Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 590-598.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2017.7100
• Orginal Article • Previous Articles Next Articles
Zongxiang CHEN1, Zhiming FENG1, Longping WANG1, Fan FENG1, Yafang ZHANG1, Yuyin MA2, Xuebiao PAN1, Shimin ZUO1,*()
Received:
2017-08-20
Revised:
2017-10-11
Online:
2017-11-25
Published:
2017-11-10
Contact:
Shimin ZUO
陈宗祥1, 冯志明1, 王龙平1, 冯凡1, 张亚芳1, 马玉银2, 潘学彪1, 左示敏1,*()
通讯作者:
左示敏
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Zongxiang CHEN, Zhiming FENG, Longping WANG, Fan FENG, Yafang ZHANG, Yuyin MA, Xuebiao PAN, Shimin ZUO. Breeding Potential of Rice TAC1 Gene for Tiller Angle[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2017, 31(6): 590-598.
陈宗祥, 冯志明, 王龙平, 冯凡, 张亚芳, 马玉银, 潘学彪, 左示敏. 水稻分蘖角基因TAC1的育种应用价值分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(6): 590-598.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2017.7100
材料 Material | 分蘖角 Tiller angle/° | 播始历期 Heading date/d | 株高 Plant height/cm | |
---|---|---|---|---|
特青-TAC1 Teqing-TAC1 5 | 17.8±0.3 cd | 97.0±0.0 d | 105.1±0.7 a | |
特青-tac1 Teqing-tac1 | 9.4±0.3 f | 96.5±0.7 d | 103.0±0.1 ab | |
IR24-TAC1 | 14.8±0.8 de | 94.0±0.0 e | 89.4±0.4 f | |
IR24-TAC1Ri | 10.0±0.6 f | 89.0±0.0 h | 95.3±2.1 cde | |
Lemont-TAC1 | 39.1±0.1 a | 106.0±0.7 b | 92.8±3.9 def | |
Lemont-tac1 | 19.9±0.2 c | 105.5±0.0 b | 92.4±0.4 ef | |
日本晴-TAC1ox Nipponbare-TAC1ox | 32.4±3.4 b | 93.0±0.0 f | 93.6±0.7 def | |
日本晴-tac1 Nipponbare-tac1 | 12.2±0.8 ef | 90.0±0.0 g | 97.7±0.6 bcde | |
武陵粳1号-TAC1 Wulingjing 1-TAC1 | 32.1±1.3 b | 109.0±0.0 a | 97.7±3.1 bcd | |
武陵粳1号-tac1 Wulingjing 1-tac1 | 19.4±0.6 c | 109.0±0.0 a | 100.5±4.9 abc | |
镇稻88-TAC1 Zhendao 88-TAC1 | 33.7±3.9 b | 100.5±0.7 c | 95.8±1.0 cde | |
镇稻88-tac1 Zhendao 88-tac1 | 20.0±0.7 c | 101.0±0.0 c | 93.8±1.2 def | |
遗传背景 Genetic background | ||||
F值 F-value | 73.91 | 1604.68 | 15.30 | |
P值 P-value | 0 | 0 | 1.0×10-4 | |
TAC1基因型 TAC1 genotype | ||||
F值 F-value | 373.55 | 70.71 | 1.85 | |
P值 P-value | 0 | 0 | 0.20 |
Table 1 Information of the basic agronomic traits of the rice lines tested in the study.
材料 Material | 分蘖角 Tiller angle/° | 播始历期 Heading date/d | 株高 Plant height/cm | |
---|---|---|---|---|
特青-TAC1 Teqing-TAC1 5 | 17.8±0.3 cd | 97.0±0.0 d | 105.1±0.7 a | |
特青-tac1 Teqing-tac1 | 9.4±0.3 f | 96.5±0.7 d | 103.0±0.1 ab | |
IR24-TAC1 | 14.8±0.8 de | 94.0±0.0 e | 89.4±0.4 f | |
IR24-TAC1Ri | 10.0±0.6 f | 89.0±0.0 h | 95.3±2.1 cde | |
Lemont-TAC1 | 39.1±0.1 a | 106.0±0.7 b | 92.8±3.9 def | |
Lemont-tac1 | 19.9±0.2 c | 105.5±0.0 b | 92.4±0.4 ef | |
日本晴-TAC1ox Nipponbare-TAC1ox | 32.4±3.4 b | 93.0±0.0 f | 93.6±0.7 def | |
日本晴-tac1 Nipponbare-tac1 | 12.2±0.8 ef | 90.0±0.0 g | 97.7±0.6 bcde | |
武陵粳1号-TAC1 Wulingjing 1-TAC1 | 32.1±1.3 b | 109.0±0.0 a | 97.7±3.1 bcd | |
武陵粳1号-tac1 Wulingjing 1-tac1 | 19.4±0.6 c | 109.0±0.0 a | 100.5±4.9 abc | |
镇稻88-TAC1 Zhendao 88-TAC1 | 33.7±3.9 b | 100.5±0.7 c | 95.8±1.0 cde | |
镇稻88-tac1 Zhendao 88-tac1 | 20.0±0.7 c | 101.0±0.0 c | 93.8±1.2 def | |
遗传背景 Genetic background | ||||
F值 F-value | 73.91 | 1604.68 | 15.30 | |
P值 P-value | 0 | 0 | 1.0×10-4 | |
TAC1基因型 TAC1 genotype | ||||
F值 F-value | 373.55 | 70.71 | 1.85 | |
P值 P-value | 0 | 0 | 0.20 |
变异来源 Source of variance | 自由度 df | 均方 MS | F值 F-value | P值 P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
区组 Plot | 2 | 0.0033 | 0.0561 | 0.9456 |
遗传背景 Genetic background(GB) | 5 | 4.1462 | 69.5545 | 0 |
TAC1基因型 TAC1 genotype(TAC1) | 1 | 2.5440 | 42.6770 | 0 |
GB×TAC1 | 5 | 0.1544 | 2.5904 | 0.0547 |
误差 Error | 22 | 0.0596 | ||
总变异 Total | 35 |
Table 2 ANOVA of sheath blight scores of the rice lines tested in the study.
