中国水稻科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (6): 561-573.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2020.0404
周娟1, 舒小伟1, 赖上坤1,2, 许高平1,3, 黄建晔1, 姚友礼1, 杨连新1, 董桂春1, 王余龙1,*()
收稿日期:
2020-04-23
修回日期:
2020-07-03
出版日期:
2020-11-10
发布日期:
2020-11-10
通讯作者:
王余龙
基金资助:
Juan ZHOU1, Xiaowei SHU1, Shangkun LAI1,2, Gaoping XU1,3, Jianye HUANG1, Youli YAO1, Lianxin Yang1, Guichun DONG1, Yulong WANG1,*()
Received:
2020-04-23
Revised:
2020-07-03
Online:
2020-11-10
Published:
2020-11-10
Contact:
Yulong WANG
摘要: 目的 探明不同类型水稻品种产量和氮素吸收利用对FACE(大气CO2浓度增高)响应的差异。方法 以常规粳稻、杂交籼稻、常规籼稻共6个品种为供试材料,研究FACE对不同类型水稻产量、氮素吸收利用的影响。结果 1)FACE处理极显著提高了水稻产量,平均增加24.17%, 常规籼稻增幅最大,FACE和对照均以杂交籼稻最高;2)FACE处理显著增加了单位面积穗数,常规粳稻增幅最大,并显著增加了杂交籼稻和常规籼稻每穗粒数;3)FACE处理显著提高了成熟期吸氮量和氮素籽粒生产效率,成熟期吸氮量平均增加21.23%,杂交籼稻增幅最大, FACE和对照均以常规籼稻最高;氮素籽粒生产效率平均增加7.33%,杂交籼稻增幅最大,FACE和对照均以杂交籼稻最高。成熟期吸氮量对产量促进作用略大于成熟期氮素籽粒生产效率;4)FACE处理降低了植株含氮率,成熟期平均下降0.105个百分点,常规粳稻降幅最大。FACE处理极显著提高植株干物质量,成熟期平均增加23.95%,常规籼稻增幅最大;FACE处理显著提高常规籼稻和杂交籼稻成熟期单穗吸氮量,分别增加10.79%、13.93%,但常规粳稻下降了9.60%;FACE处理显著提高了成熟期群体吸氮强度,平均增加22.29%,杂交籼稻增幅最大。FACE处理对水稻全生育期天数无显著影响;FACE处理显著提高茎鞘、叶片、穗各器官吸氮量,叶片增幅最大,平均增加51.86%,杂交籼稻增幅最大;FACE处理显著提高了不同生育阶段吸氮量,抽穗-成熟阶段增幅最大,平均增加108.90%,杂交籼稻增幅最大;5)植株干物质量、单穗吸氮量、吸氮强度、穗吸氮量、抽穗-成熟阶段吸氮量对成熟期总吸氮量的促进作用分别大于植株含氮率、单位面积穗数、生育天数、茎鞘叶吸氮量、移栽-分蘖和分蘖-抽穗阶段吸氮量;6)FACE处理显著提高了氮肥偏生产力,降低了每百千克籽粒需氮量,前者平均增加24.16%,常规籼稻增加最多;后者平均降低4.7%,常规籼稻降幅最大。结论 FACE处理可显著提高水稻产量和氮素吸收利用效率,但品种间差异较大。
中图分类号:
周娟, 舒小伟, 赖上坤, 许高平, 黄建晔, 姚友礼, 杨连新, 董桂春, 王余龙. 不同类型水稻品种产量和氮素吸收利用对大气CO2浓度升高响应的差异[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(6): 561-573.
Juan ZHOU, Xiaowei SHU, Shangkun LAI, Gaoping XU, Jianye HUANG, Youli YAO, Lianxin Yang, Guichun DONG, Yulong WANG. Differences in Response of Grain Yield, Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization to Elevated CO2Concentration in Different Rice Varieties[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2020, 34(6): 561-573.
处理 Treatment | 类型 Type | 品种 Variety | 产量 Grain yield /(g·m-2) | 单位面积穗数 Panicle number per 1 m2 | 每穗颖花数Spikelet number per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grainweight/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 常规粳稻 | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 654.53 cB | 198.5 abABC | 143.6 bB | 77.7 aA | 29.87 bcBC |
CJR | 扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 659.15 cB | 221.0 aA | 139.8 bB | 74.3 abA | 28.70 cCD | |
杂交籼稻 | 汕优63SY63 | 870.33 abAB | 219.6 aA | 157.6 bB | 81.4 abA | 31.49 abAB | |
HIR | 两优培九LYP9 | 929.96 aA | 209.7 aAB | 232.1 aA | 71.2 bA | 26.86 dD | |
常规籼稻 | 扬稻6号YD6 | 814.64 abAB | 174.6 cC | 167.2 bB | 87.0 aA | 32.36 aA | |
CIR | 扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 759.98 bcAB | 184.6 bcBC | 168.0 bB | 81.3 abA | 30.53 bABC | |
平均值 Average | 781.43 | 201.4 | 168.0 | 78.8 | 29.97 | ||
FACE | 常规粳稻 | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 808.12 cBC | 255.8 abAB | 140.1 cCD | 76.0 bBC | 29.95 bAB |
CJR | 扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 760.12 cC | 279.1 aA | 128.2 cD | 73.7 bC | 29.47 bB | |
杂交籼稻 | 汕优63SY63 | 1093.28 abA | 244.5 abABC | 167.8 bBC | 84.6 aAB | 31.74 aA | |
HIR | 两优培九LYP9 | 1139.50 aA | 225.4 bcBC | 224.9 aA | 83.2 aABC | 27.24 cC | |
常规籼稻 | 扬稻6号YD6 | 1061.24 abA | 199.5 cC | 188.6 bB | 88.6 aA | 32.11 aA | |
CIR | 扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 971.54 bAB | 201.5 cC | 182.7 bB | 86.4 aA | 30.70 abAB | |
平均值 Average | 972.30 | 234.3 | 172.1 | 82.1 | 30.20 | ||
Ft | 40.428** | 29.900** | 0.336 | 1.875 | 0.260 | ||
Fv | 31.329** | 22.983** | 24.066** | 6.355** | 8.612** | ||
Ft×v | 1.137 | 4.213 | 1.174 | 1.126 | 0.095 | ||
ry | 0.082 | 0.557** | 0.559** | 0.089 |
表1 大气CO2浓度升高对不同类型水稻产量及其构成因素的影响
Table 1 Response of grain yield and yield components to the increase of atmospheric CO2 concentration in different rice varieties.
