Effects of Nitrogen Application and Shading on Yields and Some Physiological Characteristics in Different Rice Genotypes

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2015.02.005

Abstract

Abstract:

Effects of shading at the beginning of heading stage on grain yields and some physiological characteristics under different nitrogen application rates in different rice genotypes were investigated by using Peizataifeng, Yuejingsimiao and Tianyou 998 as test materials. Nitrogen application rate was 0, 120 and 180 kg/hm², which was expressed as NN, MN and HN in order, respectively. The shading treatment was double-deck shade, single-deck shade and no shade, which was expressed as DS, SS and CK, respectively. Compared with NN, leaf area index (LAI), stem dry weight, total dry material weight, dry weight output and export percentage of dry matter in stem and sheath under HN were higher in five days recovery under shade treatment in rice. And photosynthesis rate (P_r) and stomatal conductance (G_s)in the first leaf from the top under HN was higher than that under NN, respectively. Furthermore, grain yield and effective panicle number per hill and total number of spikelets per panicle were significantly higher under HN, whereas seed setting rate and 1000-grain-weight was remarkably fewer than that under NN. Compared with no shade treatment, stem dry weight, total dry material weight, LAI, P_r and G_s declined evidently under DS. And grain yield and effective panicle number per hill decreased significantly, too. There were significant effects of interaction between nitrogen application and shading on LAI, stem dry weight, total dry weight, effective panicle number per hill and yield. Nitrogen application under single-deck shade treatment could reduce harmful effects on LAI, stem dry weight, total dry weight, effective panicle number per hill and grain yield in rice. Among the tested cultivars, super hybrid rice Tianyou 998 was the most sensitive to nitrogen application and shading.

Key words: nitrogen, shading, rice, yield, physiological characteristics

摘要：

以培杂泰丰、粤晶丝苗和天优998为材料,分别设置不施氮、中氮和高氮3个不同的氮肥水平(即施纯氮0、120和180 kg/hm²,依次记为NN、MN、HN),研究始穗期遮荫(分别为双层遮荫、单层遮荫和不遮荫,依次记为DS、SS、CK)对不同基因型水稻产量及一些生理特性的影响。结果表明,与不施氮处理相比,遮荫处理结束后恢复5d高氮显著增加水稻叶面积指数、茎鞘干质量、总干质量、茎鞘物质输出量和茎鞘物质转运率,水稻剑叶的光合速率和气孔导度也显著提高。高氮处理下水稻的收获产量、有效穗数和每穗总粒数显著高于不施氮处理,而结实率和千粒重却显著降低。与不遮荫相比,双层遮荫处理水稻叶面积指数、茎鞘干质量、总干质量、剑叶的光合速率和气孔导度显著降低,双层遮荫处理水稻的收获产量和有效穗数也显著降低。氮肥和遮荫的互作效应对水稻叶面积指数、茎鞘干质量、总干质量、有效穗数以及收获产量的影响也达到显著水平。在单层遮荫条件下,增施氮肥可以减轻遮荫对水稻叶面积指数、叶片干质量、茎鞘干质量、总干质量、有效穗数和收获产量的不利影响。对不同品种而言,超级杂交稻天优998受到氮肥和遮荫的影响更大。

关键词: 氮肥, 遮荫, 水稻, 产量, 生理特性

CLC Number:

Sheng-gang PAN, Xiang-cheng WEN, Zhao-wen MO, Mei-yang DUAN, Hao-ran DONG, Gui-xing HUANG, Hua TIAN, Xiang-ru TANG. Effects of Nitrogen Application and Shading on Yields and Some Physiological Characteristics in Different Rice Genotypes[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2015, 29(2): 141-149.

潘圣刚, 闻祥成, 莫钊文, 段美洋, 董浩然, 黄贵兴, 田华, 唐湘如. 施氮量和遮荫对不同基因型水稻产量及一些生理特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(2): 141-149.

