Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2020, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 125-134.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2020.9125
• Research Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
Panpan LI1, Yujun ZHU1, Liang GUO2, Jieyun ZHUANG1, Yeyang FAN1,*()
Received:
2019-11-21
Revised:
2019-12-28
Online:
2020-03-10
Published:
2020-03-10
Contact:
Yeyang FAN
李盼盼1, 朱玉君1, 郭梁2, 庄杰云1, 樊叶杨1,*()
通讯作者:
樊叶杨
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Panpan LI, Yujun ZHU, Liang GUO, Jieyun ZHUANG, Yeyang FAN. Fine Mapping of qGL1.1, a Minor QTL for Grain Length, Using Near Isogenic Lines Derived from Residual Heterozygotes in Rice[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2020, 34(2): 125-134.
李盼盼, 朱玉君, 郭梁, 庄杰云, 樊叶杨. 利用剩余杂合体衍生的近等基因系精细定位水稻粒长微效QTL qGL1.1[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(2): 125-134.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2020.9125
Fig. 2. Genotypic compositions of the nine NILs sets in the target region. A, Three sets of NILs in F5:6 for validation. B, Six sets of NILs in F8:9 for fine-mapping.
标记名称 | 类型 | 限制性内切酶 | 正向引物(5'-3') | 反向引物(5'-3') |
---|---|---|---|---|
Name | Type | Restriction enzyme | Forward primer (5'-3') | Reverse primer (5'-3') |
Wn28826 | CAPS | BstN I | GACAAGTTGGGATAATTCTTCGAT | TAACGTGTCGATCTCTGACC |
Wn28893 | dCAPS | Hha I | GATCGCTCCCTTGTATACGCTGA | CCATTCCGCCCGGTTGATGAAACGC |
Wn28944 | InDel | CATTACAAGGTAAATTGTAGATTGG | TCATTTAGGGATTATGTTGGTC | |
Wn28990 | InDel | AGTTTATAAATCCGAAGCCAT | AGCACAAATAAGTAATTATGCCTA | |
Wn29048 | dCAPS | N1a III | GAATAAGTCCACTTTACGCATCTTTCTCA | GGATCAAGATTTTCCGTATTGCAG |
Wn29077 | dCAPS | Kpn I | CAGTTCACGGGATACGAAGC | CAGTTTGACCATCCTCTAAGCAAAGGGTA |
Wn29125 | dCAPS | Sty I | AAGTGTGTACGGTCAAATGTTTGCCA | ACGTCAGTCAAAACAAATACGG |
Wn29154 | CAPS | Xba I | TGGATTAATTAGGCTAGGTAGACA | TTCTCCCTCTCGTGATCGC |
Table 1 DNA markers developed in this study.
标记名称 | 类型 | 限制性内切酶 | 正向引物(5'-3') | 反向引物(5'-3') |
---|---|---|---|---|
Name | Type | Restriction enzyme | Forward primer (5'-3') | Reverse primer (5'-3') |
Wn28826 | CAPS | BstN I | GACAAGTTGGGATAATTCTTCGAT | TAACGTGTCGATCTCTGACC |
Wn28893 | dCAPS | Hha I | GATCGCTCCCTTGTATACGCTGA | CCATTCCGCCCGGTTGATGAAACGC |
Wn28944 | InDel | CATTACAAGGTAAATTGTAGATTGG | TCATTTAGGGATTATGTTGGTC | |
Wn28990 | InDel | AGTTTATAAATCCGAAGCCAT | AGCACAAATAAGTAATTATGCCTA | |
Wn29048 | dCAPS | N1a III | GAATAAGTCCACTTTACGCATCTTTCTCA | GGATCAAGATTTTCCGTATTGCAG |
Wn29077 | dCAPS | Kpn I | CAGTTCACGGGATACGAAGC | CAGTTTGACCATCCTCTAAGCAAAGGGTA |
Wn29125 | dCAPS | Sty I | AAGTGTGTACGGTCAAATGTTTGCCA | ACGTCAGTCAAAACAAATACGG |
Wn29154 | CAPS | Xba I | TGGATTAATTAGGCTAGGTAGACA | TTCTCCCTCTCGTGATCGC |
性状 | 试验 | 名称 | 平均 | 标准差 | 变异系数 | 范围 | 偏斜度 | 峰度 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trait | Trial | Name | Mean | SD | CV | Range | Skewness | Kurtosis | ||
千粒重 1000-grain weight /g | 杭州 | Y1 | 25.55 | 0.34 | 0.013 | 24.92~26.27 | 0.30 | -0.59 | ||
Hangzhou | Y2 | 26.74 | 0.36 | 0.013 | 25.84~27.92 | 0.45 | 1.15 | |||
Y3 | 25.67 | 0.26 | 0.010 | 25.05~26.17 | -0.27 | -0.38 | ||||
陵水 | LP1 | 30.16 | 0.36 | 0.012 | 29.42~30.89 | 0.07 | -0.34 | |||
Lingshui | LP2 | 29.25 | 0.61 | 0.021 | 27.67~30.36 | -0.50 | -0.18 | |||
LP3 | 29.93 | 0.29 | 0.010 | 29.26~30.57 | 0.07 | -0.43 | ||||
LP4 | 30.74 | 0.31 | 0.010 | 30.04~31.37 | 0.24 | -0.52 | ||||
LP5 | 29.81 | 0.48 | 0.016 | 28.35~30.79 | -0.31 | 0.28 | ||||
LP6 | 29.73 | 0.52 | 0.017 | 28.69~30.68 | -0.27 | -0.71 | ||||
粒长 Grain length / mm | 杭州 | Y1 | 8.120 | 0.057 | 0.007 | 7.999~8.261 | -0.08 | -0.06 | ||
Hangzhou | Y2 | 8.216 | 0.057 | 0.007 | 8.106~8.362 | 0.58 | 0.28 | |||
Y3 | 8.136 | 0.050 | 0.006 | 8.033~8.264 | 0.02 | -0.34 | ||||
陵水 | LP1 | 8.106 | 0.037 | 0.005 | 8.034~8.191 | 0.30 | -0.39 | |||
Lingshui | LP2 | 8.114 | 0.040 | 0.005 | 8.040~8.201 | 0.07 | -0.87 | |||
LP3 | 8.097 | 0.041 | 0.005 | 8.003~8.199 | 0.16 | -0.10 | ||||
LP4 | 8.268 | 0.047 | 0.006 | 8.138~8.358 | -0.44 | 0.02 | ||||
LP5 | 8.094 | 0.054 | 0.007 | 7.978~8.217 | 0.13 | -0.47 | ||||
LP6 | 8.164 | 0.045 | 0.005 | 8.051~8.245 | -0.15 | -0.29 | ||||
粒宽 Grain width / mm | 杭州 | Y1 | 2.958 | 0.022 | 0.008 | 2.899~3.024 | 0.13 | 0.81 | ||
Hangzhou | Y2 | 3.053 | 0.018 | 0.006 | 3.014~3.103 | 0.35 | 0.43 | |||
Y3 | 2.924 | 0.024 | 0.008 | 2.875~2.972 | 0.14 | -0.71 | ||||
陵水 | LP1 | 3.288 | 0.014 | 0.004 | 3.244~3.312 | -0.67 | 0.82 | |||
Lingshui | LP2 | 3.218 | 0.044 | 0.014 | 3.091~3.290 | -0.78 | 0.48 | |||
LP3 | 3.273 | 0.022 | 0.007 | 3.217~3.306 | -0.98 | 0.49 | ||||
LP4 | 3.296 | 0.014 | 0.004 | 3.267~3.324 | -0.26 | -0.63 | ||||
LP5 | 3.265 | 0.031 | 0.009 | 3.156~3.313 | -1.81 | 4.27 | ||||
LP6 | 3.236 | 0.040 | 0.012 | 3.129~3.306 | -0.66 | -0.14 |
Table 2 Phenotypic variations of 1000-grain weight, grain length and grain width in nine sets of NILs.
性状 | 试验 | 名称 | 平均 | 标准差 | 变异系数 | 范围 | 偏斜度 | 峰度 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trait | Trial | Name | Mean | SD | CV | Range | Skewness | Kurtosis | ||
千粒重 1000-grain weight /g | 杭州 | Y1 | 25.55 | 0.34 | 0.013 | 24.92~26.27 | 0.30 | -0.59 | ||
Hangzhou | Y2 | 26.74 | 0.36 | 0.013 | 25.84~27.92 | 0.45 | 1.15 | |||
Y3 | 25.67 | 0.26 | 0.010 | 25.05~26.17 | -0.27 | -0.38 | ||||
陵水 | LP1 | 30.16 | 0.36 | 0.012 | 29.42~30.89 | 0.07 | -0.34 | |||
Lingshui | LP2 | 29.25 | 0.61 | 0.021 | 27.67~30.36 | -0.50 | -0.18 | |||
LP3 | 29.93 | 0.29 | 0.010 | 29.26~30.57 | 0.07 | -0.43 | ||||
LP4 | 30.74 | 0.31 | 0.010 | 30.04~31.37 | 0.24 | -0.52 | ||||
LP5 | 29.81 | 0.48 | 0.016 | 28.35~30.79 | -0.31 | 0.28 | ||||
LP6 | 29.73 | 0.52 | 0.017 | 28.69~30.68 | -0.27 | -0.71 | ||||
粒长 Grain length / mm | 杭州 | Y1 | 8.120 | 0.057 | 0.007 | 7.999~8.261 | -0.08 | -0.06 | ||
Hangzhou | Y2 | 8.216 | 0.057 | 0.007 | 8.106~8.362 | 0.58 | 0.28 | |||
Y3 | 8.136 | 0.050 | 0.006 | 8.033~8.264 | 0.02 | -0.34 | ||||
陵水 | LP1 | 8.106 | 0.037 | 0.005 | 8.034~8.191 | 0.30 | -0.39 | |||
Lingshui | LP2 | 8.114 | 0.040 | 0.005 | 8.040~8.201 | 0.07 | -0.87 | |||
LP3 | 8.097 | 0.041 | 0.005 | 8.003~8.199 | 0.16 | -0.10 | ||||
LP4 | 8.268 | 0.047 | 0.006 | 8.138~8.358 | -0.44 | 0.02 | ||||
LP5 | 8.094 | 0.054 | 0.007 | 7.978~8.217 | 0.13 | -0.47 | ||||
LP6 | 8.164 | 0.045 | 0.005 | 8.051~8.245 | -0.15 | -0.29 | ||||
粒宽 Grain width / mm | 杭州 | Y1 | 2.958 | 0.022 | 0.008 | 2.899~3.024 | 0.13 | 0.81 | ||
Hangzhou | Y2 | 3.053 | 0.018 | 0.006 | 3.014~3.103 | 0.35 | 0.43 | |||
Y3 | 2.924 | 0.024 | 0.008 | 2.875~2.972 | 0.14 | -0.71 | ||||