处理 Treatment | 类型 Type | 品种 Variety | 产量 Grain yield /(g·m-2) | 单位面积穗数 Panicle number per 1 m2 | 每穗颖花数Spikelet number per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grainweight/g |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 常规粳稻 | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 654.53 cB | 198.5 abABC | 143.6 bB | 77.7 aA | 29.87 bcBC |
CJR | 扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 659.15 cB | 221.0 aA | 139.8 bB | 74.3 abA | 28.70 cCD | |
杂交籼稻 | 汕优63SY63 | 870.33 abAB | 219.6 aA | 157.6 bB | 81.4 abA | 31.49 abAB | |
HIR | 两优培九LYP9 | 929.96 aA | 209.7 aAB | 232.1 aA | 71.2 bA | 26.86 dD | |
常规籼稻 | 扬稻6号YD6 | 814.64 abAB | 174.6 cC | 167.2 bB | 87.0 aA | 32.36 aA | |
CIR | 扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 759.98 bcAB | 184.6 bcBC | 168.0 bB | 81.3 abA | 30.53 bABC | |
平均值 Average | 781.43 | 201.4 | 168.0 | 78.8 | 29.97 | ||
FACE | 常规粳稻 | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 808.12 cBC | 255.8 abAB | 140.1 cCD | 76.0 bBC | 29.95 bAB |
CJR | 扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 760.12 cC | 279.1 aA | 128.2 cD | 73.7 bC | 29.47 bB | |
杂交籼稻 | 汕优63SY63 | 1093.28 abA | 244.5 abABC | 167.8 bBC | 84.6 aAB | 31.74 aA | |
HIR | 两优培九LYP9 | 1139.50 aA | 225.4 bcBC | 224.9 aA | 83.2 aABC | 27.24 cC | |
常规籼稻 | 扬稻6号YD6 | 1061.24 abA | 199.5 cC | 188.6 bB | 88.6 aA | 32.11 aA | |
CIR | 扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 971.54 bAB | 201.5 cC | 182.7 bB | 86.4 aA | 30.70 abAB | |
平均值 Average | 972.30 | 234.3 | 172.1 | 82.1 | 30.20 | ||
Ft | 40.428** | 29.900** | 0.336 | 1.875 | 0.260 | ||
Fv | 31.329** | 22.983** | 24.066** | 6.355** | 8.612** | ||
Ft×v | 1.137 | 4.213 | 1.174 | 1.126 | 0.095 | ||
ry | 0.082 | 0.557** | 0.559** | 0.089 |
图1 大气CO2浓度升高对不同类型水稻成熟期吸氮量和氮素籽粒生产效率的影响
Fig. 1. Response of nitrogen absorption amount(NAA) at maturity and nitrogen use efficiency for grain yield(NUEg) to theincrease of atmospheric CO2 concentration in different rice varieties.
处理 Treatment | 类型 Type | 品种 Variety | 移栽期 Transplanting stage | 分蘖期 Tillering stage | 抽穗期 Heading stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 常规粳稻 CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 2.34 aAB | 1.80 aA | 1.45 aA | 1.05 aA |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 2.38 aAB | 1.75 aA | 1.20 bB | 0.92 abA | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 2.22 bB | 1.99 aA | 1.16 bB | 0.85 bA | |
两优培九LYP9 | 2.24 aAB | 2.04 aA | 1.09 bB | 0.95 abA | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 3.04 aA | 1.85 aA | 1.16 bB | 0.97 abA | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 2.75 aAB | 1.86 aA | 1.18 bB | 0.98 abA | ||
平均值 Average | 2.50 | 1.89 | 1.21 | 0.95 | ||
FACE | 常规粳稻 CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 2.34 aAB | 1.72 aA | 1.24 aA | 0.98 aA |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 2.38 aAB | 1.71 aA | 1.12 aA | 0.87 aA | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 2.22 bB | 1.98 aA | 1.03 aA | 0.86 aA | |
两优培九LYP9 | 2.24 aAB | 1.79 aA | 0.93 aA | 0.93 aA | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 3.04 aA | 1.75 aA | 1.05 aA | 0.89 aA | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 2.75 aAB | 1.78 aA | 1.12 aA | 0.98 aA | ||
平均值 Average | 2.50 | 1.79 | 1.08 | 0.92 | ||
Ft | 1.530 | 8.459** | 0.714 | |||
Fv | 10.014** | 1.986 | 7.979** | 0.849 | ||
Ft×v | 0.032 | 0.222 | 0.127 | |||
rNAA | -0.054 | -0.098 | -0.287* | 0.561** |
表2 大气CO2浓度升高对不同类型水稻品种地上部植株含氮率的影响
Table 2 Response of nitrogen content of oboveground parts to the increase of atmospheric CO2 concentration in different ricevarieties. %
处理 Treatment | 类型 Type | 品种 Variety | 移栽期 Transplanting stage | 分蘖期 Tillering stage | 抽穗期 Heading stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 常规粳稻 CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 2.34 aAB | 1.80 aA | 1.45 aA | 1.05 aA |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 2.38 aAB | 1.75 aA | 1.20 bB | 0.92 abA | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 2.22 bB | 1.99 aA | 1.16 bB | 0.85 bA | |
两优培九LYP9 | 2.24 aAB | 2.04 aA | 1.09 bB | 0.95 abA | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 3.04 aA | 1.85 aA | 1.16 bB | 0.97 abA | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 2.75 aAB | 1.86 aA | 1.18 bB | 0.98 abA | ||
平均值 Average | 2.50 | 1.89 | 1.21 | 0.95 | ||
FACE | 常规粳稻 CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 2.34 aAB | 1.72 aA | 1.24 aA | 0.98 aA |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 2.38 aAB | 1.71 aA | 1.12 aA | 0.87 aA | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 2.22 bB | 1.98 aA | 1.03 aA | 0.86 aA | |
两优培九LYP9 | 2.24 aAB | 1.79 aA | 0.93 aA | 0.93 aA | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 3.04 aA | 1.75 aA | 1.05 aA | 0.89 aA | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 2.75 aAB | 1.78 aA | 1.12 aA | 0.98 aA | ||
平均值 Average | 2.50 | 1.79 | 1.08 | 0.92 | ||
Ft | 1.530 | 8.459** | 0.714 | |||
Fv | 10.014** | 1.986 | 7.979** | 0.849 | ||
Ft×v | 0.032 | 0.222 | 0.127 | |||
rNAA | -0.054 | -0.098 | -0.287* | 0.561** |
