中国水稻科学 ›› 2017, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (1): 81-90.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2017.6036
胡剑锋1, 杨波2, 周伟1, 张培培1, 张强1, 李培程1, 任万军1,*(), 杨文钰1
收稿日期:
2016-03-04
修回日期:
2016-07-27
出版日期:
2017-01-20
发布日期:
2017-01-10
通讯作者:
任万军
基金资助:
Jianfeng HU1, Bo YANG2, Wei ZHOU1, Peipei ZHANG1, Qiang ZHANG1, Peicheng LI1, Wanjun REN1,*(), Wenyu YANG1
Received:
2016-03-04
Revised:
2016-07-27
Online:
2017-01-20
Published:
2017-01-10
Contact:
Wanjun REN
摘要:
目的 探索机插杂交籼稻稀播育秧秧苗生长特性、栽插质量、产量与效益特点。方法 以F优498和Ⅱ优498的种子为材料开发并优选条播器后,采用两因素裂区设计,播种方式为主区,播种量为副区。结果 条播播种均匀度优势明显,24行条播规格效果最佳。播种14 d后,秧苗开始产生分蘖芽,播后17至23 d是分蘖芽发生速率最快时期。随播种密度的增加,成苗率、干物质积累量、根冠比、秧苗充实度、N积累量、分蘖芽发生率、发根力、漏插率都呈降低趋势,同时有效穗数增加,每穗粒数减少,产量先增加后降低。条播相对于散播,秧苗整体素质较好,易形成壮秧,产量较高。结论 投入与产出综合分析,采用条播方式,播种密度为50 g/盘时,秧苗群体密度和个体优势之间能得到较好的协调,产投比最高。
中图分类号:
胡剑锋, 杨波, 周伟, 张培培, 张强, 李培程, 任万军, 杨文钰. 播种方式和播种密度对杂交籼稻机插秧节本增效的研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(1): 81-90.
Jianfeng HU, Bo YANG, Wei ZHOU, Peipei ZHANG, Qiang ZHANG, Peicheng LI, Wanjun REN, Wenyu YANG. Effect of Seeding Method and Density on the Benefit of Mechanical Transplanting in indica Hybrid Rice[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2017, 31(1): 81-90.
每工作行程插秧 机秧爪取秧次数 N1 | 每回合秧爪取秧宽度 d1 /cm | 条插行数 N2 | 秧苗行距 d2 /cm | 导种槽宽度 d3 /cm | 粒长 L/cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
18 | 1.56 | 18 | 1.56 | 0.78-1.56 | 0.57-0.64 |
20 | 1.40 | 20 | 1.40 | 0.70-1.40 | |
26 | 1.20 | 26 | 1.08 | 0.54-1.08 | |
24 | 1.10 | 24 | 1.17 | 0.58-1.17 |
表1 条播器与插秧机对应相关参数表
Table1 Parameters for drill planters and rice transplanters.
每工作行程插秧 机秧爪取秧次数 N1 | 每回合秧爪取秧宽度 d1 /cm | 条插行数 N2 | 秧苗行距 d2 /cm | 导种槽宽度 d3 /cm | 粒长 L/cm |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
18 | 1.56 | 18 | 1.56 | 0.78-1.56 | 0.57-0.64 |
20 | 1.40 | 20 | 1.40 | 0.70-1.40 | |
26 | 1.20 | 26 | 1.08 | 0.54-1.08 | |
24 | 1.10 | 24 | 1.17 | 0.58-1.17 |
图1 不同播种密度、不同行数条播器两种粒型水稻种子播种均匀度三维模型
Fig.1. Three-dimensional models of seeding uniformity for two grain types under different seeding densities with different row sized drill planters.
粒型与播种密度 Seed shape and seeding density /(g·plate-1) | 机条播A2 | 机散播 A1 | 人工撒播 A3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18行 18 lines | 20行 20 lines | 24行 24 lines | 26行 26 lines | 平均 Average | |||
长粒型(长/宽>2.7)Long-grain type(Length/Width>2.7) | |||||||
50 | 85.98 bB | 88.04 bB | 96.60 aA | 86.81 bB | 89.36 aA | 77.07 bB | 72.27 cB |
75 | 88.07 bB | 89.81 bAB | 94.17 aA | 87.95 bB | 90.00 aA | 84.14 bB | 78.88 cB |
100 | 86.35 bA | 86.04 bA | 90.81 aA | 88.00 abA | 87.80 aA | 87.52 aA | 87.29 aA |
平均 Average | 86.80 bB | 87.96 bB | 93.86 aA | 87.58 bB | 89.05 aA | 82.91 bAB | 79.48 cB |
圆粒型(长/宽<2.2) Cirdllar grain type(Length/Width<2.2) | |||||||
50 | 87.17 bcB | 90.51 bAB | 94.55 aA | 85.51 cB | 89.43 aA | 79.58 bB | 74.49 cB |
75 | 94.28 aA | 94.97 aA | 96.27 aA | 93.82 aA | 94.83 aA | 92.01 aA | 83.27 bB |
100 | 92.99 aA | 93.84 aA | 96.27 aA | 93.82 aA | 94.23 aA | 93.27 aA | 92.03 aA |
平均 Average | 91.48 bA | 93.11 abA | 95.69 aA | 91.05 bA | 92.83 aA | 88.29 bAB | 83.26 cB |
表2 不同播种方式的播种均匀度
Table 2 Seeding uniformity under different seeding methods.%
粒型与播种密度 Seed shape and seeding density /(g·plate-1) | 机条播A2 | 机散播 A1 | 人工撒播 A3 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
18行 18 lines | 20行 20 lines | 24行 24 lines | 26行 26 lines | 平均 Average | |||
长粒型(长/宽>2.7)Long-grain type(Length/Width>2.7) | |||||||
50 | 85.98 bB | 88.04 bB | 96.60 aA | 86.81 bB | 89.36 aA | 77.07 bB | 72.27 cB |
75 | 88.07 bB | 89.81 bAB | 94.17 aA | 87.95 bB | 90.00 aA | 84.14 bB | 78.88 cB |
100 | 86.35 bA | 86.04 bA | 90.81 aA | 88.00 abA | 87.80 aA | 87.52 aA | 87.29 aA |
平均 Average | 86.80 bB | 87.96 bB | 93.86 aA | 87.58 bB | 89.05 aA | 82.91 bAB | 79.48 cB |
圆粒型(长/宽<2.2) Cirdllar grain type(Length/Width<2.2) | |||||||
50 | 87.17 bcB | 90.51 bAB | 94.55 aA | 85.51 cB | 89.43 aA | 79.58 bB | 74.49 cB |
75 | 94.28 aA | 94.97 aA | 96.27 aA | 93.82 aA | 94.83 aA | 92.01 aA | 83.27 bB |
100 | 92.99 aA | 93.84 aA | 96.27 aA | 93.82 aA | 94.23 aA | 93.27 aA | 92.03 aA |
平均 Average | 91.48 bA | 93.11 abA | 95.69 aA | 91.05 bA | 92.83 aA | 88.29 bAB | 83.26 cB |
图2 不同播种方式和播种密度下苗期秧苗分蘖动态特征 A1-机散播; A2-机条播; B1-播种量40 g/盘; B2-50 g/盘; B3,60 g/盘; B4,70 g/盘。下同。
Fig. 2. Dynamic characteristics of tiller number under different seeding methods and planting densities. A1,Mechanized broadcasting; A2,Mechanized drilling seeding; B1,Seeding level of 40 g/plate; B2, 50 g/plate; B3, 60 g/plate; B4, 70 g/plate. The same as in tables and figures below.
处理 Treatment | 秧苗充实度 Dry weight per unit seedling height /(mg·cm-1) | 成苗率 Rate of seedlings /% | 盘结力 Root twisting degree /(kg·dm-2) | 发根力 Root- developing ability /cm | 百株苗 干质量 Dry weight per 100 seedlings/g | 百株根 干质量 Dry root weight per 100 plants/g | 根冠比 Root- shoot rate | N积累量 N accumulation /(mg·plant-1) | 分蘖芽发生率 Percentage of tiller occurrence /% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 3.01 aA | 68.67 a | 1.86 b | 84.13 aA | 5.72 aA | 0.809 a | 0.14 | 2.41 aA | 70.38 aA |
A1B2 | 2.83 aA | 68.42 a | 2.05 ab | 61.79 bB | 5.65 aA | 0.814 a | 0.14 | 2.37 aA | 36.38 bB |
A1B3 | 2.55 aAB | 64.46 b | 2.27 a | 56.32 cC | 4.26 bAB | 0.669 ab | 0.16 | 1.76 bAB | 26.44 bcBC |
A1B4 | 2.13 bB | 64.36 b | 2.20 a | 55.88 cC | 3.93 bB | 0.542 b | 0.14 | 1.56 bB | 18.12 cC |
A2B1 | 3.55 a | 74.67 aA | 1.85 bB | 87.48 aA | 7.15 aA | 0.975 a | 0.14 | 3.65 aA | 72.44 aA |
A2B2 | 2.96 b | 69.60 bAB | 2.45 aA | 69.15 bB | 5.94 abAB | 0.754 ab | 0.13 | 2.87 bA | 37.59 bB |
A2B3 | 2.61 b | 67.37 bB | 2.75 aA | 58.55 cC | 5.17 bB | 0.578 b | 0.11 | 1.99 cB | 37.59 bB |
A2B4 | 2.97 ab | 61.12 cC | 2.40 aA | 44.32 dD | 5.39 bB | 0.619 b | 0.12 | 1.97 cB | 29.29 bB |
F值 F value | |||||||||
播种方式 Method(A) | 4.37 | 29.82* | 10.92 | 0.04 | 25.32* | 0.10 | 5.42 | 25.68* | 2.82 |
播种密度 Density(B) | 6.77** | 14.83** | 8.34** | 89.42** | 6.90** | 3.40 | 0.11 | 16.84** | 30.92** |
A×B | 0.38 | 4.21* | 1.34 | 6.38** | 0.70 | 0.58 | 0.77 | 2.29 | 0.64 |
表3 播种方式和播种密度对秧苗素质的影响
Table 3 Effects of seeding methods and planting densities on seedling quality.
处理 Treatment | 秧苗充实度 Dry weight per unit seedling height /(mg·cm-1) | 成苗率 Rate of seedlings /% | 盘结力 Root twisting degree /(kg·dm-2) | 发根力 Root- developing ability /cm | 百株苗 干质量 Dry weight per 100 seedlings/g | 百株根 干质量 Dry root weight per 100 plants/g | 根冠比 Root- shoot rate | N积累量 N accumulation /(mg·plant-1) | 分蘖芽发生率 Percentage of tiller occurrence /% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 3.01 aA | 68.67 a | 1.86 b | 84.13 aA | 5.72 aA | 0.809 a | 0.14 | 2.41 aA | 70.38 aA |
A1B2 | 2.83 aA | 68.42 a | 2.05 ab | 61.79 bB | 5.65 aA | 0.814 a | 0.14 | 2.37 aA | 36.38 bB |
A1B3 | 2.55 aAB | 64.46 b | 2.27 a | 56.32 cC | 4.26 bAB | 0.669 ab | 0.16 | 1.76 bAB | 26.44 bcBC |
A1B4 | 2.13 bB | 64.36 b | 2.20 a | 55.88 cC | 3.93 bB | 0.542 b | 0.14 | 1.56 bB | 18.12 cC |
A2B1 | 3.55 a | 74.67 aA | 1.85 bB | 87.48 aA | 7.15 aA | 0.975 a | 0.14 | 3.65 aA | 72.44 aA |
A2B2 | 2.96 b | 69.60 bAB | 2.45 aA | 69.15 bB | 5.94 abAB | 0.754 ab | 0.13 | 2.87 bA | 37.59 bB |
A2B3 | 2.61 b | 67.37 bB | 2.75 aA | 58.55 cC | 5.17 bB | 0.578 b | 0.11 | 1.99 cB | 37.59 bB |
A2B4 | 2.97 ab | 61.12 cC | 2.40 aA | 44.32 dD | 5.39 bB | 0.619 b | 0.12 | 1.97 cB | 29.29 bB |
F值 F value | |||||||||
播种方式 Method(A) | 4.37 | 29.82* | 10.92 | 0.04 | 25.32* | 0.10 | 5.42 | 25.68* | 2.82 |
播种密度 Density(B) | 6.77** | 14.83** | 8.34** | 89.42** | 6.90** | 3.40 | 0.11 | 16.84** | 30.92** |
A×B | 0.38 | 4.21* | 1.34 | 6.38** | 0.70 | 0.58 | 0.77 | 2.29 | 0.64 |
处理 Treatment | 漏插率 Rate of empty hills /% | 每穴苗数 Seeding number per hill | 单株带蘖数 Tiller number per plant | 基本苗 Basic seedling number /(×104/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 17.68 aA | 1.37 bB | 0.53 aA | 35.25 a |
A1B2 | 16.09 aAB | 1.43 bAB | 0.23 bB | 29.69 b |
A1B3 | 13.69 bB | 1.57 aA | 0.14 bcBC | 32.21 ab |
A1B4 | 5.54 cC | 1.63 aA | 0.06 cC | 32.81 ab |
A2B1 | 17.07 aA | 1.40 cB | 0.55 aA | 36.04 |
A2B2 | 13.98 bAB | 1.53 bAB | 0.24 bB | 33.15 |
A2B3 | 11.69 bBC | 1.57 abAB | 0.24 bB | 34.03 |
A2B4 | 9.46 cC | 1.70 aA | 0.17 bB | 36.23 |
F值 F value | ||||
播种方式 Method(A) | 1.44 | 4.00 | 2.92 | 8.93 |
播种密度 Density(B) | 49.53** | 9.46** | 33.58** | 2.89 |
A×B | 6.95** | 0.83 | 0.64 | 0.32 |
表 4 播种方式和播种密度对栽插质量的影响
Table 4 Effects of seeding methods and planting densities on mechanical transplanting quantity.
