Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2022, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 195-206.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2022.210608
• Research Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
CHEN Zhiqing, LIU Mengzhu, WANG Rui, CUI Peiyuan, LU Hao, WEI Haiyan, ZHANG Hongcheng, ZHANG Haipeng*()
Received:
2021-06-23
Revised:
2021-09-14
Online:
2022-03-10
Published:
2022-03-11
Contact:
ZHANG Haipeng
陈志青, 刘梦竹, 王锐, 崔培媛, 卢豪, 魏海燕, 张洪程, 张海鹏*()
通讯作者:
张海鹏
基金资助:
CHEN Zhiqing, LIU Mengzhu, WANG Rui, CUI Peiyuan, LU Hao, WEI Haiyan, ZHANG Hongcheng, ZHANG Haipeng. Effects of Nano-magnesium on Rice Yield Formation and Nitrogen Utilization[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(2): 195-206.
陈志青, 刘梦竹, 王锐, 崔培媛, 卢豪, 魏海燕, 张洪程, 张海鹏. 纳米镁对水稻产量形成和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(2): 195-206.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2022.210608
年份 Year | 镁肥类型 Mg fertilizer type | 氮肥用量 N application rate/(kg·hm-2) | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Grains per panicle | 结实率 Seed setting rate /% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight /g | 实际产量 Yield /(g·pot-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 不施镁 | 0 | 263.9 d | 107.8 d | 91.83 a | 26.92 a | 238.76 d |
Zero-Mg | 180 | 352.4 b | 114.8 c | 90.64 a | 26.72 a | 313.32 c | |
270 | 382.3 ab | 131.0 ab | 91.26 a | 26.78 a | 404.44 a | ||
离子镁 | 0 | 285.9 c | 110.7 c | 92.01 a | 26.90 a | 243.13 d | |
Ionic-Mg | 180 | 365.6 b | 125.7 b | 92.86 a | 27.16 a | 359.55 b | |
270 | 386.0 a | 133.1 a | 91.41 a | 26.76 a | 410.10 a | ||
纳米镁 | 0 | 294.4 c | 112.8 c | 92.38 a | 26.72 a | 246.04 d | |
Nano-Mg | 180 | 369.6 ab | 125.6 b | 92.56 a | 27.61 a | 364.36 b | |
270 | 386.8 a | 132.6 a | 91.52 a | 26.81 a | 413.29 a | ||
2020 | 不施镁 | 0 | 269.7 d | 108.6 d | 91.98 a | 27.12 a | 249.29 d |
Zero-Mg | 180 | 362.0 b | 115.4 c | 90.97 a | 26.97 a | 316.89 c | |
270 | 387.8 a | 132. ab | 91.55 a | 26.71 a | 419.27 a | ||
离子镁 | 0 | 292.7 c | 111.9 cd | 92.40 a | 27.22 a | 254.10 d | |
Ionic-Mg | 180 | 375.6 ab | 126.5 b | 92.54 a | 27.01 a | 367.68 b | |
270 | 395.6 a | 133.9 a | 93.19 a | 27.59 a | 426.87 a | ||
纳米镁 | 0 | 298.8 c | 113.8 cd | 91.82 a | 27.38 a | 256.46 d | |
Nano-Mg | 180 | 376.1 ab | 127.6 b | 93.05 a | 27.53 a | 373.70 b | |
270 | 395.6 a | 133.6 ab | 92.48 a | 27.74 a | 432.47 a | ||
年份 Y | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
镁肥处理 Mg | ** | ** | ns | ns | ** | ||
氮肥用量 N | ** | ** | ns | ns | ** | ||
镁肥×氮肥 Mg×N | ns | * | ns | ns | ** |
Table 1 Effects of nano- and ionic-magnesium fertilizers on rice yield and yield components.
年份 Year | 镁肥类型 Mg fertilizer type | 氮肥用量 N application rate/(kg·hm-2) | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Grains per panicle | 结实率 Seed setting rate /% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight /g | 实际产量 Yield /(g·pot-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 不施镁 | 0 | 263.9 d | 107.8 d | 91.83 a | 26.92 a | 238.76 d |
Zero-Mg | 180 | 352.4 b | 114.8 c | 90.64 a | 26.72 a | 313.32 c | |
270 | 382.3 ab | 131.0 ab | 91.26 a | 26.78 a | 404.44 a | ||
离子镁 | 0 | 285.9 c | 110.7 c | 92.01 a | 26.90 a | 243.13 d | |
Ionic-Mg | 180 | 365.6 b | 125.7 b | 92.86 a | 27.16 a | 359.55 b | |
270 | 386.0 a | 133.1 a | 91.41 a | 26.76 a | 410.10 a | ||
纳米镁 | 0 | 294.4 c | 112.8 c | 92.38 a | 26.72 a | 246.04 d | |
Nano-Mg | 180 | 369.6 ab | 125.6 b | 92.56 a | 27.61 a | 364.36 b | |
270 | 386.8 a | 132.6 a | 91.52 a | 26.81 a | 413.29 a | ||
2020 | 不施镁 | 0 | 269.7 d | 108.6 d | 91.98 a | 27.12 a | 249.29 d |
Zero-Mg | 180 | 362.0 b | 115.4 c | 90.97 a | 26.97 a | 316.89 c | |
270 | 387.8 a | 132. ab | 91.55 a | 26.71 a | 419.27 a | ||
离子镁 | 0 | 292.7 c | 111.9 cd | 92.40 a | 27.22 a | 254.10 d | |
Ionic-Mg | 180 | 375.6 ab | 126.5 b | 92.54 a | 27.01 a | 367.68 b | |
270 | 395.6 a | 133.9 a | 93.19 a | 27.59 a | 426.87 a | ||
纳米镁 | 0 | 298.8 c | 113.8 cd | 91.82 a | 27.38 a | 256.46 d | |
Nano-Mg | 180 | 376.1 ab | 127.6 b | 93.05 a | 27.53 a | 373.70 b | |
270 | 395.6 a | 133.6 ab | 92.48 a | 27.74 a | 432.47 a | ||
年份 Y | * | ns | ns | ns | ns | ||
