中国水稻科学 ›› 2019, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 541-552.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2019.9022
石吕1,2, 张新月1, 孙惠艳1, 曹先梅1, 刘建2, 张祖建1,*()
收稿日期:
2019-02-18
修回日期:
2019-08-24
出版日期:
2019-11-10
发布日期:
2019-11-10
通讯作者:
张祖建
基金资助:
Lü SHI1,2, Xinyue ZHANG1, Huiyan SUN1, Xianmei CAO1, Jian LIU2, Zujian ZHANG1,*()
Received:
2019-02-18
Revised:
2019-08-24
Online:
2019-11-10
Published:
2019-11-10
Contact:
Zujian ZHANG
摘要:
目的 为揭示不同类型水稻品种稻米蛋白质含量与其蒸煮食味品质间的关系及其对不同后期施氮水平的响应。方法 以3个常规籼稻品种和3个常规粳稻品种为供试材料,在抽穗期实施不同氮肥水平的处理,分析稻米蛋白质及其组分含量与蒸煮食味品质的关系。结果 不论籼粳亚种,后期氮素肥料均显著增加了稻米蛋白质含量,品种对氮素的反应存在明显不同,但肥料处理效应大于品种间差异。随着后期氮肥水平的提高,稻米中四种蛋白组分含量也显著增加,以醇溶蛋白和谷蛋白对氮肥的施用反应较大;直链淀粉含量有所下降,胶稠度显著变短;淀粉糊化特征值中最高黏度、热浆黏度、崩解值和最终黏度下降,而回复值、消减值呈上升趋势;食味值显著下降。相关分析显示,籼﹑粳稻总蛋白质含量与胶稠度呈极显著负相关;籼稻蛋白质含量与食味值(r=-0.975**)﹑最高黏度呈极显著负相关,与崩解值呈负相关,与回复值﹑消减值呈正相关或显著正相关;粳稻蛋白质含量与食味值(r=-0.923**)和崩解值呈极显著负相关,与最高黏度呈显著负相关,与回复值﹑消减值的关系和籼稻基本相同。籼、粳稻食味值均与球蛋白、醇溶蛋白和谷蛋白显著负相关,与清蛋白(即比例最小的组分)的关系,籼稻呈极显著负相关,而粳稻相关性未达显著。结论 后期氮肥水平的增加显著提高稻米蛋白质及其组分含量。稻米蛋白质含量的增加,显著劣化稻米蒸煮品质和适口性。四种蛋白组分的增加均会不同程度地劣化稻米食味,其中,尤以球蛋白和醇溶蛋白的负效应较为显著,谷蛋白对食味的负效应也不可忽视,在籼稻品种中表现更明显。
中图分类号:
石吕, 张新月, 孙惠艳, 曹先梅, 刘建, 张祖建. 不同类型水稻品种稻米蛋白质含量与蒸煮食味品质的关系及后期氮肥的效应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(6): 541-552.
Lü SHI, Xinyue ZHANG, Huiyan SUN, Xianmei CAO, Jian LIU, Zujian ZHANG. Relationship of Grain Protein Content with Cooking and Eating Quality as Affected by Nitrogen Fertilizer at Late Growth Stage for Different Types of Rice Varieties[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2019, 33(6): 541-552.
年份 Year | 亚种Subspecies | 品种 Variety | 处理Treatment | 总蛋白质含量 Total protein | 清蛋白含量Albumin | 球蛋白含量Globulin | 醇溶蛋白含量Gliadin | 谷蛋白含量Glutenin | 其他蛋白含量 Other protein |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 | 籼稻 indica | 扬稻6号Yangdao 6 | N1 | 6.38±0.14 c | 0.14±0.002 b | 0.57±0.004 c | 0.66±0.002 c | 3.46±0.033 c | 1.44±0.04 b |
N2 | 8.44±0.24 b | 0.20±0.003 a | 0.71±0.002 b | 1.15±0.005 b | 4.51±0.002 b | 1.65±0.08 a | |||
N3 | 9.36±0.13 a | 0.22±0.003 a | 0.77±0.001 a | 1.23±0.006 a | 5.97±0.026 a | 1.08±0.13 c | |||
南京16 Nanjing 16 | N1 | 6.14±0.09 c | 0.16±0.002 b | 0.53±0.004 c | 0.56±0.004 c | 3.56±0.026 c | 1.33±0.10 b | ||
N2 | 8.10±0.12 b | 0.22±0.003 a | 0.68±0.002 b | 0.95±0.002 b | 4.58±0.033 b | 1.70±0.20 a | |||
N3 | 8.85±0.26 a | 0.23±0.003 a | 0.76±0.001 a | 1.07±0.003 a | 6.11±0.033 a | 0.84±0.01 c | |||
R3012 | N1 | 6.10±0.03 c | 0.19±0.003 b | 0.48±0.005 c | 0.51±0.004 c | 3.78±0.039 c | 0.71±0.07 a | ||
N2 | 7.25±0.16 b | 0.25±0.004 a | 0.65±0.002 b | 0.91±0.001 b | 5.70±0.033 b | 0.10±0.01 c | |||
N3 | 8.19±0.18 a | 0.26±0.004 a | 0.73±0.001 a | 0.98±0.002 a | 6.78±0.026 a | 0.16±0.04 b | |||
粳稻 japonica | 日本晴Nipponbare | N1 | 6.75±0.10 c | 0.14±0.002 c | 0.57±0.004 c | 0.70±0.002 c | 3.78±0.039 c | 1.72±0.04 a | |
N2 | 8.05±0.17 b | 0.16±0.002 b | 0.79±0.001 b | 1.15±0.005 b | 4.92±0.039 b | 1.21±0.04 b | |||
N3 | 9.17±0.20 a | 0.20±0.003 a | 0.84±0.000 a | 1.34±0.006 a | 5.61±0.037 a | 1.23±0.11 b | |||
农垦57 Nongken 57 | N1 | 6.25±0.13 c | 0.22±0.003 c | 0.53±0.004 c | 0.55±0.004 c | 4.48±0.037 c | 0.69±0.10 a | ||
N2 | 7.11±0.21 b | 0.28±0.004 b | 0.63±0.003 b | 0.90±0.001 b | 5.61±0.037 b | 0.54±0.08 b | |||
N3 | 8.10±0.11 a | 0.31±0.004 a | 0.73±0.001 a | 1.11±0.004 a | 6.36±0.039 a | 0.27±0.07 c | |||
淮稻5号Huaidao 5 | N1 | 6.61±0.01 c | 0.17±0.002 c | 0.55±0.004 c | 0.65±0.002 c | 4.04±0.039 c | 1.38±0.08 a | ||
N2 | 7.97±0.11 b | 0.19±0.003 b | 0.69±0.002 b | 1.01±0.003 b | 5.32±0.039 b | 0.80±0.04 b | |||
N3 | 9.04±0.06 a | 0.22±0.003 a | 0.79±0.001 a | 1.25±0.006 a | 5.92±0.039 a | 0.78±0.08 b | |||
2017 | 籼稻 indica | 扬稻6号Yangdao 6 | N1 | 6.41±0.09 c | 0.15±0.002 b | 0.55±0.004 c | 0.70±0.002 c | 3.55±0.030 c | 1.38±0.03 b |
N2 | 8.48±0.19 b | 0.18±0.003 a | 0.77±0.001 b | 1.18±0.005 b | 4.45±0.036 b | 1.67±0.06 a | |||
