Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2023, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 321-328.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2023.220706
Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHENG Chengmei1,2,#, SUN Jinqiu1,#, LIU Mengjie1, YANG Yongjie1, LU Yongliang1, GUO Yiqing2, TANG Wei1,*()
Received:
2022-07-11
Revised:
2022-10-13
Online:
2023-05-10
Published:
2023-05-16
Contact:
*email: tangwei@caas.cn
About author:
#These authors contributed equally to this work
郑承梅1,2,#, 孙金秋1,#, 刘梦杰1, 杨永杰1, 陆永良1, 郭怡卿2, 唐伟1,*()
通讯作者:
*email: tangwei@caas.cn
作者简介:
#共同第一作者
基金资助:
ZHENG Chengmei, SUN Jinqiu, LIU Mengjie, YANG Yongjie, LU Yongliang, GUO Yiqing, TANG Wei. Seed Germination, Seedling Emergence Characteristics and Response of Panicum bisulcatum to Pre- and Post-emergence Herbicides in Paddy Field[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 321-328.
郑承梅, 孙金秋, 刘梦杰, 杨永杰, 陆永良, 郭怡卿, 唐伟. 水稻田糠稷种子萌发和出苗特性及化学防除药剂筛选[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 321-328.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2023.220706
药剂名称 Herbicide | 剂型 Formulation | 生产厂家 Manufacturer | 处理剂量 Dose(ai)/(g·hm−2) |
---|---|---|---|
苗前封闭处理除草剂 Pre-emergence herbicide | |||
丙草胺Pretilachlor | 30% EC | 江苏富田农化有限公司 | 562.5 |
丁草胺Butachlor | 60% EC | 南通南沈植保科技开发有限公司 | 1145.25 |
氟酮磺草胺Triafamone | 19% SC | 拜耳作物科学(中国)有限公司 | 28.5 |
噁草酮Oxadiazon | 120 g/L EC | 安徽科立华化工有限公司 | 405.0 |
丙炔噁草酮Oxadiargyl | 10% EC | 法国罗纳·普朗克公司 | 82.5 |
双环磺草酮Benzobicyclon | 25% SE | 日本史迪士生物科学株式会社 | 187.5 |
苄嘧磺隆Bensulfuron-methyl | 10% WP | 江苏常隆农化有限公司 | 33.75 |
吡嘧磺隆Pyrazosulfuron-ethyl | 10% WP | 江苏快达农化股份有限公司 | 22.5 |
嗪吡嘧磺隆Metazosulfuron | 33% WG | 日产化学工业株式会社 | 86.625 |
乙氧磺隆Ethoxysulfuron | 15% WG | 江苏江南农化有限公司 | 15.75 |
双唑草腈Pyraclonil | 2% GR | 湖北相和精密化学有限公司 | 189.0 |
苗后茎叶处理除草剂Post-emergence heibicide | |||
氯氟吡啶酯Florpyrauxifen-benzyl | 3% EC | 美国陶氏益农公司 | 28.0 |
五氟磺草胺Penoxsulam | 25 g/L EC | 陶氏益农农业科技(江苏)有限公司 | 15.0 |
双草醚Bispyribac sodium | 100 g/L SC | 日本组合化学株式会社 | 26.25 |
氰氟草酯Cyhalofop-butyl | 100 g/L EC | 美国陶氏益农公司 | 90.0 |
噁唑酰草胺Metamifop | 10% EC | 苏州富美实植物保护剂有限公司 | 105.0 |
二氯喹啉酸Quinclorac | 50% WP | 浙江天一生物科技有限公司 | 112.5 |
精噁唑禾草灵Fenoxaprop-P-ethyl | 6.9% EW | 拜耳作物科学(中国)有限公司 | 56.92 |
Table 1. Detailed information of herbicides and treated doses.