变异来源 Source of variance | 自由度 df | 均方 MS | F值 F-value | P值 P-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
区组 Plot | 2 | 0.0033 | 0.0561 | 0.9456 |
遗传背景 Genetic background(GB) | 5 | 4.1462 | 69.5545 | 0 |
TAC1基因型 TAC1 genotype(TAC1) | 1 | 2.5440 | 42.6770 | 0 |
GB×TAC1 | 5 | 0.1544 | 2.5904 | 0.0547 |
误差 Error | 22 | 0.0596 | ||
总变异 Total | 35 |
材料 | 纹枯病病级 | 5%显著水平 | 1%极显著水平 |
---|---|---|---|
Material | Sheath blight disease rating | 5% significance level | 1% significance level |
特青-TAC1 Teqing-TAC1 5 | 5.63±0.14 | f | E |
特青-tac1 Teqing-tac1 | 6.78±0.15 | d | CD |
IR24-TAC1 | 7.53±0.10 | ab | AB |
IR24-TAC1Ri | 7.84±0.09 | a | A |
Lemont-TAC1 | 7.10±0.18 | bcd | BC |
Lemont-tac1 | 7.63±0.13 | a | AB |
日本晴-TAC1ox Nipponbare-TAC1ox | 5.36±0.31 | f | E |
日本晴-tac1 Nipponbare-tac1 | 5.62±0.42 | f | E |
武陵粳1号-TAC1 Wulingjing 1-TAC1 | 7.05±0.21 | cd | BC |
武陵粳1号-tac1 Wulingjing 1-tac1 | 7.47±0.41 | abc | AB |
镇稻88-TAC1 Zhendao 88-TAC1 | 6.27±0.15 | e | D |
镇稻88-tac1 Zhendao 88-tac1 | 6.79±0.20 | d | CD |
Table 3 Multiple comparison of sheath blight scores of the rice lines tested in the study.
材料 | 纹枯病病级 | 5%显著水平 | 1%极显著水平 |
---|---|---|---|
Material | Sheath blight disease rating | 5% significance level | 1% significance level |
特青-TAC1 Teqing-TAC1 5 | 5.63±0.14 | f | E |
特青-tac1 Teqing-tac1 | 6.78±0.15 | d | CD |
IR24-TAC1 | 7.53±0.10 | ab | AB |
IR24-TAC1Ri | 7.84±0.09 | a | A |
Lemont-TAC1 | 7.10±0.18 | bcd | BC |
Lemont-tac1 | 7.63±0.13 | a | AB |
日本晴-TAC1ox Nipponbare-TAC1ox | 5.36±0.31 | f | E |
日本晴-tac1 Nipponbare-tac1 | 5.62±0.42 | f | E |
武陵粳1号-TAC1 Wulingjing 1-TAC1 | 7.05±0.21 | cd | BC |
武陵粳1号-tac1 Wulingjing 1-tac1 | 7.47±0.41 | abc | AB |
镇稻88-TAC1 Zhendao 88-TAC1 | 6.27±0.15 | e | D |
镇稻88-tac1 Zhendao 88-tac1 | 6.79±0.20 | d | CD |
材料 | 基本苗 | 高峰苗 | 分蘖率 | 成穗率 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Material | Number of basic seedlings per hill | Max number of tillers per hill | Percentage of tillering/% | Productive tiller percentage/% |
特青-TAC1 Teqing-TAC1 5 | 2.3±0.1 abc | 9.2±0.4 c | 306.6±2.9 defg | 69.8±5.6 de |
特青-tac1 Teqing-tac1 | 2.4±0.1 ab | 9.4±0.2 c | 298.2±21.0 efg | 66.7±4.2 e |
IR24-TAC1 | 2.4±0.1 ab | 11.9±0.1 a | 404.6±19.2 bc | 67.2±0.9 e |
IR24-TAC1Ri | 2.5±0.4 a | 10.9±0.7 ab | 339.9±46.4 cdef | 69.9±5.8 de |
Lemont-TAC1 | 1.7±0.1 d | 6.3±0.4 d | 269.8±51.6 fg | 87.2±2.6 a |
Lemont-tac1 | 1.9±0.1 cd | 6.4±0.1 d | 243.6±17.0 g | 87.0±1.8 ab |
日本晴-TAC1ox Nipponbare-TAC1ox | 2.1±0.1 bcd | 12.2±0.6 a | 496.0±48.2 a | 74.8±0.0 cde |
日本晴-tac1 Nipponbare-tac1 | 1.9±0.3 cd | 11.0±1.4 ab | 479.8±11.9 ab | 80.5±10.6 abc |
武陵粳1号-TAC1 Wulingjing 1-TAC1 | 2.0±0.1 bcd | 12.2±0.2 a | 523.7±33.5 a | 77.3±4.6 abcde |
武陵粳1号-tac1 Wulingjing 1-tac1 | 2.1±0.1 bcd | 11.8±0.1 a | 473.6±23.2 ab | 78.6±3.4 abcd |
镇稻88-TAC1 Zhendao 88-TAC1 | 2.1±0.0 abcd | 10.3±0.4 bc | 390.5±20.2 cd | 76.5±1.8 bcde |
镇稻88-tac1 Zhendao 88-tac1 | 2.1±0.1 bcd | 9.7±0.9 bc | 371.8±61.1 cde | 80.8±7.0 abc |
遗传背景 Genetic background | ||||
F值 F-value | 7.62 | 50.47 | 29.65 | 10.69 |
P值 P-value | 2.6×10-3 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 6.0×10-4 |
TAC1基因型 TAC1 genotype | ||||
F值 F-value | 0.52 | 3.93 | 4.47 | 1.00 |
P值 P-value | 0.49 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.34 |
Table 4 Population characteristics of rice lines tested in one-plant one-point transplantation condition.
