中国水稻科学 ›› 2018, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 226-236.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2018.7149
张浪, 周玲红, 魏甲彬, 成小琳, 徐华勤*(), 肖志祥, 唐启源, 唐剑武
收稿日期:
2017-12-15
修回日期:
2018-03-13
出版日期:
2018-05-10
发布日期:
2018-05-10
通讯作者:
徐华勤
基金资助:
Lang ZHANG, Linghong ZHOU, Jiabin WEI, Xiaolin CHENG, Huaqin XU*(), Zhixiang XIAO, Qiyuan TANG, Jianwu TANG
Received:
2017-12-15
Revised:
2018-03-13
Online:
2018-05-10
Published:
2018-05-10
Contact:
Huaqin XU
摘要:
【目的】以长江中下游地区冬季休闲稻田为研究对象,研究冬季种养制度对后季稻田土壤肥力及水稻产量的影响,以期为南方稻田生态保育提供理论依据。【方法】设置紫云英养鸡(milk vetch+ chicken, MC)、黑麦草养鸡(ryegrass + chicken, RC)、单种紫云英(milk vetch, M)、单种黑麦草(ryegrass, R)及冬闲(winter fallow, WF) 5个处理。【结果】冬季种养期间,MC和RC两处理水稻产量均显著高于其他处理,且MC处理增产效果最佳。MC和RC两处理能显著提高双季稻田有机质、全氮、铵态氮和硝态氮含量,与冬闲相比分别提高了17.36%和22.95%、73.73%和250.48%、76.36%和85.11%、67.89%和70.05%;土壤全磷和速效磷含量以M处理最高;各处理对全钾含量影响不大。相关分析表明,水稻理论产量与成熟期土壤硝态氮、铵态氮、全氮、有机质含量显著相关(P<0.05),冬季种养主要通过提高有效穗数影响水稻产量。【结论】与冬闲和单种绿肥相比,绿肥过腹还田有利于土壤有机质、全氮、铵态氮、硝态氮含量的提高;与单种绿肥相比,绿肥过腹还田更有利于水稻分蘖数、叶面积系数和干物质量与稻谷产量的形成,且紫云英养鸡处理效果最显著。冬季种养结合模式下,有机质、全氮、铵态氮、硝态氮利于增源扩库,促进水稻增产。因此,冬闲田种养结合可满足后季水稻生长的养分需求,在稻田生态保育的基础上促进水稻增产,对长江中下游地区稻田可持续发展具有极其重要的指导意义。
中图分类号:
张浪, 周玲红, 魏甲彬, 成小琳, 徐华勤, 肖志祥, 唐启源, 唐剑武. 冬季种养结合对双季稻生长与土壤肥力的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(3): 226-236.
Lang ZHANG, Linghong ZHOU, Jiabin WEI, Xiaolin CHENG, Huaqin XU, Zhixiang XIAO, Qiyuan TANG, Jianwu TANG. Effects ofRicePlanting Combined with ChickenRaisingin Winter on Double-cropping Rice Growth and Soil Fertility[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2018, 32(3): 226-236.
图1 种养结合对双季稻田土壤有机质含量的影响 MC–紫云英养鸡; RC–黑麦草养鸡;R–黑麦草;M–紫云英; WF–冬闲。柱上相同小写字母表示同一时期不同处理间差异未达0.05显著水平。下同。
Fig.1. Effects of rice planting combined with chicken grazing on soil organic matter in double-croppingpaddyfield. MC, Milk vetch+chicken; RC, Ryegrass + chicken; R, Ryegrass; M, Milk vetch; WF, Winterfallow.The same as below.
图2 种养结合对双季稻田土壤全氮、磷、钾含量的影响
Fig.2. Effects of rice planting combined with chicken grazingon soil total nitrogen content, total phosphorus content and total potassium content in double-croppingpaddyfield.
图3 种养结合对稻田土壤铵态氮含量的影响 A–早稻;B–晚稻。MC–紫云英养鸡; RC–黑麦草养鸡;R–黑麦草;M–紫云英; WF–冬闲。下同。
Fig.3. Effects of rice planting combined with chicken grazing on ammonium nitrogen content in soil of paddyfield. A,Early rice;B, Later rice. MC, Milk vetch+ chicken; RC, Ryegrass + chicken; R, Ryegrass; M, Milk vetch; WF, Winterfallow.The same as below.
