中国水稻科学 ›› 2025, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 245-254.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2025.240405
唐承翰1,#, 王晶卿1,#, 陈惠哲1, 张玉屏1, 向镜1, 张义凯1, 王志刚1, 怀燕2, 陈佳峰3, 王亚梁1,*()
收稿日期:
2024-04-15
修回日期:
2024-10-08
出版日期:
2025-03-10
发布日期:
2025-03-19
通讯作者:
* email:wangyaliang@caas.cn作者简介:
#共同第一作者
基金资助:
TANG Chenghan1,#, WANG Jingqing1,#, CHEN Huizhe1, ZHANG Yuping1, XIANG Jing1, ZHANG Yikai1, WANG Zhigang1, HUAI Yan2, CHEN Jiafeng3, WANG Yaliang1,*()
Received:
2024-04-15
Revised:
2024-10-08
Online:
2025-03-10
Published:
2025-03-19
Contact:
* email:wangyaliang@caas.cnAbout author:
#These authors contributed equally to this work
摘要:
【目的】精准条播育秧可提升机插秧苗素质与群体均匀度。本研究旨在阐明杂交稻条播育秧秧苗素质与机插产量间的关系,为构建高产群体提供理论依据。【方法】本研究选用籼粳杂交稻甬优1538为供试品种,设置3个条播规格(D1:16条,D2:18条,D3:20条)和3个每穴播种粒数(S1:3粒,S2:4粒,S3:5粒)处理。播种规格为每个秧盘横向播种40次,纵向播种次数与播种条数相对应。分析比较了不同处理下水稻的秧苗素质、群体分蘖动态、叶面积指数、干物质积累、穗部性状、产量及其构成要素。【结果】 (1)每穴播种粒数和播种条数越少,秧苗素质越高;秧苗素质提高有利于增加移栽后秧苗第2、第3叶位分蘖的发生比例和单株分蘖力;每穴播种粒数越高,群体成穗率越低。(2)每穴播种粒数相同条件下,降低播种条数使群体的叶面积指数和地上部干物质量增加;每穴播种粒数越多,群体收获指数越低。(3)减少每穴播种粒数,增加了每穗粒数,并对籽粒的结实率起到促进作用;通过减少播种条数能有效提高二次枝梗着粒的结实率。(4)降低播种条数可以使产量增加,D1的平均产量较D2、D3分别提升5.0%、10.8%;每穴播种粒数为4粒时,群体产量较高,S2的平均产量较S1、S3的分别提升6.0%、7.1%。(5)单株产量与秧苗充实度的相关性最高,秧苗充实度每提升1 mg/cm,单株产量提高13.94 g。【结论】壮秧能够提高机插秧苗低位分蘖的比例,秧苗充实度可作为判断秧苗素质的重要指标,降低播种量是促进壮秧的最有效措施。在相同基本苗下,机插壮秧提高了群体的叶面积指数和干物质积累量,通过提高有效穗数而获得高产。
唐承翰, 王晶卿, 陈惠哲, 张玉屏, 向镜, 张义凯, 王志刚, 怀燕, 陈佳峰, 王亚梁. 杂交稻条播育秧机插秧苗素质对产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2025, 39(2): 245-254.
TANG Chenghan, WANG Jingqing, CHEN Huizhe, ZHANG Yuping, XIANG Jing, ZHANG Yikai, WANG Zhigang, HUAI Yan, CHEN Jiafeng, WANG Yaliang. Effects of Hybrid Rice Seedling Quality in Drill-seeding Nursery on Grain Yield in Mechanical Transplanting[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2025, 39(2): 245-254.
处理 Treatment | 条播播种规格 Drill seeding specification | 每穴播种粒数 Number of seeds sown per hole | 每盘播种量 Seeding amount per tray(g) | 每穴种植苗数 Seedlings per hole |
---|---|---|---|---|
S1D1 | 16 | 3 | 44.16 | 2 |
S1D2 | 18 | 3 | 49.68 | 2 |
S1D3 | 20 | 3 | 55.20 | 2 |
S2D1 | 16 | 4 | 58.88 | 3 |
S2D2 | 18 | 4 | 66.24 | 3 |
S2D3 | 20 | 4 | 73.60 | 3 |
S3D1 | 16 | 5 | 73.60 | 4 |
S3D2 | 18 | 5 | 82.80 | 4 |
S3D3 | 20 | 5 | 92.00 | 4 |
表1 试验处理设置
Table 1. Experimental treatment setup
处理 Treatment | 条播播种规格 Drill seeding specification | 每穴播种粒数 Number of seeds sown per hole | 每盘播种量 Seeding amount per tray(g) | 每穴种植苗数 Seedlings per hole |
---|---|---|---|---|
S1D1 | 16 | 3 | 44.16 | 2 |
S1D2 | 18 | 3 | 49.68 | 2 |
S1D3 | 20 | 3 | 55.20 | 2 |
S2D1 | 16 | 4 | 58.88 | 3 |
S2D2 | 18 | 4 | 66.24 | 3 |
S2D3 | 20 | 4 | 73.60 | 3 |
S3D1 | 16 | 5 | 73.60 | 4 |
S3D2 | 18 | 5 | 82.80 | 4 |
S3D3 | 20 | 5 | 92.00 | 4 |
每穴播种 粒数 Number of seeds per hole | 播种条数 Number of drill sowing | 叶龄 Leaf age | 苗高 Seeding height(cm) | 茎基宽 Stem base width(mm) | 根长 Root length(cm) | 根数 Number of roots | 百株苗干物质量 Dry matter weight of 100 seedlings(g) | 秧苗充实度 Fullness of seedling(mg/cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | D1 | 3.41±0.12 a | 15.97±0.29 a | 2.94±0.12 a | 11.50±0.51 a | 13.67±0.85 a | 4.76±0.17 a | 2.39±0.12 a |
D2 | 3.31±0.04 ab | 16.27±0.26 a | 2.79±0.16 ab | 10.76±0.51 b | 12.90±0.70 a | 4.65±0.17 a | 2.29±0.08 ab | |
D3 | 3.24±0.12 b | 16.41±0.34 a | 2.65±0.14 b | 10.30±0.25 b | 11.40±0.56 b | 4.41±0.34 a | 2.15±0.19 b | |
S2 | D1 | 3.11±0.10 a | 16.29±0.36 a | 2.58±0.07 a | 10.02±0.28 a | 11.23±0.50 a | 4.02±0.21 a | 1.98±0.15 a |
D2 | 3.02±0.09 a | 16.52±0.39 a | 2.43±0.08 ab | 9.68±0.16 a | 10.40±0.56 ab | 3.79±0.33 ab | 1.84±0.12 ab | |
D3 | 3.00±0.03 a | 16.84±0.32 a | 2.33±0.06 b | 9.57±0.10 a | 10.10±0.60 b | 3.55±0.28 b | 1.69±0.15 b | |
S3 | D1 | 3.02±0.07 a | 16.67±0.43 a | 2.33±0.08 a | 9.54±0.24 a | 9.93±0.65 a | 3.33±0.29 a | 1.60±0.17 a |
D2 | 2.95±0.08 a | 16.84±0.61 a | 2.23±0.06 ab | 9.27±0.23 a | 9.47±0.35 a | 3.19±0.18 a | 1.52±0.08 a | |
D3 | 2.79±0.06 b | 17.29±0.44 a | 2.13±0.09 b | 9.05±0.24 a | 9.07±0.35 a | 3.09±0.18 a | 1.43±0.06 a | |
每穴播种粒数(S) Number of seeds per hole | 81.420** | 61.256** | 399.148** | 41.902** | 45.056** | 366.592** | 472.400** | |
播种条数(D) Number of sowing rows | 13.800* | 34.331** | 75.287** | 8.396* | 8.805* | 23.879** | 44.576** | |
每穴粒数×播种条数 S×D | 0.654 | 0.121 | 0.185 | 1.447 | 1.493 | 0.198 | 0.161 |
表2 不同处理对机插秧苗素质的影响
Table 2. Effects of seedling quality before transplanting in different treatments
