5 b | 72.7 b | |||
E两优476 ELY 476 | 81.3 a | 82.0 b | 71.3 ab | 74.5 d | 49.6 c | 51.0 e | |||
平均值Mean | 81.6 | 81.9 | 71.8 | 75.5 | 53.3 | 67.9 | |||
头低再高 LH | 准两优608 ZLY 608 | 80.9 c | 82.0 b | 70.7 a | 74.5 d | 46.2 d | 52.3 d | ||
凤两优464 FLY 464 | 81.9 a | 82.0 b | 71.5 a | 75.9 a | 54.7 a | 65.9 a | |||
德优8258 DY 8258 | 81.1 b | 82.5 a | 68.2 d | 75.3 b | 36.7 e | 64.7 c | |||
平均值Mean | 81.3 | 82.1 | 70.1 | 75.2 | 45.9 | 61.0 |
产量类型 Yield type | 组合名称 Combination name | 直链淀粉含量 Amylose content /% | 胶稠度 Gel consistency /mm | 蛋白质含量 Protein contents /% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
头季稻MS | 再生稻RS | 头季稻MS | 再生稻RS | 头季稻MS | 再生稻RS | ||||
双高 BH | 两优6326 LY 6326 | 19.7 a | 17.2 a | 86.5 a | 60.5 a | 9.42 a | 8.02 ab | ||
泸优9803 LY 9803 | 19.6 a | 17.3 a | 32.0 e | 30.0 b | 7.64 d | 7.00 bc | |||
天两优616 TLY 616 | 17.8 a | 17.1 b | 65.0 bc | 61.0 a | 8.82 ab | 8.25 a | |||
广两优476 GLY 476 | 17.4 a | 18.5 ab | 62.5 b | 58.5 a | 9.09 a | 8.03 ab | |||
丰两优香1号FLYX 1 | 18.6 a | 17.3 a | 73.5 a | 59.5 a | 9.68 a | 8.01 ab | |||
平均值Mean | 18.6 | 17.5 | 63.9 | 53.9 | 8.93 | 7.86 | |||
头高再低 HL | C两优018 CLY 018 | 14.2 c | 16.6 b | 86.0 a | 69.5 a | 9.10 a | 6.70 c | ||
两优0815 LY 0815 | 16.7 b | 17.8 a | 74.5 a | 34.5 b | 8.40 b | 8.00 ab | |||
E两优476 ELY 476 | 15.0 b | 15.7 c | 92.0 a | 60.5 a | 8.40 b | 6.70 c | |||
平均值Mean | 15.3 | 16.7 | 84.2 | 54.8 | 8.70 | 7.10 | |||
头低再高 LH | 准两优608 ZLY 608 | 22.4 a | 19.8 a | 41.0 d | 40.5 b | 7.10 e | 6.80 c | ||
凤两优464 FLY 464 | 18.7 a | 16.2 b | 49.0 c | 35.0 b | 8.20 c | 7.90 b | |||
德优8258 DY 8258 | 11.2 d | 14.3 d | 74.5 a | 36.0 b | 10.00 a | 9.30 a | |||
平均值Mean | 17.4 | 16.8 | 54.8 | 37.2 | 8.40 | 8.00 |
表7 不同杂交籼稻组合头季稻与再生季稻蒸煮食味品质与蛋白质含量比较
Table 7 Comparison of cooking taste quality and protein contents among different indica hybrid rice combinations in main and ratoon seasons.
