中国水稻科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 695-708.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2024.240109
曹玉东1, 吴朋浩1, 戴志刚2, 王贵兵1, 何帅1, 巩细民2, 李小坤1,3,*()
收稿日期:
2024-01-20
修回日期:
2024-04-13
出版日期:
2024-11-10
发布日期:
2024-11-15
通讯作者:
李小坤
基金资助:
CAO Yudong1, WU Penghao1, DAI Zhigang2, WANG Guibing1, HE Shuai1, GONG Ximin2, LI Xiaokun1,3,*()
Received:
2024-01-20
Revised:
2024-04-13
Online:
2024-11-10
Published:
2024-11-15
Contact:
LI Xiaokun
摘要:
【目的】明确侧深施肥技术对水稻产量、产量构成因子、养分吸收、肥料利用率及经济效益的影响,以期为水稻专用肥及侧深施肥技术的大面积推广应用提供科学依据。【方法】分别于2020年在湖北省6个试点县和2021年在湖北省9个试点县进行田间试验,试验设3个处理,分别为不施肥(T1)、常规施肥(T2)和侧深施肥(T3)。研究分析不同施肥处理对水稻产量、产量构成因子、养分吸收量、肥料利用率和经济效益的影响。【结果】1)所有试点县的施肥处理均可显著提高水稻产量,与T1处理相比,T2和T3处理分别平均增产37.42%和51.61%;与T2处理相比,T3处理平均显著增产9.81%。产量构成因子结果显示,侧深施肥可以显著提高水稻平均有效穗数,与T2处理相比,显著增加3.58%。不同试点施肥处理的增产效果存在一定的差异,变异系数为59.54%,这可能与试验点基础土壤理化性质有关,分析表明侧深施肥的增产效果与土壤的有机质含量极显著正相关。2)侧深施肥技术显著提高了水稻的养分吸收量和肥料利用率。与T2处理相比,T3处理水稻氮、磷和钾的养分吸收量分别平均提高了9.65%、7.51%和12.79%;肥料偏生产力、农学效率和生理利用率分别平均提高了10.34%、37.90%和3.28%。3)侧深施肥技术显著提高了种植水稻的经济效益。与T2处理相比,T3处理水稻产投比平均增加7.65%,稻谷收益平均增加2504元/hm2,收益增长的主要来源是产量的提高与人工成本的降低。【结论】侧深施肥技术显著提高了水稻产量和肥料利用率,增加经济效益,实现了增产、增效和节本、增收,并且伴随土壤有机质含量的升高侧深施肥的增产效果愈加显著,因此可在湖北省主要水稻种植区域及高肥力土壤上推广应用。
曹玉东, 吴朋浩, 戴志刚, 王贵兵, 何帅, 巩细民, 李小坤. 侧深施肥对水稻产量、养分吸收及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(6): 695-708.
CAO Yudong, WU Penghao, DAI Zhigang, WANG Guibing, HE Shuai, GONG Ximin, LI Xiaokun. Effect of Side-deep Fertilization on Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Economic Benefits of Rice[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(6): 695-708.
年份 Year | 试验点 Test site | pH | 有机质 OM (g/kg) | 全氮 TN (g/kg) | 有效磷 AP (mg/kg) | 速效钾 AK (mg/kg) | 供试品种 Variety |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2020 | 黄冈市武穴市WX(29°84′N, 115°56′E) | 6.2 | 30.8 | 1.7 | 17.2 | 100.1 | 楚禾丰占Chuhefengzhan |
襄阳市襄州区XZ(32°08′N, 112°21′E) | 6.0 | 15.2 | 1.1 | 22.1 | 109.2 | 粤禾丝苗Yuehesimiao | |
孝感市云梦县YM(31°02′N, 113°75′E) | 6.1 | 26.7 | 1.4 | 20.8 | 141.0 | 红糯优1号Hongnuoyou 1 | |
宜昌市枝江市ZJ(30°42′N, 111°76′E) | 6.0 | 20.3 | 1.5 | 18.3 | 196.4 | 昌两优8号Changliangyou 8 | |
荆州市荆州区JZ(30°35′N, 112°19′E) | 6.8 | 20.5 | 1.1 | 19.5 | 147.0 | 福稻99 Fudao 99 | |
随州市曾都区ZD(31°71′N, 113°37′E) | 6.8 | 18.3 | 1.4 | 49.4 | 46.1 | 昌凯丝苗Changkaisimiao | |
2021 | 黄冈市武穴市WX(29°84′N, 115°56′E) | 6.1 | 23.5 | 1.0 | 26.0 | 71.0 | 野香优莉斯Yexiangyoulisi |
襄阳市襄州区XZ(32°08′N, 112°21′E) | 5.9 | 15.2 | 1.1 | 22.1 | 109.2 | 粤禾丝苗Yuehesimiao | |
荆门市沙洋县SY(30°71′N, 112°37′E) | 6.7 | 20.8 | 1.2 | 19.2 | 147.6 | 楚丰晶占Chufengjingzhan | |
荆州市荆州区JZ(30°35′N, 112°19′E) | 6.7 | 19.8 | 1.0 | 9.0 | 113.5 | 创两优926 Chuangliangyou 926 | |
黄冈市英山县YS(30°73′N, 115°68′E) | 6.3 | 29.6 | 1.6 | 20.7 | 172.3 | 黄华占Huanghuazhan | |
宜昌市枝江市ZJ(30°42′N, 111°76′E) | 6.0 | 20.3 | 1.5 | 20.6 | 190.6 | 昌两优8号Changliangyou 8 | |
襄阳市老河口市LHK(32°38′N, 111°67′E) | 6.8 | 11.7 | 0.7 | 15.2 | 212.0 | 襄中稻2号Xiangzhongdao 2 | |
随州市曾都区ZD(31°71′N, 113°37′E) | 6.3 | 18.5 | 1.2 | 30.3 | 50.3 | 禾福玉占Hefuyuzhan | |
天门市TM(30°66′N, 113°16′E) | 6.1 | 26.7 | 1.4 | 20.8 | 164.1 | 昌香优8号Changxiangyou 8 |
表1 试验点土壤基础理化性状与供试品种
Table 1. Basic soil physicochemical properties and test varieties at the test sites
年份 Year | 试验点 Test site | pH | 有机质 OM (g/kg) | 全氮 TN (g/kg) | 有效磷 AP (mg/kg) | 速效钾 AK (mg/kg) | 供试品种 Variety |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2020 | 黄冈市武穴市WX(29°84′N, 115°56′E) | 6.2 | 30.8 | 1.7 | 17.2 | 100.1 | 楚禾丰占Chuhefengzhan |
襄阳市襄州区XZ(32°08′N, 112°21′E) | 6.0 | 15.2 | 1.1 | 22.1 | 109.2 | 粤禾丝苗Yuehesimiao | |
孝感市云梦县YM(31°02′N, 113°75′E) | 6.1 | 26.7 | 1.4 | 20.8 | 141.0 | 红糯优1号Hongnuoyou 1 | |
宜昌市枝江市ZJ(30°42′N, 111°76′E) | 6.0 | 20.3 | 1.5 | 18.3 | 196.4 | 昌两优8号Changliangyou 8 | |
荆州市荆州区JZ(30°35′N, 112°19′E) | 6.8 | 20.5 | 1.1 | 19.5 | 147.0 | 福稻99 Fudao 99 | |
随州市曾都区ZD(31°71′N, 113°37′E) | 6.8 | 18.3 | 1.4 | 49.4 | 46.1 | 昌凯丝苗Changkaisimiao | |
2021 | 黄冈市武穴市WX(29°84′N, 115°56′E) | 6.1 | 23.5 | 1.0 | 26.0 | 71.0 | 野香优莉斯Yexiangyoulisi |
襄阳市襄州区XZ(32°08′N, 112°21′E) | 5.9 | 15.2 | 1.1 | 22.1 | 109.2 | 粤禾丝苗Yuehesimiao | |
荆门市沙洋县SY(30°71′N, 112°37′E) | 6.7 | 20.8 | 1.2 | 19.2 | 147.6 | 楚丰晶占Chufengjingzhan | |
荆州市荆州区JZ(30°35′N, 112°19′E) | 6.7 | 19.8 | 1.0 | 9.0 | 113.5 | 创两优926 Chuangliangyou 926 | |
