中国水稻科学 ›› 2024, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 57-71.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2024.230209
雍明玲1,2, 叶苗1,2, 张雨1,2, 陶钰1,2, 倪川1,2, 康钰莹1,2, 张祖建1,2,*()
收稿日期:
2023-02-28
修回日期:
2023-03-17
出版日期:
2024-01-10
发布日期:
2024-01-16
通讯作者:
* email: 基金资助:
YONG Mingling1,2, YE Miao1,2, ZHANG Yu1,2, TAO Yu1,2, NI Chuan1,2, KANG Yuying1,2, ZHANG Zujian1,2,*()
Received:
2023-02-28
Revised:
2023-03-17
Online:
2024-01-10
Published:
2024-01-16
Contact:
* email: 摘要:
【目的】淀粉是稻米的主要成分,其构成及理化特性基本决定了稻米食味表现。探讨优良食味稻米的淀粉构成特征,并解析结实期氮素水平的作用效应,对优良食味水稻品种的调优栽培具有重要意义。【方法】以稻米食味有明显差异的水稻品种金香玉1号、武育粳3号、武密粳和淮稻5号为试验材料,设置结实期不同氮素水平处理,分析稻米淀粉理化特性与食味品质的关系及其对氮素水平的响应。【结果】稻米的食味值表现为金香玉1号>武育粳3号>武密粳>淮稻5号,不同氮素水平下表现一致。优良食味稻米的直链淀粉和蛋白质含量均较低;淀粉RVA谱崩解值较高,消减值较低,淀粉易于糊化;溶解度、膨胀势和淀粉颗粒形态较优,淀粉相对结晶度较高;短支链淀粉占比较高。随着结实期氮素水平的提高,稻米的食味值显著下降,直链淀粉含量有所降低,蛋白质含量显著增加,胶稠度变短,最高黏度和崩解值下降,消减值上升;淀粉的颗粒形态劣化;淀粉的糊化焓、相对结晶度和支链淀粉分支中的B2、B3链含量上升,溶解度、膨胀势、A链和B1链含量下降。稻米理化特性和食味值对氮素的响应存在明显的品种间差异,优良食味品种的食味品质较为稳定,对氮素的敏感度小于普通食味稻米。【结论】优良食味稻米的直链淀粉和蛋白质含量较低,直链淀粉含量、蒸煮特性和淀粉颗粒形态特征较优,淀粉结晶特性较好,短支链含量较多。结实期较高的氮素水平提高了支链淀粉长支链占比,增加了淀粉糊化所需能量,降低了淀粉溶解度和膨胀势,对稻米蒸煮食味品质有明显的劣化作用。
雍明玲, 叶苗, 张雨, 陶钰, 倪川, 康钰莹, 张祖建. 不同食味水稻品种稻米淀粉结构与理化特性及其对氮素响应的差异[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(1): 57-71.
YONG Mingling, YE Miao, ZHANG Yu, TAO Yu, NI Chuan, KANG Yuying, ZHANG Zujian. Rice Starch Structure and Physicochemical Properties of Good Taste japonica Rice Varieties and Their Regulations by Nitrogen[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(1): 57-71.
处理 | 品种 | 外观 | 硬度 | 黏度 | 平衡度 | 食味值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment | Cultivar | Appearance | Hardness | Viscosity | Balance degree | Taste value |
N1 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 8.0±0.1 a | 5.8±0.1 c | 8.3±0.2 a | 8.2±0.1 a | 80±1.0 a |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 6.8±0.2 b | 6.4±0.1 b | 7.5±0.3 b | 7.4±0.2 b | 75±1.5 b | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 4.8±0.2 c | 7.1±0.2 a | 5.1±0.1 c | 4.8±0.2 c | 61±1.0 c | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 4.3±0.3 c | 7.3±0.3 a | 4.5±0.4 c | 4.4±0.2 d | 56±2.5 d | |
N2 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 7.7±0.1 a | 6.1±0.2 c | 7.9±0.1 a | 7.7±0.1 a | 77±0.6 a |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 6.7±0.2 b | 6.6±0.2 b | 6.8±0.2 b | 6.6±0.1 b | 72±1.0 b | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 4.1±0.2 c | 7.5±0.2 a | 4.1±0.2 c | 4.1±0.1 c | 57±2.3 c | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 3.7±0.2 d | 7.8±0.2 a | 3.9±0.1 c | 3.9±0.1 c | 53±1.5 d | |
N3 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 6.7±0.3 a | 6.2±0.1 b | 7.2±0.2 a | 7.3±0.2 a | 74±1.2 a |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 6.3±0.1 b | 6.9±0.2 b | 6.7±0.2 a | 6.5±0.2 b | 69±1.0 b | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 3.6±0.1 c | 7.9±0.4 a | 3.6±0.3 b | 3.5±0.2 c | 53±2.1 c | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 2.7±0.4 d | 8.2±0.1 a | 3.3±0.2 b | 2.9±0.2 d | 48±1.5 d | |
方差分析 Analysis of variance | 氮素水平Nitrogen level (N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
品种 Cultivar (C) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
氮素水平×品种 N×C | ** | ns | ns | ** | ns |
表1 不同氮素水平下供试品种的稻米食味性状
Table 1. Taste traits of the tested rice varieties at different nitrogen levels.
