植物引导编辑技术——作物育种的新方向

doi:10.16819/j.1001-7216.2025.241005

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

植物引导编辑技术(Plant Prime Editing，PPE)为植物基因组的精准改良提供了全新途径，克服了传统基因编辑方法中依赖双链断裂和外源供体DNA的局限性，不仅可以实现任意类型碱基替换，还可以进行小片段乃至大范围片段的精准插入和删除，并且脱靶率较低。本文详细阐述了PPE技术在国内外的最新研究进展，包括其发展历程与工作原理、在作物育种与性状改良中的应用，及PE技术在大规模基因组编辑和多重基因编辑等领域的拓展。针对PPE系统在植物遗传转化过程中遇到的瓶颈问题，提出了若干解决方案，并展望了PPE技术在植物遗传改良中的广泛应用前景及未来与人工智能(Artificial Intelligence，AI)相结合的研究方向。

关键词: 植物引导编辑技术, CRISPR/Cas, 精准编辑, 作物育种, 植物遗传转化

Abstract:

Plant Prime Editing (PPE) provides a novel approach for precise genome modification in plants, overcoming the limitations of conventional gene editing methods that rely on double-strand breaks and exogenous donor DNA. It enables not only arbitrary base substitutions, but also precise insertions and deletions of small to large DNA fragments, with reduced off-target effects. This review systematically summarizes the latest research advances in PPE technology globally, including its development history and working mechanism, applications in crop breeding and trait improvement, and representative cases. It also discusses the expansion of prime editing into large-scale genome editing and multiplex gene editing. To address the bottlenecks faced by PPE systems in plant genetic transformation, several potential solutions are proposed. Finally, the broad application prospects of PPE technology in plant genetic improvement and its potential integration with artificial intelligence (AI) in future research are outlined.

Key words: plant prime editing, CRISPR/Cas, precision gene editing, crop breeding, plant genetic transformation

宋安琪, 吴松权, 马秋月, 班宛宁, 刘相国, 金永梅. 植物引导编辑技术——作物育种的新方向[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2025, 39(6): 711-730.

SONG Anqi, WU Songquan, MA Qiuyue, BAN Wanning, LIU Xiangguo, JIN Yongmei. Plant Prime Editing: A New Direction in Crop Breeding[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2025, 39(6): 711-730.