N3 | 9.41±0.07 a | 0.19±0.003 a | 0.81±0.000 a | 1.26±0.006 a | 5.91±0.021 a | 1.03±0.06 c | |||
南京16 Nanjing 16 | N1 | 6.17±0.05 c | 0.17±0.003 b | 0.52±0.004 c | 0.59±0.003 c | 3.65±0.008 c | 1.29±0.02 b | ||
N2 | 8.15±0.06 b | 0.19±0.003 ab | 0.74±0.001 b | 0.98±0.002 b | 4.57±0.020 b | 1.75±0.13 a | |||
N3 | 8.90±0.19 a | 0.22±0.003 a | 0.77±0.001 a | 1.04±0.003 a | 6.06±0.016 a | 0.74±0.01 c | |||
R3012 | N1 | 6.01±0.08 c | 0.19±0.003 b | 0.49±0.005 c | 0.52±0.004 c | 3.84±0.026 c | 0.81±0.07 a | ||
N2 | 7.29±0.11 b | 0.24±0.003 a | 0.69±0.002 b | 0.89±0.001 b | 5.73±0.028 b | 0.15±0.06 c | |||
N3 | 8.23±0.12 a | 0.26±0.004 a | 0.74±0.001 a | 0.96±0.002 a | 6.66±0.019 a | 0.21±0.03 b | |||
粳稻 japonica | 日本晴Nipponbare | N1 | 6.78±0.05 c | 0.13±0.002 c | 0.59±0.003 c | 0.73±0.001 c | 3.85±0.007 c | 1.67±0.03 a | |
N2 | 8.09±0.12 b | 0.16±0.002 b | 0.77±0.001 b | 1.06±0.003 b | 4.72±0.014 b | 1.26±0.03 b | |||
N3 | 9.21±0.13 a | 0.18±0.003 a | 0.88±0.001 a | 1.28±0.006 a | 5.56±0.025 a | 1.18±0.04 b | |||
农垦57 Nongken 57 | N1 | 6.28±0.09 c | 0.20±0.003 b | 0.49±0.007 c | 0.58±0.004 c | 4.50±0.011 c | 0.64±0.03 a | ||
N2 | 7.14±0.16 b | 0.22±0.003 ab | 0.60±0.003 b | 0.88±0.001 b | 5.36±0.036 b | 0.49±0.01 b | |||
N3 | 8.14±0.06 a | 0.24±0.003 a | 0.72±0.002 a | 1.05±0.003 a | 6.30±0.042 a | 0.22±0.00 c | |||
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | N1 | 6.64±0.03 c | 0.16±0.002 b | 0.55±0.004 c | 0.69±0.002 c | 4.13±0.038 c | 1.32±0.04 a | ||
N2 | 8.01±0.06 b | 0.19±0.003 a | 0.66±0.002 b | 0.99±0.002 b | 5.21±0.029 b | 0.72±0.01 b | |||
N3 | 9.08±0.00 a | 0.20±0.003 a | 0.76±0.001 a | 1.19±0.005 a | 5.81±0.006 a | 0.68±0.06 b |
表1 不同后期氮肥水平下精米蛋白质及其组分含量的变化
Table 1 Changes of protein and its components contents in polished rice under different nitrogen levels at late growing stage. %
年份 Year | 亚种Subspecies | 品种 Variety | 处理Treatment | 总蛋白质含量 Total protein | 清蛋白含量Albumin | 球蛋白含量Globulin | 醇溶蛋白含量Gliadin | 谷蛋白含量Glutenin | 其他蛋白含量 Other protein |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2016 | 籼稻 indica | 扬稻6号Yangdao 6 | N1 | 6.38±0.14 c | 0.14±0.002 b | 0.57±0.004 c | 0.66±0.002 c | 3.46±0.033 c | 1.44±0.04 b |
N2 | 8.44±0.24 b | 0.20±0.003 a | 0.71±0.002 b | 1.15±0.005 b | 4.51±0.002 b | 1.65±0.08 a | |||
N3 | 9.36±0.13 a | 0.22±0.003 a | 0.77±0.001 a | 1.23±0.006 a | 5.97±0.026 a | 1.08±0.13 c | |||
南京16 Nanjing 16 | N1 | 6.14±0.09 c | 0.16±0.002 b | 0.53±0.004 c | 0.56±0.004 c | 3.56±0.026 c | 1.33±0.10 b | ||
N2 | 8.10±0.12 b | 0.22±0.003 a | 0.68±0.002 b | 0.95±0.002 b | 4.58±0.033 b | 1.70±0.20 a | |||
N3 | 8.85±0.26 a | 0.23±0.003 a | 0.76±0.001 a | 1.07±0.003 a | 6.11±0.033 a | 0.84±0.01 c | |||
R3012 | N1 | 6.10±0.03 c | 0.19±0.003 b | 0.48±0.005 c | 0.51±0.004 c | 3.78±0.039 c | 0.71±0.07 a | ||
N2 | 7.25±0.16 b | 0.25±0.004 a | 0.65±0.002 b | 0.91±0.001 b | 5.70±0.033 b | 0.10±0.01 c | |||
N3 | 8.19±0.18 a | 0.26±0.004 a | 0.73±0.001 a | 0.98±0.002 a | 6.78±0.026 a | 0.16±0.04 b | |||
粳稻 japonica | 日本晴Nipponbare | N1 | 6.75±0.10 c | 0.14±0.002 c | 0.57±0.004 c | 0.70±0.002 c | 3.78±0.039 c | 1.72±0.04 a | |
N2 | 8.05±0.17 b | 0.16±0.002 b | 0.79±0.001 b | 1.15±0.005 b | 4.92±0.039 b | 1.21±0.04 b | |||
N3 | 9.17±0.20 a | 0.20±0.003 a | 0.84±0.000 a | 1.34±0.006 a | 5.61±0.037 a | 1.23±0.11 b | |||
农垦57 Nongken 57 | N1 | 6.25±0.13 c | 0.22±0.003 c | 0.53±0.004 c | 0.55±0.004 c | 4.48±0.037 c | 0.69±0.10 a | ||
N2 | 7.11±0.21 b | 0.28±0.004 b | 0.63±0.003 b | 0.90±0.001 b | 5.61±0.037 b | 0.54±0.08 b | |||
N3 | 8.10±0.11 a | 0.31±0.004 a | 0.73±0.001 a | 1.11±0.004 a | 6.36±0.039 a | 0.27±0.07 c | |||
淮稻5号Huaidao 5 | N1 | 6.61±0.01 c | 0.17±0.002 c | 0.55±0.004 c | 0.65±0.002 c | 4.04±0.039 c | 1.38±0.08 a | ||
N2 | 7.97±0.11 b | 0.19±0.003 b | 0.69±0.002 b | 1.01±0.003 b | 5.32±0.039 b | 0.80±0.04 b | |||
