中国水稻科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 295-306.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2023.220805
魏晓东, 宋雪梅, 赵凌, 赵庆勇, 陈涛, 路凯, 朱镇, 黄胜东, 王才林*(), 张亚东*()
收稿日期:
2022-08-20
修回日期:
2022-10-02
出版日期:
2023-05-10
发布日期:
2023-05-16
通讯作者:
*email:clwang@jaas.ac.cn;zhangyd@jaas.ac.cn
基金资助:
WEI Xiaodong, SONG Xuemei, ZHAO Ling, ZHAO Qingyong, CHEN Tao, LU Kai, ZHU Zhen, HUANG Shengdong, WANG Cailin*(), ZHANG Yadong*()
Received:
2022-08-20
Revised:
2022-10-02
Online:
2023-05-10
Published:
2023-05-16
Contact:
*email:clwang@jaas.ac.cn;zhangyd@jaas.ac.cn
摘要:
【目的】比较硅锌肥及其施用方式对南粳46稻米产量和品质的影响,为调优栽培提供参考依据。【方法】以优良食味粳稻品种南粳46为材料,倒4叶期土壤追施和孕穗期(抽穗前5~7 d)叶面喷施硅肥和锌肥,设置土壤追施硅肥(Si-B)、土壤追施锌肥(Zn-B)、土壤追施硅肥+叶面喷施硅肥(Si-B+Si-L)、土壤追施锌肥+叶面喷施锌肥(Zn-B+Zn-L)、土壤追施硅肥+土壤追施锌肥(Si-B+Zn-B)、叶面喷施硅肥(Si-L)、叶面喷施锌肥(Zn-L)、叶面喷施硅肥+叶面喷施锌肥(Si-L+Zn-L)8个处理,以不施硅锌肥(CK)为对照,调查分析不同处理对南粳46籽粒产量及其构成因素、加工品质、外观品质、食味品质和香味物质2-乙酰-1-吡咯啉(2-AP)含量的影响。【结果】施用硅锌肥对南粳46均有明显的增产作用,增幅为0.8%~11.9%,增产的原因主要是增加了每穗粒数和千粒重,而对穗数和结实率没有明显影响。施用硅肥使糙米率和精米率下降,施用锌肥则使糙米率和精米率增加,施用硅肥和锌肥都可使整精米率提高,施用锌肥提高整精米率的效果比施用硅肥更明显。硅锌肥对直链淀粉含量和RVA特征值的影响随处理不同而异,但施用硅锌肥可以提高崩解值,降低消减值,使胶稠度显著增加,食味值明显提高,稻米2-AP含量显著增加,香味明显变浓。【结论】倒4叶期土壤追施硅肥与孕穗期叶面喷施锌肥相结合,既可增加南粳46的产量,又能提高整精米率和食味品质,增加香味。
魏晓东, 宋雪梅, 赵凌, 赵庆勇, 陈涛, 路凯, 朱镇, 黄胜东, 王才林, 张亚东. 硅锌肥及其施用方式对南粳46产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 295-306.
WEI Xiaodong, SONG Xuemei, ZHAO Ling, ZHAO Qingyong, CHEN Tao, LU Kai, ZHU Zhen, HUANG Shengdong, WANG Cailin, ZHANG Yadong. Effects of Silicon and Zinc Fertilizer and Their Application Ways on Yield and Grain Quality of Rice Variety Nanjing 46[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 295-306.
名称 Name | 处理 Treatment | 用量 Dosage |
---|---|---|
CK | 不施硅锌肥 | 0 |
Si-B | 土壤追施硅肥 | Si≥25%, 30 kg/hm2 |
Si-L | 叶面喷施硅肥 | Si≥50%, 1.5 kg/hm2 |
Zn-B | 土壤追施锌肥 | 98% ZnCl2, 15 kg/hm2 |
Zn-L | 叶面喷施锌肥 | 98% ZnCl2, 1.8 kg/hm2 |
Si-B+Si-L | 土壤追施硅肥+叶面喷施硅肥 | Si≥25%, 30 kg/hm2+Si≥50%, 1.5 kg/hm2 |
Zn-B+Zn-L | 土壤追施锌肥+叶面喷施锌肥 | 98% ZnCl2, 15 kg/hm2+98% ZnCl2, 1.8 kg/hm2 |
Si-B+Zn-B | 土壤追施硅肥+土壤追施锌肥 | Si≥25%, 30 kg/hm2+98% ZnCl2, 15 kg/hm2 |
Si-L+Zn-L | 叶面喷施硅肥+叶面喷施锌肥 | Si≥50%, 1.5 kg/hm2+98% ZnCl2, 1.8 kg/hm2 |
表1 本研究采用的锌硅肥处理
Table 1. Treatment of silicon and zinc fertilizer in the experiment.
名称 Name | 处理 Treatment | 用量 Dosage |
---|---|---|
CK | 不施硅锌肥 | 0 |
Si-B | 土壤追施硅肥 | Si≥25%, 30 kg/hm2 |
Si-L | 叶面喷施硅肥 | Si≥50%, 1.5 kg/hm2 |
Zn-B | 土壤追施锌肥 | 98% ZnCl2, 15 kg/hm2 |
Zn-L | 叶面喷施锌肥 | 98% ZnCl2, 1.8 kg/hm2 |
Si-B+Si-L | 土壤追施硅肥+叶面喷施硅肥 | Si≥25%, 30 kg/hm2+Si≥50%, 1.5 kg/hm2 |
Zn-B+Zn-L | 土壤追施锌肥+叶面喷施锌肥 | 98% ZnCl2, 15 kg/hm2+98% ZnCl2, 1.8 kg/hm2 |
Si-B+Zn-B | 土壤追施硅肥+土壤追施锌肥 | Si≥25%, 30 kg/hm2+98% ZnCl2, 15 kg/hm2 |
Si-L+Zn-L | 叶面喷施硅肥+叶面喷施锌肥 | Si≥50%, 1.5 kg/hm2+98% ZnCl2, 1.8 kg/hm2 |
变异来源 Source of variance | 自由度 df | 穗数 PN | 每穗粒数 NSP | 结实率 SSR/% | 千粒重 GW/g | 产量 GY |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
重复Repetition | 2 | 1.87 | 0.62 | 0.78 | 0.23 | 0.86 |
年份 Year | 1 | 2.48 | 0.44 | 0.01 | 0.52 | 1.66 |
处理Treatment | 8 | 1.84 | 4.35** | 0.93 | 8.04** | 8.10** |
年份×处理 Year×Treatment | 8 | 0.94 | 1.28 | 0.65 | 1.07 | 0.98 |
表2 硅锌肥处理产量性状的方差分析
Table 2. Analysis of variance for yield and its components of Nanjing 46.
