中国水稻科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 187-199.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2021.0710
章燕柳1, 邵在胜1, 杨阳2, 童楷程2, 王云霞2,*(), 景立权1, 王余龙1, 杨连新1
收稿日期:
2020-07-17
修回日期:
2020-09-29
出版日期:
2021-03-10
发布日期:
2021-03-10
通讯作者:
王云霞
基金资助:
Yanliu ZHANG1, Zaisheng SHAO1, Yang YANG2, Kaicheng TONG2, Yunxia WANG2,*(), Liquan JING1, Yulong WANG1, Lianxin YANG1
Received:
2020-07-17
Revised:
2020-09-29
Online:
2021-03-10
Published:
2021-03-10
Contact:
Yunxia WANG
摘要:
【目的】研究不同类型水稻品种稻草饲用品质相关理化指标对臭氧胁迫的响应。【方法】利用新型自然光气体熏蒸平台,以 8个水稻品种为供试材料,设置室内对照和高臭氧浓度(80 nL/L)处理,于抽穗期、穗后20 d和成熟期分别测定叶片和茎鞘中饲用品质相关的理化指标。【结果】与对照相比,高浓度臭氧处理使稻草粗蛋白、木质素、纤维素、半纤维素和总酚含量分别增加7.07%(P <0.1)、10.88%(P <0.1)、1.98%、0.92%和5.01% (P<0.01),可溶性糖和淀粉含量分别下降15.07%(P <0.1)和18.55%(P <0.01)。多数情形下,叶片各指标含量对臭氧胁迫的响应大于茎鞘。所有测定指标的品种间差异均达极显著水平。不同生育期稻草木质素、纤维素、半纤维素和总酚含量表现为穗后20 d>成熟期>抽穗期,稻草可溶性糖和淀粉含量则表现为抽穗期>成熟期>穗后20 d,而粗蛋白含量随生育进程推进呈降低趋势。方差分析表明,臭氧胁迫与品种互作对所有测定指标的影响均达显著或极显著水平;除总酚含量外,臭氧与植株部位互作对所有测定指标的影响均达极显著水平;而臭氧与生育时期互作仅对植株粗蛋白、纤维素、可溶性糖和总酚含量有显著或极显著影响。【结论】稻草饲用品质相关理化指标因生育时期、供试品种和茎叶不同部位而异,高浓度臭氧环境下稻草饲用品质表现出变劣的趋势。
章燕柳, 邵在胜, 杨阳, 童楷程, 王云霞, 景立权, 王余龙, 杨连新. 全生育期臭氧胁迫对不同水稻品种稻草饲用品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(2): 187-199.
Yanliu ZHANG, Zaisheng SHAO, Yang YANG, Kaicheng TONG, Yunxia WANG, Liquan JING, Yulong WANG, Lianxin YANG. Effects of Ozone Stress on Feeding Quality of Straw of Different Rice Varieties During the Whole Growth Period[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2021, 35(2): 187-199.
图1 2018年水稻生长季自然光气体熏蒸平台控制情况 Ambient–室外对照;C-O3–室内对照;E-O3–高臭氧浓度;臭氧浓度为熏蒸期间的日平均浓度。下同。
Fig. 1. Ozone concentration, temperature and relative humidity in the greenhouse-type gas fumigation device during rice growing season in 2018. C-O3, Control, E-O3, Elevated ozone concentration, Ozone concentration is the average daily concentration during fumigation; The same as below.
植株部位Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片Leaf | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O₃ | 188±6 | 163±4 | 165±6 | 192±3 | 158±4 | 179±6 | 200±1 | 214±6 |
E-O₃ | 189±6 | 176±7 | 172±6 | 164±5 | 159±8 | 183±5 | 184±2 | 223±4 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O₃ | 113±6 | 120±6 | 106±6 | 88±4 | 82±4 | 108±2 | 110±7 | 127±3 | |
E-O₃ | 124±5 | 126±6 | 100±3 | 95±4 | 87±6 | 117±4 | 111±4 | 119±3 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O₃ | 68±4 | 68±3 | 47±3 | 54±2 | 55±2 | 55±4 | 43±1 | 73±3 | |
E-O₃ | 74±2 | 71±2 | 56±2 | 53±1 | 57±4 | 56±3 | 49±3 | 79±2 | ||
茎秆Stem | 抽穗期Heading | C-O₃ | 68±3 | 52±2 | 59±3 | 53±1 | 40±1 | 58±2 | 69±4 | 59±3 |
E-O₃ | 62±3 | 59±1 | 68±5 | 50±2 | 45±0 | 60±2 | 67±3 | 65±2 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O₃ | 48±2 | 58±4 | 36±1 | 29±1 | 30±1 | 45±1 | 40±2 | 42±2 | |
E-O₃ | 44±3 | 57±2 | 59±6 | 35±2 | 36±2 | 50±3 | 55±5 | 59±5 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O₃ | 48±1 | 35±3 | 33±1 | 37±3 | 35±1 | 39±2 | 33±1 | 42±2 | |
E-O₃ | 50±2 | 43±2 | 48±4 | 39±1 | 36±1 | 45±3 | 44±3 | 55±1 | ||
稻草 Straw | 抽穗期Heading | C-O₃ | 114±7 | 94±2 | 109±9 | 97±1 | 74±3 | 106±5 | 125±3 | 112±3 |
E-O₃ | 104±4 | 103±5 | 116±8 | 84±3 | 79±3 | 107±4 | 117±2 | 119±1 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O₃ | 69±1 | 78±1 | 57±2 | 47±1 | 45±1 | 66±2 | 64±3 | 59±2 | |
E-O₃ | 70±4 | 78±3 | 73±3 | 53±2 | 51±2 | 74±1 | 77±5 | 74±3 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O₃ | 54±1 | 46±3 | 38±2 | 42±2 | 41±1 | 44±2 | 37±1 | 48±2 | |
E-O₃ | 58±1 | 53±2 | 51±3 | 44±1 | 43±2 | 49±3 | 46±2 | 61±2 | ||
ANOVA结果 ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.685 | 0.014 | 0.147 | 0.333 | 0.192 | 0.168 | 0.460 | <0.001 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S | 0.441 | 0.403 | 0.765 | <0.001 | 0.742 | 0.625 | 0.001 | 0.622 | ||
O3×P | 0.056 | 0.586 | 0.016 | 0.005 | 0.765 | 0.972 | 0.007 | 0.010 | ||
S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3× S×P | 0.633 | 0.475 | 0.062 | 0.004 | 0.859 | 0.591 | 0.536 | 0.007 |
表1 臭氧胁迫对不同品种水稻叶片、茎秆和稻草粗蛋白含量的影响
Table 1 Effects of ozone stress on crude protein concentrations in leaves, stems and straw of different rice varieties. mg/g
植株部位Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片Leaf | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O₃ | 188±6 | 163±4 | 165±6 | 192±3 | 158±4 | 179±6 | 200±1 | 214±6 |
E-O₃ | 189±6 | 176±7 | 172±6 | 164±5 | 159±8 | 183±5 | 184±2 | 223±4 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O₃ | 113±6 | 120±6 | 106±6 | 88±4 | 82±4 | 108±2 | 110±7 | 127±3 | |
E-O₃ | 124±5 | 126±6 | 100±3 | 95±4 | 87±6 | 117±4 | 111±4 | 119±3 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O₃ | 68±4 | 68±3 | 47±3 | 54±2 | 55±2 | 55±4 | 43±1 | 73±3 | |
E-O₃ | 74±2 | 71±2 | 56±2 | 53±1 | 57±4 | 56±3 | 49±3 | 79±2 | ||
茎秆Stem | 抽穗期Heading | C-O₃ | 68±3 | 52±2 | 59±3 | 53±1 | 40±1 | 58±2 | 69±4 | 59±3 |
E-O₃ | 62±3 | 59±1 | 68±5 | 50±2 | 45±0 | 60±2 | 67±3 | 65±2 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O₃ | 48±2 | 58±4 | 36±1 | 29±1 | 30±1 | 45±1 | 40±2 | 42±2 | |
E-O₃ | 44±3 | 57±2 | 59±6 | 35±2 | 36±2 | 50±3 | 55±5 | 59±5 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O₃ | 48±1 | 35±3 | 33±1 | 37±3 | 35±1 | 39±2 | 33±1 | 42±2 | |
E-O₃ | 50±2 | 43±2 | 48±4 | 39±1 | 36±1 | 45±3 | 44±3 | 55±1 | ||
稻草 Straw | 抽穗期Heading | C-O₃ | 114±7 | 94±2 | 109±9 | 97±1 | 74±3 | 106±5 | 125±3 | 112±3 |
E-O₃ | 104±4 | 103±5 | 116±8 | 84±3 | 79±3 | 107±4 | 117±2 | 119±1 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O₃ | 69±1 | 78±1 | 57±2 | 47±1 | 45±1 | 66±2 | 64±3 | 59±2 | |
E-O₃ | 70±4 | 78±3 | 73±3 | 53±2 | 51±2 | 74±1 | 77±5 | 74±3 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O₃ | 54±1 | 46±3 | 38±2 | 42±2 | 41±1 | 44±2 | 37±1 | 48±2 | |
E-O₃ | 58±1 | 53±2 | 51±3 | 44±1 | 43±2 | 49±3 | 46±2 | 61±2 | ||
ANOVA结果 ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.685 | 0.014 | 0.147 | 0.333 | 0.192 | 0.168 | 0.460 | <0.001 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S | 0.441 | 0.403 | 0.765 | <0.001 | 0.742 | 0.625 | 0.001 | 0.622 | ||
O3×P | 0.056 | 0.586 | 0.016 | 0.005 | 0.765 | 0.972 | 0.007 | 0.010 | ||
S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3× S×P | 0.633 | 0.475 | 0.062 | 0.004 | 0.859 | 0.591 | 0.536 | 0.007 |
ANOVA | 粗蛋白 Crude protein | 结构性碳水化合物 Structural carbohydrates | 非结构性碳水化合物 Non-structured carbohydrates | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
木质素 Lignin | 纤维素 Cellulose | 半纤维素 Hemicellulose | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | 淀粉 Starch | 总酚 Total phenolic | |||||
臭氧胁迫 O3 stress | 0.063 | 0.059 | 0.562 | 0.886 | 0.059 | 0.003 | 0.009 | |||
品种 Variety (V) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
植株部位 Plant parts (P) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.718 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
O3×V | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.015 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
O3×S | 0.005 | 0.713 | 0.015 | 0.522 | <0.001 | 0.506 | <0.001 | |||
O3×P | 0.006 | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.004 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.076 | |||
V×S | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
V×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
O3×V×S | 0.007 | 0.269 | 0.089 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
O3×V×P | 0.002 | 0.021 | 0.146 | 0.004 | 0.059 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
O3×S×P | 0.804 | 0.001 | 0.480 | 0.007 | 0.085 | 0.149 | 0.001 | |||
V×S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
O3×V×S×P | 0.014 | 0.161 | 0.085 | 0.092 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.023 |
表2 臭氧胁迫对不同水稻品种稻草饲用品质相关理化指标影响的汇总显著性检验 (P值)
Table 2 ANOVA results of the effect of ozone stress on feed value index of rice straw from different rice varieties (P value).