处理 | 品种 | 外观 | 硬度 | 黏度 | 平衡度 | 食味值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment | Cultivar | Appearance | Hardness | Viscosity | Balance degree | Taste value |
N1 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 8.0±0.1 a | 5.8±0.1 c | 8.3±0.2 a | 8.2±0.1 a | 80±1.0 a |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 6.8±0.2 b | 6.4±0.1 b | 7.5±0.3 b | 7.4±0.2 b | 75±1.5 b | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 4.8±0.2 c | 7.1±0.2 a | 5.1±0.1 c | 4.8±0.2 c | 61±1.0 c | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 4.3±0.3 c | 7.3±0.3 a | 4.5±0.4 c | 4.4±0.2 d | 56±2.5 d | |
N2 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 7.7±0.1 a | 6.1±0.2 c | 7.9±0.1 a | 7.7±0.1 a | 77±0.6 a |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 6.7±0.2 b | 6.6±0.2 b | 6.8±0.2 b | 6.6±0.1 b | 72±1.0 b | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 4.1±0.2 c | 7.5±0.2 a | 4.1±0.2 c | 4.1±0.1 c | 57±2.3 c | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 3.7±0.2 d | 7.8±0.2 a | 3.9±0.1 c | 3.9±0.1 c | 53±1.5 d | |
N3 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 6.7±0.3 a | 6.2±0.1 b | 7.2±0.2 a | 7.3±0.2 a | 74±1.2 a |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 6.3±0.1 b | 6.9±0.2 b | 6.7±0.2 a | 6.5±0.2 b | 69±1.0 b | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 3.6±0.1 c | 7.9±0.4 a | 3.6±0.3 b | 3.5±0.2 c | 53±2.1 c | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 2.7±0.4 d | 8.2±0.1 a | 3.3±0.2 b | 2.9±0.2 d | 48±1.5 d | |
方差分析 Analysis of variance | 氮素水平Nitrogen level (N) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** |
品种 Cultivar (C) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
氮素水平×品种 N×C | ** | ns | ns | ** | ns |
处理 Treatment | 品种 Cultivar | 直链淀粉含量 Amylose content/% | 胶稠度 Gel consistency/mm | 蛋白质含量 Protein content/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 11.64±0.67 c | 82±1.0 a | 6.32±0.19 b |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 14.93±0.31 b | 81±1.7 a | 6.49±0.17 b | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 18.18±0.14 a | 84±1.2 a | 7.22±0.57 a | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 18.63±0.31 a | 78±1.5 b | 7.51±0.51 a | |
N2 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 11.05±0.16 d | 81±0.6 a | 7.04±0.08 c |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 14.56±0.45 c | 79±1.0 ab | 7.25±0.12 c | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 17.92±0.11 b | 81±3.8 a | 7.57±0.09 b | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 18.51±0.08 a | 76±1.2 b | 7.81±0.11 a | |
N3 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 10.64±0.75 c | 78±1.5 ab | 7.53±0.22 b |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 14.06±0.86 b | 77±1.5 ab | 7.75±0.21 b | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 17.47±0.54 a | 79±3.6 a | 8.34±0.27 a | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 18.05±0.43 a | 75±0.6 b | 8.49±0.18 a | |
方差分析 Analysis of variance | 氮素水平Nitrogen level (N) | ** | ** | ** |
品种 Cultivar (C) | ** | ** | ** | |
氮素水平×品种 N×C | ns | ns | ns |
表2 不同氮素水平下供试品种的稻米蒸煮品质
Table 2. Cooking quality of the tested rice varieties at different nitrogen levels.
处理 Treatment | 品种 Cultivar | 直链淀粉含量 Amylose content/% | 胶稠度 Gel consistency/mm | 蛋白质含量 Protein content/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 11.64±0.67 c | 82±1.0 a | 6.32±0.19 b |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 14.93±0.31 b | 81±1.7 a | 6.49±0.17 b | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 18.18±0.14 a | 84±1.2 a | 7.22±0.57 a | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 18.63±0.31 a | 78±1.5 b | 7.51±0.51 a | |
N2 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 11.05±0.16 d | 81±0.6 a | 7.04±0.08 c |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 14.56±0.45 c | 79±1.0 ab | 7.25±0.12 c | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 17.92±0.11 b | 81±3.8 a | 7.57±0.09 b | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 18.51±0.08 a | 76±1.2 b | 7.81±0.11 a | |
N3 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 10.64±0.75 c | 78±1.5 ab | 7.53±0.22 b |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 14.06±0.86 b | 77±1.5 ab | 7.75±0.21 b | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 17.47±0.54 a | 79±3.6 a | 8.34±0.27 a | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 18.05±0.43 a | 75±0.6 b | 8.49±0.18 a | |
方差分析 Analysis of variance | 氮素水平Nitrogen level (N) | ** | ** | ** |
品种 Cultivar (C) | ** | ** | ** | |
氮素水平×品种 N×C | ns | ns | ns |
处理 | 品种 | 最高黏度 | 热浆黏度 | 崩解值 | 最终黏度 | 消减值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment | Cultivar | Peak viscosity/cP | Hot viscosity/cP | Breakdown/cP | Final viscosity/cP | Setback/cP |
N1 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 3447±77 a | 1848±104 a | 1598±128 a | 2792±60 b | −655±27 c |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 3322±110 a | 2017±260 a | 1305±169 b | 3009±94 a | −313±19 b | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 3018±96 b | 2163±89 a | 855±8 c | 2863±81 ab | −155±17 a | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 2934±105 b | 2097±97 a | 837±12 c | 2811±120 ab | −123±34 a | |
N2 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 3436±110 a | 1864±104 c | 1572±44 a | 2791±114 b | −645±25 d |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 3266±21 b | 2106±34 a | 1160±14 b | 2977±26 a | −289±13 c | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 2812±61 c | 2011±46 ab | 801±16 c | 2726±41 bc | −86±24 b | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 2686±78 d | 1938±50 bc | 749±28 d | 2654±64 c | −32±16 a | |
N3 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 3305±178 a | 1973±445 a | 1333±268 a | 2744±139 ab | −562±47 c |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 3142±73 a | 2029±54 a | 1113±45 a | 2906±49 a | −235±25 b | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 2688±59 b | 1919±48 a | 769±11 b | 2629±65 b | −59±7 a | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 2612±106 b | 1909±114 a | 703±11 b | 2595±102 b | −17±8 a | |
方差分析 Analysis of variance | 氮素水平Nitrogen level (N) | ** | ns | ** | ** | ** |
品种 Cultivar (C) | ** | ns | ** | ** | ** | |
氮素水平×品种 N×C | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
表3 不同氮素水平下供试品种稻米淀粉的RVA谱特征值
Table 3. RVA spectral characteristic values of starch in the tested rice varieties at different nitrogen levels.
