磷肥施用量对湖北省直播水稻产量、磷素积累及利用率的影响

doi:10.16819/j.1001-7216.2025.240512

中国水稻科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 399-411.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2025.240512

磷肥施用量对湖北省直播水稻产量、磷素积累及利用率的影响

沈智达¹, 余秋华², 张斌³, 曹玉东¹, 王少华⁴, 王红飞⁵, 伍永清⁶, 戴志刚², 李小坤¹^,⁷^,^*()

¹华中农业大学资源与环境学院/农业农村部长江中下游耕地保育重点实验室/华中农业大学微量元素研究中心，武汉 430070
²湖北省耕地质量与肥料工作总站，武汉 430070
³宜昌市夷陵区耕地质量保护监测中心, 湖北宜昌 443199
⁴湖北省武穴市农业农村局，湖北武穴 435401
⁵湖北省团风县耕地质量保护与肥料管理局，湖北团风 438899
⁶湖北省沙洋县土壤肥料工作站，湖北沙洋 448200
⁷华中农业大学双水双绿研究院，武汉 430070

收稿日期:2024-05-24 修回日期:2024-09-26 出版日期:2025-05-10 发布日期:2025-05-21
通讯作者: *email：lixiaokun@mail.hzau.edu.cn
基金资助:
湖北省现代农业水稻产业技术体系项目(2023HBSTX4-01);湖北洪山实验室重大项目(2121hsz002);湖北省重点研发计划资助项目(2022BBA0048)

Effects of Phosphorus Fertilizer Application Rate on Grain Yield, Phosphorus Accumulation and Utilization of Direct-seeded Rice in Hubei Province

SHEN Zhida¹, YU Qiuhua², ZHANG Bin³, CAO Yudong¹, WANG Shaohua⁴, WANG Hongfei⁵, WU Yongqing⁶, DAI Zhigang², LI Xiaokun¹^,⁷^,^*()

¹College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University / Key Laboratory of Arable Land Conservation (Middle and Lower Reaches of Yangtze River) of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs / Microelement Research Center, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
²Hubei Provincial General Station of Arable Land Quality and Fertilizer, Wuhan 430070, China
³Cultivated Land Quality Protection and Monitoring Center of Yiling District, Yichang 443199, China
⁴Agricultural and Rural Bureau of Wuxue City, Hubei Province, Wuxue 435401, China
⁵Cultivated Land Quality Protection and Fertilizer Administration of Tuanfeng County, Tuanfeng 438899, China
⁶Soil and Fertilizer Work Station of Shayang City, Shayang 448200, China
⁷Shuangshui Shuanglü Institute, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China

Received:2024-05-24 Revised:2024-09-26 Online:2025-05-10 Published:2025-05-21
Contact: *email：lixiaokun@mail.hzau.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】明确磷肥用量对湖北省直播水稻产量、磷素积累、磷肥利用率及经济效益的影响，为湖北省直播水稻的科学施肥提供理论依据。【方法】在湖北省水稻主产区的县(市、区)采用多点试验，设置0、45、90、135 kg/hm² 4个磷肥用量处理。对比分析了不同磷肥用量下水稻的产量、磷素含量、磷素积累量、磷肥利用率和经济效益。【结果】与不施磷(0 kg/hm²)处理相比，各试验点磷肥用量为45、90、135 kg/hm²处理分别增产0.18~1.80 t/hm²、0.30~3.24 t/hm²和0.60~2.61 t/hm²，平均增幅分别为9.15%、16.08%和18.24%，水稻地上部磷素积累量分别增加了1.57~9.18 kg/hm²、2.67~12.77 kg/hm²、4.16~15.06 kg/hm²，平均增幅分别为29.14%、44.92%、53.60%。整体而言，磷肥用量在0−90 kg /hm²范围内，水稻产量随磷肥用量的增加而增加，磷肥用量超过90 kg/hm²时水稻产量无显著差异。随着磷肥用量的增加水稻磷素积累量、产值和纯收入呈现先增加后保持不变的趋势，而磷肥偏生产力、磷肥农学利用率、磷肥回收利用率和产投比随磷肥用量的增加而下降。磷肥用量和试验地点对直播水稻产量、秸秆磷素含量、秸秆磷素积累量、磷肥偏生产力、磷肥农学利用率、磷肥回收利用率、产值、纯收入和产投比的影响均存在交互作用。【结论】适宜的磷肥用量可以显著提高直播水稻产量、地上部磷素积累量和磷肥利用率。综合考虑产量、磷素积累、肥料利用率和经济效益，湖北省直播水稻磷肥推荐用量为58~104 kg/hm²，平均为82 kg/hm²，理论最高产量可达6.97~12.18 t/hm²，平均为9.14 t/hm²能够保障水稻产量的同时能减少养分损失和环境污染。

关键词: 直播水稻, 磷肥用量, 产量, 磷素积累, 肥料利用率, 经济效益

Abstract:

【Objective】This study aims to clarify the effect of phosphorus fertilizer dosage on grain yield, phosphorus accumulation, phosphorus fertilizer utilization, and economic benefits of direct-seeded rice in Hubei Province. It provides a theoretical basis for the scientific fertilization of direct-seeded rice in the region.【Methods】Four phosphorus fertilizer application rates (0, 45, 90, and 135 kg/hm²)were established in a multi-site experiment across counties (cities and districts) in the major rice-producing areas of Hubei Province. The grain yield, phosphorus content, phosphorus accumulation, phosphorus fertilizer utilization, and economic benefits of rice under different phosphorus fertilizer dosages were comparatively analyzed.【Results】Compared to the zero phosphorus treatment (0 kg/hm²), the phosphorus fertilizer dosages of 45, 90, and 135 kg/hm² at each experimental site increased the grain yield by 0.18−1.80 t/hm², 0.30−3.24 t/hm², and 0.60−2.61 t/hm², respectively, with average increases of 9.15%, 16.08%, and 18.24%.Additionally, the aboveground phosphorus accumulation of rice increased by 1.57−9.18 kg/hm², 2.67−12.77 kg/hm², and 4.16−15.06 kg/hm², with average increases of 29.14%, 44.92%, and 53.60%, respectively. Overall, rice yield increased with the phosphorus fertilizer dosage in the range of 0−90 kg/hm², and there was no significant difference in rice yield when the phosphorus fertilizer dosage exceeded 90 kg/hm².With the increase in phosphorus fertilizer dosage, rice phosphorus accumulation, production value, and net income followed a trend of increasing and then stabilizing, while partial productivity of phosphate fertilizer, agronomic utilization rate, recycling rate, and production-to-input ratio decreased with higher phosphorus fertilizer dosages. An interaction was observed between phosphorus fertilizer dosage and experimental location regarding yield, phosphorus accumulation, phosphorus fertilizer utilization, production value, and net income of direct-seeded rice.【Conclusion】Appropriate phosphorus fertilizer dosage can significantly improve the grain yield, aboveground phosphorus accumulation, and phosphorus fertilizer utilization of direct-seeded rice. Considering yield, phosphorus accumulation, fertilizer utilization, and economic benefits, the recommended dosage of phosphorus fertilizer for direct-seeded rice in Hubei Province is 58−104 kg/hm², with an average of 82 kg/hm². The theoretical maximum yield can reach 6.97−12.18 t/hm², with an average of 9.14t/hm², which can ensure rice yield while minimizing nutrient loss and reducing environmental pollution.

Key words: direct-seeded rice, phosphorus fertilizer dosage, yield, phosphorus accumulation, fertilizer utilization, economic benefits

沈智达, 余秋华, 张斌, 曹玉东, 王少华, 王红飞, 伍永清, 戴志刚, 李小坤. 磷肥施用量对湖北省直播水稻产量、磷素积累及利用率的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2025, 39(3): 399-411.

SHEN Zhida, YU Qiuhua, ZHANG Bin, CAO Yudong, WANG Shaohua, WANG Hongfei, WU Yongqing, DAI Zhigang, LI Xiaokun. Effects of Phosphorus Fertilizer Application Rate on Grain Yield, Phosphorus Accumulation and Utilization of Direct-seeded Rice in Hubei Province[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2025, 39(3): 399-411.