材料 | 基本苗 | 高峰苗 | 分蘖率 | 成穗率 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Material | Number of basic seedlings per hill | Max number of tillers per hill | Percentage of tillering/% | Productive tiller percentage/% |
特青-TAC1 Teqing-TAC1 5 | 2.3±0.1 abc | 9.2±0.4 c | 306.6±2.9 defg | 69.8±5.6 de |
特青-tac1 Teqing-tac1 | 2.4±0.1 ab | 9.4±0.2 c | 298.2±21.0 efg | 66.7±4.2 e |
IR24-TAC1 | 2.4±0.1 ab | 11.9±0.1 a | 404.6±19.2 bc | 67.2±0.9 e |
IR24-TAC1Ri | 2.5±0.4 a | 10.9±0.7 ab | 339.9±46.4 cdef | 69.9±5.8 de |
Lemont-TAC1 | 1.7±0.1 d | 6.3±0.4 d | 269.8±51.6 fg | 87.2±2.6 a |
Lemont-tac1 | 1.9±0.1 cd | 6.4±0.1 d | 243.6±17.0 g | 87.0±1.8 ab |
日本晴-TAC1ox Nipponbare-TAC1ox | 2.1±0.1 bcd | 12.2±0.6 a | 496.0±48.2 a | 74.8±0.0 cde |
日本晴-tac1 Nipponbare-tac1 | 1.9±0.3 cd | 11.0±1.4 ab | 479.8±11.9 ab | 80.5±10.6 abc |
武陵粳1号-TAC1 Wulingjing 1-TAC1 | 2.0±0.1 bcd | 12.2±0.2 a | 523.7±33.5 a | 77.3±4.6 abcde |
武陵粳1号-tac1 Wulingjing 1-tac1 | 2.1±0.1 bcd | 11.8±0.1 a | 473.6±23.2 ab | 78.6±3.4 abcd |
镇稻88-TAC1 Zhendao 88-TAC1 | 2.1±0.0 abcd | 10.3±0.4 bc | 390.5±20.2 cd | 76.5±1.8 bcde |
镇稻88-tac1 Zhendao 88-tac1 | 2.1±0.1 bcd | 9.7±0.9 bc | 371.8±61.1 cde | 80.8±7.0 abc |
遗传背景 Genetic background | ||||
F值 F-value | 7.62 | 50.47 | 29.65 | 10.69 |
P值 P-value | 2.6×10-3 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 6.0×10-4 |
TAC1基因型 TAC1 genotype | ||||
F值 F-value | 0.52 | 3.93 | 4.47 | 1.00 |
P值 P-value | 0.49 | 0.07 | 0.06 | 0.34 |
材料 Material | 基本苗 No. of basic seedlings per hill | 高峰苗 Max number of tillers per hill | 分蘖率 Percentage of tillering/% | 成穗率 Productive tiller percentage/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
特青-TAC1 Teqing-TAC1 5 | 4.8±0.1 a | 13.1±0.4 b | 173.3±9.4 b | 66.1±2.9 b |
特青-tac1 Teqing-tac1 | 4.8±0.3 a | 12.3±0.3 b | 157.8±21.3 b | 65.7±2.9 b |
武陵粳1号-TAC1 Wulingjing 1-TAC1 | 4.4±0.2 abc | 15.1±0.2 a | 247.1±18.3 a | 81.4±3.5 a |
武陵粳1号-tac1 Wulingjing 1-tac1 | 4.5±0.3 ab | 14.6±0.2 a | 221.6±17.7 a | 75.2±4.1 ab |
镇稻88-TAC1 Zhendao 88-TAC1 | 4.6±0.3 ab | 13.0±0.3 b | 182.2±11.5 b | 79.6±6.1 a |
镇稻88-tac1 Zhendao 88-tac1 | 4.4±0.2 abc | 12.5±0.9 b | 182.1±18.7 b | 76.8±9.6 a |
Lemont-TAC1 | 4.1±0.1 bc | 9.3±0.3 c | 127.9±6.9 c | 82.1±6.5 a |
Lemont-tac1 | 4.0±0.1 c | 9.2±0.2 c | 127.0±13.2 c | 77.7±1.4 a |
遗传背景 Genetic background | ||||
F值F-value | 8.64 | 173.97 | 49.06 | 9.03 |
P值 P-value | 1.7×10-3 | 0 | 0 | 1.4×10-3 |
TAC1基因型 TAC1 genotype | ||||
F值 F-value | 0.03 | 8.10 | 2.75 | 2.59 |
P值 P-value | 0.86 | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.13 |
Table 5 Population characteristics of rice lines tested in multi-plants one-point transplantation condition.
