中国水稻科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 491-500.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2025.241106
唐承翰1,#, 陈惠哲1,#, 怀燕2, 孙良3, 张玉屏1, 向镜1, 张义凯1, 王志刚1, 徐逸文1, 王亚梁1,*()
收稿日期:
2024-11-13
修回日期:
2025-05-22
出版日期:
2025-07-10
发布日期:
2025-07-21
通讯作者:
*email: wangyaliang@caas.cn作者简介:
#共同第一作者
基金资助:
TANG Chenghan1,#, CHEN Huizhe1,#, HUAI Yan2, SUN Liang3, ZHANG Yuping1, XIANG Jing1, ZHANG Yikai1, WANG Zhigang1, XU Yiwen1, WANG Yaliang1,*()
Received:
2024-11-13
Revised:
2025-05-22
Online:
2025-07-10
Published:
2025-07-21
Contact:
*email:wangyaliang@caas.cn
About author:
#These authors contributed equally to this work
摘要:
【目的】钵毯苗能有效聚拢根系,降低水稻机插损伤,明确钵深对杂交稻钵毯苗机插质量及产量形成的影响,为研发适宜的杂交稻钵毯苗秧盘提供理论依据。【方法】以籼粳杂交稻甬优1540为供试品种。普通平盘(CK,平盘,钵深为0 cm)作为对照,设置4个不同钵深类型的钵毯苗处理:T1(钵毯盘,钵深为0.4 cm,钵体体积为1.6 cm3、T2(钵毯盘,钵深为0.8 cm,钵体体积为3.2 cm3)、T3(钵毯盘,钵深为1.2 cm,钵体体积为4.8 cm3)、T4(钵毯盘,钵深为1.6 cm,钵体体积为6.4 cm3)。所有处理采用的秧盘大小一致(长度×宽度×高度=58 cm×28 cm×2.8 cm),横向播种14次,纵向播种29次,每穴播种3粒种子,播种量为30.94 g/盘。比较分析不同处理间成毯性、秧苗素质、机插质量、机插根系损伤、移栽后秧苗的生理指标以及群体产量形成的差异。【结果】1)钵深增加,降低了机插取秧对根系的损伤,提高机插后秧苗的根系活力、叶片可溶性糖和叶绿素含量。钵深1.6 cm的秧苗成毯性差,机插后群体漏秧率高、均匀度低。2)钵深增大,群体分蘖多,群体的叶面积指数和干物质积累量增加。3)钵深越大,群体依靠更多的有效穗数促进产量提升,T1、T2、T3、T4的产量较CK分别提高2.37%、2.93%、4.03%、7.60%。【结论】增加钵毯盘的钵深能降低机插对水稻秧苗根系的损伤,使群体以更多有效穗数获得高产,但钵深过大的秧苗成毯困难、机插质量差,大钵体稀播育秧的钵深不宜大于1.2 cm。实际生产中,建议在确保秧苗成毯的前提下,增加钵毯盘的钵深,以促进杂交稻钵毯苗机插高产群体的构建。
唐承翰, 陈惠哲, 怀燕, 孙良, 张玉屏, 向镜, 张义凯, 王志刚, 徐逸文, 王亚梁. 杂交稻钵毯苗机插质量及产量形成对钵深的响应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2025, 39(4): 491-500.
TANG Chenghan, CHEN Huizhe, HUAI Yan, SUN Liang, ZHANG Yuping, XIANG Jing, ZHANG Yikai, WANG Zhigang, XU Yiwen, WANG Yaliang. Response of Machine-transplanting Quality and Yield Formation of Hybrid Rice Pot-mat Seedlings to Pot Depth[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2025, 39(4): 491-500.
图1 不同处理在机插前秧苗根系 CK: 平盘,钵深为0 cm;T1: 钵毯盘,钵深为0.4 cm,钵体体积为1.6 cm3;T2: 钵毯盘,钵深为0.8 cm,钵体体积为3.2 cm3;T3: 钵毯盘,钵深为1.2 cm,钵体体积为4.8 cm3;T4: 钵毯盘,钵深为1.6 cm,钵体体积为6.4 cm3;图中比例尺为2 cm。
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of rice seedling root system before machine transplanting under different treatments CK, Blanket seedling tray. The pot depth is 0 cm; T1, Pot-mat seedling tray. The pot depth is 0.4 cm and the pot volume is 1.6 cm3. T2, Pot-mat seedling tray. The pot depth is 0.8 cm and the pot volume is 3.2 cm3. T3, Pot-mat seedling tray. The pot depth is 1.2 cm and the pot volume is 4.8 cm3. T4, Pot-mat seedling tray. The pot depth is 1.6 cm and the pot volume is 6.4 cm3. The scale in the figure is 2 cm.