ANOVA | 粗蛋白 Crude protein | 结构性碳水化合物 Structural carbohydrates | 非结构性碳水化合物 Non-structured carbohydrates | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
木质素 Lignin | 纤维素 Cellulose | 半纤维素 Hemicellulose | 可溶性糖 Soluble sugar | 淀粉 Starch | 总酚 Total phenolic | |||||
臭氧胁迫 O3 stress | 0.063 | 0.059 | 0.562 | 0.886 | 0.059 | 0.003 | 0.009 | |||
品种 Variety (V) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
植株部位 Plant parts (P) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.718 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
O3×V | 0.003 | 0.003 | 0.015 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
O3×S | 0.005 | 0.713 | 0.015 | 0.522 | <0.001 | 0.506 | <0.001 | |||
O3×P | 0.006 | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.004 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.076 | |||
V×S | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
V×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
O3×V×S | 0.007 | 0.269 | 0.089 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
O3×V×P | 0.002 | 0.021 | 0.146 | 0.004 | 0.059 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
O3×S×P | 0.804 | 0.001 | 0.480 | 0.007 | 0.085 | 0.149 | 0.001 | |||
V×S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||
O3×V×S×P | 0.014 | 0.161 | 0.085 | 0.092 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.023 |
植株部位Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片 Leaf | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 139±1 | 129±9 | 114±6 | 118±5 | 125±4 | 142±2 | 121±3 | 126±3 |
E-O3 | 141±3 | 155±5 | 153±5 | 120±5 | 140±4 | 141±2 | 129±3 | 150±4 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 122±4 | 153±6 | 109±6 | 110±3 | 134±7 | 117±5 | 122±5 | 132±10 | |
E-O3 | 145±10 | 164±9 | 142±2 | 138±6 | 155±4 | 154±5 | 145±7 | 150±8 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 122±5 | 138±4 | 118±3 | 111±2 | 130±3 | 120±4 | 125±2 | 117±4 | |
E-O3 | 131±4 | 154±3 | 135±4 | 122±5 | 143±7 | 130±7 | 141±2 | 133±3 | ||
茎秆 Stem | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 116±9 | 138±4 | 86±5 | 103±5 | 101±3 | 106±2 | 85±5 | 94±1 |
E-O3 | 122±5 | 145±3 | 94±5 | 109±5 | 121±5 | 112±4 | 86±3 | 129±6 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 149±3 | 150±8 | 107±3 | 121±2 | 139±8 | 128±7 | 117±2 | 96±2 | |
E-O3 | 148±6 | 163±5 | 110±6 | 116±6 | 157±3 | 128±11 | 117±4 | 109±4 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 120±3 | 141±7 | 99±4 | 103±5 | 116±9 | 103±6 | 100±1 | 97±4 | |
E-O3 | 123±5 | 147±6 | 107±9 | 114±8 | 150±3 | 120±8 | 108±4 | 113±4 | ||
稻草 Straw | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 124±6 | 135±3 | 100±6 | 108±5 | 108±3 | 120±3 | 100±4 | 105±1 |
E-O3 | 129±4 | 149±3 | 122±6 | 112±5 | 127±3 | 123±3 | 105±1 | 136±5 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 140±4 | 151±8 | 107±3 | 117±2 | 137±8 | 124±5 | 119±1 | 104±1 | |
E-O3 | 147±7 | 163±3 | 121±4 | 123±6 | 156±2 | 137±8 | 128±5 | 119±3 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 121±3 | 140±6 | 106±3 | 105±3 | 120±7 | 109±3 | 109±1 | 101±4 | |
E-O3 | 125±4 | 149±4 | 118±6 | 117±7 | 147±3 | 124±4 | 122±2 | 118±3 | ||
ANOVA 结果ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.028 | 0.001 | 0.115 | 0.285 | 0.047 | 0.179 | 0.111 | <0.001 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.289 | 0.010 | <0.001 | 0.004 | <0.001 | 0.024 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | 0.242 | 0.597 | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.022 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S | 0.647 | 0.796 | 0.208 | 0.386 | 0.774 | 0.112 | 0.349 | 0.098 | ||
O3×P | 0.145 | 0.226 | <0.001 | 0.061 | 0.231 | 0.216 | 0.006 | 0.833 | ||
S×P | <0.001 | 0.982 | 0.001 | 0.486 | 0.005 | 0.006 | <0.001 | 0.035 | ||
O3×S×P | 0.155 | 0.478 | 0.139 | 0.014 | 0.254 | 0.011 | 0.248 | 0.549 | ||
O3 | 0.028 | 0.001 | 0.115 | 0.285 | 0.047 | 0.179 | 0.111 | <0.001 |
表3 臭氧胁迫对不同品种水稻叶片、茎秆和稻草木质素含量的影响
Table 3 Effects of ozone stress on lignin concentrations in leaves, stems and straw of different rice varieties. g/kg
植株部位Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片 Leaf | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 139±1 | 129±9 | 114±6 | 118±5 | 125±4 | 142±2 | 121±3 | 126±3 |
E-O3 | 141±3 | 155±5 | 153±5 | 120±5 | 140±4 | 141±2 | 129±3 | 150±4 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 122±4 | 153±6 | 109±6 | 110±3 | 134±7 | 117±5 | 122±5 | 132±10 | |
E-O3 | 145±10 | 164±9 | 142±2 | 138±6 | 155±4 | 154±5 | 145±7 | 150±8 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 122±5 | 138±4 | 118±3 | 111±2 | 130±3 | 120±4 | 125±2 | 117±4 | |
E-O3 | 131±4 | 154±3 | 135±4 | 122±5 | 143±7 | 130±7 | 141±2 | 133±3 | ||
茎秆 Stem | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 116±9 | 138±4 | 86±5 | 103±5 | 101±3 | 106±2 | 85±5 | 94±1 |
E-O3 | 122±5 | 145±3 | 94±5 | 109±5 | 121±5 | 112±4 | 86±3 | 129±6 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 149±3 | 150±8 | 107±3 | 121±2 | 139±8 | 128±7 | 117±2 | 96±2 | |
E-O3 | 148±6 | 163±5 | 110±6 | 116±6 | 157±3 | 128±11 | 117±4 | 109±4 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 120±3 | 141±7 | 99±4 | 103±5 | 116±9 | 103±6 | 100±1 | 97±4 | |
E-O3 | 123±5 | 147±6 | 107±9 | 114±8 | 150±3 | 120±8 | 108±4 | 113±4 | ||
稻草 Straw | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 124±6 | 135±3 | 100±6 | 108±5 | 108±3 | 120±3 | 100±4 | 105±1 |
E-O3 | 129±4 | 149±3 | 122±6 | 112±5 | 127±3 | 123±3 | 105±1 | 136±5 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 140±4 | 151±8 | 107±3 | 117±2 | 137±8 | 124±5 | 119±1 | 104±1 | |
E-O3 | 147±7 | 163±3 | 121±4 | 123±6 | 156±2 | 137±8 | 128±5 | 119±3 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 121±3 | 140±6 | 106±3 | 105±3 | 120±7 | 109±3 | 109±1 | 101±4 | |
E-O3 | 125±4 | 149±4 | 118±6 | 117±7 | 147±3 | 124±4 | 122±2 | 118±3 | ||
ANOVA 结果ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.028 | 0.001 | 0.115 | 0.285 | 0.047 | 0.179 | 0.111 | <0.001 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.289 | 0.010 | <0.001 | 0.004 | <0.001 | 0.024 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | 0.242 | 0.597 | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.022 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S | 0.647 | 0.796 | 0.208 | 0.386 | 0.774 | 0.112 | 0.349 | 0.098 | ||
O3×P | 0.145 | 0.226 | <0.001 | 0.061 | 0.231 | 0.216 | 0.006 | 0.833 | ||
S×P | <0.001 | 0.982 | 0.001 | 0.486 | 0.005 | 0.006 | <0.001 | 0.035 | ||
O3×S×P | 0.155 | 0.478 | 0.139 | 0.014 | 0.254 | 0.011 | 0.248 | 0.549 | ||