产量类型 Yield type | 组合名称 Combination name | 直链淀粉含量 Amylose content /% | 胶稠度 Gel consistency /mm | 蛋白质含量 Protein contents /% | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
头季稻MS | 再生稻RS | 头季稻MS | 再生稻RS | 头季稻MS | 再生稻RS | ||||
双高 BH | 两优6326 LY 6326 | 19.7 a | 17.2 a | 86.5 a | 60.5 a | 9.42 a | 8.02 ab | ||
泸优9803 LY 9803 | 19.6 a | 17.3 a | 32.0 e | 30.0 b | 7.64 d | 7.00 bc | |||
天两优616 TLY 616 | 17.8 a | 17.1 b | 65.0 bc | 61.0 a | 8.82 ab | 8.25 a | |||
广两优476 GLY 476 | 17.4 a | 18.5 ab | 62.5 b | 58.5 a | 9.09 a | 8.03 ab | |||
丰两优香1号FLYX 1 | 18.6 a | 17.3 a | 73.5 a | 59.5 a | 9.68 a | 8.01 ab | |||
平均值Mean | 18.6 | 17.5 | 63.9 | 53.9 | 8.93 | 7.86 | |||
头高再低 HL | C两优018 CLY 018 | 14.2 c | 16.6 b | 86.0 a | 69.5 a | 9.10 a | 6.70 c | ||
两优0815 LY 0815 | 16.7 b | 17.8 a | 74.5 a | 34.5 b | 8.40 b | 8.00 ab | |||
E两优476 ELY 476 | 15.0 b | 15.7 c | 92.0 a | 60.5 a | 8.40 b | 6.70 c | |||
平均值Mean | 15.3 | 16.7 | 84.2 | 54.8 | 8.70 | 7.10 | |||
头低再高 LH | 准两优608 ZLY 608 | 22.4 a | 19.8 a | 41.0 d | 40.5 b | 7.10 e | 6.80 c | ||
凤两优464 FLY 464 | 18.7 a | 16.2 b | 49.0 c | 35.0 b | 8.20 c | 7.90 b | |||
德优8258 DY 8258 | 11.2 d | 14.3 d | 74.5 a | 36.0 b | 10.00 a | 9.30 a | |||
平均值Mean | 17.4 | 16.8 | 54.8 | 37.2 | 8.40 | 8.00 |
产量类型 Yield type | 组合名称 Combination name | 最高黏度 Peak viscosity/cP | 崩解值 Break down/cP | 消减值 Setback/cP | 糊化温度 Pasting temperature/°C | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
头季稻MS | 再生稻RS | 头季稻MS | 再生稻RS | 头季稻MS | 再生稻RS | 头季稻MS | 再生稻RS | ||
双高 BH | 两优6326 LY 6326 | 2190 a | 2554 a | 668 b | 629 ab | 125 b | 324 b | 80.4 a | 81.9 a |
泸优9803 LY 9803 | 2830 a | 2223 e | 488 a | 471 b | 380 a | 443 a | 78.4 c | 86.6 a | |
天两优616 TLY 616 | 2770 a | 2587 ab | 1248 c | 669 ab | -550 g | 315 b | 85.5 a | 89.8 a | |
广两优476 GLY 476 | 2609 a | 2153 f | 727 a | 433 d | 10 cde | 361 a | 79.9 a | 91.0 a | |
丰两优香1号FLYX 1 | 2244 a | 2426 b | 877 c | 779 b | -175 e | 252 cd | 82.3 a | 80.3 a | |
平均值Mean | 2528.6 | 2388.6 | 801.6 | 596.2 | -42 | 339 | 81.3 | 85.9 | |
头高再低HL | C两优018 CLY 018 | 2201 a | 2676 a | 917 c | 725 a | -304 f | 160 d | 83.5 a | 81.5 a |
两优0815 LY 0815 | 2525 a | 2385 b | 974 b | 518 b | -218 e | 331 b | 81.5 a | 83.9 a | |
E两优476 ELY 476 | 2694 a | 2367 c | 861 a | 542 b | -11 de | 348 b | 78.7 b | 89.0 ab | |
平均值Mean | 2473.3 | 2476 | 917.3 | 595 | -177.7 | 279.7 | 81.2 | 84.8 | |
头低再高LH | 准两优608 ZLY 608 | 2895 a | 2485 a | 816 a | 439 ab | 294 a | 420 a | 84.7 a | 80.3 a |
凤两优464 FLY 464 | 2659 a | 2299 d | 486 a | 391 a | 535 a | 540 a | 84.3 a | 79.5 b | |
德优8258 DY 8258 | 2313 a | 2263 e | 745 a | 689 c | 146 b | 325 b | 80.3 a | 89.3 a | |
平均值Mean | 2622.3 | 2349 | 682.3 | 506.3 | 325.0 | 428.3 | 83.1 | 83.0 |
表8 不同杂交籼稻组合头季稻与再生季稻RVA谱
Table 8 RVA spectra of different indica hybrid combinations in main and ratoon seasons.
