中国水稻科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 447-456.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2019.9021
王海月1,2, 张桥1, 武云霞1, 严奉君1, 郭长春1, 孙永健1,*(), 徐徽1, 杨志远1, 马均1,*(
)
收稿日期:
2019-02-14
修回日期:
2019-05-13
出版日期:
2019-09-10
发布日期:
2019-09-10
通讯作者:
孙永健,马均
基金资助:
Haiyue WANG1,2, Qiao ZHANG1, Yunxia WU1, Fengjun YAN1, Changchun GUO1, Yongjian SUN1,*(), Hui XU1, Zhiyuan YANG1, Jun MA1,*(
)
Received:
2019-02-14
Revised:
2019-05-13
Online:
2019-09-10
Published:
2019-09-10
Contact:
Yongjian SUN, Jun MA
摘要:
【目的】 研究不同机插株距下缓释氮肥与常规氮肥减量配施在水稻关键生育时期的运筹方式,为水稻机插秧配套技术的应用提供理论和实践依据。【方法】 以中迟熟杂交籼稻川谷优7329为试验材料,采用两因素裂区设计,在机插行距均为30 cm下,设株距16 cm、18 cm、20 cm;并设4种缓释氮肥与常规氮肥运筹模式:1)基肥为96 kg/hm2缓释氮肥和24 kg/hm2常规氮肥,不施追肥;2)基肥施96 kg/hm2缓释氮肥,追肥施24 kg/hm2常规氮肥;3)基肥施96 kg/hm2缓释氮肥和54 kg/hm2常规氮肥,不施追肥;4)基肥为96 kg/hm2缓释氮肥和24 kg/hm2常规氮肥,追肥为30 kg/hm2常规氮肥;以不施氮肥为对照。【结果】 缓释氮肥与常规氮肥减量配施运筹和株距对机插杂交籼稻叶面积指数(LAI)、拔节-齐穗期光合势及产量的影响均达显著或极显著水平,且缓释氮肥与常规氮肥减量配施运筹的效应明显高于机插株距。3种株距下,随缓释氮肥与常规氮肥配施量及常规氮肥后移量的增加,机插杂交籼稻的LAI、拔节-齐穗期光合势、干物质积累量、净光合速率及产量均呈增加的趋势。株距为16 cm时,群体茎蘖数显著增大,形成的有效穗多,对养分的竞争性增强,光合特性减弱,未能形成大穗,虽然结实率高但每穗粒数较少,产量较低;株距为20 cm,由于密度降低,群体茎蘖数显著减少,形成的有效穗少,后期对养分的吸收充足,光合特性增强,形成了足够的大穗,每穗实粒数显著增加,但结实率和千粒重较小,因此未能高产;而株距为18 cm时,在足够群体茎蘖数的基础上形成的有效穗较多,后期能有效吸收养分,光合特性增强,结实率和千粒重显著增大。相关分析表明,缓释氮肥与常规氮肥减量配施运筹和株距下,尤以齐穗-成熟期群体生长率、拔节-齐穗期光合势和齐穗期有效叶面积指数与产量相关性较高。【结论】 株距为18 cm,96 kg/hm2缓释氮肥和24 kg/hm2常规氮肥作为基肥施用,30 kg/hm2常规氮肥作为追肥在倒4叶期施用,能充分发挥本区域机插杂交籼稻的高产优势,提高光合物质生产,产量最高可达11 681.56 kg/hm2。
中图分类号:
王海月, 张桥, 武云霞, 严奉君, 郭长春, 孙永健, 徐徽, 杨志远, 马均. 不同株距下氮肥减量配施运筹对机插杂交稻的产量及光合特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(5): 447-456.
Haiyue WANG, Qiao ZHANG, Yunxia WU, Fengjun YAN, Changchun GUO, Yongjian SUN, Hui XU, Zhiyuan YANG, Jun MA. Effects of Reduced Urea Application on Yield and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Mechanically-transplanted Rice Under Different Planting Spaces[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2019, 33(5): 447-456.
处理 Treatment | 施氮量 N application rate | 基肥 Basal manure | 追肥-倒4叶期(常规氮肥) Topdressing(conventional urea) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
缓释氮肥 Slow-release urea | 常规氮肥 Conventional urea | |||
N0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
N1 | 120 | 96 | 24 | 0 |
N2 | 120 | 96 | 0 | 24 |
N3 | 150 | 96 | 54 | 0 |
N4 | 150 | 96 | 30 | 24 |
表1 氮肥运筹处理
Table 1 Nitrogen managements. kg/hm2
处理 Treatment | 施氮量 N application rate | 基肥 Basal manure | 追肥-倒4叶期(常规氮肥) Topdressing(conventional urea) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
缓释氮肥 Slow-release urea | 常规氮肥 Conventional urea | |||
N0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
N1 | 120 | 96 | 24 | 0 |
N2 | 120 | 96 | 0 | 24 |
N3 | 150 | 96 | 54 | 0 |
N4 | 150 | 96 | 30 | 24 |
处理 Treatment | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Grain number per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 实际产量 Grain yield /(kg·hm-2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1N0 | 186.99 c | 144.23 b | 93.77 a | 33.16 a | 8 192.67 e | |
D1N1 | 214.03 b | 147.66 b | 93.31 a | 34.03 a | 9 811.97 d | |
D1N2 | 216.67 b | 159.37 a | 93.19 ab | 32.21 b | 10 117.09 c | |
D1N3 | 220.30 b | 160.36 a | 92.16 bc | 33.21 a | 10 558.64 b | |
D1N4 | 237.96 a | 165.05 a | 91.82 c | 32.13 b | 11 326.29 a | |
平均 Average | 215.19 | 155.33 | 92.85 | 32.95 | 10 001.34 | |
D2N0 | 187.18 c | 147.18 c | 94.10 a | 33.46 ab | 8 596.79 e | |
D2N1 | 207.10 b | 160.12 b | 92.95 ab | 33.12 ab | 10 081.51 d | |
D2N2 | 209.05 b | 165.01 ab | 92.35 b | 34.18 a | 10 699.25 c | |
D2N3 | 228.93 a | 167.41 ab | 92.08 b | 32.36 b | 11 249.35 b | |
D2N4 | 232.76 a | 168.18 a | 90.94 c | 33.10 ab | 11 681.56 a | |
平均 Average | 213.00 | 161.58 | 92.48 | 33.25 | 10 461.69 | |
D3N0 | 185.00 b | 150.79 c | 92.03 a | 32.21 b | 8 086.98 e | |
D3N1 | 208.48 a | 163.73 b | 92.27 a | 31.61 b | 9 760.95 d | |
D3N2 | 214.15 a | 165.39 ab | 92.14 a | 31.85 b | 10 098.75 c | |
D3N3 | 218.83 a | 168.96 ab | 89.05 b | 32.71 b | 10 663.29 b | |
D3N4 | 219.31 a | 171.49 a | 88.57 b | 34.26 a | 11 079.20 a | |
平均 Average | 209.16 | 164.07 | 90.81 | 32.53 | 9 937.83 | |
F值 | 株距Plant spacing(D) | 0.55 | 5.14 | 33.19** | 1.67 | 35.83** |
F value | 氮肥用量Nitrogen level(N) | 23.39** | 21.28** | 10.78** | 0.33 | 710.11** |
D×N | 0.75 | 0.60 | 1.15 | 3.99** | 1.75 |
表2 常规氮肥减量配施和株距对机插稻产量及其构成因素的影响
Table 2 Effects of reduced urea application combined with slow-release urea on yield and its components in mechanically- transplanted rice under different plant spacing.