处理 | 品种 | 最高黏度 | 热浆黏度 | 崩解值 | 最终黏度 | 消减值 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment | Cultivar | Peak viscosity/cP | Hot viscosity/cP | Breakdown/cP | Final viscosity/cP | Setback/cP |
N1 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 3447±77 a | 1848±104 a | 1598±128 a | 2792±60 b | −655±27 c |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 3322±110 a | 2017±260 a | 1305±169 b | 3009±94 a | −313±19 b | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 3018±96 b | 2163±89 a | 855±8 c | 2863±81 ab | −155±17 a | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 2934±105 b | 2097±97 a | 837±12 c | 2811±120 ab | −123±34 a | |
N2 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 3436±110 a | 1864±104 c | 1572±44 a | 2791±114 b | −645±25 d |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 3266±21 b | 2106±34 a | 1160±14 b | 2977±26 a | −289±13 c | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 2812±61 c | 2011±46 ab | 801±16 c | 2726±41 bc | −86±24 b | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 2686±78 d | 1938±50 bc | 749±28 d | 2654±64 c | −32±16 a | |
N3 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 3305±178 a | 1973±445 a | 1333±268 a | 2744±139 ab | −562±47 c |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 3142±73 a | 2029±54 a | 1113±45 a | 2906±49 a | −235±25 b | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 2688±59 b | 1919±48 a | 769±11 b | 2629±65 b | −59±7 a | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 2612±106 b | 1909±114 a | 703±11 b | 2595±102 b | −17±8 a | |
方差分析 Analysis of variance | 氮素水平Nitrogen level (N) | ** | ns | ** | ** | ** |
品种 Cultivar (C) | ** | ns | ** | ** | ** | |
氮素水平×品种 N×C | ns | ns | ns | ns | ns |
处理 Treatment | 品种 Cultivar | 起始温度 Onset temperature/℃ | 峰值温度 Peak temperature/℃ | 终止温度 Conclusion temperature/℃ | 糊化焓 Enthalpy of gelatinization /(J·g−1) | 回升焓 Enthalpy of recovery /(J·g−1) | 回升度 Recovery ratio/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 64.3±0.1 b | 70.1±0.1 c | 76.5±0.6 c | 7.93±0.12 d | 1.55±0.14 b | 19.51±0.02 b |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 65.0±0.1 a | 70.8±0.2 b | 76.9±0.4 bc | 8.34±0.23 c | 2.04±0.16 b | 24.48±0.02 b | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 64.4±0.6 b | 70.3±0.1 c | 77.5±0.2 b | 8.67±0.23 b | 2.69±0.36 a | 31.02±0.04 a | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 65.3±0.2 a | 72.0±0.1 a | 78.8±0.5 a | 9.21±0.27 a | 2.95±0.37 a | 31.96±0.03 a | |
N2 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 64.1±0.1 c | 70.1±0.1 d | 75.9±0.4 c | 8.37±0.19 b | 1.92±0.29 b | 22.92±0.03 c |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 65.1±0.2 b | 70.6±0.2 c | 77.3±0.2 b | 8.56±0.36 b | 2.17±0.29 b | 25.50±0.04 bc | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 64.3±0.2 c | 71.1±0.2 b | 77.3±0.6 b | 9.26±0.27 a | 2.89±0.10 a | 31.20±0.02 ab | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 65.9±0.3 a | 72.2±0.2 a | 78.8±0.4 a | 9.53±0.35 a | 3.20±0.14 a | 33.58±0.02 a | |
N3 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 64.2±0.2 c | 70.3±0.2 d | 76.5±0.4 b | 8.63±0.22 d | 2.01±0.27 b | 23.27±0.03 b |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 65.1±0.1 b | 71.0±0.1 c | 77.2±0.4 b | 9.02±0.49 c | 2.25±0.41 b | 24.83±0.03 b | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 64.9±0.3 b | 71.7±0.3 b | 77.1±0.7 b | 9.60±0.20 b | 3.14±0.35 a | 32.71±0.03 a | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 65.9±0.1 a | 73.3±0.2 a | 79.0±0.2 a | 10.01±0.17 a | 3.37±0.33 a | 33.67±0.04 a | |
方差分析Analysis of variance | 氮素水平N level (N) | * | ** | ns | ** | * | ns |
品种 Cultivar (C) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
氮素水平×品种 N×C | ns | ** | ns | ns | ns | ns |
表4 不同氮素水平下供试品种稻米淀粉的热力学特征值
Table 4. Thermodynamic characteristic values of starch in the tested rice varieties at different nitrogen levels.
处理 Treatment | 品种 Cultivar | 起始温度 Onset temperature/℃ | 峰值温度 Peak temperature/℃ | 终止温度 Conclusion temperature/℃ | 糊化焓 Enthalpy of gelatinization /(J·g−1) | 回升焓 Enthalpy of recovery /(J·g−1) | 回升度 Recovery ratio/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 64.3±0.1 b | 70.1±0.1 c | 76.5±0.6 c | 7.93±0.12 d | 1.55±0.14 b | 19.51±0.02 b |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 65.0±0.1 a | 70.8±0.2 b | 76.9±0.4 bc | 8.34±0.23 c | 2.04±0.16 b | 24.48±0.02 b | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 64.4±0.6 b | 70.3±0.1 c | 77.5±0.2 b | 8.67±0.23 b | 2.69±0.36 a | 31.02±0.04 a | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 65.3±0.2 a | 72.0±0.1 a | 78.8±0.5 a | 9.21±0.27 a | 2.95±0.37 a | 31.96±0.03 a | |
N2 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 64.1±0.1 c | 70.1±0.1 d | 75.9±0.4 c | 8.37±0.19 b | 1.92±0.29 b | 22.92±0.03 c |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 65.1±0.2 b | 70.6±0.2 c | 77.3±0.2 b | 8.56±0.36 b | 2.17±0.29 b | 25.50±0.04 bc | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 64.3±0.2 c | 71.1±0.2 b | 77.3±0.6 b | 9.26±0.27 a | 2.89±0.10 a | 31.20±0.02 ab | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 65.9±0.3 a | 72.2±0.2 a | 78.8±0.4 a | 9.53±0.35 a | 3.20±0.14 a | 33.58±0.02 a | |
N3 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 64.2±0.2 c | 70.3±0.2 d | 76.5±0.4 b | 8.63±0.22 d | 2.01±0.27 b | 23.27±0.03 b |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 65.1±0.1 b | 71.0±0.1 c | 77.2±0.4 b | 9.02±0.49 c | 2.25±0.41 b | 24.83±0.03 b | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 64.9±0.3 b | 71.7±0.3 b | 77.1±0.7 b | 9.60±0.20 b | 3.14±0.35 a | 32.71±0.03 a | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 65.9±0.1 a | 73.3±0.2 a | 79.0±0.2 a | 10.01±0.17 a | 3.37±0.33 a | 33.67±0.04 a | |
方差分析Analysis of variance | 氮素水平N level (N) | * | ** | ns | ** | * | ns |
品种 Cultivar (C) | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
氮素水平×品种 N×C | ns | ** | ns | ns | ns | ns |
处理 | 品种 | 相对结晶度 |
---|---|---|
Treatment | Cultivar | Relative crystallinity/% |
N1 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 29.08±0.15 a |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 28.13±0.16 a | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 26.43±0.09 b | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 24.67±0.87 c | |
N2 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 29.98±1.02 a |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 28.40±0.13 ab | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 26.88±0.53 bc | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 25.45±0.04 c | |
N3 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 30.43±0.56 a |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 28.66±0.11 b | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 27.00±1.14 bc | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 25.74±0.09 c | |
方差分析 Analysis of variance | 氮素水平Nitrogen level (N) | * |
品种 Cultivar (C) | ** | |
氮素水平×品种 N×C | ns |
表5 不同氮素水平下供试品种稻米淀粉的相对结晶度
Table 5. Relative crystallinity of starch in the tested rice varieties at different nitrogen levels.