产量类型 Yield type | 组合名称 Combination name | 最高黏度 Peak viscosity/cP | 崩解值 Break down/cP | 消减值 Setback/cP | 糊化温度 Pasting temperature/°C | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
头季稻MS | 再生稻RS | 头季稻MS | 再生稻RS | 头季稻MS | 再生稻RS | 头季稻MS | 再生稻RS | ||
双高 BH | 两优6326 LY 6326 | 2190 a | 2554 a | 668 b | 629 ab | 125 b | 324 b | 80.4 a | 81.9 a |
泸优9803 LY 9803 | 2830 a | 2223 e | 488 a | 471 b | 380 a | 443 a | 78.4 c | 86.6 a | |
天两优616 TLY 616 | 2770 a | 2587 ab | 1248 c | 669 ab | -550 g | 315 b | 85.5 a | 89.8 a | |
广两优476 GLY 476 | 2609 a | 2153 f | 727 a | 433 d | 10 cde | 361 a | 79.9 a | 91.0 a | |
丰两优香1号FLYX 1 | 2244 a | 2426 b | 877 c | 779 b | -175 e | 252 cd | 82.3 a | 80.3 a | |
平均值Mean | 2528.6 | 2388.6 | 801.6 | 596.2 | -42 | 339 | 81.3 | 85.9 | |
头高再低HL | C两优018 CLY 018 | 2201 a | 2676 a | 917 c | 725 a | -304 f | 160 d | 83.5 a | 81.5 a |
两优0815 LY 0815 | 2525 a | 2385 b | 974 b | 518 b | -218 e | 331 b | 81.5 a | 83.9 a | |
E两优476 ELY 476 | 2694 a | 2367 c | 861 a | 542 b | -11 de | 348 b | 78.7 b | 89.0 ab | |
平均值Mean | 2473.3 | 2476 | 917.3 | 595 | -177.7 | 279.7 | 81.2 | 84.8 | |
头低再高LH | 准两优608 ZLY 608 | 2895 a | 2485 a | 816 a | 439 ab | 294 a | 420 a | 84.7 a | 80.3 a |
凤两优464 FLY 464 | 2659 a | 2299 d | 486 a | 391 a | 535 a | 540 a | 84.3 a | 79.5 b | |
德优8258 DY 8258 | 2313 a | 2263 e | 745 a | 689 c | 146 b | 325 b | 80.3 a | 89.3 a | |
平均值Mean | 2622.3 | 2349 | 682.3 | 506.3 | 325.0 | 428.3 | 83.1 | 83.0 |
品质指标 Quality index | 1–7 d1) | 8–14 d | 15–21 d | 22–28 d | 29–35 d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
整精米率 Head milled rice rate | -0.252 | -0.533* | -0.644** | -0.584** | -0.623** |
垩白度Chalkiness | 0.456* | 0.503* | 0.621** | 0.671** | 0.634** |
垩白率 Chalky grain rate | 0.384 | 0.508* | 0.378 | 0.430* | 0.491* |
直链淀粉含量 Amylose content | 0.017 | 0.037 | 0.013 | 0.003 | 0.047 |
胶稠度 Gel consistency | 0.324 | 0.303 | 0.445* | 0.459* | 0.402 |
蛋白质含量 Protein content | 0.481* | 0.277 | 0.621** | 0.656** | 0.480* |
表9 头季和再生季齐穗后不同时间段日平均温度与稻米品质间的相关系数
Table 9 Correlation coefficients between average daily temperature and rice quality at different stages after full heading in main and ratoon seasons.