N3 | 9.04±0.06 a | 0.22±0.003 a | 0.79±0.001 a | 1.25±0.006 a | 5.92±0.039 a | 0.78±0.08 b | |||
2017 | 籼稻 indica | 扬稻6号Yangdao 6 | N1 | 6.41±0.09 c | 0.15±0.002 b | 0.55±0.004 c | 0.70±0.002 c | 3.55±0.030 c | 1.38±0.03 b |
N2 | 8.48±0.19 b | 0.18±0.003 a | 0.77±0.001 b | 1.18±0.005 b | 4.45±0.036 b | 1.67±0.06 a | |||
N3 | 9.41±0.07 a | 0.19±0.003 a | 0.81±0.000 a | 1.26±0.006 a | 5.91±0.021 a | 1.03±0.06 c | |||
南京16 Nanjing 16 | N1 | 6.17±0.05 c | 0.17±0.003 b | 0.52±0.004 c | 0.59±0.003 c | 3.65±0.008 c | 1.29±0.02 b | ||
N2 | 8.15±0.06 b | 0.19±0.003 ab | 0.74±0.001 b | 0.98±0.002 b | 4.57±0.020 b | 1.75±0.13 a | |||
N3 | 8.90±0.19 a | 0.22±0.003 a | 0.77±0.001 a | 1.04±0.003 a | 6.06±0.016 a | 0.74±0.01 c | |||
R3012 | N1 | 6.01±0.08 c | 0.19±0.003 b | 0.49±0.005 c | 0.52±0.004 c | 3.84±0.026 c | 0.81±0.07 a | ||
N2 | 7.29±0.11 b | 0.24±0.003 a | 0.69±0.002 b | 0.89±0.001 b | 5.73±0.028 b | 0.15±0.06 c | |||
N3 | 8.23±0.12 a | 0.26±0.004 a | 0.74±0.001 a | 0.96±0.002 a | 6.66±0.019 a | 0.21±0.03 b | |||
粳稻 japonica | 日本晴Nipponbare | N1 | 6.78±0.05 c | 0.13±0.002 c | 0.59±0.003 c | 0.73±0.001 c | 3.85±0.007 c | 1.67±0.03 a | |
N2 | 8.09±0.12 b | 0.16±0.002 b | 0.77±0.001 b | 1.06±0.003 b | 4.72±0.014 b | 1.26±0.03 b | |||
N3 | 9.21±0.13 a | 0.18±0.003 a | 0.88±0.001 a | 1.28±0.006 a | 5.56±0.025 a | 1.18±0.04 b | |||
农垦57 Nongken 57 | N1 | 6.28±0.09 c | 0.20±0.003 b | 0.49±0.007 c | 0.58±0.004 c | 4.50±0.011 c | 0.64±0.03 a | ||
N2 | 7.14±0.16 b | 0.22±0.003 ab | 0.60±0.003 b | 0.88±0.001 b | 5.36±0.036 b | 0.49±0.01 b | |||
N3 | 8.14±0.06 a | 0.24±0.003 a | 0.72±0.002 a | 1.05±0.003 a | 6.30±0.042 a | 0.22±0.00 c | |||
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | N1 | 6.64±0.03 c | 0.16±0.002 b | 0.55±0.004 c | 0.69±0.002 c | 4.13±0.038 c | 1.32±0.04 a | ||
N2 | 8.01±0.06 b | 0.19±0.003 a | 0.66±0.002 b | 0.99±0.002 b | 5.21±0.029 b | 0.72±0.01 b | |||
N3 | 9.08±0.00 a | 0.20±0.003 a | 0.76±0.001 a | 1.19±0.005 a | 5.81±0.006 a | 0.68±0.06 b |
亚种 Subspecies | 品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 清蛋白 Albumin | 球蛋白 Globulin | 醇溶蛋白 Gliadin | 谷蛋白 Glutenin | 其他蛋白 Other protein |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
籼稻 indica | 扬稻6号Yangdao 6 | N1 | 2.33±0.10 | 8.85±0.19 | 10.78±0.38 | 55.65±0.65 | 22.40±0.13 |
N2 | 2.33±0.18 | 8.97±0.05 | 14.18±0.23 | 54.39±0.64 | 20.12±0.09 | ||
N3 | 2.24±0.02 | 8.55±0.15 | 13.52±0.30 | 64.28±0.11 | 11.41±0.32 | ||
南京16 Nanjing 16 | N1 | 2.70±0.10 | 8.46±0.19 | 9.27±0.26 | 58.39±0.53 | 21.17±0.29 | |
N2 | 2.53±0.08 | 8.66±0.24 | 11.82±0.15 | 55.91±0.57 | 21.07±0.26 | ||
N3 | 2.55±0.05 | 8.57±0.20 | 11.85±0.07 | 68.19±0.59 | 8.85±0.17 | ||
R3012 | N1 | 3.34±0.08 | 8.37±0.06 | 8.90±0.07 | 66.21±0.74 | 13.19±0.05 | |
N2 | 3.23±0.12 | 8.73±0.10 | 11.76±0.28 | 74.65±0.35 | 1.63±0.15 | ||
N3 | 2.96±0.02 | 8.27±0.13 | 10.95±0.10 | 75.73±0.47 | 2.08±0.02 | ||
粳稻 japonica | 日本晴Nipponbare | N1 | 1.97±0.12 | 8.32±0.16 | 10.29±0.24 | 54.99±0.37 | 24.43±0.16 |
N2 | 1.99±0.05 | 9.62±0.04 | 13.67±0.48 | 59.47±0.39 | 15.25±0.09 | ||
N3 | 2.10±0.13 | 9.40±0.21 | 14.35±0.31 | 61.00±0.27 | 13.15±0.24 | ||
农垦57 Nongken 57 | N1 | 3.30±0.20 | 7.93±0.11 | 8.74±0.38 | 69.72±0.62 | 10.32±0.18 | |
N2 | 3.25±0.03 | 7.90±0.02 | 11.49±0.24 | 70.73±0.37 | 6.63±0.21 | ||
N3 | 3.20±0.21 | 8.36±0.09 | 12.50±0.24 | 73.11±1.01 | 2.82±0.05 | ||
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | N1 | 2.45±0.12 | 8.03±0.05 | 9.81±0.36 | 59.94±0.59 | 19.77±0.24 | |
N2 | 2.43±0.05 | 8.53±0.09 | 12.69±0.09 | 66.72±0.45 | 9.62±0.15 | ||
N3 | 2.41±0.10 | 8.80±0.02 | 13.90±0.13 | 66.62±0.83 | 8.28±0.08 |
表2 不同后期氮肥水平下精米各组分蛋白占总蛋白比例的变化(2年平均值)
Table 2 Changes in the ratio of protein component to total protein in polished rice under different nitrogen levels at late growing stage (2-year average).
