
Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2026, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 106-117.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2026.250112
• Research Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Cheng1,*(
), SHAO Guojun1, ZHANG Xue1, TIAN Shujun1, SUN Chi1, GUO Yanying1, ZHOU Ran2, HAN Yong1, ZHENG Wenjing1, SUN Lianping2,*(
)
Received:2025-01-14
Revised:2025-03-22
Online:2026-01-10
Published:2026-01-21
Contact:
ZHANG Cheng, SUN Lianping
张城1,*(
), 邵国军1, 张雪1, 田书军1, 孙驰1, 郭艳颖1, 周燃2, 韩勇1, 郑文静1, 孙廉平2,*(
)
通讯作者:
张城,孙廉平
基金资助:ZHANG Cheng, SHAO Guojun, ZHANG Xue, TIAN Shujun, SUN Chi, GUO Yanying, ZHOU Ran, HAN Yong, ZHENG Wenjing, SUN Lianping. QTL Mapping and Pyramiding Effect Analysis of Diurnal Floret Opening Time Traits in japonica Rice[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2026, 40(1): 106-117.
张城, 邵国军, 张雪, 田书军, 孙驰, 郭艳颖, 周燃, 韩勇, 郑文静, 孙廉平. 粳稻花时性状QTL定位与聚合效应分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2026, 40(1): 106-117.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2026.250112
| 环境 Environment | 天气 Weather | 气温 Temperature(℃) | 注 Note | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-04 | 阴转多云Overcast to cloudy | 23~29 | ||
| 2022-08-05 | 阴转阵雨Overcast with showers later | 21~26 | 部分晚花时株系受降雨影响未开花 Some late-FT lines failed to bloom due to rainfall | |
| 2022-08-07 | 阴转晴Overcast to clear | 19~30 | ||
| 2022-08-08 | 晴Clear | 19~32 | ||
| 2022-08-09 | 阴转阵雨Overcast with showers later | 20~30 | 部分晚花时株系受降雨影响未开花 Some late-FT lines failed to bloom due to rainfall | |
| 2022-08-10 | 阴转阵雨Overcast with showers later | 19~27 | 雨后花时异常 Abnormal FT after rain | |
| 2022-08-14 | 多云转晴 Cloudy to clear | 17~27 | 群体开花末期 Flowering end period of the population | |
| 2023-08-10 | 多云 Cloudy | 20~30 | 群体开花始期 Flowering initiation period of the population | |
| 2023-08-11 | 多云 Cloudy | 20~29 | ||
| 2023-08-12 | 阴转阵雨 Overcast with showers later | 19~27 | ||
| 2023-08-14 | 多云转阵雨Cloudy with showers later | 20~27 | ||
| 2023-08-17 | 多云转晴Cloudy to clear | 19~31 | ||
| 2024-08-02 | 多云Cloudy | 26~32 | 闷热,开花早 Hot and stuffy, early FT | |
| 2024-08-03 | 多云转阵雨Cloudy with showers later | 27~32 | 闷热,开花早,部分晚花时株系受降雨影响未开花 Hot and stuffy, early FT. Some late-FT lines failed to bloom due to the rainfall | |
Table 1. Meteorological conditions of the investigation environments
| 环境 Environment | 天气 Weather | 气温 Temperature(℃) | 注 Note | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-04 | 阴转多云Overcast to cloudy | 23~29 | ||
| 2022-08-05 | 阴转阵雨Overcast with showers later | 21~26 | 部分晚花时株系受降雨影响未开花 Some late-FT lines failed to bloom due to rainfall | |
| 2022-08-07 | 阴转晴Overcast to clear | 19~30 | ||
| 2022-08-08 | 晴Clear | 19~32 | ||
| 2022-08-09 | 阴转阵雨Overcast with showers later | 20~30 | 部分晚花时株系受降雨影响未开花 Some late-FT lines failed to bloom due to rainfall | |
| 2022-08-10 | 阴转阵雨Overcast with showers later | 19~27 | 雨后花时异常 Abnormal FT after rain | |
| 2022-08-14 | 多云转晴 Cloudy to clear | 17~27 | 群体开花末期 Flowering end period of the population | |
| 2023-08-10 | 多云 Cloudy | 20~30 | 群体开花始期 Flowering initiation period of the population | |
| 2023-08-11 | 多云 Cloudy | 20~29 | ||
| 2023-08-12 | 阴转阵雨 Overcast with showers later | 19~27 | ||
| 2023-08-14 | 多云转阵雨Cloudy with showers later | 20~27 | ||
| 2023-08-17 | 多云转晴Cloudy to clear | 19~31 | ||
| 2024-08-02 | 多云Cloudy | 26~32 | 闷热,开花早 Hot and stuffy, early FT | |
| 2024-08-03 | 多云转阵雨Cloudy with showers later | 27~32 | 闷热,开花早,部分晚花时株系受降雨影响未开花 Hot and stuffy, early FT. Some late-FT lines failed to bloom due to the rainfall | |
Fig. 1. Floret-opening time performance of the two parents A, Diurnal-floret-opening-time dynamics of the parents;B, Diurnal-floret-opening-time difference between the two parents under 14 environments;C, Floret-opening-time of the two parents.
