Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2015, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (2): 150-158.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2015.02.006
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Zhi-jun WANG1, Zong-ming XIE1,*(), You-sheng TIAN1, Lin CHEN2, Yong-mei DONG1, You-zhong LI1, Zhao-zhi LV1,3
Received:
2014-04-10
Revised:
2014-12-23
Online:
2015-03-10
Published:
2015-03-10
Contact:
Zong-ming XIE
王志军1, 谢宗铭1,*(), 田又升1, 陈林2, 董永梅1, 李有忠1, 吕昭智1,3
通讯作者:
谢宗铭
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Zhi-jun WANG, Zong-ming XIE, You-sheng TIAN, Lin CHEN, Yong-mei DONG, You-zhong LI, Zhao-zhi LV. Photosynthetic Characteristics of Rice Under Drip Irrigation with Plastic Film Mulching and Continuous Flooding[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2015, 29(2): 150-158.
王志军, 谢宗铭, 田又升, 陈林, 董永梅, 李有忠, 吕昭智. 膜下滴灌和淹灌两种栽培模式下水稻光合生理特性的研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(2): 150-158.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2015.02.006
材料 Material | 栽培方式 Cultivation | 叶绿素a含量 Chlorophyll a content /(mg·g-1) | 叶绿素b含量 Chlorophyll b content /(mg·g-1) | 总叶绿素含量 Total Chlorophyll contents /(mg·g-1) | 类胡萝卜素含量 Carotenoids contents /(mg·g-1) | 叶绿素a/b Chlorophyll a/b | 类胡萝卜素/ 叶绿素 Carotenoids/ chlorophyll |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T-04 | 传统淹灌TCF | 1.09±0.08 a | 0.37±0.03 a | 1.46±0.11 a | 0.21±0.014 a | 2.96±0.24 a | 0.15±0.001 a |
膜下滴灌DIPFM | 0.85±0.04 b | 0.31±0.02 b | 1.15±0.05 b | 0.11±0.004 b | 2.77±0.39 c | 0.13±0.003 b | |
T-43 | 传统淹灌TCF | 1.14±0.00 a | 0.40±0.01 a | 1.54±0.03 a | 0.21±0.006 a | 2.89±0.16 b | 0.14±0.002 b |
膜下滴灌DIPFM | 1.11±0.04 a | 0.40±0.01 a | 1.51±0.04 a | 0.21±0.006 a | 2.77±0.41 c | 0.14±0.001 b |
Table 1 Contents and partial ratio of photosynthetic pigments in flag leaf at milky stage in rice under two cultivation patterns.
材料 Material | 栽培方式 Cultivation | 叶绿素a含量 Chlorophyll a content /(mg·g-1) | 叶绿素b含量 Chlorophyll b content /(mg·g-1) | 总叶绿素含量 Total Chlorophyll contents /(mg·g-1) | 类胡萝卜素含量 Carotenoids contents /(mg·g-1) | 叶绿素a/b Chlorophyll a/b | 类胡萝卜素/ 叶绿素 Carotenoids/ chlorophyll |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T-04 | 传统淹灌TCF | 1.09±0.08 a | 0.37±0.03 a | 1.46±0.11 a | 0.21±0.014 a | 2.96±0.24 a | 0.15±0.001 a |
膜下滴灌DIPFM | 0.85±0.04 b | 0.31±0.02 b | 1.15±0.05 b | 0.11±0.004 b | 2.77±0.39 c | 0.13±0.003 b | |
T-43 | 传统淹灌TCF | 1.14±0.00 a | 0.40±0.01 a | 1.54±0.03 a | 0.21±0.006 a | 2.89±0.16 b | 0.14±0.002 b |
膜下滴灌DIPFM | 1.11±0.04 a | 0.40±0.01 a | 1.51±0.04 a | 0.21±0.006 a | 2.77±0.41 c | 0.14±0.001 b |
材料 Material | 栽培方式 Cultivation | 蒸腾速率 Transpiration rate(Tr) /(mmol·m-2s-1) | 气孔导度 Stomatal conductance(Gs) /(μmol·m-2s-1) | 光合速率 Photosynthetic rate(Pn) /(μmol·m-2s-1) | 胞间CO2浓度 Intercellular CO2 concentration(Ci) /(μmol·mol-1) | 水分利用效率 Water use efficiency(WUE) μmol/mmol |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T-04 | 传统淹灌TCF | 17.79±2.26 a | 451.96±63.38 a | 21.18±2.86 a | 258.92±13.56 a | 1.19±0.05 b |
膜下滴灌DIPFM | 8.72±1.28 b | 211.70±42.95 b | 14.48±2.92 c | 241.19±18.08 b | 1.66±0.06 a | |
T-43 | 传统淹灌TCF | 17.31±1.77 a | 387.92±58.31 a | 20.95±4.40 ab | 248.34±7.79 ab | 1.21±0.03 b |
膜下滴灌DIPFM | 10.50±1.41 b | 244.51±41.04 b | 16.51±3.27 bc | 232.85±5.98 b | 1.57±0.08 a |
Table 2 Photosynthetic characteristics in flag leaf at milky stage in rice under two cultivation patterns.
