水稻田糠稷种子萌发和出苗特性及化学防除药剂筛选

doi:10.16819/j.1001-7216.2023.220706

中国水稻科学 ›› 2023, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 321-328.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2023.220706

水稻田糠稷种子萌发和出苗特性及化学防除药剂筛选

郑承梅¹^,²^,^#, 孙金秋¹^,^#, 刘梦杰¹, 杨永杰¹, 陆永良¹, 郭怡卿², 唐伟¹^,^*()

¹中国水稻研究所水稻生物育种全国重点实验室, 杭州 311401
²云南农业大学植物保护学院, 昆明 650201

收稿日期:2022-07-11 修回日期:2022-10-13 出版日期:2023-05-10 发布日期:2023-05-16
通讯作者: ^*email: tangwei@caas.cn
作者简介:^#共同第一作者
基金资助:
浙江省基础公益研究计划资助项目(LGN21C140003);浙江省“三农九方”科技协作计划资助项目(2022SNJF00301);财政部-农业农村部基本科研业务费项目(CPSIBRF-CNRRI-202124)

Seed Germination, Seedling Emergence Characteristics and Response of Panicum bisulcatum to Pre- and Post-emergence Herbicides in Paddy Field

ZHENG Chengmei¹^,²^,^#, SUN Jinqiu¹^,^#, LIU Mengjie¹, YANG Yongjie¹, LU Yongliang¹, GUO Yiqing², TANG Wei¹^,^*()

¹State Key Laboratory of Rice Biology and Breeding, China National Rice Research Institute, Hangzhou 311401, China
²Institute of Plant Protection, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming 650201, China

Received:2022-07-11 Revised:2022-10-13 Online:2023-05-10 Published:2023-05-16
Contact: ^*email: tangwei@caas.cn
About author:^#These authors contributed equally to this work

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

【目的】糠稷已成为我国局部水稻田主要恶性杂草之一。明确糠稷的种子萌发和出苗特性，探索化学防除技术具有重要意义。【方法】通过室内及温室试验，测定了温度、光照、盐和渗透胁迫、水层深度、土层深度对糠稷种子萌发及出苗的影响，并评估了水稻田常用苗前封闭和苗后茎叶除草剂对糠稷的防效。【结果】1）糠稷种子在20/10℃(昼/夜)~35/25℃温度范围萌发率均大于95%，且光照/黑暗交替处理的萌发率大于持续黑暗处理。糠稷萌发率随水势降低而下降，−0.35 MPa的水势对其种子萌发的抑制率达50%。250 mmol/L NaCl处理后糠稷萌发率大于50%，表明其耐盐胁迫能力较强。2）糠稷仅能在0~0.5 cm土层深度萌发出苗，播种深度大于0.5 cm时未见其出苗。水层大于2 cm时糠稷幼苗无法长出水面。3）在田间推荐剂量下，丙草胺、丁草胺、噁草酮、丙炔噁草酮和双唑草腈苗前土壤喷雾对糠稷防效100%，氯氟吡啶酯、五氟磺草胺、双草醚、氰氟草酯、噁唑酰草胺和精噁唑禾草灵可防除95%以上2~4叶期糠稷，在糠稷6叶期时选用噁唑酰草胺和精噁唑禾草灵，防治效果亦可达到90%以上。【结论】明确了环境因子对糠稷种子萌发和出苗的影响及稻田除草剂对该杂草防除效果，表明通过耕作将糠稷种子带入深土层，在幼苗早期保持水层，根据其不同叶龄选择适宜除草剂，可有效治理水稻田糠稷。

关键词: 糠稷, 种子萌发, 出苗, 除草剂筛选, 水稻

Abstract:

【Objective】Panicum bisulcatum is an annual grass weed widely distributed in China and is becoming increasingly problematic in paddy fields in some regions. This research aims to investigate the seed germination and seedling emergence characteristics and screen effective herbicides for control of this weed.【Methods】Laboratory and greenhouse experiments were conducted to determine the effect of temperature, light, osmotic and salt stress, seed burial depth, flooding depth on seed germination and seedling emergence of P. bisulcatum and evaluate the response of this weed to commonly available pre- and post-emergence herbicides in rice.【Results】1) In the light/dark regime, the germination rate was greater than 95% under a wide temperature range of 20℃/10℃(day/night) to 35℃/25℃ and significantly higher in alternate light/dark conditions as compared with that in continuous dark. The osmotic potential required for 50% inhibition of maximum germination was -0.35 MPa. P. bisulcatum is moderately tolerant to salt stress with germination rates greater than 50% at NaCl concentrations ranging from 0 to 250 mmol/L. 2) Seedling emergence only occurred at seed burial depths of 0 and 0.5 cm, with 78% and 18% emergence rates, respectively. Seeds can germinate and seedlings grow out of water at flooding depth of 2cm, and no germinated seeds reached water surface at flooding depth over 2cm. 3) Application of pre-emergence herbicides pretilachlor, butachlor, oxadiazon, oxadiargyl and pyraclonil provided 100% control effectiveness of P. bisulcatum at their recommended field rates. Florpyrauxifen-benzyl, penoxsulam, bispyribac-sodium, cyhalofop-butyl, metamifop and fenoxaprop-P-ethyl provided greater than 95% control of P. bisulcatum at the 2- to 4-leaf stages, however, only metamifop and fenoxaprop-P-ethyl provided greater than 90% control of P. bisulcatum at the 6-leaf stage.【Conclusion】 The results contribute to an insight into the germination and emergence of P. bisulcatum, and illustrate the role of seed burial by tillage, flooding, and herbicide screening according to its leaf-age as effective measures for the control of P. bisulcatum in paddy fields.

Key words: Panicum bisulcatum, seed germination, seedling emergence, herbicide screening, rice

郑承梅, 孙金秋, 刘梦杰, 杨永杰, 陆永良, 郭怡卿, 唐伟. 水稻田糠稷种子萌发和出苗特性及化学防除药剂筛选[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 321-328.

ZHENG Chengmei, SUN Jinqiu, LIU Mengjie, YANG Yongjie, LU Yongliang, GUO Yiqing, TANG Wei. Seed Germination, Seedling Emergence Characteristics and Response of Panicum bisulcatum to Pre- and Post-emergence Herbicides in Paddy Field[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 321-328.

