Performance of Yield, Photosynthesis and Grain Quality of japonicaRice Cultivars UnderSalinity Stress in Micro-plots

doi:10.16819/j.1001-7216.2018.7068

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】Rice growing is one of the widely utilized technologies for desalting, improving and exploiting tidal flat in Jiangsu coastal beach. The objective is to revealthe effects of salinity stress on rice yield,photosynthetic parameters, grain quality and starch viscosity, providing a reference and laying a theoretical basis for developing rice production in Jiangsu coastal beach.【Method】Four japonica rice varieties with better salt tolerance, Tongjing 981, Yandao 12, Yandao 10 and Nanjing 5055 were used to investigate theyield and its components, photosynthetic parameters, rice quality and starch viscosity under salinity stress (S₁, 1.112 dS/m for EC_1:5) and no salinity stress (S₀, 0.207 dS/m, control).【Result】Compared with the control, rice yield decreased significantly under salinity stress, was only 40.5% of that of the control, panicle number per unit area had no significant difference, while grain number per panicle and 1000-grain weight also decreased significantly. The photosynthetic rate and intercellular CO₂ concentration decreased significantly, but stomatal induction and transpiration rate had no significant difference between S₀ and S₁. The processing quality of rice, together with amylose content decreased significantly, the appearance quality almost remained unchanged, while protein content increased significantly. The peak viscosity, trough viscosity, final viscosity, breakdown value, consistence value showed no significant changes, the setback value and pasting temperature increased significantly.【Conclusion】Salinity stress had adverse effects on yield, photosynthetic parameters and grain quality of rice.During the critical period of salt stress on yield and quality, such as booting stage and filling stage, measures should be taken to alleviate salt stress.

Key words: salinity stress, rice variety, yield, photosynthetic parameters, grain quality, starch viscosity

摘要：

【目的】江苏沿海滩涂种植水稻是促进盐土脱盐改良和开发利用滩涂的主要技术之一,研究盐逆境对水稻产量、光合特性和稻米品质的影响,可为发展滩涂种稻提供参考和理论依据。【方法】以耐盐性较好的通粳981、盐稻12、盐稻10号和南粳5055等4个粳稻品种为材料,设置非盐逆境(S₀, 电导率0.207 dS/m)和逆境(S₁,电导率1.112 dS/m)2个处理,分别测定产量及其构成因素、光合参数、稻米品质和淀粉黏滞特性。【结果】与非盐逆境相比,盐逆境下水稻产量显著下降,仅为非逆境的40.5%,单位面积穗数差异不显著,每穗粒数和千粒重显著减少;光合速率、胞间CO₂浓度显著下降,而气孔导度和蒸腾速率差异不显著;稻米加工品质显著下降,外观品质变化不大,直链淀粉含量显著下降,蛋白质含量显著增加;峰值黏度、热浆黏度、最终黏度、崩解值和回复值均未发生显著的变化,消减值和起始糊化温度显著增高。【结论】盐逆境对水稻产量、光合参数、稻米品质等均有不利的影响,可在盐逆境对产量、品质影响的关键时期孕穗期和灌浆结实期采取措施缓解盐逆境的危害。

关键词: 盐逆境, 水稻品种, 产量, 光合参数, 稻米品质, 淀粉黏滞性

CLC Number:

Genyou ZHOU, Caijiao ZHAI, Xianliang DENG, Jiao ZHANG, Zhenliang ZHANG, Qigeng DAI, Shiyou CUI. Performance of Yield, Photosynthesis and Grain Quality of japonicaRice Cultivars UnderSalinity Stress in Micro-plots[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2018, 1(1): 146-154.

周根友, 翟彩娇, 邓先亮, 张蛟, 张振良, 戴其根, 崔士友. 盐逆境对水稻产量、光合特性及品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 1(1): 146-154.

