Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2025, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 399-411.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2025.240512
• Research Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
SHEN Zhida1, YU Qiuhua2, ZHANG Bin3, CAO Yudong1, WANG Shaohua4, WANG Hongfei5, WU Yongqing6, DAI Zhigang2, LI Xiaokun1,7,*()
Received:
2024-05-24
Revised:
2024-09-26
Online:
2025-05-10
Published:
2025-05-21
Contact:
*email:lixiaokun@mail.hzau.edu.cn
沈智达1, 余秋华2, 张斌3, 曹玉东1, 王少华4, 王红飞5, 伍永清6, 戴志刚2, 李小坤1,7,*()
通讯作者:
*email:lixiaokun@mail.hzau.edu.cn
基金资助:
SHEN Zhida, YU Qiuhua, ZHANG Bin, CAO Yudong, WANG Shaohua, WANG Hongfei, WU Yongqing, DAI Zhigang, LI Xiaokun. Effects of Phosphorus Fertilizer Application Rate on Grain Yield, Phosphorus Accumulation and Utilization of Direct-seeded Rice in Hubei Province[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2025, 39(3): 399-411.
沈智达, 余秋华, 张斌, 曹玉东, 王少华, 王红飞, 伍永清, 戴志刚, 李小坤. 磷肥施用量对湖北省直播水稻产量、磷素积累及利用率的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2025, 39(3): 399-411.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2025.240512
试验地点 Experimental site | 经纬度 Longitude and latitude | 水稻品种 Rice variety | 播种量 Seeding rate(kg/hm2) | 土壤基础理化性质 Soil physical and chemical properties | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH值 pH value | 有机质 Organic matter (g/kg) | 全氮 Total nitrogen (g/kg) | 速效磷 Available phosphorus (mg/kg) | 速效钾 Available potassium (mg/kg) | ||||
潜江 Qianjiang | 30°27′N, 112°37′E | 荃两优2118 Quanliangyou 2118 | 36.0 | 6.89 | 20.26 | 1.52 | 10.60 | 97.52 |
团风 Tuanfeng | 30°39′N, 114°52′E | 华珍115 Huazhen 115 | 60.0 | 5.70 | 28.40 | 1.33 | 15.35 | 98.21 |
大悟 Dawu | 31°58′N, 120°32′E | 隆两优3463 Longliangyou 3463 | 37.5 | 8.13 | 28.51 | 2.34 | 16.75 | 73.97 |
夷陵 Yiling | 30°38′N, 111°36′E | 荃两优丝苗 Quanliangyousimiao | 45.0 | 6.10 | 21.50 | 1.65 | 23.20 | 115.13 |
襄州 Xiangzhou | 32°04′N, 112°12′E | 粤禾丝苗 Yuehesimiao | 66.0 | 6.27 | 26.06 | 1.49 | 23.81 | 83.17 |
武穴 Wuxue | 29°51′N, 115°33′E | 黄华占 Huanghuazhan | 75.0 | 6.63 | 25.46 | 1.62 | 12.20 | 163.69 |
鄂州-1 Ezhou-1 | 30°04′N, 114°40′E | 鄂优丝苗 Eyousimiao | 75.0 | 7.60 | 19.02 | 1.11 | 22.55 | 90.07 |
鄂州-2 Ezhou-2 | 30°25′N, 114°44′E | 黄花粘 Huanghuazhan | 75.0 | 6.72 | 22.29 | 1.68 | 29.45 | 130.93 |
天门 Tianmen | 30°39′N, 113°01′E | 粤农丝苗 Yuenongsimiao | 60.0 | 7.57 | 18.54 | 1.33 | 34.20 | 183.20 |
沙洋 Shayang | 31°02′N, 112°12′E | 青香优香九 Qingxiangyouxiangjiu | 37.5 | 8.10 | 22.06 | 1.19 | 17.38 | 187.97 |
Table 1. Rice varieties, seeding rate and soil physical and chemical properties in each experimental site
试验地点 Experimental site | 经纬度 Longitude and latitude | 水稻品种 Rice variety | 播种量 Seeding rate(kg/hm2) | 土壤基础理化性质 Soil physical and chemical properties | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
pH值 pH value | 有机质 Organic matter (g/kg) | 全氮 Total nitrogen (g/kg) | 速效磷 Available phosphorus (mg/kg) | 速效钾 Available potassium (mg/kg) | ||||
潜江 Qianjiang | 30°27′N, 112°37′E | 荃两优2118 Quanliangyou 2118 | 36.0 | 6.89 | 20.26 | 1.52 | 10.60 | 97.52 |
团风 Tuanfeng | 30°39′N, 114°52′E | 华珍115 Huazhen 115 | 60.0 | 5.70 | 28.40 | 1.33 | 15.35 | 98.21 |
大悟 Dawu | 31°58′N, 120°32′E | 隆两优3463 Longliangyou 3463 | 37.5 | 8.13 | 28.51 | 2.34 | 16.75 | 73.97 |
夷陵 Yiling | 30°38′N, 111°36′E | 荃两优丝苗 Quanliangyousimiao | 45.0 | 6.10 | 21.50 | 1.65 | 23.20 | 115.13 |
襄州 Xiangzhou | 32°04′N, 112°12′E | 粤禾丝苗 Yuehesimiao | 66.0 | 6.27 | 26.06 | 1.49 | 23.81 | 83.17 |
武穴 Wuxue | 29°51′N, 115°33′E | 黄华占 Huanghuazhan | 75.0 | 6.63 | 25.46 | 1.62 | 12.20 | 163.69 |
鄂州-1 Ezhou-1 | 30°04′N, 114°40′E | 鄂优丝苗 Eyousimiao | 75.0 | 7.60 | 19.02 | 1.11 | 22.55 | 90.07 |
鄂州-2 Ezhou-2 | 30°25′N, 114°44′E | 黄花粘 Huanghuazhan | 75.0 | 6.72 | 22.29 | 1.68 | 29.45 | 130.93 |
天门 Tianmen | 30°39′N, 113°01′E | 粤农丝苗 Yuenongsimiao | 60.0 | 7.57 | 18.54 | 1.33 | 34.20 | 183.20 |
沙洋 Shayang | 31°02′N, 112°12′E | 青香优香九 Qingxiangyouxiangjiu | 37.5 | 8.10 | 22.06 | 1.19 | 17.38 | 187.97 |
F值 F value | 产量 Yield | 籽粒磷素含量 Seed phosphorus content | 秸秆磷素含量 Straw phosphorus content | 籽粒磷素积累量 Seed phosphorus accumulation | 秸秆磷素积累量 Straw phosphorus accumulation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
地点Site(S) | 920.27** | 29.81** | 111.56** | 65.41** | 86.68** |
磷肥用量Phosphorus fertilizer level(P) | 357.97** | 28.50** | 20.98** | 72.33** | 83.04** |
S×P | 10.69** | 0.83ns | 3.09** | 1.15ns | 3.62** |
F值 F value | 磷肥偏生产力 Partial productivity of phosphate fertilizer | 磷肥农学利用率Agronomic utilization of phosphate fertilizer | 磷肥回收利用率Recovery rate of phosphate fertilizer | 磷肥生理利用率 Phosphorus fertilizer physiological utilization | 磷素收获指数Phosphorus harvest index |
地点Site(S) | 590.17** | 51.10** | 15.81** | 8.89** | 14.58** |
磷肥用量Phosphorus fertilizer level(P) | 18827.46** | 23.48** | 45.21** | 0.86ns | 1.89ns |
S×P | 67.82** | 4.09** | 2.72* | 1.37ns | 1.50ns |
F值 F value | 产值 Output | 施磷肥增加产值 Increased production value | 纯收入 Net income | 产投比 Fertilizer output−input ratio | |
地点Site(S) | 920.27** | 49.49** | 920.27** | 886.52** | |
磷肥用量Phosphorus fertilizer level(P) | 357.97** | 73.31** | 210.90** | 702.06** | |
S×P | 10.69** | 3.45** | 10.69** | 19.04** |
Table 2 Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of effects of phosphorus fertilizer dosage on indicators of direct seeded rice
