褐飞虱取食对不同耐虫性水稻胼胝质沉积的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2013.06.009

中国水稻科学 ›› 2013, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 624-632.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2013.06.009

褐飞虱取食对不同耐虫性水稻胼胝质沉积的影响

杨丽^1,2,陈建明^1,* ,张海强^{1, 2},张珏锋¹,何月平¹

¹浙江省植物有害生物防控重点实验室省部共建国家重点实验室培育基地/浙江省农业科学院植物保护与微生物研究所，杭州 310021； ²杭州师范大学生命与环境科学学院，杭州 310036；

收稿日期:2013-04-12 修回日期:2013-08-08 出版日期:2013-11-10 发布日期:2013-11-10
通讯作者: 陈建明1,*,
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（30971918）；浙江省重点科技创新团队项目（2010R50028）。

Effects of Brown Planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stl) (Homoptera: Delphacidae), Feeding on Callose Deposition in Rice with Different Tolerance

YANG Li ^1,2, CHEN Jianming ^1,* , ZHANG Haiqiang^1,2 , ZHANG Juefeng¹ , HE Yueping ¹

¹State Key Laboratory Breeding Base for Zhejiang Sustainable Pest and Disease Control/ Institute of Plant Protection and Microbiology, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hangzhou 310021, China;² College of Life and Environment Science, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 310036, China;

Received:2013-04-12 Revised:2013-08-08 Online:2013-11-10 Published:2013-11-10
Contact: CHEN Jianming1,*,

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用冷冻切片和荧光显微技术检测了褐飞虱取食对不同耐虫性水稻叶鞘组织中胼胝质的分布、形态和数量的影响，发现胼胝质主要分布在韧皮部组织、薄壁组织、表皮组织和木质部组织中，尤其以韧皮部筛管中的胼胝质沉积最多；胼胝质的形态主要有丝状、颗粒状，尤其是小颗粒占大多数。在褐飞虱取食、人工针刺或者注射褐飞虱唾液后，不同耐虫性水稻叶鞘组织胼胝质的沉积数量和面积明显增加，尤其是感虫品种TN1增加显著。移除褐飞虱后稻株恢复生长8d，与处理前比较，感虫品种的胼胝质数量和面积无明显差异，耐虫品种Utri Rajapan明显减少，抗生性品种Rathu Heenati略有减少。停止人工针刺或注射褐飞虱唾液后稻株恢复生长8d，感虫品种的胼胝质数量和面积显著增加，耐虫品种无明显差异，抗生性品种有所增加。上述结果说明，品种耐虫性与叶鞘维管束组织中胼胝质的沉积数量和沉积面积有关。

关键词: 褐飞虱, 水稻, 不同耐虫性品种, 叶鞘组织, 胼胝质沉积

Abstract: Effect of feeding of brown planthopper (BPH), Nilaparvata lugens (Stl), on depositional site, shape and numbers of callose in various leafsheath tissues were investigated using frozen section and fluoresence microscopy. The results showed that callose was mainly deposited in phloem, parenchyma, epidermal and xylem tissues, with phloem being dominant. Most calloses have a small granular shape. After treated with BPH feeding, manual acupuncture or injection of BPH saliva, numbers and distribution of callose in leafsheath increased evidently in each of the three rice varieties that have different tolerance, in particular in the susceptible variety TN1. As compared with healthy plants (control), after eight days recovery growth from BPH removal, callose number and distribution did not change significantly in TN1 leafsheaths, reduced evidently in the tolerant variety Utri Rajapan, and reduced slightly in the antibiosis variety Rathu Heenati. By contract, in the treatments of manual acupuncture or injection of BPH saliva, numbers and distribution of callose after eight days of recovery growth were significantly increased in the susceptible variety, changed little in tolerant variety, and increased slightly in antibiosis variety, as compared with control plants. It was concluded that tolerance of rice varieties were related to abundance of callose deposited in phloem tissue of leafsheath.

Key words: Nilaparvata lugens, rice, varieties with different tolerance, leaf sheath tissue, callose deposition

中图分类号:

S435.112+.3

杨丽1,2,陈建明1,*,张海强1, 2,张珏锋1,何月平1. 褐飞虱取食对不同耐虫性水稻胼胝质沉积的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(6): 624-632.

YANG Li1,2, CHEN Jianming1,*, ZHANG Haiqiang1,2, ZHANG Juefeng1, HE Yueping1. Effects of Brown Planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stl) (Homoptera: Delphacidae), Feeding on Callose Deposition in Rice with Different Tolerance[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2013, 27(6): 624-632.

