中国水稻科学 ›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (3): 265-277.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2017.6091 265
李应洪, 王海月, 吕腾飞, 张绍文, 蒋明金, 何巧林, 孙永健*(), 马均*
收稿日期:
2016-06-01
修回日期:
2016-08-01
出版日期:
2017-05-10
发布日期:
2017-05-10
通讯作者:
孙永健,马均
基金资助:
Yinghong LI, Haiyue WANG, Tengfei LÜ, Shaowen ZHANG, Mingjin JIANG, Qiaolin HE, Yongjian SUN*(), Jun MA*
Received:
2016-06-01
Revised:
2016-08-01
Online:
2017-05-10
Published:
2017-05-10
Contact:
Yongjian SUN, Jun MA
摘要:
【目的】探究不同秧龄下机插方式与密度对杂交稻光合生产及产量的影响,为水稻机插秧配套技术的应用提供理论和实践依据,【方法】以超级杂交稻F优498为材料,采用两因素裂区试验设计,在25 d和40 d秧龄下,设置“钵苗机插+高密度(M1D1)”、“钵苗机插+中密度(M1D2)”、“钵苗机插+低密度(M1D3)”、“毯苗机插+高密度(M2D4)”、“毯苗机插+中密度(M2D5)”、“毯苗机插+低密度(M2D6)”6种机插方式与密度的处理开展试验。【结果】秧龄与插秧方式和密度对水稻主要生育期光合生产及最终产量均存在显著的调控作用,且互作效应显著。同一机插方式及密度处理下,机插25 d秧龄水稻的秧苗素质、群体茎蘖数、叶面积指数(LAI)、单茎叶片和茎鞘表观转运量及转运率、单茎和群体干物质量、阶段干物质积累量、群体生长率、光合势、抽穗后净同化率以及产量均明显优于40 d秧龄处理。同一秧龄和机插方式下,水稻群体茎蘖数、各时期LAI和衰减率、群体干物质量、光合势以及抽穗前干物质积累量、群体生长率、净同化率均表现出随密度的增加而增加的趋势;而抽穗后物质积累量、群体生长率、净同化率在25 d秧龄下钵苗机插均表现为随着密度的增加呈现先增加后降低的趋势,以M1D2处理最优,而毯苗机插则表现为随着密度的降低而降低的趋势,且钵苗机插各指标较毯苗优势明显。25 d秧龄下,钵苗机插行距33 cm、配套株距14.5~15.5 cm,因群体总颖花数、结实率的优势,产量显著高于其余处理,其中又以行距33 cm、株距15.5 cm最能充分发挥其杂交籼稻株型的优势,提高光合物质生产,产量最高可达到12.74 t/hm2,是本研究最佳组合;而毯苗机插随秧龄增大以及栽插密度的降低,群体质量指标恶化,有效穗数不同程度降低,产量并不高。
中图分类号:
李应洪, 王海月, 吕腾飞, 张绍文, 蒋明金, 何巧林, 孙永健, 马均. 不同秧龄下机插方式与密度对杂交稻光合生产及产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(3): 265-277.
Yinghong LI, Haiyue WANG, Tengfei LÜ, Shaowen ZHANG, Mingjin JIANG, Qiaolin HE, Yongjian SUN, Jun MA. Effects of Mechanically-transplanted Modes and Density on Photosynthetic Production and Yield in Hybrid Rice at Different Seedling-ages[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2017, 31(3): 265-277.
秧龄 Seedling-age | 机插方式 Transplanting -method | 分蘖盛期 Tillering (Month-day) | 拔节期 Jointing (Month-day) | 抽穗期 Heading (Month-day) | 成熟期 Maturity (Month-day) | 全生育期天数 WGD/d | 移栽-拔节天数 DTJ/d | 拔节-抽穗天数 DJH/d | 抽穗-成熟天数 DHM/d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | M1 | 05-27 | 06-13 | 07-19 | 08-29 | 149 | 47 | 36 | 41 |
M2 | 05-28 | 06-14 | 07-20 | 08-31 | 151 | 48 | 36 | 42 | |
T2 | M1 | 06-10 | 06-21 | 07-25 | 09-07 | 158 | 40 | 34 | 44 |
M2 | 06-11 | 06-23 | 07-26 | 09-09 | 160 | 42 | 33 | 45 |
表1 水稻生育期进程
Table 1 Growth stage of rice.
秧龄 Seedling-age | 机插方式 Transplanting -method | 分蘖盛期 Tillering (Month-day) | 拔节期 Jointing (Month-day) | 抽穗期 Heading (Month-day) | 成熟期 Maturity (Month-day) | 全生育期天数 WGD/d | 移栽-拔节天数 DTJ/d | 拔节-抽穗天数 DJH/d | 抽穗-成熟天数 DHM/d |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | M1 | 05-27 | 06-13 | 07-19 | 08-29 | 149 | 47 | 36 | 41 |
M2 | 05-28 | 06-14 | 07-20 | 08-31 | 151 | 48 | 36 | 42 | |
T2 | M1 | 06-10 | 06-21 | 07-25 | 09-07 | 158 | 40 | 34 | 44 |
M2 | 06-11 | 06-23 | 07-26 | 09-09 | 160 | 42 | 33 | 45 |
秧龄 Seedling age | 育秧方式 Seedling cultivation methods | 株高 Plant height /cm | 叶龄 Leaf age | 茎基宽 Stalk width /mm | 单株绿叶数 Number of green leaves per plant | 百苗干质量 Dry weight per hundred seedlings/g | 根系性状 Root Traits(≥5 mm) | 单位株高干质量 W/H /(mg·cm-1) | 整齐度 Uniformity/% | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地上 Aboveground | 地下 Under ground | 根数 Number of roots per plant | 根长 Root length /cm | 发根力 Root vitality | |||||||||
T1 | M1 | 19.87±0.88 a | 4.25±0.12 a | 3.15±0.32 a | 3.97±0.12 a | 4.01±0.10 a | 1.90±0.20 a | 12.80±0.44 a | 7.23±0.09 b | 6.27±0.06 a | 2.02±0.07 a | 90.97±1.71 a | |
M2 | 18.86±1.16 a | 4.08±0.10 b | 2.57±0.02 b | 3.40±0.26 b | 3.28±0.12 a | 1.60±0.60 a | 10.70±0.52 b | 8.50±0.12 a | 5.47±0.50 b | 1.73±0.11 b | 88.73±2.46 a | ||
平均Average | 19.37 | 4.17 | 2.86 | 3.68 | 3.64 | 1.75 | 11.75 | 7.86 | 5.87 | 1.88 | 89.85 | ||
T2 | M1 | 32.63±1.31 a | 6.32±0.18 a | 4.72±0.12 a | 3.57±0.25 a | 14.19±0.80 a | 10.52±1.03 a | 16.85±0.66 a | 8.72±0.57 a | 8.12±0.13 a | 4.34±0.12 a | 89.90±1.97 a | |
M2 | 25.51±0.53 b | 6.03±0.12 b | 3.10±0.37 b | 2.83±0.30 b | 9.00±0.64 b | 5.33±1.13 b | 10.39±0.10 b | 9.29±0.39 a | 7.54±0.06 b | 3.52±0.18 b | 83.54±1.22 b | ||
平均Average | 29.07 | 6.18 | 3.91 | 3.19 | 11.59 | 7.92 | 13.62 | 9.01 | 7.83 | 3.94 | 86.72 | ||
变异来源 Source of variation | |||||||||||||
F值 F value | T | 231.34** | 586.90** | 62.12** | 42.81* | 328.38** | 79.73* | 67.08** | 437.70** | 258.16** | 872.00** | 45.43* | |
M | 43.56** | 101.84** | 42.54** | 18.02* | 162.63** | 97.64** | 177.48** | 10.85** | 25.82** | 75.07** | 37.16** | ||
T×M | 24.61** | 6.80 | 9.47* | 0.31 | 92.56** | 77.07** | 46.10** | 1.54 | 0.62 | 18.08* | 8.55* |
表2 秧龄和育秧方式对秧苗素质的影响
Table 2 Effects of seedling-age on seedling quality under different seedling cultivation methods.