黄冈市英山县YS(30°73′N, 115°68′E) | 6.3 | 29.6 | 1.6 | 20.7 | 172.3 | 黄华占Huanghuazhan | |
宜昌市枝江市ZJ(30°42′N, 111°76′E) | 6.0 | 20.3 | 1.5 | 20.6 | 190.6 | 昌两优8号Changliangyou 8 | |
襄阳市老河口市LHK(32°38′N, 111°67′E) | 6.8 | 11.7 | 0.7 | 15.2 | 212.0 | 襄中稻2号Xiangzhongdao 2 | |
随州市曾都区ZD(31°71′N, 113°37′E) | 6.3 | 18.5 | 1.2 | 30.3 | 50.3 | 禾福玉占Hefuyuzhan | |
天门市TM(30°66′N, 113°16′E) | 6.1 | 26.7 | 1.4 | 20.8 | 164.1 | 昌香优8号Changxiangyou 8 |
年份 Year | 试验点 Experimental site | 处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield (kg/hm2) | 有效穗数 Effective panicles per m2 | 每穗粒数 Spikelets per panicle | 结实率 Seed setting rate(%) | 千粒重 1000-grain weight(g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2021 | 随州市曾都区ZD | T1 | 6436±141 c | 333±7 c | 141±7 b | 80.7±2.1 b | 19.4±0.8 a |
T2 | 9374±108 b | 398±5 b | 167±4 a | 86.0±0.8 a | 20.5±0.8 a | ||
T3 | 9890±75 a | 428±11 a | 173±4 a | 85.8±2.1 a | 20.6±0.3 a | ||
荆州市荆州区JZ | T1 | 6108±53 c | 386±7 c | 130±3 b | 80.9±2.3 a | 18.6±1.6 a | |
T2 | 8204±131 b | 437±5 b | 146±2 a | 83.3±2.4 a | 19.9±1.1 a | ||
T3 | 9239±184 a | 460±7 a | 150±2 a | 85.7±3.6 a | 19.4±0.3 a | ||
黄冈市武穴市WX | T1 | 6175±325 c | 376±7 c | 129±5 b | 80.3±2.0 a | 19.0±1.4 a | |
T2 | 8230±163 b | 421±6 b | 149±2 a | 84.3±1.4 a | 20.1±1.2 a | ||
T3 | 9213±206 a | 455±10 a | 161±7 a | 85.7±3.3 a | 19.5±0.4 a | ||
襄阳市襄州区XZ | T1 | 6697±45 c | 192±4 c | 153±4 b | 80.4±1.9 b | 20.1±0.5 b | |
T2 | 10251±180 b | 257±10 b | 189±6 a | 88.7±2.0 a | 21.2±0.6 a | ||
T3 | 10601±218 b | 288±2 a | 197±6 a | 85.8±0.8 a | 21.7±0.4 a | ||
宜昌市枝江市ZJ | T1 | 6155±236 c | 307±23 c | 151±10 a | 82.9±5.1 a | 20.1±0.3 b | |
T2 | 8608±271 b | 396±14 b | 157±6 a | 87.0±2.3 a | 20.6±0.1 a | ||
T3 | 9167±161 a | 433±14 a | 164±4 a | 82.7±3.9 a | 20.8±0.2 a | ||
黄冈市英山县YS | T1 | 6321±152 c | 368±44 b | 126±8 b | 89.8±2.2 a | 24.6±0.1 a | |
T2 | 8907±227 b | 472±58 a | 146±3 a | 89.7±0.9 a | 24.6±0.7 a | ||
T3 | 9813±316 a | 494±19 a | 152±3 a | 89.1±2.7 a | 24.2±0.1 a | ||
襄阳市老河口市LHK | T1 | 6297±117 c | 373±12 c | 140±6 b | 81.9±3.6 a | 19.4±0.6 a | |
T2 | 8739±245 b | 446±4 b | 152±4 a | 85.2±0.3 a | 20.2±0.6 a | ||
T3 | 9243±257 a | 478±10 a | 157±3 a | 84.2±2.2 a | 20.1±0.2 a | ||
荆门市沙洋县SY | T1 | 6226±166 c | 286±14 c | 146±8 b | 82.4±4.3 a | 19.7±0.2 b | |
T2 | 8790±220 b | 355±7 b | 155±4 ab | 86.1±1.2 a | 20.4±0.4 a | ||
T3 | 9205±188 a | 383±10 a | 160±3 a | 83.5±2.8 a | 20.5±0.2 a | ||
天门市TM | T1 | 6467±507 c | 296±7 c | 151±7 b | 89.2±2.0 a | 22.4±0.7 a | |
T2 | 9482±78 b | 332±4 b | 176±5 a | 90.4±2.8 a | 22.4±1.0 a | ||
T3 | 10447±405 a | 361±14 a | 180±5 a | 90.2±2.6 a | 22.5±0.5 a | ||
2020 | 随州市曾都区ZD | T1 | 7646±51 c | 254±6 c | 180±2 b | 84.6±2.4 a | 18.6±0.6 a |
T2 | 9233±130 b | 278±6 b | 203±5 a | 80.4±2.8 a | 18.6±0.1 a | ||
T3 | 9972±64 a | 296±6 a | 197±4 a | 82.4±1.5 a | 18.5±0.5 a | ||
荆州市荆州区JZ | T1 | 6612±319 c | 283±11 b | 141±9 b | 70.9±2.4 a | 19.2±1.1 a | |
T2 | 8467±103 b | 275±10 a | 161±4 a | 69.4±2.2 a | 18.4±0.6 a | ||
T3 | 9855±199 a | 334±21 a | 150±10 a | 66.8±3.2 a | 18.1±0.6 a | ||
黄冈市武穴市WX | T1 | 5401±283 c | 214±11 c | 215±19 a | 80.2±2.3 a | 19.4±0.6 a | |
T2 | 7877±315 b | 234±7 b | 213±5 a | 74.7±4.0 a | 19.4±0.3 a | ||
T3 | 9961±278 a | 285±8 a | 246±4 a | 80.2±3.1 a | 19.2±0.1 a | ||
襄阳市襄州区XZ | T1 | 6609±180 c | 208±11 c | 150±7 a | 92.4±0.4 a | 21.2±0.1 a | |
T2 | 8194±161 b | 268±4 b | 164±9 a | 90.0±1.0 a | 21.0±0.3 a | ||
T3 | 8867±217 a | 273±13 a | 165±9 a | 86.6±1.3 a | 20.3±0.7 a | ||
宜昌市枝江市ZJ | T1 | 7616±15 c | 260±20 b | 130±7 a | 85.1±0.4 a | 21.1±0.4 a | |
T2 | 10307±450 b | 318±5 a | 144±24 a | 79.2±1.2 a | 20.7±0.3 a | ||
T3 | 11036±295 a | 329±12 a | 146±8 a | 83.6±4.0 a | 21.1±0.2 a | ||
孝感市云梦县YM | T1 | 7774±307c | 189±13 c | 207±24 a | 95.2±1.2 a | 23.1±0.2 a | |
T2 | 10889±162 b | 272±10 b | 220±15 a | 88.0±0.2 a | 22.4±0.5 a | ||
T3 | 13061±206 a | 316±10 a | 220±10 a | 91.3±3.1 a | 23.1±0.7 a |
表2 不同施肥处理对各试验点水稻产量与产量构成因子的影响
Table 2. Effect of different fertilization treatments on rice yield and yield components
年份 Year | 试验点 Experimental site | 处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield (kg/hm2) | 有效穗数 Effective panicles per m2 | 每穗粒数 Spikelets per panicle | 结实率 Seed setting rate(%) | 千粒重 1000-grain weight(g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2021 | 随州市曾都区ZD | T1 | 6436±141 c | 333±7 c | 141±7 b | 80.7±2.1 b | 19.4±0.8 a |
