Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2021, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 187-199.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2021.0710
• Research Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
Yanliu ZHANG1, Zaisheng SHAO1, Yang YANG2, Kaicheng TONG2, Yunxia WANG2,*(), Liquan JING1, Yulong WANG1, Lianxin YANG1
Received:
2020-07-17
Revised:
2020-09-29
Online:
2021-03-10
Published:
2021-03-10
Contact:
Yunxia WANG
章燕柳1, 邵在胜1, 杨阳2, 童楷程2, 王云霞2,*(), 景立权1, 王余龙1, 杨连新1
通讯作者:
王云霞
基金资助:
Yanliu ZHANG, Zaisheng SHAO, Yang YANG, Kaicheng TONG, Yunxia WANG, Liquan JING, Yulong WANG, Lianxin YANG. Effects of Ozone Stress on Feeding Quality of Straw of Different Rice Varieties During the Whole Growth Period[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2021, 35(2): 187-199.
章燕柳, 邵在胜, 杨阳, 童楷程, 王云霞, 景立权, 王余龙, 杨连新. 全生育期臭氧胁迫对不同水稻品种稻草饲用品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(2): 187-199.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2021.0710
Fig. 1. Ozone concentration, temperature and relative humidity in the greenhouse-type gas fumigation device during rice growing season in 2018. C-O3, Control, E-O3, Elevated ozone concentration, Ozone concentration is the average daily concentration during fumigation; The same as below.
植株部位Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片Leaf | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O₃ | 188±6 | 163±4 | 165±6 | 192±3 | 158±4 | 179±6 | 200±1 | 214±6 |
E-O₃ | 189±6 | 176±7 | 172±6 | 164±5 | 159±8 | 183±5 | 184±2 | 223±4 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O₃ | 113±6 | 120±6 | 106±6 | 88±4 | 82±4 | 108±2 | 110±7 | 127±3 | |
E-O₃ | 124±5 | 126±6 | 100±3 | 95±4 | 87±6 | 117±4 | 111±4 | 119±3 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O₃ | 68±4 | 68±3 | 47±3 | 54±2 | 55±2 | 55±4 | 43±1 | 73±3 | |
E-O₃ | 74±2 | 71±2 | 56±2 | 53±1 | 57±4 | 56±3 | 49±3 | 79±2 | ||
茎秆Stem | 抽穗期Heading | C-O₃ | 68±3 | 52±2 | 59±3 | 53±1 | 40±1 | 58±2 | 69±4 | 59±3 |
E-O₃ | 62±3 | 59±1 | 68±5 | 50±2 | 45±0 | 60±2 | 67±3 | 65±2 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O₃ | 48±2 | 58±4 | 36±1 | 29±1 | 30±1 | 45±1 | 40±2 | 42±2 | |
E-O₃ | 44±3 | 57±2 | 59±6 | 35±2 | 36±2 | 50±3 | 55±5 | 59±5 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O₃ | 48±1 | 35±3 | 33±1 | 37±3 | 35±1 | 39±2 | 33±1 | 42±2 | |
E-O₃ | 50±2 | 43±2 | 48±4 | 39±1 | 36±1 | 45±3 | 44±3 | 55±1 | ||
稻草 Straw | 抽穗期Heading | C-O₃ | 114±7 | 94±2 | 109±9 | 97±1 | 74±3 | 106±5 | 125±3 | 112±3 |
E-O₃ | 104±4 | 103±5 | 116±8 | 84±3 | 79±3 | 107±4 | 117±2 | 119±1 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O₃ | 69±1 | 78±1 | 57±2 | 47±1 | 45±1 | 66±2 | 64±3 | 59±2 | |
E-O₃ | 70±4 | 78±3 | 73±3 | 53±2 | 51±2 | 74±1 | 77±5 | 74±3 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O₃ | 54±1 | 46±3 | 38±2 | 42±2 | 41±1 | 44±2 | 37±1 | 48±2 | |
E-O₃ | 58±1 | 53±2 | 51±3 | 44±1 | 43±2 | 49±3 | 46±2 | 61±2 | ||
ANOVA结果 ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.685 | 0.014 | 0.147 | 0.333 | 0.192 | 0.168 | 0.460 | <0.001 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S | 0.441 | 0.403 | 0.765 | <0.001 | 0.742 | 0.625 | 0.001 | 0.622 | ||
O3×P | 0.056 | 0.586 | 0.016 | 0.005 | 0.765 | 0.972 | 0.007 | 0.010 | ||
S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3× S×P | 0.633 | 0.475 | 0.062 | 0.004 | 0.859 | 0.591 | 0.536 | 0.007 |
Table 1 Effects of ozone stress on crude protein concentrations in leaves, stems and straw of different rice varieties. mg/g
植株部位Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片Leaf | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O₃ | 188±6 | 163±4 | 165±6 | 192±3 | 158±4 | 179±6 | 200±1 | 214±6 |
E-O₃ | 189±6 | 176±7 | 172±6 | 164±5 | 159±8 | 183±5 | 184±2 | 223±4 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O₃ | 113±6 | 120±6 | 106±6 | 88±4 | 82±4 | 108±2 | 110±7 | 127±3 | |
E-O₃ | 124±5 | 126±6 | 100±3 | 95±4 | 87±6 | 117±4 | 111±4 | 119±3 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O₃ | 68±4 | 68±3 | 47±3 | 54±2 | 55±2 | 55±4 | 43±1 | 73±3 | |
E-O₃ | 74±2 | 71±2 | 56±2 | 53±1 | 57±4 | 56±3 | 49±3 | 79±2 | ||
茎秆Stem | 抽穗期Heading | C-O₃ | 68±3 | 52±2 | 59±3 | 53±1 | 40±1 | 58±2 | 69±4 | 59±3 |
E-O₃ | 62±3 | 59±1 | 68±5 | 50±2 | 45±0 | 60±2 | 67±3 | 65±2 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O₃ | 48±2 | 58±4 | 36±1 | 29±1 | 30±1 | 45±1 | 40±2 | 42±2 | |
E-O₃ | 44±3 | 57±2 | 59±6 | 35±2 | 36±2 | 50±3 | 55±5 | 59±5 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O₃ | 48±1 | 35±3 | 33±1 | 37±3 | 35±1 | 39±2 | 33±1 | 42±2 | |
E-O₃ | 50±2 | 43±2 | 48±4 | 39±1 | 36±1 | 45±3 | 44±3 | 55±1 | ||
稻草 Straw | 抽穗期Heading | C-O₃ | 114±7 | 94±2 | 109±9 | 97±1 | 74±3 | 106±5 | 125±3 | 112±3 |
E-O₃ | 104±4 | 103±5 | 116±8 | 84±3 | 79±3 | 107±4 | 117±2 | 119±1 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O₃ | 69±1 | 78±1 | 57±2 | 47±1 | 45±1 | 66±2 | 64±3 | 59±2 | |
E-O₃ | 70±4 | 78±3 | 73±3 | 53±2 | 51±2 | 74±1 | 77±5 | 74±3 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O₃ | 54±1 | 46±3 | 38±2 | 42±2 | 41±1 | 44±2 | 37±1 | 48±2 | |
E-O₃ | 58±1 | 53±2 | 51±3 | 44±1 | 43±2 | 49±3 | 46±2 | 61±2 | ||
ANOVA结果 ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.685 | 0.014 | 0.147 | 0.333 | 0.192 | 0.168 | 0.460 | <0.001 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S | 0.441 | 0.403 | 0.765 | <0.001 | 0.742 | 0.625 | 0.001 | 0.622 | ||
O3×P | 0.056 | 0.586 | 0.016 | 0.005 | 0.765 | 0.972 | 0.007 | 0.010 | ||
S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3× S×P | 0.633 | 0.475 | 0.062 | 0.004 | 0.859 | 0.591 | 0.536 | 0.007 |
ANOVA | 粗蛋白 Crude protein | 结构性碳水化合物 Structural carbohydrates | 非结构性碳水化合物 Non-structured carbohydrates | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
木质素 Lignin | 纤维素 Cellulose | 半纤维素 Hemicellulose | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | 淀粉 Starch | 总酚 Total phenolic | |||||
臭氧胁迫 O3 stress | 0.063 | 0.059 | 0.562 | 0.886 | 0.059 | 0.003 | 0.009 | |||
品种 Variety (V) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
植株部位 Plant parts (P) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.718 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
O3×V | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.015 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
O3×S | 0.005 | 0.713 | 0.015 | 0.522 | <0.001 | 0.506 | <0.001 | |||
O3×P | 0.006 | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.004 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.076 | |||
V×S | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
V×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
O3×V×S | 0.007 | 0.269 | 0.089 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
O3×V×P | 0.002 | 0.021 | 0.146 | 0.004 | 0.059 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
O3×S×P | 0.804 | 0.001 | 0.480 | 0.007 | 0.085 | 0.149 | 0.001 | |||
V×S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
O3×V×S×P | 0.014 | 0.161 | 0.085 | 0.092 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.023 |
Table 2 ANOVA results of the effect of ozone stress on feed value index of rice straw from different rice varieties (P value).