处理 Treatment | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number (×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Grain number per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate /% | 千粒重 Thousand-grain Weight/g (g) | 理论产量 Theoretical yield /(t·hm-2) | 实际产量 Actual yield /(t·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
早稻 Early rice growth period | ||||||
RC | 310.27±12.93a | 113±3.1ab | 76.71±0.02a | 26.29±0.94a | 7.03±0.09a | 6.19±0.17a |
MC | 301.97±3.38ab | 116±3.6ab | 75.47±0.03ab | 26.81±0.86a | 7.12±0.07a | 6.34±0.13a |
R | 280.03±2.22b | 111±1.2b | 79.87±0.04a | 26.95±0.44a | 6.69±0.04b | 6.17±0.17ab |
M | 283.78±1.37b | 124±0.9a | 70.17±0.01b | 26.67±0.35a | 6.59±0.14b | 6.06±0.05ab |
WF | 244.50±3.28c | 113±4.2ab | 79.82±0.03a | 27.63±0.28a | 6.08±0.08c | 5.64±0.12b |
晚稻 Later rice growth period | ||||||
RC | 396.64±10.61ab | 88.8±1.2c | 82.97±0.01ab | 27.37±0.14a | 8.00±0.17a | 7.15±0.18a |
MC | 424.44±6.13a | 84.7±1.4d | 82.62±0.02ab | 27.53±0.10a | 8.17±0.16a | 7.04±0.18a |
R | 371.14±11.89bc | 90.5±0.7bc | 80.77±0.01ab | 27.26±0.11a | 7.39±0.10b | 6.70±0.24ab |
M | 356.31±5.35c | 96.0±0.1a | 78.94±0.02b | 27.32±0.23a | 7.37±0.00b | 6.89±0.17a |
WF | 318.21±19.77d | 92.7±1.2ab | 83.58±0.01a | 27.38±0.06a | 6.74±0.24c | 6.10±0.35b |
表1 种养结合对水稻产量构成因素的影响
Table 1 Effects of rice planting combined with chicken grazing on yield components of rice.
处理 Treatment | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number (×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Grain number per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate /% | 千粒重 Thousand-grain Weight/g (g) | 理论产量 Theoretical yield /(t·hm-2) | 实际产量 Actual yield /(t·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
早稻 Early rice growth period | ||||||
RC | 310.27±12.93a | 113±3.1ab | 76.71±0.02a | 26.29±0.94a | 7.03±0.09a | 6.19±0.17a |
MC | 301.97±3.38ab | 116±3.6ab | 75.47±0.03ab | 26.81±0.86a | 7.12±0.07a | 6.34±0.13a |
R | 280.03±2.22b | 111±1.2b | 79.87±0.04a | 26.95±0.44a | 6.69±0.04b | 6.17±0.17ab |
M | 283.78±1.37b | 124±0.9a | 70.17±0.01b | 26.67±0.35a | 6.59±0.14b | 6.06±0.05ab |
WF | 244.50±3.28c | 113±4.2ab | 79.82±0.03a | 27.63±0.28a | 6.08±0.08c | 5.64±0.12b |
晚稻 Later rice growth period | ||||||
RC | 396.64±10.61ab | 88.8±1.2c | 82.97±0.01ab | 27.37±0.14a | 8.00±0.17a | 7.15±0.18a |
MC | 424.44±6.13a | 84.7±1.4d | 82.62±0.02ab | 27.53±0.10a | 8.17±0.16a | 7.04±0.18a |
R | 371.14±11.89bc | 90.5±0.7bc | 80.77±0.01ab | 27.26±0.11a | 7.39±0.10b | 6.70±0.24ab |
M | 356.31±5.35c | 96.0±0.1a | 78.94±0.02b | 27.32±0.23a | 7.37±0.00b | 6.89±0.17a |
WF | 318.21±19.77d | 92.7±1.2ab | 83.58±0.01a | 27.38±0.06a | 6.74±0.24c | 6.10±0.35b |
参数 Parameter | 理论产量 Theoretical yield /(t·hm-2) | 分蘖 Tiller number | 叶面积指数 LAI | 干物质量 Dry matter /(kg·m2) | 有效穗数 Effective panicles /(×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Grain number /panicle | 千粒重 Thousand-grain weight/g | 结实率 Seed-setting rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
早稻Early rice growth duration | ||||||||
硝态氮Nitrate N | 0.8079 | 0.4603 | 0.5006 | 0.6516 | 0.8181 | 0.7393 | 0.6230 | 0.4240 |