材料 Material | 栽培方式 Cultivation | 蒸腾速率 Transpiration rate(Tr) /(mmol·m-2s-1) | 气孔导度 Stomatal conductance(Gs) /(μmol·m-2s-1) | 光合速率 Photosynthetic rate(Pn) /(μmol·m-2s-1) | 胞间CO2浓度 Intercellular CO2 concentration(Ci) /(μmol·mol-1) | 水分利用效率 Water use efficiency(WUE) μmol/mmol |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T-04 | 传统淹灌TCF | 17.79±2.26 a | 451.96±63.38 a | 21.18±2.86 a | 258.92±13.56 a | 1.19±0.05 b |
膜下滴灌DIPFM | 8.72±1.28 b | 211.70±42.95 b | 14.48±2.92 c | 241.19±18.08 b | 1.66±0.06 a | |
T-43 | 传统淹灌TCF | 17.31±1.77 a | 387.92±58.31 a | 20.95±4.40 ab | 248.34±7.79 ab | 1.21±0.03 b |
膜下滴灌DIPFM | 10.50±1.41 b | 244.51±41.04 b | 16.51±3.27 bc | 232.85±5.98 b | 1.57±0.08 a |
材料 Material | 栽培方式 Cultivation | 最大净光合速率 Maximum net photosynthetic rate /(μmol·m-2s-1) | 暗呼吸速率 Respiration rate /(μmol·m-2s-1) | 光补偿点 Light compensation point /(μmol·m-2s-1) | 光饱和点 Light saturation point /(μmol·m-2s-1) | 表观量子效 Apparent quantum efficiency | 决定系数 Determination coefficient |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T-04 | 传统淹灌TCF | 18.92 b | -0.132 b | 4.00 b | 733 b | 0.044 b | 0.939 |
膜下滴灌DIPFM | 13.81 d | -1.402 a | 6.75 a | 644 d | 0.041 c | 0.914 | |
T-43 | 传统淹灌TCF | 21.23 a | -0.075 b | 2.40 c | 690 c | 0.048 a | 0.929 |
膜下滴灌DIPFM | 17.40 c | -0.033 b | 1.43 d | 757 a | 0.016 d | 0.896 |
Table 3 Simulated parameters of light-response curve in flag leaf at milky stage in rice under two cultivation patterns.