处理 Treatment | 类型 Type | 品种 Variety | 移栽期 Transplanting stage | 分蘖期 Tillering stage | 抽穗期 Heading stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 常规粳稻 CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 5.21 bcBC | 90.67 dD | 686.34 dC | 1112.77 dD |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 5.35 bB | 113.01 cCD | 825.33 cBC | 1286.28 cBC | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 4.08 cdCD | 133.79 bBC | 1005.46 bA | 1358.31 bcAB | |
两优培九LYP9 | 3.60 dD | 135.22 bBC | 1141.62 aA | 1576.69 aA | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 9.07 aA | 186.86 aA | 1056.76 abA | 1495.99 abAB | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 8.17 aA | 153.67 bB | 972.17 bAB | 1369.15 bcAB | ||
平均值 Average | 5.91 | 135.54 | 947.95 | 1366.53 | ||
FACE | 常规粳稻 CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 5.21 bcBC | 108.14 cD | 742.78 dC | 1382.25 bB |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 5.35 bB | 127.76 cCD | 1030.98 cB | 1473.58 bB | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 4.08 cdCD | 169.94 abAB | 1424.38 aA | 1863.12 aA | |
两优培九LYP9 | 3.60 dD | 156.70 bBC | 1253.98 bA | 1846.88 aA | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 9.07 aA | 194.26 aA | 1256.34 bA | 1868.38 aA | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 8.17 aA | 194.60 aA | 1212.74 bAB | 1826.99 aA | ||
平均值 Average | 5.91 | 158.57 | 1153.53 | 1710.20 | ||
Ft | 10.513** | 28.006** | 60.370** | |||
Fv | 62.539** | 35.617** | 36.345** | 25.871** | ||
Ft×v | 0.280 | 0.361 | 0.185 | |||
rNAA | 0.239* | 0.526** | 0.516** | 0.691** |
表3 大气CO2浓度升高对不同类型水稻品种植株地上部干物质量的影响
Table 3 Response of dry matter weight of aboveground parts to the increase of atmospheric CO2 concentration in different rice varieties.g/m2
处理 Treatment | 类型 Type | 品种 Variety | 移栽期 Transplanting stage | 分蘖期 Tillering stage | 抽穗期 Heading stage | 成熟期 Maturity stage |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 常规粳稻 CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 5.21 bcBC | 90.67 dD | 686.34 dC | 1112.77 dD |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 5.35 bB | 113.01 cCD | 825.33 cBC | 1286.28 cBC | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 4.08 cdCD | 133.79 bBC | 1005.46 bA | 1358.31 bcAB | |
两优培九LYP9 | 3.60 dD | 135.22 bBC | 1141.62 aA | 1576.69 aA | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 9.07 aA | 186.86 aA | 1056.76 abA | 1495.99 abAB | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 8.17 aA | 153.67 bB | 972.17 bAB | 1369.15 bcAB | ||
平均值 Average | 5.91 | 135.54 | 947.95 | 1366.53 | ||
FACE | 常规粳稻 CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 5.21 bcBC | 108.14 cD | 742.78 dC | 1382.25 bB |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 5.35 bB | 127.76 cCD | 1030.98 cB | 1473.58 bB | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 4.08 cdCD | 169.94 abAB | 1424.38 aA | 1863.12 aA | |
两优培九LYP9 | 3.60 dD | 156.70 bBC | 1253.98 bA | 1846.88 aA | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 9.07 aA | 194.26 aA | 1256.34 bA | 1868.38 aA | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 8.17 aA | 194.60 aA | 1212.74 bAB | 1826.99 aA | ||
平均值 Average | 5.91 | 158.57 | 1153.53 | 1710.20 | ||
Ft | 10.513** | 28.006** | 60.370** | |||
Fv | 62.539** | 35.617** | 36.345** | 25.871** | ||
Ft×v | 0.280 | 0.361 | 0.185 | |||
rNAA | 0.239* | 0.526** | 0.516** | 0.691** |
处理 Treatment | 类型 Type | 品种 Variety | 移栽-分蘖 Transplanting-tillering | 分蘖-抽穗 Tillering-heading | 抽穗-成熟 Heading-maturity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 常规粳稻 CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 1.50 cC | 8.25 aA | 1.64 aA |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 1.82 cC | 7.95 aA | 1.74 aA | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 2.56 bAB | 8.98 bA | -0.16 aA | |
两优培九LYP9 | 2.51 bB | 9.73 aA | 2.67 aA | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 3.16 aA | 8.80 aA | 2.27 aA | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 2.66 bAB | 8.62 aA | 1.92 aA | ||
平均值Average | 2.37 | 8.72 | 1.68 | ||
FACE | 常规粳稻 CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 1.68 cB | 7.32 bA | 4.47 aA |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 2.03 bcB | 9.39 abA | 1.18 aA | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 3.22 aA | 11.39 aA | 1.37 aA | |
两优培九LYP9 | 2.68 abAB | 9.01 abA | 5.39 aA | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 3.14 aA | 9.93 abA | 3.44 aA | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 3.29 aA | 9.89 abA | 4.53 aA | ||
平均值Average | 2.67 | 9.49 | 3.40 | ||
Ft | 5.278* | 2.119 | 4.467* | ||
Fv | 34.713** | 3.022 | 0.379 | ||
Ft×v | 0.221 | 0.299 | 0.134 | ||
rNAA | 0.451** | 0.294* | 0.721** |
表4 大气CO2浓度升高对不同类型水稻品种不同生育阶段氮素吸收量的影响
Table 4 Response of nitrogen absorption amount at different growth stages to the increase of atmospheric CO2 concentration in different rice varieties. g/m2
处理 Treatment | 类型 Type | 品种 Variety | 移栽-分蘖 Transplanting-tillering | 分蘖-抽穗 Tillering-heading | 抽穗-成熟 Heading-maturity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 常规粳稻 CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 1.50 cC | 8.25 aA | 1.64 aA |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 1.82 cC | 7.95 aA | 1.74 aA | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 2.56 bAB | 8.98 bA | -0.16 aA | |
两优培九LYP9 | 2.51 bB | 9.73 aA | 2.67 aA | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 3.16 aA | 8.80 aA | 2.27 aA | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 2.66 bAB | 8.62 aA | 1.92 aA | ||