变异来源 Source of variance | 自由度 df | 穗数 PN | 每穗粒数 NSP | 结实率 SSR/% | 千粒重 GW/g | 产量 GY |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
重复Repetition | 2 | 1.87 | 0.62 | 0.78 | 0.23 | 0.86 |
年份 Year | 1 | 2.48 | 0.44 | 0.01 | 0.52 | 1.66 |
处理Treatment | 8 | 1.84 | 4.35** | 0.93 | 8.04** | 8.10** |
年份×处理 Year×Treatment | 8 | 0.94 | 1.28 | 0.65 | 1.07 | 0.98 |
处理 Treatment | 穗数 PN/(×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 NSP | 千粒重 GW/g | 结实率 SSR/% | 产量 GY/(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 410.5 | 125.7 c | 25.7 b | 93.4 | 8656.3 d |
Si-B | 376.3 | 136.0 b | 26.6 b | 94.2 | 8966.3 bcd |
Si-L | 401.9 | 123.7 c | 25.6 b | 93.9 | 8840.9 cd |
Zn-B | 410.5 | 117.2 c | 26.3 b | 93.7 | 8728.6 d |
Zn-L | 350.6 | 142.0 b | 26.5 b | 93.3 | 8848.4 cd |
Si-B+Si-L | 367.7 | 146.2 ab | 27.8 a | 95.5 | 9682.6 a |
Zn-B+Zn-L | 359.2 | 153.9 a | 25.6 b | 93.2 | 9085.0 abcd |
Si-B+Zn-B | 367.7 | 141.6 b | 26.4 b | 94.8 | 9548.0 ab |
Si-L+Zn-L | 359.2 | 150.3 a | 26.2 b | 94.0 | 9364.3 abc |
表3 硅锌肥处理下南粳46的产量性状
Table 3. Grain yield and its components of Nanjing 46 under silicon and zinc fertilizer treatments.
处理 Treatment | 穗数 PN/(×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 NSP | 千粒重 GW/g | 结实率 SSR/% | 产量 GY/(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 410.5 | 125.7 c | 25.7 b | 93.4 | 8656.3 d |
Si-B | 376.3 | 136.0 b | 26.6 b | 94.2 | 8966.3 bcd |
Si-L | 401.9 | 123.7 c | 25.6 b | 93.9 | 8840.9 cd |
Zn-B | 410.5 | 117.2 c | 26.3 b | 93.7 | 8728.6 d |
Zn-L | 350.6 | 142.0 b | 26.5 b | 93.3 | 8848.4 cd |
Si-B+Si-L | 367.7 | 146.2 ab | 27.8 a | 95.5 | 9682.6 a |
Zn-B+Zn-L | 359.2 | 153.9 a | 25.6 b | 93.2 | 9085.0 abcd |
Si-B+Zn-B | 367.7 | 141.6 b | 26.4 b | 94.8 | 9548.0 ab |
Si-L+Zn-L | 359.2 | 150.3 a | 26.2 b | 94.0 | 9364.3 abc |
处理比较 Comparison between treatments | 每穗粒数 NSP | 千粒重 GW/g | 产量 GY/(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|
Si-Zn-0Si-Zn | 13.2* | 0.6 | 476.7* |
Si-Zn | −2.4 | 0.6 | 275.9 |
Si-B-Zn-B | 18.8** | 0.3 | 237.7 |
Si-L-Zn-L | −18.3** | −0.8* | −7.5 |
(Si-B+Si-L)-(Zn-B+Zn-L) | −7.7* | 2.2** | 597.6** |
B-L | −7.0* | 0.4 | 63.1 |
Si-B-Si-L | 12.3* | 1.0* | 125.4 |
Zn-B-Zn-L | −24.8** | −0.1 | −119.8 |
(Si-B+Zn-B)-(Si-L+Zn-L) | −8.6* | 0.3 | 183.7 |
表4 南粳46产量性状不同硅锌肥处理效果比较
Table 4. Comparison of effects of silicon and zinc fertilizer treatment on yield components of Nanjing 46.
处理比较 Comparison between treatments | 每穗粒数 NSP | 千粒重 GW/g | 产量 GY/(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|
Si-Zn-0Si-Zn | 13.2* | 0.6 | 476.7* |
Si-Zn | −2.4 | 0.6 | 275.9 |
Si-B-Zn-B | 18.8** | 0.3 | 237.7 |
Si-L-Zn-L | −18.3** | −0.8* | −7.5 |
(Si-B+Si-L)-(Zn-B+Zn-L) | −7.7* | 2.2** | 597.6** |
B-L | −7.0* | 0.4 | 63.1 |
Si-B-Si-L | 12.3* | 1.0* | 125.4 |
Zn-B-Zn-L | −24.8** | −0.1 | −119.8 |
(Si-B+Zn-B)-(Si-L+Zn-L) | −8.6* | 0.3 | 183.7 |
变异来源 Source of variance | 自由度 df | 糙米率 Brown rice rate | 精米率 Milled rice rate | 整精米率 Head rice rate | 垩白粒率 Chalky grain rate | 垩白度 Chalkiness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
重复Repetition | 2 | 0.07 | 0.53 | 1.70 | 0.07 | 0.12 |
年份 Year | 1 | 0.11 | 1.98 | 0.02 | 0.26 | 0.29 |
处理Treatment | 8 | 6.03** | 12.90** | 9.73** | 1.10 | 1.35 |
年份×处理 Year×Treatment | 8 | 0.53 | 2.58 | 1.48 | 1.13 | 1.21 |
表5 硅锌肥处理加工品质与外观品质的方差分析
Table 5. Analysis of variance for processing and appearance quality of Nanjing 46.