图/表 9

参考文献 33

[1]	赵正洪, 戴力, 黄见良, 潘晓华, 游艾青, 赵全志, 陈光辉, 周政, 胡文彬, 纪龙. 长江中游稻区水稻产业发展现状、问题与建议[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(6): 553-564.
	Zhao Z H, Dai L, Huang J L, Pan X H, You A Q, Zhao Q Z, Chen G H, Zhou Z, Hu W B, Ji L. Status, problems and solutions in rice industry development in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2019, 33(6): 553-564. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	张怡, 曹宁, 王金明, 孙强. 磷肥调控对直播水稻产量及磷肥利用率的影响[J]. 北方水稻, 2021, 51(6): 10-13.
	Zhang Y, Cao N, Wang J M, Sun Q. Effects of phosphate fertilizer on grain yield and phosphorus use efficiency in direct-seeding rice[J]. North Rice, 2021, 51(6): 10-13. (in Chinese)
[3]	都江雪, 柳开楼, 黄晶, 韩天富, 王远鹏, 李冬初, 李亚贞, 马常宝, 薛彦东, 张会民. 中国稻田土壤有效磷时空演变特征及其对磷平衡的响应[J]. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(2): 476-486.
	Du J X, Liu K L, Huang J, Han T F, Wang Y P, Li D C, Li Y Z, Ma C B, Xue Y D, Zhang H M. Spatio-temporal Evolution Characteristics of Soil Available Phosphorus and Its Response to Phosphorus Balance in Paddy Soil in China[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2021, 58(2): 476-486. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	徐新朋, 王秀斌, 李大明, 柳开楼, 余喜初, 梁国庆, 何萍, 周卫. 双季稻最佳磷肥和钾肥用量与密度组合研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(3): 598-608.
	Xu X P, Wang X B, Li D M, Liu K L, Yu X C, Liang G Q, He P, Zhou W. Optimum combination of phosphorus,potassium and density for double-rice systems[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2016, 22(3): 598-608. (in Chinese)
[5]	江尚焘, 王火焰, 周健民, 刘晓伟, 陈照明, 严陶韬. 磷肥施用对水稻生长和磷素吸收的影响[J]. 土壤, 2016, 48(6): 1085-1091.
	Jiang S T, Wang H Y, Zhou J M, Liu X W, Chen Z M, Yan T T. Effects of application methods of phosphorus fertilizers on the growth and phosphorus absorption of rice in Jiangyan and Guangde regions[J]. Soils, 2016, 48(6): 1085-1091. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[6]	Fu J, Jian Y W, Wu Y L, Chen D J, Zhao X, Ma Y H, Niu S W, Wang Y F, Zhang F L, Xu C X, Wang S, Zhai L M, Zhou F. Nationwide estimates of nitrogen and phosphorus losses via runoff from rice paddies using data-constrained model simulations[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 279: 123642.
[7]	Saleque M A, Abedin M J, Bhuiyan N I, Zaman S K, Panaullah G M. Long-term effects of inorganic and organic fertilizer sources on yield and nutrient accumulation of lowland rice[J]. Field Crops Research, 2004, 86(1): 53-65.
[8]	Ameer S, Ibrahim H, Kulsoom F N U, Ameer G, Sher M. Real-time detection and measurements of nitrogen, phosphorous & potassium from soil samples: A comprehensive review[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2024, 24(7): 2565-2583.
[9]	Gui R, Mo Z, Zeng S, Wen Z, Long W. Effects of mechanized, deep application of slow-release fertilizer on yield and nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium utilization of direct-seeded rice[J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2023, 42(3): 1604-1613.
[10]	Bindraban P S, Dimkpa C O, Pandey R. Exploring phosphorus fertilizers and fertilization strategies for improved human and environmental health[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2020, 56(3): 299-317.
[11]	Minarsih S, Praptana R H, Sahara D, Supriyo A. Effectiveness of bio-phosphate fertilizer on growth performance and production of irrigated lowland rice[J]. BIO Web of Conferences, 2023, 69: 2006.
[12]	Wendimu A, Yoseph T, Ayalew T. Ditching phosphatic fertilizers for phosphate-solubilizing biofertilizers: A step towards sustainable agriculture and environmental health[J]. Sustainability-Basel, 2023, 15 (2): 1713.
[13]	王伟妮, 鲁剑巍, 鲁明星, 戴志刚, 李小坤. 水田土壤肥力现状及变化规律分析——以湖北省为例[J]. 土壤学报, 2012, 49(2): 319-330.
	Wang W N, Lu J W, Lu M X, Dai Z G, Li X K. Status quo and variation of soil fertility in paddy field-a case study of Hubei province.[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2012, 49(2): 319-330. (in Chinese)
[14]	Wang X X, Liu S, Zhang S, Li H, Maimaitiaili B, Feng G, Rengel Z. Localized ammonium and phosphorus fertilization can improve cotton lint yield by decreasing rhizosphere soil pH and salinity[J]. Field Crops Research, 2018, 217: 75-81.
[15]	Mehmet Y, Kaleli A, Çorapsiz M F. Machine learning based dynamic super twisting sliding mode controller for increase speed and accuracy of MPPT using real-time data under PSCs[J]. Renewable Energy, 2023, 219(1): 119470.
[16]	卜容燕, 任涛, 鲁剑巍, 李小坤, 丛日环, 李云春, 汪洋, 鲁君明. 水稻-油菜轮作条件下磷肥效应研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(6): 1227-1234.
	Bu R Y, Ren T, Lu J W, Li X K, Cong R H, Li Y C, Wang Y, Lu J M. Analysis of P fertilizer efficiency under rice-rapeseed rotation system[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(6): 1227-1234. (in Chinese)
[17]	龚金龙, 张洪程, 李杰, 常勇, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 李德剑, 李炳维, 沙安勤, 周有炎, 罗学超, 朱镇. 施磷量对超级稻南粳44产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(4): 447-451.
	Gong J L, Zhang H C, Li J, Chang Y, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Li D J, Li B W, Sha A Q, Zhou Y Y, Luo X C, Zhu Z. Effects of phosphorus levels on grain yield and quality of super rice Nanjing 44[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2011, 25(4): 447-451. (in Chinese)
[18]	Yan X J, Chen X H, Zhang S W, Muneer M A, Xu X Z, Ma C C, Cai Y Y, Cui Z L, Chen X P, Wu L Q, Zhang F S. Fertilization as the most critical factor affecting yield response and agronomic efficiency of phosphorus in Chinese rice production: Evidence from multi-location field trials[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2023, 103(15): 7816-7828.
[19]	Cavagnaro T R, Bender S F, Asghari H R, van der Heijden M G A. The role of arbuscular mycorrhizas in reducing soil nutrient loss[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2015, 20(5): 283-290.
[20]	Li P, Zhang T L, Wang X X, Yu D S. Development of biological soil quality indicator system for subtropical China[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2013, 126: 112-118.
[21]	闫金垚, 鲁君明, 侯文峰, 李小坤. 磷肥用量对不同水稻品种产量和磷肥利用率的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2018, 20(8): 74-81.
	Yan J Y, Lu J M, Hou W F, Li X K. Influence of Phosphorus Application Dosage on the Yield and Phosphorus Recovery Efficiency of Different Rice Varieties[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(8): 74-81. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	Yan J Y, Ren T, Wang K K, Li H Z, Li X K, Cong R H, Lu J W. Improved crop yield and phosphorus uptake through the optimization of phosphorus fertilizer rates in an oilseed rape-rice cropping system[J]. Field Crops Research, 2022, 286: 108614.
[23]	Chaudhary M I, Adu-Gyamfi J J, Saneoka H, Nguyen N T, Suwa R, Kanai S, El-Shemy H A, Lightfoot D A, Fujita K. The effect of phosphorus deficiency on nutrient uptake, nitrogen fixation and photosynthetic rate in mashbean, mungbean and soybean[J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2008, 30(4): 537-544.
[24]	郭鑫年, 孙娇, 梁锦绣, 周涛, 田旭东, 陈刚. 栽培方式与施磷量对水稻养分累积、分配及磷素平衡的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017(4): 104-111.
	Guo X N, Sun J, Liang J X, Zhou T, Tian X D, Chen G. Cultivation way and phosphorus fertilizer on rice nutrient accumulation, distribution and soil phosphorus balance[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2017(4): 104-111. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	李雨阳, 李浩晶, 郝威名, 赵喜辉, 曹静, 徐国伟. 施磷量对不同耐低磷型水稻品质及淀粉合成酶活性的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2024, 32(5): 816-826.
	Li Y Y, Li H J, Hao W M, Zhao X H, Cao J, Xu G W. Effects of phosphorus fertilizer rate on grain quality and starch synthase activity of different low-phosphorus tolerance varieties of rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture (in English and Chinese), 2024, 32(5): 816-826.
[26]	Luo T, Zhu Y J, Lu W D, Chen L L, Min T, Li J H, Wei C Z. Acidic compost tea enhances phosphorus availability and cotton yield in calcareous soils by decreasing soil pH[J]. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B: Soil & Plant Science, 2021, 71 (8): 657-666.
[27]	Ju C X, Buresh R J, Wang Z Q, Zhang H, Liu L J, Yang J C, Zhang J H. Root and shoot traits for rice varieties with higher grain yield and higher nitrogen use efficiency at lower nitrogen rates application[J]. Field Crops Research, 2015, 175: 47-55.
[28]	戴黎, 胡诚, 万建华, 徐化林, 刘茂军, 郭卫红, 乔月. 有机无机复混肥料对水稻产量及养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2024(2): 111-119.
	Dai L, Hu C, Wan J H, Wang J H, Xu H L, Liu M J, Guo W H, Qiao Y. Effects of combined application of organic inorganic fertilizer on rice yield and nutrient absorption and utilization[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2024(2): 111-119. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	侯云鹏, 孔丽丽, 李前, 杨建, 尹彩侠, 秦裕波, 张磊, 于雷, 王立春, 谢佳贵. 不同施磷水平下水稻产量、养分吸收及土壤磷素平衡研究[J]. 东北农业科学, 2016, 41(6): 61-66.
	Hou Y P, Kong L L, Li Q, Yang J, Yin C X, Qian Y B, Zhang L, Yu L, Wang L C, Xie J G. Studies on effect of different phosphorus levels on yield, nutrient absorption of rice and soil phosphorus balance[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 41(6): 61-66. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	郑丽, 樊剑波, 何园球, 郑学博, 许小伟. 不同供磷水平对旱作条件下水稻生长、根系形态和养分吸收的影响[J]. 土壤, 2015, 47(4): 664-669.
	Zheng L, Fan J B, He Y Q, Zheng X B, Xu X W. Effects of phosphorus on growth, root morphology, phosphorus uptake and utilization efficiency of rice seedlings[J]. Soils, 2015, 47(4): 664-669. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	Townsend A R, Porder S. Agricultural legacies, food production and its environmental consequences[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109(16): 5917-5918.
[32]	Zhang B, Wang Y, Liu H, Yang X, Yuan P, Wang C, Cai H, Wang S, Ding G, Xu F, Shi L. Optimal phosphorus management strategies to enhance crop productivity and soil phosphorus fertility in rapeseed-rice rotation[J]. Chemosphere, 2023, 337: 139392.
[33]	Mi W H, Zheng S Y, Yang X, Wu L H, Liu Y L, Chen J Q. Comparison of yield and nitrogen use efficiency of different types of nitrogen fertilizers for different rice cropping systems under subtropical monsoon climate in China[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2017, 90: 78-86.