O3 | 0.028 | 0.001 | 0.115 | 0.285 | 0.047 | 0.179 | 0.111 | <0.001 |
植株部位 Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片 Leaf | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 379±15 | 395±18 | 408±13 | 403±12 | 406±8 | 409±3 | 435±7 | 351±13 |
E-O3 | 368±17 | 408±12 | 384±8 | 427±4 | 416±4 | 400±5 | 453±9 | 387±4 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 425±5 | 452±14 | 459±18 | 464±18 | 477±10 | 429±5 | 453±4 | 417±15 | |
E-O3 | 407±12 | 436±14 | 426±14 | 442±10 | 460±9 | 431±11 | 475±7 | 392±15 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 523±6 | 479±10 | 501±14 | 511±5 | 511±14 | 523±8 | 520±7 | 477±7 | |
E-O3 | 506±7 | 508±19 | 501±5 | 508±4 | 525±9 | 514±12 | 500±6 | 464±2 | ||
茎秆 Stem | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 433±13 | 480±6 | 408±13 | 426±9 | 358±18 | 418±8 | 454±7 | 381±10 |
E-O3 | 430±4 | 498±10 | 448±5 | 421±9 | 368±10 | 416±10 | 457±8 | 449±18 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 489±9 | 534±13 | 508±5 | 503±11 | 480±5 | 532±12 | 501±10 | 439±13 | |
E-O3 | 498±10 | 543±13 | 495±17 | 495±5 | 546±9 | 505±12 | 501±10 | 430±17 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 427±13 | 458±9 | 481±6 | 455±5 | 396±14 | 463±7 | 481±11 | 366±5 | |
E-O3 | 425±13 | 460±14 | 473±15 | 480±17 | 464±21 | 499±15 | 486±11 | 411±21 | ||
稻草 Straw | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 413±8 | 448±8 | 405±5 | 419±3 | 372±13 | 414±6 | 446±5 | 372±5 |
E-O3 | 408±8 | 465±10 | 415±6 | 423±7 | 382±8 | 410±4 | 455±3 | 428±13 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 468±13 | 507±6 | 494±11 | 491±9 | 479±5 | 497±8 | 484±7 | 434±10 | |
E-O3 | 469±9 | 511±11 | 470±14 | 480±7 | 520±6 | 479±12 | 491±9 | 421±15 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 455±10 | 464±6 | 488±5 | 471±5 | 427±9 | 483±20 | 496±9 | 389±4 | |
E-O3 | 451±11 | 476±10 | 483±11 | 489±13 | 484±13 | 504±14 | 492±8 | 424±15 | ||
ANOVA结果ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.403 | 0.419 | 0.451 | 0.873 | 0.144 | 0.917 | 0.344 | 0.241 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | 0.000 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | 0.060 | <0.001 | 0.014 | 0.465 | <0.001 | 0.005 | 0.136 | 0.763 | ||
O3×S | 0.966 | 0.544 | 0.341 | 0.102 | 0.171 | 0.309 | 0.194 | 0.002 | ||
O3×P | 0.308 | 0.951 | 0.142 | 0.679 | 0.002 | 0.602 | 0.648 | 0.016 | ||
S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S×P | 0.875 | 0.417 | 0.249 | 0.096 | 0.436 | 0.118 | 0.103 | 0.502 |
表4 臭氧胁迫对不同品种水稻叶片、茎秆和稻草纤维素含量的影响
Table 4 Effects of ozone stress on cellulose concentrations in leaves, stems and straw of different rice varieties. g/kg
植株部位 Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片 Leaf | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 379±15 | 395±18 | 408±13 | 403±12 | 406±8 | 409±3 | 435±7 | 351±13 |
E-O3 | 368±17 | 408±12 | 384±8 | 427±4 | 416±4 | 400±5 | 453±9 | 387±4 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 425±5 | 452±14 | 459±18 | 464±18 | 477±10 | 429±5 | 453±4 | 417±15 | |
E-O3 | 407±12 | 436±14 | 426±14 | 442±10 | 460±9 | 431±11 | 475±7 | 392±15 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 523±6 | 479±10 | 501±14 | 511±5 | 511±14 | 523±8 | 520±7 | 477±7 | |
E-O3 | 506±7 | 508±19 | 501±5 | 508±4 | 525±9 | 514±12 | 500±6 | 464±2 | ||
茎秆 Stem | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 433±13 | 480±6 | 408±13 | 426±9 | 358±18 | 418±8 | 454±7 | 381±10 |
E-O3 | 430±4 | 498±10 | 448±5 | 421±9 | 368±10 | 416±10 | 457±8 | 449±18 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 489±9 | 534±13 | 508±5 | 503±11 | 480±5 | 532±12 | 501±10 | 439±13 | |
E-O3 | 498±10 | 543±13 | 495±17 | 495±5 | 546±9 | 505±12 | 501±10 | 430±17 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 427±13 | 458±9 | 481±6 | 455±5 | 396±14 | 463±7 | 481±11 | 366±5 | |
E-O3 | 425±13 | 460±14 | 473±15 | 480±17 | 464±21 | 499±15 | 486±11 | 411±21 | ||
稻草 Straw | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 413±8 | 448±8 | 405±5 | 419±3 | 372±13 | 414±6 | 446±5 | 372±5 |
E-O3 | 408±8 | 465±10 | 415±6 | 423±7 | 382±8 | 410±4 | 455±3 | 428±13 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 468±13 | 507±6 | 494±11 | 491±9 | 479±5 | 497±8 | 484±7 | 434±10 | |
E-O3 | 469±9 | 511±11 | 470±14 | 480±7 | 520±6 | 479±12 | 491±9 | 421±15 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 455±10 | 464±6 | 488±5 | 471±5 | 427±9 | 483±20 | 496±9 | 389±4 | |
E-O3 | 451±11 | 476±10 | 483±11 | 489±13 | 484±13 | 504±14 | 492±8 | 424±15 | ||
ANOVA结果ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.403 | 0.419 | 0.451 | 0.873 | 0.144 | 0.917 | 0.344 | 0.241 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | 0.000 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | 0.060 | <0.001 | 0.014 | 0.465 | <0.001 | 0.005 | 0.136 | 0.763 | ||
O3×S | 0.966 | 0.544 | 0.341 | 0.102 | 0.171 | 0.309 | 0.194 | 0.002 | ||
O3×P | 0.308 | 0.951 | 0.142 | 0.679 | 0.002 | 0.602 | 0.648 | 0.016 | ||
S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S×P | 0.875 | 0.417 | 0.249 | 0.096 | 0.436 | 0.118 | 0.103 | 0.502 |
植株部位 Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理 Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片 Leaf | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 190±4 | 184±5 | 182±4 | 197±3 | 196±2 | 182±6 | 186±6 | 171±5 |
E-O3 | 188±7 | 184±6 | 191±2 | 198±7 | 196±5 | 179±5 | 183±2 | 167±4 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 197±2 | 187±5 | 207±9 | 209±5 | 221±9 | 196±3 | 198±3 | 176±8 | |
E-O3 | 195±6 | 202±3 | 204±0 | 197±6 | 219±4 | 204±2 | 198±3 | 180±8 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 220±4 | 217±1 | 208±4 | 205±4 | 211±5 | 226±4 | 212±7 | 199±6 | |
E-O3 | 198±5 | 213±8 | 212±3 | 202±5 | 205±3 | 209±4 | 208±5 | 178±6 | ||
茎秆 Stem | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 182±1 | 196±12 | 212±4 | 157±7 | 200±4 | 184±4 | 170±1 | 200±6 |
E-O3 | 169±5 | 192±4 | 193±6 | 181±5 | 197±5 | 194±1 | 195±1 | 186±5 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 208±7 | 210±6 | 206±3 | 224±4 | 200±5 | 214±5 | 197±6 | 177±11 | |
E-O3 | 209±6 | 227±2 | 211±4 | 204±7 | 216±4 | 207±2 | 207±1 | 183±9 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 208±3 | 204±2 | 210±5 | 170±5 | 194±10 | 206±5 | 190±5 | 186±11 | |
E-O3 | 193±9 | 206±5 | 204±7 | 186±6 | 217±13 | 218±3 | 224±5 | 180±8 | ||
稻草 Straw | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 185±2 | 191±9 | 198±2 | 169±5 | 199±3 | 184±3 | 176±2 | 191±5 |