处理 | 品种 | 相对结晶度 |
---|---|---|
Treatment | Cultivar | Relative crystallinity/% |
N1 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 29.08±0.15 a |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 28.13±0.16 a | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 26.43±0.09 b | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 24.67±0.87 c | |
N2 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 29.98±1.02 a |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 28.40±0.13 ab | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 26.88±0.53 bc | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 25.45±0.04 c | |
N3 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 30.43±0.56 a |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 28.66±0.11 b | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 27.00±1.14 bc | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 25.74±0.09 c | |
方差分析 Analysis of variance | 氮素水平Nitrogen level (N) | * |
品种 Cultivar (C) | ** | |
氮素水平×品种 N×C | ns |
处理 Treatment | 品种 Cultivar | 溶解度 Solubility/% | 膨胀势 Swelling power/(g·g−1) |
---|---|---|---|
N1 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 13.46±0.37 a | 15.10±0.37 a |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 12.40±0.81 b | 13.87±0.44 b | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 10.48±0.15 c | 11.95±0.53 c | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 9.58±0.30 c | 11.01±0.58 c | |
N2 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 12.47±0.89 a | 14.34±0.39 a |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 11.48±0.34 a | 13.16±0.32 b | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 9.66±0.47 b | 11.35±0.24 c | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 8.81±0.13 b | 10.35±0.31 d | |
N3 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 11.96±0.52 a | 13.47±0.63 a |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 11.04±0.35 b | 12.75±0.23 a | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 8.68±0.33 c | 10.28±0.60 b | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 7.87±0.32 c | 9.77±0.31 b | |
方差分析 Analysis of variance | 氮素水平Nitrogen level (N) | ** | ** |
品种 Cultivar (C) | ** | ** | |
氮素水平×品种 N×C | ns | ns |
表6 不同氮素水平下供试品种稻米淀粉的溶解度和膨胀势
Table 6. Solubility and swelling potential of starch in the tested rice varieties at different nitrogen levels.
处理 Treatment | 品种 Cultivar | 溶解度 Solubility/% | 膨胀势 Swelling power/(g·g−1) |
---|---|---|---|
N1 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 13.46±0.37 a | 15.10±0.37 a |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 12.40±0.81 b | 13.87±0.44 b | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 10.48±0.15 c | 11.95±0.53 c | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 9.58±0.30 c | 11.01±0.58 c | |
N2 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 12.47±0.89 a | 14.34±0.39 a |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 11.48±0.34 a | 13.16±0.32 b | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 9.66±0.47 b | 11.35±0.24 c | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 8.81±0.13 b | 10.35±0.31 d | |
N3 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 11.96±0.52 a | 13.47±0.63 a |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 11.04±0.35 b | 12.75±0.23 a | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 8.68±0.33 c | 10.28±0.60 b | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 7.87±0.32 c | 9.77±0.31 b | |
方差分析 Analysis of variance | 氮素水平Nitrogen level (N) | ** | ** |
品种 Cultivar (C) | ** | ** | |
氮素水平×品种 N×C | ns | ns |
图2 不同氮素水平下稻米淀粉颗粒电镜拍照 A、B、C、D分别表示金香玉1号、武育粳3号、武密粳和淮稻5号,1、2、3分别代表N1、N2、N3。
Fig. 2. Electron microscopic photographs of rice starch granules at different nitrogen levels. A-D respectively represent Jinxiangyu 1, Wuyujing 3, Wumijing and Huaidao 5; 1-3 respectively represent N1, N2 and N3.
处理 Treatment | 品种 Cultivar | A链含量 A chain content /% | B1链含量 B1 chain content /% | B2链含量 B2 chain content /% | B3链含量 B3 chain content /% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 26.51±0.15 a | 43.08±0.38 a | 8.51±0.50 c | 11.13±0.05 d |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 25.35±0.67 b | 42.56±0.19 a | 9.83±0.07 b | 13.24±0.07 c | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 24.48±0.14 c | 41.44±0.07 b | 10.10±0.07 ab | 14.09±0.11 b | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 21.56±0.42 d | 37.42±0.47 c | 10.30±0.13 a | 14.61±0.11 a | |
N2 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 25.66±0.42 a | 42.74±0.11 a | 9.16±0.04 c | 11.77±0.55 c |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 24.41±0.63 b | 42.03±0.23 a | 9.89±0.06 b | 13.49±0.02 b | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 23.39±0.14 c | 40.87±0.54 b | 10.31±0.08 a | 14.37±0.06 a | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 20.47±0.22 d | 36.63±0.12 c | 10.39±0.05 a | 14.66±0.03 a | |
N3 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 25.24±0.50 a | 42.51±0.08 a | 9.36±0.12 c | 12.96±0.42 d |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 24.15±0.74 b | 41.46±0.11 ab | 10.03±0.05 b | 13.80±0.22 c | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 23.19±0.02 c | 40.32±0.43 b | 10.38±0.02 a | 14.43±0.12 b | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 20.35±0.13 d | 34.70±1.44 c | 10.47±0.04 a | 15.07±0.41 a | |
方差分析 Analysis of variance | 氮素水平Nitrogen level (N) | ** | ** | ** | ** |
品种 Cultivar (C) | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
氮素水平×品种 N×C | ns | ns | ns | * |
表7 不同氮素水平下供试品种稻米支链淀粉链长分布比例
Table 7. Distribution ratio of amylopectin chain length of the tested rice varieties at different nitrogen levels.