试验地点 Experimental site	经纬度 Longitude and latitude	水稻品种 Rice variety	播种量 Seeding rate(kg/hm²)	土壤基础理化性质 Soil physical and chemical properties
试验地点 Experimental site	经纬度 Longitude and latitude	水稻品种 Rice variety	播种量 Seeding rate(kg/hm²)	pH值 pH value	有机质 Organic matter (g/kg)	全氮 Total nitrogen (g/kg)	速效磷 Available phosphorus (mg/kg)	速效钾 Available potassium (mg/kg)
潜江 Qianjiang	30°27′N, 112°37′E	荃两优2118 Quanliangyou 2118	36.0	6.89	20.26	1.52	10.60	97.52
团风 Tuanfeng	30°39′N, 114°52′E	华珍115 Huazhen 115	60.0	5.70	28.40	1.33	15.35	98.21
大悟 Dawu	31°58′N, 120°32′E	隆两优3463 Longliangyou 3463	37.5	8.13	28.51	2.34	16.75	73.97
夷陵 Yiling	30°38′N, 111°36′E	荃两优丝苗 Quanliangyousimiao	45.0	6.10	21.50	1.65	23.20	115.13
襄州 Xiangzhou	32°04′N, 112°12′E	粤禾丝苗 Yuehesimiao	66.0	6.27	26.06	1.49	23.81	83.17
武穴 Wuxue	29°51′N, 115°33′E	黄华占 Huanghuazhan	75.0	6.63	25.46	1.62	12.20	163.69
鄂州-1 Ezhou-1	30°04′N, 114°40′E	鄂优丝苗 Eyousimiao	75.0	7.60	19.02	1.11	22.55	90.07
鄂州-2 Ezhou-2	30°25′N, 114°44′E	黄花粘 Huanghuazhan	75.0	6.72	22.29	1.68	29.45	130.93
天门 Tianmen	30°39′N, 113°01′E	粤农丝苗 Yuenongsimiao	60.0	7.57	18.54	1.33	34.20	183.20
沙洋 Shayang	31°02′N, 112°12′E	青香优香九 Qingxiangyouxiangjiu	37.5	8.10	22.06	1.19	17.38	187.97