秧盘处理 Seedling tray | 成毯性 Mat-forming capacity | 苗高 Seedling height(cm) | 叶龄 Leaf age | 茎基宽 Stem base width(mm) | 茎叶干质量 Biomass of stem and leaves(mg) | 根长 Root length (cm) | 根干质量 Biomass of root(mg) | 成苗率 Seedling rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 好 Good | 23.15±0.60 a | 4.26±0.02 a | 2.67±0.04 a | 45.77±0.80 a | 10.94±0.15 a | 16.83±1.03 a | 84.99±1.44 a |
T1 | 好 Good | 23.33±0.99 a | 4.21±0.04 a | 2.67±0.05 a | 46.47±1.25 a | 11.06±0.19 a | 16.40±1.68 a | 85.02±2.02 a |
T2 | 一般 Common | 23.48±0.78 a | 4.23±0.06 a | 2.68±0.05 a | 46.07±0.76 a | 10.90±0.17 a | 16.73±1.26 a | 84.85±1.22 a |
T3 | 一般 Common | 23.48±0.99 a | 4.22±0.05 a | 2.68±0.04 a | 46.80±1.71 a | 10.82±0.13 a | 16.37±0.87 a | 84.85±1.68 a |
T4 | 差 Bad | 23.73±0.67 a | 4.26±0.03 a | 2.67±0.05 a | 47.07±0.38 a | 10.85±0.25 a | 16.93±1.33 a | 85.10±1.61 a |
表1 不同处理下成毯性和秧苗素质的比较
Table 1. Comparison of mat-forming capacity and rice seedling quality before machanical transplanting under different treatments
秧盘处理 Seedling tray | 成毯性 Mat-forming capacity | 苗高 Seedling height(cm) | 叶龄 Leaf age | 茎基宽 Stem base width(mm) | 茎叶干质量 Biomass of stem and leaves(mg) | 根长 Root length (cm) | 根干质量 Biomass of root(mg) | 成苗率 Seedling rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 好 Good | 23.15±0.60 a | 4.26±0.02 a | 2.67±0.04 a | 45.77±0.80 a | 10.94±0.15 a | 16.83±1.03 a | 84.99±1.44 a |
T1 | 好 Good | 23.33±0.99 a | 4.21±0.04 a | 2.67±0.05 a | 46.47±1.25 a | 11.06±0.19 a | 16.40±1.68 a | 85.02±2.02 a |
T2 | 一般 Common | 23.48±0.78 a | 4.23±0.06 a | 2.68±0.05 a | 46.07±0.76 a | 10.90±0.17 a | 16.73±1.26 a | 84.85±1.22 a |
T3 | 一般 Common | 23.48±0.99 a | 4.22±0.05 a | 2.68±0.04 a | 46.80±1.71 a | 10.82±0.13 a | 16.37±0.87 a | 84.85±1.68 a |
T4 | 差 Bad | 23.73±0.67 a | 4.26±0.03 a | 2.67±0.05 a | 47.07±0.38 a | 10.85±0.25 a | 16.93±1.33 a | 85.10±1.61 a |
秧盘处理 Seedling tray | 单穴苗数 Number of seedlings per hill | 机插群体漏秧率 Missed hill rate under mechanical transplanting(%) | 机插种植均匀度 Mechanical transplanting uniformity(%) |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 2.51±0.03 a | 4.41±0.45 c | 69.39±1.85 a |
T1 | 2.49±0.07 a | 4.94±0.35 c | 67.33±0.90 a |
T2 | 2.48±0.06 a | 6.52±0.41 b | 59.14±1.34 b |
T3 | 2.51±0.04 a | 7.07±0.37 b | 57.45±0.81 b |
T4 | 2.50±0.07 a | 16.1±0.48 a | 39.87±0.97 c |
表2 不同处理下机插秧苗群体质量的比较
Table 2. Comparison of mechanical transplanting quality of rice population under different treatments
秧盘处理 Seedling tray | 单穴苗数 Number of seedlings per hill | 机插群体漏秧率 Missed hill rate under mechanical transplanting(%) | 机插种植均匀度 Mechanical transplanting uniformity(%) |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 2.51±0.03 a | 4.41±0.45 c | 69.39±1.85 a |
T1 | 2.49±0.07 a | 4.94±0.35 c | 67.33±0.90 a |
T2 | 2.48±0.06 a | 6.52±0.41 b | 59.14±1.34 b |
T3 | 2.51±0.04 a | 7.07±0.37 b | 57.45±0.81 b |
T4 | 2.50±0.07 a | 16.1±0.48 a | 39.87±0.97 c |
秧盘处理 Seedling tray | 总根长 Root total length(cm) | 总根表面积 Root total superficial area(cm2) | 总根体积 Root total volume(×10-2 cm3) | 总根数 Root number | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
取秧前 Before transplanting | 取秧后 After transplanting | 取秧前 Before transplanting | 取秧后 After transplanting | 取秧前 Before transplanting | 取秧后 After transplanting | 取秧前 Before transplanting | 取秧后 After transplanting | ||||
CK | 37.85±1.05 a | 22.65±1.16 d | 2.10±0.09 a | 1.45±0.05 c | 1.01±0.05 a | 0.72±0.03 d | 26.40±1.89 a | 26.35±0.89 a | |||
T1 | 37.70±0.94 a | 24.74±1.02 cd | 2.08±0.10 a | 1.54±0.04 c | 1.01±0.05 a | 0.75±0.02 cd | 26.22±1.56 a | 26.07±1.81 a | |||
T2 | 37.54±1.11 a | 26.50±0.86 c | 2.09±0.16 a | 1.66±0.06 b | 1.03±0.07 a | 0.79±0.02 c | 26.37±1.36 a | 26.45±1.31 a | |||
T3 | 37.70±1.12 a | 29.98±0.17 b | 2.09±0.09 a | 1.73±0.06 b | 1.02±0.05 a | 0.83±0.03 b | 26.44±1.13 a | 26.11±1.63 a | |||
T4 | 37.63±1.02 a | 33.48±1.86 a | 2.08±0.12 a | 1.85±0.03 a | 1.01±0.04 a | 0.89±0.02 a | 26.74±1.42 a | 26.77±1.82 a |
表3 不同处理机插前后根系形态的比较
Table 3. Comparison of root traits before and after machine transplanting under different treatments
秧盘处理 Seedling tray | 总根长 Root total length(cm) | 总根表面积 Root total superficial area(cm2) | 总根体积 Root total volume(×10-2 cm3) | 总根数 Root number | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
取秧前 Before transplanting | 取秧后 After transplanting | 取秧前 Before transplanting | 取秧后 After transplanting | 取秧前 Before transplanting | 取秧后 After transplanting | 取秧前 Before transplanting | 取秧后 After transplanting | ||||
CK | 37.85±1.05 a | 22.65±1.16 d | 2.10±0.09 a | 1.45±0.05 c | 1.01±0.05 a | 0.72±0.03 d | 26.40±1.89 a | 26.35±0.89 a | |||
T1 | 37.70±0.94 a | 24.74±1.02 cd | 2.08±0.10 a | 1.54±0.04 c | 1.01±0.05 a | 0.75±0.02 cd | 26.22±1.56 a | 26.07±1.81 a | |||
T2 | 37.54±1.11 a | 26.50±0.86 c | 2.09±0.16 a | 1.66±0.06 b | 1.03±0.07 a | 0.79±0.02 c | 26.37±1.36 a | 26.45±1.31 a | |||
T3 | 37.70±1.12 a | 29.98±0.17 b | 2.09±0.09 a | 1.73±0.06 b | 1.02±0.05 a | 0.83±0.03 b | 26.44±1.13 a | 26.11±1.63 a | |||
T4 | 37.63±1.02 a | 33.48±1.86 a | 2.08±0.12 a | 1.85±0.03 a | 1.01±0.04 a | 0.89±0.02 a | 26.74±1.42 a | 26.77±1.82 a |
图2 不同处理下对移栽后秧苗生理指标的影响 柱上相同小写字母表示处理间差异未达显著水平(P<0.05, LSD最小显著性差异法)。
Fig. 2. Physiological indexes of seedlings after mechanical transplanting in different treatments The same lowercase letters indicated that there was no significant difference between the treatments at 0.05 level(LSD test).