亚种 Subspecies | 品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 清蛋白 Albumin | 球蛋白 Globulin | 醇溶蛋白 Gliadin | 谷蛋白 Glutenin | 其他蛋白 Other protein |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
籼稻 indica | 扬稻6号Yangdao 6 | N1 | 2.33±0.10 | 8.85±0.19 | 10.78±0.38 | 55.65±0.65 | 22.40±0.13 |
N2 | 2.33±0.18 | 8.97±0.05 | 14.18±0.23 | 54.39±0.64 | 20.12±0.09 | ||
N3 | 2.24±0.02 | 8.55±0.15 | 13.52±0.30 | 64.28±0.11 | 11.41±0.32 | ||
南京16 Nanjing 16 | N1 | 2.70±0.10 | 8.46±0.19 | 9.27±0.26 | 58.39±0.53 | 21.17±0.29 | |
N2 | 2.53±0.08 | 8.66±0.24 | 11.82±0.15 | 55.91±0.57 | 21.07±0.26 | ||
N3 | 2.55±0.05 | 8.57±0.20 | 11.85±0.07 | 68.19±0.59 | 8.85±0.17 | ||
R3012 | N1 | 3.34±0.08 | 8.37±0.06 | 8.90±0.07 | 66.21±0.74 | 13.19±0.05 | |
N2 | 3.23±0.12 | 8.73±0.10 | 11.76±0.28 | 74.65±0.35 | 1.63±0.15 | ||
N3 | 2.96±0.02 | 8.27±0.13 | 10.95±0.10 | 75.73±0.47 | 2.08±0.02 | ||
粳稻 japonica | 日本晴Nipponbare | N1 | 1.97±0.12 | 8.32±0.16 | 10.29±0.24 | 54.99±0.37 | 24.43±0.16 |
N2 | 1.99±0.05 | 9.62±0.04 | 13.67±0.48 | 59.47±0.39 | 15.25±0.09 | ||
N3 | 2.10±0.13 | 9.40±0.21 | 14.35±0.31 | 61.00±0.27 | 13.15±0.24 | ||
农垦57 Nongken 57 | N1 | 3.30±0.20 | 7.93±0.11 | 8.74±0.38 | 69.72±0.62 | 10.32±0.18 | |
N2 | 3.25±0.03 | 7.90±0.02 | 11.49±0.24 | 70.73±0.37 | 6.63±0.21 | ||
N3 | 3.20±0.21 | 8.36±0.09 | 12.50±0.24 | 73.11±1.01 | 2.82±0.05 | ||
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | N1 | 2.45±0.12 | 8.03±0.05 | 9.81±0.36 | 59.94±0.59 | 19.77±0.24 | |
N2 | 2.43±0.05 | 8.53±0.09 | 12.69±0.09 | 66.72±0.45 | 9.62±0.15 | ||
N3 | 2.41±0.10 | 8.80±0.02 | 13.90±0.13 | 66.62±0.83 | 8.28±0.08 |
图1 不同后期氮肥水平下供试品种直链淀粉含量和胶稠度的变化 N1–0 kg/hm2; N2–60 kg/hm2; N3–120 kg/hm2。不同小写字母表示同一品种内处理间差异达0.05显著水平。A、B为2016年数据,C、D为2017年数据。
Fig. 1. Changes in amylose content and gel consistency of tested varieties under different nitrogen levels at late growth stage. N1, 0 kg/hm2; N2, 60 kg/hm2; N3, 120 kg/hm2. Different small letters indicate that the difference between treatments for the same variety is significantly different at 0.05 probability level. A and B are the data for 2016, C and D are the data for 2017.
亚种 Subspecies | 品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 最高黏度 Peak viscosity /cP | 热浆黏度 Hot viscosity /cP | 崩解值Breakdown /cP | 最终黏度 Final viscosity /cP | 回复值Consistence /cP | 消减值 Setback /cP | 峰值时间 Peak time /min | 糊化温度 Pasting temperature /℃ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
籼稻 indica | 扬稻6号 Yangdao 6 | N1 | 3442±75.66 a | 2240±78.49 a | 1202±2.83 a | 3630±14.14 a | 1391±92.63 c | 189±89.80 b | 6.5±0.00 b | 72.6±0.07 b |
N2 | 3163±23.33 b | 2121±19.09 b | 1042±4.24 b | 3589±9.90 b | 1469±9.19 b | 427±13.44 a | 6.6±0.05 b | 72.9±0.04 b | ||
N3 | 3104±67.88 c | 1998±0.71 c | 1107±67.18 b | 3553±0.71 b | 1555±0.00 a | 449±67.18 a | 6.8±0.00 a | 73.6±0.07 a | ||
南京16 Nanjing 16 | N1 | 3625±10.61 a | 2373±31.11 a | 1252±20.51 a | 3564±46.67 a | 1191±15.56 b | -61±36.06 c | 6.4±0.05 a | 70.8±0.14 b | |
N2 | 3447±100.41 b | 2261±9.90 b | 1186±110.31 b | 3487±6.36 b | 1226±3.54 a | 40±106.77 b | 6.5±0.02 a | 71.4±0.49 a | ||
N3 | 3188±3.54 c | 2075±97.58 c | 1113±94.05 c | 3318±7.78 c | 1243±89.80 a | 130±4.24 a | 6.5±0.19 a | 71.6±0.07 a | ||
R3012 | N1 | 3650±53.74 a | 1761±21.92 a | 1890±31.82 a | 2811±4.24 a | 1051±26.16 b | -839±57.98 c | 5.5±0.05 b | 79.2±0.00 c | |
N2 | 3476±17.68 b | 1675±72.83 b | 1801±90.51 b | 2761±4.95 b | 1086±77.78 b | -715±12.73 b | 5.8±0.09 a | 80.0±1.20 b | ||
N3 | 3311±54.45 c | 1627±1.41 c | 1684±55.86 c | 2734±4.95 b | 1107±6.36 a | -577±49.50 a | 5.7±0.05 a | 81.2±0.00 a | ||
粳稻 japonica | 日本晴 Nipponbare | N1 | 2910±4.24 a | 1970±7.78 a | 941±12.02 a | 3663±1.41 a | 1694±6.36 c | 753±5.66 c | 6.4±0.00 a | 73.5±0.04 c |
N2 | 2739±14.14 b | 1861±7.07 b | 878±7.07 b | 3602±105.36 b | 1741±112.43 b | 863±119.50 b | 6.5±0.02 a | 74.3±0.02 b | ||
N3 | 2383±11.31 c | 1658±43.84 c | 725±55.15 c | 3527±0.71 c | 1869±44.55 a | 1144±10.61 a | 6.5±0.00 a | 75.1±0.00 a | ||
农垦57 Nongken 57 | N1 | 3485±21.21 a | 2397±3.54 a | 1089±24.75 a | 3106±2.83 a | 710±0.71 b | -379±24.04 b | 6.3±0.00 a | 71.0±0.35 c | |
N2 | 3418±22.63 b | 2336±3.54 b | 1083±26.16 a | 3088±2.12 a | 752±5.66 a | -331±20.51 b | 6.3±0.05 a | 71.6±0.04 b | ||
N3 | 3034±72.83 c | 2215±55.86 c | 819±128.69 b | 2976±0.71 b | 761±55.15 a | -58±9.54 a | 6.4±0.05 a | 72.2±0.07 a | ||
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | N1 | 3336±29.70 a | 2380±7.78 a | 957±37.48 a | 3436±2.12 a | 1056±9.90 b | 100±27.58 c | 6.5±0.05 b | 71.1±0.00 c | |
N2 | 3160±2.12 b | 2271±6.36 b | 889±8.49 b | 3351±29.70 b | 1081±36.06 a | 192±27.58 b | 6.7±0.14 a | 72.1±0.04 b | ||
N3 | 2983±5.66 c | 2163±6.36 c | 821±0.71 c | 3257±0.71 c | 1094±7.07 a | 274±6.36 a | 6.7±0.02 a | 72.8±0.07 a |
表3 不同后期氮肥水平下供试品种RVA谱特征值的变化(2016)
Table 3 Changes of RVA profile characteristics of tested varieties under different nitrogen levels at late growing stage(2016).
