Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2022, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 181-194.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2022.210809
• Research Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
ZHANG Xiaopeng1, GONG Yanlong1,2, YAN Bingchun1, LI Li1, LI Kunyi1, WANG Yiwei1, JU Xiaotang1, CHEN Xiaoyi1,*(), XU Hai1,*()
Received:
2021-08-17
Revised:
2021-10-17
Online:
2022-03-10
Published:
2022-03-11
Contact:
CHEN Xiaoyi, XU Hai
张小鹏1, 宫彦龙1,2, 闫秉春1, 李丽1, 李坤译1, 王祎玮1, 鞠晓堂1, 程效义1,*(), 徐海1,*()
通讯作者:
程效义,徐海
基金资助:
ZHANG Xiaopeng, GONG Yanlong, YAN Bingchun, LI Li, LI Kunyi, WANG Yiwei, JU Xiaotang, CHEN Xiaoyi, XU Hai. Effects of Trinexapac-ethyl on Lodging Resistance, Yield and Rice Quality of Northern Rice with Good Quality[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(2): 181-194.
张小鹏, 宫彦龙, 闫秉春, 李丽, 李坤译, 王祎玮, 鞠晓堂, 程效义, 徐海. 抗倒酯对北方优质稻抗倒伏能力、产量和米质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(2): 181-194.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2022.210809
品种 Variety | 试验因素 Experiment factor | 节间长度Internode length/cm | 株高Plant height/cm | 穗长Panicle length/cm | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | N2 | N3 | ||||
丰锦 Toyonishiki | 浓度Concentration(C) | |||||
对照CK | 5.21 Aa | 12.64 Aa | 25.71 Aa | 118.61 Aa | 19.52 Aa | |
低浓度C1 | 4.32 Ab | 10.46 Bb | 21.30 Aab | 113.10 Ab | 19.31 Aa | |
中浓度C2 | 2.89 Bc | 8.74 BCc | 18.61 Aab | 101.46 Bc | 17.27 Bb | |
高浓度C3 | 2.91 Bc | 8.17 Cc | 16.46 Ab | 85.66 Cd | 16.10 Bc | |
时期Stage(T) | ||||||
分蘖末期Late tillering stage(T1) | 4.35 Aa | 10.54 Aa | 19.89 Aa | 106.47 Aa | 19.18 Aa | |
拔节始期Early jointing stage(T2) | 4.05 Aa | 10.23 Aa | 23.89 Aa | 105.24 Aa | 17.68 Bb | |
孕穗期Booting stage(T3) | 3.10 Ab | 9.24 Aa | 17.79 Aa | 102.43 Aa | 17.29 Bb | |
F值F value | 浓度Concentration(C) | 15.60** | 17.17** | 2.54* | 111.42** | 24.03** |
时期Stage(T) | 7.57* | 1.42ns | 2.15ns | 3.19ns | 28.17** | |
C×T | 4.44** | 1.04ns | 0.99ns | 4.50** | 3.60* | |
沈农09001 Shennong 09001 | 浓度Concentration(C) | |||||
对照CK | 6.03 Aa | 13.02 Aa | 17.91 Aa | 114.76 Aa | 19.44 Aa | |
低浓度C1 | 4.30 Bb | 10.14 Bb | 16.42 Aa | 103.10 Bb | 19.22 Aa | |
中浓度C2 | 3.17 Cc | 8.15 Cc | 13.71 Bb | 91.24 Cc | 19.13 Aa | |
高浓度C3 | 2.79 Cc | 5.51 Dd | 11.37 Cc | 76.26 Dd | 17.56 Bb | |
时期Stage(T) | ||||||
分蘖末期Late tillering stage(T1) | 4.51 Aa | 11.06 Aa | 15.40 Aa | 99.45 Aa | 19.78 Aa | |
拔节始期Early jointing stage(T2) | 3.63 Aa | 9.56 Ab | 15.29 Aa | 97.03 Aa | 18.64 Ab | |
孕穗期Booting stage(T3) | 4.07 Aa | 6.99 Bc | 13.88 Bb | 92.55 Bb | 18.09 Ab | |
F值F value | 浓度Concentration(C) | 40.61** | 51.35** | 33.06** | 186.00** | 15.70** |
时期Stage(T) | 1.35* | 42.23** | 16.02* | 25.98** | 10.97* | |
C×T | 2.57* | 1.17ns | 0.45ns | 3.86* | 5.23** |
Table 1 Effects of TE on panicle length, basal internode length and plant height of good quality rice.
品种 Variety | 试验因素 Experiment factor | 节间长度Internode length/cm | 株高Plant height/cm | 穗长Panicle length/cm | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | N2 | N3 | ||||
丰锦 Toyonishiki | 浓度Concentration(C) | |||||
对照CK | 5.21 Aa | 12.64 Aa | 25.71 Aa | 118.61 Aa | 19.52 Aa | |
低浓度C1 | 4.32 Ab | 10.46 Bb | 21.30 Aab | 113.10 Ab | 19.31 Aa | |
中浓度C2 | 2.89 Bc | 8.74 BCc | 18.61 Aab | 101.46 Bc | 17.27 Bb | |