试验地点 Experimental site	经纬度 Longitude and latitude	水稻品种 Rice variety	播种量 Seeding rate(kg/hm²)	土壤基础理化性质 Soil physical and chemical properties
试验地点 Experimental site	经纬度 Longitude and latitude	水稻品种 Rice variety	播种量 Seeding rate(kg/hm²)	pH值 pH value	有机质 Organic matter (g/kg)	全氮 Total nitrogen (g/kg)	速效磷 Available phosphorus (mg/kg)	速效钾 Available potassium (mg/kg)
潜江 Qianjiang	30°27′N, 112°37′E	荃两优2118 Quanliangyou 2118	36.0	6.89	20.26	1.52	10.60	97.52
团风 Tuanfeng	30°39′N, 114°52′E	华珍115 Huazhen 115	60.0	5.70	28.40	1.33	15.35	98.21
大悟 Dawu	31°58′N, 120°32′E	隆两优3463 Longliangyou 3463	37.5	8.13	28.51	2.34	16.75	73.97
夷陵 Yiling	30°38′N, 111°36′E	荃两优丝苗 Quanliangyousimiao	45.0	6.10	21.50	1.65	23.20	115.13
襄州 Xiangzhou	32°04′N, 112°12′E	粤禾丝苗 Yuehesimiao	66.0	6.27	26.06	1.49	23.81	83.17
武穴 Wuxue	29°51′N, 115°33′E	黄华占 Huanghuazhan	75.0	6.63	25.46	1.62	12.20	163.69
鄂州-1 Ezhou-1	30°04′N, 114°40′E	鄂优丝苗 Eyousimiao	75.0	7.60	19.02	1.11	22.55	90.07
鄂州-2 Ezhou-2	30°25′N, 114°44′E	黄花粘 Huanghuazhan	75.0	6.72	22.29	1.68	29.45	130.93
天门 Tianmen	30°39′N, 113°01′E	粤农丝苗 Yuenongsimiao	60.0	7.57	18.54	1.33	34.20	183.20
沙洋 Shayang	31°02′N, 112°12′E	青香优香九 Qingxiangyouxiangjiu	37.5	8.10	22.06	1.19	17.38	187.97

F值 F value	产量 Yield	籽粒磷素含量 Seed phosphorus content	秸秆磷素含量 Straw phosphorus content	籽粒磷素积累量 Seed phosphorus accumulation	秸秆磷素积累量 Straw phosphorus accumulation
地点Site(S)	920.27**	29.81**	111.56**	65.41**	86.68**
磷肥用量Phosphorus fertilizer level(P)	357.97**	28.50**	20.98**	72.33**	83.04**
S×P	10.69**	0.83ns	3.09**	1.15ns	3.62**
F值 F value	磷肥偏生产力 Partial productivity of phosphate fertilizer	磷肥农学利用率Agronomic utilization of phosphate fertilizer	磷肥回收利用率Recovery rate of phosphate fertilizer	磷肥生理利用率 Phosphorus fertilizer physiological utilization	磷素收获指数Phosphorus harvest index
地点Site(S)	590.17**	51.10**	15.81**	8.89**	14.58**
磷肥用量Phosphorus fertilizer level(P)	18827.46**	23.48**	45.21**	0.86ns	1.89ns
S×P	67.82**	4.09**	2.72*	1.37ns	1.50ns
F值 F value	产值 Output	施磷肥增加产值 Increased production value	纯收入 Net income	产投比 Fertilizer output−input ratio
地点Site(S)	920.27**	49.49**	920.27**	886.52**
磷肥用量Phosphorus fertilizer level(P)	357.97**	73.31**	210.90**	702.06**
S×P	10.69**	3.45**	10.69**	19.04**

F值 F value	产量 Yield	籽粒磷素含量 Seed phosphorus content	秸秆磷素含量 Straw phosphorus content	籽粒磷素积累量 Seed phosphorus accumulation	秸秆磷素积累量 Straw phosphorus accumulation
地点Site(S)	920.27**	29.81**	111.56**	65.41**	86.68**
磷肥用量Phosphorus fertilizer level(P)	357.97**	28.50**	20.98**	72.33**	83.04**
S×P	10.69**	0.83ns	3.09**	1.15ns	3.62**
F值 F value	磷肥偏生产力 Partial productivity of phosphate fertilizer	磷肥农学利用率Agronomic utilization of phosphate fertilizer	磷肥回收利用率Recovery rate of phosphate fertilizer	磷肥生理利用率 Phosphorus fertilizer physiological utilization	磷素收获指数Phosphorus harvest index
地点Site(S)	590.17**	51.10**	15.81**	8.89**	14.58**
磷肥用量Phosphorus fertilizer level(P)	18827.46**	23.48**	45.21**	0.86ns	1.89ns
S×P	67.82**	4.09**	2.72*	1.37ns	1.50ns
F值 F value	产值 Output	施磷肥增加产值 Increased production value	纯收入 Net income	产投比 Fertilizer output−input ratio
地点Site(S)	920.27**	49.49**	920.27**	886.52**
磷肥用量Phosphorus fertilizer level(P)	357.97**	73.31**	210.90**	702.06**
S×P	10.69**	3.45**	10.69**	19.04**

试验地点 Experimental site	磷肥用量 Phosphorus fertilizer application rate
试验地点 Experimental site	0 kg/hm²	45 kg/hm²	90 kg/hm²	135 kg/hm²
潜江 Qianjiang	5.92±0.37 c	7.31±0.37 b	8.57±0.45 a	8.37±0.27 a
团风 Tuanfeng	9.88±0.08 c	10.30±0.02 b	10.69±0.08 a	10.81±0.08 a
大悟 Dawu	5.53±0.21 c	6.18±0.23 b	6.87±0.21 a	7.08±0.07 a
夷陵 Yiling	8.47±0.19 c	9.76±0.23 b	10.25±0.16 a	10.03±0.24 ab
襄州 Xiangzhou	9.07±0.12 d	9.33±0.10 c	9.64±0.01 b	10.17±0.11 a
武穴 Wuxue	8.21±0.33 d	8.88±0.15 c	9.45±0.06 b	10.23±0.30 a
鄂州-1 Ezhou-1	6.45±0.04 c	7.08±0.07 b	7.34±0.04 a	7.28±0.09 a
鄂州-2 Ezhou-2	7.89±0.05 c	8.39±0.06 b	8.55±0.03 ab	8.77±0.06 a
天门 Tianmen	10.43±0.08 c	11.21±0.06 b	11.97±0.24 a	12.18±0.13 a
沙洋 Shayang	8.92±0.03 c	9.11±0.04 bc	9.23±0.03 ab	9.57±0.03 a
平均值 Average	8.08±1.60 b	8.75±1.49 ab	9.26±1.48 a	9.45±1.54 a

磷肥施用量对湖北省直播水稻产量、磷素积累及利用率的影响

Effects of Phosphorus Fertilizer Application Rate on Grain Yield, Phosphorus Accumulation and Utilization of Direct-seeded Rice in Hubei Province

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 33

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

部位 Position	施磷量 Phosphorus application rates(kg/hm²)	平均值 Mean	标准偏差 Standard deviation	最小值 Minimum	1/4位点 First quartile	中位数 Median	3/4位点 Third quartile	最大值 Maximum
籽粒 Seed	0	0.18 b	0.04	0.11	0.14	0.18	0.21	0.25
	45	0.21 a	0.03	0.15	0.18	0.21	0.24	0.27
	90	0.22 a	0.04	0.16	0.19	0.22	0.26	0.28
	135	0.23 a	0.04	0.16	0.19	0.24	0.26	0.29
秸秆 Straw	0	0.11 a	0.06	0.01	0.05	0.10	0.15	0.24
	45	0.12 a	0.07	0.01	0.06	0.12	0.17	0.24
	90	0.13 a	0.07	0.02	0.07	0.13	0.17	0.25
	135	0.13 a	0.07	0.05	0.07	0.12	0.19	0.28

试验地点 Experimental site	施磷量 Phosphorus application(kg/hm²)	磷肥偏生产力 Partial productivity of phosphate fertilizer(kg/kg)	磷肥农学利用率 Agronomic utilization of phosphate fertilizer(kg/kg)	磷肥回收利用率 Recovery rate of phosphate fertilizer(%)	磷肥生理利用率 Phosphorus fertilizer physiological utilization(kg/kg)	磷素收获指数 Phosphorus harvest index(%)
潜江	0	-	-	-	-	0.50±0.02 a
Qianjiang	45	162.44±8.28 a	30.98±9.35 a	36.31±5.49 a	70.59±13.74 a	0.61±0.01 a
	90	95.26±5.04 b	29.52±6.42 a	25.61±4.24 b	137.87±86.06 a	0.73±0.24 a
	135	61.97±1.97 c	18.14±0.92 a	21.72±1.05 b	101.64±60.04 a	0.60±0.09 a
团风	0	-	-	-	-	0.62±0.04 a
Tuanfeng	45	228.85±0.36 a	9.30±1.80 a	33.46±3.06 a	28.09±7.24 a	0.64±0.00 a
	90	118.81±0.86 b	9.04±1.51 a	26.56±2.20 b	33.96±3.85 a	0.66±0.03 a
	135	80.04±0.62 c	6.85±1.11 a	18.75±1.94 c	36.41±2.20 a	0.62±0.03 a
大悟	0	-	-	-	-	0.48±0.01 b
Dawu	45	137.41±5.01 a	14.44±1.11 a	28.29±5.84 a	52.15±8.04 a	0.53±0.01 a
	90	76.30±2.31 b	14.81±3.21 a	24.49±6.70 a	61.28±5.98 a	0.53±0.02 a
	135	52.43±0.50 c	11.44±1.43 a	21.89±3.47 a	53.20±10.59 a	0.49±0.03 b
夷陵	0	-	-	-	-	0.65±0.01 a
Yiling	45	216.88±5.05 a	28.75±0.76 a	31.43±5.84 a	84.14±11.66 a	0.65±0.03 a
	90	113.91±1.77 b	19.84±0.65 b	23.15±1.17 b	78.17±4.36 a	0.66±0.02 a
	135	74.27±1.80 c	11.57±3.22 c	21.21±1.52 b	50.78±10.09 b	0.63±0.01 a
襄州	0	-	-	-	-	0.67±0.04 c
Xiangzhou	45	207.28±2.26 a	5.65±1.04 b	31.39±7.30 a	18.75±6.06 b	0.68±0.02 ab
	90	107.15±0.06 b	6.33±1.37 ab	25.69±6.59 ab	25.31±6.00 b	0.61±0.02 b
	135	75.33±0.78 c	8.12±0.95 a	14.03±5.68 b	65.17±27.83 a	0.73±0.01 a
武穴	0	-	-	-	-	0.52±0.02 a
Wuxue	45	197.33±3.33 a	14.92±4.06 a	18.96±2.48 a	79.54±14.89 a	0.49±0.01 a
	90	104.95±0.68 b	13.75±3.97 a	19.00±3.87 a	76.05±10.71 a	0.49±0.11 a
	135	75.75±2.22 c	14.94±4.46 a	19.44±2.98 a	77.09±12.26 a	0.54±0.02 a
鄂州-1	0	-	-	-	-	0.61±0.05 a
Ezhou-1	45	157.30±1.47 a	13.89±2.01 a	15.86±1.07 a	79.39±7.29 a	0.61±0.05 a
	90	81.52±0.42 b	9.82±0.90 b	16.06±0.83 a	57.28±7.08 b	0.61±0.02 a
	135	53.92±0.67 c	6.11±0.81 b	8.74±1.59 b	66.07±10.17 ab	0.61±0.03 a
鄂州-2	0	-	-	-	-	0.50±0.04 a
Ezhou-2	45	186.51±1.25 a	11.21±1.16 a	39.57±2.37 a	28.43±3.62 a	0.53±0.04 a
	90	95.05±0.28 b	7.40±0.33 ab	20.76±3.50 b	36.35±6.41 a	0.55±0.06 a
	135	64.99±0.45 c	6.56±0.10 b	19.27±5.69 b	36.46±9.43 a	0.51±0.04 a
天门	0	-	-	-	-	0.56±0.02 a
Tianmen	45	249.07±1.40 a	17.22±0.56 a	36.21±9.27 a	49.73±9.81 a	0.56±0.05 a
	90	133.01±2.62 b	17.09±3.27 a	29.89±2.81 ab	57.93±10.6 a	0.56±0.03 a
	135	90.19±0.95 c	12.91±0.88 b	21.05±1.81 b	61.79±8.69 a	0.58±0.04 a
沙洋	0	-	-	-	-	0.56±0.03 a
Shayang	45	202.55±0.91 a	4.40±0.31 a	10.61±2.48 a	39.28±9.96 a	0.59±0.02 a
	90	102.59±0.32 b	3.52±0.32 a	9.37±2.81 a	36.75±9.77 a	0.59±0.03 a
	135	70.86±0.21 c	4.81±0.37 a	9.77±1.41 a	44.90±8.19 a	0.58±0.05 a