材料 Material | 基本苗 No. of basic seedlings per hill | 高峰苗 Max number of tillers per hill | 分蘖率 Percentage of tillering/% | 成穗率 Productive tiller percentage/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
特青-TAC1 Teqing-TAC1 5 | 4.8±0.1 a | 13.1±0.4 b | 173.3±9.4 b | 66.1±2.9 b |
特青-tac1 Teqing-tac1 | 4.8±0.3 a | 12.3±0.3 b | 157.8±21.3 b | 65.7±2.9 b |
武陵粳1号-TAC1 Wulingjing 1-TAC1 | 4.4±0.2 abc | 15.1±0.2 a | 247.1±18.3 a | 81.4±3.5 a |
武陵粳1号-tac1 Wulingjing 1-tac1 | 4.5±0.3 ab | 14.6±0.2 a | 221.6±17.7 a | 75.2±4.1 ab |
镇稻88-TAC1 Zhendao 88-TAC1 | 4.6±0.3 ab | 13.0±0.3 b | 182.2±11.5 b | 79.6±6.1 a |
镇稻88-tac1 Zhendao 88-tac1 | 4.4±0.2 abc | 12.5±0.9 b | 182.1±18.7 b | 76.8±9.6 a |
Lemont-TAC1 | 4.1±0.1 bc | 9.3±0.3 c | 127.9±6.9 c | 82.1±6.5 a |
Lemont-tac1 | 4.0±0.1 c | 9.2±0.2 c | 127.0±13.2 c | 77.7±1.4 a |
遗传背景 Genetic background | ||||
F值F-value | 8.64 | 173.97 | 49.06 | 9.03 |
P值 P-value | 1.7×10-3 | 0 | 0 | 1.4×10-3 |
TAC1基因型 TAC1 genotype | ||||
F值 F-value | 0.03 | 8.10 | 2.75 | 2.59 |
P值 P-value | 0.86 | 0.01 | 0.12 | 0.13 |
材料 Material | 有效穗数 Panicle number per plant | 每穗粒数 Grain number per panicle | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 单株产量 Grain yield per plant/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
特青-TAC1 Teqing-TAC1 5 | 6.4±0.3 d | 181.4±8.3 a | 83.4±2.1 d | 25.4±0.1 ab | 24.5±0.6 de |
特青-tac1 Teqing-tac1 | 6.2±0.3 d | 182.1±2.7 a | 84.5±1.5 cd | 24.9±0.1 bcde | 23.9±0.1 e |
IR24-TAC1 | 8.0±0.1 c | 149.6±1.8 c | 84.3±2.7 cd | 25.5±0.1 a | 25.6±0.5 bc |
IR24-TAC1Ri | 7.6±0.1 c | 147.0±4.2 c | 87.9±1.9 bc | 25.3±0.1 abc | 24.8±0.1 cde |
Lemont-TAC1 | 5.4±0.1 e | 164.7±4.5 b | 91.3±0.8 ab | 25.0±0.4 abcd | 20.5±0.5 g |
Lemont-tac1 | 5.5±0.2 e | 169.3±7.4 b | 90.0±0.6 ab | 24.9±0.4 cde | 21.0±0.2 fg |
日本晴-TAC1ox Nipponbare-TAC1ox | 9.1±0.4 ab | 107.4±3.4 e | 90.4±0.8 ab | 24.0±0.2 g | 21.3±0.4 fg |
日本晴-tac1 Nipponbare-tac1 | 8.8±0.0 b | 112.8±8.1 e | 92.7±2.6 a | 23.9±0.3 g | 21.9±0.6 f |
武陵粳1号-TAC1 Wulingjing 1-TAC1 | 9.4±0.4 a | 126.7±2.0 d | 90.1±1.8 ab | 24.3±0.1 fg | 25.9±0.3 ab |
武陵粳1号-tac1 Wulingjing 1-tac1 | 9.2±0.5 ab | 130.5±3.5 d | 90.9±1.5 ab | 24.5±0.1 ef | 26.8±0.3 a |
镇稻88-TAC1 Zhendao 88-TAC1 | 7.9±0.1 c | 145.9±2.1 c | 90.3±0.3 ab | 24.5±0.1 ef | 25.5±0.3 bcd |
镇稻88-tac1 Zhendao 88-tac1 | 7.8±0.1 c | 148.1±4.1 c | 92.2±0.3 a | 24.7±0.2 def | 26.2±0.7 ab |
遗传背景 Genetic background | |||||
F值 F-value | 196.59 | 162.31 | 14.24 | 27.69 | 114.01 |
P值 P-value | 0 | 0 | 2×10-4 | 0 | 0 |
TAC1基因型 TAC1 genotype | |||||
F值 F-value | 3.95 | 1.99 | 4.10 | 0.85 | 1.73 |
P值 P-value | 0.07 | 0.19 | 0.07 | 0.38 | 0.22 |
Table 6 Multiple comparison of plant yield and its components among rice lines tested in one-plant one-point transplantation condition.