品质指标 Quality index | 1–7 d1) | 8–14 d | 15–21 d | 22–28 d | 29–35 d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
整精米率 Head milled rice rate | -0.252 | -0.533* | -0.644** | -0.584** | -0.623** |
垩白度Chalkiness | 0.456* | 0.503* | 0.621** | 0.671** | 0.634** |
垩白率 Chalky grain rate | 0.384 | 0.508* | 0.378 | 0.430* | 0.491* |
直链淀粉含量 Amylose content | 0.017 | 0.037 | 0.013 | 0.003 | 0.047 |
胶稠度 Gel consistency | 0.324 | 0.303 | 0.445* | 0.459* | 0.402 |
蛋白质含量 Protein content | 0.481* | 0.277 | 0.621** | 0.656** | 0.480* |
品质指标 Quality index | 1–7 d1) | 8–14 d | 15–21 d | 22–28 d | 29–35 d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
整精米率 Head milled rice rate | 0.019 | -0.295 | -0.638** | -0.370 | -0.062 |
垩白度Chalkiness | 0.110 | 0.268 | 0.507* | 0.650** | 0.132 |
垩白率 Chalky Grain rate | 0.283 | 0.396 | 0.255 | 0.463* | 0.133 |
直链淀粉含量 Amylose content | 0.013 | 0.039 | -0.002 | 0.230 | 0.100 |
胶稠度 Gel consistency | -0.005 | 0.143 | 0.442* | 0.355 | -0.313 |
蛋白质含量 Protein content | -0.149 | 0.189 | 0.371 | 0.059 | 0.247 |
表10 头季和再生季齐穗后不同时间段平均日照时数与稻米品质间的相关系数
Table 10. Correlation coefficients between average sunshine hours and rice quality at different stages after full heading in main and ratoon seasons.
品质指标 Quality index | 1–7 d1) | 8–14 d | 15–21 d | 22–28 d | 29–35 d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
整精米率 Head milled rice rate | 0.019 | -0.295 | -0.638** | -0.370 | -0.062 |
垩白度Chalkiness | 0.110 | 0.268 | 0.507* | 0.650** | 0.132 |
垩白率 Chalky Grain rate | 0.283 | 0.396 | 0.255 | 0.463* | 0.133 |
直链淀粉含量 Amylose content | 0.013 | 0.039 | -0.002 | 0.230 | 0.100 |
胶稠度 Gel consistency | -0.005 | 0.143 | 0.442* | 0.355 | -0.313 |
蛋白质含量 Protein content | -0.149 | 0.189 | 0.371 | 0.059 | 0.247 |
[1] | Chen Q, He A, Wang W, Peng S B, Huang J L, Cui K.Comparisons of regeneration rate and yields performance between inbred and hybrid rice cultivars in a direct seeding rice-ratoon rice system in central China[J]. Field Crops Research, 2018, 223: 164-170. |
[2] | 林文雄, 陈鸿飞, 张志兴, 徐倩华, 屠乃美, 方长旬, 任万军. 再生稻产量形成的生理生态特性与关键栽培技术的研究与展望[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23(4): 392-401. |
Lin W X, Chen H F, Zhang Z X, Xu Q H, Tu N M, Fang C X, Ren W J.Research and prospect on physio-ecological properties of ratoon rice yield formation its key cultivation technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2015, 23(4): 392-401. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 徐富贤, 熊洪, 张林, 朱永川, 蒋鹏, 郭晓艺, 刘茂. 再生稻产量形成特点与关键调控技术研究进展[J].中国农业科学, 2015, 48(9): 1702-1717. |
Xu F X, Xiong H, Zhang L, Zhu Y C, Jiang P, Guo X Y, Liu M.Progress in research of yield formation of ratooning rice and its high-yielding key regulation technologies[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(9): 1702-1717. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 杨坚, 陈恺林, 赵正洪, 刘洋, 周学其, 张玉烛. 不同种植方式对再生稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 湖南农业大学学报: 自然科学版, 2017, 43(3): 234-237. |
Yang J, Chen K L, Zhao Z H, Liu Y, Zhou X Q, Zhang Y Z.Effect of different planting methods on yield and quality of ratooning rice[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University: Natural Sciences, 2017, 43(3): 234-237. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 邓桥江, 曹凑贵, 李成芳. 不同再生稻栽培模式对稻田温室气体排放和产量的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2019(6): 1373-1380. |