平均值Average | 2.37 | 8.72 | 1.68 | ||
FACE | 常规粳稻 CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 1.68 cB | 7.32 bA | 4.47 aA |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 2.03 bcB | 9.39 abA | 1.18 aA | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 3.22 aA | 11.39 aA | 1.37 aA | |
两优培九LYP9 | 2.68 abAB | 9.01 abA | 5.39 aA | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 3.14 aA | 9.93 abA | 3.44 aA | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 3.29 aA | 9.89 abA | 4.53 aA | ||
平均值Average | 2.67 | 9.49 | 3.40 | ||
Ft | 5.278* | 2.119 | 4.467* | ||
Fv | 34.713** | 3.022 | 0.379 | ||
Ft×v | 0.221 | 0.299 | 0.134 | ||
rNAA | 0.451** | 0.294* | 0.721** |
处理 Treatment | 类型 Type | 品种 Variety | 抽穗期 Heading stage | 成熟期 Maturity | 抽穗后 After heading |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 常规粳稻 CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 58.32 bcB | 49.18 bcAB | 8.54 aA |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 52.64 cB | 44.15 cB | 7.92 aA | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 52.90 cB | 53.60 bcAB | -1.06 aA | |
两优培九LYP9 | 71.82 abAB | 59.05 abcAB | 12.41 aA | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 83.46 aA | 68.84 aA | 13.07 aA | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 72.74 abAB | 61.09 abAB | 10.47 aA | ||
平均值Average | 65.31 | 55.99 | 8.56 | ||
FACE | 常规粳稻 CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 54.04 cdC | 35.94 bC | 17.63 bB |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 46.27 dC | 41.75 bBC | 4.06 cC | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 65.68 bcBC | 59.97 aAB | 5.39 cC | |
两优培九LYP9 | 76.41 abAB | 51.41 abABC | 24.66 aA | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 83.84 aAB | 65.13 aA | 17.37 bAB | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 89.22 aA | 65.99 aA | 22.15 aA | ||
平均值Average | 69.24 | 53.37 | 15.21 | ||
Ft | 0.954 | 1.256 | 3.009 | ||
Fv | 23.652** | 23.625** | 1.039 | ||
Ft×v | 0.954 | 1.744 | 0.288 | ||
rNAA | 0.317** | 0.848** | 0.708** |
表5 大气CO2浓度升高对不同类型水稻品种主要生育时期单穗吸氮量的影响
Table 5 Response of nitrogen absorption amount per panicle to the increase of atmospheric CO2 concentration in different rice varieties.mg
处理 Treatment | 类型 Type | 品种 Variety | 抽穗期 Heading stage | 成熟期 Maturity | 抽穗后 After heading |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 常规粳稻 CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 58.32 bcB | 49.18 bcAB | 8.54 aA |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 52.64 cB | 44.15 cB | 7.92 aA | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 52.90 cB | 53.60 bcAB | -1.06 aA | |
两优培九LYP9 | 71.82 abAB | 59.05 abcAB | 12.41 aA | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 83.46 aA | 68.84 aA | 13.07 aA | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 72.74 abAB | 61.09 abAB | 10.47 aA | ||
平均值Average | 65.31 | 55.99 | 8.56 | ||
FACE | 常规粳稻 CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 54.04 cdC | 35.94 bC | 17.63 bB |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 46.27 dC | 41.75 bBC | 4.06 cC | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 65.68 bcBC | 59.97 aAB | 5.39 cC | |
两优培九LYP9 | 76.41 abAB | 51.41 abABC | 24.66 aA | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 83.84 aAB | 65.13 aA | 17.37 bAB | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 89.22 aA | 65.99 aA | 22.15 aA | ||
平均值Average | 69.24 | 53.37 | 15.21 | ||
Ft | 0.954 | 1.256 | 3.009 | ||
Fv | 23.652** | 23.625** | 1.039 | ||
Ft×v | 0.954 | 1.744 | 0.288 | ||
rNAA | 0.317** | 0.848** | 0.708** |
处理 Treatment | 类型 Type | 品种 Variety | 播种-抽穗 Sowing-heading | 全生育期 Whole growth duration | 抽穗-成熟 Heading-maturity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 常规粳稻 CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 84.8 dC | 132.5 cCD | 47.7 bcB |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 92.2 bB | 146.5 aA | 54.3 aA | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 87.8 cC | 131.5 cD | 43.7 cB | |
两优培九LYP9 | 98.0 aA | 144.2 aA | 46.2 bcB | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 94.2 bAB | 137.8 bB | 43.7 cB | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 91.8 bB | 136.3 bBC | 44.5 bcB | ||
平均值Average | 91.5 | 138.1 | 46.7 | ||
FACE | 常规粳稻 CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 82.8 dD | 130.0 cC | 47.2 bcB |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 90.3 cBC | 144.5 aA | 54.2 aA | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 89.2 cC | 132.5 cC | 43.3 cB | |
两优培九LYP9 | 95.5 aA | 143.5 aA | 48.0 bB | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 93.7 abAB | 137.7 bB | 44.0 bcB | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 91.5 bcABC | 136.2 bB | 44.7 bcB | ||
平均值Average | 90.5 | 137.4 | 46.9 | ||
Ft | 0.963 | 0.268 | 0.056 | ||
Fv | 12.093** | 0.311 | 19.128** | ||
Ft×v | 0.229 | 0.272 | 0.111 | ||
rNAA | 0.325** | 0.043 | -0.268* |
表6 大气CO2浓度升高对不同类型水稻品种生育天数的影响
Table 6 Response of the growth duration to the increase of atmospheric CO2 concentration in different rice varieties.d
处理 Treatment | 类型 Type | 品种 Variety | 播种-抽穗 Sowing-heading | 全生育期 Whole growth duration | 抽穗-成熟 Heading-maturity |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 常规粳稻 CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 84.8 dC | 132.5 cCD | 47.7 bcB |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 92.2 bB | 146.5 aA | 54.3 aA | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 87.8 cC | 131.5 cD | 43.7 cB | |
两优培九LYP9 | 98.0 aA | 144.2 aA | 46.2 bcB | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 94.2 bAB | 137.8 bB | 43.7 cB | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 91.8 bB | 136.3 bBC | 44.5 bcB | ||
平均值Average | 91.5 | 138.1 | 46.7 | ||
FACE | 常规粳稻 CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 82.8 dD | 130.0 cC | 47.2 bcB |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 90.3 cBC | 144.5 aA | 54.2 aA | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 89.2 cC | 132.5 cC | 43.3 cB | |
两优培九LYP9 | 95.5 aA | 143.5 aA | 48.0 bB | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 93.7 abAB | 137.7 bB | 44.0 bcB | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 91.5 bcABC | 136.2 bB | 44.7 bcB | ||
平均值Average | 90.5 | 137.4 | 46.9 | ||
Ft | 0.963 | 0.268 | 0.056 | ||
Fv | 12.093** | 0.311 | 19.128** | ||
Ft×v | 0.229 | 0.272 | 0.111 | ||
rNAA | 0.325** | 0.043 | -0.268* |
处理 Treatment | 类型 Type | 品种 Variety | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 抽穗后 After heading |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 常规粳稻CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 116.21 aA | 86.80abA | 32.04 aA |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 107.32 aA | 79.57 bA | 32.09 aA | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 132.14 aA | 87.08 abA | -4.01 aA | |
两优培九LYP9 | 125.60 aA | 103.52 aA | 55.69 aA | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 129.62 aA | 105.30 aA | 51.22 aA | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 124.27 aA | 98.41 abA | 40.49 aA | ||
平均值Average | 122.53 | 93.45 | 34.59 | ||
FACE | 常规粳稻 CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 109.84 bB | 104.54 bcAB | 90.89 aA |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 127.76 bAB | 88.25 cB | 23.76 aA | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 164.67 aA | 121.31 abAB | 30.23 aA | |
两优培九LYP9 | 123.13 bAB | 120.21 abAB | 121.82 aA | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 142.03 abAB | 121.83 abAB | 78.80 aA | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 146.01 abAB | 131.34 aA | 104.21 aA | ||
平均值Average | 135.57 | 114.58 | 74.95 | ||
Ft | 5.189* | 16.917** | 5.109* | ||
Fv | 5.787** | 8.143** | 0.647 | ||
Ft×v | 0.286 | 0.595 | 0.184 | ||
rNAA | 0.344** | 0.987** | 0.735** |
表7 大气CO2浓度升高对不同类型水稻品种群体吸氮强度的影响
Table 7 Response of nitrogen absorption intensity to the increase of atmospheric CO2 concentration in different rice varieties.mg/(m2·d)
处理 Treatment | 类型 Type | 品种 Variety | 抽穗期 Heading | 成熟期 Maturity | 抽穗后 After heading |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 常规粳稻CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 116.21 aA | 86.80abA | 32.04 aA |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 107.32 aA | 79.57 bA | 32.09 aA | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 132.14 aA | 87.08 abA | -4.01 aA | |
两优培九LYP9 | 125.60 aA | 103.52 aA | 55.69 aA | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 129.62 aA | 105.30 aA | 51.22 aA | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 124.27 aA | 98.41 abA | 40.49 aA | ||
平均值Average | 122.53 | 93.45 | 34.59 | ||
FACE | 常规粳稻 CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 109.84 bB | 104.54 bcAB | 90.89 aA |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 127.76 bAB | 88.25 cB | 23.76 aA | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 164.67 aA | 121.31 abAB | 30.23 aA | |
两优培九LYP9 | 123.13 bAB | 120.21 abAB | 121.82 aA | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 142.03 abAB | 121.83 abAB | 78.80 aA | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 146.01 abAB | 131.34 aA | 104.21 aA | ||
平均值Average | 135.57 | 114.58 | 74.95 | ||
Ft | 5.189* | 16.917** | 5.109* | ||
Fv | 5.787** | 8.143** | 0.647 | ||
Ft×v | 0.286 | 0.595 | 0.184 | ||
rNAA | 0.344** | 0.987** | 0.735** |
处理 Treatment | 类型 Type | 品种 Variety | 茎鞘 Stem and sheath | 叶 Leaf | 穗 Panicle |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 常规粳稻 CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 2.14 cB | 1.23 bA | 8.14 abA |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 3.15 abAB | 1.63 abA | 6.87 bA | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 2.72 bcAB | 1.36 bA | 7.37 abA | |
两优培九LYP9 | 3.72 aA | 1.57 abA | 9.68 aA | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 3.29 abA | 2.30 aA | 8.92 abA | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 3.49 abA | 1.95 abA | 7.98 abA | ||
平均值Average | 3.09 | 1.67 | 8.16 | ||
FACE | 常规粳稻 CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 2.59 bB | 1.31 cB | 9.69 abA |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 3.46 aA | 1.37 cB | 7.89 bA | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 4.05 aAB | 1.81 cAB | 10.21 abA | |
两优培九LYP9 | 3.22 abAB | 4.05 abAB | 9.88 abA | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 3.75 aAB | 2.26 bcAB | 10.77 aA | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 3.56 aAB | 4.62 aA | 9.76 abA | ||
平均值Average | 3.44 | 2.57 | 9.70 | ||
Ft | 2.508 | 4.784* | 10.081** | ||
Fv | 3.751* | 3.911* | 2.586 | ||
Ft×v | 0.040 | 1.447 | 0.099 | ||
rNAA | 0.641** | 0.682** | 0.748** |
表8 大气CO2浓度升高对不同类型水稻品种成熟期各器官吸氮量的影响
Table 8 Response of nitrogen absorption amount in plant organs at maturity to the increase of atmospheric CO2 concentration in different rice varieties.g/m2
处理 Treatment | 类型 Type | 品种 Variety | 茎鞘 Stem and sheath | 叶 Leaf | 穗 Panicle |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 常规粳稻 CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 2.14 cB | 1.23 bA | 8.14 abA |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 3.15 abAB | 1.63 abA | 6.87 bA | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 2.72 bcAB | 1.36 bA | 7.37 abA | |
两优培九LYP9 | 3.72 aA | 1.57 abA | 9.68 aA | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 3.29 abA | 2.30 aA | 8.92 abA | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 3.49 abA | 1.95 abA | 7.98 abA | ||
平均值Average | 3.09 | 1.67 | 8.16 | ||
FACE | 常规粳稻 CJR | 武运粳21 WYJ21 | 2.59 bB | 1.31 cB | 9.69 abA |
扬辐粳8号YFJ8 | 3.46 aA | 1.37 cB | 7.89 bA | ||
杂交籼稻HIR | 汕优63SY63 | 4.05 aAB | 1.81 cAB | 10.21 abA | |
两优培九LYP9 | 3.22 abAB | 4.05 abAB | 9.88 abA | ||
常规籼稻CIR | 扬稻6号YD6 | 3.75 aAB | 2.26 bcAB | 10.77 aA | |
扬辐籼6号YFX6 | 3.56 aAB | 4.62 aA | 9.76 abA | ||
平均值Average | 3.44 | 2.57 | 9.70 | ||
Ft | 2.508 | 4.784* | 10.081** | ||
Fv | 3.751* | 3.911* | 2.586 | ||
Ft×v | 0.040 | 1.447 | 0.099 | ||
rNAA | 0.641** | 0.682** | 0.748** |
图2 大气CO2浓度升高对不同类型水稻品种氮肥偏生产力和每百千克籽粒需氮量的影响
Fig. 2. Response of partial productivity of nitrogen fertilizer(PFPN) and nitrogen absorption amount(NAA) per 100kg grains to the increase of atmospheric CO2 concentration in different rice varieties.
[1] | Stocker T F, Qin D, Plattner G K.IPCC:Climate change: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change[M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013:1-1535. |
[2] | Cracknell A P, Varotsos C A.The IPCC fourth assessment report and the fiftieth anniversary of Sputnik[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,2007, 14(6): 384-387. |
[3] | Ainsworth E A, Long S P.What have we learned from 15 years of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) A meta-analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy[J]. New Phytologist, 2005, 165(2): 351-371. |
[4] | Wei D, Cui K, Pan J, Ye G, Xiang J, Nie L, Huang J.Genetic dissection of grain nitrogen use efficiency and grain yield and their relationship in rice[J]. Field Crops Research, 2011, 124(3):340-346. |
[5] | Roberts TL, Ross WJ, Norman RJ, Slaton NA, Jr. Wilson CE.Predicting nitrogen fertilizer needs for rice in arkansas using alkaline hydrolyzable-nitrogen[J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2011, 75(3):1161-1171. |
[6] | Liang XQ, Li H, Wang SX, Ye YS, Ji YJ, Tian GM, van Kessel C, Linquist BA. Nitrogen management to reduce yield-scaled global warming potential in rice[J]. Field Crops Research, 2013, 146:66-74. |
[7] | Wang B, Guo C, Wan Y, Li J, Ju X, Cai W, You S, Qin X, Wilkes A, Li Y.Air warming and CO2 enrichment increase N use efficiency and decrease N surplus in a Chinese double rice cropping system[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 706(136063). |
[8] | 杨连新,王余龙,黄建晔,杨洪建,刘红江. 开放式空气CO2浓度增高对水稻生长发育影响的研究进展[J].应用生态学报,2006(7):1331-1337. |
Yang L X, Wang Y L, Huang J Y, YangH J, Liu H J. Responses of rice growth and development to free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE): A research review[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2006(7):1331-1337. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 杨连新, 王云霞, 朱建国. 十年水稻FACE的产量响应[J]. 生态学报, 2009, 29(3): 1486-1497. |
Yang L X, Wang Y X,Zhu J G.What have we learned from 10 years of free air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiments on riceCO2 and grain yield[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2009, 29(3): 1486-1497. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 杨连新,王云霞,朱建国,Toshihiro H,王余龙.开放式空气中CO2浓度增高(FACE)对水稻生长和发育的影响[J].生态学报,2010,30(6):1573-1585. |
YangL X, Wang Y X, Zhu J G,Toshihiro H, Wang Y L. What have we learned from 10 years of free-air CO2enrichment(FACE)experiments on rice growth and development[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30(6): 1573-1585. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | Noguchi K, Tsunoda T, Miyagi A, Kawai-Yamada M, Sugiura D, Miyazawa S, Tokida T, Usui Y, Nakamura H, Sakai H.Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on respiratory rates in mature leaves of two rice cultivars grown at a free-air CO2enrichment site and analyses of the underlying mechanisms[J]. Plant and Cell Physlology, 2018, 59(3): 637-649. |
[12] | Cai C, Yin X, He S, Jiang W, Si C, Struik PC, Luo W, Li G, Xie Y, Xiong Y.Responses of wheat and rice to factorial combinations of ambient and elevated CO2 and temperature in FACE experiments[J]. Global Change Biology, 2016, 22(2): 856-874. |
[13] | Cai C, Li G, Yang H, Yang J, Liu H, Struik PC, Luo W, Yin X, Di L, Guo X.Do all leaf photosynthesis parameters of rice acclimate to elevated CO2, elevated temperature, and their combination, in FACE environments[J]? Global Change Biology, 2018, 24(4):1685-1707. |
[14] | Wang W, Cai C, He J, Gu J, Zhu G, Zhang W, Zhu J, Liu G.Yield, dry matter distribution and photosynthetic characteristics of rice under elevated CO2 and increased temperature conditions[J]. Field Crops Research, 2020, 248:107605. |
[15] | Kim HY, Lieffering M, Miura S, Kobayashi K, Okada M.Growth and nitrogen uptake of CO2-enriched rice under field conditions[J]. New Phytologist, 2001, 150(2): 223-229. |
[16] | 谢祖彬, 朱建国, 张雅丽, 马红亮, 刘钢, 韩勇, 曾青, 蔡祖聪. 水稻生长及其体内C、N、P 组成对开放式空气 CO2浓度增高和N、P施肥的响应[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(10): 1223-1230. |
Xie Z B, Zhu J G, Zhang Y L, Liu G, Han Y, Zeng Q, Cai Z C.Responses of rice (Oryza sativa) growth and its C,N and P composition to FACE (Free-air Carbon Dioxide Enrichment) and N,P fertilization[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 13(10): 1223-1230.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 董桂春, 王余龙, 杨洪建,黄建晔, 朱建国, 杨连新, 单玉华. 开放式空气 CO2浓度增高对水稻N素吸收利用的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(10): 1219-1222. |
Dong G C, Wang Y L, Yang H J, Huang J Y, Yang L X, Shan Y H.Effect of free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) on nitrogen accumulation and utilization efficiency in rice (Oryza sativa)[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002,13(10): 1219-1222.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 黄建晔, 杨洪建, 杨连新,王余龙, 朱建国, 刘红江, 董桂春, 单玉华. 水稻不同生育时期N素营养对FACE响应的研究[J]. 作物学报, 2004, 30(12): 1237-1243. |
Huang J Y, Yang H J, Yang L X, Wang Y L, Zhu J G, Liu H J,Dong G C, Shan Y H.Effects of free-air CO2enrichment(FACE) on nitrogen nutrition at different growth stages in rice(Oryza sativa L.) cultivar Wuxiangjing 14[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2004,30(12): 1237-1243.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 庞静, 朱建国, 谢祖彬,刘刚, 陈改苹.CO2浓度升高条件下水稻蒸腾与N吸收的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2006, 20(2):205-209. |
Pang J, Zhu J G, Xie Z B, Liu G, Chen G P.Relations between transpiration and N uptake of rice grown in elevated air carbon dioxide concentration[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2006, 20(2):205-209.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 刘红江, 杨连新, 黄建晔, 董桂春, 朱建国, 刘钢, 王余龙. FACE对三系杂交籼稻汕优63氮素吸收利用的影响[J].农业环境科学学报, 2008, 27(3): 1015-1021. |
Liu H J, Yang L X, Huang J Y, Dong G C, Zhu J G, Liu G, Wang Y L.Effect of free-air CO2 enrichment(FACE)on phosphorus uptake and utilization of three-line indica hybrid rice cultivar Shanyou 63[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2008, 27(3): 1015-1021.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | Cotrufo MF, Ineson P, Scott AY.Elevated CO2 reduces thenitrogen concentration of plant tissues[J]. Global Change Biology, 1998, 4: 43-54. |
[22] | Lin H W, Bai K Z, Kuang T Y.Effects of elevated CO2 and hightemperature on single leaf and canopy photosynthesis of rice.Acta Botanica Sinica, 1999, 41(6): 624-628. |
[23] | 黄建晔, 杨洪建, 董桂春. 开放式空气CO2对水稻产量形成的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2002, 13(10): 1210-1214. |
Huang J Y, Yang H J, Dong G C.Effects of free-air CO2enrichment(FACE) on yield formation in rice (Oryza sativa)[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2002, 13(10): 1210-1214.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 张立极, 潘根兴, 张旭辉,李恋卿, 郑经伟, 郑聚峰, 俞欣妍, 王家芳. 大气CO2浓度和温度升高对水稻植株碳氮吸收及分配的影响[J]. 土壤, 2015, 47(1):26-32. |
Zhang L J, Pan G X, Zhang X H, Li L Q, Zheng J W, Zheng J F, Yu X Y, Wang J F.Effect of experimental CO2 enrichment and warming on uptake and distribution of C and N in rice plant[J]. Soils, 2015, 47(1): 26-32. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 刘红江, 杨连新, 黄建晔,董桂春, 杨欢, 朱建国, 刘钢, 王余龙.FACE对三系杂交籼稻汕优63产量形成的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2008,27(6):2285-2290. |
Liu H J,Yang L X, Huang J Y, Dong G C, Yang H, Zhu J G, Liu G, Wang Y L.Effect of free-air CO2enrichment(FACE)on phosphorus uptake and utilization of three-line indica hybrid rice cultivar shanyou 63[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2008, 27(6): 2285-2290. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | Kim H Y, Lieffering M, Kobayashi K, Okada M, Miura S.Seasonal changes in the effects of elevated CO2 on rice at three levels of nitrogen supply: A free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) experiment[J]. Global Change Biology, 2003, 9(6): 826-837. |
[27] | 刘红江, 杨连新, 黄建晔,董桂春, 朱建国, 刘钢, 王余龙. FACE对常规籼稻扬稻6号产量形成的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2009, 28(2): 299-304. |
Liu H J,Yang L X, Huang J Y, Dong G C, Zhu J G, Liu G, Wang Y L.Effect of free air CO2 enrichment(FACE)on yield formation of indica rice cultivar Yangdao 6[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2009, 28(2): 299-304.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 黄建晔, 董桂春, 杨洪建,王余龙, 朱建国, 杨连新, 单玉华. 开放式空气CO2增高对水稻物质生产与分配的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2003, 14(2): 253-257. |
Huang J Y, Dong G C,Yang H J, Wang Y L, Zhu J G, Yang L X, Shan Y H.Effect of free-air CO2 enrichment on biomass accumulation and distribution in rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2003, 14(2): 253-257. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 黄建晔, 杨洪建, 杨连新, 刘红江, 董桂春, 朱建国, 王余龙. 开放式空气CO2浓度增加(FACE)对水稻产量形成的影响及其与氮的互作效应[J]. 中国农业科学, 2004, 37(12): 1824-1830. |