材料 Material | 栽培方式 Cultivation | 最大净光合速率 Maximum net photosynthetic rate /(μmol·m-2s-1) | 暗呼吸速率 Respiration rate /(μmol·m-2s-1) | 光补偿点 Light compensation point /(μmol·m-2s-1) | 光饱和点 Light saturation point /(μmol·m-2s-1) | 表观量子效 Apparent quantum efficiency | 决定系数 Determination coefficient |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T-04 | 传统淹灌TCF | 18.92 b | -0.132 b | 4.00 b | 733 b | 0.044 b | 0.939 |
膜下滴灌DIPFM | 13.81 d | -1.402 a | 6.75 a | 644 d | 0.041 c | 0.914 | |
T-43 | 传统淹灌TCF | 21.23 a | -0.075 b | 2.40 c | 690 c | 0.048 a | 0.929 |
膜下滴灌DIPFM | 17.40 c | -0.033 b | 1.43 d | 757 a | 0.016 d | 0.896 |
材料 Material | 栽培方式 Cultivation | 最大净光合速率 Maximum net photosynthetic rate /(μmol·m-2s-1) | 羧化效率 Carboxylation efficiency | 光呼吸速率 Photorespiratory rate /(μmol·m-2s-1) | CO2补偿点 CO2 compensation point /(μmol·mol-1) | CO2饱和点 CO2 saturation point /(μmol·mol-1) | 决定系数 Determination coefficient |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T-04 | 传统淹灌TCF | 41.10 b | 0.048 b | -1.885 b | 39.27 a | 895 b | 0.955 |
膜下滴灌DIPFM | 35.05 c | 0.045 c | -1.712 c | 37.78 b | 816 c | 0.955 | |
T-43 | 传统淹灌TCF | 50.16 a | 0.055 a | -1.940 a | 35.27 c | 947 a | 0.967 |
膜下滴灌DIPFM | 33.34 d | 0.049 b | -1.703 c | 34.76 d | 646 d | 0.905 |
Table 4 Simulated parameters of CO2-response curve in flag leaf at milky stage in rice under two cultivation patterns.
材料 Material | 栽培方式 Cultivation | 最大净光合速率 Maximum net photosynthetic rate /(μmol·m-2s-1) | 羧化效率 Carboxylation efficiency | 光呼吸速率 Photorespiratory rate /(μmol·m-2s-1) | CO2补偿点 CO2 compensation point /(μmol·mol-1) | CO2饱和点 CO2 saturation point /(μmol·mol-1) | 决定系数 Determination coefficient |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T-04 | 传统淹灌TCF | 41.10 b | 0.048 b | -1.885 b | 39.27 a | 895 b | 0.955 |
膜下滴灌DIPFM | 35.05 c | 0.045 c | -1.712 c | 37.78 b | 816 c | 0.955 | |
T-43 | 传统淹灌TCF | 50.16 a | 0.055 a | -1.940 a | 35.27 c | 947 a | 0.967 |
膜下滴灌DIPFM | 33.34 d | 0.049 b | -1.703 c | 34.76 d | 646 d | 0.905 |
参数 Parameter | T-04 | T-43 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
传统淹灌TCF | 膜下滴灌DIPFM | 传统淹灌TCF | 膜下滴灌DIPFM | |||||||||
光系统Ⅱ有效量子产量 | 0.74 | ± | 0.04 a | 0.73 | ± | 0.03 a | 0.64 | ± | 0.06 b | 0.66 | ± | 0.05 ab |
Effective quantum yield of photosystemⅡ | ||||||||||||
相对电子传递 | 117.63 | ± | 15.06 ab | 85.3 | ± | 13.29 bc | 144.53 | ± | 29.94 a | 72.5 | ± | 23.76 c |
Electron transport rate/(μmol·m-2s-1) | ||||||||||||
光化学猝灭 | 0.91 | ± | 0.06 ab | 0.95 | ± | 0.10 ab | 0.81 | ± | 0.10 b | 0.99 | ± | 0.10 a |
Photochemical quenching | ||||||||||||
非光化学猝灭 | 0.044 | ± | 0.05 ab | 0.100 | ± | 0.09 a | 0.035 | ± | 0.01 ab | 0.017 | ± | 0.03 b |
Non-photochemical quenching | ||||||||||||
暗适应样品最小荧光 | 339 | ± | 18 c | 379 | ± | 17 b | 372 | ± | 33 b | 544 | ± | 50 a |
Minimal fluorescence | ||||||||||||
暗适应样品最大荧 | 1868 | ± | 59 a | 1823 | ± | 365 a | 1903 | ± | 252 a | 1696 | ± | 23 a |
Maximal fluorescence | ||||||||||||
暗适应PSⅡ最大量子Fv/ | 0.82 | ± | 0.00 a | 0.79 | ± | 0.05 a | 0.80 | ± | 0.03 a | 0.67 | ± | 0.07 b |
Optimal/maximal photochemical | ||||||||||||
efficiency of PSⅡ in the dark |
Table 5 Chlorophyll fluorescence kinetic parameters in flag leaf at milky stage in rice under two cultivation patterns.