参考文献

\[1\]Xie B, Wang X, Zhu M, et al.CalS7 encodes a callose synthase responsible for callose deposition in the phloem. Plant J, 2011, 65(1): 114.

\[2\]Zavalive R, Ueki S, Epel B L, et al. Biology of callose(β1,3glucan) turnover at plasmodesmata. Protoplasma, 2011, 248(1): 117130.

\[3\]Barratt D H, Klling K, Graf A, et al. Callose synthase GSL7 is necessary for normal phloem transport and inflorescence growth in Arabidopsis.Plant Physiol, 2011, 155(1): 328341.

\[4\]Chen X Y, Kim J Y. Callose synthesis in higher plants. Plant Signal & Behav, 2009, 4(6): 489492.

\[5\]Wan L, Zha W, Cheng X, et al.A rice β1,3glucanase gene Osg1 is required for callose degradation in pollen development. Planta, 2011, 233(2): 309323.

\[6\]Luna E, Pastor V, Robert J, et al. Callose deposition: A multifaceted plant defense response. Mol Plant Microbe, 2011, 24(2): 183193.

\[7\]田国忠, 张锡津, 熊耀国, 等. 泡桐筛管内胼胝质与抗丛枝病关系的研究. 植物病理学报, 1994, 24: 352.

\[8\]杨和民, 郑重, Leach J E. 水稻受稻瘟菌侵染后发病初期的细胞学反应. 实验生物学报, 2004, 37(5): 344350.

\[9\]张伟丽, 郭振飞. 不同抗性品种柱花草接种炭疽菌后CAT、SOD活性及H2O2、胼胝质含量的变化. 扬州大学学报：农业与生命科学版, 2007, 28(2): 7377, 94.

\[10\]丁新伦, 谢荔岩, 林奇英, 等. 水稻条纹病毒胁迫下抗、感病水稻品种胼胝质的沉积. 植物保护学报, 2008, 35(1): 1922.

\[11\]李文龙. 胼胝质在大豆抵抗大豆花叶病毒中的作用. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2008.

\[12\]赵永山. 胼胝质对胞间连丝的修饰在大豆抗病毒侵染过程中的作用. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2010.

\[13\]吴思思. 不同大豆与大豆花叶病毒组合中胼胝质的荧光标记及其功能的初步研究. 保定: 河北农业大学, 2012.

\[14\]董玉梅, 潘满华, 赵正龙, 等. 玉米小斑病菌诱导大豆叶片胼胝质沉积的初步研究. 云南农业大学学报, 2013, 28(1): 1620.

\[15\]Ecale C, Backus E A. Phloem injury and repair following potato leafhopper feeding on alfalfa stems.Can J Bot, 1999, 77(4): 537547.

\[16\]Hao P, Liu C, Wang Y, et al. Herbiovore induced callose deposition on the sieve plates of rice: An important mechanism for host resistance. Plant Physiol, 2008, 146(4): 18101820.

\[17\]Du B, Zhang W L, Liu B F,et al. Identification and characterization of Bph14，a gene conferring resistance to brown planthopper in rice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2009, 106(52): 2216322168.

\[18\]Wei Z, Li R B, Li Y R, et al. Understanding rice plant resistance to the brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens): A proteomic approach. Proteomics, 2009, 9(10): 27982808.

\[19\]程遐年, 吴进才, 马飞. 褐飞虱发生与防治. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003.

\[20\]Khush G S.Green revolution: The way forward. Nat Rev Genet, 2001, 2(10): 815822.

\[21\]Painter R H. Insect resistance in crop plants. New York: Macmillan Press, 1951: 520.

\[22\]陈建明, 俞晓平, 程家安, 等. 植物耐虫性研究进展. 昆虫学报, 2005, 48(2): 262272.

\[23\]Juan N F, Juan F, Pedro L V. The evolution of resistance and tolerance to herbivores. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst, 2007, 38: 541566.

\[24\]陈建明, 俞晓平, 程家安. 不同水稻品种对褐飞虱的耐虫特性研究. 作物学报, 2009, 35(5): 795801.

\[25\]陈建明. 水稻品种对褐飞虱为害的耐性及其生理机制研究. 杭州: 浙江大学, 2004.

\[26\]陈建明, 杨丽, 张珏锋, 等.一种用于观察水稻叶鞘组织胼胝质的叶鞘组织制片方法. 中国， 201210048297. X.

\[27\]Stone B A, Clarke A E. Chemistry and biology of (1,3)βglucanase. Bundoora, Vic: La Trobe University Press, 1992.

\[28\]Radford J E, Vesk M, Overall R L. Callose deposition at plasmodesmata. Protoplasma, 1998, 201(1/2): 3037.

\[29\]Jaffe M J, Leopoda C. Callose deposition during garavitropism of Zea mays and Pisum satuvum and its inhibition by 2deoxyDglucose. Planta, 1984, 161(1): 2026.

\[30\]Currier H B, Webster D H. Callose formation and subsequent disappearance: Studies in ultrasound stimulation. Plant Physiol, 1964, 39: 843847.

\[31\]Majumder S K, Leopold A C. Callose formation in response to low temperature. Plant Cell Physiol, 1967, 8: 775778.