处理 Treatment | 漏插率 Rate of empty hills /% | 每穴苗数 Seeding number per hill | 单株带蘖数 Tiller number per plant | 基本苗 Basic seedling number /(×104/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 17.68 aA | 1.37 bB | 0.53 aA | 35.25 a |
A1B2 | 16.09 aAB | 1.43 bAB | 0.23 bB | 29.69 b |
A1B3 | 13.69 bB | 1.57 aA | 0.14 bcBC | 32.21 ab |
A1B4 | 5.54 cC | 1.63 aA | 0.06 cC | 32.81 ab |
A2B1 | 17.07 aA | 1.40 cB | 0.55 aA | 36.04 |
A2B2 | 13.98 bAB | 1.53 bAB | 0.24 bB | 33.15 |
A2B3 | 11.69 bBC | 1.57 abAB | 0.24 bB | 34.03 |
A2B4 | 9.46 cC | 1.70 aA | 0.17 bB | 36.23 |
F值 F value | ||||
播种方式 Method(A) | 1.44 | 4.00 | 2.92 | 8.93 |
播种密度 Density(B) | 49.53** | 9.46** | 33.58** | 2.89 |
A×B | 6.95** | 0.83 | 0.64 | 0.32 |
处理 Treatment | 产量 Grain yield /(kg·hm-2) | 有效穗 Effective panicle number /(×104·hm2) | 成穗率 Percentage of fertile tillers/% | 每穗实粒数 Filled grain number | 结实率 Seed-setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 充实率 Filled grain percentage /% | 充实度 Grain plumpness /% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 8546.53 ab | 215.30 | 68.26 | 130.1 | 93.4 | 32.8 | 96.00 | 95.75 |
A1B2 | 8603.84 ab | 217.94 | 62.44 | 136.4 | 90.9 | 32.3 | 97.32 | 96.64 |
A1B3 | 9084.45 a | 247.38 | 68.48 | 128.6 | 93.1 | 32.5 | 96.43 | 96.62 |
A1B4 | 8320.51 b | 256.62 | 67.53 | 118.2 | 91.4 | 32.7 | 96.25 | 94.90 |
A2B1 | 8405.79 b | 207.33 | 64.99 | 134.2 | 92.1 | 32.6 a | 97.12 | 97.30 |
A2B2 | 9081.18 a | 227.60 | 64.84 | 125.9 | 92.0 | 32.1 ab | 95.38 | 95.50 |
A2B3 | 9015.49 a | 241.42 | 63.44 | 124.9 | 92.4 | 32.4 a | 96.08 | 96.99 |
A2B4 | 8862.06 ab | 245.83 | 63.58 | 120.8 | 90.6 | 31.7 b | 94.83 | 95.36 |
F值 F value | ||||||||
播种方式 Method(A) | 0.59 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.87 | 2.46 | 1.22 | 2.89 | 0.06 |
播种密度 Density(B) | 2.71 | 2.02 | 0.39 | 1.08 | 1.37 | 1.20 | 0.79 | 1.37 |
A×B | 1.30 | 0.12 | 0.65 | 0.37 | 0.49 | 2.15 | 0.83 | 0.59 |
表5 不同播种方式和播种密度对机插秧产量及其构成因素的影响
Table 5 Effects of seeding methods and planting densities on grain yield and its components of mechanically-transplanted rice.