亚种 Subspecies | 品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 最高黏度 Peak viscosity /cP | 热浆黏度 Hot viscosity /cP | 崩解值Breakdown /cP | 最终黏度 Final viscosity /cP | 回复值Consistence /cP | 消减值 Setback /cP | 峰值时间 Peak time /min | 糊化温度 Pasting temperature /℃ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
籼稻 indica | 扬稻6号 Yangdao 6 | N1 | 3442±75.66 a | 2240±78.49 a | 1202±2.83 a | 3630±14.14 a | 1391±92.63 c | 189±89.80 b | 6.5±0.00 b | 72.6±0.07 b |
N2 | 3163±23.33 b | 2121±19.09 b | 1042±4.24 b | 3589±9.90 b | 1469±9.19 b | 427±13.44 a | 6.6±0.05 b | 72.9±0.04 b | ||
N3 | 3104±67.88 c | 1998±0.71 c | 1107±67.18 b | 3553±0.71 b | 1555±0.00 a | 449±67.18 a | 6.8±0.00 a | 73.6±0.07 a | ||
南京16 Nanjing 16 | N1 | 3625±10.61 a | 2373±31.11 a | 1252±20.51 a | 3564±46.67 a | 1191±15.56 b | -61±36.06 c | 6.4±0.05 a | 70.8±0.14 b | |
N2 | 3447±100.41 b | 2261±9.90 b | 1186±110.31 b | 3487±6.36 b | 1226±3.54 a | 40±106.77 b | 6.5±0.02 a | 71.4±0.49 a | ||
N3 | 3188±3.54 c | 2075±97.58 c | 1113±94.05 c | 3318±7.78 c | 1243±89.80 a | 130±4.24 a | 6.5±0.19 a | 71.6±0.07 a | ||
R3012 | N1 | 3650±53.74 a | 1761±21.92 a | 1890±31.82 a | 2811±4.24 a | 1051±26.16 b | -839±57.98 c | 5.5±0.05 b | 79.2±0.00 c | |
N2 | 3476±17.68 b | 1675±72.83 b | 1801±90.51 b | 2761±4.95 b | 1086±77.78 b | -715±12.73 b | 5.8±0.09 a | 80.0±1.20 b | ||
N3 | 3311±54.45 c | 1627±1.41 c | 1684±55.86 c | 2734±4.95 b | 1107±6.36 a | -577±49.50 a | 5.7±0.05 a | 81.2±0.00 a | ||
粳稻 japonica | 日本晴 Nipponbare | N1 | 2910±4.24 a | 1970±7.78 a | 941±12.02 a | 3663±1.41 a | 1694±6.36 c | 753±5.66 c | 6.4±0.00 a | 73.5±0.04 c |
N2 | 2739±14.14 b | 1861±7.07 b | 878±7.07 b | 3602±105.36 b | 1741±112.43 b | 863±119.50 b | 6.5±0.02 a | 74.3±0.02 b | ||
N3 | 2383±11.31 c | 1658±43.84 c | 725±55.15 c | 3527±0.71 c | 1869±44.55 a | 1144±10.61 a | 6.5±0.00 a | 75.1±0.00 a | ||
农垦57 Nongken 57 | N1 | 3485±21.21 a | 2397±3.54 a | 1089±24.75 a | 3106±2.83 a | 710±0.71 b | -379±24.04 b | 6.3±0.00 a | 71.0±0.35 c | |
N2 | 3418±22.63 b | 2336±3.54 b | 1083±26.16 a | 3088±2.12 a | 752±5.66 a | -331±20.51 b | 6.3±0.05 a | 71.6±0.04 b | ||
N3 | 3034±72.83 c | 2215±55.86 c | 819±128.69 b | 2976±0.71 b | 761±55.15 a | -58±9.54 a | 6.4±0.05 a | 72.2±0.07 a | ||
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | N1 | 3336±29.70 a | 2380±7.78 a | 957±37.48 a | 3436±2.12 a | 1056±9.90 b | 100±27.58 c | 6.5±0.05 b | 71.1±0.00 c | |
N2 | 3160±2.12 b | 2271±6.36 b | 889±8.49 b | 3351±29.70 b | 1081±36.06 a | 192±27.58 b | 6.7±0.14 a | 72.1±0.04 b | ||
N3 | 2983±5.66 c | 2163±6.36 c | 821±0.71 c | 3257±0.71 c | 1094±7.07 a | 274±6.36 a | 6.7±0.02 a | 72.8±0.07 a |
亚种 Subspecies | 品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 外观 Appearance | 硬度 Hardness | 黏度 Viscosity | 平衡度 Balance degree | 食味值 Taste value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
籼稻 indica | 扬稻6号 Yangdao 6 | N1 | 4.16±0.07 a | 7.74±0.06 b | 3.50±0.10 a | 3.38±0.01 a | 49.06±0.84 a |
N2 | 1.96±0.14 b | 9.33±0.06 a | 2.26±0.01 b | 0.64±0.18 b | 32.91±1.11 b | ||
N3 | 1.63±0.01 c | 9.39±0.00 a | 0.77±0.01 c | 0.20±0.00 c | 30.31±0.44 c | ||
南京16 Nanjing 16 | N1 | 4.48±0.08 a | 7.34±0.03 c | 3.33±0.02 a | 3.45±0.05 a | 50.50±0.42 a | |
N2 | 2.06±0.01 b | 9.13±0.01 b | 1.13±0.01 b | 0.74±0.01 b | 34.33±0.00 b | ||
N3 | 1.56±0.03 c | 9.37±0.01 a | 0.76±0.01 c | 0.26±0.01 c | 30.60±0.04 c | ||
R3012 | N1 | 4.60±0.05 a | 7.29±0.01 c | 3.03±0.08 a | 3.54±0.02 a | 51.64±0.01 a | |
N2 | 3.23±0.03 b | 9.10±0.14 b | 0.91±0.07 b | 2.22±0.01 b | 42.25±0.11 b | ||
N3 | 1.75±0.05 c | 9.34±0.09 a | 0.74±0.01 c | 0.30±0.14 c | 30.77±0.04 c | ||
粳稻 japonica | 日本晴 Nipponbare | N1 | 4.05±0.18 a | 7.92±0.09 c | 3.84±0.21 a | 3.36±0.24 a | 47.53±1.24 a |
N2 | 2.77±0.17 b | 8.73±0.19 b | 3.13±0.32 b | 1.71±0.21 b | 38.47±1.11 b | ||
N3 | 1.59±0.13 c | 8.99±0.04 a | 2.23±0.54 c | 0.45±0.17 c | 30.00±0.00 c | ||
农垦57 Nongken 57 | N1 | 5.82±0.02 a | 6.40±0.04 c | 5.23±0.02 a | 5.83±0.06 a | 54.36±0.82 a | |
N2 | 4.25±0.21 b | 7.78±0.16 b | 3.78±0.25 b | 3.60±0.31 b | 47.96±1.27 b | ||
N3 | 3.27±0.01 c | 8.32±0.04 a | 2.58±0.48 c | 2.31±0.10 c | 40.23±2.36 c | ||
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | N1 | 4.66±0.13 a | 7.22±0.06 c | 3.59±0.26 a | 4.20±0.18 a | 50.10±0.70 a | |
N2 | 3.70±0.36 b | 8.08±0.29 b | 2.12±0.05 b | 2.94±0.48 b | 45.88±0.05 b | ||
N3 | 2.94±0.00 c | 8.50±0.04 a | 0.32±0.17 c | 1.98±0.02 c | 39.93±3.14 c |
表4 不同后期氮肥水平下供试品种食味指标的变化(2016)
Table 4 Changes of taste index of tested varieties under different nitrogen levels at late growing stage(2016).