变异来源 Source of variance | 自由度 df | 糙米率 Brown rice rate | 精米率 Milled rice rate | 整精米率 Head rice rate | 垩白粒率 Chalky grain rate | 垩白度 Chalkiness |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
重复Repetition | 2 | 0.07 | 0.53 | 1.70 | 0.07 | 0.12 |
年份 Year | 1 | 0.11 | 1.98 | 0.02 | 0.26 | 0.29 |
处理Treatment | 8 | 6.03** | 12.90** | 9.73** | 1.10 | 1.35 |
年份×处理 Year×Treatment | 8 | 0.53 | 2.58 | 1.48 | 1.13 | 1.21 |
处理 Treatment | 糙米率 Brown rice rate/% | 精米率 Milled rice rate/% | 整精米率 Head rice rate/% |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 84.3 ab | 75.9 a | 59.5 b |
Si-B | 83.8 bc | 75.5 a | 58.9 b |
Si-L | 83.7 bc | 75.4 a | 61.8 ab |
Zn-B | 83.8 bc | 75.5 a | 61.9 ab |
Zn-L | 84.4 ab | 76.0 a | 63.6 ab |
Si-B+Si-L | 83.4 c | 73.9 b | 58.9 b |
Zn-B+Zn-L | 84.4 ab | 75.9 a | 65.8 a |
Si-B+Zn-B | 84.1 ab | 75.7 a | 65.1 a |
Si-L+Zn-L | 84.6 a | 76.4 a | 66.2 a |
表6 硅锌肥处理下南粳46的加工品质性状
Table 6. Processing quality of Nanjing 46 under silicon and zinc fertilizer treatments.
处理 Treatment | 糙米率 Brown rice rate/% | 精米率 Milled rice rate/% | 整精米率 Head rice rate/% |
---|---|---|---|
CK | 84.3 ab | 75.9 a | 59.5 b |
Si-B | 83.8 bc | 75.5 a | 58.9 b |
Si-L | 83.7 bc | 75.4 a | 61.8 ab |
Zn-B | 83.8 bc | 75.5 a | 61.9 ab |
Zn-L | 84.4 ab | 76.0 a | 63.6 ab |
Si-B+Si-L | 83.4 c | 73.9 b | 58.9 b |
Zn-B+Zn-L | 84.4 ab | 75.9 a | 65.8 a |
Si-B+Zn-B | 84.1 ab | 75.7 a | 65.1 a |
Si-L+Zn-L | 84.6 a | 76.4 a | 66.2 a |
处理比较 Comparison between treatments | 糙米率 Brown rice rate/% | 精米率 Milled rice rate/% | 整精米率 Head rice rate/% |
---|---|---|---|
Si-Zn-0Si-Zn | −0.2 | −0.4 | 3.3* |
Si-Zn | −0.6* | −0.9* | −3.9* |
Si-B-Zn-B | 0.0 | 0.0 | −3.0 |
Si-L-Zn-L | −0.6** | −0.6 | −1.8 |
(Si-B+Si-L)-(Zn-B+Zn-L) | −1.0* | −2.0** | −7.0** |
B-L | −0.3 | −0.4 | −1.9 |
Si-B-Si-L | 0.1 | 0.1 | −2.9 |
Zn-B-Zn-L | −0.5* | −0.5 | −1.7 |
(Si-B+Zn-B)-(Si-L+Zn-L) | −0.5* | −0.7* | −1.1 |
表7 不同硅锌肥处理下南粳46加工品质比较
Table 7. Comparison of effects of silicon and zinc fertilizer treatment on processing quality of Nanjing 46.
处理比较 Comparison between treatments | 糙米率 Brown rice rate/% | 精米率 Milled rice rate/% | 整精米率 Head rice rate/% |
---|---|---|---|
Si-Zn-0Si-Zn | −0.2 | −0.4 | 3.3* |
Si-Zn | −0.6* | −0.9* | −3.9* |
Si-B-Zn-B | 0.0 | 0.0 | −3.0 |
Si-L-Zn-L | −0.6** | −0.6 | −1.8 |
(Si-B+Si-L)-(Zn-B+Zn-L) | −1.0* | −2.0** | −7.0** |
B-L | −0.3 | −0.4 | −1.9 |
Si-B-Si-L | 0.1 | 0.1 | −2.9 |
Zn-B-Zn-L | −0.5* | −0.5 | −1.7 |
(Si-B+Zn-B)-(Si-L+Zn-L) | −0.5* | −0.7* | −1.1 |
变异来源 Source of variance | 自由度 df | 峰值黏度 PV | 热浆黏度 HV | 崩解值 BDV | 最终黏度 FV | 消减值 SBV | 峰值时间 PeT | 成糊温度 PaT |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
重复Repetition | 2 | 0.35 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.21 | 0.38 | 0.28 | 1.42 |
年份 Year | 1 | 0.23 | 0.96 | 0.62 | 0.83 | 0.51 | 0.62 | 0.08 |
处理Treatment | 8 | 6.51** | 6.89** | 4.10** | 7.64** | 4.52** | 4.10** | 3.00* |
年份×处理 Year×Treatment | 8 | 1.65 | 1.95 | 1.41 | 2.20 | 1.46 | 1.41 | 0.87 |
表8 硅锌肥处理下南粳46 RVA特征值的方差分析
Table 8. Analysis of variance for RVA profile of Nanjing 46.
变异来源 Source of variance | 自由度 df | 峰值黏度 PV | 热浆黏度 HV | 崩解值 BDV | 最终黏度 FV | 消减值 SBV | 峰值时间 PeT | 成糊温度 PaT |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
重复Repetition | 2 | 0.35 | 0.27 | 0.28 | 0.21 | 0.38 | 0.28 | 1.42 |
年份 Year | 1 | 0.23 | 0.96 | 0.62 | 0.83 | 0.51 | 0.62 | 0.08 |
处理Treatment | 8 | 6.51** | 6.89** | 4.10** | 7.64** | 4.52** | 4.10** | 3.00* |
年份×处理 Year×Treatment | 8 | 1.65 | 1.95 | 1.41 | 2.20 | 1.46 | 1.41 | 0.87 |
处理 Treatment | 峰值黏度 PV/cP | 热浆黏度 HV/cP | 崩解值 BDV/cP | 最终黏度 FV/cP | 消减值 SBV/cP | 峰值时间 PeT/min | 成糊温度 PaT/℃ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 2588 bc | 1485 abc | 1103 ab | 2095 ab | −493 ab | 6.2 ab | 70.4 b |
Si-B | 2694 abc | 1542 abc | 1152 ab | 2125 ab | −570 ab | 6.1 b | 70.4 b |
Si-L | 2769 ab | 1714 a | 1055 ab | 2310 a | −459 ab | 6.3 ab | 71.3 a |
Zn-B | 2528 c | 1507 abc | 1021 b | 2072 ab | −456 ab | 6.2 ab | 71.2 a |
Zn-L | 2815 a | 1653 ab | 1163 ab | 2259 a | −556 ab | 6.2 ab | 70.7 ab |
Si-B+Si-L | 2707 abc | 1462 abc | 1245 a | 2048 ab | −660 b | 6.0 b | 71.3 a |
Zn-B+Zn-L | 2718 abc | 1672 ab | 1046 ab | 2298 a | −420 a | 6.4 a | 70.2 b |
Si-B+Zn-B | 2508 c | 1279 c | 1229 a | 1841 b | −667 b | 6.0 b | 71.5 a |
Si-L+Zn-L | 2562 bc | 1417 bc | 1145 ab | 1999 ab | −563 ab | 6.2 ab | 71.0 ab |
表9 硅锌肥处理南粳46的RVA特征值
Table 9. RVA profile of Nanjing 46 under silicon and zinc fertilizer treatments.
处理 Treatment | 峰值黏度 PV/cP | 热浆黏度 HV/cP | 崩解值 BDV/cP | 最终黏度 FV/cP | 消减值 SBV/cP | 峰值时间 PeT/min | 成糊温度 PaT/℃ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 2588 bc | 1485 abc | 1103 ab | 2095 ab | −493 ab | 6.2 ab | 70.4 b |
Si-B | 2694 abc | 1542 abc | 1152 ab | 2125 ab | −570 ab | 6.1 b | 70.4 b |
Si-L | 2769 ab | 1714 a | 1055 ab | 2310 a | −459 ab | 6.3 ab | 71.3 a |
Zn-B | 2528 c | 1507 abc | 1021 b | 2072 ab | −456 ab | 6.2 ab | 71.2 a |
Zn-L | 2815 a | 1653 ab | 1163 ab | 2259 a | −556 ab | 6.2 ab | 70.7 ab |
Si-B+Si-L | 2707 abc | 1462 abc | 1245 a | 2048 ab | −660 b | 6.0 b | 71.3 a |
Zn-B+Zn-L | 2718 abc | 1672 ab | 1046 ab | 2298 a | −420 a | 6.4 a | 70.2 b |
Si-B+Zn-B | 2508 c | 1279 c | 1229 a | 1841 b | −667 b | 6.0 b | 71.5 a |
Si-L+Zn-L | 2562 bc | 1417 bc | 1145 ab | 1999 ab | −563 ab | 6.2 ab | 71.0 ab |
变异来源 Source of variance | 自由度 df | 外观 Appearance | 硬度 Hardness | 黏度 Stickiness | 平衡度 Balance | 食味值 TV | 蛋白质含量 PC | 直链淀粉含量 AC | 胶稠度 GC | 2-AP含量 2-AP content |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
重复Repetition | 2 | 2.99 | 1.15 | 2.10 | 2.87 | 0.21 | 3.91* | 3.41 | 2.31 | 4.26* |
年份 Year | 1 | 0.46 | 0.38 | 0.15 | 0.53 | 0.01 | 6.51* | 1.37 | 7.13* | 76.68** |
处理Treatment | 8 | 2.14 | 2.97 | 1.86 | 2.29 | 6.83** | 1.30 | 7.77** | 14.15** | 1292.03** |
年份×处理 Year×Treatment | 8 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 0.98 | 1.73 | 0.29 | 1.11 | 0.98 | 18.00** |
表10 硅锌肥处理食味品质和2-AP含量的方差分析
Table 10. Analysis of variance for eating quality and 2-AP content of Nanjing 46
变异来源 Source of variance | 自由度 df | 外观 Appearance | 硬度 Hardness | 黏度 Stickiness | 平衡度 Balance | 食味值 TV | 蛋白质含量 PC | 直链淀粉含量 AC | 胶稠度 GC | 2-AP含量 2-AP content |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
重复Repetition | 2 | 2.99 | 1.15 | 2.10 | 2.87 | 0.21 | 3.91* | 3.41 | 2.31 | 4.26* |
年份 Year | 1 | 0.46 | 0.38 | 0.15 | 0.53 | 0.01 | 6.51* | 1.37 | 7.13* | 76.68** |
处理Treatment | 8 | 2.14 | 2.97 | 1.86 | 2.29 | 6.83** | 1.30 | 7.77** | 14.15** | 1292.03** |
年份×处理 Year×Treatment | 8 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 0.98 | 1.73 | 0.29 | 1.11 | 0.98 | 18.00** |
处理 Treatment | 食味值 TV | 蛋白质含量 PC/% | 直链淀粉含量 AC/% | 胶稠度 GC/mm | 消减值 SBV/cP | 2-AP含量 2-AP content/(μg·g−1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 86.1 c | 6.0 | 10.4 abc | 84.3 c | −493 ab | 0.1855 d |
Si-B | 88.8 ab | 5.8 | 10.3 abcd | 93.7 ab | −570 ab | 0.2465 bc |
Si-L | 89.3 ab | 5.9 | 9.8 cd | 88.7 c | −459 ab | 0.1795 d |
Zn-B | 88.6 ab | 5.5 | 10.2 bcd | 96.0 a | −456 ab | 0.2345 bc |
Zn-L | 89.4 ab | 5.8 | 10.9 a | 94.0 ab | −556 ab | 0.2815 a |
Si-B+Si-L | 89.0 ab | 6.1 | 9.6 d | 90.0 bc | −660 b | 0.2300 c |
Zn-B+Zn-L | 90.6 a | 6.0 | 10.5 ab | 92.0 abc | −420 a | 0.2520 b |
Si-B+Zn-B | 88.9 ab | 6.0 | 10.2 bcd | 89.7 bc | −667 b | 0.2545 b |
Si-L+Zn-L | 88.6 b | 5.9 | 10.4 abc | 91.3 bc | −563 ab | 0.2545 b |
表11 硅锌肥处理南粳46的食味品质和2-AP含量
Table 11. Eating quality and 2-AP content of Nanjing 46 under silicon and zinc fertilizer treatments.