图/表 9

参考文献 26

[1]	李扬汉. 中国杂草志[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1998: 1280
	Li Y H. Weed Flora of China[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 1998: 1280. (in Chinese)
[2]	李香菊. 近年我国农田杂草防控中的突出问题与治理对策[J]. 植物保护, 2018, 44(5): 77-84.
	Li X J. Main problems and management strategies of weeds in agricultural fields in China in recent years[J]. Plant Protection, 2018, 44(5): 77-84. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[3]	强胜. 中国杂草生物学研究的新进展[J]. 杂草学报, 2018, 36(2): 1-9.
	Qiang S. New Progresses on Studies of Weed Biology in China[J]. Journal of Weed Science, 2018, 36(2): 1-9. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[4]	Javaid M M, Tanveer A. Germination ecology of Emex spinosa and Emex australis, invasive weeds of winter crops[J]. Weed Research, 2014, 54(6): 565-575.
[5]	Travlos I, Gazoulis I, Kanatas P, Tsekoura A, Zannopoulos S, Papastylianou P. Key factors affecting weed seeds’ germination, weed emergence, and their possible role for the efficacy of false seedbed technique as weed management practice[J]. Frontiers in Agronomy, 2020, 2: 1.
[6]	徐伟东, 黎菊, 陆强. 浙北稻麦连作区稻田糠稷发生对水稻生长的影响及对除草剂敏感性研究[J]. 中国稻米, 2021, 27(3): 47-50.
	Xu W D, Li J, Lu Q. Study on the effects of the occurrence of Panicum bisulcatum Thunb. on rice growth and sensitivity to herbicides in paddy fields in rice-wheat rotation area of northern Zhejiang[J]. China Rice, 2021, 27(3): 47-50. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[7]	Riemens M M, Scheepens P C, van der Weide R Y. Dormancy, germination and emergence of weed seeds, with emphasis on the influence of light: Results of a literature survey[M]. Wageningen: Plant Research International, 2004: 5-6.
[8]	Michel B E. Evaluation of the water potentials of solutions of polyethylene glycol 8000 both in the absence and presence of other solutes[J]. Plant Physiology, 1983, 72(1): 66-70.
[9]	Tang W, Chen J, Zhang J P, Lu Y L. Seed germination, seedling emergence, and response to herbicides of triquetrous murdannia (Murdannia triquetra) in rice[J]. Weed Science, 2017, 65: 141-150.
[10]	Rezvani M, Nadimi S, Zaefarian F, Chauhan B S. Environmental factors affecting seed germination and seedling emergence of three Phalaris species[J]. Crop Protection, 2021, 148: 105743.
[11]	Ahmed S, Opeña J L, Chauhan B S. Seed germination ecology of doveweed (Murdannia nudiflora) and its implication for management in dry-seeded rice[J]. Weed Science, 2015, 63: 491-501.
[12]	Opeña J L, Chauhan B S, Baltazar A M. Seed germination ecology of Echinochloa glabrescens and its implication for management in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(3): e92261.
[13]	罗小娟, 吕波, 李俊, 董立尧. 鳢肠种子萌发及出苗条件的研究[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2012, 35(2): 71-75.
	Luo X J, Lü B, Li J, Dong L Y. Study on the environmental factors affecting seed germination and seedling emergence of Eclipta prostrate[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2012, 35(2): 71-75. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[14]	李阳, 亓雯雯, 李绍阳, 赵丹丹, 李景玉, 马红媛. 苜蓿种子萌发和幼苗生长对温度、光照和埋深的响应[J]. 生态学杂志, 2021, 40(2): 332-339.
	Li Y, Qi W W, Li S Y, Zhao D D, Li J Y, Ma H Y. Seed germination and seedling growth of Medicago sativa in response to the variations of temperature, light, and burial depth[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2021, 40(2): 332-339. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[15]	李欣勇, 黄迎, 金雪, 刘国道. 碎米莎草种子休眠与萌发特性研究[J]. 热带作物学报, 2021, 42(7): 2001-2007.
	LiX Y, Huang Y, Jin X, Liu G D. Seed dormancy and germination characteristics of Cyperus iria[J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2021, 42(7): 2001-2007. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[16]	冯伟, 吴新民, 潘根兴, 许信旺, 强胜. 皖江湿地及其开垦为稻田后土壤种子库结构比较[J]. 生态学杂志, 2008, 27(6): 874-879.
[17]	Feng W, Wu X M, Pan G X, Xu X W, Qiang S. Comparison of soil seed bank structure in natural wetlands and their corresponding reclaimed paddy fields at lower reaches of Yangtze River in Anhui, China[J]. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2008, 27(6): 874-879. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[18]	Ismail A M, Ella E S, Vergara G V, Mackill D J. Mechanisms associated with tolerance to flooding during germination and early seedling growth in rice(Oryza Sativa)[J]. Annals of Botany, 2009, 103: 197-209.
[19]	Korres N E, Loka D A, Gitsopoulos T K, Varanasi V K, Chachalis D, Price A, Slaton N A. Salinity effects on rice, rice weeds, and strategies to secure crop productivity and effective weed control: A review[J]. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2022, 42: 58.
[20]	杨升, 张华新, 张丽. 植物耐盐生理生化指标及耐盐植物筛选综述[J]. 西北林学院学报, 2010, 25(3): 59-65.
	Yang S, Zhang H X, Zhang L. Physiological and biochemical indices of salt tolerance and scanning of salt-tolerance plants[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2010, 25(3): 59-65. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[21]	Yu J L, McCullough P E. Growth stage influences mesotrione efficacy and fate in two bluegrass (Poa) species[J]. Weed Technology, 2016, 30: 524-532.
[22]	Kieloch R, Domaradzki K. The role of the growth stage of weeds in their response to reduced herbicide doses[J]. Acta Agrobotanica, 2011, 64(4): 259-266.
[23]	郭文磊, 冯莉, 吴丹丹, 田兴山. 稻田苗后茎叶处理剂混用的联合除草作用[J]. 杂草学报, 2020, 38(2): 75-78.
	Guo W L, Feng L, Wu D D, Tian X S. Combined effect of foliar herbicide mixtures for the control of weeds in rice[J]. Journal of Weed Science, 2020, 38(2): 75-78. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[24]	柏连阳. 除草剂安全剂及其应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019: 143-147.
	Bai L Y. Introduction and Application of Herbicide Safeners[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2019: 143-147. (in Chinese)
[25]	刘兴林, 孙涛, 付声姣, 钟国华. 水稻田除草剂的应用及杂草抗药性现状[J]. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 43(7): 115-126.
	Liu X L, Sun T, Fu S J, Zhong G H. Herbicde application and weeds resistance in rice field in China[J]. Journal of Northwest A&F University (Nature Science Edition), 2015, 43(7): 115-126. (in Chinese with English abstract)
[26]	Liu X, Merchant A, Xiang S, Zong T, Zhou X, Bai L. Managing herbicide resistance in China[J]. Weed Science, 2021, 69: 4-17.