试验地点 Experimental site	施磷量 Phosphorus application (kg/hm²)	产值 Output (×10³ Yuan/hm²)	施磷肥增加产值 Increased production value (×10³ Yuan/hm²)	施肥成本 Fertilization cost (×10³ Yuan/hm²)	纯收入 Net income (×10³ Yuan/hm²)	产投比 Fertilizer output−input ratio(%)
潜江	0	16.57±1.03 c	0	1.31	14.56±1.03 c	8.24±0.51 a
Qianjiang	45	20.47±1.04 b	3.90±1.18 b	1.63	18.14±1.04 b	8.78±0.45 a
	90	24.01±1.27 a	7.44±1.62 a	1.95	21.36±1.27 a	9.06±0.48 a
	135	23.42±0.74 a	6.86±0.35 a	2.27	20.45±0.74 a	7.89±0.25 b
团风	0	27.66±0.22 c	0	1.31	25.65±0.22 c	13.76±0.11 a
Tuanfeng	45	28.84±0.05 b	1.17±0.23 b	1.63	26.51±0.05 b	12.38±0.02 b
	90	29.94±0.22 a	2.28±0.38 a	1.95	27.29±0.22 a	11.30±0.08 c
	135	30.25±0.23 a	2.59±0.42 a	2.27	27.28±0.23 a	10.19±0.08 d
大悟	0	15.49±0.58 c	0	1.31	13.48±0.58 c	7.71±0.29 a
Dawu	45	17.31±0.63 b	1.82±0.14 b	1.63	14.98±0.63 b	7.43±0.27 b
	90	19.23±0.58 a	3.73±0.81 a	1.95	16.58±0.58 a	7.26±0.22 c
	135	19.82±0.19 a	4.33±0.54 a	2.27	16.85±0.19 a	6.67±0.06 d
夷陵	0	23.70±0.54 c	0	1.31	21.69±0.54 b	11.79±0.27 a
Yiling	45	27.33±0.64 b	3.62±0.10 a	1.63	25.00±0.64 a	11.73±0.27 b
	90	28.70±0.44 a	5.00±0.16 a	1.95	26.05±0.44 a	10.83±0.17 c
	135	28.08±0.68 ab	4.37±1.22 a	2.27	25.11±0.68 a	9.45±0.23 d
襄州	0	25.41±0.34 d	0	1.31	23.40±0.34 d	12.64±0.17 a
Xiangzhou	45	26.12±0.28 c	0.71±0.13 c	1.63	23.79±0.28 c	11.21±0.12 b
	90	27.00±0.02 b	1.60±0.35 b	1.95	24.35±0.02 b	10.19±0.01 c
	135	28.47±0.30 a	3.07±0.06 a	2.27	25.50±0.30 a	9.59±0.10 d
武穴	0	22.98±0.92 d	0	1.31	20.97±0.92 d	11.43±0.46 a
Wuxue	45	24.86±0.42 c	1.88±0.51 b	1.63	22.53±0.42 c	10.67±0.18 b
	90	26.45±0.17 b	3.46±1.00 ab	1.95	23.80±0.17 b	9.98±0.06 c
	135	28.63±0.84 a	5.65±1.68 a	2.27	25.66±0.84 a	9.64±0.28 d
鄂州-1	0	18.07±0.12 c	0	1.31	16.06±0.12 b	8.99±0.06 a
Ezhou-1	45	19.82±0.19 b	1.75±0.25 b	1.63	17.49±0.19 a	8.51±0.08 b
	90	20.54±0.11 a	2.47±0.23 a	1.95	17.89±0.11 a	7.75±0.04 c
	135	20.38±0.25 a	2.31±0.31 a	2.27	17.41±0.25 a	6.86±0.08 d
鄂州-2	0	22.09±0.15 d	0	1.31	20.08±0.15 d	10.99±0.07 a
Ezhou-2	45	23.50±0.16 c	1.41±0.15 b	1.63	21.17±0.16 c	10.09±0.07 b
	90	23.95±0.07 b	1.87±0.08 a	1.95	21.30±0.07 b	9.04±0.03 c
	135	24.57±0.17 a	2.48±0.04 a	2.27	21.60±0.17 a	8.27±0.06 d
天门	0	29.21±0.21 c	0	1.31	27.20±0.21 c	14.53±0.11 a
Tianmen	45	31.38±0.18 b	2.17±0.07 b	1.63	29.05±0.18 b	13.47±0.08 b
	90	33.52±0.66 a	4.31±0.82 a	1.95	30.87±0.66 a	12.65±0.25 c
	135	34.09±0.36 a	4.88±0.33 a	2.27	31.12±0.36 a	11.48±0.12 d
沙洋	0	24.97±0.08 d	0	1.31	22.96±0.08 c	12.42±0.04 a
Shayang	45	25.52±0.11 c	0.55±0.04 c	1.63	23.19±0.11 b	10.95±0.05 b
	90	25.85±0.08 b	0.89±0.08 b	1.95	23.20±0.08 b	9.76±0.03 c
	135	26.79±0.08 a	1.82±0.14 a	2.27	23.82±0.08 a	9.02±0.03 d