| 环境 Environment | J139B (min) | J65B (min) | 群体均值 Mean(min) | 幅度 FT difference(min) | 标准误 Standard error | 偏度 Skewness | 峰度 Kurtosis | KS检验 KS-test | P值 P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-04 | 358 b B | 277.9 bc C | 328.0 | 130.0 | 21.9 | −1.527 | 2.840 | 2.29 | 0.000 |
| 2022-08-05 | 360 b AB | 278 bc C | 348.2 | 141.0 | 43.2 | −0.704 | −0.884 | 1.61 | 0.011 |
| 2022-08-07 | 338 c CD | 280.1 bc BC | 318.0 | 126.0 | 17.1 | −1.524 | 5.989 | 1.91 | 0.001 |
| 2022-08-08 | 333.6 cd D | 248.4 d D | 304.5 | 125.0 | 24.3 | −1.453 | 2.103 | 2.26 | 0.000 |
| 2022-08-09 | 354 b BC | 242.8 d D | 307.8 | 140.0 | 33.4 | −0.349 | −0.699 | 1.07 | 0.203 |
| 2022-08-10 | 272.9 h H | 266.8 c C | 267.5 | 80.0 | 16.9 | 0.109 | −0.552 | 0.83 | 0.489 |
| 2022-08-14 | 322.1 de DE | 306.5 a A | 312.9 | 91.0 | 13.8 | 0.434 | 1.271 | 1.03 | 0.236 |
| 2023-08-10 | 301.4 fg FG | 274.4 bc C | 283.2 | 135.0 | 27.3 | −2.179 | 6.351 | 1.07 | 0.200 |
| 2023-08-11 | 366.4 ab AB | 297.7 a AB | 337.5 | 206.6 | 30.0 | −1.560 | 4.279 | 1.55 | 0.017 |
| 2023-08-12 | 313.1 ef EF | 275.9 bc C | 305.2 | 130.9 | 28.0 | −0.813 | 0.191 | 1.49 | 0.024 |
| 2023-08-14 | 376.6 a A | 282.7 b BC | 344.3 | 192.6 | 32.1 | −1.524 | 2.691 | 2.66 | 0.000 |
| 2023-08-17 | 333.9 cd D | 272.5 bc C | 304.0 | 102.9 | 19.3 | −0.840 | 1.138 | 1.09 | 0.189 |
| 2024-08-02 | 293.1 g G | 115.5 e E | 237.1 | 220.0 | 53.3 | −0.952 | −0.162 | 2.57 | 0.000 |
| 2024-08-03 | 358.3 b B | 85.4 f F | 238.5 | 281.2 | 84.4 | −0.322 | −1.188 | 1.60 | 0.012 |
| 均值Mean | 334.4 | 250.3 | |||||||
| 标准差 SD | 30.6 | 65.8 | |||||||
| 变异系数 CV | 9.1 | 26.3 |
Table 2. Performance of FT in two parents and the RIL population under 14 environments
| 环境 Environment | J139B (min) | J65B (min) | 群体均值 Mean(min) | 幅度 FT difference(min) | 标准误 Standard error | 偏度 Skewness | 峰度 Kurtosis | KS检验 KS-test | P值 P-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-04 | 358 b B | 277.9 bc C | 328.0 | 130.0 | 21.9 | −1.527 | 2.840 | 2.29 | 0.000 |
| 2022-08-05 | 360 b AB | 278 bc C | 348.2 | 141.0 | 43.2 | −0.704 | −0.884 | 1.61 | 0.011 |
| 2022-08-07 | 338 c CD | 280.1 bc BC | 318.0 | 126.0 | 17.1 | −1.524 | 5.989 | 1.91 | 0.001 |
| 2022-08-08 | 333.6 cd D | 248.4 d D | 304.5 | 125.0 | 24.3 | −1.453 | 2.103 | 2.26 | 0.000 |
| 2022-08-09 | 354 b BC | 242.8 d D | 307.8 | 140.0 | 33.4 | −0.349 | −0.699 | 1.07 | 0.203 |
| 2022-08-10 | 272.9 h H | 266.8 c C | 267.5 | 80.0 | 16.9 | 0.109 | −0.552 | 0.83 | 0.489 |
| 2022-08-14 | 322.1 de DE | 306.5 a A | 312.9 | 91.0 | 13.8 | 0.434 | 1.271 | 1.03 | 0.236 |
| 2023-08-10 | 301.4 fg FG | 274.4 bc C | 283.2 | 135.0 | 27.3 | −2.179 | 6.351 | 1.07 | 0.200 |
| 2023-08-11 | 366.4 ab AB | 297.7 a AB | 337.5 | 206.6 | 30.0 | −1.560 | 4.279 | 1.55 | 0.017 |
| 2023-08-12 | 313.1 ef EF | 275.9 bc C | 305.2 | 130.9 | 28.0 | −0.813 | 0.191 | 1.49 | 0.024 |
| 2023-08-14 | 376.6 a A | 282.7 b BC | 344.3 | 192.6 | 32.1 | −1.524 | 2.691 | 2.66 | 0.000 |