Deng Q J, Cao Z G, Li C F. Effects of different ratooning cultivation modes on greenhouse gas emissions and grain yields in paddy fields[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2019(6): 1373-1380. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 刘祥臣, 丰大清, 李平, 乔利, 余贵龙, 范学军. 对豫南稻区再生稻的研究与思考[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2015(2): 39-44. |
Liu X C, Feng D Q, Li P, Qiao L, Yu G L, Fan X J. Research and thoughts on ratooning rice in Southern Henan region[J]. Agricultural Technology Communication, 2015(2): 39-44. (in Chinese) | |
[7] | 刘祥臣, 丰大清, 郑志松, 张强, 余贵龙, 蓝黎明, 赵海英, 刘守尧, 黄靖元. 豫南稻区再生稻精确定量施肥技术探讨[J]. 中国稻米, 2019, 25(1): 93-96, 99. |
Liu X C, Feng D Q, Zheng Z S, Zhang Q, Yu G L, Lan L M, Zhao H Y, Liu S Y, Huang J Y.Discussion on precise quantitative fertilization techniques for ratoon rice in southern Henan Province[J]. China Rice, 2019, 25(1): 93-96, 99. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 国家质量技术监督局. 中华人民共和国国家标准: 优质稻谷: GB/T17891–2017[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017. |
State Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision. National Standard of the People’s Republic of China: High-quality Rice: GB/T17891–2017[S]. Beijing: China Standard Press, 2017. (in Chinese) | |
[9] | Liu X C, Feng D, Yu G L, Zhao H Y, Qiao L, Li Y T, X J Fan, M C Liu, Q J Zhang. Effect of different sowing dates in south Henan’s rice-growing areas on the growth and yield of ratoon rice[J]. Asian Agricultural Research, 2016(2): 43-47. |
[10] | 李贵勇, 谭丽明, 刘玉文, 黄洁, 陈双云, 夏琼梅, 龙瑞平, 杨从党.再生稻的产量形成及其高产群体分析[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2015, 37(4): 577-583. |
Li G Y, Tan L M, Liu Y W, Huang J, Chen S Y, Xia Q M, Long R P, Yang C D.Analysis on yield formation and its higher-yielding population quality of ratooning rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2015, 37(4):577-583. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 习敏, 吴文革, 汪靖桂, 汪宏伟, 陈刚, 许有尊. 再生稻种植产量差形成的研究[J].华北农学报, 2017, 32(1): 104-110. |
Xi M, Wu W G, Wang J G, Wang H W, Chen G, Xu Y Z.Study on formation of grain yield differences in ratooning rice cultivation[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2017, 32(1): 104-110. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 徐富贤, 郑家奎, 朱永川, 熊洪, 王贵雄. 杂交中稻再生力的鉴定方法[J]. 作物学报, 2005(4): 506-510. |
Xu F X, Zheng J K, Zhu Y C, Xiong H, Wang G X. Evaluation method of ratooning ability of mid-season hybrid rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2005(4): 506-510. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 段门俊, 吴芸紫, 田玉聪, 刘永武, 刘章勇, 陈阜, 金涛. 不同品种再生稻产量及品质比较研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2018(2): 61-67. |
Duan M J, Wu Y Z, Tian Y C, Liu Y W, Liu Z Y, Chen F, Jin T. Comparison of yield and quality among different ratooning rice varieties[J]. Crops, 2018(2): 61-67. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 卢锦荣, 房贤涛, 何花榕. 不同品种和栽培条件对再生稻产量及其构成因素的影响[J]. 福建农业学报, 2017, 32(8): 842-848. |
