Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2018, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 237-246.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2018.7102 237
• Research Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
Chengxin JU1,2, Yaojie CHEN1, Buhong ZHAO2, Lijun LIU1, Zhiqin WANG1, Jianchang YANG1,*()
Received:
2017-08-27
Revised:
2018-01-03
Online:
2018-05-10
Published:
2018-05-10
Contact:
Jianchang YANG
剧成欣1,2, 陈尧杰1, 赵步洪2, 刘立军1, 王志琴1, 杨建昌1,*()
通讯作者:
杨建昌
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Chengxin JU, Yaojie CHEN, Buhong ZHAO, Lijun LIU, Zhiqin WANG, Jianchang YANG. Effect of Site-Specific Nitrogen Management on Grain Yield and Quality of japonicaRice Varieties Differed in Response to Nitrogen[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2018, 32(3): 237-246.
剧成欣, 陈尧杰, 赵步洪, 刘立军, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 实地氮肥管理对不同氮响应粳稻品种产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(3): 237-246.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2018.7102 237
时期 Stage | 氮空白区ZN /(kg·hm-2) | 农民常规FCP /(kg·hm-2) | 实地氮肥SSNM /(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|
移栽前Pre-transplanting | - | 150 | 90 |
分蘖中期Mid-tillering | - | 60 | 60 |
穗分化始期Panicle initiation | - | 60 | 60 (38<SPAD<40) 75 (SPAD≤38) 45 (SPAD≥42) |
颖花分化期Spikelet differentiation | - | 30 | 60 (40<SPAD<42) 75 (SPAD≤40) 45 (SPAD≥42) |
合计Total | 0 | 300 | 240-300 |
Table 1 Stage and amount of nitrogen application for different nitrogen managements.
时期 Stage | 氮空白区ZN /(kg·hm-2) | 农民常规FCP /(kg·hm-2) | 实地氮肥SSNM /(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|
移栽前Pre-transplanting | - | 150 | 90 |
分蘖中期Mid-tillering | - | 60 | 60 |
穗分化始期Panicle initiation | - | 60 | 60 (38<SPAD<40) 75 (SPAD≤38) 45 (SPAD≥42) |
颖花分化期Spikelet differentiation | - | 30 | 60 (40<SPAD<42) 75 (SPAD≤40) 45 (SPAD≥42) |
合计Total | 0 | 300 | 240-300 |
年份/品种 Year/Variety | 处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield /(t·hm-2) | 穗数 No. of panicles per hm2/(×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle | 结实率 Filled grain rate /% | 粒重 Grain weight /mg | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014 | ||||||||
淮稻5号 | 氮空白区ZN | 6.40 d | 223 d | 115 e | 90.4 a | 27.6 a | ||
Huaidao5 | 农民常规FCP | 9.19 c | 301 a | 141 c | 80.5 e | 26.9 ab | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 10.29 a | 298 a | 149 b | 85.8 c | 27.0 ab | |||
连粳7号 | 氮空白区ZN | 6.41 d | 199 de | 132 d | 89.7 a | 27.2 a | ||
Lianjing7 | 农民常规FCP | 9.28 c | 286 ab | 150 b | 82.9 d | 26.1 cd | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 10.35 a | 277 b | 162 a | 87.4 b | 26.4 bc | |||
宁粳1号 | 氮空白区ZN | 6.00 e | 209 de | 122 de | 89.5 a | 26.3 cd | ||
Ningjing1 | 农民常规FCP | 9.33 c | 303 a | 145 bc | 83.3 d | 25.5 d | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 9.83 b | 283 ab | 151 b | 86.8 bc | 26.5 bc | |||
扬粳4038 | 氮空白区ZN | 6.03 e | 190 e | 129 d | 89.4 a | 27.5 a | ||
Yangjing4038 | 农民常规FCP | 9.24 c | 261 bc | 165 a | 80.7 e | 26.6 bc | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 9.73 b | 251 c | 169 a | 84.6 cd | 27.1 ab | |||
2015 | ||||||||
淮稻5号 | 氮空白区ZN | 6.33 d | 204 d | 122 f | 93.5 a | 27.2 b | ||
Huaidao5 | 农民常规FCP | 9.12 c | 284 a | 146 d | 81.5 e | 27.0 b | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 10.30 a | 285 a | 156 c | 86.1 d | 26.9 b | |||
连粳7号 | 氮空白区ZN | 6.31 d | 187 e | 140 e | 89.3 bc | 27.0 b | ||
Lianjing7 | 农民常规FCP | 9.15 c | 263 b | 163 b | 82.7 de | 25.8 c | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 10.29 a | 263 b | 174 a | 86.5 d | 26.0 c | |||
宁粳1号 | 氮空白区ZN | 5.86 e | 202 d | 121 f | 91.1 b | 26.3 c | ||
Ningjing1 | 农民常规FCP | 9.07 c | 290 a | 153 c | 81.4 e | 25.1 d | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 9.77 b | 286 a | 156 c | 84.2 d | 26.0 c | |||
扬粳4038 | 氮空白区ZN | 5.84 e | 172 f | 137 e | 88.5 c | 28.0 a | ||
Yangjing4038 | 农民常规FCP | 8.97 c | 256 bc | 164 b | 80.9 e | 26.4 c | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 9.48 b | 248 c | 167 b | 85.1 d | 26.9 b |
Table 2 Grain yield and its components of rice varieties under different nitrogen managements.