图/表 6

参考文献 112

[1]	Townsend J A, Wright D A, Winfrey R J, Fu F L, Maeder M L, Joung J K, Voytas D F. High-frequency modification of plant genes using engineered zinc-finger nucleases[J]. Nature, 2009, 459(7245): 442-445.
[2]	Bogdanove A J, Voytas D F. TAL effectors: Customizable proteins for DNA targeting[J]. Science, 2011, 333(6051): 1843-1846.
[3]	Gasiunas G, Barrangou R, Horvath P, Siksnys V. Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109(39): E2579-E2586.
[4]	Mali P, Yang L H, Esvelt K M, Aach J, Guell M, DiCarlo J E, Norville J E, Church G M. RNA-guided human genome engineering via cas9[J]. Science, 2013, 339(6121): 823-826.
[5]	Lu Y M, Tian Y F, Shen R D, Yao Q, Wang M G, Chen M, Dong J S, Zhang T G, Li F, Lei M G, Zhu J K. Targeted, efficient sequence insertion and replacement in rice[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2020, 38(12): 1402-1407.
[6]	Shmakov S, Smargon A, Scott D, Cox D, Pyzocha N, Yan W, Abudayyeh O O, Gootenberg J S, Makarova K S, Wolf Y I, Severinov K, Zhang F, Koonin E V. Diversity and evolution of class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems[J]. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2017, 15(3): 169-182.
[7]	Zetsche B, Gootenberg J S, Abudayyeh O O, Slaymaker I M, Makarova K S, Essletzbichler P, Volz S, Joung J, van der Oost J, Regev A, Koonin E V, Zhang F. Cpf1 is a single-RNA-guided endonuclease of a Class 2 CRISPR-Cas system[J]. Cell, 2015, 163(3): 759-771.
[8]	Barrangou R, Gersbach C A. Expanding the CRISPR Toolbox: Targeting RNA with Cas13b[J]. Molecular Cell, 2017, 65(4): 582-584.
[9]	Komor A C, Kim Y B, Packer M S, Zuris J A, Liu D R. Programmable editing of a target base in genomic DNA without double-stranded DNA cleavage[J]. Nature, 2016, 533(7603): 420-424.
[10]	Gaudelli N M, Komor A C, Rees H A, Packer M S, Badran A H, Bryson D I, Liu D R. Programmable base editing of A•T to G•C in genomic DNA without DNA cleavage[J]. Nature, 2017, 551(7681): 464-471.
[11]	Huang T P, Newby G A, Liu D V R. Precision genome editing using cytosine and adenine base editors in mammalian cells[J]. Nature Protocols, 2021, 16(2): 1089-1128.
[12]	Rees H A, Liu D R. Base editing: precision chemistry on the genome and transcriptome of living cells[J]. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2018, 19(12): 770-788.
[13]	Ren Q R, Sretenovic S, Liu G Q, Zhong Z H, Wang J H, Huang L, Tang X, Guo Y C, Liu L, Wu Y C, Zhou J, Zhao Y X, Yang H, He Y, Liu S S, Yin D S, Mayorga R, Zheng X L, Zhang T, Qi Y P, Zhang Y. Improved plant cytosine base editors with high editing activity, purity, and specificity[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2021, 19(10): 2052-2068.
[14]	Monsur M B I, Cao N, Wei X J, Xie L H, Jiao G A, Tang S Q, Sreenivasulu N, Shao G N, Hu P S. Improved eating and cooking quality of indica rice cultivar YK17 via adenine base editing of Wx^a allele of granule-bound starch synthase I (GBSS I)[J]. Rice Science, 2021, 28(5): 427-430.
[15]	Jin S, Zong Y, Gao Q, Zhu Z, Wang Y, Qin P, Liang C, Wang D, Qiu J L, Zhang F, Gao C. Cytosine, but not adenine, base editors induce genome-wide off-target mutations in rice[J]. Science, 2019, 364(6437): 292-295.
[16]	Anzalone A V, Randolph P B, Davis J R, Sousa A A, Koblan L W, Levy J M, Chen P J, Wilson C, Newby G A, Raguram A, Liu D R. Search-and-replace genome editing without double-strand breaks or donor DNA[J]. Nature, 2019, 576(7785): 149-157.
[17]	Gehrke J M, Cervantes O, Clement M K, Wu Y X, Zeng J, Bauer D E, Pinello L, Joung J K. An APOBEC3A-Cas9 base editor with minimized bystander and off-target activities[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2018, 36(10): 977-982.
[18]	Kim Y B, Komor A C, Levy J M, Packer M S, Zhao K T, Liu D R. Increasing the genome-targeting scope and precision of base editing with engineered Cas9-cytidine deaminase fusions[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2017, 35(4): 371-376.
[19]	Nishimasu H, Shi X, Ishiguro S, Gao L Y, Hirano S, Okazaki S, Noda T, Abudayyeh O O, Gootenberg J S, Mori H, Oura S, Holmes B, Tanaka M, Seki M, Hirano H, Aburatani H, Ishitani R, Ikawa M, Yachie N, Zhang F, Nureki O. Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease with expanded targeting space[J]. Science, 2018, 361(6408): 1259-1262.
[20]	Huang T P, Zhao K T, Miller S M, Gaudelli N M, Oakes B L, Fellmann C, Savage D F, Liu D R. Circularly permuted and PAM-modified Cas9 variants broaden the targeting scope of base editors[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2019, 37(6): 626-631.
[21]	Walton R T, Christie K A, Whittaker M N, Kleinstiver B P. Unconstrained genome targeting with near-PAMless engineered CRISPR-Cas9 variants[J]. Science, 2020, 368(6488): 290-296.
[22]	Miller S M, Wang T, Randolph P B, Arbab M, Shen M W, Huang T P, Matuszek Z, Newby G A, Rees H A, Liu D R. Continuous evolution of SpCas9 variants compatible with non-G PAMs[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2020, 38(4): 471-481.
[23]	Doman J L, Raguram A, Newby G A, Liu D R. Evaluation and minimization of Cas9-independent off-target DNA editing by cytosine base editors[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2020, 38(5): 620-628.
[24]	Rees H A, Wilson C, Doman J L, Liu D R. Analysis and minimization of cellular RNA editing by DNA adenine base editors[J]. Science Advances, 2019, 5(5): eaax5717.
[25]	Grunewald J, Zhou R H, Iyer S, Lareau C A, Garcia S P, Aryee M J, Joung J K. CRISPR DNA base editors with reduced RNA off-target and self-editing activities[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2019, 37(9): 1041-1048.
[26]	Liu T T, Zou J P, Yang X, Wang K J, Rao Y C, Wang C. Development and application of prime editing in plants[J]. Rice Science, 2023, 30(6): 509-522.
[27]	Gao R Z, Fu Z C, Li X Y, Wang Y, Wei J, Li G Y, Wang L J, Wu J, Huang X X, Yang L, Chen J. Genomic and transcriptomic analyses of prime editing guide RNA-independent off-target effects by prime editors[J]. CRISPR Journal, 2022, 5(2): 276-293.
[28]	Schene I F, Joore I P, Oka R, Mokry M, van Vugt A H M, van Boxtel R, Verstegen M M A, van Hasselt P M, Nieuwenhuis E E S, Fuchs S A. Prime editing for functional repair in patient-derived disease models[J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11(1): 5352.
[29]	Geurts M H, de Poel E, Pleguezuelos-Manzano C, Oka R, Carrillo L, Andersson-Rolf A, Boretto M, Brunsveld J E, van Boxtel R, Beekman J M, Clevers H. Evaluating CRISPR-based prime editing for cancer modeling and CFTR repair in organoids[J]. Life Science Alliance, 2021, 4(10): e202000940.
[30]	Park S J, Jeong T Y, Shin S K, Yoon D E, Lim S Y, Kim S P, Choi J, Lee H, Hong J I, Ahn J, Seong J K, Kim K. Targeted mutagenesis in mouse cells and embryos using an enhanced prime editor[J]. Genome Biology, 2021, 22(1): 170.
[31]	Liu Y, Li X Y, He S T, Huang S H, Li C, Chen Y L, Liu Z, Huang X X, Wang X L. Efficient generation of mouse models with the prime editing system[J]. Cell Discovery, 2020, 6(1): 27.
[32]	Gao P, Lyu Q, Ghanam A R, Lazzarotto C R, Newby G A, Zhang W, Choi M, Slivano O J, Holden K, Walker J A, Kadina A P, Munroe R J, Abratte C M, Schimenti J C, Liu D R, Tsai S Q, Long X C, Miano J M. Prime editing in mice reveals the essentiality of a single base in driving tissue-specific gene expression[J]. Genome Biology, 2021, 22(1): 83.
[33]	Lin J X, Liu X C, Lu Z Y, Huang S S, Wu S S, Yu W X, Liu Y, Zheng X G, Huang X X, Sun Q, Qiao Y B, Liu Z. Modeling a cataract disorder in mice with prime editing[J]. Molecular Therapy Nucleic Acids, 2021, 25: 494-501.
[34]	Lin Q, Zong Y, Xue C, Wang S, Jin S, Zhu Z, Wang Y, Anzalone A V, Raguram A, Doman J L, Liu D R, Gao C. Prime genome editing in rice and wheat[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2020, 38(5): 582-585.
[35]	Tang X, Sretenovic S, Ren Q R, Jia X Y, Li M K, Fan T T, Yin D S, Xiang S Y, Guo Y H, Liu L, Zheng X L, Qi Y P, Zhang Y. Plant prime editors enable precise gene editing in rice cells[J]. Molecular Plant, 2020, 13(5): 667-670.
[36]	Li H Y, Li J Y, Chen J L, Yan L, Xia L Q. Precise modifications of both exogenous and endogenous genes in rice by prime editing[J]. Molecular Plant, 2020, 13(5): 671-674.
[37]	Xu W, Zhang C W, Yang Y X, Zhao S, Kang G T, He X Q, Song J L, Yang J X. Versatile nucleotides substitution in plant using an improved prime editing system[J]. Molecular Plant, 2020, 13(5): 675-678.
[38]	Xu R F, Li J, Liu X S, Shan T F, Qin R Y, Wei P C. Development of plant prime-editing systems for precise genome editing[J]. Plant Communications, 2020, 1(3): 100043.
[39]	Hua K, Jiang Y W, Tao X P, Zhu J K. Precision genome engineering in rice using prime editing system[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2020, 18(11): 2167-2169.
[40]	Jin S, Lin Q P, Luo Y F, Zhu Z X, Liu G W, Li Y J, Chen K L, Qiu J L, Gao C X. Genome-wide specificity of prime editors in plants[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2021, 39(10): 1292-1299.
[41]	Chai Y, Jiang Y, Wang J, Qiao D, Zhang Y, Xin C, Zhou Y, Wang X C, Chen Q. MS2 RNA aptamer greatly enhances prime editing in rice[J]. Research Square, 2021.
[42]	Xu W, Yang Y X, Yang B Y, Krueger C J, Xiao Q L, Zhao S, Zhang L, Kang G T, Wang F P, Yi H M, Ren W, Li L, He X Q, Zhang C M, Zhang B, Zhao J R, Yang J X. A design optimized prime editor with expanded scope and capability in plants[J]. Nature Plants, 2022, 8(1): 45-52.
[43]	Zong Y, Liu Y J, Xue C X, Li B S, Li X Y, Wang Y P, Li J, Liu G W, Huang X X, Cao X F, Gao C X. An engineered prime editor with enhanced editing efficiency in plants[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2022, 40(9): 1394-1402.
[44]	Zou J P, Meng X B, Liu Q, Shang M Q, Wang K J, Li J Y, Yu H, Wang C. Improving the efficiency of prime editing with epegRNAs and high-temperature treatment in rice[J]. Science China-Life Sciences, 2022, 65(11): 2328-2331.
[45]	Li J, Chen L K, Liang J, Xu R F, Jiang Y L, Li Y Z, Ding J, Li M, Qin R Y, Wei P C. Development of a highly efficient prime editor 2 system in plants[J]. Genome Biology, 2022, 23(1): 161.
[46]	Jiang Y, Chai Y, Qiao D, Wang J, Xin C, Sun W, Cao Z, Zhang Y, Zhou Y, Wang X C. Optimized prime editing efficiently generates glyphosate-resistant rice plants carrying homozygous TAP-IVS mutation in EPSPS[J]. Molecular plant, 2022, 15(11): 1646-1649.
[47]	Sun C, Lei Y, Li B S, Gao Q, Li Y J, Cao W, Yang C, Li H C, Wang Z W, Li Y, Wang Y P, Liu J, Zhao K T, Gao C X. Precise integration of large DNA sequences in plant genomes using PrimeRoot editors[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2024, 42(2): 316-327.
[48]	Ni P, Zhao Y D, Zhou X M, Liu Z H, Huang Z W, Ni Z F, Sun Q X, Zong Y. Efficient and versatile multiplex prime editing in hexaploid wheat[J]. Genome Biology, 2023, 24(1): 156.
[49]	Qiao D, Wang J, Lu M H, Xin C, Chai Y, Jiang Y, Sun W, Cao Z, Guo S, Wang X C. Optimized prime editing efficiently generates heritable mutations in maize[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2023, 65(4): 900-906.
[50]	Lu Y M, Tian Y F, Shen R D, Yao Q, Zhong D T, Zhang X N, Zhu J K. Precise genome modification in tomato using an improved prime editing system[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2021, 19(3): 415-417.
[51]	Wang L, Kaya H B, Zhang N, Rai R, Willmann M R, Carpenter S C D, Read A C, Martin F, Fei Z J, Leach J E, Martin G B, Bogdanove A J. Spelling changes and fluorescent tagging with prime editing vectors for plants[J]. Frontiers in Genome Editing, 2021, 3: 617553.
[52]	Perroud P F, Guyon-Debast A, Veillet F, Kermarrec M P, Chauvin L, Chauvin J E, Gallois J L, Nogué F. Prime Editing in the model plant Physcomitrium patens and its potential in the tetraploid potato[J]. Plant Science, 2022, 316: 111162.
[53]	Biswas S, Bridgeland A, Irum S, Thomson M J, Septiningsih E M. Optimization of prime editing in rice, peanut, chickpea, and cowpea protoplasts by restoration of GFP activity[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2022, 23(17): 9809.
[54]	Zhang J D, Zhang L, Zhang C W, Yang Y X, Liu H Y, Li L, Zhang S X, Li X G, Liu X X, Liu Y, Wang J, Yang G Y, Xia Q Y, Wang W G, Yang J X. Developing an efficient and visible prime editing system to restore tobacco 8-hydroxy-copalyl diphosphate gene for labdane diterpene Z-abienol biosynthesis[J]. Science China-Life Sciences, 2023, 66(12): 2910-2921.
[55]	Liang Z, Wu Y Q, Guo Y J, Wei S. Addition of the T5 exonuclease increases the prime editing efficiency in plants[J]. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 2023, 50(8): 582-588.
[56]	Li H Y, Zhu Z W, Li S Y, Li J Y, Yan L, Zhang C, Ma Y Z, Xia L Q. Multiplex precision gene editing by a surrogate prime editor in rice[J]. Molecular Plant, 2022, 15(7): 1077-1080.
[57]	Gupta A, Liu B, Raza S, Chen Q J, Yang B. Modularly assembled multiplex prime editors for simultaneous editing of agronomically important genes in rice[J]. Plant Communications, 2024, 5(2): 100741.
[58]	Vu T V, Nguyen N T, Kim J, Song Y J, Nguyen T H, Kim J-Y. Optimized dicot prime editing enables heritable desired edits in tomato and Arabidopsis[J]. Nature Plants, 2024, 10(10): 1502-1513.
[59]	Liu X X, Wang Y Y, Wang H Z, He Y X, Song Y J, Li Z R, Li M, Wei C, Dong Y H, Xue L, Zhang J S, Zhu J K, Wang M G. Generating herbicide resistant and dwarf rice germplasms through precise sequence insertion or replacement[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2024, 22(2): 293-295.
[60]	Gupta A, Liu B, Chen Q J, Yang B. High-efficiency prime editing enables new strategies for broad-spectrum resistance to bacterial blight of rice[J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2023, 21(7): 1454-1464.
[61]	Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, Hauer M, Doudna J A, Charpentier E. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity[J]. Science, 2012, 337(6096): 816-821.
[62]	Hu J H, Miller S M, Geurts M H, Tang W X, Chen L W, Sun N, Zeina C M, Gao X, Rees H A, Lin Z, Liu D R. Evolved Cas9 variants with broad PAM compatibility and high DNA specificity[J]. Nature, 2018, 556(7699): 57-63.
[63]	Kleinstiver B P, Prew M S, Tsai S Q, Topkar V V, Nguyen N T, Zheng Z L, Gonzales A P W, Li Z Y, Peterson R T, Yeh J R J, Aryee M J, Joung J K. Engineered CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with altered PAM specificities[J]. Nature, 2015, 523(7561): 481-485.
[64]	Christie K A, Guo J A, Silverstein R A, Doll R M, Mabuchi M, Stutzman H E, Lin J, Ma L, Walton R T, Pinello L, Robb G B, Kleinstiver B P. Precise DNA cleavage using CRISPR-SpRYgests[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2023, 41(3): 409-416.
[65]	Ren Q R, Sretenovic S, Liu S S, Tang X, Huang L, He Y, Liu L, Guo Y C, Zhong Z H, Liu G Q, Cheng Y H, Zheng X L, Pan C T, Yin D S, Zhang Y X, Li W F, Qi L W, Li C H, Qi Y P, Zhang Y. PAM-less plant genome editing using a CRISPR-SpRY toolbox[J]. Nature Plants, 2021, 7(1): 25-33.
[66]	Liu Y, Yang G, Huang S H, Li X Y, Wang X, Li G L, Chi T, Chen Y L, Huang X X, Wang X L. Enhancing prime editing by Csy4-mediated processing of pegRNA[J]. Cell Research, 2021, 31(10): 1134-1136.
[67]	Nelson J W, Randolph P B, Shen S P, Everette K A, Chen P J, Anzalone A V, An M R, Newby G A, Chen J C, Hsu A, Liu D R. Engineered pegRNAs improve prime editing efficiency[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2022, 40(3): 402-410.
[68]	Chow R D, Chen J S, Shen J, Chen S. A web tool for the design of prime-editing guide RNAs[J]. Nature Biomedical Engineering, 2021, 5(2): 190-194.
[69]	Hsu J Y, Grünewald J, Szalay R, Shih J, Anzalone A V, Lam K C, Shen M W, Petri K, Liu D R, Joung J K. PrimeDesign software for rapid and simplified design of prime editing guide RNAs[J]. Nature Communications, 2021, 12(1): 1034.
[70]	Standage-Beier K, Tekel S J, Brafman D A, Wang X. Prime editing guide RNA design automation using PINE-CONE[J]. ACS Synthetic Biology, 2021, 10(2): 422-427.
[71]	Hwang G H, Jeong Y K, Habib O, Hong S A, Lim K, Kim J S, Bae S. PE-Designer and PE-Analyzer: Web-based design and analysis tools for CRISPR prime editing[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2021, 49(W1): W499-W504.
[72]	Siegner S M, Karasu M E, Schröder M S, Kontarakis Z, Corn J E. PnB Designer: A web application to design prime and base editor guide RNAs for animals and plants[J]. BMC Bioinformatics, 2021, 22(1): 101.
[73]	Anderson M V, Haldrup J, Thomsen E A, Wolff J H, Mikkelsen J G. pegIT-a web-based design tool for prime editing[J]. Nucleic Acids Research, 2021, 49(W1): W505-W509.
[74]	Kim H K, Yu G, Park J, Min S, Lee S, Yoon S, Kim H H. Predicting the efficiency of prime editing guide RNAs in human cells[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2021, 39(2): 198-206.
[75]	Lin Q, Jin S, Zong Y, Yu H, Zhu Z, Liu G, Kou L, Wang Y, Qiu J L, Li J. High-efficiency prime editing with optimized, paired pegRNAs in plants[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2021, 39(8): 923-927.
[76]	Chen P J, Hussmann J A, Yan J, Knipping F, Ravisankar P, Chen P F, Chen C, Nelson J W, Newby G A, Sahin M. Enhanced prime editing systems by manipulating cellular determinants of editing outcomes[J]. Cell, 2021, 184(22): 5635-5652.
[77]	Ding X, Seebeck T, Feng Y, Jiang Y, Davis G D, Chen F. Improving CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing efficiency by fusion with chromatin-modulating peptides[J]. The CRISPR Journal, 2019, 2(1): 51-63.
[78]	Wang J, He Z, Wang G, Zhang R, Duan J, Gao P, Lei X, Qiu H, Zhang C, Zhang Y. Efficient targeted insertion of large DNA fragments without DNA donors[J]. Nature Methods, 2022, 19(3): 331-340.
[79]	Choi J, Chen W, Suiter C C, Lee C, Chardon F M, Yang W, Leith A, Daza R M, Martin B, Shendure J. Precise genomic deletions using paired prime editing[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2022, 40(2): 218-226.
[80]	Jiang T, Zhang X O, Weng Z, Xue W. Deletion and replacement of long genomic sequences using prime editing[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2022, 40(2): 227-234.
[81]	Liu P, Panda K, Edwards S A, Swanson R, Yi H, Pandesha P, Hung Y H, Klaas G, Ye X, Collins M V. Transposase-assisted target-site integration for efficient plant genome engineering[J]. Nature, 2024, 631(8021): 593-600.
[82]	Zou J, Meng X, Hong Z, Rao Y, Wang K, Li J, Yu H, Wang C. Cas9-PE: A robust multiplex gene editing tool for simultaneous precise editing and site-specific random mutation in rice[J]. Trends in Biotechnology, 2025, 43(2): 433-446.
[83]	Ferreira da Silva J, Tou C J, King E M, Eller M L, Rufino-Ramos D, Ma L, Cromwell C R, Metovic J, Benning F M, Chao L H. Click editing enables programmable genome writing using DNA polymerases and HUH endonucleases[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2025, 43(6): 923-935.
[84]	Ghogare R, Ludwig Y, Bueno G M, Slamet-Loedin I H, Dhingra A. Genome editing reagent delivery in plants[J]. Transgenic Research, 2021, 30(4): 321-335.
[85]	Li B, Sun C, Li J, Gao C. Targeted genome-modification tools and their advanced applications in crop breeding[J]. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2024, 25(9): 603-622.
[86]	Woo J W, Kim J, Kwon S I, Corvalán C, Cho S W, Kim H, Kim S G, Kim S T, Choe S, Kim J S. DNA-free genome editing in plants with preassembled CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2015, 33(11): 1162-1164.
[87]	Svitashev S, Schwartz C, Lenderts B, Young J K, Mark Cigan A. Genome editing in maize directed by CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes[J]. Nature Communications, 2016, 7(1): 13274.
[88]	Kim H, Kim S T, Ryu J, Kang B C, Kim J S, Kim S G. CRISPR/Cpf1-mediated DNA-free plant genome editing[J]. Nature Communications, 2017, 8(1): 14406.
[89]	Liang Z, Chen K, Zhang Y, Liu J, Yin K, Qiu J L, Gao C. Genome editing of bread wheat using biolistic delivery of CRISPR/Cas9 in vitro transcripts or ribonucleoproteins[J]. Nature Protocols, 2018, 13(3): 413-430.
[90]	Murovec J, Guček K, Bohanec B, Avbelj M, Jerala R. DNA-free genome editing of Brassica oleracea and B. rapa protoplasts using CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoprotein complexes[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018, 9: 1594.
[91]	Osakabe Y, Liang Z, Ren C, Nishitani C, Osakabe K, Wada M, Komori S, Malnoy M, Velasco R, Poli M. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing in apple and grapevine[J]. Nature Protocols, 2018, 13(12): 2844-2863.
[92]	Lowe K, Wu E, Wang N, Hoerster G, Hastings C, Cho M J, Scelonge C, Lenderts B, Chamberlin M, Cushatt J. Morphogenic regulators Baby boom and Wuschel improve monocot transformation[J]. The Plant Cell, 2016, 28(9): 1998-2015.
[93]	Pan C, Li G, Malzahn A A, Cheng Y, Leyson B, Sretenovic S, Gurel F, Coleman G D, Qi Y. Boosting plant genome editing with a versatile CRISPR-Combo system[J]. Nature Plants, 2022, 8(5): 513-525.
[94]	Debernardi J M, Tricoli D M, Ercoli M F, Hayta S, Ronald P, Palatnik J F, Dubcovsky J. A GRF-GIF chimeric protein improves the regeneration efficiency of transgenic plants[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2020, 38(11): 1274-1279.
[95]	Chen Z, Debernardi J M, Dubcovsky J, Gallavotti A. Recent advances in crop transformation technologies[J]. Nature Plants, 2022, 8(12): 1343-1351.
[96]	Maher M F, Nasti R A, Vollbrecht M, Starker C G, Clark M D, Voytas D F. Plant gene editing through de novo induction of meristems[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2020, 38(1): 84-89.
[97]	Oh Y, Kim H, Kim S G. Virus-induced plant genome editing[J]. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2021, 60: 101992.
[98]	Ellison E E, Nagalakshmi U, Gamo M E, Huang P J, Dinesh-Kumar S, Voytas D F. Multiplexed heritable gene editing using RNA viruses and mobile single guide RNAs[J]. Nature Plants, 2020, 6(6): 620-624.
[99]	Čermák T, Curtin S J, Gil-Humanes J, Čegan R, Kono T J, Konečná E, Belanto J J, Starker C G, Mathre J W, Greenstein R L. A multipurpose toolkit to enable advanced genome engineering in plants[J]. The Plant Cell, 2017, 29(6): 1196-1217.
[100]	Li T, Hu J, Sun Y, Li B, Zhang D, Li W, Liu J, Li D, Gao C, Zhang Y. Highly efficient heritable genome editing in wheat using an RNA virus and bypassing tissue culture[J]. Molecular Plant, 2021, 14(11): 1787-1798.
[101]	Nguyen Tran M T, Mohd Khalid M K N, Wang Q, Walker J K, Lidgerwood G E, Dilworth K L, Lisowski L, Pébay A, Hewitt A W. Engineering domain-inlaid SaCas9 adenine base editors with reduced RNA off-targets and increased on-target DNA editing[J]. Nature Communications, 2020, 11(1): 4871.
[102]	Ma X, Zhang X, Liu H, Li Z. Highly efficient DNA-free plant genome editing using virally delivered CRISPR-Cas9[J]. Nature Plants, 2020, 6(7): 773-779.
[103]	Liu Q, Zhao C, Sun K, Deng Y, Li Z. Engineered biocontainable RNA virus vectors for non-transgenic genome editing across crop species and genotypes[J]. Molecular Plant, 2023, 16(3): 616-631.
[104]	Anzalone A V, Koblan L W, Liu D R. Genome editing with CRISPR-Cas nucleases, base editors, transposases and prime editors[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 2020, 38(7): 824-844.
[105]	Kantor A, McClements M E, MacLaren R E. CRISPR-Cas9 DNA base-editing and prime-editing[J]. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2020, 21(17): 6240.
[106]	Li G, Cheng Y, Yu J, Zhu Y, Ma H, Zhou Y, Pu Z, Zhu G, Yuan Y, Zhang Z. Compact RNA editors with natural miniature Cas13j nucleases[J]. Nature Chemical Biology, 2025, 21(2): 280-290.
[107]	Xu C, Lu P, Gamal El-Din T M, Pei X Y, Johnson M C, Uyeda A, Bick M J, Xu Q, Jiang D, Bai H. Computational design of transmembrane pores[J]. Nature, 2020, 585(7823): 129-134.
[108]	Glasscock C J, Pecoraro R J, McHugh R, Doyle L A, Chen W, Boivin O, Lonnquist B, Na E, Politanska Y, Haddox H K. Computational design of sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins[J]. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 2025: 1-10.
[109]	Watson J L, Juergens D, Bennett N R, Trippe B L, Yim J, Eisenach H E, Ahern W, Borst A J, Ragotte R J, Milles L F. De novo design of protein structure and function with RFdiffusion[J]. Nature, 2023, 620(7976): 1089-1100.
[110]	Yeh A H-W, Norn C, Kipnis Y, Tischer D, Pellock S J, Evans D, Ma P, Lee G R, Zhang J Z, Anishchenko I. De novo design of luciferases using deep learning[J]. Nature, 2023, 614(7949): 774-780.
[111]	Vora Z, Pandya J, Sangh C, Vaikuntapu P R. The evolving landscape of global regulations on genome-edited crops[J]. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2023, 32(4): 831-845.
[112]	Ahmad A, Jamil A, Munawar N. GMOs or non-GMOs? The CRISPR conundrum[J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2023, 14: 1232938.