ANOVA | 粗蛋白 Crude protein | 结构性碳水化合物 Structural carbohydrates | 非结构性碳水化合物 Non-structured carbohydrates | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
木质素 Lignin | 纤维素 Cellulose | 半纤维素 Hemicellulose | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | 淀粉 Starch | 总酚 Total phenolic | |||||
臭氧胁迫 O3 stress | 0.063 | 0.059 | 0.562 | 0.886 | 0.059 | 0.003 | 0.009 | |||
品种 Variety (V) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
植株部位 Plant parts (P) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.718 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
O3×V | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.015 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
O3×S | 0.005 | 0.713 | 0.015 | 0.522 | <0.001 | 0.506 | <0.001 | |||
O3×P | 0.006 | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.004 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.076 | |||
V×S | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
V×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
O3×V×S | 0.007 | 0.269 | 0.089 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
O3×V×P | 0.002 | 0.021 | 0.146 | 0.004 | 0.059 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
O3×S×P | 0.804 | 0.001 | 0.480 | 0.007 | 0.085 | 0.149 | 0.001 | |||
V×S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
O3×V×S×P | 0.014 | 0.161 | 0.085 | 0.092 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.023 |
植株部位Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片 Leaf | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 139±1 | 129±9 | 114±6 | 118±5 | 125±4 | 142±2 | 121±3 | 126±3 |
E-O3 | 141±3 | 155±5 | 153±5 | 120±5 | 140±4 | 141±2 | 129±3 | 150±4 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 122±4 | 153±6 | 109±6 | 110±3 | 134±7 | 117±5 | 122±5 | 132±10 | |
E-O3 | 145±10 | 164±9 | 142±2 | 138±6 | 155±4 | 154±5 | 145±7 | 150±8 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 122±5 | 138±4 | 118±3 | 111±2 | 130±3 | 120±4 | 125±2 | 117±4 | |
E-O3 | 131±4 | 154±3 | 135±4 | 122±5 | 143±7 | 130±7 | 141±2 | 133±3 | ||
茎秆 Stem | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 116±9 | 138±4 | 86±5 | 103±5 | 101±3 | 106±2 | 85±5 | 94±1 |
E-O3 | 122±5 | 145±3 | 94±5 | 109±5 | 121±5 | 112±4 | 86±3 | 129±6 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 149±3 | 150±8 | 107±3 | 121±2 | 139±8 | 128±7 | 117±2 | 96±2 | |
E-O3 | 148±6 | 163±5 | 110±6 | 116±6 | 157±3 | 128±11 | 117±4 | 109±4 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 120±3 | 141±7 | 99±4 | 103±5 | 116±9 | 103±6 | 100±1 | 97±4 | |
E-O3 | 123±5 | 147±6 | 107±9 | 114±8 | 150±3 | 120±8 | 108±4 | 113±4 | ||
稻草 Straw | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 124±6 | 135±3 | 100±6 | 108±5 | 108±3 | 120±3 | 100±4 | 105±1 |
E-O3 | 129±4 | 149±3 | 122±6 | 112±5 | 127±3 | 123±3 | 105±1 | 136±5 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 140±4 | 151±8 | 107±3 | 117±2 | 137±8 | 124±5 | 119±1 | 104±1 | |
E-O3 | 147±7 | 163±3 | 121±4 | 123±6 | 156±2 | 137±8 | 128±5 | 119±3 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 121±3 | 140±6 | 106±3 | 105±3 | 120±7 | 109±3 | 109±1 | 101±4 | |
E-O3 | 125±4 | 149±4 | 118±6 | 117±7 | 147±3 | 124±4 | 122±2 | 118±3 | ||
ANOVA 结果ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.028 | 0.001 | 0.115 | 0.285 | 0.047 | 0.179 | 0.111 | <0.001 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.289 | 0.010 | <0.001 | 0.004 | <0.001 | 0.024 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | 0.242 | 0.597 | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.022 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S | 0.647 | 0.796 | 0.208 | 0.386 | 0.774 | 0.112 | 0.349 | 0.098 | ||
O3×P | 0.145 | 0.226 | <0.001 | 0.061 | 0.231 | 0.216 | 0.006 | 0.833 | ||
S×P | <0.001 | 0.982 | 0.001 | 0.486 | 0.005 | 0.006 | <0.001 | 0.035 | ||
O3×S×P | 0.155 | 0.478 | 0.139 | 0.014 | 0.254 | 0.011 | 0.248 | 0.549 | ||
O3 | 0.028 | 0.001 | 0.115 | 0.285 | 0.047 | 0.179 | 0.111 | <0.001 |
Table 3 Effects of ozone stress on lignin concentrations in leaves, stems and straw of different rice varieties. g/kg
植株部位Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片 Leaf | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 139±1 | 129±9 | 114±6 | 118±5 | 125±4 | 142±2 | 121±3 | 126±3 |
E-O3 | 141±3 | 155±5 | 153±5 | 120±5 | 140±4 | 141±2 | 129±3 | 150±4 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 122±4 | 153±6 | 109±6 | 110±3 | 134±7 | 117±5 | 122±5 | 132±10 | |
E-O3 | 145±10 | 164±9 | 142±2 | 138±6 | 155±4 | 154±5 | 145±7 | 150±8 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 122±5 | 138±4 | 118±3 | 111±2 | 130±3 | 120±4 | 125±2 | 117±4 | |
E-O3 | 131±4 | 154±3 | 135±4 | 122±5 | 143±7 | 130±7 | 141±2 | 133±3 | ||
茎秆 Stem | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 116±9 | 138±4 | 86±5 | 103±5 | 101±3 | 106±2 | 85±5 | 94±1 |
E-O3 | 122±5 | 145±3 | 94±5 | 109±5 | 121±5 | 112±4 | 86±3 | 129±6 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 149±3 | 150±8 | 107±3 | 121±2 | 139±8 | 128±7 | 117±2 | 96±2 | |
E-O3 | 148±6 | 163±5 | 110±6 | 116±6 | 157±3 | 128±11 | 117±4 | 109±4 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 120±3 | 141±7 | 99±4 | 103±5 | 116±9 | 103±6 | 100±1 | 97±4 | |
E-O3 | 123±5 | 147±6 | 107±9 | 114±8 | 150±3 | 120±8 | 108±4 | 113±4 | ||
稻草 Straw | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 124±6 | 135±3 | 100±6 | 108±5 | 108±3 | 120±3 | 100±4 | 105±1 |
E-O3 | 129±4 | 149±3 | 122±6 | 112±5 | 127±3 | 123±3 | 105±1 | 136±5 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 140±4 | 151±8 | 107±3 | 117±2 | 137±8 | 124±5 | 119±1 | 104±1 | |
E-O3 | 147±7 | 163±3 | 121±4 | 123±6 | 156±2 | 137±8 | 128±5 | 119±3 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 121±3 | 140±6 | 106±3 | 105±3 | 120±7 | 109±3 | 109±1 | 101±4 | |
E-O3 | 125±4 | 149±4 | 118±6 | 117±7 | 147±3 | 124±4 | 122±2 | 118±3 | ||
ANOVA 结果ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.028 | 0.001 | 0.115 | 0.285 | 0.047 | 0.179 | 0.111 | <0.001 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.289 | 0.010 | <0.001 | 0.004 | <0.001 | 0.024 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | 0.242 | 0.597 | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.022 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S | 0.647 | 0.796 | 0.208 | 0.386 | 0.774 | 0.112 | 0.349 | 0.098 | ||
O3×P | 0.145 | 0.226 | <0.001 | 0.061 | 0.231 | 0.216 | 0.006 | 0.833 | ||
S×P | <0.001 | 0.982 | 0.001 | 0.486 | 0.005 | 0.006 | <0.001 | 0.035 | ||
O3×S×P | 0.155 | 0.478 | 0.139 | 0.014 | 0.254 | 0.011 | 0.248 | 0.549 | ||
O3 | 0.028 | 0.001 | 0.115 | 0.285 | 0.047 | 0.179 | 0.111 | <0.001 |
植株部位 Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片 Leaf | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 379±15 | 395±18 | 408±13 | 403±12 | 406±8 | 409±3 | 435±7 | 351±13 |
E-O3 | 368±17 | 408±12 | 384±8 | 427±4 | 416±4 | 400±5 | 453±9 | 387±4 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 425±5 | 452±14 | 459±18 | 464±18 | 477±10 | 429±5 | 453±4 | 417±15 | |
E-O3 | 407±12 | 436±14 | 426±14 | 442±10 | 460±9 | 431±11 | 475±7 | 392±15 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 523±6 | 479±10 | 501±14 | 511±5 | 511±14 | 523±8 | 520±7 | 477±7 | |
E-O3 | 506±7 | 508±19 | 501±5 | 508±4 | 525±9 | 514±12 | 500±6 | 464±2 | ||
茎秆 Stem | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 433±13 | 480±6 | 408±13 | 426±9 | 358±18 | 418±8 | 454±7 | 381±10 |
E-O3 | 430±4 | 498±10 | 448±5 | 421±9 | 368±10 | 416±10 | 457±8 | 449±18 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 489±9 | 534±13 | 508±5 | 503±11 | 480±5 | 532±12 | 501±10 | 439±13 | |
E-O3 | 498±10 | 543±13 | 495±17 | 495±5 | 546±9 | 505±12 | 501±10 | 430±17 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 427±13 | 458±9 | 481±6 | 455±5 | 396±14 | 463±7 | 481±11 | 366±5 | |
E-O3 | 425±13 | 460±14 | 473±15 | 480±17 | 464±21 | 499±15 | 486±11 | 411±21 | ||
稻草 Straw | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 413±8 | 448±8 | 405±5 | 419±3 | 372±13 | 414±6 | 446±5 | 372±5 |
E-O3 | 408±8 | 465±10 | 415±6 | 423±7 | 382±8 | 410±4 | 455±3 | 428±13 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 468±13 | 507±6 | 494±11 | 491±9 | 479±5 | 497±8 | 484±7 | 434±10 | |
E-O3 | 469±9 | 511±11 | 470±14 | 480±7 | 520±6 | 479±12 | 491±9 | 421±15 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 455±10 | 464±6 | 488±5 | 471±5 | 427±9 | 483±20 | 496±9 | 389±4 | |
E-O3 | 451±11 | 476±10 | 483±11 | 489±13 | 484±13 | 504±14 | 492±8 | 424±15 | ||
ANOVA结果ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.403 | 0.419 | 0.451 | 0.873 | 0.144 | 0.917 | 0.344 | 0.241 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | 0.000 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | 0.060 | <0.001 | 0.014 | 0.465 | <0.001 | 0.005 | 0.136 | 0.763 | ||
O3×S | 0.966 | 0.544 | 0.341 | 0.102 | 0.171 | 0.309 | 0.194 | 0.002 | ||
O3×P | 0.308 | 0.951 | 0.142 | 0.679 | 0.002 | 0.602 | 0.648 | 0.016 | ||
S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S×P | 0.875 | 0.417 | 0.249 | 0.096 | 0.436 | 0.118 | 0.103 | 0.502 |
Table 4 Effects of ozone stress on cellulose concentrations in leaves, stems and straw of different rice varieties. g/kg
植株部位 Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片 Leaf | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 379±15 | 395±18 | 408±13 | 403±12 | 406±8 | 409±3 | 435±7 | 351±13 |
E-O3 | 368±17 | 408±12 | 384±8 | 427±4 | 416±4 | 400±5 | 453±9 | 387±4 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 425±5 | 452±14 | 459±18 | 464±18 | 477±10 | 429±5 | 453±4 | 417±15 | |
E-O3 | 407±12 | 436±14 | 426±14 | 442±10 | 460±9 | 431±11 | 475±7 | 392±15 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 523±6 | 479±10 | 501±14 | 511±5 | 511±14 | 523±8 | 520±7 | 477±7 | |
E-O3 | 506±7 | 508±19 | 501±5 | 508±4 | 525±9 | 514±12 | 500±6 | 464±2 | ||
茎秆 Stem | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 433±13 | 480±6 | 408±13 | 426±9 | 358±18 | 418±8 | 454±7 | 381±10 |
E-O3 | 430±4 | 498±10 | 448±5 | 421±9 | 368±10 | 416±10 | 457±8 | 449±18 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 489±9 | 534±13 | 508±5 | 503±11 | 480±5 | 532±12 | 501±10 | 439±13 | |
E-O3 | 498±10 | 543±13 | 495±17 | 495±5 | 546±9 | 505±12 | 501±10 | 430±17 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 427±13 | 458±9 | 481±6 | 455±5 | 396±14 | 463±7 | 481±11 | 366±5 | |
E-O3 | 425±13 | 460±14 | 473±15 | 480±17 | 464±21 | 499±15 | 486±11 | 411±21 | ||
稻草 Straw | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 413±8 | 448±8 | 405±5 | 419±3 | 372±13 | 414±6 | 446±5 | 372±5 |
E-O3 | 408±8 | 465±10 | 415±6 | 423±7 | 382±8 | 410±4 | 455±3 | 428±13 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 468±13 | 507±6 | 494±11 | 491±9 | 479±5 | 497±8 | 484±7 | 434±10 | |
E-O3 | 469±9 | 511±11 | 470±14 | 480±7 | 520±6 | 479±12 | 491±9 | 421±15 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 455±10 | 464±6 | 488±5 | 471±5 | 427±9 | 483±20 | 496±9 | 389±4 | |
E-O3 | 451±11 | 476±10 | 483±11 | 489±13 | 484±13 | 504±14 | 492±8 | 424±15 | ||
ANOVA结果ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.403 | 0.419 | 0.451 | 0.873 | 0.144 | 0.917 | 0.344 | 0.241 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | 0.000 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | 0.060 | <0.001 | 0.014 | 0.465 | <0.001 | 0.005 | 0.136 | 0.763 | ||
O3×S | 0.966 | 0.544 | 0.341 | 0.102 | 0.171 | 0.309 | 0.194 | 0.002 | ||
O3×P | 0.308 | 0.951 | 0.142 | 0.679 | 0.002 | 0.602 | 0.648 | 0.016 | ||
S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S×P | 0.875 | 0.417 | 0.249 | 0.096 | 0.436 | 0.118 | 0.103 | 0.502 |
植株部位 Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理 Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片 Leaf | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 190±4 | 184±5 | 182±4 | 197±3 | 196±2 | 182±6 | 186±6 | 171±5 |
E-O3 | 188±7 | 184±6 | 191±2 | 198±7 | 196±5 | 179±5 | 183±2 | 167±4 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 197±2 | 187±5 | 207±9 | 209±5 | 221±9 | 196±3 | 198±3 | 176±8 | |
E-O3 | 195±6 | 202±3 | 204±0 | 197±6 | 219±4 | 204±2 | 198±3 | 180±8 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 220±4 | 217±1 | 208±4 | 205±4 | 211±5 | 226±4 | 212±7 | 199±6 | |
E-O3 | 198±5 | 213±8 | 212±3 | 202±5 | 205±3 | 209±4 | 208±5 | 178±6 | ||
茎秆 Stem | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 182±1 | 196±12 | 212±4 | 157±7 | 200±4 | 184±4 | 170±1 | 200±6 |
E-O3 | 169±5 | 192±4 | 193±6 | 181±5 | 197±5 | 194±1 | 195±1 | 186±5 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 208±7 | 210±6 | 206±3 | 224±4 | 200±5 | 214±5 | 197±6 | 177±11 | |
E-O3 | 209±6 | 227±2 | 211±4 | 204±7 | 216±4 | 207±2 | 207±1 | 183±9 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 208±3 | 204±2 | 210±5 | 170±5 | 194±10 | 206±5 | 190±5 | 186±11 | |
E-O3 | 193±9 | 206±5 | 204±7 | 186±6 | 217±13 | 218±3 | 224±5 | 180±8 | ||
稻草 Straw | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 185±2 | 191±9 | 198±2 | 169±5 | 199±3 | 184±3 | 176±2 | 191±5 |
E-O3 | 176±2 | 189±4 | 192±4 | 186±5 | 196±4 | 188±2 | 190±1 | 179±4 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 205±5 | 202±3 | 207±2 | 219±3 | 206±5 | 208±2 | 197±4 | 177±10 | |
E-O3 | 205±6 | 219±1 | 209±3 | 202±5 | 217±4 | 206±2 | 204±2 | 182±8 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 211±2 | 208±2 | 210±5 | 180±3 | 199±7 | 213±3 | 198±5 | 188±9 | |
E-O3 | 195±6 | 208±3 | 206±5 | 191±4 | 212±8 | 215±3 | 218±3 | 180±7 | ||
ANOVA结果 ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.341 | 0.587 | 0.721 | 0.674 | 0.452 | 0.839 | <0.001 | 0.586 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.347 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | 0.283 | 0.011 | 0.047 | <0.001 | 0.296 | 0.060 | 0.898 | 0.091 | ||
O3×S | 0.033 | 0.030 | 0.639 | 0.002 | 0.459 | 0.559 | 0.290 | 0.168 | ||
O3×P | 0.852 | 0.887 | 0.059 | 0.090 | 0.060 | 0.057 | <0.001 | 0.787 | ||
S×P | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.018 | <0.001 | 0.279 | 0.009 | 0.457 | 0.014 | ||
O3×S×P | 0.395 | 0.836 | 0.025 | 0.101 | 0.208 | 0.002 | 0.091 | 0.444 |
Table 5 Effects of ozone stress on hemicellulose concentrations in leaves, stems and straw of different rice varieties. g/kg
植株部位 Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理 Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片 Leaf | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 190±4 | 184±5 | 182±4 | 197±3 | 196±2 | 182±6 | 186±6 | 171±5 |
E-O3 | 188±7 | 184±6 | 191±2 | 198±7 | 196±5 | 179±5 | 183±2 | 167±4 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 197±2 | 187±5 | 207±9 | 209±5 | 221±9 | 196±3 | 198±3 | 176±8 | |
E-O3 | 195±6 | 202±3 | 204±0 | 197±6 | 219±4 | 204±2 | 198±3 | 180±8 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 220±4 | 217±1 | 208±4 | 205±4 | 211±5 | 226±4 | 212±7 | 199±6 | |
E-O3 | 198±5 | 213±8 | 212±3 | 202±5 | 205±3 | 209±4 | 208±5 | 178±6 | ||
茎秆 Stem | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 182±1 | 196±12 | 212±4 | 157±7 | 200±4 | 184±4 | 170±1 | 200±6 |
E-O3 | 169±5 | 192±4 | 193±6 | 181±5 | 197±5 | 194±1 | 195±1 | 186±5 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 208±7 | 210±6 | 206±3 | 224±4 | 200±5 | 214±5 | 197±6 | 177±11 | |
E-O3 | 209±6 | 227±2 | 211±4 | 204±7 | 216±4 | 207±2 | 207±1 | 183±9 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 208±3 | 204±2 | 210±5 | 170±5 | 194±10 | 206±5 | 190±5 | 186±11 | |
E-O3 | 193±9 | 206±5 | 204±7 | 186±6 | 217±13 | 218±3 | 224±5 | 180±8 | ||
稻草 Straw | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 185±2 | 191±9 | 198±2 | 169±5 | 199±3 | 184±3 | 176±2 | 191±5 |
E-O3 | 176±2 | 189±4 | 192±4 | 186±5 | 196±4 | 188±2 | 190±1 | 179±4 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 205±5 | 202±3 | 207±2 | 219±3 | 206±5 | 208±2 | 197±4 | 177±10 | |
E-O3 | 205±6 | 219±1 | 209±3 | 202±5 | 217±4 | 206±2 | 204±2 | 182±8 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 211±2 | 208±2 | 210±5 | 180±3 | 199±7 | 213±3 | 198±5 | 188±9 | |
E-O3 | 195±6 | 208±3 | 206±5 | 191±4 | 212±8 | 215±3 | 218±3 | 180±7 | ||
ANOVA结果 ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.341 | 0.587 | 0.721 | 0.674 | 0.452 | 0.839 | <0.001 | 0.586 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.347 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | 0.283 | 0.011 | 0.047 | <0.001 | 0.296 | 0.060 | 0.898 | 0.091 | ||
O3×S | 0.033 | 0.030 | 0.639 | 0.002 | 0.459 | 0.559 | 0.290 | 0.168 | ||
O3×P | 0.852 | 0.887 | 0.059 | 0.090 | 0.060 | 0.057 | <0.001 | 0.787 | ||
S×P | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.018 | <0.001 | 0.279 | 0.009 | 0.457 | 0.014 | ||
O3×S×P | 0.395 | 0.836 | 0.025 | 0.101 | 0.208 | 0.002 | 0.091 | 0.444 |
植株部位 Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片Leaf | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 58±3.2 | 89±2.2 | 88±9.0 | 66±5.3 | 128±1.6 | 101±4.9 | 68±1.8 | 84±1.1 |
E-O3 | 63±0.9 | 59±4.8 | 55±2.8 | 60±2.6 | 113±3.2 | 79±2.0 | 72±5.1 | 69±2.4 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 31±1.5 | 30±2.1 | 30±3.2 | 51±7.2 | 94±1.9 | 83±2.5 | 49±3.4 | 79±5.5 | |
E-O3 | 34±4.9 | 27±1.4 | 22±1.5 | 39±6.3 | 45±3.4 | 64±2.6 | 49±2.9 | 53±3.3 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 80±6.0 | 70±3.7 | 61±3.9 | 54±4.3 | 76±3.0 | 47±7.5 | 44±5.0 | 68±5.4 | |
E-O3 | 48±4.9 | 39±3.7 | 39±1.0 | 27±1.8 | 40±2.7 | 33±2.3 | 20±1.9 | 42±2.8 | ||
茎秆Stem | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 60±2.0 | 54±2.0 | 78±7.1 | 137±4.8 | 141±4.6 | 120±2.3 | 92±0.4 | 131±4.5 |
E-O3 | 56±3.7 | 73±0.7 | 72±6.3 | 137±14 | 127±5.9 | 120±1.0 | 96±0.8 | 84±2.6 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 22±0.5 | 67±2.5 | 78±5.7 | 90±9.2 | 81±2.7 | 39±5.0 | 30±2.6 | 97±5.6 | |
E-O3 | 27±4.9 | 65±1.1 | 66±3.8 | 84±4.8 | 53±6.0 | 20±2.1 | 24±2.0 | 95±3.2 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 70±1.5 | 79±4.0 | 120±8.2 | 137±4.3 | 96±3.9 | 121±10.5 | 85±2.3 | 100±5.8 | |
E-O3 | 73±2.6 | 71±5.9 | 99±7.1 | 118±4.7 | 85±7.7 | 105±11.3 | 74±6.1 | 93±2.8 | ||
稻草Straw | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 60±2.0 | 67±1.9 | 83±5.1 | 114±4.4 | 137±3.5 | 112±2.7 | 82±0.9 | 115±4.4 |
E-O3 | 58±2.7 | 67±1.9 | 64±4.0 | 113±10.4 | 122±4.0 | 104±0.4 | 86±2.0 | 79±1.9 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 25±0.8 | 55±2.3 | 64±4.4 | 77±8.9 | 84±1.7 | 53±4.1 | 37±0.9 | 93±4.8 | |
E-O3 | 29±4.7 | 54±0.4 | 51±1.9 | 70±5.7 | 51±5.0 | 36±2.6 | 33±1.9 | 86±2.9 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 73±2.3 | 76±1.7 | 100±5.6 | 113±4.8 | 91±3.3 | 96±7.4 | 69±1.7 | 94±5.2 | |
E-O3 | 65±3.3 | 60±3.6 | 78±5.5 | 87±4.3 | 70±6.4 | 79±8.3 | 52±3.4 | 79±2.8 | ||
ANOVA结果 ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.603 | <0.001 | 0.059 | 0.288 | 0.019 | 0.107 | 0.005 | 0.029 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | 0.453 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.301 | 0.055 | 0.012 | 0.581 | 0.000 | 0.009 | ||
O3×P | 0.014 | <0.001 | 0.194 | 0.301 | 0.003 | 0.269 | 0.608 | 0.397 | ||
S×P | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.098 | ||
O3×S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.124 | 0.999 | 0.089 | 0.208 | 0.175 | <0.001 |
Table 6 Effects of ozone stress on soluble sugar concentrations in leaves, stems and straw of different rice varieties. mg/g
植株部位 Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片Leaf | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 58±3.2 | 89±2.2 | 88±9.0 | 66±5.3 | 128±1.6 | 101±4.9 | 68±1.8 | 84±1.1 |
E-O3 | 63±0.9 | 59±4.8 | 55±2.8 | 60±2.6 | 113±3.2 | 79±2.0 | 72±5.1 | 69±2.4 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 31±1.5 | 30±2.1 | 30±3.2 | 51±7.2 | 94±1.9 | 83±2.5 | 49±3.4 | 79±5.5 | |
E-O3 | 34±4.9 | 27±1.4 | 22±1.5 | 39±6.3 | 45±3.4 | 64±2.6 | 49±2.9 | 53±3.3 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 80±6.0 | 70±3.7 | 61±3.9 | 54±4.3 | 76±3.0 | 47±7.5 | 44±5.0 | 68±5.4 | |
E-O3 | 48±4.9 | 39±3.7 | 39±1.0 | 27±1.8 | 40±2.7 | 33±2.3 | 20±1.9 | 42±2.8 | ||
茎秆Stem | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 60±2.0 | 54±2.0 | 78±7.1 | 137±4.8 | 141±4.6 | 120±2.3 | 92±0.4 | 131±4.5 |
E-O3 | 56±3.7 | 73±0.7 | 72±6.3 | 137±14 | 127±5.9 | 120±1.0 | 96±0.8 | 84±2.6 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 22±0.5 | 67±2.5 | 78±5.7 | 90±9.2 | 81±2.7 | 39±5.0 | 30±2.6 | 97±5.6 | |