| 2023-08-17 | 333.9 cd D | 272.5 bc C | 304.0 | 102.9 | 19.3 | −0.840 | 1.138 | 1.09 | 0.189 |
| 2024-08-02 | 293.1 g G | 115.5 e E | 237.1 | 220.0 | 53.3 | −0.952 | −0.162 | 2.57 | 0.000 |
| 2024-08-03 | 358.3 b B | 85.4 f F | 238.5 | 281.2 | 84.4 | −0.322 | −1.188 | 1.60 | 0.012 |
| 均值Mean | 334.4 | 250.3 | |||||||
| 标准差 SD | 30.6 | 65.8 | |||||||
| 变异系数 CV | 9.1 | 26.3 |
| QTL | 环境 Environment | 染色体 Chr. | 位置 Position | 标记区间 Marker interval | LOD | 表型贡献率 Phenotypic variance explained(%) | 加性效应 Additive effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| qFT2.1 | 1 | 2 | 32 | 3548115−5120420 | 3.69 | 13.511 | 15.93 |
| qFT2.2 | 1 | 2 | 160 | 5211026−10870893 | 2.50 | 0.721 | 14.08 |
| qFT2.3 | 3 | 2 | 174-181 | 10870893−15640124 | 2.94-7.67 | 1.673-3.905 | 26.8-38.06 |
| qFT3.1 | 2 | 3 | 2-3 | 1276817−6232373 | 4.28-5.10 | 0.993-3.874 | 3.76-6.51 |
| qFT3.2 | 2 | 3 | 66-68 | 11778351−15589648 | 3.11-6.14 | 0.442-1.631 | 10.23-24.27 |
| qFT3.3 | 1 | 3 | 133 | 15589648−15963860 | 3.65 | 3.867 | 35.89 |
| qFT3.4 | 4 | 3 | 157-161 | 15963860−19173865 | 2.56-3.36 | 1.679-3.841 | 15.65-37.13 |
| qFT3.5 | 2 | 3 | 180-180 | 21059861−22120274 | 3.06-3.56 | 0.512-0.672 | 10.78-15.3 |
| qFT4 | 1 | 4 | 96 | 20657255−20765327 | 2.97 | 0.183 | 5.43 |
| qFT5.1 | 1 | 5 | 23 | 1178896−2313820 | 3.48 | 0.895 | 6.13 |
| qFT5.2 | 8 | 5 | 89-102 | 3512365−3770562 | 4.60-16.46 | 0.271-5.459 | 18.09-50.52 |
| qFT5.3 | 10 | 5 | 107-119 | 3770562−5289420 | 3.11-18.94 | 0.271-8.945 | 13.04-50.47 |
| qFT5.4 | 3 | 5 | 211-212 | 10410805−10847593 | 2.87-4.59 | 1.223-3.273 | 20.33-34.22 |
| qFT5.5 | 9 | 5 | 217-232 | 11057325−20726014 | 3.87-13.67 | 0.271-5.636 | 16.81-48.85 |
| qFT6.1 | 1 | 6 | 10 | 1632003−3338507 | 3.00 | 0.449 | 4.09 |
| qFT6.2 | 3 | 6 | 129 | 26902414−29897327 | 3.28-7.15 | 0.555-1.644 | 6.71-24.23 |
| qFT7.1 | 1 | 7 | 84 | 10497568−13804874 | 4.57 | 3.267 | -22.95 |
| qFT7.2 | 2 | 7 | 91-92 | 13804874−17673544 | 5.15-6.00 | 2.731-3.429 | -22.09--17.81 |
| qFT8.1 | 1 | 8 | 161 | 15987810−17697658 | 2.65 | 2.313 | 2.91 |
| qFT8.2 | 1 | 8 | 227 | 21632760−24890652 | 3.03 | 1.061 | 7.32 |
| qFT9.1 | 1 | 9 | 83 | 15336683−16946239 | 10.50 | 1.399 | -10.86 |
| qFT9.2 | 1 | 9 | 94 | 17736891−19018118 | 6.09 | 0.718 | 8.02 |
| qFT10.1 | 1 | 10 | 22 | 2340168−2526630 | 2.95 | 0.566 | 6.72 |
| qFT10.2 | 8 | 10 | 97-108 | 10550006−14355797 | 2.83-12.27 | 0.239-5.465 | 16.27-50.37 |
| qFT10.3 | 8 | 10 | 117-127 | 14355797−17930367 | 2.64-11.99 | 0.236-5.428 | 16.41-50.93 |
| qFT11.1 | 1 | 11 | 1 | 5768520−6510910 | 3.92 | 3.699 | 8.52 |
| qFT11.2 | 1 | 11 | 37 | 8759552−8972803 | 4.16 | 0.594 | 4.73 |
| qFT11.3 | 1 | 11 | 163 | 23361525−23613051 | 9.30 | 1.855 | 8.82 |
| qFT12.1 | 1 | 11 | 81 | 19422618−22520720 | 2.65 | 0.805 | 5.81 |
| qFT12.2 | 2 | 12 | 136-148 | 22520720−25953139 | 4.35-5.47 | 3.854-5.540 | 35.39-46.63 |
Table 3. Information of FT-related QTLs in RILs under 11 environments