药剂名称 Herbicide	剂型 Formulation	生产厂家 Manufacturer	处理剂量 Dose(ai)/(g·hm⁻²)
苗前封闭处理除草剂 Pre-emergence herbicide
丙草胺Pretilachlor	30% EC	江苏富田农化有限公司	562.5
丁草胺Butachlor	60% EC	南通南沈植保科技开发有限公司	1145.25
氟酮磺草胺Triafamone	19% SC	拜耳作物科学（中国）有限公司	28.5
噁草酮Oxadiazon	120 g/L EC	安徽科立华化工有限公司	405.0
丙炔噁草酮Oxadiargyl	10% EC	法国罗纳·普朗克公司	82.5
双环磺草酮Benzobicyclon	25% SE	日本史迪士生物科学株式会社	187.5
苄嘧磺隆Bensulfuron-methyl	10% WP	江苏常隆农化有限公司	33.75
吡嘧磺隆Pyrazosulfuron-ethyl	10% WP	江苏快达农化股份有限公司	22.5
嗪吡嘧磺隆Metazosulfuron	33% WG	日产化学工业株式会社	86.625
乙氧磺隆Ethoxysulfuron	15% WG	江苏江南农化有限公司	15.75
双唑草腈Pyraclonil	2% GR	湖北相和精密化学有限公司	189.0
苗后茎叶处理除草剂Post-emergence heibicide
氯氟吡啶酯Florpyrauxifen-benzyl	3% EC	美国陶氏益农公司	28.0
五氟磺草胺Penoxsulam	25 g/L EC	陶氏益农农业科技（江苏）有限公司	15.0
双草醚Bispyribac sodium	100 g/L SC	日本组合化学株式会社	26.25
氰氟草酯Cyhalofop-butyl	100 g/L EC	美国陶氏益农公司	90.0
噁唑酰草胺Metamifop	10% EC	苏州富美实植物保护剂有限公司	105.0
二氯喹啉酸Quinclorac	50% WP	浙江天一生物科技有限公司	112.5
精噁唑禾草灵Fenoxaprop-P-ethyl	6.9% EW	拜耳作物科学（中国）有限公司	56.92

药剂名称 Herbicide	剂型 Formulation	生产厂家 Manufacturer	处理剂量 Dose(ai)/(g·hm⁻²)
苗前封闭处理除草剂 Pre-emergence herbicide
丙草胺Pretilachlor	30% EC	江苏富田农化有限公司	562.5
丁草胺Butachlor	60% EC	南通南沈植保科技开发有限公司	1145.25
氟酮磺草胺Triafamone	19% SC	拜耳作物科学（中国）有限公司	28.5
噁草酮Oxadiazon	120 g/L EC	安徽科立华化工有限公司	405.0
丙炔噁草酮Oxadiargyl	10% EC	法国罗纳·普朗克公司	82.5
双环磺草酮Benzobicyclon	25% SE	日本史迪士生物科学株式会社	187.5
苄嘧磺隆Bensulfuron-methyl	10% WP	江苏常隆农化有限公司	33.75
吡嘧磺隆Pyrazosulfuron-ethyl	10% WP	江苏快达农化股份有限公司	22.5
嗪吡嘧磺隆Metazosulfuron	33% WG	日产化学工业株式会社	86.625
乙氧磺隆Ethoxysulfuron	15% WG	江苏江南农化有限公司	15.75
双唑草腈Pyraclonil	2% GR	湖北相和精密化学有限公司	189.0
苗后茎叶处理除草剂Post-emergence heibicide
氯氟吡啶酯Florpyrauxifen-benzyl	3% EC	美国陶氏益农公司	28.0
五氟磺草胺Penoxsulam	25 g/L EC	陶氏益农农业科技（江苏）有限公司	15.0
双草醚Bispyribac sodium	100 g/L SC	日本组合化学株式会社	26.25
氰氟草酯Cyhalofop-butyl	100 g/L EC	美国陶氏益农公司	90.0
噁唑酰草胺Metamifop	10% EC	苏州富美实植物保护剂有限公司	105.0
二氯喹啉酸Quinclorac	50% WP	浙江天一生物科技有限公司	112.5
精噁唑禾草灵Fenoxaprop-P-ethyl	6.9% EW	拜耳作物科学（中国）有限公司	56.92