年份/品种 Year/Variety | 处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield /(t·hm-2) | 穗数 No. of panicles per hm2/(×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle | 结实率 Filled grain rate /% | 粒重 Grain weight /mg | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014 | ||||||||
淮稻5号 | 氮空白区ZN | 6.40 d | 223 d | 115 e | 90.4 a | 27.6 a | ||
Huaidao5 | 农民常规FCP | 9.19 c | 301 a | 141 c | 80.5 e | 26.9 ab | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 10.29 a | 298 a | 149 b | 85.8 c | 27.0 ab | |||
连粳7号 | 氮空白区ZN | 6.41 d | 199 de | 132 d | 89.7 a | 27.2 a | ||
Lianjing7 | 农民常规FCP | 9.28 c | 286 ab | 150 b | 82.9 d | 26.1 cd | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 10.35 a | 277 b | 162 a | 87.4 b | 26.4 bc | |||
宁粳1号 | 氮空白区ZN | 6.00 e | 209 de | 122 de | 89.5 a | 26.3 cd | ||
Ningjing1 | 农民常规FCP | 9.33 c | 303 a | 145 bc | 83.3 d | 25.5 d | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 9.83 b | 283 ab | 151 b | 86.8 bc | 26.5 bc | |||
扬粳4038 | 氮空白区ZN | 6.03 e | 190 e | 129 d | 89.4 a | 27.5 a | ||
Yangjing4038 | 农民常规FCP | 9.24 c | 261 bc | 165 a | 80.7 e | 26.6 bc | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 9.73 b | 251 c | 169 a | 84.6 cd | 27.1 ab | |||
2015 | ||||||||
淮稻5号 | 氮空白区ZN | 6.33 d | 204 d | 122 f | 93.5 a | 27.2 b | ||
Huaidao5 | 农民常规FCP | 9.12 c | 284 a | 146 d | 81.5 e | 27.0 b | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 10.30 a | 285 a | 156 c | 86.1 d | 26.9 b | |||
连粳7号 | 氮空白区ZN | 6.31 d | 187 e | 140 e | 89.3 bc | 27.0 b | ||
Lianjing7 | 农民常规FCP | 9.15 c | 263 b | 163 b | 82.7 de | 25.8 c | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 10.29 a | 263 b | 174 a | 86.5 d | 26.0 c | |||
宁粳1号 | 氮空白区ZN | 5.86 e | 202 d | 121 f | 91.1 b | 26.3 c | ||
Ningjing1 | 农民常规FCP | 9.07 c | 290 a | 153 c | 81.4 e | 25.1 d | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 9.77 b | 286 a | 156 c | 84.2 d | 26.0 c | |||
扬粳4038 | 氮空白区ZN | 5.84 e | 172 f | 137 e | 88.5 c | 28.0 a | ||
Yangjing4038 | 农民常规FCP | 8.97 c | 256 bc | 164 b | 80.9 e | 26.4 c | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 9.48 b | 248 c | 167 b | 85.1 d | 26.9 b |
年份/品种 Year/Variety | 处理 Treatment | 吸氮量 N uptake/(kg·hm-2) | 吸收利用效率 RE/% | 农学利用效率 AE/(kg·kg-1) | 生理利用效率 PE/(kg·kg-1) | 氮肥偏生产力 PFP/(kg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014 | ||||||
淮稻5号 | 氮空白区ZN | 75.2 d | ||||
Huaidao5 | 农民常规FCP | 169.3 c | 31.4 c | 9.3 d | 29.6 d | 30.6 c |
实地氮肥SSNM | 190.2 a | 45.1 a | 15.3 a | 33.8 b | 40.4 a | |
连粳7号 | 氮空白区ZN | 75.3 d | ||||
Lianjing7 | 农民常规FCP | 168.5 c | 31.1 c | 9.6 d | 30.8 d | 30.9 c |
实地氮肥SSNM | 190.8 a | 45.3 a | 15.5 a | 34.1 b | 40.6 a | |
宁粳1号 | 氮空白区ZN | 72.7 e | ||||
Ningjing1 | 农民常规FCP | 170.9 c | 32.7 c | 11.1 c | 33.9 c | 31.1 c |
实地氮肥SSNM | 181.3 b | 40.2 b | 14.2 b | 35.3 a | 36.4 b | |
扬粳4038 | 氮空白区ZN | 72.5 e | ||||
Yangjing4038 | 农民常规FCP | 169.4 c | 32.3 c | 10.7 c | 33.1 c | 30.8 c |
实地氮肥SSNM | 177.6 b | 39.0 b | 13.7 b | 35.2 a | 36.0 b | |
2015 | ||||||
淮稻5号 | 氮空白区ZN | 77.5 d | ||||
Huaidao5 | 农民常规FCP | 172.3 c | 31.6 c | 9.3 d | 29.5 e | 30.4 c |
实地氮肥SSNM | 190.5 a | 44.3 a | 15.6 a | 35.1 b | 40.4 a | |
连粳7号 | 氮空白区ZN | 77.6 d | ||||
Lianjing7 | 农民常规FCP | 170.5 c | 31.0 c | 9.4 d | 30.5 e | 30.5 c |
实地氮肥SSNM | 191.6 a | 44.7 a | 15.5 a | 34.9 b | 40.4 a | |
宁粳1号 | 氮空白区ZN | 74.5 e | ||||
Ningjing1 | 农民常规FCP | 169.1 c | 31.5 c | 10.7 c | 33.9 c | 30.2 c |
实地氮肥SSNM | 180.3 b | 39.2 b | 14.5 b | 37.0 a | 36.2 b | |
扬粳4038 | 氮空白区ZN | 74.8 e | ||||
Yangjing4038 | 农民常规FCP | 172.6 c | 32.6 c | 10.4 c | 32.0 d | 29.9 c |
实地氮肥SSNM | 179.8 b | 38.9 b | 13.5 b | 34.7 b | 37.2 b |
Table 3 Nitrogen uptake and nitrogen use efficiency of rice varieties under different nitrogen managements.
