Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2019, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 523-531.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2019.9084
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Zhiguo E, Benyi CHENG, Hongwei SUN, Yujun WANG, Lianfeng ZHU, Hai LIN, Lei WANG, Hanhua TONG*(), Hongqi CHEN*(
)
Received:
2019-07-17
Revised:
2019-09-12
Online:
2019-11-10
Published:
2019-11-10
Contact:
Hanhua TONG, Hongqi CHEN
鄂志国, 程本义, 孙红伟, 汪玉军, 朱练峰, 林海, 王磊, 童汉华*(), 陈红旗*(
)
通讯作者:
童汉华,陈红旗
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Zhiguo E, Benyi CHENG, Hongwei SUN, Yujun WANG, Lianfeng ZHU, Hai LIN, Lei WANG, Hanhua TONG, Hongqi CHEN. Analysis on Chinese Improved Rice Varieties in Recent Four Decades[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2019, 33(6): 523-531.
鄂志国, 程本义, 孙红伟, 汪玉军, 朱练峰, 林海, 王磊, 童汉华, 陈红旗. 近40年我国水稻育成品种分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(6): 523-531.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2019.9084
Fig. 1. Yield of indica varieties in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River and japonica varieties in Huanghuai area from 2004 to 2018. Red point, indica rice; black, japonica rice. The orange broken line links the average annual yield. The bottom and top of the box indicate the 25th and 75th percentile, respectively. The band near the middle of the box is the median. The same as those in Fig. 2 and Fig. 3.
Fig. 2. The gel consistency and amylose content of nationally registered mid-season indica rice varieties in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River and japonica varieties in Huanghuai area from 2004 to 2018. Red point, indica rice; Black, japonica rice. The orange broken line links the average annual yield.
Fig. 3. Head rice rate and chalkiness of nationally registered mid-season indica rice varieties in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River and japonica varieties in Huanghuai area from 2004 to 2018. Red point, indica rice; Black, japonica rice. The orange broken line links the average annual yield.
Fig. 4. Comprehensive resistance index to rice blast of nationally registered mid-season indica rice varieties in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River from 2007 to 2018. The every point in the figure represents a variety. The blue dot indicates that the resistance level of this variety to bacterial blight is above the middle resistance level. The orange broken line links the average annual.
位次 Rank | 杂交稻(面积) Hybrid rice(Area) | 常规稻(面积) Conventional rice(Area) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
三系 Three-line | 两系 Two-line | 籼型 indica | 粳型 japonica | ||||||
1 | 汕优63 Shanyou 63(6264.20) | 两优培九 Liangyoupeijiu(604.47) | 浙辐802 Zhefu 802(977.80) | 空育131 Kongyu 131(964.33) | |||||
2 | 汕优64 Shanyou 64(1291.33) | 丰两优1号 Fengliangyou 1(301.20) | 桂朝2号 Guichao 2(529.13) | 武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3(607.87) | |||||
3 | 威优64 Weiyou 64(1186.40) | 扬两优6号 Yangliangyou 6(287.20) | 双桂1号 Shuanggui 1(440.07) | 龙粳31 Longjing 31(508.20) | |||||
4 | 冈优22 Gangyou 22(929.73) | Y两优1号 Y Liangyou 1(248.93) | 广陆矮4号 Guanglu’ai 4(423.40) | 武运粳7号 Wuyunjing 7(362.80) | |||||
5 | 汕优2号 Shanyou 2(844.20) | 新两优6号 Xinliangyou 6(216.60) | 中嘉早17 Zhongjiazao 17(363.13) | 鄂宜105 Eyi 105(319.00) | |||||
6 | 汕优6号 Shanyou 6(794.87) | 两优6326 Liangyou 6326(163.60) | 七桂早25 Qiguizao 25 (290.00) | 合江19号 Hejiang 19(298.73) | |||||
7 | Ⅱ优838 Ⅱ You 838(674.60) | 深两优5814 Shenliangyou 5814 (156.73) | 二九丰 Erjiufeng(257.47) | 鄂晚5号 Ewan 5(245.00) | |||||
8 | 威优6号 Weiyou 6(646.73) | 丰两优香1号 Fengliangyouxiang 1 (116.80) | 黄华占 Huanghuazhan(256.93) | 垦稻12 Kendao 12(217.60) | |||||
9 | D优63 D You 63(640.07) | 株两优02 Zhuliangyou 02(102.80) | 二九青 Erjiuqing(234.07) | 秋光 Akihikari(215.20) | |||||
10 | 汕优10 Shanyou 10(616.27) | 培两优288 Peiliangyou 288(102.67) | 余赤231-8 Yuchi 231-8(217.93) | 盐丰47 Yanfeng 47(186.33) |
Table 1 Most widely grown rice varieties in 1983-2018. ×104 hm2.
位次 Rank | 杂交稻(面积) Hybrid rice(Area) | 常规稻(面积) Conventional rice(Area) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
三系 Three-line | 两系 Two-line | 籼型 indica | 粳型 japonica | ||||||
1 | 汕优63 Shanyou 63(6264.20) | 两优培九 Liangyoupeijiu(604.47) | 浙辐802 Zhefu 802(977.80) | 空育131 Kongyu 131(964.33) | |||||
2 | 汕优64 Shanyou 64(1291.33) | 丰两优1号 Fengliangyou 1(301.20) | 桂朝2号 Guichao 2(529.13) | 武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3(607.87) | |||||
3 | 威优64 Weiyou 64(1186.40) | 扬两优6号 Yangliangyou 6(287.20) | 双桂1号 Shuanggui 1(440.07) | 龙粳31 Longjing 31(508.20) | |||||
4 | 冈优22 Gangyou 22(929.73) | Y两优1号 Y Liangyou 1(248.93) | 广陆矮4号 Guanglu’ai 4(423.40) | 武运粳7号 Wuyunjing 7(362.80) | |||||
5 | 汕优2号 Shanyou 2(844.20) | 新两优6号 Xinliangyou 6(216.60) | 中嘉早17 Zhongjiazao 17(363.13) | 鄂宜105 Eyi 105(319.00) | |||||
6 | 汕优6号 Shanyou 6(794.87) | 两优6326 Liangyou 6326(163.60) | 七桂早25 Qiguizao 25 (290.00) | 合江19号 Hejiang 19(298.73) | |||||
7 | Ⅱ优838 Ⅱ You 838(674.60) | 深两优5814 Shenliangyou 5814 (156.73) | 二九丰 Erjiufeng(257.47) | 鄂晚5号 Ewan 5(245.00) | |||||
8 | 威优6号 Weiyou 6(646.73) | 丰两优香1号 Fengliangyouxiang 1 (116.80) | 黄华占 Huanghuazhan(256.93) | 垦稻12 Kendao 12(217.60) | |||||
9 | D优63 D You 63(640.07) | 株两优02 Zhuliangyou 02(102.80) | 二九青 Erjiuqing(234.07) | 秋光 Akihikari(215.20) | |||||
10 | 汕优10 Shanyou 10(616.27) | 培两优288 Peiliangyou 288(102.67) | 余赤231-8 Yuchi 231-8(217.93) | 盐丰47 Yanfeng 47(186.33) |
位次 Rank | 不育系 Sterile line | 恢复系 Restorer line | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
名称(所配组合数) Name(Number of combinations) | 名称(应用面积) Name(Area of combinations /×104 hm2) | 名称(所配组合数) Name(Number of combinations) | 名称(应用面积) Name(Area of combinations /×104 hm2) | |||||
1 | Ⅱ-32A(206) | 珍汕97A Zhenshan 97A(12806.53) | 华占 Huazhan(86) | 明恢63 Minghui 63(8416.93) | ||||
2 | 金23A Jin 23A(161) | 威20A Wei 20A(3659.20) | 蜀恢527 Shuhui 527(43) | 测64-7 Ce 64-7(3052.8) | ||||
3 | 中9A Zhong 9A(121) | Ⅱ-32A(2947.26) | 明恢63 Minghui 63(33) | 93-11(1516.6) | ||||
4 | Y58S(110) | 金23A Jin 23A(2812.4) | 成恢727 Chenghui 727(29) | IR26(1468.4) | ||||
5 | 龙特甫A Longtefu A(108) | 冈46A Gang 46A(2698) | 先恢207 Xianhui 207(21) | 密阳46 Milyang 46(1438.93) | ||||
6 | 珍汕97A Zhenshan 97A(99) | 协青早A | 辐恢838 Fuhui 838(20) | 桂99 Gui 99(1024.40) | ||||
7 | 博A Bo A(98) | 博A Bo A(1255.93) | 闽恢3301 Minhui 3301(20) | CDR22(970.67) | ||||
8 | 天丰A Tianfeng A(95) | 龙特甫A Longtefu A(1209.66) | 桂99 Gui 99(18) | 辐恢838 Fuhui 838(923.93) | ||||
9 | 协青早A Xieqingzao A(88) | 培矮64S Peiai 64S(854.6) | R402(17) | 绵恢725 Mianhui 725(916.07) | ||||
10 | 五丰A Wufeng A(86) | 中9A Zhong 9A(718.4) | 广恢998 Guanghui 998(15) | IR24(872.53) |
Table 2 Most widely used sterile and restorer lines in 1983-2018.
位次 Rank | 不育系 Sterile line | 恢复系 Restorer line | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
名称(所配组合数) Name(Number of combinations) | 名称(应用面积) Name(Area of combinations /×104 hm2) | 名称(所配组合数) Name(Number of combinations) | 名称(应用面积) Name(Area of combinations /×104 hm2) | |||||
1 | Ⅱ-32A(206) | 珍汕97A Zhenshan 97A(12806.53) | 华占 Huazhan(86) | 明恢63 Minghui 63(8416.93) | ||||
2 | 金23A Jin 23A(161) | 威20A Wei 20A(3659.20) | 蜀恢527 Shuhui 527(43) | 测64-7 Ce 64-7(3052.8) | ||||
3 | 中9A Zhong 9A(121) | Ⅱ-32A(2947.26) | 明恢63 Minghui 63(33) | 93-11(1516.6) | ||||
4 | Y58S(110) | 金23A Jin 23A(2812.4) | 成恢727 Chenghui 727(29) | IR26(1468.4) | ||||
5 | 龙特甫A Longtefu A(108) | 冈46A Gang 46A(2698) | 先恢207 Xianhui 207(21) | 密阳46 Milyang 46(1438.93) | ||||
6 | 珍汕97A Zhenshan 97A(99) | 协青早A | 辐恢838 Fuhui 838(20) | 桂99 Gui 99(1024.40) | ||||
7 | 博A Bo A(98) | 博A Bo A(1255.93) | 闽恢3301 Minhui 3301(20) | CDR22(970.67) | ||||
8 | 天丰A Tianfeng A(95) | 龙特甫A Longtefu A(1209.66) | 桂99 Gui 99(18) | 辐恢838 Fuhui 838(923.93) | ||||
9 | 协青早A Xieqingzao A(88) | 培矮64S Peiai 64S(854.6) | R402(17) | 绵恢725 Mianhui 725(916.07) | ||||
10 | 五丰A Wufeng A(86) | 中9A Zhong 9A(718.4) | 广恢998 Guanghui 998(15) | IR24(872.53) |
品种名 Variety | 第一完成单位 Breeding unit | 育成年代 Release year | 连续3代个数 Number of next three generations | 连续3代面积 Area of next three generation | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
籼型 indica | |||||
明恢63 Minghui 63 | 三明市农业科学研究所 | 1980s | 1370 | 20100.73 | |
博B Bo B | 广西博白县农业科学研究所 | 1980s | 461 | 2488.93 | |
优ⅠB You ⅠB | 湖南杂交水稻研究中心 | 1980s | 462 | 2325.60 | |
测64-7 Ce 64-7 | 原湖南省安江农业学校 | 1980s | 202 | 4993.67 | |
扬稻4号 Yangdao 4 | 江苏里下河地区农业科学研究所 | 1980s | 273 | 2936.27 | |
金23B Jin 23B | 常德市农业科学研究所 | 1990s | 741 | 3662.47 | |
蜀恢527 Shuhui 527 | 四川农业大学水稻研究所 | 1990s | 495 | 1998.53 | |
扬稻6号 Yangdao 6 | 江苏里下河地区农业科学研究所 | 1990s | 357 | 2859.60 | |
中9B Zhong 9B | 中国水稻研究所 | 1990s | 313 | 1238.87 | |
浙9248 Zhe 9248 | 浙江省农业科学院作物研究所 | 1990s | 274 | 1142.00 | |
华占 Huazhan | 中国水稻研究所 | 2000s | 193 | 414.87 | |
ZR02 | 湖南亚华种业科学研究院 | 2000s | 166 | 346.07 | |
天丰B Tianfeng B | 广东省农业科学院水稻研究所 | 2000s | 137 | 713.80 | |
荣丰B Rongfeng B | 广东省农业科学院水稻研究所 | 2000s | 129 | 381.13 | |
黄华占 Huanghuazhan | 广东省农业科学院水稻研究所 | 2000s | 142 | 71.40 | |
粳型 japonica | |||||
轮回422 Lunhui 422 | 湖南杂交水稻研究中心 | 1980s | 316 | 2483.87 | |
02428 | 江苏省农业科学院 | 1980s | 397 | 1480.47 | |
武香粳1号 Wuxiangjing 1 | 江苏(武进)水稻研究所 | 1980s | 140 | 1485.13 | |
测21 Ce 21 | 浙江省农业科学院 | 1980s | 124 | 1502.67 | |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 江苏(武进)水稻研究所 | 1980s | 126 | 1452.07 | |
香糯9121 Xiangnuo 9121 | 江苏(武进)水稻研究所 | 1990s | 108 | 1164.80 | |
镇稻88 Zhendao 88 | 江苏丘陵地区镇江农业科学研究所 | 1990s | 99 | 886.73 | |
五优稻1号 Wuyoudao 1 | 黑龙江省五常市种子公司 | 1990s | 126 | 441.93 | |
长白9号 Changbai 9 | 吉林省农业科学院水稻研究所 | 1990s | 128 | 261.87 | |
79-227 | 辽宁省农业科学院稻作研究所 | 1990s | 96 | 251.80 | |
吉粳88 Jijing 88 | 吉林省农业科学院水稻研究所 | 2000s | 96 | 35.53 | |
龙粳13 Longjing 13 | 黑龙江省农业科学院水稻研究所 | 2000s | 8 | 509.87 | |
秀水110 Xiushui 110 | 嘉兴市农业科学研究院 | 2000s | 59 | 165.60 | |
垦稻10号 Kendao 10 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院水稻研究所 | 2000s | 18 | 361.00 | |
盐丰47 Yanfeng 47 | 辽宁省盐碱地利用研究所 | 2000s | 55 | 25.53 |
Table 3 Backbone parents bred since 1979 (15 indica and 15 japonica rice, 5 varieties per decade). ×104 hm2
品种名 Variety | 第一完成单位 Breeding unit | 育成年代 Release year | 连续3代个数 Number of next three generations | 连续3代面积 Area of next three generation | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
籼型 indica | |||||
明恢63 Minghui 63 | 三明市农业科学研究所 | 1980s | 1370 | 20100.73 | |
博B Bo B | 广西博白县农业科学研究所 | 1980s | 461 | 2488.93 | |
优ⅠB You ⅠB | 湖南杂交水稻研究中心 | 1980s | 462 | 2325.60 | |
测64-7 Ce 64-7 | 原湖南省安江农业学校 | 1980s | 202 | 4993.67 | |
扬稻4号 Yangdao 4 | 江苏里下河地区农业科学研究所 | 1980s | 273 | 2936.27 | |
金23B Jin 23B | 常德市农业科学研究所 | 1990s | 741 | 3662.47 | |
蜀恢527 Shuhui 527 | 四川农业大学水稻研究所 | 1990s | 495 | 1998.53 | |
扬稻6号 Yangdao 6 | 江苏里下河地区农业科学研究所 | 1990s | 357 | 2859.60 | |
中9B Zhong 9B | 中国水稻研究所 | 1990s | 313 | 1238.87 | |
浙9248 Zhe 9248 | 浙江省农业科学院作物研究所 | 1990s | 274 | 1142.00 | |
华占 Huazhan | 中国水稻研究所 | 2000s | 193 | 414.87 | |
ZR02 | 湖南亚华种业科学研究院 | 2000s | 166 | 346.07 | |
天丰B Tianfeng B | 广东省农业科学院水稻研究所 | 2000s | 137 | 713.80 | |
荣丰B Rongfeng B | 广东省农业科学院水稻研究所 | 2000s | 129 | 381.13 | |
黄华占 Huanghuazhan | 广东省农业科学院水稻研究所 | 2000s | 142 | 71.40 | |
粳型 japonica | |||||
轮回422 Lunhui 422 | 湖南杂交水稻研究中心 | 1980s | 316 | 2483.87 | |
02428 | 江苏省农业科学院 | 1980s | 397 | 1480.47 | |
武香粳1号 Wuxiangjing 1 | 江苏(武进)水稻研究所 | 1980s | 140 | 1485.13 | |
测21 Ce 21 | 浙江省农业科学院 | 1980s | 124 | 1502.67 | |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 江苏(武进)水稻研究所 | 1980s | 126 | 1452.07 | |
香糯9121 Xiangnuo 9121 | 江苏(武进)水稻研究所 | 1990s | 108 | 1164.80 | |
镇稻88 Zhendao 88 | 江苏丘陵地区镇江农业科学研究所 | 1990s | 99 | 886.73 | |
五优稻1号 Wuyoudao 1 | 黑龙江省五常市种子公司 | 1990s | 126 | 441.93 | |
长白9号 Changbai 9 | 吉林省农业科学院水稻研究所 | 1990s | 128 | 261.87 | |
79-227 | 辽宁省农业科学院稻作研究所 | 1990s | 96 | 251.80 | |
吉粳88 Jijing 88 | 吉林省农业科学院水稻研究所 | 2000s | 96 | 35.53 | |
龙粳13 Longjing 13 | 黑龙江省农业科学院水稻研究所 | 2000s | 8 | 509.87 | |
秀水110 Xiushui 110 | 嘉兴市农业科学研究院 | 2000s | 59 | 165.60 | |
垦稻10号 Kendao 10 | 黑龙江省农垦科学院水稻研究所 | 2000s | 18 | 361.00 | |
盐丰47 Yanfeng 47 | 辽宁省盐碱地利用研究所 | 2000s | 55 | 25.53 |
年份 Year | 杂交组合数 No. of combinations | 不育系数 No. of sterile lines | 不育系指数 Sterile index | 恢复系数 No. of restore lines | 恢复系指数Restorer index | 亲本指数 Parent index | 常规品种数 No. of conventional varieties | 亲本数 No. of parents | 亲本指数 Parent index | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1979 | 5 | 3 | 0.60 | 2 | 0.40 | 1.00 | 15 | 22 | 1.47 | ||
1980 | 2 | 2 | 1.00 | 2 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 5 | 8 | 1.60 | ||
1981 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | 6 | 9 | 1.50 | ||
1982 | 4 | 3 | 0.75 | 3 | 0.75 | 1.50 | 28 | 43 | 1.54 | ||
1983 | 11 | 5 | 0.45 | 8 | 0.73 | 1.18 | 70 | 104 | 1.49 | ||
1984 | 4 | 3 | 0.75 | 3 | 0.75 | 1.50 | 15 | 26 | 1.73 | ||
1985 | 18 | 10 | 0.56 | 17 | 0.94 | 1.50 | 78 | 122 | 1.56 | ||
1986 | 7 | 5 | 0.71 | 7 | 1.00 | 1.71 | 38 | 62 | 1.63 | ||
1987 | 13 | 6 | 0.46 | 9 | 0.69 | 1.15 | 72 | 109 | 1.51 | ||
1988 | 10 | 7 | 0.70 | 5 | 0.50 | 1.20 | 60 | 99 | 1.65 | ||
1989 | 12 | 8 | 0.67 | 11 | 0.92 | 1.58 | 59 | 93 | 1.58 | ||
1990 | 27 | 12 | 0.44 | 22 | 0.81 | 1.26 | 80 | 122 | 1.53 | ||
1991 | 16 | 8 | 0.50 | 13 | 0.81 | 1.31 | 61 | 98 | 1.61 | ||
1992 | 20 | 9 | 0.45 | 19 | 0.95 | 1.40 | 72 | 123 | 1.71 | ||
1993 | 25 | 17 | 0.68 | 20 | 0.80 | 1.48 | 75 | 123 | 1.64 | ||
1994 | 29 | 22 | 0.76 | 24 | 0.83 | 1.59 | 72 | 118 | 1.64 | ||
1995 | 25 | 17 | 0.68 | 21 | 0.84 | 1.52 | 70 | 121 | 1.73 | ||
1996 | 28 | 15 | 0.54 | 27 | 0.96 | 1.50 | 66 | 109 | 1.65 | ||
1997 | 47 | 26 | 0.55 | 38 | 0.81 | 1.36 | 76 | 136 | 1.79 | ||
1998 | 65 | 30 | 0.46 | 58 | 0.89 | 1.35 | 82 | 142 | 1.73 | ||
1999 | 79 | 27 | 0.34 | 66 | 0.84 | 1.18 | 98 | 160 | 1.63 | ||
2000 | 147 | 45 | 0.31 | 99 | 0.67 | 0.98 | 104 | 178 | 1.71 | ||
2001 | 209 | 64 | 0.31 | 128 | 0.61 | 0.92 | 107 | 168 | 1.57 | ||
2002 | 124 | 58 | 0.47 | 105 | 0.85 | 1.31 | 123 | 203 | 1.65 | ||
2003 | 174 | 79 | 0.45 | 140 | 0.80 | 1.26 | 163 | 268 | 1.64 | ||
2004 | 217 | 105 | 0.48 | 180 | 0.83 | 1.31 | 122 | 211 | 1.73 | ||
2005 | 320 | 124 | 0.39 | 263 | 0.82 | 1.21 | 195 | 301 | 1.54 | ||
2006 | 409 | 152 | 0.37 | 342 | 0.84 | 1.21 | 172 | 276 | 1.60 | ||
2007 | 319 | 149 | 0.47 | 285 | 0.89 | 1.36 | 140 | 228 | 1.63 | ||
2008 | 318 | 153 | 0.48 | 296 | 0.93 | 1.41 | 153 | 246 | 1.61 | ||
2009 | 331 | 157 | 0.47 | 308 | 0.93 | 1.40 | 145 | 237 | 1.63 | ||
2010 | 325 | 172 | 0.53 | 300 | 0.92 | 1.45 | 156 | 256 | 1.64 | ||
2011 | 272 | 162 | 0.60 | 259 | 0.95 | 1.55 | 113 | 190 | 1.68 | ||
2012 | 261 | 161 | 0.62 | 239 | 0.92 | 1.53 | 129 | 216 | 1.67 | ||
2013 | 282 | 159 | 0.56 | 259 | 0.92 | 1.48 | 135 | 213 | 1.58 | ||
2014 | 314 | 181 | 0.58 | 279 | 0.89 | 1.46 | 169 | 282 | 1.67 | ||
2015 | 332 | 187 | 0.56 | 276 | 0.83 | 1.39 | 135 | 231 | 1.71 | ||
2016 | 310 | 176 | 0.57 | 260 | 0.84 | 1.41 | 129 | 223 | 1.73 | ||
2017 | 506 | 278 | 0.55 | 395 | 0.78 | 1.33 | 220 | 348 | 1.58 | ||
2018 | 657 | 314 | 0.48 | 539 | 0.82 | 1.30 | 283 | 432 | 1.53 | ||
平均 Mean | 0.55 | 0.83 | 1.37 | 1.63 | |||||||
变异系数 Variation | 25.60% | 15.10% | 14.60% | 4.75% |
Table 4 Number and IOP of rice varieties approved by provincial or national agencies in 1979-2018.
年份 Year | 杂交组合数 No. of combinations | 不育系数 No. of sterile lines | 不育系指数 Sterile index | 恢复系数 No. of restore lines | 恢复系指数Restorer index | 亲本指数 Parent index | 常规品种数 No. of conventional varieties | 亲本数 No. of parents | 亲本指数 Parent index | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1979 | 5 | 3 | 0.60 | 2 | 0.40 | 1.00 | 15 | 22 | 1.47 | ||
1980 | 2 | 2 | 1.00 | 2 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 5 | 8 | 1.60 | ||
1981 | 0 | - | - | - | - | - | 6 | 9 | 1.50 | ||
1982 | 4 | 3 | 0.75 | 3 | 0.75 | 1.50 | 28 | 43 | 1.54 | ||
1983 | 11 | 5 | 0.45 | 8 | 0.73 | 1.18 | 70 | 104 | 1.49 | ||
1984 | 4 | 3 | 0.75 | 3 | 0.75 | 1.50 | 15 | 26 | 1.73 | ||
1985 | 18 | 10 | 0.56 | 17 | 0.94 | 1.50 | 78 | 122 | 1.56 | ||
1986 | 7 | 5 | 0.71 | 7 | 1.00 | 1.71 | 38 | 62 | 1.63 | ||
1987 | 13 | 6 | 0.46 | 9 | 0.69 | 1.15 | 72 | 109 | 1.51 | ||
1988 | 10 | 7 | 0.70 | 5 | 0.50 | 1.20 | 60 | 99 | 1.65 | ||
1989 | 12 | 8 | 0.67 | 11 | 0.92 | 1.58 | 59 | 93 | 1.58 | ||
1990 | 27 | 12 | 0.44 | 22 | 0.81 | 1.26 | 80 | 122 | 1.53 | ||
1991 | 16 | 8 | 0.50 | 13 | 0.81 | 1.31 | 61 | 98 | 1.61 | ||
1992 | 20 | 9 | 0.45 | 19 | 0.95 | 1.40 | 72 | 123 | 1.71 | ||
1993 | 25 | 17 | 0.68 | 20 | 0.80 | 1.48 | 75 | 123 | 1.64 | ||
1994 | 29 | 22 | 0.76 | 24 | 0.83 | 1.59 | 72 | 118 | 1.64 | ||
1995 | 25 | 17 | 0.68 | 21 | 0.84 | 1.52 | 70 | 121 | 1.73 | ||
1996 | 28 | 15 | 0.54 | 27 | 0.96 | 1.50 | 66 | 109 | 1.65 | ||
1997 | 47 | 26 | 0.55 | 38 | 0.81 | 1.36 | 76 | 136 | 1.79 | ||
1998 | 65 | 30 | 0.46 | 58 | 0.89 | 1.35 | 82 | 142 | 1.73 | ||
1999 | 79 | 27 | 0.34 | 66 | 0.84 | 1.18 | 98 | 160 | 1.63 | ||
2000 | 147 | 45 | 0.31 | 99 | 0.67 | 0.98 | 104 | 178 | 1.71 | ||
2001 | 209 | 64 | 0.31 | 128 | 0.61 | 0.92 | 107 | 168 | 1.57 | ||
2002 | 124 | 58 | 0.47 | 105 | 0.85 | 1.31 | 123 | 203 | 1.65 | ||
2003 | 174 | 79 | 0.45 | 140 | 0.80 | 1.26 | 163 | 268 | 1.64 | ||
2004 | 217 | 105 | 0.48 | 180 | 0.83 | 1.31 | 122 | 211 | 1.73 | ||
2005 | 320 | 124 | 0.39 | 263 | 0.82 | 1.21 | 195 | 301 | 1.54 | ||
2006 | 409 | 152 | 0.37 | 342 | 0.84 | 1.21 | 172 | 276 | 1.60 | ||
2007 | 319 | 149 | 0.47 | 285 | 0.89 | 1.36 | 140 | 228 | 1.63 | ||
2008 | 318 | 153 | 0.48 | 296 | 0.93 | 1.41 | 153 | 246 | 1.61 | ||
2009 | 331 | 157 | 0.47 | 308 | 0.93 | 1.40 | 145 | 237 | 1.63 | ||
2010 | 325 | 172 | 0.53 | 300 | 0.92 | 1.45 | 156 | 256 | 1.64 | ||
2011 | 272 | 162 | 0.60 | 259 | 0.95 | 1.55 | 113 | 190 | 1.68 | ||
2012 | 261 | 161 | 0.62 | 239 | 0.92 | 1.53 | 129 | 216 | 1.67 | ||
2013 | 282 | 159 | 0.56 | 259 | 0.92 | 1.48 | 135 | 213 | 1.58 | ||
2014 | 314 | 181 | 0.58 | 279 | 0.89 | 1.46 | 169 | 282 | 1.67 | ||
2015 | 332 | 187 | 0.56 | 276 | 0.83 | 1.39 | 135 | 231 | 1.71 | ||
2016 | 310 | 176 | 0.57 | 260 | 0.84 | 1.41 | 129 | 223 | 1.73 | ||
2017 | 506 | 278 | 0.55 | 395 | 0.78 | 1.33 | 220 | 348 | 1.58 | ||
2018 | 657 | 314 | 0.48 | 539 | 0.82 | 1.30 | 283 | 432 | 1.53 | ||
平均 Mean | 0.55 | 0.83 | 1.37 | 1.63 | |||||||
变异系数 Variation | 25.60% | 15.10% | 14.60% | 4.75% |
[1] | 林世成, 闵绍楷. 中国水稻品种及其系谱. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1991: 1-8. |
Lin S C, Min S K.Rice Variety and Their Genealogy in China. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Press, 1991: 1-8. (in Chinese) | |
[2] | 万建民. 中国水稻遗传育种与品种系谱(1986-2005). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2009: 1-22. |
Wan J M.Rice Genetic Breeding and Variety Genealogy in China(1986-2005). Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2009: 1-22. (in Chinese) | |
[3] | 鄂志国, 王磊. 中国水稻品种及其系谱数据库. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(5): 565-566. |
E Z G, Wang L. Construction of database for Chinese rice varieties and their genealogy.Chin J Rice Sci, 2011, 25(5): 565-566. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 孙宗修, 鄂志国, 王磊, 朱德峰, 张玉屏, 胡国成, 刘文真, 付亚萍. 对中国水稻骨干亲本评定方法的探索. 作物学报, 2014, 40(6): 973-983. |
Sun Z X, E Z G, Wang L, Zhu D F, Zhang Y P, Hu G C, Liu W Z, Fu Y P. Exploring assessment method of Chinese rice backbone parents.Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40(6): 973-983. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 林海, 李婷婷, 童汉华, 王志刚, 王磊, 鄂志国. 我国水稻主栽品种演替分析. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(6): 565-571. |
Lin H, Li T T, Tong H H, Wang Z G, Wang L, E Z G. Analysis on evolution of major rice cultivars in China.Chin J Rice Sci, 2018, 32(6): 565-571. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 王江春, 胡延吉, 余松烈, 王振林, 刘爱峰, 王洪刚. 建国以来山东省小麦品种及其亲本的亲缘系数分析. 中国农业科学, 2006, 39(4): 664-672. |
Wang J C, Hu Y J, Yu S L, Wang Z L, Liu A F, Wang H G.Relationship coefficient analysis among winter wheat varieties and their parents in Shandong Province after liberation.Sci Agric Sin, 2006, 39(4): 664-672. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 刘章雄, 石孙, 李卫东, 陈立军, 常汝镇, 邱丽娟. 1983—2010年北京市大豆育成品种的亲缘关系分析. 作物学报, 2013, 39(9): 1693-1700. |
Liu Z X, Shi S, Li W D, Chen L J, Chang R Z, Qiu L J.Analysis of parental relationship for soybean cultivars released from 1983 to 2010 in Beijing.Acta Agron Sin, 2013, 39(9): 1693-1700. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | GUO Zhan, ZHANG Yunbo. Research Progress in Physiological,Biochemical Responses of Rice to Drought Stress and Its Molecular Regulation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[2] | WEI Huanhe, MA Weiyi, ZUO Boyuan, WANG Lulu, ZHU Wang, GENG Xiaoyu, ZHANG Xiang, MENG Tianyao, CHEN Yinglong, GAO Pinglei, XU Ke, HUO Zhongyang, DAI Qigen. Research Progress in the Effect of Salinity, Drought, and Their Combined Stresses on Rice Yield and Quality Formation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[3] | XU Danjie, LIN Qiaoxia, LI Zhengkang, ZHUANG Xiaoqian, LING Yu, LAI Meiling, CHEN Xiaoting, LU Guodong. OsOPR10 Positively Regulates Rice Blast and Bacterial Blight Resistance [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 364-374. |
[4] | CHEN Mingliang, ZENG Xihua, SHEN Yumin, LUO Shiyou, HU Lanxiang, XIONG Wentao, XIONG Huanjin, WU Xiaoyan, XIAO Yeqing. Typing of Inter-subspecific Fertility Loci and Fertility Locus Pattern of indica-japonica Hybrid Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 386-396. |
[5] | DING Zhengquan, PAN Yueyun, SHI Yang, HUANG Haixiang. Comprehensive Evaluation and Comparative Analysis of Jiahe Series Long-Grain japonica Rice with High Eating Quality Based on Gene Chip Technology [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 397-408. |
[6] | HOU Xiaoqin, WANG Ying, YU Bei, FU Weimeng, FENG Baohua, SHEN Yichao, XIE Hangjun, WANG Huanran, XU Yongqiang, WU Zhihai, WANG Jianjun, TAO Longxing, FU Guanfu. Mechanisms Behind the Role of Potassium Fulvic Acid in Enhancing Salt Tolerance in Rice Seedlings [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 409-421. |
[7] | LÜ Zhou, YI Binghuai, CHEN Pingping, ZHOU Wenxin, TANG Wenbang, YI Zhenxie. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Transplanting Density on Yield Formation of Small Seed Hybrid Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 422-436. |
[8] | HU Jijie, HU Zhihua, ZHANG Junhua, CAO Xiaochuang, JIN Qianyu, ZHANG Zhiyuan, ZHU Lianfeng. Effects of Rhizosphere Saturated Dissolved Oxygen on Photosynthetic and Growth Characteristics of Rice at Tillering Stage [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 437-446. |
[9] | WU Yue, LIANG Chengwei, ZHAO Chenfei, SUN Jian, MA Dianrong. Occurrence of Weedy Rice Disaster and Ecotype Evolution in Direct-Seeded Rice Fields [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 447-455. |
[10] | LIU Fuxiang, ZHEN Haoyang, PENG Huan, ZHENG Liuchun, PENG Deliang, WEN Yanhua. Investigation and Species Identification of Cyst Nematode Disease on Rice in Guangdong Province [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 456-461. |
[11] | CHEN Haotian, QIN Yuan, ZHONG Xiaohan, LIN Chenyu, QIN Jinghang, YANG Jianchang, ZHANG Weiyang. Research Progress on the Relationship Between Rice Root, Soil Properties and Methane Emissions in Paddy Fields [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 233-245. |
[12] | MIAO Jun, RAN Jinhui, XU Mengbin, BO Liubing, WANG Ping, LIANG Guohua, ZHOU Yong. Overexpression of RGG2, a Heterotrimeric G Protein γ Subunit-Encoding Gene, Improves Drought Tolerance in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 246-255. |
[13] | YIN Xiaoxiao, ZHANG Zhihan, YAN Xiulian, LIAO Rong, YANG Sijia, Beenish HASSAN, GUO Daiming, FAN Jing, ZHAO Zhixue, WANG Wenming. Signal Peptide Validation and Expression Analysis of Multiple Effectors from Ustilaginoidea virens [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 256-265. |
[14] | ZHU Yujing, GUI Jinxin, GONG Chengyun, LUO Xinyang, SHI Jubin, ZHANG Haiqing, HE Jiwai. QTL Mapping for Tiller Angle in Rice by Genome-wide Association Analysis [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 266-276. |
[15] | WEI Qianqian, WANG Yulei, KONG Haimin, XU Qingshan, YAN Yulian, PAN Lin, CHI Chunxin, KONG Yali, TIAN Wenhao, ZHU Lianfeng, CAO Xiaochuang, ZHANG Junhua, ZHU Chunqun. Mechanism of Hydrogen Sulfide, a Signaling Molecule Involved in Reducing the Inhibitory Effect of Aluminum Toxicity on Rice Growth Together with Sulfur Fertilizer [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 290-302. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||