Figures/Tables 5

References 31

[1]	崔士友, 张蛟蛟, 碳管理:盐土治理的一种新思路.农学学报, 2015, 5(12): 44-50.
	Cui S Y, Zhang JJ.Carbon management: A new approach to the governance of saline soils.J Agric, 2015,5(12):44-50.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	国家统计局.中国统计年鉴.北京: 中国统计出版社, 2014.
	National Bureau of Statistics.China Statistical Yearbook.Bejing: China Statistics Press, 2016.(in Chinese)
[3]	Horie T, Karahara I, Katsuhara M.Salinity tolerance mechanisms in glycophytes: An overview with the central focus on rice plants.Rice, 2012, 5(1):11.
[4]	Zeng L, Shannon M C, Grieve C M.Evaluation of salt tolerance in rice genotypes by multiple agronomic parameters.Euphytica, 2002, 127(2):235-245.
[5]	Zeng L, Poss J A, Wilson C, Ase D, Gregorio G B, Grieve C M.Evaluation of salt tolerance in rice genotypes by physiological characters.Euphytica, 2003, 129(3):281-292.
[6]	Heenan D P, Lewin L G, Mccaffery D W.Salinity tolerance in rice varieties at different growth stages. Australian J ExpAgric, 1988, 28(3):343-349.
[7]	Xie J H, Zapataarias F J, Shen M, Afza R.Salinity tolerant performance and genetic diversity of four rice varieties. Euphytica,2000, 116(2): 105-110.
[8]	杨福, 梁正伟, 王志春.水稻耐盐碱鉴定标准评价及建议与展望.植物遗传资源学报, 2011, 12(4): 625-628.
	Yang F, Liang Z W, Wang Z C.Evaluation, suggestion and prospect on identification standards of saline-alkali tolerance in rice.J Plant Genetic Resour, 2011, 12(4): 625-628. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	陈志德, 仲维功, 杨杰, 黄转运.水稻新种质资源的耐盐性鉴定评价.植物遗传资源学报, 2004, 5(4): 351-355.
	Chen Z D, Chong W G, Yang J, Huang Z Y.Evaluation of salt tolerance of rice (Oryza sativa L.) germplasm. J Plant GenetResour, 2004, 5(4): 351-355.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	方先文, 汤陵华, 王艳平.耐盐水稻种质资源的筛选.植物遗传资源学报, 2004, 5(3): 295-298.
	Fang X W, Tang L H, Wang Y P.Selection on rice germplasm tolerant to salt stress.J Plant Genet Resour, 2004, 5(3): 295-298.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[11]	Zeng L H, Shannon M C.Effects of salinity on grain yield and yield components of rice at different seeding densities.Agron J, 2000, 92(3):418-423.
[12]	Zeng L H, Shannon M C.Salinity effects on seedling growth and yield components of rice.Crop Sci, 2000, 40(4):996-1003.
[13]	朱萍, 王华, 夏伟, 顾艾节, 汤梅林, 周士良.微酸性有机肥用量对滩涂土壤理化性状及水稻产量的影响.上海农业学报, 2015(6): 101-103.
	Zhu P, Wang H, Xia W, GuA J, Tang M L, Zhou S L. Effects of acidulous organic fertilizer rates on both beach soil physicochemical properties and rice yield.ActaAgric Shanghai,2015(6):101-103. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	Julino B O.The chemical basis of rice grain quality∥Chemical aspect of rice grain quality. Manila: IRRI, 1979: 69-90.
[15]	张文绪, 汤圣祥.我国水稻品种蒸煮品质的初步研究.中国农业科学, 1981, 14(6): 1-4.
	Zhang W X, Tang S X.A preliminary study on the cooking qualities of chines rice varieties (O. sativa L.).SciAgric Sin, 1981, 14(6): 1-4.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	陈能, 罗玉坤, 朱智伟, 张伯平, 郑有川, 谢黎虹.优质食用稻米品质的理化指标与食昧相关性研究.中国水稻科学, 1997, 11(2): 70-76.
	Chen N, Luo Y K, Zhu Z W, Zhang B P, Zheng Y C, Xie L H.Correlation between eating quality and physico-chemical properties of high grain quality rice.Chin J Rice Sci, 1997, 11(2): 70-76.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[17]	张欣, 施利利, 丁得亮, 王松文, 崔晶.74份优质粳稻品种的理化特征和食味特性研究.食品科技, 2010, (9): 178-181.
	Zhang X, Shi L L, Ding D L, Wang S W, Cui J.Study on physicochemical properties and palatability characteristics of 74 high-quality rice varieties.Food Sci＆Technol, 2010, (9): 178-181. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	崔世友, 张蛟蛟.盐分逆境对园艺作物品质的影响.农学学报, 2014, (12): 60-62.
	Cui S Y, Zhang J J.Effects of salt stress on the quality of horticultural crops.JAgric, 2014 (12): 60-62. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[19]	李红宇, 潘世驹, 钱永德, 马艳, 司洋, 高尚, 郑桂萍, 姜玉伟, 周健.混合盐碱胁迫对寒地水稻产量和品质的影响.南方农业学报, 2015, 46(12): 2100-2105.
	Li H Y, Pan S J, Qian Y D, Ma Y, Si Y, Gao S, Zheng J P, Jiang Y W, Zhou J.Effects of saline-alkali stress on yield and quality of rice in cold region.J SouthAgric, 2015, 46(12): 2100-2105. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	杨福, 梁正伟, 王志春, 张军, 陈渊.水稻耐盐碱品种(系)筛选试验与省区域试验产量性状的比较.吉林农业大学学报, 2007, 29(6): 596-600.
	Yang F, Liang Z W, Wang Z C, Zhang J, Chen Y.Comparison of yield characters between screening test of saline-alkali tolerant rice varieties and regional experiment.J Jilin AgricUniv, 2007, 29(6): 596-600.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	步金宝, 赵宏伟, 刘化龙, 王敬国, 兴旺.盐碱胁迫对寒地粳稻产量形成机理的研究.农业现代化研究, 2012, 33(4): 485-488.
	BuJ B, ZhaoH W,LiuH L,WangJ G,Xing W. Study on yield formation mechanism of salinity and alkalinity stress in japonica rice of cold region. ResAgricModern, 2012, 33(4): 485-488. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	刘晓龙, 徐晨, 徐克章, 崔菁菁, 安久海, 凌凤楼, 张治安, 武志海.盐胁迫对水稻叶片光合作用和叶绿素荧光特性的影响.作物杂志, 2014, (2): 88-92.
	Liu X L, Xu C, Xu K Z, Cui J J, An J H, Ling F L, Zhang Z A, Wu Z H.Effects on characteristics of photosynthesis and chlorophyll fluorescence of rice under salt stress.Crops, 2014, (2): 88-92. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	王仁雷, 华春, 刘友良.盐胁迫对水稻光合特性的影响.南京农业大学学报, 2002, 25(4): 11-14.
	Wang R L, Hua C, Liu Y L.Effect of salt stress on photosynthetic characteristics in rice.J Nanjing AgriUniv, 2002, 25(4):11-14.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	徐晨, 凌风楼, 徐克章, 武志海, 刘晓龙, 安久海, 赵兰坡.盐胁迫对不同水稻品种光合特性和生理生化特性的影响.中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(3): 280-286.
	Xu C, Ling F L, Xu K Z, Wu Z H, Liu X L, An J H, Zhao L P.Effect of salt stress on photosynthetic characteristics and physiological and biochemical traits of different rice varieties.Chin J Rice Sci, 2013, 27(3): 280-286.(in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	Desamero N V, Romero M V, Aquino D V, Tibayan P A, Guloy M B, Valdez R E, Ablaza M J C, Dimaano Y A, Chico M V, Cardenas C C, Orbon C A, Cavite O V. Rice grain quality as affected by salt stress.Philipp J Crop Sci, 2003, 28(S1): 70-70.
[26]	Surekha Rao P, Mishra B, Gupta S R.Effects of soil salinity and alkalinity on grain quality of tolerant, semi-tolerant and sensitive rice genotypes.Rice Sci, 2013, 20(4): 284-291.
[27]	余为仆. 秸秆还田条件下盐胁迫对水稻产量与品质形成的影响.扬州: 扬州大学. 2014.
	Yu W P.Effect of salt stress associated with straw returning on yield and quality of rice. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2014. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[28]	高焕晔, 王三根, 宗学凤, 腾中华, 赵芳明, 刘照.灌浆结实期高温干旱复合胁迫对稻米直链淀粉及蛋白质含量的影响.中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(1): 40-47.
	Gao H Y, Wang S G, Zong X F, Teng Z H, Zhao F M, Liu Z.Effects of combined high temperature and drought stress on amylose and protein contents at rice grain-filling stage.Chin J Eco-Agric, 2012, 20(1): 40-47. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[29]	张桂莲, 廖斌, 李博, 蔡志欢.花后高温对稻米品质及胚乳淀粉粒结构的影响.中国农学通报, 2016, 32(9): 10-14.
	Zhang G L, Liao B, Li B, Cai Z H.Effect of high temperature after anthesis on rice quality and starch granule structure of endosperm.Chin AgricSci Bull, 2012, 20(1): 40-47. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[30]	杨东雷, 董伟欣, 张迎迎, 何祖华.赤霉素调节植物对非生物逆境的耐性.中国科学: 生命科学, 2013, 43: 1119-1126.
	Yang D L, Dong W X, Zhang Y Y, He Z H.Gibberellins modulates abiotic stress tolerance in plant.Sci Sin Vitae, 2013, 43: 1119-1126.
[31]	王静超, 王志琴.多胺在水稻产量形成与响应逆境中的作用.安徽农业科学, 2012, 40(8): 4473-4477.
	Wang J C, Wang Z Q.Functions of polyamines in the rice yield formation and response to stress.J Anhui AgricSci, 2012, 40(8): 4473-4477.