处理 Treatment | 产量 Grain yield /(kg·hm-2) | 有效穗 Effective panicle number /(×104·hm2) | 成穗率 Percentage of fertile tillers/% | 每穗实粒数 Filled grain number | 结实率 Seed-setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 充实率 Filled grain percentage /% | 充实度 Grain plumpness /% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 8546.53 ab | 215.30 | 68.26 | 130.1 | 93.4 | 32.8 | 96.00 | 95.75 |
A1B2 | 8603.84 ab | 217.94 | 62.44 | 136.4 | 90.9 | 32.3 | 97.32 | 96.64 |
A1B3 | 9084.45 a | 247.38 | 68.48 | 128.6 | 93.1 | 32.5 | 96.43 | 96.62 |
A1B4 | 8320.51 b | 256.62 | 67.53 | 118.2 | 91.4 | 32.7 | 96.25 | 94.90 |
A2B1 | 8405.79 b | 207.33 | 64.99 | 134.2 | 92.1 | 32.6 a | 97.12 | 97.30 |
A2B2 | 9081.18 a | 227.60 | 64.84 | 125.9 | 92.0 | 32.1 ab | 95.38 | 95.50 |
A2B3 | 9015.49 a | 241.42 | 63.44 | 124.9 | 92.4 | 32.4 a | 96.08 | 96.99 |
A2B4 | 8862.06 ab | 245.83 | 63.58 | 120.8 | 90.6 | 31.7 b | 94.83 | 95.36 |
F值 F value | ||||||||
播种方式 Method(A) | 0.59 | 0.36 | 0.40 | 0.87 | 2.46 | 1.22 | 2.89 | 0.06 |
播种密度 Density(B) | 2.71 | 2.02 | 0.39 | 1.08 | 1.37 | 1.20 | 0.79 | 1.37 |
A×B | 1.30 | 0.12 | 0.65 | 0.37 | 0.49 | 2.15 | 0.83 | 0.59 |
处理 Treatment | 育秧人工 Labor for seedling culture(No./hm2) | 用种量 Seeding rate /(kg·hm-2) | 种子成本 Seed cost /(Yuan·hm-2) | 农资及其他 Agricultural production materials and others /(Yuan·hm-2) | 投入成本 Input cost /(Yuan·hm-2) | 产量 Grain yield /(kg·hm-2) | 总收益 Total income /(Yuan·hm-2) | 产投比 Output/ input |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 7.5 | 15.00 | 600 | 4687.5 | 5888 | 8546.53 | 17 093.06 | 2.903 |
A1B2 | 7.5 | 18.75 | 750 | 4687.5 | 6038 | 8603.84 | 17 207.68 | 2.850 |
A1B3 | 7.5 | 22.50 | 900 | 4687.5 | 6188 | 9084.45 | 18 168.90 | 2.936 |
A1B4 | 7.5 | 26.25 | 1050 | 4687.5 | 6338 | 8320.51 | 16 641.02 | 2.626 |
A2B1 | 7.5 | 15.00 | 600 | 4687.5 | 5888 | 8405.79 | 16 811.58 | 2.855 |
A2B2 | 7.5 | 18.75 | 750 | 4687.5 | 6038 | 9081.18 | 18 162.36 | 3.008 |
A2B3 | 7.5 | 22.50 | 900 | 4687.5 | 6188 | 9015.49 | 18 030.98 | 2.914 |
A2B4 | 7.5 | 26.25 | 1050 | 4687.5 | 6338 | 8862.06 | 17 724.12 | 2.796 |
平均值 Average | ||||||||
A1 | 7.5 | 20.63 | 825 | 4687.5 | 6113 | 8638.83 | 17 277.66 | 2.826 |
A2 | 7.5 | 20.63 | 825 | 4687.5 | 6113 | 8841.16 | 17 682.32 | 2.893 |
B1 | 7.5 | 15.00 | 600 | 4687.5 | 5888 | 8476.17 | 16 952.34 | 2.879 |
B2 | 7.5 | 18.75 | 750 | 4687.5 | 6038 | 8842.51 | 17 685.02 | 2.929 |
B3 | 7.5 | 22.50 | 900 | 4687.5 | 6188 | 9049.98 | 18 099.96 | 2.925 |
B4 | 7.5 | 26.25 | 1050 | 4687.5 | 6338 | 8591.28 | 17 182.56 | 2.711 |
表6 不同播种方式和播种密度间经济效益分析
Table 6 Economic benefit of different seeding methods and planting densities.
处理 Treatment | 育秧人工 Labor for seedling culture(No./hm2) | 用种量 Seeding rate /(kg·hm-2) | 种子成本 Seed cost /(Yuan·hm-2) | 农资及其他 Agricultural production materials and others /(Yuan·hm-2) | 投入成本 Input cost /(Yuan·hm-2) | 产量 Grain yield /(kg·hm-2) | 总收益 Total income /(Yuan·hm-2) | 产投比 Output/ input |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A1B1 | 7.5 | 15.00 | 600 | 4687.5 | 5888 | 8546.53 | 17 093.06 | 2.903 |
A1B2 | 7.5 | 18.75 | 750 | 4687.5 | 6038 | 8603.84 | 17 207.68 | 2.850 |
A1B3 | 7.5 | 22.50 | 900 | 4687.5 | 6188 | 9084.45 | 18 168.90 | 2.936 |
A1B4 | 7.5 | 26.25 | 1050 | 4687.5 | 6338 | 8320.51 | 16 641.02 | 2.626 |
A2B1 | 7.5 | 15.00 | 600 | 4687.5 | 5888 | 8405.79 | 16 811.58 | 2.855 |
A2B2 | 7.5 | 18.75 | 750 | 4687.5 | 6038 | 9081.18 | 18 162.36 | 3.008 |
A2B3 | 7.5 | 22.50 | 900 | 4687.5 | 6188 | 9015.49 | 18 030.98 | 2.914 |
A2B4 | 7.5 | 26.25 | 1050 | 4687.5 | 6338 | 8862.06 | 17 724.12 | 2.796 |
平均值 Average | ||||||||
A1 | 7.5 | 20.63 | 825 | 4687.5 | 6113 | 8638.83 | 17 277.66 | 2.826 |
A2 | 7.5 | 20.63 | 825 | 4687.5 | 6113 | 8841.16 | 17 682.32 | 2.893 |
B1 | 7.5 | 15.00 | 600 | 4687.5 | 5888 | 8476.17 | 16 952.34 | 2.879 |
B2 | 7.5 | 18.75 | 750 | 4687.5 | 6038 | 8842.51 | 17 685.02 | 2.929 |
B3 | 7.5 | 22.50 | 900 | 4687.5 | 6188 | 9049.98 | 18 099.96 | 2.925 |
B4 | 7.5 | 26.25 | 1050 | 4687.5 | 6338 | 8591.28 | 17 182.56 | 2.711 |
[1] | 牛盾. 我国农业机械化的新形势和水稻生产机械化问题. 农业工程学报, 2000, 16(4): 7-10. |
Niu D.New situation of agricultural mechanization and the development of paddy production mechanization in China.Trans CSAE, 2000, 16(4): 7-10. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 宋建农, 庄乃生, 王立臣, 刘小伟, 魏文军. 21世纪我国水稻种植机械化发展方向. 中国农业大学学报, 2000, 5(2): 30-33. |
Song J N, Zhuang N S, Wang L C, Liu X W, Wei W J.The development tendency of Chinese rice planting mechanization in the 21st Century.J China Agric Univ, 2000, 5(2): 30-33. | |
[3] | 陈惠哲, 向镜, 徐一成, 林贤青, 张玉屏, 朱德峰. 水稻免耕机插质量、生长特性及产量的形成. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(6): 610-616. |
Chen H Z, Xiang J, Xu Y C,Lin X Q, Zhang Y P, Zhu D F.Effect of no-tillage on the quality of mechanical transplanting, growth and grain yield of rice.Chin J Rice Sci, 2013, 27(6): 610-616.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 臧英, 罗锡文. 周志艳. 南方水稻种植和收获机械化的发展策略. 农业机械学报, 2008, 39(1): 60-63. |
Zang Y, Luo X W, Zhou Z Y.Development strategy on rice planting and harvesting mechanization in south China.Transac CSAM, 2008, 39(1): 60-63.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 吴崇友, 金诚谦, 卢晏, 涂安富. 我国水稻种植机械发展问题探讨. 农业工程学报, 2000, 16(2): 21-23. |
Wu C Y, Jin C Q, L Y,Tu A F. Discussion of developing rice planting machine in China.Trans CSAE, 2000, 16(2): 21-23.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 罗汉亚, 李吉, 袁钊和, 何瑞银, 马拯胞, 张璐. 杂交稻机插秧育秧播种密度与取样面积耦合关系. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(7): 98-102. |
Luo H Y, Li J, Yuan Z H,He R Y, Ma Z B, Zhang L.Coupling relationships of nursing seedling densities and finger sticking area by mechanized hybrid rice transplanter.Transac CSAE, 2009, 25(7): 98-102.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 何文洪, 陈惠哲, 朱德峰, 徐一成, 林贤青, 张玉屏. 不同播种量对水稻机插秧苗素质及产量的影响.中国稻米, 2008(3) : 60-62. |
He W H, Chen H Z, Zhu D F, Xu Y C, Lin X Q, Zhang Y P.Effects of different sowing densities on seedling quality and yield of rice of mechanical transplanting.China Rice, 2008(3): 60-62.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | Hiroyuki S, Hisashi K, Kensuke O, Kazuyasu N, Mitsunori S, Akio O, Morio M, Satoko Y.Development of rice "seed-mats"consisting of hardened seeds with a cover of soil for the rice transplantor.Plant Prod Sci, 2008, 11(1): 108-115 |
[9] | 李耀明, 徐立章, 向忠平, 邓玲黎. 日本水稻种植机械化技术的最新研究进展. 农业工程学报, 2005, 21(11): 182-185. |
Li Y M, Xu L Z, Xiang Z P, Deng L L.Research advances of rice planting mechanization in Japan.Trans CSAE, 2005, 21(11): 182-185.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 金庆明. 突破水稻机插瓶颈的难点及对策讨.中国农机化, 2009(4): 28-30. |
Jin Q M.Difficulties in the breakthrough of the bottlenecks for rice transplanting by machine and their resolving strategies.China Agric Mechan, 2009(4): 28-30.(in Chinese) | |