| QTL | 环境 Environment | 染色体 Chr. | 位置 Position | 标记区间 Marker interval | LOD | 表型贡献率 Phenotypic variance explained(%) | 加性效应 Additive effect |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| qFT2.1 | 1 | 2 | 32 | 3548115−5120420 | 3.69 | 13.511 | 15.93 |
| qFT2.2 | 1 | 2 | 160 | 5211026−10870893 | 2.50 | 0.721 | 14.08 |
| qFT2.3 | 3 | 2 | 174-181 | 10870893−15640124 | 2.94-7.67 | 1.673-3.905 | 26.8-38.06 |
| qFT3.1 | 2 | 3 | 2-3 | 1276817−6232373 | 4.28-5.10 | 0.993-3.874 | 3.76-6.51 |
| qFT3.2 | 2 | 3 | 66-68 | 11778351−15589648 | 3.11-6.14 | 0.442-1.631 | 10.23-24.27 |
| qFT3.3 | 1 | 3 | 133 | 15589648−15963860 | 3.65 | 3.867 | 35.89 |
| qFT3.4 | 4 | 3 | 157-161 | 15963860−19173865 | 2.56-3.36 | 1.679-3.841 | 15.65-37.13 |
| qFT3.5 | 2 | 3 | 180-180 | 21059861−22120274 | 3.06-3.56 | 0.512-0.672 | 10.78-15.3 |
| qFT4 | 1 | 4 | 96 | 20657255−20765327 | 2.97 | 0.183 | 5.43 |
| qFT5.1 | 1 | 5 | 23 | 1178896−2313820 | 3.48 | 0.895 | 6.13 |
| qFT5.2 | 8 | 5 | 89-102 | 3512365−3770562 | 4.60-16.46 | 0.271-5.459 | 18.09-50.52 |
| qFT5.3 | 10 | 5 | 107-119 | 3770562−5289420 | 3.11-18.94 | 0.271-8.945 | 13.04-50.47 |
| qFT5.4 | 3 | 5 | 211-212 | 10410805−10847593 | 2.87-4.59 | 1.223-3.273 | 20.33-34.22 |
| qFT5.5 | 9 | 5 | 217-232 | 11057325−20726014 | 3.87-13.67 | 0.271-5.636 | 16.81-48.85 |
| qFT6.1 | 1 | 6 | 10 | 1632003−3338507 | 3.00 | 0.449 | 4.09 |
| qFT6.2 | 3 | 6 | 129 | 26902414−29897327 | 3.28-7.15 | 0.555-1.644 | 6.71-24.23 |
| qFT7.1 | 1 | 7 | 84 | 10497568−13804874 | 4.57 | 3.267 | -22.95 |
| qFT7.2 | 2 | 7 | 91-92 | 13804874−17673544 | 5.15-6.00 | 2.731-3.429 | -22.09--17.81 |
| qFT8.1 | 1 | 8 | 161 | 15987810−17697658 | 2.65 | 2.313 | 2.91 |
| qFT8.2 | 1 | 8 | 227 | 21632760−24890652 | 3.03 | 1.061 | 7.32 |
| qFT9.1 | 1 | 9 | 83 | 15336683−16946239 | 10.50 | 1.399 | -10.86 |
| qFT9.2 | 1 | 9 | 94 | 17736891−19018118 | 6.09 | 0.718 | 8.02 |
| qFT10.1 | 1 | 10 | 22 | 2340168−2526630 | 2.95 | 0.566 | 6.72 |
| qFT10.2 | 8 | 10 | 97-108 | 10550006−14355797 | 2.83-12.27 | 0.239-5.465 | 16.27-50.37 |
| qFT10.3 | 8 | 10 | 117-127 | 14355797−17930367 | 2.64-11.99 | 0.236-5.428 | 16.41-50.93 |
| qFT11.1 | 1 | 11 | 1 | 5768520−6510910 | 3.92 | 3.699 | 8.52 |
| qFT11.2 | 1 | 11 | 37 | 8759552−8972803 | 4.16 | 0.594 | 4.73 |
| qFT11.3 | 1 | 11 | 163 | 23361525−23613051 | 9.30 | 1.855 | 8.82 |
| qFT12.1 | 1 | 11 | 81 | 19422618−22520720 | 2.65 | 0.805 | 5.81 |
| qFT12.2 | 2 | 12 | 136-148 | 22520720−25953139 | 4.35-5.47 | 3.854-5.540 | 35.39-46.63 |
Fig. 4. Distribution of ED-based linkage value on chromosomes A, ED-SNP;B, ED-InDel. The abscissa is the chromosome name. Each coloured dot represents an ED-based linkage value of an SNP/InDel site. Black line represents ED value after fitting. Red dashed line represents linkage threshold. Figure A has a threshold of 0.65 and Figure B has a threshold of 1.15. A larger ED value indicates a stronger linkage of the SNP/InDel site to target trait.
