Effect of Biochar-based Fertilizer Application on Rice Yield and Nitrogen Utilization in Film- mulched PaddyFields

doi:10.16819/j.1001-7216.2024.230901

Abstract

Abstract:

【Objective】To investigate the impact of biochar-based fertilizers and increased biochar application on grain yield and nitrogen utilization of film-mulched rice, aiming to provide a theoretical foundation for sustainable rice mulching technology.【Methods】Utilizing the high-quality conventional japonica rice variety Zhehexiang 2(ZHX2) and the indica-japonica hybrid rice Yongyou 538(YY538), film-mulched mechanical transplanting experiments were conducted in 2021 with CK (no nitrogen application), T1 (slow-release fertilizers), and T2 (biochar-based fertilizers) treatments. In 2022, similar experiments were conducted with CK, T2, T3 (biochar-based fertilizers with an additional 6 t/hm² biochar), and T4 (biochar-based fertilizers with an additional 12 t/hm² biochar) treatments. The study assessed the effects of biochar-based fertilizer application on dry matter accumulation, yield, yield components, and nitrogen uptake and utilization in mulched rice fields. 【Result】 Biochar-based fertilizers enhanced the growth and yield of mulched rice. They significantly increased dry matter accumulation by 5.40% to 29.69% compared to T1, and additional biochar application further increased dry matter accumulation by 9.28% to 46.91% compared to T2. The impact was consistent throughout ZHX2's growth duration, with YY538 showing more significant effects in the later stages. Biochar-based fertilizers significantly boosted rice yield by 3.84% to 4.65% compared to T1. Increased biochar application led to a 7.97% to 15.06% yield increase compared to T2. Biochar-based fertilizers enhanced nitrogen uptake and utilization, improving nitrogen utilization efficiency. They increased nitrogen accumulation in critical growth periods by 4.87% to 31.68%, with higher accumulation observed with additional biochar application. The highest nitrogen accumulation was achieved in T4, showing an 11.87% to 40.59% increase compared to T2. Biochar-based fertilizers reduced nitrogen dry matter productivity and nitrogen grain production efficiency but enhanced nitrogen partial factor productivity, nitrogen agronomic efficiency, and nitrogen recovery efficiency. Increased biochar application further improved nitrogen utilization and reduced losses.【Conclusion】 Applying biochar-based fertilizers in mulched rice fields enhances dry matter mass and nitrogen accumulation, with additional biochar application further improving these effects, leading to increased yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency. The yield increase in ZHX2 was primarily due to panicle number and grain number per panicle, while in YY538, it was due to panicle number, with the best effect observed in T4.

Key words: film, mulching, biochar-based fertilizer, yield, nitrogen utilization, rice

摘要：

【目的】研究炭基肥及增施生物炭对覆膜水稻产量、氮素利用的影响，以期为水稻覆膜技术可持续发展应用提供理论依据。【方法】以优质粳型常规水稻品种浙禾香2号和籼粳杂交稻甬优538为材料，2021年覆膜机插种植设置CK(不施氮)、T1(施用缓释肥)和T2(施用炭基肥)处理。2022年覆膜机插种植设置CK(不施氮)、T2(施用炭基肥)、T3(炭基肥增施 6 t/hm²生物炭)和T4(炭基肥增施 12 t/hm² 生物炭)处理，研究覆膜稻田施用炭基肥对水稻干物质积累、产量及产量构成和氮素吸收利用的影响。【结果】炭基肥促进了覆膜水稻的生长，提高了覆膜水稻产量。炭基肥显著增加水稻干物质积累量，与T1相比干物质积累显著增加5.40%~29.69%，增施生物炭与T2相比增加了覆膜水稻干物质积累量9.28%~46.91%。浙禾香2号整个生长期效果明显，甬优538在后期作用更显著。与T1相比，炭基肥能显著提高水稻产量3.84%~4.65%。增施生物炭较T2进一步提高了覆膜水稻产量7.97%~15.06%；炭基肥促进了覆膜水稻对氮素的吸收利用，提高水稻氮素利用效率。施用炭基肥显著增加覆膜水稻各生长关键时期的氮素积累量4.87%~31.68%，且氮素积累量随炭基肥增施生物炭量的增加而提高，炭基肥增施12 t/hm² 生物炭(T4)氮素积累最高，较施炭基肥(T2)增加11.87%~40.59%。炭基肥降低了覆膜水稻氮素干物质生产率和氮素稻谷生产率，提高了氮肥偏生产力、氮肥农学效率和氮肥吸收利用效率。增施生物炭处理进一步提高氮素利用，减少氮素损失。【结论】覆膜稻田施用炭基肥有利于水稻干物质量和氮素积累量增加，增施生物炭能够进一步提高其效果，从而增加产量，提高氮素利用效率。浙禾香2号增产主要通过增加穗数和每穗粒数，甬优538则通过增加穗数增产，炭基肥增施12 t/hm² 生物炭增产效果最好。