亚种 Subspecies | 品种 Variety | 处理 Treatment | 外观 Appearance | 硬度 Hardness | 黏度 Viscosity | 平衡度 Balance degree | 食味值 Taste value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
籼稻 indica | 扬稻6号 Yangdao 6 | N1 | 4.16±0.07 a | 7.74±0.06 b | 3.50±0.10 a | 3.38±0.01 a | 49.06±0.84 a |
N2 | 1.96±0.14 b | 9.33±0.06 a | 2.26±0.01 b | 0.64±0.18 b | 32.91±1.11 b | ||
N3 | 1.63±0.01 c | 9.39±0.00 a | 0.77±0.01 c | 0.20±0.00 c | 30.31±0.44 c | ||
南京16 Nanjing 16 | N1 | 4.48±0.08 a | 7.34±0.03 c | 3.33±0.02 a | 3.45±0.05 a | 50.50±0.42 a | |
N2 | 2.06±0.01 b | 9.13±0.01 b | 1.13±0.01 b | 0.74±0.01 b | 34.33±0.00 b | ||
N3 | 1.56±0.03 c | 9.37±0.01 a | 0.76±0.01 c | 0.26±0.01 c | 30.60±0.04 c | ||
R3012 | N1 | 4.60±0.05 a | 7.29±0.01 c | 3.03±0.08 a | 3.54±0.02 a | 51.64±0.01 a | |
N2 | 3.23±0.03 b | 9.10±0.14 b | 0.91±0.07 b | 2.22±0.01 b | 42.25±0.11 b | ||
N3 | 1.75±0.05 c | 9.34±0.09 a | 0.74±0.01 c | 0.30±0.14 c | 30.77±0.04 c | ||
粳稻 japonica | 日本晴 Nipponbare | N1 | 4.05±0.18 a | 7.92±0.09 c | 3.84±0.21 a | 3.36±0.24 a | 47.53±1.24 a |
N2 | 2.77±0.17 b | 8.73±0.19 b | 3.13±0.32 b | 1.71±0.21 b | 38.47±1.11 b | ||
N3 | 1.59±0.13 c | 8.99±0.04 a | 2.23±0.54 c | 0.45±0.17 c | 30.00±0.00 c | ||
农垦57 Nongken 57 | N1 | 5.82±0.02 a | 6.40±0.04 c | 5.23±0.02 a | 5.83±0.06 a | 54.36±0.82 a | |
N2 | 4.25±0.21 b | 7.78±0.16 b | 3.78±0.25 b | 3.60±0.31 b | 47.96±1.27 b | ||
N3 | 3.27±0.01 c | 8.32±0.04 a | 2.58±0.48 c | 2.31±0.10 c | 40.23±2.36 c | ||
淮稻5号 Huaidao 5 | N1 | 4.66±0.13 a | 7.22±0.06 c | 3.59±0.26 a | 4.20±0.18 a | 50.10±0.70 a | |
N2 | 3.70±0.36 b | 8.08±0.29 b | 2.12±0.05 b | 2.94±0.48 b | 45.88±0.05 b | ||
N3 | 2.94±0.00 c | 8.50±0.04 a | 0.32±0.17 c | 1.98±0.02 c | 39.93±3.14 c |
材料 Material | 最高黏度 Peak viscosity | 热浆黏度 Hot viscosity | 崩解值 Breakdown | 最终黏度 Final viscosity | 回复值 Consistence | 消减值 Setback |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
籼稻 indica | 0.712** | 0.177 | 0.329 | -0.030 | -0.352 | -0.382 |
粳稻 japonica | 0.678** | 0.590** | 0.737** | -0.240 | -0.402 | -0.635** |
表5 籼、粳稻食味值与RVA谱特征值的相关性
Table 5 Relationship between taste value and RVA profile characteristics of indica and japonica.
材料 Material | 最高黏度 Peak viscosity | 热浆黏度 Hot viscosity | 崩解值 Breakdown | 最终黏度 Final viscosity | 回复值 Consistence | 消减值 Setback |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
籼稻 indica | 0.712** | 0.177 | 0.329 | -0.030 | -0.352 | -0.382 |
粳稻 japonica | 0.678** | 0.590** | 0.737** | -0.240 | -0.402 | -0.635** |
材料 Material | 最高黏度 Peak viscosity | 热浆黏度 Hot viscosity | 崩解值 Breakdown | 最终黏度 Final viscosity | 回复值 Consistence | 消减值 Setback | 糊化温度Pasting temperature | 胶稠度 Gel consistency | 直链淀粉含量 Amylose content | 食味值 Taste value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
籼稻indica | -0.786** | -0.108 | -0.419 | 0.116 | 0.427 | 0.481* | -0.126 | -0.680** | -0.519* | -0.975** |
粳稻japonica | -0.569* | -0.450 | -0.726** | 0.129 | 0.166 | 0.492* | 0.428 | -0.688** | -0.553* | -0.923** |
表6 籼、粳稻蛋白质含量与蒸煮食味品质的相关性
Table 6 Relationship between grain protein content and cooking and eating quality of indica and japonica.
材料 Material | 最高黏度 Peak viscosity | 热浆黏度 Hot viscosity | 崩解值 Breakdown | 最终黏度 Final viscosity | 回复值 Consistence | 消减值 Setback | 糊化温度Pasting temperature | 胶稠度 Gel consistency | 直链淀粉含量 Amylose content | 食味值 Taste value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
籼稻indica | -0.786** | -0.108 | -0.419 | 0.116 | 0.427 | 0.481* | -0.126 | -0.680** | -0.519* | -0.975** |
粳稻japonica | -0.569* | -0.450 | -0.726** | 0.129 | 0.166 | 0.492* | 0.428 | -0.688** | -0.553* | -0.923** |
材料 Material | 清蛋白 Albumin | 球蛋白 Globulin | 醇溶蛋白 Gliadin | 谷蛋白 Glutenin |
---|---|---|---|---|
籼稻 indica | -0.598** | -0.962** | -0.933** | -0.800** |
粳稻 japonica | -0.057 | -0.965** | -0.940** | -0.591** |
表7 籼、粳稻蛋白质组分含量与食味品质的相关性
Table 7 Relationship between protein components contents and taste quality of indica and japonica.