高浓度C3 | 2.91 Bc | 8.17 Cc | 16.46 Ab | 85.66 Cd | 16.10 Bc | |
时期Stage(T) | ||||||
分蘖末期Late tillering stage(T1) | 4.35 Aa | 10.54 Aa | 19.89 Aa | 106.47 Aa | 19.18 Aa | |
拔节始期Early jointing stage(T2) | 4.05 Aa | 10.23 Aa | 23.89 Aa | 105.24 Aa | 17.68 Bb | |
孕穗期Booting stage(T3) | 3.10 Ab | 9.24 Aa | 17.79 Aa | 102.43 Aa | 17.29 Bb | |
F值F value | 浓度Concentration(C) | 15.60** | 17.17** | 2.54* | 111.42** | 24.03** |
时期Stage(T) | 7.57* | 1.42ns | 2.15ns | 3.19ns | 28.17** | |
C×T | 4.44** | 1.04ns | 0.99ns | 4.50** | 3.60* | |
沈农09001 Shennong 09001 | 浓度Concentration(C) | |||||
对照CK | 6.03 Aa | 13.02 Aa | 17.91 Aa | 114.76 Aa | 19.44 Aa | |
低浓度C1 | 4.30 Bb | 10.14 Bb | 16.42 Aa | 103.10 Bb | 19.22 Aa | |
中浓度C2 | 3.17 Cc | 8.15 Cc | 13.71 Bb | 91.24 Cc | 19.13 Aa | |
高浓度C3 | 2.79 Cc | 5.51 Dd | 11.37 Cc | 76.26 Dd | 17.56 Bb | |
时期Stage(T) | ||||||
分蘖末期Late tillering stage(T1) | 4.51 Aa | 11.06 Aa | 15.40 Aa | 99.45 Aa | 19.78 Aa | |
拔节始期Early jointing stage(T2) | 3.63 Aa | 9.56 Ab | 15.29 Aa | 97.03 Aa | 18.64 Ab | |
孕穗期Booting stage(T3) | 4.07 Aa | 6.99 Bc | 13.88 Bb | 92.55 Bb | 18.09 Ab | |
F值F value | 浓度Concentration(C) | 40.61** | 51.35** | 33.06** | 186.00** | 15.70** |
时期Stage(T) | 1.35* | 42.23** | 16.02* | 25.98** | 10.97* | |
C×T | 2.57* | 1.17ns | 0.45ns | 3.86* | 5.23** |
品种 Variety | 试验因素 Experiment factor | 茎秆粗度Culm diameter/mm | 茎壁厚度Culm wall thickness/mm | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | N2 | N3 | N1 | N2 | N3 | |||
丰锦 | 浓度Concentration(C) | |||||||
Toyonishiki | 对照CK | 5.01 Aab | 4.50 Bb | 4.08 Aa | 0.81 Ab | 0.62 Bb | 0.52 Ab | |
低浓度C1 | 4.82 Ab | 4.49 Bb | 3.75 BCbc | 0.90 Aab | 0.70 ABa | 0.53 Aab | ||
中浓度C2 | 5.16 Aa | 4.68 Aa | 3.95 ABab | 0.93 Aab | 0.72 Aa | 0.54 Aab | ||
高浓度C3 | 5.09 Aab | 4.42 Bb | 3.63 Cc | 0.94 Aa | 0.68 ABa | 0.57 Aa | ||
时期Stage(T) | ||||||||
分蘖末期Late tillering stage(T1) | 5.03 Aa | 4.60 Aa | 3.90 Aa | 0.87 Aa | 0.68 Aa | 0.55 Aa | ||
拔节始期Early jointing stage(T2) | 4.91 Aa | 4.35 Aa | 3.74 Aa | 0.89 Aa | 0.68 Aa | 0.54 Aa | ||
孕穗期Booting stage(T3) | 5.12 Aa | 4.61 Aa | 3.92 Aa | 0.92 Aa | 0.69 Aa | 0.53 Aa | ||
F值F value | 浓度Concentration(C) | 2.13ns | 11.04** | 7.10** | 2.27ns | 5.09** | 2.78ns | |
时期Stage(T) | 1.29ns | 2.51ns | 4.66ns | 0.77ns | 0.07ns | 0.72ns | ||
C×T | 2.60* | 4.00* | 2.59* | 0.68ns | 1.08ns | 1.04ns | ||
沈农09001 | 浓度Concentration(C) | |||||||
Shennong 09001 | 对照CK | 5.09 Bb | 4.56 Ab | 3.77 Bb | 0.78 Cc | 0.58 Bc | 0.45 Bb | |
低浓度C1 | 5.13 Bb | 4.65Aab | 3.89 ABb | 0.81 BCc | 0.63 Bc | 0.48 Bb | ||
中浓度C2 | 5.53 Aa | 4.79 Aa | 4.07 Aa | 0.92 ABb | 0.73 Ab | 0.57 Aa | ||
高浓度C3 | 5.30 ABb | 4.73 Aab | 3.93 ABab | 1.02 Aa | 0.80 Aa | 0.58 Aa | ||
时期Stage(T) | ||||||||
分蘖末期Late tillering stage(T1) | 5.04 Bb | 4.43 Bb | 3.79 Bb | 0.83 Ab | 0.64 Ab | 0.49 Aa | ||
拔节始期Early jointing stage(T2) | 5.08 Bb | 4.63 ABb | 3.81 Bb | 0.87 Ab | 0.68 Aab | 0.53 Aa | ||
孕穗期Booting stage(T3) | 5.66 Aa | 4.99 Aa | 4.15 Aa | 0.94 Aa | 0.73 Aa | 0.54 Aa | ||
F值F value | 浓度Concentration(C) | 7.90** | 2.3* | 5.52** | 16.74** | 28.51** | 15.74** | |
时期Stage(T) | 19.58** | 13.34ns | 21.97** | 11.17* | 5.38ns | 2.56ns | ||
C×T | 7.31** | 3.76* | 0.74ns | 4.37** | 3.07* | 3.89* |
Table 2 Effects of TE on stem diameter and stem wall thickness of good quality rice.