年份/品种 Year/Variety | 处理 Treatment | 吸氮量 N uptake/(kg·hm-2) | 吸收利用效率 RE/% | 农学利用效率 AE/(kg·kg-1) | 生理利用效率 PE/(kg·kg-1) | 氮肥偏生产力 PFP/(kg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2014 | ||||||
淮稻5号 | 氮空白区ZN | 75.2 d | ||||
Huaidao5 | 农民常规FCP | 169.3 c | 31.4 c | 9.3 d | 29.6 d | 30.6 c |
实地氮肥SSNM | 190.2 a | 45.1 a | 15.3 a | 33.8 b | 40.4 a | |
连粳7号 | 氮空白区ZN | 75.3 d | ||||
Lianjing7 | 农民常规FCP | 168.5 c | 31.1 c | 9.6 d | 30.8 d | 30.9 c |
实地氮肥SSNM | 190.8 a | 45.3 a | 15.5 a | 34.1 b | 40.6 a | |
宁粳1号 | 氮空白区ZN | 72.7 e | ||||
Ningjing1 | 农民常规FCP | 170.9 c | 32.7 c | 11.1 c | 33.9 c | 31.1 c |
实地氮肥SSNM | 181.3 b | 40.2 b | 14.2 b | 35.3 a | 36.4 b | |
扬粳4038 | 氮空白区ZN | 72.5 e | ||||
Yangjing4038 | 农民常规FCP | 169.4 c | 32.3 c | 10.7 c | 33.1 c | 30.8 c |
实地氮肥SSNM | 177.6 b | 39.0 b | 13.7 b | 35.2 a | 36.0 b | |
2015 | ||||||
淮稻5号 | 氮空白区ZN | 77.5 d | ||||
Huaidao5 | 农民常规FCP | 172.3 c | 31.6 c | 9.3 d | 29.5 e | 30.4 c |
实地氮肥SSNM | 190.5 a | 44.3 a | 15.6 a | 35.1 b | 40.4 a | |
连粳7号 | 氮空白区ZN | 77.6 d | ||||
Lianjing7 | 农民常规FCP | 170.5 c | 31.0 c | 9.4 d | 30.5 e | 30.5 c |
实地氮肥SSNM | 191.6 a | 44.7 a | 15.5 a | 34.9 b | 40.4 a | |
宁粳1号 | 氮空白区ZN | 74.5 e | ||||
Ningjing1 | 农民常规FCP | 169.1 c | 31.5 c | 10.7 c | 33.9 c | 30.2 c |
实地氮肥SSNM | 180.3 b | 39.2 b | 14.5 b | 37.0 a | 36.2 b | |
扬粳4038 | 氮空白区ZN | 74.8 e | ||||
Yangjing4038 | 农民常规FCP | 172.6 c | 32.6 c | 10.4 c | 32.0 d | 29.9 c |
实地氮肥SSNM | 179.8 b | 38.9 b | 13.5 b | 34.7 b | 37.2 b |
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 糙米率 Brown rice percentage/% | 精米率 Milled rice percentage/% | 整精米率 Head rice percentage/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
淮稻5号 | 氮空白区ZN | 84.1 a | 74.9 bc | 64.1 cd | ||
Huaidao5 | 农民常规FCP | 82.6 a | 74.0 c | 62.2 e | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 83.8 a | 78.1 a | 71.1 a | |||
连粳7号 | 氮空白区ZN | 83.8 a | 73.8 c | 63.2 d | ||
Lianjing7 | 农民常规FCP | 81.3 a | 73.7 c | 64.7 c | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 84.3 a | 78.6 a | 70.6 a | |||
宁粳1号 | 氮空白区ZN | 82.9 a | 72.2 d | 63.1 d | ||
Ningjing 1 | 农民常规FCP | 82.6 a | 73.8 c | 63.0 d | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 83.7 a | 77.4 a | 69.2 b | |||
扬粳4038 | 氮空白区ZN | 83.7 a | 70.8 e | 60.4 e | ||
Yangjing4038 | 农民常规FCP | 82.2 a | 70.5 e | 62.3 e | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 83.9 a | 75.8 b | 69.2 b |
Table 4 Effect of nitrogen management on milling quality of rice.
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 糙米率 Brown rice percentage/% | 精米率 Milled rice percentage/% | 整精米率 Head rice percentage/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
淮稻5号 | 氮空白区ZN | 84.1 a | 74.9 bc | 64.1 cd | ||
Huaidao5 | 农民常规FCP | 82.6 a | 74.0 c | 62.2 e | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 83.8 a | 78.1 a | 71.1 a | |||
连粳7号 | 氮空白区ZN | 83.8 a | 73.8 c | 63.2 d | ||
Lianjing7 | 农民常规FCP | 81.3 a | 73.7 c | 64.7 c | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 84.3 a | 78.6 a | 70.6 a | |||
宁粳1号 | 氮空白区ZN | 82.9 a | 72.2 d | 63.1 d | ||
Ningjing 1 | 农民常规FCP | 82.6 a | 73.8 c | 63.0 d | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 83.7 a | 77.4 a | 69.2 b | |||
扬粳4038 | 氮空白区ZN | 83.7 a | 70.8 e | 60.4 e | ||
Yangjing4038 | 农民常规FCP | 82.2 a | 70.5 e | 62.3 e | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 83.9 a | 75.8 b | 69.2 b |
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 垩白粒率 Chalky grain rate/% | 垩白大小 Chalky area/% | 垩白度 Chalkiness/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
淮稻5号 | 氮空白区ZN | 23.1 e | 24.8 d | 5.7 e | ||
Huaidao5 | 农民常规FCP | 39.4 a | 34.2 b | 13.5 a | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 17.5 g | 18.8 e | 3.3 f | |||
连粳7号 | 氮空白区ZN | 27.6 d | 28.9 c | 8.0 cd | ||
Lianjing7 | 农民常规FCP | 32.4 c | 36.2 a | 11.7 b | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 20.9 f | 19.7 e | 4.1 f | |||
宁粳1号 | 氮空白区ZN | 27.2 d | 28.1 c | 7.6 d | ||
Ningjing 1 | 农民常规FCP | 38.4 a | 34.6 b | 13.3 a | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 22.1 e | 25.1 d | 5.5 e | |||
扬粳4038 | 氮空白区ZN | 31.5 c | 28.3 c | 8.9 c | ||
Yangjing4038 | 农民常规FCP | 35.8 b | 37.2 a | 13.3 a | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 22.6 e | 26.7 cd | 6.0 e |
Table 5 Effect of nitrogen management on appearance quality of rice.
