中国水稻科学 ›› 2018, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (1): 12-22.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2018.7055
刘小云, 李晓, 李腾飞, 苏鲁方
收稿日期:
2017-05-18
修回日期:
2017-09-15
出版日期:
2018-01-10
发布日期:
2018-01-10
基金资助:
Xiaoyun LIU, Xiao LI, Tengfei LI, Lufang SU
Received:
2017-05-18
Revised:
2017-09-15
Online:
2018-01-10
Published:
2018-01-10
摘要:
【目的】 OsENO2-2是OsENO2通过可变剪切产生的短转录本,其cDNA序列从粳稻中花11中分离获得。本研究的主要目的是初步分析OsENO2-2在水稻抽穗期调控中的作用。【方法】 构建了OsENO2-2的超量表达载体,获得转基因植株,通过对表型的观察和统计,分析目的基因在过量表达条件下的功能,并利用反向遗传学方法验证该基因的功能。【结果】 OsENO2-2过量表达导致水稻在长日照条件下的抽穗期推迟,而短日照条件下抽穗期无明显变化。通过qRT-PCR方法对水稻开花关键基因的检测发现,在长日照条件下,RFT1的表达量在超表达材料中显著下调,其他开花重要基因表达量在野生型和超表达材料中没有显著变化;而在短日照条件下,所有检测基因的表达量在野生型和超表达材料中均没有显著变化。【结论】 在长日照条件下,OsENO2-2主要通过调控RFT1基因的表达来调控水稻抽穗期。
中图分类号:
刘小云, 李晓, 李腾飞, 苏鲁方. 水稻OsENO2-2基因过表达对水稻抽穗期的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(1): 12-22.
Xiaoyun LIU, Xiao LI, Tengfei LI, Lufang SU. Overexpression of OsENO2-2 Affects Heading Date in Rice[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2018, 32(1): 12-22.
图1 超表达载体和RNAi载体的构建 A-超表达载体结构。LB为T-DNA左边界;Hn-潮霉素抗性筛选标记;Pubiqutin为玉米ubiqutin基因启动子;GUS为β-葡萄糖苷酸酶基因;RB为T-DNA右边界。B-RNAi载体结构。35S-花椰菜花叶病毒启动子;R-f为OsENO2-2 RNAi片段。
Fig. 1. Construction of overexpression vector and RNAi vector. A, Structure of overexpression vector; LB, Left border of T-DNA; Hn, Hygromycin; Pubiqutin, Promoter of ubiqutin; GUS, beta-glucuronidase; RB, Right border of T-DNA. B, Structure of RNAi vector. 35S, 35S promoter of CaMV; R-f, RNAi fragment of OsENO2-2.
引物名称 Primer name | 引物序列(5′-3′) Primer sequence(5′-3′) |
---|---|
OsENO2-2-F | GGGGGTACCATGGTTCAACAGCTTGATGGAA |
OsENO2-2-R | GGGGGTACCTTAGTACGGCTCCACAGGGG |
R-OsENO2-2-F | AGAACTAGTGGTACCTGCTTCCACCGGAATATATGAG |
R-OsENO2-2-R | AGAGAGCTCGGATCCCCCTCTTTGTTTTCCTGAATGTTA |
Hn-F | TACACAGCCATCGGTCCAGA |
Hn-R | TAGGAGGGCGTGGATATGTC |
OsENO2-2-QF | GGCCAAGATGCCACAAATGT |
OsENO2-2-QR | TTGCCTGTGTAGCCAGCCTTA |
Actin-QF | TGTATGCCAGTGGTCGTACCA |
Actin-QR | CCAGCAAGGTCGAGACGAA |
RFT1-QF | TGGTGTTCGTGCTGTTCCA |
RFT1-QR | TTGTAGAGCTCGGCGAAGTTC |
RID1-QF | CGACGACAATAGCTCGATCGC |
RID1-QR | GTGCATGGTCACGGAGCCTT |
Hd3a-QF | GCTCACTATCATCATCCAGCATG |
Hd3a-QR | CCTTGCTCAGCTATTTAATTGCATAA |
Hd1-QF | TCAG CAACAGCATATCT TTCTCATCA |
Hd1-QR | TCTGGAATTTGGCTATACTATCACC |
Ehd1-QF | GGATGCAAGGAAATCATGGA |
Ehd1-QR | AATCCCATCGGAAATCTTGG |
OsGI-QF | TGGAGAAAGGTTGTGGATGC |
OsGI-QR | GATAGACGGCACTTCAGCAGAT |
Ghd7-QF | AAATCCGGTACGCGTCCAG |
Ghd7-QR | GACATAGGTGGATGGCGGTG |
表1 本研究所用引物
Table 1 Primers used in the study.