每穴播种 粒数 Number of seeds per hole | 播种条数 Number of drill sowing | 叶龄 Leaf age | 苗高 Seeding height(cm) | 茎基宽 Stem base width(mm) | 根长 Root length(cm) | 根数 Number of roots | 百株苗干物质量 Dry matter weight of 100 seedlings(g) | 秧苗充实度 Fullness of seedling(mg/cm) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | D1 | 3.41±0.12 a | 15.97±0.29 a | 2.94±0.12 a | 11.50±0.51 a | 13.67±0.85 a | 4.76±0.17 a | 2.39±0.12 a |
D2 | 3.31±0.04 ab | 16.27±0.26 a | 2.79±0.16 ab | 10.76±0.51 b | 12.90±0.70 a | 4.65±0.17 a | 2.29±0.08 ab | |
D3 | 3.24±0.12 b | 16.41±0.34 a | 2.65±0.14 b | 10.30±0.25 b | 11.40±0.56 b | 4.41±0.34 a | 2.15±0.19 b | |
S2 | D1 | 3.11±0.10 a | 16.29±0.36 a | 2.58±0.07 a | 10.02±0.28 a | 11.23±0.50 a | 4.02±0.21 a | 1.98±0.15 a |
D2 | 3.02±0.09 a | 16.52±0.39 a | 2.43±0.08 ab | 9.68±0.16 a | 10.40±0.56 ab | 3.79±0.33 ab | 1.84±0.12 ab | |
D3 | 3.00±0.03 a | 16.84±0.32 a | 2.33±0.06 b | 9.57±0.10 a | 10.10±0.60 b | 3.55±0.28 b | 1.69±0.15 b | |
S3 | D1 | 3.02±0.07 a | 16.67±0.43 a | 2.33±0.08 a | 9.54±0.24 a | 9.93±0.65 a | 3.33±0.29 a | 1.60±0.17 a |
D2 | 2.95±0.08 a | 16.84±0.61 a | 2.23±0.06 ab | 9.27±0.23 a | 9.47±0.35 a | 3.19±0.18 a | 1.52±0.08 a | |
D3 | 2.79±0.06 b | 17.29±0.44 a | 2.13±0.09 b | 9.05±0.24 a | 9.07±0.35 a | 3.09±0.18 a | 1.43±0.06 a | |
每穴播种粒数(S) Number of seeds per hole | 81.420** | 61.256** | 399.148** | 41.902** | 45.056** | 366.592** | 472.400** | |
播种条数(D) Number of sowing rows | 13.800* | 34.331** | 75.287** | 8.396* | 8.805* | 23.879** | 44.576** | |
每穴粒数×播种条数 S×D | 0.654 | 0.121 | 0.185 | 1.447 | 1.493 | 0.198 | 0.161 |
每穴播种粒数 Number of seeds per hole | 播种条数 Number of sowing rows | 第2叶位分蘖发生比例 Percentage of tillers at the 2nd leaf position (%) | 第3叶位分蘖发生比例 Percentage of tillers at the 3rd leaf position (%) | 单株分蘖力 Tillering capacity per plant | 成穗率 Productive tiller rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | D1 | 59.61±1.34 a | 94.46±2.14 a | 4.25±0.17 a | 85.79±0.77 a |
D2 | 53.55±1.93 b | 93.15±2.26 a | 4.14±0.14 ab | 85.31±0.41 a | |
D3 | 47.09±1.72 c | 92.52±1.50 a | 4.07±0.12 b | 85.23±0.76 a | |
S2 | D1 | 38.07±2.84 a | 89.92±2.09 a | 3.19±0.08 a | 80.00±0.14 a |
D2 | 32.68±1.38 b | 87.22±1.80 a | 3.06±0.05 ab | 79.91±0.44 a | |
D3 | 28.45±1.75 c | 82.94±1.59 b | 2.97±0.06 b | 79.64±0.60 a | |
S3 | D1 | 20.74±1.93 a | 72.48±2.50 a | 2.58±0.03 a | 69.99±0.53 a |
D2 | 14.41±3.00 b | 67.92±2.49 b | 2.50±0.05 ab | 69.44±0.76 a | |
D3 | 4.91±3.04 c | 59.00±2.99 c | 2.38±0.07 b | 68.99±0.32 a | |
每穴播种粒数(S) Number of seeds per hole | 428.964** | 66.119** | 8174.564** | 1853.467** | |
播种条数(D) Number of sowing rows | 42.870** | 4.781 | 116.719** | 2.922 | |
每穴粒数×播种条数S×D | 1.741 | 5.528** | 0.082 | 0.313 |
表3 不同处理下水稻分蘖相关能力的比较
Table 3. Comparison of the ability about tillering in different treatments
每穴播种粒数 Number of seeds per hole | 播种条数 Number of sowing rows | 第2叶位分蘖发生比例 Percentage of tillers at the 2nd leaf position (%) | 第3叶位分蘖发生比例 Percentage of tillers at the 3rd leaf position (%) | 单株分蘖力 Tillering capacity per plant | 成穗率 Productive tiller rate (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | D1 | 59.61±1.34 a | 94.46±2.14 a | 4.25±0.17 a | 85.79±0.77 a |
D2 | 53.55±1.93 b | 93.15±2.26 a | 4.14±0.14 ab | 85.31±0.41 a | |
D3 | 47.09±1.72 c | 92.52±1.50 a | 4.07±0.12 b | 85.23±0.76 a | |
S2 | D1 | 38.07±2.84 a | 89.92±2.09 a | 3.19±0.08 a | 80.00±0.14 a |
D2 | 32.68±1.38 b | 87.22±1.80 a | 3.06±0.05 ab | 79.91±0.44 a | |
D3 | 28.45±1.75 c | 82.94±1.59 b | 2.97±0.06 b | 79.64±0.60 a | |
S3 | D1 | 20.74±1.93 a | 72.48±2.50 a | 2.58±0.03 a | 69.99±0.53 a |
D2 | 14.41±3.00 b | 67.92±2.49 b | 2.50±0.05 ab | 69.44±0.76 a | |
D3 | 4.91±3.04 c | 59.00±2.99 c | 2.38±0.07 b | 68.99±0.32 a | |
每穴播种粒数(S) Number of seeds per hole | 428.964** | 66.119** | 8174.564** | 1853.467** | |
播种条数(D) Number of sowing rows | 42.870** | 4.781 | 116.719** | 2.922 | |
每穴粒数×播种条数S×D | 1.741 | 5.528** | 0.082 | 0.313 |
每穴播种粒数 Number of seeds per hole | 播种条数 Number of drill sowing | 分蘖盛期 Peak tillering | 孕穗期 Booting | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | D1 | 1.25±0.03 a | 4.27±0.08 a | 5.88±0.15 a | 2.51±0.05 a |
D2 | 1.17±0.04 b | 4.17±0.11 ab | 5.74±0.06 ab | 2.38±0.03 b | |
D3 | 1.15±0.04 b | 4.02±0.12 b | 5.62±0.09 b | 2.33±0.07 b | |
S2 | D1 | 1.45±0.06 a | 4.90±0.08 a | 6.79±0.12 a | 3.01±0.04 a |
D2 | 1.38±0.07 ab | 4.67±0.12 b | 6.61±0.11 ab | 2.93±0.03 b | |