关键词: 覆膜, 炭基肥, 产量, 氮素利用, 水稻

XIONG Jiahuan, ZHANG Yikai, XIANG Jing, CHEN Huizhe, XU Yicheng, WANG Yaliang, WANG Zhigang, YAO Jian, ZHANG Yuping. Effect of Biochar-based Fertilizer Application on Rice Yield and Nitrogen Utilization in Film- mulched PaddyFields[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(5): 567-576.

熊家欢, 张义凯, 向镜, 陈惠哲, 徐一成, 王亚梁, 王志刚, 姚坚, 张玉屏. 覆膜稻田施用炭基肥对水稻产量及氮素利用的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(5): 567-576.

Figures/Tables 6

References 32

[1]	朱兆良, 金继运. 保障我国粮食安全的肥料问题[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(2): 259-273.
	Zhu Z L, Jin J Y. Fertilizer use and food security in China[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertitizer Science, 2013, 19(2): 259-273. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[2]	石吕, 薛亚光, 韩笑, 石晓旭, 魏亚凤, 杨美英, 刘建. 不同土壤类型条件下生物炭施用量对水稻产量、品质和土壤理化性状的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(23): 222-228.
	Shi L, Xue Y G, Han X, Shi X X, Wei Y F, Yang M Y, Liu J. Impacts of biochar application rate on rice yield, quality and soil physicochemical properties under differernt soil types[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 50(23): 222-228. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	王耀锋, 刘玉学, 吕豪豪, 杨生茂. 水洗生物炭配施化肥对水稻产量及养分吸收的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(4): 1049-1055.
	Wang Y F, Liu Y X, Lu H H, Yang S M. Effect of washing biochar and chemical fertilizers on rice yield and nutrient uptake[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertitizer, 2015, 21(4): 1049-1055. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	何大卫, 赵艳泽, 高继平, 隋阳辉, 辛威, 易军, 张文忠. 生物炭和氮肥配施对粳稻产量形成、氮肥当季效应及其后效的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(12): 2114-2124.
	He D W, Zhao Y Z, Gao J P, Sui Y H, Xin W, Yi J, Zhang W Z. Effects of biochar application combined with nitrogen fertilizer on yield formation of japonica rice and the immediate and residual effects of nitrogen[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertitizer, 2021, 27(12): 2114-2124. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[5]	Roy A, Chaturvedi S, Singh S V. Preparation and evaluation of two enriched biochar-based fertilizers for nutrient release kinetics and agronomic effectiveness in direct-seeded rice[J]. Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery, 2022, 14(8): 1-12.
[6]	徐彬, 王小利, 蒙婼熙, 杨宏伟, 龙大勇, 梅婷婷, 段建军. 减氮配施生物炭对水稻产量及不同生育期氮素累积的影响[J]. 福建农业学报, 2022, 37(12): 1528-1535.
	Xu B, Wang X L, Meng R X, Yang H W, Long D Y, Mei T T, Duan J J. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer reduction accompanied by biochar application on yield and nitrogen accumulation of rice at various growth stages[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 37(12): 1528-1535. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	段建军, 郭琴波, 徐彬, 蒙婼熙, 刘安凯, 侯再芬, 梁国太, 王小利. 氮肥减量施生物炭对水稻产量和养分利用的影响[J]. 水土保持学报. 2022, 36(6): 298-308.
	Duan J J, Guo Q B, Xu B, Meng R X, Liu A H, Hou Z F, Liang G T, Wang X X. Effects of biochar application with reduced nitrogen fertilizer on rice yield and nutrient utilization[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2022, 36(6): 298-308. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[8]	张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 崔振岭, 马文奇, 陈新平, 江荣风. 中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径[J]. 土壤学报, 2008(5): 915-924.
	Zhang F S, Wang J Q, Zhang W F, Cui Z L, Ma W Q, Chen X P, Jiang R F. Nutrient use efficiencies of major cereal crops in China and measures for improvement[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2008, 45(5): 915-924. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[9]	徐富贤, 熊洪, 谢戎, 张林, 朱永川, 郭晓艺, 杨大金, 周兴兵, 刘茂. 水稻氮素利用效率的研究进展及其动向[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2009, 15(5): 1215-1225.
	Xu F X, Xiong H, Xie L, Zhang L, Zhu Y C, Guo X Y, Yang D J, Zhou X B, Liu M. Advance of rice fertilizer-nitrogen use efficiency[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertitizer Science, 2009, 15(5): 1215-1225. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[10]	Nan Q, Wang C, Wang H. Biochar drives microbially- mediated rice production by increasing soil carbon[J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2020, 387: 121680.
[11]	索猛利, 吴建富, 刘方平, 徐涛, 苏甜, 张庚金, 熊江花. 不同水肥管理与耕作措施对涝渍灾后稻田土壤养分和水稻产量的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2023, 45(1): 17-27.
	Suo M L, Wu J F, Liu F P, Xu T, Su T, Zhang G J, Xiong J H. Effects of different water and fertilizer management and tillage practices on soil nutrients and rice yield in post-flooded rice fields[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2023, 45(1): 17-27. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[12]	Bai S H, Omidvar N, Gallart M. Combined effects of biochar and fertilizer applications on yield: A review and meta-analysis[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 808: 152073.
[13]	Liu Y, Li H, Hu T. A quantitative review of the effects of biochar application on rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency in paddy fields: A meta-analysis[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 830: 154792.