E-O3 | 27±4.9 | 65±1.1 | 66±3.8 | 84±4.8 | 53±6.0 | 20±2.1 | 24±2.0 | 95±3.2 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 70±1.5 | 79±4.0 | 120±8.2 | 137±4.3 | 96±3.9 | 121±10.5 | 85±2.3 | 100±5.8 | |
E-O3 | 73±2.6 | 71±5.9 | 99±7.1 | 118±4.7 | 85±7.7 | 105±11.3 | 74±6.1 | 93±2.8 | ||
稻草Straw | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 60±2.0 | 67±1.9 | 83±5.1 | 114±4.4 | 137±3.5 | 112±2.7 | 82±0.9 | 115±4.4 |
E-O3 | 58±2.7 | 67±1.9 | 64±4.0 | 113±10.4 | 122±4.0 | 104±0.4 | 86±2.0 | 79±1.9 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 25±0.8 | 55±2.3 | 64±4.4 | 77±8.9 | 84±1.7 | 53±4.1 | 37±0.9 | 93±4.8 | |
E-O3 | 29±4.7 | 54±0.4 | 51±1.9 | 70±5.7 | 51±5.0 | 36±2.6 | 33±1.9 | 86±2.9 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 73±2.3 | 76±1.7 | 100±5.6 | 113±4.8 | 91±3.3 | 96±7.4 | 69±1.7 | 94±5.2 | |
E-O3 | 65±3.3 | 60±3.6 | 78±5.5 | 87±4.3 | 70±6.4 | 79±8.3 | 52±3.4 | 79±2.8 | ||
ANOVA结果 ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.603 | <0.001 | 0.059 | 0.288 | 0.019 | 0.107 | 0.005 | 0.029 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | 0.453 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.301 | 0.055 | 0.012 | 0.581 | 0.000 | 0.009 | ||
O3×P | 0.014 | <0.001 | 0.194 | 0.301 | 0.003 | 0.269 | 0.608 | 0.397 | ||
S×P | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.098 | ||
O3×S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.124 | 0.999 | 0.089 | 0.208 | 0.175 | <0.001 |
植株部位 Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理 Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片Leaf | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 43±0.9 | 52±0.7 | 53±0.1 | 45±0.8 | 40±1.0 | 50±2.4 | 40±1.3 | 45±0.8 |
E-O3 | 47±1.3 | 49±1.3 | 49±1.3 | 44±1.1 | 41±1.1 | 46±2.4 | 35±1.0 | 42±1.5 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 42±2.3 | 36±0.3 | 41±1.2 | 45±2.3 | 36±1.5 | 44±2.6 | 36±1.4 | 34±0.5 | |
E-O3 | 43±0.9 | 34±0.7 | 37±1.0 | 33±1.4 | 36±1.3 | 37±3.1 | 33±1.7 | 33±1.1 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 40±3.3 | 39±0.4 | 42±1.7 | 42±1.5 | 39±1.7 | 38±0.4 | 38±2.0 | 46±1.0 | |
E-O3 | 42±0.4 | 37±1.2 | 39±0.5 | 39±0.4 | 36±1.3 | 37±1.4 | 35±1.5 | 42±0.9 | ||
茎秆Stem | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 181±5.3 | 99±2.8 | 150±9.5 | 190±3.1 | 239±3.8 | 184±3.7 | 143±0.6 | 206±7.2 |
E-O3 | 174±5.9 | 89±1.1 | 102±4.9 | 170±1.7 | 227±9.6 | 158±3.5 | 125±10.1 | 134±3.5 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 127±2.4 | 49±2.3 | 63±2.5 | 74±2.8 | 98±7.0 | 45±1.1 | 61±1.4 | 193±5.9 | |
E-O3 | 91±3.8 | 39±0.9 | 42±1.9 | 56±4.2 | 60±0.4 | 39±3.2 | 55±1.6 | 145±2.0 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 189±3.2 | 98±2.6 | 93±5.1 | 141±3.5 | 216±6.2 | 122±9.5 | 93±2.4 | 204±2.1 | |
E-O3 | 170±2.8 | 89±3.2 | 80±6.3 | 112±0.9 | 174±8.1 | 98±4.0 | 69±3.8 | 140±1.4 | ||
稻草Straw | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 129±4.2 | 81±1.9 | 106±8.5 | 144±2.1 | 181±4.3 | 131±5.8 | 99±0.9 | 151±6.9 |
E-O3 | 132±6.7 | 74±1.0 | 77±3.5 | 132±1.1 | 170±7.3 | 115±3.0 | 87±5.9 | 102±1.8 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 100±2.2 | 45±1.7 | 56±2.1 | 65±1.7 | 80±5.2 | 45±1.3 | 52±0.8 | 161±5.3 | |
E-O3 | 75±2.4 | 38±0.8 | 40±1.6 | 49±3.2 | 53±0.3 | 39±2.9 | 46±0.6 | 119±0.7 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 146±3.7 | 79±1.2 | 76±3.5 | 112±4.0 | 167±4.0 | 94±6.7 | 72±2.2 | 170±2.1 | |
E-O3 | 128±2.6 | 71±2.6 | 65±4.2 | 87±1.4 | 126±8.8 | 76±3.8 | 55±1.8 | 113±1.0 | ||
ANOVA结果 ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.127 | <0.001 | 0.106 | 0.012 | 0.063 | 0.058 | 0.057 | <0.001 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.011 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S | 0.002 | 0.801 | 0.002 | 0.214 | 0.036 | 0.237 | 0.153 | 0.017 | ||
O3×P | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.004 | <0.001 | ||
S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.104 | ||
O3×S×P | 0.010 | 0.905 | 0.004 | 0.015 | 0.088 | 0.056 | 0.147 | 0.061 |
Table 7 Effects of ozone stress on starch concentrations in leaves, stems and straw of different rice varieties. mg/g
植株部位 Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理 Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片Leaf | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 43±0.9 | 52±0.7 | 53±0.1 | 45±0.8 | 40±1.0 | 50±2.4 | 40±1.3 | 45±0.8 |
E-O3 | 47±1.3 | 49±1.3 | 49±1.3 | 44±1.1 | 41±1.1 | 46±2.4 | 35±1.0 | 42±1.5 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 42±2.3 | 36±0.3 | 41±1.2 | 45±2.3 | 36±1.5 | 44±2.6 | 36±1.4 | 34±0.5 | |
E-O3 | 43±0.9 | 34±0.7 | 37±1.0 | 33±1.4 | 36±1.3 | 37±3.1 | 33±1.7 | 33±1.1 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 40±3.3 | 39±0.4 | 42±1.7 | 42±1.5 | 39±1.7 | 38±0.4 | 38±2.0 | 46±1.0 | |
E-O3 | 42±0.4 | 37±1.2 | 39±0.5 | 39±0.4 | 36±1.3 | 37±1.4 | 35±1.5 | 42±0.9 | ||
茎秆Stem | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 181±5.3 | 99±2.8 | 150±9.5 | 190±3.1 | 239±3.8 | 184±3.7 | 143±0.6 | 206±7.2 |
E-O3 | 174±5.9 | 89±1.1 | 102±4.9 | 170±1.7 | 227±9.6 | 158±3.5 | 125±10.1 | 134±3.5 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 127±2.4 | 49±2.3 | 63±2.5 | 74±2.8 | 98±7.0 | 45±1.1 | 61±1.4 | 193±5.9 | |
E-O3 | 91±3.8 | 39±0.9 | 42±1.9 | 56±4.2 | 60±0.4 | 39±3.2 | 55±1.6 | 145±2.0 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 189±3.2 | 98±2.6 | 93±5.1 | 141±3.5 | 216±6.2 | 122±9.5 | 93±2.4 | 204±2.1 | |
E-O3 | 170±2.8 | 89±3.2 | 80±6.3 | 112±0.9 | 174±8.1 | 98±4.0 | 69±3.8 | 140±1.4 | ||
稻草Straw | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 129±4.2 | 81±1.9 | 106±8.5 | 144±2.1 | 181±4.3 | 131±5.8 | 99±0.9 | 151±6.9 |
E-O3 | 132±6.7 | 74±1.0 | 77±3.5 | 132±1.1 | 170±7.3 | 115±3.0 | 87±5.9 | 102±1.8 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 100±2.2 | 45±1.7 | 56±2.1 | 65±1.7 | 80±5.2 | 45±1.3 | 52±0.8 | 161±5.3 | |
E-O3 | 75±2.4 | 38±0.8 | 40±1.6 | 49±3.2 | 53±0.3 | 39±2.9 | 46±0.6 | 119±0.7 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 146±3.7 | 79±1.2 | 76±3.5 | 112±4.0 | 167±4.0 | 94±6.7 | 72±2.2 | 170±2.1 | |
E-O3 | 128±2.6 | 71±2.6 | 65±4.2 | 87±1.4 | 126±8.8 | 76±3.8 | 55±1.8 | 113±1.0 | ||
ANOVA结果 ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.127 | <0.001 | 0.106 | 0.012 | 0.063 | 0.058 | 0.057 | <0.001 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.011 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S | 0.002 | 0.801 | 0.002 | 0.214 | 0.036 | 0.237 | 0.153 | 0.017 | ||
O3×P | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.004 | <0.001 | ||
S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.104 | ||
O3×S×P | 0.010 | 0.905 | 0.004 | 0.015 | 0.088 | 0.056 | 0.147 | 0.061 |
植株部位 Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片Leaf | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 2.3±0.02 | 2.1±0.00 | 2.3±0.01 | 2.6±0.02 | 2.7±0.02 | 2.6±0.05 | 2.8±0.03 | 3.0±0.04 |