系统名称	系统组件			PAM	启动子	编辑效率 (%)	物种	参考文献
系统名称	Cas9 Nickcase	逆转录酶	pegRNA	PAM	启动子	编辑效率 (%)	物种	参考文献
PPE2	nCas9(H840A) 密码子优化	M-MLV RT密码子优化(D200N/L603W/ T330P/T306K/W31S)	原始的pegRNA	NGG	OsU3/TaU6, TaU3	0~21.8 (Pr, Re)^*	水稻, 小麦	[34]
PPE3			pegRNA+nicking sgRNA
PPE3b			Nicking sgRNA中的spacer序列与被编辑后的序列互补
PPE-CaMV		CaMV RT	原始的pegRNA	NGG		5.8、0.3 (Pr, Re)	水稻
PPE-ribozyme	nCas9(H840A) proteintranscript +polymerase II (Pol II)	Retron RT	Ribozyme-processed pegRNA	NGG		>9 (Pr, Re)	水稻
PPE3-V01, PPE3b-V01	nCas9(H840A) 密码子优化	M-MLV RT密码子优化	pegRNA+nicking sgRNA	NGG	OsU3, OsU6	0.05~0.4 (Pr)	水稻	[35]
PPE2-V02, PPE3-V02	nCas9(H840A) 密码子优化	M-MLV RT密码子优化、核定位信号配置优化	pegRNA	NGG	OsU6	<1.55 (Pr)	水稻	[35]
Prime editor basic (PPE3)	nCas9(H840A) C端+核定位信号NLS	在M-MLV RT上引入了 6个点突变(H9Y/ D200N/T306K/W313F/ T330P/L603W)	使用多顺反子tRNA策略同时产生pegRNA和nicking sgRNA	NGG	Actin	2.22~9.38 (Pr)	水稻	[36]
PE-P1	nCas9(H840A) 密码子优化	M-MLV RT密码子优化、核定位信号配置优化、 Link序列类型优化	原始的pegRNA	NGG	OsU3, OsU6a	0%~1.4 (Re)	水稻	[37]
PE-P2	nCas9(H840A) 密码子优化	在PE-P1的基础上，M- MLV 的C端添加了多顺反子连接子：2A self-cleaving peptides(P2A)	pegRNA+由增强的esgRNA组成的pegRNA		OsU3, OsU6a	1.7~26 (Re)	水稻	[37]
pPE2	nCas9(H840A) 密码子优化	M-MLV RT密码子优化(D200N/L603W/ T330P/T306K/ W313F)、 Link序列类型优化	原始的pegRNA	NGG	OsU3	0~31.3 (Re)	水稻	[38]
pPE3, pPE3b			pegRNA+nicking sgRNA		TaU3
Surrogate pPE2			采用双pegRNA策略，“编辑HPT起始密码子pegRNA+带有编辑信息pegRNA”	NGG	OsU3
Sp-PE2	nCas9(H840A) 密码子优化	M-MLV RT密码子优化(D200N/L603W/T306K/ W313F/T330P)、核定位信号配置优化	原始的pegRNA	NGG	OsU6	15.60 (Re)	水稻	[39]