材料 Material | 清蛋白 Albumin | 球蛋白 Globulin | 醇溶蛋白 Gliadin | 谷蛋白 Glutenin |
---|---|---|---|---|
籼稻 indica | -0.598** | -0.962** | -0.933** | -0.800** |
粳稻 japonica | -0.057 | -0.965** | -0.940** | -0.591** |
[1] | 黄发松, 孙宗修, 胡培松, 唐绍清. 食用稻米品质形成研究的现状与展望. 中国水稻科学, 1998, 12(3): 172-176. |
Huang F S, Sun Z X, Hu P S, Tang S Q.Present situations and prospects for the research on rice grain quality forming.Chin J Rice Sci, 1998, 12(3): 172-176. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 向远鸿, 唐启源, 黄燕湘. 稻米品质性状相关性研究: I. 籼型粘稻食味与其他米质性状的关系. 湖南农学院学报, 1990, 16(4): 325-330. |
Xiang Y H, Tang Q Y, Huang Y X.The relativity of rice grain quality characteristics: I. Relations between eating quality and other grain quality characteristics ofindica non-waxy rice. J Hunan Agric Coll, 1990, 16(4): 325-330. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | Lira S J, Kim D U, Sohn J K, Lee S K.Varietal variation of amylogram properties and its relationship with other eating quality characteristics in rice.Kor J Breeding, 1995, 27(3): 268-275. (in Korean with English Abstract) |
[4] | 沈鹏, 罗秋香, 金正勋. 稻米蛋白质与蒸煮食味品质关系研究. 东北农业大学学报, 2003, 34(4): 368-371. |
Shen P, Luo Q X, Jin Z X.Relationship between protein content and the cooking and eating quality properties of rice grain.J Northeast Agric Univ, 2003, 34(4): 368-371. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 谢黎虹, 罗炬, 唐绍清, 陈能, 焦桂爱, 邵高能, 魏祥进, 胡培松. 蛋白质影响水稻米饭食味品质的机理. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(1): 91-96. |
Xie L H, Luo J, Tang S Q, Chen N, Jiao G A, Shao G N, Wei X J, Hu P S.Proteins affect rice eating quality properties and its mechanism.Chin J Rice Sci, 2013, 27(1): 91-96. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | Juliao B O.Physicochemcal properties of starch and protein in relation to grain quality and nutritional value of rice.Rice Breeding, 1972, 5: 389-405. |
[7] | He Y, Wang S, Ding Y.Identification of novel glutelin subunits and a comparison of glutelin composition betweenjaponica and indica rice(Oryza sativa L.). J Cer Sci, 2013, 57(3): 362-371. |
[8] | Wang R X, Hai L, Zhang X Y, You G X, Yan C S, Xiao S H.QTL mapping for grain filling rate and yield-related traits in RILs of the Chinese winter wheat population Heshangmai×Yu 8679.Theor Appl Genet, 2009, 118(2): 313-325. |
[9] | Kawakatsu T, Hirose S, Yasuda H, Takaiwa F.Reducing rice seed storage protein accumulation leads to changes in nutrient quality and storage organelle formation.Plant Physiol, 2010, 154(4): 1842-1854. |
[10] | Shewry P R, Halford N G.Cereal seed storage proteins: Structures, properties and role in grain utilization.J Exp Bot, 2002, 53(370): 947-958. |
[11] | Peng B, Kong H L, Li Y B, Wang L Q, Zhong M, Sun L, Gao G J, Zhang Q L, Luo L J, Wang G W, Xie W B, Chen J X, Yao W, Peng Y, Lei L, Lian X M, Xiao J H, Xu C G, Li X H, He Y Q.OsAAP6 functions as an important regulator of grain protein content and nutritional quality in rice.Nat Comm, 2014, 5(1): 4847. |
[12] | Chen Y, Wang M, Pieter B F Ouwerkerk. Molecular and environmental factors determining grain quality in rice.Food Ener Sec, 2012, 1(2): 111-132. |
[13] | 钱春荣, 冯延江, 杨静, 刘海英, 金正勋. 水稻籽粒蛋白质含量选择对杂种早代蒸煮食味品质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2007, 21(3): 323-326. |
Qian C R, Feng Y J, Yang J, Liu H Y, Jin Z X.Effects of protein content selection on cooking and eating properties of rice in early generation of crosses.Chin J Rice Sci, 2007, 21(3): 323-326. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 孙平. 蛋白质含量多会降低稻米的食味吗?试析日本产销界关于稻米食味和应否追肥问题的争议. 中国稻米, 1998(5): 31-33. |
Sun P.Does the protein content reduce the taste of rice? Analysis of the disputes between Japanese producers and sellers about rice taste and whether or not to topdress.China Rice, 1998(5): 31-33. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 张欣, 施利利, 刘晓宇, 丁德亮, 王松文, 崔晶. 不同施肥处理对水稻产量、食味品质及蛋白质组分的影响. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(4): 104-108. |
Zhang X, Shi L L, Liu X Y, Ding D L, Wang S W, Cui J.Effect of different fertilizer treatments on rice yield, grain quality and protein fraction content.Chin Agric Sci Bull, 2010, 26(4): 104-108. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 罗秋香. 粳稻稻米蛋白质与蒸煮食味品质的关系. 哈尔滨: 东北农业大学, 2003. |
Luo Q X.Relationship between protein and eating and cooking qualities of grains of japonica rice. Harbin: Northeast Agricultural University, 2003. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 兰艳, 黄曌, 胡明明, 涂云彪, 孙影影, 隋晓东, 龚静, 李天. 施氮量对低谷蛋白水稻籽粒品质及蛋白质组分的影响. 浙江农业学报, 2019, 31(2): 182-190. |
Lan Y, Huang Z, Hu M M, Tu Y B, Sun Y Y, Sui X D, Gong J, Li T.Effects of nitrogen application rate on quality and protein components of low-gluten rice.Acta Agric Zhejiang, 2019, 31(2): 182-190. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 马启林, 李阳生, 鄢圣之, 雷慰慈. 高温及穗肥对水稻子粒蛋白质积累动态的影响. 湖北农业科学, 2008, 47(11): 1228-1231. |
Ma Q L, Li Y S, Yan S Z, Lei W C.Influence of high temperature stress on dynamic accumulation of rice grain protein under different earing fertilization.Hubei Agric Sci, 2008, 47(11): 1228-1231. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | Li G H, Chen Y L, Ding Y F, Geng C M, Li Q, Liu Z H, Wang S H, Tang S.Charactering protein fraction concen- trations as influenced by nitrogen application in low- glutelin rice cultivars.J Integ Agric, 2016, 15(3): 537-544. |
[20] | 陈莹莹. 江苏早熟晚粳品种稻米品质对氮肥的响应及其类型. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2012. |
Chen Y Y.The response to nitrogen fertilizer of the quality properties of early-maturing late japonica rice in Jiangsu and its type. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2012. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 耿春苗. 氮肥及播期对低谷蛋白水稻产量和品质形成的影响. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2011. |
Geng C M.Effects of nitrogen and seeding date on the yield and quality of low glutelin rice. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2011. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 邱才飞, 彭春瑞, 邵彩虹. 施肥技术对不同早稻品种的产量及稻米蛋白质的影响. 中国稻米, 2009(6): 43-45. |
Qiu C F, Peng C R, Shao C H.Effect of fertilization technology on yield and rice protein of different early rice varieties.China Rice, 2009(6): 43-45. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 夏加发, 李泽福, 唐光勇. 农艺措施对水稻籽粒蛋白质含量的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2004, 32(6): 1116-1117. |