[14]	Li X, Yao T, Huang X. Biochar increases rice yield by improving root morphological and root physiological functions in heavily saline-sodic paddy soil of northeast China[J]. Bioresources, 2022, 17(1): 1241-1256.
[15]	Binh T N, Vinh N N, Tong X N, My H N, Hao P D, Gai D D, Nghia V N, Tan-Viet P. High biochar rates may suppress rice (Oryza sativa) growth by altering the ratios of C to N and available N to P in paddy soils[J]. Soil Use and Management, 2022, 39(1): 415-428.
[16]	Chu L, Zhang Y, Qian L. Influence of biochar on nitrogen use efficiency and root morphology of rice-seedling in two contrasting paddy soils[J]. Phyton-International Journal of Experimental Botany. 2020, 89(4): 1035-1042.
[17]	Selvarajh G, Ch'ng H Y. Enhancing soil nitrogen availability and rice growth by using urea fertilizer amended with rice straw biochar[J]. Agronomy(Basel), 2021, 11(7): 1352.
[18]	Lü R, Wang Y, Wang Q. Residual effect of straw biochar on grain yield and yield attributes in a double rice cropping system of subtropical China[J]. Plant Soil and Environment, 2022, 68(7): 328-337.
[19]	陈琳, 乔志刚, 李恋卿, 潘根兴. 施用生物质炭基肥对水稻产量及氮素利用的影响[J]. 生态与农村环境学报, 2013, 29(5): 671-675.
	Chen L, Qiao Z G, Li L Q, Pan G X. Effects of biochar-based fertilizers on rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency[J]. Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment, 2013, 29(5): 671-675. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[20]	Danso F, Agyare W A. Modelling rice yield from biochar-inorganic fertilizer amended fields[J]. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 2021, 4: 100123.
[21]	杨天昱. 生物炭基肥对水稻产量及稻田土壤肥力特性的影响[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2020.
	Yang T Y. Effects of biochar-based fertilizer on rice yield and paddy soil fertility characteristic[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2020. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[22]	金丹丹, 宫亮, 李波, 曲航, 孙文涛, 张文忠. 2种缓/控释肥对滨海盐碱地区水稻产量及氮代谢的影响[J]. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(4): 334-339.
	Jin D D, Gong L, Li B, Qu H, Sun W T, Zhang W Z. The effects of two slow/controlled release fertilizers on the productivity and nitrogen metabolism of rice in coastal saline-alkaline regions[J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2020, 34(4): 334-339. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[23]	Yin X, Chen J, Cao F. Short-term application of biochar improves post-heading crop growth but reduces pre-heading biomass translocation in rice[J]. Plant Production Science, 2020, 23(4): 522-528.
[24]	谢志坚, 吴佳, 段金贵, 喻成龙, 郑琴, 倪国荣, 荣勤雷, 赵尊康, 周春火. 生物炭基肥与紫云英联合还田对红壤区早稻干物质累积和氮素利用特征的影响[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(9): 1732-1739.
	Xie Z J, Wu J, Duan J G, Yu C L, Zheng Q, Ni G R, Rong Q L, Zhao Z K, Zhou C H. Effects of combining biochar-based fertilizer and milk vetch on dry matter accumulation and N use efficiencies of early rice in reddish paddy field of south China[J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertitizer, 2020, 26(9): 1732-1739. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[25]	原鲁明, 赵立欣, 沈玉君, 尚书旗, 孟海波. 我国生物炭基肥生产工艺与设备研究进展[J]. 中国农业科技导报, 2015, 17(4): 107-113.
	Yuan L M, Zhao L X, Shen Y J, Shang S Q, Meng H B. Progress on biochar-based fertilizer production technology and equipment in China[J]. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology (Beijing), 2015, 17(4): 107-113. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	Kimani S M, Bimantara P O, Kautsar V. Poultry litter biochar application in combination with chemical fertilizer and Azolla green manure improves rice grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency in paddy soil[J]. Biochar, 2021, 3(4): 591-602.
[27]	Roy A, Pyne S. Chaturvedi S. Effect of enriched biochar based fertilizers on growth, yield and nitrogen use efficiency in direct-seeded rice (Oryza sativa)[J]. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2021, 91(3): 459-463.
[28]	Jia Y, Hu Z, Ba Y. Application of biochar-coated urea controlled loss of fertilizer nitrogen and increased nitrogen use efficiency[J]. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 2021, 8(1): 3.
[29]	Dong D, Wang C, van Zwieten L. An effective biochar-based slow-release fertilizer for reducing nitrogen loss in paddy fields[J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2020, 20(8): 3027-3040.
[30]	武玉, 徐刚, 吕迎春, 邵宏波. 生物炭对土壤理化性质影响的研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展. 2014, 29(1): 68-79.
	Wu Y, Xu G, Lu Y C, Shao H B. Effects of biochar amendment on soil physical and chemical properties[J]. Advance in Earth Sciences, 2014, 29(1): 68-79. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[31]	乔志刚, 陈琳, 李恋卿, 刘福礼, 胡仁健, 郑金伟, 俞欣妍, 王家芳, 潘根兴. 生物质炭基肥对水稻生长及氮素利用率的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(5): 175-180.
	Qiao Z G, Chen L, Li L Q, Liu F L, Hu R J, Zheng J W, Yu X Y, Wang J F, Pan G X. Effects of biochar fertilizer on growth and nitrogen utilizing rate of rice[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014, 30(5): 175-80. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[32]	Chew J, Joseph S, Chen G. Biochar-based fertiliser enhances nutrient uptake and transport in rice seedlings[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2022, 826: 154174.