材料 Material | 有效穗数 Panicle number per plant | 每穗粒数 Grain number per panicle | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 单株产量 Grain yield per plant/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
特青-TAC1 Teqing-TAC1 5 | 6.4±0.3 d | 181.4±8.3 a | 83.4±2.1 d | 25.4±0.1 ab | 24.5±0.6 de |
特青-tac1 Teqing-tac1 | 6.2±0.3 d | 182.1±2.7 a | 84.5±1.5 cd | 24.9±0.1 bcde | 23.9±0.1 e |
IR24-TAC1 | 8.0±0.1 c | 149.6±1.8 c | 84.3±2.7 cd | 25.5±0.1 a | 25.6±0.5 bc |
IR24-TAC1Ri | 7.6±0.1 c | 147.0±4.2 c | 87.9±1.9 bc | 25.3±0.1 abc | 24.8±0.1 cde |
Lemont-TAC1 | 5.4±0.1 e | 164.7±4.5 b | 91.3±0.8 ab | 25.0±0.4 abcd | 20.5±0.5 g |
Lemont-tac1 | 5.5±0.2 e | 169.3±7.4 b | 90.0±0.6 ab | 24.9±0.4 cde | 21.0±0.2 fg |
日本晴-TAC1ox Nipponbare-TAC1ox | 9.1±0.4 ab | 107.4±3.4 e | 90.4±0.8 ab | 24.0±0.2 g | 21.3±0.4 fg |
日本晴-tac1 Nipponbare-tac1 | 8.8±0.0 b | 112.8±8.1 e | 92.7±2.6 a | 23.9±0.3 g | 21.9±0.6 f |
武陵粳1号-TAC1 Wulingjing 1-TAC1 | 9.4±0.4 a | 126.7±2.0 d | 90.1±1.8 ab | 24.3±0.1 fg | 25.9±0.3 ab |
武陵粳1号-tac1 Wulingjing 1-tac1 | 9.2±0.5 ab | 130.5±3.5 d | 90.9±1.5 ab | 24.5±0.1 ef | 26.8±0.3 a |
镇稻88-TAC1 Zhendao 88-TAC1 | 7.9±0.1 c | 145.9±2.1 c | 90.3±0.3 ab | 24.5±0.1 ef | 25.5±0.3 bcd |
镇稻88-tac1 Zhendao 88-tac1 | 7.8±0.1 c | 148.1±4.1 c | 92.2±0.3 a | 24.7±0.2 def | 26.2±0.7 ab |
遗传背景 Genetic background | |||||
F值 F-value | 196.59 | 162.31 | 14.24 | 27.69 | 114.01 |
P值 P-value | 0 | 0 | 2×10-4 | 0 | 0 |
TAC1基因型 TAC1 genotype | |||||
F值 F-value | 3.95 | 1.99 | 4.10 | 0.85 | 1.73 |
P值 P-value | 0.07 | 0.19 | 0.07 | 0.38 | 0.22 |
材料 Material | 有效穗数 Panicle number per plant | 每穗粒数 Grain number per panicle | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 单株产量 Grain yield per plant/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
特青-TAC1 Teqing-TAC1 | 8.6±0.3 d | 155.8±5.3 ab | 85.3±2.0 cd | 25.7±0.2 ab | 29.5±0.3 a |
特青-tac1 Teqing-tac1 | 8.0±0.3 de | 159.6±5.8 a | 82.0±3.2 d | 25.0±0.3 d | 26.6±1.1 b |
武陵粳1号-TAC1 Wulingjing 1-TAC1 | 12.3±0.7 a | 113.4±2.2 f | 87.1±2.3 bcd | 25.2±0.1 cd | 30.7±1.7 a |
武陵粳1号-tac1 Wulingjing 1-tac1 | 11.0±0.6 b | 117.4±0.5 ef | 91.1±0.4 ab | 25.9±0.4 a | 30.4±1.7 a |
镇稻88-TAC1 Zhendao 88-TAC1 | 10.4±0.5 b | 128.1±2.5 d | 87.7±2.9 bc | 25.3±0.3 bcd | 29.5±1.2 a |
镇稻88-tac1 Zhendao 88-tac1 | 9.5±0.5 c | 123.2±2.5 de | 94.7±1.9 a | 26.1±0.1 a | 29.0±0.8 a |
Lemont-TAC1 | 7.7±0.4 ef | 147.0±5.3 c | 83.4±1.9 cd | 24.6±0.3 e | 22.3±0.2 d |
Lemont-tac1 | 7.1±0.2 f | 149.9±5.3 bc | 86.8±1.4 cd | 25.5±0.2 bc | 24.4±0.9 c |
遗传背景 Genetic background | |||||
F值 F-value | 100.79 | 132.78 | 13.45 | 8.98 | 50.65 |
P值 P-value | 0 | 0 | 2×10-4 | 1.4×10-3 | 0 |
TAC1基因型 TAC1 genotype | |||||
F值 F-value | 19.59 | 0.71 | 10.61 | 18.43 | 0.69 |
P值 P-value | 6×10-4 | 0.41 | 5.7×10-3 | 7×10-4 | 0.42 |
Table 7 Multiple comparison of plant yield and its components among rice lines tested in multi-plants one-point transplantation condition.
材料 Material | 有效穗数 Panicle number per plant | 每穗粒数 Grain number per panicle | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 单株产量 Grain yield per plant/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
特青-TAC1 Teqing-TAC1 | 8.6±0.3 d | 155.8±5.3 ab | 85.3±2.0 cd | 25.7±0.2 ab | 29.5±0.3 a |
特青-tac1 Teqing-tac1 | 8.0±0.3 de | 159.6±5.8 a | 82.0±3.2 d | 25.0±0.3 d | 26.6±1.1 b |
武陵粳1号-TAC1 Wulingjing 1-TAC1 | 12.3±0.7 a | 113.4±2.2 f | 87.1±2.3 bcd | 25.2±0.1 cd | 30.7±1.7 a |
武陵粳1号-tac1 Wulingjing 1-tac1 | 11.0±0.6 b | 117.4±0.5 ef | 91.1±0.4 ab | 25.9±0.4 a | 30.4±1.7 a |
镇稻88-TAC1 Zhendao 88-TAC1 | 10.4±0.5 b | 128.1±2.5 d | 87.7±2.9 bc | 25.3±0.3 bcd | 29.5±1.2 a |
镇稻88-tac1 Zhendao 88-tac1 | 9.5±0.5 c | 123.2±2.5 de | 94.7±1.9 a | 26.1±0.1 a | 29.0±0.8 a |
Lemont-TAC1 | 7.7±0.4 ef | 147.0±5.3 c | 83.4±1.9 cd | 24.6±0.3 e | 22.3±0.2 d |
Lemont-tac1 | 7.1±0.2 f | 149.9±5.3 bc | 86.8±1.4 cd | 25.5±0.2 bc | 24.4±0.9 c |
遗传背景 Genetic background | |||||
F值 F-value | 100.79 | 132.78 | 13.45 | 8.98 | 50.65 |
P值 P-value | 0 | 0 | 2×10-4 | 1.4×10-3 | 0 |
TAC1基因型 TAC1 genotype | |||||
F值 F-value | 19.59 | 0.71 | 10.61 | 18.43 | 0.69 |
P值 P-value | 6×10-4 | 0.41 | 5.7×10-3 | 7×10-4 | 0.42 |
材料 Material | 出糙率 Brown rice rate/% | 整精米率 Head rice rate/% | 垩白粒率 Percentage of chalky rice/% | 垩白度 Chalkiness degree/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