陵水 | LP1 | 3.288 | 0.014 | 0.004 | 3.244~3.312 | -0.67 | 0.82 | |||
Lingshui | LP2 | 3.218 | 0.044 | 0.014 | 3.091~3.290 | -0.78 | 0.48 | |||
LP3 | 3.273 | 0.022 | 0.007 | 3.217~3.306 | -0.98 | 0.49 | ||||
LP4 | 3.296 | 0.014 | 0.004 | 3.267~3.324 | -0.26 | -0.63 | ||||
LP5 | 3.265 | 0.031 | 0.009 | 3.156~3.313 | -1.81 | 4.27 | ||||
LP6 | 3.236 | 0.040 | 0.012 | 3.129~3.306 | -0.66 | -0.14 |
试验 Trial | 名称 Name | 分离区间 Segregating region | 性状 Trait | 表型值(平均值±标准差) | P | A | R2 / % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype (Mean±SD) | |||||||||
NILZS97 | NILMY46 | ||||||||
杭州 | Y1 | Wn28826-RM1231 | TGW/g | 25.42±0.30 | 25.69±0.32 | 0.0017 | 0.13 | 8.99 | |
Hangzhou | GL/mm | 8.098±0.062 | 8.143±0.041 | 0.0018 | 0.023 | 8.13 | |||
GW/mm | 2.950±0.019 | 2.966±0.023 | 0.0048 | 0.008 | 8.19 | ||||
Y2 | Wn28990-RM1231 | TGW/g | 26.68±0.32 | 26.78±0.38 | 0.2372 | ||||
GL/mm | 8.201±0.050 | 8.231±0.061 | 0.0343 | 0.015 | 5.33 | ||||
GW/mm | 3.049±0.017 | 3.056±0.019 | 0.1553 | ||||||
Y3 | Wn29154-RM1231 | TGW/g | 25.65±0.25 | 25.68±0.28 | 0.6181 | ||||
GL/mm | 8.143±0.053 | 8.129±0.046 | 0.2623 | ||||||
GW/mm | 2.922±0.023 | 2.927±0.025 | 0.3944 | ||||||
陵水 | LP1 | Wn28826-Wn28893 | TGW/g | 30.19±0.39 | 30.12±0.34 | 0.4894 | |||
Lingshui | GL/mm | 8.110±0.034 | 8.104±0.040 | 0.5480 | |||||
GW/mm | 3.291±0.013 | 3.286±0.014 | 0.1920 | ||||||
LP2 | Wn28826-Wn28990 | TGW/g | 29.32±0.58 | 29.19±0.64 | 0.4124 | ||||
GL/mm | 8.123±0.042 | 8.105±0.037 | 0.1011 | ||||||
GW/mm | 3.224±0.041 | 3.212±0.046 | 0.3026 | ||||||
LP3 | Wn28990-Wn29048 | TGW/g | 30.00±0.27 | 29.85±0.29 | 0.0394 | -0.08 | 4.30 | ||
GL/mm | 8.109±0.043 | 8.086±0.035 | 0.0256 | -0.012 | 5.25 | ||||
GW/mm | 3.275±0.022 | 3.272±0.023 | 0.6138 | ||||||
LP4 | Wn29048-Wn29125 | TGW/g | 30.56±0.25 | 30.91±0.27 | <0.0001 | 0.17 | 19.09 | ||
GL/mm | 8.241±0.043 | 8.296±0.033 | <0.0001 | 0.027 | 27.12 | ||||
GW/mm | 3.297±0.015 | 3.295±0.014 | 0.7289 | ||||||
LP5 | Wn29125-RM1231 | TGW/g | 29.84±0.44 | 29.78±0.52 | 0.6563 | ||||
GL/mm | 8.083±0.049 | 8.105±0.057 | 0.1154 | ||||||
GW/mm | 3.268±0.024 | 3.262±0.036 | 0.4580 | ||||||
LP6 | Wn29154-RM1231 | TGW/g | 29.67±0.49 | 29.78±0.55 | 0.4381 | ||||
GL/mm | 8.177±0.042 | 8.151±0.043 | 0.0206 | -0.013 | 6.03 | ||||
GW/mm | 3.227±0.043 | 3.245±0.034 | 0.0711 | ||||||
A-密阳46等位基因取代珍汕97等位基因所产生的遗传效应。R2-效应对表型方差的贡献率。 A, Additive effect of replacing a Zhenshan 97 allele with a Milyang 46 allele. R2, Proportion of phenotypic variance explained by the QTL effect. |
Table 3 QTL analysis for 1000-grain weight, grain length and grain width in nine sets of NILs.
试验 Trial | 名称 Name | 分离区间 Segregating region | 性状 Trait | 表型值(平均值±标准差) | P | A | R2 / % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phenotype (Mean±SD) | |||||||||
NILZS97 | NILMY46 | ||||||||
杭州 | Y1 | Wn28826-RM1231 | TGW/g | 25.42±0.30 | 25.69±0.32 | 0.0017 | 0.13 | 8.99 | |
Hangzhou | GL/mm | 8.098±0.062 | 8.143±0.041 | 0.0018 | 0.023 | 8.13 | |||
GW/mm | 2.950±0.019 | 2.966±0.023 | 0.0048 | 0.008 | 8.19 | ||||
Y2 | Wn28990-RM1231 | TGW/g | 26.68±0.32 | 26.78±0.38 | 0.2372 | ||||
GL/mm | 8.201±0.050 | 8.231±0.061 | 0.0343 | 0.015 | 5.33 | ||||
GW/mm | 3.049±0.017 | 3.056±0.019 | 0.1553 | ||||||
Y3 | Wn29154-RM1231 | TGW/g | 25.65±0.25 | 25.68±0.28 | 0.6181 | ||||