F值 F value | 产量 Yield | 籽粒磷素含量 Seed phosphorus content | 秸秆磷素含量 Straw phosphorus content | 籽粒磷素积累量 Seed phosphorus accumulation | 秸秆磷素积累量 Straw phosphorus accumulation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
地点Site(S) | 920.27** | 29.81** | 111.56** | 65.41** | 86.68** |
磷肥用量Phosphorus fertilizer level(P) | 357.97** | 28.50** | 20.98** | 72.33** | 83.04** |
S×P | 10.69** | 0.83ns | 3.09** | 1.15ns | 3.62** |
F值 F value | 磷肥偏生产力 Partial productivity of phosphate fertilizer | 磷肥农学利用率Agronomic utilization of phosphate fertilizer | 磷肥回收利用率Recovery rate of phosphate fertilizer | 磷肥生理利用率 Phosphorus fertilizer physiological utilization | 磷素收获指数Phosphorus harvest index |
地点Site(S) | 590.17** | 51.10** | 15.81** | 8.89** | 14.58** |
磷肥用量Phosphorus fertilizer level(P) | 18827.46** | 23.48** | 45.21** | 0.86ns | 1.89ns |
S×P | 67.82** | 4.09** | 2.72* | 1.37ns | 1.50ns |
F值 F value | 产值 Output | 施磷肥增加产值 Increased production value | 纯收入 Net income | 产投比 Fertilizer output−input ratio | |
地点Site(S) | 920.27** | 49.49** | 920.27** | 886.52** | |
磷肥用量Phosphorus fertilizer level(P) | 357.97** | 73.31** | 210.90** | 702.06** | |
S×P | 10.69** | 3.45** | 10.69** | 19.04** |
试验地点 Experimental site | 磷肥用量 Phosphorus fertilizer application rate | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
0 kg/hm2 | 45 kg/hm2 | 90 kg/hm2 | 135 kg/hm2 | |
潜江 Qianjiang | 5.92±0.37 c | 7.31±0.37 b | 8.57±0.45 a | 8.37±0.27 a |
团风 Tuanfeng | 9.88±0.08 c | 10.30±0.02 b | 10.69±0.08 a | 10.81±0.08 a |
大悟 Dawu | 5.53±0.21 c | 6.18±0.23 b | 6.87±0.21 a | 7.08±0.07 a |
夷陵 Yiling | 8.47±0.19 c | 9.76±0.23 b | 10.25±0.16 a | 10.03±0.24 ab |
襄州 Xiangzhou | 9.07±0.12 d | 9.33±0.10 c | 9.64±0.01 b | 10.17±0.11 a |
武穴 Wuxue | 8.21±0.33 d | 8.88±0.15 c | 9.45±0.06 b | 10.23±0.30 a |
鄂州-1 Ezhou-1 | 6.45±0.04 c | 7.08±0.07 b | 7.34±0.04 a | 7.28±0.09 a |
鄂州-2 Ezhou-2 | 7.89±0.05 c | 8.39±0.06 b | 8.55±0.03 ab | 8.77±0.06 a |
天门 Tianmen | 10.43±0.08 c | 11.21±0.06 b | 11.97±0.24 a | 12.18±0.13 a |
沙洋 Shayang | 8.92±0.03 c | 9.11±0.04 bc | 9.23±0.03 ab | 9.57±0.03 a |
平均值 Average | 8.08±1.60 b | 8.75±1.49 ab | 9.26±1.48 a | 9.45±1.54 a |
Table 3. Effect of phosphorus application rates on yield of direct-seeded rice t/hm2
试验地点 Experimental site | 磷肥用量 Phosphorus fertilizer application rate | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
0 kg/hm2 | 45 kg/hm2 | 90 kg/hm2 | 135 kg/hm2 | |
潜江 Qianjiang | 5.92±0.37 c | 7.31±0.37 b | 8.57±0.45 a | 8.37±0.27 a |
团风 Tuanfeng | 9.88±0.08 c | 10.30±0.02 b | 10.69±0.08 a | 10.81±0.08 a |
大悟 Dawu | 5.53±0.21 c | 6.18±0.23 b | 6.87±0.21 a | 7.08±0.07 a |
夷陵 Yiling | 8.47±0.19 c | 9.76±0.23 b | 10.25±0.16 a | 10.03±0.24 ab |
襄州 Xiangzhou | 9.07±0.12 d | 9.33±0.10 c | 9.64±0.01 b | 10.17±0.11 a |
武穴 Wuxue | 8.21±0.33 d | 8.88±0.15 c | 9.45±0.06 b | 10.23±0.30 a |
鄂州-1 Ezhou-1 | 6.45±0.04 c | 7.08±0.07 b | 7.34±0.04 a | 7.28±0.09 a |
鄂州-2 Ezhou-2 | 7.89±0.05 c | 8.39±0.06 b | 8.55±0.03 ab | 8.77±0.06 a |
天门 Tianmen | 10.43±0.08 c | 11.21±0.06 b | 11.97±0.24 a | 12.18±0.13 a |
沙洋 Shayang | 8.92±0.03 c | 9.11±0.04 bc | 9.23±0.03 ab | 9.57±0.03 a |
平均值 Average | 8.08±1.60 b | 8.75±1.49 ab | 9.26±1.48 a | 9.45±1.54 a |
部位 Position | 施磷量 Phosphorus application rates(kg/hm2) | 平均值 Mean | 标准偏差 Standard deviation | 最小值 Minimum | 1/4位点 First quartile | 中位数 Median | 3/4位点 Third quartile | 最大值 Maximum |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
籽粒 Seed | 0 | 0.18 b | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.25 |
45 | 0.21 a | 0.03 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.27 | |
90 | 0.22 a | 0.04 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.28 | |
135 | 0.23 a | 0.04 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.29 | |
秸秆 Straw | 0 | 0.11 a | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.24 |
45 | 0.12 a | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.24 | |
90 | 0.13 a | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.25 | |
135 | 0.13 a | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.19 | 0.28 |
Table 4. Descriptive statistics of phosphorus nutrient content (%) in direct-seeded rice under phosphorus application rates
部位 Position | 施磷量 Phosphorus application rates(kg/hm2) | 平均值 Mean | 标准偏差 Standard deviation | 最小值 Minimum | 1/4位点 First quartile | 中位数 Median | 3/4位点 Third quartile | 最大值 Maximum |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
籽粒 Seed | 0 | 0.18 b | 0.04 | 0.11 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.25 |
45 | 0.21 a | 0.03 | 0.15 | 0.18 | 0.21 | 0.24 | 0.27 | |
90 | 0.22 a | 0.04 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.26 | 0.28 | |
135 | 0.23 a | 0.04 | 0.16 | 0.19 | 0.24 | 0.26 | 0.29 | |
秸秆 Straw | 0 | 0.11 a | 0.06 | 0.01 | 0.05 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.24 |
45 | 0.12 a | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.12 | 0.17 | 0.24 | |
90 | 0.13 a | 0.07 | 0.02 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.17 | 0.25 | |
135 | 0.13 a | 0.07 | 0.05 | 0.07 | 0.12 | 0.19 | 0.28 |
Fig. 2. Effects of phosphorus application rates on phosphorus accumulation in direct-seeded rice Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences in phosphorus accumulation among the four treatments at an experimental site; S refers site and P refers phosphate fertilizer level.