E-O3 | 176±2 | 189±4 | 192±4 | 186±5 | 196±4 | 188±2 | 190±1 | 179±4 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 205±5 | 202±3 | 207±2 | 219±3 | 206±5 | 208±2 | 197±4 | 177±10 | |
E-O3 | 205±6 | 219±1 | 209±3 | 202±5 | 217±4 | 206±2 | 204±2 | 182±8 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 211±2 | 208±2 | 210±5 | 180±3 | 199±7 | 213±3 | 198±5 | 188±9 | |
E-O3 | 195±6 | 208±3 | 206±5 | 191±4 | 212±8 | 215±3 | 218±3 | 180±7 | ||
ANOVA结果 ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.341 | 0.587 | 0.721 | 0.674 | 0.452 | 0.839 | <0.001 | 0.586 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.347 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | 0.283 | 0.011 | 0.047 | <0.001 | 0.296 | 0.060 | 0.898 | 0.091 | ||
O3×S | 0.033 | 0.030 | 0.639 | 0.002 | 0.459 | 0.559 | 0.290 | 0.168 | ||
O3×P | 0.852 | 0.887 | 0.059 | 0.090 | 0.060 | 0.057 | <0.001 | 0.787 | ||
S×P | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.018 | <0.001 | 0.279 | 0.009 | 0.457 | 0.014 | ||
O3×S×P | 0.395 | 0.836 | 0.025 | 0.101 | 0.208 | 0.002 | 0.091 | 0.444 |
表5 臭氧胁迫对不同品种水稻叶片、茎秆和稻草半纤维素含量的影响
Table 5 Effects of ozone stress on hemicellulose concentrations in leaves, stems and straw of different rice varieties. g/kg
植株部位 Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理 Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片 Leaf | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 190±4 | 184±5 | 182±4 | 197±3 | 196±2 | 182±6 | 186±6 | 171±5 |
E-O3 | 188±7 | 184±6 | 191±2 | 198±7 | 196±5 | 179±5 | 183±2 | 167±4 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 197±2 | 187±5 | 207±9 | 209±5 | 221±9 | 196±3 | 198±3 | 176±8 | |
E-O3 | 195±6 | 202±3 | 204±0 | 197±6 | 219±4 | 204±2 | 198±3 | 180±8 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 220±4 | 217±1 | 208±4 | 205±4 | 211±5 | 226±4 | 212±7 | 199±6 | |
E-O3 | 198±5 | 213±8 | 212±3 | 202±5 | 205±3 | 209±4 | 208±5 | 178±6 | ||
茎秆 Stem | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 182±1 | 196±12 | 212±4 | 157±7 | 200±4 | 184±4 | 170±1 | 200±6 |
E-O3 | 169±5 | 192±4 | 193±6 | 181±5 | 197±5 | 194±1 | 195±1 | 186±5 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 208±7 | 210±6 | 206±3 | 224±4 | 200±5 | 214±5 | 197±6 | 177±11 | |
E-O3 | 209±6 | 227±2 | 211±4 | 204±7 | 216±4 | 207±2 | 207±1 | 183±9 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 208±3 | 204±2 | 210±5 | 170±5 | 194±10 | 206±5 | 190±5 | 186±11 | |
E-O3 | 193±9 | 206±5 | 204±7 | 186±6 | 217±13 | 218±3 | 224±5 | 180±8 | ||
稻草 Straw | 抽穗期 Heading | C-O3 | 185±2 | 191±9 | 198±2 | 169±5 | 199±3 | 184±3 | 176±2 | 191±5 |
E-O3 | 176±2 | 189±4 | 192±4 | 186±5 | 196±4 | 188±2 | 190±1 | 179±4 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 205±5 | 202±3 | 207±2 | 219±3 | 206±5 | 208±2 | 197±4 | 177±10 | |
E-O3 | 205±6 | 219±1 | 209±3 | 202±5 | 217±4 | 206±2 | 204±2 | 182±8 | ||
成熟期 Maturity | C-O3 | 211±2 | 208±2 | 210±5 | 180±3 | 199±7 | 213±3 | 198±5 | 188±9 | |
E-O3 | 195±6 | 208±3 | 206±5 | 191±4 | 212±8 | 215±3 | 218±3 | 180±7 | ||
ANOVA结果 ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.341 | 0.587 | 0.721 | 0.674 | 0.452 | 0.839 | <0.001 | 0.586 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.347 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | 0.283 | 0.011 | 0.047 | <0.001 | 0.296 | 0.060 | 0.898 | 0.091 | ||
O3×S | 0.033 | 0.030 | 0.639 | 0.002 | 0.459 | 0.559 | 0.290 | 0.168 | ||
O3×P | 0.852 | 0.887 | 0.059 | 0.090 | 0.060 | 0.057 | <0.001 | 0.787 | ||
S×P | 0.001 | <0.001 | 0.018 | <0.001 | 0.279 | 0.009 | 0.457 | 0.014 | ||
O3×S×P | 0.395 | 0.836 | 0.025 | 0.101 | 0.208 | 0.002 | 0.091 | 0.444 |
植株部位 Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片Leaf | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 58±3.2 | 89±2.2 | 88±9.0 | 66±5.3 | 128±1.6 | 101±4.9 | 68±1.8 | 84±1.1 |
E-O3 | 63±0.9 | 59±4.8 | 55±2.8 | 60±2.6 | 113±3.2 | 79±2.0 | 72±5.1 | 69±2.4 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 31±1.5 | 30±2.1 | 30±3.2 | 51±7.2 | 94±1.9 | 83±2.5 | 49±3.4 | 79±5.5 | |
E-O3 | 34±4.9 | 27±1.4 | 22±1.5 | 39±6.3 | 45±3.4 | 64±2.6 | 49±2.9 | 53±3.3 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 80±6.0 | 70±3.7 | 61±3.9 | 54±4.3 | 76±3.0 | 47±7.5 | 44±5.0 | 68±5.4 | |
E-O3 | 48±4.9 | 39±3.7 | 39±1.0 | 27±1.8 | 40±2.7 | 33±2.3 | 20±1.9 | 42±2.8 | ||
茎秆Stem | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 60±2.0 | 54±2.0 | 78±7.1 | 137±4.8 | 141±4.6 | 120±2.3 | 92±0.4 | 131±4.5 |
E-O3 | 56±3.7 | 73±0.7 | 72±6.3 | 137±14 | 127±5.9 | 120±1.0 | 96±0.8 | 84±2.6 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 22±0.5 | 67±2.5 | 78±5.7 | 90±9.2 | 81±2.7 | 39±5.0 | 30±2.6 | 97±5.6 | |
E-O3 | 27±4.9 | 65±1.1 | 66±3.8 | 84±4.8 | 53±6.0 | 20±2.1 | 24±2.0 | 95±3.2 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 70±1.5 | 79±4.0 | 120±8.2 | 137±4.3 | 96±3.9 | 121±10.5 | 85±2.3 | 100±5.8 | |
E-O3 | 73±2.6 | 71±5.9 | 99±7.1 | 118±4.7 | 85±7.7 | 105±11.3 | 74±6.1 | 93±2.8 | ||
稻草Straw | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 60±2.0 | 67±1.9 | 83±5.1 | 114±4.4 | 137±3.5 | 112±2.7 | 82±0.9 | 115±4.4 |
E-O3 | 58±2.7 | 67±1.9 | 64±4.0 | 113±10.4 | 122±4.0 | 104±0.4 | 86±2.0 | 79±1.9 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 25±0.8 | 55±2.3 | 64±4.4 | 77±8.9 | 84±1.7 | 53±4.1 | 37±0.9 | 93±4.8 | |
E-O3 | 29±4.7 | 54±0.4 | 51±1.9 | 70±5.7 | 51±5.0 | 36±2.6 | 33±1.9 | 86±2.9 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 73±2.3 | 76±1.7 | 100±5.6 | 113±4.8 | 91±3.3 | 96±7.4 | 69±1.7 | 94±5.2 | |
E-O3 | 65±3.3 | 60±3.6 | 78±5.5 | 87±4.3 | 70±6.4 | 79±8.3 | 52±3.4 | 79±2.8 | ||
ANOVA结果 ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.603 | <0.001 | 0.059 | 0.288 | 0.019 | 0.107 | 0.005 | 0.029 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | 0.453 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.301 | 0.055 | 0.012 | 0.581 | 0.000 | 0.009 | ||
O3×P | 0.014 | <0.001 | 0.194 | 0.301 | 0.003 | 0.269 | 0.608 | 0.397 | ||
S×P | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.098 | ||
O3×S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.124 | 0.999 | 0.089 | 0.208 | 0.175 | <0.001 |
表6 臭氧胁迫对不同品种水稻叶片、茎秆和稻草可溶性糖含量的影响
Table 6 Effects of ozone stress on soluble sugar concentrations in leaves, stems and straw of different rice varieties. mg/g
植株部位 Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片Leaf | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 58±3.2 | 89±2.2 | 88±9.0 | 66±5.3 | 128±1.6 | 101±4.9 | 68±1.8 | 84±1.1 |
E-O3 | 63±0.9 | 59±4.8 | 55±2.8 | 60±2.6 | 113±3.2 | 79±2.0 | 72±5.1 | 69±2.4 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 31±1.5 | 30±2.1 | 30±3.2 | 51±7.2 | 94±1.9 | 83±2.5 | 49±3.4 | 79±5.5 | |
E-O3 | 34±4.9 | 27±1.4 | 22±1.5 | 39±6.3 | 45±3.4 | 64±2.6 | 49±2.9 | 53±3.3 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 80±6.0 | 70±3.7 | 61±3.9 | 54±4.3 | 76±3.0 | 47±7.5 | 44±5.0 | 68±5.4 | |
E-O3 | 48±4.9 | 39±3.7 | 39±1.0 | 27±1.8 | 40±2.7 | 33±2.3 | 20±1.9 | 42±2.8 | ||
茎秆Stem | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 60±2.0 | 54±2.0 | 78±7.1 | 137±4.8 | 141±4.6 | 120±2.3 | 92±0.4 | 131±4.5 |
E-O3 | 56±3.7 | 73±0.7 | 72±6.3 | 137±14 | 127±5.9 | 120±1.0 | 96±0.8 | 84±2.6 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 22±0.5 | 67±2.5 | 78±5.7 | 90±9.2 | 81±2.7 | 39±5.0 | 30±2.6 | 97±5.6 | |
E-O3 | 27±4.9 | 65±1.1 | 66±3.8 | 84±4.8 | 53±6.0 | 20±2.1 | 24±2.0 | 95±3.2 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 70±1.5 | 79±4.0 | 120±8.2 | 137±4.3 | 96±3.9 | 121±10.5 | 85±2.3 | 100±5.8 | |
E-O3 | 73±2.6 | 71±5.9 | 99±7.1 | 118±4.7 | 85±7.7 | 105±11.3 | 74±6.1 | 93±2.8 | ||
稻草Straw | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 60±2.0 | 67±1.9 | 83±5.1 | 114±4.4 | 137±3.5 | 112±2.7 | 82±0.9 | 115±4.4 |
E-O3 | 58±2.7 | 67±1.9 | 64±4.0 | 113±10.4 | 122±4.0 | 104±0.4 | 86±2.0 | 79±1.9 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 25±0.8 | 55±2.3 | 64±4.4 | 77±8.9 | 84±1.7 | 53±4.1 | 37±0.9 | 93±4.8 | |
E-O3 | 29±4.7 | 54±0.4 | 51±1.9 | 70±5.7 | 51±5.0 | 36±2.6 | 33±1.9 | 86±2.9 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 73±2.3 | 76±1.7 | 100±5.6 | 113±4.8 | 91±3.3 | 96±7.4 | 69±1.7 | 94±5.2 | |
E-O3 | 65±3.3 | 60±3.6 | 78±5.5 | 87±4.3 | 70±6.4 | 79±8.3 | 52±3.4 | 79±2.8 | ||
ANOVA结果 ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.603 | <0.001 | 0.059 | 0.288 | 0.019 | 0.107 | 0.005 | 0.029 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | 0.453 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.301 | 0.055 | 0.012 | 0.581 | 0.000 | 0.009 | ||
O3×P | 0.014 | <0.001 | 0.194 | 0.301 | 0.003 | 0.269 | 0.608 | 0.397 | ||
S×P | 0.002 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.098 | ||
O3×S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.124 | 0.999 | 0.089 | 0.208 | 0.175 | <0.001 |
植株部位 Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理 Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片Leaf | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 43±0.9 | 52±0.7 | 53±0.1 | 45±0.8 | 40±1.0 | 50±2.4 | 40±1.3 | 45±0.8 |
E-O3 | 47±1.3 | 49±1.3 | 49±1.3 | 44±1.1 | 41±1.1 | 46±2.4 | 35±1.0 | 42±1.5 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 42±2.3 | 36±0.3 | 41±1.2 | 45±2.3 | 36±1.5 | 44±2.6 | 36±1.4 | 34±0.5 | |
E-O3 | 43±0.9 | 34±0.7 | 37±1.0 | 33±1.4 | 36±1.3 | 37±3.1 | 33±1.7 | 33±1.1 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 40±3.3 | 39±0.4 | 42±1.7 | 42±1.5 | 39±1.7 | 38±0.4 | 38±2.0 | 46±1.0 | |
E-O3 | 42±0.4 | 37±1.2 | 39±0.5 | 39±0.4 | 36±1.3 | 37±1.4 | 35±1.5 | 42±0.9 | ||
茎秆Stem | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 181±5.3 | 99±2.8 | 150±9.5 | 190±3.1 | 239±3.8 | 184±3.7 | 143±0.6 | 206±7.2 |
E-O3 | 174±5.9 | 89±1.1 | 102±4.9 | 170±1.7 | 227±9.6 | 158±3.5 | 125±10.1 | 134±3.5 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 127±2.4 | 49±2.3 | 63±2.5 | 74±2.8 | 98±7.0 | 45±1.1 | 61±1.4 | 193±5.9 | |
E-O3 | 91±3.8 | 39±0.9 | 42±1.9 | 56±4.2 | 60±0.4 | 39±3.2 | 55±1.6 | 145±2.0 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 189±3.2 | 98±2.6 | 93±5.1 | 141±3.5 | 216±6.2 | 122±9.5 | 93±2.4 | 204±2.1 | |
E-O3 | 170±2.8 | 89±3.2 | 80±6.3 | 112±0.9 | 174±8.1 | 98±4.0 | 69±3.8 | 140±1.4 | ||
稻草Straw | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 129±4.2 | 81±1.9 | 106±8.5 | 144±2.1 | 181±4.3 | 131±5.8 | 99±0.9 | 151±6.9 |
E-O3 | 132±6.7 | 74±1.0 | 77±3.5 | 132±1.1 | 170±7.3 | 115±3.0 | 87±5.9 | 102±1.8 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 100±2.2 | 45±1.7 | 56±2.1 | 65±1.7 | 80±5.2 | 45±1.3 | 52±0.8 | 161±5.3 | |
E-O3 | 75±2.4 | 38±0.8 | 40±1.6 | 49±3.2 | 53±0.3 | 39±2.9 | 46±0.6 | 119±0.7 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 146±3.7 | 79±1.2 | 76±3.5 | 112±4.0 | 167±4.0 | 94±6.7 | 72±2.2 | 170±2.1 | |
E-O3 | 128±2.6 | 71±2.6 | 65±4.2 | 87±1.4 | 126±8.8 | 76±3.8 | 55±1.8 | 113±1.0 | ||
ANOVA结果 ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.127 | <0.001 | 0.106 | 0.012 | 0.063 | 0.058 | 0.057 | <0.001 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.011 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S | 0.002 | 0.801 | 0.002 | 0.214 | 0.036 | 0.237 | 0.153 | 0.017 | ||
O3×P | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.004 | <0.001 | ||
S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.104 | ||
O3×S×P | 0.010 | 0.905 | 0.004 | 0.015 | 0.088 | 0.056 | 0.147 | 0.061 |
表7 臭氧胁迫对不同品种水稻叶片、茎秆和稻草淀粉含量的影响
Table 7 Effects of ozone stress on starch concentrations in leaves, stems and straw of different rice varieties. mg/g
植株部位 Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理 Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片Leaf | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 43±0.9 | 52±0.7 | 53±0.1 | 45±0.8 | 40±1.0 | 50±2.4 | 40±1.3 | 45±0.8 |
E-O3 | 47±1.3 | 49±1.3 | 49±1.3 | 44±1.1 | 41±1.1 | 46±2.4 | 35±1.0 | 42±1.5 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 42±2.3 | 36±0.3 | 41±1.2 | 45±2.3 | 36±1.5 | 44±2.6 | 36±1.4 | 34±0.5 | |
E-O3 | 43±0.9 | 34±0.7 | 37±1.0 | 33±1.4 | 36±1.3 | 37±3.1 | 33±1.7 | 33±1.1 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 40±3.3 | 39±0.4 | 42±1.7 | 42±1.5 | 39±1.7 | 38±0.4 | 38±2.0 | 46±1.0 | |
E-O3 | 42±0.4 | 37±1.2 | 39±0.5 | 39±0.4 | 36±1.3 | 37±1.4 | 35±1.5 | 42±0.9 | ||
茎秆Stem | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 181±5.3 | 99±2.8 | 150±9.5 | 190±3.1 | 239±3.8 | 184±3.7 | 143±0.6 | 206±7.2 |
E-O3 | 174±5.9 | 89±1.1 | 102±4.9 | 170±1.7 | 227±9.6 | 158±3.5 | 125±10.1 | 134±3.5 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 127±2.4 | 49±2.3 | 63±2.5 | 74±2.8 | 98±7.0 | 45±1.1 | 61±1.4 | 193±5.9 | |
E-O3 | 91±3.8 | 39±0.9 | 42±1.9 | 56±4.2 | 60±0.4 | 39±3.2 | 55±1.6 | 145±2.0 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 189±3.2 | 98±2.6 | 93±5.1 | 141±3.5 | 216±6.2 | 122±9.5 | 93±2.4 | 204±2.1 | |
E-O3 | 170±2.8 | 89±3.2 | 80±6.3 | 112±0.9 | 174±8.1 | 98±4.0 | 69±3.8 | 140±1.4 | ||
稻草Straw | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 129±4.2 | 81±1.9 | 106±8.5 | 144±2.1 | 181±4.3 | 131±5.8 | 99±0.9 | 151±6.9 |