参数 Parameter | T-04 | T-43 | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
传统淹灌TCF | 膜下滴灌DIPFM | 传统淹灌TCF | 膜下滴灌DIPFM | |||||||||
光系统Ⅱ有效量子产量 | 0.74 | ± | 0.04 a | 0.73 | ± | 0.03 a | 0.64 | ± | 0.06 b | 0.66 | ± | 0.05 ab |
Effective quantum yield of photosystemⅡ | ||||||||||||
相对电子传递 | 117.63 | ± | 15.06 ab | 85.3 | ± | 13.29 bc | 144.53 | ± | 29.94 a | 72.5 | ± | 23.76 c |
Electron transport rate/(μmol·m-2s-1) | ||||||||||||
光化学猝灭 | 0.91 | ± | 0.06 ab | 0.95 | ± | 0.10 ab | 0.81 | ± | 0.10 b | 0.99 | ± | 0.10 a |
Photochemical quenching | ||||||||||||
非光化学猝灭 | 0.044 | ± | 0.05 ab | 0.100 | ± | 0.09 a | 0.035 | ± | 0.01 ab | 0.017 | ± | 0.03 b |
Non-photochemical quenching | ||||||||||||
暗适应样品最小荧光 | 339 | ± | 18 c | 379 | ± | 17 b | 372 | ± | 33 b | 544 | ± | 50 a |
Minimal fluorescence | ||||||||||||
暗适应样品最大荧 | 1868 | ± | 59 a | 1823 | ± | 365 a | 1903 | ± | 252 a | 1696 | ± | 23 a |
Maximal fluorescence | ||||||||||||
暗适应PSⅡ最大量子Fv/ | 0.82 | ± | 0.00 a | 0.79 | ± | 0.05 a | 0.80 | ± | 0.03 a | 0.67 | ± | 0.07 b |
Optimal/maximal photochemical | ||||||||||||
efficiency of PSⅡ in the dark |
材料 Material | 栽培方式 Cultivation | 丙二醛含量 Malondialdehyde content /(mmol·g -1) | 脯氨酸含量 Proline content /(μg·g -1) | 可溶性蛋白含量 Soluble protein content /(μg·g-1) | 可溶性糖含量 Soluble sugar content /(mg·g -1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T-04 | 传统淹灌TCF | 8.24±0.90 d | 247.25±10.08 d | 14.11±0.58 b | 13.10±0.03 b |
膜下滴灌DIPFM | 9.71±1.05 c | 638.45±11.01a | 12.74±0.76 d | 10.02±1.46 c | |
T-43 | 传统淹灌TCF | 10.73±1.26 b | 514.25±7.45 c | 15.80±0.04 a | 14.41±1.02 a |
膜下滴灌DIPFM | 11.59±1.26 a | 601.03±10.46 b | 13.19±0.70 c | 9.01±0.01 d |
Table 6 Contents of osmolyts in flag leaf at milky stage in rice under two cultivation patterns.