Figures/Tables 4

References 24

[1]	凌启鸿. 作物群体质量. 上海:上海科技出版社, 2000: 11.
[2]	Samarajeewa K, Kojima N, Sakagami J I, et al.The effect of different timing of top dressing of nitrogen application under low light intensity on the yield of rice (Oryza sativa L).Agron Crop Sci, 2005, 191: 99-105.
[3]	Restrepo, Hermann, Garcés, Gabriel.Evaluation of low light intensity at three physiogical stages in the agronomic and physiological responses of two rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars.Agron Colom, 2013, 31(2): 195-200.
[4]	田小海, 吴晨阳, 袁立, 等.普通气候年景下江汉平原超级杂交稻结实率及其与气候条件的关系.中国水稻科学,2010,24( 5):539-543.
[5]	刘奇华,周学标,杨连群,等.生育前期遮光对水稻灌浆期剑叶生理特性及籽粒生长的影响.应用生态学报,2009,20(9):2135-2141.
[6]	朱萍,杨世民,马均,等.遮光对杂交水稻组合生育后期光合特性和产量的影响.作物学报,2008,34(11):2003-2009.
[7]	Zhang J, Li G H, Song Y P, et al.Lodging resistance characteristics of high-yielding rice populations.Field Crops Res, 2014, 161: 64-74.
[8]	Pan S G, Huang S Q, Zhai J, et al.Effects of N management on yield and N uptake of rice in central China.J Integ Agric,2012, 11(12): 1993-2000.
[9]	肖金香. 农业气象学. 北京:高等教育出版社,2009.
[10]	Peng S, Buresh R J, Huang J L, et al.Strategies for overcoming low agrockmic nitrogen use efficiency in irrigated rice systems in China.Field Crop Res, 2006, 96: 37-47.
[11]	官春云. 现代作物栽培学. 北京:高等教育出版社,2011:11.
[12]	朱从桦,孙永健,严奉君,等.晒田强度和氮素穗肥运筹对不同氮效率杂交稻产量及氮素利用的影响.中国水稻科学,2014,28(3):258-266.
[13]	秦建权, 唐启源, 李迪秦, 等.抽穗后光照强度对超级杂交稻干物质生产及氮素吸收与分配的影响.四川农业大学学报,2010,28(1):28-34.
[14]	郭翠花, 高志强, 苗果园.花后遮阴对小麦旗叶光合特性及籽粒产量和品质的影响.作物学报,2010,36(4):673-679.
[15]	王忠. 植物生理学. 北京:中国农业出版社,2009.
[16]	杨东,段留生,谢华安,等.花前光照亏缺对水稻物质积累及生理特性的影响.中国生态农业学报,2011,19(2):347-352.
[17]	刘国顺,云菲,史宏志,等.光、氮及其互作对烤烟含氮化合物含量、抗氧化系统及品质的影响.中国农业科学,2010,43(18):3732-3741.
[18]	孙永健,孙园园,徐徽,等.水氮管理模式与磷钾肥配施对杂交水稻冈优725 养分吸收的影响.中国农业科学,2013,46(7):1335-1346.
[19]	杨虎,戈长水,应武,等.遮荫对水稻冠层叶片 SPAD 值及光合、形态特性参数的影响.植物营养与肥料学报,2014,20(3):580-587.
[20]	曾建敏,彭少兵,崔克辉,黄见良.热带水稻光合特性及氮素光合效率的差异研究.作物学报,2006,32(12):1818-1822.
[21]	刘利,王丽,邓飞,等.遮荫对不同杂交稻组合叶片渗透调节物质含量及保护酶活性的影响.中国水稻科学,2012, 26(5):569-575.
[22]	Ishibashia Y, Okamura K, Miyazaki M, et al.Expression of rice sucrose transporter gene OsSUT1 in sink and source organs shaded during grain filling may affect grain yield and quality.Environ Exp Bot, 2014, 97: 49-54.
[23]	符冠富,李华,陶龙兴,等.灌浆期遮光对水稻籽粒生长和Q酶活性的影响.生态学杂志,2009,28(3):438-444.
[24]	邓飞,王丽,姚雄,等.不同生育阶段遮阴对水稻籽粒充实和产量的影响.四川农业大学学报,2009,27(3):265-270.

处理 Treatment	茎鞘干质量 Stem dry weight /(t·hm^-2)	叶片干质量 Leaf dry weight /(t·hm^-2)	总干质量 Total dry weight /(t·hm^-2)	叶面积指数(LAI)	比叶重 SLW /(mg·cm^-2)
高氮 HN
培杂泰丰 PZ
CK	9.62	1.04	10.66	2.84	4.13
SS	8.53	0.96	9.48	3.07	4.02
DS	7.53	0.91	8.44	2.06	4.42
粤晶丝苗 YJ
CK	12.00	1.49	13.49	3.14	4.74
SS	11.99	1.55	13.54	3.40	4.57
DS	8.62	1.17	9.79	2.64	4.43
天优998 TY
CK	13.29	1.03	14.32	2.95	3.54
SS	9.67	1.03	10.69	2.56	4.02
DS	7.69	0.63	8.31	1.92	3.70
均值 Mean	9.88 a	1.09 a	10.97 a	2.73 a	4.17 b
中氮 MN
培杂泰丰 PZ
CK	7.79	0.65	8.44	1.83	3.95
SS	9.04	0.98	10.02	2.34	4.17
DS	6.38	1.06	7.44	2.05	5.20
粤晶丝苗 YJ
CK	10.99	1.34	12.33	2.93	4.58
SS	9.20	1.05	10.25	2.14	4.93
DS	6.94	0.91	7.85	1.88	4.83
天优998 TY
CK	8.70	0.95	9.65	2.66	3.56
SS	9.27	0.94	10.22	2.17	4.35
DS	9.70	1.03	10.73	2.20	4.70
均值 Mean	8.67 b	0.99 a	9.66 b	2.24 b	4.48 ab
不施氮 NN
培杂泰丰 PZ
CK	6.99	0.78	7.78	1.78	4.43
SS	6.73	0.75	7.48	1.83	4.08
DS	6.95	1.04	7.99	2.42	4.31
粤晶丝苗 YJ
CK	8.68	0.86	9.54	1.66	5.19
SS	9.86	1.21	11.07	2.09	5.78
DS	9.35	0.89	10.25	1.60	5.60
天优998 TY
CK	8.20	0.55	8.75	1.26	4.42
SS	8.14	0.99	9.14	2.44	4.25
DS	7.97	0.99	8.96	2.22	4.46
均值 Mean	8.10 b	0.90 a	9.00 b	1.92 c	4.72 a
变异来源 Variation source
氮肥 Nitrogen(N)	*	ns	*	*	*
品种 Variety(V)	**	**	*	*	*
遮荫 Shading(S)	*	ns	*	*	*
N×V	ns	ns	**	*	*
N×S	*	*	*	*	ns
V×S	ns	*	ns	ns	*
N×V×S	ns	*	ns	*	ns

处理 Treatment	茎鞘干质量 Stem dry weight /(t·hm^-2)	叶片干质量 Leaf dry weight /(t·hm^-2)	总干质量 Total dry weight /(t·hm^-2)	叶面积指数(LAI)	比叶重 SLW /(mg·cm^-2)
高氮 HN
培杂泰丰 PZ
CK	9.62	1.04	10.66	2.84	4.13
SS	8.53	0.96	9.48	3.07	4.02
DS	7.53	0.91	8.44	2.06	4.42
粤晶丝苗 YJ
CK	12.00	1.49	13.49	3.14	4.74
SS	11.99	1.55	13.54	3.40	4.57
DS	8.62	1.17	9.79	2.64	4.43
天优998 TY
CK	13.29	1.03	14.32	2.95	3.54
SS	9.67	1.03	10.69	2.56	4.02
DS	7.69	0.63	8.31	1.92	3.70
均值 Mean	9.88 a	1.09 a	10.97 a	2.73 a	4.17 b
中氮 MN
培杂泰丰 PZ
CK	7.79	0.65	8.44	1.83	3.95
SS	9.04	0.98	10.02	2.34	4.17
DS	6.38	1.06	7.44	2.05	5.20
粤晶丝苗 YJ
CK	10.99	1.34	12.33	2.93	4.58
SS	9.20	1.05	10.25	2.14	4.93
DS	6.94	0.91	7.85	1.88	4.83
天优998 TY
CK	8.70	0.95	9.65	2.66	3.56
SS	9.27	0.94	10.22	2.17	4.35
DS	9.70	1.03	10.73	2.20	4.70
均值 Mean	8.67 b	0.99 a	9.66 b	2.24 b	4.48 ab
不施氮 NN
培杂泰丰 PZ
CK	6.99	0.78	7.78	1.78	4.43
SS	6.73	0.75	7.48	1.83	4.08
DS	6.95	1.04	7.99	2.42	4.31
粤晶丝苗 YJ
CK	8.68	0.86	9.54	1.66	5.19
SS	9.86	1.21	11.07	2.09	5.78
DS	9.35	0.89	10.25	1.60	5.60
天优998 TY
CK	8.20	0.55	8.75	1.26	4.42
SS	8.14	0.99	9.14	2.44	4.25
DS	7.97	0.99	8.96	2.22	4.46
均值 Mean	8.10 b	0.90 a	9.00 b	1.92 c	4.72 a
变异来源 Variation source
氮肥 Nitrogen(N)	*	ns	*	*	*
品种 Variety(V)	**	**	*	*	*
遮荫 Shading(S)	*	ns	*	*	*
N×V	ns	ns	**	*	*
N×S	*	*	*	*	ns
V×S	ns	*	ns	ns	*
N×V×S	ns	*	ns	*	ns

处理 Treatment	始穗期茎鞘干质量 DW of culm and sheath at initial heading stage /(t· hm^-2)	始穗期叶片干质量 DW of leaf at initial heading stage /(t· hm^-2)	成熟期茎鞘干质量 DW of culm and sheath at mature stage /(t· hm^-2)	成熟期穗干质量 DW of panicle at mature stage /(t· hm^-2)	始穗后茎鞘物质输出量 DW output after initial heading /(t· hm^-2)	茎鞘物质输出率 EPMSS /%	茎鞘物质转运率 TPMSS /%
高氮 HN
培杂泰丰 PZ
CK	6.74	1.76	4.08	5.69	2.66	39.40	46.67
SS	6.74	1.76	5.26	5.29	1.48	21.96	27.97
DS	6.74	1.76	4.89	5.53	1.85	27.51	33.55
粤晶丝苗 YJ
CK	7.75	1.80	4.52	6.76	3.23	41.72	47.85
SS	7.75	1.80	5.20	6.38	2.55	32.93	40.04
DS	7.75	1.80	6.10	5.44	1.65	21.29	30.33
天优998 TY
CK	8.45	2.10	5.00	8.14	3.45	40.83	42.38
SS	8.45	2.10	6.06	7.65	2.39	28.25	31.22
DS	8.45	2.10	6.56	5.91	1.89	22.39	32.03
均值 Mean	7.65 a	1.89 a	5.30 a	6.31 a	2.35 a	30.69 a	36.89 ab
中氮 MN
培杂泰丰 PZ
CK	7.41	1.56	4.25	5.30	3.16	42.65	59.65
SS	7.41	1.56	4.93	5.69	2.48	33.50	43.60
DS	7.41	1.56	5.72	5.26	1.69	22.77	32.07
粤晶丝苗 YJ
CK	8.24	1.43	5.72	7.03	2.52	30.64	35.94
SS	8.24	1.43	6.08	6.06	2.16	26.24	35.70
DS	8.24	1.43	6.23	5.20	2.01	24.39	38.66
天优998 TY
CK	7.71	1.38	4.87	6.00	2.84	36.84	47.37
SS	7.71	1.38	5.66	5.35	2.05	26.60	38.34
DS	7.71	1.38	6.16	4.44	1.55	20.13	34.98
均值 Mean	7.79 a	1.46 b	5.51 a	5.59 b	2.27 a	29.31 a	40.70 a
不施氮 NN
培杂泰丰 PZ
CK	7.10	1.94	4.62	5.70	2.48	34.87	43.46
SS	7.10	1.94	4.62	5.35	2.48	34.89	46.26
DS	7.10	1.94	5.19	5.74	1.91	26.88	33.28
粤晶丝苗 YJ
CK	6.43	1.78	3.90	5.45	2.53	39.28	46.37
SS	6.43	1.78	4.03	6.06	2.40	37.36	39.64
DS	6.43	1.78	4.81	5.33	1.62	25.19	30.39
天优998 TY
CK	5.15	1.17	3.41	4.61	1.74	33.72	37.68
SS	5.15	1.17	4.41	5.64	0.74	14.34	13.10
DS	5.15	1.17	4.53	4.77	0.62	12.04	12.99
均值 Mean	6.23 b	1.63 ab	4.39 b	5.40 b	1.83 b	28.73 a	33.69 b
变异来源 Variation source
氮肥 Nitrogen(N)	*	*	*	*	*	ns	*
品种Variety(V)	ns	ns	ns	ns	*	*	*
遮荫 Shading(S)	-	-	**	*	**	*	*
N×V	*	*	*	*	*	ns	ns
N×S	-	-	ns	ns	ns	*	*
V×S	-	-	ns	*	*	*	*
N×V×S	-	-	*	*	*	*	*