E-O3 | 2.4±0.03 | 2.2±0.03 | 2.5±0.03 | 2.8±0.02 | 2.8±0.02 | 2.8±0.04 | 2.9±0.01 | 3.2±0.01 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 2.2±0.05 | 2.3±0.04 | 2.0±0.02 | 2.4±0.02 | 2.4±0.03 | 2.5±0.02 | 2.5±0.03 | 2.9±0.05 | |
E-O3 | 2.4±0.05 | 2.7±0.03 | 2.1±0.03 | 2.5±0.05 | 2.6±0.04 | 2.6±0.01 | 2.6±0.01 | 3.0±0.05 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 2.0±0.03 | 1.9±0.02 | 1.8±0.05 | 2.0±0.01 | 2.2±0.04 | 1.9±0.06 | 2.0±0.00 | 2.7±0.03 | |
E-O3 | 2.2±0.04 | 2.1±0.02 | 1.9±0.05 | 2.1±0.01 | 2.4±0.04 | 2.0±0.06 | 2.1±0.04 | 2.9±0.05 | ||
茎秆Stem | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 2.7±0.02 | 2.7±0.01 | 2.4±0.02 | 2.7±0.01 | 2.5±0.01 | 2.9±0.05 | 2.9±0.03 | 3.1±0.01 |
E-O3 | 2.9±0.01 | 2.7±0.01 | 2.5±0.01 | 2.9±0.01 | 2.6±0.02 | 2.9±0.01 | 3.1±0.04 | 3.3±0.03 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 3.4±0.03 | 3.7±0.03 | 3.6±0.05 | 3.6±0.03 | 3.9±0.02 | 4.0±0.04 | 4.1±0.02 | 4.4±0.03 | |
E-O3 | 3.7±0.04 | 4.0±0.06 | 3.7±0.04 | 3.8±0.05 | 4.0±0.03 | 4.0±0.02 | 4.2±0.03 | 4.5±0.02 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 3.3±0.03 | 3.1±0.06 | 3.0±0.07 | 3.0±0.05 | 2.7±0.03 | 3.0±0.03 | 3.1±0.08 | 3.4±0.03 | |
E-O3 | 3.4±0.02 | 3.4±0.05 | 3.3±0.04 | 3.3±0.02 | 3.1±0.06 | 3.1±0.03 | 3.3±0.04 | 3.7±0.05 | ||
稻草Straw | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 2.5±0.02 | 2.5±0.00 | 2.3±0.01 | 2.7±0.01 | 2.5±0.01 | 2.8±0.04 | 2.9±0.02 | 3.1±0.02 |
E-O3 | 2.7±0.01 | 2.5±0.00 | 2.5±0.02 | 2.8±0.01 | 2.6±0.02 | 2.8±0.01 | 3.0±0.02 | 3.3±0.02 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 3.0±0.02 | 3.2±0.04 | 3.1±0.05 | 3.2±0.03 | 3.5±0.01 | 3.5±0.03 | 3.5±0.01 | 4.1±0.03 | |
E-O3 | 3.3±0.04 | 3.6±0.05 | 3.1±0.03 | 3.4±0.04 | 3.6±0.02 | 3.5±0.03 | 3.6±0.01 | 4.2±0.04 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 2.9±0.03 | 2.7±0.06 | 2.6±0.06 | 2.7±0.04 | 2.6±0.03 | 2.6±0.03 | 2.7±0.07 | 3.3±0.01 | |
E-O3 | 3.0±0.02 | 3.0±0.04 | 2.8±0.03 | 2.9±0.02 | 2.8±0.03 | 2.8±0.04 | 2.9±0.02 | 3.5±0.06 | ||
ANOVA结果 ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.010 | 0.012 | 0.034 | 0.020 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.026 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S | 0.008 | <0.001 | 0.021 | 0.713 | 0.006 | 0.571 | 0.104 | 0.263 | ||
O3×P | 0.010 | 0.085 | 0.011 | 0.064 | 0.763 | 0.041 | 0.040 | 0.639 | ||
S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S×P | 0.211 | 0.359 | 0.358 | 0.004 | 0.008 | 0.034 | 0.817 | 0.098 |
Table 8 Effects of ozone stress on total phenolic concentrations in leaves, stems and straw of different rice varieties. mg/g
植株部位 Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片Leaf | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 2.3±0.02 | 2.1±0.00 | 2.3±0.01 | 2.6±0.02 | 2.7±0.02 | 2.6±0.05 | 2.8±0.03 | 3.0±0.04 |
E-O3 | 2.4±0.03 | 2.2±0.03 | 2.5±0.03 | 2.8±0.02 | 2.8±0.02 | 2.8±0.04 | 2.9±0.01 | 3.2±0.01 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 2.2±0.05 | 2.3±0.04 | 2.0±0.02 | 2.4±0.02 | 2.4±0.03 | 2.5±0.02 | 2.5±0.03 | 2.9±0.05 | |
E-O3 | 2.4±0.05 | 2.7±0.03 | 2.1±0.03 | 2.5±0.05 | 2.6±0.04 | 2.6±0.01 | 2.6±0.01 | 3.0±0.05 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 2.0±0.03 | 1.9±0.02 | 1.8±0.05 | 2.0±0.01 | 2.2±0.04 | 1.9±0.06 | 2.0±0.00 | 2.7±0.03 | |
E-O3 | 2.2±0.04 | 2.1±0.02 | 1.9±0.05 | 2.1±0.01 | 2.4±0.04 | 2.0±0.06 | 2.1±0.04 | 2.9±0.05 | ||
茎秆Stem | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 2.7±0.02 | 2.7±0.01 | 2.4±0.02 | 2.7±0.01 | 2.5±0.01 | 2.9±0.05 | 2.9±0.03 | 3.1±0.01 |
E-O3 | 2.9±0.01 | 2.7±0.01 | 2.5±0.01 | 2.9±0.01 | 2.6±0.02 | 2.9±0.01 | 3.1±0.04 | 3.3±0.03 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 3.4±0.03 | 3.7±0.03 | 3.6±0.05 | 3.6±0.03 | 3.9±0.02 | 4.0±0.04 | 4.1±0.02 | 4.4±0.03 | |
E-O3 | 3.7±0.04 | 4.0±0.06 | 3.7±0.04 | 3.8±0.05 | 4.0±0.03 | 4.0±0.02 | 4.2±0.03 | 4.5±0.02 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 3.3±0.03 | 3.1±0.06 | 3.0±0.07 | 3.0±0.05 | 2.7±0.03 | 3.0±0.03 | 3.1±0.08 | 3.4±0.03 | |
E-O3 | 3.4±0.02 | 3.4±0.05 | 3.3±0.04 | 3.3±0.02 | 3.1±0.06 | 3.1±0.03 | 3.3±0.04 | 3.7±0.05 | ||
稻草Straw | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 2.5±0.02 | 2.5±0.00 | 2.3±0.01 | 2.7±0.01 | 2.5±0.01 | 2.8±0.04 | 2.9±0.02 | 3.1±0.02 |
E-O3 | 2.7±0.01 | 2.5±0.00 | 2.5±0.02 | 2.8±0.01 | 2.6±0.02 | 2.8±0.01 | 3.0±0.02 | 3.3±0.02 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 3.0±0.02 | 3.2±0.04 | 3.1±0.05 | 3.2±0.03 | 3.5±0.01 | 3.5±0.03 | 3.5±0.01 | 4.1±0.03 | |
E-O3 | 3.3±0.04 | 3.6±0.05 | 3.1±0.03 | 3.4±0.04 | 3.6±0.02 | 3.5±0.03 | 3.6±0.01 | 4.2±0.04 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 2.9±0.03 | 2.7±0.06 | 2.6±0.06 | 2.7±0.04 | 2.6±0.03 | 2.6±0.03 | 2.7±0.07 | 3.3±0.01 | |
E-O3 | 3.0±0.02 | 3.0±0.04 | 2.8±0.03 | 2.9±0.02 | 2.8±0.03 | 2.8±0.04 | 2.9±0.02 | 3.5±0.06 | ||
ANOVA结果 ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.010 | 0.012 | 0.034 | 0.020 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.026 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S | 0.008 | <0.001 | 0.021 | 0.713 | 0.006 | 0.571 | 0.104 | 0.263 | ||
O3×P | 0.010 | 0.085 | 0.011 | 0.064 | 0.763 | 0.041 | 0.040 | 0.639 | ||
S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S×P | 0.211 | 0.359 | 0.358 | 0.004 | 0.008 | 0.034 | 0.817 | 0.098 |
[1] | The Royal Society.Ground-level ozone in the 21st century: Future trends, impacts and policy implications[C]. London: The Royal Society, 2008. |
[2] | Shon Z H, Kim K H, Song S K.Long-term trend in NO2 and NOx levels and their emission ratio in relation to road traffic activities in East Asia[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2011, 45(18): 3120-3131. |
[3] | Wang Y X, Zhang Y Q, Hao J, Luo M.Seasonal and spatial variability of surface ozone over China: Contributions from background and domestic pollution[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2011, 11: 3511-3525. |
[4] | Xing J, Wang S X, Chatani S, Zhang C Y, Wei W, Hao J M, Klimont Z, Cofala J, Amann M.Projections of air pollutant emissions and its impacts on regional air quality in China in 2020[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2011, 11: 3119-3136. |
[5] | Lai D M, Ghude S D, Patil S D, Kulkarni S H, Jena C, Tiwari S, Srivastava M K.Tropospheric ozone and aerosol long-term trends over the Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP), India[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2012, 116(10): 82-92. |
[6] | Liu Q, Lam K S, Jiang F, Wang T J, Xie M, Zhuang B L, Jiang X Y.A numerical study of the impact of climate and emission changes on surface ozone over South China in autumn time in 2000-2050[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2013, 76: 227-237. |