处理 Treatment | 品种 Cultivar | A链含量 A chain content /% | B1链含量 B1 chain content /% | B2链含量 B2 chain content /% | B3链含量 B3 chain content /% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 26.51±0.15 a | 43.08±0.38 a | 8.51±0.50 c | 11.13±0.05 d |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 25.35±0.67 b | 42.56±0.19 a | 9.83±0.07 b | 13.24±0.07 c | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 24.48±0.14 c | 41.44±0.07 b | 10.10±0.07 ab | 14.09±0.11 b | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 21.56±0.42 d | 37.42±0.47 c | 10.30±0.13 a | 14.61±0.11 a | |
N2 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 25.66±0.42 a | 42.74±0.11 a | 9.16±0.04 c | 11.77±0.55 c |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 24.41±0.63 b | 42.03±0.23 a | 9.89±0.06 b | 13.49±0.02 b | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 23.39±0.14 c | 40.87±0.54 b | 10.31±0.08 a | 14.37±0.06 a | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 20.47±0.22 d | 36.63±0.12 c | 10.39±0.05 a | 14.66±0.03 a | |
N3 | 金香玉1号 Jinxiangyu 1 | 25.24±0.50 a | 42.51±0.08 a | 9.36±0.12 c | 12.96±0.42 d |
武育粳3号 Wuyujing 3 | 24.15±0.74 b | 41.46±0.11 ab | 10.03±0.05 b | 13.80±0.22 c | |
武密粳 Wumijing | 23.19±0.02 c | 40.32±0.43 b | 10.38±0.02 a | 14.43±0.12 b | |
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | 20.35±0.13 d | 34.70±1.44 c | 10.47±0.04 a | 15.07±0.41 a | |
方差分析 Analysis of variance | 氮素水平Nitrogen level (N) | ** | ** | ** | ** |
品种 Cultivar (C) | ** | ** | ** | ** | |
氮素水平×品种 N×C | ns | ns | ns | * |
指标 Index | 食味值 Taste value |
---|---|
直链淀粉含量 Amylose content | −0.866** |
胶稠度 Gel consistency | 0.588* |
蛋白质含量 Protein content | −0.861** |
崩解值 Breakdown | 0.965** |
消减值 Setback | −0.949** |
相对结晶度 Relative crystallinity | 0.818** |
回升度 Recovery ratio | −0.832** |
溶解度 Solubility | 0.984** |
膨胀势 Swelling power | 0.983** |
A链含量 A chain content | 0.918** |
B3链含量 B3 chain content | −0.956** |
表8 稻米食味品质与淀粉理化特性的相关分析
Table 8. Correlation analysis between eating quality of rice and physicochemical properties of starch.
指标 Index | 食味值 Taste value |
---|---|
直链淀粉含量 Amylose content | −0.866** |
胶稠度 Gel consistency | 0.588* |
蛋白质含量 Protein content | −0.861** |
崩解值 Breakdown | 0.965** |
消减值 Setback | −0.949** |
相对结晶度 Relative crystallinity | 0.818** |
回升度 Recovery ratio | −0.832** |
溶解度 Solubility | 0.984** |
膨胀势 Swelling power | 0.983** |
A链含量 A chain content | 0.918** |
B3链含量 B3 chain content | −0.956** |
[1] | 张洪程, 胡雅杰, 杨建昌, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 高辉, 郭保卫, 邢志鹏, 胡群. 中国特色水稻栽培学发展与展望[J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(7): 1301-1321. |
Zhang H C, Hu Y J, Yang J C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Gao H, Guo B W, Xing Z P, Hu Q. Development and prospect of rice cultivation in China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(7): 1301-1321. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 蒋天昊, 任晓佳, 仇景涛, 顾雪怡, 张祖建. 晚播晚栽机插水稻稻米品质的变化特征[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2021, 49(12): 67-71. |
Jiang T H, Ren X J, Qiu J T, Gu X Y, Zhang Z J. Variation characteristics of rice quality of late sowing and late planting machine-transplanted rice[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 49(12): 67-71. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | Maclean J L, Dawe D C, Hardy B, Hettel G P. Rice Almanac: Source Book for the Most Important Economic Activity on Earth[M]. Manila, the Philippines: International Rice Research Institute, 2002. |
[4] | Hasjim J, Li E P, Dhital S. Milling of rice grains: Effects of starch/flour structures on gelatinization and pasting properties[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2013, 92(1): 682-690. |
[5] | Tester R F, Karkalas J, Qi X. Starch—composition, fine structure and architecture[J]. Journal of Cereal Science, 2004, 39(2): 151-165. |
[6] | Patindol J A, Siebenmorgen T J, Wang Y J. Impact of environmental factors on rice starch structure: A review[J]. Starch‐Stärke, 2015, 67(1-2): 42-54 |
[7] | 明东风, 马均, 马文波, 许凤英, 孙晓辉, 田彦华. 稻米直链淀粉及其含量研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2003, 19(1): 68-71. |
Ming D F, Ma J, Ma W B, Xu F Y, Sun X H, Tian Y H. A review of rice amylose and its content[J]. Chinese Agriculture Science Bulletin, 2003, 19(1): 68-71. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | Buleon A, Colonna P, Planchot V, Ball S. Starch granules: Structure and biosynthesis[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 1998, 23(2): 85-112. |
[9] | 张艳霞. 稻米直链淀粉含量与淀粉理化特性及品质的关系[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2007. |
Zhang Y X. Relationship between rice quality, physicochemical property of starch and amylose content[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agriculture University, 2007. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | Zhang C Q, Zhou L H, Zhu Z B, Lu H W, Zhou X Z, Qian Y T, Li Q F, Lu Y, Gu M H, Liu Q Q. Characterization of grain quality and starch fine structure of two japonica rice (Oryza sativa) cultivars with good sensory properties at different temperatures during the filling stage[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2016, 64(20): 4048-4057. |
[11] | 施利利, 张欣, 丁得亮, 王松文, 崔晶. 稻米理化特性与食味品质的相关性研究[J]. 种子, 2010 (11): 82-84. |
Shi L L, Zhang X, Ding D L, Wang S W, Cui J. Study on the correlation of rice physicochemical properties and palatability quality[J]. Seed, 2010(11): 82-84. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 金丽晨, 耿志明, 李金州, 王澎, 陈菲, 刘蔼民. 稻米淀粉组成及分子结构与食味品质的关系[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2011, 27(1): 13-18. |