T2 | 9374±108 b | 398±5 b | 167±4 a | 86.0±0.8 a | 20.5±0.8 a | ||
T3 | 9890±75 a | 428±11 a | 173±4 a | 85.8±2.1 a | 20.6±0.3 a | ||
荆州市荆州区JZ | T1 | 6108±53 c | 386±7 c | 130±3 b | 80.9±2.3 a | 18.6±1.6 a | |
T2 | 8204±131 b | 437±5 b | 146±2 a | 83.3±2.4 a | 19.9±1.1 a | ||
T3 | 9239±184 a | 460±7 a | 150±2 a | 85.7±3.6 a | 19.4±0.3 a | ||
黄冈市武穴市WX | T1 | 6175±325 c | 376±7 c | 129±5 b | 80.3±2.0 a | 19.0±1.4 a | |
T2 | 8230±163 b | 421±6 b | 149±2 a | 84.3±1.4 a | 20.1±1.2 a | ||
T3 | 9213±206 a | 455±10 a | 161±7 a | 85.7±3.3 a | 19.5±0.4 a | ||
襄阳市襄州区XZ | T1 | 6697±45 c | 192±4 c | 153±4 b | 80.4±1.9 b | 20.1±0.5 b | |
T2 | 10251±180 b | 257±10 b | 189±6 a | 88.7±2.0 a | 21.2±0.6 a | ||
T3 | 10601±218 b | 288±2 a | 197±6 a | 85.8±0.8 a | 21.7±0.4 a | ||
宜昌市枝江市ZJ | T1 | 6155±236 c | 307±23 c | 151±10 a | 82.9±5.1 a | 20.1±0.3 b | |
T2 | 8608±271 b | 396±14 b | 157±6 a | 87.0±2.3 a | 20.6±0.1 a | ||
T3 | 9167±161 a | 433±14 a | 164±4 a | 82.7±3.9 a | 20.8±0.2 a | ||
黄冈市英山县YS | T1 | 6321±152 c | 368±44 b | 126±8 b | 89.8±2.2 a | 24.6±0.1 a | |
T2 | 8907±227 b | 472±58 a | 146±3 a | 89.7±0.9 a | 24.6±0.7 a | ||
T3 | 9813±316 a | 494±19 a | 152±3 a | 89.1±2.7 a | 24.2±0.1 a | ||
襄阳市老河口市LHK | T1 | 6297±117 c | 373±12 c | 140±6 b | 81.9±3.6 a | 19.4±0.6 a | |
T2 | 8739±245 b | 446±4 b | 152±4 a | 85.2±0.3 a | 20.2±0.6 a | ||
T3 | 9243±257 a | 478±10 a | 157±3 a | 84.2±2.2 a | 20.1±0.2 a | ||
荆门市沙洋县SY | T1 | 6226±166 c | 286±14 c | 146±8 b | 82.4±4.3 a | 19.7±0.2 b | |
T2 | 8790±220 b | 355±7 b | 155±4 ab | 86.1±1.2 a | 20.4±0.4 a | ||
T3 | 9205±188 a | 383±10 a | 160±3 a | 83.5±2.8 a | 20.5±0.2 a | ||
天门市TM | T1 | 6467±507 c | 296±7 c | 151±7 b | 89.2±2.0 a | 22.4±0.7 a | |
T2 | 9482±78 b | 332±4 b | 176±5 a | 90.4±2.8 a | 22.4±1.0 a | ||
T3 | 10447±405 a | 361±14 a | 180±5 a | 90.2±2.6 a | 22.5±0.5 a | ||
2020 | 随州市曾都区ZD | T1 | 7646±51 c | 254±6 c | 180±2 b | 84.6±2.4 a | 18.6±0.6 a |
T2 | 9233±130 b | 278±6 b | 203±5 a | 80.4±2.8 a | 18.6±0.1 a | ||
T3 | 9972±64 a | 296±6 a | 197±4 a | 82.4±1.5 a | 18.5±0.5 a | ||
荆州市荆州区JZ | T1 | 6612±319 c | 283±11 b | 141±9 b | 70.9±2.4 a | 19.2±1.1 a | |
T2 | 8467±103 b | 275±10 a | 161±4 a | 69.4±2.2 a | 18.4±0.6 a | ||
T3 | 9855±199 a | 334±21 a | 150±10 a | 66.8±3.2 a | 18.1±0.6 a | ||
黄冈市武穴市WX | T1 | 5401±283 c | 214±11 c | 215±19 a | 80.2±2.3 a | 19.4±0.6 a | |
T2 | 7877±315 b | 234±7 b | 213±5 a | 74.7±4.0 a | 19.4±0.3 a | ||
T3 | 9961±278 a | 285±8 a | 246±4 a | 80.2±3.1 a | 19.2±0.1 a | ||
襄阳市襄州区XZ | T1 | 6609±180 c | 208±11 c | 150±7 a | 92.4±0.4 a | 21.2±0.1 a | |
T2 | 8194±161 b | 268±4 b | 164±9 a | 90.0±1.0 a | 21.0±0.3 a | ||
T3 | 8867±217 a | 273±13 a | 165±9 a | 86.6±1.3 a | 20.3±0.7 a | ||
宜昌市枝江市ZJ | T1 | 7616±15 c | 260±20 b | 130±7 a | 85.1±0.4 a | 21.1±0.4 a | |
T2 | 10307±450 b | 318±5 a | 144±24 a | 79.2±1.2 a | 20.7±0.3 a | ||
T3 | 11036±295 a | 329±12 a | 146±8 a | 83.6±4.0 a | 21.1±0.2 a | ||
孝感市云梦县YM | T1 | 7774±307c | 189±13 c | 207±24 a | 95.2±1.2 a | 23.1±0.2 a | |
T2 | 10889±162 b | 272±10 b | 220±15 a | 88.0±0.2 a | 22.4±0.5 a | ||
T3 | 13061±206 a | 316±10 a | 220±10 a | 91.3±3.1 a | 23.1±0.7 a |
图2 不同施肥处理下水稻地上部养分积累量 图中数据来自2020年6个地市和2021年9个地市,共15个试验点数据,每个试验点设置3个重复,因此图中总计45个试验数据。中间实线代表中值,方框左侧黑点表示产量数值分布,方框中的黑点表示均值,方框上下顶点、上下实线分别代表上下25%的数值、最大值和最小值。柱上相同小写字母表示处理之间的差异未达0.05显著水平。下同。
Fig. 2. Aboveground nutrient accumulation of rice under different fertilization treatments The data in the figure is based on a survey of 15 experimental sites in 6 municipalities in 2020 and 9 cities in 2021, with 3 replications for each site, thus totaling 45 trials in the figure. The solid line in the center represents the median value, the black dots on the left side of the box represent the distribution of yield values, the black dots in the box represent the mean value, and the top and bottom vertices and the top and bottom solid lines of the box represent the top and bottom 25% of the values, the maximum value and the minimum value, respectively. Common lowercase letters indicate no significant difference among treatments at 0.05 level. The same below.