\[32\]McNairn R B. Phloem translocation and heatinduced callose formation in field grown Gossypium hirsutum L. Plant Physiol, 1972, 50(3): 366370.

\[33\]Sivaguru M, Fujiwara T, Samaj J, et al. Aluminuminduced 13βglucan inhibits celltocell trafficking of molecules through plasmodesmata: A new mechanism of aluminum toxicity in plants. Plant Physiol, 2000, 124(3): 9911005.

\[34\]Knoblauch M, van Bel A J E. Sieve tubes in action. Plant Cell, 1998, 10(1): 3550.

\[35\]Will T, van Bel A J E. Physical and chemical interactions between aphids and plants. J Exp Bot, 2006, 57(4): 729737.

\[36\]杜孟浩, 严兴成, 娄永根, 等. 褐飞虱唾液中诱导水稻释放挥发物的活性组分研究. 浙江大学学报：农业与生命科学版， 2005, 31(3): 237244.

\[37\]Sogawa K. Studies on feeding habits of the brown planthopper. Ⅰ: Effects of nitrogendeficiency of host plant on insect feeding. Jpn J Appl Entomol Zool, 1970, 14: 101106.

\[38\]陈利, 陈建明, 何月平, 等抗感吡虫啉褐飞虱在不同水稻品种上的取食行为比较. 浙江农业学报, 2011, 23(5): 924931.

[1]	任志奇, 薛可欣, 董铮, 李小湘, 黎用朝, 郭玉静, 刘文强, 郭梁, 盛新年, 刘之熙, 潘孝武. 水稻外卷叶突变体ocl1的鉴定及基因定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 337-346.
[2]	肖乐铨, 李雷, 戴伟民, 强胜, 宋小玲. 转cry2A/bar*基因水稻与杂草稻杂交后代的苗期生长特性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 347-358.
[3]	李刚, 高清松, 李伟, 张雯霞, 王健, 程保山, 王迪, 高浩, 徐卫军, 陈红旗, 纪剑辉. 定向敲除SD1基因提高水稻的抗倒性和稻瘟病抗性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 359-367.
[4]	汪胜勇, 陈宇航, 陈会丽, 黄钰杰, 张啸天, 丁双成, 王宏伟. 水稻减数分裂期高温对苯丙烷类代谢及下游分支代谢途径的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 368-378.
[5]	董立强, 杨铁鑫, 李睿, 商文奇, 马亮, 李跃东, 隋国民. 株行距配置对超高产田水稻产量及根系形态生理特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 392-404.
[6]	韩聪, 何禹畅, 吴丽娟, 郏丽丽, 王磊, 鄂志国. 水稻碱性亮氨酸拉链(bZIP)蛋白家族功能研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 436-448.
[7]	沈雨民, 陈明亮, 熊焕金, 熊文涛, 吴小燕, 肖叶青. 水稻内外稃异常发育突变体blg1 (beak like grain 1)的表型分析与精细定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 225-232.
[8]	段敏, 谢留杰, 高秀莹, 唐海娟, 黄善军, 潘晓飚. 利用CRISPR/Cas9技术创制广亲和水稻温敏雄性不育系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 233-243.
[9]	程玲, 黄福钢, 邱一埔, 王心怡, 舒宛, 邱永福, 李发活. 籼稻材料570011抗褐飞虱基因的遗传分析及鉴定[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 244-252.
[10]	王文婷, 马佳颖, 李光彦, 符卫蒙, 李沪波, 林洁, 陈婷婷, 奉保华, 陶龙兴, 符冠富, 秦叶波. 高温下不同施肥量对水稻产量品质形成的影响及其与能量代谢的关系分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 253-264.
[11]	刘嫒桦, 李小坤. 不同肥料施用与稻米品质关系的整合分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 276-284.
[12]	杨晓龙, 王彪, 汪本福, 张枝盛, 张作林, 杨蓝天, 程建平, 李阳. 不同水分管理方式对旱直播水稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 285-294.
[13]	魏晓东, 宋雪梅, 赵凌, 赵庆勇, 陈涛, 路凯, 朱镇, 黄胜东, 王才林, 张亚东. 硅锌肥及其施用方式对南粳46产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 295-306.
[14]	林聃, 江敏, 苗波, 郭萌, 石春林. 水稻高温热害模型研究及其在福建省的应用[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 307-320.
[15]	郑承梅, 孙金秋, 刘梦杰, 杨永杰, 陆永良, 郭怡卿, 唐伟. 水稻田糠稷种子萌发和出苗特性及化学防除药剂筛选[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 321-328.

褐飞虱取食对不同耐虫性水稻胼胝质沉积的影响

Effects of Brown Planthopper, Nilaparvata lugens (Stl) (Homoptera: Delphacidae), Feeding on Callose Deposition in Rice with Different Tolerance

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics