Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2016, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (1): 85-92.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2016.5094
• Research Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
Peng LI1, Jing-zhi ZHANG1, Ya WEI1, Jiang CHANG1,*(), Hong-jian GAO1, Li-gan ZHANG1, Yu-yu DING2
Received:
2015-06-08
Revised:
2015-09-07
Online:
2016-01-10
Published:
2016-01-10
Contact:
Jiang CHANG
李鹏1, 张敬智1, 魏亚1, 常江1,*(), 郜红建1, 章力干1, 丁玉宇2
通讯作者:
常江
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Peng LI, Jing-zhi ZHANG, Ya WEI, Jiang CHANG, Hong-jian GAO, Li-gan ZHANG, Yu-yu DING. Effect of Formulated Fertilization and Postponed Application of Phosphorus Fertilizer on Phosphorus Utilization Efficiency, Grain Yield and Economic Benefit of Single-cropping Rice[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2016, 30(1): 85-92.
李鹏, 张敬智, 魏亚, 常江, 郜红建, 章力干, 丁玉宇. 配方施肥及磷肥后移对单季稻磷素利用效率、产量和经济效益的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(1): 85-92.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2016.5094
处理 Treatment | 肥料施用量 Fertilizer application level /(kg·hm-2) | 氮肥施用比例 (基肥:分蘖肥:穗肥) N fertilizer application proportion (Basal: For tillering : For panicle initiation) /% | 磷肥施用比例 基肥:穗肥) P fertilizer application proportion (Basal: For panicle initiation) /% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O* | |||
T1 | 199.5 | 123.0 | 72.0 | 75:25:0 | 100:0 |
T2 | 180.0 | 105.0 | 105.0 | 40:30:30 | 100:0 |
T3 | 180.0 | 105.0 | 105.0 | 40:30:30 | 70:30 |
T4 | 127.5 | 90.0 | 45.0 | 40:30:30 | 100:0 |
T5 | 180.0 | 0 | 105.0 | 40:30:30 | - |
Table 1 Scheme design of the field experiment.
处理 Treatment | 肥料施用量 Fertilizer application level /(kg·hm-2) | 氮肥施用比例 (基肥:分蘖肥:穗肥) N fertilizer application proportion (Basal: For tillering : For panicle initiation) /% | 磷肥施用比例 基肥:穗肥) P fertilizer application proportion (Basal: For panicle initiation) /% | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | P2O5 | K2O* | |||
T1 | 199.5 | 123.0 | 72.0 | 75:25:0 | 100:0 |
T2 | 180.0 | 105.0 | 105.0 | 40:30:30 | 100:0 |
T3 | 180.0 | 105.0 | 105.0 | 40:30:30 | 70:30 |
T4 | 127.5 | 90.0 | 45.0 | 40:30:30 | 100:0 |
T5 | 180.0 | 0 | 105.0 | 40:30:30 | - |
处理 Treatment | 分蘖期 Tillering stage | 拔节期 Jointing stage | 抽穗期 Heading stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 穗 Panicle | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 穗 Panicle | ||||
T1 | 2.97±0.07 b | 3.10±0.17 a | 2.44±0.08 a | 2.57±0.29 bc | 2.12±0.17 ab | 2.08±0.10 b | 1.09±0.25 cd | 1.00±0.03 c | 3.00±0.38 ab | ||
T2 | 2.91±0.10 b | 2.90±0.07 ab | 2.24±0.10 b | 3.12±0.06 a | 2.30±0.11 a | 2.34±0.13 a | 1.40±0.03 ab | 1.46±0.06 ab | 3.17±0.26 a | ||
T3 | 2.85±0.09 b | 2.89±0.25 ab | 2.25±0.12 b | 2.81±0.02 ab | 2.28±0.03 ab | 2.29±0.11 ab | 1.57±0.14 a | 1.51±0.03 a | 3.32±0.02 a | ||
T4 | 3.30±0.02 a | 2.82±0.04 b | 2.29±0.03 b | 3.01±0.12 a | 2.29±0.08 a | 2.40±0.05 a | 1.29±0.09 bc | 1.43±0.07 b | 3.08±0.02 ab | ||
T5 | 2.18±0.04 c | 2.79±0.02 b | 2.20±0.05 b | 2.31±0.25 c | 2.06±0.10 b | 2.07±0.17 b | 0.86±0.06 d | 0.96±0.02 c | 2.67±0.15 b |
Table 2 Contents of total P accumulated in rice at different growth stages. g/kg
处理 Treatment | 分蘖期 Tillering stage | 拔节期 Jointing stage | 抽穗期 Heading stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 穗 Panicle | 茎 Stem | 叶 Leaf | 穗 Panicle | ||||
T1 | 2.97±0.07 b | 3.10±0.17 a | 2.44±0.08 a | 2.57±0.29 bc | 2.12±0.17 ab | 2.08±0.10 b | 1.09±0.25 cd | 1.00±0.03 c | 3.00±0.38 ab | ||
T2 | 2.91±0.10 b | 2.90±0.07 ab | 2.24±0.10 b | 3.12±0.06 a | 2.30±0.11 a | 2.34±0.13 a | 1.40±0.03 ab | 1.46±0.06 ab | 3.17±0.26 a | ||
T3 | 2.85±0.09 b | 2.89±0.25 ab | 2.25±0.12 b | 2.81±0.02 ab | 2.28±0.03 ab | 2.29±0.11 ab | 1.57±0.14 a | 1.51±0.03 a | 3.32±0.02 a | ||
T4 | 3.30±0.02 a | 2.82±0.04 b | 2.29±0.03 b | 3.01±0.12 a | 2.29±0.08 a | 2.40±0.05 a | 1.29±0.09 bc | 1.43±0.07 b | 3.08±0.02 ab | ||
T5 | 2.18±0.04 c | 2.79±0.02 b | 2.20±0.05 b | 2.31±0.25 c | 2.06±0.10 b | 2.07±0.17 b | 0.86±0.06 d | 0.96±0.02 c | 2.67±0.15 b |
Fig. 3. Utilization efficiency of P of rice in different growth periods. Different letters above the bars indicate significant difference at 0.05 level.
处理 Treatment | 磷肥贡献率 Contribution rate of P /% | 磷肥吸收利用率 Absorption efficiency of P /% | 磷肥农学利用率 Agronomic use efficiency of P /(kg·kg-1) | 磷肥偏生产力 Partial factor productivity of P /(kg·kg-1) | 磷肥生理利用率 Physiological efficiency of P /(kg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 4.90±1.36 c | 9.58±1.69 d | 3.17±1.46 c | 67.26±3.36 c | 73.15±12.49 b |
T2 | 15.40±0.79 ab | 19.70±1.46 b | 13.93±0.50 ab | 90.71±5.86 b | 162.22±6.38 ab |
T3 | 21.03±3.60 a | 24.25±0.33 a | 20.36±4.89 a | 97.14±1.72 ab | 191.81±27.26 a |
T4 | 10.12±3.60 bc | 16.56±1.60 c | 10.33±3.51 bc | 99.58±1.59 a | 132.82±33.93 ab |
Table 3 Influence of different fertilization practices on fertilizer-P utilization efficiency in rice.
处理 Treatment | 磷肥贡献率 Contribution rate of P /% | 磷肥吸收利用率 Absorption efficiency of P /% | 磷肥农学利用率 Agronomic use efficiency of P /(kg·kg-1) | 磷肥偏生产力 Partial factor productivity of P /(kg·kg-1) | 磷肥生理利用率 Physiological efficiency of P /(kg·kg-1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 4.90±1.36 c | 9.58±1.69 d | 3.17±1.46 c | 67.26±3.36 c | 73.15±12.49 b |
T2 | 15.40±0.79 ab | 19.70±1.46 b | 13.93±0.50 ab | 90.71±5.86 b | 162.22±6.38 ab |
T3 | 21.03±3.60 a | 24.25±0.33 a | 20.36±4.89 a | 97.14±1.72 ab | 191.81±27.26 a |
T4 | 10.12±3.60 bc | 16.56±1.60 c | 10.33±3.51 bc | 99.58±1.59 a | 132.82±33.93 ab |
处理 Treatment | 有效穗数 Productive panicle number /(104·hm-2) | 每穗总粒数 Grain number per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate /% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight /g | 产量 Yield /(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 223.06±10.96 ab | 188.10±19.58 b | 78.57±4.05 c | 29.14±0.30 b | 8 272.5±107.2 c |
T2 | 228.75±15.23 ab | 248.45±10.09 a | 82.40±4.33 bc | 30.01±0.21 a | 9 525.0±384.1 ab |
T3 | 248.09±6.13 a | 203.50±19.69 b | 87.86±3.62 ab | 30.05±0.05 a | 10 200.0±244.2 a |
T4 | 242.78±17.77 ab | 173.40±6.50 b | 93.33±4.04 a | 30.29±0.23 a | 8 962.5±137.1 bc |
T5 | 210.54±13.55 b | 183.00±10.59 b | 80.65±6.08 bc | 29.23±0.31 b | 8 062.5±266.9 c |
Table 4 Influence of different fertilization practices on yield components of rice.
处理 Treatment | 有效穗数 Productive panicle number /(104·hm-2) | 每穗总粒数 Grain number per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate /% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight /g | 产量 Yield /(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 223.06±10.96 ab | 188.10±19.58 b | 78.57±4.05 c | 29.14±0.30 b | 8 272.5±107.2 c |
T2 | 228.75±15.23 ab | 248.45±10.09 a | 82.40±4.33 bc | 30.01±0.21 a | 9 525.0±384.1 ab |
T3 | 248.09±6.13 a | 203.50±19.69 b | 87.86±3.62 ab | 30.05±0.05 a | 10 200.0±244.2 a |
T4 | 242.78±17.77 ab | 173.40±6.50 b | 93.33±4.04 a | 30.29±0.23 a | 8 962.5±137.1 bc |
T5 | 210.54±13.55 b | 183.00±10.59 b | 80.65±6.08 bc | 29.23±0.31 b | 8 062.5±266.9 c |
处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield /(kg·hm-2) | 增产 Yield increase /% | 成本 Cost /(Yuan·hm-2) | 收益 Profit /(Yuan·hm-2) | 产投比 Output-input ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 8 272.5 c | - | 218 8.83 | 233 28.4 5 | 10.66 |
T2 | 9 525.0 ab | 15.14 | 207 9.42 | 268 60.5 0 | 12.92 |
T3 | 10 200.0 a | 23.30 | 207 9.42 | 287 64.0 0 | 13.83 |
T4 | 8 962.5 bc | 8.34 | 143 7.08 | 252 74.2 5 | 17.59 |
Table 5 Influence of different fertilization practices on yield and economic effects of rice.
处理 Treatment | 产量 Yield /(kg·hm-2) | 增产 Yield increase /% | 成本 Cost /(Yuan·hm-2) | 收益 Profit /(Yuan·hm-2) | 产投比 Output-input ratio |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1 | 8 272.5 c | - | 218 8.83 | 233 28.4 5 | 10.66 |
T2 | 9 525.0 ab | 15.14 | 207 9.42 | 268 60.5 0 | 12.92 |
T3 | 10 200.0 a | 23.30 | 207 9.42 | 287 64.0 0 | 13.83 |
T4 | 8 962.5 bc | 8.34 | 143 7.08 | 252 74.2 5 | 17.59 |
[1] | 中国农业年鉴编辑委员会. 中国农业年鉴. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2010. |
Editorial Board of China Agriculture Yearbook. China Agriculture Yearbook: 2010. Beijing: China Agriculture Press,2010. (in Chinese) | |
[2] | 陆景陵. 植物营养学. 北京: 北京农业大学出版社, 1994. |
Lu J L.Plant nutrition science. Beijing: Beijing Agricultural University Press, 1994. (in Chinese) | |
[3] | Ma W Q, Ma L, Li J H, et al.Phosphorus flows and use efficiencies in production and consumption of wheat, rice, and maize in China.Chemosphere, 2011, 84(6): 814-821. |
[4] | 郭朝晖, 李合松, 张杨珠, 等. 磷素水平对杂交水稻生长发育和磷素运移的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2002, 16: 54-59. |
Guo Z H, Li H S, Zhang Y Z, et al.Effect of phosphorus levels on hybrid rice growth and characteristics of phosphorus transportation.Chin J Rice Sci, 2002, 2:54-59. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 王海龙, 孙羲. 磷对水稻生长发育的影响及其生理效应. 浙江农业大学学报, 1988, 1: 11-17. |
Wang H L, Sun X.Effect of phosphorus on the growth physiological metabolisms in rice plant.Acta Agric Univ Zhejiang, 1988,1:11-17. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 刘运武. 磷对杂交水稻生长发育及其生理效应影响的研究. 土壤学报, 1996, 3: 308-316. |
Liu Y W.Effect of phosphorus on growth and physiological effect of hybrid rice.Act Ped Sin, 1996, 3:308-316. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 李成亮, 何园球, 王艳玲, 等. 氮磷钾肥对红壤区水稻增产效应的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2007, 21: 179-184. |
Li C L, He Y Q, Wang Y L, et al.Effect of N, P and K fertilizer application on rice grain yield in red paddy soil.Chin J Rice Sci, 2007, 2:179-184. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 张福锁, 崔振岭, 王激清, 等. 中国土壤和植物养分管理现状与改进策略. 植物学通报, 2007, 6: 687-694. |
Zhang F S, Cui Z L, Wang J Q, et al.Current status of soil and plant nutrient management in China and improvement strategies.Chin Bull Bot, 2007, 6:687-694. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | Tilman D, Cassman K G, Matson P A, et al.Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices.Nature, 2002, 418(6898): 671-677. |
[10] | 戢林, 张锡洲, 李廷轩. 基于“3414”试验的川中丘陵区水稻测土配方施肥指标体系构建. 中国农业科学, 2011, 1: 84-92. |
Ji L, Zhang X Z, Li Y X.Establishing fertilization recommendation index of paddy soil based on the ‘3414’ field experiments in the middle of Sichuan hilly regions.Sci Agric Sin, 2011, 1:84-92. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 何昌芳, 李鹏, 郜红建, 等. 配方施肥及氮肥后移对单季稻氮素累积和利用率的影响. 中国农业大学学报, 2015, 20(1): 144-149. |
He C F, Li P, Gao H J, et al.Nitrogen accumulation and use efficiency of single rice under soil testing and nitrogen distribution.J China Agric Univ, 2015, 20(1):144-149. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 郭文, 郭华春, 卢义宣, 等. 不同氮肥施用量与磷肥运筹对云光109叶长及产量的影响. 西南农业学报, 2012, 3: 935-939. |
Guo W, Guo H C, Lu Y X, et al.Effect of different nitrogen levels and phosphorous fertilizer managements on leaf length and grain yield of Yunguang 109.Southwest China J f Agric Sci, 2012, 3:935-939. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 田忠孝, 曹季江. 磷肥残效研究. 土壤, 1997, 5: 251-253,280. |
Tian Z X, Cao J J. Residual effect of phosphate research. Soil, 1997, 5:251-253/280. (in Chinese) | |
[14] | 周全来, 赵牧秋, 鲁彩艳, 等. P肥施入土壤后的变化进程及对P淋失的影响. 生态与农村环境学报, 2006, 3: 80-83. |
Zhou Q L, Zhao M Q, Lu C Y, et al.Change of P fertilizer after application into soil and its influence on P leaching loss.J Ecol Rural Environ, 2006, 3:80-83.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 程明芳, 何萍, 金继运. 我国主要作物磷肥利用率的研究进展. 作物杂志, 2010, 1: 12-14. |
Cheng M F, He P, Jin J Y.Advance of phosphate recovery rate in Chinese main crops.Crops, 2010, 1:12-14. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 陈敏, 马婷婷, 丁艳萍, 等. 配方施肥对水稻养分吸收动态及产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 1: 237-246. |
Chen M, Ma T T, Ding Y P, et al.Effects of formula fertilizer application on nutrient uptake and grain yield of rice.Plant Nutr Fert Sci, 2014, 1: 237-246. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 付立东, 王宇, 李旭, 等. 磷肥不同施用量对水稻产量及磷肥利用率的影响. 北方水稻, 2011, 4: 20-24. |
Fu L D, Wang Y, Li X, et al.Effect of phosphorus fertilizer amounts on yield of rice.Northrice, 2011, 4:20-24. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 王苏影, 潘晓华, 吴建富, 等. 施磷量对双季早、晚稻产量及稻米品质的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2011, 2: 39-43. |
Wang S Y, Pan X H, Wu J F, Effect of amount P-applied on yield and rice quality of double-cropping rice.Soil Fert Sci China, 2011, 2:39-43. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 刘海涛, 童良军, 赵立琴, 等. 寒地水稻磷素适宜施用量的研究. 黑龙江八一农垦大学学报, 2011, 4: 15-19. |
Liu H T, Tong L J, Zhao L Q, et al.The study on reasonable dosage of phosphate fertilization in paddy in cold areas.J Heilongjiang Bayi Agric Univ, 2011, 4:15-19. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 廖佳丽. 测土配方施肥水稻3414肥料效应的研究. 中国农学通报, 2010, 13: 213-218. |
Liao J L.Effects of formula fertilization on rice.Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2010, 13:213-218. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 宇万太, 马强, 周桦, 等. 不同施肥模式对下辽河平原水稻生态系统生产力及养分收支的影响. 生态学杂志, 2007, 26(9): 1350-1354. |
Yu W T, Ma Q, Zhou H, et al.Productivity and nutrient budget of rice ecosystem in lower reaches of Liaohe River plain under effects of different fertilization patterns.Chin J Ecol, 2007, 26(9): 1350-1354. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | Li M, Zhang H C, Yang X, et al.Accumulation and utilization of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium of irrigated rice cultivars with high productivities and high N use efficiencies.Field Crops Res, 2014, 161: 55-63. |
[23] | 韦正宝, 曾维宾, 刘永贤, 等. 桂中双季稻区磷肥用量对水稻生长与产量的影响. 磷肥与复肥, 2011, 6: 74-75. |
Wei Z B, Zeng W B, Liu Y X, et al.Effects of phosphate fertilizer dosages on growth and yield of rice in double cropping rice region of Guangxi.Phosp Comp Fert, 2011, 6:74-75.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 罗莲香, 林书蓉, 胡梓汲, 等. 杂交稻的吸磷特性分析. 广东农业科学, 1989, 5: 16-19. |
Luo L X, Lin S R, Hu Z J, et al.Analysis on the phosphorus absorption properties of hybrid rice plants.Guangdong Agric Sci, 1989, 5:16-19. (in Chinese) | |
[25] | 张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 等. 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径. 土壤学报, 2008, 5: 915-924. |
Zhang F S, Wang J Q, Zhang W F, et al.Nutrient use efficiencies of major cereal crops in China and measures for improvement.Acta Ped Sin, 2008, 5:915-924. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 王伟妮, 鲁剑巍, 何予卿, 等. 氮、磷、钾肥对水稻产量、品质及养分吸收利用的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(6): 645-653. |
Wang W N, Lu J W, He Y Q, et al.Effects of N, P, K Fertilizer application on grain yield, quality, nutrient uptake and utilization of rice.Chin J Rice Sci, 2011, 25(6): 645-653. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 王苏影, 潘晓华, 吴建富, 等. 磷肥运筹对双季早、晚稻产量与品质的影响. 作物杂志, 2011(4): 63-66. |
Wang S Y, Pan X H, Wu J F, et al.Effects of phosphate application on yield and quality of double-cropping rice.Crops, 2011(4): 63-66. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 李晓蓉, 顾书忠, 王春姐. 磷肥不同施用量和施用时期对水稻产量性状的影响初探. 上海农业科技, 2013(5): 101-102,117. |
Li X R, Gu S Z, Wang C J. Effect of phosphate application amount and period on yield of rice. Shanghai Agricu Sci Technol, 2013(5):101-102/117. (in Chinese) |
[1] | GUO Zhan, ZHANG Yunbo. Research Progress in Physiological,Biochemical Responses of Rice to Drought Stress and Its Molecular Regulation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[2] | WEI Huanhe, MA Weiyi, ZUO Boyuan, WANG Lulu, ZHU Wang, GENG Xiaoyu, ZHANG Xiang, MENG Tianyao, CHEN Yinglong, GAO Pinglei, XU Ke, HUO Zhongyang, DAI Qigen. Research Progress in the Effect of Salinity, Drought, and Their Combined Stresses on Rice Yield and Quality Formation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[3] | XU Danjie, LIN Qiaoxia, LI Zhengkang, ZHUANG Xiaoqian, LING Yu, LAI Meiling, CHEN Xiaoting, LU Guodong. OsOPR10 Positively Regulates Rice Blast and Bacterial Blight Resistance [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 364-374. |
[4] | CHEN Mingliang, ZENG Xihua, SHEN Yumin, LUO Shiyou, HU Lanxiang, XIONG Wentao, XIONG Huanjin, WU Xiaoyan, XIAO Yeqing. Typing of Inter-subspecific Fertility Loci and Fertility Locus Pattern of indica-japonica Hybrid Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 386-396. |
[5] | DING Zhengquan, PAN Yueyun, SHI Yang, HUANG Haixiang. Comprehensive Evaluation and Comparative Analysis of Jiahe Series Long-Grain japonica Rice with High Eating Quality Based on Gene Chip Technology [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 397-408. |
[6] | HOU Xiaoqin, WANG Ying, YU Bei, FU Weimeng, FENG Baohua, SHEN Yichao, XIE Hangjun, WANG Huanran, XU Yongqiang, WU Zhihai, WANG Jianjun, TAO Longxing, FU Guanfu. Mechanisms Behind the Role of Potassium Fulvic Acid in Enhancing Salt Tolerance in Rice Seedlings [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 409-421. |
[7] | LÜ Zhou, YI Binghuai, CHEN Pingping, ZHOU Wenxin, TANG Wenbang, YI Zhenxie. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Transplanting Density on Yield Formation of Small Seed Hybrid Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 422-436. |
[8] | HU Jijie, HU Zhihua, ZHANG Junhua, CAO Xiaochuang, JIN Qianyu, ZHANG Zhiyuan, ZHU Lianfeng. Effects of Rhizosphere Saturated Dissolved Oxygen on Photosynthetic and Growth Characteristics of Rice at Tillering Stage [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 437-446. |
[9] | WU Yue, LIANG Chengwei, ZHAO Chenfei, SUN Jian, MA Dianrong. Occurrence of Weedy Rice Disaster and Ecotype Evolution in Direct-Seeded Rice Fields [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 447-455. |
[10] | LIU Fuxiang, ZHEN Haoyang, PENG Huan, ZHENG Liuchun, PENG Deliang, WEN Yanhua. Investigation and Species Identification of Cyst Nematode Disease on Rice in Guangdong Province [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 456-461. |
[11] | CHEN Haotian, QIN Yuan, ZHONG Xiaohan, LIN Chenyu, QIN Jinghang, YANG Jianchang, ZHANG Weiyang. Research Progress on the Relationship Between Rice Root, Soil Properties and Methane Emissions in Paddy Fields [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 233-245. |
[12] | MIAO Jun, RAN Jinhui, XU Mengbin, BO Liubing, WANG Ping, LIANG Guohua, ZHOU Yong. Overexpression of RGG2, a Heterotrimeric G Protein γ Subunit-Encoding Gene, Improves Drought Tolerance in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 246-255. |
[13] | YIN Xiaoxiao, ZHANG Zhihan, YAN Xiulian, LIAO Rong, YANG Sijia, Beenish HASSAN, GUO Daiming, FAN Jing, ZHAO Zhixue, WANG Wenming. Signal Peptide Validation and Expression Analysis of Multiple Effectors from Ustilaginoidea virens [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 256-265. |
[14] | ZHU Yujing, GUI Jinxin, GONG Chengyun, LUO Xinyang, SHI Jubin, ZHANG Haiqing, HE Jiwai. QTL Mapping for Tiller Angle in Rice by Genome-wide Association Analysis [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 266-276. |
[15] | ZHAO Yiting, XIE Keran, GAO Ti, CUI Kehui. Effects of Drought Priming During Tillering Stage on Panicle Development and Yield Formation Under High Temperature During Panicle Initiation Stage in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 277-289. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||