GL/mm | 8.143±0.053 | 8.129±0.046 | 0.2623 | ||||||
GW/mm | 2.922±0.023 | 2.927±0.025 | 0.3944 | ||||||
陵水 | LP1 | Wn28826-Wn28893 | TGW/g | 30.19±0.39 | 30.12±0.34 | 0.4894 | |||
Lingshui | GL/mm | 8.110±0.034 | 8.104±0.040 | 0.5480 | |||||
GW/mm | 3.291±0.013 | 3.286±0.014 | 0.1920 | ||||||
LP2 | Wn28826-Wn28990 | TGW/g | 29.32±0.58 | 29.19±0.64 | 0.4124 | ||||
GL/mm | 8.123±0.042 | 8.105±0.037 | 0.1011 | ||||||
GW/mm | 3.224±0.041 | 3.212±0.046 | 0.3026 | ||||||
LP3 | Wn28990-Wn29048 | TGW/g | 30.00±0.27 | 29.85±0.29 | 0.0394 | -0.08 | 4.30 | ||
GL/mm | 8.109±0.043 | 8.086±0.035 | 0.0256 | -0.012 | 5.25 | ||||
GW/mm | 3.275±0.022 | 3.272±0.023 | 0.6138 | ||||||
LP4 | Wn29048-Wn29125 | TGW/g | 30.56±0.25 | 30.91±0.27 | <0.0001 | 0.17 | 19.09 | ||
GL/mm | 8.241±0.043 | 8.296±0.033 | <0.0001 | 0.027 | 27.12 | ||||
GW/mm | 3.297±0.015 | 3.295±0.014 | 0.7289 | ||||||
LP5 | Wn29125-RM1231 | TGW/g | 29.84±0.44 | 29.78±0.52 | 0.6563 | ||||
GL/mm | 8.083±0.049 | 8.105±0.057 | 0.1154 | ||||||
GW/mm | 3.268±0.024 | 3.262±0.036 | 0.4580 | ||||||
LP6 | Wn29154-RM1231 | TGW/g | 29.67±0.49 | 29.78±0.55 | 0.4381 | ||||
GL/mm | 8.177±0.042 | 8.151±0.043 | 0.0206 | -0.013 | 6.03 | ||||
GW/mm | 3.227±0.043 | 3.245±0.034 | 0.0711 | ||||||
A-密阳46等位基因取代珍汕97等位基因所产生的遗传效应。R2-效应对表型方差的贡献率。 A, Additive effect of replacing a Zhenshan 97 allele with a Milyang 46 allele. R2, Proportion of phenotypic variance explained by the QTL effect. |
[1] | Xing Y Z, Zhang Q F.Genetic and molecular bases of rice yield[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2010, 61: 421-442. |
[2] | Duan P G, Ni S, Wang J M, Zhang B L, Xu R, Wang Y X, Chen H Q, Zhu X D, Li Y H.Regulation of OsGRF4 by OsmiR396 controls grain size and yield in rice[J]. Nature Plants, 2016, 2: 15203. |
[3] | Hu J, Wang Y X, Fang Y X, Zeng L J, Xu J, Yu H P, Shi Z Y, Pan J J, Zhang D, Kang S J, Zhu L, Dong G J, Guo L B, Zeng D L, Zhang G H, Xie L H, Xiong G S, Li J Y, Qian Q.A rare allele of GS2 enhances grain size and grain yield in rice[J]. Molecular Plant, 2015, 8: 1455-1465. |
[4] | Yu J P, Xiong H Y, Zhu X Y, Zhang H L, Li H H, Miao J L, Wang W S, Tang Z S, Zhang Z Y, Yao G X, Zhang Q, Pan Y H, Wang X, Rashid M A R, Li J J, Gao Y M, Li Z K, Yang W C, Fu X D, Li Z C. OsLG3 contributing to rice grain length and yield was mined by Ho-LAMap[J]. BMC Biology, 2017, 15: 28. |
[5] | Yu J P, Miao J L, Zhang Z Y, Xiong H Y, Zhu X Y, Sun X M, Pan Y H, Liang Y T, Zhang Q, Abdul Rehman R M, Li J J, Zhang H L, Li Z C. Alternative splicing of OsLG3b controls grain length and yield in japonica rice[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2018, 16: 1667-1678. |
[6] | Liu Q, Han R X, Wu K, Zhang J Q, Ye Y F, Wang S S, Chen J F, Pan Y J, Li Q, Xu X P, Zhou J W, Tao D Y, Wu Y J, Fu X D.G-protein βγ subunits determine grain size through interaction with MADS-domain transcription factors in rice[J]. Nature Communications, 2018, 9: 852. |
[7] | Fan C C, Xing Y Z, Mao H L, Lu T T, Han B, Xu C G, Li X H, Zhang Q F.GS3, a major QTL for grain length and weight and minor QTL for grain width and thickness in rice, encodes a putative transmembrane protein[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2006, 112: 1164-1171. |