Huang J Y, Yang H J, Yang L X, Liu H J, Dong G C, Zhu J G, Wang Y L.Effects of free-air CO2enrichment (FACE) on yield formation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) and its interaction with nitrogen[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica , 2004, 37(12): 1824-1830. | |
[30] | 蔡威威, 艾天成, 万运帆, 李健陵, 郭晨. 环境温度和CO2浓度升高对湖北早稻氮素含量及产量的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 2016, 37(2): 231-237. |
CaiW W, Ai T C, Wan Y F, Li J L, Guo C. Influence of elevated atmospheric temperature and CO2 concentration on plant and soil N concentration and yield of early rice in Hubei[J]. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2016, 37(2): 231-237. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | 龚金龙, 邢志鹏, 胡雅杰, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 高辉. 籼、粳超级稻氮素吸收利用与转运差异研究[J].植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(4):796-810. |
Gong J L, Xing Z P, Hu Y J, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, GaoH. Differences of nitrogen uptake utilization and translocation between indica and japonica super rice[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2014, 20(4): 796-810. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] | 李超, 韦还和, 许俊伟,王子杰, 许轲, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 魏海燕, 郭保卫. 甬优系列籼粳杂交稻氮素积累与转运特征[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(5):1177-1186. |
Li C, Wei H H, Xu J W, Wang Z J, Xu K, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Wei H Y,Guo B W.Characteristics of nitrogen uptake, utilization and translocation in the indica-japonica hybrid rice of Yongyou series[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2016, 22(5): 1177-1186. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[33] | 陈贵, 陈梅, 张红梅, 王士磊, 施卫明, 程旺大. 籼粳杂交稻与常规粳稻产量、干物质氮素累积转运及氮素利用差异研究[J]. 浙江农业学报, 2018, 30(12): 1992-2000. |
Chen G, Chen M, Zhang H M, Wang S L, Shi W M, Cheng W D.Differences of yield, accumulation and translocation properties of dry matter and N, and N use efficiency between indica-japonica hybrid rice and japonica rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2018, 30(12): 1992-2000. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[34] | 董桂春,于小凤,赵江宁,居静, 田昊, 李进前, 张燕, 王余龙.不同穗型常规籼稻品种氦素吸收利用的基本特点[J].作物学报,2009,35(11):2091-2100. |
Dong G C, Yu X F, Zhao J L,Ju J, Tian H, Li Q J, Zhang Y, Wang Y L.General characteristics of nitrogen uptake and utilization in conven-tional indica rice cultivars with different panicle weight types[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2009, 35(11): 2091-2100.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[35] | 陈琛, 王熠, 羊彬,朱正康, 曹文雅, 罗刚, 周娟, 王祥菊, 于小凤, 袁秋梅. 株高对遗传群体水稻株系氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(22): 4450-4459. |
Chen C, Wang Y, Yang B, Cao W Y, Luo G, Zhou J, Wang X J, Yu X F, Yuan Q M.Plant height affects nitrogen absorption and utilization in rice with similar genetic background[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2015, 48(22): 4450-4459. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[36] | 马红亮, 朱建国, 谢祖彬,曾青, 刘钢. CO2浓度升高对水稻生物量及 C、N吸收分配的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2005, 13(3): 38-41. |
Ma H L, Zhu J G, Xie Z B, Zeng Q, Liu G.Effect of CO2 enrichment on the allocation of biomass and C, N uptake in rice organs[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2005, 13(3): 38-41.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 任志奇, 薛可欣, 董铮, 李小湘, 黎用朝, 郭玉静, 刘文强, 郭梁, 盛新年, 刘之熙, 潘孝武. 水稻外卷叶突变体ocl1的鉴定及基因定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 337-346. |
[2] | 肖乐铨, 李雷, 戴伟民, 强胜, 宋小玲. 转cry2A*/bar基因水稻与杂草稻杂交后代的苗期生长特性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 347-358. |
[3] | 李刚, 高清松, 李伟, 张雯霞, 王健, 程保山, 王迪, 高浩, 徐卫军, 陈红旗, 纪剑辉. 定向敲除SD1基因提高水稻的抗倒性和稻瘟病抗性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 359-367. |
[4] | 汪胜勇, 陈宇航, 陈会丽, 黄钰杰, 张啸天, 丁双成, 王宏伟. 水稻减数分裂期高温对苯丙烷类代谢及下游分支代谢途径的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 368-378. |
[5] | 黄亚茹, 徐鹏, 王乐乐, 贺一哲, 王辉, 柯健, 何海兵, 武立权, 尤翠翠. 外源海藻糖对粳稻品系W1844籽粒灌浆特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[6] | 董立强, 杨铁鑫, 李睿, 商文奇, 马亮, 李跃东, 隋国民. 株行距配置对超高产田水稻产量及根系形态生理特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 392-404. |
[7] | 高欠清, 任孝俭, 翟中兵, 郑普兵, 吴源芬, 崔克辉. 头季穗肥和促芽肥对再生稻再生芽生长及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 405-414. |
[8] | 韩聪, 何禹畅, 吴丽娟, 郏丽丽, 王磊, 鄂志国. 水稻碱性亮氨酸拉链(bZIP)蛋白家族功能研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 436-448. |
[9] | 沈雨民, 陈明亮, 熊焕金, 熊文涛, 吴小燕, 肖叶青. 水稻内外稃异常发育突变体blg1 (beak like grain 1)的表型分析与精细定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 225-232. |
[10] | 段敏, 谢留杰, 高秀莹, 唐海娟, 黄善军, 潘晓飚. 利用CRISPR/Cas9技术创制广亲和水稻温敏雄性不育系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 233-243. |
[11] | 程玲, 黄福钢, 邱一埔, 王心怡, 舒宛, 邱永福, 李发活. 籼稻材料570011抗褐飞虱基因的遗传分析及鉴定[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 244-252. |
[12] | 王文婷, 马佳颖, 李光彦, 符卫蒙, 李沪波, 林洁, 陈婷婷, 奉保华, 陶龙兴, 符冠富, 秦叶波. 高温下不同施肥量对水稻产量品质形成的影响及其与能量代谢的关系分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
[13] | 刘嫒桦, 李小坤. 不同肥料施用与稻米品质关系的整合分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 276-284. |
[14] | 杨晓龙, 王彪, 汪本福, 张枝盛, 张作林, 杨蓝天, 程建平, 李阳. 不同水分管理方式对旱直播水稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
[15] | 魏晓东, 宋雪梅, 赵凌, 赵庆勇, 陈涛, 路凯, 朱镇, 黄胜东, 王才林, 张亚东. 硅锌肥及其施用方式对南粳46产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 295-306. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||