Jin L L, Gen Z M, Lin J Z, Wang P, Chen F, Liu E M. Correlation between components and molecule structure of rice starch and eating quality[J]. Jiangsu Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 27(1): 13-18. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 蔡一霞, 刘春香, 王维, 张洪熙, 张祖建, 杨静, 唐汉忠. 灌浆期表观直链淀粉含量相似品种稻米胶稠度和 RVA 谱的动态差异[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(12): 2439-2445. |
Cai Y X, Liu C X, Wang W, Zhang H X, Zhang Z J, Yang J, Tang H Z. Dynamic differences of the RVA profile and gel consistency in two rice varieties with similar apparent amylose content during grain filling[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011, 44(12): 2439-2445. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 周天阳. 栽培措施对超级稻产量和品质的影响[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2020. |
Zhou T Y. Effects of cultivation treatments on yield and quality of supe rice[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2020. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 侯丹平. 不同栽培措施对稻田土壤理化特性和米质的影响[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2019. |
Hou D P. Effect of different cultivation patterns on physicochemical properties of soil and rice quality[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 朱大伟. 三种关键栽培措施对软米粳稻产量与品质的影响[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2018. |
Zhu D W. Effects of three key cultivation measures on yield and quality of soft rice japonica[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2018. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 彭少兵, 黄见良, 钟旭华, 杨建昌, 王光火, 邹应斌, 张福锁, 朱庆森,Buresh R, Witt C. 提高中国稻田氮肥利用率的研究策略[J]. 中国农业科学, 2002, 35: 1095-1103. |
Peng S B, Huang J L, Zhong X H, Yang J C, Wang G H, Zou Y B, Zhang F S, Zhu Q S, Buresh R, Witt C. Research strategy in improving fertilizer-nitrogen use efficiency of irrigated rice in China[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2002, 35: 1095-1103. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | Huang L Y, Sun F, Yuan S, Peng S B, Wang F. Different mechanisms underlying the yield advantage of ordinary hybrid and super hybrid rice over inbred rice under low and moderate N input conditions[J]. Field Crops Research, 2018, 216: 150-157. |
[19] | 吴家青, 熊若愚, 解嘉鑫, 蒋海燕, 谭雪明, 潘晓华, 曾勇军, 石庆华, 曾研华. 稻米食味品质形成及其响应氮素调控作用的研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(2): 28-37. |
Wu J Q, Xiong R Y, Jie J X, Jiang H Y, Tan X M, Pan X H, Zeng Y J, Shi Q H, Zeng Y H. Research advances on rice eating grain quality formation and its response to nitrogen application[J]. China Rice, 2021, 27(2): 28-37. (in Chinese) | |
[20] | 韩春雷, 侯守贵, 刘宪平, 魏树和, 邹积斌. 栽培技术对稻米品质的作用及其数量关系研究[J]. 辽宁农业科学, 1997(1): 18-21. |
Han C L, Hou S G, Liu X P, Wei S H, Zou J B. Study on the effect of cultivation techniques on the rice quality and its quantitative relationship[J]. Liaoning Agricultural Science, 1997(1): 18-21. (in Chinese) | |
[21] | 孙艳丽, 沈鹏, 金正勋, 金学泳, 马红. 氮素营养对稻米理化特性及淀粉谱特性的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2002(2): 134-138. |
Sun Y L, Shen P, Jin Z X, Jin X Y, Ma H. Effects of nitrogenous nutrition on the physicochemical properties and amylogram properties of rice grain[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2002(2): 134-138. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 金正勋, 同拉嘎, 李丹, 李明月, 潘冬, 张玉磊, 王海微, 韩云飞, 张忠臣. 灌浆成熟期氮素营养对水稻增产及淀粉品质的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2017, 48(4): 1-6. |
Jin Z X, Tong L G, Li D, Li M Y, Pan D, Zhang Y L, Wang H W, Han Y F, Zhang Z C. Effect of grain-filling nitrogen on yield increasing and starch quality in rice[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2017, 48(4): 1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | Gu J F, Chen J, Chen L, Wang Z Q, Zhang H, Yang J C. Grain quality changes and responses to nitrogen fertilizer of japonica rice cultivars released in the Yangtze River Basin from the 1950s to 2000s[J]. The Crop Journal, 2015, 3(4): 285-297. |
[24] | 申勇. 不同粳稻品种稻米品质对施氮量的响应差异及其原因分析[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2021. |
Shen Y. Difference in response of grain quality to nitrogen application rates among japonica rice varieties and its causes[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | Cai J W, Cai C H, Man J M, Yang Y, Zhang F M, Wei C X. Crystalline and structural properties of acid-modified lotus rhizome C-type starch[J]. Carbohydr Polym, 2014, 102: 799-807. |
[26] | 沈泓, 姚栋萍, 吴俊, 罗秋红, 吴志鹏, 雷东阳, 邓启云, 柏斌. 灌浆期不同时段高温对稻米淀粉理化特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(4): 377-387. |
Shen H, Yao D P, Wu J, Luo Q H, Wu Z P, Lei D Y, Den Q Y, Bai B. Effects of high temperature at different times during grain filling stage on rice starch physicochemical properties[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2022, 36(4): 377-387. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | Syahariza Z A, Li E, Hasjim J. Extraction and dissolution of starch from rice and sorghum grains for accurate structural analysis[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2010, 82(1): 14-20. |
[28] | Wu A C, Li E P, Gilbert R G. Exploring extraction/ dissolution procedures for analysis of starch chain-length distributions[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2014, 114: 36-42. |
[29] | 徐斌, 满建民, 韦存虚. 粉末X射线衍射图谱计算植物淀粉结晶度方法的探讨[J]. 植物学报, 2012, 47 (3): 278-285. |
Xu B, Man J M, Wei C X. Methods for determining relative crystallinity of plant starch X-ray powder diffraction spectra[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2012, 47(3): 278-285. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 薛薇. 江苏省粳米品质分析及其淀粉性质的研究[D]. 无锡: 江南大学, 2021. |
Xue W. Study on quality analysis and starch properties of Japonica rice in Jiangsu Province[D]. Wuxi: Jiangnan University, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | 卢毅, 路兴花, 张青峰, 余建国, 肖雄雄, 庞林江, 成纪予. 稻米直链淀粉与米饭物性及食味品质的关联特征研究[J]. 食品科技, 2018, 43(10): 219-223. |