处理 Treatment | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Grain number per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 实际产量 Grain yield /(kg·hm-2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1N0 | 186.99 c | 144.23 b | 93.77 a | 33.16 a | 8 192.67 e | |
D1N1 | 214.03 b | 147.66 b | 93.31 a | 34.03 a | 9 811.97 d | |
D1N2 | 216.67 b | 159.37 a | 93.19 ab | 32.21 b | 10 117.09 c | |
D1N3 | 220.30 b | 160.36 a | 92.16 bc | 33.21 a | 10 558.64 b | |
D1N4 | 237.96 a | 165.05 a | 91.82 c | 32.13 b | 11 326.29 a | |
平均 Average | 215.19 | 155.33 | 92.85 | 32.95 | 10 001.34 | |
D2N0 | 187.18 c | 147.18 c | 94.10 a | 33.46 ab | 8 596.79 e | |
D2N1 | 207.10 b | 160.12 b | 92.95 ab | 33.12 ab | 10 081.51 d | |
D2N2 | 209.05 b | 165.01 ab | 92.35 b | 34.18 a | 10 699.25 c | |
D2N3 | 228.93 a | 167.41 ab | 92.08 b | 32.36 b | 11 249.35 b | |
D2N4 | 232.76 a | 168.18 a | 90.94 c | 33.10 ab | 11 681.56 a | |
平均 Average | 213.00 | 161.58 | 92.48 | 33.25 | 10 461.69 | |
D3N0 | 185.00 b | 150.79 c | 92.03 a | 32.21 b | 8 086.98 e | |
D3N1 | 208.48 a | 163.73 b | 92.27 a | 31.61 b | 9 760.95 d | |
D3N2 | 214.15 a | 165.39 ab | 92.14 a | 31.85 b | 10 098.75 c | |
D3N3 | 218.83 a | 168.96 ab | 89.05 b | 32.71 b | 10 663.29 b | |
D3N4 | 219.31 a | 171.49 a | 88.57 b | 34.26 a | 11 079.20 a | |
平均 Average | 209.16 | 164.07 | 90.81 | 32.53 | 9 937.83 | |
F值 | 株距Plant spacing(D) | 0.55 | 5.14 | 33.19** | 1.67 | 35.83** |
F value | 氮肥用量Nitrogen level(N) | 23.39** | 21.28** | 10.78** | 0.33 | 710.11** |
D×N | 0.75 | 0.60 | 1.15 | 3.99** | 1.75 |
图1 常规氮肥减量配施与株距对机插稻分蘖动态的影响
Fig. 1. Effects of reduced urea application combined with slow-release nitrogen on the dynamic changes of number of stems and tillers in mechanically-transplanted rice under different plant spacing.
处理 Treatment | 叶面积指数 LAI | 齐穗期高效 叶面积指数 High effective LAI at full heading stage | 齐穗期高效 叶面积率 High effective LAI rate at full heading stage/% | 拔节-齐穗期光合势Photosynthetic potential of jointing-full heading /(×104 m2d·hm-2) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期 Jointing stage | 齐穗期 Full heading stage | |||||
D1N0 D1N1 D1N2 D1N3 D1N4 | 2.28 c | 3.09 d | 1.96 d | 63.25 b | 125.30 d | |
3.59 a | 4.74 c | 3.17 c | 67.06 a | 194.47 c | ||
3.27 b | 5.70 b | 3.65 b | 64.07 b | 209.35 b | ||
3.78 a | 6.44 a | 4.11 a | 63.83 b | 238.34 a | ||
3.62 a | 6.64 a | 4.25 a | 64.11 b | 239.32 a | ||
平均 Average | 3.31 | 5.32 | 3.43 | 64.46 | 201.35 | |
D2N0 D2N1 D2N2 D2N3 D2N4 | 2.46 d | 3.30 d | 2.16 d | 65.12 a | 136.25 d | |
3.84 b | 5.26 c | 3.52 c | 66.93 a | 214.82 c | ||
3.55 c | 5.98 b | 3.73 b | 62.39 b | 225.02 b | ||
4.21 a | 7.12 a | 4.36 a | 61.31 b | 267.86 a | ||
4.02 ab | 7.42 a | 4.58 a | 61.68 b | 270.18 a | ||
平均 Average | 3.62 | 5.82 | 3.67 | 63.49 | 222.83 | |
D3N0 D3N1 D3N2 D3N3 D3N4 | 2.29 d | 2.94 e | 1.86 d | 63.16 b | 121.33 c | |
3.38 bc | 4.57 d | 3.02 c | 66.04 a | 184.40 b | ||
3.26 c | 5.01 c | 3.23 c | 64.44 ab | 191.79 b | ||
3.75 a | 5.55 b | 3.52 b | 63.59 ab | 215.59 a | ||
3.53 ab | 6.31 a | 3.93 a | 62.32 b | 228.42 a | ||
平均 Average | 3.24 | 4.88 | 3.11 | 63.91 | 188.31 | |
F 值 F value | D | 20.28** | 61.55** | 40.37** | 1.35 | 181.46** |
N | 98.22** | 262.05** | 237.89** | 7.80** | 326.74** | |
D×N | 0.53 | 2.63* | 1.55 | 1.29** | 2.58* |
表3 常规氮肥减量配施与株距对机插稻光合物质生产的影响
Table 3 Effects of reduced urea application combined with slow-release urea on photosynthetic production in mechanically- transplanted rice under different plant spacing.
处理 Treatment | 叶面积指数 LAI | 齐穗期高效 叶面积指数 High effective LAI at full heading stage | 齐穗期高效 叶面积率 High effective LAI rate at full heading stage/% | 拔节-齐穗期光合势Photosynthetic potential of jointing-full heading /(×104 m2d·hm-2) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期 Jointing stage | 齐穗期 Full heading stage | |||||
D1N0 D1N1 D1N2 D1N3 D1N4 | 2.28 c | 3.09 d | 1.96 d | 63.25 b | 125.30 d | |
3.59 a | 4.74 c | 3.17 c | 67.06 a | 194.47 c | ||
3.27 b | 5.70 b | 3.65 b | 64.07 b | 209.35 b | ||
3.78 a | 6.44 a | 4.11 a | 63.83 b | 238.34 a | ||
3.62 a | 6.64 a | 4.25 a | 64.11 b | 239.32 a | ||
平均 Average | 3.31 | 5.32 | 3.43 | 64.46 | 201.35 | |
D2N0 D2N1 D2N2 D2N3 D2N4 | 2.46 d | 3.30 d | 2.16 d | 65.12 a | 136.25 d | |
3.84 b | 5.26 c | 3.52 c | 66.93 a | 214.82 c | ||
3.55 c | 5.98 b | 3.73 b | 62.39 b | 225.02 b | ||
4.21 a | 7.12 a | 4.36 a | 61.31 b | 267.86 a | ||
4.02 ab | 7.42 a | 4.58 a | 61.68 b | 270.18 a | ||
平均 Average | 3.62 | 5.82 | 3.67 | 63.49 | 222.83 | |
D3N0 D3N1 D3N2 D3N3 D3N4 | 2.29 d | 2.94 e | 1.86 d | 63.16 b | 121.33 c | |
3.38 bc | 4.57 d | 3.02 c | 66.04 a | 184.40 b | ||
3.26 c | 5.01 c | 3.23 c | 64.44 ab | 191.79 b | ||
3.75 a | 5.55 b | 3.52 b | 63.59 ab | 215.59 a | ||
3.53 ab | 6.31 a | 3.93 a | 62.32 b | 228.42 a | ||
平均 Average | 3.24 | 4.88 | 3.11 | 63.91 | 188.31 | |
F 值 F value | D | 20.28** | 61.55** | 40.37** | 1.35 | 181.46** |
N | 98.22** | 262.05** | 237.89** | 7.80** | 326.74** | |
D×N | 0.53 | 2.63* | 1.55 | 1.29** | 2.58* |
处理 Treatment | 净光合速率 Pn/(μmol·m-2 s-1) | 气孔导度 Gs/(mol·m-2 s-1) | 胞间CO2浓度 Ci/(μmol·mol-1) | 表观叶肉导度 AMC/(mmol·m-2 s-1) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
齐穗期 FHS | 齐穗后15 d 15 d after FHS | 齐穗期 FHS | 齐穗后15 d 15 d after FHS | 齐穗期 FHS | 齐穗后15 d 15 d after FHS | 齐穗期 FHS | 齐穗后15 d 15 d after FHS | |||||
D1N0 D1N1 D1N2 D1N3 D1N4 | 17.41 c | 16.85 b | 0.70 b | 0.40 c | 280.86 ab | 329.06 a | 62.62 b | 51.20 c | ||||
17.51 c | 17.02 b | 0.78 a | 0.41 bc | 286.77 a | 327.87 a | 61.04 b | 51.92 c | |||||
17.86 c | 17.32 b | 0.79 a | 0.44 ab | 286.30 a | 323.08 ab | 62.44 b | 53.63 bc | |||||
20.25 b | 17.67 ab | 0.82 a | 0.44 ab | 273.30 bc | 321.47 bc | 74.41 a | 55.78 ab | |||||
22.65 a | 18.71 a | 0.85 a | 0.46 a | 265.68 c | 316.86 c | 85.30 a | 58.20 a | |||||
平均 Average | 19.14 | 17.51 | 0.79 | 0.43 | 278.58 | 323.67 | 69.16 | 54.15 | ||||
D2N0 D2N1 D2N2 D2N3 D2N4 | 18.85 b | 17.59 c | 0.72 b | 0.38 b | 282.65 a | 319.72 a | 66.74 b | 55.06 d | ||||
19.25 b | 18.49 b | 0.79 a | 0.38 b | 280.94 a | 313.46 ab | 68.55 b | 59.02 c | |||||
19.27 b | 20.07 a | 0.82 a | 0.40 b | 277.37 a | 310.82 b | 69.56 b | 69.42 a | |||||
20.62 ab | 20.81 a | 0.84 a | 0.45 a | 275.04 a | 307.15 bc | 75.03 ab | 64.60 b | |||||
22.96 a | 21.15 a | 0.86 a | 0.48 a | 274.76 a | 304.73 c | 83.53 a | 67.90 ab | |||||
平均 Average | 20.19 | 19.62 | 0.80 | 0.42 | 278.15 | 311.17 | 72.68 | 63.20 | ||||
D3N0 D3N1 D3N2 D3N3 D3N4 | 17.14 c | 17.06 b | 0.66 c | 0.39 b | 283.34 a | 331.57 a | 60.54 c | 51.45 b | ||||
17.73 bc | 17.36 b | 0.79 ab | 0.41 ab | 279.71 a | 323.31 ab | 63.85 bc | 54.65 ab | |||||
18.24 abc | 17.80 ab | 0.75 b | 0.42 ab | 276.28 a | 319.09 bc | 66.25 abc | 56.67 a | |||||
19.95 ab | 18.17 ab | 0.81 ab | 0.43 ab | 274.79 a | 317.91 bc | 72.63 ab | 56.97 a | |||||
20.96 a | 19.07 a | 0.87 a | 0.45 a | 272.93 a | 314.16 c | 76.80 a | 59.00 a | |||||
平均 Average | 18.80 | 17.89 | 0.78 | 0.42 | 277.41 | 321.21 | 68.02 | 55.75 | ||||
F 值 F value | D | 4.96 | 6.60 | 1.25 | 0.35 | 0.11 | 18.32** | 2.47 | 8.65* | |||
N | 10.16** | 10.38** | 8.08** | 7.47** | 2.55 | 11.95** | 8.74** | 11.38** | ||||
D×N | 0.24 | 1.04 | 0.26 | 0.70 | 0.56 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 1.57 |
表4 常规氮肥减量配施和株距对机插稻光合特性的影响
Table 4 Effects of reduced urea application combined with slow-release urea on photosynthetic parameters in mechanical- transplanted rice under different plant spacing.
处理 Treatment | 净光合速率 Pn/(μmol·m-2 s-1) | 气孔导度 Gs/(mol·m-2 s-1) | 胞间CO2浓度 Ci/(μmol·mol-1) | 表观叶肉导度 AMC/(mmol·m-2 s-1) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
齐穗期 FHS | 齐穗后15 d 15 d after FHS | 齐穗期 FHS | 齐穗后15 d 15 d after FHS | 齐穗期 FHS | 齐穗后15 d 15 d after FHS | 齐穗期 FHS | 齐穗后15 d 15 d after FHS | |||||
D1N0 D1N1 D1N2 D1N3 D1N4 | 17.41 c | 16.85 b | 0.70 b | 0.40 c | 280.86 ab | 329.06 a | 62.62 b | 51.20 c | ||||
17.51 c | 17.02 b | 0.78 a | 0.41 bc | 286.77 a | 327.87 a | 61.04 b | 51.92 c | |||||
17.86 c | 17.32 b | 0.79 a | 0.44 ab | 286.30 a | 323.08 ab | 62.44 b | 53.63 bc | |||||
20.25 b | 17.67 ab | 0.82 a | 0.44 ab | 273.30 bc | 321.47 bc | 74.41 a | 55.78 ab | |||||
22.65 a | 18.71 a | 0.85 a | 0.46 a | 265.68 c | 316.86 c | 85.30 a | 58.20 a | |||||
平均 Average | 19.14 | 17.51 | 0.79 | 0.43 | 278.58 | 323.67 | 69.16 | 54.15 | ||||
D2N0 D2N1 D2N2 D2N3 D2N4 | 18.85 b | 17.59 c | 0.72 b | 0.38 b | 282.65 a | 319.72 a | 66.74 b | 55.06 d | ||||
19.25 b | 18.49 b | 0.79 a | 0.38 b | 280.94 a | 313.46 ab | 68.55 b | 59.02 c | |||||
19.27 b | 20.07 a | 0.82 a | 0.40 b | 277.37 a | 310.82 b | 69.56 b | 69.42 a | |||||
20.62 ab | 20.81 a | 0.84 a | 0.45 a | 275.04 a | 307.15 bc | 75.03 ab | 64.60 b | |||||
22.96 a | 21.15 a | 0.86 a | 0.48 a | 274.76 a | 304.73 c | 83.53 a | 67.90 ab | |||||
平均 Average | 20.19 | 19.62 | 0.80 | 0.42 | 278.15 | 311.17 | 72.68 | 63.20 | ||||
D3N0 D3N1 D3N2 D3N3 D3N4 | 17.14 c | 17.06 b | 0.66 c | 0.39 b | 283.34 a | 331.57 a | 60.54 c | 51.45 b | ||||
17.73 bc | 17.36 b | 0.79 ab | 0.41 ab | 279.71 a | 323.31 ab | 63.85 bc | 54.65 ab | |||||
18.24 abc | 17.80 ab | 0.75 b | 0.42 ab | 276.28 a | 319.09 bc | 66.25 abc | 56.67 a | |||||
19.95 ab | 18.17 ab | 0.81 ab | 0.43 ab | 274.79 a | 317.91 bc | 72.63 ab | 56.97 a | |||||
20.96 a | 19.07 a | 0.87 a | 0.45 a | 272.93 a | 314.16 c | 76.80 a | 59.00 a | |||||
平均 Average | 18.80 | 17.89 | 0.78 | 0.42 | 277.41 | 321.21 | 68.02 | 55.75 | ||||
F 值 F value | D | 4.96 | 6.60 | 1.25 | 0.35 | 0.11 | 18.32** | 2.47 | 8.65* | |||
N | 10.16** | 10.38** | 8.08** | 7.47** | 2.55 | 11.95** | 8.74** | 11.38** | ||||
D×N | 0.24 | 1.04 | 0.26 | 0.70 | 0.56 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 1.57 |
处理 Treatment | 群体干物质量 Population dry matter/(t·hm-2) | 群体生长率 Population growth rate/(g·m-2 d-1) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
分蘖盛期 TS | 拔节期 JS | 齐穗期 FHS | 成熟期 MS | 分蘖-拔节 TS-JS | 拔节-齐穗 JS-FHS | 齐穗-成熟 FHS-MS | |||
D1N0 D1N1 D1N2 D1N3 D1N4 | 0.51 e | 2.25 e | 8.78 d | 13.23 e | 12.45 e | 18.66 b | 10.87 b | ||
1.03 d | 3.52 d | 10.45 c | 16.86 d | 17.85 d | 19.78 ab | 15.63 a | |||
1.17 c | 3.88 c | 10.88 bc | 17.33 c | 19.37 c | 19.99 ab | 15.75 a | |||
1.32 b | 4.34 b | 11.30 b | 17.92 b | 21.54 b | 19.90 ab | 16.14 a | |||
1.45 a | 4.75 a | 12.29 a | 19.41 a | 23.61 a | 21.54 a | 17.36 a | |||
平均 Average | 1.09 | 3.75 | 10.74 | 16.95 | 18.9 | 19.98 | 15.15 | ||
D2N0 D2N1 D2N2 D2N3 D2N4 | 0.52 e | 2.30 e | 9.10 c | 13.59 d | 12.76 d | 19.41 b | 10.97 c | ||
1.05 d | 3.62 d | 10.61 b | 17.18 c | 18.34 c | 19.98 b | 16.02 b | |||
1.18 c | 4.04 c | 10.94 b | 17.92 b | 20.38 b | 19.73 b | 17.02 ab | |||
1.35 b | 4.45 b | 12.36 a | 19.17 a | 22.13 ab | 22.59 a | 16.63 ab | |||
1.50 a | 4.83 a | 12.59 a | 19.93 a | 23.82 a | 22.17 a | 17.89 a | |||
平均 Average | 1.12 | 3.85 | 11.12 | 17.56 | 19.49 | 20.78 | 15.71 | ||
D3N0 D3N1 D3N2 D3N3 D3N4 | 0.49 e | 2.17 e | 8.60 d | 13.08 d | 12.00 d | 18.38 b | 10.92 b | ||
1.01 d | 3.27 d | 10.33 c | 16.67 c | 16.13 c | 20.19 ab | 15.44 a | |||
1.11 c | 3.74 c | 10.62 bc | 17.31 bc | 18.83 b | 19.64 ab | 16.31 a | |||
1.29 b | 4.12 b | 11.19 ab | 18.01 b | 20.25 ab | 20.18 ab | 16.64 a | |||
1.42 a | 4.43 a | 11.95 a | 18.98 a | 21.52 a | 21.48 a | 17.15 a | |||
平均 Average | 1.06 | 3.55 | 10.54 | 16.81 | 17.75 | 19.97 | 15.29 | ||
F值 F value | D | 2.88 | 2.59 | 3.38 | 6.05 | 2.08 | 2.09 | 1.53 | |
N | 429.11** | 280.50** | 55.22** | 220.98** | 89.77** | 5.01** | 36.75** | ||
D×N | 0.19 | 0.36 | 0.52 | 0.60 | 0.30 | 0.55 | 0.14 |
表5 常规氮肥减量配施和株距下机插稻群体干物质积累特性
Table 5 Dry matter accumulation of population in mechanically-transplanted rice under different plant spacing at reduced urea application combined with slow-release urea.
处理 Treatment | 群体干物质量 Population dry matter/(t·hm-2) | 群体生长率 Population growth rate/(g·m-2 d-1) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
分蘖盛期 TS | 拔节期 JS | 齐穗期 FHS | 成熟期 MS | 分蘖-拔节 TS-JS | 拔节-齐穗 JS-FHS | 齐穗-成熟 FHS-MS | |||
D1N0 D1N1 D1N2 D1N3 D1N4 | 0.51 e | 2.25 e | 8.78 d | 13.23 e | 12.45 e | 18.66 b | 10.87 b | ||
1.03 d | 3.52 d | 10.45 c | 16.86 d | 17.85 d | 19.78 ab | 15.63 a | |||
1.17 c | 3.88 c | 10.88 bc | 17.33 c | 19.37 c | 19.99 ab | 15.75 a | |||
1.32 b | 4.34 b | 11.30 b | 17.92 b | 21.54 b | 19.90 ab | 16.14 a | |||
1.45 a | 4.75 a | 12.29 a | 19.41 a | 23.61 a | 21.54 a | 17.36 a | |||
平均 Average | 1.09 | 3.75 | 10.74 | 16.95 | 18.9 | 19.98 | 15.15 | ||
D2N0 D2N1 D2N2 D2N3 D2N4 | 0.52 e | 2.30 e | 9.10 c | 13.59 d | 12.76 d | 19.41 b | 10.97 c | ||
1.05 d | 3.62 d | 10.61 b | 17.18 c | 18.34 c | 19.98 b | 16.02 b | |||
1.18 c | 4.04 c | 10.94 b | 17.92 b | 20.38 b | 19.73 b | 17.02 ab | |||
1.35 b | 4.45 b | 12.36 a | 19.17 a | 22.13 ab | 22.59 a | 16.63 ab | |||
1.50 a | 4.83 a | 12.59 a | 19.93 a | 23.82 a | 22.17 a | 17.89 a | |||
平均 Average | 1.12 | 3.85 | 11.12 | 17.56 | 19.49 | 20.78 | 15.71 | ||
D3N0 D3N1 D3N2 D3N3 D3N4 | 0.49 e | 2.17 e | 8.60 d | 13.08 d | 12.00 d | 18.38 b | 10.92 b | ||
1.01 d | 3.27 d | 10.33 c | 16.67 c | 16.13 c | 20.19 ab | 15.44 a | |||
1.11 c | 3.74 c | 10.62 bc | 17.31 bc | 18.83 b | 19.64 ab | 16.31 a | |||
1.29 b | 4.12 b | 11.19 ab | 18.01 b | 20.25 ab | 20.18 ab | 16.64 a | |||
1.42 a | 4.43 a | 11.95 a | 18.98 a | 21.52 a | 21.48 a | 17.15 a | |||
平均 Average | 1.06 | 3.55 | 10.54 | 16.81 | 17.75 | 19.97 | 15.29 | ||
F值 F value | D | 2.88 | 2.59 | 3.38 | 6.05 | 2.08 | 2.09 | 1.53 | |
N | 429.11** | 280.50** | 55.22** | 220.98** | 89.77** | 5.01** | 36.75** | ||
D×N | 0.19 | 0.36 | 0.52 | 0.60 | 0.30 | 0.55 | 0.14 |
指标 Index | 生育期 Growth stage | 成熟期干物质量 Dry biomass at MS | 有效穗数 No. of effective panicles | 穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate | 千粒重 1000-grain weight | 产量 Grain yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶面积指数LAI | 拔节期 JS | 0.88** | 0.69** | 0.64** | -0.32* | 0.05 | 0.88** |
齐穗期 FHS | 0.94** | 0.80** | 0.67** | -0.42** | 0.03 | 0.96** | |
净光合速率Net photosynthetic rate | 齐穗期 FHS | 0.59** | 0.50** | 0.45** | -0.27 | 0.11 | 0.64** |
齐穗15 d 15 d FHS | 0.62** | 0.51** | 0.44** | -0.31* | 0.07 | 0.64** | |
群体生长率Population growth rate | 分蘖盛期-拔节期TS-JS | 0.94** | 0.82** | 0.63** | -0.39** | -0.01 | 0.94** |
拔节-齐穗期JS-FHS | 0.62** | 0.79** | 0.13 | -0.32* | -0.18 | 0.60** | |
齐穗-成熟期FHS-MS | 0.89** | 0.63** | 0.72** | -0.42** | 0.07 | 0.86** | |
光合势 Photosynthetic potential | 拔节-齐穗期JS-FHS | 0.94** | 0.79** | 0.67** | -0.39** | 0.05 | 0.96** |
表6 氮肥减量配施运筹和株距下叶面积指数、光合物质生产与产量的相关系数
Table 6 Correlation coefficients of leaf area index(LAI) and photosynthetic production with yield in different plant spacing at reduced urea application combined with slow-release urea.
指标 Index | 生育期 Growth stage | 成熟期干物质量 Dry biomass at MS | 有效穗数 No. of effective panicles | 穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate | 千粒重 1000-grain weight | 产量 Grain yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶面积指数LAI | 拔节期 JS | 0.88** | 0.69** | 0.64** | -0.32* | 0.05 | 0.88** |
齐穗期 FHS | 0.94** | 0.80** | 0.67** | -0.42** | 0.03 | 0.96** | |
净光合速率Net photosynthetic rate | 齐穗期 FHS | 0.59** | 0.50** | 0.45** | -0.27 | 0.11 | 0.64** |
齐穗15 d 15 d FHS | 0.62** | 0.51** | 0.44** | -0.31* | 0.07 | 0.64** | |
群体生长率Population growth rate | 分蘖盛期-拔节期TS-JS | 0.94** | 0.82** | 0.63** | -0.39** | -0.01 | 0.94** |
拔节-齐穗期JS-FHS | 0.62** | 0.79** | 0.13 | -0.32* | -0.18 | 0.60** | |
齐穗-成熟期FHS-MS | 0.89** | 0.63** | 0.72** | -0.42** | 0.07 | 0.86** | |
光合势 Photosynthetic potential | 拔节-齐穗期JS-FHS | 0.94** | 0.79** | 0.67** | -0.39** | 0.05 | 0.96** |
[1] | 蒋鹏, 熊洪, 张林, 朱永川, 周兴兵, 刘茂, 郭晓艺, 徐富贤. 不同生态条件下施氮量和移栽密度对杂交稻氮、磷、钾吸收积累的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(2): 342-350. |
Jiang P, Xiong H, Zhang L, Zhu Y C, Zhou X B, Liu M, Guo X Y, Xu F X.Effects of N rate and planting density on nutrient uptake and utilization of hybrid rice under different ecological conditions.Plant Nutr & Fert Sci, 2017, 23(2): 342-350. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 徐新朋, 周卫, 梁国庆, 孙静文, 王秀斌, 何萍, 徐芳森, 余喜初. 氮肥用量和密度对双季稻产量及氮肥利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(3): 763-772. |
Xu X P, Zhou W, Liang G Q, Sun J W, Wang X B, He P, Xu F S, Yu X C.Effects of nitrogen and density interactions on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of double-rice systems.Plant Nutr & Fert Sci, 2015, 21(3): 763-772. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 陈海飞, 冯洋, 蔡红梅, 徐芳森, 周卫, 刘芳, 庞再明, 李登荣. 氮肥与移栽密度互作对低产田水稻群体结构及产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(6): 1319-1328. |
Chen H F, Feng Y, Cai H M, Xu F S, Zhou W, Liu F, Pang Z M, Li D R.Effects of the interaction of nitrogen and transplanting density on the rice population structure and grain yield in low-yield paddy fields.Plant Nutr & Fert Sci, 2014, 20(6): 1319-1328.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 陈佳娜, 谢小兵, 伍丹丹, 曹放波, 单双吕, 高伟, 李志斌, 邹应斌. 机插密度与氮肥运筹对中嘉早17产量形成及氮肥利用率的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(6): 628-636. |
Chen J N, Xie X B, Wu D D, Cao F B, Shan S L, Gao W, Li Z B, Zou Y B.Effects of nitrogen application and mechanical transplanting density on yield formation and nitrogen use efficiency of conventional rice Zhongjiazao 17.Chin J Rice Sci, 2015, 29(6): 628-636. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 郭保卫, 周兴涛, 曹利强, 张洪程, 许珂, 霍中洋, 魏海燕, 戴其根. 钵苗类型和摆栽密度对粳型超级稻植株抗倒伏能力的影响. 扬州大学学报: 农业与生命科学版, 2016, 37(3): 87-94. |
Guo B W, Zhou X T, Cao L Q, Zhang H C, Xu K, Huo Z Y, Wei H Y, Dai Q G.Effects of different bowl types and densities on the culm lodging resistance of bowl seedling transplanting japonica super rice.J Yangzhou Univ: Agric & Life Sci Ed, 2016, 37(3): 87-94.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 左文刚, 黄顾林, 陈亚斯, 朱晓雯, 沈袁玲, 柏彦超, 单玉华, 封克. 氮肥运筹对秸秆全量还田双季稻氮产量及氮素吸收利用的影响. 扬州大学学报: 农业与生命科学版, 2017, 38(2): 75-81. |
Zuo W G, Huang G L, ChenY S, Zhu X W, Sheng Y L, Bai Y C, Shan Y H, Feng K. Effects of nitrogen management on grain yield and nitrogen use of double cropping rice system with all rice straw returned to the field.J Yangzhou Univ: Agric & Life Sci Ed, 2017, 38(2): 75-81. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 李玥, 李应洪, 赵建红, 孙永健, 徐徽, 严奉君, 谢华英, 马均. 缓控释氮肥对机插稻氮素利用特征及产量的影响. 浙江大学学报: 农业与生命科学版, 2015, 41(6): 673-684. |
Li Y, Li Y H, Zhao J H, Sun Y J, Xu H, Yan F J, Xie H Y, Ma J.Effects of slow and controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer on nitrogen utilization characteristics and yield of machine- transplanted rice.J Zhejiang Univ: Agric & Life Sci, 2015, 41(6): 673-684. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 张敬昇, 李冰, 王昌全, 向毫, 周杨洪, 尹斌, 梁靖越, 付月君. 控释氮肥与尿素掺混比例对作物中后期土壤供氮能力和稻麦产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(1): 110-118. |
Zhang J S, Li B, Wang C Q, Xiang H, Zhou Y H, Yin B, Liang J Y, Fu Y J.Effects of the blending ratio of controlled release nitrogen fertilizer and urea on soil nitrogen supply in the mid-late growing stage and yield of wheat and rice.Plant Nutr & Fert Sci, 2017, 23(1): 110-118. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 张敬昇, 李冰, 王昌全, 罗晶, 古珺, 龙思帆, 何杰, 向毫, 尹斌. 控释掺混尿素对稻麦产量及氮素利用率的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(3): 288-298. |
Zhang J S, L i B, Wang C Q, Luo J, Gu J, Long S F, He J, Xiang H, Yin B. Effects of controlled release blend bulk urea on the yield and nitrogen use efficiency of wheat and rice.Chin J Rice Sci, 2017, 31(3): 288-298. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 彭玉, 孙永健, 蒋明金, 徐徽, 秦俭, 杨致远, 马均. 不同水分条件下缓/控释氮肥对水稻干物质量和氮素吸收、运转及分配的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40(5): 859-870. |
Peng Y, Sun Y J, Jiang M J, Xu H, Qin J, Yang Z Y, Ma J.Effects of water management and slow/controlled release nitrogen fertilizer on biomass and nitrogen accumulation, translocation, and distribution in rice.Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40(5): 859-870. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 胡剑锋, 杨波, 周伟, 张培培, 张强, 李培程, 任万军, 杨文钰. 播种方式和播种密度对杂交籼稻机插秧节本增效的研究. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(1): 81-90. |
Hu J F, Yang B, Zhou W, Zhang P P, Zhang Q, Li P C, Ren W J, Yang W Y.Effect of seeding method and density on the benefit of mechanical transplanting in indica hybrid rice.Chin J Rice Sci, 2017, 31(1): 81-90. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 胡雅杰, 曹伟伟, 钱海军, 邢志鹏, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 郭保卫, 高辉, 沙安勤, 周有炎, 刘国林. 钵苗机插密度对不同穗型水稻品种产量、株型和抗倒伏能力的影响. 作物学报, 2015, 41(5): 743-757. |
Hu Y J, Cao W W, Qian H J, Xing Z P, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Guo B W, Gao H, Sha A Q, Zhou Y Y, Liu G L.Effect of density of mechanically transplanted plot seedings on yield, plant type and lodging resistance in rice with different panicle types.Acta Agron Sin, 2015, 41(5): 743-757. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 谢小兵, 王玉梅, 黄敏, 赵春容, 陈佳娜, 曹放波, 单双吕, 周雪峰, 李志斌, 范龙, 高伟, 邹应斌. 单本密植机插对杂交稻生长和产量的影响. 作物学报, 2016, 42(6): 924-931. |
Xie X B, Wang Y M, Huang M, Zhao C R, Chen J N, Cao F B, Shan S L, Zhou X F, Li Z B, Fan L, Gao W, Zou Y B.Effect of mechanized transplanting with high hill density and single seeding per hill on growth and grain yield in hybrid rice.Acta Agron Sin, 2016, 42(6): 924-931.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 许俊伟, 孟天瑶, 荆培培, 张洪程, 李超, 戴其根, 魏海燕, 郭保卫. 机插密度对不同类型水稻抗倒伏能力及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2015, 41(11): 1767-1776. |
Xu J W, Meng T Y, Jing P P, Zhang H C, Li C, Dai Q G, Wei H Y, Guo B W.Effect of mechanical-transplanting density on lodging resistance and yield in different types of rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2015, 41(11): 1767-1776.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 孙永健, 马均, 孙园园, 杨志远, 徐徽, 熊洪, 徐富贤. 施氮量和株距对机插杂交稻结实期养分转运和产量的影响. 核农学报, 2014, 28(8): 1510-1520. |
Sun Y J, Ma J, Sun Y Y, Yang Z Y, Xu H, Xiong H, Xu F X.Effects of nitrogen application rates and plant spacing on nutrient translocation during filling stage and yield of mechanical-transplanted hybrid rice. J Nuc Agric Sci, 2014, 28(8):1510-1520.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 邓中华, 明日, 李小坤, 郑磊, 徐维明, 杨运清, 任涛, 丛日环, 鲁剑巍. 不同密度和氮肥用量对水稻产量、构成因子及氮肥利用率的影响. 土壤, 2015, 47(1): 20-25. |
Deng Z H, Ming R, Li X K, Zheng L, Xu W M, Yang Y Q, Ren T, Cong R H, Lu W J.Effects of nitrogen application rate and planting density on grain yields, yield components and nitrogen use efficiencies of rice.Soils, 2015, 47(1): 20-25. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 孙永健, 陈宇, 孙园园, 徐徽, 许远明, 刘树金, 马均. 不同施氮量和栽插密度下三角形强化栽培杂交稻抗倒伏性与群体质量的关系. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(2): 189-196. |
Sun Y J, Chen Y, Sun Y Y, Xu H, Xu M Y, Liu S J, Ma J.Relationship between culm lodging resistanceand population quality of hybrids under triangle-planted system of rice intensification at different nitrogen application ratesand planting densities.Chin J Rice Sci, 2012, 26(2): 189-196. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 王斌, 万运帆, 郭晨, 李玉娥, 秦晓波, 任涛, 赵婧. 控释尿素、稳定性尿素和配施菌剂尿素提高双季稻产量和氮素利用率的效应比较. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(5): 1104-1112. |
Wang B, Wan Y F, Guo C, Li Y E, Qin X B, Ren T, Zhao J.A comparison of the effects of controlled release urea, stable urea and microorganisms increasing double rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency.Plant Nutr & Fert Sci, 2015, 21(5): 1104-1112. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 鲁艳红, 廖育林, 聂军, 周兴, 谢坚, 杨曾平. 紫云英与尿素或控释尿素配施对双季稻产量及氮钾利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(2): 360-368. |
Lu Y H, Liao Y L, Nie J, Zhou X, Xie J, Yang Z P.Effect of different incorporation of Chinese milk vetch coupled with urea or controlled release urea on yield and nitrogen and potassium nutrient use efficiency in double-cropping rice system.Plant Nutr & Fert Sci, 2017, 23(2): 360-368. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 王海月, 李玥, 孙永健, 李应洪, 蒋明金, 王春雨, 赵建红, 孙园园, 徐徽, 严奉君, 马均. 不同施氮水平下缓释氮肥配施对机插稻氮素利用特征及产量的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(1): 50-64. |
Wang H Y, Li Y, Sun Y J, Li Y H, Jiang M J, Wang C Y, Zhao J H, Sun Y Y, Xu H, Yan F J, Ma J.Effects of slow-release urea combined with conventional urea on characteristics of nitrogen utilization and yield in mechanical-transplanted rice under different nitrogen application rates.Chin J Rice Sci, 2017, 31(1): 50-64. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 王海月, 殷尧翥, 孙永健, 李应洪, 杨志远, 严奉君, 张绍文, 郭长春, 马均. 不同株距和缓释氮肥配施量下机插杂交稻的产量及光合特性. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(4): 843-855. |
Wang H Y, Yin Y Z, Sun Y J, Li Y H, Yang Z Y, Yan F J, ZhangG S W, Guo C C, Ma J.Yield and photosynthetic characteristics of mechanical-transplanted rice under different slow-release nitrogen fertilizer rates and plant population.Plant Nutr & Fert Sci, 2017, 23(4): 843-855.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 薛亚光, 王康君, 颜晓元, 尹斌, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 不同栽培模式对杂交粳稻常优3号产量及养分吸收利用效率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(23): 4781-4792. |
Xue Y G, Wang K J, Yan X Y, Yin B, Liu L J, Yang J C.Effects of different cultivation patterns on grain yield and nutrient absorption and utilization efficiency of japonica hybrid rice Changyou 3.Sci Agric Sin, 2011, 44(23): 4781-4792.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 范立慧, 徐珊珊, 侯朋福, 薛利红, 李刚华, 丁艳锋, 杨林章. 不同地力下基蘖肥运筹比例对水稻产量及氮肥吸收利用的影响. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(10): 1872-1884. |
Fan L H, Xu S S, Hou P F, Xue L H, Li G H, Ding Y F, Yang L Z.Effect of different ratios of basal to tiller nitrogen on rice yield and nitrogen utilization under different soil fertility.Sci Agric Sin, 2016, 49(10): 1872-1884. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 赵锋, 程建平, 张国忠, 徐得泽, 吴建平, 吴继洪, 杨兆林. 氮肥运筹和秸秆还田对直播稻氮素利用和产量的影响. 湖北农业科学, 2011, 50(18): 3701-3704. |