秧龄 Seedling age | 育秧方式 Seedling cultivation methods | 株高 Plant height /cm | 叶龄 Leaf age | 茎基宽 Stalk width /mm | 单株绿叶数 Number of green leaves per plant | 百苗干质量 Dry weight per hundred seedlings/g | 根系性状 Root Traits(≥5 mm) | 单位株高干质量 W/H /(mg·cm-1) | 整齐度 Uniformity/% | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
地上 Aboveground | 地下 Under ground | 根数 Number of roots per plant | 根长 Root length /cm | 发根力 Root vitality | |||||||||
T1 | M1 | 19.87±0.88 a | 4.25±0.12 a | 3.15±0.32 a | 3.97±0.12 a | 4.01±0.10 a | 1.90±0.20 a | 12.80±0.44 a | 7.23±0.09 b | 6.27±0.06 a | 2.02±0.07 a | 90.97±1.71 a | |
M2 | 18.86±1.16 a | 4.08±0.10 b | 2.57±0.02 b | 3.40±0.26 b | 3.28±0.12 a | 1.60±0.60 a | 10.70±0.52 b | 8.50±0.12 a | 5.47±0.50 b | 1.73±0.11 b | 88.73±2.46 a | ||
平均Average | 19.37 | 4.17 | 2.86 | 3.68 | 3.64 | 1.75 | 11.75 | 7.86 | 5.87 | 1.88 | 89.85 | ||
T2 | M1 | 32.63±1.31 a | 6.32±0.18 a | 4.72±0.12 a | 3.57±0.25 a | 14.19±0.80 a | 10.52±1.03 a | 16.85±0.66 a | 8.72±0.57 a | 8.12±0.13 a | 4.34±0.12 a | 89.90±1.97 a | |
M2 | 25.51±0.53 b | 6.03±0.12 b | 3.10±0.37 b | 2.83±0.30 b | 9.00±0.64 b | 5.33±1.13 b | 10.39±0.10 b | 9.29±0.39 a | 7.54±0.06 b | 3.52±0.18 b | 83.54±1.22 b | ||
平均Average | 29.07 | 6.18 | 3.91 | 3.19 | 11.59 | 7.92 | 13.62 | 9.01 | 7.83 | 3.94 | 86.72 | ||
变异来源 Source of variation | |||||||||||||
F值 F value | T | 231.34** | 586.90** | 62.12** | 42.81* | 328.38** | 79.73* | 67.08** | 437.70** | 258.16** | 872.00** | 45.43* | |
M | 43.56** | 101.84** | 42.54** | 18.02* | 162.63** | 97.64** | 177.48** | 10.85** | 25.82** | 75.07** | 37.16** | ||
T×M | 24.61** | 6.80 | 9.47* | 0.31 | 92.56** | 77.07** | 46.10** | 1.54 | 0.62 | 18.08* | 8.55* |
图1 不同秧龄下机插方式与密度对杂交稻群体茎蘖数的影响柱上不同小写字母表示同一秧龄下不同机插方式与密度在5%水平上差异显著(n=3, 最小显著差数法)。M1D1–钵苗机插+高密度;M1D2–钵苗机插+中密度;M1D3–钵苗机插+低密度;M2D4–毯苗机插+高密度;M2D5–毯苗机插+中密度;M2D6–毯苗机插+低密度。下同。
Fig. 1. Effects of mechanically-transplanted modes and density on number of stems and tillers in hybrid rice at different seedling-ages. Different lowercase letters mean significant difference for a given seedling-age among various mechanically-transplanted modes and density at 0.05 level (n=3, LSD). M1D1, Bowl mechanical-transplanting and high density; M1D2, Bowl mechanical-transplanting and middle density; M1D3, Bowl mechanical-transplanting and low density; M2D4, Carpet mechanical-transplanting and high density; M2D5, Carpet mechanical-transplanting and middle density; M2D6, Carpet mechanical-transplanting and low density. The same as in tables below.
叶面积指数 Leaf area index | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
秧龄 Seedling-age | 处理 Treatment | 移栽期 Transplanting | 拔节期 Jointing | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 抽穗-成熟期 叶面积衰减率 HMDRLA/(LAI·d-1) |
T1 | M1D1 | 0.0272±0.0021 c | 3.47±0.03 a | 6.84±0.04 a | 3.42±0.04 a | 0.0834±0.0020 a |
M1D2 | 0.0250±0.0004 d | 3.33±0.04 b | 6.80±0.05 a | 3.40±0.05 a | 0.0830±0.0020 a | |
M1D3 | 0.0239±0.0013 d | 3.25±0.02 bc | 6.77±0.07 a | 3.38±0.03 a | 0.0827±0.0024 a | |
M2D4 | 0.0366±0.0008 a | 3.26±0.09 bc | 6.67±0.02 b | 3.31±0.02 b | 0.0798±0.0009 b | |
M2D5 | 0.0313±0.0012 b | 3.20±0.02 cd | 6.21±0.06 c | 3.09±0.03 c | 0.0743±0.0016 c | |
M2D6 | 0.0244±0.0020 d | 3.15±0.04 d | 5.85±0.14 d | 3.06±0.06 c | 0.0665±0.0022 d | |
平均Average | 0.0281 | 3.28 | 6.52 | 3.28 | 0.0783 | |
T2 | M1D1 | 0.0436±0.0013 c | 3.21±0.14 a | 6.65±0.07 a | 3.30±0.03 a | 0.0761±0.0021 a |
M1D2 | 0.0408±0.0029 d | 3.18±0.16 a | 6.21±0.08 b | 3.26±0.02 ab | 0.0672±0.0021 b | |
M1D3 | 0.0383±0.0027 e | 3.15±0.15 a | 6.02±0.02 c | 3.25±0.03 ab | 0.0630±0.0003 c | |
M2D4 | 0.0585±0.0007 a | 2.97±0.07 b | 5.99±0.05 c | 3.23±0.05 b | 0.0613±0.0006 c | |
M2D5 | 0.0501±0.0006 b | 2.94±0.04 b | 5.70±0.02 d | 3.05±0.03 c | 0.0589±0.0008 d | |
M2D6 | 0.0390±0.0017 de | 2.90±0.04 b | 5.36±0.02 e | 2.84±0.05 d | 0.0560±0.0012 e | |
平均Average | 0.0451 | 3.06 | 5.99 | 3.15 | 0.0637 | |
变异来源 Source of variation | ||||||
F值 F value | T | 322.62** | 34.12* | 598.74** | 61.29* | 472.78** |
MD | 100.20** | 15.36** | 242.71** | 116.11** | 98.43** | |
T×MD | 5.10** | 1.59 | 13.51** | 3.85* | 13.50** |
表3 不同秧龄下机插方式与密度对杂交稻叶面积指数和叶面积衰减率的影响
Table 3 Effects of mechanically-transplanted modes and density on leaf area index and decay rate in hybrid rice at different seedling-ages.
叶面积指数 Leaf area index | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
秧龄 Seedling-age | 处理 Treatment | 移栽期 Transplanting | 拔节期 Jointing | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 抽穗-成熟期 叶面积衰减率 HMDRLA/(LAI·d-1) |
T1 | M1D1 | 0.0272±0.0021 c | 3.47±0.03 a | 6.84±0.04 a | 3.42±0.04 a | 0.0834±0.0020 a |
M1D2 | 0.0250±0.0004 d | 3.33±0.04 b | 6.80±0.05 a | 3.40±0.05 a | 0.0830±0.0020 a | |
M1D3 | 0.0239±0.0013 d | 3.25±0.02 bc | 6.77±0.07 a | 3.38±0.03 a | 0.0827±0.0024 a | |
M2D4 | 0.0366±0.0008 a | 3.26±0.09 bc | 6.67±0.02 b | 3.31±0.02 b | 0.0798±0.0009 b | |
M2D5 | 0.0313±0.0012 b | 3.20±0.02 cd | 6.21±0.06 c | 3.09±0.03 c | 0.0743±0.0016 c | |
M2D6 | 0.0244±0.0020 d | 3.15±0.04 d | 5.85±0.14 d | 3.06±0.06 c | 0.0665±0.0022 d | |
平均Average | 0.0281 | 3.28 | 6.52 | 3.28 | 0.0783 | |
T2 | M1D1 | 0.0436±0.0013 c | 3.21±0.14 a | 6.65±0.07 a | 3.30±0.03 a | 0.0761±0.0021 a |
M1D2 | 0.0408±0.0029 d | 3.18±0.16 a | 6.21±0.08 b | 3.26±0.02 ab | 0.0672±0.0021 b | |
M1D3 | 0.0383±0.0027 e | 3.15±0.15 a | 6.02±0.02 c | 3.25±0.03 ab | 0.0630±0.0003 c | |
M2D4 | 0.0585±0.0007 a | 2.97±0.07 b | 5.99±0.05 c | 3.23±0.05 b | 0.0613±0.0006 c | |
M2D5 | 0.0501±0.0006 b | 2.94±0.04 b | 5.70±0.02 d | 3.05±0.03 c | 0.0589±0.0008 d | |
M2D6 | 0.0390±0.0017 de | 2.90±0.04 b | 5.36±0.02 e | 2.84±0.05 d | 0.0560±0.0012 e | |