引物名称 Primer name | 引物序列(5′-3′) Primer sequence(5′-3′) |
---|---|
OsENO2-2-F | GGGGGTACCATGGTTCAACAGCTTGATGGAA |
OsENO2-2-R | GGGGGTACCTTAGTACGGCTCCACAGGGG |
R-OsENO2-2-F | AGAACTAGTGGTACCTGCTTCCACCGGAATATATGAG |
R-OsENO2-2-R | AGAGAGCTCGGATCCCCCTCTTTGTTTTCCTGAATGTTA |
Hn-F | TACACAGCCATCGGTCCAGA |
Hn-R | TAGGAGGGCGTGGATATGTC |
OsENO2-2-QF | GGCCAAGATGCCACAAATGT |
OsENO2-2-QR | TTGCCTGTGTAGCCAGCCTTA |
Actin-QF | TGTATGCCAGTGGTCGTACCA |
Actin-QR | CCAGCAAGGTCGAGACGAA |
RFT1-QF | TGGTGTTCGTGCTGTTCCA |
RFT1-QR | TTGTAGAGCTCGGCGAAGTTC |
RID1-QF | CGACGACAATAGCTCGATCGC |
RID1-QR | GTGCATGGTCACGGAGCCTT |
Hd3a-QF | GCTCACTATCATCATCCAGCATG |
Hd3a-QR | CCTTGCTCAGCTATTTAATTGCATAA |
Hd1-QF | TCAG CAACAGCATATCT TTCTCATCA |
Hd1-QR | TCTGGAATTTGGCTATACTATCACC |
Ehd1-QF | GGATGCAAGGAAATCATGGA |
Ehd1-QR | AATCCCATCGGAAATCTTGG |
OsGI-QF | TGGAGAAAGGTTGTGGATGC |
OsGI-QR | GATAGACGGCACTTCAGCAGAT |
Ghd7-QF | AAATCCGGTACGCGTCCAG |
Ghd7-QR | GACATAGGTGGATGGCGGTG |
图2 OsENO2-2全长开放阅读框的PCR扩增和过表达载体的鉴定 A-OsENO2-2全长开放阅读框的PCR扩增。B-过表达载体的酶切鉴定。1~4为4个不同单克隆,其中1、3、4为阳性克隆;2-阴性对照;M为DNA标记。
Fig. 2. PCR amplification of OsENO2-2 and identification of recombinant plasmid. A, PCR amplification of OsENO2-2 full open reading frame. B, Digesting identification of recombinant plasmid. Lanes 1-4, Four independent clones of recombinant plasmid. Lane 1, 3, 4, Positive clones; Lane 2, Negative control.
图3 OsNEO2-2组织特异性表达 S-幼苗;FL-剑叶;L-抽穗期倒2叶;LS-叶鞘;ST-茎秆;R-根;PA-幼穗;EN-胚乳。
Fig. 3. Tissue-specific expression of OsENO2-2. S, Seedling; FL, Flag leaf; L, The second leaf from the top at the heading stage; LS, Leaf sheath; ST, Stem; R, Root; PA, Panicle; EN, Endosperm.