药剂名称 Herbicide | 剂型 Formulation | 生产厂家 Manufacturer | 处理剂量 Dose(ai)/(g·hm−2) |
---|---|---|---|
苗前封闭处理除草剂 Pre-emergence herbicide | |||
丙草胺Pretilachlor | 30% EC | 江苏富田农化有限公司 | 562.5 |
丁草胺Butachlor | 60% EC | 南通南沈植保科技开发有限公司 | 1145.25 |
氟酮磺草胺Triafamone | 19% SC | 拜耳作物科学(中国)有限公司 | 28.5 |
噁草酮Oxadiazon | 120 g/L EC | 安徽科立华化工有限公司 | 405.0 |
丙炔噁草酮Oxadiargyl | 10% EC | 法国罗纳·普朗克公司 | 82.5 |
双环磺草酮Benzobicyclon | 25% SE | 日本史迪士生物科学株式会社 | 187.5 |
苄嘧磺隆Bensulfuron-methyl | 10% WP | 江苏常隆农化有限公司 | 33.75 |
吡嘧磺隆Pyrazosulfuron-ethyl | 10% WP | 江苏快达农化股份有限公司 | 22.5 |
嗪吡嘧磺隆Metazosulfuron | 33% WG | 日产化学工业株式会社 | 86.625 |
乙氧磺隆Ethoxysulfuron | 15% WG | 江苏江南农化有限公司 | 15.75 |
双唑草腈Pyraclonil | 2% GR | 湖北相和精密化学有限公司 | 189.0 |
苗后茎叶处理除草剂Post-emergence heibicide | |||
氯氟吡啶酯Florpyrauxifen-benzyl | 3% EC | 美国陶氏益农公司 | 28.0 |
五氟磺草胺Penoxsulam | 25 g/L EC | 陶氏益农农业科技(江苏)有限公司 | 15.0 |
双草醚Bispyribac sodium | 100 g/L SC | 日本组合化学株式会社 | 26.25 |
氰氟草酯Cyhalofop-butyl | 100 g/L EC | 美国陶氏益农公司 | 90.0 |
噁唑酰草胺Metamifop | 10% EC | 苏州富美实植物保护剂有限公司 | 105.0 |
二氯喹啉酸Quinclorac | 50% WP | 浙江天一生物科技有限公司 | 112.5 |
精噁唑禾草灵Fenoxaprop-P-ethyl | 6.9% EW | 拜耳作物科学(中国)有限公司 | 56.92 |
Fig. 2. Cumulative germination of Panicum bisulcatum at alternate day/night temperature and under illumination treatments. Data are mean±SE. Bars with common lowercase letters above show no significant difference (Fisher's LSD test, P>0.05). The same as in figures below.
除草剂名称 Herbicide name | 鲜质量 Shoot biomass/g | 鲜质量防效 Shoot biomass reduction/% | 出苗株数 Emerged seedling number | 株防效 Seedling mortality/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
丙草胺Pretilachlor | 0 | 100±0 a | 0 | 100±0 a |
丁草胺Butachlor | 0 | 100±0 a | 0 | 100±0 a |
噁草酮Oxadiazon | 0 | 100±0 a | 0 | 100±0 a |
丙炔噁草酮Oxadiargyl | 0 | 100±0 a | 0 | 100±0 a |
双唑草腈Pyraclonil | 0 | 100±0 a | 0 | 100±0 a |
嗪吡嘧磺隆Metazosulfuron | 1.24 | 96.6±3.0 ab | 2.3 | 94.2±2.6 b |
氟酮磺草胺Triafamone | 2.13 | 94.2±3.0 b | 2.7 | 93.3±1.7 b |
吡嘧磺隆Pyrazosulfuron-ethyl | 2.29 | 93.8±3.4 b | 4.3 | 89.2±2.6 c |
乙氧磺隆Ethoxysulfuron | 2.40 | 93.5±3.5 b | 10.7 | 73.3±0.8 e |
苄嘧磺隆Bensulfuron-methyl | 2.72 | 92.6±2.4 b | 2.7 | 93.3±2.2 b |
双环磺草酮Benzobicyclon | 4.97 | 86.5±4.5 c | 7.0 | 82.5±1.8 d |
空白对照Control | 36.76 | -- | 40.0 | -- |
Table 2. Control effectiveness of pre-emergence herbicides on Panicum bisulcatum.
除草剂名称 Herbicide name | 鲜质量 Shoot biomass/g | 鲜质量防效 Shoot biomass reduction/% | 出苗株数 Emerged seedling number | 株防效 Seedling mortality/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
丙草胺Pretilachlor | 0 | 100±0 a | 0 | 100±0 a |
丁草胺Butachlor | 0 | 100±0 a | 0 | 100±0 a |
噁草酮Oxadiazon | 0 | 100±0 a | 0 | 100±0 a |
丙炔噁草酮Oxadiargyl | 0 | 100±0 a | 0 | 100±0 a |
双唑草腈Pyraclonil | 0 | 100±0 a | 0 | 100±0 a |
嗪吡嘧磺隆Metazosulfuron | 1.24 | 96.6±3.0 ab | 2.3 | 94.2±2.6 b |
氟酮磺草胺Triafamone | 2.13 | 94.2±3.0 b | 2.7 | 93.3±1.7 b |
吡嘧磺隆Pyrazosulfuron-ethyl | 2.29 | 93.8±3.4 b | 4.3 | 89.2±2.6 c |
乙氧磺隆Ethoxysulfuron | 2.40 | 93.5±3.5 b | 10.7 | 73.3±0.8 e |
苄嘧磺隆Bensulfuron-methyl | 2.72 | 92.6±2.4 b | 2.7 | 93.3±2.2 b |
双环磺草酮Benzobicyclon | 4.97 | 86.5±4.5 c | 7.0 | 82.5±1.8 d |
空白对照Control | 36.76 | -- | 40.0 | -- |
除草剂 Herbicide | 2叶龄 2-leaf age | 4叶龄 4-leaf age | 6叶龄6-leaf age | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
鲜质量 Shoot biomass/g | 鲜质量防效 Shoot biomass reduction/% | 鲜质量 Shoot biomass/g | 鲜质量防效 Shoot biomass reduction/% | 鲜质量 Shoot biomass/g | 鲜质量防效 Shoot biomass reduction/% | |||
氰氟草酯Cyhalofop-butyl | 0 | 100±0 a | 0.59 | 97.2±0.35 a | 3.63 | 84.6±0.88 c | ||
噁唑酰草胺Metamifop | 0 | 100±0 a | 0.19 | 99.1±0.49 a | 0.35 | 98.5±0.35 a | ||
精噁唑禾草灵Fenoxaprop-P-ethyl | 0 | 100±0 a | 0.34 | 98.4±0.64 a | 1.91 | 91.9±1.55 b | ||
五氟磺草胺Penoxsulam | 1.82 | 99.4±0.14 a | 2.38 | 88.7±1.85 c | 18.52 | 21.5±2.12 f | ||
氯氟吡啶酯Florpyrauxifen-benzyl | 1.02 | 97.9±0.57 a | 1.35 | 93.6±1.91 b | 7.93 | 66.4±2.15 d | ||
双草醚Bispyribac sodium | 0.89 | 96.3±1.17 b | 1.18 | 94.4±1.85 b | 11.59 | 50.9±2.18 e | ||
二氯喹啉酸Quinclorac | 0.97 | 93.9±2.70 c | 12.79 | 39.4±2.44 d | 21.59 | 8.5±0.68 g | ||
空白对照Control | 16.02 | - | 21.07 | - | 23.56 | - |
Table 3. Control effectiveness of post-emergence herbicides on Panicum bisulcatum at different leaf ages.