处理 Treatment | 食味值 TV | 蛋白质含量 PC/% | 直链淀粉含量 AC/% | 胶稠度 GC/mm | 消减值 SBV/cP | 2-AP含量 2-AP content/(μg·g−1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CK | 86.1 c | 6.0 | 10.4 abc | 84.3 c | −493 ab | 0.1855 d |
Si-B | 88.8 ab | 5.8 | 10.3 abcd | 93.7 ab | −570 ab | 0.2465 bc |
Si-L | 89.3 ab | 5.9 | 9.8 cd | 88.7 c | −459 ab | 0.1795 d |
Zn-B | 88.6 ab | 5.5 | 10.2 bcd | 96.0 a | −456 ab | 0.2345 bc |
Zn-L | 89.4 ab | 5.8 | 10.9 a | 94.0 ab | −556 ab | 0.2815 a |
Si-B+Si-L | 89.0 ab | 6.1 | 9.6 d | 90.0 bc | −660 b | 0.2300 c |
Zn-B+Zn-L | 90.6 a | 6.0 | 10.5 ab | 92.0 abc | −420 a | 0.2520 b |
Si-B+Zn-B | 88.9 ab | 6.0 | 10.2 bcd | 89.7 bc | −667 b | 0.2545 b |
Si-L+Zn-L | 88.6 b | 5.9 | 10.4 abc | 91.3 bc | −563 ab | 0.2545 b |
处理比较 Comparison between treatments | 食味值 TV | 直链淀粉含量 AC/% | 胶稠度 GC/mm | 2-AP含量 2-AP content/(μg·g−1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Si-Zn-ZSiZn | 3.00* | −0.2 | 7.6** | 0.0561** |
Si-Zn | −0.5 | −0.6 | −3.2* | −0.0373** |
Si-B-Zn-B | 0.1 | 0.1 | −2.3 | 0.0120* |
Si-L-Zn-L | −0.1 | −1.1** | −5.3** | −0.1020** |
(Si-B+Si-L)-(Zn-B+Zn-L) | −1.6 | −0.9** | −2.0 | −0.0220** |
ST-FS | −0.3 | −0.2 | 1.8 | 0.0067 |
Si-B-Si-L | −0.5 | 0.5* | 5.0 | 0.0670** |
Zn-B-Zn-L | −0.8 | −0.8** | 2.0 | −0.0470** |
(Si-B+Zn-B)-(Si-L+Zn-L) | 0.3 | −0.2 | −1.7 | 0.0000 |
表12 南粳46食味品质性状和2-AP含量不同硅锌肥处理效果比较
Table 12. Comparison of effects of silicon and zinc fertilizer on eating quality and 2-AP content of Nanjing 46.
处理比较 Comparison between treatments | 食味值 TV | 直链淀粉含量 AC/% | 胶稠度 GC/mm | 2-AP含量 2-AP content/(μg·g−1) |
---|---|---|---|---|
Si-Zn-ZSiZn | 3.00* | −0.2 | 7.6** | 0.0561** |
Si-Zn | −0.5 | −0.6 | −3.2* | −0.0373** |
Si-B-Zn-B | 0.1 | 0.1 | −2.3 | 0.0120* |
Si-L-Zn-L | −0.1 | −1.1** | −5.3** | −0.1020** |
(Si-B+Si-L)-(Zn-B+Zn-L) | −1.6 | −0.9** | −2.0 | −0.0220** |
ST-FS | −0.3 | −0.2 | 1.8 | 0.0067 |
Si-B-Si-L | −0.5 | 0.5* | 5.0 | 0.0670** |
Zn-B-Zn-L | −0.8 | −0.8** | 2.0 | −0.0470** |
(Si-B+Zn-B)-(Si-L+Zn-L) | 0.3 | −0.2 | −1.7 | 0.0000 |
[1] | 戴青云, 刘代欢, 王德新, 李鹏祥, 朱维, 桂娟. 硅对水稻生长的影响及其缓解镉毒害机理研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(5): 86-92. |
Dai Q Y, Liu D H, Wang D X, Li P X, Zhu W, Gui J. A review on silicon: Effect on rice growth and its mechanism of relieving cadmium toxicity[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020, 36(5): 86-92. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 黄彬, 韩永圣, 秦政. 硅素的肥料效应及补硅途径[J]. 江苏农业科学, 1997(3): 47-49. |
Huang B, Han Y S, Qin Z. Fertilizer effect of silicon and ways of silicon supplement[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 1997(3): 47-49. (in Chinese) | |
[3] | 许佳莹, 朱练峰, 禹盛苗, 张均华, 金千瑜. 硅肥对水稻产量及生理特性影响的研究进展[J]. 中国稻米, 2012, 18(6): 18-22. |
Xu J Y, Zhu L F, Yu S M, Zhang J H, Jin Q Y. Research progress on the effects of silicon fertilizer on rice yield and physiological characteristics[J]. China Rice, 2012, 18 (6): 18-22. (in Chinese) | |
[4] | 张岩, 宋玉霞, 陈虞超, 石磊. 硅元素对水稻生长的影响概述[J]. 宁夏农林科技, 2010(6): 85-88. |
Zhang Y, Song Y X, Chen Y C, Shi L. Effects of silicon on rice growth[J]. Ningxia Agriculture and Forestry Science and Technology, 2010(6): 85-88. (in Chinese) | |
[5] | 杨波, 靳辉勇, 屠乃美, 田茂成, 田丰, 周伟, 李栋宇. 锌肥在水稻上的应用研究进展[J]. 天津农业科学, 2018, 24(3): 47-50, 58. |
Yang B, Jin H Y, Tu N M, Tian M C, Tian F, Zhou W, Li D Y. Progress of researches on Zinc fertilizer application in rice[J]. Tianjin Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 24(3): 47-50, 58. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | Alvarez J, Datnoff L E. The Economic potential of silicon for integrated management and sustainable rice production[J]. Crop Protection, 2001, 20: 43-48. |
[7] | 丁能飞, 郭彬, 李建强, 林义成, 刘琛, 李华, 李凝玉, 傅庆林. 氮硅互作对水稻营养和产量的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2013, 29: 127-130. |
Ding N F, Guo B, Li J Q, Lin Y C, Liu C, Li H, Li N Y, Fu Q L. Effects of nitrogen and silicon interaction on the nutrition and yield of rice[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Agronomy, 2013, 29: 127-130. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 张国良, 戴其根, 王建武, 张洪程, 霍中洋, 凌励, 王显, 张军. 施硅量对粳稻品种武育粳3号产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2007, 21(3): 299-303. |
Zhang G L, Dai Q G, Wang J W, Zhang H C, Huo Z Y, Ling L, Wang Y, Zhang J. Effects of silicon fertilizer rate on yield and quality of japonica rice Wuyujing 3[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2007, 21(3): 299-303. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 邓接楼, 王艾平, 何长水, 王爱斌, 徐芬芬. 硅肥对水稻生长发育及产量品质的影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2011(12): 58-61. |