图4 T0代转基因阳性植株阳性鉴定以及表达量检测 A-转基因阳性植株Hn基因PCR鉴定,自上到下依次为超表达载体、空载体对照组、RNAi载体的转基因植株。B-转基因植株OsENO2-2的表达量(平均值±标准差)。WT-野生型;OX-1~OX-8,8个超表达转基因植株;R-1~R-7,7个RNAi转基因植株。
Fig. 4. PCR analysis of Hn gene in T0 transgenic positive plants and expression analysis of OsENO2-2 in transgenic lines. A, PCR identification of Hn gene of the transgenic plants. The transgenic plants of the overexpressed lines, the transgenic plants of the control group lines, the transgenic plants of the RNAi lines, from up to down, respectively. B, The relative expression level of OsENO2-2 in transgenic plants(Mean±SD). WT, Wild type; OX-1 to OX-8, Eight independent overexpression transgenic plants. R-1 to R-7, Seven independent RNAi transgenic plants.
图5 转基因阳性植株的抽穗期(平均值±标准差) A-野生型和超表达植株的抽穗期表型。WT-野生型植株,OX-超表达植株; B-野生型和超表达植株在长日照大田的抽穗期(n=30)。WT-野生型植株,OX-1, OX-2, OX-3为超表达阳性株系,OX-7为转基因对照株系。LD-长日照条件。C-在长日照条件下(光照14 h/黑暗10 h)超表达,RNAi株系以及野生型株系的抽穗期(n=10)。R-1,R-2,R-5为RNAi抑制阳性株系。D-在短日照条件下(光照10 h/黑暗14 h)超表达,RNAi株系以及野生型株系的抽穗期(n=10)。SD-短日照条件。**表示与野生型植株相比差异达极显著水平(P<0.01,t检验)。
Fig. 5. Heading date of the transgenic plants(Mean±SD). A, Heading phenotypes of wild-type and overexpression plants. WT, Wild type; OX, Overexpression lines. B, Heading date of wild-type and overexpressing plants(n=30). WT, Wild type; OX-1, OX-2, OX-3, Overexpressed transgenetic positive plants; OX-7, The transgenic plants of the control group. C, Statistical analysis of heading date of wild-type, overexpressed plants and RNAi plants under long-day condition(14h light/10 h dark) (n=10). D, Statistical analysis of heading date of wild-type, overexpressed plants and RNAi plants under short-day condition(10h light/14h dark) (n=10). **The differences between wild type and transgenic plants are significant at 0.01 level(Student's t-test).
图6 OsENO2-2基因在不同光周期条件下的昼夜节律性表达(平均值±标准差) LD-长日照条件(光照14 h/黑暗10 h); SD-短日照条件(光照10 h/黑暗14 h); WT-野生型植株; OX-OsENO2-2超表达植株。
Fig. 6. Circadian rhythm expression of OsENO2-2 under different photoperiods(Mean±SD). LD, Long-day condition(light 14 h/dark 10 h); SD, Short-day condition(light 10 h/dark 14 h); WT, Wild type; OX, OsENO2-2 overexpressed plants.
图7 长日照条件下野生型植株(WT)与OsENO2-2超表达水稻植株(OX)中抽穗期关键基因的表达量(平均值±标准差)
Fig. 7. Expression levels of key heading regulatory genes in leaves of OsENO2-2 overexpression plants(OX) compared to wild type(WT) under long-day condition(Mean±SD).
图8 短日照条件下野生型植株(WT)与OsENO2-2超表达水稻植株(OX)中抽穗期关键基因的表达量(平均值±标准差)
Fig. 8. Expression levels of key heading regulatory genes in leaves of OsENO2-2 overexpression plants(OX) compared to wild type(WT) under short-day condition(Mean±SD).