品种 Variety | 试验因素 Experiment factor | 茎秆粗度Culm diameter/mm | 茎壁厚度Culm wall thickness/mm | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | N2 | N3 | N1 | N2 | N3 | |||
丰锦 | 浓度Concentration(C) | |||||||
Toyonishiki | 对照CK | 5.01 Aab | 4.50 Bb | 4.08 Aa | 0.81 Ab | 0.62 Bb | 0.52 Ab | |
低浓度C1 | 4.82 Ab | 4.49 Bb | 3.75 BCbc | 0.90 Aab | 0.70 ABa | 0.53 Aab | ||
中浓度C2 | 5.16 Aa | 4.68 Aa | 3.95 ABab | 0.93 Aab | 0.72 Aa | 0.54 Aab | ||
高浓度C3 | 5.09 Aab | 4.42 Bb | 3.63 Cc | 0.94 Aa | 0.68 ABa | 0.57 Aa | ||
时期Stage(T) | ||||||||
分蘖末期Late tillering stage(T1) | 5.03 Aa | 4.60 Aa | 3.90 Aa | 0.87 Aa | 0.68 Aa | 0.55 Aa | ||
拔节始期Early jointing stage(T2) | 4.91 Aa | 4.35 Aa | 3.74 Aa | 0.89 Aa | 0.68 Aa | 0.54 Aa | ||
孕穗期Booting stage(T3) | 5.12 Aa | 4.61 Aa | 3.92 Aa | 0.92 Aa | 0.69 Aa | 0.53 Aa | ||
F值F value | 浓度Concentration(C) | 2.13ns | 11.04** | 7.10** | 2.27ns | 5.09** | 2.78ns | |
时期Stage(T) | 1.29ns | 2.51ns | 4.66ns | 0.77ns | 0.07ns | 0.72ns | ||
C×T | 2.60* | 4.00* | 2.59* | 0.68ns | 1.08ns | 1.04ns | ||
沈农09001 | 浓度Concentration(C) | |||||||
Shennong 09001 | 对照CK | 5.09 Bb | 4.56 Ab | 3.77 Bb | 0.78 Cc | 0.58 Bc | 0.45 Bb | |
低浓度C1 | 5.13 Bb | 4.65Aab | 3.89 ABb | 0.81 BCc | 0.63 Bc | 0.48 Bb | ||
中浓度C2 | 5.53 Aa | 4.79 Aa | 4.07 Aa | 0.92 ABb | 0.73 Ab | 0.57 Aa | ||
高浓度C3 | 5.30 ABb | 4.73 Aab | 3.93 ABab | 1.02 Aa | 0.80 Aa | 0.58 Aa | ||
时期Stage(T) | ||||||||
分蘖末期Late tillering stage(T1) | 5.04 Bb | 4.43 Bb | 3.79 Bb | 0.83 Ab | 0.64 Ab | 0.49 Aa | ||
拔节始期Early jointing stage(T2) | 5.08 Bb | 4.63 ABb | 3.81 Bb | 0.87 Ab | 0.68 Aab | 0.53 Aa | ||
孕穗期Booting stage(T3) | 5.66 Aa | 4.99 Aa | 4.15 Aa | 0.94 Aa | 0.73 Aa | 0.54 Aa | ||
F值F value | 浓度Concentration(C) | 7.90** | 2.3* | 5.52** | 16.74** | 28.51** | 15.74** | |
时期Stage(T) | 19.58** | 13.34ns | 21.97** | 11.17* | 5.38ns | 2.56ns | ||
C×T | 7.31** | 3.76* | 0.74ns | 4.37** | 3.07* | 3.89* |
品种 Variety | 试验因素 Experiment factor | 抗折力Breaking resistance/N | 倒伏指数lodging index/(g·cm·N-1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | N2 | N3 | N1 | N2 | N3 | |||
丰锦 | 浓度Concentration(C) | |||||||
Toyonishiki | 对照CK | 16.34 Bb | 10.74 Ab | 7.66 Aa | 11408.94 Aa | 13608.33 Aa | 13583.25 Aa | |
低浓度C1 | 19.14 Aa | 12.47 Aab | 7.38 Aa | 9006.10 Bb | 10127.09 Bb | 12734.24 Aab | ||
中浓度C2 | 17.83 Aa | 13.32 Aa | 8.04 Aa | 8515.16 Bb | 9515.70 Bb | 11238.77 Ab | ||
高浓度C3 | 18.60 Aa | 13.52 Aa | 8.41 Aa | 6273.97 Cc | 6870.78 Cc | 8407.52 Bc | ||
时期Stage(T) | ||||||||
分蘖末期Late tillering stage(T1) | 16.11 Ab | 11.79 Ab | 7.60 Aa | 9171.90 Aab | 10563.48 Aa | 11941.59 Aa | ||
拔节始期Early jointing stage(T2) | 16.76 Ab | 12.23 Aab | 7.86 Aa | 9454.56 Aa | 9845.19 Aa | 11275.56 Aa | ||
孕穗期Booting stage(T3) | 21.07 Aa | 13.53 Aa | 8.17 Aa | 7776.67 Ab | 9682.75 Aa | 11255.69 Aa | ||
F值F value | 浓度Concentration(C) | 1.77* | 3.30* | 1.60ns | 39.64** | 39.11** | 15.46** | |
时期Stage(T) | 9.34* | 5.29ns | 0.79ns | 6.33ns | 0.57ns | 1.13ns | ||
C×T | 1.30ns | 1.95ns | 2.81* | 6.46** | 2.95** | 2.27ns | ||
沈农09001 | 浓度Concentration(C) | |||||||
Shennong 09001 | 对照CK | 11.96 Bb | 8.65 Bb | 6.72 Cc | 16916.22 Aa | 16999.73 Aa | 15404.13 Aa | |
低浓度C1 | 13.97 Bb | 9.49 Bb | 7.27 Cc | 13990.12 Ab | 14111.39 Bb | 13287.17 Bb | ||
中浓度C2 | 21.13 Aa | 14.56 Aa | 8.99 Bb | 8806.27 Bc | 9550.14 Cc | 10365.94 Cc | ||
高浓度C3 | 24.48 Aa | 17.22 Aa | 10.73 Aa | 5494.76 Cd | 6001.77 Dd | 7013.21 Dd | ||
时期Stage(T) | ||||||||
分蘖末期Late tillering stage(T1) | 15.40 Aa | 10.22 Bb | 7.61 Bb | 11554.35 Aa | 12214.87 Aab | 11652.35 Aa | ||
拔节始期Early jointing stage(T2) | 16.39 Aa | 11.73 Bb | 8.43 ABab | 12345.39 Aa | 12527.41 Aa | 11649.22 Aa | ||
孕穗期Booting stage(T3) | 21.87 Aa | 15.50 Aa | 9.25 Aa | 10005.77 Aa | 10254.98 Ab | 11251.26 Aa | ||
F值F value | 浓度Concentration(C) | 14.24** | 19.65** | 21.68** | 41.29** | 57.00** | 66.72** | |
时期Stage(T) | 4.13* | 34.37** | 14.85* | 2.68ns | 4.73ns | 0.29ns | ||
C×T | 3.85* | 6.01** | 3.08* | 9.01** | 6.78** | 4.94** |
Table 3 Effects of TE on breaking resistance and lodging index of good quality rice.
品种 Variety | 试验因素 Experiment factor | 抗折力Breaking resistance/N | 倒伏指数lodging index/(g·cm·N-1) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | N2 | N3 | N1 | N2 | N3 | |||
丰锦 | 浓度Concentration(C) | |||||||
Toyonishiki | 对照CK | 16.34 Bb | 10.74 Ab | 7.66 Aa | 11408.94 Aa | 13608.33 Aa | 13583.25 Aa | |
低浓度C1 | 19.14 Aa | 12.47 Aab | 7.38 Aa | 9006.10 Bb | 10127.09 Bb | 12734.24 Aab | ||
中浓度C2 | 17.83 Aa | 13.32 Aa | 8.04 Aa | 8515.16 Bb | 9515.70 Bb | 11238.77 Ab | ||
高浓度C3 | 18.60 Aa | 13.52 Aa | 8.41 Aa | 6273.97 Cc | 6870.78 Cc | 8407.52 Bc | ||
时期Stage(T) | ||||||||
分蘖末期Late tillering stage(T1) | 16.11 Ab | 11.79 Ab | 7.60 Aa | 9171.90 Aab | 10563.48 Aa | 11941.59 Aa | ||
拔节始期Early jointing stage(T2) | 16.76 Ab | 12.23 Aab | 7.86 Aa | 9454.56 Aa | 9845.19 Aa | 11275.56 Aa | ||
孕穗期Booting stage(T3) | 21.07 Aa | 13.53 Aa | 8.17 Aa | 7776.67 Ab | 9682.75 Aa | 11255.69 Aa | ||
F值F value | 浓度Concentration(C) | 1.77* | 3.30* | 1.60ns | 39.64** | 39.11** | 15.46** | |
时期Stage(T) | 9.34* | 5.29ns | 0.79ns | 6.33ns | 0.57ns | 1.13ns | ||
C×T | 1.30ns | 1.95ns | 2.81* | 6.46** | 2.95** | 2.27ns | ||
沈农09001 | 浓度Concentration(C) | |||||||
Shennong 09001 | 对照CK | 11.96 Bb | 8.65 Bb | 6.72 Cc | 16916.22 Aa | 16999.73 Aa | 15404.13 Aa | |
低浓度C1 | 13.97 Bb | 9.49 Bb | 7.27 Cc | 13990.12 Ab | 14111.39 Bb | 13287.17 Bb | ||
中浓度C2 | 21.13 Aa | 14.56 Aa | 8.99 Bb | 8806.27 Bc | 9550.14 Cc | 10365.94 Cc | ||
高浓度C3 | 24.48 Aa | 17.22 Aa | 10.73 Aa | 5494.76 Cd | 6001.77 Dd | 7013.21 Dd | ||
时期Stage(T) | ||||||||
分蘖末期Late tillering stage(T1) | 15.40 Aa | 10.22 Bb | 7.61 Bb | 11554.35 Aa | 12214.87 Aab | 11652.35 Aa | ||
拔节始期Early jointing stage(T2) | 16.39 Aa | 11.73 Bb | 8.43 ABab | 12345.39 Aa | 12527.41 Aa | 11649.22 Aa | ||
孕穗期Booting stage(T3) | 21.87 Aa | 15.50 Aa | 9.25 Aa | 10005.77 Aa | 10254.98 Ab | 11251.26 Aa | ||
F值F value | 浓度Concentration(C) | 14.24** | 19.65** | 21.68** | 41.29** | 57.00** | 66.72** | |
时期Stage(T) | 4.13* | 34.37** | 14.85* | 2.68ns | 4.73ns | 0.29ns | ||
C×T | 3.85* | 6.01** | 3.08* | 9.01** | 6.78** | 4.94** |
品种 Variety | 试验因素 Experiment factor | 茎秆强度Strength of the stem/N | 抗推力 Plant thrust resistance/N | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | N2 | N3 | |||
丰锦 | 浓度Concentration(C) | ||||
Toyonishiki | 对照CK | 16.23 Ab | 11.72 Bb | 10.45 Aa | 10.09 Bb |
低浓度C1 | 17.22 Aab | 13.14 ABa | 9.12 Aa | 9.59 Bb | |
中浓度C2 | 17.89 Aab | 13.54 Aa | 10.00 Aa | 14.55 Aa | |
高浓度C3 | 18.28 Aa | 13.58 Aa | 10.20 Aa | 13.27 Aa | |
时期Stage(T) | |||||
分蘖末期Late tillering stage(T1) | 15.65 Bb | 12.46 Ab | 9.30 Aa | 10.58 Aa | |
拔节始期Early jointing stage(T2) | 18.42 Aa | 12.98 Aab | 10.13 Aa | 11.68 Aa | |
孕穗期Booting stage(T3) | 18.14 Aa | 13.55 Aa | 10.41 Aa | 13.37 Aa | |
F值F value | 浓度Concentration(C) | 2.80ns | 4.56* | 1.71ns | 12.68** |
时期Stage(T) | 26.14** | 5.52ns | 3.20ns | 2.71ns | |
C×T | 1.35ns | 4.74** | 1.73ns | 5.13** | |
沈农09001 | 浓度Concentration(C) | ||||
Shennong09001 | 对照CK | 13.82 Bc | 9.96 Cc | 8.20 Bc | 13.95 Bb |
低浓度C1 | 14.94 Bc | 11.43 BCc | 9.19 Bc | 14.82 Bb | |
中浓度C2 | 18.72 Ab | 13.85 Bb | 11.10 Ab | 19.30 ABa | |
高浓度C3 | 20.87 Aa | 17.40 Aa | 12.61 Aa | 20.73 Aa | |
时期Stage(T) | |||||
分蘖末期Late tillering stage(T1) | 15.92 Ab | 11.85 Bb | 8.98 Ab | 16.36 Aa | |
拔节始期Early jointing stage(T2) | 17.05 Aab | 12.31 Bb | 10.12 Aab | 17.83 Aa | |
孕穗期Booting stage(T3) | 18.30 Aa | 15.32 Aa | 11.73 Aa | 17.41 Aa | |
F值F value | 浓度Concentration(C) | 21.59** | 20.08** | 19.74** | 6.45** |
时期Stage(T) | 6.30ns | 18.42** | 10.48* | 0.63ns | |
C×T | 6.76** | 1.85ns | 1.53ns | 0.62* |
Table 4 Effects of TE on stem strength and thrust resistance of good quality rice.