Deng J L, Wang A P, He C S, Wang A B, Xu F F. The effect of Si fertilizer on growth and development, yield and quality of rice[J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2011(12): 58-61. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | Luo H W, Du B, He L X, He J, Hu L, Pan S G, Tang X R. Exogenous application of zinc (Zn) at the heading stage regulates 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline(2-AP) biosynthesis in different fragrant rice genotypes[J]. Scientific Reports, 2019 (9): 19513. |
[11] | Mo Z W, Lei S, Umair A, Imran K, Li Y, Pan S G, Duan M Y, Tian H, Tang X R. Silicon fertilization modulates 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline content, yield formation and grain quality of aromatic rice[J]. Journal of Cereal Science, 2017, 75: 17-24. |
[12] | 高丹, 陈基宁, 蔡昆争, 骆世明. 硅在植物体内的分布和吸收及其在病害逆境胁迫中的抗性作用[J]. 生态学报, 2010, 30: 2745-2755. |
Gao D, Chen J N, Cai K Z, Luo S M. Distribution and absorption of Si in plant and its role in plant disease resistance under environmental stress[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2010, 30: 2745-2755. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 薛高峰, 孙万春, 宋阿琳, 李兆君, 范分良, 梁永超. 硅对水稻生长、白叶枯病抗性及病程相关蛋白活性的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(4): 690-697. |
Xue G F, Sun W C, Song A L, Li Z J, Fan F L, Liang Y C. Influence of Si on rice growth, resistance to bacterial blight and activity of pathogenesis-related proteins[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010, 43(4): 690-697. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 王力, 孙影, 张洪程, 魏海燕, 朱大伟, 朱盈, 徐栋, 霍中洋. 不同时期施用锌硅肥对优良食味粳稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017, 43(6): 885-898. |
Wang L, Sun Y, Zhang H C, Wei H Y, Zhu D W, Zhu Y, Xu D, Huo Z Y. Effect of Zn and Si fertilizers applied at different stages on yield and quality of japonica rice with good eating quality[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2017, 43(6): 885-898. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 黄锦霞, 肖迪, 段美洋, 田华, 黎国喜, 钟克友, 唐湘如. 不同锌肥施用量对香稻产量和糙米香气含量的影响[J]. 华北农学报, 2008, 23(S2): 290-292. |
Huang J X, Xiao D, Duan M Y, Tian H, Li G X, Zhong K Y, Tang X R. Effects of different applications of ZnCl2 on the yield and aroma content of aromatic rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Sinica, 2008, 23(S2): 290-292. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 黄锦霞, 肖迪, 唐湘如. 施锌对香稻产量、香气和品质的影响[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2010(3): 5-7. |
Huang J X, Xiao D, Tang X R. Effects of zinc application on yield, aroma and quality of fragrant rice[J]. Tillage and Cultivation, 2010 (3): 5-7. (in Chinese) | |
[17] | Liu X W, Huang Z L, Li Y H, Xie W J, Li W, Tang X R, Ashraf U, Kong L L, Wu L M, Wang S L, Mo Z W. Selenium-silicon (Se-Si) induced modulations in physio-biochemical responses, grain yield, quality, aroma formation and lodging in fragrant rice[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2020, 196: 110525. |
[18] | 李军, 邓先亮, 朱兴敏, 郭保卫, 魏海燕, 张洪程. 镁锌肥施用时期对优质软米粳稻产量及稻米中6种元素吸收的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2018, 24(4): 57-63. |
Li J, Deng X L, Zhu X M, Guo B W, Wei H Y, Zhang H C. Effects of magnesium and zinc microelement fertilizer on the yield and accumulation of six elements of japonica rice[J]. China Rice, 2018, 24(4): 57-63. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 张磊, 陈雪丽, 李伟群, 常本超, 王爽, 谷学佳, 王晓军, 王玉峰, 王英. 叶喷式高效硅肥对水稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 现代化农业, 2014(11): 12-13. |
Zhang L, Chen X L, Li W Q, Chang B C, Wang S, Gu X J, Wang X J, Wang Y F, Wang Y. Effects of leaf spraying high efficiency silicon fertilizer on yield and quality of rice[J]. Modernizing Agriculture, 2014(11): 12-13. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 王才林, 张亚东, 朱镇, 赵凌, 陈涛, 林静. 优质水稻新品种南粳46的选育与应用[J]. 中国稻米, 2008(3): 38-40. |
Wang C L, Zhang Y D, Zhu Z, Zhao L, Chen T, Lin J. Breeding and utilization of new rice variety Nanjing 46 with good eating quality[J]. China Rice, 2008(3): 38-40. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 王才林, 张亚东, 赵春芳, 魏晓东, 姚姝, 周丽慧, 朱镇, 陈涛, 赵庆勇, 赵凌, 路凯, 梁文化. 江苏省优良食味粳稻的遗传与育种研究[J]. 遗传, 2021, 43(5): 442-458. |
Wang C L, Zhang Y D, Zhao C F, Wei X D, Yao S, Zhou L H, Zhu Z, Chen T, Zhao Q Y, Zhao L, Lu K, Liang W H. Inheritance and breeding of japonicarice with good eating quality in Jiangsu Province, 2021, 43 (5): 442-458. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 莫惠栋. 农业试验统计[M]. 上海: 上海科学技术出版社, 1992: 151-166. |
Mo H D. Agricultural Experiment Statistics[M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Press, 1992: 151-166. (in Chinese) | |
[23] | 殷碧秋, 常红, 齐君. 硅肥对水稻品质的影响及发展前景[J]. 吉林农业, 2010(5): 112. |
Yin B Q, Chang H, Qi J. Effect of silicon fertilizer on rice quality and its development prospect[J]. Jilin Agriculture, 2010 (5): 112. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 陈平平. 硅在水稻生活中的作用[J]. 生物学通报, 1998, 33(8): 5-7. |
Chen P P. Role of silicon in rice life[J]. Bulletin of Biology, 1998, 33(8): 5-7. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 赵海成, 李红宇, 陈立强, 赫臣, 郑桂萍, 韩笑, 何文翠, 周云峰. 硅氮配施对寒地水稻产量品质及抗倒性的影响[J]. 上海农业学报, 2018, 34(4): 36-42. |
Zhao H C, Li H Y, Chen L Q, He C, Zhen G P, Han X, He W C, Zhou Y F. Effects of combined application of silicon and nitrogen on yield and lodging resistance of cold-region rice[J]. Acta Agriculturae Shanghai, 2018, 34(4): 36-42. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 陈光东, 杨新彬, 董广林. 硅肥对水稻的增产及抗瘟效应[J]. 农村实用科技信息, 2006(6): 9. |
Chen G D, Yang X B, Dong G L. Effects of silicon fertilizer on yield increase and blast resistance of rice[J]. Rural Practical Science and Technology Information, 2006 (6): 9. (in Chinese) | |
[27] | Mathpal B, Srivastava P C, Shankhdhar D. Improving key enzyme activities and quality of rice under various methods of zinc application[J]. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 2015, 21(4): 567-572. |
[28] | 张凯岳. 锌对水稻碳酸酐酶和光合作用的调节作用研究[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2015. |
Zhang K Y. Regulation of zinc on carbonic anhydrase and photosynthesis in rice[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 周青, 潘国庆, 施作家, 陈风华. 不同时期施用硅肥对水稻群体产量及产量的影响[J]. 耕作与栽培, 2001(3): 25-27. |
Zhou Q, Pan G Q, Shi Z J, Chen F H. Effect of application of Si on populication quality and yield of rice at different periods[J]. Tillage and Cultivation, 2001(3): 25-27. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 张国良, 戴其根, 周青, 潘国庆, 凌励, 张洪程. 硅肥对水稻群体质量及产量影响研究[J]. 中国农学通报, 2004(4): 114-117. |
Zhang G L, Dai Q G, Zhou Q. Influences of Si fertilizer on population quality and yield in rice[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Agronomy, 2004(4): 114-117. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | 宋合林, 刘兵, 崔占文, 田强. 不同生育时期施用硅肥对水稻产量的影响[J]. 现代化农业, 2009(9): 18. |
Song H L, Liu B, Cui Z W, Tian Q. Effect of application of Si on yield of rice at different periods[J]. Modernizing Agriculture, 2009(9): 18. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] | 龚金龙, 胡雅杰, 龙厚元, 常勇, 葛梦婕, 高辉, 刘艳阳, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 李德剑, 沙安勤, 周有炎, 罗学超. 不同时期施硅对超级稻产量和硅素吸收、利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2012, 45(8): 1475-1488. |
Gong J L, Hu Y J, Long H Y, Chang Y, Ge M J, Gao H, Liu Y Y, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Li D J, Sha A Q, Zhou Y Y, Luo X C. Effect of application of Si at different periods on grain yield and Si absorption, use efficiency in super rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2012, 45(8): 1475-1488. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[33] | 张珍淑, 漆光成, 杨培权, 蒋明艳. 基施锌肥对水稻产量影响试验初探[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2014(6): 84-85. |
Zhang Z S, Qi G C, Yang P Q, Jiang M Y. The first exploring experiment the efficiency on yield of rice with basal Zn fertilizers[J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014(6): 84-85. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[34] | 阮洪家, 胡敬年, 叶为发, 马俊飞. 施用硅肥对水稻生育特性及产量的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2015(3): 9-10. |
Ruan H J, Hu J N, Ye W F, Ma J F. Effect of application of Si on growth characters and yield of rice[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2015(3): 9-10. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[35] | 韦还和, 孟天瑶, 李超, 张洪程, 史天宇, 马荣荣, 王晓燕, 杨筠文, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 郭保卫. 施硅量对甬优系列籼粳交超级稻产量及相关形态生理性状的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2016, 42(3): 437-445. |