秧盘处理 Seeding tray | 叶面积指数 Leaf area index (LAI) | 地上部干物质量 Biomass of aboveground parts(t/hm2) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
分蘖盛期 Peak tillering | 孕穗期 Booting | 抽穗期 Heading | 分蘖盛期 Peak tillering | 孕穗期 Booting | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | ||
CK | 1.40±0.05 d | 4.18±0.32 b | 5.60±0.23 b | 1.15±0.06 c | 5.60±0.23 d | 12.24±0.28 c | 17.75±0.10 c | |
T1 | 1.48±0.04 c | 4.31±0.39 b | 5.71±0.29 b | 1.18±0.04 bc | 5.71±0.29 cd | 12.49±0.27 c | 17.85±0.28 bc | |
T2 | 1.52±0.06 bc | 4.45±0.22 ab | 5.85±0.23 ab | 1.24±0.05 bc | 5.85±0.23 bc | 12.88±0.20 b | 17.96±0.30 b | |
T3 | 1.57±0.05 b | 4.55±0.32 ab | 5.93±0.20 ab | 1.28±0.06 ab | 5.93±0.20 b | 13.16±0.21 b | 18.16±0.28 b | |
T4 | 1.66±0.04 a | 4.64±0.32 a | 6.18±0.21 a | 1.35±0.06 a | 6.18±0.21 a | 13.62±0.26 a | 18.79±0.37 a |
表4 不同处理下叶面积指数和地上部干物质量的比较
Table 4. Comparison of LAI and biomass of aboveground parts under different treatments
秧盘处理 Seeding tray | 叶面积指数 Leaf area index (LAI) | 地上部干物质量 Biomass of aboveground parts(t/hm2) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
分蘖盛期 Peak tillering | 孕穗期 Booting | 抽穗期 Heading | 分蘖盛期 Peak tillering | 孕穗期 Booting | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | ||
CK | 1.40±0.05 d | 4.18±0.32 b | 5.60±0.23 b | 1.15±0.06 c | 5.60±0.23 d | 12.24±0.28 c | 17.75±0.10 c | |
T1 | 1.48±0.04 c | 4.31±0.39 b | 5.71±0.29 b | 1.18±0.04 bc | 5.71±0.29 cd | 12.49±0.27 c | 17.85±0.28 bc | |
T2 | 1.52±0.06 bc | 4.45±0.22 ab | 5.85±0.23 ab | 1.24±0.05 bc | 5.85±0.23 bc | 12.88±0.20 b | 17.96±0.30 b | |
T3 | 1.57±0.05 b | 4.55±0.32 ab | 5.93±0.20 ab | 1.28±0.06 ab | 5.93±0.20 b | 13.16±0.21 b | 18.16±0.28 b | |
T4 | 1.66±0.04 a | 4.64±0.32 a | 6.18±0.21 a | 1.35±0.06 a | 6.18±0.21 a | 13.62±0.26 a | 18.79±0.37 a |
秧盘处理 Seeding tray | 有效穗数 No. of productive panicles(×104/hm2) | 每穗粒数 Spikelets per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate(%) | 千粒重 1000-grain weight(g) | 产量 Yield(t/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 155.56±1.85 d | 281.45±2.86 a | 85.77±1.02 a | 22.28±0.43 a | 8.38±0.09 c |
T1 | 159.88±1.07 c | 283.68±7.39 a | 85.61±1.11 a | 22.05±0.35 a | 8.57±0.11 bc |
T2 | 162.35±2.14 c | 284.48±6.28 a | 85.18±0.24 a | 21.92±0.15 a | 8.62±0.09 b |
T3 | 166.67±1.85 b | 281.47±6.58 a | 84.76±1.02 a | 21.90±0.13 a | 8.71±0.09 b |
T4 | 172.22±3.21 a | 282.33±3.21 a | 84.64±0.39 a | 21.87±0.13 a | 9.01±0.13 a |
表5 不同处理下产量及其构成因素的比较
Table 5. Comparison of grain yield and its components under different treatments
秧盘处理 Seeding tray | 有效穗数 No. of productive panicles(×104/hm2) | 每穗粒数 Spikelets per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate(%) | 千粒重 1000-grain weight(g) | 产量 Yield(t/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 155.56±1.85 d | 281.45±2.86 a | 85.77±1.02 a | 22.28±0.43 a | 8.38±0.09 c |
T1 | 159.88±1.07 c | 283.68±7.39 a | 85.61±1.11 a | 22.05±0.35 a | 8.57±0.11 bc |
T2 | 162.35±2.14 c | 284.48±6.28 a | 85.18±0.24 a | 21.92±0.15 a | 8.62±0.09 b |
T3 | 166.67±1.85 b | 281.47±6.58 a | 84.76±1.02 a | 21.90±0.13 a | 8.71±0.09 b |
T4 | 172.22±3.21 a | 282.33±3.21 a | 84.64±0.39 a | 21.87±0.13 a | 9.01±0.13 a |
[1] | 王怡婷, 文姝蓉, 果文帅, 钟钰. 中国粮食增产的贡献分解与路径分析[J]. 科技导报, 2024, 42(16): 26-39. |
Wang Y T, Wen S R, Guo W S, Zhong Y. Contribution decomposition and path analysis of China's grain production increase[J]. Science & Technology Review, 2024, 42(16): 26-39. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 杨璇, 胡骏. 杂交水稻育种技术的研究进展[J]. 武汉大学学报: 理学版, 2024, 70(5): 556-566. |
Yang X, Hu J. Progress in hybrid rice breeding technology[J]. Journal of Wuhan University: Natural Science Edition, 2024, 70(5): 556-566. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 徐伟东, 蔡金洋, 杨尧城. 水稻籼粳亚种间杂种优势利用研究现状与展望[J]. 中国稻米, 2016, 42(2): 1-7. |
Xu W D, Cai J Y, Yang Y C. Research progress and prospect on utilization of heterosis between indica-Japonica rice subspecies[J]. China Rice, 2016, 42(2): 1-7. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 何瑞银, 罗汉亚, 李玉同, 汪小函, 张璐. 水稻不同种植方式的比较试验与评价[J]. 农业工程学报, 2008, 24(1): 167-171. |
He R Y, Luo H Y, Li Y T, Wang X H, Zhang L. Comparison and analysis of different rice planting methods in China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2008, 24(1): 167-171. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 朱德峰, 张玉屏, 陈惠哲, 向镜, 张义凯. 中国水稻高产栽培技术创新与实践[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(17): 3404-3414. |
Zhu D F, Zhang Y P, Chen H Z, Xiang J, Zhang Y K. Innovation and practice of high-yield rice cultivation technology in China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(17): 3404-3414. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 陈惠哲, 朱德峰, 徐一成. 水稻钵形毯状秧苗机插技术及应用效果[J]. 中国稻米, 2009, 15(3): 5-7. |
Chen H Z, Zhu D F, Xu Y C. Technique and application effect of machine transplanting of rice pot-mat seedling[J]. China Rice, 2009, 15(3): 5-7. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 张洪程, 龚金龙. 中国水稻种植机械化高产农艺研究现状及发展探讨[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(7): 1273-1289. |
Zhang H C, Gong J L. Research status and development discussion on high-yielding agronomy of mechanized planting rice in China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(7): 1273-1289. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 张洪程, 朱聪聪, 霍中洋, 许轲, 蒋晓鸿, 陈厚存, 高尚勤, 李德剑, 赵成美, 戴其根, 魏海燕, 郭保卫. 钵苗机插水稻产量形成优势及主要生理生态特点[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(21): 50-59. |
Zhang H C, Zhu C C, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Jiang X H, Chen H C, Gao S Q, Li D J, Zhao C M, Dai Q G, Wei H Y, Guo B W. Advantages of yield formation and main characteristics of physiological and ecological in rice with nutrition bowl mechanical transplanting[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013, 29(21): 50-59. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 郭保卫, 许轲, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 魏海燕, 陈厚存. 有序摆抛栽超高产栽培对水稻根系形态生理特征的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(6): 611-625. |
Guo B W, Xu K, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Wei H Y, Chen H C. Effect of ordered transplanting and optimized broadcasting on rice root system morphological and physiological characteristics under super high-yielding cultivation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2016, 30(6): 611-625. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | Zhang H, Liu X L, Zhang R X, Yuan H Y, Wang M M, Yang H Y, Ma H Y, Liu D, Jiang C J, Liang Z W. Root damage under alkaline stress is associated with reactive oxygen species accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2017, 8: 1580. |
[11] | 李应洪, 孙永健, 李玥, 吕腾飞, 蒋明金, 严奉君, 马均. 不同秧龄下机插方式与密度对杂交稻根系生长及氮素利用特征的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(6): 599-610. |
Li Y H, Sun Y J, Li Y, Lü T F, Jiang M J, Yan F J, Ma J. Effects of mechanical-transplanted modes and density on root growth and characteristics of nitrogen utilization in hybrid rice at different seedling-ages[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2017, 31(6): 599-610. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 陈惠哲, 徐一成, 张玉屏, 向镜, 张义凯, 朱德峰. 超级早稻钵形毯状秧苗机插效果及产量形成[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(23): 4240-4250. |
Chen H Z, Xu Y C, Zhang Y P, Xiang J, Zhang Y K, Zhu D F. Effect of pot-mat seedling on the quality of machined transplanting and yield formation of super early rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(23): 4240-4250. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 陈少杰, 蒋琪, 朱德峰, 陈惠哲. 连作晚稻钵形毯苗精量稀播机插技术研究[J]. 中国稻米, 2017, 23(6): 53-56. |
Chen S J, Jiang Q, Zhu D F, Chen H Z. Investigation on precision bowl carpet seedling raising and mechine transplanted late season rice[J]. China Rice, 2017, 23(6): 53-56. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 王亚梁, 朱德峰, 陈若霞, 方文英, 王晶卿, 向镜, 陈惠哲, 张玉屏, 谌江华. 杂交稻低播量精准条播育秧机插提高群体均匀度和产量的效应分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(4): 666-679. |
Wang Y L, Zhu D F, Chen R X, Fang W Y, Wang J Q, Xiang J, Chen H Z, Zhang Y P, Shen J H. Beneficial effects of precision drill sowing with low seeding rates in machine transplanting for hybrid rice to improve population uniformity and yield[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 666-679. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 王亚梁, 朱德峰, 向镜, 陈惠哲, 张玉屏, 徐一成, 张义凯. 杂交稻低播量精量播种育秧及机插取秧特性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(4): 332-338. |
Wang Y L, Zhu D F, Xiang J, Chen H Z, Zhang Y P, Xu Y C, Zhang Y K. Characteristics of seedling raising and mechanized transplanting of hybrid rice with a low seeding rate by precise seeding method[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2020, 34(4): 332-338. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 陈晨, 龚海青, 金梦灿, 郜红建. 不同供氮形态下水稻苗期磷吸收累积与根系形态的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(2): 167-175. |
Fang W Y, Zhu D F, Huai Y, Gai G J. Correlation between root morphology and accumulation of phosphorus in rice seedlings under different N forms[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2019, 33(2): 167-175. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | Zhang H, Xue Y G, Wang Z Q, Yang J, Zhang J H. Morphological and physiological traits of roots and their relationships with shoot growth in “super” rice[J]. Field Crops Research, 2009, 113(1): 31-40. |
[18] | Song S, Wang Y, Ding X, Tian Y L, Wu Z W, Li H, Li Q, Wang Y P, Zhou S R, Dong X O, Wan J M, Liu L L. A plastid RNA polymerase-associated protein is involved in early chloroplast development in rice[J]. Agronomy, 2023, 13(5): 1424. |
[19] | 刘洋, 赵宏伟, 谷海东, 姚辰. 插秧密度对寒地粳稻花后可溶性糖形成积累的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2015, 29(6): 1165-1173. |
Liu Y, Zhao H W, Gu H D, Yao C. Effects of transplanting density on contribution and accumulation of soluble sugar on japonica rice in cold region[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 29(6): 1165-1173. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 滕飞, 陈惠哲, 朱德峰, 蔡雪青, 向镜, 徐一成, 张正凯. 播种量对水稻机插秧苗成毯性及素质的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2015, 37(3): 398-403. |
Teng F, Chen H Z, Zhu D F, Cai X Q, Xiang J, Xu Y C, Zhang Z K. Effects of transplanting density on contribution and accumulation of soluble sugar on japonica rice in cold region[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2015, 37(3): 398-403. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 唐承翰, 陈惠哲, 叶天承, 张玉屏, 向镜, 张义凯, 王志刚, 王亚梁. 机插种植均匀度对水稻产量构建及品质形成的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2024, 50(10): 2625-2636. |
Tang C H, Chen H Z, Ye T C, Zhang Y P, Xiang J, Zhang Y K, Wang Z G, Wang Y L. Effect of planting uniformity with machine on yield construction and quality formation of rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2024, 50(10): 2625-2636. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 贾旋, 宋建农, 王继承, 曹晓林, 刘彩玲, 万里鹏程, 郑慧娜, 徐泽昕. 秧龄和基土比对机插大钵体毯状苗晚稻群体质量和产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(12): 1-11. |
Jia X, Song J N, Wang J C, Cao X L, Liu C L, Wanli P C, Zheng H N, Xu Z X. Effects of seedling age and substrate soil ratio on the population quality and yield of late rice of machine-transplanted large-pot carpet seedlings[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 38(12): 1-11. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 罗友谊, 王慰亲, 郑华斌, 刘功义, 巢英, 徐彩, 郑志刚, 李雪倩, 韦银兰, 唐启源. 不同机械有序种植方式对水稻生长特性及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(7): 162-171. |
Luo Y Y, Wang W Q, Zheng H B, Liu G Y, Cao Y, Xu C, Zheng Z G, Li X Q, Wei Y L, Tang Q Y. Influences of different mechanical and orderly planting methods on growth characteristics and yield of rice[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2021, 23(7): 162-171. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 易子豪, 朱德峰, 朱从桦, 张玉屏, 向镜, 陈惠哲. 不同规格大钵育秧盘育秧对水稻秧苗生长和产量的影响[J]. 中国农机化学报, 2018, 39(10): 18-21. |
Yi Z H, Zhu D F, Zhu C H, Zhang Y P, Xiang J, Chen H Z. Effect of big bowl seedling tray with different spercifications on seedling growth and yield of rice[J]. Journal of Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2018, 39(10): 18-21. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 俞高红, 王磊, 孙良, 赵雄, 叶秉良. 大田机械化移栽技术与装备研究进展[J]. 农业机械学报, 2022, 53(9): 1-20. |
Yu G H, Wang L, Sun L, Zhao X, Ye B L. Advancement of mechanized transplanting technology and equipments for field crops[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(7): 1322-1337. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 李泽华, 马旭, 陈林涛, 李宏伟, 黄益强, 黎俊荣, 罗国武, 姚俊豪. 育秧播种密度与取秧面积耦合对杂交稻机插质量和产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(24): 20-30. |
Li Z H, Ma X, Chen L T, Li H W, Huang Y Q, Li J R, Luo G W, Yao J H. Effects of coupling of nursing seedling densities and seedling fetching area on transplanting quality and yield of hybrid rice[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019, 35(24): 20-30. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 顾逸彪, 颜佳倩, 薛张逸, 束晨晨, 张伟杨, 张耗, 刘立军, 王志琴, 周振玲, 徐大勇, 杨建昌, 顾俊飞. 耐盐性不同水稻品种根系对盐胁迫的响应差异及其机理研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2023(2): 67-76. |
Gu Y B, Yan J Q, Xue Z Y, Shu C C, Zhang W Y, Zhang H, Liu L J, Wang Z Q, Zhou Z L, Xu D Y, Yang J C, Gu J F. Different responses of roots of rice varieties to salt stress and the underlying mechanisms[J]. Crops, 2023(2): 67-76. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 李静怡, 梁玉刚, 王忍, 孟祥杰, 龚向胜, 黄璜. 免耕半固态直播对水稻根系生长特性的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2021, 36(2): 135-145. |
Li Y J, Liang Y G, Wang R, Meng X J, Gong X S, Huang H. Effects on root growth characteristics in no-tillage semi-solid direct seeding of rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2021, 36(2): 135-145. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | Wen R, Zhu M D, Yu J M, Kou L Q, Ahmad S, Wei X J, Jiao G A, Hu S K, Sheng Z H, Zhao F L, Tang S Q, Shao G E, Yu H, Hu P S. Photosynthesis regulates tillering bud elongation and nitrogen use efficiency via sugar-induced NGR5 in rice[J]. New Phytologist, 2024, 243(4): 1440-1454. |
[30] | 魏永霞, 曹晓强, 冀俊超, 张学文, 刘慧, 吴昱. 不同灌溉方式下旱直播水稻光合特性与干物质积累动态[J]. 农业机械学报, 2021, 52(10): 358-368. |