材料 Material | 栽培方式 Cultivation | 丙二醛含量 Malondialdehyde content /(mmol·g -1) | 脯氨酸含量 Proline content /(μg·g -1) | 可溶性蛋白含量 Soluble protein content /(μg·g-1) | 可溶性糖含量 Soluble sugar content /(mg·g -1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T-04 | 传统淹灌TCF | 8.24±0.90 d | 247.25±10.08 d | 14.11±0.58 b | 13.10±0.03 b |
膜下滴灌DIPFM | 9.71±1.05 c | 638.45±11.01a | 12.74±0.76 d | 10.02±1.46 c | |
T-43 | 传统淹灌TCF | 10.73±1.26 b | 514.25±7.45 c | 15.80±0.04 a | 14.41±1.02 a |
膜下滴灌DIPFM | 11.59±1.26 a | 601.03±10.46 b | 13.19±0.70 c | 9.01±0.01 d |
耗水量及农艺性状 Water consumption and agronomic traits | T-04 | T-43 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
传统淹灌 TCF | 膜下滴灌 DIPFM | 传统淹灌 TCF | 膜下滴灌 DIPFM | |
耗水量water consumption/(m3·667m-2) | 1834 | 697 | 1834 | 697 |
有效穗数Effective panicle number/(×104·hm-2) | 319.6±7.8 b | 230.8±10.1 c | 456.6±8.7 a | 333.5±9.5 b |
株高 Plant height | 94.8±5.3 a | 76.9±9.6 b | 92.7±6.2 a | 73.8±12.5 b |
主穗长Main panicle length | 17.2±2.0 ab | 18.6±1.4 a | 14.9±1.6 c | 15.9±3.0 bc |
每穗实粒数Filled grain number per panicle | 128.1±10.6 a | 110.1±11.5 a | 77.2±7.4 b | 69.7±10.8 b |
结实率Seed setting rate/% | 91.4±5.1 a | 81.6±6.5 b | 91.0±3.9 a | 80.0±6.1 b |
千粒重1000-grain weight/g | 28.4±1.9 a | 24.6±1.6 b | 28.5±1.6 a | 27.2±1.8 ab |
产量Yield/(kg·hm-2) | 11609.8±57.4 a | 6241.5±43.1 b | 10041.9±37.8 a | 6331.2±26.1 b |
Table 7 Comparison of water consumption and agronomic traits of rice under two cultivation patterns.
耗水量及农艺性状 Water consumption and agronomic traits | T-04 | T-43 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
传统淹灌 TCF | 膜下滴灌 DIPFM | 传统淹灌 TCF | 膜下滴灌 DIPFM | |
耗水量water consumption/(m3·667m-2) | 1834 | 697 | 1834 | 697 |
有效穗数Effective panicle number/(×104·hm-2) | 319.6±7.8 b | 230.8±10.1 c | 456.6±8.7 a | 333.5±9.5 b |
株高 Plant height | 94.8±5.3 a | 76.9±9.6 b | 92.7±6.2 a | 73.8±12.5 b |
主穗长Main panicle length | 17.2±2.0 ab | 18.6±1.4 a | 14.9±1.6 c | 15.9±3.0 bc |
每穗实粒数Filled grain number per panicle | 128.1±10.6 a | 110.1±11.5 a | 77.2±7.4 b | 69.7±10.8 b |
结实率Seed setting rate/% | 91.4±5.1 a | 81.6±6.5 b | 91.0±3.9 a | 80.0±6.1 b |
千粒重1000-grain weight/g | 28.4±1.9 a | 24.6±1.6 b | 28.5±1.6 a | 27.2±1.8 ab |
产量Yield/(kg·hm-2) | 11609.8±57.4 a | 6241.5±43.1 b | 10041.9±37.8 a | 6331.2±26.1 b |
[1] | Belder P, Bouman B A M, Cabangon R, et al. Effect of water-saving irrigation on rice yield and water use in typical lowand conditions in Asia.Agric Water Manag, 2004, 65: 193-210. |
[2] | 徐俊增, 彭世彰, 魏征, 等. 不同供氮水平及水分调控条件下水稻光合作用光响应特征.农业工程学报, 2012, 28(2): 71-77. |
[3] | 程旺大, 张国平, 赵国平, 等. 嘉早935水稻覆膜旱栽的物质积累及运转研究.作物学报, 2003, 29(3): 413-418. |
[4] | 邓环, 曹凑贵, 程建平, 等. 不同灌溉方式对水稻生物学特性的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2008, 16(3): 602-606. |
[5] | 邹桂花, 梅捍卫, 余新桥, 等. 不同灌水量对水、旱稻营养生长和光合特性及其产量的影响.作物学报, 2006, 32(8): 1179-1183. |
[6] | 郭庆人, 陈林. 水稻膜下滴灌栽培技术在我国发展的优势及前景分析. 中国稻米, 2012, 18(4): 36-39. |
[7] | He H B, Ma F Y, Yang R, et al.Rice performance and water use efficiency under plastic mulching with drip irrigation.Plos One, 2013, 8: 1-15. |
[8] | 朱齐超,危常州,李美宁,等. 氮肥运筹对膜下滴灌水稻生长和产量的影响,中国水稻科学,2013,27(4):440-446. |
[9] | 陈学庚,康建明. 水稻膜下滴灌种植与播种机的研究开发. 农机化研究, 2013(3): 74-79. |