Fig. 5. Distribution of SNP-index and InDel-index on chromosomes A, SNP-index;B, InDel-index. The abscissa is the chromosome name. The coloured dot represents the calculated SNP-index/InDel-index value of each SNP/InDel site. The black line is the fitted SNP index/InDel-index value. The red line is 0.99 threshold, the blue line is 0.95 threshold and the green line is 0.90 threshold.
| 数据 Data | 基因座 QTL | ED | Index | 交集 Intersection | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 起始 位置 Start | 终止 位置 End | 片段长度 Segment size(Mb) | 起始 位置 Start | 终止 位置 End | 片段长度 Segment size(Mb) | 起始 位置 Start | 终止 位置 End | 片段长度 Segment size(Mb) | ||||
| SNP | 14650000 | 14780000 | 0.13 | |||||||||
| 16790000 | 17840000 | 1.05 | ||||||||||
| qFT3-SNP | 4690000 | 6010000 | 1.32 | 4720000 | 5710000 | 0.99 | 4720000 | 5710000 | 0.99 | |||
| qFT5-SNP | 4880000 | 6390000 | 1.51 | 5050000 | 6420000 | 1.37 | 5050000 | 6390000 | 1.34 | |||
| qFT6-SNP | 28740000 | 31230000 | 2.49 | 28750000 | 31230000 | 2.48 | 28750000 | 31230000 | 2.48 | |||
| qFT8.1-SNP | 19550000 | 19880000 | 0.33 | 19250000 | 20060000 | 0.81 | 19550000 | 19880000 | 0.33 | |||
| qFT8.2-SNP | 19910000 | 20060000 | 0.15 | 19250000 | 20060000 | 0.81 | 19910000 | 20060000 | 0.15 | |||
| 18480000 | 19000000 | 0.52 | ||||||||||
| 10920000 | 10980000 | 0.06 | ||||||||||
| InDel | 4880000 | 4910000 | 0.03 | |||||||||
| 5140000 | 6390000 | 1.25 | ||||||||||
| qFT5-InDel | 18410000 | 19710000 | 1.30 | 19380000 | 19550000 | 0.17 | 19380000 | 19550000 | 0.17 | |||
| qFT6-InDel | 28810000 | 31230000 | 2.42 | 28760000 | 31230000 | 2.47 | 28810000 | 31230000 | 2.42 | |||
| qFT12-InDel | 7010000 | 9000000 | 1.99 | 7770000 | 7860000 | 0.09 | 7770000 | 7860000 | 0.09 | |||
| 19010000 | 19010000 | 0.00 | ||||||||||
| 34530000 | 35140000 | 0.61 | ||||||||||
| 21690000 | 21860000 | 0.17 | ||||||||||
| 22180000 | 22250000 | 0.07 | ||||||||||
| 22740000 | 23810000 | 1.07 | ||||||||||
Table 4. Association interval of flowering time
| 数据 Data | 基因座 QTL | ED | Index | 交集 Intersection | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 起始 位置 Start | 终止 位置 End | 片段长度 Segment size(Mb) | 起始 位置 Start | 终止 位置 End | 片段长度 Segment size(Mb) | 起始 位置 Start | 终止 位置 End | 片段长度 Segment size(Mb) | ||||
| SNP | 14650000 | 14780000 | 0.13 | |||||||||
| 16790000 | 17840000 | 1.05 | ||||||||||
| qFT3-SNP | 4690000 | 6010000 | 1.32 | 4720000 | 5710000 | 0.99 | 4720000 | 5710000 | 0.99 | |||
| qFT5-SNP | 4880000 | 6390000 | 1.51 | 5050000 | 6420000 | 1.37 | 5050000 | 6390000 | 1.34 | |||
| qFT6-SNP | 28740000 | 31230000 | 2.49 | 28750000 | 31230000 | 2.48 | 28750000 | 31230000 | 2.48 | |||
| qFT8.1-SNP | 19550000 | 19880000 | 0.33 | 19250000 | 20060000 | 0.81 | 19550000 | 19880000 | 0.33 | |||
| qFT8.2-SNP | 19910000 | 20060000 | 0.15 | 19250000 | 20060000 | 0.81 | 19910000 | 20060000 | 0.15 | |||
| 18480000 | 19000000 | 0.52 | ||||||||||
| 10920000 | 10980000 | 0.06 | ||||||||||
| InDel | 4880000 | 4910000 | 0.03 | |||||||||
| 5140000 | 6390000 | 1.25 | ||||||||||
| qFT5-InDel | 18410000 | 19710000 | 1.30 | 19380000 | 19550000 | 0.17 | 19380000 | 19550000 | 0.17 | |||
| qFT6-InDel | 28810000 | 31230000 | 2.42 | 28760000 | 31230000 | 2.47 | 28810000 | 31230000 | 2.42 | |||
| qFT12-InDel | 7010000 | 9000000 | 1.99 | 7770000 | 7860000 | 0.09 | 7770000 | 7860000 | 0.09 | |||
| 19010000 | 19010000 | 0.00 | ||||||||||
| 34530000 | 35140000 | 0.61 | ||||||||||
| 21690000 | 21860000 | 0.17 | ||||||||||
| 22180000 | 22250000 | 0.07 | ||||||||||
| 22740000 | 23810000 | 1.07 | ||||||||||
| [1] | 隋国民. 杂交粳稻研究进展与发展策略[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2018(1): 51-55+2. |