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 垩白粒率 Chalky grain rate/% | 垩白大小 Chalky area/% | 垩白度 Chalkiness/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
淮稻5号 | 氮空白区ZN | 23.1 e | 24.8 d | 5.7 e | ||
Huaidao5 | 农民常规FCP | 39.4 a | 34.2 b | 13.5 a | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 17.5 g | 18.8 e | 3.3 f | |||
连粳7号 | 氮空白区ZN | 27.6 d | 28.9 c | 8.0 cd | ||
Lianjing7 | 农民常规FCP | 32.4 c | 36.2 a | 11.7 b | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 20.9 f | 19.7 e | 4.1 f | |||
宁粳1号 | 氮空白区ZN | 27.2 d | 28.1 c | 7.6 d | ||
Ningjing 1 | 农民常规FCP | 38.4 a | 34.6 b | 13.3 a | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 22.1 e | 25.1 d | 5.5 e | |||
扬粳4038 | 氮空白区ZN | 31.5 c | 28.3 c | 8.9 c | ||
Yangjing4038 | 农民常规FCP | 35.8 b | 37.2 a | 13.3 a | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 22.6 e | 26.7 cd | 6.0 e |
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 蛋白质含量 Protein content/% | 直链淀粉含量 Amylose content/% | 胶稠度 Gel consistency/mm | 糊化温度 Gelatinization temperature/℃ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
淮稻5号 | 氮空白区ZN | 7.7 d | 15.5 g | 70.3 e | 85.4 c |
Huaidao5 | 农民常规FCP | 8.7 a | 17.1 de | 77.5 c | 84.5 cd |
实地氮肥SSNM | 8.1 c | 15.4 g | 82.5 b | 82.6 e | |
连粳7号 | 氮空白区ZN | 7.6 d | 17.5 c | 73.6 d | 84.1 d |
Lianjing7 | 农民常规FCP | 8.5 b | 19.5 a | 79.8 bc | 82.9 e |
实地氮肥SSNM | 8.0 c | 16.5 f | 88.8 a | 80.2 f | |
宁粳1号 | 氮空白区ZN | 7.2 f | 16.9 e | 48.6 h | 89.9 a |
Ningjing1 | 农民常规FCP | 8.1 c | 17.3 cd | 57.3 g | 86.6 b |
实地氮肥SSNM | 7.6 d | 17.0 e | 64.5 f | 84.3 d | |
扬粳4038 | 氮空白区ZN | 7.1 f | 16.5 f | 50.3 h | 89.5 a |
Yangjing4038 | 农民常规FCP | 7.8 d | 18.9 b | 60.2 g | 87.0 b |
实地氮肥SSNM | 7.4 e | 17.4 c | 68.3 e | 84.2 d |
Table 6 Effect of nitrogen management on cooking quality and protein content of rice.
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 蛋白质含量 Protein content/% | 直链淀粉含量 Amylose content/% | 胶稠度 Gel consistency/mm | 糊化温度 Gelatinization temperature/℃ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
淮稻5号 | 氮空白区ZN | 7.7 d | 15.5 g | 70.3 e | 85.4 c |
Huaidao5 | 农民常规FCP | 8.7 a | 17.1 de | 77.5 c | 84.5 cd |
实地氮肥SSNM | 8.1 c | 15.4 g | 82.5 b | 82.6 e | |
连粳7号 | 氮空白区ZN | 7.6 d | 17.5 c | 73.6 d | 84.1 d |
Lianjing7 | 农民常规FCP | 8.5 b | 19.5 a | 79.8 bc | 82.9 e |
实地氮肥SSNM | 8.0 c | 16.5 f | 88.8 a | 80.2 f | |
宁粳1号 | 氮空白区ZN | 7.2 f | 16.9 e | 48.6 h | 89.9 a |
Ningjing1 | 农民常规FCP | 8.1 c | 17.3 cd | 57.3 g | 86.6 b |
实地氮肥SSNM | 7.6 d | 17.0 e | 64.5 f | 84.3 d | |
扬粳4038 | 氮空白区ZN | 7.1 f | 16.5 f | 50.3 h | 89.5 a |
Yangjing4038 | 农民常规FCP | 7.8 d | 18.9 b | 60.2 g | 87.0 b |
实地氮肥SSNM | 7.4 e | 17.4 c | 68.3 e | 84.2 d |
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 清蛋白 Albumin/% | 球蛋白 Globulin/% | 醇溶蛋白 Prolamin/% | 谷蛋白 Glutelin/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
淮稻5号 | 氮空白区ZN | 0.39 c | 0.69 b | 0.85 b | 5.74 c | ||
Huaidao5 | 农民常规FCP | 0.42 b | 0.68 b | 0.97 a | 5.91 b | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 0.45 a | 0.67 bc | 0.69 c | 6.29 a | |||
连粳7号 | 氮空白区ZN | 0.36 d | 0.70 b | 0.94 ab | 5.33 g | ||
Lianjing7 | 农民常规FCP | 0.37 d | 0.73 a | 1.01 a | 5.89 b | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 0.41 b | 0.69 b | 0.73 c | 6.21 a | |||
宁粳1号 | 氮空白区ZN | 0.29 fg | 0.68 b | 0.75 c | 5.48 ef | ||
Ningjing1 | 农民常规FCP | 0.28 g | 0.72 a | 0.86 b | 5.55 de | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 0.31 f | 0.65 c | 0.75 c | 5.90 b | |||
扬粳4038 | 氮空白区ZN | 0.28 g | 0.67 bc | 0.68 c | 5.40 fg | ||
Yangjing4038 | 农民常规FCP | 0.30 f | 0.70 b | 0.91 ab | 5.56 de | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 0.34 e | 0.72 a | 0.75 c | 5.68 cd |
Table 7 Effect of nitrogen management on protein content and its components in rice grain.