[10] | 陈林,程莲,李丽,等. 水稻膜下滴灌技术的增产效果与经济效益分析.中国稻米,2013,19(1):41-4. |
[11] | 陈林,郭庆人.膜下滴灌水稻栽培技术的形成与发展. 2012,26(5):587-588. |
[12] | 陈林,王芬. 水稻光合特性研究综述.高原山地气象研究,2010,30(4):89-92. |
[13] | 周可金,肖文娜,官春云. 不同油菜品种角果光合特性及叶绿素荧光参数的差异.中国油料作物学报,2009,31(3):316-321. |
[14] | 凌启鸿. 作物群体质量. 上海:上海科学技术出版社,2000. |
[15] | 高俊风. 植物生理实验指导. 北京:高等教育出版社.2006. |
[16] | Thomley J H M.Mathematical models in plannt physiology.London:Academic Press,1976. |
[17] | Baly E C C. The kinetics of photosynthesis. London:Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B(Biological Sciences),1935. |
[18] | Krause G H,Weis E.Chlorophyll fluorescence and photosynthesis:The basis.Annu Rev Plant physiol Plant Mol Biol,1991,42:313-349. |
[19] | Van K, Snel J F H. The use of chlorophyll fluorescence nomenclature in plant stress physiology.Photo-synth Res,1990,25:147-150. |
[20] | 张明生,谢波,谈锋,等. 甘薯可溶性蛋白、叶绿素及ATP含量变化与品种抗旱性关系的研究.中国农业科学,2003,36(1):13-16. |
[21] | 孙小玲,许岳飞,马鲁沂,等. 植株叶片的光合色素构成对遮阴的响应.植物生态学报,2010,34(8):989-999. |
[22] | 董志新,韩清芳,贾志宽,等. 不同苜蓿品种光合速率对光和CO2浓度的响应特征.生态学报,2007,27(6):2272-2277. |
[23] | 杜伟莉,高杰,胡富亮,等. 玉米叶片光合作用和渗透调节对干旱胁迫的响应.作物学报,2013,39(3):530-536. |
[24] | Pieters A J,Souki S E.Effects drought during grain filling on PS II activity in rice.J Plant Physiol,2005,162:903-911. |
[25] | 赵丽英,邓西平,山仑. 不同水分处理下冬小麦旗叶叶绿素荧光参数的变化研究.中国生态农业学报,2007,15(1):63-66. |
[26] | Morgan J M,Osmoregulation and water stress in higher plants.Ann Rev plant pgysiol,1984,35:299-319. |
[27] | Cabuslay G S,Ito O,Alejar A A.Physiological evaluation of responses of rice to water deficit.Plant Sci,2002,163:815-827. |
[28] | Martino C D,Delfine S,Pizzuto R,et al.Free amino acids and glycine betaine in leaf osmoregulation of spinach responding to increasing salt stress.New Phytol,2003,158: 455-463. |
[29] | Chaves M M,Oliveira M M.Mechanisms underlying plant resilience to water deficits:Prospects for water-saving agriculture.J Exper Bot,2004,55:2365-2384. |
[30] | 蔡昆争,吴学祝,骆世明. 不同生育期水分胁迫对水稻根叶渗透调节物质变化的影响.植物生态学报,2008,32(2):491-500. |
[31] | 张荣萍,马均,王贺正,等. 不同灌水方式对水稻生育特性及水分利用率的影响.中国农学通报,2005,21(9):144-150. |
[32] | 蔡永萍,杨其光,黄义德. 水稻水作与旱作对抽穗后剑叶光合特性、衰老及根系活性的影响.中国水稻科学,2000,14(4):219-224. |
[33] | 倪同坤,戴柏元,王卫军,等. 水稻控制灌溉技术在苏北沿海垦区的应用.江苏农业科学,2008,3:52-54. |
[1] | REN Zhiqi, XUE Kexin, DONG Zheng, LI Xiaoxiang, LI Yongzhao, GUO Yujing, LIU Wenqiang, GUO Liang, SHENG Xinnian, LIU Zhixi, PAN Xiaowu. Identification and Gene Mapping of Outcurved Leaf Mutant ocl1 in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 337-346. |
[2] | XIAO Lequan, LI Lei, DAI Weimin, QIANG Sheng, SONG Xiaoling. Seedling Growth Characteristics of Hybrids Between Transgenic Rice with cry2A*/bar Genes and Weedy Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 347-358. |
[3] | LI Gang, GAO Qingsong, LI Wei, ZHANG Wenxia, WANG Jian, CHEN Baoshan, WANG Di, GAO Hao, XU Weijun, CHEN Hongqi, JI Jianhui. Directed Knockout of SD1 Gene Improves Lodging Resistance and Blast Resistance of Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 359-367. |
[4] | WANG Shengyong, CHEN Yuhang, CHEN Huili, HUANG Yujie, ZHANG Xiaotian, DING Shuangcheng, WANG Hongwei. Effects of High Temperature on Phenylpropane Metabolism and Downstream Branch Metabolic Pathways in Rice Meiosis [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 368-378. |