铵态氮Ammonium N | 0.9294* | 0.6808 | 0.9340* | 0.8906* | 0.9153* | 0.5249 | 0.7949 | 0.2819 |
速效磷Available P | 0.6319 | 0.8815* | 0.9440* | 0.6460 | 0.5780 | 0.0262 | 0.7212 | 0.6733 |
全氮Total N | 0.9458* | 0.4306 | 0.8484 | 0.9175* | 0.9613** | 0.6841 | 0.6862 | 0.1780 |
全磷Total P | 0.6121 | 0.7080 | 0.9408* | 0.6541 | 0.5845 | 0.0779 | 0.6065 | 0.7363 |
全钾Total K | 0.2133 | 0.3907 | 0.0594 | 0.0078 | 0.2261 | 0.3051 | 0.1966 | 0.5978 |
有机质Organic matter | 0.9530* | 0.6363 | 0.8727 | 0.9528* | 0.9107* | 0.4969 | 0.8764 | 0.3024 |
晚稻 Late rice growth duration | ||||||||
硝态氮Nitrate N | 0.9036* | 0.781 | 0.7894 | 0.8796* | 0.9817** | 0.1293 | 0.2138 | 0.2138 |
铵态氮Ammonium N | 0.9256* | 0.4757 | 0.7409 | 0.7412 | 0.8095 | 0.0241 | 0.7779 | 0.7779 |
速效磷Available P | 0.3315 | 0.6893 | 0.6656 | 0.6503 | 0.5027 | 0.8240 | 0.2028 | 0.2028 |
全氮Total N | 0.8767 | 0.8065 | 0.9501* | 0.9185* | 0.7901 | 0.2763 | 0.5428 | 0.5428 |
全磷Total P | 0.2902 | 0.8162 | 0.6131 | 0.6348 | 0.4519 | 0.5934 | 0.4041 | 0.4041 |
全钾Total K | 0.0943 | 0.3972 | 0.5615 | 0.4173 | 0.1032 | 0.9113* | 0.1248 | 0.1248 |
有机质Organic matter | 0.8799* | 0.9647** | 0.9328* | 0.9852** | 0.9431* | 0.3094 | 0.1522 | 0.1522 |
表2 双季稻产量、各产量构成因素与土壤理化性状之间的相关性
Table 2 Correlation between rice yields, yield components and soil chemical properties.
参数 Parameter | 理论产量 Theoretical yield /(t·hm-2) | 分蘖 Tiller number | 叶面积指数 LAI | 干物质量 Dry matter /(kg·m2) | 有效穗数 Effective panicles /(×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Grain number /panicle | 千粒重 Thousand-grain weight/g | 结实率 Seed-setting rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
早稻Early rice growth duration | ||||||||
硝态氮Nitrate N | 0.8079 | 0.4603 | 0.5006 | 0.6516 | 0.8181 | 0.7393 | 0.6230 | 0.4240 |
铵态氮Ammonium N | 0.9294* | 0.6808 | 0.9340* | 0.8906* | 0.9153* | 0.5249 | 0.7949 | 0.2819 |
速效磷Available P | 0.6319 | 0.8815* | 0.9440* | 0.6460 | 0.5780 | 0.0262 | 0.7212 | 0.6733 |
全氮Total N | 0.9458* | 0.4306 | 0.8484 | 0.9175* | 0.9613** | 0.6841 | 0.6862 | 0.1780 |
全磷Total P | 0.6121 | 0.7080 | 0.9408* | 0.6541 | 0.5845 | 0.0779 | 0.6065 | 0.7363 |
全钾Total K | 0.2133 | 0.3907 | 0.0594 | 0.0078 | 0.2261 | 0.3051 | 0.1966 | 0.5978 |
有机质Organic matter | 0.9530* | 0.6363 | 0.8727 | 0.9528* | 0.9107* | 0.4969 | 0.8764 | 0.3024 |
晚稻 Late rice growth duration | ||||||||
硝态氮Nitrate N | 0.9036* | 0.781 | 0.7894 | 0.8796* | 0.9817** | 0.1293 | 0.2138 | 0.2138 |
铵态氮Ammonium N | 0.9256* | 0.4757 | 0.7409 | 0.7412 | 0.8095 | 0.0241 | 0.7779 | 0.7779 |
速效磷Available P | 0.3315 | 0.6893 | 0.6656 | 0.6503 | 0.5027 | 0.8240 | 0.2028 | 0.2028 |
全氮Total N | 0.8767 | 0.8065 | 0.9501* | 0.9185* | 0.7901 | 0.2763 | 0.5428 | 0.5428 |
全磷Total P | 0.2902 | 0.8162 | 0.6131 | 0.6348 | 0.4519 | 0.5934 | 0.4041 | 0.4041 |
全钾Total K | 0.0943 | 0.3972 | 0.5615 | 0.4173 | 0.1032 | 0.9113* | 0.1248 | 0.1248 |
有机质Organic matter | 0.8799* | 0.9647** | 0.9328* | 0.9852** | 0.9431* | 0.3094 | 0.1522 | 0.1522 |
[1] | 张北赢, 陈天林, 王兵. 长期施用化肥对土壤质量的影响. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(11): 182-187. |