除草剂 Herbicide | 2叶龄 2-leaf age | 4叶龄 4-leaf age | 6叶龄6-leaf age | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
鲜质量 Shoot biomass/g | 鲜质量防效 Shoot biomass reduction/% | 鲜质量 Shoot biomass/g | 鲜质量防效 Shoot biomass reduction/% | 鲜质量 Shoot biomass/g | 鲜质量防效 Shoot biomass reduction/% | |||
氰氟草酯Cyhalofop-butyl | 0 | 100±0 a | 0.59 | 97.2±0.35 a | 3.63 | 84.6±0.88 c | ||
噁唑酰草胺Metamifop | 0 | 100±0 a | 0.19 | 99.1±0.49 a | 0.35 | 98.5±0.35 a | ||
精噁唑禾草灵Fenoxaprop-P-ethyl | 0 | 100±0 a | 0.34 | 98.4±0.64 a | 1.91 | 91.9±1.55 b | ||
五氟磺草胺Penoxsulam | 1.82 | 99.4±0.14 a | 2.38 | 88.7±1.85 c | 18.52 | 21.5±2.12 f | ||
氯氟吡啶酯Florpyrauxifen-benzyl | 1.02 | 97.9±0.57 a | 1.35 | 93.6±1.91 b | 7.93 | 66.4±2.15 d | ||
双草醚Bispyribac sodium | 0.89 | 96.3±1.17 b | 1.18 | 94.4±1.85 b | 11.59 | 50.9±2.18 e | ||
二氯喹啉酸Quinclorac | 0.97 | 93.9±2.70 c | 12.79 | 39.4±2.44 d | 21.59 | 8.5±0.68 g | ||
空白对照Control | 16.02 | - | 21.07 | - | 23.56 | - |
[1] | 李扬汉. 中国杂草志[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1998: 1280 |
Li Y H. Weed Flora of China[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 1998: 1280. (in Chinese) | |
[2] | 李香菊. 近年我国农田杂草防控中的突出问题与治理对策[J]. 植物保护, 2018, 44(5): 77-84. |
Li X J. Main problems and management strategies of weeds in agricultural fields in China in recent years[J]. Plant Protection, 2018, 44(5): 77-84. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 强胜. 中国杂草生物学研究的新进展[J]. 杂草学报, 2018, 36(2): 1-9. |
Qiang S. New Progresses on Studies of Weed Biology in China[J]. Journal of Weed Science, 2018, 36(2): 1-9. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | Javaid M M, Tanveer A. Germination ecology of Emex spinosa and Emex australis, invasive weeds of winter crops[J]. Weed Research, 2014, 54(6): 565-575. |
[5] | Travlos I, Gazoulis I, Kanatas P, Tsekoura A, Zannopoulos S, Papastylianou P. Key factors affecting weed seeds’ germination, weed emergence, and their possible role for the efficacy of false seedbed technique as weed management practice[J]. Frontiers in Agronomy, 2020, 2: 1. |
[6] | 徐伟东, 黎菊, 陆强. 浙北稻麦连作区稻田糠稷发生对水稻生长的影响及对除草剂敏感性研究[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(3): 47-50. |
Xu W D, Li J, Lu Q. Study on the effects of the occurrence of Panicum bisulcatum Thunb. on rice growth and sensitivity to herbicides in paddy fields in rice-wheat rotation area of northern Zhejiang[J]. China Rice, 2021, 27(3): 47-50. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | Riemens M M, Scheepens P C, van der Weide R Y. Dormancy, germination and emergence of weed seeds, with emphasis on the influence of light: Results of a literature survey[M]. Wageningen: Plant Research International, 2004: 5-6. |
[8] | Michel B E. Evaluation of the water potentials of solutions of polyethylene glycol 8000 both in the absence and presence of other solutes[J]. Plant Physiology, 1983, 72(1): 66-70. |
[9] | Tang W, Chen J, Zhang J P, Lu Y L. Seed germination, seedling emergence, and response to herbicides of triquetrous murdannia (Murdannia triquetra) in rice[J]. Weed Science, 2017, 65: 141-150. |
[10] | Rezvani M, Nadimi S, Zaefarian F, Chauhan B S. Environmental factors affecting seed germination and seedling emergence of three Phalaris species[J]. Crop Protection, 2021, 148: 105743. |
[11] | Ahmed S, Opeña J L, Chauhan B S. Seed germination ecology of doveweed (Murdannia nudiflora) and its implication for management in dry-seeded rice[J]. Weed Science, 2015, 63: 491-501. |
[12] | Opeña J L, Chauhan B S, Baltazar A M. Seed germination ecology of Echinochloa glabrescens and its implication for management in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(3): e92261. |
[13] | 罗小娟, 吕波, 李俊, 董立尧. 鳢肠种子萌发及出苗条件的研究[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2012, 35(2): 71-75. |
Luo X J, Lü B, Li J, Dong L Y. Study on the environmental factors affecting seed germination and seedling emergence of Eclipta prostrate[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2012, 35(2): 71-75. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 李阳, 亓雯雯, 李绍阳, 赵丹丹, 李景玉, 马红媛. 苜蓿种子萌发和幼苗生长对温度、光照和埋深的响应[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(2): 332-339. |
Li Y, Qi W W, Li S Y, Zhao D D, Li J Y, Ma H Y. Seed germination and seedling growth of Medicago sativa in response to the variations of temperature, light, and burial depth[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2021, 40(2): 332-339. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 李欣勇, 黄迎, 金雪, 刘国道. 碎米莎草种子休眠与萌发特性研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2021, 42(7): 2001-2007. |
LiX Y, Huang Y, Jin X, Liu G D. Seed dormancy and germination characteristics of Cyperus iria[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(7): 2001-2007. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 冯伟, 吴新民, 潘根兴, 许信旺, 强胜. 皖江湿地及其开垦为稻田后土壤种子库结构比较[J]. 生态学杂志, 2008, 27(6): 874-879. |
[17] | Feng W, Wu X M, Pan G X, Xu X W, Qiang S. Comparison of soil seed bank structure in natural wetlands and their corresponding reclaimed paddy fields at lower reaches of Yangtze River in Anhui, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2008, 27(6): 874-879. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[18] | Ismail A M, Ella E S, Vergara G V, Mackill D J. Mechanisms associated with tolerance to flooding during germination and early seedling growth in rice(Oryza Sativa)[J]. Annals of Botany, 2009, 103: 197-209. |
[19] | Korres N E, Loka D A, Gitsopoulos T K, Varanasi V K, Chachalis D, Price A, Slaton N A. Salinity effects on rice, rice weeds, and strategies to secure crop productivity and effective weed control: A review[J]. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2022, 42: 58. |
[20] | 杨升, 张华新, 张丽. 植物耐盐生理生化指标及耐盐植物筛选综述[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2010, 25(3): 59-65. |
Yang S, Zhang H X, Zhang L. Physiological and biochemical indices of salt tolerance and scanning of salt-tolerance plants[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2010, 25(3): 59-65. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | Yu J L, McCullough P E. Growth stage influences mesotrione efficacy and fate in two bluegrass (Poa) species[J]. Weed Technology, 2016, 30: 524-532. |
[22] | Kieloch R, Domaradzki K. The role of the growth stage of weeds in their response to reduced herbicide doses[J]. Acta Agrobotanica, 2011, 64(4): 259-266. |
[23] | 郭文磊, 冯莉, 吴丹丹, 田兴山. 稻田苗后茎叶处理剂混用的联合除草作用[J]. 杂草学报, 2020, 38(2): 75-78. |
Guo W L, Feng L, Wu D D, Tian X S. Combined effect of foliar herbicide mixtures for the control of weeds in rice[J]. Journal of Weed Science, 2020, 38(2): 75-78. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 柏连阳. 除草剂安全剂及其应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019: 143-147. |
Bai L Y. Introduction and Application of Herbicide Safeners[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2019: 143-147. (in Chinese) | |
[25] | 刘兴林, 孙涛, 付声姣, 钟国华. 水稻田除草剂的应用及杂草抗药性现状[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 43(7): 115-126. |
Liu X L, Sun T, Fu S J, Zhong G H. Herbicde application and weeds resistance in rice field in China[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Nature Science Edition), 2015, 43(7): 115-126. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | Liu X, Merchant A, Xiang S, Zong T, Zhou X, Bai L. Managing herbicide resistance in China[J]. Weed Science, 2021, 69: 4-17. |
[1] | REN Zhiqi, XUE Kexin, DONG Zheng, LI Xiaoxiang, LI Yongzhao, GUO Yujing, LIU Wenqiang, GUO Liang, SHENG Xinnian, LIU Zhixi, PAN Xiaowu. Identification and Gene Mapping of Outcurved Leaf Mutant ocl1 in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 337-346. |
[2] | XIAO Lequan, LI Lei, DAI Weimin, QIANG Sheng, SONG Xiaoling. Seedling Growth Characteristics of Hybrids Between Transgenic Rice with cry2A*/bar Genes and Weedy Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 347-358. |
[3] | LI Gang, GAO Qingsong, LI Wei, ZHANG Wenxia, WANG Jian, CHEN Baoshan, WANG Di, GAO Hao, XU Weijun, CHEN Hongqi, JI Jianhui. Directed Knockout of SD1 Gene Improves Lodging Resistance and Blast Resistance of Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 359-367. |
[4] | WANG Shengyong, CHEN Yuhang, CHEN Huili, HUANG Yujie, ZHANG Xiaotian, DING Shuangcheng, WANG Hongwei. Effects of High Temperature on Phenylpropane Metabolism and Downstream Branch Metabolic Pathways in Rice Meiosis [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 368-378. |
[5] | HUANG Yaru, XU Peng, WANG Lele, HE Yizhe, WANG Hui, KE Jian, HE Haibing, WU Liquan, YOU Cuicui. Effects of Exogenous Trehalose on Grain Filling Characteristics and Yield Formation of japonica Rice Cultivar W1844 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[6] | DONG Liqiang, YANG Tiexin, LI Rui, SHANG Wenqi, MA Liang, LI Yuedong, SUI Guomin. Effect of Plant-row Spacing on Rice Yield and Root Morphological and Physiological Characteristics in Super High Yield Field [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 392-404. |
[7] | GAO Qianqing, REN Xiaojian, ZHAI Zhongbing, ZHENG Pubing, WU Yuanfen, CUI Kehui. Effects of Panicle and Bud-promoting Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on Growth of Regenerated Bud and Grain Yield of Ratoon Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 405-414. |
[8] | HUANG Jinwen, LI Rikun, CHEN Zhicheng, ZHANG Bianhong, LEI Han, PAN Ruixin, YANG Mingyu, PAN Meiqing, TANG Lina. Effects of Straw Returning Techniques on Soil Nutrients, Organic Carbon and Microbial Diversity in Tobacco-rice Rotation System [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 415-426. |
[9] | HAN Cong, HE Yuchang, WU Lijuan, JIA Lili, WANG Lei, E Zhiguo. Research Progress in the Function of Basic Leucine Zipper (bZIP) Protein Family in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 436-448. |
[10] | SHEN Yumin, CHEN Mingliang, XIONG Huanjin, XIONG Wentao, WU Xiaoyan, XIAO Yeqing. Phenotypic Analysis and Fine Mapping of blg1(beak like grain 1), a Rice Mutant with Abnormal Palea and Lemma Development [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 225-232. |
[11] | DUAN Min, XIE Liujie, GAO Xiuying, TANG Haijuan, HUANG Shanjun, PAN Xiaobiao. Creation of Thermo-sensitive Genic Male Sterile Rice Lines with Wide Compatibility Based on CRISPR/Cas9 Technology [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 233-243. |
[12] | WANG Wenting, MA Jiaying, LI Guangyan, FU Weimeng, LI Hubo, LIN Jie, CHEN Tingting, FENG Baohua, TAO Longxing, FU Guanfu, QIN Yebo. Effect of Different Fertilizer Application Rates on Rice Yield and Quality Formation and Its Relationship with Energy Metabolism at High Temperature [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
[13] | LIU Aihua, LI Xiaokun. Meta-analysis of Relationship Between Fertilizer Application and Rice Quality [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 276-284. |
[14] | YANG Xiaolong, WANG Biao, WANG Benfu, ZHANG Zhisheng, ZHANG Zuolin, YANG Lantian, CHENG Jianping, LI Yang. Effects of Different Water Management on Yield and Rice Quality of Dry-seeded Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
[15] | WEI Xiaodong, SONG Xuemei, ZHAO Ling, ZHAO Qingyong, CHEN Tao, LU Kai, ZHU Zhen, HUANG Shengdong, WANG Cailin, ZHANG Yadong. Effects of Silicon and Zinc Fertilizer and Their Application Ways on Yield and Grain Quality of Rice Variety Nanjing 46 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 295-306. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||