Zhao F, Cheng J P, Zhang G Z, Xu D Z, Wu J P, Wu J H, Yang Z L.Effect of nitrogen fertilizer regimes and returning straw on N availability and forming yield of direct-sowing rice.Hubei Agric Sci, 2011, 50(18): 3701-3704. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 石丽红, 纪雄辉, 朱校奇, 李洪顺, 彭华, 刘昭兵. 提高超级杂交稻库容量的施氮数量和时期运筹. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(6): 1274-1281. |
Shi L H, Ji X H, Zhu X Q, Li H S, Peng H, Liu Z B.A preliminary study on optimizing nitrogen fertilization amount at different phases to enhance the storage capacity of super hybrid rice.Sci Agric Sin, 2010, 43(6): 1274-1281.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 程建平, 张旅峰, 吴建平, 柯传勇, 金卫兵, 范绍斌, 罗又红, 程磊. 播种量与氮肥运筹方式对直播早稻生物学特性和产量的影响. 湖北农业科学, 2010, 49(10): 2362-2365. |
Cheng J P, Zhang L F, Wu J P, Ke C Y, Jin W B, Fan S B, Luo Y H, Cheng L.The influence of different seeding rate and nitrogen application on yield and biological characteristics of direct seeding early rice.Hubei Agric Sci, 2010, 43(10): 2362-2365. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 程建平, 张再君, 赵锋, 汪光友, 杨如辉, 李家普, 王启均. 机械插秧密度和氮肥运筹对两优1528群体动态和产量的影响. 杂交水稻, 2011, 26(6): 69-73. |
Cheng J P, Zhang Z J, Zhao F, Wang G Y, Yang R H, Li J P, Wang Q J.Effects of planting density and nitrogen fertilizer management on population formation and yield of Liangyou 1528 under mechanized transplanting conditions.Hybrid Rice, 2011, 26(6): 69-73. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 张小翠, 戴其根, 胡星星, 朱德建, 丁秀文, 马克强, 张洪程, 朱聪聪. 不同质地土壤下缓释尿素与常规尿素配施对水稻产量及其生长发育的影响. 作物学报, 2012, 38(8): 1494-1503. |
Zhang X C, Dai Q G, Hu X X, Zhu D J, Ding X W, Ma K Q, Zhang H C, Zhu C C.Effects of slow-release urea combined with conventional urea on rice output and growth in soils of different textures. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38(8): 1494-1503. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 赵黎明, 李明, 郑殿峰, 顾春梅, 那永光, 解保胜. 灌溉方式与种植密度对寒地水稻产量及光合物质生产特性的影响. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(6): 159-169. |
Zhao L M, Li M, Zheng D F, Gu C M, Na Y G, Xie B S.Effects of irrigation methods and rice planting densities on yield and photosynthetic characteristics of matter production in cold area.Trans CSAE, 2015, 31(6): 159-169. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 朱懿, 江青山, 孙永健, 赵德明, 马均. 宜香1A系列组合的光合生产及产量形成特点. 杂交水稻, 2014, 29(4):68-72. |
Zhu Y, Jiang Q S, Sun Y J, Zhao D M, Ma J.Photosynthetic production and yield formation of Yixiang 1A series of combinations.Hybrid Rice, 2014, 29(4): 68-72. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | 李敏, 郭熙盛, 叶舒娅, 刘枫, 袁嫚嫚, 黄义德. 硫膜和树脂膜控释尿素对水稻产量、光合特性及氮肥利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(4): 808-815. |
Li M, GUO X S, Ye S Y, Liu F, Yuan M M, Huang Y D.Effects of sulfur-and polymer-coated controlled release urea on yield,photosynthetic characteristics and nitrogen fertilizer efficiency of rice.Plant Nutr & Fert Sci, 2013, 19(4): 808-815. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] | 邢晓鸣, 李小春, 丁艳锋, 王绍华, 刘正辉, 唐设, 丁承强, 李刚华, 魏广彬. 缓控释肥组配对机插常规粳稻群体物质生产和产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(24): 4892-4902. |
Xing X M, Li X C, Ding Y F, Wang S H, Liu Z H, Tang S, Ding C Q, Li G H, Wei G B.Effects of types of controlled released nitrogen and fertilization modes on Yield and Dry Mass Production.Sci Agric Sin, 2015, 48(24): 4892-4902. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 郭展, 张运波. 水稻对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应及分子调控研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[2] | 韦还和, 马唯一, 左博源, 汪璐璐, 朱旺, 耿孝宇, 张翔, 孟天瑶, 陈英龙, 高平磊, 许轲, 霍中洋, 戴其根. 盐、干旱及其复合胁迫对水稻产量和品质形成影响的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[3] | 吕宙, 易秉怀, 陈平平, 周文新, 唐文帮, 易镇邪. 施氮量与移栽密度对小粒型杂交水稻产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 422-436. |
[4] | 赵艺婷, 谢可冉, 高逖, 崔克辉. 水稻分蘖期干旱锻炼对幼穗分化期高温下穗发育和产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 277-289. |
[5] | 周甜, 吴少华, 康建宏, 吴宏亮, 杨生龙, 王星强, 李昱, 黄玉峰. 不同种植模式对水稻籽粒淀粉含量及淀粉关键酶活性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 303-315. |
[6] | 彭显龙, 董强, 张辰, 李鹏飞, 李博琳, 刘智蕾, 于彩莲. 不同土壤条件下秸秆还田量对土壤还原性物质及水稻生长的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(2): 198-210. |
[7] | 朱旺, 张翔, 耿孝宇, 张哲, 陈英龙, 韦还和, 戴其根, 许轲, 朱广龙, 周桂生, 孟天瑶. 盐-旱复合胁迫下水稻根系的形态和生理特征及其与产量形成的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(6): 617-627. |
[8] | 邹宇傲, 吴启侠, 周乾顺, 朱建强, 晏军. 孕穗期杂交中稻对淹涝胁迫的响应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(6): 642-656. |
[9] | 袁沛, 周旋, 杨威, 尹凌洁, 靳拓, 彭建伟, 荣湘民, 田昌. 化肥减氮配施对洞庭湖区双季稻产量和田面水氮磷流失风险的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(5): 518-528. |
[10] | 肖大康, 胡仁, 韩天富, 张卫峰, 侯俊, 任科宇. 氮肥用量和运筹对我国水稻产量及其构成因子影响的整合分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(5): 529-542. |
[11] | 黄亚茹, 徐鹏, 王乐乐, 贺一哲, 王辉, 柯健, 何海兵, 武立权, 尤翠翠. 外源海藻糖对粳稻品系W1844籽粒灌浆特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[12] | 高欠清, 任孝俭, 翟中兵, 郑普兵, 吴源芬, 崔克辉. 头季穗肥和促芽肥对再生稻再生芽生长及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 405-414. |
[13] | 王文婷, 马佳颖, 李光彦, 符卫蒙, 李沪波, 林洁, 陈婷婷, 奉保华, 陶龙兴, 符冠富, 秦叶波. 高温下不同施肥量对水稻产量品质形成的影响及其与能量代谢的关系分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
[14] | 杨晓龙, 王彪, 汪本福, 张枝盛, 张作林, 杨蓝天, 程建平, 李阳. 不同水分管理方式对旱直播水稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
[15] | 魏晓东, 宋雪梅, 赵凌, 赵庆勇, 陈涛, 路凯, 朱镇, 黄胜东, 王才林, 张亚东. 硅锌肥及其施用方式对南粳46产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 295-306. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||