Zhang B Y, Chen T L, Wang B.Effects of long-term uses of chemical fertilizers on soil quality.Chin Agric Sci Bull,2010,26(11):182-187.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | Chen Z M, Wang H Y, Liu X W, Zhao X L, Lu D J, Zhou J M.Changes in soil microbial community and organic carbon fractions under short-term straw return in a rice-wheat cropping system.SoilTill Res, 2017, 165: 121-127. |
[3] | Lee C H, Park K D, Jung K Y, Lee D, Ali M A, Gutierrez J, Kim P J.Effect of Chinese milk vetch (Astragalus sinicus L.) as a green manure on rice productivity and methane emission in paddy soil. Agric, Ecosys & Environ, 2010, 138(3): 343-347. |
[4] | 黄晶, 高菊生, 刘淑军, 曹卫东, 张杨珠. 冬种紫云英对水稻产量及其养分吸收的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2013(1): 88-92. |
Huang J, Gao J S, Liu S J, Cao W D, Zhang Y Z.Effect of Chinese milk vetch in winter on rice yield and its nutrient uptake.Chin Soil Fer, 2013(1): 88-92. (in Chinese) | |
[5] | Brookes P C, Landman A, Puden G.Chloroform fumigation and the release of soil nitrogen: A rapid direct extraction method to measure microbial biomass nitrogen in soil.Soil Biol Biochem, 1985(17): 837-842. |
[6] | 王丹英, 彭建, 徐春梅, 赵锋章, 章秀福. 油菜作绿肥还田的培肥效应及对水稻生长的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(1): 85-91. |
Wang D Y, Peng J, Xu C M, Zhao F, Zhang X F.Effects of rape straw manuring on soil fertility and rice growth. ChineseJ Rice Sci, 2011,26(1): 85-91. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | Wang J Z, Wang X J, Xu M G, Feng G, Zhang W J, Lu C A.Crop yield and soil organic matter after long-term straw return to soil in China.Nutr CyclAgroecos, 2015, 102(3): 371-381. |
[8] | 杨滨娟, 黄国勤, 王超, 林青, 徐宁. 稻田冬种绿肥对水稻产量和土壤肥力的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(10): 1209-1216. |
Yang B J, Huang G Q, Wang C, Lin qing, Xu ning. Effects of winter green manure cultivation on rice and fertility in paddy field.Chin J Eco-Agric,2013, 21(10): 1209-1216. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 徐华勤, 崔国贤, 杨知建, 赵志力, 杨凤飞. 冬闲苎麻田套种牧草对杂草生物多样性的影响. 草业科学, 2014, 31(1): 139-143 . |
Xu H Q, Cui G X, Yang Z X, Zhao Z L, Yang F F.Effects of interplanting cold-reason grass on weeds biodiversity in ramie plantation in winter.Pratacul Sci, 2014, 31(1): 139-143. (in Chinese) | |
[10] | 杨曾平, 徐明岗, 聂军, 郑圣先, 高菊生, 谢坚, 廖育林. 长期冬种绿肥对双季稻种植下红壤性水稻土质量的影响及其评价. 水土保持学报, 2011, 25(3): 92-97,102. |
Yang C P, Xu M G, Nie J, Zheng S X, Gao J S, Xie J, Liao Y L.Long-term regional green manure for cropping plant under the influence of red soil paddy soilquality and its evaluation.J Soil Water Conser, 2011, 25(3): 92-97, 102. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 吴增琪, 朱贵平, 张惠琴, 陈惠哲. 紫云英结荚翻耕还田对土壤肥力及水稻产量的影响. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(15): 270-273. |
Wu Z Q, Zhu G P, Zhang H Q, Chen H Z.Effects of Astragalus sinicus returning to field in maturity on soil fertility and yield of rice.Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2010, 26(15): 270-273. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 张珺穜, 曹卫东, 徐昌旭, 刘佳. 种植利用紫云英对稻田土壤微生物及酶活性的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2012 (1): 19-25. |
Zhang J T, Cao W D, Xu C X, Liu J.Effects of incorporation of mick vetch(Astragalus sinicus)on microbial populations and enzyme activities of poddey soil in Jiangxi. Soil Fert Sci China, 2012(1):19-25. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 潘圣刚, 莫钊文, 田华, 聂俊, 罗一鸣, 段美洋, 唐湘如. 源库调节对水稻生长发育的影响. 广东农业科学, 2012, 39(14): 1-3 |
Pan S G, Mo Z W, Tian H, Lie J, Luo Y M, Duan M Y, Tang X R.Effects of source-sink regulation on the growth of rice.Guangdong Agric Sci, 2012, 39(14): 1-3. (in Chinese) | |
[14] | 江学海, 周维佳, 李敏, 周彩霞, 罗德强, 姬广梅, 李立江, 丁艳锋, 王绍华, 李刚华. 紫云英还田对常规红米水稻产量和品质的影响. 中国稻米, 2016, 22(6): 34-37. |
Jiang X H, Zhou W J, Li M, Zhou C X, Luo D Q, Ji G M, Li L J, Ding Y F, Wang S H, Li G H.Effects of total returning of Astragalus sinicus on yield and quality of the conventional red rice varieties.China Rice, 2016, 22(6): 34-37. (in Chinese) | |
[15] | 何录秋, 薛灿辉, 张亚. 经济绿肥在湖南农田循环生产中应用研究——经济绿肥品种比较. 耕作与栽培, 2010(5): 24-25,44. |
He L Q, Xue X H, Zhang Y.Application of economic green fertilizer in farmland recycling production in hunan province-comparison of economic green fertilizer variety.TillCult, 2010(5): 24-25, 44. (in Chinese) | |
[16] | 宿庆瑞. 玉米秸秆过腹还田培肥增产综合技术与效益的研究. 黑龙江农业科学, 1997(6): 36-37. |
Su Q R.Study on the comprehensive technology and benefit of increasing yield and yield of corn straw.Heilongjiang Agric Sci, 1997(6): 36-37. (in Chinese) | |
[17] | 辛国荣, 杨中艺, 徐亚幸,陈三有, 郭仁东. “黑麦草-水稻”草田轮作系统的研究: V.稻田冬种黑麦草的优质髙产栽培技术. 草业学报, 2000, 9(2): 17-23 . |
Xin G R, Yang Z Y, Xu Y X, Chen S Y, Guo R D.Cultivation technology for high yield and quality ryegrass fodder in a ryegrass-rice rotation system.Acta Pratacul Sin, 2000, 9(2): 17-23. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 唐剑武, 魏甲斌, 徐华勤, 唐先亮. 用于农闲田轮牧养鸡的移动鸡笼: CN204653383U, 2015-09-23. |
Tang J W, Wei J B, Xu H Q, Tang X L. A mobile chicken cage for farming and raising chickens in farmlands: CN204653383U, 2015-09-23. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 周玲红, 魏甲彬, 唐先亮, 成小琳, 肖志祥, 徐华勤, 唐剑武. 冬季种养结合对稻田土壤微生物量及有效碳氮库的影响. 草业学报, 2016, 25(11):103-114. |
Zhou L H, Wei J B, Tang X L, Chen X L, Xiao Z X, Xu H Q, Tang J W.Effects of winter green manure crops with and without chicken rearing on microbial biomass and effective carbon and nitrogen pools in a double-crop rice paddy soil.Acta Pratacul Sin, 2016, 26(11): 103-114. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 魏甲彬, 周玲红, 徐华勤, 唐启源, 傅志强, 成小琳, 肖志祥, 唐剑武. 南方种养结合模式对冬季稻田净碳交换和不同土层活性碳氮转化的影响. 草业学报, 2017, 26(07): 138-146. |
Wei J B,Zhou L H,Xu H Q, Tang Q Y, Fu Z Q, Chen X L, Xiao Z X, Tang J W.Effects of forage planting and chickens on net carbon exchange and transformation of soil active carbon and nitrogen at different layers in paddy fields in south China in winter.Acta Pratacul Sin, 2017, 26(07):138-146. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 鲍士旦. 土壤农化分析.北京:中国农业出版社,2000. |
Bostown. Analysis of soil agronomation. Beijing: China agricultural press, 2000. (in Chinese) | |
[22] | 涂成, 黄威, 陈安磊, 宋歌, 陈春兰, 王卫, 谢小立. 测定土壤硝态氮的紫外分光光度法和镉柱还原法比较. 土壤, 2016, 48(01): 147-151. |
Tu C, Huang W, Chen A L, Sun G, Chen C L, Wang W, Xie X L.Comparison between ultraviolet spectrophotometry and cadmium reduction method in determination of soil nitrate-N.Soils, 2016, 48(1): 147-151. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 潘福霞, 鲁剑巍, 刘威, 耿明建, 李小坤, 曹卫东. 三种不同绿肥的腐解和养分释放特征研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011, 17(1): 216-223. |
Pan F X, Lu J W, Liu W, Gen M J, Li X K, Cao W D.Study on characteristics of decomposing and nutrients releasing of three kinds of green manure crops.Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2011, 17(1): 216-223. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | Chang L, Meng L, Jun C, Bo L, Chang M F.Effects of straw carbon input on carbon dynamics in agricultural soils: Ameta-analysis.Glob Chan Biol, 2014, 20(5): 1366-1381. |
[25] | 王飞, 林诚, 林新坚, 何春梅, 李清华, 李昱, 黄功标, 钟少杰. 连续翻压紫云英对福建单季稻产量与化肥氮素吸收、分配及残留的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(4): 896-904. |
Wang F, Lin C, Lin X J, He C M, Li Q H, Li X, Huang G B, Zhong S J.Effects of continuous turnover of Astragalus sinicus on rice yield and N absorption,distribution and residue in single-cropping rice regions of Fujian Province. Plant Nutr Fer Sci, 2014, 20(4):896-904. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 乔伟艳, 顾洪如, 沈益新. 稻茬种植多花黑麦草对土壤肥力和微生物组成的影响. 草业科学, 2017, 34(2): 240-245. |
Qiao W Y, Gu H R, Shen Y X.Effects of planting Italian ryegrass in winter fallow fields on soil fertility and microorganisms.Pratacul Sci, 2017,34(02):240-245. (in Chinese) | |
[27] | 黎国喜, 李厚金, 杨中艺, 辛国荣, 唐湘如, 袁剑刚. “黑麦草-水稻”草田轮作系统的根际效应: V.意大利黑麦草(Lolium multiflorum)根茬腐解物中存在促水稻生长活性物质的证据. 中山大学学报:自然科学版, 2008(4):88-93. |
Li G X, Li H J, Yang Z Y, Xin G R, Tang X R, Yuan J G.The rhizisphere effects in “Italian ryegrass-Rice” rotational system. V. Evidences for the existence of rice stimulators in decaying products of Italian ryegrass residues.Acta Sci Nat Univ Sun, 2008(4):88-93. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 李江涛, 钟晓兰, 赵其国. 畜禽粪便施用对稻麦轮作土壤质量的影响. 生态学报, 2011, 31(10): 2837-2845. |
Li J T, Zhong X L, Zhao Q G.Enhancement of soil quality in a rice-wheat rotation after long-term application of poultry litter and livestock manure.Acta Ecol Sin,2011,31(10):2837-2845. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 张振都, 吴景贵, 石峰. 不同绿肥与牛粪混合堆腐过程中有机组分的动态变化.土壤通报, 2012, 43(1): 87-92. |
Zhang Z D,Wu J G,Shi F.Dynamics of Organic Components during Decomposition of Cow Manure Mixed with Different Green Manures.Chin J Soil Sci, 2012,43(1):87-92. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 韩天龙,李宝栋,王敏,赵瑞霞,红敏,萨其仍贵,乌仁图雅,李志明. 不同堆放时间对鸡粪营养成分的影响. 黑龙江畜牧兽医,2016(6):52-54. |
Han T L, Li B D, Wang M, Zhao R X, Hong M, Sa Q R G, Wu R T Y, Li Z M. Effect of different stacking time on the nutritional components in chicken manure.Heilongjiang Animal Sci Veter Med,2016(6):52-54. (in Chinese) | |
[31] | 杨志辉, 黄璜, 王华. 稻-鸭复合生态系统稻田土壤质量研究. 土壤通报, 2004, 35(2): 117-121. |
Yang Z H, Huang H, Wang H.Paddy soil quality of a wetland rice-duck complex ecosystem.Chin J Soil Sci, 2004,35(2):117-121. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] | 赵鲁, 史冬燕, 高小叶, 安渊. 紫花苜蓿绿肥对水稻产量和土壤肥力的影响. 草业科学, 2012, 29(7): 1142-1147. |
Zhao L, Shi DY, Gao XY, An Y.Effects of alfalfa green manure on rice yield and soil fertility.Pratacul Sci, 2012,29(7):1142-1147. (in Chinese) | |
[33] | 张影, 刘星, 焦瑞锋, 李东方, 任秀娟, 吴大付, 陈锡岭. 生物质炭与有机物料配施的土壤培肥效果及对玉米生长的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(9): 1287-1297. |
Zhang Y, Liu X, Jiao R F, Li D F, Ren X J, Wu D F, Chen X L.Effects of combined biochar and organic matter on soil fertility and maize growth.Chin J Eco-Agric, 2017, 25(9): 1287-1297. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[34] | 马义虎, 葛立立, 杨凯鹏, 刘立军. 有机肥对水稻生长发育·产量及土壤环境的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(16): 8888-8891, 8894. |
Ma Y H, Ge L L,Yang K P, Liu L J.Effects of organic fertilizer on growth and yield of rice and soil environment.J Anhui Agri Sci 2012, 40(16):8888-8891,8894. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[35] | 慕美财,张曰秋, 崔从光, 衣淑玉, 麻常运, 荀艳波. 冬小麦高产群体源-库-流特征及指标研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2010, 18(1): 35-40. |
Mu M C, Zhang Y Q, Cui CG, Yi S Y, Ma C Y, Xun Y B.Analysis of source-sink-translocation characteristics and indicators for hige-yield colony of winter wheat.Chin J Eco-Agric, 2010,18(01):35-40.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[36] | 胡志华, 李大明, 徐小林, 余喜初, 柳开楼, 叶会财,周利军, 胡惠文, 黄庆海. 不同有机培肥模式下双季稻田碳汇效应与收益评估. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(2): 157-165. |
Hu Z H, Li D M, Xu X L, Yu X C, Liu K L, Ye H C, Zhou L J, Hu H W, Huang Q H.Evaluation of net carbon sink effects and costs/benefits of double-ropped rice fields under different organic fertilizer applications. Chin J Eco-Agric, 2017, 25(2):157-165. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[37] | 马艳芹,钱晨晨, 邓丽萍, 黄国勤. 紫云英配施氮肥对双季稻产量、干物质量及氮素吸收利用的影响. 核农学报, 2017, 31(12): 2399-2407. |
Ma Y Q, Qian C C, Deng L P, Huang G Q.Effects of combining chinese milk vetch with nitrogen fertilizer on grain and dry matter yield, nitrogen absorption and utilization of double-cropping rice.J Nucl Agric Sci, 2017, 31(12): 2399-2407. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[38] | 万水霞, 唐杉,蒋光月, 李帆, 郭熙盛, 王允青, 曹卫东. 紫云英与化肥配施对土壤微生物特征和作物产量的影响. 草业学报, 2016, 25(6): 109-117. |
Wan S X, Tang S, Jiang G Y, Li F, Guo X S, Wang Y Q, Cao W D.Effects of Chinese milk vetch manure and fertilizer on soil microbial characteristies and yield of rice.Acta Pratacul Sin, 2016,25(6):109-117. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[39] | 杨滨娟, 黄国勤, 王超, 林青, 徐宁. 稻田冬种绿肥对水稻产量和土壤肥力的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2013, 21(10): 1209-1216. |
Yang B J,Huang G Q,Wang C, Li Q, Xu N.Effects of Winter green manure cultivation on rice and fertility in paddy field.Chin J Eco-Agric,2013,21(10):1209-1216. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[40] | 黄山, 汤军, 廖萍, 曾勇军, 潘晓华, 石庆华. 冬种紫云英和稻草还田下氮钾肥减量施用对双季水稻产量和养分吸收的影响. 江西农业大学学报, 2016, 38(4): 607-615. |
Huang S, Tang J, Liao P, Zeng Y J, Pan X H, Shi Q H.Yield and nutrient uptake of double rice affected by winter legume covering ( Astragalus sinicus L. ) and straw retention with reduced rates of inorganic nitrogen and potassium fertilizers.Acta Agric Univ Jiangxi, 2016, 38(4): 607-615. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[41] | 李洁静, 潘根兴, 张旭辉, 费庆华, 李志鹏, 周萍, 郑聚锋, 邱多生. 太湖地区长期施肥条件下水稻-油菜轮作生态系统净碳汇效应及收益评估. 应用生态学报, 2009, 20(7): 1664-1670. |
Li J J,Pan G X,Zhang X H, Fei Q H, Li Z P, Zhou P, Zheng J F, Qiu D S.An evaluation of net curbon sink effect and cost/benefits of a rice-rape rotation ecosystem under long-term fertilization from Tai Lake region of China.Chin J Appl Ecol, 2009,20(7):1664-1670. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[42] | 佀国涵,彭成林, 徐祥玉, 徐大兵, 袁家富, 李金华. 稻虾共作模式对涝渍稻田土壤理化性状的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2017, 25(1): 61-68. |
Si G H,Peng C L,Xu D B, Xu D B, Yuan J F, Li J H.Effects of ontegrated rice-crayfish farming system on soil physico-chemical properties in waterlogged paddy soils.Chin J Eco-Agric,2017,25(1):61-68. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[43] | Sara E, Katarina H, Anna M.Soil enzyme activities,microbial community composition and function after 47 years of continuous green manuring.Appl Soil Ecol, 2007, 35(3): 610-620. |
[44] | 章学东, 楼立峰, 严甦, 陈效绘,王竺美. 冬闲田种草养鸡对土壤和后期作物的影响试验. 浙江畜牧兽医, 2010(2): 5-6. |
Zhang X D, Lou L F, Yan S C, Chen X L, Wang Z M.Experimental study on the impact of seedling and chicken breeding on soil and later crops.Zhejiang Anim Hus Vet Med, 2010(2): 5-6. (in Chinese) |
[1] | 郭展, 张运波. 水稻对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应及分子调控研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[2] | 韦还和, 马唯一, 左博源, 汪璐璐, 朱旺, 耿孝宇, 张翔, 孟天瑶, 陈英龙, 高平磊, 许轲, 霍中洋, 戴其根. 盐、干旱及其复合胁迫对水稻产量和品质形成影响的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[3] | 吕宙, 易秉怀, 陈平平, 周文新, 唐文帮, 易镇邪. 施氮量与移栽密度对小粒型杂交水稻产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 422-436. |
[4] | 赵艺婷, 谢可冉, 高逖, 崔克辉. 水稻分蘖期干旱锻炼对幼穗分化期高温下穗发育和产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 277-289. |
[5] | 周甜, 吴少华, 康建宏, 吴宏亮, 杨生龙, 王星强, 李昱, 黄玉峰. 不同种植模式对水稻籽粒淀粉含量及淀粉关键酶活性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 303-315. |
[6] | 彭显龙, 董强, 张辰, 李鹏飞, 李博琳, 刘智蕾, 于彩莲. 不同土壤条件下秸秆还田量对土壤还原性物质及水稻生长的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(2): 198-210. |
[7] | 唐志伟, 朱相成, 张俊, 邓艾兴, 张卫建. 水分调控下绿肥种植和石灰施用对双季稻稻米镉含量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(2): 211-222. |
[8] | 朱旺, 张翔, 耿孝宇, 张哲, 陈英龙, 韦还和, 戴其根, 许轲, 朱广龙, 周桂生, 孟天瑶. 盐-旱复合胁迫下水稻根系的形态和生理特征及其与产量形成的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(6): 617-627. |
[9] | 邹宇傲, 吴启侠, 周乾顺, 朱建强, 晏军. 孕穗期杂交中稻对淹涝胁迫的响应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(6): 642-656. |
[10] | 袁沛, 周旋, 杨威, 尹凌洁, 靳拓, 彭建伟, 荣湘民, 田昌. 化肥减氮配施对洞庭湖区双季稻产量和田面水氮磷流失风险的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(5): 518-528. |
[11] | 肖大康, 胡仁, 韩天富, 张卫峰, 侯俊, 任科宇. 氮肥用量和运筹对我国水稻产量及其构成因子影响的整合分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(5): 529-542. |
[12] | 黄亚茹, 徐鹏, 王乐乐, 贺一哲, 王辉, 柯健, 何海兵, 武立权, 尤翠翠. 外源海藻糖对粳稻品系W1844籽粒灌浆特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[13] | 高欠清, 任孝俭, 翟中兵, 郑普兵, 吴源芬, 崔克辉. 头季穗肥和促芽肥对再生稻再生芽生长及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 405-414. |
[14] | 王文婷, 马佳颖, 李光彦, 符卫蒙, 李沪波, 林洁, 陈婷婷, 奉保华, 陶龙兴, 符冠富, 秦叶波. 高温下不同施肥量对水稻产量品质形成的影响及其与能量代谢的关系分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
[15] | 杨晓龙, 王彪, 汪本福, 张枝盛, 张作林, 杨蓝天, 程建平, 李阳. 不同水分管理方式对旱直播水稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||