除草剂名称 Herbicide name	鲜质量 Shoot biomass/g	鲜质量防效 Shoot biomass reduction/%	出苗株数 Emerged seedling number	株防效 Seedling mortality/%
丙草胺Pretilachlor	0	100±0 a	0	100±0 a
丁草胺Butachlor	0	100±0 a	0	100±0 a
噁草酮Oxadiazon	0	100±0 a	0	100±0 a
丙炔噁草酮Oxadiargyl	0	100±0 a	0	100±0 a
双唑草腈Pyraclonil	0	100±0 a	0	100±0 a
嗪吡嘧磺隆Metazosulfuron	1.24	96.6±3.0 ab	2.3	94.2±2.6 b
氟酮磺草胺Triafamone	2.13	94.2±3.0 b	2.7	93.3±1.7 b
吡嘧磺隆Pyrazosulfuron-ethyl	2.29	93.8±3.4 b	4.3	89.2±2.6 c
乙氧磺隆Ethoxysulfuron	2.40	93.5±3.5 b	10.7	73.3±0.8 e
苄嘧磺隆Bensulfuron-methyl	2.72	92.6±2.4 b	2.7	93.3±2.2 b
双环磺草酮Benzobicyclon	4.97	86.5±4.5 c	7.0	82.5±1.8 d
空白对照Control	36.76	--	40.0	--

除草剂名称 Herbicide name	鲜质量 Shoot biomass/g	鲜质量防效 Shoot biomass reduction/%	出苗株数 Emerged seedling number	株防效 Seedling mortality/%
丙草胺Pretilachlor	0	100±0 a	0	100±0 a
丁草胺Butachlor	0	100±0 a	0	100±0 a
噁草酮Oxadiazon	0	100±0 a	0	100±0 a
丙炔噁草酮Oxadiargyl	0	100±0 a	0	100±0 a
双唑草腈Pyraclonil	0	100±0 a	0	100±0 a
嗪吡嘧磺隆Metazosulfuron	1.24	96.6±3.0 ab	2.3	94.2±2.6 b
氟酮磺草胺Triafamone	2.13	94.2±3.0 b	2.7	93.3±1.7 b
吡嘧磺隆Pyrazosulfuron-ethyl	2.29	93.8±3.4 b	4.3	89.2±2.6 c
乙氧磺隆Ethoxysulfuron	2.40	93.5±3.5 b	10.7	73.3±0.8 e
苄嘧磺隆Bensulfuron-methyl	2.72	92.6±2.4 b	2.7	93.3±2.2 b
双环磺草酮Benzobicyclon	4.97	86.5±4.5 c	7.0	82.5±1.8 d
空白对照Control	36.76	--	40.0	--

除草剂 Herbicide	2叶龄 2-leaf age		4叶龄 4-leaf age		6叶龄6-leaf age
除草剂 Herbicide	鲜质量 Shoot biomass/g	鲜质量防效 Shoot biomass reduction/%	鲜质量 Shoot biomass/g	鲜质量防效 Shoot biomass reduction/%	鲜质量 Shoot biomass/g	鲜质量防效 Shoot biomass reduction/%
氰氟草酯Cyhalofop-butyl	0	100±0 a	0.59	97.2±0.35 a	3.63	84.6±0.88 c
噁唑酰草胺Metamifop	0	100±0 a	0.19	99.1±0.49 a	0.35	98.5±0.35 a
精噁唑禾草灵Fenoxaprop-P-ethyl	0	100±0 a	0.34	98.4±0.64 a	1.91	91.9±1.55 b
五氟磺草胺Penoxsulam	1.82	99.4±0.14 a	2.38	88.7±1.85 c	18.52	21.5±2.12 f
氯氟吡啶酯Florpyrauxifen-benzyl	1.02	97.9±0.57 a	1.35	93.6±1.91 b	7.93	66.4±2.15 d
双草醚Bispyribac sodium	0.89	96.3±1.17 b	1.18	94.4±1.85 b	11.59	50.9±2.18 e
二氯喹啉酸Quinclorac	0.97	93.9±2.70 c	12.79	39.4±2.44 d	21.59	8.5±0.68 g
空白对照Control	16.02	-	21.07	-	23.56	-