Lu Y, Lu X H, Zhang Q F, Yu J G, Xiao X X, Pang L J, Cheng J Y. Correlation of rice amylose with physical properties and taste quality of rice[J]. Food Science and Technology, 2018, 43(10): 219-223. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] | 张小明, 石春海, 富田桂. 稻米淀粉特性与食味间的相关性分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2002(2): 60-64. |
Zhang X M, Shi C H, Fu C G. Correlation analysis between starch characteristics and taste quality in japonica rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2002(2): 60-64. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[33] | 杨标, 雍明玲, 赵步洪, 陈前, 叶苗, 张祖建. 氮肥减施对粳稻稻米淀粉结构与食味品质的效应[J]. 扬州大学学报: 农业与生命科学版, 2022, 43(5): 37-46. |
Yang B, Yong M L, Zhao B H, Chen Q, Ye M, Zhang Z J. Effects of reducing nitrogen fertilization on the starch structure and the eating quality of japonica rice grain[J]. Journal of Yangzhou University: Agricultural and Life Science Edition, 2022, 43(5): 37-46. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[34] | 周慧颖, 彭小松, 欧阳林娟, 朱昌兰, 陈小荣, 傅军如, 边建民, 胡丽芳, 贺浩华, 贺晓鹏. 支链淀粉结构对稻米淀粉糊化特性的影响[J]. 中国粮油学报, 2018, 33(8): 25-30. |
Zhou H Y, Peng X S, Ouyang L J, Zhu C L, Chen X R, Fu J R, Bian J M, Hu L F, He H H, He X P. Effects of amylopectin structure on gelatinization characteristics of rice starch[J]. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association, 2018, 33(8): 25-30. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[35] | 李丁鲁, 张建明, 王慧, 李茂柏, 朴钟泽. 长江下游地区部分优质粳稻品种与越光稻米支链淀粉结构特征及品质性状比较[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2010(4): 379-384. |
Li D L, Zhang J M, Wang H, Li M B, Piao Z Z. Differences in amylopectin structure and grain quality of rice between some high-quality japonica cultivars from the lower Yangtze River region, China and Koshihikari from Niigata, Japan[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2010(4): 379-384. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[36] | 隋炯明, 李欣, 严松, 严长杰, 张蓉, 汤述翥, 陆驹飞, 陈宗祥, 顾铭洪. 稻米淀粉 RVA 谱特征与品质性状相关性研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2005, 38(4): 657-663. |
Sui J M, Lin X, Yan S, Yan C J, Zhang R, Tang S Z, Lu J F, Chen Z X, Gu M H. Studies on the rice RVA profile characteristics and its correlation with the quality[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2005, 38(4): 657-663. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[37] | 蔡金文. 普通水稻淀粉结构和功能特性研究[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2015. |
Cai J W. Structural and functional properties of normal rice starches[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2015. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[38] | 张艳霞, 丁艳锋, 李刚华, 王强盛, 黄丕生, 王绍华. 直链淀粉含量不同的稻米淀粉结构, 糊化特性研究[J]. 作物学报, 2007, 33(7): 1201-1205. |
Zhang Y X, Ding Y F, Li G H, Wang Q S, Huang B S, Wang S H. Starch structure and paste property of rice with different amylose content[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2007, 33(7): 1201-1205. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[39] | 赵春芳, 岳红亮, 黄双杰, 周丽慧, 赵凌, 张亚东, 陈涛, 朱镇, 赵庆勇, 姚姝, 梁文化, 路凯, 王才林. 南粳系列水稻品种的食味品质与稻米理化特性[J]. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(5): 909-920. |
Zhao C F, Yue H L, Huang S J, Zhou L H, Zhao L, Zhang Y D, Chen T, Zhu Z, Zhao Q Y, Yao S, Liang W H, Lu K, Wang C L. Eating quality and physicochemical properties in Nanjing rice varieties[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2019, 52(5): 909-920. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[40] | Bhat F M, Riar C S. Effect of amylose, particle size & morphology on the functionality of starches of traditional rice cultivars[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 2016, 92: 637-644. |
[41] | 王艳, 崔晶, 王小波, 赵梅, 朱长娟, 施利利, 张欣. 施肥对中日水稻品系土壤养分及食味品质的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2010, 18(2): 286-289. |
Wang Y, Cui J, Wang X B, Zhao M, Zhu C J, Shi L L, Zhang X. Effect of fertilization method on soil available nutrients and taste of Japanese and Chinese rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2010, 18(2): 286-289. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[42] | 张艳霞, 丁艳锋, 王强盛, 李刚华, 李福春, 王绍华. 氮素穗肥对不同品种稻米品质性状的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007(6): 1080-1085. |
Zhang Y X, Ding Y F, Wang Q S, Li G H, Li F C, Wang S H. Effect of panicle nitrogen fertilizer on quality properties of different rice varieties[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2007(6): 1080-1085. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[43] | 孙文星, 田伟, 肖峰, 高叶敏, 敖和军. 施用粒肥对水稻产量和氮素吸收利用的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2022, 61(13): 31-36. |
Sun W X, Tian W, Xiao F, Gao Y M, Ao H J. Effects of grain fertilizer application on rice yield and nitrogen uptake and utilization[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 61(13): 31-36. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[44] | 石吕, 张新月, 孙惠艳, 曹先梅, 刘建, 张祖建. 不同类型水稻品种稻米蛋白质含量与蒸煮食味品质的关系及后期氮肥的效应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(6): 541-552. |
Shi L, Zhang X Y, Sun H Y, Cao X M, Liu J, Zhang Z J. Relationship of grain protein content with cooking and eating quality as affected by nitrogen fertilizer at late growth stage for different types of rice varieties[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2019, 33(6): 541-552. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[45] | 戴湘桂, 赵一童, 宋肖肖, 黎江川, 冯艺章, 韦有访, 刘丕庆. 粒肥施用对籽粒蛋白质含量组分及米质性状的影响[J/OL]. 分子植物育种, 2022: 1-22[2023-03-13]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20220829.1738.004.html |