镁肥处理 Mg | ** | ** | ns | ns | ** | ||
氮肥用量 N | ** | ** | ns | ns | ** | ||
镁肥×氮肥 Mg×N | ns | * | ns | ns | ** |
镁肥类型 Mg fertilizer type | 氮肥用量 N application rate/(kg·hm-2) | 干物质量 Dry matter weight/(t·hm-2) | 播种-拔节 Sowing-jointing | 拔节-抽穗 Jointing-heading | 抽穗-成熟 Heading-maturity | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期 Jointing stage | 抽穗期 Heading stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage | 积累量 Accumulation /(t·hm-2) | 比例 Ratio /% | 积累量 Accumulation /(t·hm-2) | 比例 Ratio /% | 积累量 Accumulation /(t·hm-2) | 比例 Ratio /% | |||||
不施镁 | 0 | 2.33 d | 6.97 d | 10.04 d | 2.33 d | 23.21 a | 4.64 d | 46.22 a | 3.07 d | 30.58 c | |||
Zero-Mg | 180 | 3.06 c | 8.55 c | 13.27 c | 3.06 c | 23.06 ab | 5.49 c | 41.37 b | 4.72 c | 35.57 b | |||
270 | 3.63 a | 10.31 a | 16.15 a | 3.63 a | 22.48 ab | 6.68 a | 41.36 b | 5.84 b | 36.16 b | ||||
离子镁 | 0 | 2.35 d | 7.00 d | 10.15 d | 2.35 d | 23.15 a | 4.65 d | 45.81 a | 3.15 d | 31.03 c | |||
Ionic-Mg | 180 | 3.37 b | 9.47 b | 15.18 b | 3.37 b | 22.20 ab | 6.10 b | 40.18 b | 5.71 b | 37.62 ab | |||
270 | 3.66 a | 10.38 a | 16.45 a | 3.66 a | 22.25 ab | 6.72 a | 40.85 b | 6.07 ab | 36.90 ab | ||||
纳米镁 | 0 | 2.43 d | 7.20 d | 10.44 d | 2.43 d | 23.28 a | 4.77 d | 45.69 a | 3.24 d | 31.03 c | |||
Nano-Mg | 180 | 3.34 b | 9.40 b | 15.30 b | 3.34 b | 21.83 b | 6.06 b | 39.61 b | 5.90 ab | 38.56 a | |||
270 | 3.68 a | 10.42 a | 16.57 a | 3.68 a | 22.21 ab | 6.74 a | 40.68 b | 6.15 a | 37.12 ab | ||||
镁肥处理 Mg | * | * | ** | * | ns | * | ns | ** | * | ||||
氮肥用量 N | ** | ** | ** | ** | * | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||||
镁肥×氮肥 Mg×N | ns | * | ** | ns | ns | * | ns | ** | ns |
Table 2 Effects of different magnesium fertilizer on rice dry matter accumulation in different growth stages.
镁肥类型 Mg fertilizer type | 氮肥用量 N application rate/(kg·hm-2) | 干物质量 Dry matter weight/(t·hm-2) | 播种-拔节 Sowing-jointing | 拔节-抽穗 Jointing-heading | 抽穗-成熟 Heading-maturity | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期 Jointing stage | 抽穗期 Heading stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage | 积累量 Accumulation /(t·hm-2) | 比例 Ratio /% | 积累量 Accumulation /(t·hm-2) | 比例 Ratio /% | 积累量 Accumulation /(t·hm-2) | 比例 Ratio /% | |||||
不施镁 | 0 | 2.33 d | 6.97 d | 10.04 d | 2.33 d | 23.21 a | 4.64 d | 46.22 a | 3.07 d | 30.58 c | |||
Zero-Mg | 180 | 3.06 c | 8.55 c | 13.27 c | 3.06 c | 23.06 ab | 5.49 c | 41.37 b | 4.72 c | 35.57 b | |||
270 | 3.63 a | 10.31 a | 16.15 a | 3.63 a | 22.48 ab | 6.68 a | 41.36 b | 5.84 b | 36.16 b | ||||
离子镁 | 0 | 2.35 d | 7.00 d | 10.15 d | 2.35 d | 23.15 a | 4.65 d | 45.81 a | 3.15 d | 31.03 c | |||
Ionic-Mg | 180 | 3.37 b | 9.47 b | 15.18 b | 3.37 b | 22.20 ab | 6.10 b | 40.18 b | 5.71 b | 37.62 ab | |||
270 | 3.66 a | 10.38 a | 16.45 a | 3.66 a | 22.25 ab | 6.72 a | 40.85 b | 6.07 ab | 36.90 ab | ||||
纳米镁 | 0 | 2.43 d | 7.20 d | 10.44 d | 2.43 d | 23.28 a | 4.77 d | 45.69 a | 3.24 d | 31.03 c | |||
Nano-Mg | 180 | 3.34 b | 9.40 b | 15.30 b | 3.34 b | 21.83 b | 6.06 b | 39.61 b | 5.90 ab | 38.56 a | |||
270 | 3.68 a | 10.42 a | 16.57 a | 3.68 a | 22.21 ab | 6.74 a | 40.68 b | 6.15 a | 37.12 ab | ||||
镁肥处理 Mg | * | * | ** | * | ns | * | ns | ** | * | ||||
氮肥用量 N | ** | ** | ** | ** | * | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||||
镁肥×氮肥 Mg×N | ns | * | ** | ns | ns | * | ns | ** | ns |
镁肥类型 Mg fertilizer type | 氮肥用量 N application rate/(kg·hm-2) | 拔节期 Jointing | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 结实期叶面积衰减速率 Decreasing rate of leaf area/(d-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
不施镁Zero-Mg | 0 | 2.80 c | 4.80 c | 2.08 d | 0.0545 d |
180 | 4.16 b | 7.03 b | 3.16 c | 0.0773 b | |
270 | 4.52 a | 7.49 a | 3.36 b | 0.0826 a | |
离子镁Ionic-Mg | 0 | 2.82 c | 4.95 c | 2.20 d | 0.0551 d |
180 | 4.23 b | 7.38 a | 3.79 a | 0.0718 c | |
270 | 4.55 a | 7.61 a | 3.79 a | 0.0765 b | |
纳米镁Nano-Mg | 0 | 2.91 c | 4.93 c | 2.21 d | 0.0544 d |
180 | 4.25 b | 7.47 a | 3.86 a | 0.0722 c | |
270 | 4.58 a | 7.64 a | 3.88 a | 0.0752 bc | |
镁肥处理 Mg | ns | * | ** | ** | |
氮肥用量 N | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
镁肥×氮肥 Mg×N | ns | ns | ** | * |
Table 3 Effects of different magnesium fertilizer on leaf area index.