D3 | 1.34±0.04 b | 4.56±0.12 b | 6.44±0.10 b | 2.85±0.03 b | |
S3 | D1 | 1.80±0.06 a | 5.41±0.11 a | 7.13±0.21 a | 3.20±0.04 a |
D2 | 1.74±0.05 ab | 5.26±0.12 a | 6.97±0.13 a | 3.07±0.05 b | |
D3 | 1.67±0.03 b | 5.05±0.08 b | 6.72±0.14 b | 2.89±0.05 c | |
每穴播种粒数(S) Number of seeds per hole | 1938.896** | 558.760** | 604.348** | 174.983** | |
播种条数(D) Number of drill sowing | 83.625** | 47.388** | 46.151** | 17.126* | |
每穴粒数×播种条数S×D | 0.160 | 0.420 | 0.338 | 2.829 |
表4 不同处理下关键生育时期叶面积指数的比较
Table 4. Comparison of LAI at critical growth period in different treatments
每穴播种粒数 Number of seeds per hole | 播种条数 Number of drill sowing | 分蘖盛期 Peak tillering | 孕穗期 Booting | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | D1 | 1.25±0.03 a | 4.27±0.08 a | 5.88±0.15 a | 2.51±0.05 a |
D2 | 1.17±0.04 b | 4.17±0.11 ab | 5.74±0.06 ab | 2.38±0.03 b | |
D3 | 1.15±0.04 b | 4.02±0.12 b | 5.62±0.09 b | 2.33±0.07 b | |
S2 | D1 | 1.45±0.06 a | 4.90±0.08 a | 6.79±0.12 a | 3.01±0.04 a |
D2 | 1.38±0.07 ab | 4.67±0.12 b | 6.61±0.11 ab | 2.93±0.03 b | |
D3 | 1.34±0.04 b | 4.56±0.12 b | 6.44±0.10 b | 2.85±0.03 b | |
S3 | D1 | 1.80±0.06 a | 5.41±0.11 a | 7.13±0.21 a | 3.20±0.04 a |
D2 | 1.74±0.05 ab | 5.26±0.12 a | 6.97±0.13 a | 3.07±0.05 b | |
D3 | 1.67±0.03 b | 5.05±0.08 b | 6.72±0.14 b | 2.89±0.05 c | |
每穴播种粒数(S) Number of seeds per hole | 1938.896** | 558.760** | 604.348** | 174.983** | |
播种条数(D) Number of drill sowing | 83.625** | 47.388** | 46.151** | 17.126* | |
每穴粒数×播种条数S×D | 0.160 | 0.420 | 0.338 | 2.829 |
每穴播种 粒数 Number of seeds per hole | 播种条数 Number of drill sowing | 地上部干物质总质量Total dry matter for aboveground parts(t/hm2) | 收获指数 Harvest index(%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
分蘖盛期 Peak tillering | 孕穗期 Booting | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 抽穗至成熟期 From heading to maturity | |||
S1 | D1 | 1.49±0.05 a | 6.99±0.20 a | 13.47±0.26 a | 20.44±0.32 a | 6.97±0.19 a | 48.31±1.62 a |
D2 | 1.41±0.06 ab | 6.62±0.28 ab | 13.09±0.23 ab | 19.12±0.44 b | 6.03±0.22 b | 48.26±1.26 a | |
D3 | 1.34±0.06 b | 6.37±0.42 b | 12.87±0.43 b | 18.54±0.36 b | 5.66±0.20 c | 48.14±1.09 a | |
S2 | D1 | 1.65±0.04 a | 8.11±0.36 a | 15.11±0.31 a | 22.93±0.40 a | 7.81±0.22 a | 45.58±0.79 a |
D2 | 1.58±0.06 ab | 7.64±0.37 ab | 14.50±0.33 b | 21.99±0.44 b | 7.49±0.13 a | 45.15±0.71 a | |
D3 | 1.51±0.04 b | 7.38±0.28 b | 14.13±0.06 b | 21.27±0.44 c | 7.14±0.14 b | 44.99±1.81 a | |
S3 | D1 | 1.88±0.07 a | 9.05±0.36 a | 16.05±0.28 a | 24.08±0.39 a | 8.03±0.19 a | 40.83±1.34 a |
D2 | 1.74±0.07 b | 8.60±0.35 a | 15.62±0.30 a | 23.14±0.26 b | 7.52±0.21 b | 40.78±1.66 a | |
D3 | 1.71±0.05 b | 8.00±0.23 b | 14.92±0.22 b | 22.13±0.34 c | 7.20±0.23 b | 40.02±1.36 a | |
每穴播种粒数(S) Number of seeds per hole | 230.219** | 173.918** | 169.302** | 557.414** | 49.175** | 994.842** | |
播种条数(D) Number of drill sowing | 41.235** | 30.938** | 23.840** | 126.805** | 19.168** | 4.711 | |
每穴粒数×播种条数S×D | 0.430 | 0.442 | 0.947 | 0.415 | 2.764 | 0.076 |
表5 不同处理下关键生育时期地上部干物质重和收获指数的比较
Table 5. Comparison of dry matter weight and harvest index in critical growth period in different treatments
每穴播种 粒数 Number of seeds per hole | 播种条数 Number of drill sowing | 地上部干物质总质量Total dry matter for aboveground parts(t/hm2) | 收获指数 Harvest index(%) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
分蘖盛期 Peak tillering | 孕穗期 Booting | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 抽穗至成熟期 From heading to maturity | |||
S1 | D1 | 1.49±0.05 a | 6.99±0.20 a | 13.47±0.26 a | 20.44±0.32 a | 6.97±0.19 a | 48.31±1.62 a |
D2 | 1.41±0.06 ab | 6.62±0.28 ab | 13.09±0.23 ab | 19.12±0.44 b | 6.03±0.22 b | 48.26±1.26 a | |
D3 | 1.34±0.06 b | 6.37±0.42 b | 12.87±0.43 b | 18.54±0.36 b | 5.66±0.20 c | 48.14±1.09 a | |
S2 | D1 | 1.65±0.04 a | 8.11±0.36 a | 15.11±0.31 a | 22.93±0.40 a | 7.81±0.22 a | 45.58±0.79 a |
D2 | 1.58±0.06 ab | 7.64±0.37 ab | 14.50±0.33 b | 21.99±0.44 b | 7.49±0.13 a | 45.15±0.71 a | |
D3 | 1.51±0.04 b | 7.38±0.28 b | 14.13±0.06 b | 21.27±0.44 c | 7.14±0.14 b | 44.99±1.81 a | |
S3 | D1 | 1.88±0.07 a | 9.05±0.36 a | 16.05±0.28 a | 24.08±0.39 a | 8.03±0.19 a | 40.83±1.34 a |
D2 | 1.74±0.07 b | 8.60±0.35 a | 15.62±0.30 a | 23.14±0.26 b | 7.52±0.21 b | 40.78±1.66 a | |
D3 | 1.71±0.05 b | 8.00±0.23 b | 14.92±0.22 b | 22.13±0.34 c | 7.20±0.23 b | 40.02±1.36 a | |
每穴播种粒数(S) Number of seeds per hole | 230.219** | 173.918** | 169.302** | 557.414** | 49.175** | 994.842** | |
播种条数(D) Number of drill sowing | 41.235** | 30.938** | 23.840** | 126.805** | 19.168** | 4.711 | |
每穴粒数×播种条数S×D | 0.430 | 0.442 | 0.947 | 0.415 | 2.764 | 0.076 |
每穴播种粒数 Number of seeds per hole | 播种条数 Number of drill sowing | 穗长 Panicle length (cm) | 一次枝梗Primary branch | 二次枝梗Secondary branch | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
枝梗数 Branch number | 着粒数 Number of grains | 结实率 Seed setting rate(%) | 枝梗数 Branch number | 着粒数 Number of grains | 结实率 Seed setting rate(%) | ||||
S1 | D1 | 22.41±0.40 a | 16.17±0.39 a | 92.01±0.87 a | 93.76±0.61 a | 65.31±1.03 a | 201.33±5.12 a | 89.90±1.67 a | |
D2 | 22.36±0.33 a | 16.07±0.32 a | 91.52±0.58 a | 93.85±0.68 a | 64.37±0.68 a | 199.94±2.17 a | 87.73±1.30 b | ||
D3 | 22.23±0.35 a | 16.19±0.41 a | 91.62±1.00 a | 93.72±1.13 a | 64.10±0.84 a | 199.06±4.34 a | 85.99±0.87 b | ||
S2 | D1 | 20.93±0.22 a | 15.42±0.46 a | 89.29±1.40 a | 93.21±0.63 a | 63.28±0.83 a | 196.47±5.16 a | 87.30±1.17 a | |
D2 | 20.88±0.19 a | 15.36±0.34 a | 89.13±0.89 a | 92.76±0.72 a | 63.10±0.91 a | 194.24±3.27 a | 84.98±1.22 b | ||
D3 | 20.90±0.24 a | 15.35±0.38 a | 89.14±0.97 a | 92.59±0.53 a | 62.55±0.58 a | 194.16±3.10 a | 83.19±1.08 b | ||
S3 | D1 | 20.23±0.20 a | 14.54±0.35 a | 85.17±1.25 a | 92.46±1.01 a | 60.90±0.88 a | 187.83±3.06 a | 86.25±1.30 a | |
D2 | 20.29±0.18 a | 14.42±0.26 a | 84.37±0.67 a | 92.36±1.02 a | 60.62±1.22 a | 187.76±4.49 a | 84.99±1.05 a | ||
D3 | 20.18±0.24 a | 14.36±0.25 a | 84.22±0.97 a | 92.53±0.66 a | 59.68±0.65 a | 185.92±3.13 a | 81.37±1.39 b | ||
每穴播种粒数(S) Number of seeds per hole | 1254.318** | 658.848** | 809.762** | 34.026** | 226.582** | 381.704** | 37.512** | ||
播种条数(D) Number of drill sowing | 2.259 | 2.356 | 4.979 | 0.837 | 14.186* | 10.564* | 48.084** | ||
每穴粒数×播种条数S×D | 0.111 | 0.079 | 0.15 | 0.191 | 0.236 | 0.066 | 0.560 |
表6 不同处理穗部性状的比较
Table 6. Comparison of the panicle traits in different treatments
每穴播种粒数 Number of seeds per hole | 播种条数 Number of drill sowing | 穗长 Panicle length (cm) | 一次枝梗Primary branch | 二次枝梗Secondary branch | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
枝梗数 Branch number | 着粒数 Number of grains | 结实率 Seed setting rate(%) | 枝梗数 Branch number | 着粒数 Number of grains | 结实率 Seed setting rate(%) | ||||
S1 | D1 | 22.41±0.40 a | 16.17±0.39 a | 92.01±0.87 a | 93.76±0.61 a | 65.31±1.03 a | 201.33±5.12 a | 89.90±1.67 a | |
D2 | 22.36±0.33 a | 16.07±0.32 a | 91.52±0.58 a | 93.85±0.68 a | 64.37±0.68 a | 199.94±2.17 a | 87.73±1.30 b | ||
D3 | 22.23±0.35 a | 16.19±0.41 a | 91.62±1.00 a | 93.72±1.13 a | 64.10±0.84 a | 199.06±4.34 a | 85.99±0.87 b | ||
S2 | D1 | 20.93±0.22 a | 15.42±0.46 a | 89.29±1.40 a | 93.21±0.63 a | 63.28±0.83 a | 196.47±5.16 a | 87.30±1.17 a | |
D2 | 20.88±0.19 a | 15.36±0.34 a | 89.13±0.89 a | 92.76±0.72 a | 63.10±0.91 a | 194.24±3.27 a | 84.98±1.22 b | ||
D3 | 20.90±0.24 a | 15.35±0.38 a | 89.14±0.97 a | 92.59±0.53 a | 62.55±0.58 a | 194.16±3.10 a | 83.19±1.08 b | ||
S3 | D1 | 20.23±0.20 a | 14.54±0.35 a | 85.17±1.25 a | 92.46±1.01 a | 60.90±0.88 a | 187.83±3.06 a | 86.25±1.30 a | |
D2 | 20.29±0.18 a | 14.42±0.26 a | 84.37±0.67 a | 92.36±1.02 a | 60.62±1.22 a | 187.76±4.49 a | 84.99±1.05 a | ||
D3 | 20.18±0.24 a | 14.36±0.25 a | 84.22±0.97 a | 92.53±0.66 a | 59.68±0.65 a | 185.92±3.13 a | 81.37±1.39 b | ||
每穴播种粒数(S) Number of seeds per hole | 1254.318** | 658.848** | 809.762** | 34.026** | 226.582** | 381.704** | 37.512** | ||
播种条数(D) Number of drill sowing | 2.259 | 2.356 | 4.979 | 0.837 | 14.186* | 10.564* | 48.084** | ||
每穴粒数×播种条数S×D | 0.111 | 0.079 | 0.15 | 0.191 | 0.236 | 0.066 | 0.560 |
每穴播种粒数 Number of seeds per hole | 播种条数 Number of drill sowing | 有效穗数 No. of productive panicles (×104/hm2) | 每穗粒数 Spikelets per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate (%) | 千粒重 1000-grain weight(g) | 产量 Yield (t/hm2) | 单株穗数 Panicles of single plant | 单株产量 Yield of single plant(g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | D1 | 166.91±4.79 a | 293.14±7.54 a | 91.33±1.07 a | 22.05±0.50 a | 9.37±0.26 a | 4.51±0.13 a | 25.30±0.69 a |
D2 | 162.35±4.26 ab | 291.97±6.74 a | 89.93±1.78 ab | 22.02±0.56 a | 8.91±0.19 b | 4.38±0.12 ab | 24.07±0.50 b | |
D3 | 160.06±3.69 b | 290.87±7.16 a | 88.61±1.77 b | 21.97±0.45 a | 8.53±0.13 c | 4.32±0.10 b | 23.04±0.35 c | |
S2 | D1 | 186.11±3.46 a | 285.28±8.68 a | 89.32±1.73 a | 22.03±0.37 a | 9.92±0.23 a | 3.35±0.08 a | 17.86±0.40 a |