E-O3 | 132±6.7 | 74±1.0 | 77±3.5 | 132±1.1 | 170±7.3 | 115±3.0 | 87±5.9 | 102±1.8 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 100±2.2 | 45±1.7 | 56±2.1 | 65±1.7 | 80±5.2 | 45±1.3 | 52±0.8 | 161±5.3 | |
E-O3 | 75±2.4 | 38±0.8 | 40±1.6 | 49±3.2 | 53±0.3 | 39±2.9 | 46±0.6 | 119±0.7 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 146±3.7 | 79±1.2 | 76±3.5 | 112±4.0 | 167±4.0 | 94±6.7 | 72±2.2 | 170±2.1 | |
E-O3 | 128±2.6 | 71±2.6 | 65±4.2 | 87±1.4 | 126±8.8 | 76±3.8 | 55±1.8 | 113±1.0 | ||
ANOVA结果 ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.127 | <0.001 | 0.106 | 0.012 | 0.063 | 0.058 | 0.057 | <0.001 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.011 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S | 0.002 | 0.801 | 0.002 | 0.214 | 0.036 | 0.237 | 0.153 | 0.017 | ||
O3×P | <0.001 | 0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.002 | 0.004 | <0.001 | ||
S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.104 | ||
O3×S×P | 0.010 | 0.905 | 0.004 | 0.015 | 0.088 | 0.056 | 0.147 | 0.061 |
植株部位 Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片Leaf | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 2.3±0.02 | 2.1±0.00 | 2.3±0.01 | 2.6±0.02 | 2.7±0.02 | 2.6±0.05 | 2.8±0.03 | 3.0±0.04 |
E-O3 | 2.4±0.03 | 2.2±0.03 | 2.5±0.03 | 2.8±0.02 | 2.8±0.02 | 2.8±0.04 | 2.9±0.01 | 3.2±0.01 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 2.2±0.05 | 2.3±0.04 | 2.0±0.02 | 2.4±0.02 | 2.4±0.03 | 2.5±0.02 | 2.5±0.03 | 2.9±0.05 | |
E-O3 | 2.4±0.05 | 2.7±0.03 | 2.1±0.03 | 2.5±0.05 | 2.6±0.04 | 2.6±0.01 | 2.6±0.01 | 3.0±0.05 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 2.0±0.03 | 1.9±0.02 | 1.8±0.05 | 2.0±0.01 | 2.2±0.04 | 1.9±0.06 | 2.0±0.00 | 2.7±0.03 | |
E-O3 | 2.2±0.04 | 2.1±0.02 | 1.9±0.05 | 2.1±0.01 | 2.4±0.04 | 2.0±0.06 | 2.1±0.04 | 2.9±0.05 | ||
茎秆Stem | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 2.7±0.02 | 2.7±0.01 | 2.4±0.02 | 2.7±0.01 | 2.5±0.01 | 2.9±0.05 | 2.9±0.03 | 3.1±0.01 |
E-O3 | 2.9±0.01 | 2.7±0.01 | 2.5±0.01 | 2.9±0.01 | 2.6±0.02 | 2.9±0.01 | 3.1±0.04 | 3.3±0.03 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 3.4±0.03 | 3.7±0.03 | 3.6±0.05 | 3.6±0.03 | 3.9±0.02 | 4.0±0.04 | 4.1±0.02 | 4.4±0.03 | |
E-O3 | 3.7±0.04 | 4.0±0.06 | 3.7±0.04 | 3.8±0.05 | 4.0±0.03 | 4.0±0.02 | 4.2±0.03 | 4.5±0.02 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 3.3±0.03 | 3.1±0.06 | 3.0±0.07 | 3.0±0.05 | 2.7±0.03 | 3.0±0.03 | 3.1±0.08 | 3.4±0.03 | |
E-O3 | 3.4±0.02 | 3.4±0.05 | 3.3±0.04 | 3.3±0.02 | 3.1±0.06 | 3.1±0.03 | 3.3±0.04 | 3.7±0.05 | ||
稻草Straw | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 2.5±0.02 | 2.5±0.00 | 2.3±0.01 | 2.7±0.01 | 2.5±0.01 | 2.8±0.04 | 2.9±0.02 | 3.1±0.02 |
E-O3 | 2.7±0.01 | 2.5±0.00 | 2.5±0.02 | 2.8±0.01 | 2.6±0.02 | 2.8±0.01 | 3.0±0.02 | 3.3±0.02 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 3.0±0.02 | 3.2±0.04 | 3.1±0.05 | 3.2±0.03 | 3.5±0.01 | 3.5±0.03 | 3.5±0.01 | 4.1±0.03 | |
E-O3 | 3.3±0.04 | 3.6±0.05 | 3.1±0.03 | 3.4±0.04 | 3.6±0.02 | 3.5±0.03 | 3.6±0.01 | 4.2±0.04 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 2.9±0.03 | 2.7±0.06 | 2.6±0.06 | 2.7±0.04 | 2.6±0.03 | 2.6±0.03 | 2.7±0.07 | 3.3±0.01 | |
E-O3 | 3.0±0.02 | 3.0±0.04 | 2.8±0.03 | 2.9±0.02 | 2.8±0.03 | 2.8±0.04 | 2.9±0.02 | 3.5±0.06 | ||
ANOVA结果 ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.010 | 0.012 | 0.034 | 0.020 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.026 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S | 0.008 | <0.001 | 0.021 | 0.713 | 0.006 | 0.571 | 0.104 | 0.263 | ||
O3×P | 0.010 | 0.085 | 0.011 | 0.064 | 0.763 | 0.041 | 0.040 | 0.639 | ||
S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S×P | 0.211 | 0.359 | 0.358 | 0.004 | 0.008 | 0.034 | 0.817 | 0.098 |
表8 臭氧胁迫对不同品种水稻叶片、茎秆和稻草总酚含量的影响
Table 8 Effects of ozone stress on total phenolic concentrations in leaves, stems and straw of different rice varieties. mg/g
植株部位 Plant parts | 生育期 Growth stage | 处理Treatment | 淮稻5号 HD5 | 武运粳27 WYJ27 | 扬稻6号 YD6 | 丰优香占 FYXZ | 甬优1540 YY1540 | 桂农占 GNZ | 深两优136 SLY136 | 中早39 ZZ39 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶片Leaf | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 2.3±0.02 | 2.1±0.00 | 2.3±0.01 | 2.6±0.02 | 2.7±0.02 | 2.6±0.05 | 2.8±0.03 | 3.0±0.04 |
E-O3 | 2.4±0.03 | 2.2±0.03 | 2.5±0.03 | 2.8±0.02 | 2.8±0.02 | 2.8±0.04 | 2.9±0.01 | 3.2±0.01 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 2.2±0.05 | 2.3±0.04 | 2.0±0.02 | 2.4±0.02 | 2.4±0.03 | 2.5±0.02 | 2.5±0.03 | 2.9±0.05 | |
E-O3 | 2.4±0.05 | 2.7±0.03 | 2.1±0.03 | 2.5±0.05 | 2.6±0.04 | 2.6±0.01 | 2.6±0.01 | 3.0±0.05 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 2.0±0.03 | 1.9±0.02 | 1.8±0.05 | 2.0±0.01 | 2.2±0.04 | 1.9±0.06 | 2.0±0.00 | 2.7±0.03 | |
E-O3 | 2.2±0.04 | 2.1±0.02 | 1.9±0.05 | 2.1±0.01 | 2.4±0.04 | 2.0±0.06 | 2.1±0.04 | 2.9±0.05 | ||
茎秆Stem | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 2.7±0.02 | 2.7±0.01 | 2.4±0.02 | 2.7±0.01 | 2.5±0.01 | 2.9±0.05 | 2.9±0.03 | 3.1±0.01 |
E-O3 | 2.9±0.01 | 2.7±0.01 | 2.5±0.01 | 2.9±0.01 | 2.6±0.02 | 2.9±0.01 | 3.1±0.04 | 3.3±0.03 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 3.4±0.03 | 3.7±0.03 | 3.6±0.05 | 3.6±0.03 | 3.9±0.02 | 4.0±0.04 | 4.1±0.02 | 4.4±0.03 | |
E-O3 | 3.7±0.04 | 4.0±0.06 | 3.7±0.04 | 3.8±0.05 | 4.0±0.03 | 4.0±0.02 | 4.2±0.03 | 4.5±0.02 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 3.3±0.03 | 3.1±0.06 | 3.0±0.07 | 3.0±0.05 | 2.7±0.03 | 3.0±0.03 | 3.1±0.08 | 3.4±0.03 | |
E-O3 | 3.4±0.02 | 3.4±0.05 | 3.3±0.04 | 3.3±0.02 | 3.1±0.06 | 3.1±0.03 | 3.3±0.04 | 3.7±0.05 | ||
稻草Straw | 抽穗期Heading | C-O3 | 2.5±0.02 | 2.5±0.00 | 2.3±0.01 | 2.7±0.01 | 2.5±0.01 | 2.8±0.04 | 2.9±0.02 | 3.1±0.02 |
E-O3 | 2.7±0.01 | 2.5±0.00 | 2.5±0.02 | 2.8±0.01 | 2.6±0.02 | 2.8±0.01 | 3.0±0.02 | 3.3±0.02 | ||
穗后20 d 20DAH | C-O3 | 3.0±0.02 | 3.2±0.04 | 3.1±0.05 | 3.2±0.03 | 3.5±0.01 | 3.5±0.03 | 3.5±0.01 | 4.1±0.03 | |
E-O3 | 3.3±0.04 | 3.6±0.05 | 3.1±0.03 | 3.4±0.04 | 3.6±0.02 | 3.5±0.03 | 3.6±0.01 | 4.2±0.04 | ||
成熟期Maturity | C-O3 | 2.9±0.03 | 2.7±0.06 | 2.6±0.06 | 2.7±0.04 | 2.6±0.03 | 2.6±0.03 | 2.7±0.07 | 3.3±0.01 | |
E-O3 | 3.0±0.02 | 3.0±0.04 | 2.8±0.03 | 2.9±0.02 | 2.8±0.03 | 2.8±0.04 | 2.9±0.02 | 3.5±0.06 | ||
ANOVA结果 ANOVA results | ||||||||||
臭氧胁迫O3 stress | 0.010 | 0.012 | 0.034 | 0.020 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.026 | ||
生育期 Growth stage (S) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
植株部位Plant parts (P) | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S | 0.008 | <0.001 | 0.021 | 0.713 | 0.006 | 0.571 | 0.104 | 0.263 | ||