水稻田糠稷种子萌发和出苗特性及化学防除药剂筛选

Seed Germination, Seedling Emergence Characteristics and Response of Panicum bisulcatum to Pre- and Post-emergence Herbicides in Paddy Field

RichHTML

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 9

参考文献 26

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	郭展, 张运波. 水稻对干旱胁迫的生理生化响应及分子调控研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 335-349.
[2]	韦还和, 马唯一, 左博源, 汪璐璐, 朱旺, 耿孝宇, 张翔, 孟天瑶, 陈英龙, 高平磊, 许轲, 霍中洋, 戴其根. 盐、干旱及其复合胁迫对水稻产量和品质形成影响的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 350-363.
[3]	许丹洁, 林巧霞, 李正康, 庄小倩, 凌宇, 赖美玲, 陈晓婷, 鲁国东. OsOPR10正调控水稻对稻瘟病和白叶枯病的抗性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 364-374.
[4]	候小琴, 王莹, 余贝, 符卫蒙, 奉保华, 沈煜潮, 谢杭军, 王焕然, 许用强, 武志海, 王建军, 陶龙兴, 符冠富. 黄腐酸钾提高水稻秧苗耐盐性的作用途径分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 409-421.
[5]	胡继杰, 胡志华, 张均华, 曹小闯, 金千瑜, 章志远, 朱练峰. 根际饱和溶解氧对水稻分蘖期光合及生长特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 437-446.
[6]	刘福祥, 甄浩洋, 彭焕, 郑刘春, 彭德良, 文艳华. 广东省水稻孢囊线虫病调查与鉴定[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(4): 456-461.
[7]	陈浩田, 秦缘, 钟笑涵, 林晨语, 秦竞航, 杨建昌, 张伟杨. 水稻根系和土壤性状与稻田甲烷排放关系的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 233-245.
[8]	缪军, 冉金晖, 徐梦彬, 卜柳冰, 王平, 梁国华, 周勇. 过量表达异三聚体G蛋白γ亚基基因RGG2提高水稻抗旱性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 246-255.
[9]	尹潇潇, 张芷菡, 颜绣莲, 廖蓉, 杨思葭, 郭岱铭, 樊晶, 赵志学, 王文明. 多个稻曲病菌效应因子的信号肽验证和表达分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 256-265.
[10]	朱裕敬, 桂金鑫, 龚成云, 罗新阳, 石居斌, 张海清, 贺记外. 全基因组关联分析定位水稻分蘖角度QTL[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 266-276.
[11]	魏倩倩, 汪玉磊, 孔海民, 徐青山, 颜玉莲, 潘林, 迟春欣, 孔亚丽, 田文昊, 朱练峰, 曹小闯, 张均华, 朱春权. 信号分子硫化氢参与硫肥缓解铝对水稻生长抑制作用的机制[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 290-302.
[12]	周甜, 吴少华, 康建宏, 吴宏亮, 杨生龙, 王星强, 李昱, 黄玉峰. 不同种植模式对水稻籽粒淀粉含量及淀粉关键酶活性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 303-315.
[13]	关雅琪, 鄂志国, 王磊, 申红芳. 影响中国水稻生产环节外包发展因素的实证研究：基于群体效应视角[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(3): 324-334.
[14]	许用强, 姜宁, 奉保华, 肖晶晶, 陶龙兴, 符冠富. 水稻开花期高温热害响应机理及其调控技术研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(2): 111-126.
[15]	吕海涛, 李建忠, 鲁艳辉, 徐红星, 郑许松, 吕仲贤. 稻田福寿螺的发生、危害及其防控技术研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(2): 127-139.