[8] | Qi P, Lin Y S, Song X J, Shen J B, Huang W, Shan J X, Zhu M Z, Jiang L W, Gao P J, Lin H X.The novel quantitative trait locus GL3.1 controls rice grain size and yield by regulating Cyclin-T1;3[J]. Cell Research, 2012, 22: 1666-1680. |
[9] | Zhang X J, Wang J F, Huang J, Lan H X, Wang C L, Yin C F, Wu Y Y, Tang H J, Qian Q, Li J Y, Zhang H S.Rare allele of OsPPKL1 associated with grain length causes extra-large grain and a significant yield increase in rice[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109(52): 21534-21539. |
[10] | Hu Z J, Lu S J, Wang M J, He H H, Sun L, Wang H R, Liu X H, Jiang L, Sun J L, Xin X Y, Kong W, Chu C C, Xue H W, Yang J S, Luo X J, Liu J X.A novel QTL qTGW3 encodes the GSK3/SHAGGY-like kinase OsGSK5/OsSK41 that interacts with OsARF4 to negatively regulate grain size and weight in rice[J]. Molecular Plant, 2018, 11:736-749. |
[11] | Xia D, Zhou H, Liu R j, Dan W H, Li P B, Wu B, Chen J X, Wang L Q, Gao G J, Zhang Q L, He Y Q. GL3.3, a novel QTL encoding a GSK3/SHAGGY-like kinase, epistatically interacts with GS3 to produce extra-long grains in rice[J]. Molecular Plant, 2018, 11: 754-756. |
[12] | Ying J Z, Ma M, Bai C, Huang X H, Liu J L, Fan Y Y, Song X J.TGW3, a major QTL that negatively modulates grain length and weight in rice[J]. Molecular Plant, 2018, 11: 750-753. |
[13] | Wu W G, Liu X Y, Wang M H, Meyer R S, Luo X J, Ndjiondjop M N, Tan L B, Zhang J W, Wu J Z, Cai H W, Sun C Q, Wang X K, Wing R A, Zhu Z F.A single-nucleotide polymorphism causes smaller grain size and loss of seed shattering during African rice domestication[J]. Nature Plants, 2017, 3: 17064. |
[14] | Wang A H, Hou Q Q, Si L Z, Huang X H, Luo J H, Lu D F, Zhu J J, Shangguan Y Y, Miao J S, Xie Y F, Wang Y C, Zhao Q, Feng Q, Zhou C C, Li Y, Fan D L, Lu Y Q, Tian Q L, Wang Z X, Han B.The PLATZ transcription factor GL6 affects grain length and number in rice[J]. Plant Physiology, 2019, 180 : 2077-2090. |
[15] | Ishimaru K, Hirotsu N, Madoka Y, Murakami N, Hara N, Onodera H, Kashiwagi T, Ujiie K, Shimizu B I, Onishi A, Miyagawa H, Katoh E.Loss of function of the IAA-glucose hydrolase gene TGW6 enhances rice grain weight and increases yield[J]. Nature Genetics, 2013, 45(6): 707-711. |
[16] | Si L Z, Chen J Y, Huang X H, Gong H, Luo J H, Hou Q Q, Zhou T Y, Lu T T, Zhu J J, Shangguan Y Y, Chen E W, Gong C X, Zhao Q, Jing Y F, Zhao Y, Li Y, Cui L L, Fan D L, Lu Y Q, Weng Q J, Wang Y C, Zhan Q L, Liu K Y, Wei X H, An K, An G, Han B.OsSPL13 controls grain size in cultivated rice[J]. Nature Genetics, 2016, 48(4): 447-456. |
[17] | Song X J, Huang W, Shi M, Zhu M Z, Lin H X.A QTL for rice grain width and weight encodes a previously unknown RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase[J]. Nature Genetics, 2007, 39(5): 623-630. |
[18] | Li Y B, Fan C C, Xing Y Z, Jiang Y H, Luo L J, Sun L, Shao D, Xu C J, Li X H, Xiao J H, He Y Q, Zhang Q F.Natural variation in GS5 plays an important role in regulating grain size and yield in rice[J]. Nature Genetics, 2011, 43(12): 1266-1269. |
[19] | Duan P G, Xu J S, Zeng D L, Zhang B L, Geng M F, Zhang G Z, Huang K, Huang L J, Xu R, Ge S, Qian Q, Li Y H.Natural variation in the promoter of GSE5 contributes to grain size diversity in rice[J]. Molecular Plant, 2017, 10: 685-694. |
[20] | Liu J F, Chen J, Zheng X M, Wu F Q, Lin Q B, Heng Y Q, Tian P, Cheng Z J, Yu X W, Zhou K N, Zhang X, Guo X P, Wang J L, Wang H Y, Wan J M.GW5 acts in the brassinosteroid signaling pathway to regulate grain width and weight in rice[J]. Nature Plants, 2017, 3: 17043. |
[21] | Wang S K, Wu K, Yuan Q B, Liu X Y, Liu Z B, Lin X Y, Zeng R Z, Zhu H T, Dong G J, Qian Q, Zhang G Q, Fu X D.Control of grain size, shape and quality by OsSPL16 in rice[J]. Nature Genetics, 2012, 44(8): 950-954. |
[22] | Song X J, Kuroha T, Ayano M, Furuta T, Nagai K, Komeda N, Segami S, Miura K, Ogawa D, Kamura T, Suzuki T, Higashiyama T, Yamasaki M, Mori H, Inukai Y, Wu J Z, Kitano H, Sakakibara H, Jacobsen S E, Ashikari M.Rare allele of a previously unidentified histone H4 acetyltransferase enhances grain weight, yield, and plant biomass in rice[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015, 112(1): 76-81. |
[23] | Wang Y X, Xiong G S, Hu J, Jiang L, Yu H, Xu J, Fang Y X, Zeng L J, Xu E B, Xu J, Ye W J, Meng X B, Liu R F, Chen H Q, Jing Y H, Wang Y H, Zhu X D, Li J Y, Qian Q.Copy number variation at the GL7 locus contributes to grain size diversity in rice[J]. Nature Genetics, 2015, 47(8): 944-948. |
[24] | Wang S K, Li S, Liu Q, Wu K, Zhang J Q, Wang S S, Wang Y, Chen X B, Zhang Y, Gao C X, Wang F, Huang H X, Fu X D.The OsSPL16-GW7 regulatory module determines grain shape and simultaneously improves rice yield and grain quality[J]. Nature Genetics, 2015, 47(8): 949-954. |
[25] | Zhao D S, Li Q F, Zhang C Q, Zhang C, Yang Q Q, Pan L X, Ren X Y, Lu J, Gu M H, Liu Q Q.GS9 acts as a transcriptional activator to regulate rice grain shape and appearance quality[J]. Nature Communications, 2018, 9: 1240. |
[26] | Li N, Xu R, Duan P G, Li Y H.Control of grain size in rice[J]. Plant Reproduction, 2018, 31: 237-251. |
[27] | 刘喜,牟昌铃,周春雷,程治军,江玲,万建民. 水稻粒型基因克隆和调控机制研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学,2018, 32(1): 1-11. |
Liu X, Mou C L, Zhou C L, Cheng Z J, Jiang L, Wang J M.Research progress on cloning and regulation mechanism of rice grain shape genes[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2018, 32(1): 1-11. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | Mackay T F C, Stone E A, Ayroles J F. The genetics of quantitative traits: challenges and prospects[J]. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2009, 10: 565-577. |
[29] | Kumar J, Gupta D S, Gupta S, Dubey S, Gupta P, Kumar S.Quantitative trait loci from identification to exploitation for crop improvement[J]. Plant Cell Reports, 2017, 36: 1187-1213. |
[30] | Yamamoto T, Yonemaru J, Yano M.Towards the understanding of complex traits in rice: substantially or superficially[J]. DNA Research, 2009, 16: 141-154. |
[31] | Zhang H W, Fan Y Y, Zhu Y J, Chen J Y, Yu S B, Zhuang J Y.Dissection of the qTGW1.1 region into two tightly-linked minor QTLs having stable effects for grain weight in rice[J]. BMC Genetics, 2016, 17: 98. |
[32] | Guo L, Wang K, Chen J Y, Huang D R, Fan Y Y, Zhuang J Y.Dissection of two quantitative trait loci for grain weight linked in repulsion on the long arm of chromosome 1 of rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. The Crop Journal, 2013, 1: 70-76. |
[33] | Zheng K L, Huang N, Bennett J, Khush G S.PCR-based marker-assisted selection in rice breeding//IRRI Discussion Paper Series No. 12. Los Banos: International Rice Research Institute, 1995. |
[34] | Chen X, Temnykh S, Xu Y, Cho Y G, McCouch S R. Development of a microsatellite framework map providing genome-wide coverage in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 1997, 95: 553-567. |
[35] | SAS Institute Inc.SAS/STAT User’s Guide[M]. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 1999. |
[36] | Dai W M, Zhang K Q, Wu J R, Wang L, Duan B W, Zheng K L, Cai R, Zhuang J Y.Validating a segment on the short arm of chromosome 6 responsible for genetic variation in the hull silicon content and yield traits of rice[J]. Euphytica, 2008, 160: 317-324. |
[37] | Abiola O, Angel J M, Avner P, Bachmanov A A, Belknap J K, Bennett B, Blankenhorn E P, Blizard D A, Bolivar V, Brockmann G A, Buck K J, Bureau J F, Casley W L, Chesler E J, Cheverud J M, Churchill G A, Cook M, Crabbe J C, Crusio W E, Darvasi A, Haan G D, Dermant P, Doerge R W, Elliot R W, Farber C R, Flaherty L, Flint J, Gershenfeld H, Gibson J P, Gu J, Gu W, Himmelbauer H, Hitzemann R, Hsu H C, Hunter K, Iraqi F F, Jansen R C, Johnson T E, Jones B C, Kempermann G, Lammert F, Lu L, Manly K F, Matthews D B, Medrano J F, Mehrabian M, Mittlemann G, Mock B A, Mogil J S, Montagutelli X, Morahan G, Mountz J D, Nagase H, Nowakowski R S, O'Hara B F, Osadchuk A V, Paigen B, Palmer A A, Peirce J L, Pomp D, Rosemann M, Rosen G D, Schalkwyk L C, Seltzer Z, Settle S, Shimomura K, Shou S, Sikela J M, Siracusa L D, Spearow J L, Teuscher C, Threadgill D W, Toth L A, Toye A A, Vadasz C, Van Zant G, Wakeland E, Williams R W, Zhang H G, Zou F. Complex Trait Consortium. The nature and identification of quantitative trait loci: A community’s view[J]. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2003, 4(11): 911-916. |
[38] | Wang L L, Chen Y Y, Guo L, Zhang H W, Fan Y Y, Zhuang J Y.Dissection of qTGW1.2 to three QTLs for grain weight and grain size in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Euphytica, 2015, 202: 119-127. |
[39] | Dong Q, Zhang Z H, Wang L L, Zhu Y J, Fan Y Y, Mou T M, Ma L Y, Zhuang J Y.Dissection and fine-mapping of two QTL for grain size linked in a 460-kb region on chromosome 1 of rice[J]. Rice, 2018, 11: 44. |
[40] | Wang W H, Wang L L, Zhu Y J, Fan Y Y, Zhuang J Y.Fine-mapping of qTGW1.2a, a quantitative trait locus for 1000-grain weight in rice[J]. Rice Science, 2019, 26(4): 220-228. |
[1] | REN Zhiqi, XUE Kexin, DONG Zheng, LI Xiaoxiang, LI Yongzhao, GUO Yujing, LIU Wenqiang, GUO Liang, SHENG Xinnian, LIU Zhixi, PAN Xiaowu. Identification and Gene Mapping of Outcurved Leaf Mutant ocl1 in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 337-346. |
[2] | XIAO Lequan, LI Lei, DAI Weimin, QIANG Sheng, SONG Xiaoling. Seedling Growth Characteristics of Hybrids Between Transgenic Rice with cry2A*/bar Genes and Weedy Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 347-358. |
[3] | LI Gang, GAO Qingsong, LI Wei, ZHANG Wenxia, WANG Jian, CHEN Baoshan, WANG Di, GAO Hao, XU Weijun, CHEN Hongqi, JI Jianhui. Directed Knockout of SD1 Gene Improves Lodging Resistance and Blast Resistance of Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 359-367. |