D2 | 180.19±3.35 ab | 283.92±5.98 a | 87.93±1.44 a | 22.06±0.28 a | 9.43±0.12 b | 3.30±0.14 ab | 17.29±0.76 a | |
D3 | 175.62±2.68 b | 283.54±7.07 a | 86.95±0.85 a | 22.07±0.42 a | 9.08±0.12 c | 3.16±0.08 b | 16.34±0.40 b | |
S3 | D1 | 185.64±1.52 a | 272.18±6.79 a | 88.18±1.05 a | 22.04±0.33 a | 9.33±0.19 a | 2.75±0.08 a | 13.84±0.33 a |
D2 | 179.86±4.34 a | 272.86±7.79 a | 87.15±1.30 ab | 22.03±0.40 a | 8.96±0.17 b | 2.65±0.11 a | 13.19±0.55 ab | |
D3 | 172.50±4.30 b | 270.43±6.43 a | 84.83±1.84 b | 21.98±0.48 a | 8.27±0.22 c | 2.57±0.06 a | 12.33±0.37 b | |
每穴播种粒数(S) Number of seeds per hole | 100.999** | 760.877** | 60.699** | 1.624 | 36.596** | 4100.837** | 1749.955** | |
播种条数(D) Number of drill sowing | 27.378** | 7.046* | 45.586** | 1.031 | 67.117** | 44.802** | 43.955** | |
每穴粒数×播种条数S×D | 0.613 | 0.024 | 0.182 | 0.017 | 0.819 | 0.163 | 0.625 |
表7 不同处理对产量及其构成因素的影响
Table 7. Effects of grain yield and its components in different treatments
每穴播种粒数 Number of seeds per hole | 播种条数 Number of drill sowing | 有效穗数 No. of productive panicles (×104/hm2) | 每穗粒数 Spikelets per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate (%) | 千粒重 1000-grain weight(g) | 产量 Yield (t/hm2) | 单株穗数 Panicles of single plant | 单株产量 Yield of single plant(g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | D1 | 166.91±4.79 a | 293.14±7.54 a | 91.33±1.07 a | 22.05±0.50 a | 9.37±0.26 a | 4.51±0.13 a | 25.30±0.69 a |
D2 | 162.35±4.26 ab | 291.97±6.74 a | 89.93±1.78 ab | 22.02±0.56 a | 8.91±0.19 b | 4.38±0.12 ab | 24.07±0.50 b | |
D3 | 160.06±3.69 b | 290.87±7.16 a | 88.61±1.77 b | 21.97±0.45 a | 8.53±0.13 c | 4.32±0.10 b | 23.04±0.35 c | |
S2 | D1 | 186.11±3.46 a | 285.28±8.68 a | 89.32±1.73 a | 22.03±0.37 a | 9.92±0.23 a | 3.35±0.08 a | 17.86±0.40 a |
D2 | 180.19±3.35 ab | 283.92±5.98 a | 87.93±1.44 a | 22.06±0.28 a | 9.43±0.12 b | 3.30±0.14 ab | 17.29±0.76 a | |
D3 | 175.62±2.68 b | 283.54±7.07 a | 86.95±0.85 a | 22.07±0.42 a | 9.08±0.12 c | 3.16±0.08 b | 16.34±0.40 b | |
S3 | D1 | 185.64±1.52 a | 272.18±6.79 a | 88.18±1.05 a | 22.04±0.33 a | 9.33±0.19 a | 2.75±0.08 a | 13.84±0.33 a |
D2 | 179.86±4.34 a | 272.86±7.79 a | 87.15±1.30 ab | 22.03±0.40 a | 8.96±0.17 b | 2.65±0.11 a | 13.19±0.55 ab | |
D3 | 172.50±4.30 b | 270.43±6.43 a | 84.83±1.84 b | 21.98±0.48 a | 8.27±0.22 c | 2.57±0.06 a | 12.33±0.37 b | |
每穴播种粒数(S) Number of seeds per hole | 100.999** | 760.877** | 60.699** | 1.624 | 36.596** | 4100.837** | 1749.955** | |
播种条数(D) Number of drill sowing | 27.378** | 7.046* | 45.586** | 1.031 | 67.117** | 44.802** | 43.955** | |
每穴粒数×播种条数S×D | 0.613 | 0.024 | 0.182 | 0.017 | 0.819 | 0.163 | 0.625 |
性状 Trait | 单株分蘖力 Tillering ability in individual plant | 单株穗数 Panicle of single plant | 每穗粒数 Spikelets per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate | 千粒重 1000-grain weight | 单株产量 Yield of single plant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶龄Leaf age | 0.874** | 0.876** | 0.716** | 0.761** | −0.087 | 0.904** |
苗高Seeding height | −0.631** | −0.636** | −0.623** | −0.695** | −0.096 | −0.666** |
茎基宽Stem base width | 0.889** | 0.883** | 0.706** | 0.814** | −0.100 | 0.913** |
根长Root length | 0.860** | 0.864** | 0.643** | 0.735** | −0.083 | 0.886** |
根数Number of roots | 0.887** | 0.891** | 0.774** | 0.802** | −0.148 | 0.912** |
苗干物质重Dry matter weight of seedlings | 0.938** | 0.925** | 0.797** | 0.677** | −0.165 | 0.930** |
秧苗充实度Fullness of seeding | 0.934** | 0.923** | 0.803** | 0.708** | −0.133 | 0.932** |
表8 秧苗素质与单株产量及其构成因素的相关性分析
Table 8. Correlation coefficients analysis of seedling quality and yield per seeding with its components
性状 Trait | 单株分蘖力 Tillering ability in individual plant | 单株穗数 Panicle of single plant | 每穗粒数 Spikelets per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate | 千粒重 1000-grain weight | 单株产量 Yield of single plant |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶龄Leaf age | 0.874** | 0.876** | 0.716** | 0.761** | −0.087 | 0.904** |
苗高Seeding height | −0.631** | −0.636** | −0.623** | −0.695** | −0.096 | −0.666** |
茎基宽Stem base width | 0.889** | 0.883** | 0.706** | 0.814** | −0.100 | 0.913** |
根长Root length | 0.860** | 0.864** | 0.643** | 0.735** | −0.083 | 0.886** |
根数Number of roots | 0.887** | 0.891** | 0.774** | 0.802** | −0.148 | 0.912** |
苗干物质重Dry matter weight of seedlings | 0.938** | 0.925** | 0.797** | 0.677** | −0.165 | 0.930** |
秧苗充实度Fullness of seeding | 0.934** | 0.923** | 0.803** | 0.708** | −0.133 | 0.932** |