系统名称	系统组件			PAM	启动子	编辑效率 (%)	物种	参考文献
系统名称	Cas9 Nickcase	逆转录酶	pegRNA	PAM	启动子	编辑效率 (%)	物种	参考文献
PPE2	nCas9(H840A) 密码子优化	M-MLV RT密码子优化(D200N/L603W/ T330P/T306K/W31S)	原始的pegRNA	NGG	OsU3/TaU6, TaU3	0~21.8 (Pr, Re)^*	水稻, 小麦	[34]
PPE3			pegRNA+nicking sgRNA
PPE3b			Nicking sgRNA中的spacer序列与被编辑后的序列互补
PPE-CaMV		CaMV RT	原始的pegRNA	NGG		5.8、0.3 (Pr, Re)	水稻
PPE-ribozyme	nCas9(H840A) proteintranscript +polymerase II (Pol II)	Retron RT	Ribozyme-processed pegRNA	NGG		>9 (Pr, Re)	水稻
PPE3-V01, PPE3b-V01	nCas9(H840A) 密码子优化	M-MLV RT密码子优化	pegRNA+nicking sgRNA	NGG	OsU3, OsU6	0.05~0.4 (Pr)	水稻	[35]
PPE2-V02, PPE3-V02	nCas9(H840A) 密码子优化	M-MLV RT密码子优化、核定位信号配置优化	pegRNA	NGG	OsU6	<1.55 (Pr)	水稻	[35]
Prime editor basic (PPE3)	nCas9(H840A) C端+核定位信号NLS	在M-MLV RT上引入了 6个点突变(H9Y/ D200N/T306K/W313F/ T330P/L603W)	使用多顺反子tRNA策略同时产生pegRNA和nicking sgRNA	NGG	Actin	2.22~9.38 (Pr)	水稻	[36]
PE-P1	nCas9(H840A) 密码子优化	M-MLV RT密码子优化、核定位信号配置优化、 Link序列类型优化	原始的pegRNA	NGG	OsU3, OsU6a	0%~1.4 (Re)	水稻	[37]
PE-P2	nCas9(H840A) 密码子优化	在PE-P1的基础上，M- MLV 的C端添加了多顺反子连接子：2A self-cleaving peptides(P2A)	pegRNA+由增强的esgRNA组成的pegRNA		OsU3, OsU6a	1.7~26 (Re)	水稻	[37]
pPE2	nCas9(H840A) 密码子优化	M-MLV RT密码子优化(D200N/L603W/ T330P/T306K/ W313F)、 Link序列类型优化	原始的pegRNA	NGG	OsU3	0~31.3 (Re)	水稻	[38]
pPE3, pPE3b			pegRNA+nicking sgRNA		TaU3
Surrogate pPE2			采用双pegRNA策略，“编辑HPT起始密码子pegRNA+带有编辑信息pegRNA”	NGG	OsU3
Sp-PE2	nCas9(H840A) 密码子优化	M-MLV RT密码子优化(D200N/L603W/T306K/ W313F/T330P)、核定位信号配置优化	原始的pegRNA	NGG	OsU6	15.60 (Re)	水稻	[39]