年份 Year | 试验点 Experimental site | 处理 Treatment | 地上部生物量 Aboveground biomass (kg/hm2) | 产量收获指数 Yield harvest index | 地上部养分积累量 Aboveground nutrient accumulation (kg/hm2) | 养分收获指数 Nutrient harvest index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2021 | 随州市曾都区ZD | T1 | 11972 c | 0.54 a | 298 c | 0.31 a |
T2 | 16761 b | 0.56 a | 446 b | 0.32 a | ||
T3 | 17925 a | 0.55 a | 492 a | 0.31 a | ||
荆州市荆州区JZ | T1 | 11415 c | 0.54 a | 330 c | 0.31 a | |
T2 | 15167 b | 0.54 a | 469 b | 0.30 a | ||
T3 | 16803 a | 0.55 a | 505 a | 0.29 a | ||
黄冈市武穴市WX | T1 | 11715 c | 0.53 a | 357 c | 0.23 a | |
T2 | 15620 b | 0.53 a | 509 b | 0.25a | ||
T3 | 18699 a | 0.49 a | 552 a | 0.22 a | ||
襄阳市襄州区XZ | T1 | 11158 c | 0.60 a | 337 c | 0.35 a | |
T2 | 16339 b | 0.63 a | 476 b | 0.39 a | ||
T3 | 17235 b | 0.62 a | 525 a | 0.38 a | ||
宜昌市枝江市ZJ | T1 | 11098 c | 0.55 a | 289 c | 0.36 a | |
T2 | 15475 b | 0.56 a | 431 b | 0.34 a | ||
T3 | 16724 a | 0.55 a | 475 a | 0.31 a | ||
黄冈市英山县YS | T1 | 11379 c | 0.56 a | 308 c | 0.32 a | |
T2 | 16038 b | 0.56 a | 420 b | 0.31 a | ||
T3 | 17456 a | 0.56 a | 465 a | 0.30 a | ||
襄阳市老河口市LHK | T1 | 11807 c | 0.53 a | 330 c | 0.33 a | |
T2 | 16159 b | 0.54 a | 467 b | 0.31 a | ||
T3 | 17352 a | 0.53 a | 487 a | 0.29 a | ||
荆门市沙洋县SY | T1 | 10626 c | 0.59 a | 378 c | 0.38 a | |
T2 | 14803 a | 0.59 a | 507 b | 0.37 a | ||
T3 | 15799 a | 0.58 a | 527 b | 0.34 a | ||
天门市TM | T1 | 12408 c | 0.52 a | 359 c | 0.28 a | |
T2 | 18453 b | 0.51 a | 510 b | 0.27 a | ||
T3 | 19945 a | 0.52 a | 554 a | 0.27 a | ||
2020 | 随州市曾都区ZD | T1 | 13337 c | 0.58 a | 387 c | 0.33 a |
T2 | 15816 b | 0.58 a | 543 b | 0.36 a | ||
T3 | 16880 a | 0.59 a | 562b | 0.36 a | ||
荆州市荆州区JZ | T1 | 12301 c | 0.54 a | 304 c | 0.30 a | |
T2 | 14635 b | 0.58 a | 423 b | 0.36 a | ||
T3 | 16553 a | 0.60 a | 443 a | 0.37 a | ||
黄冈市武穴市WX | T1 | 10152 c | 0.53 a | 348 c | 0.33 a | |
T2 | 14787 b | 0.53 a | 496 b | 0.34 a | ||
T3 | 17492 a | 0.57 a | 524 a | 0.37 a | ||
襄阳市襄州区XZ | T1 | 11766 c | 0.56 a | 341 c | 0.37 a | |
T2 | 14911 a | 0.55 a | 465 b | 0.37 a | ||
T3 | 15556 a | 0.57 a | 489 a | 0.38 a | ||
宜昌市枝江市ZJ | T1 | 14197 c | 0.54 a | 416 c | 0.35 a | |
T2 | 18228 a | 0.57 a | 561 b | 0.37 a | ||
T3 | 18692 a | 0.59 a | 592 a | 0.39 a | ||
孝感市云梦县YM | T1 | 14197 c | 0.55 a | 471 c | 0.28 a | |
T2 | 20023 b | 0.54 a | 576b | 0.29 a | ||
T3 | 25566 a | 0.51 a | 652 a | 0.25 a |
表3 不同施肥处理对水稻干物质积累及养分吸收的影响
Table 3. Effects of different fertilization treatments on rice dry matter accumulation and nutrient uptake
年份 Year | 试验点 Experimental site | 处理 Treatment | 地上部生物量 Aboveground biomass (kg/hm2) | 产量收获指数 Yield harvest index | 地上部养分积累量 Aboveground nutrient accumulation (kg/hm2) | 养分收获指数 Nutrient harvest index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2021 | 随州市曾都区ZD | T1 | 11972 c | 0.54 a | 298 c | 0.31 a |
T2 | 16761 b | 0.56 a | 446 b | 0.32 a | ||
T3 | 17925 a | 0.55 a | 492 a | 0.31 a | ||
荆州市荆州区JZ | T1 | 11415 c | 0.54 a | 330 c | 0.31 a | |
T2 | 15167 b | 0.54 a | 469 b | 0.30 a | ||
T3 | 16803 a | 0.55 a | 505 a | 0.29 a | ||
黄冈市武穴市WX | T1 | 11715 c | 0.53 a | 357 c | 0.23 a | |
T2 | 15620 b | 0.53 a | 509 b | 0.25a | ||
T3 | 18699 a | 0.49 a | 552 a | 0.22 a | ||
襄阳市襄州区XZ | T1 | 11158 c | 0.60 a | 337 c | 0.35 a | |
T2 | 16339 b | 0.63 a | 476 b | 0.39 a | ||
T3 | 17235 b | 0.62 a | 525 a | 0.38 a | ||
宜昌市枝江市ZJ | T1 | 11098 c | 0.55 a | 289 c | 0.36 a | |
T2 | 15475 b | 0.56 a | 431 b | 0.34 a | ||
T3 | 16724 a | 0.55 a | 475 a | 0.31 a | ||
黄冈市英山县YS | T1 | 11379 c | 0.56 a | 308 c | 0.32 a | |
T2 | 16038 b | 0.56 a | 420 b | 0.31 a | ||
T3 | 17456 a | 0.56 a | 465 a | 0.30 a | ||
襄阳市老河口市LHK | T1 | 11807 c | 0.53 a | 330 c | 0.33 a | |
T2 | 16159 b | 0.54 a | 467 b | 0.31 a | ||
T3 | 17352 a | 0.53 a | 487 a | 0.29 a | ||
荆门市沙洋县SY | T1 | 10626 c | 0.59 a | 378 c | 0.38 a | |
T2 | 14803 a | 0.59 a | 507 b | 0.37 a | ||
T3 | 15799 a | 0.58 a | 527 b | 0.34 a | ||
天门市TM | T1 | 12408 c | 0.52 a | 359 c | 0.28 a | |
T2 | 18453 b | 0.51 a | 510 b | 0.27 a | ||
T3 | 19945 a | 0.52 a | 554 a | 0.27 a | ||
2020 | 随州市曾都区ZD | T1 | 13337 c | 0.58 a | 387 c | 0.33 a |
T2 | 15816 b | 0.58 a | 543 b | 0.36 a | ||
T3 | 16880 a | 0.59 a | 562b | 0.36 a | ||
荆州市荆州区JZ | T1 | 12301 c | 0.54 a | 304 c | 0.30 a | |
T2 | 14635 b | 0.58 a | 423 b | 0.36 a | ||
T3 | 16553 a | 0.60 a | 443 a | 0.37 a | ||
黄冈市武穴市WX | T1 | 10152 c | 0.53 a | 348 c | 0.33 a | |
T2 | 14787 b | 0.53 a | 496 b | 0.34 a | ||
T3 | 17492 a | 0.57 a | 524 a | 0.37 a | ||
襄阳市襄州区XZ | T1 | 11766 c | 0.56 a | 341 c | 0.37 a | |
T2 | 14911 a | 0.55 a | 465 b | 0.37 a | ||
T3 | 15556 a | 0.57 a | 489 a | 0.38 a | ||
宜昌市枝江市ZJ | T1 | 14197 c | 0.54 a | 416 c | 0.35 a | |
T2 | 18228 a | 0.57 a | 561 b | 0.37 a | ||
T3 | 18692 a | 0.59 a | 592 a | 0.39 a | ||
孝感市云梦县YM | T1 | 14197 c | 0.55 a | 471 c | 0.28 a | |
T2 | 20023 b | 0.54 a | 576b | 0.29 a | ||
T3 | 25566 a | 0.51 a | 652 a | 0.25 a |
图3 不同施肥处理下的肥料利用率
Fig. 3. Fertilizer utilization rate under different fertilization treatments FRR: Recycling rate; AEF: Agronomic efficiency; PFPF: Partial factor productivity; PUF: Physiological utilization rate. * Indicates a significant difference between the two treatments at the 0.05 level.