Wei Y X, Cao X Q, Ji J C, Zhang X W, Liu H, Wu Y. Effects of different irrigation methods on photosynthetic characteristics and dry matter accumulation dynamics of dry direct seeding rice[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2021, 52(10): 358-368. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | 刘杨, 王强盛, 丁艳锋, 王绍华. 水稻分蘖发生机理的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(3): 1-5. |
Liu Y, Wang Q S, Ding Y F, Wang S H. Advances in mechanisms of tiller occurs in rice[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(3): 1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] | 胡雅杰, 邢志鹏, 龚金龙, 刘国涛, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 郭保卫, 沙安勤, 周有炎, 罗学超, 刘国林. 钵苗机插水稻群体动态特征及高产形成机制的探讨[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(5): 865-879. |
Hu Y J, Xing Z P, Gong J L, Liu G T, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Guo B W, Sha A Q, Zhou Y Y, Luo X C, Liu G L. Study on population characteristics and formation mechanisms for high yield of pot-seedling mechanical transplanting rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(5): 865-879. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[33] | 吕腾飞, 谌洁, 代邹, 杨志远, 郑传刚, 马均. 氮肥缓速配施对两种机插稻物质生产特性的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2021, 39(3): 286-296. |
Lü T F, Shen J, Dai Z, Yang Z Y, Zheng C G, Ma J. Effect of combined application of slow release nitrogen fertilizer and urea on dry matter production characteristics in two mechanical transplanted rice[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2021, 39(3): 286-296. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 唐承翰, 王晶卿, 陈惠哲, 张玉屏, 向镜, 张义凯, 王志刚, 怀燕, 陈佳峰, 王亚梁. 杂交稻条播育秧机插秧苗素质对产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2025, 39(2): 245-254. |
[2] | 李伟, 徐霞, 边莹, 张晓波, 范炯炯, 程本义, 杨仕华, 吴建利, 魏鑫, 曾波, 龚俊义. 5460个三系杂交稻品种的不育系细胞质来源分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(6): 653-664. |
[3] | 汪邑晨, 朱本顺, 周磊, 朱骏, 杨仲南. 光/温敏核不育系的不育机理及两系杂交稻的发展与展望[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(5): 463-474. |
[4] | 蒋鹏, 张林, 周兴兵, 郭晓艺, 朱永川, 刘茂, 郭长春, 熊洪, 徐富贤. 冬水田轻简化栽培杂交稻蓄留再生稻产量形成特点[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(5): 544-554. |
[5] | 陈明亮, 曾细华, 沈雨民, 罗世友, 胡兰香, 熊文涛, 熊焕金, 吴小燕, 肖叶青. 籼粳亚种间育性位点分型及籼粳杂交稻育性位点模式研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 386-396. |
[6] | 吕宙, 易秉怀, 陈平平, 周文新, 唐文帮, 易镇邪. 施氮量与移栽密度对小粒型杂交水稻产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 422-436. |
[7] | 曾波, 龚俊义, 张芳. 我国优质杂交稻主要品种推广情况与展望[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(5): 439-446. |
[8] | 王亚梁, 朱德峰, 陈惠哲, 张玉屏, 向镜, 王志刚, 张义凯. 籼粳杂交稻精准条播育秧机插减氮增产的效应研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(5): 495-502. |
[9] | 王亚梁, 朱德峰, 向镜, 陈惠哲, 张玉屏, 徐一成, 张义凯. 杂交稻低播量精量播种育秧及机插取秧特性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(4): 332-338. |
[10] | 孟天瑶, 葛佳琳, 张徐彬, 韦还和, 周桂生, 戴其根. 甬优中熟籼粳杂交稻栽后植株磷素积累特征与模型分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(3): 256-265. |
[11] | 彭志芸, 向开宏, 杨志远, 唐源, 谌洁, 张宇杰, 何艳, 严田蓉, 孙永健, 马均. 麦/油-稻轮作下秸秆还田与氮肥管理对直播杂交稻氮素利用特征的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(1): 57-68. |
[12] | 赵正洪, 戴力, 黄见良, 潘晓华, 游艾青, 赵全志, 陈光辉, 周政, 胡文彬, 纪龙. 长江中游稻区水稻产业发展现状、问题与建议[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(6): 553-564. |
[13] | 吕川根, 李霞, 宗寿余, 邹江石. 超级杂交稻两优培九的广适性分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(3): 191-205. |
[14] | 汪文娟, 周继勇, 汪聪颖, 苏菁, 封金奇, 陈炳, 冯爱卿, 杨健源, 陈深, 朱小源. 八个抗稻瘟病基因在华南籼型杂交水稻中的分布[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(3): 299-306. |
[15] | 曾研华, 张玉屏, 潘晓华, 朱德峰, 向镜, 陈惠哲, 张义凯, 曾勇军. 花后不同时段低温对籼粳杂交稻稻米品质性状的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(2): 166-174. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||