系统名称	系统组件						编辑类型			编辑效率 (%)		物种		参考文献
系统名称	Cas9 Nickcase		逆转录酶		pegRNA		编辑类型			编辑效率 (%)		物种		参考文献
MS2PE	nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV密码子优化(D200N/L603W/ T330P/T306K/W31S)与MS2 RNA 结合蛋白基因MCP融合		在原始pegRNA的3'端添加MS2 RNA结合蛋白基因MCP		3-bp subs			1.7~55.6 (Pr, Re)		水稻		[41]
PE-P2 (水稻)	nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV依旧在nCas9的C端融合		pegRNA+增强的esgRNA		1-bp subs			0~5.9(Re)		水稻		[42]
PE-P3 (水稻)			M-MLV从nCas9 C端融合变为N 端融合		pegRNA+增强的esgRNA					2.6~92.3(Re)		水稻
PE-P2 (玉米)			M-MLV-02玉米密码子优化；依旧在nCas9 C端融合		Target+esgRNA和pegRNA					0~7.7(Pr)		玉米
PE-P3 (玉米)			M-MLV-02玉米密码子优化，从 nCas9 C端融合变为N端融合		Target+esgRNA和pegRNA					2.9~80(Pr)		玉米
ePPE	nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		在原始PPE基础上，去除RT的 RNase H结构域并添加病毒核衣壳(NC)蛋白		原始的pegRNA		1-2-bp subs；3-bp ins；2-bp del； 15-90-bp ins or del			0~31.5 (Re)		水稻		[43]
PPE3- evopreQ1	nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV密码子优化(D200N/ L603W/T330P/T306K/W31S)		在PPE3基础上, 结构化pegRNA，在原始pegRNA的3'端添加8 bp linker和evopreQ1/ mpknot以提高稳定性		1-3-bp subs； 3-bp ins			2.6~60.5 (Pr, Re)		水稻		[44]
PPE3-mpknot	nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV密码子优化(D200N/ L603W/T330P/T306K/W31S)				1-3-bp subs； 3-bp ins			0~6.3 (Pr, Re)		水稻		[44]
pPEmax	nCas9(R221K/N394K/H840A) 密码子优化		M-MLV密码子优化，N端添加 NLS-embedded linker，C端添加异质串联NLS		epegRNA：在pegRNA 3'端添加evopreQ1		1-bp ins； 1-2-bp subs			14.58~66.67 (Re)		水稻		[45]
pPEmax- MLHdn			在pPEmax的基础上，C端添加MLH1dn，以抑制MMR途径		epegRNA：在pegRNA 3'端添加evopreQ1					0.18~2.3 (Re)
enpPE2			同pPEmax		在U6复合启动子驱动下，构成tRNA(Gly-tRNA):: pegRNA::evopreQ1:: HDV表达盒					64.58~77(Re)
pINPE2	nCas9(H840A)密码子优化， N端添加小肽		M-MLV C端添加异质串联NLSs		epegRNA：在pegRNA 3'端添加evopreQ1					0.01~0.8 (Re)
phyPE2	nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV N端添加DBD linker (hRad51-ssDBD)		epegRNA：在pegRNA 3'端添加evopreQ1					<0.1(Re)
ePE3max	nCas9(R221K/N394K/H840A) 密码子优化		M-MLV密码子优化(D200N/ L603W/T330P/T306K/W31S)		U6复合启动子驱动的表达盒中添加tRNA(Gly-tRNA)和HDV核酶，并添加nicking sgRNA		1-bp ins； 1-3-bp subs			~40(Re)		水稻		[46]
ePE5max	nCas9(R221K/N394K/H840A) 密码子优化		M-MLV C端添加MLH1dn，以抑制MMR途径		U6复合启动子驱动的表达盒中添加tRNA(Gly-tRNA)和HDV核酶，并添加nicking sgRNA		1-bp ins； 1-3-bp subs			~40(纯合率提高)(Re)		水稻		[46]
PrimeRoot	nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV去除RNase H结构域，并添加重组酶		采用“双ePPE”策略，使用了两个相邻的epegRNA，每个模板都包含一个仅与另一个epegRNA模板具有同源性的RT模板		720-bp，1.4-kb，4.9-kb, 7.7-kb，11.1-kb ins			0~8.3 (Pr, Re)		水稻		[47]
ePPE*	nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV密码子优化(D200N/ V223A/T306K/W313F/T330P/ L603W)，去除RNase H结构域并添加病毒核衣壳(NC)蛋白；优化核定位信号		epegRNA：在pegRNA 3’端添加evopreQ1		1-3-bp subs； 3-6-bp del； 4-bp ins			0~18.9 (Pr, Re)		小麦		[48]
ePPEmax	nCas9(H840A)密码子优化
ePPEmax*	nCas9(R221K/N394K/H840A) 密码子优化
ePPEplus	nCas9(R221K/N394K/H840A) 密码子优化
CMPE- ePPEplus	Csy4核糖核酸内切酶				串联多个(e)pegRNA		6- bp del; 1-bp subs			2~21.6; 19.6~86.3 (Pr, Re)
ePE5max (玉米)	nCas9(R221K/N394K/H840A) 密码子优化		M-MLV C端添加MLH1dn玉米同源物，以抑制MMR途径		U6复合启动子驱动的双pegRNA表达盒中添加tRNA(Gly-tRNA)和HDV核酶		1-bp subs			Homo: 1.4~3 hetero: 15~75 (Re)		玉米		[49]
pCXPE01, pCXPE02, pCXPE03	nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV植物密码子优化		原始的pegRNA		2-bp subs； 1-3-bp del			0.025~1.66; 2.6 (Pr)		番茄		[50]
pPPED	nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV植物密码子优linker序列类型优化		原始的pegRNA		2-bp subs			0.06 (Pr)		本氏烟草		[51]
系统名称		系统组件						编辑类型	编辑效率 (%)		物种		参考文献
系统名称		Cas9 Nickcase		逆转录酶		pegRNA		编辑类型	编辑效率 (%)		物种
pPPEDs								2-bp subs； 25-66-bp ins	0.07±0.12 (Re)		拟南芥
pPPEM								2-bp subs；25-66-bp ins	0.7~2.2 (Pr)		水稻
pAct-PPE		nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV植物密码子优化		原始的pegRNA		3-bp subs	0~5 (Re)		小立碗藓、马铃薯		[52]
PPE2 PPE3 PPE3b		nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV植物密码子优化		原始的pegRNA和nicking sgRNA		1-bp subs	0.2~0.5 (Pr)		花生，鹰嘴豆，豇豆		[53]
PE-Nt2		nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV通过linker在nCas9 C 端融合		pegRNA与nesgRNA (用于切割非编辑链的增强sgRNA)通过tRNA序列连接		1-bp subs	0~1.4 (Re)		烟草		[54]
PE-Nt3				M-MLV通过linker在nCas9 N 端融合					1.1~7.5 (Re)
PE-Nt4				M-MLV通过linker在nCas9 N 端融合					1.3~16.3 (Re)
PE2 (v2)		nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		在nCas9-M-MLV 融合蛋白N端添加T5外切酶		原始的pegRNA、双pegRNA优化、 PBS的长度优化		4-bp ins； 4-bp del； 1−2-bp subs	3.5~48.65 (Pr, Re)		水稻		[55]
PE3-HS/AS/ DS		nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV植物密码子优化；潮霉素代理系统、除草剂代理系统和潮霉素+除草剂双代理系统		tRNA-pegRNA(n)- tRNA-sgRNA(n)- tRNA		1-7-bp subs	1.3~54.2 (Re)		水稻		[56]
PE-DSM vector		nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		潮霉素+除草剂双代理多基因编辑系统		tRNA-pegRNA(n)- tRNA-sgRNA(n)- tRNA		1-7-bp subs	1.8~45.8 (Re)		水稻		[56]
DPE, TPE, QPE		nCas9(R221K/N394K/H840A)密码子优化		同ePE3max		pegRNA(n)-ngRNA(n)通过Gateway连接		2-3-bp subs, 28-bp ins	57.14 (Re)		水稻		[57]
-		nCas9(R221K/N394K/H840A) 密码子优化		同ePE5max		epegRNA：在pegRNA 3’端添加evopreQ1		4-bp ins	9.7 (Re)		番茄、拟南芥		[58]
GRAND		nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV植物密码子优化		RTT部分对齐，但与双pegRNA中的目标序列非同源		46-bp subs	0.59~9.88 (Pr, Re)		水稻		[59]
PE5max		nCas9(R221K/N394K/H840A) 密码子优化		M-MLV C端添加MLH1dn，以抑制MMR途径		U6复合启动子驱动的双pegRNA表达盒中添加tRNA(Gly-tRNA)和HDV核酶		30-bp ins	47 (Re)		水稻		[60]