O3×P | 0.010 | 0.085 | 0.011 | 0.064 | 0.763 | 0.041 | 0.040 | 0.639 | ||
S×P | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||
O3×S×P | 0.211 | 0.359 | 0.358 | 0.004 | 0.008 | 0.034 | 0.817 | 0.098 |
[1] | The Royal Society.Ground-level ozone in the 21st century: Future trends, impacts and policy implications[C]. London: The Royal Society, 2008. |
[2] | Shon Z H, Kim K H, Song S K.Long-term trend in NO2 and NOx levels and their emission ratio in relation to road traffic activities in East Asia[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2011, 45(18): 3120-3131. |
[3] | Wang Y X, Zhang Y Q, Hao J, Luo M.Seasonal and spatial variability of surface ozone over China: Contributions from background and domestic pollution[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2011, 11: 3511-3525. |
[4] | Xing J, Wang S X, Chatani S, Zhang C Y, Wei W, Hao J M, Klimont Z, Cofala J, Amann M.Projections of air pollutant emissions and its impacts on regional air quality in China in 2020[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2011, 11: 3119-3136. |
[5] | Lai D M, Ghude S D, Patil S D, Kulkarni S H, Jena C, Tiwari S, Srivastava M K.Tropospheric ozone and aerosol long-term trends over the Indo-Gangetic Plain (IGP), India[J]. Atmospheric Research, 2012, 116(10): 82-92. |
[6] | Liu Q, Lam K S, Jiang F, Wang T J, Xie M, Zhuang B L, Jiang X Y.A numerical study of the impact of climate and emission changes on surface ozone over South China in autumn time in 2000-2050[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2013, 76: 227-237. |
[7] | Wang Y X, Shen L L, Wu S L, Wu S L, Mickley L, He J W, Hao J M.Sensitivity of surface ozone over China to 2000-2050 global changes of climate and emissions[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2013, 75: 374-382. |
[8] | Wang X P, Mauzerall D L.Characterizing distributions of surface ozone and its impact on grain production in China, Japan, and South Korea: 1990 and 2020[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2004, 38(26): 4383-4402. |
[9] | Wang X K, Manning W, Feng Z W, Zhu Y G.Ground-level ozone in China: Distribution and effects on crop yields[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2007, 147(2): 394-400. |
[10] | 冯兆忠, 彭金龙. 地表臭氧对中国主要粮食作物产量与品质的影响:现状与展望[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(4): 797-804. |
Feng Z Z, Peng J L.Effects of ground-level ozone on grain yield and quality of cereal crops in China:Status and perspectives[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2020, 39(4): 797-804. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 王云霞, 杨连新. 水稻品质对主要气候变化因子的响应[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39(4):822-833. |
Wang Y X,Yang L X.Response of rice quality to major climate change factors[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2020, 39(4): 822-833. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | Kangasjarvi J, Jaspers P, Kollist H.Signalling and cell death in ozone exposed plants[J]. Plant Cell and Environment, 2005, 28(8): 1021-1036. |
[13] | Ueda Y, Uehara N, Sasaki H, Kobayashi K, Yamakawa T.Impacts of acute ozone stress on superoxide dismutase (SOD) expression and reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation in rice leaves[J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2013, 70: 396-402. |
[14] | Fiscus E L, Booker F L, Burkey K O.Crop responses to ozone: Uptake, modes of action, carbon assimilation and partitioning[J]. Plant Cell and Environment, 2005, 28(8): 997-1011. |
[15] | Ainsworth E A, Yendrek C R, Sitch S, Collins W J, Emberson L D.The effects of tropospheric ozone on net primary productivity and implications for climate change[J]. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2012, 63(1): 637-661. |
[16] | Binod P, Sindhu R, Singhania R R, Vikram S, Devi L, Nagalakshmi S, Kurien N, Sukumaran R K, Pandey A.Bioethanol production from rice straw: An overview[J]. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101(13): 4767-4774. |
[17] | 董臣飞, 丁成龙, 许能祥, 程云辉, 沈益新, 顾洪如. 稻草饲用品质及茎秆形态特征的研究[J].草业学报, 2013(4): 86-89. |
Dong C F, Ding C L, Xu N X, Cheng Y H, Shen Y X, Gu H R.Research on the feeding quality and related stem morphological traits of rice straw[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013(4): 86-91. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | Van Soest P J. Rice straw, the role of silica and treatments to improve quality[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2006, 130(3-4): 137-171. |
[19] | Frei M, Kohno Y, Wissuwa M, Makkar H P S, Becker K, Negative effects of tropospheric ozone on the feed value of rice straw are mitigated by an ozone tolerance QTL[J]. Global Change Biology, 2011, 17(7): 2319-2329. |
[20] | Frei M, Makkar H P S, Becker K, Wissuwa M. Ozone exposure during growth affects the feeding value of rice shoots[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2010, 155(1): 74-79. |
[21] | Shao Z S, Zhang Y L, Mu H R, Wang Y X, Yang L X.Ozone-induced reduction in rice yield is closely related to the response of spikelet density under ozone stress[J/OL].Science of the Total Environment, 2020, 712: 136560. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136560. |
[22] | Shiro S, Yoshie S, Naoki Y, Takefumi H, Masahiro S, Toshiaki U.High-throughput determination of thioglycolic acid lignin from rice[J]. Plant Biotechnology, 2009, 26(3): 337-340. |
[23] | Brenner E A, Salazar A M, Zabotina O A, Thomas L. Characterization of European forage maize lines for stover composition and associations with polymorphisms within O-methyltransferase genes[J]. Journal of Experimental Plant Biology, 2012, 185-186: 281-287. |
[24] | 赵轶鹏, 赵新勇. 植物体可溶性糖测定方法的优化[J]. 安徽农业科学, 2018, 46(4): 184-185. |
Zhao Y P, Zhao X Y.Optimization of classical measuring method of soluble sugars in plant[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 46(4): 184-185. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 胡宏纹. 有机化学[M]. 北京. 高等教育出版社, 1990: 652. |
Hu H W. Organic Chemistry [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 1990: 652. | |
[26] | Makkar H P S, Blummel M, Borowy N K, Becke K. Gravimetric determination of tannins and their correlations with chemical and protein precipitation methods[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 1993, 61(2): 161-165. |
[27] | Piepho H P, Buchse A, Emrich K.A hitchhiker’s guide to mixed models for randomized experiments[J]. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 2003, 189(5): 310-322. |