| Sui G M. Resarch progress and development strategy of japonica hybrid rice[J]. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, 2018(1): 51-55+2. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [2] | 邓运, 康蓉蓉, 田小海, 林俊城, 陈淑莲. 12个杂交水稻不育系异交性能的测定[J]. 作物杂志, 2008(2): 38-42. |
| Deng Y, Kang R R, Tian X H, Lin J C, Chen S L. Field performance of outcrossing characteristics for twelve male sterile-lines of hybrid rice[J]. Crops, 2008(2): 38-42. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [3] | 田大成, 黄三奎, 段永国, 王友红. 水稻不育系花时和受粉时间与异交结实率的关系[J]. 杂交水稻, 2004(3): 53-57. |
| Tian D C, Huang S K, Duan Y G, Wang Y H. The relationship between flowering and pollination time and outcrossing rate of male sterile lines in hybrid rice seed production[J]. Hybrid Rice, 2004(3): 53-57. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [4] | 张雪, 张城, 王彦荣, 陈亚军, 李春凯, 田书军. 6个水稻三系不育系异交特性研究[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 2021(2): 34-36. |
| Zhang X, Zhang C, Wang Y R, Chen Y J, Li C K, Tian S J. Outcrossing characteristics of 6 rice CMS lines[J]. Liaoning Agricultural Sciences, 2021(2): 34-36. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [5] | Wang M M, Chen M H, Huang Z, Zhou H, Liu Z L. Advances on the study of diurnal flower-opening times of rice[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2023, 24(13): 10654. |
| [6] | 白刚. 水稻花时性状的QTL分析[D]. 成都: 四川师范大学, 2010. |
| Bai G. QTL analysis for flowering time in rice[D]. Chengdu: Sichuan Normal University, 2010. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [7] | 马作斌, 詹瞻, 徐海, 徐正进, 毛艇, 朱春杰, 郭艳华. 籼粳稻杂交后代花时性状的QTL分析[J]. 植物生理学报, 2011, 47(8): 799-802. |
| Ma Z B, Zhan Z, Xu H, Xu Z J, Mao T, Zhu C J, Guo Y H. QTL analysis on flowering time in filial generations of cross between indica and japonica rice[J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2011, 47(8): 799-802. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [8] | 万国, 冯跃, 张凤娇, 徐群, 王一平, 袁筱萍, 余汉勇, 彭锁堂. 水稻花时性状的QTL定位[J]. 核农学报, 2013, 27(5): 562-567. |
| Wan G, Feng Y, Zhang F J, Xu Q, Wang Y P, Yuan X P, Yu H Y, Peng S T. Mapping QTLs for flowering time in rice[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 27(5): 562-567. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [9] | 张萌. 水稻花时的研究新方法探究及其QTL定位[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2016. |
| Zhang M. New methods developed and QTL mapping for flowering time in rice[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [10] | Hirabayashi H, Sasaki K, Kambe T, Gannaban R B, Miras M A, Mendioro M S, Simon E V, Lumanglas P D, Fujita D, Takemoto-Kuno Y, Takeuchi Y, Kaji R, Kondo M, Kobayashi N, Ogawa T, Ando I, Jagadish K S V, Ishimaru T. qEMF3, a novel QTL for the early-morning flowering trait from wild rice, Oryza officinalis, to mitigate heat stress damage at flowering in rice, O. sativa[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2015, 66(5): 1227-1236. |
| [11] | Che J, Li X, Ouyang Y. To open early or late: Decoding the mystery of diurnal floret opening time in rice[J]. Plant Communications, 2024, 5(5): 100889. |
| [12] | Xu P Z, Wu T K, Ali A, Zhang H Y, Liao Y X, Chen X Q, Tian Y H, Wang W M, Fu X D, Li Y, Fan J, Wang H, Tian Y F, Liu Y T, Jiang Q S, Sun C H, Zhou H, Wu X J. EARLY MORNING FLOWERING 1 (EMF1) regulates the floret opening time by mediating lodicule cell wall formation in rice[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2022, 20(8): 1441-1443. |
| [13] | Wang M M, Zhu X P, Peng G Q, Liu M L, Zhang S Q, Chen M H, Liao S T, Wei X Y, Xu P, Tan X Y, Li F P, Li Z C, Deng L, Luo Z L, Zhu L Y, Zhao S, Jiang D G, Li J, Liu Z L, Xie X R, Wang S K, Wu A M, Zhuang C X, Zhou H. Controlling diurnal flower-opening time by manipulating the jasmonate pathway accelerates development of indica-japonica hybrid rice breeding[J]. Molecular Plant, 2022, 15: 956-972. |
| [14] | Liu L, Zou Z S, Qian K, Xia C, He Y, Zeng H, Zhou X, Riemann M, Yin C X. Jasmonic acid deficiency leads to scattered floret opening time in cytoplasmic male sterile rice Zhenshan 97A[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2017, 68(16): 4613-4625. |
| [15] | Wang M M, Zhu X P, Huang Z, Chen M H, Xu P, Liao S T, Zhao Y Z, Gao Y N, He J H, Luo Y T, Chen H X, Wei X Y, Nie S A, Dong J F, Zhu L Y, Zhuang C X, Zhao J L, Liu Z L, Zhou H. Controlling diurnal flower-opening time by manipulating the jasmonate pathway accelerates development of indica-japonica hybrid rice breeding[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2024, 22(8): 2267-2281. |
| [16] | Zhu X P, Wang M M, Huang Z, Chen M H, Xu P, Liao S T, Gao Y N, Zhao Y Z, Chen H X, He J H, Luo Y T, Wei X Y, Zhu L Y, Liu C H, Huang J L, Zhao X H, Zhao J L, Zhang Z M, Zhuang C X, Liu Z L, Zhou H. The OsMYC2-JA feedback loop regulates diurnal flower-opening time via cell wall loosening in rice[J]. Plant Journal, 2024, 119(6): 2585-2598. |
| [17] | Ding W Y, Gou Y J, Li Y J, Li J J, Fang Y D, Liu X P, Zhu X Y, Ye R J, Heng Y Q, Wang H Y, Shen R X. A jasmonate-mediated regulatory network modulates diurnal floret opening time in rice[J]. The New Phytologist, 2024, 244(1): 176-191. |
| [18] | Ding W, Gou Y, Li Y, Li J, Fang Y, Liu X, Zhu X, Ye R, Heng Y, Wang H, Shen R. A jasmonate-mediated regulatory network modulates diurnal floret opening time in rice[J]. The New Phytologist, 2024, 244(1): 176-191. |
| [19] | Gou Y J, Heng Y Q, Ding W Y, Xu C H, Tan Q S, Li Y J, Fang y d, Li X Q, Zhou D G, Zhu X Y, Zhang M Y, Ye R J, Wang H Y, Shen R X. Natural variation in OsMYB8 confers diurnal floret opening time divergence between indica and japonica subspecies[J]. Nature Communications, 2024, 15(1): 2262. |
| [20] | 孟帅, 徐鹏, 张迎信, 王宏, 曹立勇, 程式华, 沈希宏. 利用CRISPR/Cas9技术编辑粒长基因GS3改善粳稻花时[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(2): 119-127. |
| Meng S, Xu P, Zhang Y X, Wang H, Cao L Y, Cheng S H, Shen X H. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of GS3 to improve flowering time in japonica rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2018, 32(2): 119-127. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
| [21] | McCouch S R. Gene nomenclature system for rice[J]. Rice, 2008, 1(1): 72-84. |
| [1] | WANG Shilin, WU Ting, ZHOU Shiqi, SONG Siming, HU Biaolin. Identification of QTLs for Seed Storability in Dongxiang Wild Rice by Integrating BSA-Seq and QTL Analysis [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2025, 39(6): 789-800. |
| [2] | BIAN Jinlong, REN Gaolei, QIU Shi, XU Fangfu, HU Zhonglei, ZHANG Hongcheng, WEI Haiyan. Effect of Application Methods of Mixed Controlled-release Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization of Good Taste Quality japonica Rice Under Different Mechanical Transplanting Methods in the Huaibei Region [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2025, 39(6): 847-862. |
| [3] | SHAO Yafang, ZHU Dawei, ZHENG Xin, MOU Renxiang, ZHANG Linping, CHEN Mingxue. Development Status and Regional Differences of japonica Rice Quality in the Yangtze River Delta Region from 2002 to 2022 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2025, 39(2): 264-276. |
| [4] | YANG Chuanming, WANG Lizhi, ZHANG Xijuan, YANG Xianli, WANG Yangyang, HOU Benfu, CUI Shize, LI Qingchao, LIU Kai, MA Rui, FENG Yanjiang, LAI Yongcai, LI Hongyu, JIANG Shukun. Analysis of QTL Controlling Cold Tolerance at Seedling Stage by Using a High-Density SNP Linkage Map in japonica Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2025, 39(1): 82-91. |