Wei H H, Meng T Y, Li C, Zhang H C, Shi T Y, Ma R R, Wang X Y, Yang J W, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Guo B W. Effects of Si fertilizer rate on grain yield and related morphological and physiological characteristics in super rice of Yongyou japonica-indica hybrids series[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2016, 42(3): 437-445. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[36] | Liu X W, Huang Z L, Li Y Z, Xie W J, Li W, Tang X R, Ashraf U, Kong L L, Wu L M, Wang S L, Mo Z W. Selenium-silicon (Se-Si) induced modulations in physio-biochemical responses, grain yield, quality, aroma formation and lodging in fragrant rice[J]. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 2020, 196 (15): 110525. |
[37] | 马朝红, 汪应城, 陈家贵, 黄学富, 王乾璋. 硅、锌肥配合施用对水稻生长和产量的影响[J]. 湖北农业科学, 2014, 53 (24): 5956-5958. |
Ma C H, Wang Y C, Chen J G, Huang X F, Wang Q Z. Effects of applying Si fertilizer combined with Zn fertilizer on the growth and grain yield of rice[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 53(24): 5956-5958. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[38] | 张国良. 硅肥对水稻产量和品质的影响及硅对水稻纹枯病抗性的初步研究[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2005. |
Zhang G L. Effects of silicon fertilizer on rice yield and quality and resistance to rice sheath blight[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2005. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[39] | 商全玉, 张文忠, 韩亚东, 荣蓉, 徐海, 徐正进, 陈温福. 硅肥对北方粳稻产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2009, 23(6): 661-664. |
Shang Q Y, Zhang W Z, Han Y D, Rong R, Xu H, Xu Z J, Chen W F. Effect of silicon fertilizer application on yield and grain quality of japonica rice from northeast China[J]. Chinease Journal of Rice Science, 2009, 23 (6): 661-664. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[40] | 唐湘如, 吴密. 施用锌、铁、镧肥对香稻米质和产量的影响[J]. 杂交水稻, 2007, 22(2): 69-72. |
Tang X R, Wu M. Effects of zinc, iron and lanthanum on rice quality and yield of fragrant rice[J]. Hybrid Rice, 2007, 22(2): 69-72. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[41] | 王远敏. 硅对水稻生长发育及产量品质的影响研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2007. |
Wang Y M. Effects of silicon on growth, yield and quality of rice[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2007. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[42] | 丁王梅. 纳米硅制剂对水稻养分吸收及品质的影响[D]. 沈阳: 东北农业大学, 2015. |
Ding W M. Effects of nano silicon preparation on nutrient absorption and quality of rice[D]. Shenyang: Northeast Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 任志奇, 薛可欣, 董铮, 李小湘, 黎用朝, 郭玉静, 刘文强, 郭梁, 盛新年, 刘之熙, 潘孝武. 水稻外卷叶突变体ocl1的鉴定及基因定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 337-346. |
[2] | 肖乐铨, 李雷, 戴伟民, 强胜, 宋小玲. 转cry2A*/bar基因水稻与杂草稻杂交后代的苗期生长特性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 347-358. |
[3] | 李刚, 高清松, 李伟, 张雯霞, 王健, 程保山, 王迪, 高浩, 徐卫军, 陈红旗, 纪剑辉. 定向敲除SD1基因提高水稻的抗倒性和稻瘟病抗性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 359-367. |
[4] | 汪胜勇, 陈宇航, 陈会丽, 黄钰杰, 张啸天, 丁双成, 王宏伟. 水稻减数分裂期高温对苯丙烷类代谢及下游分支代谢途径的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 368-378. |
[5] | 黄亚茹, 徐鹏, 王乐乐, 贺一哲, 王辉, 柯健, 何海兵, 武立权, 尤翠翠. 外源海藻糖对粳稻品系W1844籽粒灌浆特性及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[6] | 董立强, 杨铁鑫, 李睿, 商文奇, 马亮, 李跃东, 隋国民. 株行距配置对超高产田水稻产量及根系形态生理特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 392-404. |
[7] | 高欠清, 任孝俭, 翟中兵, 郑普兵, 吴源芬, 崔克辉. 头季穗肥和促芽肥对再生稻再生芽生长及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 405-414. |
[8] | 韩聪, 何禹畅, 吴丽娟, 郏丽丽, 王磊, 鄂志国. 水稻碱性亮氨酸拉链(bZIP)蛋白家族功能研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 436-448. |
[9] | 沈雨民, 陈明亮, 熊焕金, 熊文涛, 吴小燕, 肖叶青. 水稻内外稃异常发育突变体blg1 (beak like grain 1)的表型分析与精细定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 225-232. |
[10] | 段敏, 谢留杰, 高秀莹, 唐海娟, 黄善军, 潘晓飚. 利用CRISPR/Cas9技术创制广亲和水稻温敏雄性不育系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 233-243. |
[11] | 程玲, 黄福钢, 邱一埔, 王心怡, 舒宛, 邱永福, 李发活. 籼稻材料570011抗褐飞虱基因的遗传分析及鉴定[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 244-252. |
[12] | 王文婷, 马佳颖, 李光彦, 符卫蒙, 李沪波, 林洁, 陈婷婷, 奉保华, 陶龙兴, 符冠富, 秦叶波. 高温下不同施肥量对水稻产量品质形成的影响及其与能量代谢的关系分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
[13] | 刘嫒桦, 李小坤. 不同肥料施用与稻米品质关系的整合分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 276-284. |
[14] | 杨晓龙, 王彪, 汪本福, 张枝盛, 张作林, 杨蓝天, 程建平, 李阳. 不同水分管理方式对旱直播水稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
[15] | 林聃, 江敏, 苗波, 郭萌, 石春林. 水稻高温热害模型研究及其在福建省的应用[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 307-320. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||