[11] | 姚雄, 杨文钰, 任万军. 育秧方式和播种量对水稻机插长秧龄秧苗的影响. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(6): 152-157. |
Yao X, Yang W Y, Ren W J.Effects seedling raising methods and sowing rates on machine-transplanted long-age rice seedling.Transac CSAE , 2009, 25(6): 152-157.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 彭长青, 李世峰, 卞新民, 吴九林, 周宇, 刘蓉蓉. 机插水稻高产栽培关键技术的适宜值. 应用生态学报, 2006, 17(9): 1619-1623. |
Peng C Q, Li S F, Bian X M, Wu J L, Zhou Y, Liu R R.Appropriate parameters for high-yielding cultivation of machine-transplanted rice.Chin J Appl Ecol, 2006, 17(9) : 1619-1623. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 李世峰, 刘蓉蓉, 吴九林. 不同播量与移栽密度对机插水稻产量形成的影响. 作物杂志, 2008, 17: 71-74. |
Li S F, Liu R R, Wu J L.Effects of different sowing rates and transplanting densities on yield formation of machine-transplanted rice.Crops, 2008, 17: 71-74.(in Chinese) | |
[14] | 艾治勇, 马国辉, 青先国. 超级杂交稻生理生态特征及高产稳产栽培调控的研究进展. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(5) : 553-560. |
Ai Z Y, Ma G H, Qin X G.Physiological and ecological characteristics and cultivation regulation for high and stable yield of super hybrid rice.Chin J Rice Sci, 2011, 25(5): 553-560.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 徐一成, 朱德峰, 赵匀, 陈惠哲. 超级稻精量条播与撒播育秧对秧苗素质及机插效果的影响. 农业工程学报, 2009, 25(1) : 99-103. |
Xu Y C, Zhu D F, Zhao Y, Chen H Z.Effects of broadcast sowing and precision drilling of super rice seed on seedling quality and effectiveness of mechanized transplanting.Trans CSAE, 2009, 25(1): 99-103. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 沈建辉, 邵文娟, 张祖建, 景启坚, 杨建昌, 陈文林, 朱庆森. 苗床落谷密度、施肥量和秧龄对机插稻苗质及大田产量的影响. 作物学报, 2006, 32(3): 402-409. |
Shen J H, Shao W J, Zhang Z J, Jin Q J, Yang J C, Chen W L, Zhu Q S.Effects of sowing density, fertilizer amount in seedbed and seedling age on seedling quality and grain yield in paddy field for mechanical transplanting rice.Acta Agron Sin,2006, 32(3): 402-409. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 李刚华, 于林惠, 候朋福, 王绍华, 刘正辉, 王强盛, 凌启鸿, 丁艳锋. 机插水稻适宜基本苗定量参数的获取与验证. 农业工程学报, 2012, 28(8): 98-104. |
Li G H, Yu L H, Hou P F, Wang S H, Liu Z H, Wang Q S, Ling Q H, Ding Y F.Calculation and verification of quantitative parameters of optimal planting density of machine-transplant rice.Trans CSAE, 2012, 28(8): 98-104. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 李杰, 张洪程, 龚金龙, 常勇, 吴桂成, 郭振华, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕. 稻麦两熟地不同栽培方式超级稻分蘖特性及其与群体生产力的关系. 作物学报, 2011, 37(2): 309-320. |
Li J, Zhang H C, Gong J L, Chang Y, Wu G C, Guo Z H, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y.Tillering characteristics and its relationships with population productivity of super rice under different cultivation methods in rice-wheat cropping areas.Acta Agron Sin, 2011, 37(2): 309-320.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 沈建辉, 邵文娟, 张祖建, 杨建昌, 曹卫星, 朱庆森. 水稻机插中苗双膜育秧落谷密度对苗质和产量影响的研究. 作物学报, 2004, 30(9): 906-911. |
Shen J H, Shao W J, Zhang Z J, Yang J C, Cao W X, Zhu Q S.Effects of sowing density on quality of medium-seedling nursed with two-layer plastic film and grain yield in mechanical transplanting rice.Acta Agron Sin, 2004, 30(9): 906-911. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 张卫星, 朱德峰, 林贤青, 徐一成, 林兴军, 陈惠哲, 张玉屏. 不同播量及育秧基质对机插水稻秧苗素质的影响. 扬州大学学报:农业与生命科学版, 2007, 28(1): 45-48. |