镁肥类型 Mg fertilizer type | 氮肥用量 N application rate/(kg·hm-2) | 拔节期 Jointing | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 结实期叶面积衰减速率 Decreasing rate of leaf area/(d-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
不施镁Zero-Mg | 0 | 2.80 c | 4.80 c | 2.08 d | 0.0545 d |
180 | 4.16 b | 7.03 b | 3.16 c | 0.0773 b | |
270 | 4.52 a | 7.49 a | 3.36 b | 0.0826 a | |
离子镁Ionic-Mg | 0 | 2.82 c | 4.95 c | 2.20 d | 0.0551 d |
180 | 4.23 b | 7.38 a | 3.79 a | 0.0718 c | |
270 | 4.55 a | 7.61 a | 3.79 a | 0.0765 b | |
纳米镁Nano-Mg | 0 | 2.91 c | 4.93 c | 2.21 d | 0.0544 d |
180 | 4.25 b | 7.47 a | 3.86 a | 0.0722 c | |
270 | 4.58 a | 7.64 a | 3.88 a | 0.0752 bc | |
镁肥处理 Mg | ns | * | ** | ** | |
氮肥用量 N | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
镁肥×氮肥 Mg×N | ns | ns | ** | * |
镁肥类型 Mg fertilizer type | 氮肥用量 N application rate/(kg·hm-2) | 播种-拔节 Sowing-jointing | 拔节-抽穗 Jointing-heading | 抽穗-成熟 Heading-maturity |
---|---|---|---|---|
不施镁Zero-Mg | 0 | 91.02 c | 133.00 c | 171.90 d |
180 | 135.20 b | 195.78 b | 254.71 c | |
270 | 146.80 a | 210.17 ab | 271.40 b | |
离子镁Ionic-Mg | 0 | 91.74 c | 136.08 c | 178.74 d |
180 | 137.37 b | 203.10 b | 279.24 ab | |
270 | 147.96 a | 212.87 a | 284.93 ab | |
纳米镁Nano-Mg | 0 | 94.65 c | 137.26 c | 178.53 d |
180 | 138.27 b | 205.22 ab | 283.36 ab | |
270 | 148.73 a | 213.77 a | 287.94 a | |
镁肥处理 Mg | ns | ns | ** | |
氮肥用量 N | ** | ** | ** | |
镁肥×氮肥 Mg×N | ns | ns | ns |
Table 4 Effects of different magnesium fertilizers on photosynthetic potential.
镁肥类型 Mg fertilizer type | 氮肥用量 N application rate/(kg·hm-2) | 播种-拔节 Sowing-jointing | 拔节-抽穗 Jointing-heading | 抽穗-成熟 Heading-maturity |
---|---|---|---|---|
不施镁Zero-Mg | 0 | 91.02 c | 133.00 c | 171.90 d |
180 | 135.20 b | 195.78 b | 254.71 c | |
270 | 146.80 a | 210.17 ab | 271.40 b | |
离子镁Ionic-Mg | 0 | 91.74 c | 136.08 c | 178.74 d |
180 | 137.37 b | 203.10 b | 279.24 ab | |
270 | 147.96 a | 212.87 a | 284.93 ab | |
纳米镁Nano-Mg | 0 | 94.65 c | 137.26 c | 178.53 d |
180 | 138.27 b | 205.22 ab | 283.36 ab | |
270 | 148.73 a | 213.77 a | 287.94 a | |
镁肥处理 Mg | ns | ns | ** | |
氮肥用量 N | ** | ** | ** | |
镁肥×氮肥 Mg×N | ns | ns | ns |
镁肥类型 Mg fertilizer type | 氮肥用量 N application rate/(kg·hm-2) | SPAD值 SPAD value | 净光合速率Net photosynthetic rate/(μmol·m-2·s-1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
齐穗后5 d 5 d after heading | 齐穗后25 d 25 d after heading | 衰减率 Decrement/% | 齐穗后5 d 5 d after heading | 齐穗后25 d 25 d after heading | 衰减率 Decrement/% | |||
不施镁Zero-Mg | 0 | 37.67 e | 28.70 f | 31.25 a | 17.85 e | 11.70 d | 52.56 a | |
180 | 41.78 bc | 32.45 cd | 28.75 bc | 19.21 d | 12.92 c | 48.75 b | ||
270 | 43.19 ab | 33.88 bc | 27.48 cd | 21.44 ab | 14.49 ab | 47.93 bc | ||
离子镁Ionic-Mg | 0 | 39.45 de | 30.56 e | 29.09 b | 18.69 de | 12.37 cd | 51.06 ab | |
180 | 43.81 ab | 34.72 ab | 26.18 de | 20.31 c | 13.97 b | 45.37 cd | ||
270 | 44.95 a | 35.83 a | 25.45 e | 21.89 a | 14.95 a | 46.42 bc | ||
纳米镁Nano-Mg | 0 | 39.97 cd | 31.19 de | 28.15 bc | 18.97 d | 12.55 c | 51.17 ab | |
180 | 44.23 a | 35.11 ab | 25.98 e | 20.67 bc | 14.42 ab | 43.32 d | ||
270 | 45.46 a | 36.34 a | 25.10 e | 22.17 a | 15.17 a | 46.16 c | ||
镁肥处理 Mg | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||
氮肥用量 N | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||
镁肥×氮肥 Mg×N | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
Table 5 Effects of different magnesium fertilizers on SPAD value and net photosynthetic rate.
镁肥类型 Mg fertilizer type | 氮肥用量 N application rate/(kg·hm-2) | SPAD值 SPAD value | 净光合速率Net photosynthetic rate/(μmol·m-2·s-1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
齐穗后5 d 5 d after heading | 齐穗后25 d 25 d after heading | 衰减率 Decrement/% | 齐穗后5 d 5 d after heading | 齐穗后25 d 25 d after heading | 衰减率 Decrement/% | |||
不施镁Zero-Mg | 0 | 37.67 e | 28.70 f | 31.25 a | 17.85 e | 11.70 d | 52.56 a | |
180 | 41.78 bc | 32.45 cd | 28.75 bc | 19.21 d | 12.92 c | 48.75 b | ||
270 | 43.19 ab | 33.88 bc | 27.48 cd | 21.44 ab | 14.49 ab | 47.93 bc | ||
离子镁Ionic-Mg | 0 | 39.45 de | 30.56 e | 29.09 b | 18.69 de | 12.37 cd | 51.06 ab | |
180 | 43.81 ab | 34.72 ab | 26.18 de | 20.31 c | 13.97 b | 45.37 cd | ||
270 | 44.95 a | 35.83 a | 25.45 e | 21.89 a | 14.95 a | 46.42 bc | ||
纳米镁Nano-Mg | 0 | 39.97 cd | 31.19 de | 28.15 bc | 18.97 d | 12.55 c | 51.17 ab | |
180 | 44.23 a | 35.11 ab | 25.98 e | 20.67 bc | 14.42 ab | 43.32 d | ||
270 | 45.46 a | 36.34 a | 25.10 e | 22.17 a | 15.17 a | 46.16 c | ||
镁肥处理 Mg | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||
氮肥用量 N | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||
镁肥×氮肥 Mg×N | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
镁肥类型 Mg fertilizer type | 氮肥用量 N application rate/(kg·hm-2) | 氮浓度N concentration/(mg·g-1) | 氮积累量N accumulation/(kg·hm-2) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
茎鞘 Stem and sheath | 叶 Leaf | 籽粒 Grain | 茎鞘 Stem and sheath | 叶 Leaf | 籽粒 Grain | 总株 Total | |||
不施镁Zero-Mg | 0 | 3.3 d | 7.3 e | 8.7 e | 16.2 e | 13.8 e | 68.8 f | 98.7 f | |
180 | 3.6 c | 8.6 d | 9.7 c | 23.2 d | 26.7 c | 120.7 d | 170.6 d | ||
270 | 4.8 a | 10.1 b | 11.1 a | 32.3 b | 32.3 a | 144.7 b | 209.2 b | ||
离子镁Ionic-Mg | 0 | 3.4 cd | 7.3 e | 9.3 cd | 17.4 e | 14.7 e | 73.6 ef | 105.8 ef | |
180 | 4.0 b | 9.3 c | 10.3 b | 26.4 c | 29.2 b | 130.4 c | 186.0 c | ||
270 | 4.9 a | 10.7 a | 11.4 a | 35.0 a | 33.4 a | 153.1 a | 221.5 a | ||
纳米镁Nano-Mg | 0 | 3.4 cd | 7.4 e | 9.0 de | 17.4 e | 16.1 d | 76.3 e | 109.8 e | |
180 | 4.1 b | 9.5 c | 10.4 b | 27.3 c | 29.1 b | 135.3 c | 191.6 c | ||
270 | 4.9 a | 10.9 a | 11.5 a | 35.2 a | 33.3 a | 158.4 a | 226.9 a | ||
镁肥处理 Mg | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||
氮肥用量 N | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||
镁肥×氮肥 Mg×N | * | ns | ns | ** | * | * | * |
Table 6 Effects of different magnesium fertilizers on nitrogen accumulation.
镁肥类型 Mg fertilizer type | 氮肥用量 N application rate/(kg·hm-2) | 氮浓度N concentration/(mg·g-1) | 氮积累量N accumulation/(kg·hm-2) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
茎鞘 Stem and sheath | 叶 Leaf | 籽粒 Grain | 茎鞘 Stem and sheath | 叶 Leaf | 籽粒 Grain | 总株 Total | |||
不施镁Zero-Mg | 0 | 3.3 d | 7.3 e | 8.7 e | 16.2 e | 13.8 e | 68.8 f | 98.7 f | |
180 | 3.6 c | 8.6 d | 9.7 c | 23.2 d | 26.7 c | 120.7 d | 170.6 d | ||
270 | 4.8 a | 10.1 b | 11.1 a | 32.3 b | 32.3 a | 144.7 b | 209.2 b | ||
离子镁Ionic-Mg | 0 | 3.4 cd | 7.3 e | 9.3 cd | 17.4 e | 14.7 e | 73.6 ef | 105.8 ef | |
180 | 4.0 b | 9.3 c | 10.3 b | 26.4 c | 29.2 b | 130.4 c | 186.0 c | ||
270 | 4.9 a | 10.7 a | 11.4 a | 35.0 a | 33.4 a | 153.1 a | 221.5 a | ||
纳米镁Nano-Mg | 0 | 3.4 cd | 7.4 e | 9.0 de | 17.4 e | 16.1 d | 76.3 e | 109.8 e | |
180 | 4.1 b | 9.5 c | 10.4 b | 27.3 c | 29.1 b | 135.3 c | 191.6 c | ||
270 | 4.9 a | 10.9 a | 11.5 a | 35.2 a | 33.3 a | 158.4 a | 226.9 a | ||
镁肥处理 Mg | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||
氮肥用量 N | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ||
镁肥×氮肥 Mg×N | * | ns | ns | ** | * | * | * |
镁肥类型 Mg fertilizer type | 氮肥用量 N application rate/(kg·hm-2) | 氮肥偏生产力 PFP/(kg·kg-1) | 氮素籽粒生产效率 NUEG/(kg·kg-1) | 氮素农学利用率 AE/(kg·kg-1) | 氮素生理利用率 PNUE/(kg·kg-1) | 氮素吸收利用率 NRE/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
不施镁Zero-Mg | 180 | 43.52 b | 45.92 b | 10.36 c | 25.94 d | 39.94 c |
270 | 36.05 c | 46.53 ab | 13.95 b | 34.08 b | 40.93 c | |
离子镁Ionic-Mg | 180 | 49.92 a | 48.31 a | 16.15 a | 36.25 a | 44.56 a |
270 | 36.30 c | 44.25 bc | 13.79 b | 32.17 c | 42.85 b | |
纳米镁Nano-Mg | 180 | 50.61 a | 47.54 ab | 16.43 a | 36.16 a | 45.44 a |
270 | 36.74 c | 43.72 c | 13.96 b | 32.18 c | 43.37 b | |
镁肥处理 Mg | ** | * | ** | ** | ** | |
氮肥用量 N | ** | ns | ns | ** | ** | |
镁肥×氮肥 Mg×N | ** | ns | ** | ** | ns |
Table 7 Effects of different magnesium fertilizer on nitrogen utilization.
镁肥类型 Mg fertilizer type | 氮肥用量 N application rate/(kg·hm-2) | 氮肥偏生产力 PFP/(kg·kg-1) | 氮素籽粒生产效率 NUEG/(kg·kg-1) | 氮素农学利用率 AE/(kg·kg-1) | 氮素生理利用率 PNUE/(kg·kg-1) | 氮素吸收利用率 NRE/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
不施镁Zero-Mg | 180 | 43.52 b | 45.92 b | 10.36 c | 25.94 d | 39.94 c |
270 | 36.05 c | 46.53 ab | 13.95 b | 34.08 b | 40.93 c | |
离子镁Ionic-Mg | 180 | 49.92 a | 48.31 a | 16.15 a | 36.25 a | 44.56 a |
270 | 36.30 c | 44.25 bc | 13.79 b | 32.17 c | 42.85 b | |
纳米镁Nano-Mg | 180 | 50.61 a | 47.54 ab | 16.43 a | 36.16 a | 45.44 a |
270 | 36.74 c | 43.72 c | 13.96 b | 32.18 c | 43.37 b | |
镁肥处理 Mg | ** | * | ** | ** | ** | |
氮肥用量 N | ** | ns | ns | ** | ** | |
镁肥×氮肥 Mg×N | ** | ns | ** | ** | ns |
[1] | Yang J C. Approaches to achieve high grain yield and high resource use efficiency in rice[J]. Frontiers of Agricultural Science and Engineering, 2015,2(2):155-123. |
[2] | 张智, 李小坤, 丛日环, 任涛, 黄铁平, 鲁艳红. 稻田优化施肥效果与氮、磷环境效益评价[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(5):906-915. |
Zhang Z, Li X K, Cong R H, Ren T, Huang T P, Lu Y H. Optimized fertilization effects and environmental benefits evaluation of nitrogen and phosphorus in the paddy soil[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016,49(5):906-915. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 杨艳菊, 赵宇航, 柯帅, 单玉华, 张海鹏, 李宏图, 钱晓晴, 王娟娟. 种植年限对设施西瓜土壤净硝化速率及N2O排放的影响[J]. 扬州大学学报: 农业与生命科学版, 2018,39(3):75-80. |
Yang Y J, Zhao Y H, Ke S, Shan Y H, Zhang H P, Li H T, Qian X Q, Wang J J. Effects of cropping years on net nitrification rate and N2O emission from greenhouse soils planted with watermelons[J]. Journal of Yangzhou University: Agricultural and Life Science Edition, 2018,39(3):75-80. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 蔡祖聪, 钦绳武. 作物N、P、K含量对于平衡施肥的诊断意义[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006,12(4):473-478. |
Cai Z C, Qin S W. Diagnosis of balanced fertilization by N, P, K contents in grain and straw of wheat and maize[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2006,12(4):473-478. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 周雯雯, 贾浩然, 张月, 李卫, 李保同, 汤丽梅. 不同类型新型肥料对双季稻产量、氮肥利用率和经济效益的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020,26(4):657-668. |
Zhou W W, Jia H R, Zhang Y, Li W, Li B T, Tang L M. Effects of different new types of fertilizer on yield, nitrogen use eiificiency and economic benefit of double cropping rice[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2020,26(4):657-668. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 刘晓霞, 潘贤, 张欢. 施肥方式及化肥用量对水稻产量和氮肥利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020,36(34):1-4. |
Liu X X, Pan X, Zhang H. Effects of fertilization method and chemical fertilizer amount on rice yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020,36(34):1-4. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 解文孝, 李建国, 刘军, 吕军, 梁传斌, 潘争艳, 李蒙杉, 史鸿儒. 不同土壤背景下秸秆还田量对水稻产量构成及氮吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021,53(2):248-255. |
Xie W X, Li J G, Liu J, Lv J, Liang C B, Pan Z Y, Li M S, Shi H R. Effects of straw returning amounts on rice yield components and N uptake of different soil background[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2021,53(2):248-255. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 杨祥田, 林贤青, 曾孝元, 王旭辉, 罗三镯. 水稻强化栽培下不同氮肥管理对产量与氮素利用的影响[J]. 土壤通报, 2007,38(3):463-466. |
Yang X T, Lin X Q, Zeng X Y, Wang X H, Luo S Z. Effects of Different Nitrogen Fertilizer Management on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization under Rice Intensification Cultivation[J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2007,38(3):463-466. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | Tian X P, Fan Y, Jin Y L, Yi Z L, Li J M. Ammonium detoxification mechanism of ammonium-tolerant duckweed (Landolina punctate) revealed by carbon and nitrogen metabolism under ammonium stress[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2021,277:116834-116834. |
[10] | 卞赛男, 常鹏杰, 王宁杭, 刘志高, 张明如, 吴家胜, 申亚梅, 王小德. 氮素形态对喜树叶片生长、叶绿素荧光参数及叶绿体相关基因表达的影响[J]. 浙江农林大学学报, 2019,36(5):908-916. |
Bian S N, Chang P J, Wang N H, Liu Z G, Zhang M R, Wu J S, Shen Y M, Wang X D. Leaf growth, chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics, and expression of photosystem-related genes in Camptotheca acuminata with different N forms’ fertilization[J]. Journal of Zhejiang A & F University, 2019,36(5):908-916. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 顾俊飞, 周振翔, 李志康, 戴琪星, 孔祥胜, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 水稻低叶绿素含量突变对光合作用及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2016,42(4):551-560. |
Gu J F, Zhou Z X, Li Z K, Dai Q X, Kong X S, Wang Z Q, Yang J C. Effects of the mutant with low chlorophyll content on photosynjournal and yield in rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2016,42(4):551-560. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 徐晨, 刘晓龙, 李前, 凌凤楼, 武志海, 张志安. 供氮水平对盐胁迫下水稻叶片光合及叶绿素荧光特性的影响[J]. 植物学报, 2018,53(2):185-195. |
Xu C, Liu X L, Li Q, Ling F L, Wu Z H, Zhang Z A. Effect of salt stress on photosynjournal and chlorophyll fluorescence characteristics of rice leaf for nitrogen levels[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2018,53(2):185-195. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 李军, 肖丹丹, 邓先亮, 朱大伟, 邢志鹏, 胡雅杰, 崔培媛, 郭保卫, 魏海燕, 张洪程. 镁锌肥追施时期对优良食味粳稻产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2018,51(8):1448-1463. |
Li J, Xiao D D, Deng X L, Zhu D W, Xing Z P, Hu Y J, Cui P Y, Guo B W, Wei H Y, Zhang H C. Effects of topdressing magnesium and zinc fertilizers at different periods on yield and quality of japonica rice with good eating quality[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2018,51(8):1448-1463. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 杨文祥, 李刚华, 王强盛, 王绍华, 吴昊, 丁艳锋. 镁对稻米食味品质的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2007,23(3):166-171. |
Yang W X, Li G H, Wang Q S, Wang S H, Wu H, Ding Y F. Effect of Mg fertilizer on rice taste quality[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2007,23(3):166-171. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 聂录, 林玉萍, 张少波. 镁肥对水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 现代化农业, 2017,39(6):17-18. |
Nie L, Lin Y P, Zhang S B. Effect of magnesium fertilizer on rice yield and quality[J]. Modernizing Agriculture, 2017,39(6):17-18. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 张美玲, 耿玉辉, 曹国军, Stephano M F, 黄琦嘉, 周丽娟. 秸秆还田下施镁对土壤交换镁及春玉米镁素积累和产量的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020,34(3):226-231, 237. |
Zhang M L, Geng Y H, Cao G J, Stephano M F, Huang Q J, Zhou L J. Effects of magnesium application on exchangeable magnesium and magnesium accumulation in soil and yield of spring maize under straw returning[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020,34(3):226-231, 237. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 田贵生, 陆志峰, 任涛, 鲁剑巍. 镁肥基施及后期喷施对油菜产量与品质的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019,51(5):85-90. |
Tian G S, Lu Z F, Ren T, Lu J W. Effects of spraying magnesium on the yield and quality of oilseed rape under different magnesium fertilizer application rates[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2019,51(5):85-90. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 李晓鸣. 矿质镁对水稻产量及品质影响的研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2002,8(1):125-126. |
Li X M. Study on the effect of mineral magnesium on rice yield and quality[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2002,8(1):125-126. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 陈士勇, 杨艳菊, 黄帅, 陆钰婷, 王娟娟, 单玉华, 刘国栋, 张海鹏. 强还原处理对西瓜连作土壤性质及西瓜产量的影响[J]. 扬州大学学报: 农业与生命科学版, 2019,40(5):103-109. |
Chen S Y, Yang Y J, Huang S, Lu Y T, Wang J J, Shan Y H, Liu G D, Zhang H P. Effects of reductive soil disinfestation (RSD) on continuous cropping soil properties and watermelon yield[J]. Journal of Yangzhou University(Agricultural and Life Science Edition), 2019,40(5):103-109. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 陶龙兴, 谈惠娟, 王熹, 曹立勇, 宋建, 程式华. 高温胁迫对国稻6号开花结实习性的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2008,34(4):669-674. |
Tao L X, Tan H J, Wang X, Cao L Y, Song J, Cheng S H. Effects of high temperature stress on flowering and grain-setting characteristics for Guodao 6[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2008,34(4):669-674. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 黄丽芬, 全晓艳, 张蓉, 袁毅, 赵伟, 姜玲玲, 施金琦, 庄恒扬. 光氮及其互作对水稻干物质积累与分配的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2014,28(2):167-176. |