年份 Year | 试验点 Test site | 处理 Treatment | 稻谷收益 Income from rice (yuan/hm2) | 投入成本 Cost of input (yuan/hm2) | 纯收益 Net earnings (yuan/hm2) | 产投比 Output-investment ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2021 | 随州市曾都区ZD | T1 | 19308 c | 9450 | 9858 c | 2.04 b |
T2 | 28122 b | 12000 | 16122 a | 2.34 a | ||
T3 | 29670 a | 12300 | 17370 a | 2.41 a | ||
荆州市荆州区JZ | T1 | 18324 c | 9450 | 8874 c | 1.94 b | |
T2 | 24612 b | 12000 | 12612 b | 2.05 a | ||
T3 | 27717 a | 12300 | 15417 a | 2.25a | ||
黄冈市武穴市WX | T1 | 18525 c | 9450 | 9075 c | 1.96 a | |
T2 | 24690 b | 12000 | 12690 b | 2.05 a | ||
T3 | 27639 a | 12300 | 15339 a | 2.24 a | ||
襄阳市襄州区XZ | T1 | 20091 c | 9450 | 10641 c | 2.13 b | |
T2 | 30753 b | 12000 | 18753 b | 2.56 a | ||
T3 | 31803 b | 12300 | 19503 b | 2.59 a | ||
宜昌市枝江市ZJ | T1 | 18465 c | 9450 | 9015 c | 1.95 a | |
T2 | 25824 b | 12000 | 13824 b | 2.15 a | ||
T3 | 27501 a | 12300 | 15201 a | 2.24 a | ||
黄冈市英山县YS | T1 | 18963 c | 9450 | 9513 c | 2.01 b | |
T2 | 26721 b | 12000 | 14721 b | 2.23 a | ||
T3 | 29439 a | 12300 | 17139 a | 2.39 a | ||
襄阳市老河口市LHK | T1 | 18891 c | 9450 | 9441 c | 1.99 b | |
T2 | 26217 b | 12000 | 14217 b | 2.18 a | ||
T3 | 27729 a | 12300 | 15429 a | 2.25 a | ||
荆门市沙洋县SY | T1 | 18678 c | 9450 | 9228 c | 1.98 b | |
T2 | 26370 b | 12000 | 14370 b | 2.20 a | ||
T3 | 27615 a | 12300 | 15315 a | 2.25 a | ||
天门市TM | T1 | 19401 c | 9450 | 9951 c | 2.05 b | |
T2 | 28446 b | 12000 | 16446 b | 2.37 a | ||
T3 | 31341 a | 12300 | 19041 a | 2.55 a | ||
2020 | 随州市曾都区ZD | T1 | 22938 c | 9450 | 13488 c | 2.42 a |
T2 | 27699 b | 12000 | 15699 b | 2.31 a | ||
T3 | 29916 a | 12300 | 17616 a | 2.43 a | ||
荆州市荆州区JZ | T1 | 19836 c | 9450 | 10386 c | 2.10 a | |
T2 | 25401 b | 12000 | 13401 b | 2.12 a | ||
T3 | 29565 a | 12300 | 17265 a | 2.40 a | ||
黄冈市武穴市WX | T1 | 16203 c | 9450 | 6753 c | 1.71 c | |
T2 | 23631 b | 12000 | 11631 b | 1.97 b | ||
T3 | 29883 a | 12300 | 17583 a | 2.43 a | ||
襄阳市襄州区XZ | T1 | 19827 c | 9450 | 10377 c | 2.10 a | |
T2 | 24582 b | 12000 | 12582 b | 2.05 a | ||
T3 | 26601 a | 12300 | 14301 a | 2.16 a | ||
宜昌市枝江市ZJ | T1 | 22848 c | 9450 | 13398 c | 2.42 a | |
T2 | 30921 b | 12000 | 18921 b | 2.58 a | ||
T3 | 33108 a | 12300 | 20808 a | 2.69 a | ||
孝感市云梦县YM | T1 | 23322 c | 9450 | 13872 c | 2.47 c | |
T2 | 32667 b | 12000 | 20667 b | 2.72 b | ||
T3 | 39183 a | 12300 | 26883 a | 3.10 a |
表4 不同施肥处理下各试验点的经济效益
Table 4. Economic benefits of each test site under different fertilization treatments
年份 Year | 试验点 Test site | 处理 Treatment | 稻谷收益 Income from rice (yuan/hm2) | 投入成本 Cost of input (yuan/hm2) | 纯收益 Net earnings (yuan/hm2) | 产投比 Output-investment ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2021 | 随州市曾都区ZD | T1 | 19308 c | 9450 | 9858 c | 2.04 b |
T2 | 28122 b | 12000 | 16122 a | 2.34 a | ||
T3 | 29670 a | 12300 | 17370 a | 2.41 a | ||
荆州市荆州区JZ | T1 | 18324 c | 9450 | 8874 c | 1.94 b | |
T2 | 24612 b | 12000 | 12612 b | 2.05 a | ||
T3 | 27717 a | 12300 | 15417 a | 2.25a | ||
黄冈市武穴市WX | T1 | 18525 c | 9450 | 9075 c | 1.96 a | |
T2 | 24690 b | 12000 | 12690 b | 2.05 a | ||
T3 | 27639 a | 12300 | 15339 a | 2.24 a | ||
襄阳市襄州区XZ | T1 | 20091 c | 9450 | 10641 c | 2.13 b | |
T2 | 30753 b | 12000 | 18753 b | 2.56 a | ||
T3 | 31803 b | 12300 | 19503 b | 2.59 a | ||
宜昌市枝江市ZJ | T1 | 18465 c | 9450 | 9015 c | 1.95 a | |
T2 | 25824 b | 12000 | 13824 b | 2.15 a | ||
T3 | 27501 a | 12300 | 15201 a | 2.24 a | ||
黄冈市英山县YS | T1 | 18963 c | 9450 | 9513 c | 2.01 b | |
T2 | 26721 b | 12000 | 14721 b | 2.23 a | ||
T3 | 29439 a | 12300 | 17139 a | 2.39 a | ||
襄阳市老河口市LHK | T1 | 18891 c | 9450 | 9441 c | 1.99 b | |
T2 | 26217 b | 12000 | 14217 b | 2.18 a | ||
T3 | 27729 a | 12300 | 15429 a | 2.25 a | ||
荆门市沙洋县SY | T1 | 18678 c | 9450 | 9228 c | 1.98 b | |
T2 | 26370 b | 12000 | 14370 b | 2.20 a | ||
T3 | 27615 a | 12300 | 15315 a | 2.25 a | ||
天门市TM | T1 | 19401 c | 9450 | 9951 c | 2.05 b | |
T2 | 28446 b | 12000 | 16446 b | 2.37 a | ||
T3 | 31341 a | 12300 | 19041 a | 2.55 a | ||
2020 | 随州市曾都区ZD | T1 | 22938 c | 9450 | 13488 c | 2.42 a |
T2 | 27699 b | 12000 | 15699 b | 2.31 a | ||
T3 | 29916 a | 12300 | 17616 a | 2.43 a | ||
荆州市荆州区JZ | T1 | 19836 c | 9450 | 10386 c | 2.10 a | |
T2 | 25401 b | 12000 | 13401 b | 2.12 a | ||
T3 | 29565 a | 12300 | 17265 a | 2.40 a | ||
黄冈市武穴市WX | T1 | 16203 c | 9450 | 6753 c | 1.71 c | |
T2 | 23631 b | 12000 | 11631 b | 1.97 b | ||
T3 | 29883 a | 12300 | 17583 a | 2.43 a | ||
襄阳市襄州区XZ | T1 | 19827 c | 9450 | 10377 c | 2.10 a | |
T2 | 24582 b | 12000 | 12582 b | 2.05 a | ||
T3 | 26601 a | 12300 | 14301 a | 2.16 a | ||
宜昌市枝江市ZJ | T1 | 22848 c | 9450 | 13398 c | 2.42 a | |
T2 | 30921 b | 12000 | 18921 b | 2.58 a | ||
T3 | 33108 a | 12300 | 20808 a | 2.69 a | ||
孝感市云梦县YM | T1 | 23322 c | 9450 | 13872 c | 2.47 c | |
T2 | 32667 b | 12000 | 20667 b | 2.72 b | ||
T3 | 39183 a | 12300 | 26883 a | 3.10 a |
图4 水稻产量与土壤基础肥力相关性分析 pH: 酸碱度;SOC: 有机质含量;TN: 全氮含量;AP: 速效磷含量;AK: 速效钾含量;IFI: 土壤综合肥力指数;RY: 水稻产量;IRY: 水稻增产量(水稻增产量=侧深施肥产量−常规施肥产量)。
Fig. 4. Correlation analysis between rice yield and soil basic fertility pH, Potential of hydrogen; SOC, Organic matter content; TN, Total nitrogen content; AP, Available phosphorus content; AK, Available potassium content; IFI, Integrated fertility index; RY, Rice yield; IRY, Incremental rice yield (incremental rice yield=yield of side-depth fertilizer application−conventional fertilizer application yield).
[1] | 中华人民共和国国家统计局. 中国统计年鉴[M]. 北京: 中国统计出版社, 2021. |
National Bureau of Statistics of China. China Statistical Yearbook[M]. Beijing: China Statistics Press, 2021. (in Chinese) | |
[2] | 曾祥明, 韩宝吉, 徐芳森, 黄见良, 蔡红梅, 石磊. 不同基础地力土壤优化施肥对水稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(14): 2886-2894. |
Zeng X M, Han B J, Xu F S, Huang J L, Cai H M, Shi L. Effects of soil optimal fertilization with different soil fertility on rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(14): 2886-2894. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 闫湘, 金继运, 梁鸣早. 我国主要粮食作物化肥增产效应与肥料利用效率[J]. 土壤, 2017, 49(6): 1067-1077. |
Yan X, Jin J Y, Liang M Z. Effect of fertilizer on increasing yield and fertilizer use efficiency of main grain crops in China[J]. Soil Science, 2017, 49(6): 1067-1077. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 刘兆辉, 吴小宾, 谭德水, 李彦, 江丽华. 一次性施肥在我国主要粮食作物中的应用与环境效应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018, 51(20): 3827-3839. |
Liu Z H, Wu X B, Tan D S, Li Y, Jiang L H. Application and environmental effects of single-use fertilization on main grain crops in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 51(20): 3827-3839. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 田昌, 周旋, 杨俊彦, 石敦杰, 荣湘民, 谢桂先, 彭建伟. 化肥氮磷优化减施对水稻产量和田面水氮磷流失的影响[J]. 土壤, 2020, 52(2): 311-319. |
Tian C, Zhou X, Yang J Y, Shi D J, Rong X M, Xie G X, Peng J W. Effects of optimal nitrogen and phosphorus application reduction of fertilizer on rice yield and nitrogen and phosphorus loss in surface water[J]. Soil Science, 2020, 52(2): 311-319. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 曹小闯, 吴龙龙, 朱春权, 朱练峰, 孔亚丽, 陆若辉, 孔海民, 张均华, 金千瑜. 不同灌溉和施肥模式对水稻产量、氮利用和稻田氮转化特征的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(7): 1482-1498. |
Cao X C, Wu L L, Zhu C Q, Zhu L F, Kong Y L, Lu R H, Kong H M, Zhang J H, Jin Q Y. Effects of different irrigation and fertilization modes on rice yield, nitrogen utilization and nitrogen transformation characteristics in paddy field[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 54(7): 1482-1498. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 左兴健, 武广伟, 付卫强, 李立伟, 魏学礼, 赵春江. 风送式水稻侧深精准施肥装置的设计与试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(3): 14-21. |
Zuo X J, Wu G W, Fu W Q, Li L W, Wei X L, Zhao C J. Design and experiment of wind-driven side deep precision fertilization device for rice[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(3): 14-21. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 中华人民共和国农业农村部. 农业农村部关于印发《到2025年化肥减量化行动方案》和《到2025年化学农药减量化行动方案》的通知[EB/OL].(2022-11-16)[2024-04-13]. http://www.moa.gov.cn/nybgb/2022/202212/202301/t20230104_6418252.htm. |
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs. Notice of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs on the Action Plan for the Reduction of Chemical Fertilizers by 2025 and the Action Plan for the Reduction of Chemical Pesticides by 2025[EB/OL].(2022-11-16)[2024-04-13]. http://www.moa.gov.cn/nybgb/2022/202212/202301/t20230104_6418252.htm. (in Chinese) | |
[9] | 王姣琳. 长江流域中稻养分优化管理研究[D]. 武汉: 湖北大学, 2022. |
Wang J L. Study on optimal nutrient management of rice in Yangtze River Basin[D]. Wuhan: Hubei University, 2022. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 宋文杰, 罗嘉润, 刘伟, 张大弘, 李燕丽, 卢碧林. 控释肥一次性侧深施对水稻生长、氮素利用和产量的影响[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2023, 42(2): 99-107. |
Song W J, Luo J R, Liu W, Zhang D H, Li Y L, Lu B L. Effects of single side deep application of controlled release fertilizer on growth, nitrogen use and yield of rice[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2023, 42(2): 99-107. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 朱从桦, 张玉屏, 向镜, 张义凯, 武辉, 王亚梁, 朱德峰, 陈惠哲. 侧深施氮对机插水稻产量形成及氮素利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(23): 4228-4239. |
Zhu C H, Zhang Y P, Xiang J, Zhang Y K, Wu H, Wang Y L, Zhu D F, Chen H Z. Effects of lateral deep nitrogen application on yield formation and nitrogen utilization of machine-inserted rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(23): 4228-4239. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 姜恒鑫, 黄恒, 汪源, 赵灿, 王维领, 霍中洋. 减量侧深施肥对里下河地区单季粳稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2022, 28(4): 84-89. |
Jiang H X, Huang H, Wang Y, Zhao C, Wang W L, Huo Z Y. Effects of reduced lateral depth fertilization on single-season japonica rice yield and quality in Lixihe River area[J]. China Rice, 2022, 28(4): 84-89. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | Janssen B. Small farms, big plans: Mechanization and specialization as measures of “the middle”[J]. Culture, Agriculture, Food and Environment, 2018, 40(2): 96-104. |
[14] | Huang M, Zou Y. Integrating mechanization with agronomy and breeding to ensure food security in China[J]. Field Crops Research, 2018, 224: 22-27. |
[15] | 洪瑜, 李旭, 张慈娟, 王英, 王芳, 刘汝亮. 基于养分专家系统的侧深施肥技术对宁夏引黄灌区水稻产量与养分利用的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(3): 252-258. |
Hong Y, Li X, Zhang C J, Wang Y, Wang F, Liu R L. Effects of lateral deep fertilization technique based on nutrient expert system on rice yield and nutrient utilization in Ningxia Irrigation area[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 34(3): 252-258. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | Min J, Sun H, Wang Y. Mechanical side-deep fertilization mitigates ammonia volatilization and nitrogen runoff and increases profitability in rice production independent of fertilizer type and split ratio[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 316: 128370. |
[17] | Ke J, He R, Hou P, Ding C, Ding Y, Wang S. Combined controlled-released nitrogen fertilizers and deep placement effects of N leaching, rice yield and N recovery in machine-transplanted rice[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2018, 265: 402-412. |
[18] | Zhong X, Zhou X, Fei J. Reducing ammonia volatilization and increasing nitrogen use efficiency in machine-transplanted rice with side-deep fertilization in a double-cropping rice system in Southern China[J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2021, 306: 107183. |