品种 Variety | 试验因素 Experiment factor | 茎秆强度Strength of the stem/N | 抗推力 Plant thrust resistance/N | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N1 | N2 | N3 | |||
丰锦 | 浓度Concentration(C) | ||||
Toyonishiki | 对照CK | 16.23 Ab | 11.72 Bb | 10.45 Aa | 10.09 Bb |
低浓度C1 | 17.22 Aab | 13.14 ABa | 9.12 Aa | 9.59 Bb | |
中浓度C2 | 17.89 Aab | 13.54 Aa | 10.00 Aa | 14.55 Aa | |
高浓度C3 | 18.28 Aa | 13.58 Aa | 10.20 Aa | 13.27 Aa | |
时期Stage(T) | |||||
分蘖末期Late tillering stage(T1) | 15.65 Bb | 12.46 Ab | 9.30 Aa | 10.58 Aa | |
拔节始期Early jointing stage(T2) | 18.42 Aa | 12.98 Aab | 10.13 Aa | 11.68 Aa | |
孕穗期Booting stage(T3) | 18.14 Aa | 13.55 Aa | 10.41 Aa | 13.37 Aa | |
F值F value | 浓度Concentration(C) | 2.80ns | 4.56* | 1.71ns | 12.68** |
时期Stage(T) | 26.14** | 5.52ns | 3.20ns | 2.71ns | |
C×T | 1.35ns | 4.74** | 1.73ns | 5.13** | |
沈农09001 | 浓度Concentration(C) | ||||
Shennong09001 | 对照CK | 13.82 Bc | 9.96 Cc | 8.20 Bc | 13.95 Bb |
低浓度C1 | 14.94 Bc | 11.43 BCc | 9.19 Bc | 14.82 Bb | |
中浓度C2 | 18.72 Ab | 13.85 Bb | 11.10 Ab | 19.30 ABa | |
高浓度C3 | 20.87 Aa | 17.40 Aa | 12.61 Aa | 20.73 Aa | |
时期Stage(T) | |||||
分蘖末期Late tillering stage(T1) | 15.92 Ab | 11.85 Bb | 8.98 Ab | 16.36 Aa | |
拔节始期Early jointing stage(T2) | 17.05 Aab | 12.31 Bb | 10.12 Aab | 17.83 Aa | |
孕穗期Booting stage(T3) | 18.30 Aa | 15.32 Aa | 11.73 Aa | 17.41 Aa | |
F值F value | 浓度Concentration(C) | 21.59** | 20.08** | 19.74** | 6.45** |
时期Stage(T) | 6.30ns | 18.42** | 10.48* | 0.63ns | |
C×T | 6.76** | 1.85ns | 1.53ns | 0.62* |
试验因素 Experiment factor | 大维管束数目 Number of LVB | 小维管束数目 Number of SVB | 大维管束面积 LVA(×104 μm2) | 大维管束韧皮部面积 LVPA(×104 μm2) | 大维管束木质部面积 LVXA(×104 μm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
浓度Concentration(C) | |||||
对照CK | 27.89 ABb | 25.89 Ab | 42.77 Aa | 4.14 ABab | 15.69 Aa |
低浓度C1 | 28.33 Aa | 26.45 Aa | 44.96 Aa | 4.23 ABab | 15.88 Aa |
中浓度C2 | 27.52 Bb | 26.22 Aa | 43.71 Aa | 4.47 Aa | 15.95 Aa |
高浓度C3 | 27.26 Bb | 25.44 Ab | 35.07 Bb | 3.90 Bb | 12.76 Bb |
时期Stage(T) | |||||
分蘖末期Late tillering stage(T1) | 27.72 Aa | 25.86 Aa | 39.41 Aa | 4.16 Aa | 15.03 Aa |
拔节始期Early jointing stage(T2) | 28.30 Aa | 25.89 Aa | 41.88 Aab | 4.25 Aa | 14.90 Aa |
孕穗期Booting stage(T3) | 27.22 Aa | 25.78 Aa | 43.59 Ab | 4.15 Aa | 15.29 Aa |
浓度Concentration(C) | 1.70ns | 1.49ns | 9.09** | 3.25* | 7.93** |
时期Stage(T) | 3.31ns | 0.04ns | 4.78ns | 0.12ns | 0.23ns |
C×T | 0.82ns | 1.19ns | 2.90* | 4.24** | 3.08* |
Table 5 Effects of TE on vascular bundle traits of Toyonishiki.
试验因素 Experiment factor | 大维管束数目 Number of LVB | 小维管束数目 Number of SVB | 大维管束面积 LVA(×104 μm2) | 大维管束韧皮部面积 LVPA(×104 μm2) | 大维管束木质部面积 LVXA(×104 μm2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
浓度Concentration(C) | |||||
对照CK | 27.89 ABb | 25.89 Ab | 42.77 Aa | 4.14 ABab | 15.69 Aa |
低浓度C1 | 28.33 Aa | 26.45 Aa | 44.96 Aa | 4.23 ABab | 15.88 Aa |
中浓度C2 | 27.52 Bb | 26.22 Aa | 43.71 Aa | 4.47 Aa | 15.95 Aa |
高浓度C3 | 27.26 Bb | 25.44 Ab | 35.07 Bb | 3.90 Bb | 12.76 Bb |
时期Stage(T) | |||||
分蘖末期Late tillering stage(T1) | 27.72 Aa | 25.86 Aa | 39.41 Aa | 4.16 Aa | 15.03 Aa |
拔节始期Early jointing stage(T2) | 28.30 Aa | 25.89 Aa | 41.88 Aab | 4.25 Aa | 14.90 Aa |
孕穗期Booting stage(T3) | 27.22 Aa | 25.78 Aa | 43.59 Ab | 4.15 Aa | 15.29 Aa |
浓度Concentration(C) | 1.70ns | 1.49ns | 9.09** | 3.25* | 7.93** |
时期Stage(T) | 3.31ns | 0.04ns | 4.78ns | 0.12ns | 0.23ns |
C×T | 0.82ns | 1.19ns | 2.90* | 4.24** | 3.08* |
性状 Trait | 调控方向 Regulation direction | 施用时期和浓度最佳组合 Optimum combination of application time and concentration |
---|---|---|
倒伏指数Lodging index | 减小Decrease | T3C3 |
抗折力Breaking resistance | 增加Increase | T3C3 |
抗推力Plant thrust resistance | 增加Increase | T2C3 |
茎秆强度Stalk strength | 增加Increase | T3C3 |
节间长度Internode length | 减少Decrease | T3C3 |
茎秆粗度Culm diameter | 增加Increase | T3C2 |
茎壁厚度Culm wall thickness | 增加Increase | T3C2 |
株高Plant height | 降低Decrease | T1C3 |
重心高度Height of center of gravity | 降低Decrease | T1C3 |
Table 6 TE regulates the optimal application concentration and period of lodging resistance traits.