Huang L F, Quan X Y, Zhang R, Yuan Y, Zhao W, Jiang L L, Shi J Q, Zhuang H Y. Interactive effects of light intensity and nitrogen supply on dry matter production and distribution of rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2014,28(2):167-176. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 付正豪, 马中涛, 魏海燕, 邢志鹏, 刘国栋, 胡群, 张洪程. 不同机械化栽培方式下控释肥配比对迟熟中粳水稻产量形成及氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2022,48(1):165-179. |
Fu Z H, Ma Z T, Wei H Y, Xing Z P, Liu G D, Hu Q, Zhang H C. Effects of controlled release fertilizer ratio on yield formation and nitrogen absorption and utilization of late-maturing medium japonica rice under different mechanized cultivation methods[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2022,48(1):165-179. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 张洪程, 胡雅杰, 杨建昌, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 高辉, 郭保卫, 邢志鹏, 胡群. 中国特色水稻栽培学发展与展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021,54(7):1301-1321. |
Zhang H C, Hu Y J, Yang J C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Gao H, Guo B W, Xing Z P, Hu Q. Development and prospect of rice cultivation in China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021,54(7):1301-1321. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | Hu Q, Jang W Q, Qiu S, Xing Z P, Hu Y J A. Effect of wide-narrow row arrangement in mechanical pot-seedling transplanting and plant density on yield formation and grain quality of japonica rice[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020,19(5):1197-1214. |
[25] | 凌宇飞, 王锐, 陈志青, 杨硕, 崔培媛, 邢志鹏, 张海鹏, 张洪程. 纳米镁对水稻产量及其形成特征影响的差异[J]. 扬州大学学报: 农业与生命科学版, 2020,41(6):9-14. |
Ling Y F, Wang R, Chen Z Q, Yang S, Cui P Y, Xing Z P, Zhang H P, Zhang H C. Effects of nano-molybdenum on rice yield and yield components[J]. Journal of Yangzhou University: Agricultural and Life Science Edition) 2020,41(6):9-14. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 魏海燕, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 杭杰, 马群, 张胜飞, 张庆, 刘艳阳. 不同水稻氮利用效率基因型的物质生产与积累特性[J]. 作物学报, 2007,33(11):1802-1809. |
Wei H Y, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Hang J, Ma Q, Zhang S F, Zhang Q, Liu Y Y. Characteristics of matter production and accumulation of rice genotypes with different nitrogen use efficiency[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2007,33(11):1802-1809. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 侯云鹏, 韩立国, 孔丽丽, 尹彩侠, 秦裕波, 李前, 谢佳贵. 不同施氮水平下水稻的养分吸收、转运及土壤氮素平衡[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015,21(4):836-845. |
Hou Y P, Han L G, Kong L L, Yin C X, Qin Y B, Li Q, Xie J G. Nutrient absorption,translocation in rice and soil nitrogen equilibrium under different nitrogen application doses[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2015,21(4):836-845. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | Tirol-Padre A, Ladha J K, Singh U, Laureles E, Punzalan G, Akita S. Grain yield performance of rice genotypes at suboptimal levels of soil N as affected by N uptake and utilization efficiency[J]. Field Crops Research, 1996,46(1):127-143. |
[29] | Inthapanya I P, Sihavong P, Sihathep V, Chanphengsay M, Ukai S F, Basnayake J. Genotype differences in nutrient uptake and utilization for grain yield production of rainfed lowland rice under fertilised and non-fertilised conditions[J]. Field Crops Research, 2000,65(1):57-68. |
[30] | 董桂春, 王熠, 于小凤, 周娟, 彭斌, 李进前, 田昊, 张燕, 袁秋梅, 王余龙. 不同生育期水稻品种氮素吸收利用的差异[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011,44(22):4570-4582. |
Dong G C, Wang Y, Yu X F, Zhou J, Peng B, Li J Q, Tian H, Zhang Y, Yuan Q M, Wang Y L. Differences in nitrogen absorption and utilization of rice varieties in different growth periods[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011,44(22):4570-4582. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | Ntanos D A, Koutroubas S D. Dry matter and N accumulation and translocation for indica and japonica rice under Mediterranean conditions[J]. Field Crops Research, 2002,74(1):93-101. |
[32] | Jiang L G, Dai T B, Jiang D, Cao W X, Gan X Q, Wei S Q. Charactering physiological N-use efficiency as influenced by nitrogen management in three rice cultivars[J]. Field Crops Research, 2004,88(2):239-250. |
[33] | 丁玉川, 罗伟, 任小利, 徐国华. 不同镁浓度对水稻根系生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009,15(3):537-543. |
Ding Y C, Luo W, Ren X L, Xu G H. Effect of different magnesium nutrition on root growth and physiological characteristics of rice[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2009,15(3):537-543. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[34] | 丁玉川, 罗伟, 徐国华. 镁、钾相互作用对水稻生长、养分吸收及有关生理特性的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2008,16(2):340-344. |
Ding Y C, Luo W, Xu G H. Effect of magnesium and potassium interaction on growth, nutrient uptake and related physiological characteristics of rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2008,16(2):340-344. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[35] | 吴越, 胡静, 陈琛, 张家星, 李万元, 唐东南, 仲军, 羊彬, 朱正康, 姚友礼, 王余龙, 董桂春. 江苏省早熟晚粳高产水稻新品种氮素吸收利用特征及成因分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017,31(6):63-74. |