Xia J F, Li Z F, Tang G Y.Effect of agronomic measures on the content of the protein in rice seed. J Anhui Agric Sci,2004, 32(6): 1116-1117. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 杨静, 罗秋香, 钱春荣, 刘海英, 金正勋. 氮素对稻米蛋白质组分含量及蒸煮食味品质的影响. 东北农业大学学报, 2006, 37(2): 145-150. |
Yang J, Luo Q X, Qian C R, Liu H Y, Jing Z X.Effect of nitrogen on the protein fractions content and cooking and eating quality of rice grain.J Northeast Agric Univ, 2006, 37(2): 145-150. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 王鹏跃, 沈庆霞, 路兴花, 庞林江, 陈忠秀. 米蛋白及其组分与米饭物性及感官的关联特征研究. 食品与机械, 2016, 32(3): 24-27. |
Wang Y P, Shen Q X, Lu X H, Pang L J, Chen Z X.Relevance features of rice protein and its components to physical and sensory properties of cooked rice.Food & Mach, 2016, 32(3): 24-27. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 芮闯, 刘莹, 孙建平. 蛋白质与大米食味品质的相关性分析. 食品科技, 2012, 37(3): 164-167, 171. |
Rui C, Liu L, Sun J P.The correlation analysis of protein and eating quality of rice.Food Sci Technol, 2012, 37(3): 164-167, 171. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | Baxter G, Blanchard C, Zhao J.Effects of glutelin and globulin on the physicochemical properties of rice starch and flour.J Cer Sci, 2014, 60(2): 414-420. |
[28] | Baxter G, Blanchard C, Zhao J.Effects of prolamin on the textural and pasting properties of rice flour and starch.J Cer Sci, 2004, 40(3): 205-211. |
[29] | Baxter G, Zhao J, Blanchard C.Albumin significantly affects the pasting and textural characteristics of rice flour.Cer Chem, 2010, 87(3): 250-255. |
[30] | Furukawa S, Tanaka K, Masumura T, Ogihara Y, Kiyokawa Y, Wakai Y.Influence of rice proteins on eating quality of cooked rice and on aroma and flavor of sake.Cer Chem, 2006, 83(4): 439-446. |
[31] | 焦爱霞, 杨昌仁, 曹桂兰, 李点浩, 郭建春, 金钟焕, 金弘烈, 李圭星, 韩龙植. 水稻蛋白质含量的遗传研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(1): 1-8. |
Jiao A X, Yang C R, Cao G L, Li D H, Guo J C, Jin Z H, Jin H L, Li G X, Han L Z.Progress in genetic research on protein content of rice.Sci Agric Sin, 2008, 41(1): 1-8. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] | 张艳霞, 丁艳锋, 王强盛, 李刚华, 李福春, 王绍华. 氮素穗肥对不同品种稻米品质性状的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007, 13(6): 1080-1085. |
Zhang Y X, Ding Y F, Wang Q S, Li G H, Li F C, Wang S H.Effect of panicle nitrogen fertilizer on quality properties of different rice varieties.Plant Nutr Fer Sci, 2007, 13(6): 1080-1085. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[33] | 赵艳岭. 中期氮肥调控影响水稻产量及稻米品质的生理机制. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2014. |
Zhao Y L.Effect of nitrogen on rice yield and quality and its physiological mechanism. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2014. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[34] | 张洪程, 王秀芹, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲. 施氮量对杂交稻两优培九产量、品质及吸氮特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2003, 36(7): 800-806. |
Zhang H C, Wang X Q, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K.Effects of N-application rate on yield, quality and characters of nitrogen uptake of hybrid rice variety Liangyoupeijiu.Sci Agric Sin, 2003, 36(7): 800-806. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[35] | 吕川根, 徐耀垣. 氮素影响稻米品质的机理初探. 江苏农业学报, 1990, 6(3): 64-65. |
Lv C G, Xu Y H.The mechanism of improving rice grain quality by nitrogen application.Jiangsu J Agric Sci, 1990, 6(3): 64-65. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[36] | 唐湘如. 施氮对饲用杂交稻产量和蛋白质含量的影响及其机理研究. 杂交水稻, 2000, 15(2): 36-39. |
Tang X R.Effect of N supply on yield and protein content and its mechanism in fodder hybrid rice.Hybrid Rice, 2000, 15(2): 36-39. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[37] | 张艳霞. 稻米直链淀粉含量与淀粉理化特性及品质的关系. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2007. |
Zhang Y X.Relationship between rice quality, physicochemical property of starch and amylose content. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2007. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[38] | 王维金. 关于不同籼稻品种和施肥时期稻株对15N的吸收及其分配的研究. 作物学报, 1994, 20(4): 476-480. |
Wang W J.Studies on rice uptake and distribution of 15N fertilizer in different varieties od indica rice and at different growth stages.Acta Agron Sin, 1994, 20(4): 476-480. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 郭展, 张运波. 水稻对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应及分子调控研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[2] | 韦还和, 马唯一, 左博源, 汪璐璐, 朱旺, 耿孝宇, 张翔, 孟天瑶, 陈英龙, 高平磊, 许轲, 霍中洋, 戴其根. 盐、干旱及其复合胁迫对水稻产量和品质形成影响的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[3] | 许丹洁, 林巧霞, 李正康, 庄小倩, 凌宇, 赖美玲, 陈晓婷, 鲁国东. OsOPR10正调控水稻对稻瘟病和白叶枯病的抗性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 364-374. |
[4] | 候小琴, 王莹, 余贝, 符卫蒙, 奉保华, 沈煜潮, 谢杭军, 王焕然, 许用强, 武志海, 王建军, 陶龙兴, 符冠富. 黄腐酸钾提高水稻秧苗耐盐性的作用途径分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 409-421. |
[5] | 胡继杰, 胡志华, 张均华, 曹小闯, 金千瑜, 章志远, 朱练峰. 根际饱和溶解氧对水稻分蘖期光合及生长特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 437-446. |
[6] | 刘福祥, 甄浩洋, 彭焕, 郑刘春, 彭德良, 文艳华. 广东省水稻孢囊线虫病调查与鉴定[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 456-461. |
[7] | 陈浩田, 秦缘, 钟笑涵, 林晨语, 秦竞航, 杨建昌, 张伟杨. 水稻根系和土壤性状与稻田甲烷排放关系的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 233-245. |
[8] | 缪军, 冉金晖, 徐梦彬, 卜柳冰, 王平, 梁国华, 周勇. 过量表达异三聚体G蛋白γ亚基基因RGG2提高水稻抗旱性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 246-255. |
[9] | 尹潇潇, 张芷菡, 颜绣莲, 廖蓉, 杨思葭, 郭岱铭, 樊晶, 赵志学, 王文明. 多个稻曲病菌效应因子的信号肽验证和表达分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 256-265. |
[10] | 朱裕敬, 桂金鑫, 龚成云, 罗新阳, 石居斌, 张海清, 贺记外. 全基因组关联分析定位水稻分蘖角度QTL[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 266-276. |
[11] | 魏倩倩, 汪玉磊, 孔海民, 徐青山, 颜玉莲, 潘林, 迟春欣, 孔亚丽, 田文昊, 朱练峰, 曹小闯, 张均华, 朱春权. 信号分子硫化氢参与硫肥缓解铝对水稻生长抑制作用的机制[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 290-302. |
[12] | 周甜, 吴少华, 康建宏, 吴宏亮, 杨生龙, 王星强, 李昱, 黄玉峰. 不同种植模式对水稻籽粒淀粉含量及淀粉关键酶活性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 303-315. |
[13] | 肖正午, 方升亮, 曹威, 胡丽琴, 黎星, 解嘉鑫, 廖成静, 康玉灵, 胡玉萍, 张珂骞, 曹放波, 陈佳娜, 黄敏. 米粉质构特性与稻米理化性状的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 316-323. |
[14] | 关雅琪, 鄂志国, 王磊, 申红芳. 影响中国水稻生产环节外包发展因素的实证研究:基于群体效应视角[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 324-334. |
[15] | 许用强, 姜宁, 奉保华, 肖晶晶, 陶龙兴, 符冠富. 水稻开花期高温热害响应机理及其调控技术研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(2): 111-126. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||