盐逆境 Salt stress	品种 Variety	产量 Grain yield/(kg·m^-2)	单位面积穗数 Effective panicle number perm²	每穗粒数 Grain number per panicle	千粒重 1000-grain weight/g
S₀	V₁	1.316±0.153 a	275.1±26.7 b	165.4±8.6 a	28.9±0.6 a
	V₂	1.127±0.135 a	343.3±15.1 a	128.4±10.6 b	25.1±0.2 b
	V₃	1.188±0.314 a	340.3±12.0 a	126.2±12.8 b	24.8±0.3 b
	V₄	0.931±0.083 b	332.7±10.3 a	108.1±7.2 b	25.8±0.1 b
平均 Average		1.140	322.8	132.0	26.2
S₁	V₁	0.523±0.126 a	281.2±12.9 c	76.0±9.1 a	25.1±1.5 a
	V₂	0.481±0.099 a	327.7±14.0 a	62.6±11.0 a	22.7±2.4 b
	V₃	0.401±0.068 a	319.7±4.6 ab	61.8±9.4 a	20.3±0.2 c
	V₄	0.443±0.037 a	305.7±7.6 b	68.6±5.4 a	21.2±0.8 bc
平均 Average		0.462	308.6	67.2	22.3
变异来源 Source of variation
F值	S	103.90^**	7.39	293.06^**	62.90^**
F value	V	5.01^**	31.35^**	23.08^**	33.69^**
	S×V	2.87	2.40	11.61^**	2.64