试验地点 Experimental site | 施磷量 Phosphorus application(kg/hm2) | 磷肥偏生产力 Partial productivity of phosphate fertilizer(kg/kg) | 磷肥农学利用率 Agronomic utilization of phosphate fertilizer(kg/kg) | 磷肥回收利用率 Recovery rate of phosphate fertilizer(%) | 磷肥生理利用率 Phosphorus fertilizer physiological utilization(kg/kg) | 磷素收获指数 Phosphorus harvest index(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
潜江 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0.50±0.02 a |
Qianjiang | 45 | 162.44±8.28 a | 30.98±9.35 a | 36.31±5.49 a | 70.59±13.74 a | 0.61±0.01 a |
90 | 95.26±5.04 b | 29.52±6.42 a | 25.61±4.24 b | 137.87±86.06 a | 0.73±0.24 a | |
135 | 61.97±1.97 c | 18.14±0.92 a | 21.72±1.05 b | 101.64±60.04 a | 0.60±0.09 a | |
团风 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0.62±0.04 a |
Tuanfeng | 45 | 228.85±0.36 a | 9.30±1.80 a | 33.46±3.06 a | 28.09±7.24 a | 0.64±0.00 a |
90 | 118.81±0.86 b | 9.04±1.51 a | 26.56±2.20 b | 33.96±3.85 a | 0.66±0.03 a | |
135 | 80.04±0.62 c | 6.85±1.11 a | 18.75±1.94 c | 36.41±2.20 a | 0.62±0.03 a | |
大悟 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0.48±0.01 b |
Dawu | 45 | 137.41±5.01 a | 14.44±1.11 a | 28.29±5.84 a | 52.15±8.04 a | 0.53±0.01 a |
90 | 76.30±2.31 b | 14.81±3.21 a | 24.49±6.70 a | 61.28±5.98 a | 0.53±0.02 a | |
135 | 52.43±0.50 c | 11.44±1.43 a | 21.89±3.47 a | 53.20±10.59 a | 0.49±0.03 b | |
夷陵 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0.65±0.01 a |
Yiling | 45 | 216.88±5.05 a | 28.75±0.76 a | 31.43±5.84 a | 84.14±11.66 a | 0.65±0.03 a |
90 | 113.91±1.77 b | 19.84±0.65 b | 23.15±1.17 b | 78.17±4.36 a | 0.66±0.02 a | |
135 | 74.27±1.80 c | 11.57±3.22 c | 21.21±1.52 b | 50.78±10.09 b | 0.63±0.01 a | |
襄州 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0.67±0.04 c |
Xiangzhou | 45 | 207.28±2.26 a | 5.65±1.04 b | 31.39±7.30 a | 18.75±6.06 b | 0.68±0.02 ab |
90 | 107.15±0.06 b | 6.33±1.37 ab | 25.69±6.59 ab | 25.31±6.00 b | 0.61±0.02 b | |
135 | 75.33±0.78 c | 8.12±0.95 a | 14.03±5.68 b | 65.17±27.83 a | 0.73±0.01 a | |
武穴 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0.52±0.02 a |
Wuxue | 45 | 197.33±3.33 a | 14.92±4.06 a | 18.96±2.48 a | 79.54±14.89 a | 0.49±0.01 a |
90 | 104.95±0.68 b | 13.75±3.97 a | 19.00±3.87 a | 76.05±10.71 a | 0.49±0.11 a | |
135 | 75.75±2.22 c | 14.94±4.46 a | 19.44±2.98 a | 77.09±12.26 a | 0.54±0.02 a | |
鄂州-1 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0.61±0.05 a |
Ezhou-1 | 45 | 157.30±1.47 a | 13.89±2.01 a | 15.86±1.07 a | 79.39±7.29 a | 0.61±0.05 a |
90 | 81.52±0.42 b | 9.82±0.90 b | 16.06±0.83 a | 57.28±7.08 b | 0.61±0.02 a | |
135 | 53.92±0.67 c | 6.11±0.81 b | 8.74±1.59 b | 66.07±10.17 ab | 0.61±0.03 a | |
鄂州-2 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0.50±0.04 a |
Ezhou-2 | 45 | 186.51±1.25 a | 11.21±1.16 a | 39.57±2.37 a | 28.43±3.62 a | 0.53±0.04 a |
90 | 95.05±0.28 b | 7.40±0.33 ab | 20.76±3.50 b | 36.35±6.41 a | 0.55±0.06 a | |
135 | 64.99±0.45 c | 6.56±0.10 b | 19.27±5.69 b | 36.46±9.43 a | 0.51±0.04 a | |
天门 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0.56±0.02 a |
Tianmen | 45 | 249.07±1.40 a | 17.22±0.56 a | 36.21±9.27 a | 49.73±9.81 a | 0.56±0.05 a |
90 | 133.01±2.62 b | 17.09±3.27 a | 29.89±2.81 ab | 57.93±10.6 a | 0.56±0.03 a | |
135 | 90.19±0.95 c | 12.91±0.88 b | 21.05±1.81 b | 61.79±8.69 a | 0.58±0.04 a | |
沙洋 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0.56±0.03 a |
Shayang | 45 | 202.55±0.91 a | 4.40±0.31 a | 10.61±2.48 a | 39.28±9.96 a | 0.59±0.02 a |
90 | 102.59±0.32 b | 3.52±0.32 a | 9.37±2.81 a | 36.75±9.77 a | 0.59±0.03 a | |
135 | 70.86±0.21 c | 4.81±0.37 a | 9.77±1.41 a | 44.90±8.19 a | 0.58±0.05 a |
Table 5. Effect of phosphorus application rates on phosphorus use efficiency in direct-seeded rice
试验地点 Experimental site | 施磷量 Phosphorus application(kg/hm2) | 磷肥偏生产力 Partial productivity of phosphate fertilizer(kg/kg) | 磷肥农学利用率 Agronomic utilization of phosphate fertilizer(kg/kg) | 磷肥回收利用率 Recovery rate of phosphate fertilizer(%) | 磷肥生理利用率 Phosphorus fertilizer physiological utilization(kg/kg) | 磷素收获指数 Phosphorus harvest index(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
潜江 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0.50±0.02 a |
Qianjiang | 45 | 162.44±8.28 a | 30.98±9.35 a | 36.31±5.49 a | 70.59±13.74 a | 0.61±0.01 a |
90 | 95.26±5.04 b | 29.52±6.42 a | 25.61±4.24 b | 137.87±86.06 a | 0.73±0.24 a | |
135 | 61.97±1.97 c | 18.14±0.92 a | 21.72±1.05 b | 101.64±60.04 a | 0.60±0.09 a | |
团风 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0.62±0.04 a |
Tuanfeng | 45 | 228.85±0.36 a | 9.30±1.80 a | 33.46±3.06 a | 28.09±7.24 a | 0.64±0.00 a |
90 | 118.81±0.86 b | 9.04±1.51 a | 26.56±2.20 b | 33.96±3.85 a | 0.66±0.03 a | |
135 | 80.04±0.62 c | 6.85±1.11 a | 18.75±1.94 c | 36.41±2.20 a | 0.62±0.03 a | |
大悟 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0.48±0.01 b |
Dawu | 45 | 137.41±5.01 a | 14.44±1.11 a | 28.29±5.84 a | 52.15±8.04 a | 0.53±0.01 a |
90 | 76.30±2.31 b | 14.81±3.21 a | 24.49±6.70 a | 61.28±5.98 a | 0.53±0.02 a | |
135 | 52.43±0.50 c | 11.44±1.43 a | 21.89±3.47 a | 53.20±10.59 a | 0.49±0.03 b | |
夷陵 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0.65±0.01 a |
Yiling | 45 | 216.88±5.05 a | 28.75±0.76 a | 31.43±5.84 a | 84.14±11.66 a | 0.65±0.03 a |
90 | 113.91±1.77 b | 19.84±0.65 b | 23.15±1.17 b | 78.17±4.36 a | 0.66±0.02 a | |
135 | 74.27±1.80 c | 11.57±3.22 c | 21.21±1.52 b | 50.78±10.09 b | 0.63±0.01 a | |
襄州 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0.67±0.04 c |
Xiangzhou | 45 | 207.28±2.26 a | 5.65±1.04 b | 31.39±7.30 a | 18.75±6.06 b | 0.68±0.02 ab |
90 | 107.15±0.06 b | 6.33±1.37 ab | 25.69±6.59 ab | 25.31±6.00 b | 0.61±0.02 b | |
135 | 75.33±0.78 c | 8.12±0.95 a | 14.03±5.68 b | 65.17±27.83 a | 0.73±0.01 a | |
武穴 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0.52±0.02 a |
Wuxue | 45 | 197.33±3.33 a | 14.92±4.06 a | 18.96±2.48 a | 79.54±14.89 a | 0.49±0.01 a |
90 | 104.95±0.68 b | 13.75±3.97 a | 19.00±3.87 a | 76.05±10.71 a | 0.49±0.11 a | |
135 | 75.75±2.22 c | 14.94±4.46 a | 19.44±2.98 a | 77.09±12.26 a | 0.54±0.02 a | |
鄂州-1 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0.61±0.05 a |
Ezhou-1 | 45 | 157.30±1.47 a | 13.89±2.01 a | 15.86±1.07 a | 79.39±7.29 a | 0.61±0.05 a |
90 | 81.52±0.42 b | 9.82±0.90 b | 16.06±0.83 a | 57.28±7.08 b | 0.61±0.02 a | |
135 | 53.92±0.67 c | 6.11±0.81 b | 8.74±1.59 b | 66.07±10.17 ab | 0.61±0.03 a | |
鄂州-2 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0.50±0.04 a |
Ezhou-2 | 45 | 186.51±1.25 a | 11.21±1.16 a | 39.57±2.37 a | 28.43±3.62 a | 0.53±0.04 a |
90 | 95.05±0.28 b | 7.40±0.33 ab | 20.76±3.50 b | 36.35±6.41 a | 0.55±0.06 a | |
135 | 64.99±0.45 c | 6.56±0.10 b | 19.27±5.69 b | 36.46±9.43 a | 0.51±0.04 a | |
天门 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0.56±0.02 a |
Tianmen | 45 | 249.07±1.40 a | 17.22±0.56 a | 36.21±9.27 a | 49.73±9.81 a | 0.56±0.05 a |
90 | 133.01±2.62 b | 17.09±3.27 a | 29.89±2.81 ab | 57.93±10.6 a | 0.56±0.03 a | |
135 | 90.19±0.95 c | 12.91±0.88 b | 21.05±1.81 b | 61.79±8.69 a | 0.58±0.04 a | |
沙洋 | 0 | - | - | - | - | 0.56±0.03 a |
Shayang | 45 | 202.55±0.91 a | 4.40±0.31 a | 10.61±2.48 a | 39.28±9.96 a | 0.59±0.02 a |
90 | 102.59±0.32 b | 3.52±0.32 a | 9.37±2.81 a | 36.75±9.77 a | 0.59±0.03 a | |
135 | 70.86±0.21 c | 4.81±0.37 a | 9.77±1.41 a | 44.90±8.19 a | 0.58±0.05 a |
试验地点 Experimental site | 施磷量 Phosphorus application (kg/hm2) | 产值 Output (×103 Yuan/hm2) | 施磷肥增加产值 Increased production value (×103 Yuan/hm2) | 施肥成本 Fertilization cost (×103 Yuan/hm2) | 纯收入 Net income (×103 Yuan/hm2) | 产投比 Fertilizer output−input ratio(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
潜江 | 0 | 16.57±1.03 c | 0 | 1.31 | 14.56±1.03 c | 8.24±0.51 a |
Qianjiang | 45 | 20.47±1.04 b | 3.90±1.18 b | 1.63 | 18.14±1.04 b | 8.78±0.45 a |
90 | 24.01±1.27 a | 7.44±1.62 a | 1.95 | 21.36±1.27 a | 9.06±0.48 a | |
135 | 23.42±0.74 a | 6.86±0.35 a | 2.27 | 20.45±0.74 a | 7.89±0.25 b | |
团风 | 0 | 27.66±0.22 c | 0 | 1.31 | 25.65±0.22 c | 13.76±0.11 a |
Tuanfeng | 45 | 28.84±0.05 b | 1.17±0.23 b | 1.63 | 26.51±0.05 b | 12.38±0.02 b |
90 | 29.94±0.22 a | 2.28±0.38 a | 1.95 | 27.29±0.22 a | 11.30±0.08 c | |
135 | 30.25±0.23 a | 2.59±0.42 a | 2.27 | 27.28±0.23 a | 10.19±0.08 d | |
大悟 | 0 | 15.49±0.58 c | 0 | 1.31 | 13.48±0.58 c | 7.71±0.29 a |
Dawu | 45 | 17.31±0.63 b | 1.82±0.14 b | 1.63 | 14.98±0.63 b | 7.43±0.27 b |
90 | 19.23±0.58 a | 3.73±0.81 a | 1.95 | 16.58±0.58 a | 7.26±0.22 c | |
135 | 19.82±0.19 a | 4.33±0.54 a | 2.27 | 16.85±0.19 a | 6.67±0.06 d | |
夷陵 | 0 | 23.70±0.54 c | 0 | 1.31 | 21.69±0.54 b | 11.79±0.27 a |
Yiling | 45 | 27.33±0.64 b | 3.62±0.10 a | 1.63 | 25.00±0.64 a | 11.73±0.27 b |
90 | 28.70±0.44 a | 5.00±0.16 a | 1.95 | 26.05±0.44 a | 10.83±0.17 c | |
135 | 28.08±0.68 ab | 4.37±1.22 a | 2.27 | 25.11±0.68 a | 9.45±0.23 d | |
襄州 | 0 | 25.41±0.34 d | 0 | 1.31 | 23.40±0.34 d | 12.64±0.17 a |
Xiangzhou | 45 | 26.12±0.28 c | 0.71±0.13 c | 1.63 | 23.79±0.28 c | 11.21±0.12 b |
90 | 27.00±0.02 b | 1.60±0.35 b | 1.95 | 24.35±0.02 b | 10.19±0.01 c | |
135 | 28.47±0.30 a | 3.07±0.06 a | 2.27 | 25.50±0.30 a | 9.59±0.10 d | |
武穴 | 0 | 22.98±0.92 d | 0 | 1.31 | 20.97±0.92 d | 11.43±0.46 a |
Wuxue | 45 | 24.86±0.42 c | 1.88±0.51 b | 1.63 | 22.53±0.42 c | 10.67±0.18 b |
90 | 26.45±0.17 b | 3.46±1.00 ab | 1.95 | 23.80±0.17 b | 9.98±0.06 c | |
135 | 28.63±0.84 a | 5.65±1.68 a | 2.27 | 25.66±0.84 a | 9.64±0.28 d | |
鄂州-1 | 0 | 18.07±0.12 c | 0 | 1.31 | 16.06±0.12 b | 8.99±0.06 a |
Ezhou-1 | 45 | 19.82±0.19 b | 1.75±0.25 b | 1.63 | 17.49±0.19 a | 8.51±0.08 b |
90 | 20.54±0.11 a | 2.47±0.23 a | 1.95 | 17.89±0.11 a | 7.75±0.04 c | |
135 | 20.38±0.25 a | 2.31±0.31 a | 2.27 | 17.41±0.25 a | 6.86±0.08 d | |
鄂州-2 | 0 | 22.09±0.15 d | 0 | 1.31 | 20.08±0.15 d | 10.99±0.07 a |
Ezhou-2 | 45 | 23.50±0.16 c | 1.41±0.15 b | 1.63 | 21.17±0.16 c | 10.09±0.07 b |
90 | 23.95±0.07 b | 1.87±0.08 a | 1.95 | 21.30±0.07 b | 9.04±0.03 c | |
135 | 24.57±0.17 a | 2.48±0.04 a | 2.27 | 21.60±0.17 a | 8.27±0.06 d | |
天门 | 0 | 29.21±0.21 c | 0 | 1.31 | 27.20±0.21 c | 14.53±0.11 a |
Tianmen | 45 | 31.38±0.18 b | 2.17±0.07 b | 1.63 | 29.05±0.18 b | 13.47±0.08 b |
90 | 33.52±0.66 a | 4.31±0.82 a | 1.95 | 30.87±0.66 a | 12.65±0.25 c | |
135 | 34.09±0.36 a | 4.88±0.33 a | 2.27 | 31.12±0.36 a | 11.48±0.12 d | |
沙洋 | 0 | 24.97±0.08 d | 0 | 1.31 | 22.96±0.08 c | 12.42±0.04 a |
Shayang | 45 | 25.52±0.11 c | 0.55±0.04 c | 1.63 | 23.19±0.11 b | 10.95±0.05 b |
90 | 25.85±0.08 b | 0.89±0.08 b | 1.95 | 23.20±0.08 b | 9.76±0.03 c | |
135 | 26.79±0.08 a | 1.82±0.14 a | 2.27 | 23.82±0.08 a | 9.02±0.03 d |
Table 6. Effect of phosphorus application rates on economic benefit of direct-seeded rice
试验地点 Experimental site | 施磷量 Phosphorus application (kg/hm2) | 产值 Output (×103 Yuan/hm2) | 施磷肥增加产值 Increased production value (×103 Yuan/hm2) | 施肥成本 Fertilization cost (×103 Yuan/hm2) | 纯收入 Net income (×103 Yuan/hm2) | 产投比 Fertilizer output−input ratio(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
潜江 | 0 | 16.57±1.03 c | 0 | 1.31 | 14.56±1.03 c | 8.24±0.51 a |
Qianjiang | 45 | 20.47±1.04 b | 3.90±1.18 b | 1.63 | 18.14±1.04 b | 8.78±0.45 a |
90 | 24.01±1.27 a | 7.44±1.62 a | 1.95 | 21.36±1.27 a | 9.06±0.48 a | |
135 | 23.42±0.74 a | 6.86±0.35 a | 2.27 | 20.45±0.74 a | 7.89±0.25 b | |
团风 | 0 | 27.66±0.22 c | 0 | 1.31 | 25.65±0.22 c | 13.76±0.11 a |
Tuanfeng | 45 | 28.84±0.05 b | 1.17±0.23 b | 1.63 | 26.51±0.05 b | 12.38±0.02 b |
90 | 29.94±0.22 a | 2.28±0.38 a | 1.95 | 27.29±0.22 a | 11.30±0.08 c | |
135 | 30.25±0.23 a | 2.59±0.42 a | 2.27 | 27.28±0.23 a | 10.19±0.08 d | |
大悟 | 0 | 15.49±0.58 c | 0 | 1.31 | 13.48±0.58 c | 7.71±0.29 a |
Dawu | 45 | 17.31±0.63 b | 1.82±0.14 b | 1.63 | 14.98±0.63 b | 7.43±0.27 b |
90 | 19.23±0.58 a | 3.73±0.81 a | 1.95 | 16.58±0.58 a | 7.26±0.22 c | |
135 | 19.82±0.19 a | 4.33±0.54 a | 2.27 | 16.85±0.19 a | 6.67±0.06 d | |
夷陵 | 0 | 23.70±0.54 c | 0 | 1.31 | 21.69±0.54 b | 11.79±0.27 a |
Yiling | 45 | 27.33±0.64 b | 3.62±0.10 a | 1.63 | 25.00±0.64 a | 11.73±0.27 b |
90 | 28.70±0.44 a | 5.00±0.16 a | 1.95 | 26.05±0.44 a | 10.83±0.17 c | |
135 | 28.08±0.68 ab | 4.37±1.22 a | 2.27 | 25.11±0.68 a | 9.45±0.23 d | |
襄州 | 0 | 25.41±0.34 d | 0 | 1.31 | 23.40±0.34 d | 12.64±0.17 a |
Xiangzhou | 45 | 26.12±0.28 c | 0.71±0.13 c | 1.63 | 23.79±0.28 c | 11.21±0.12 b |
90 | 27.00±0.02 b | 1.60±0.35 b | 1.95 | 24.35±0.02 b | 10.19±0.01 c | |
135 | 28.47±0.30 a | 3.07±0.06 a | 2.27 | 25.50±0.30 a | 9.59±0.10 d | |
武穴 | 0 | 22.98±0.92 d | 0 | 1.31 | 20.97±0.92 d | 11.43±0.46 a |
Wuxue | 45 | 24.86±0.42 c | 1.88±0.51 b | 1.63 | 22.53±0.42 c | 10.67±0.18 b |
90 | 26.45±0.17 b | 3.46±1.00 ab | 1.95 | 23.80±0.17 b | 9.98±0.06 c | |
135 | 28.63±0.84 a | 5.65±1.68 a | 2.27 | 25.66±0.84 a | 9.64±0.28 d | |
鄂州-1 | 0 | 18.07±0.12 c | 0 | 1.31 | 16.06±0.12 b | 8.99±0.06 a |
Ezhou-1 | 45 | 19.82±0.19 b | 1.75±0.25 b | 1.63 | 17.49±0.19 a | 8.51±0.08 b |
90 | 20.54±0.11 a | 2.47±0.23 a | 1.95 | 17.89±0.11 a | 7.75±0.04 c | |
135 | 20.38±0.25 a | 2.31±0.31 a | 2.27 | 17.41±0.25 a | 6.86±0.08 d | |
鄂州-2 | 0 | 22.09±0.15 d | 0 | 1.31 | 20.08±0.15 d | 10.99±0.07 a |
Ezhou-2 | 45 | 23.50±0.16 c | 1.41±0.15 b | 1.63 | 21.17±0.16 c | 10.09±0.07 b |
90 | 23.95±0.07 b | 1.87±0.08 a | 1.95 | 21.30±0.07 b | 9.04±0.03 c | |
135 | 24.57±0.17 a | 2.48±0.04 a | 2.27 | 21.60±0.17 a | 8.27±0.06 d | |
天门 | 0 | 29.21±0.21 c | 0 | 1.31 | 27.20±0.21 c | 14.53±0.11 a |
Tianmen | 45 | 31.38±0.18 b | 2.17±0.07 b | 1.63 | 29.05±0.18 b | 13.47±0.08 b |
90 | 33.52±0.66 a | 4.31±0.82 a | 1.95 | 30.87±0.66 a | 12.65±0.25 c | |
135 | 34.09±0.36 a | 4.88±0.33 a | 2.27 | 31.12±0.36 a | 11.48±0.12 d | |
沙洋 | 0 | 24.97±0.08 d | 0 | 1.31 | 22.96±0.08 c | 12.42±0.04 a |
Shayang | 45 | 25.52±0.11 c | 0.55±0.04 c | 1.63 | 23.19±0.11 b | 10.95±0.05 b |
90 | 25.85±0.08 b | 0.89±0.08 b | 1.95 | 23.20±0.08 b | 9.76±0.03 c | |
135 | 26.79±0.08 a | 1.82±0.14 a | 2.27 | 23.82±0.08 a | 9.02±0.03 d |
试验地点 Experimental site | 肥料效应方程 Fertilizer effect equation | 相关系数 Coefficient | 磷肥推荐用量 Recommended amount of phosphate fertilizer(kg/hm2) | 理论产量 Theoretical yield(t/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
潜江 Qianjiang | y=0.031x+5.916(x≤82) y=8.366(x>82) | 0.919** | 82 | 8.37 |
团风 Tuanfeng | y=0.009x+9.88(x≤101) y=10.749(x>101) | 0.976** | 97 | 10.75 |
大悟 Dawu | y=0.014x +5.533(x≤104) y =6.972(x>104) | 0.939** | 104 | 6.98 |
夷陵 Yiling | y =0.029x +8.466(x≤58) y =10.027(x>58) | 0.930** | 58 | 10.03 |
襄州 Xiangzhou | y =0.00752x +8.967 | 0.930* | - | - |
武穴 Wuxue | y =0.01377x +8.219 | 0.989** | - | - |
鄂州-1 Ezhou-1 | y =0.014x +6.453(x≤62) y =7.279(x>62) | 0.975** | 62 | 7.28 |
鄂州-2 Ezhou-2 | y =0.011x +7.888(x≤70) y =8.664(x>70) | 0.774** | 70 | 8.66 |
天门 Tianmen | y =0.016x +10.433(x≤103) y =12.176(x>103) | 0.969** | 103 | 12.18 |
沙洋 Shayang | y =0.00461x +8.895 | 0.959** | - | - |
Table 7. Rice phosphorus fertilizer effect equation and corresponding phosphorus application level
试验地点 Experimental site | 肥料效应方程 Fertilizer effect equation | 相关系数 Coefficient | 磷肥推荐用量 Recommended amount of phosphate fertilizer(kg/hm2) | 理论产量 Theoretical yield(t/hm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|
潜江 Qianjiang | y=0.031x+5.916(x≤82) y=8.366(x>82) | 0.919** | 82 | 8.37 |
团风 Tuanfeng | y=0.009x+9.88(x≤101) y=10.749(x>101) | 0.976** | 97 | 10.75 |
大悟 Dawu | y=0.014x +5.533(x≤104) y =6.972(x>104) | 0.939** | 104 | 6.98 |
夷陵 Yiling | y =0.029x +8.466(x≤58) y =10.027(x>58) | 0.930** | 58 | 10.03 |
襄州 Xiangzhou | y =0.00752x +8.967 | 0.930* | - | - |
武穴 Wuxue | y =0.01377x +8.219 | 0.989** | - | - |
鄂州-1 Ezhou-1 | y =0.014x +6.453(x≤62) y =7.279(x>62) | 0.975** | 62 | 7.28 |
鄂州-2 Ezhou-2 | y =0.011x +7.888(x≤70) y =8.664(x>70) | 0.774** | 70 | 8.66 |
天门 Tianmen | y =0.016x +10.433(x≤103) y =12.176(x>103) | 0.969** | 103 | 12.18 |
沙洋 Shayang | y =0.00461x +8.895 | 0.959** | - | - |
[1] | 赵正洪, 戴力, 黄见良, 潘晓华, 游艾青, 赵全志, 陈光辉, 周政, 胡文彬, 纪龙. 长江中游稻区水稻产业发展现状、问题与建议[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(6): 553-564. |
Zhao Z H, Dai L, Huang J L, Pan X H, You A Q, Zhao Q Z, Chen G H, Zhou Z, Hu W B, Ji L. Status, problems and solutions in rice industry development in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2019, 33(6): 553-564. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 张怡, 曹宁, 王金明, 孙强. 磷肥调控对直播水稻产量及磷肥利用率的影响[J]. 北方水稻, 2021, 51(6): 10-13. |
Zhang Y, Cao N, Wang J M, Sun Q. Effects of phosphate fertilizer on grain yield and phosphorus use efficiency in direct-seeding rice[J]. North Rice, 2021, 51(6): 10-13. (in Chinese) | |
[3] | 都江雪, 柳开楼, 黄晶, 韩天富, 王远鹏, 李冬初, 李亚贞, 马常宝, 薛彦东, 张会民. 中国稻田土壤有效磷时空演变特征及其对磷平衡的响应[J]. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(2): 476-486. |
Du J X, Liu K L, Huang J, Han T F, Wang Y P, Li D C, Li Y Z, Ma C B, Xue Y D, Zhang H M. Spatio-temporal Evolution Characteristics of Soil Available Phosphorus and Its Response to Phosphorus Balance in Paddy Soil in China[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2021, 58(2): 476-486. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 徐新朋, 王秀斌, 李大明, 柳开楼, 余喜初, 梁国庆, 何萍, 周卫. 双季稻最佳磷肥和钾肥用量与密度组合研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2016, 22(3): 598-608. |
Xu X P, Wang X B, Li D M, Liu K L, Yu X C, Liang G Q, He P, Zhou W. Optimum combination of phosphorus,potassium and density for double-rice systems[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2016, 22(3): 598-608. (in Chinese) | |
[5] | 江尚焘, 王火焰, 周健民, 刘晓伟, 陈照明, 严陶韬. 磷肥施用对水稻生长和磷素吸收的影响[J]. 土壤, 2016, 48(6): 1085-1091. |
Jiang S T, Wang H Y, Zhou J M, Liu X W, Chen Z M, Yan T T. Effects of application methods of phosphorus fertilizers on the growth and phosphorus absorption of rice in Jiangyan and Guangde regions[J]. Soils, 2016, 48(6): 1085-1091. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | Fu J, Jian Y W, Wu Y L, Chen D J, Zhao X, Ma Y H, Niu S W, Wang Y F, Zhang F L, Xu C X, Wang S, Zhai L M, Zhou F. Nationwide estimates of nitrogen and phosphorus losses via runoff from rice paddies using data-constrained model simulations[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2021, 279: 123642. |
[7] | Saleque M A, Abedin M J, Bhuiyan N I, Zaman S K, Panaullah G M. Long-term effects of inorganic and organic fertilizer sources on yield and nutrient accumulation of lowland rice[J]. Field Crops Research, 2004, 86(1): 53-65. |
[8] | Ameer S, Ibrahim H, Kulsoom F N U, Ameer G, Sher M. Real-time detection and measurements of nitrogen, phosphorous & potassium from soil samples: A comprehensive review[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2024, 24(7): 2565-2583. |
[9] | Gui R, Mo Z, Zeng S, Wen Z, Long W. Effects of mechanized, deep application of slow-release fertilizer on yield and nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium utilization of direct-seeded rice[J]. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2023, 42(3): 1604-1613. |
[10] | Bindraban P S, Dimkpa C O, Pandey R. Exploring phosphorus fertilizers and fertilization strategies for improved human and environmental health[J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2020, 56(3): 299-317. |
[11] | Minarsih S, Praptana R H, Sahara D, Supriyo A. Effectiveness of bio-phosphate fertilizer on growth performance and production of irrigated lowland rice[J]. BIO Web of Conferences, 2023, 69: 2006. |
[12] | Wendimu A, Yoseph T, Ayalew T. Ditching phosphatic fertilizers for phosphate-solubilizing biofertilizers: A step towards sustainable agriculture and environmental health[J]. Sustainability-Basel, 2023, 15 (2): 1713. |
[13] | 王伟妮, 鲁剑巍, 鲁明星, 戴志刚, 李小坤. 水田土壤肥力现状及变化规律分析——以湖北省为例[J]. 土壤学报, 2012, 49(2): 319-330. |
Wang W N, Lu J W, Lu M X, Dai Z G, Li X K. Status quo and variation of soil fertility in paddy field-a case study of Hubei province.[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2012, 49(2): 319-330. (in Chinese) | |
[14] | Wang X X, Liu S, Zhang S, Li H, Maimaitiaili B, Feng G, Rengel Z. Localized ammonium and phosphorus fertilization can improve cotton lint yield by decreasing rhizosphere soil pH and salinity[J]. Field Crops Research, 2018, 217: 75-81. |
[15] | Mehmet Y, Kaleli A, Çorapsiz M F. Machine learning based dynamic super twisting sliding mode controller for increase speed and accuracy of MPPT using real-time data under PSCs[J]. Renewable Energy, 2023, 219(1): 119470. |
[16] | 卜容燕, 任涛, 鲁剑巍, 李小坤, 丛日环, 李云春, 汪洋, 鲁君明. 水稻-油菜轮作条件下磷肥效应研究[J]. 中国农业科学, 2014, 47(6): 1227-1234. |
Bu R Y, Ren T, Lu J W, Li X K, Cong R H, Li Y C, Wang Y, Lu J M. Analysis of P fertilizer efficiency under rice-rapeseed rotation system[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2014, 47(6): 1227-1234. (in Chinese) | |
[17] | 龚金龙, 张洪程, 李杰, 常勇, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 李德剑, 李炳维, 沙安勤, 周有炎, 罗学超, 朱镇. 施磷量对超级稻南粳44产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(4): 447-451. |
Gong J L, Zhang H C, Li J, Chang Y, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Li D J, Li B W, Sha A Q, Zhou Y Y, Luo X C, Zhu Z. Effects of phosphorus levels on grain yield and quality of super rice Nanjing 44[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2011, 25(4): 447-451. (in Chinese) | |
[18] | Yan X J, Chen X H, Zhang S W, Muneer M A, Xu X Z, Ma C C, Cai Y Y, Cui Z L, Chen X P, Wu L Q, Zhang F S. Fertilization as the most critical factor affecting yield response and agronomic efficiency of phosphorus in Chinese rice production: Evidence from multi-location field trials[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2023, 103(15): 7816-7828. |
[19] | Cavagnaro T R, Bender S F, Asghari H R, van der Heijden M G A. The role of arbuscular mycorrhizas in reducing soil nutrient loss[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2015, 20(5): 283-290. |
[20] | Li P, Zhang T L, Wang X X, Yu D S. Development of biological soil quality indicator system for subtropical China[J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2013, 126: 112-118. |
[21] | 闫金垚, 鲁君明, 侯文峰, 李小坤. 磷肥用量对不同水稻品种产量和磷肥利用率的影响[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2018, 20(8): 74-81. |
Yan J Y, Lu J M, Hou W F, Li X K. Influence of Phosphorus Application Dosage on the Yield and Phosphorus Recovery Efficiency of Different Rice Varieties[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2018, 20(8): 74-81. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | Yan J Y, Ren T, Wang K K, Li H Z, Li X K, Cong R H, Lu J W. Improved crop yield and phosphorus uptake through the optimization of phosphorus fertilizer rates in an oilseed rape-rice cropping system[J]. Field Crops Research, 2022, 286: 108614. |
[23] | Chaudhary M I, Adu-Gyamfi J J, Saneoka H, Nguyen N T, Suwa R, Kanai S, El-Shemy H A, Lightfoot D A, Fujita K. The effect of phosphorus deficiency on nutrient uptake, nitrogen fixation and photosynthetic rate in mashbean, mungbean and soybean[J]. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum, 2008, 30(4): 537-544. |
[24] | 郭鑫年, 孙娇, 梁锦绣, 周涛, 田旭东, 陈刚. 栽培方式与施磷量对水稻养分累积、分配及磷素平衡的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017(4): 104-111. |
Guo X N, Sun J, Liang J X, Zhou T, Tian X D, Chen G. Cultivation way and phosphorus fertilizer on rice nutrient accumulation, distribution and soil phosphorus balance[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2017(4): 104-111. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 李雨阳, 李浩晶, 郝威名, 赵喜辉, 曹静, 徐国伟. 施磷量对不同耐低磷型水稻品质及淀粉合成酶活性的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2024, 32(5): 816-826. |
Li Y Y, Li H J, Hao W M, Zhao X H, Cao J, Xu G W. Effects of phosphorus fertilizer rate on grain quality and starch synthase activity of different low-phosphorus tolerance varieties of rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture (in English and Chinese), 2024, 32(5): 816-826. | |
[26] | Luo T, Zhu Y J, Lu W D, Chen L L, Min T, Li J H, Wei C Z. Acidic compost tea enhances phosphorus availability and cotton yield in calcareous soils by decreasing soil pH[J]. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section B: Soil & Plant Science, 2021, 71 (8): 657-666. |
[27] | Ju C X, Buresh R J, Wang Z Q, Zhang H, Liu L J, Yang J C, Zhang J H. Root and shoot traits for rice varieties with higher grain yield and higher nitrogen use efficiency at lower nitrogen rates application[J]. Field Crops Research, 2015, 175: 47-55. |
[28] | 戴黎, 胡诚, 万建华, 徐化林, 刘茂军, 郭卫红, 乔月. 有机无机复混肥料对水稻产量及养分吸收利用的影响[J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2024(2): 111-119. |
Dai L, Hu C, Wan J H, Wang J H, Xu H L, Liu M J, Guo W H, Qiao Y. Effects of combined application of organic inorganic fertilizer on rice yield and nutrient absorption and utilization[J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2024(2): 111-119. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 侯云鹏, 孔丽丽, 李前, 杨建, 尹彩侠, 秦裕波, 张磊, 于雷, 王立春, 谢佳贵. 不同施磷水平下水稻产量、养分吸收及土壤磷素平衡研究[J]. 东北农业科学, 2016, 41(6): 61-66. |
Hou Y P, Kong L L, Li Q, Yang J, Yin C X, Qian Y B, Zhang L, Yu L, Wang L C, Xie J G. Studies on effect of different phosphorus levels on yield, nutrient absorption of rice and soil phosphorus balance[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 41(6): 61-66. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 郑丽, 樊剑波, 何园球, 郑学博, 许小伟. 不同供磷水平对旱作条件下水稻生长、根系形态和养分吸收的影响[J]. 土壤, 2015, 47(4): 664-669. |
Zheng L, Fan J B, He Y Q, Zheng X B, Xu X W. Effects of phosphorus on growth, root morphology, phosphorus uptake and utilization efficiency of rice seedlings[J]. Soils, 2015, 47(4): 664-669. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | Townsend A R, Porder S. Agricultural legacies, food production and its environmental consequences[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109(16): 5917-5918. |
[32] | Zhang B, Wang Y, Liu H, Yang X, Yuan P, Wang C, Cai H, Wang S, Ding G, Xu F, Shi L. Optimal phosphorus management strategies to enhance crop productivity and soil phosphorus fertility in rapeseed-rice rotation[J]. Chemosphere, 2023, 337: 139392. |