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 清蛋白 Albumin/% | 球蛋白 Globulin/% | 醇溶蛋白 Prolamin/% | 谷蛋白 Glutelin/% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
淮稻5号 | 氮空白区ZN | 0.39 c | 0.69 b | 0.85 b | 5.74 c | ||
Huaidao5 | 农民常规FCP | 0.42 b | 0.68 b | 0.97 a | 5.91 b | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 0.45 a | 0.67 bc | 0.69 c | 6.29 a | |||
连粳7号 | 氮空白区ZN | 0.36 d | 0.70 b | 0.94 ab | 5.33 g | ||
Lianjing7 | 农民常规FCP | 0.37 d | 0.73 a | 1.01 a | 5.89 b | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 0.41 b | 0.69 b | 0.73 c | 6.21 a | |||
宁粳1号 | 氮空白区ZN | 0.29 fg | 0.68 b | 0.75 c | 5.48 ef | ||
Ningjing1 | 农民常规FCP | 0.28 g | 0.72 a | 0.86 b | 5.55 de | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 0.31 f | 0.65 c | 0.75 c | 5.90 b | |||
扬粳4038 | 氮空白区ZN | 0.28 g | 0.67 bc | 0.68 c | 5.40 fg | ||
Yangjing4038 | 农民常规FCP | 0.30 f | 0.70 b | 0.91 ab | 5.56 de | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 0.34 e | 0.72 a | 0.75 c | 5.68 cd |
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 最高黏度 Peak viscosity | 热浆黏度 Hot viscosity | 崩解值 Breakdown | 最终黏度 Final viscosity | 消减值 Setback | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
淮稻5号 | 氮空白区ZN | 2640 de | 1915 d | 725 d | 2984 bc | 344 d | ||
Huaidao5 | 农民常规FCP | 2779 d | 2059 c | 720 d | 2888 cd | 109 g | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 2920 c | 2163 b | 757 c | 2672 e | -248 i | |||
连粳7号 | 氮空白区ZN | 3070 b | 1931 d | 1039 b | 3306 a | 236 e | ||
Lianjing7 | 农民常规FCP | 3141 b | 2057 c | 1064 b | 2970 bc | -171 h | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 3374 a | 2359 a | 1115 a | 3221 a | -153 h | |||
宁粳1号 | 氮空白区ZN | 2124 h | 1544 f | 580 e | 3041 b | 917 a | ||
Ningjing1 | 农民常规FCP | 2487 fg | 1799 e | 608 e | 3006 bc | 519 c | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 2687 de | 2189 b | 698 d | 2864 cd | 177 f | |||
扬粳4038 | 氮空白区ZN | 2428 g | 1846 de | 582 e | 3073 b | 645 b | ||
Yangjing4038 | 农民常规FCP | 2573 ef | 1995 cd | 578 e | 2746 de | 273 e | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 2737 d | 2027 c | 710 d | 2994 bc | 257 e |
Table 8 Effect of nitrogen management on starch viscosity of rice.cP
品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 最高黏度 Peak viscosity | 热浆黏度 Hot viscosity | 崩解值 Breakdown | 最终黏度 Final viscosity | 消减值 Setback | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
淮稻5号 | 氮空白区ZN | 2640 de | 1915 d | 725 d | 2984 bc | 344 d | ||
Huaidao5 | 农民常规FCP | 2779 d | 2059 c | 720 d | 2888 cd | 109 g | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 2920 c | 2163 b | 757 c | 2672 e | -248 i | |||
连粳7号 | 氮空白区ZN | 3070 b | 1931 d | 1039 b | 3306 a | 236 e | ||
Lianjing7 | 农民常规FCP | 3141 b | 2057 c | 1064 b | 2970 bc | -171 h | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 3374 a | 2359 a | 1115 a | 3221 a | -153 h | |||
宁粳1号 | 氮空白区ZN | 2124 h | 1544 f | 580 e | 3041 b | 917 a | ||
Ningjing1 | 农民常规FCP | 2487 fg | 1799 e | 608 e | 3006 bc | 519 c | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 2687 de | 2189 b | 698 d | 2864 cd | 177 f | |||
扬粳4038 | 氮空白区ZN | 2428 g | 1846 de | 582 e | 3073 b | 645 b | ||
Yangjing4038 | 农民常规FCP | 2573 ef | 1995 cd | 578 e | 2746 de | 273 e | ||
实地氮肥SSNM | 2737 d | 2027 c | 710 d | 2994 bc | 257 e |
[1] | Fageria N K.Yield physiology of rice.J Plant Nutr, 2007, 30: 843-879. |
[2] | FAOSTAT. FAO Statistical Databases.Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization(FAO) of the United Nations, 2016. . |
[3] | Peng S B, Tang Q Y, Zou Y B.Current status and challenges of rice production in China.Plant Prod Sci, 2009, 12: 3-8. |
[4] | Fan M S, Shen J B, Yuan L X, Jiang R F, Chen X P, Davies W J, Zhang F S.Improving crop productivity and resource use efficiency to ensure food security and environmental quality in China.J Exp Bot, 2012, 63: 13-24. |
[5] | 徐富贤, 熊洪, 谢戎, 张林, 朱永川, 郭晓艺, 杨大金, 周兴兵, 刘茂. 水稻氮素利用效率的研究进展及其动向. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(5): 1215-1225. |
Xu F X, Xiong H, Xie R, Zhang L, Zhu Y C, Guo X Y, Yang D J, Zhou X B, Liu M.Advance of rice fertilizer-nitrogen use efficiency.Plant NutrFertSci, 2009, 15(5): 1215-1225. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 崔振岭, 马文奇, 陈新平, 江荣风. 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(5): 915-924. |
Zhang F S, Wang J Q, Zhang W F, Cui Z L, Ma W Q, Chen X P, Jiang R F.Nutrient use efficiencies of major cereal crops in China and measures for improvement.ActaPedoSin, 2008, 45(5): 915-924. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 樊剑波, 张亚丽, 王东升, 段英华, 叶利庭, 沈其荣. 水稻氮素高效吸收利用机理研究进展. 南京农业大学学报, 2008, 31(2): 129-134. |
Fan J B, Zhang Y L, Wang D S, Duan Y H, Ye L T, Shen Q R.Research progress on high nitrogen uptake and utilization by rice plants.J Nanjing AgricUniv, 2008, 31(2): 129-134. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 剧成欣, 张耗, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 水稻高产和氮肥高效利用研究进展. 中国稻米, 2013, 19(1): 16-21. |
Ju C X, Zhang H, Wang Z Q, Yang J C.Research progress of high yield and high nitrogen use efficiency of rice.China Rice, 2013, 19(1): 16-21. (in Chinese) | |
[9] | 彭少兵, 黄见良, 钟旭华, 杨建昌, 王光火, 邹应斌, 张福锁, 朱庆森, Roland J B, Christian W.提高中国稻田氮肥利用率的研究策略. 中国农业科学, 2002, 35(9): 1095-1103. |
Peng S B, Huang J L, Zhong X H, Yang J C, Wang G H, Zou Y B, Zhang F S, Zhu Q S, Roland J B, Christian W.Research strategy in improving fertilizer-nitrogen use efficiency of irrigated rice in China.SciAgric Sin, 2002, 35(9): 1095-1103. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 杨建昌. 水稻根系形态生理与产量、品质形成及养分吸收利用的关系. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(1): 36-46. |
Yang J C.Relationships of rice root morphology and physiology with the formation of grain yield and quality and the nutrient absorption and utilization.SciAgric Sin, 2011, 44: 36-46 (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 张亚丽, 樊剑波, 段英华, 王东升, 叶利庭, 沈其荣. 不同基因型水稻氮利用效率的差异及评价. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(2): 267-273. |
Zhang Y L, Fan J B, Duan Y H, Wang D S, Ye L T, Shen Q R.Variation of Nitrogen use efficiency of rice different in genotype and its evaluation.ActaPedol Sin, 2008, 45(2): 267-273. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 朱兆良, 金继运. 保障我国粮食安全的肥料问题. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(2): 259-273. |
Zhu Z L, Jin J Y.Fertilizer use and food security in China.Plant NutrFertSci, 2013, 19: 259-273. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | Zhang F S, Chen X P, Vitousek P.An experiment for the world.Nature, 2013, 497: 33-35. |
[14] | Galloway J N, Townsend A R, Erisman J W, Bekunda M, Cai Z, Freney J R, Martinelli L A, Seitzinger S P, Sutton M A.Transformation of the nitrogen cycle: Recent trends, questions, and potential solutions.Science, 2008, 320: 889-892. |
[15] | Kant S, Bi Y M, Rothstein S J.Understanding plant response to nitrogen limitation for the improvement of crop nitrogen use efficiency.J ExpBot, 2011, 62: 1490-1509. |
[16] | Haegele J W, Cook K A, Nichols D M, Below F E.Changes in nitrogen use traits associated with genetic improvement for grain yield of maize hybrids released in different decades.Crop Sci, 2013, 53: 1256-1268. |
[17] | Ju C X, Roland J B, Wang Z Q, Zhang H, Liu L J, Yang J C, Zhang J H.Root and shoot traits for rice varieties with higher grain yield and higher nitrogen use efficiency at lower nitrogen rates application. Field Crops Res, 2015, 175: 47-55. |
[18] | 刘立军, 杨立年, 孙小淋, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 水稻实地氮肥管理的氮肥利用效率及其生理原因. 作物学报, 2009, 35(9):1672-1680. |
Liu L J, Yang L N, Sun X L, Wang Z Q, Yang J C.Fertilizer-nitrogen use efficiency and its physiological mechanism under site-specific nitrogen management in rice.ActaAgron Sin, 2009, 35(9):1672-1680. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 王光火, 张奇春, 黄昌勇. 提高水稻氮肥利用率、控制氮肥污染的新途径—SSNM. 浙江大学学报:农业与生命科学版, 2003, 29(1): 70-73. |
Wang G H, Zhang C Q, Huang C Y.SSNM-A new approach to increasing fertilizer N use efficiency and reducing N loss from rice fields.J Zhejiang Univ:Agric& Life Sci, 2003, 29(1): 70-73. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 刘立军, 徐伟, 桑大志, 刘翠莲, 周家麟, 杨建昌. 实地氮肥管理提高水稻氮肥利用效率. 作物学报, 2006, 32(7): 987-994. |
Liu L J, Xu D W, Sang D Z, Liu C L, Zhou J L, Yang J C.Site-specific nitrogen management increases fertilizer-nitrogen use efficiency in rice.ActaAgron Sin, 2006, 32(7):987-994. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 国家质量技术监督局.优质稻谷:GB/T 17891–1999. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2005. |
National Quality and Technical Supervision Bureau . High Quality Rice:GB/T 17891–1999.Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2005. (in Chinese) | |
[22] | 中华人民共和国农业部. 米质测定方法:NY/T 83–1988.北京: 中国标准出版社, 1988. |
The Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China.DeterminationMethod of Rice Quality:NY/T 83-1988.Beijing: Standards Press of China, 1988. (in Chinese) | |
[23] | 陈毓荃. 生物化学研究技术. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1995: 196-197. |
Chen L Q.Techniques in biochemistry researches. Beijing: China agriculture press, 1995: 196-197. | |
[24] | 陈因. 现代植物生理学实验指南. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999: 143-144. |
Chen Y.Modern plant physiology experiment guide. Beijing:Science Press, 1999: 143-144. | |
[25] | Ju X T, Xing G X, Chen X P, Zhang S L, Zhang L J, Liu X J, Cui Z L, Yin B, Christiea P, Zhu Z L, Zhang F S.Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems.Proc NatlAcadSci USA, 2009, 106:3041-3046. |
[26] | Liu L, Chen T, Wang Z, Zhang H, Yang J, Zhang J.Combination of site-specific nitrogen management and alternate wetting and drying irrigation increases grain yield and nitrogen and water use efficiency in super rice.Field Crops Res, 2013, 154: 226-235. |