性状 Trait | 调控方向 Regulation direction | 施用时期和浓度最佳组合 Optimum combination of application time and concentration |
---|---|---|
倒伏指数Lodging index | 减小Decrease | T3C3 |
抗折力Breaking resistance | 增加Increase | T3C3 |
抗推力Plant thrust resistance | 增加Increase | T2C3 |
茎秆强度Stalk strength | 增加Increase | T3C3 |
节间长度Internode length | 减少Decrease | T3C3 |
茎秆粗度Culm diameter | 增加Increase | T3C2 |
茎壁厚度Culm wall thickness | 增加Increase | T3C2 |
株高Plant height | 降低Decrease | T1C3 |
重心高度Height of center of gravity | 降低Decrease | T1C3 |
品种 Variety | 试验因素 Experiment factor | 糙米率 Brown rice rate/% | 精米率 Milled rice rate /% | 整精米率 Head rice rate /% | 垩白粒率 Chalky rice rate/% | 垩白度 Chalkiness degree/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
丰锦 | 浓度Concentration(C) | |||||
Toyonishiki | 对照CK | 77.37 Aa | 64.18 Aa | 53.41 Aab | 8.21 Aa | 2.29 Aa |
低浓度C1 | 78.19 Aa | 64.58 Aa | 55.22 Aa | 7.57 Aa | 2.07 Aa | |
中浓度C2 | 75.11 Aa | 62.46 Aa | 50.53 Ab | 7.53 Aa | 2.04 Aa | |
高浓度C3 | 75.84 Aa | 62.45 Aa | 51.50 Aab | 7.34 Aa | 1.94 Aa | |
时期Stage(T) | ||||||
分蘖末期Late tillering stage(T1) | 77.49 Aa | 63.66 Aa | 53.23 Aa | 10.67 Aa | 2.82 Aa | |
拔节始期Early jointing stage(T2) | 76.83 Aa | 63.83 Aa | 52.99 Aa | 7.24 ABb | 2.05 ABab | |
孕穗期Booting stage(T3) | 75.57 Aa | 62.76 Aa | 51.74 Aa | 5.08 Bb | 1.39 Bb | |
F值F value | 浓度Concentration(C) | 1.48ns | 1.25ns | 2.20* | 0.24* | 0.31ns |
时期Stage(T) | 3.49ns | 0.91ns | 0.59ns | 15.54ns | 12.03* | |
C×T | 1.27ns | 1.50ns | 1.51ns | 0.68ns | 0.55ns | |
沈农09001 | 浓度Concentration(C) | |||||
Shennong 09001 | 对照CK | 76.53 Aa | 63.92 Aa | 57.57 Aa | 2.66 Aa | 0.96 Aa |
低浓度C1 | 76.32 Aba | 62.00 ABab | 57.44 Aa | 2.57 Aa | 0.79 Aa | |
中浓度C2 | 73.43 Cb | 60.67 Bb | 54.85 Aab | 2.56 Aa | 0.72 Aa | |
高浓度C3 | 73.75 BCb | 60.00 Bb | 51.55 Ab | 2.12 Aa | 0.62 Aa | |
时期Stage(T) | ||||||
分蘖末期Late tillering stage(T1) | 76.63 Aa | 62.33 Aa | 56.17 Aa | 2.98 Aa | 1.00 Aa | |
拔节始期Early jointing stage(T2) | 74.77 Aa | 61.65 Aa | 56.20 Aa | 2.51 Aa | 0.78 Aa | |
孕穗期Booting stage(T3) | 73.62 Aa | 60.96 Aa | 53.64 Aa | 1.94 Aa | 0.54 Aa | |
F值F value | 浓度Concentration(C) | 6.73** | 5.87** | 5.41** | 0.50* | 1.30ns |
时期Stage(T) | 3.52ns | 0.83ns | 1.07ns | 3.01ns | 3.16* | |
C×T | 2.03ns | 1.79ns | 0.76ns | 1.54ns | 2.57ns |
Table 7 Effect of TE on processing and appearance quality of good quality rice.
品种 Variety | 试验因素 Experiment factor | 糙米率 Brown rice rate/% | 精米率 Milled rice rate /% | 整精米率 Head rice rate /% | 垩白粒率 Chalky rice rate/% | 垩白度 Chalkiness degree/% |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
丰锦 | 浓度Concentration(C) | |||||
Toyonishiki | 对照CK | 77.37 Aa | 64.18 Aa | 53.41 Aab | 8.21 Aa | 2.29 Aa |
低浓度C1 | 78.19 Aa | 64.58 Aa | 55.22 Aa | 7.57 Aa | 2.07 Aa | |
中浓度C2 | 75.11 Aa | 62.46 Aa | 50.53 Ab | 7.53 Aa | 2.04 Aa | |
高浓度C3 | 75.84 Aa | 62.45 Aa | 51.50 Aab | 7.34 Aa | 1.94 Aa | |
时期Stage(T) | ||||||
分蘖末期Late tillering stage(T1) | 77.49 Aa | 63.66 Aa | 53.23 Aa | 10.67 Aa | 2.82 Aa | |
拔节始期Early jointing stage(T2) | 76.83 Aa | 63.83 Aa | 52.99 Aa | 7.24 ABb | 2.05 ABab | |
孕穗期Booting stage(T3) | 75.57 Aa | 62.76 Aa | 51.74 Aa | 5.08 Bb | 1.39 Bb | |
F值F value | 浓度Concentration(C) | 1.48ns | 1.25ns | 2.20* | 0.24* | 0.31ns |
时期Stage(T) | 3.49ns | 0.91ns | 0.59ns | 15.54ns | 12.03* | |
C×T | 1.27ns | 1.50ns | 1.51ns | 0.68ns | 0.55ns | |
沈农09001 | 浓度Concentration(C) | |||||
Shennong 09001 | 对照CK | 76.53 Aa | 63.92 Aa | 57.57 Aa | 2.66 Aa | 0.96 Aa |
低浓度C1 | 76.32 Aba | 62.00 ABab | 57.44 Aa | 2.57 Aa | 0.79 Aa | |
中浓度C2 | 73.43 Cb | 60.67 Bb | 54.85 Aab | 2.56 Aa | 0.72 Aa | |
高浓度C3 | 73.75 BCb | 60.00 Bb | 51.55 Ab | 2.12 Aa | 0.62 Aa | |
时期Stage(T) | ||||||
分蘖末期Late tillering stage(T1) | 76.63 Aa | 62.33 Aa | 56.17 Aa | 2.98 Aa | 1.00 Aa | |
拔节始期Early jointing stage(T2) | 74.77 Aa | 61.65 Aa | 56.20 Aa | 2.51 Aa | 0.78 Aa | |
孕穗期Booting stage(T3) | 73.62 Aa | 60.96 Aa | 53.64 Aa | 1.94 Aa | 0.54 Aa | |
F值F value | 浓度Concentration(C) | 6.73** | 5.87** | 5.41** | 0.50* | 1.30ns |
时期Stage(T) | 3.52ns | 0.83ns | 1.07ns | 3.01ns | 3.16* | |
C×T | 2.03ns | 1.79ns | 0.76ns | 1.54ns | 2.57ns |
品种 Variety | 试验因素 Experiment factor | 蛋白质含量 Protein/% | 直链淀粉含量 Amylose/% | 硬度 Hardness | 黏度 Viscosity | 平衡度 Balance degree | 食味值 Taste value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
丰锦 | 浓度Concentration(C) | ||||||
Toyonishiki | 对照CK | 7.86 Bc | 18.10 Aa | 7.99 Ab | 4.94 Aa | 4.30 Aa | 81.89 Aa |