系统名称	系统组件						编辑类型			编辑效率 (%)		物种		参考文献
系统名称	Cas9 Nickcase		逆转录酶		pegRNA		编辑类型			编辑效率 (%)		物种		参考文献
MS2PE	nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV密码子优化(D200N/L603W/ T330P/T306K/W31S)与MS2 RNA 结合蛋白基因MCP融合		在原始pegRNA的3'端添加MS2 RNA结合蛋白基因MCP		3-bp subs			1.7~55.6 (Pr, Re)		水稻		[41]
PE-P2 (水稻)	nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV依旧在nCas9的C端融合		pegRNA+增强的esgRNA		1-bp subs			0~5.9(Re)		水稻		[42]
PE-P3 (水稻)			M-MLV从nCas9 C端融合变为N 端融合		pegRNA+增强的esgRNA					2.6~92.3(Re)		水稻
PE-P2 (玉米)			M-MLV-02玉米密码子优化；依旧在nCas9 C端融合		Target+esgRNA和pegRNA					0~7.7(Pr)		玉米
PE-P3 (玉米)			M-MLV-02玉米密码子优化，从 nCas9 C端融合变为N端融合		Target+esgRNA和pegRNA					2.9~80(Pr)		玉米
ePPE	nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		在原始PPE基础上，去除RT的 RNase H结构域并添加病毒核衣壳(NC)蛋白		原始的pegRNA		1-2-bp subs；3-bp ins；2-bp del； 15-90-bp ins or del			0~31.5 (Re)		水稻		[43]
PPE3- evopreQ1	nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV密码子优化(D200N/ L603W/T330P/T306K/W31S)		在PPE3基础上, 结构化pegRNA，在原始pegRNA的3'端添加8 bp linker和evopreQ1/ mpknot以提高稳定性		1-3-bp subs； 3-bp ins			2.6~60.5 (Pr, Re)		水稻		[44]
PPE3-mpknot	nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV密码子优化(D200N/ L603W/T330P/T306K/W31S)				1-3-bp subs； 3-bp ins			0~6.3 (Pr, Re)		水稻		[44]
pPEmax	nCas9(R221K/N394K/H840A) 密码子优化		M-MLV密码子优化，N端添加 NLS-embedded linker，C端添加异质串联NLS		epegRNA：在pegRNA 3'端添加evopreQ1		1-bp ins； 1-2-bp subs			14.58~66.67 (Re)		水稻		[45]
pPEmax- MLHdn			在pPEmax的基础上，C端添加MLH1dn，以抑制MMR途径		epegRNA：在pegRNA 3'端添加evopreQ1					0.18~2.3 (Re)
enpPE2			同pPEmax		在U6复合启动子驱动下，构成tRNA(Gly-tRNA):: pegRNA::evopreQ1:: HDV表达盒					64.58~77(Re)
pINPE2	nCas9(H840A)密码子优化， N端添加小肽		M-MLV C端添加异质串联NLSs		epegRNA：在pegRNA 3'端添加evopreQ1					0.01~0.8 (Re)
phyPE2	nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV N端添加DBD linker (hRad51-ssDBD)		epegRNA：在pegRNA 3'端添加evopreQ1					<0.1(Re)
ePE3max	nCas9(R221K/N394K/H840A) 密码子优化		M-MLV密码子优化(D200N/ L603W/T330P/T306K/W31S)		U6复合启动子驱动的表达盒中添加tRNA(Gly-tRNA)和HDV核酶，并添加nicking sgRNA		1-bp ins； 1-3-bp subs			~40(Re)		水稻		[46]
ePE5max	nCas9(R221K/N394K/H840A) 密码子优化		M-MLV C端添加MLH1dn，以抑制MMR途径		U6复合启动子驱动的表达盒中添加tRNA(Gly-tRNA)和HDV核酶，并添加nicking sgRNA		1-bp ins； 1-3-bp subs			~40(纯合率提高)(Re)		水稻		[46]
PrimeRoot	nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV去除RNase H结构域，并添加重组酶		采用“双ePPE”策略，使用了两个相邻的epegRNA，每个模板都包含一个仅与另一个epegRNA模板具有同源性的RT模板		720-bp，1.4-kb，4.9-kb, 7.7-kb，11.1-kb ins			0~8.3 (Pr, Re)		水稻		[47]
ePPE*	nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV密码子优化(D200N/ V223A/T306K/W313F/T330P/ L603W)，去除RNase H结构域并添加病毒核衣壳(NC)蛋白；优化核定位信号		epegRNA：在pegRNA 3’端添加evopreQ1		1-3-bp subs； 3-6-bp del； 4-bp ins			0~18.9 (Pr, Re)		小麦		[48]
ePPEmax	nCas9(H840A)密码子优化
ePPEmax*	nCas9(R221K/N394K/H840A) 密码子优化
ePPEplus	nCas9(R221K/N394K/H840A) 密码子优化
CMPE- ePPEplus	Csy4核糖核酸内切酶				串联多个(e)pegRNA		6- bp del; 1-bp subs			2~21.6; 19.6~86.3 (Pr, Re)
ePE5max (玉米)	nCas9(R221K/N394K/H840A) 密码子优化		M-MLV C端添加MLH1dn玉米同源物，以抑制MMR途径		U6复合启动子驱动的双pegRNA表达盒中添加tRNA(Gly-tRNA)和HDV核酶		1-bp subs			Homo: 1.4~3 hetero: 15~75 (Re)		玉米		[49]
pCXPE01, pCXPE02, pCXPE03	nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV植物密码子优化		原始的pegRNA		2-bp subs； 1-3-bp del			0.025~1.66; 2.6 (Pr)		番茄		[50]
pPPED	nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV植物密码子优linker序列类型优化		原始的pegRNA		2-bp subs			0.06 (Pr)		本氏烟草		[51]
系统名称		系统组件						编辑类型	编辑效率 (%)		物种		参考文献
系统名称		Cas9 Nickcase		逆转录酶		pegRNA		编辑类型	编辑效率 (%)		物种
pPPEDs								2-bp subs； 25-66-bp ins	0.07±0.12 (Re)		拟南芥
pPPEM								2-bp subs；25-66-bp ins	0.7~2.2 (Pr)		水稻
pAct-PPE		nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV植物密码子优化		原始的pegRNA		3-bp subs	0~5 (Re)		小立碗藓、马铃薯		[52]
PPE2 PPE3 PPE3b		nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV植物密码子优化		原始的pegRNA和nicking sgRNA		1-bp subs	0.2~0.5 (Pr)		花生，鹰嘴豆，豇豆		[53]
PE-Nt2		nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV通过linker在nCas9 C 端融合		pegRNA与nesgRNA (用于切割非编辑链的增强sgRNA)通过tRNA序列连接		1-bp subs	0~1.4 (Re)		烟草		[54]
PE-Nt3				M-MLV通过linker在nCas9 N 端融合					1.1~7.5 (Re)
PE-Nt4				M-MLV通过linker在nCas9 N 端融合					1.3~16.3 (Re)
PE2 (v2)		nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		在nCas9-M-MLV 融合蛋白N端添加T5外切酶		原始的pegRNA、双pegRNA优化、 PBS的长度优化		4-bp ins； 4-bp del； 1−2-bp subs	3.5~48.65 (Pr, Re)		水稻		[55]
PE3-HS/AS/ DS		nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV植物密码子优化；潮霉素代理系统、除草剂代理系统和潮霉素+除草剂双代理系统		tRNA-pegRNA(n)- tRNA-sgRNA(n)- tRNA		1-7-bp subs	1.3~54.2 (Re)		水稻		[56]
PE-DSM vector		nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		潮霉素+除草剂双代理多基因编辑系统		tRNA-pegRNA(n)- tRNA-sgRNA(n)- tRNA		1-7-bp subs	1.8~45.8 (Re)		水稻		[56]
DPE, TPE, QPE		nCas9(R221K/N394K/H840A)密码子优化		同ePE3max		pegRNA(n)-ngRNA(n)通过Gateway连接		2-3-bp subs, 28-bp ins	57.14 (Re)		水稻		[57]
-		nCas9(R221K/N394K/H840A) 密码子优化		同ePE5max		epegRNA：在pegRNA 3’端添加evopreQ1		4-bp ins	9.7 (Re)		番茄、拟南芥		[58]
GRAND		nCas9(H840A)密码子优化		M-MLV植物密码子优化		RTT部分对齐，但与双pegRNA中的目标序列非同源		46-bp subs	0.59~9.88 (Pr, Re)		水稻		[59]
PE5max		nCas9(R221K/N394K/H840A) 密码子优化		M-MLV C端添加MLH1dn，以抑制MMR途径		U6复合启动子驱动的双pegRNA表达盒中添加tRNA(Gly-tRNA)和HDV核酶		30-bp ins	47 (Re)		水稻		[60]

Cas9变体	Cas蛋白大小（kb）	预测的PE载体大小（kb）	参考文献
SpCas9	4.2	6.2	[107]
SaCas9	3.2	5.2	[9]
CjCas9	3.0	5.0	[108]
Casϕ	2.1~2.4	4.1~4.4	[62]
Cas12f	1.2~1.8	3.2~3.8	[63]
CasX	<3.0	<5.0	[19]
Cas13j	1.2~1.5	3.2~3.5	[109]