盐逆境 Salt stress	品种 Variety	产量 Grain yield/(kg·m^-2)	单位面积穗数 Effective panicle number perm²	每穗粒数 Grain number per panicle	千粒重 1000-grain weight/g
S₀	V₁	1.316±0.153 a	275.1±26.7 b	165.4±8.6 a	28.9±0.6 a
	V₂	1.127±0.135 a	343.3±15.1 a	128.4±10.6 b	25.1±0.2 b
	V₃	1.188±0.314 a	340.3±12.0 a	126.2±12.8 b	24.8±0.3 b
	V₄	0.931±0.083 b	332.7±10.3 a	108.1±7.2 b	25.8±0.1 b
平均 Average		1.140	322.8	132.0	26.2
S₁	V₁	0.523±0.126 a	281.2±12.9 c	76.0±9.1 a	25.1±1.5 a
	V₂	0.481±0.099 a	327.7±14.0 a	62.6±11.0 a	22.7±2.4 b
	V₃	0.401±0.068 a	319.7±4.6 ab	61.8±9.4 a	20.3±0.2 c
	V₄	0.443±0.037 a	305.7±7.6 b	68.6±5.4 a	21.2±0.8 bc
平均 Average		0.462	308.6	67.2	22.3
变异来源 Source of variation
F值	S	103.90^**	7.39	293.06^**	62.90^**
F value	V	5.01^**	31.35^**	23.08^**	33.69^**
	S×V	2.87	2.40	11.61^**	2.64

盐逆境 Salt stress	品种 Variety	光合速率 Photosynthetic rate /(μmol·m^-2s^-1)	气孔导度 Stomatal conductance /(mol·m^-2·s^-1)	胞间CO₂浓度 CO₂ concentration /(μmol·mol^-1)	蒸腾速率 Evaporation rate /(mmol·m^-2s^-1)
S₀	V₁	28.3±0.8 a	11.5±9.2 a	361.0±20.4 a	1.2±1.0 a
	V₂	29.5±2.5 a	19.7±8.7 a	345.3±91.6 a	1.9±0.8 a
	V₃	27.2±2.0 a	23.3±20.4 a	364.0±27.3 a	2.4±2.1 a
	V₄	29.7±5.2 a	27.2±21.4 a	355.7±40.2 a	2.8±2.1 a
平均 Average		28.7	20.4	356.5	2.1
S₁	V₁	18.6±4.1 a	25.5±11.6 a	272.5±21.0 a	2.9±1.3 a
	V₂	19.3±5.3 a	40.1±33.1 a	271.8±35.4 a	4.5±3.4 a
	V₃	20.6±3.3 a	44.7±28.1 a	222.6±29.8 a	4.7±2.9 a
	V₄	16.6±4.6 a	29.1±214.0 a	270.4±27.0 a	3.0±1.3 a
平均 Average		18.8	34.8	259.3	3.8
变异来源 Source of variation
F值	S	168.78^**	2.92	46.10^**	3.99
F value	V	0.14	0.87	0.52	0.81
	S×V	0.78	0.40	1.12	0.57