年份 Year	品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	干物质积累量Dry matter accumulation
年份 Year	品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	分蘖期 Tillering stage	穗分化始期 Panicle initiation stage	齐穗期 Heading stage	成熟期 Maturing stage
2021	浙禾香2号 Zhehexiang 2	CK	1.7 ± 0.2 c	3.0 ± 0.2 c	6.7 ± 0.3 c	13.8 ± 0.7 c
		T1	2.3 ± 0.2 b	4.1 ± 0.3 b	8.7 ± 0.2 b	15.4 ± 0.3 b
		T2	3.0 ± 0.1 a	5.0 ± 0.4 a	9.7 ± 0.2 a	18.5 ± 0.5 a
	甬优538 Yongyou 538	CK	1.8 ± 0.1 b	3.2 ± 0.2 b	7.6 ± 0.7 c	14.7 ± 0.1 c
		T1	3.2 ± 0.1 a	4.5 ± 0.2 a	9.3 ± 0.2 b	16.3 ± 0.3 b
		T2	3.1 ± 0.2 a	4.3 ± 0.3 a	10.8 ± 0.2 a	17.2 ± 0.1 a
2022	浙禾香2号 Zhehexiang 2	CK	1.4 ± 0.2 b	2.8 ± 0.3 d	7.9 ± 0.9 c	14.4 ± 0.4 c
		T2	2.6 ± 0.4 a	4.4 ± 0.1 c	10.5 ± 0.4 b	17.6 ± 0.8 b
		T3	3.2 ± 0.6 a	5.5 ± 0.2 b	11.8 ± 0.8 b	18.5 ± 0.4 b
		T4	3.0 ± 0.3 a	6.4 ± 0.3 a	14.3 ± 1.2 a	20.8 ± 0.7 a
	甬优538 Yongyou 538	CK	2.0 ± 0.4 b	4.1 ± 0.1 c	10.0 ± 0.6 b	17.3 ± 0.9 c
		T2	2.9 ± 0.3 a	5.6 ± 0.5 b	13.5 ± 0.4 a	19.7 ± 0.4 b
		T3	3.5 ± 0.2 a	5.5 ± 0.1 b	13.5 ± 0.5 a	19.9 ± 0.7 b
		T4	3.0 ± 0.6 a	7.4 ± 0.6 a	14.3 ± 0.1 a	21.5 ± 0.5 a

年份 Year	品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	干物质积累量Dry matter accumulation
年份 Year	品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	分蘖期 Tillering stage	穗分化始期 Panicle initiation stage	齐穗期 Heading stage	成熟期 Maturing stage
2021	浙禾香2号 Zhehexiang 2	CK	1.7 ± 0.2 c	3.0 ± 0.2 c	6.7 ± 0.3 c	13.8 ± 0.7 c
		T1	2.3 ± 0.2 b	4.1 ± 0.3 b	8.7 ± 0.2 b	15.4 ± 0.3 b
		T2	3.0 ± 0.1 a	5.0 ± 0.4 a	9.7 ± 0.2 a	18.5 ± 0.5 a
	甬优538 Yongyou 538	CK	1.8 ± 0.1 b	3.2 ± 0.2 b	7.6 ± 0.7 c	14.7 ± 0.1 c
		T1	3.2 ± 0.1 a	4.5 ± 0.2 a	9.3 ± 0.2 b	16.3 ± 0.3 b
		T2	3.1 ± 0.2 a	4.3 ± 0.3 a	10.8 ± 0.2 a	17.2 ± 0.1 a
2022	浙禾香2号 Zhehexiang 2	CK	1.4 ± 0.2 b	2.8 ± 0.3 d	7.9 ± 0.9 c	14.4 ± 0.4 c
		T2	2.6 ± 0.4 a	4.4 ± 0.1 c	10.5 ± 0.4 b	17.6 ± 0.8 b
		T3	3.2 ± 0.6 a	5.5 ± 0.2 b	11.8 ± 0.8 b	18.5 ± 0.4 b
		T4	3.0 ± 0.3 a	6.4 ± 0.3 a	14.3 ± 1.2 a	20.8 ± 0.7 a
	甬优538 Yongyou 538	CK	2.0 ± 0.4 b	4.1 ± 0.1 c	10.0 ± 0.6 b	17.3 ± 0.9 c
		T2	2.9 ± 0.3 a	5.6 ± 0.5 b	13.5 ± 0.4 a	19.7 ± 0.4 b
		T3	3.5 ± 0.2 a	5.5 ± 0.1 b	13.5 ± 0.5 a	19.9 ± 0.7 b
		T4	3.0 ± 0.6 a	7.4 ± 0.6 a	14.3 ± 0.1 a	21.5 ± 0.5 a

年份 Year			处理 Treatment	有效穗数 Effective panicle (×10⁴/hm²)	每穗粒数 Panicle number per panicle		结实率 Seed setting rate(%)	千粒重 1000-grain weight(g)	产量 Yield (t/hm²)
2021	浙禾香2号		CK	176.3 ± 14.7 c	162.4 ± 6.3 a		92.2 ± 0.8 a	22.1 ± 0.6 a	6.8 ± 0.3 c
	Zhehexiang 2		T1	215.6 ± 3.0 b	155.3 ± 8.8 a		89.5 ± 4.2 a	20.6 ± 0.4 b	8.8 ± 0.2 b
	Zhehexiang 2		T2	243.8 ± 7.7 a	156.4 ± 6.7 a		92.4 ± 2.3 a	21.2 ± 0.4 ab	9.2 ± 0.1 a
	甬优538 Yongyou 538		CK	165.6 ± 4.7 b	386.8 ± 5.7 b		74.2 ± 5.7 a	20.7 ± 0.4 b	8.8 ± 0.2 c
			T1	184.6 ± 5.7 a	387.4 ± 4.9 b		74.3 ± 5.4 a	22.7 ± 0.7 a	10.7 ± 0.1 b
			T2	193.8 ± 6.5 a	463.0 ± 8.6 a		73.0 ± 4.6 a	21.2 ± 0.1 b	11.1 ± 0.2 a
方差分析 Analysis of variance
品种 Variety(V)				**	**		**	**	**
处理 Treatment(T)				**	**		NA	*	**
品种×处理 V×T				**	**		NA	**	NA
2022		浙禾香2号	CK	217.4 ± 10.7 d	131.8 ± 9.5 a		91.3 ± 0.6 a	22.4 ± 0.1 a	6.7 ± 0.2 c
	Zhehexiang 2		T2	254.0 ± 12.5 c	129.6 ± 6.2 a		87.8 ± 0.9 b	22.5 ± 0.3 a	8.3 ± 0.3 b
			T3	294.9 ± 10.6 b	135.4 ± 3.8 a		89.1 ± 0.9 b	21.8 ± 0.1 a	8.3 ± 0.2 b
			T4	316.3 ± 12.7 a	141.3 ± 4.5 a		88.1 ± 0.8 b	20.2 ± 0.8 b	8.9 ± 0.1 a
	甬优538 Yongyou 538		CK	169.7 ± 3.2 c	339.4 ± 5.7 a		81.4 ± 1.4 a	21.8 ± 0.2 a	9.9 ± 0.2 c
			T2	232.0 ± 6.9 b	288.4 ± 8.6 bc		73.2 ± 0.9 c	20.9 ± 0.2 a	11.7 ± 0.5 b
			T3	232.7 ± 12.4 b	296.7 ± 5.7 b		74.2 ± 1.0 c	21.4 ± 0.5 a	12.4 ± 0.6 b
			T4	252.3 ± 7.9 a	277.0 ± 9.8 c		76.5 ± 1.3 b	21.3 ± 0.1 a	13.5 ± 0.2 a
方差分析 Analysis of variance
品种Variety(V)				**		**	**	**	**
处理Treatment(T)				**		**	**	**	**
品种×处理V×T				**		**	**	**	*