平均Average | 0.0451 | 3.06 | 5.99 | 3.15 | 0.0637 | |
变异来源 Source of variation | ||||||
F值 F value | T | 322.62** | 34.12* | 598.74** | 61.29* | 472.78** |
MD | 100.20** | 15.36** | 242.71** | 116.11** | 98.43** | |
T×MD | 5.10** | 1.59 | 13.51** | 3.85* | 13.50** |
秧龄 Seedling-age | 处理 Treatment | 单茎叶片 Leaves per shoot | 单茎茎鞘 Culm and sheath per stem | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期 Heading/g | 成熟期 Maturity/g | 表观转运量Exportation/g | 表观转运率 Export rate/% | 抽穗期 Heading/g | 成熟期 Maturity/g | 表观转运量Exportation/g | 表观转运率 Export rate/% | |||||||||
T1 | M1D1 | 1.36±0.01 b | 1.14±0.01 b | 0.225±0.011 ab | 16.53±0.71 c | 3.03±0.07 b | 2.65±0.05 b | 0.387±0.025 b | 12.74±0.56 b | |||||||
M1D2 | 1.40±0.01 a | 1.16±0.01 a | 0.236±0.015 ab | 16.90±0.89 bc | 3.11±0.01 a | 2.68±0.02 a | 0.430±0.010 a | 13.84±0.35 a | ||||||||
M1D3 | 1.42±0.02 a | 1.18±0.01 a | 0.240±0.019 a | 17.00±1.21 bc | 3.13±0.01 a | 2.69±0.03 a | 0.437±0.035 a | 13.96±1.08 a | ||||||||
M2D4 | 1.18±0.02 e | 0.96±0.05 e | 0.217±0.026 b | 18.43±2.48 ab | 2.46±0.04 e | 2.17±0.04 e | 0.293±0.006 d | 11.91±0.30 c | ||||||||
M2D5 | 1.22±0.02 d | 0.99±0.01 d | 0.231±0.006 ab | 18.93±0.25 a | 2.74±0.04 d | 2.38±0.05 d | 0.357±0.012 c | 13.04±0.58 ab | ||||||||
M2D6 | 1.29±0.01 c | 1.04±0.01 c | 0.251±0.011 a | 19.37±0.75 a | 2.91±0.01 c | 2.52±0.02 c | 0.390±0.017 b | 13.42±0.62 ab | ||||||||
平均Average | 1.31 | 1.08 | 0.233 | 17.86 | 2.90 | 2.51 | 0.382 | 13.16 | ||||||||
T2 | M1D1 | 1.29±0.02 c | 1.09±0.03 c | 0.205±0.007 ab | 15.90±0.80 c | 2.75±0.02 cd | 2.40±0.03 bc | 0.343±0.012 b | 12.5±0.47 b | |||||||
M1D2 | 1.35±0.03 b | 1.13±0.01 b | 0.216±0.027 ab | 16.03±1.65 c | 2.78±0.02 bc | 2.42±0.02 b | 0.363±0.015 b | 13.07±0.53 ab | ||||||||
M1D3 | 1.39±0.01 a | 1.16±0.01 a | 0.226±0.010 a | 16.27±0.59 bc | 2.87±0.04 a | 2.48±0.02 a | 0.393±0.029 a | 13.69±0.88 a | ||||||||
M2D4 | 1.13±0.04 f | 0.93±0.01 e | 0.198±0.048 b | 17.40±3.58 abc | 2.43±0.03 e | 2.15±0.03 d | 0.283±0.006 c | 11.65±0.16 c | ||||||||
M2D5 | 1.16±0.01 e | 0.95±0.01 e | 0.212±0.006 ab | 18.27±0.35 ab | 2.72±0.01 d | 2.37±0.03 c | 0.350±0.020 b | 12.87±0.76 b | ||||||||
M2D6 | 1.24±0.02 d | 1.01±0.01 d | 0.230±0.004 a | 18.57±0.06 a | 2.80±0.04 b | 2.44±0.03 ab | 0.363±0.015 ab | 12.97±0.36 ab | ||||||||
平均Average | 1.26 | 1.05 | 0.215 | 17.07 | 2.73 | 2.38 | 0.349 | 12.79 | ||||||||
变异来源 Source of variation | ||||||||||||||||
F值 F value | T | 34.31* | 26.99* | 59.29* | 96.58* | 208.19** | 272.54** | 69.19* | 15.67* | |||||||
MD | 166.14** | 214.00** | 2.45 | 4.28** | 276.17** | 194.97** | 30.53** | 8.05** | ||||||||
T×MD | 1.00 | 1.06 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 31.37** | 26.05** | 1.75* | 0.14 |
表4 不同秧龄下机插方式与密度对杂交稻单茎叶片及茎鞘干物质转运的影响
Table 4 Effects of mechanically-transplanted modes and density on leaves, culm and sheath per stem in hybrid rice at different seedling-ages.
秧龄 Seedling-age | 处理 Treatment | 单茎叶片 Leaves per shoot | 单茎茎鞘 Culm and sheath per stem | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
抽穗期 Heading/g | 成熟期 Maturity/g | 表观转运量Exportation/g | 表观转运率 Export rate/% | 抽穗期 Heading/g | 成熟期 Maturity/g | 表观转运量Exportation/g | 表观转运率 Export rate/% | |||||||||
T1 | M1D1 | 1.36±0.01 b | 1.14±0.01 b | 0.225±0.011 ab | 16.53±0.71 c | 3.03±0.07 b | 2.65±0.05 b | 0.387±0.025 b | 12.74±0.56 b | |||||||
M1D2 | 1.40±0.01 a | 1.16±0.01 a | 0.236±0.015 ab | 16.90±0.89 bc | 3.11±0.01 a | 2.68±0.02 a | 0.430±0.010 a | 13.84±0.35 a | ||||||||
M1D3 | 1.42±0.02 a | 1.18±0.01 a | 0.240±0.019 a | 17.00±1.21 bc | 3.13±0.01 a | 2.69±0.03 a | 0.437±0.035 a | 13.96±1.08 a | ||||||||
M2D4 | 1.18±0.02 e | 0.96±0.05 e | 0.217±0.026 b | 18.43±2.48 ab | 2.46±0.04 e | 2.17±0.04 e | 0.293±0.006 d | 11.91±0.30 c | ||||||||
M2D5 | 1.22±0.02 d | 0.99±0.01 d | 0.231±0.006 ab | 18.93±0.25 a | 2.74±0.04 d | 2.38±0.05 d | 0.357±0.012 c | 13.04±0.58 ab | ||||||||
M2D6 | 1.29±0.01 c | 1.04±0.01 c | 0.251±0.011 a | 19.37±0.75 a | 2.91±0.01 c | 2.52±0.02 c | 0.390±0.017 b | 13.42±0.62 ab | ||||||||
平均Average | 1.31 | 1.08 | 0.233 | 17.86 | 2.90 | 2.51 | 0.382 | 13.16 | ||||||||
T2 | M1D1 | 1.29±0.02 c | 1.09±0.03 c | 0.205±0.007 ab | 15.90±0.80 c | 2.75±0.02 cd | 2.40±0.03 bc | 0.343±0.012 b | 12.5±0.47 b | |||||||
M1D2 | 1.35±0.03 b | 1.13±0.01 b | 0.216±0.027 ab | 16.03±1.65 c | 2.78±0.02 bc | 2.42±0.02 b | 0.363±0.015 b | 13.07±0.53 ab | ||||||||
M1D3 | 1.39±0.01 a | 1.16±0.01 a | 0.226±0.010 a | 16.27±0.59 bc | 2.87±0.04 a | 2.48±0.02 a | 0.393±0.029 a | 13.69±0.88 a | ||||||||
M2D4 | 1.13±0.04 f | 0.93±0.01 e | 0.198±0.048 b | 17.40±3.58 abc | 2.43±0.03 e | 2.15±0.03 d | 0.283±0.006 c | 11.65±0.16 c | ||||||||
M2D5 | 1.16±0.01 e | 0.95±0.01 e | 0.212±0.006 ab | 18.27±0.35 ab | 2.72±0.01 d | 2.37±0.03 c | 0.350±0.020 b | 12.87±0.76 b | ||||||||
M2D6 | 1.24±0.02 d | 1.01±0.01 d | 0.230±0.004 a | 18.57±0.06 a | 2.80±0.04 b | 2.44±0.03 ab | 0.363±0.015 ab | 12.97±0.36 ab | ||||||||
平均Average | 1.26 | 1.05 | 0.215 | 17.07 | 2.73 | 2.38 | 0.349 | 12.79 | ||||||||
变异来源 Source of variation | ||||||||||||||||
F值 F value | T | 34.31* | 26.99* | 59.29* | 96.58* | 208.19** | 272.54** | 69.19* | 15.67* | |||||||
MD | 166.14** | 214.00** | 2.45 | 4.28** | 276.17** | 194.97** | 30.53** | 8.05** | ||||||||
T×MD | 1.00 | 1.06 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 31.37** | 26.05** | 1.75* | 0.14 |
秧龄 Seedling -age | 处理 Treatment | 移栽Transplanting | 拔节Jointing | 抽穗Heading | 成熟Maturity | 收获指数 Harvest index | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单茎 DMWPS /g | 群体 DMWP /(t·hm-2) | 单茎 DMWPS /g | 群体 DMWP /(t·hm-2) | 单茎DMWPS /g | 群体 DMWP /(t·hm-2) | 单茎 DMWPS /g | 群体 DMWP /(t·hm-2) | |||||||
T1 | M1D1 | 0.040±0.005 a | 0.028±0.003 bc | 1.13±0.07 a | 3.94±0.24 a | 5.42±0.05 b | 12.89±0.12 a | 9.88±0.07 b | 21.33±0.39 a | 0.575±0.009 b | ||||
M1D2 | 0.040±0.005 a | 0.026±0.003 bcd | 1.15±0.09 a | 3.81±0.34 ab | 5.65±0.05 a | 12.78±0.11 a | 10.26±0.19 a | 21.40±0.52 a | 0.596±0.013 a | |||||
M1D3 | 0.040±0.005 a | 0.025±0.003 cd | 1.19±0.09 a | 3.76±0.31 ab | 5.67±0.05 a | 12.23±0.10 b | 10.29±0.09 a | 20.52±0.17 b | 0.566±0.007 b | |||||
M2D4 | 0.033±0.004 b | 0.035±0.001 a | 0.97±0.06 b | 3.70±0.17 ab | 4.29±0.03 e | 11.39±0.09 c | 8.13±0.14 e | 19.48±0.10 c | 0.569±0.023 b | |||||
M2D5 | 0.033±0.004 b | 0.029±0.004 b | 1.01±0.08 b | 3.58±0.12 bc | 4.76±0.02 d | 11.21±0.05 d | 8.70±0.34 d | 18.76±0.23 d | 0.538±0.017 c | |||||
M2D6 | 0.033±0.004 b | 0.023±0.003 d | 1.13±0.08 a | 3.44±0.08 c | 5.22±0.05 c | 11.13±0.11 d | 9.59±0.04 c | 18.73±0.11 d | 0.531±0.012 c | |||||
平均Average | 0.116 | 0.082 | 1.10 | 3.71 | 5.17 | 11.94 | 9.47 | 20.04 | 0.563 | |||||
T2 | M1D1 | 0.142±0.008 a | 0.101±0.008 a | 1.02±0.12 ab | 3.33±0.08 a | 5.13±0.02 c | 11.52±0.04 a | 9.21±0.27 b | 19.57±0.33 a | 0.576±0.002 a | ||||
M1D2 | 0.142±0.008 a | 0.088±0.005 b | 1.03±0.06 ab | 3.25±0.05 a | 5.22±0.07 b | 11.28±0.16 b | 9.47±0.16 b | 19.11±0.78 ab | 0.569±0.014 a | |||||
M1D3 | 0.142±0.008 a | 0.073±0.008 d | 1.07±0.09 a | 3.20±0.11 a | 5.40±0.03 a | 11.17±0.07 b | 9.90±0.26 a | 18.81±0.06 b | 0.549±0.012 bc | |||||
M2D4 | 0.090±0.006 b | 0.090±0.006 b | 0.85±0.06 d | 2.91±0.15 b | 4.31±0.04 e | 10.85±0.11 c | 8.12±0.06 d | 18.72±0.06 b | 0.557±0.007 ab | |||||
M2D5 | 0.090±0.006 b | 0.077±0.005 c | 0.91±0.10 cd | 2.88±0.30 b | 4.73±0.05 d | 10.63±0.11 d | 8.53±0.23 c | 18.01±0.17 c | 0.533±0.012 c | |||||
M2D6 | 0.090±0.006 b | 0.060±0.004 e | 0.96±0.04 bc | 2.70±0.06 b | 5.19±0.04 b | 10.21±0.08 e | 9.46±0.27 b | 17.17±0.10 d | 0.499±0.014 d | |||||
平均Average | 0.036 | 0.028 | 0.90 | 3.05 | 5.00 | 10.94 | 9.11 | 18.57 | 0.547 | |||||
变异来源 Source of variation | ||||||||||||||
F值 F value | T | 229.34** | 220.18** | 12.45 | 70.40* | 43.22* | 269.52** | 27.89* | 240.97** | 11.07 | ||||
MD | 119.18** | 50.55** | 8.13** | 6.67** | 935.73** | 338.45** | 80.87** | 58.46** | 21.92** | |||||
T×MD | 67.83** | 26.41** | 0.22 | 0.36 | 35.08** | 34.50** | 3.40* | 5.22** | 1.38 |
表5 不同秧龄下机插方式与密度对杂交稻单茎和群体干物质量的影响
Table 5 Effects of mechanically-transplanted modes and density on dry matter weight per stem and population in hybrid rice at different seedling-ages.
秧龄 Seedling -age | 处理 Treatment | 移栽Transplanting | 拔节Jointing | 抽穗Heading | 成熟Maturity | 收获指数 Harvest index | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
单茎 DMWPS /g | 群体 DMWP /(t·hm-2) | 单茎 DMWPS /g | 群体 DMWP /(t·hm-2) | 单茎DMWPS /g | 群体 DMWP /(t·hm-2) | 单茎 DMWPS /g | 群体 DMWP /(t·hm-2) | |||||||
T1 | M1D1 | 0.040±0.005 a | 0.028±0.003 bc | 1.13±0.07 a | 3.94±0.24 a | 5.42±0.05 b | 12.89±0.12 a | 9.88±0.07 b | 21.33±0.39 a | 0.575±0.009 b | ||||
M1D2 | 0.040±0.005 a | 0.026±0.003 bcd | 1.15±0.09 a | 3.81±0.34 ab | 5.65±0.05 a | 12.78±0.11 a | 10.26±0.19 a | 21.40±0.52 a | 0.596±0.013 a | |||||
M1D3 | 0.040±0.005 a | 0.025±0.003 cd | 1.19±0.09 a | 3.76±0.31 ab | 5.67±0.05 a | 12.23±0.10 b | 10.29±0.09 a | 20.52±0.17 b | 0.566±0.007 b | |||||
M2D4 | 0.033±0.004 b | 0.035±0.001 a | 0.97±0.06 b | 3.70±0.17 ab | 4.29±0.03 e | 11.39±0.09 c | 8.13±0.14 e | 19.48±0.10 c | 0.569±0.023 b | |||||
M2D5 | 0.033±0.004 b | 0.029±0.004 b | 1.01±0.08 b | 3.58±0.12 bc | 4.76±0.02 d | 11.21±0.05 d | 8.70±0.34 d | 18.76±0.23 d | 0.538±0.017 c | |||||
M2D6 | 0.033±0.004 b | 0.023±0.003 d | 1.13±0.08 a | 3.44±0.08 c | 5.22±0.05 c | 11.13±0.11 d | 9.59±0.04 c | 18.73±0.11 d | 0.531±0.012 c | |||||
平均Average | 0.116 | 0.082 | 1.10 | 3.71 | 5.17 | 11.94 | 9.47 | 20.04 | 0.563 | |||||
T2 | M1D1 | 0.142±0.008 a | 0.101±0.008 a | 1.02±0.12 ab | 3.33±0.08 a | 5.13±0.02 c | 11.52±0.04 a | 9.21±0.27 b | 19.57±0.33 a | 0.576±0.002 a | ||||
M1D2 | 0.142±0.008 a | 0.088±0.005 b | 1.03±0.06 ab | 3.25±0.05 a | 5.22±0.07 b | 11.28±0.16 b | 9.47±0.16 b | 19.11±0.78 ab | 0.569±0.014 a | |||||
M1D3 | 0.142±0.008 a | 0.073±0.008 d | 1.07±0.09 a | 3.20±0.11 a | 5.40±0.03 a | 11.17±0.07 b | 9.90±0.26 a | 18.81±0.06 b | 0.549±0.012 bc | |||||
M2D4 | 0.090±0.006 b | 0.090±0.006 b | 0.85±0.06 d | 2.91±0.15 b | 4.31±0.04 e | 10.85±0.11 c | 8.12±0.06 d | 18.72±0.06 b | 0.557±0.007 ab | |||||
M2D5 | 0.090±0.006 b | 0.077±0.005 c | 0.91±0.10 cd | 2.88±0.30 b | 4.73±0.05 d | 10.63±0.11 d | 8.53±0.23 c | 18.01±0.17 c | 0.533±0.012 c | |||||
M2D6 | 0.090±0.006 b | 0.060±0.004 e | 0.96±0.04 bc | 2.70±0.06 b | 5.19±0.04 b | 10.21±0.08 e | 9.46±0.27 b | 17.17±0.10 d | 0.499±0.014 d | |||||
平均Average | 0.036 | 0.028 | 0.90 | 3.05 | 5.00 | 10.94 | 9.11 | 18.57 | 0.547 | |||||
变异来源 Source of variation | ||||||||||||||
F值 F value | T | 229.34** | 220.18** | 12.45 | 70.40* | 43.22* | 269.52** | 27.89* | 240.97** | 11.07 | ||||
MD | 119.18** | 50.55** | 8.13** | 6.67** | 935.73** | 338.45** | 80.87** | 58.46** | 21.92** | |||||
T×MD | 67.83** | 26.41** | 0.22 | 0.36 | 35.08** | 34.50** | 3.40* | 5.22** | 1.38 |
秧龄 Seedling-age | 处理 Treatment | 物质积累量 Dry accumulation /(t·hm-2) | 群体生长率 Population growth rate /(g·m-2 d-1) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
移栽-拔节 Transplanting-jointing | 拔节-抽穗 Jointing-heading | 抽穗-成熟 Heading-maturity | 移栽-拔节 Transplanting-jointing | 拔节-抽穗 Jointing-heading | 抽穗-成熟 Heading-maturiy | |||||||
T1 | M1D1 | 3.92±0.66 a | 8.98±0.58 a | 8.40±0.29 a | 8.33±1.40 a | 24.95±1.63 a | 19.10±0.67 a | |||||
M1D2 | 3.79±0.34 ab | 8.86±0.24 a | 8.62±0.41 a | 8.06±0.71 a | 24.62±0.68 a | 19.60±0.94 a | ||||||
M1D3 | 3.73±0.32 ab | 8.79±0.06 a | 8.34±0.29 a | 7.94±0.67 ab | 24.41±0.16 a | 18.96±0.65 ab | ||||||
M2D4 | 3.59±0.18 abc | 7.82±0.22 b | 7.87±0.12 b | 7.47±0.37 abc | 21.71±0.63 b | 18.30±0.27 b | ||||||
M2D5 | 3.46±0.28 bc | 7.73±0.19 b | 7.45±0.16 c | 7.22±0.58 bc | 21.46±0.54 b | 17.34±0.38 c | ||||||
M2D6 | 3.27±0.30 c | 7.69±0.08 b | 7.35±0.23 c | 6.81±0.63 c | 21.35±0.21 b | 17.08±0.53 c | ||||||
平均Average | 3.63 | 8.31 | 8.01 | 7.64 | 23.09 | 18.39 | ||||||
T2 | M1D1 | 3.23±0.08 a | 8.04±0.31 a | 8.14±0.25 a | 8.06±0.20 a | 23.66±0.91 a | 18.08±0.56 a | |||||
M1D2 | 3.16±0.06 a | 8.03±0.17 a | 7.84±0.63 ab | 7.91±0.14 a | 23.61±0.49 a | 17.41±1.39 ab | ||||||
M1D3 | 3.13±0.12 a | 7.97±0.05 a | 7.71±0.05 b | 7.82±0.30 a | 23.44±0.13 a | 17.13±0.11 b | ||||||
M2D4 | 2.82±0.15 ab | 7.75±0.17 ab | 7.71±0.19 b | 6.72±0.36 b | 23.50±0.53 a | 17.53±0.42 ab | ||||||
M2D5 | 2.80±0.31 ab | 7.69±0.09 ab | 7.37±0.13 c | 6.67±0.73 b | 23.29±0.26 a | 16.75±0.28 bc | ||||||
M2D6 | 2.64±0.06 b | 7.47±0.11 b | 7.18±0.25 c | 6.30±0.16 b | 22.65±0.34 a | 16.32±0.57 c | ||||||
平均Average | 2.96 | 7.83 | 7.66 | 7.25 | 23.36 | 17.20 | ||||||
变异来源 Source of variation | ||||||||||||
F值 F value | T | 654.69** | 57.82* | 8.31 | 46.87* | 44.83* | 19.12* | |||||
MD | 3.78* | 17.27** | 13.87** | 6.60** | 11.44** | 9.10** | ||||||
T×MD | 0.06 | 4.35** | 1.65 | 0.23 | 6.46** | 1.65 |
表6 不同秧龄下机插方式与密度对杂交稻阶段干物质积累量及群体生长率的影响
Table 6 Effects of mechanically-transplanted modes and density on dry accumulation and crop growth rate in hybrid rice at different seedling-ages.
秧龄 Seedling-age | 处理 Treatment | 物质积累量 Dry accumulation /(t·hm-2) | 群体生长率 Population growth rate /(g·m-2 d-1) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
移栽-拔节 Transplanting-jointing | 拔节-抽穗 Jointing-heading | 抽穗-成熟 Heading-maturity | 移栽-拔节 Transplanting-jointing | 拔节-抽穗 Jointing-heading | 抽穗-成熟 Heading-maturiy | |||||||
T1 | M1D1 | 3.92±0.66 a | 8.98±0.58 a | 8.40±0.29 a | 8.33±1.40 a | 24.95±1.63 a | 19.10±0.67 a | |||||
M1D2 | 3.79±0.34 ab | 8.86±0.24 a | 8.62±0.41 a | 8.06±0.71 a | 24.62±0.68 a | 19.60±0.94 a | ||||||
M1D3 | 3.73±0.32 ab | 8.79±0.06 a | 8.34±0.29 a | 7.94±0.67 ab | 24.41±0.16 a | 18.96±0.65 ab | ||||||
M2D4 | 3.59±0.18 abc | 7.82±0.22 b | 7.87±0.12 b | 7.47±0.37 abc | 21.71±0.63 b | 18.30±0.27 b | ||||||
M2D5 | 3.46±0.28 bc | 7.73±0.19 b | 7.45±0.16 c | 7.22±0.58 bc | 21.46±0.54 b | 17.34±0.38 c | ||||||
M2D6 | 3.27±0.30 c | 7.69±0.08 b | 7.35±0.23 c | 6.81±0.63 c | 21.35±0.21 b | 17.08±0.53 c | ||||||
平均Average | 3.63 | 8.31 | 8.01 | 7.64 | 23.09 | 18.39 | ||||||
T2 | M1D1 | 3.23±0.08 a | 8.04±0.31 a | 8.14±0.25 a | 8.06±0.20 a | 23.66±0.91 a | 18.08±0.56 a | |||||
M1D2 | 3.16±0.06 a | 8.03±0.17 a | 7.84±0.63 ab | 7.91±0.14 a | 23.61±0.49 a | 17.41±1.39 ab | ||||||
M1D3 | 3.13±0.12 a | 7.97±0.05 a | 7.71±0.05 b | 7.82±0.30 a | 23.44±0.13 a | 17.13±0.11 b | ||||||
M2D4 | 2.82±0.15 ab | 7.75±0.17 ab | 7.71±0.19 b | 6.72±0.36 b | 23.50±0.53 a | 17.53±0.42 ab | ||||||
M2D5 | 2.80±0.31 ab | 7.69±0.09 ab | 7.37±0.13 c | 6.67±0.73 b | 23.29±0.26 a | 16.75±0.28 bc | ||||||
M2D6 | 2.64±0.06 b | 7.47±0.11 b | 7.18±0.25 c | 6.30±0.16 b | 22.65±0.34 a | 16.32±0.57 c | ||||||
平均Average | 2.96 | 7.83 | 7.66 | 7.25 | 23.36 | 17.20 | ||||||
变异来源 Source of variation | ||||||||||||
F值 F value | T | 654.69** | 57.82* | 8.31 | 46.87* | 44.83* | 19.12* | |||||
MD | 3.78* | 17.27** | 13.87** | 6.60** | 11.44** | 9.10** | ||||||
T×MD | 0.06 | 4.35** | 1.65 | 0.23 | 6.46** | 1.65 |
秧龄 Seedling-age | 处理 Treatment | 光合势 Photosynthetic potential / (×104 m2 d·hm-2) | 净同化率 Net assimilation / (g·m-2 d-1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
移栽-拔节 Transplanting- jointing | 拔节-抽穗 Jointing- heading | 抽穗-成熟 Heading- maturity | 移栽-拔节 Transplanting- jointing | 拔节-抽穗 Jointing- heading | 抽穗-成熟 Heading- maturity | |||
T1 | M1D1 | 82.14±0.64 a | 185.50±1.12 a | 225.68±0.58 a | 11.71±1.72 ab | 5.03±0.36 a | 3.87±0.15 a | |
M1D2 | 78.77±0.83 bc | 182.36±0.29 b | 224.46±1.06 ab | 11.93±0.95 a | 5.07±0.14 a | 3.99±0.17 a | ||
M1D3 | 77.02±0.57 cd | 180.33±1.41 c | 223.12±0.80 b | 12.07±1.76 a | 5.09±0.03 a | 3.89±0.14 a | ||
M2D4 | 79.12±2.27 b | 178.65±1.91 c | 209.56±0.22 c | 10.41±1.11 c | 4.56±0.16 c | 3.82±0.06 a | ||
M2D5 | 77.50±0.54 bcd | 169.30±0.91 d | 195.21±1.57 d | 10.54±0.82 c | 4.73±0.13 bc | 3.88±0.10 a | ||
M2D6 | 76.29±0.86 d | 162.16±2.97 e | 187.21±4.10 e | 10.58±0.92 bc | 4.89±0.11 ab | 3.97±0.20 a | ||
平均Average | 78.47 | 176.38 | 210.87 | 11.21 | 4.89 | 3.90 | ||
T2 | M1D1 | 65.02±2.74 a | 167.45±3.45 a | 223.60±0.94 a | 10.97±0.58 a | 5.01±0.10 c | 3.79±0.12 b | |
M1D2 | 64.44±3.31 a | 159.71±1.99 b | 213.11±1.63 b | 10.99±0.57 a | 5.22±0.20 b | 3.80±0.30 b | ||
M1D3 | 63.84±3.07 a | 155.95±2.21 c | 208.50±1.26 c | 11.11±1.00 a | 5.29±0.13 b | 3.81±0.05 b | ||
M2D4 | 63.60±1.50 a | 147.77±1.30 d | 198.18±1.89 d | 9.07±0.48 b | 5.54±0.07 a | 3.93±0.14 ab | ||
M2D5 | 62.86±0.93 ab | 142.55±0.96 e | 188.01±0.75 e | 9.39±1.03 b | 5.61±0.05 a | 3.96±0.09 ab | ||
M2D6 | 61.68±0.84 b | 136.23±0.54 f | 176.26±1.29 f | 9.49±0.28 b | 5.75±0.11 a | 4.11±0.16 a | ||
平均Average | 63.57 | 151.61 | 201.28 | 10.17 | 5.40 | 3.89 | ||
变异来源 Source of variation | ||||||||
F值 F value | T | 402.17** | 608.66** | 255.41** | 6.88 | 270.86** | 0.01 | |
MD | 6.01** | 228.16** | 582.31** | 4.81** | 2.60 | 1.58 | ||
T×MD | 1.08 | 10.40** | 9.88** | 0.07 | 10.92** | 1.20 |
表7 不同秧龄下机插方式与密度对杂交稻光合势及净同化率的影响
Table 7 Effects of mechanically-transplanted modes and density on photosynthetic potential and net assimilation in hybrid rice at different seedling-ages.