特青-TAC1 Teqing-TAC1 | 81.4±0.9 bc | 62.6±6.1 bcd | 52.0±4.4 ab | 14.6±2.4 a |
特青-tac1 Teqing-tac1 | 80.5±0.1 c | 56.9±3.8 d | 54.3±4.5 a | 16.1±0.6 a |
武陵粳1号-TAC1 Wulingjing 1-TAC1 | 83.4±1.2 abc | 63.7±3.7 abc | 37.1±7.2 cd | 7.3±1.0 bc |
武陵粳1号-tac1 Wulingjing 1-tac1 | 84.8±0.9 ab | 69.2±2.5 a | 29.0±8.2 d | 5.7±1.1 cd |
镇稻88-TAC1 Zhendao 88-TAC1 | 82.7±1.6 abc | 61.7±5.0 bcd | 42.7±4.2 bc | 8.4±1.2 b |
镇稻88-tac1 Zhendao 88-tac1 | 84.6±1.0 a | 67.3±3.7 ab | 37.0±6.2 cd | 6.1±1.1 bcd |
Lemont-TAC1 | 83.2±2.0 abc | 58.6±1.9 cd | 15.3±4.0 e | 3.9±0.8 de |
Lemont-tac1 | 85.1±3.4 a | 62.4±1.5 bcd | 19.0±1.7 e | 2.6±0.6 e |
遗传背景 Genetic background | ||||
F值 F-value | 4.49 | 5.74 | 45.95 | 106.60 |
P值 P-value | 0.02 | 9×10-3 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
TAC1基因型 TAC1 genotype | ||||
F值 F-value | 2.46 | 2.95 | 0.77 | 3.45 |
P值 P-value | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.40 | 0.08 |
Table 8 Multiple comparison of grain processing and appearance qualities among rice lines tested in multi-plants one-point transplantation condition.
材料 Material | 出糙率 Brown rice rate/% | 整精米率 Head rice rate/% | 垩白粒率 Percentage of chalky rice/% | 垩白度 Chalkiness degree/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
特青-TAC1 Teqing-TAC1 | 81.4±0.9 bc | 62.6±6.1 bcd | 52.0±4.4 ab | 14.6±2.4 a |
特青-tac1 Teqing-tac1 | 80.5±0.1 c | 56.9±3.8 d | 54.3±4.5 a | 16.1±0.6 a |
武陵粳1号-TAC1 Wulingjing 1-TAC1 | 83.4±1.2 abc | 63.7±3.7 abc | 37.1±7.2 cd | 7.3±1.0 bc |
武陵粳1号-tac1 Wulingjing 1-tac1 | 84.8±0.9 ab | 69.2±2.5 a | 29.0±8.2 d | 5.7±1.1 cd |
镇稻88-TAC1 Zhendao 88-TAC1 | 82.7±1.6 abc | 61.7±5.0 bcd | 42.7±4.2 bc | 8.4±1.2 b |
镇稻88-tac1 Zhendao 88-tac1 | 84.6±1.0 a | 67.3±3.7 ab | 37.0±6.2 cd | 6.1±1.1 bcd |
Lemont-TAC1 | 83.2±2.0 abc | 58.6±1.9 cd | 15.3±4.0 e | 3.9±0.8 de |
Lemont-tac1 | 85.1±3.4 a | 62.4±1.5 bcd | 19.0±1.7 e | 2.6±0.6 e |
遗传背景 Genetic background | ||||
F值 F-value | 4.49 | 5.74 | 45.95 | 106.60 |
P值 P-value | 0.02 | 9×10-3 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
TAC1基因型 TAC1 genotype | ||||
F值 F-value | 2.46 | 2.95 | 0.77 | 3.45 |
P值 P-value | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.40 | 0.08 |
[1] | 徐云碧, 申宗坦. 早籼稻品种分蘖角度的遗传分析. 浙江农业学报, 1993, 5(1): 1-5. |
Xu Y B, Shen Z T.Genetic analysis of tiller angles for early season indica rice.Acta Agric, 1993, 5(1): 1-5. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | Dong H J, Zhao H, Xie W B, Han Z M, Li G W, Yao W, Bai X F, Hu Y, Guo Z L, Lu K, Yang L, Xing Y Z. A novel tiller angle gene, TAC3, together with TAC1 and D2 largely determine the natural variation of tiller angle in rice cultivars. PLoS Genet, 2016. . |
[3] | Takahashi M.Linkage groups and gene schemes of some striking morphological characters in Japanese rice//IRRI. Rice Genetics and Cytogenetics. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1964: 215-236. |
[4] | Takahashi M, Kinoshita T, Takeda K.Character expression and caudal genes of some mutants in rice.Fac Agric Hokkaido Univ, 1968, 54: 496-512. |
[5] | Kinoshita T, Takahashi M, Mori K.Character expression and inheritance node of three kinds of dwarf rice.Res Bull Farm Hokkaido Univ, 1974, 19: 64-75. |
[6] | 李培金, 曾大力, 刘新仿, 徐聃, 谷岱, 李家洋, 钱前.水稻散生突变体的遗传和基因定位研究. 科学通报, 2003, 48(21): 2271-2274. |
Li P J, Zeng D L, Liu X F, Xu D, Gu D, Li J Y, Qian Q.Genetic analysis and gene mapping of rice tiller angle mutant.Sci Bull, 2003, 48(21): 2271-2274. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | Tan L, Li X, Liu F, Sun X, Li C, Zhu Z, Fu Y, Cai H, Wang X, Xie D, Sun C.Control of a key transition from prostrate to erect growth in rice domestication.Nat Genet, 2008, 40(11): 1360-1364. |
[8] | Yamamoto T, Sasaki T, Yano M.Genetic analysis of spreading stub usingindica/japonica backcrossed progenies in rice. Breeding Sci, 1997, 47(2): 141-144. |
[9] | 杨菲, 张德春. 一个水稻散生突变体tag1的遗传分析及基因定位. 农业现代化研究, 2015, 36(4): 684-689. |
Yang F, Zhang D C.Genetic analysis and fine-mapping of a tiller spreading mutant in rice.Res Agric Modern, 2015, 36(4): 684-689. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 方立魁, 桑贤春, 杨正林, 凌英华, 王楠, 何光华. 一个水稻分蘖角度突变体tac2的遗传分析和基因初步定位.中国水稻科学, 2009, 23(3): 315-318. |