[27] | Fu J, Huang Z H, Wang Z Q, Yang J C, Zhang J H.Pre-anthesis non-structural carbohydrate reserve in the stem enhances the sink strength of inferior spikelets during grain filling of rice.Field Crops Res, 2011, 123: 170-182. |
[28] | 杨文钰, 屠乃美. 作物栽培学各论. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003: 29-39. |
Yang W Y, Tu N M.Theory of crop cultivation. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2003: 29-39. | |
[29] | 毕京翠, 张文伟, 肖应辉, 王海莲, 江玲, 刘玲珑, 万向元, 翟虎渠, 万建民. 应用近红外光谱技术分析稻米蛋白质含量. 作物学报, 2006, 32(5): 709-715. |
Bi J C, Zhang W W, Xiao Y H, Wang H L, Jiang L, Liu L L, Wan X Y, Zhai H Q, Wan J M.Analysis for protein content in rice by near reflectance spectroscopy (NIRS)Technique.ActaAgron Sin, 2006, 32(5): 709-715. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 龚金龙, 张洪程, 李杰, 常勇, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 李德剑, 李炳维, 沙安勤, 周有炎, 罗学超, 朱镇. 施磷量对超级稻南粳44产量和品质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(4): 447-451. |
Gong J L, Zhang H C, Li J, Chang Y, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Li D J, Li B W, Sha A Q, Zhou Y Y, Luo X C, Zhu Z.Effects of phosphorus levels on grain yield and quality of super rice Nanjing44.Chin J Rice Sci, 2011, 25(4): 447-451. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | 焦爱霞, 杨昌仁, 曹桂兰, 李点浩, 郭建春, 金钟焕, 金弘烈, 李圭星, 韩龙植. 水稻蛋白质含量的遗传研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(1): 1-8. |
Jiao A X, Yang C R, Cao G L, Li D H, Guo J C, Jin Z H, Jin H L, L G X, Han L Z. Progress in genetic research on protein content of rice.ActaAgricSci, 2008, 41(1): 1-8. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] | 王百灵, 张文忠, 商全玉, 于红卫, 黄丽丽, 张振宇. 不同收获时期对超级稻沈农014主要稻米品质影响. 北方水稻, 2009, 39(3): 7-9. |
Wang B L, Zhang W Z, Shang Y Q, Yu H W, Huang L L, Zhang Z Y.Effect of harvesting time on quality of super rice variety, Shennong014.North Rice, 2009, 39(3): 7-9. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[33] | 赵晶晶, 李宏梁. 茚三铜柱后衍生法测定软香酥糕点中氨基酸含量及其营养评价. 食品科学, 2011, 32(9): 295-298. |
Zhao J J, Li H L.Determination of amino acids by ninhydrin post-column derivatization in soft crisp pastry and its nutritional evaluation.Food Sci, 2011, 32(9): 295-298. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[34] | 李欣, 张蓉, 隋炯明, 梁国华, 沈新平, 严长杰, 顾世梁, 顾铭洪. 稻米淀粉粘滞性谱特征的表现极其遗传. 中国水稻科学, 2004, 18(5): 384-390. |
Li X, Zhang R, Sui J M, Liang G H, Shen X P, Yan C J, Gu S L, Gu M H.Performance and inheritance of rice starch viscosity (RVA Profile) characteristics.Chin J Rice Sci, 2004, 18(5): 384-390. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[35] | 隋炯明, 李欣, 严松, 严长杰, 张蓉, 汤述翥, 陆驹飞, 陈宗祥顾铭洪. 稻米淀粉RVA谱特征与品质性状相关性研究. 中国农业科学, 2005, 38(4): 657-663. |
Sui J M, Li X, Yan S, Yan C J, Zhang R, Tang S Z, Lu J F, Chen Z X, Gu M H.Studies on the rice RVA profile characteristics and its correlation with the quality.ActaAgricSci, 2005, 38(4): 657-663. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[36] | 胡培松, 翟虎渠, 唐绍清, 万建民. 利用RVA快速鉴定稻米蒸煮及食味品质的研究. 作物学报, 2004, 30(6): 519-524. |
Hu P S, Zhai H Q, Tang S Q, Wan J M.Rapid evaluation of rice cooking and palatability quality by RVA profile.ActaAgron Sin, 2004, 30(6): 519-524. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[37] | Han Y P, Xu M L, Liu X Y, Yan C J, Korban S S, Chen X L, Gu M H.Genes coding for starch branching enzymes are major contributors to starch viscosity characteristics in waxy rice ( Oryza sativa L.).Plant Sci, 2004, 166: 357-364. |
[38] | 程方民, 钟连进. 不同气候生态条件下稻米品质性状的变异及主要影响因子分析. 中国水稻科学, 2001, 15(3): 187-191. |
Cheng F M, Zhong L J.Variation of rice quality traits under different climate conditions and its main affected factors.Chin J Rice Sci, 2001, 15(3): 187-191. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[39] | 李彦利, 严光彬, 贾玉敏, 孟令君, 严永峰, 张晓梅. 栽培因素对北方粳稻产量及米质的影响. 北方水稻, 2008, 38(2): 37-39. |
Li Y L, Yan G B, Jia Y M, Meng L J, Yan Y F, Zhang X M.Effect of cultivation factors on the yield and quality of North Japonica rice.North Rice, 2008, 38(2): 37-39. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[40] | 徐春梅, 王丹英, 邵国胜, 章秀福. 施氮量和栽插密度对超高产水稻中早22产量和品质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2008, 22(5): 507-512. |
Xu C M, Wang D Y, Shao G S, Zhang X F.Effect of transplanting density and nitrogen fertilizer rate on yield formation anf grain quality of super high yielding rice Zhongzao22.Chin J Rice Sci, 2008, 22(5): 507-512. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[41] | 金军, 徐大勇, 蔡一霞, 胡署云, 葛敏, 朱庆森. 施氮量对水稻主要米质性状及RVA谱特征参数的影响. 作物学报, 2004, 30(2): 154-158. |
Jin J, Xu D Y, Cai Y X, Hu S Y, Ge M, Zhu Q S.Effect of N-fertilizer on main quality characters of rice and RVA profile parameters.ActaAgron Sin, 2004, 30(2): 154-158. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[42] | 刘立军, 吴长付, 张耗, 杨建昌, 赵步洪. 实地氮肥管理对稻米品质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2007, 21(6): 625-630. |