[19] | 李凯旭, 鲁剑巍, 鲁明星, 徐维明, 王振, 彭文勇, 李小坤. 不同专用配方肥对水稻产量、养分吸收及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2017, 19(1): 100-107. |
Li K X, Lu J W, Lu M X, Xu W M, Wang Z, Peng W Y, Li X K. Effects of different special fertilizer formulations on yield, nutrient absorption and economic benefit of rice[J]. China Agricultural Science & Technology Guide, 2017, 19(1): 100-107. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 孙义祥, 袁嫚嫚, 邬刚. 不同土壤肥力水平下钙对水稻专用肥增产效应的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(9): 77-81. |
Sun Y X, Yuan M M, Wu G. Effects of calcium on yield increase of special fertilizer for rice under different soil fertility levels[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(9): 77-81. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | Shu S, Tang X, Luo X. Deep mechanized application of super rice special fertilizer increasing soil fertility and yield of super rice[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013, 29(23): 9-14. |
[22] | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析. 第3版[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 2000. |
Bao S D. Soil Agrochemical Analysis. 3rd ed.[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural University Press, 2000. (in Chinese) | |
[23] | 王伟妮, 鲁剑巍, 何予卿, 李小坤, 李慧. 氮、磷、钾肥对水稻产量品质及养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(6): 645-653. |
Wang W N, Lu J W, He Y Q, Li X K, Li H. Effects of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium fertilizer on yield, quality and nutrient uptake and utilization of rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2011, 25(6): 645-653. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 吴玉红, 王吕, 崔月贞, 郝兴顺, 王保军, 田霄鸿, 李小刚, 秦宇航. 轮作模式及秸秆还田对水稻产量、稻米品质及土壤肥力的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(11): 1926-1937. |
Wu Y H, Wang L, Cui Y Z, Hao X S, Wang B J, Tian Xiaohong, Li Xiaogang, Qin Y H. Effects of crop rotation pattern and straw returning on rice yield, rice quality and soil fertility[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2021, 27(11): 1926-1937. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | Jiang S C, Wang J M, Luo H W. Effect of meteorology and soil fertility on direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa L.) performance in central China[J]. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 2019, 17: 12397-12406. |
[26] | 吴桂成, 张洪程, 钱银飞, 李德剑, 周有炎, 徐军, 吴文革, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 高辉, 徐宗进, 钱宗华, 孙菊英, 赵品恒. 粳型超级稻产量构成因素协同规律及超高产特征的研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(2): 266-276. |
Wu G C, Zhang H C, Qian Y F, Li D J, Zhou Y Y, Xu J, Wu W G, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Gao H, Xu Z J, Qian Z H, Sun J Y, Zhao P H. Study on synergistic rule of yield components and characteristics of super high yield of japonica super rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(2): 266-276. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 王秋菊. 黑龙江地区土壤肥力和积温对水稻产量、品质影响研究[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2012. |
Wang Q J. Effects of soil fertility and accumulated temperature on rice yield and quality in Heilongjiang Province[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2012. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 黄恒, 姜恒鑫, 刘光明. 侧深施氮对水稻产量及氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2021, 47(11): 2232-2249. |
Huang H, Jiang H X, Liu G M. Effects of lateral deep nitrogen application on yield and nitrogen uptake and utilization of rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2021, 47(11): 2232-2249. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 周平遥. 氮肥减量深施对水稻产量和氨挥发的影响[D]. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2023. |
Zhou P Y. Effects of reduced deep application of nitrogen fertilizer on rice yield and ammonia volatilization[D]. Changsha: Hunan Agricultural University, 2023. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 胡洋, 肖大康, 李炫, 李锦涛, 胡仁, 任科宇, 侯俊, 曹玉贤. 侧深施氮对我国水稻产量和氮利用效率影响的整合分析[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2024(6): 79-88. |
Hu Y, Xiao D K, Li X, Li J T, Hu R, Ren K Y, Hou J, Cao Y X. Integrated analysis of the effects of side-depth nitrogen application on rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency in China[J]. Soil and Fertilizer China, 2024(6): 79-88. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | Han X, Wu K, Fu X. Improving coordination of plant growth and nitrogen metabolism for sustainable agriculture[J]. ABIOTECH, 2020, 1: 255-275 |
[32] | 李秀秀, 涂田华, 柳开楼, 陈先茂, 谢江, 邓国强, 梁喜欢, 黄晶, 关贤交, 邱才飞, 钱银飞, 彭春瑞, 陈金. 红壤丘陵区稻田土壤剖面肥力特征及其与产量的关系[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2023, 29(8): 1390-1399. |
Li X X, Tu T H, Liu K L, Chen X M, Xie J, Deng G Q, Liang X H, Huang J, Guan X J, Qiu C F, Qian Y F, Peng C R, Chen J. Characteristics of soil profile fertility and its relationship with yield in paddy fields in hilly areas with red soil[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2023, 29(8): 1390-1399. | |
[33] | 阚文杰, 吴启堂. 一个定量综合评价土壤肥力的方法初探[J]. 土壤通报, 1994(6): 245-247. |
Kan W J, Wu Q T. A preliminary study on a method for quantitative and comprehensive evaluation of soil fertility[J]. Soil Bulletin, 1994(6): 245-247. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[34] | 全国土壤普查办公室. 中国土壤[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1998: 534-549. |
National Soil Census Office. Soil of China[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 1998: 534-549. (in Chinese) | |
[35] | 侯云鹏, 韩立国, 孔丽丽, 尹彩侠, 秦裕波, 李前, 谢佳贵. 不同施氮水平下水稻的养分吸收、转运及土壤氮素平衡[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(4): 836-845. |