Dai X G, Zhao Y T, Song X X, Li J C, Feng Y Z, WeiY F, Liu B Q. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer application on protein content and rice(Oryza sativa. L) grain quality[J/OL]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2022: 1-22 [2023-03-13]. http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20220829.1738.004.html. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[46] | 刘文哲. 开放式增温条件下氮素粒肥对水稻籽粒灌浆及品质的影响[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2019. |
Liu W Z. Effects of nitrogen granule fertilizer on rice grain filling and quality under open warming conditions[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agriculture University, 2019. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[47] | 窦志. 灌浆期开放式增温对水稻籽粒灌浆和品质的影响及氮素粒肥的调控效应[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2017. |
Dou Z. Effects of free-air warming during grain filling stage on rice grain filling and quality and the regulation effects of nitrogen spikelet fertilizer[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agriculture University, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[48] | 朱大伟, 李敏, 郭保卫, 张洪程. 氮肥水平对优质粳稻蒸煮食味品质与质构特性的影响[J]. 贵州农业科学, 2018, 46(3): 62-66. |
Zhu D W, Li M, Guo B W, Zhang H C. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer application level on eating and textural characteristics of high quality Japonica rice[J]. Guizhou Agricultura Sciences, 2018, 46(3): 62-66. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[49] | 朱安. 穗粒肥用量对优质食味水稻品种产量和品质的影响[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2021. |
Zhu A. Effects of panicle and grain nitrogen fertilizer rates on yield and grain quality of rice with good taste quality[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2021. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[50] | 陆丹丹, 雍明玲, 陶钰, 叶苗, 张祖建. 优良食味水稻品种籽粒蛋白质积累特征及其对氮素水平的响应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(5): 520-530. |
Lu D D, Yong M L, Tao Y, Ye M, Zhang Z J. Characteristics of grain protein accumulation and its response to nitrogen level in good taste rice varieties[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2022, 36(5): 520-530. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[51] | 孙涛, 同拉嘎, 赵书宇, 王海微, 韩云飞, 张忠臣, 金正勋. 氮肥对水稻胚乳淀粉品质、相关酶活性及基因表达量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(5): 475-484. |
Sun T, Tong L G, Zhao S Y, Wang H W, Han Y F, Zhang Z C, Jin Z X. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer application on starch quality, activities and gene expression levels of related enzymes in rice endosperm[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2018, 32(5): 475-484. | |
[52] | 王才林. 江苏省优良食味粳稻品种培育的发展与启示[J]. 中国稻米, 2022, 28(5): 82-91. |
Wang C L. Development and enlightenment of Japonica rice breeding with good eating quality in Jiangsu Province[J]. China Rice, 2022, 28(5): 82-91. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[53] | Zhang C Q, Yang Y, Chen S J, Liu X J, Zhu J H, Zhou L H, Lu Y, Li Q F, Fan X L, Tang S Z, Gu M H, Liu Q Q. A rare Waxy allele coordinately improves rice eating and cooking quality and grain transparency[J]. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2021, 63(5): 889-901. |
[54] | 赵凌, 朱镇, 陈涛, 赵庆勇, 赵春芳, 张亚东, 王才林. 水稻优良品种南粳46及其衍生品种特性分析[J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2023, 24(3): 648-660. |
Zhao L, Zhu Z, Chen T, Zhao Q Y, Zhao C F, Zhang Y D, Wang C L. Analysis on characteristics of rice core germplasm Nanjing 46 with good eating quality and its derived varieties[J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2023, 24(3): 648-660. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 吕阳, 刘聪聪, 杨龙波, 曹兴岚, 王月影, 童毅, Mohamed Hazman, 钱前, 商连光, 郭龙彪. 全基因组关联分析(GWAS)鉴定水稻氮素利用效率候选基因 [J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(5): 516-524. |
[2] | 熊家欢, 张义凯, 向镜, 陈惠哲, 徐一成, 王亚梁, 王志刚, 姚坚, 张玉屏. 覆膜稻田施用炭基肥对水稻产量及氮素利用的影响 [J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(5): 567-576. |
[3] | 吴子牛, 何丽梅, 熊莹, 陈凯瑞, 杨志远, 孙永健, 吕旭, 马均. 氮素穗肥对杂交籼稻籽粒灌浆影响及其与淀粉合成关键酶活性间关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(1): 48-56. |
[4] | 易晓璇, 刘玮琦, 曾盖, 罗丽华, 肖应辉. 灌浆期高温胁迫对早籼稻品质性状的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(1): 72-80. |
[5] | 谢开珍, 张建明, 程灿, 周继华, 牛付安, 孙滨, 张安鹏, 闻伟军, 代雨婷, 胡启琰, 邱越, 曹黎明, 储黄伟. 低直链淀粉含量水稻种质资源的鉴定与QTL定位分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(6): 609-616. |
[6] | 吴玉红, 李艳华, 王吕, 秦宇航, 李杉杉, 郝兴顺, 张庆路, 崔月贞, 肖飞. 陕南稻区紫云英稻草联合还田配施减量氮肥协同提升水稻产量与稻米品质[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(6): 628-641. |
[7] | 高欠清, 任孝俭, 翟中兵, 郑普兵, 吴源芬, 崔克辉. 头季穗肥和促芽肥对再生稻再生芽生长及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 405-414. |
[8] | 杨晓龙, 王彪, 汪本福, 张枝盛, 张作林, 杨蓝天, 程建平, 李阳. 不同水分管理方式对旱直播水稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
[9] | 姚姝, 赵春芳, 陈涛, 路凯, 周丽慧, 赵凌, 朱镇, 赵庆勇, 梁文化, 赫磊, 王才林, 张亚东. 低谷蛋白半糯型粳稻营养品质与蒸煮食味品质特征分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(2): 178-188. |
[10] | 杨陶陶, 邹积祥, 伍龙梅, 包晓哲, 江瑜, 张楠, 张彬. 开放式增温对华南双季稻稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(1): 66-77. |
[11] | 任维晨, 常庆霞, 张亚军, 朱宽宇, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 不同氮利用率粳稻品种的碳氮积累与转运特征及其生理机制[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(6): 586-600. |
[12] | 史玉良, 杨勇, 李雪飞, 李钱峰, 黄李春, 张昌泉, 宋学堂, 刘巧泉. 不同直链淀粉含量软米品种品质性状的比较[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(6): 601-610. |
[13] | 景文疆, 顾汉柱, 张小祥, 吴昊, 张伟杨, 顾骏飞, 刘立军, 王志琴, 杨建昌, 张耗. 中籼水稻品种改良过程中米质和根系特征对灌溉方式的响应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(5): 505-519. |
[14] | 陆丹丹, 雍明玲, 陶钰, 叶苗, 张祖建. 优良食味水稻品种籽粒蛋白质积累特征及其对氮素水平的响应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(5): 520-530. |
[15] | 张露, 吴龙龙, 黄晶, 田仓, 祈军, 张均华, 曹小闯, 朱春权, 孔亚丽, 金千瑜, 朱练峰. 增氧处理对稻田土壤微生物量碳、氮和酶活性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(4): 410-418. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||