[1] | 王瑞峰, 李爽, 孔凡娜. 粮食安全保障能力:内涵特征、指标测度与提升路径[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2022, 40(3): 301-311. |
Wang R F, Li S, Kong F N. Food security capacity: connotation characteristics, index measurement and promotion path[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2022, 40(3): 301-311. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 李泽华, 马旭, 李秀昊, 陈林涛, 李宏伟, 袁志成. 水稻栽植机械化技术研究进展[J]. 农业机械学报, 2018, 49(5): 1-20. |
Li Z H, Ma X, Li X H, Chen L T, Li H W, Yuan Z C. Research progress of rice transplanting mechanization[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2018, 49(5): 1-20. (in Chinese) | |
[3] | Zhang G Q. Prospects of utilization of inter-subspecific heterosis between indica and japonica rice[J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(1): 1-10. |
[4] | 应伟杰, 王亚梁, 朱德峰, 怀燕, 张玉屏, 向镜, 陈惠哲. 水稻机械育插秧技术研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2024, 30(4): 12-16. |
Ying W J, Wang Y L, Zhu D F, Huai Y, Zhang Y P, Xiang J, Chen H Z. Research progress of rice transplanting mechanization[J]. China Rice, 2024, 30(4): 12-16. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 李博, 袁玉洁, 何辰延, 周星, 李秋萍, 朱莜芸, 何宇欣, 黄小凡, 艾小凤, 陈勇, 周伟, 程红, 王丽, 肖洪, 任万军, 邓飞. “减穴稳苗” 田间配置对西南稻区水稻冠层结构和光能分布的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2023, 41(2): 266-274. |
Li B, Yuan Y J, He C Y, Zhou X, Li Q P, Zhu Y Y, He Y X, Huang X F, Ai X F, Chen Y, Zhou W, Cheng H, Wang L, Xiao H, Ren W J, Deng F. Effects of field configuration of ‘increasing the number of seedlings per hill with reduced number of hills’ on rice canopy structure and light energy distribution characteristics of indica hybrid rice in the southwest China[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2023, 41(2): 266-274. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 魏颖娟, 赵杨, 邹应斌. 不同穗型超级稻品种籽粒灌浆特性[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(10): 1516-1529. |
Wei Y J, Zhao Y, Zou Y B. Grain-filling characteristics in super rice with different panicle types[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2016, 42(10): 1516-1529. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 隗溟, 廖学群, 李冬霞, 段海龙. 水稻分蘖节位生产力比较[J]. 植物生态学报, 2012, 36(4): 324-332. |
Kui M, Liao X Q, Li D X, Duan H L. Comparison of tillering productivity among nodes along the Mian stem of rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology, 2012, 36(4): 324-332. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 贾旋, 宋建农, 王继承, 曹晓林, 刘彩玲, 万里鹏程, 郑慧娜, 徐泽昕. 秧龄和基土比对机插大钵体毯状苗晚稻群体质量和产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2022, 38(12): 1-11. |
Jia X, Song J N, Wang J C, Cao X L, Liu C L, Wan L, Zheng H N, Xu Z X. Effects of seedling age and substrate soil ratio on the population quality and yield of late rice of machine-transplanted large-pot carpet seedlings[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2022, 38(12): 1-11. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 董玉兵, 孙春梅, 董青君, 陈川, 纪力, 庄春. 不同铵硝配比肥对水稻秧苗素质及土壤养分变化的影响[J]. 西南农业学报, 2023, 36(10): 2183-2190. |
Dong Y B, Sun C M, Dong Q J, Chen C, Ji L, Zhuang C. Effect of fertilizer with different ammonia-nitrate ratio on rice seedling quality and soil nutrient[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2023, 36(10): 2183-2190. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 周海波, 李晨铭, 张镔, 王海欣, 李霞. 水稻钵体育秧智能补种决策方法与试验[J]. 农业机械学报, 2020, 51(12): 122-129. |
Zhou H B, Li C M, Zhang B, Wang H X, Li X. Decision and experiment on intelligent reseeding system of rice bowl nursing seedling[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, 2020, 51(12): 122-129. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 张桥, 向开宏, 孙永健, 武云霞, 郭长春, 唐源, 刘芳艳, 马均. 不同育秧方式下播种量和插秧机具对水稻产量及群体质量的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2020, 34(11): 2595-2606. |
Zhang Q, Xiang K H, Sun Y J, Wu Y X, Guo C C, Tang Y, Liu F Y, Ma J. Effects of seeding amount and transplanting machines on rice yield and population quality under different seedling raising methods[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2020, 34(11): 2595-2606. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 安之冬, 管浩, 朱远芃, 柴如山, 郜红建, 华胜, 王宜坤. 育秧基质配施腐植酸对水稻秧苗素质及产量的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(6): 173-181. |