秧龄 Seedling-age | 处理 Treatment | 光合势 Photosynthetic potential / (×104 m2 d·hm-2) | 净同化率 Net assimilation / (g·m-2 d-1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
移栽-拔节 Transplanting- jointing | 拔节-抽穗 Jointing- heading | 抽穗-成熟 Heading- maturity | 移栽-拔节 Transplanting- jointing | 拔节-抽穗 Jointing- heading | 抽穗-成熟 Heading- maturity | |||
T1 | M1D1 | 82.14±0.64 a | 185.50±1.12 a | 225.68±0.58 a | 11.71±1.72 ab | 5.03±0.36 a | 3.87±0.15 a | |
M1D2 | 78.77±0.83 bc | 182.36±0.29 b | 224.46±1.06 ab | 11.93±0.95 a | 5.07±0.14 a | 3.99±0.17 a | ||
M1D3 | 77.02±0.57 cd | 180.33±1.41 c | 223.12±0.80 b | 12.07±1.76 a | 5.09±0.03 a | 3.89±0.14 a | ||
M2D4 | 79.12±2.27 b | 178.65±1.91 c | 209.56±0.22 c | 10.41±1.11 c | 4.56±0.16 c | 3.82±0.06 a | ||
M2D5 | 77.50±0.54 bcd | 169.30±0.91 d | 195.21±1.57 d | 10.54±0.82 c | 4.73±0.13 bc | 3.88±0.10 a | ||
M2D6 | 76.29±0.86 d | 162.16±2.97 e | 187.21±4.10 e | 10.58±0.92 bc | 4.89±0.11 ab | 3.97±0.20 a | ||
平均Average | 78.47 | 176.38 | 210.87 | 11.21 | 4.89 | 3.90 | ||
T2 | M1D1 | 65.02±2.74 a | 167.45±3.45 a | 223.60±0.94 a | 10.97±0.58 a | 5.01±0.10 c | 3.79±0.12 b | |
M1D2 | 64.44±3.31 a | 159.71±1.99 b | 213.11±1.63 b | 10.99±0.57 a | 5.22±0.20 b | 3.80±0.30 b | ||
M1D3 | 63.84±3.07 a | 155.95±2.21 c | 208.50±1.26 c | 11.11±1.00 a | 5.29±0.13 b | 3.81±0.05 b | ||
M2D4 | 63.60±1.50 a | 147.77±1.30 d | 198.18±1.89 d | 9.07±0.48 b | 5.54±0.07 a | 3.93±0.14 ab | ||
M2D5 | 62.86±0.93 ab | 142.55±0.96 e | 188.01±0.75 e | 9.39±1.03 b | 5.61±0.05 a | 3.96±0.09 ab | ||
M2D6 | 61.68±0.84 b | 136.23±0.54 f | 176.26±1.29 f | 9.49±0.28 b | 5.75±0.11 a | 4.11±0.16 a | ||
平均Average | 63.57 | 151.61 | 201.28 | 10.17 | 5.40 | 3.89 | ||
变异来源 Source of variation | ||||||||
F值 F value | T | 402.17** | 608.66** | 255.41** | 6.88 | 270.86** | 0.01 | |
MD | 6.01** | 228.16** | 582.31** | 4.81** | 2.60 | 1.58 | ||
T×MD | 1.08 | 10.40** | 9.88** | 0.07 | 10.92** | 1.20 |
秧龄 Seedling-age | 处理 Treatment | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number /(×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle | 总颖花数 Total spikelet number /(×107·hm-2) | 结实率 Seed-setting rate /% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight /g | 稻谷产量 Grain yield /(t·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | M1D1 | 215.84±2.79 b | 234.93±9.07 a | 50.69±1.37 a | 80.49±1.46 b | 30.79±0.33 a | 12.26±0.32 b |
M1D2 | 208.64±1.28 b | 239.18±1.64 a | 49.56±0.37 a | 84.23±0.92 a | 30.57±0.31 a | 12.74±0.11 a | |
M1D3 | 199.43±2.93 c | 235.18±5.85 a | 46.58±0.42 b | 83.42±0.60 a | 30.31±0.69 a | 11.61±0.22 c | |
M2D4 | 239.80±3.26 a | 198.24±4.45 d | 48.67±2.30 a | 77.90±0.70 c | 30.71±0.21 a | 11.09±0.40 d | |
M2D5 | 215.87±6.33 b | 211.04±1.54 c | 46.20±1.45 b | 79.87±1.52 b | 30.67±0.42 a | 10.10±0.43 e | |
M2D6 | 195.42±1.87 c | 221.12±8.60 b | 42.16±0.43 c | 80.54±1.36 b | 30.86±0.39 a | 9.96±0.26 e | |
平均Average | 213.05 | 223.28 | 47.30 | 81.07 | 30.65 | 11.29 | |
T2 | M1D1 | 212.71±4.71 b | 215.02±4.94 ab | 45.89±0.71 a | 80.04±0.64 b | 31.03±0.70 a | 11.28±0.17 a |
M1D2 | 201.67±4.84 c | 218.25±7.36 a | 44.91±0.23 ab | 81.67±2.39 ab | 31.08±0.31 a | 10.88±0.20 a | |
M1D3 | 190.20±5.31 d | 220.18±7.00 a | 43.33±2.37 bc | 82.45±2.09 a | 31.15±0.06 a | 10.33±0.24 b | |
M2D4 | 230.55±11.61 a | 197.40±2.78 d | 44.77±3.07 ab | 74.91±1.26 d | 30.98±0.16 a | 10.43±0.17 b | |
M2D5 | 211.15±3.98 b | 202.86±6.91 cd | 41.86±0.69 c | 76.37±0.84 cd | 30.85±0.27 a | 9.60±0.25 c | |
M2D6 | 181.62±4.13 e | 207.95±2.71 bc | 36.99±1.03 d | 78.00±1.44 c | 30.71±1.03 a | 8.57±0.18 d | |
平均Average | 204.65 | 210.28 | 42.97 | 78.91 | 30.97 | 10.18 | |
变异来源 Source of variation | |||||||
F值 F value | T | 330.13** | 146.93** | 155.45** | 28.94* | 4.79 | 580.32** |
MD | 47.54** | 24.68** | 27.45** | 20.81** | 0.10 | 81.63** | |
T×MD | 0.74 | 2.23 | 0.35 | 1.08 | 0.67 | 4.90** |
表8 不同秧龄下机插方式与密度对杂交稻产量及其构成因素的影响
Table 8 Effects of mechanically-transplanted modes and density on yield and yield components of hybrid rice at different seedling-ages.