低浓度C1 | 7.96 Bbc | 18.17 Aa | 8.35 Aab | 4.77 Aa | 3.79 Aa | 81.22 Aa | |
中浓度C2 | 8.27 ABb | 18.08 Aa | 8.63 Aa | 5.02 Aa | 4.09 Aa | 80.89 Aa | |
高浓度C3 | 8.66 Aa | 18.10 Aa | 8.58 Aa | 3.56 Aa | 3.66 Aa | 79.44 Bb | |
时期Stage(T) | |||||||
分蘖末期Late tillering stage(T1) | 8.28 Aa | 18.18 Aa | 8.63 Aa | 4.14 Aa | 3.69 Ab | 80.33 Bb | |
拔节始期Early jointing stage(T2) | 8.22 Aa | 18.18 Aa | 8.09 Aa | 4.80 Aa | 4.24 Aa | 80.58 Bb | |
孕穗期Booting stage(T3) | 8.06 Ab | 17.98 Ab | 8.44 Aa | 4.78 Aa | 4.20 Aa | 81.67 Aa | |
F值F value | 浓度Concentration(C) | 8.83** | 0.35ns | 3.33* | 1.67ns | 1.29ns | 8.70** |
时期Stage(T) | 11.64* | 4.82* | 2.67ns | 0.32ns | 12.14* | 21.70** | |
C×T | 3.14* | 0.89ns | 0.88ns | 2.93ns | 0.88ns | 2.75* | |
沈农09001 | 浓度Concentration(C) | ||||||
Shennong 09001 | 对照CK | 6.38 Bc | 18.24 Aa | 7.73 Ab | 5.46 Aa | 4.62 Aa | 84.56 Aa |
低浓度C1 | 6.48 Bbc | 18.13 Aa | 8.20 Aa | 4.86 Aab | 4.71 Aa | 84.78 Aa | |
中浓度C2 | 6.62 Bb | 17.98 ABa | 8.02 Aab | 5.06 Aab | 4.75 Aa | 84.11 ABa | |
高浓度C3 | 7.74 Aa | 17.61 Bb | 8.16 Aa | 4.14 Ab | 4.32 Aa | 82.33 Bb | |
时期Stage(T) | |||||||
分蘖末期Late tillering stage(T1) | 7.01 Aa | 18.26 Aa | 8.18 Aa | 4.61 Aa | 4.55 Aa | 83.42 Ab | |
拔节始期Early jointing stage(T2) | 6.71 Ab | 17.88 ABb | 8.01 Aa | 5.10 Aa | 4.32 Aa | 83.83 Aa | |
孕穗期Booting stage(T3) | 6.70 Ab | 17.84 Bb | 7.89 Aa | 4.93 Aa | 4.17 Aa | 84.58 Aa | |
F值F value | 浓度Concentration(C) | 77.66** | 6.64** | 2.92ns | 1.95ns | 0.89ns | 4.62* |
时期Stage(T) | 3.00* | 13.81* | 0.86ns | 2.43ns | 0.11ns | 11.78* | |
C×T | 7.81** | 2.48ns | 2.53ns | 1.00ns | 1.60ns | 1.53* |
Table 8 Effects of TE on nutrition and cooking quality of good quality rice.
品种 Variety | 试验因素 Experiment factor | 蛋白质含量 Protein/% | 直链淀粉含量 Amylose/% | 硬度 Hardness | 黏度 Viscosity | 平衡度 Balance degree | 食味值 Taste value |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
丰锦 | 浓度Concentration(C) | ||||||
Toyonishiki | 对照CK | 7.86 Bc | 18.10 Aa | 7.99 Ab | 4.94 Aa | 4.30 Aa | 81.89 Aa |
低浓度C1 | 7.96 Bbc | 18.17 Aa | 8.35 Aab | 4.77 Aa | 3.79 Aa | 81.22 Aa | |
中浓度C2 | 8.27 ABb | 18.08 Aa | 8.63 Aa | 5.02 Aa | 4.09 Aa | 80.89 Aa | |
高浓度C3 | 8.66 Aa | 18.10 Aa | 8.58 Aa | 3.56 Aa | 3.66 Aa | 79.44 Bb | |
时期Stage(T) | |||||||
分蘖末期Late tillering stage(T1) | 8.28 Aa | 18.18 Aa | 8.63 Aa | 4.14 Aa | 3.69 Ab | 80.33 Bb | |
拔节始期Early jointing stage(T2) | 8.22 Aa | 18.18 Aa | 8.09 Aa | 4.80 Aa | 4.24 Aa | 80.58 Bb | |
孕穗期Booting stage(T3) | 8.06 Ab | 17.98 Ab | 8.44 Aa | 4.78 Aa | 4.20 Aa | 81.67 Aa | |
F值F value | 浓度Concentration(C) | 8.83** | 0.35ns | 3.33* | 1.67ns | 1.29ns | 8.70** |
时期Stage(T) | 11.64* | 4.82* | 2.67ns | 0.32ns | 12.14* | 21.70** | |
C×T | 3.14* | 0.89ns | 0.88ns | 2.93ns | 0.88ns | 2.75* | |
沈农09001 | 浓度Concentration(C) | ||||||
Shennong 09001 | 对照CK | 6.38 Bc | 18.24 Aa | 7.73 Ab | 5.46 Aa | 4.62 Aa | 84.56 Aa |
低浓度C1 | 6.48 Bbc | 18.13 Aa | 8.20 Aa | 4.86 Aab | 4.71 Aa | 84.78 Aa | |
中浓度C2 | 6.62 Bb | 17.98 ABa | 8.02 Aab | 5.06 Aab | 4.75 Aa | 84.11 ABa | |
高浓度C3 | 7.74 Aa | 17.61 Bb | 8.16 Aa | 4.14 Ab | 4.32 Aa | 82.33 Bb | |
时期Stage(T) | |||||||
分蘖末期Late tillering stage(T1) | 7.01 Aa | 18.26 Aa | 8.18 Aa | 4.61 Aa | 4.55 Aa | 83.42 Ab | |
拔节始期Early jointing stage(T2) | 6.71 Ab | 17.88 ABb | 8.01 Aa | 5.10 Aa | 4.32 Aa | 83.83 Aa | |
孕穗期Booting stage(T3) | 6.70 Ab | 17.84 Bb | 7.89 Aa | 4.93 Aa | 4.17 Aa | 84.58 Aa | |
F值F value | 浓度Concentration(C) | 77.66** | 6.64** | 2.92ns | 1.95ns | 0.89ns | 4.62* |
时期Stage(T) | 3.00* | 13.81* | 0.86ns | 2.43ns | 0.11ns | 11.78* | |
C×T | 7.81** | 2.48ns | 2.53ns | 1.00ns | 1.60ns | 1.53* |
[1] | 彭显龙, 梁辰, 于彩莲, 张晓辉, 刘智蕾. 氮肥优化管理对稻花香抗倒伏能力的影响[J]. 东北农业大学学报, 2017,48(8):45-50. |
Peng X L, Liang C, Yu C L, Zhang X H, Liu Z L. Effect of optimal nitrogen management on rice lodging resistance ability of Daohuaxiang-2[J]. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University, 2017,48(8):45-50. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 窦永秀. 水稻结实期抗倒性评价及倒伏对产量与品质影响的研究[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2008. |
Dou Y X. Evaluation of lodging resistance and effects of lodging on yield & rice quality during grain filling stage[D]. Yangzhou: Yangzhou University, 2008. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 张存銮, 黄宝林, 徐小兰, 刁凤玲. 水稻倒伏原因及防倒对策[J]. 作物杂志, 2000(5):19-20. |
Zhang C L, Huang B L, Xu X L, Diao F L. Causes of rice lodging and countermeasures against lodging[J]. Crops, 2000(5):19-20. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 徐正进, 张树林, 周淑清, 刘丽霞. 水稻穗型与抗倒伏性关系的初步分析[J]. 植物生理学通讯, 2004,(5):561-563. |