An Z D, Guan H, Zhu Y P, Chai R S, Gao H J, Hua S, Wang Y K. Effects of combined application of humic acid with seedling raising substrate on seedling quality and rice yield[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2022(6): 173-181. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 方文英, 朱德峰, 怀燕, 陈佳麒, 陈惠哲, 王亚梁. 精准条播育秧提高单季杂交稻机插稀植群体产量的效应分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2023(5): 124-130. |
Fang W Y, Zhu D F, Huai Y, Chen J Q, Chen H Z, Wang Y L. Analysis on the effects of precision drill sowing in machine transplanting for single-season hybrid rice to improve yield of sparsely planted population[J]. Crops, 2023(5): 124-130. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 王亚梁, 朱德峰, 向镜, 陈惠哲, 张玉屏, 徐一成, 张义凯. 杂交稻低播量精量播种育秧及机插取秧特性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(4): 332-338. |
Wang Y L, Zhu D F, Xiang J, Chen H Z, Zhang Y B, Xu Y C, Zhang Y K. Characteristics of seedling raising and mechanized transplanting of hybrid rice with a low seeding rate by precise seeding method[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2020, 34(4): 332-338. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 王亚梁, 朱德峰, 陈若霞, 方文英, 王晶卿, 向镜, 陈惠哲, 张玉屏, 谌江华. 杂交稻低播量精准条播育秧机插提高群体均匀度和产量的效应分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2022, 55(4): 666-679. |
Wang Y L, Zhu D F, Chen R X, Fang W Y, Wang J Q, Xiang J, Chen H Z, Zhang Y B, Chen J H. Beneficial effects of precision drill sowing with low seeding rates in machine transplanting for hybrid rice to improve population uniformity and yield[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2022, 55(4): 666-679. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 蒋明金, 李敏, 罗德强, 周维佳, 江学海, 姬广梅, 李立江. 播种量对不同粒型机插优质杂交籼稻秧苗素质、机插质量及产量的影响[J]. 四川农业大学学报, 2020, 38(4): 399-408, 422. |
Jiang M J, Li M, Luo D Q, Zhou W J, Jiang X H, Ji G M, Li L J. Effect of seeding rate on seedling quality, transplanting quality and grain yield of mechanical transplanted high-quality indica rice with different grain shape[J]. Journal of Sichuan Agricultural University, 2020, 38(4): 399-408, 422. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 吕伟生, 曾勇军, 石庆华, 潘晓华, 黄山, 商庆银, 谭雪明, 李木英, 胡水秀. 机插早稻分蘖成穗特性及基本苗公式参数研究[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(3): 427-436. |
Lü W S, Zeng Y J, Shi Q H, Pan X H, Huang S, Shang Q Y, Tan X M, Li M Y, Hu S X. Tillering and panicle formation characteristics of machine-transplanted early rice and its parameters of basic population formulae[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2016, 42(3): 427-436. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 李泽华, 马旭, 陈林涛, 李宏伟, 黄益强, 黎俊荣, 罗国武, 姚俊豪. 育秧播种密度与取秧面积耦合对杂交稻机插质量和产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2019, 35(24): 20-30. |
Li Z H, Ma X, Chen L T, Li H W, Huang Y Q, Li J R, Luo G W, Yao J H. Effects of coupling of nursing seedling densities and seedling fetching area on transplanting quality and yield of hybrid rice[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2019, 35(24): 20-30. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 刘杨, 王强盛, 丁艳锋, 王绍华. 水稻分蘖发生机理的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2011, 27(3): 1-5. |
Liu Y, Wang Q S, Ding Y F, Wang S H. Advances in mechanisms of tiller occurs in rice[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 27(3): 1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 顾俊荣, 韩立宇, 董明辉, 陈培峰, 乔中英. 不同穗型粳稻干物质运转与颖花形成及籽粒灌浆结实的差异研究[J]. 扬州大学学报: 农业与生命科学版, 2017, 38(4): 68-73, 88. |
Gu J Y, Han L Y, Dong M H, Chen P F, Qiao Z Y. Studies on the difference of dry matter accumulation and transportation,spikelets formation and the grain filling of japonica rice varieties with different panicle types[J]. Journal of Yangzhou University: Agricultural and Life Sciences Edition, 2017, 38(4): 68-73, 88. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 张洪程, 邢志鹏, 翁文安, 田晋钰, 陶钰, 程爽, 胡群, 胡雅杰, 郭保卫, 魏海燕. 生育约束型直播水稻生育特征与稳产关键技术[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(7): 1322-1337. |
Zhang H C, Xing Z P, Weng W A, Tian J Y, Tao Y, Cheng S, Hu Q, Hu Y J, Guo B W, Wei H Y. Growth characteristics and key techniques for stable yield of growth constrained direct seeding rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(7): 1322-1337. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 宋云生, 张洪程, 戴其根, 杨大柳, 郭保卫, 朱聪聪, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 胡加敏, 吴爱国, 蒋晓鸿. 水稻机栽钵苗单穴苗数对分蘖成穗及产量的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(10): 37-47. |
Song Y S, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Yang D L, Guo B W, Zhu C C, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Hu J M, Wu A G, Jiang X H. Effect of rice potted-seedlings per hole by mechanical transplanting on tillers emergence, panicles formation and yield[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2014, 30(10): 37-47. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 袁奇, 于林惠, 石世杰, 邵建国, 丁艳锋. 机插秧每穴栽插苗数对水稻分蘖与成穗的影响[J]. 农业工程学报, 2007, 23(10): 121-125. |
Yuan Q, Yu L H, Shi S J, Shao J G, Ding Y F. Effects of different quantities of planting seedlings per hill on outgrowth and tiller production for machine-transplanted rice[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2007, 23(10): 121-125. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 宋云生, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 朱聪聪, 孙圳, 杨大柳, 王惟清, 刘俊, 吴爱国. 水稻钵苗机插秧苗素质的调控[J]. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(22): 11-22. |
Song Y S, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Zhu C C, Sun Z, Yang D L, Wang W Q, Liu J, Wu A G. Seedling quality regulation of rice potted-seedling in mechanical transplanting[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2013, 29(22): 11-22. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 胡剑锋, 杨波, 周伟, 张培培, 张强, 李培程, 任万军, 杨文钰. 播种方式和播种密度对杂交籼稻机插秧节本增效的研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(1): 81-90. |
Hu J F, Yang B, Zhou W, Zhang P P, Zhang Q, Li P C, Ren W J, Yang W Y. Effect of seeding method and density on the benefit of mechanical transplanting in indica hybrid rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2017, 31(1): 81-90. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 李锦涛, 胡洋, 李炫, 丁紫娟, 杨朔, 聂玺斌, 黄飞, 侯俊, 曹兵. 控释尿素接触施用对水稻秧苗生长的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2023(1): 57-64. |
Li J T, Hu Y, Li X, Ding Z J, Yang S, Nie X B, Huang F, Hou J, Cao B. Effects of contact application of controlled-release urea for rice seedling raising and optimized methods on seedling growth[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2023(1): 57-64. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | Feng Y, Liu M, Wang K, Ling Y, Hu Q, Zhang H, Zhang H. Optimal seeding rate enhances seedling quality, mechanical transplanting quality, and yield in hybrid rice[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2024, 15: 1427972. |
[1] | 韦还和, 汪璐璐, 马唯一, 张翔, 左博源, 耿孝宇, 朱旺, 朱济邹, 孟天瑶, 陈英龙, 高平磊, 许轲, 戴其根. 盐−旱复合胁迫下粳稻品种南粳9108籽粒灌浆特性及其与产量形成的关系 [J]. 中国水稻科学, 2025, 39(3): 373-386. |
[2] | 沈智达, 余秋华, 张斌, 曹玉东, 王少华, 王红飞, 伍永清, 戴志刚, 李小坤. 磷肥施用量对湖北省直播水稻产量、磷素积累及利用率的影响 [J]. 中国水稻科学, 2025, 39(3): 399-411. |
[3] | 何勇, 张诗骞, 王志成, 詹逍康, 丁一可, 刘晓瑞, 马素素, 田志宏. 印度梨形孢与复合肥组合施用对水稻机插秧秧苗素质的影响 [J]. 中国水稻科学, 2025, 39(3): 412-422. |
[4] | 徐月梅, 彭诗燕, 孙志伟, 王志琴, 朱宽宇, 杨建昌. 不同耐低磷水稻品种的内源激素水平差异及其与产量和磷利用率的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2025, 39(2): 231-244. |
[5] | 舒傲, 解嘉鑫, 曹威, 周传名, 李蓓蕾, 陈嘉馨, 李莉, 曹放波, 陈佳娜, 黄敏. 氮肥运筹对优质杂交中稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2025, 39(2): 255-263. |
[6] | 陈书融, 朱练峰, 秦碧蓉, 王婕, 朱旭华, 田文昊, 朱春权, 曹小闯, 孔亚丽, 张均华, 金千瑜. 增氧灌溉下配施硝化抑制剂对水稻生长、产量和氮肥利用的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2025, 39(1): 92-100. |
[7] | 冯向前, 王爱冬, 洪卫源, 李子秋, 覃金华, 詹丽钏, 陈里鹏, 张运波, 王丹英, 陈松. 基于低空无人机遥感的水稻产量估测方法研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(6): 604-616. |
[8] | 李伟, 徐霞, 边莹, 张晓波, 范炯炯, 程本义, 杨仕华, 吴建利, 魏鑫, 曾波, 龚俊义. 5460个三系杂交稻品种的不育系细胞质来源分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(6): 653-664. |
[9] | 刘俊峰, 牟静怡, 赵红艳, 郭诗梦, 李漪濛, 梁超, 周婵婵, 王术, 黄元财. 施氮方式与行距配置对不同穗型粳稻品种产量和氮素利用率的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(6): 672-684. |
[10] | 曹玉东, 吴朋浩, 戴志刚, 王贵兵, 何帅, 巩细民, 李小坤. 侧深施肥对水稻产量、养分吸收及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(6): 695-708. |
[11] | 汪邑晨, 朱本顺, 周磊, 朱骏, 杨仲南. 光/温敏核不育系的不育机理及两系杂交稻的发展与展望[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(5): 463-474. |
[12] | 蒋鹏, 张林, 周兴兵, 郭晓艺, 朱永川, 刘茂, 郭长春, 熊洪, 徐富贤. 冬水田轻简化栽培杂交稻蓄留再生稻产量形成特点[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(5): 544-554. |
[13] | 熊家欢, 张义凯, 向镜, 陈惠哲, 徐一成, 王亚梁, 王志刚, 姚坚, 张玉屏. 覆膜稻田施用炭基肥对水稻产量及氮素利用的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(5): 567-576. |
[14] | 郭展, 张运波. 水稻对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应及分子调控研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[15] | 韦还和, 马唯一, 左博源, 汪璐璐, 朱旺, 耿孝宇, 张翔, 孟天瑶, 陈英龙, 高平磊, 许轲, 霍中洋, 戴其根. 盐、干旱及其复合胁迫对水稻产量和品质形成影响的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||