Fang L K, Sang X C, Yang Z L, Ling Y H, Wang N, He G H.Genetic analysis and gene mapping of a rice tiller angle mutanttac2. Chin J Rice Sci, 2009, 23(3): 315-318. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | Li Z K, Paterson A H, Pinson S R M, Stansel J W. RFLP facilitated analysis of tiller and leaf angles in rice.Euphytica, 1999, 109(2): 79-84. |
[12] | Yan J Q, Zhu J, He C X, Benmoussa M, Wu P.Quantitative trait loci analysis for the developmental behavior of tiller number in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Theor Appl Genet, 1998, 97(1/2): 267-274. |
[13] | 钱前, 何平, 滕胜, 曾大力, 朱立煌. 水稻分蘖角度的QTLs分析. 遗传学报, 2001, 28(1): 29-32. |
Qian Q, He P, Teng S, Zeng D L, Zhu L H.QTLs analysis of tiller angle in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Genet Sin, 2001, 28(1): 29-32. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 沈圣泉, 庄杰云, 包劲松, 郑康乐, 夏英武, 舒庆尧. 水稻分蘖最大角度的QTL分析. 农业生物技术学报, 2005, 13(1): 16-20. |
Sheng S Q, Zhuang J Y, Bao J S, Zheng K L, Xia Y W, Shu Q Y.QTL analysis of rice maximum tiller angle.Agric Biotechnol J, 2005, 13(1): 16-20. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 余传元, 刘裕强, 江玲, 王春明, 翟虎渠, 万建民.水稻分蘖角度的QTL定位和主效基因的遗传分析. 遗传学报, 2005, 32(9): 948-954. |
Yu C Y, Liu Y Q, Jiang L, Wang C M, Zhai H Q, Wan J M.QTLs mapping and genetic analysis of tiller angle in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Acta Genet Sin, 2005, 32(9): 948-954. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 赵春芳, 周丽慧, 于新, 赵庆勇, 陈涛, 姚姝, 张亚东, 朱镇, 王才林. 基于CSSL的高密度物理图谱定位水稻分蘖角度QTL. 植物学报, 2012, 47(6): 594-601. |
Zhao C F, Zhou L H, Yu X, Zhao Q Y, Chen T, Yao S, Zhang Y D, Zhu Z, Wang C L.Identification of tiller angle quantitative trait loci based on chromosome segment substituted lines and high-density physical map in rice.Chin Bull Bot, 2012, 47(6): 594-601. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | Yu B S, Lin Z W, Li H X, Li X J, Li J Y, Wang YH, Zhang X, Zhu Z F, Zhai W X, Wang X K, Xie D X, Sun C Q.TAC1, a major quantitative trait locus controlling tiller angle in rice. Plant J, 2007, 52(5): 891-898. |
[18] | 李家洋. 水稻分蘖数目与分蘖角度的分子机理. 中国基础科学, 2008, 10(3): 14-15. |
Li J Y.Molecular regulation mechanism of rice tillering number and tillering angle.China Basic Sci, 2008, 10(3): 14-15. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 陈宗祥, 左示敏, 张亚芳, 陈红旗, 冯明辉, 姜伟, 冯凡, 马玉银, 华鹤良, 李国生, 潘学彪. 抗纹枯病基因qSB-9TQ和分蘖角基因TAC1TQ在抗病育种中的互作效应及育种价值. 中国水稻科学, 2014, 28(5): 479-486. |
Chen Z X, Zuo S M, Zhang Y F, Chen H Q, Feng M H, Jiang W, Feng F, Ma Y Y, Hua H L, Li G S, Pan X B.Breeding potential and interaction effects of qSB-9TQ and TAC1TQ in rice breeding against sheath blight disease. Chin J Rice Sci, 2014, 28(5): 479-486. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | Han Y P, Xing Y Z, Gu S L, Chen Z X, Pan X B, Chen X L.Effect of morphological traits on sheath blight resistance in rice.Acta Bot Sin, 2003, 45(7): 825-831. |
[21] | 潘学彪, 陈宗祥, 徐敬友, 童蕴慧, 王子斌, 潘兴元.不同接种调查方法对抗水稻纹枯病遗传研究的影响. 江苏农学院学报, 1997, 18(3): 27-32. |
Pan X B, Chen Z X, Xu J Y, Tong Y H, Wang Z B, Pan X Y.The effects of different methods of inoculation and investigation on genetic research of resistance to rice sheath blight. J Jiangsu Agric Coll, 1997, 18(3): 27-32. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 左示敏, 张亚芳, 殷跃军, 陈宗祥, 潘学彪. 田间水稻纹枯病抗性鉴定体系的确立与完善. 扬州大学学报: 农业与生命科学版, 2006, 27(4): 57-61. |
Zuo S M, Zhang Y F, Yin Y J, Chen Z X, Pan X B.Establishment and improvement of inoculation technique and rating system in researching rice sheath blight resistance in field.J Yangzhou Univ: Agric & Life Sci, 2006, 27(4): 57-61. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 梁彦, 王永红. 水稻株型功能基因及其在育种上的应用.生命科学, 2016, 28(10): 1156-1167. |
Liang Y, Wang Y H.The genes controlling rice architecture and its application in breeding.Chin Bull Life Sci, 2016, 28(10): 1156-1167. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 谢元璋, 夏仲炎. 粳稻品种分蘖性状的遗传研究. 安徽农业科学, 1994, 22(4): 319-322. |
Xie Y Z, Xia Z Y.Genetic analysis of japonica rice tillering.Anhui Agric Sci, 1994, 22(4): 319-322. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | WEI Huanhe, MA Weiyi, ZUO Boyuan, WANG Lulu, ZHU Wang, GENG Xiaoyu, ZHANG Xiang, MENG Tianyao, CHEN Yinglong, GAO Pinglei, XU Ke, HUO Zhongyang, DAI Qigen. Research Progress in the Effect of Salinity, Drought, and Their Combined Stresses on Rice Yield and Quality Formation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[2] | ZHU Yujing, GUI Jinxin, GONG Chengyun, LUO Xinyang, SHI Jubin, ZHANG Haiqing, HE Jiwai. QTL Mapping for Tiller Angle in Rice by Genome-wide Association Analysis [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 266-276. |