[33] | Mi W H, Zheng S Y, Yang X, Wu L H, Liu Y L, Chen J Q. Comparison of yield and nitrogen use efficiency of different types of nitrogen fertilizers for different rice cropping systems under subtropical monsoon climate in China[J]. European Journal of Agronomy, 2017, 90: 78-86. |
[1] |
CAO Yun, CHEN Xuefang, HUANG Xinghai, HE Ziting, TANG Jingsha, CHEN Kun, WANG Ailing, LUO Guanzhou, LIAO Qin, SUN Yuanyuan, GUO Xiang, YANG Zhiyuan, MA Jun, SUN Yongjian.
Effects of Seeding Rate and Seedling Picking Area on Establishment of High-yield Populations and Energy Efficiency in Precision Drill-Sown and Machine-transplanted Hybrid Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2025, 39(4): 477-490. |
[2] |
ZHU Peng, LING Xitie, WANG Jinyan, ZHANG Baolong, YANG Yuwen, XU Ke, QIU Shi.
Effects of Weed Control Methods on Grain Yield and Quality of Herbicide-resistant Rice Under Direct Seeding [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2025, 39(4): 501-515. |
[3] | WEI Huanhe, WANG Lulu, MA Weiyi, ZHANG Xiang, ZUO Boyuan, GENG Xiaoyu, ZHU Wang, ZHU Jizou, MENG Tianyao, CHEN Yinglong, GAO Pinglei, XU Ke, DAI Qigen. Grain-filling Characteristics and Its Relationship with Grain Yield Formation of japonica Rice Nanjing 9108 Under Combined Salinity-drought Stress [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2025, 39(3): 373-386. |
[4] | XU Yuemei, PENG Shiyan, SUN Zhiwei, WANG Zhiqin, ZHU Kuanyu, YANG Jianchang. Differences in Endogenous Hormone Levels and Their Relationship with Yield and Phosphorus Use Efficiency in Rice Varieties With Various Tolerance to Low Phosphorus Stress [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2025, 39(2): 231-244. |
[5] | TANG Chenghan, WANG Jingqing, CHEN Huizhe, ZHANG Yuping, XIANG Jing, ZHANG Yikai, WANG Zhigang, HUAI Yan, CHEN Jiafeng, WANG Yaliang. Effects of Hybrid Rice Seedling Quality in Drill-seeding Nursery on Grain Yield in Mechanical Transplanting [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2025, 39(2): 245-254. |
[6] | SHU Ao, XIE Jiaxin, CAO Wei, ZHOU Chuanming, LI Beilei, CHEN Jiaxin, LI Li, CAO Fangbo, CHEN Jiana, HUANG Min. Effect of Nitrogen Management Strategies on Yield and Grain Quality of High-quality Hybrid Mid-season Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2025, 39(2): 255-263. |
[7] | CHEN Shurong, ZHU Lianfeng, QIN Birong, WANG Jie, Zhu Xuhua, TIAN Wenhao, ZHU Chunquan, CAO Xiaochuang, KONG Yali, ZHANG Junhua, JIN Qianyu. Effects of Nitrification Inhibitors on Rice Growth, Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency Under Oxygenated Irrigation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2025, 39(1): 92-100. |
[8] | FENG Xiangqian, WANG Aidong, HONG Weiyuan, LI Ziqiu, QIN Jinhua, ZHAN Lichuan, CHEN Lipeng, ZHANG Yunbo, WANG Danying, CHEN Song. Research Progress in Rice Yield Estimation Method Based on Low-altitude Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Remote Sensing [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(6): 604-616. |
[9] | LIU Junfeng, MOU Jingyi, ZHAO Hongyan, GUO Shimeng, LI Yimeng, LIANG Chao, ZHOU Chanchan, WANG Shu, HUANG Yuancai. Effects of Nitrogen Application Practice and Row Spacing on Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in japonica Rice With Different Panicle Types [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(6): 672-684. |
[10] | CAO Yudong, WU Penghao, DAI Zhigang, WANG Guibing, HE Shuai, GONG Ximin, LI Xiaokun. Effect of Side-deep Fertilization on Yield, Nutrient Uptake and Economic Benefits of Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(6): 695-708. |
[11] | JIANG Peng, ZHANG Lin, ZHOU Xingbing, GUO Xiaoyi, ZHU Yongchuan, LIU Mao, GUO Chanchun, XIONG Hong, XU Fuxian. Yield Formation Characteristics of Ratooning Hybrid Rice Under Simplified Cultivation Practices in Winter Paddy Fields [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(5): 544-554. |
[12] | XIONG Jiahuan, ZHANG Yikai, XIANG Jing, CHEN Huizhe, XU Yicheng, WANG Yaliang, WANG Zhigang, YAO Jian, ZHANG Yuping. Effect of Biochar-based Fertilizer Application on Rice Yield and Nitrogen Utilization in Film- mulched PaddyFields [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(5): 567-576. |
[13] | GUO Zhan, ZHANG Yunbo. Research Progress in Physiological,Biochemical Responses of Rice to Drought Stress and Its Molecular Regulation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[14] | WEI Huanhe, MA Weiyi, ZUO Boyuan, WANG Lulu, ZHU Wang, GENG Xiaoyu, ZHANG Xiang, MENG Tianyao, CHEN Yinglong, GAO Pinglei, XU Ke, HUO Zhongyang, DAI Qigen. Research Progress in the Effect of Salinity, Drought, and Their Combined Stresses on Rice Yield and Quality Formation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[15] | LÜ Zhou, YI Binghuai, CHEN Pingping, ZHOU Wenxin, TANG Wenbang, YI Zhenxie. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Transplanting Density on Yield Formation of Small Seed Hybrid Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 422-436. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||