Lu J R, Fang X T, He H R.Effects of variety, stubble height and nitrogen fertilization on production and yield factors of ratoon rice[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 32(8): 842-848. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 李亚贞, 郑伟, 肖国滨, 肖小军, 黄天宝, 吴艳, 吕伟生, 刘小三, 陈明, 赖诗盛, 叶川. 赣中北油稻稻三熟制条件下不同水稻品种头季生长特性及其对再生季产量的影响[J]. 杂交水稻, 2018, 33(2): 67-72. |
Li Y Z, Zheng W, Xiao G B, Xiao X J, Huang T B, Wu Y, Lu W S, Liu X S, Chen M, Lai S S, Ye C.Growing characteristics of main crop and their effects on yield of ratoon rice of different rice varieties under the triple-cropping system of rape-rice-rice in the central and northern region of Jiangxi Province[J]. Hybrid Rice, 2018, 33(2): 67-72. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 明兴权, 张桂莲, 杜蔚, 雷斌, 李凡, 黄家兴, 唐文帮.再生稻品种筛选的初步研究[J]. 杂交水稻, 2018, 33(1): 41-44. |
Ming X Q, Zhang G L, Du W, Lei B, Li F, Huang J X, Tang W B.A preliminary study on varietal selection for ratooning rice[J]. Hybrid Rice, 2018, 33(1): 41-44. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | Li X K, Wu L, Geng X, Xia X H, Wang X H, Xu Z J, Xu Q.Deciphering the environmental impacts on rice quality for different rice cultivated areas[J]. Rice, 2018, 11(1): 7. |
[18] | 绍文, 李亚贞, 郑伟, 叶川, 肖小军, 黄天宝, 吴艳, 吕伟生, 肖富良, 陈明, 赖诗盛, 肖国滨. 赣中北油稻稻三熟制再生稻优质品种筛选及气象因子对其米质的影响[J]. 杂交水稻, 2018, 33(6): 56-63. |
Shao W, Li Y Z, Zheng W, Ye C, Xiao X J, Huang T B, Wu Y, Lu W S, Xiao F L, Chen M, Lai S S, Xiao G B.Variety screening of high quality ratoon rice for the triple-cropping of rapeseed-rice-ratoon rice in the north-central Jiangxi and the effects of climatic factors on Its grain quality[J]. Hybrid Rice, 2018, 33(6): 56-63. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 龚金龙, 张洪程, 胡雅杰, 龙厚元, 常勇, 王艳, 邢志鹏, 霍中洋. 灌浆结实期温度对水稻产量和品质形成的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2013, 32(2): 482-491. |
Gong J L, Zhang H C, Hu Y J, Long H Y, Chang Y, Wang Y, Xing Z P, Huo Z Y.Effects of air temperature during rice grain-filling period on the formation of rice grain yield and its quality[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2013, 32(2): 482-491. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 吕文彦, 邵国军, 曹萍, 曹炳晨. 灌浆结实期日均温度对稻米品质之影响[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 1998(4): 4-5, 7-8. |
Lü W Y, Shao G J, Cao P, Cao B C. Effect of daily average temperature on rice quality during grain filling stage[J]. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, 1998(4): 4-5, 7-8. (in Chinese) | |
[21] | 李林, 沙国栋, 陆景淮. 水稻灌浆期温光因子对稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 1989(3): 33-38. |
Li L, Sha G D, Lu J H.Effects of temperature and light factors on rice quality at the filling stage[J]. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 1989(3): 35-38. (in Chinese) | |
[22] | 段骅. 高温与干旱对水稻产量和品质的影响及其生理机制[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2013. |
Duan H.Effects of high temperature and soil drying on the yield quality and quantity of rice and its physiological mechanism[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2013. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 周广洽, 徐孟亮, 李训贞. 温光对稻米蛋白质及氨基酸含量的影响[J]. 生态学报, 1997(5): 87-92. |