[3] | ZHAO Yiting, XIE Keran, GAO Ti, CUI Kehui. Effects of Drought Priming During Tillering Stage on Panicle Development and Yield Formation Under High Temperature During Panicle Initiation Stage in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 277-289. |
[4] | ZHU Wang, ZHANG Xiang, GENG Xiaoyu, ZHANG Zhe, CHEN Yinglong, WEI Huanhe, DAI Qigen, XU Ke, ZHU Guanglong, ZHOU Guisheng, MENG Tianyao. Morphological and Physiological Characteristics of Rice Roots Under Combined Salinity-Drought Stress and Their Relationships with Yield Formation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(6): 617-627. |
[5] | WANG Yu, SUN Quanyi, DU Haibo, XU Zhiwen, WU Keting, YIN Li, FENG Zhiming, HU Keming, CHEN Zongxiang, ZUO Shimin. Improvement of the Resistance of Nanjing 9108 to Blast and Sheath Blight by Pyramiding Resistance Gene Pigm and Quantitative Trait Genes qSB-9TQ and qSB-11HJX [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(2): 125-132. |
[6] | PEI Feng, WANG Guangda, GAO Peng, FENG Zhiming, HU Keming, CHEN Zongxiang, CHEN Hongqi, CUI Ao, ZUO Shimin. Evaluation of New japonica Rice Lines with Low Cadmium Accumulation and Good Quality Generated by Knocking Out OsNramp5 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(1): 16-28. |
[7] | REN Weichen, CHANG Qingxia, ZHANG Yajun, ZHU Kuanyu, WANG Zhiqin, YANG Jianchang. Characteristics and Physiological Mechanism of Carbon and Nitrogen Accumulation and Translocation of japonica Rice Varieties Differing in Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(6): 586-600. |
[8] | CHEN Yun, LIU Kun, LI Tingting, LI Siyu, LI Guoming, ZHANG Weiyang, ZHANG Hao, GU Junfei, LIU Lijun, YANG Jianchang. Effects of Alternate Wetting and Moderate Soil Drying Irrigation on Root Traits, Grain Yield and Soil Properties in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(3): 269-277. |
[9] | CHEN Yixuan, QIN Guiliang, ZHOU Xiaoxin, HUANG Junjun, MENG Quan, WU Junhui, YAN Xiaojing, YUAN Huizhu. Deposition and Distribution of Droplets Sprayed by Different Plant Protection Machinery in Rice Canopy and Comparison of Control Effects on Diseases and Pests [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(2): 207-214. |
[10] | YANG Chen, ZHENG Chang, YUAN Shen, XU Le, PENG Shaobing. Effect of Fertilizer Management on the Yield and Quality of Different Rice Varieties in Ratoon Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(1): 65-76. |
[11] | Guang CHU, Ran XU, Song CHEN, Chunmei XU, Yuanhui LIU, Xiufu ZHANG, Danying WANG. Effects of Improved Crop Management on Growth Characteristic of Root and Shoot, Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiency, and Grain Yield in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2021, 35(6): 586-594. |
[12] | Zhiming FENG, Guangda WANG, Jianhua ZHAO, Ran JU, Mengchen LI, Peng GAO, Keming HU, Zongxiang CHEN, Shimin ZUO. Response Characteristics of Rice Cysteine-rich Receptor-like Kinases Family Genes to Rhizoctonia solani and Plant Hormones [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2021, 35(5): 439-448. |
[13] | Kailou LIU, Tianfu HAN, Wenjun LI, Xichu YU, Zhihua HU, Huicai YE, Dandan HU, Huijie SONG, Daming LI, Qinghai HUANG. Analysis on the Key Factors of Soil Physicochemical Properties Responsible for Changes in Rice Yield with Chinese Milk Vetch Turned over for Different Years [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2021, 35(3): 291-302. |
[14] | Youjin SONG, Chao WU, Ziyu LI, She TANG, Ganghua LI, Shaohua WANG, Yanfeng DING. Differential Responses of Grain Yields to High Temperature in Different Stages of Reproductive Growth in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2021, 35(2): 177-186. |
[15] | Yun CHEN, Yajun ZHANG, Honglu ZHANG, An ZHU, Jian HUANG, Hao ZHANG, Junfei GU, Lijun LIU, Jianchang YANG. Effects of Plant Spacing on Grain Yield and Population Quality in Mechanically-transplantedRice with Good Tasting Quality [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2020, 34(6): 550-560. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||