盐逆境 Salt stress	品种 Variety	光合速率 Photosynthetic rate /(μmol·m^-2s^-1)	气孔导度 Stomatal conductance /(mol·m^-2·s^-1)	胞间CO₂浓度 CO₂ concentration /(μmol·mol^-1)	蒸腾速率 Evaporation rate /(mmol·m^-2s^-1)
S₀	V₁	28.3±0.8 a	11.5±9.2 a	361.0±20.4 a	1.2±1.0 a
	V₂	29.5±2.5 a	19.7±8.7 a	345.3±91.6 a	1.9±0.8 a
	V₃	27.2±2.0 a	23.3±20.4 a	364.0±27.3 a	2.4±2.1 a
	V₄	29.7±5.2 a	27.2±21.4 a	355.7±40.2 a	2.8±2.1 a
平均 Average		28.7	20.4	356.5	2.1
S₁	V₁	18.6±4.1 a	25.5±11.6 a	272.5±21.0 a	2.9±1.3 a
	V₂	19.3±5.3 a	40.1±33.1 a	271.8±35.4 a	4.5±3.4 a
	V₃	20.6±3.3 a	44.7±28.1 a	222.6±29.8 a	4.7±2.9 a
	V₄	16.6±4.6 a	29.1±214.0 a	270.4±27.0 a	3.0±1.3 a
平均 Average		18.8	34.8	259.3	3.8
变异来源 Source of variation
F值	S	168.78^**	2.92	46.10^**	3.99
F value	V	0.14	0.87	0.52	0.81
	S×V	0.78	0.40	1.12	0.57

盐逆境 Salt stress	品种 Variety	糙米率 Brown rice /％	精米率 Total milled rice /％	整精米率 Head rice /％	长宽比 Ratio of length to width	垩白米率 Chalky grain rate/％	垩白度 Chalkiness degree/％	蛋白质含量 Protein content /％	直链淀粉含量 Amylose content /％
S₀	V₁	84.35±0.38 b	72.24±0.68 c	62.55±5.26 a	1.74±0.03 a	30.10±1.89 c	9.53±0.66 b	8.64±0.37 b	14.25±0.70 a
	V₂	84.26±0.17 b	75.40±0.38 b	67.71±6.18 a	1.71±0.01 a	19.76±1.75 d	5.40±0.14 c	10.04±0.08 a	14.99±0.60 a
	V₃	85.76±0.42 a	77.24±0.66 a	67.73±1.64 a	1.62±0.03 b	100.00±0.00 a	60.31±0.97 a	8.56±0.09 b	1.90±0.96 c
	V₄	84.64±0.19 ab	75.41±0.43 b	62.06±5.66 a	1.49±0.02 c	48.35±3.55 b	12.69±1.17 b	9.75±0.09 a	8.94±0.39 b
平均 Average		84.75	75.07	54.38	16.40	49.55	21.95	9.24	10.02
S₁	V₁	83.64±0.75 a	73.55±1.09 b	42.09±2.36 b	1.72±0.06 a	17.81±2.78 c	5.56±1.28 c	10.05±0.54 c	11.62±1.24 a
	V₂	83.95±0.92 a	75.51±1.14 a	63.28±3.05 a	1.65±0.04 b	17.41±3.41 c	3.70±0.58 c	11.20±0.22 b	12.85±0.26 a
	V₃	83.27±0.76 a	74.37±0.83 ab	56.88±5.90 a	1.61±0.03 b	100.00±0.00 a	69.74±0.72 a	12.45±0.66 a	2.31±0.78 c
	V₄	83.91±0.25 a	74.51±0.75 ab	55.27±3.64 a	1.51±0.04 c	72.59±7.54 b	17.33±6.26 b	10.97±0.22 b	7.85±0.70 b
平均 Average		83.69	74.49	54.38	16.20	51.95	24.08	11.17	8.66
变异来源 Source of variation
F值	S	58.86^**	12.91^*	95.11^**	1.70	2.33	4.20	199.06^**	42.94^**
F value	V	1.16	17.86^**	11.87^**	59.53^**	1227.52^**	1310.12^**	26.96^**	357.43^**
	S×V	5.31^**	8.23^**	4.64^*	2.04	51.78^**	15.24^**	33.99^**	5.55^**