[7] | Wang Y X, Shen L L, Wu S L, Wu S L, Mickley L, He J W, Hao J M.Sensitivity of surface ozone over China to 2000-2050 global changes of climate and emissions[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2013, 75: 374-382. |
[8] | Wang X P, Mauzerall D L.Characterizing distributions of surface ozone and its impact on grain production in China, Japan, and South Korea: 1990 and 2020[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2004, 38(26): 4383-4402. |
[9] | Wang X K, Manning W, Feng Z W, Zhu Y G.Ground-level ozone in China: Distribution and effects on crop yields[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2007, 147(2): 394-400. |
[10] | 冯兆忠, 彭金龙. 地表臭氧对中国主要粮食作物产量与品质的影响:现状与展望[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(4): 797-804. |
Feng Z Z, Peng J L.Effects of ground-level ozone on grain yield and quality of cereal crops in China:Status and perspectives[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2020, 39(4): 797-804. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 王云霞, 杨连新. 水稻品质对主要气候变化因子的响应[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(4):822-833. |
Wang Y X,Yang L X.Response of rice quality to major climate change factors[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2020, 39(4): 822-833. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | Kangasjarvi J, Jaspers P, Kollist H.Signalling and cell death in ozone exposed plants[J]. Plant Cell and Environment, 2005, 28(8): 1021-1036. |
[13] | Ueda Y, Uehara N, Sasaki H, Kobayashi K, Yamakawa T.Impacts of acute ozone stress on superoxide dismutase (SOD) expression and reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation in rice leaves[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2013, 70: 396-402. |
[14] | Fiscus E L, Booker F L, Burkey K O.Crop responses to ozone: Uptake, modes of action, carbon assimilation and partitioning[J]. Plant Cell and Environment, 2005, 28(8): 997-1011. |
[15] | Ainsworth E A, Yendrek C R, Sitch S, Collins W J, Emberson L D.The effects of tropospheric ozone on net primary productivity and implications for climate change[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2012, 63(1): 637-661. |
[16] | Binod P, Sindhu R, Singhania R R, Vikram S, Devi L, Nagalakshmi S, Kurien N, Sukumaran R K, Pandey A.Bioethanol production from rice straw: An overview[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101(13): 4767-4774. |
[17] | 董臣飞, 丁成龙, 许能祥, 程云辉, 沈益新, 顾洪如. 稻草饲用品质及茎秆形态特征的研究[J].草业学报, 2013(4): 86-89. |
Dong C F, Ding C L, Xu N X, Cheng Y H, Shen Y X, Gu H R.Research on the feeding quality and related stem morphological traits of rice straw[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013(4): 86-91. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | Van Soest P J. Rice straw, the role of silica and treatments to improve quality[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2006, 130(3-4): 137-171. |
[19] | Frei M, Kohno Y, Wissuwa M, Makkar H P S, Becker K, Negative effects of tropospheric ozone on the feed value of rice straw are mitigated by an ozone tolerance QTL[J]. Global Change Biology, 2011, 17(7): 2319-2329. |
[20] | Frei M, Makkar H P S, Becker K, Wissuwa M. Ozone exposure during growth affects the feeding value of rice shoots[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2010, 155(1): 74-79. |
[21] | Shao Z S, Zhang Y L, Mu H R, Wang Y X, Yang L X.Ozone-induced reduction in rice yield is closely related to the response of spikelet density under ozone stress[J/OL].Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 712: 136560. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136560. |
[22] | Shiro S, Yoshie S, Naoki Y, Takefumi H, Masahiro S, Toshiaki U.High-throughput determination of thioglycolic acid lignin from rice[J]. Plant Biotechnology, 2009, 26(3): 337-340. |
[23] | Brenner E A, Salazar A M, Zabotina O A, Thomas L. Characterization of European forage maize lines for stover composition and associations with polymorphisms within O-methyltransferase genes[J]. Journal of Experimental Plant Biology, 2012, 185-186: 281-287. |
[24] | 赵轶鹏, 赵新勇. 植物体可溶性糖测定方法的优化[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2018, 46(4): 184-185. |
Zhao Y P, Zhao X Y.Optimization of classical measuring method of soluble sugars in plant[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(4): 184-185. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 胡宏纹. 有机化学[M]. 北京. 高等教育出版社, 1990: 652. |
Hu H W. Organic Chemistry [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1990: 652. | |
[26] | Makkar H P S, Blummel M, Borowy N K, Becke K. Gravimetric determination of tannins and their correlations with chemical and protein precipitation methods[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1993, 61(2): 161-165. |
[27] | Piepho H P, Buchse A, Emrich K.A hitchhiker’s guide to mixed models for randomized experiments[J]. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2003, 189(5): 310-322. |
[28] | Sanz J, Muniferting R B, Bermejo V, Gimeno B S, Elvira S.Ozone and increased nitrogen supply effects on the yield and nutritive quality of Trifolium subterraneum[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2005, 39(32): 5899-5907. |
[29] | 郑飞翔, 王效科, 侯培强, 张巍巍, 逯非, 欧阳志云. 臭氧胁迫对水稻生长以及C、N、S元素分配的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(6): 1479-1486. |
Zheng F X, Wang X K, Hou P Q, Zhang W W, Lu F, Ouyang Z Y.Influences of elevated ozone on growth and C, N, S allocations of rice[J]. Acta Oecologica, 2011, 31(6): 1479-1486. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 邵在胜, 沈士博, 贾一磊, 穆海蓉, 王云霞, 杨连新, 王余龙. 臭氧浓度增加对不同敏感型水稻元素吸收与分配的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2016, 35(9): 1642-1652. |
Shao Z S, Sheng S B, Jia Y L, Mu H R, Wang Y X, Yang L X, Wang Y L.Impact of ozone stress on element absorption and distribution of rice genotypes with different ozone sensitivities[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2016, 35(9): 1642-1652. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | Cho K, Shibato J, Agrawal G K, Jung Y H, Kubo A, Jwa N S, Tamogami S, Satoh K, Kikuchi S, Higashi T, Kimuar S, Saji H, Tanaka Y, Iwahashi H, Masuo Y, Rakwal R.Integrated transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics analyses to survey ozone responses in the leaves of rice seedlings[J]. Journal of Proteome Research, 2008, 7(7): 2980-2998. |
[32] | Wang Y X, Michael F.Stressed food: The impact of abiotic environmental stresses on crop quality[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 2011, 141(3-4): 271-286. |
[33] | Mould F L.Predicting the feed quality: Chemical analysis and in vitro evaluation[J]. Field Crops Research, 2003, 84(1-2): 31-44. |