Liu L J, Wu C F, Zhang H, Yang J C, Zhao B H.Effect of site-specific nitrogen management on rice quality.Chin J Rice Sci, 2007, 21(6): 625-630.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[43] | 张自常, 李鸿伟, 陈婷婷, 王学明, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 畦沟灌溉和干湿交替灌溉对水稻产量与品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(24): 4988-4998. |
Zhang Z C, Li H W, Chen T T, Wang X M, Wang Z Q, Yang J C.Effect of furrow irrigation and alternate wetting and drying irrigation on grain yield and quality of rice.ActaAgricSci, 2011, 44(24): 4988-4998. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | GUO Zhan, ZHANG Yunbo. Research Progress in Physiological,Biochemical Responses of Rice to Drought Stress and Its Molecular Regulation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[2] | WEI Huanhe, MA Weiyi, ZUO Boyuan, WANG Lulu, ZHU Wang, GENG Xiaoyu, ZHANG Xiang, MENG Tianyao, CHEN Yinglong, GAO Pinglei, XU Ke, HUO Zhongyang, DAI Qigen. Research Progress in the Effect of Salinity, Drought, and Their Combined Stresses on Rice Yield and Quality Formation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[3] | XU Danjie, LIN Qiaoxia, LI Zhengkang, ZHUANG Xiaoqian, LING Yu, LAI Meiling, CHEN Xiaoting, LU Guodong. OsOPR10 Positively Regulates Rice Blast and Bacterial Blight Resistance [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 364-374. |
[4] | CHEN Mingliang, ZENG Xihua, SHEN Yumin, LUO Shiyou, HU Lanxiang, XIONG Wentao, XIONG Huanjin, WU Xiaoyan, XIAO Yeqing. Typing of Inter-subspecific Fertility Loci and Fertility Locus Pattern of indica-japonica Hybrid Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 386-396. |
[5] | DING Zhengquan, PAN Yueyun, SHI Yang, HUANG Haixiang. Comprehensive Evaluation and Comparative Analysis of Jiahe Series Long-Grain japonica Rice with High Eating Quality Based on Gene Chip Technology [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 397-408. |
[6] | HOU Xiaoqin, WANG Ying, YU Bei, FU Weimeng, FENG Baohua, SHEN Yichao, XIE Hangjun, WANG Huanran, XU Yongqiang, WU Zhihai, WANG Jianjun, TAO Longxing, FU Guanfu. Mechanisms Behind the Role of Potassium Fulvic Acid in Enhancing Salt Tolerance in Rice Seedlings [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 409-421. |
[7] | LÜ Zhou, YI Binghuai, CHEN Pingping, ZHOU Wenxin, TANG Wenbang, YI Zhenxie. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Transplanting Density on Yield Formation of Small Seed Hybrid Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 422-436. |
[8] | HU Jijie, HU Zhihua, ZHANG Junhua, CAO Xiaochuang, JIN Qianyu, ZHANG Zhiyuan, ZHU Lianfeng. Effects of Rhizosphere Saturated Dissolved Oxygen on Photosynthetic and Growth Characteristics of Rice at Tillering Stage [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 437-446. |
[9] | WU Yue, LIANG Chengwei, ZHAO Chenfei, SUN Jian, MA Dianrong. Occurrence of Weedy Rice Disaster and Ecotype Evolution in Direct-Seeded Rice Fields [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 447-455. |
[10] | LIU Fuxiang, ZHEN Haoyang, PENG Huan, ZHENG Liuchun, PENG Deliang, WEN Yanhua. Investigation and Species Identification of Cyst Nematode Disease on Rice in Guangdong Province [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 456-461. |
[11] | CHEN Haotian, QIN Yuan, ZHONG Xiaohan, LIN Chenyu, QIN Jinghang, YANG Jianchang, ZHANG Weiyang. Research Progress on the Relationship Between Rice Root, Soil Properties and Methane Emissions in Paddy Fields [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 233-245. |
[12] | MIAO Jun, RAN Jinhui, XU Mengbin, BO Liubing, WANG Ping, LIANG Guohua, ZHOU Yong. Overexpression of RGG2, a Heterotrimeric G Protein γ Subunit-Encoding Gene, Improves Drought Tolerance in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 246-255. |
[13] | YIN Xiaoxiao, ZHANG Zhihan, YAN Xiulian, LIAO Rong, YANG Sijia, Beenish HASSAN, GUO Daiming, FAN Jing, ZHAO Zhixue, WANG Wenming. Signal Peptide Validation and Expression Analysis of Multiple Effectors from Ustilaginoidea virens [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 256-265. |
[14] | ZHU Yujing, GUI Jinxin, GONG Chengyun, LUO Xinyang, SHI Jubin, ZHANG Haiqing, HE Jiwai. QTL Mapping for Tiller Angle in Rice by Genome-wide Association Analysis [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 266-276. |
[15] | ZHAO Yiting, XIE Keran, GAO Ti, CUI Kehui. Effects of Drought Priming During Tillering Stage on Panicle Development and Yield Formation Under High Temperature During Panicle Initiation Stage in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 277-289. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||