[4] | WANG Shengyong, CHEN Yuhang, CHEN Huili, HUANG Yujie, ZHANG Xiaotian, DING Shuangcheng, WANG Hongwei. Effects of High Temperature on Phenylpropane Metabolism and Downstream Branch Metabolic Pathways in Rice Meiosis [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 368-378. |
[5] | HUANG Yaru, XU Peng, WANG Lele, HE Yizhe, WANG Hui, KE Jian, HE Haibing, WU Liquan, YOU Cuicui. Effects of Exogenous Trehalose on Grain Filling Characteristics and Yield Formation of japonica Rice Cultivar W1844 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[6] | DONG Liqiang, YANG Tiexin, LI Rui, SHANG Wenqi, MA Liang, LI Yuedong, SUI Guomin. Effect of Plant-row Spacing on Rice Yield and Root Morphological and Physiological Characteristics in Super High Yield Field [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 392-404. |
[7] | GAO Qianqing, REN Xiaojian, ZHAI Zhongbing, ZHENG Pubing, WU Yuanfen, CUI Kehui. Effects of Panicle and Bud-promoting Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on Growth of Regenerated Bud and Grain Yield of Ratoon Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 405-414. |
[8] | HUANG Jinwen, LI Rikun, CHEN Zhicheng, ZHANG Bianhong, LEI Han, PAN Ruixin, YANG Mingyu, PAN Meiqing, TANG Lina. Effects of Straw Returning Techniques on Soil Nutrients, Organic Carbon and Microbial Diversity in Tobacco-rice Rotation System [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 415-426. |
[9] | HAN Cong, HE Yuchang, WU Lijuan, JIA Lili, WANG Lei, E Zhiguo. Research Progress in the Function of Basic Leucine Zipper (bZIP) Protein Family in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 436-448. |
[10] | SHEN Yumin, CHEN Mingliang, XIONG Huanjin, XIONG Wentao, WU Xiaoyan, XIAO Yeqing. Phenotypic Analysis and Fine Mapping of blg1(beak like grain 1), a Rice Mutant with Abnormal Palea and Lemma Development [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 225-232. |
[11] | DUAN Min, XIE Liujie, GAO Xiuying, TANG Haijuan, HUANG Shanjun, PAN Xiaobiao. Creation of Thermo-sensitive Genic Male Sterile Rice Lines with Wide Compatibility Based on CRISPR/Cas9 Technology [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 233-243. |
[12] | WANG Wenting, MA Jiaying, LI Guangyan, FU Weimeng, LI Hubo, LIN Jie, CHEN Tingting, FENG Baohua, TAO Longxing, FU Guanfu, QIN Yebo. Effect of Different Fertilizer Application Rates on Rice Yield and Quality Formation and Its Relationship with Energy Metabolism at High Temperature [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
[13] | LIU Aihua, LI Xiaokun. Meta-analysis of Relationship Between Fertilizer Application and Rice Quality [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 276-284. |
[14] | YANG Xiaolong, WANG Biao, WANG Benfu, ZHANG Zhisheng, ZHANG Zuolin, YANG Lantian, CHENG Jianping, LI Yang. Effects of Different Water Management on Yield and Rice Quality of Dry-seeded Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
[15] | WEI Xiaodong, SONG Xuemei, ZHAO Ling, ZHAO Qingyong, CHEN Tao, LU Kai, ZHU Zhen, HUANG Shengdong, WANG Cailin, ZHANG Yadong. Effects of Silicon and Zinc Fertilizer and Their Application Ways on Yield and Grain Quality of Rice Variety Nanjing 46 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 295-306. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||