Hou Y P, Han L G, Kong L L, Yin C X, Qin Y B, Li Q, Xie J G. Nutrient uptake, translocation and soil nitrogen balance of rice under different nitrogen application levels[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2015, 21(4): 836-845. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[36] | 王劲松, 董二伟, 武爱莲, 白文斌, 王媛, 焦晓燕. 不同肥力条件下施肥对粒用高粱产量、品质及养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(22): 4166-4176. |
Wang J S, Dong E W, Wu A L, Bai W B, Wang Y, Jiao X Y. Effects of fertilization on yield, quality and Nutrient uptake and utilization of grain sorghum under different fertility conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 52(22): 4166-4176. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[37] | Eldridge S M, Pandey A, Weatherley A. Recovery of nitrogen fertilizer can be doubled by urea-briquette deep placement in rice paddies[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2022, 140: 126605. |
[38] | 吕伟生, 肖小军, 肖国滨, 黄天宝, 肖富良, 李亚贞, 韩德鹏, 郑伟. 缓释肥侧位深施及用量对油菜产量和肥料利用率的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(19): 19-29. |
Lü W S, Xiao X J, Xiao G B, Huang T B, Xiao F L, Li Y Z, Han D P, Zheng W. Effects of lateral deep application and dosage of slow-release fertilizer on yield and fertilizer utilization of rapeseed[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2020, 36(19): 19-29. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[39] | Li L, Tian H, Zhang M. Deep placement of nitrogen fertilizer increases rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency with fewer greenhouse gas emissions in a mechanical direct-seeded cropping system[J]. The Crop Journal, 2021, 9(6): 1386-1396 |
[40] | 马昕. 机械施肥对寒地水稻产量和氮效率的影响[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2016. |
Ma X. Effects of mechanical fertilization on rice yield and nitrogen efficiency in cold region[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[41] | 汪峰, 谌江华, 陈若霞, 史骏, 任少鹏, 金树权, 姚红燕. 不同减氮模式下籼粳杂交稻甬优1540的产量和肥料利用率[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(3): 93-97. |
Wang F, Chen J H, Chen R X, Shi J, Ren S P, Jin S Q, Yao H Y. Yield and fertilizer utilization of indica and japonica hybrid rice Yongyou 1540 under different nitrogen reduction modes[J]. China Rice, 2021, 27(3): 93-97. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[42] | Zhu C, Ou Y Y, You D. Effects of mechanized deep placement of nitrogen fertilizer rate and type on rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency in Chuanxi Plain, China[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2021, 20(2): 581-592. |
[43] | 左兴健, 武广伟, 付卫强, 李立伟, 魏学礼, 赵春江. 风送式水稻侧深精准施肥装置的设计与试验[J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(3): 14-21. |
Zuo X J, Wu G W, Fu W Q, Li L W, Wei X L, Zhao C J. Design and test of wind-fed rice side-depth precision fertilizer application device[J]. Journal of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(3): 14-21. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[44] | 周韦. 基于散粒体动力学的水田侧深施肥装置的分析方法和试验[D]. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2016. |
Zhou W. Analytical method and test of lateral depth fertilization device for paddy field based on bulk dynamics[D]. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2016. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[45] | 丁艳锋, 李刚华, 李伟玮, 高深, 汪瑜辉, 刘正辉, 陈琳, 丁承强, 唐设, 江瑜. 水稻机插缓混一次施肥技术的研发与示范[J]. 中国稻米, 2020, 26(5): 11-15. |
Ding Y F, Li G H, Li W W, Gao S, Wang Y H, Liu Z H, Chen L, Ding C Q, Tang S, Jiang Y. Development and demonstration of slow-mixing primary fertilization technology for rice insertion[J]. China Rice, 2020, 26(5): 11-15. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 冯向前, 王爱冬, 洪卫源, 李子秋, 覃金华, 詹丽钏, 陈里鹏, 张运波, 王丹英, 陈松. 基于低空无人机遥感的水稻产量估测方法研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(6): 604-616. |
[2] | 刘俊峰, 牟静怡, 赵红艳, 郭诗梦, 李漪濛, 梁超, 周婵婵, 王术, 黄元财. 施氮方式与行距配置对不同穗型粳稻品种产量和氮素利用率的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(6): 672-684. |
[3] | 蒋鹏, 张林, 周兴兵, 郭晓艺, 朱永川, 刘茂, 郭长春, 熊洪, 徐富贤. 冬水田轻简化栽培杂交稻蓄留再生稻产量形成特点[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(5): 544-554. |
[4] | 熊家欢, 张义凯, 向镜, 陈惠哲, 徐一成, 王亚梁, 王志刚, 姚坚, 张玉屏. 覆膜稻田施用炭基肥对水稻产量及氮素利用的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(5): 567-576. |
[5] | 郭展, 张运波. 水稻对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应及分子调控研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[6] | 韦还和, 马唯一, 左博源, 汪璐璐, 朱旺, 耿孝宇, 张翔, 孟天瑶, 陈英龙, 高平磊, 许轲, 霍中洋, 戴其根. 盐、干旱及其复合胁迫对水稻产量和品质形成影响的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[7] | 吕宙, 易秉怀, 陈平平, 周文新, 唐文帮, 易镇邪. 施氮量与移栽密度对小粒型杂交水稻产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 422-436. |
[8] | 赵艺婷, 谢可冉, 高逖, 崔克辉. 水稻分蘖期干旱锻炼对幼穗分化期高温下穗发育和产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 277-289. |
[9] | 周甜, 吴少华, 康建宏, 吴宏亮, 杨生龙, 王星强, 李昱, 黄玉峰. 不同种植模式对水稻籽粒淀粉含量及淀粉关键酶活性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 303-315. |
[10] | 彭显龙, 董强, 张辰, 李鹏飞, 李博琳, 刘智蕾, 于彩莲. 不同土壤条件下秸秆还田量对土壤还原性物质及水稻生长的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(2): 198-210. |
[11] | 朱旺, 张翔, 耿孝宇, 张哲, 陈英龙, 韦还和, 戴其根, 许轲, 朱广龙, 周桂生, 孟天瑶. 盐-旱复合胁迫下水稻根系的形态和生理特征及其与产量形成的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(6): 617-627. |
[12] | 邹宇傲, 吴启侠, 周乾顺, 朱建强, 晏军. 孕穗期杂交中稻对淹涝胁迫的响应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(6): 642-656. |
[13] | 袁沛, 周旋, 杨威, 尹凌洁, 靳拓, 彭建伟, 荣湘民, 田昌. 化肥减氮配施对洞庭湖区双季稻产量和田面水氮磷流失风险的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(5): 518-528. |
[14] | 肖大康, 胡仁, 韩天富, 张卫峰, 侯俊, 任科宇. 氮肥用量和运筹对我国水稻产量及其构成因子影响的整合分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(5): 529-542. |
[15] | 黄亚茹, 徐鹏, 王乐乐, 贺一哲, 王辉, 柯健, 何海兵, 武立权, 尤翠翠. 外源海藻糖对粳稻品系W1844籽粒灌浆特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||