Wu Y, Hu J, Chen C, Zhang J X, Li W Y, Tang D N, Zhong J, Yang B, Zhu Z K, Yao Y L, Wang Y L, Dong G C. Nitrogen absorption and utilization characteristics of the newly approved early-maturity late japonica rice cultivars in Jiangsu Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2017,31(6):63-74. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[36] | 江立庚, 曹卫星, 甘秀芹, 韦善清, 徐建云, 董登峰, 陈念平, 陆福勇, 秦华东. 不同施氮水平对南方早稻氮素吸收利用及其产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2004,37(4):490-496. |
Jiang L G, Cao W X, Gan X Q, Wei S Q, Xu J Y, Dong D F, Chen N P, Lu F Y, Qin H D. Nitrogen uptake and utilization under different nitrogen management and influence on grain yield and quality in rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2004,37(4):490-496. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[37] | Zhang H P, Wang R, Chen Z Q, Cui P Y, Lu H, Yang Y J, Zhang H C. The effect of zinc oxide nanoparticles for enhancing rice (Oryza sativa L.) yield and quality[J]. Agriculture, 2021,11(12):1247. |
[1] | GUO Zhan, ZHANG Yunbo. Research Progress in Physiological,Biochemical Responses of Rice to Drought Stress and Its Molecular Regulation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[2] | WEI Huanhe, MA Weiyi, ZUO Boyuan, WANG Lulu, ZHU Wang, GENG Xiaoyu, ZHANG Xiang, MENG Tianyao, CHEN Yinglong, GAO Pinglei, XU Ke, HUO Zhongyang, DAI Qigen. Research Progress in the Effect of Salinity, Drought, and Their Combined Stresses on Rice Yield and Quality Formation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[3] | XU Danjie, LIN Qiaoxia, LI Zhengkang, ZHUANG Xiaoqian, LING Yu, LAI Meiling, CHEN Xiaoting, LU Guodong. OsOPR10 Positively Regulates Rice Blast and Bacterial Blight Resistance [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 364-374. |
[4] | CHEN Mingliang, ZENG Xihua, SHEN Yumin, LUO Shiyou, HU Lanxiang, XIONG Wentao, XIONG Huanjin, WU Xiaoyan, XIAO Yeqing. Typing of Inter-subspecific Fertility Loci and Fertility Locus Pattern of indica-japonica Hybrid Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 386-396. |
[5] | DING Zhengquan, PAN Yueyun, SHI Yang, HUANG Haixiang. Comprehensive Evaluation and Comparative Analysis of Jiahe Series Long-Grain japonica Rice with High Eating Quality Based on Gene Chip Technology [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 397-408. |
[6] | HOU Xiaoqin, WANG Ying, YU Bei, FU Weimeng, FENG Baohua, SHEN Yichao, XIE Hangjun, WANG Huanran, XU Yongqiang, WU Zhihai, WANG Jianjun, TAO Longxing, FU Guanfu. Mechanisms Behind the Role of Potassium Fulvic Acid in Enhancing Salt Tolerance in Rice Seedlings [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 409-421. |
[7] | LÜ Zhou, YI Binghuai, CHEN Pingping, ZHOU Wenxin, TANG Wenbang, YI Zhenxie. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Transplanting Density on Yield Formation of Small Seed Hybrid Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 422-436. |
[8] | HU Jijie, HU Zhihua, ZHANG Junhua, CAO Xiaochuang, JIN Qianyu, ZHANG Zhiyuan, ZHU Lianfeng. Effects of Rhizosphere Saturated Dissolved Oxygen on Photosynthetic and Growth Characteristics of Rice at Tillering Stage [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 437-446. |
[9] | WU Yue, LIANG Chengwei, ZHAO Chenfei, SUN Jian, MA Dianrong. Occurrence of Weedy Rice Disaster and Ecotype Evolution in Direct-Seeded Rice Fields [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 447-455. |
[10] | LIU Fuxiang, ZHEN Haoyang, PENG Huan, ZHENG Liuchun, PENG Deliang, WEN Yanhua. Investigation and Species Identification of Cyst Nematode Disease on Rice in Guangdong Province [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 456-461. |
[11] | CHEN Haotian, QIN Yuan, ZHONG Xiaohan, LIN Chenyu, QIN Jinghang, YANG Jianchang, ZHANG Weiyang. Research Progress on the Relationship Between Rice Root, Soil Properties and Methane Emissions in Paddy Fields [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 233-245. |
[12] | MIAO Jun, RAN Jinhui, XU Mengbin, BO Liubing, WANG Ping, LIANG Guohua, ZHOU Yong. Overexpression of RGG2, a Heterotrimeric G Protein γ Subunit-Encoding Gene, Improves Drought Tolerance in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 246-255. |
[13] | YIN Xiaoxiao, ZHANG Zhihan, YAN Xiulian, LIAO Rong, YANG Sijia, Beenish HASSAN, GUO Daiming, FAN Jing, ZHAO Zhixue, WANG Wenming. Signal Peptide Validation and Expression Analysis of Multiple Effectors from Ustilaginoidea virens [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 256-265. |
[14] | ZHU Yujing, GUI Jinxin, GONG Chengyun, LUO Xinyang, SHI Jubin, ZHANG Haiqing, HE Jiwai. QTL Mapping for Tiller Angle in Rice by Genome-wide Association Analysis [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 266-276. |
[15] | WEI Qianqian, WANG Yulei, KONG Haimin, XU Qingshan, YAN Yulian, PAN Lin, CHI Chunxin, KONG Yali, TIAN Wenhao, ZHU Lianfeng, CAO Xiaochuang, ZHANG Junhua, ZHU Chunqun. Mechanism of Hydrogen Sulfide, a Signaling Molecule Involved in Reducing the Inhibitory Effect of Aluminum Toxicity on Rice Growth Together with Sulfur Fertilizer [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 290-302. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||