[34] | Sarnklong C, Cone J W, Pellikaan W F, Hendriks W H.Utilization of rice straw and different treatments to improve its feed value for ruminants: A review[J]. AsianAustralian Journal of Animal Science, 2010, 23(5): 680-692. |
[35] | Muntifering R B, Chappelka A H, Lin J C, Karnosky D F, Somers G L.Chemical composition and digestibility of Trifolium exposed to elevated ozone and carbon dioxide in a free-air (FACE) fumigation system[J]. Functional Ecology, 2010, 20(2): 269-275. |
[36] | Bender J, Muntifering R B, Lin J C, Weigel H J.Growth and nutritive quality of Poa pratensis as influenced by ozone and competition[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2006, 142(1): 109-115. |
[37] | Makkar H P S. In vitro gas methods for evaluation of feeds containing phytochemicals[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2005, 123-124(part-P1): 291-302. |
[38] | Nussbaum S, Geissmann M, Fuhrer J.Ozone exposure-response relationships for mixtures of perennial ryegrass and white clover depend on ozone exposure patterns[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 1995, 29(9): 989-995. |
[39] | Fuhrer J, SkRby L, Ashmore M R. Critical levels for ozone effects on vegetation in Europe[J]. Environmental Pollution, 1997, 97(1-2): 91-106. |
[40] | 董臣飞, 顾洪如, 许能祥, 程云辉, 张文洁, 丁成龙. 赤霉素对不同收获时间的稻草中非结构性碳水化合物含量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(8): 53-64. |
Dong C F, Gu H R, Xu N X, Cheng Y H, Zhang W J, Ding C L.Effects of gibberellic acid on nonstructural carbohydrates content in rice Oryza sativa straw harvested at different times[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(8): 53-64. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[41] | Dong C F, Ding C L, Xu N X, Cheng Y H, Shen Y X, Gu H R.Double-purpose rice (Oryza sativa L.) variety selection and their morphological traits[J]. Field Crops Research, 2013, 149: 276-282. |
[42] | Dong C F, Shen Y X, Ding C L, Xu N X, Cheng Y H, Gu H R.The feeding quality of rice (Oryza sativa L.) straw at different cutting heights and the related stem morphological traits[J]. Field Crops Research, 2013, 141: 1-8. |
[43] | Dong C F, Ding C L, Xu N X, Cheng Y H, Shen Y X, Gu H R.Research on the feeding quality and related stem morphological traits of rice(Oryza sativa) straw[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(4): 83-88. |
[44] | 章燕柳, 穆海蓉, 邵在胜, 王云霞, 景立权, 王余龙, 杨连新. 臭氧胁迫对稻穗不同部位糙米直链淀粉含量和RVA谱特征值的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(12): 4211-4221. |
Zhang Y L, Mu H R, Shao Z S, Wang Y X, Jing L Q, Wang Y L, Yang L X.Effects of ozone stress on amylose content and RVA profile in superior and inferior grains of different rice varieties[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(12): 4211-4221. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | REN Zhiqi, XUE Kexin, DONG Zheng, LI Xiaoxiang, LI Yongzhao, GUO Yujing, LIU Wenqiang, GUO Liang, SHENG Xinnian, LIU Zhixi, PAN Xiaowu. Identification and Gene Mapping of Outcurved Leaf Mutant ocl1 in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 337-346. |
[2] | XIAO Lequan, LI Lei, DAI Weimin, QIANG Sheng, SONG Xiaoling. Seedling Growth Characteristics of Hybrids Between Transgenic Rice with cry2A*/bar Genes and Weedy Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 347-358. |
[3] | LI Gang, GAO Qingsong, LI Wei, ZHANG Wenxia, WANG Jian, CHEN Baoshan, WANG Di, GAO Hao, XU Weijun, CHEN Hongqi, JI Jianhui. Directed Knockout of SD1 Gene Improves Lodging Resistance and Blast Resistance of Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 359-367. |
[4] | WANG Shengyong, CHEN Yuhang, CHEN Huili, HUANG Yujie, ZHANG Xiaotian, DING Shuangcheng, WANG Hongwei. Effects of High Temperature on Phenylpropane Metabolism and Downstream Branch Metabolic Pathways in Rice Meiosis [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 368-378. |
[5] | HUANG Yaru, XU Peng, WANG Lele, HE Yizhe, WANG Hui, KE Jian, HE Haibing, WU Liquan, YOU Cuicui. Effects of Exogenous Trehalose on Grain Filling Characteristics and Yield Formation of japonica Rice Cultivar W1844 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[6] | DONG Liqiang, YANG Tiexin, LI Rui, SHANG Wenqi, MA Liang, LI Yuedong, SUI Guomin. Effect of Plant-row Spacing on Rice Yield and Root Morphological and Physiological Characteristics in Super High Yield Field [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 392-404. |
[7] | GAO Qianqing, REN Xiaojian, ZHAI Zhongbing, ZHENG Pubing, WU Yuanfen, CUI Kehui. Effects of Panicle and Bud-promoting Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on Growth of Regenerated Bud and Grain Yield of Ratoon Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 405-414. |
[8] | HUANG Jinwen, LI Rikun, CHEN Zhicheng, ZHANG Bianhong, LEI Han, PAN Ruixin, YANG Mingyu, PAN Meiqing, TANG Lina. Effects of Straw Returning Techniques on Soil Nutrients, Organic Carbon and Microbial Diversity in Tobacco-rice Rotation System [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 415-426. |
[9] | HAN Cong, HE Yuchang, WU Lijuan, JIA Lili, WANG Lei, E Zhiguo. Research Progress in the Function of Basic Leucine Zipper (bZIP) Protein Family in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 436-448. |
[10] | SHEN Yumin, CHEN Mingliang, XIONG Huanjin, XIONG Wentao, WU Xiaoyan, XIAO Yeqing. Phenotypic Analysis and Fine Mapping of blg1(beak like grain 1), a Rice Mutant with Abnormal Palea and Lemma Development [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 225-232. |
[11] | DUAN Min, XIE Liujie, GAO Xiuying, TANG Haijuan, HUANG Shanjun, PAN Xiaobiao. Creation of Thermo-sensitive Genic Male Sterile Rice Lines with Wide Compatibility Based on CRISPR/Cas9 Technology [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 233-243. |
[12] | WANG Wenting, MA Jiaying, LI Guangyan, FU Weimeng, LI Hubo, LIN Jie, CHEN Tingting, FENG Baohua, TAO Longxing, FU Guanfu, QIN Yebo. Effect of Different Fertilizer Application Rates on Rice Yield and Quality Formation and Its Relationship with Energy Metabolism at High Temperature [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
[13] | LIU Aihua, LI Xiaokun. Meta-analysis of Relationship Between Fertilizer Application and Rice Quality [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 276-284. |
[14] | YANG Xiaolong, WANG Biao, WANG Benfu, ZHANG Zhisheng, ZHANG Zuolin, YANG Lantian, CHENG Jianping, LI Yang. Effects of Different Water Management on Yield and Rice Quality of Dry-seeded Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
[15] | WEI Xiaodong, SONG Xuemei, ZHAO Ling, ZHAO Qingyong, CHEN Tao, LU Kai, ZHU Zhen, HUANG Shengdong, WANG Cailin, ZHANG Yadong. Effects of Silicon and Zinc Fertilizer and Their Application Ways on Yield and Grain Quality of Rice Variety Nanjing 46 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 295-306. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||