秧龄 Seedling-age | 处理 Treatment | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number /(×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle | 总颖花数 Total spikelet number /(×107·hm-2) | 结实率 Seed-setting rate /% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight /g | 稻谷产量 Grain yield /(t·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | M1D1 | 215.84±2.79 b | 234.93±9.07 a | 50.69±1.37 a | 80.49±1.46 b | 30.79±0.33 a | 12.26±0.32 b |
M1D2 | 208.64±1.28 b | 239.18±1.64 a | 49.56±0.37 a | 84.23±0.92 a | 30.57±0.31 a | 12.74±0.11 a | |
M1D3 | 199.43±2.93 c | 235.18±5.85 a | 46.58±0.42 b | 83.42±0.60 a | 30.31±0.69 a | 11.61±0.22 c | |
M2D4 | 239.80±3.26 a | 198.24±4.45 d | 48.67±2.30 a | 77.90±0.70 c | 30.71±0.21 a | 11.09±0.40 d | |
M2D5 | 215.87±6.33 b | 211.04±1.54 c | 46.20±1.45 b | 79.87±1.52 b | 30.67±0.42 a | 10.10±0.43 e | |
M2D6 | 195.42±1.87 c | 221.12±8.60 b | 42.16±0.43 c | 80.54±1.36 b | 30.86±0.39 a | 9.96±0.26 e | |
平均Average | 213.05 | 223.28 | 47.30 | 81.07 | 30.65 | 11.29 | |
T2 | M1D1 | 212.71±4.71 b | 215.02±4.94 ab | 45.89±0.71 a | 80.04±0.64 b | 31.03±0.70 a | 11.28±0.17 a |
M1D2 | 201.67±4.84 c | 218.25±7.36 a | 44.91±0.23 ab | 81.67±2.39 ab | 31.08±0.31 a | 10.88±0.20 a | |
M1D3 | 190.20±5.31 d | 220.18±7.00 a | 43.33±2.37 bc | 82.45±2.09 a | 31.15±0.06 a | 10.33±0.24 b | |
M2D4 | 230.55±11.61 a | 197.40±2.78 d | 44.77±3.07 ab | 74.91±1.26 d | 30.98±0.16 a | 10.43±0.17 b | |
M2D5 | 211.15±3.98 b | 202.86±6.91 cd | 41.86±0.69 c | 76.37±0.84 cd | 30.85±0.27 a | 9.60±0.25 c | |
M2D6 | 181.62±4.13 e | 207.95±2.71 bc | 36.99±1.03 d | 78.00±1.44 c | 30.71±1.03 a | 8.57±0.18 d | |
平均Average | 204.65 | 210.28 | 42.97 | 78.91 | 30.97 | 10.18 | |
变异来源 Source of variation | |||||||
F值 F value | T | 330.13** | 146.93** | 155.45** | 28.94* | 4.79 | 580.32** |
MD | 47.54** | 24.68** | 27.45** | 20.81** | 0.10 | 81.63** | |
T×MD | 0.74 | 2.23 | 0.35 | 1.08 | 0.67 | 4.90** |
[1] | 朱德峰, 陈惠哲. 水稻机插秧发展与粮食安全. 中国稻米, 2009, (6): 4-7. |
Zhu D F, Chen H Z.Development of mechanical- transplanting rice and food safety.China Rice, 2009, (6): 4-7. (in Chinese) | |
[2] | 孙春梅, 张山泉, 钟平, 邵文奇, 陈川, 庄春. 直播稻与机插秧优缺点分析. 现代农业科技,2008, 24: 213,217. |
Sun C M, Zhang S Q, Zhong P, Shao W Q, Chen C, Zhuang C. Advantages and disadvantages analysis of direct seeding with mechanical-transplanter. Mod Agric Sci Technol, 2008, 24: 213,217. (in Chinese) | |
[3] | 朱德峰, 程式华, 张玉屏, 林贤青, 陈惠哲. 全球水稻生产现状与制约因素分析. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(3): 474-479. |
Zhu D F, Cheng S H, Zhang Y P, Lin X Q, Chen H Z.Analysis of status and constraints of rice production in the world.Sci Agric Sin, 2010, 43(3): 474-479. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 钱海峰, 魏清勇. 水稻插秧机国内外发展现状. 现代化农业, 2014, (3): 62-63. |
Qian H F, Wei Q Y. The development status of domestic and foreign rice transplanter, Modern Agric, 2014, (3): 62-63. (in Chinese) | |
[5] | 李耀明, 徐立章, 向忠平, 邓玲黎. 日本水稻种植机械化技术的最新研究进展. 农业工程学报, 2005, 21(11): 182-185. |
Li Y M, Xu L Z, Xiang Z P, Deng L L, Research advances of rice planting mechanization in Japan.Trans CSAE, 2005, 21(11): 182-185. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 李杰, 张洪程, 常勇, 龚金龙, 郭振华, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 高辉. 不同种植方式水稻高产栽培条件下的光合物质生产特征研究. 作物学报, 2011, 37(7): 1235-1248. |
Li J, Zhang H C, Chang Y, Gong J L, Guo Z H, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Gao H.Characteristics of photosynthesis and matter production of rice with different planting methods under high-yielding cultivation condition.Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37(7): 1235-1248. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 沈建辉, 邵文娟, 张祖建, 景启坚, 杨建昌, 陈文林, 朱庆森. 苗床落谷密度、施肥量和秧龄对机插稻苗质及大田产量的影响. 作物学报, 2006, 32(3): 402-409. |
Shen J H, Sao W J, Zhang Z J, Jing Q J, Yang J C, Chen W L, Zhu Q S, Effects of sowing density , fertilizer amount in seedbed and seedling age on seedling quality and grain yield in paddy field for mechanical transplanting rice.Acta Agron Sin, 2006, 32(3): 402-409. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 于林惠, 李刚华, 徐晶晶, 凌启鸿, 丁艳锋. 基于高产示范方的机插水稻群体特征研究. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(4): 451-456. |
Yu L H, Li G H, Xu J J, Ling Q H, Ding Y F.Population characteristics of machine-transplanted japonica rice based on hige-yield demonstration fields.Chin J Rice Sci, 2012, 26(4): 451-456. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 张洪程, 龚金龙. 中国水稻种植机械化高产农艺研究现状及发展探讨. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(7): 1273-1289. |
Zhang H C, Gong J L, Research status and development discussion on high-yielding agronomy of mechanized planting rice in china.Sci Agric Sin, 2014, 47(7): 1273-1289. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 张洪程, 朱聪聪, 霍中洋, 许轲, 蒋晓鸿, 陈厚存, 高尚勤, 李德剑, 赵成美, 戴其根. 钵苗机插水稻产量形成优势及主要生理生态特点. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(21): 50-59. |
Zhang H C, Zhu C C, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Jiang X H, Chen H C, Gao S Q, Li D J, Zhao C M, Dai Q G, Advantages of yield formation and main characteristics of physiological and ecological in rice with nutrition bowl mechanical transplanting.Trans CSAE, 2013, 29(21): 50-59. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 胡雅杰, 邢志鹏, 龚金龙, 刘国涛, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 郭保卫, 沙安勤, 周有炎, 罗学超, 刘国林. 钵苗机插水稻群体动态特征及高产形成机制的探讨. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(5): 865-879. |
Hu Y J, Xing Z P, Gong J L, Liu G T, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Guo B W, Sha A Q, Zhou Y Y, Luo X C, Liu G L.Study on population characteristics and formation mechanisms for high yield of pot-seedling mechanical transplanting Rice.Sci Agric Sin, 2014, 47(5): 865-879. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 张军, 王兴龙, 石广跃, 米长生, 郭保卫, 李必忠, 方书亮, 陆海空, 刘忠红, 张永进, 庚跃东. 不同机栽方式下杂交稻产量及其形成特征比较. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(10): 84-91. |
Zhang J, Wang X L, Shi G Y, Mi C S, Guo B W, Li B Z, Fang S L, Lu H K, Liu Z H, Zhang Y J, Geng Y D.Yield and its formation of hybrid rice under different mechanical transplanted methods.Trans CSAE, 2015, 31(10): 84-91. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 吴文革, 张健美, 周永进, 陈刚, 许有尊, 李胜群, 严文学, 高尚勤. 江淮水稻钵苗机插生育特性与高产栽培关键技术研究. 中国稻米, 2015, 21(4): 118-124. |
Wu W G, Zhang J M, Zhou Y J, Chen G, Xu Y Z, Li S Q, Yan W X, Gao S Q.Study on growth and development characteristics and high -yielding cultivation techniques of rice with nutrition bowl mechanical transplanting in jianghuai area.China Rice, 2015, 21(4): 118-124. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 马均, 孙永健, 苟永成, 李学根, 罗甫全. 杂交稻钵形毯状育秧机插不同播种密度与秧龄研究. 中国稻米, 2011, 17(3): 11-14. |
Ma J, Sun Y J, Gou Y C, Li X G, Luo F Q.Research of different sowing density and seedling age of transplanted hybrid rice bowl-carpet seedling machine.China Rice, 2011, 17(3): 11-14. (in Chinese) | |
[15] | 许俊伟, 孟天瑶, 荆培培, 张洪程, 李超, 戴其根, 魏海燕, 郭保卫. 机插密度对不同类型水稻抗倒伏能力及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2015, 11: 1767-1776. |
Xu J W, Meng T Y, Jing P P, Zhang H C, Li C, Dai Q G, Wei H Y, Guo B W.Effect of mechanical-transplanting density on lodging resistance and yield in different types of rice.Acta Agron Sin, 2015, 11: 1767-1776. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 胡雅杰, 曹伟伟, 钱海军, 邢志鹏, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 郭保卫, 高辉, 沙安勤, 周有炎, 刘国林. 钵苗机插密度对不同穗型水稻品种产量、株型和抗倒伏能力的影响. 作物学报, 2015, 41(5): 743-757. |
Hu Y J, Cao W W, Qian H J, Xing Z P, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Guo B W, Gao H, Sha A Q, Zhou Y Y, Liu G L.Effect of planting density of mechanically transplanted pot seedlings on yield, plant type and lodging resistance in rice with different panicle types.Acta Agron Sin, 2015, 41(5): 743-757. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 郑克武, 邹江石, 吕川根. 氮肥和栽插密度对杂交稻“两优培九”产量及氮素吸收利用的影响. 作物学报, 2006, 32(6): 885-893. |
