Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2019, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (4): 331-337.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2019.9025
• Research Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
Xin WANG1,2,3, Ying MA1, Zhongli HU3, Chenwu XU1,*()
Received:
2019-02-28
Revised:
2019-04-23
Online:
2019-07-10
Published:
2019-07-10
Contact:
Chenwu XU
通讯作者:
徐辰武
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Xin WANG, Ying MA, Zhongli HU, Chenwu XU. Genomic Prediction of Combining Ability for Agronomic Traits in Rice Based on NCII Design[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2019, 33(4): 331-337.
王欣, 马莹, 胡中立, 徐辰武. 基于不完全双列杂交设计的水稻农艺性状配合力基因组预测[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(4): 331-337.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2019.9025
性状 Trait | 遗传率 Heritability | 5倍交叉验证 5-fold cross-validation | 留一法 Leave-one method |
---|---|---|---|
单株产量Grain yield per plant (GY) | 0.3876 | 0.3888 | 0.3583 |
千粒重Thousand-grain weight (TGW) | 0.8321 | 0.7367 | 0.7549 |
有效穗数Productive panicle number per plant (PN) | 0.4182 | 0.2310 | 0.1732 |
株高Plant height (PH) | 0.8930 | 0.6112 | 0.6522 |
一次枝梗数Primary rachis branch number (PB) | 0.7435 | 0.5120 | 0.4945 |
二次枝梗数Secondary rachis branch number (SB) | 0.7602 | 0.5655 | 0.5840 |
主穗实粒数Grain number per panicle (GN) | 0.6926 | 0.5183 | 0.5115 |
穗长Panicle length (PL) | 0.6975 | 0.4697 | 0.4636 |
Table 1 Heritability of traits and average predictive ability of GCA for parental inbred lines.
性状 Trait | 遗传率 Heritability | 5倍交叉验证 5-fold cross-validation | 留一法 Leave-one method |
---|---|---|---|
单株产量Grain yield per plant (GY) | 0.3876 | 0.3888 | 0.3583 |
千粒重Thousand-grain weight (TGW) | 0.8321 | 0.7367 | 0.7549 |
有效穗数Productive panicle number per plant (PN) | 0.4182 | 0.2310 | 0.1732 |
株高Plant height (PH) | 0.8930 | 0.6112 | 0.6522 |
一次枝梗数Primary rachis branch number (PB) | 0.7435 | 0.5120 | 0.4945 |
二次枝梗数Secondary rachis branch number (SB) | 0.7602 | 0.5655 | 0.5840 |
主穗实粒数Grain number per panicle (GN) | 0.6926 | 0.5183 | 0.5115 |
穗长Panicle length (PL) | 0.6975 | 0.4697 | 0.4636 |
性状 Trait | SCA方法1 Method 1 for SCA | SCA方法2 Method 2 for SCA |
---|---|---|
单株产量Grain yield per plant (GY) | 0.0655 | 0.2875 |
千粒重Thousand-grain weight (TGW) | 0.1541 | 0.2198 |
有效穗数Productive panicle number per plant (PN) | 0.0000 | 0.2528 |
株高Plant height (PH) | 0.1505 | 0.1983 |
一次枝梗数Primary rachis branch number (PB) | 0.1566 | 0.2495 |
二次枝梗数Secondary rachis branch number (SB) | 0.1791 | 0.2747 |
主穗实粒数Grain number per panicle (GN) | 0.1244 | 0.2520 |
穗长Panicle length (PL) | 0.1042 | 0.2383 |
Table 2 Average predictive ability of SCA for hybrids.