| [5] | DU Yanxiu, SUN Wenyu, YUAN Zeke, ZHANG Qianqian, LI Fuhao, LI Junzhou, SUN Hongzheng. Mapping of qChalk8 Controlling Chalky Rice Rate in japonica Rice by Combining QTL-Seq with Molecular Markers [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(6): 665-671. |
| [6] | LIU Junfeng, MOU Jingyi, ZHAO Hongyan, GUO Shimeng, LI Yimeng, LIANG Chao, ZHOU Chanchan, WANG Shu, HUANG Yuancai. Effects of Nitrogen Application Practice and Row Spacing on Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in japonica Rice With Different Panicle Types [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(6): 672-684. |
| [7] | YAO Shu, CHEN Tao, ZHAO Chunfang, ZHOU Lihui, ZHAO Ling, LIANG Wenhua, HAO Lei, LU Kai, ZHU Zhen, ZHAO Qingyong, GUAN Ju, WANG Cailin, ZHANG Yadong. Analysis on Appearance and Cooking Taste Quality Characteristics of Different Types of japonica Rice in Jianghuai Rice-growing Area [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(6): 709-718. |
| [8] | HOU Benfu, YANG Chuanming, ZHANG Xijuan, YANG Xianli, WANG Lizhi, WANG Jiayu, LI Hongyu, JIANG Shukun. Mapping of Grain Shape QTLs Using RIL Population from Longdao 5/Zhongyouzao 8 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(1): 13-24. |
| [9] | JING Xiu, ZHOU Miao, WANG Jing, WANG Yan, WANG Wang, WANG Kai, GUO Baowei, HU Yajie, XING Zhipeng, XU Ke, ZHANG Hongcheng. Effect of Drought Stress on Root Morphology and Leaf Photosynthetic Characteristics of Good Taste japonica Rice from Late Stage of Panicle Differentiation to Early Stage of Grain Filling [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(1): 33-47. |
| [10] | HU Jiaxiao, LIU Jin, CUI Di, LE Si, ZHOU Huiying, HAN Bing, MENG Bingxin, YU Liqin, HAN Longzhi, MA Xiaoding, LI Maomao. Mapping Major QTLs for Panicle Traits Using CSSLs of Dongxiang Wild Rice (Oryza rufipogon Griff.) [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(6): 597-608. |
| [11] | YAO Xiaoyun, CHEN Chunlian, XIONG Yunhua, HUANG Yongping, PENG Zhiqing, LIU Jin, YIN Jianhua. Identification of QTL for Milling and Appearance Quality Traits in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(5): 507-517. |
| [12] | HUANG Yaru, XU Peng, WANG Lele, HE Yizhe, WANG Hui, KE Jian, HE Haibing, WU Liquan, YOU Cuicui. Effects of Exogenous Trehalose on Grain Filling Characteristics and Yield Formation of japonica Rice Cultivar W1844 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
| [13] | WANG Yu, SUN Quanyi, DU Haibo, XU Zhiwen, WU Keting, YIN Li, FENG Zhiming, HU Keming, CHEN Zongxiang, ZUO Shimin. Improvement of the Resistance of Nanjing 9108 to Blast and Sheath Blight by Pyramiding Resistance Gene Pigm and Quantitative Trait Genes qSB-9TQ and qSB-11HJX [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(2): 125-132. |
| [14] | PEI Feng, WANG Guangda, GAO Peng, FENG Zhiming, HU Keming, CHEN Zongxiang, CHEN Hongqi, CUI Ao, ZUO Shimin. Evaluation of New japonica Rice Lines with Low Cadmium Accumulation and Good Quality Generated by Knocking Out OsNramp5 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(1): 16-28. |
| [15] | CHEN Tao, ZHAO Qingyong, ZHU Zhen, ZHAO Ling, YAO Shu, ZHOU Lihui, ZHAO Chunfang, ZHANG Yadong, WANG Cailin. Development of New Low Glutelin Content japonica Rice Lines with Good Eating Quality and Fragrance by Molecular Marker-Assisted Selection [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(1): 55-65. |
| Viewed | ||||||
|
Full text |
|
|||||
|
Abstract |
|
|||||