Zheng K W, Zou J S, Lv C G.Effects of transplanting density and nitrogen fertilizer on yield formation and N absorption in a two-line intersubspecific hybrid rice/Liangyoupeijiu.Acta Agron Sin, 2006, 32(6): 885-893. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 李应洪, 李玥, 严奉君, 孙加威, 赵建红, 李娜, 孙永健, 马均. 不同秧龄及剪根程度对杂交水稻生长特性和产量的影响. 杂交水稻, 2016, 31(3): 50-57, 63. |
Li Y H, Li Y, Yan F J, Sun J W, Zhao J H, Li N, Sun Y J, Ma J.Effects of seedling-age and root-cutting on growth characteristics and grain yield of hybrid rice.Hybrid Rice, 2016, 31(3): 50-57, 63. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 张洪程. 水稻钵苗精确机插高产栽培新技术. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2014: 3-70 |
Zhang H C.High yield cultivation technology of rice bowl mechanical-transplanting. Beijing: China Agriculture Press, 2014: 1-8. (in Chinese) | |
[20] | 宋云生, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 朱聪聪, 孙圳, 杨大柳, 王惟清, 刘俊, 吴爱国. 水稻钵苗机插秧苗素质的调控. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(22): 11-22. |
Song Y S, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Zhu C C, Sun Z, Yang D L, Wang W Q, Liu J, Wu A G.Seedling quality regulation of rice potted-seedling in mechanical transplanting.Trans CSAE, 2013, 29(22): 11-22. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 张祖建, 王君, 郎有忠, 于林惠, 薛艳凤, 朱庆森. 机插稻超秧龄秧苗的生长特点研究. 作物学报, 2008, 34(2): 297-304. |
Zhang Z J, Wang J, Lang Y Z, Yu L H, Xue Y F, Zhu Q S.Growing characteristics of rice seedlings of over-optimum age for mechanical transplanting.Acta Agron Sin, 2008, 34(2): 297-304. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 邵文娟, 沈建辉, 张祖建, 李伟海, 杨建昌, 朱庆森. 水稻机插双膜育秧床土培肥对秧苗素质和秧龄弹性的影响. 扬州大学学报农业与生命科学版, 2004, 25(2): 22-26. |
Shao W J, Shen J H, Zhang Z J, Li W H, Yang J C, Zhu Q S.Effects of seedbed fertilizing on quality and flexibility of rice seedlings nursed with tow-layer plastic film for mechanical transplanting.J Yangzhou Univ, 2004, 25(2): 22-26. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 沈建辉, 邵文娟, 张祖建, 杨建昌, 曹卫星, 朱庆森. 水稻机插中苗双膜育秧落谷密度对苗质和产量影响的研究. 作物学报, 2004, 30(9): 906-911. |
Shen J H, Shao W J, Zhang Z J, Yang J C, Cao W X, Zhu Q S.Effects of sowing density on quality of medium-seedling nursed with two-layer plastic film and grain yield in mechanical transplanting Rice.Acta Agron Sin, 2004, 30(9): 906-911. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 贾现文, 朱起超, 杨志远, 孙永健, 郭翔, 石勇, 马均. 移栽秧龄对机插杂交稻产量及群体质量的影响. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(12): 18-25. |
Jia X W, Zhu Q C, Yang Z Y, Sun Y J, Guo X, Shi Y, Ma J.Effect of seedling age on yield and population quality of mechanized transplanted hybrid rice.Trans CSAE, 2014, 30(12): 18-25. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 钱银飞. 不同穗型水稻品种机插规格的综合研究. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2009. |
Qian Y F.Studies on effect of transplanting pattern on diffrent panicle type mechanical transplantted rice.Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2009. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 李木英, 石庆华, 王涛, 方慧铃, 潘晓华, 谭雪明. 种植密度对双季超级稻群体发育和产量的影响. 杂交水稻, 2009, 24(2): 72-77. |
Li M Y, Shi Q H, Wang T, Fang H L, Pan X H, Tan X M.Effects of different transplanting densities on the population development and grain yield of double cropping super rice.Hybrid Rice, 2009, 24(2): 72-77. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 龙旭. 水稻强化栽培不同移栽秧龄、密度的研究. 成都: 四川农业大学, 2013. |
Long X.Study on the different seedling ages and densities of SRI. Chengdu: Sichuan Agricultural University, 2010. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 朱聪聪, 张洪程, 郭保卫, 曹利强, 江峰, 葛梦婕, 花劲, 宋云生, 周兴涛, 霍中洋, 许轲, 戴其根, 魏海燕, 朱大伟. 钵苗机插密度对不同类型水稻产量及光合物质生产特性的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40(1): 122-133. |
Zhu C C, Zhang H C, Guo B W, Cao L Q, Jiang F, Ge M J, Hua J, Song Y S, Zhou X T, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Dai Q G, Wei H Y, Zhu D W.Effect of planting density on yield and photosynthate production characteristics in different types of rice with bowl mechanical-transplanting method.Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40(1): 122-133. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 陈小荣, 潘晓华. 旱育长秧龄抛栽水稻的养分及干物质积累特性初步研究. 中国水稻科学, 2001, 15(2): 34-39. |
Chen X R, Pan X H.Preliminary study on the accumulation characters of nutrient and dry matter of dry land-raised long-age seedlings associated with scattered-planting in rice.Chin J Rice Sci, 2001, 15(2): 34-39. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 刘奇华, 吴修, 陈博聪, 马加清, 高洁, 张士永, 陈峰. 长秧龄机插稻氮素利用特性及其与环境温度的相关性. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(22): 23-31. |
Liu Q H, Wu X, Chen B C, Ma J Q, Gao J, Zhang S Y, Chen F.Nitrogen utilization in mechanical transplanted rice with long seedling age and its correlation with environmental temperatures.Trans CSAE, 2013, 29(22): 23-31. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | 陈海飞, 冯洋, 蔡红梅, 徐芳森, 周卫, 刘芳, 庞再明, 李登荣. 氮肥与移栽密度互作对低产田水稻群体结构及产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(6): 1319-1328. |
Chen H F, Feng Y, Cai H M, Xu F S, Zhou W, Liu F, Pang Z M, Li D R.Effect of the interaction of nitrogen and transplanting density on the rice population structure and grain yield in low-yield paddy fields.Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2014, 20(6): 1319-1328. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] | 赵黎明, 李明, 郑殿峰, 顾春梅, 那永光, 解保胜. 灌溉方式与种植密度对寒地水稻产量及光合物质生产特性的影响. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(6): 159-169. |
Zhao L M, Li M, Zheng D F, Gu C M, Na Y G, Xie B S, Effects of irrigation methods and rice planting densities on yield and photosynthetic characteristics of matter production in cold area.Trans CSAE, 2015, 31(6): 159-169. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 郭展, 张运波. 水稻对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应及分子调控研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[2] | 韦还和, 马唯一, 左博源, 汪璐璐, 朱旺, 耿孝宇, 张翔, 孟天瑶, 陈英龙, 高平磊, 许轲, 霍中洋, 戴其根. 盐、干旱及其复合胁迫对水稻产量和品质形成影响的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[3] | 吕宙, 易秉怀, 陈平平, 周文新, 唐文帮, 易镇邪. 施氮量与移栽密度对小粒型杂交水稻产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 422-436. |
[4] | 赵艺婷, 谢可冉, 高逖, 崔克辉. 水稻分蘖期干旱锻炼对幼穗分化期高温下穗发育和产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 277-289. |
[5] | 周甜, 吴少华, 康建宏, 吴宏亮, 杨生龙, 王星强, 李昱, 黄玉峰. 不同种植模式对水稻籽粒淀粉含量及淀粉关键酶活性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 303-315. |
[6] | 彭显龙, 董强, 张辰, 李鹏飞, 李博琳, 刘智蕾, 于彩莲. 不同土壤条件下秸秆还田量对土壤还原性物质及水稻生长的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(2): 198-210. |
[7] | 朱旺, 张翔, 耿孝宇, 张哲, 陈英龙, 韦还和, 戴其根, 许轲, 朱广龙, 周桂生, 孟天瑶. 盐-旱复合胁迫下水稻根系的形态和生理特征及其与产量形成的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(6): 617-627. |
[8] | 邹宇傲, 吴启侠, 周乾顺, 朱建强, 晏军. 孕穗期杂交中稻对淹涝胁迫的响应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(6): 642-656. |
[9] | 袁沛, 周旋, 杨威, 尹凌洁, 靳拓, 彭建伟, 荣湘民, 田昌. 化肥减氮配施对洞庭湖区双季稻产量和田面水氮磷流失风险的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(5): 518-528. |
[10] | 肖大康, 胡仁, 韩天富, 张卫峰, 侯俊, 任科宇. 氮肥用量和运筹对我国水稻产量及其构成因子影响的整合分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(5): 529-542. |
[11] | 黄亚茹, 徐鹏, 王乐乐, 贺一哲, 王辉, 柯健, 何海兵, 武立权, 尤翠翠. 外源海藻糖对粳稻品系W1844籽粒灌浆特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[12] | 高欠清, 任孝俭, 翟中兵, 郑普兵, 吴源芬, 崔克辉. 头季穗肥和促芽肥对再生稻再生芽生长及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 405-414. |
[13] | 王文婷, 马佳颖, 李光彦, 符卫蒙, 李沪波, 林洁, 陈婷婷, 奉保华, 陶龙兴, 符冠富, 秦叶波. 高温下不同施肥量对水稻产量品质形成的影响及其与能量代谢的关系分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
[14] | 杨晓龙, 王彪, 汪本福, 张枝盛, 张作林, 杨蓝天, 程建平, 李阳. 不同水分管理方式对旱直播水稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
[15] | 魏晓东, 宋雪梅, 赵凌, 赵庆勇, 陈涛, 路凯, 朱镇, 黄胜东, 王才林, 张亚东. 硅锌肥及其施用方式对南粳46产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 295-306. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||