性状 Trait | SCA方法1 Method 1 for SCA | SCA方法2 Method 2 for SCA |
---|---|---|
单株产量Grain yield per plant (GY) | 0.0655 | 0.2875 |
千粒重Thousand-grain weight (TGW) | 0.1541 | 0.2198 |
有效穗数Productive panicle number per plant (PN) | 0.0000 | 0.2528 |
株高Plant height (PH) | 0.1505 | 0.1983 |
一次枝梗数Primary rachis branch number (PB) | 0.1566 | 0.2495 |
二次枝梗数Secondary rachis branch number (SB) | 0.1791 | 0.2747 |
主穗实粒数Grain number per panicle (GN) | 0.1244 | 0.2520 |
穗长Panicle length (PL) | 0.1042 | 0.2383 |
性状 Trait | 完全随机分组 Random cross-validation | 均匀随机分组 Uniform random cross-validation | 横向随机分组 Horizontal random cross-validation | 纵向随机分组 Vertical random cross-validation |
---|---|---|---|---|
单株产量Grain yield per plant (GY) | 0.3947 | 0.4205 | 0.2615 | 0.4022 |
千粒重Thousand-grain weight (TGW) | 0.8800 | 0.8863 | 0.7303 | 0.8704 |
有效穗数Productive panicle number per plant (PN) | 0.4087 | 0.4299 | 0.2280 | 0.4184 |
株高Plant height (PH) | 0.8637 | 0.8745 | 0.5738 | 0.8662 |
一次枝梗数Primary rachis branch number (PB) | 0.6827 | 0.7015 | 0.4810 | 0.6398 |
二次枝梗数Secondary rachis branch number (SB) | 0.7197 | 0.7349 | 0.4986 | 0.7070 |
主穗实粒数Grain number per panicle (GN) | 0.6444 | 0.6636 | 0.4170 | 0.6529 |
穗长Panicle length (PL) | 0.7939 | 0.7967 | 0.6976 | 0.6110 |
Table 3 Average predictive ability for the hybrids in different grouping scenarios.
性状 Trait | 完全随机分组 Random cross-validation | 均匀随机分组 Uniform random cross-validation | 横向随机分组 Horizontal random cross-validation | 纵向随机分组 Vertical random cross-validation |
---|---|---|---|---|
单株产量Grain yield per plant (GY) | 0.3947 | 0.4205 | 0.2615 | 0.4022 |
千粒重Thousand-grain weight (TGW) | 0.8800 | 0.8863 | 0.7303 | 0.8704 |
有效穗数Productive panicle number per plant (PN) | 0.4087 | 0.4299 | 0.2280 | 0.4184 |
株高Plant height (PH) | 0.8637 | 0.8745 | 0.5738 | 0.8662 |
一次枝梗数Primary rachis branch number (PB) | 0.6827 | 0.7015 | 0.4810 | 0.6398 |
二次枝梗数Secondary rachis branch number (SB) | 0.7197 | 0.7349 | 0.4986 | 0.7070 |
主穗实粒数Grain number per panicle (GN) | 0.6444 | 0.6636 | 0.4170 | 0.6529 |
穗长Panicle length (PL) | 0.7939 | 0.7967 | 0.6976 | 0.6110 |
性状 Trait | 5倍交叉验证 5-fold cross-validation | 留一法 Leave-one method |
---|---|---|
单株产量Grain yield per plant (GY) | 0.3052 | 0.2824 |
千粒重Thousand-grain weight (TGW) | 0.7303 | 0.7529 |
有效穗数Productive panicle number per plant (PN) | 0.4539 | 0.4252 |
株高Plant height (PH) | 0.4799 | 0.5141 |
一次枝梗数Primary rachis branch number (PB) | 0.6459 | 0.7521 |
二次枝梗数Secondary rachis branch number (SB) | 0.5921 | 0.6235 |
主穗实粒数Grain number per panicle (GN) | 0.5370 | 0.5557 |
穗长Panicle length (PL) | 0.3701 | 0.4022 |
Table 4 Average predictive ability of the phenotype for parental inbred lines.
性状 Trait | 5倍交叉验证 5-fold cross-validation | 留一法 Leave-one method |
---|---|---|
单株产量Grain yield per plant (GY) | 0.3052 | 0.2824 |
千粒重Thousand-grain weight (TGW) | 0.7303 | 0.7529 |
有效穗数Productive panicle number per plant (PN) | 0.4539 | 0.4252 |
株高Plant height (PH) | 0.4799 | 0.5141 |
一次枝梗数Primary rachis branch number (PB) | 0.6459 | 0.7521 |
二次枝梗数Secondary rachis branch number (SB) | 0.5921 | 0.6235 |
主穗实粒数Grain number per panicle (GN) | 0.5370 | 0.5557 |
穗长Panicle length (PL) | 0.3701 | 0.4022 |
性状 Trait | 实际值相关系数 Correlation coefficient of actual value | 预测值相关系数 Correlation coefficient of predicted value |
---|---|---|
单株产量Grain yield per plant (GY) | 0.2687 | 0.3272 |
千粒重Thousand-grain weight (TGW) | 0.8771 | 0.9395 |
有效穗数Productive panicle number per plant (PN) | 0.4206 | 0.6298 |
株高Plant height (PH) | 0.7851 | 0.7227 |
一次枝梗数Primary rachis branch number (PB) | 0.6829 | 0.5154 |
二次枝梗数Secondary rachis branch number (SB) | 0.7232 | 0.6756 |
主穗实粒数Grain number per panicle (GN) | 0.6620 | 0.6535 |
穗长Panicle length (PL) | 0.6758 | 0.6708 |
Table 5 Correlation coefficients between true phenotype and GCA, predicted phenotype and GCA for parental inbred lines.
性状 Trait | 实际值相关系数 Correlation coefficient of actual value | 预测值相关系数 Correlation coefficient of predicted value |
---|---|---|
单株产量Grain yield per plant (GY) | 0.2687 | 0.3272 |
千粒重Thousand-grain weight (TGW) | 0.8771 | 0.9395 |
有效穗数Productive panicle number per plant (PN) | 0.4206 | 0.6298 |
株高Plant height (PH) | 0.7851 | 0.7227 |
一次枝梗数Primary rachis branch number (PB) | 0.6829 | 0.5154 |
二次枝梗数Secondary rachis branch number (SB) | 0.7232 | 0.6756 |
主穗实粒数Grain number per panicle (GN) | 0.6620 | 0.6535 |
穗长Panicle length (PL) | 0.6758 | 0.6708 |
[1] | Meuwissen T H, Hayes B J, Goddard M E.Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps.Genetics, 2001, 157(4): 1819-1829. |
[2] | Lande R, Thompson R.Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits.Genetics, 1990, 124(3): 743-756. |
[3] | 王欣, 孙辉, 胡中立, 徐辰武. 基因组选择方法研究进展. 扬州大学学报: 农业与生命科学版, 2018, 39(1): 64-70. |
Wang X, Sun H, Hu Z L, Xu C W.The research progress of genomic selection methods.J Yangzhou Univ: Agric& Life Sci Ed, 2018, 39(1): 64-70. | |
[4] | Heslot N, Yang H-P, Sorrells M E, Jannink J-L.Genomic selection in plant breeding: A comparison of models.Crop Sci, 2012, 52(1): 146-160. |
[5] | Lee Y-S, Kim H-J, Cho S, Kim H.The usage of an SNP-SNP relationship matrix for best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) analysis using a community-based cohort study.Genom & Inform, 2014, 12(4): 254-260. |
[6] | Wang X, Xu Y, Hu Z, Xu C.Genomic selection methods for crop improvement: Current status and prospects.Crop J, 2018, 6(4): 330-340. |
[7] | Riedelsheimer C, Czedik-Eysenberg A, Grieder C, Lisec J, Technow F, Sulpice R, Altmann T, Stitt M, Willmitzer L, Melchinger A E.Genomic and metabolic prediction of complex heterotic traits in hybrid maize.Nat Genet, 2012, 44(2): 217-220. |
[8] | Crossa J, Perez-Rodriguez P, Cuevas J, Montesinos- Lopez O, Jarquin D, de los Campos G, Burgueno J, Gonzalez-Camacho J M, Perez-Elizalde S, Beyene Y, Dreisigacker S, Singh R, Zhang X C, Gowda M, Roorkiwal M, Rutkoski J, Varshney R K. Genomic selection in plant breeding: Methods, models, and perspectives.Trends Plant Sci, 2017, 22(11): 961-975. |
[9] | Guo T, Yang N, Tong H, Pan Q, Yang X, Tang J, Wang J, Li J, Yan J.Genetic basis of grain yield heterosis in an "immortalized F-2" maize population. Theor Appl Genet, 2014, 127(10): 2149-2158. |
[10] | Da Y, Wang C, Wang S, Hu G.Mixed model methods for genomic prediction and variance component estimation of additive and dominance effects using SNP markers.PLoS One, 2014, 9(1): e87666. |
[11] | Finley AO, Banerjee S, Waldmann P, Ericsson T.Hierarchical spatial modeling of additive and dominance genetic variance for large spatial trial datasets. Biometrics, 2009, 65(2): 441-451. |
[12] | Gianola D, de los Campos G, Hill W G, Manfredi E, Fernando R. Additive genetic variability and the Bayesian alphabet.Genetics, 2009, 183(1): 347-363. |
[13] | Ibanez-Escriche N, Fernando RL, Toosi A, Dekkers J C M. Genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance.Genet Select Evol, 2009, 41(1): 1-10. |
[14] | Wang X, Li L, Yang Z, Zheng X, Yu S, Xu C, Hu Z.Predicting rice hybrid performance using univariate and multivariate GBLUP models based on North Carolina mating design II.Heredity, 2017, 118(3): 302-310. |
[15] | Wang X, Yang Z, Xu C.A comparison of genomic selection methods for breeding value prediction.Sci Bull, 2015, 60(10): 925-935. |
[16] | Zhang Z, Erbe M, He J, Ober U, Gao N, Zhang H, Simianer H, Li J.Accuracy of whole-genome prediction using a genetic architecture-enhanced variance- covariance matrix.Genes Genomes Genetics, 2015, 5(4): 615-627. |
[17] | van Raden P M. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.J Dairy Sci, 2008, 91(11): 4414-4423. |
[18] | Nishio M, Satoh M.Including dominance effects in the genomic BLUP method for genomic evaluation. PLoS One, 2014, 9(1): e85792. |
[19] | Forni S, Aguilar I, Misztal I.Different genomic relationship matrices for single-step analysis using phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information. Genet Select Evol, 2011, 43(1): 43-53. |
[20] | Gilmour A R, Thompson R, Cullis B R.Average information REML: An efficient algorithm for variance parameter estimation in linear mixed models.Biometrics, 1995, 51(4): 1440-1450. |
[21] | Ashida I, Iwaisaki H.An expression for average information matrix for a mixed linear multi-component of variance model and REML iteration equations.Animal Sci J, 1999, 70(5): 282-289. |
[22] | Xu S, Zhu D, Zhang Q.Predicting hybrid performance in rice using genomic best linear unbiased prediction.Proc Natl Acad Sci, 2014, 111(34): 12456-12461. |
[23] | Dan Z, Chen Y, Xu Y, Huang J, Huang J, Hu J, Yao G, Zhu Y, Huang W. A metabolome-based core hybridization strategy for the prediction of rice grain weight across environments. Plant Biotechnol J, 2018, . |
[24] | Goddard M.Genomic selection: prediction of accuracy and maximisation of long term response.Genetica, 2009, 136(2): 245-257. |
[25] | Goddard M E, Hayes B J.Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes.Nat Rev Genet, 2009, 10(6): 381-391. |
[26] | van Raden P, van Tassell C, Wiggans G, Sonstegard T, Schnabel R, Taylor J, Schenkel F. Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls.J Dairy Sci, 2009, 92(1): 16-24. |
[27] | Habier D, Tetens J, Seefried F-R, Lichtner P, Thaller G.The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle.Genet Select Evol, 2010, 42(1): 5. |
[28] | Riedelsheimer C, Endelman J B, Stange M, Sorrells M E, Jannink J L, Melchinger A E.Genomic predictability of interconnected biparental maize populations.Genetics, 2013, 194(2): 493-503. |
[29] | Velez-Torres M, Garcia-Zavala J J, Hernandez-Rodriguez M, Lobato-Ortiz R, Lopez-Reynoso J J, Benitez- Riquelme I, Mejia-Contreras J A, Esquivel-Esquivel G, Molina-Galan J D, Perez-Rodriguez P, Zhang X C. Genomic prediction of the general combining ability of maize lines (Zea mays L.) and the performance of their single crosses. Plant Breeding, 2018, 137(3): 379-387. |
[30] | Mao D, Liu T, Xu C, Li X, Xing Y.Epistasis and complementary gene action adequately account for the genetic bases of transgressive segregation of kilo-grain weight in rice.Euphytica, 2011, 180(2): 261-271. |
[31] | 钏兴宽. 配合力理论及其在水稻育种中的应用. 种子, 2014, 33(6): 39-41. |
Chuan X K, Combining ability theory and its application in rice breeding. Seed, 2014, 33(6): 39-41. |
[1] | REN Zhiqi, XUE Kexin, DONG Zheng, LI Xiaoxiang, LI Yongzhao, GUO Yujing, LIU Wenqiang, GUO Liang, SHENG Xinnian, LIU Zhixi, PAN Xiaowu. Identification and Gene Mapping of Outcurved Leaf Mutant ocl1 in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 337-346. |
[2] | XIAO Lequan, LI Lei, DAI Weimin, QIANG Sheng, SONG Xiaoling. Seedling Growth Characteristics of Hybrids Between Transgenic Rice with cry2A*/bar Genes and Weedy Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 347-358. |
[3] | LI Gang, GAO Qingsong, LI Wei, ZHANG Wenxia, WANG Jian, CHEN Baoshan, WANG Di, GAO Hao, XU Weijun, CHEN Hongqi, JI Jianhui. Directed Knockout of SD1 Gene Improves Lodging Resistance and Blast Resistance of Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 359-367. |
[4] | WANG Shengyong, CHEN Yuhang, CHEN Huili, HUANG Yujie, ZHANG Xiaotian, DING Shuangcheng, WANG Hongwei. Effects of High Temperature on Phenylpropane Metabolism and Downstream Branch Metabolic Pathways in Rice Meiosis [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 368-378. |
[5] | HUANG Yaru, XU Peng, WANG Lele, HE Yizhe, WANG Hui, KE Jian, HE Haibing, WU Liquan, YOU Cuicui. Effects of Exogenous Trehalose on Grain Filling Characteristics and Yield Formation of japonica Rice Cultivar W1844 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[6] | DONG Liqiang, YANG Tiexin, LI Rui, SHANG Wenqi, MA Liang, LI Yuedong, SUI Guomin. Effect of Plant-row Spacing on Rice Yield and Root Morphological and Physiological Characteristics in Super High Yield Field [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 392-404. |
[7] | GAO Qianqing, REN Xiaojian, ZHAI Zhongbing, ZHENG Pubing, WU Yuanfen, CUI Kehui. Effects of Panicle and Bud-promoting Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on Growth of Regenerated Bud and Grain Yield of Ratoon Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 405-414. |
[8] | HUANG Jinwen, LI Rikun, CHEN Zhicheng, ZHANG Bianhong, LEI Han, PAN Ruixin, YANG Mingyu, PAN Meiqing, TANG Lina. Effects of Straw Returning Techniques on Soil Nutrients, Organic Carbon and Microbial Diversity in Tobacco-rice Rotation System [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 415-426. |
[9] | HAN Cong, HE Yuchang, WU Lijuan, JIA Lili, WANG Lei, E Zhiguo. Research Progress in the Function of Basic Leucine Zipper (bZIP) Protein Family in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 436-448. |
[10] | SHEN Yumin, CHEN Mingliang, XIONG Huanjin, XIONG Wentao, WU Xiaoyan, XIAO Yeqing. Phenotypic Analysis and Fine Mapping of blg1(beak like grain 1), a Rice Mutant with Abnormal Palea and Lemma Development [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 225-232. |
[11] | DUAN Min, XIE Liujie, GAO Xiuying, TANG Haijuan, HUANG Shanjun, PAN Xiaobiao. Creation of Thermo-sensitive Genic Male Sterile Rice Lines with Wide Compatibility Based on CRISPR/Cas9 Technology [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 233-243. |
[12] | WANG Wenting, MA Jiaying, LI Guangyan, FU Weimeng, LI Hubo, LIN Jie, CHEN Tingting, FENG Baohua, TAO Longxing, FU Guanfu, QIN Yebo. Effect of Different Fertilizer Application Rates on Rice Yield and Quality Formation and Its Relationship with Energy Metabolism at High Temperature [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
[13] | LIU Aihua, LI Xiaokun. Meta-analysis of Relationship Between Fertilizer Application and Rice Quality [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 276-284. |
[14] | YANG Xiaolong, WANG Biao, WANG Benfu, ZHANG Zhisheng, ZHANG Zuolin, YANG Lantian, CHENG Jianping, LI Yang. Effects of Different Water Management on Yield and Rice Quality of Dry-seeded Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
[15] | WEI Xiaodong, SONG Xuemei, ZHAO Ling, ZHAO Qingyong, CHEN Tao, LU Kai, ZHU Zhen, HUANG Shengdong, WANG Cailin, ZHANG Yadong. Effects of Silicon and Zinc Fertilizer and Their Application Ways on Yield and Grain Quality of Rice Variety Nanjing 46 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 295-306. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||