[1] | 徐铨,奥本裕,王晓雪.水稻开花期调控分子机理研究进展.植物遗传资源学报,2014,15(1):129-136. |
Xu Q,Okumoto Y,Wang X E.Research progress on regulatory molecular mechanisms of flowering time in riceJ Plant Genet Resour,2014,15(1):129-136. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | Imaizumi T,Kay S.Photoperiodic control of flowering: not only by coincidence.Trends Plant Sci,2006,11(11):550-558. |
[3] | Itoh H,Nonoue Y,Yano M,Izawa T.A pair of floral regulators sets critical day length forHd3a florigen expression in rice. Nat Genet,2010,42(7):635-638. |
[4] | Tsuji H,Taoka K I,Shimamoto K.Regulation of flowering in rice: Two florigen genes, a complex gene network, and natural variation.Curr Opin Plant Biol,2011,14(1):45-52. |
[5] | Yano M,Katayose Y,Ashikari M,Yamanouchi U,Monna L,Fuse T,Baba T,Yamamoto K,Umehara Y,Nagamura Y,Sasaki T. Hd1, a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering time gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell,2000,12(12):2473-2484. |
[6] | Tamaki S,Matsuo S,Wong H L,Yokoi S,Shimamoto K.Hd3a protein is a mobile flowering signal in rice.Science,2007,316(5827):1033-1036. |
[7] | Hayama R,Coupland G.The molecular basis of diversity in the photoperiodic flowering responses ofArabidopsis and rice. Plant Physiol,2004,135(2):677-684. |
[8] | Komiya R,Yokoi S,Shimamoto K.A gene network for long-day flowering activates RFT1 encoding a mobile flowering signal in rice.Development,2009,136(20):3443-3450. |
[9] | Hayama R,Yokoi S,Tamaki S,Yano M,Shimamoto K.Adaptation of photoperiodic control pathways produces short-day flowering in rice.Nature,2003,422: 719-722. |
[10] | Kim S L,Lee S,Kim H J,Nam H G,An G.OsMADS51 is a short-day flowering promoter that functions upstream ofEhd1, OsMADS14, and Hd3a. Plant Physiol,2007,145(4):1484-1494. |
[11] | Xue W,Xing Y,Weng X,Zhao Y,Tang W,Wang L,Zhou H,Yu S,Xu C,Li X,Zhang Q.Natural variation inGhd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice. Nat Genet,2008,40(6):761-767. |
[12] | Wu C,You C,Li C,Long T,Chen G,Byrne M E,Zhang Q.RID1, encoding a Cys2/His2-type zinc finger transcription factor, acts as a master switch from vegetative to floral development in rice.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA,2008,105(35):12915-12920. |
[13] | Matsubara K,Yamanouchi U,Wang Z X,Minobe Y,Izawa T,Yano M.Ehd2, a rice ortholog of the maize INDETERMINATE1 gene, promotes flowering by up-regulating Ehd1. Plant Physiol,2008,148(3):1425-1435. |
[14] | Park S J,Kim S L,Lee S,Je B I,Piao H L,Park S H,Kim C M,Ryu C H,Xuan Y H,Colasanti J,An G,Han C D.RiceIndeterminate 1 (OsId1) is necessary for the expression of Ehd1 (Early heading date 1) regardless of photoperiod. Plant J,2008,56(6):1018-1029. |
[15] | Lu S J,Wei H,Wang Y,Wang H M,Yang R F,Zhang X B,Tu J M.Overexpression of a transcription factorOsMADS15 modifies plant architecture and flowering time in rice(Oryza sativa L.). Plant Mol Biol Rep,2012,30(6):1461-1469. |
[16] | Arora R,Agarwal P,Ray S,Singh A,Singh V,Tyagi A K,Kapoor S.MADS-box gene family in rice: Genome-wide identification, organization and expression profiling during reproductive development and stress.BMC Genom,2007,8(1):242. |
[17] | Pancholi V.Multifunctional α-enolase: Its role in diseases.Cell Mol Life Sci,2001,58: 902-920. |