处理 Treatment	始穗期茎鞘干质量 DW of culm and sheath at initial heading stage /(t· hm^-2)	始穗期叶片干质量 DW of leaf at initial heading stage /(t· hm^-2)	成熟期茎鞘干质量 DW of culm and sheath at mature stage /(t· hm^-2)	成熟期穗干质量 DW of panicle at mature stage /(t· hm^-2)	始穗后茎鞘物质输出量 DW output after initial heading /(t· hm^-2)	茎鞘物质输出率 EPMSS /%	茎鞘物质转运率 TPMSS /%
高氮 HN
培杂泰丰 PZ
CK	6.74	1.76	4.08	5.69	2.66	39.40	46.67
SS	6.74	1.76	5.26	5.29	1.48	21.96	27.97
DS	6.74	1.76	4.89	5.53	1.85	27.51	33.55
粤晶丝苗 YJ
CK	7.75	1.80	4.52	6.76	3.23	41.72	47.85
SS	7.75	1.80	5.20	6.38	2.55	32.93	40.04
DS	7.75	1.80	6.10	5.44	1.65	21.29	30.33
天优998 TY
CK	8.45	2.10	5.00	8.14	3.45	40.83	42.38
SS	8.45	2.10	6.06	7.65	2.39	28.25	31.22
DS	8.45	2.10	6.56	5.91	1.89	22.39	32.03
均值 Mean	7.65 a	1.89 a	5.30 a	6.31 a	2.35 a	30.69 a	36.89 ab
中氮 MN
培杂泰丰 PZ
CK	7.41	1.56	4.25	5.30	3.16	42.65	59.65
SS	7.41	1.56	4.93	5.69	2.48	33.50	43.60
DS	7.41	1.56	5.72	5.26	1.69	22.77	32.07
粤晶丝苗 YJ
CK	8.24	1.43	5.72	7.03	2.52	30.64	35.94
SS	8.24	1.43	6.08	6.06	2.16	26.24	35.70
DS	8.24	1.43	6.23	5.20	2.01	24.39	38.66
天优998 TY
CK	7.71	1.38	4.87	6.00	2.84	36.84	47.37
SS	7.71	1.38	5.66	5.35	2.05	26.60	38.34
DS	7.71	1.38	6.16	4.44	1.55	20.13	34.98
均值 Mean	7.79 a	1.46 b	5.51 a	5.59 b	2.27 a	29.31 a	40.70 a
不施氮 NN
培杂泰丰 PZ
CK	7.10	1.94	4.62	5.70	2.48	34.87	43.46
SS	7.10	1.94	4.62	5.35	2.48	34.89	46.26
DS	7.10	1.94	5.19	5.74	1.91	26.88	33.28
粤晶丝苗 YJ
CK	6.43	1.78	3.90	5.45	2.53	39.28	46.37
SS	6.43	1.78	4.03	6.06	2.40	37.36	39.64
DS	6.43	1.78	4.81	5.33	1.62	25.19	30.39
天优998 TY
CK	5.15	1.17	3.41	4.61	1.74	33.72	37.68
SS	5.15	1.17	4.41	5.64	0.74	14.34	13.10
DS	5.15	1.17	4.53	4.77	0.62	12.04	12.99
均值 Mean	6.23 b	1.63 ab	4.39 b	5.40 b	1.83 b	28.73 a	33.69 b
变异来源 Variation source
氮肥 Nitrogen(N)	*	*	*	*	*	ns	*
品种Variety(V)	ns	ns	ns	ns	*	*	*
遮荫 Shading(S)	-	-	**	*	**	*	*
N×V	*	*	*	*	*	ns	ns
N×S	-	-	ns	ns	ns	*	*
V×S	-	-	ns	*	*	*	*
N×V×S	-	-	*	*	*	*	*