Zhang W X, Zhu D F, Lin X Q, Xu Y C, Lin X J, Chen H Z, Zhang Y P.The effects of different sowing densities and raising materials on seedling quality of mechanical transplanting rice.J Yangzhou Univ:Agric Life Sci Ed. 2007, 28(1): 45-48. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 李泽华, 马旭, 谢俊峰, 陈国锐, 郑志雄, 谭永炘, 黄益强. 双季稻区杂交稻机插秧低播量精密育秧试验. 农业工程学报, 2014, 30(6): 17-27. |
Li Z H,Ma X, Xie J F, Chen G R, Zheng Z X, Tan Y X, Hang Y Q.Experiment on precision seedling raising and mechanized transplanting of hybrid rice under low sowing rate in double cropping area.Trans CSAE , 2014, 30(6): 17-27. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 于林惠, 丁艳锋, 薛艳风, 凌启鸿, 袁钊和. 水稻机插秧田间育秧秧苗素质影响因素研究. 农业工程学报, 2006, 22(3): 73-78. |
Yu L H, Ding Y F, Xue Y F, Ling Q H, Yuan Z H.Factors effecting rice seedling quality of mechanical transplanting rice.Trans CSAE, 2006, 22(3): 73-78. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 马均, 孙永健, 苟永成, 李学根, 罗甫全. 杂交稻钵形毯状育秧机插不同播种密度与秧龄研究. 中国稻米, 2011, 17(3):11-14. |
Ma J, Sun Y J, Gou Y C, Li X G, Luo P Q.Study on sowing density and seedling age of hybrid rice in machinery bowl-shaped blanket seedling.China Rice, 2011, 17(3):11-14.(in Chinese) | |
[24] | 宋云生, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 朱聪聪, 孙圳, 杨大柳, 王惟清, 刘俊, 吴爱国. 水稻钵苗机插秧苗素质的调控. 农业工程学报, 2013, 29(22): 11-22. |
Song Y S, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Zhu C C, Sun Z, Yang D L, Wang W Q, Lui J, Wu A G.Seedling quality regulation of rice potted-seedling in mechanical transplanting.Trans CSAE, 2013, 29(22): 11-22.(in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 郭展, 张运波. 水稻对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应及分子调控研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[2] | 韦还和, 马唯一, 左博源, 汪璐璐, 朱旺, 耿孝宇, 张翔, 孟天瑶, 陈英龙, 高平磊, 许轲, 霍中洋, 戴其根. 盐、干旱及其复合胁迫对水稻产量和品质形成影响的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[3] | 陈明亮, 曾细华, 沈雨民, 罗世友, 胡兰香, 熊文涛, 熊焕金, 吴小燕, 肖叶青. 籼粳亚种间育性位点分型及籼粳杂交稻育性位点模式研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 386-396. |
[4] | 吕宙, 易秉怀, 陈平平, 周文新, 唐文帮, 易镇邪. 施氮量与移栽密度对小粒型杂交水稻产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 422-436. |
[5] | 赵艺婷, 谢可冉, 高逖, 崔克辉. 水稻分蘖期干旱锻炼对幼穗分化期高温下穗发育和产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 277-289. |
[6] | 周甜, 吴少华, 康建宏, 吴宏亮, 杨生龙, 王星强, 李昱, 黄玉峰. 不同种植模式对水稻籽粒淀粉含量及淀粉关键酶活性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 303-315. |
[7] | 彭显龙, 董强, 张辰, 李鹏飞, 李博琳, 刘智蕾, 于彩莲. 不同土壤条件下秸秆还田量对土壤还原性物质及水稻生长的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(2): 198-210. |
[8] | 朱旺, 张翔, 耿孝宇, 张哲, 陈英龙, 韦还和, 戴其根, 许轲, 朱广龙, 周桂生, 孟天瑶. 盐-旱复合胁迫下水稻根系的形态和生理特征及其与产量形成的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(6): 617-627. |
[9] | 邹宇傲, 吴启侠, 周乾顺, 朱建强, 晏军. 孕穗期杂交中稻对淹涝胁迫的响应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(6): 642-656. |
[10] | 袁沛, 周旋, 杨威, 尹凌洁, 靳拓, 彭建伟, 荣湘民, 田昌. 化肥减氮配施对洞庭湖区双季稻产量和田面水氮磷流失风险的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(5): 518-528. |
[11] | 肖大康, 胡仁, 韩天富, 张卫峰, 侯俊, 任科宇. 氮肥用量和运筹对我国水稻产量及其构成因子影响的整合分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(5): 529-542. |
[12] | 黄亚茹, 徐鹏, 王乐乐, 贺一哲, 王辉, 柯健, 何海兵, 武立权, 尤翠翠. 外源海藻糖对粳稻品系W1844籽粒灌浆特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[13] | 高欠清, 任孝俭, 翟中兵, 郑普兵, 吴源芬, 崔克辉. 头季穗肥和促芽肥对再生稻再生芽生长及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 405-414. |
[14] | 王文婷, 马佳颖, 李光彦, 符卫蒙, 李沪波, 林洁, 陈婷婷, 奉保华, 陶龙兴, 符冠富, 秦叶波. 高温下不同施肥量对水稻产量品质形成的影响及其与能量代谢的关系分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
[15] | 杨晓龙, 王彪, 汪本福, 张枝盛, 张作林, 杨蓝天, 程建平, 李阳. 不同水分管理方式对旱直播水稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||