[18] | Àngels D R,Anna R B,Ana G M,Roser L A.α-enolase, a multifunctional protein: Its role on pathophysiological situations. J Biomed Biotechnol, 2012(7):1-12. |
[19] | Kang M,Abdelmageed H,Lee S,Reichert A,Mysore K S,Allen R D.AtMBP-1, an alternative translation product of LOS2, affects abscisic acid responses and is modulated by the E3 ubiquitin ligase AtSAP5.Plant J,2013,76(3):481-493. |
[20] | Eremina M,Rozhon W,Yang S,Poppenberger B.ENO2 activity is required for the development and reproductive success of plants, and is feedback-repressed by AtMBP-1.Plant J,2015,81(6):895-906. |
[21] | Sun X,Cao Y,Yang Z,Xu C,Li X,Wang S.Xa26, a gene conferring resistance to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae in rice, encodes an LRR receptor kinase-like protein. Plant J,2004,37: 517-527. |
[22] | 卢扬江,郑康乐.提取水稻DNA 的一种简易方法.中国水稻科学,1992,6(1):47-48. |
Lu Y J,Zheng K L.A simple method for isolation of rice DNA.Chin J Rice Sci,1992,6(1):47-48. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | Livak K J,Schmittgen T D.Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2[-Delta Delta C(T)] method.Methods,2001,25(4):402-408. |
[24] | Hiei Y,Ohta S,Komari T,Kumashiro T.Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA.Plant J,1994,6(2):271-282. |
[1] | 任志奇, 薛可欣, 董铮, 李小湘, 黎用朝, 郭玉静, 刘文强, 郭梁, 盛新年, 刘之熙, 潘孝武. 水稻外卷叶突变体ocl1的鉴定及基因定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 337-346. |
[2] | 肖乐铨, 李雷, 戴伟民, 强胜, 宋小玲. 转cry2A*/bar基因水稻与杂草稻杂交后代的苗期生长特性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 347-358. |
[3] | 李刚, 高清松, 李伟, 张雯霞, 王健, 程保山, 王迪, 高浩, 徐卫军, 陈红旗, 纪剑辉. 定向敲除SD1基因提高水稻的抗倒性和稻瘟病抗性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 359-367. |
[4] | 汪胜勇, 陈宇航, 陈会丽, 黄钰杰, 张啸天, 丁双成, 王宏伟. 水稻减数分裂期高温对苯丙烷类代谢及下游分支代谢途径的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 368-378. |
[5] | 董立强, 杨铁鑫, 李睿, 商文奇, 马亮, 李跃东, 隋国民. 株行距配置对超高产田水稻产量及根系形态生理特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 392-404. |
[6] | 韩聪, 何禹畅, 吴丽娟, 郏丽丽, 王磊, 鄂志国. 水稻碱性亮氨酸拉链(bZIP)蛋白家族功能研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 436-448. |
[7] | 沈雨民, 陈明亮, 熊焕金, 熊文涛, 吴小燕, 肖叶青. 水稻内外稃异常发育突变体blg1 (beak like grain 1)的表型分析与精细定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 225-232. |
[8] | 段敏, 谢留杰, 高秀莹, 唐海娟, 黄善军, 潘晓飚. 利用CRISPR/Cas9技术创制广亲和水稻温敏雄性不育系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 233-243. |
[9] | 程玲, 黄福钢, 邱一埔, 王心怡, 舒宛, 邱永福, 李发活. 籼稻材料570011抗褐飞虱基因的遗传分析及鉴定[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 244-252. |
[10] | 王文婷, 马佳颖, 李光彦, 符卫蒙, 李沪波, 林洁, 陈婷婷, 奉保华, 陶龙兴, 符冠富, 秦叶波. 高温下不同施肥量对水稻产量品质形成的影响及其与能量代谢的关系分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
[11] | 刘嫒桦, 李小坤. 不同肥料施用与稻米品质关系的整合分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 276-284. |
[12] | 杨晓龙, 王彪, 汪本福, 张枝盛, 张作林, 杨蓝天, 程建平, 李阳. 不同水分管理方式对旱直播水稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
[13] | 魏晓东, 宋雪梅, 赵凌, 赵庆勇, 陈涛, 路凯, 朱镇, 黄胜东, 王才林, 张亚东. 硅锌肥及其施用方式对南粳46产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 295-306. |
[14] | 林聃, 江敏, 苗波, 郭萌, 石春林. 水稻高温热害模型研究及其在福建省的应用[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 307-320. |
[15] | 郑承梅, 孙金秋, 刘梦杰, 杨永杰, 陆永良, 郭怡卿, 唐伟. 水稻田糠稷种子萌发和出苗特性及化学防除药剂筛选[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 321-328. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||