[28] | Sanz J, Muniferting R B, Bermejo V, Gimeno B S, Elvira S.Ozone and increased nitrogen supply effects on the yield and nutritive quality of Trifolium subterraneum[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2005, 39(32): 5899-5907. |
[29] | 郑飞翔, 王效科, 侯培强, 张巍巍, 逯非, 欧阳志云. 臭氧胁迫对水稻生长以及C、N、S元素分配的影响[J]. 生态学报, 2011, 31(6): 1479-1486. |
Zheng F X, Wang X K, Hou P Q, Zhang W W, Lu F, Ouyang Z Y.Influences of elevated ozone on growth and C, N, S allocations of rice[J]. Acta Oecologica, 2011, 31(6): 1479-1486. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 邵在胜, 沈士博, 贾一磊, 穆海蓉, 王云霞, 杨连新, 王余龙. 臭氧浓度增加对不同敏感型水稻元素吸收与分配的影响[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2016, 35(9): 1642-1652. |
Shao Z S, Sheng S B, Jia Y L, Mu H R, Wang Y X, Yang L X, Wang Y L.Impact of ozone stress on element absorption and distribution of rice genotypes with different ozone sensitivities[J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2016, 35(9): 1642-1652. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | Cho K, Shibato J, Agrawal G K, Jung Y H, Kubo A, Jwa N S, Tamogami S, Satoh K, Kikuchi S, Higashi T, Kimuar S, Saji H, Tanaka Y, Iwahashi H, Masuo Y, Rakwal R.Integrated transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics analyses to survey ozone responses in the leaves of rice seedlings[J]. Journal of Proteome Research, 2008, 7(7): 2980-2998. |
[32] | Wang Y X, Michael F.Stressed food: The impact of abiotic environmental stresses on crop quality[J]. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 2011, 141(3-4): 271-286. |
[33] | Mould F L.Predicting the feed quality: Chemical analysis and in vitro evaluation[J]. Field Crops Research, 2003, 84(1-2): 31-44. |
[34] | Sarnklong C, Cone J W, Pellikaan W F, Hendriks W H.Utilization of rice straw and different treatments to improve its feed value for ruminants: A review[J]. AsianAustralian Journal of Animal Science, 2010, 23(5): 680-692. |
[35] | Muntifering R B, Chappelka A H, Lin J C, Karnosky D F, Somers G L.Chemical composition and digestibility of Trifolium exposed to elevated ozone and carbon dioxide in a free-air (FACE) fumigation system[J]. Functional Ecology, 2010, 20(2): 269-275. |
[36] | Bender J, Muntifering R B, Lin J C, Weigel H J.Growth and nutritive quality of Poa pratensis as influenced by ozone and competition[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2006, 142(1): 109-115. |
[37] | Makkar H P S. In vitro gas methods for evaluation of feeds containing phytochemicals[J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2005, 123-124(part-P1): 291-302. |
[38] | Nussbaum S, Geissmann M, Fuhrer J.Ozone exposure-response relationships for mixtures of perennial ryegrass and white clover depend on ozone exposure patterns[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 1995, 29(9): 989-995. |
[39] | Fuhrer J, SkRby L, Ashmore M R. Critical levels for ozone effects on vegetation in Europe[J]. Environmental Pollution, 1997, 97(1-2): 91-106. |
[40] | 董臣飞, 顾洪如, 许能祥, 程云辉, 张文洁, 丁成龙. 赤霉素对不同收获时间的稻草中非结构性碳水化合物含量的影响[J]. 草业学报, 2015, 24(8): 53-64. |
Dong C F, Gu H R, Xu N X, Cheng Y H, Zhang W J, Ding C L.Effects of gibberellic acid on nonstructural carbohydrates content in rice Oryza sativa straw harvested at different times[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2015, 24(8): 53-64. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[41] | Dong C F, Ding C L, Xu N X, Cheng Y H, Shen Y X, Gu H R.Double-purpose rice (Oryza sativa L.) variety selection and their morphological traits[J]. Field Crops Research, 2013, 149: 276-282. |
[42] | Dong C F, Shen Y X, Ding C L, Xu N X, Cheng Y H, Gu H R.The feeding quality of rice (Oryza sativa L.) straw at different cutting heights and the related stem morphological traits[J]. Field Crops Research, 2013, 141: 1-8. |
[43] | Dong C F, Ding C L, Xu N X, Cheng Y H, Shen Y X, Gu H R.Research on the feeding quality and related stem morphological traits of rice(Oryza sativa) straw[J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2013, 22(4): 83-88. |
[44] | 章燕柳, 穆海蓉, 邵在胜, 王云霞, 景立权, 王余龙, 杨连新. 臭氧胁迫对稻穗不同部位糙米直链淀粉含量和RVA谱特征值的影响[J]. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30(12): 4211-4221. |
Zhang Y L, Mu H R, Shao Z S, Wang Y X, Jing L Q, Wang Y L, Yang L X.Effects of ozone stress on amylose content and RVA profile in superior and inferior grains of different rice varieties[J]. Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(12): 4211-4221. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 任志奇, 薛可欣, 董铮, 李小湘, 黎用朝, 郭玉静, 刘文强, 郭梁, 盛新年, 刘之熙, 潘孝武. 水稻外卷叶突变体ocl1的鉴定及基因定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 337-346. |
[2] | 肖乐铨, 李雷, 戴伟民, 强胜, 宋小玲. 转cry2A*/bar基因水稻与杂草稻杂交后代的苗期生长特性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 347-358. |
[3] | 李刚, 高清松, 李伟, 张雯霞, 王健, 程保山, 王迪, 高浩, 徐卫军, 陈红旗, 纪剑辉. 定向敲除SD1基因提高水稻的抗倒性和稻瘟病抗性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 359-367. |
[4] | 汪胜勇, 陈宇航, 陈会丽, 黄钰杰, 张啸天, 丁双成, 王宏伟. 水稻减数分裂期高温对苯丙烷类代谢及下游分支代谢途径的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 368-378. |
[5] | 董立强, 杨铁鑫, 李睿, 商文奇, 马亮, 李跃东, 隋国民. 株行距配置对超高产田水稻产量及根系形态生理特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 392-404. |
[6] | 韩聪, 何禹畅, 吴丽娟, 郏丽丽, 王磊, 鄂志国. 水稻碱性亮氨酸拉链(bZIP)蛋白家族功能研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 436-448. |
[7] | 沈雨民, 陈明亮, 熊焕金, 熊文涛, 吴小燕, 肖叶青. 水稻内外稃异常发育突变体blg1 (beak like grain 1)的表型分析与精细定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 225-232. |
[8] | 段敏, 谢留杰, 高秀莹, 唐海娟, 黄善军, 潘晓飚. 利用CRISPR/Cas9技术创制广亲和水稻温敏雄性不育系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 233-243. |
[9] | 程玲, 黄福钢, 邱一埔, 王心怡, 舒宛, 邱永福, 李发活. 籼稻材料570011抗褐飞虱基因的遗传分析及鉴定[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 244-252. |
[10] | 王文婷, 马佳颖, 李光彦, 符卫蒙, 李沪波, 林洁, 陈婷婷, 奉保华, 陶龙兴, 符冠富, 秦叶波. 高温下不同施肥量对水稻产量品质形成的影响及其与能量代谢的关系分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
[11] | 刘嫒桦, 李小坤. 不同肥料施用与稻米品质关系的整合分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 276-284. |
[12] | 杨晓龙, 王彪, 汪本福, 张枝盛, 张作林, 杨蓝天, 程建平, 李阳. 不同水分管理方式对旱直播水稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
[13] | 魏晓东, 宋雪梅, 赵凌, 赵庆勇, 陈涛, 路凯, 朱镇, 黄胜东, 王才林, 张亚东. 硅锌肥及其施用方式对南粳46产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 295-306. |
[14] | 林聃, 江敏, 苗波, 郭萌, 石春林. 水稻高温热害模型研究及其在福建省的应用[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 307-320. |
[15] | 郑承梅, 孙金秋, 刘梦杰, 杨永杰, 陆永良, 郭怡卿, 唐伟. 水稻田糠稷种子萌发和出苗特性及化学防除药剂筛选[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 321-328. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||