Zhou G Q, Xu M L, Li X Z.The effect of temperature on protein and amino acid content of rice[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 1997 (5): 87-92. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 吴延寿, 姚晓云, 曹国军, 陈春莲, 熊运华, 尹建华. 优质再生稻产量形成和稻米品质比较分析[J]. 杂交水稻, 2019, 11(1): 1-7. |
Wu Y S, Yao X Y, Cao G J, Chen C L, Xiong Y H, Yin J H.Analysis of yield formation and comparison of grain quality of fine quality ratoon rice[J]. Hybrid Rice: 2019, 11(1): 1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 李刚, 高清松, 王健, 罗伯祥, 程保山, 徐卫军, 储成才, 袁彩勇. 江苏粳稻产量与品质性状及其相互关系分析[J]. 湖南农业大学学报: 自然科学版, 2017, 43(4): 353-358. |
Li G, Gao Q S, Wang J, Luo B X, Cheng B S, Xu W J, Chu C C, Yuan C Y.Analysis of yield and quality traits and their relationship in japonica rice in Jiangsu[J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University: Natural Science, 2017, 43(4): 353-358. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 于洪兰, 王伯伦, 王术, 佟伟, 王一, 黄元财, 蒋文春.不同类型水稻品种的产量与食味品质的关系比较[J]. 作物杂志, 2009(1): 46-49. |
Yu H L, Wang B L, Wang S, Tong W, Wang Y, Huang Y C, Jiang W C.Comparison of relationships between yield and eating quality in different types of rice varieties[J]. Crops, 2009(1): 46-49. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 郭展, 张运波. 水稻对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应及分子调控研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[2] | 韦还和, 马唯一, 左博源, 汪璐璐, 朱旺, 耿孝宇, 张翔, 孟天瑶, 陈英龙, 高平磊, 许轲, 霍中洋, 戴其根. 盐、干旱及其复合胁迫对水稻产量和品质形成影响的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[3] | 吕宙, 易秉怀, 陈平平, 周文新, 唐文帮, 易镇邪. 施氮量与移栽密度对小粒型杂交水稻产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 422-436. |
[4] | 赵艺婷, 谢可冉, 高逖, 崔克辉. 水稻分蘖期干旱锻炼对幼穗分化期高温下穗发育和产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 277-289. |
[5] | 周甜, 吴少华, 康建宏, 吴宏亮, 杨生龙, 王星强, 李昱, 黄玉峰. 不同种植模式对水稻籽粒淀粉含量及淀粉关键酶活性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 303-315. |
[6] | 彭显龙, 董强, 张辰, 李鹏飞, 李博琳, 刘智蕾, 于彩莲. 不同土壤条件下秸秆还田量对土壤还原性物质及水稻生长的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(2): 198-210. |
[7] | 易晓璇, 刘玮琦, 曾盖, 罗丽华, 肖应辉. 灌浆期高温胁迫对早籼稻品质性状的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(1): 72-80. |
[8] | 朱旺, 张翔, 耿孝宇, 张哲, 陈英龙, 韦还和, 戴其根, 许轲, 朱广龙, 周桂生, 孟天瑶. 盐-旱复合胁迫下水稻根系的形态和生理特征及其与产量形成的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(6): 617-627. |
[9] | 吴玉红, 李艳华, 王吕, 秦宇航, 李杉杉, 郝兴顺, 张庆路, 崔月贞, 肖飞. 陕南稻区紫云英稻草联合还田配施减量氮肥协同提升水稻产量与稻米品质[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(6): 628-641. |
[10] | 邹宇傲, 吴启侠, 周乾顺, 朱建强, 晏军. 孕穗期杂交中稻对淹涝胁迫的响应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(6): 642-656. |
[11] | 袁沛, 周旋, 杨威, 尹凌洁, 靳拓, 彭建伟, 荣湘民, 田昌. 化肥减氮配施对洞庭湖区双季稻产量和田面水氮磷流失风险的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(5): 518-528. |
[12] | 肖大康, 胡仁, 韩天富, 张卫峰, 侯俊, 任科宇. 氮肥用量和运筹对我国水稻产量及其构成因子影响的整合分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(5): 529-542. |
[13] | 黄亚茹, 徐鹏, 王乐乐, 贺一哲, 王辉, 柯健, 何海兵, 武立权, 尤翠翠. 外源海藻糖对粳稻品系W1844籽粒灌浆特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[14] | 高欠清, 任孝俭, 翟中兵, 郑普兵, 吴源芬, 崔克辉. 头季穗肥和促芽肥对再生稻再生芽生长及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 405-414. |
[15] | 王文婷, 马佳颖, 李光彦, 符卫蒙, 李沪波, 林洁, 陈婷婷, 奉保华, 陶龙兴, 符冠富, 秦叶波. 高温下不同施肥量对水稻产量品质形成的影响及其与能量代谢的关系分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||