试验地点 Experimental site	肥料效应方程 Fertilizer effect equation	相关系数 Coefficient	磷肥推荐用量 Recommended amount of phosphate fertilizer(kg/hm²)	理论产量 Theoretical yield(t/hm²)
潜江 Qianjiang	y=0.031x+5.916(x≤82) y=8.366(x>82)	0.919^**	82	8.37
团风 Tuanfeng	y=0.009x+9.88(x≤101) y=10.749(x>101)	0.976^**	97	10.75
大悟 Dawu	y=0.014x +5.533(x≤104) y =6.972(x>104)	0.939^**	104	6.98
夷陵 Yiling	y =0.029x +8.466(x≤58) y =10.027(x>58)	0.930^**	58	10.03
襄州 Xiangzhou	y =0.00752x +8.967	0.930^*	-	-
武穴 Wuxue	y =0.01377x +8.219	0.989^**	-	-
鄂州-1 Ezhou-1	y =0.014x +6.453(x≤62) y =7.279(x>62)	0.975^**	62	7.28
鄂州-2 Ezhou-2	y =0.011x +7.888(x≤70) y =8.664(x>70)	0.774^**	70	8.66
天门 Tianmen	y =0.016x +10.433(x≤103) y =12.176(x>103)	0.969^**	103	12.18
沙洋 Shayang	y =0.00461x +8.895	0.959^**	-	-

[1]	韦还和, 汪璐璐, 马唯一, 张翔, 左博源, 耿孝宇, 朱旺, 朱济邹, 孟天瑶, 陈英龙, 高平磊, 许轲, 戴其根. 盐−旱复合胁迫下粳稻品种南粳9108籽粒灌浆特性及其与产量形成的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2025, 39(3): 373-386.
[2]	徐月梅, 彭诗燕, 孙志伟, 王志琴, 朱宽宇, 杨建昌. 不同耐低磷水稻品种的内源激素水平差异及其与产量和磷利用率的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2025, 39(2): 231-244.
[3]	唐承翰, 王晶卿, 陈惠哲, 张玉屏, 向镜, 张义凯, 王志刚, 怀燕, 陈佳峰, 王亚梁. 杂交稻条播育秧机插秧苗素质对产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2025, 39(2): 245-254.
[4]	舒傲, 解嘉鑫, 曹威, 周传名, 李蓓蕾, 陈嘉馨, 李莉, 曹放波, 陈佳娜, 黄敏. 氮肥运筹对优质杂交中稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2025, 39(2): 255-263.
[5]	陈书融, 朱练峰, 秦碧蓉, 王婕, 朱旭华, 田文昊, 朱春权, 曹小闯, 孔亚丽, 张均华, 金千瑜. 增氧灌溉下配施硝化抑制剂对水稻生长、产量和氮肥利用的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2025, 39(1): 92-100.
[6]	冯向前, 王爱冬, 洪卫源, 李子秋, 覃金华, 詹丽钏, 陈里鹏, 张运波, 王丹英, 陈松. 基于低空无人机遥感的水稻产量估测方法研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(6): 604-616.
[7]	刘俊峰, 牟静怡, 赵红艳, 郭诗梦, 李漪濛, 梁超, 周婵婵, 王术, 黄元财. 施氮方式与行距配置对不同穗型粳稻品种产量和氮素利用率的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(6): 672-684.
[8]	曹玉东, 吴朋浩, 戴志刚, 王贵兵, 何帅, 巩细民, 李小坤. 侧深施肥对水稻产量、养分吸收及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(6): 695-708.
[9]	蒋鹏, 张林, 周兴兵, 郭晓艺, 朱永川, 刘茂, 郭长春, 熊洪, 徐富贤. 冬水田轻简化栽培杂交稻蓄留再生稻产量形成特点[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(5): 544-554.
[10]	熊家欢, 张义凯, 向镜, 陈惠哲, 徐一成, 王亚梁, 王志刚, 姚坚, 张玉屏. 覆膜稻田施用炭基肥对水稻产量及氮素利用的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(5): 567-576.
[11]	郭展, 张运波. 水稻对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应及分子调控研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 335-349.
[12]	韦还和, 马唯一, 左博源, 汪璐璐, 朱旺, 耿孝宇, 张翔, 孟天瑶, 陈英龙, 高平磊, 许轲, 霍中洋, 戴其根. 盐、干旱及其复合胁迫对水稻产量和品质形成影响的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 350-363.
[13]	吕宙, 易秉怀, 陈平平, 周文新, 唐文帮, 易镇邪. 施氮量与移栽密度对小粒型杂交水稻产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 422-436.
[14]	赵艺婷, 谢可冉, 高逖, 崔克辉. 水稻分蘖期干旱锻炼对幼穗分化期高温下穗发育和产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 277-289.
[15]	周甜, 吴少华, 康建宏, 吴宏亮, 杨生龙, 王星强, 李昱, 黄玉峰. 不同种植模式对水稻籽粒淀粉含量及淀粉关键酶活性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 303-315.