处理 Treatment	光合速率P_r /(μmol· m^-2 s^-1)	气孔导度G_s /(mmol·m^-2 s^-1)	胞间二氧化碳浓度C_i /(μ mol·mol^-1)	蒸腾速率T_r /(g·m^-2 h^-1)
高氮 HN
培杂泰丰 PZ
CK	10.40	0.56	311.83	6.39
SS	9.73	0.41	314.18	5.73
DS	6.16	0.24	305.64	3.87
粤晶丝苗 YJ
CK	12.60	0.91	318.72	8.95
SS	12.12	0.58	314.07	7.50
DS	9.12	0.45	314.16	5.97
天优998 TY
CK	11.78	0.71	288.45	5.95
SS	11.75	0.73	288.19	6.08
DS	11.64	0.53	282.74	5.23
均值 Mean	10.59 a	0.57 a	304.22 a	6.18 a
中氮 MN
培杂泰丰 PZ
CK	9.18	0.60	301.01	6.54
SS	8.65	0.39	289.91	5.15
DS	10.64	0.41	285.12	5.66
粤晶丝苗 YJ
CK	11.00	0.97	304.61	9.68
SS	10.83	0.58	293.21	7.42
DS	10.50	0.56	289.59	6.89
天优998 TY
CK	11.23	0.41	280.05	6.23
SS	10.82	0.61	294.56	7.91
DS	10.19	0.36	280.08	5.47
均值 Mean	10.34 a	0.54 a	290.90 a	6.77 a
不施氮 NN
培杂泰丰 PZ
CK	8.97	0.29	295.75	4.82
SS	8.77	0.30	299.72	4.83
DS	8.19	0.26	300.34	4.45
粤晶丝苗 YJ
CK	12.20	0.81	292.64	6.72
SS	11.39	0.79	297.67	6.81
DS	10.88	0.70	296.92	6.67
天优998 TY
CK	7.74	0.28	301.95	4.45
SS	7.17	0.21	295.31	3.58
DS	6.73	0.23	279.74	3.67
均值 Mean	9.12 b	0.43 b	295.56 a	5.11 b
变异来源 Variation source
氮肥Nitrogen(N)	*	*	ns	*
品种Variety(V)	*	*	ns	*
遮荫Shading(S)	*	*	ns	*
N×V	**	*	ns	*
N×S	*	*	ns	*
V×S	*	*	ns	**
N×V×S	*	ns	ns	ns