[5] | HUANG Yaru, XU Peng, WANG Lele, HE Yizhe, WANG Hui, KE Jian, HE Haibing, WU Liquan, YOU Cuicui. Effects of Exogenous Trehalose on Grain Filling Characteristics and Yield Formation of japonica Rice Cultivar W1844 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[6] | DONG Liqiang, YANG Tiexin, LI Rui, SHANG Wenqi, MA Liang, LI Yuedong, SUI Guomin. Effect of Plant-row Spacing on Rice Yield and Root Morphological and Physiological Characteristics in Super High Yield Field [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 392-404. |
[7] | GAO Qianqing, REN Xiaojian, ZHAI Zhongbing, ZHENG Pubing, WU Yuanfen, CUI Kehui. Effects of Panicle and Bud-promoting Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on Growth of Regenerated Bud and Grain Yield of Ratoon Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 405-414. |
[8] | HUANG Jinwen, LI Rikun, CHEN Zhicheng, ZHANG Bianhong, LEI Han, PAN Ruixin, YANG Mingyu, PAN Meiqing, TANG Lina. Effects of Straw Returning Techniques on Soil Nutrients, Organic Carbon and Microbial Diversity in Tobacco-rice Rotation System [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 415-426. |
[9] | HAN Cong, HE Yuchang, WU Lijuan, JIA Lili, WANG Lei, E Zhiguo. Research Progress in the Function of Basic Leucine Zipper (bZIP) Protein Family in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 436-448. |
[10] | SHEN Yumin, CHEN Mingliang, XIONG Huanjin, XIONG Wentao, WU Xiaoyan, XIAO Yeqing. Phenotypic Analysis and Fine Mapping of blg1(beak like grain 1), a Rice Mutant with Abnormal Palea and Lemma Development [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 225-232. |
[11] | DUAN Min, XIE Liujie, GAO Xiuying, TANG Haijuan, HUANG Shanjun, PAN Xiaobiao. Creation of Thermo-sensitive Genic Male Sterile Rice Lines with Wide Compatibility Based on CRISPR/Cas9 Technology [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 233-243. |
[12] | WANG Wenting, MA Jiaying, LI Guangyan, FU Weimeng, LI Hubo, LIN Jie, CHEN Tingting, FENG Baohua, TAO Longxing, FU Guanfu, QIN Yebo. Effect of Different Fertilizer Application Rates on Rice Yield and Quality Formation and Its Relationship with Energy Metabolism at High Temperature [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
[13] | LIU Aihua, LI Xiaokun. Meta-analysis of Relationship Between Fertilizer Application and Rice Quality [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 276-284. |
[14] | YANG Xiaolong, WANG Biao, WANG Benfu, ZHANG Zhisheng, ZHANG Zuolin, YANG Lantian, CHENG Jianping, LI Yang. Effects of Different Water Management on Yield and Rice Quality of Dry-seeded Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
[15] | WEI Xiaodong, SONG Xuemei, ZHAO Ling, ZHAO Qingyong, CHEN Tao, LU Kai, ZHU Zhen, HUANG Shengdong, WANG Cailin, ZHANG Yadong. Effects of Silicon and Zinc Fertilizer and Their Application Ways on Yield and Grain Quality of Rice Variety Nanjing 46 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 295-306. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||