年份 Year			处理 Treatment	有效穗数 Effective panicle (×10⁴/hm²)	每穗粒数 Panicle number per panicle		结实率 Seed setting rate(%)	千粒重 1000-grain weight(g)	产量 Yield (t/hm²)
2021	浙禾香2号		CK	176.3 ± 14.7 c	162.4 ± 6.3 a		92.2 ± 0.8 a	22.1 ± 0.6 a	6.8 ± 0.3 c
	Zhehexiang 2		T1	215.6 ± 3.0 b	155.3 ± 8.8 a		89.5 ± 4.2 a	20.6 ± 0.4 b	8.8 ± 0.2 b
	Zhehexiang 2		T2	243.8 ± 7.7 a	156.4 ± 6.7 a		92.4 ± 2.3 a	21.2 ± 0.4 ab	9.2 ± 0.1 a
	甬优538 Yongyou 538		CK	165.6 ± 4.7 b	386.8 ± 5.7 b		74.2 ± 5.7 a	20.7 ± 0.4 b	8.8 ± 0.2 c
			T1	184.6 ± 5.7 a	387.4 ± 4.9 b		74.3 ± 5.4 a	22.7 ± 0.7 a	10.7 ± 0.1 b
			T2	193.8 ± 6.5 a	463.0 ± 8.6 a		73.0 ± 4.6 a	21.2 ± 0.1 b	11.1 ± 0.2 a
方差分析 Analysis of variance
品种 Variety(V)				**	**		**	**	**
处理 Treatment(T)				**	**		NA	*	**
品种×处理 V×T				**	**		NA	**	NA
2022		浙禾香2号	CK	217.4 ± 10.7 d	131.8 ± 9.5 a		91.3 ± 0.6 a	22.4 ± 0.1 a	6.7 ± 0.2 c
	Zhehexiang 2		T2	254.0 ± 12.5 c	129.6 ± 6.2 a		87.8 ± 0.9 b	22.5 ± 0.3 a	8.3 ± 0.3 b
			T3	294.9 ± 10.6 b	135.4 ± 3.8 a		89.1 ± 0.9 b	21.8 ± 0.1 a	8.3 ± 0.2 b
			T4	316.3 ± 12.7 a	141.3 ± 4.5 a		88.1 ± 0.8 b	20.2 ± 0.8 b	8.9 ± 0.1 a
	甬优538 Yongyou 538		CK	169.7 ± 3.2 c	339.4 ± 5.7 a		81.4 ± 1.4 a	21.8 ± 0.2 a	9.9 ± 0.2 c
			T2	232.0 ± 6.9 b	288.4 ± 8.6 bc		73.2 ± 0.9 c	20.9 ± 0.2 a	11.7 ± 0.5 b
			T3	232.7 ± 12.4 b	296.7 ± 5.7 b		74.2 ± 1.0 c	21.4 ± 0.5 a	12.4 ± 0.6 b
			T4	252.3 ± 7.9 a	277.0 ± 9.8 c		76.5 ± 1.3 b	21.3 ± 0.1 a	13.5 ± 0.2 a
方差分析 Analysis of variance
品种Variety(V)				**		**	**	**	**
处理Treatment(T)				**		**	**	**	**
品种×处理V×T				**		**	**	**	*

年份 Year	品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	氮素积累量Nitrogen accumulation
年份 Year	品种 Variety	处理 Treatment	分蘖期 Tillering stage	穗分化 Panicle initiation stage	齐穗期 Heading stage	成熟期 Maturing stage
2021	浙禾香2号 Zhehexiang 2	CK	41.4 ± 5.4 c	51.7 ± 3.4 c	80.5 ± 4.0 b	110.9 ± 7.6 b
		T1	69.0 ± 5.0 b	82.9 ± 5.2 b	134.8 ± 1.7 a	173.7 ± 4.7 a
		T2	86.8 ± 3.6 a	109.2 ± 10.5 a	139.5 ± 3.4 a	183.9 ± 3.7 a
	甬优538 Yongyou 538	CK	42.4 ± 3.4 b	51.8 ± 2.8 b	86.9 ± 6.6 b	125.2 ± 2.9 b
		T1	92.6 ± 4.2 a	104.6 ± 3.9 a	144.8 ± 9.3 a	166.6 ± 9.2 a
		T2	90.5 ± 5.5 a	103.7 ± 8.7 a	151.8 ± 12.0 a	183.1 ± 11.7 a
2022	浙禾香2号 Zhehexiang 2	CK	37.8 ± 1.4 b	54.8 ± 1.3 c	97.2 ± 6.4 d	106.7 ± 6.2 c
		T2	84.4 ± 6.0 a	97.5 ± 12.6 b	120.9 ± 9.1 c	150.1 ± 6.6 b
		T3	96.6 ± 10.6 a	101.5 ± 4.8 b	140.8 ± 1.8 b	167.0 ± 7.7 b
		T4	94.2 ± 4.3 a	123.3 ± 3.6 a	169.9 ± 7.6 a	211.1 ± 16.7 a
	甬优538 Yongyou 538	CK	35.1 ± 4.9 b	50.9 ± 4.9 c	85.8 ± 8.0 c	124.2 ± 4.5 d
		T2	84.6 ± 5.6 a	110.5 ± 4.2 b	146.1 ± 4.3 b	174.4 ± 6.3 c
		T3	91.9 ± 5.6 a	116.9 ± 3.8 b	142.7 ± 7.0 b	185.8 ± 7.1 b
		T4	86.6 ± 6.1 a	130.8 ± 5.8 a	163.4 ± 6.9 a	198.7 ± 5.8 a