Xu Z J, Zhang S L, Zhou S Q, Liu L X. Primary analysis of relationship between rice panicle type and lodging resistance[J]. Plant Physiology Communication, 2004(5):561-563. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 李荣田, 姜廷波, 秋太权, 崔成焕, 龚振平. 水稻倒伏对产量影响及倒伏和株高关系的研究[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 1996(1):13-17. |
Li R T, Jiang Y B, Qiu T Q, Cui C H, Gong Z P. Study on effect of lodging to yield and relationship between lodging and plant height in rice[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Science, 1996(1):13-17. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 陈新宝, 刘会喜, 徐顺文, 柯贤文, 马国生. 水稻倒伏的危害程度及应对措施[J]. 中国种业, 2010(4): 56, 58. |
Chen X B, Liu H X, Xu S W, Ke X W, Ma G S. Harm degree and Countermeasures of rice lodging[J]. China Seed Industry, 2010(4): 56, 58. (in Chinese) | |
[7] | 郎有忠, 杨晓东, 王美娥, 朱庆森. 结实阶段不同时期倒伏对水稻产量及稻米品质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2011,25(4):407-412. |
Lang Y Z, Yang X D, Wang M E, Zhu Q S. Effect of lodging at different filling stages on rice grain yield and quality[J]. Chinese Journa of Rice Science, 2011,25(4):407-412. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | Songjiang Y C. Studies on palatability of rice grown in Northern Kyushu: II. Effects of harvest time on palatability and physicochemical properties of milled rice[J]. Chronicle of Japan Crop Society, 1991,60(4):497-503. |
[9] | 吕军, 姜秀英, 解文孝, 刘军, 蒋洪波, 沈枫, 韩勇. 辽宁省不同熟期水稻品质性状分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2020(1):17-21. |
Lü J, Jiang X Y, Xie W X, Liu J, Jiang H B, Shen F, Han Y. Analysis on quality traits of rice varieties (lines) with different maturity stages in Liaoning Province[J]. Crops, 2020(1):17-21. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 高敏, 王晓钟, 戴立言, 陈英奇. 抗倒酯的合成工艺[J]. 农药, 2006(8):535-536. |
Gao M, Wang X Z, Dai L Y, Chen Y Q. Synjournal of trinexapac-ethyl[J]. Agrochemicals, 2006(8):535-536. (in Chinese) | |
[11] | 马秀杰. 外施植物生长调节剂对多年生黑麦草低温和干旱胁迫生理响应研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2012. |
Ma X J. Effects of plant growth regulators foliar application on perennial ryegrass responses to drought stress and cold stress[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2012. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 朱占华. 植物生长调节剂对小麦茎秆抗倒伏能力及其产量和品质的影响[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2011. |
Zhu Z H. Effects of Plant Growth Regulators on Lodging Risistance of Stem and Yield, Quality in Wheat[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing AgrieuItural University, 2011. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 李宁, 李建民, 翟志席, 李召虎, 段留生. 化控技术对玉米植株抗倒伏性状、农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 玉米科学, 2010,18(6):38-42. |
Li N, Li J M, Zhai Z X, Li Z H, Duan L S. Effects of chemical regulator on the lodging resistance traits, agricultural characters and yield of maize[J]. Maize science, 2010,18(6):38-42. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | Zahra B, Jesper R, Jesper C W, Christian A. Seed yield and lodging assessment in red fescue (Festuca rubra L.) sprayed with trinexapac-ethyl[J]. Agronomy, 2019,9(10). |
[15] | 解振兴, 张居念, 林祁, 刘锋, 张初长, 卓芳梅, 姜照伟, 卓传营. 植物生长调节剂对再生稻头季抗倒伏能力和两季产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019,33(2):158-166. |
Xie Z X, Zhang J N, Lin Q, Liu F, Zhang C C, Zhuo F M, Jiang Z W, Zhuo C Y. Effect of plant growth regulators on rice lodging resistance and grain production of main-crop and ratooning rice[J]. Chinese Journa Rice Science, 2019,33(2):158-166. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 张巫军. 氮素对粳稻抗倒伏性的影响及其生理机制[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2015. |
Zhang W J. Effects of notrogen application on lodging resistance of japonica rice and its physiological mechanism[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing AgrieuItural University, 2015. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 王丹, 刘元英, 彭显龙, 刘智蕾, 宋文博. 肥水优化管理对寒地水稻抗倒伏性能的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2012,26(2):352-357. |
Wang D, Liu Y Y, Peng X L, Liu Z L, Song W B. Effects of watre and fertilizer optimization on lodging resistance of rice in cold area of Northeastern China[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2012,26(2):352-357. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 申广勒. 水稻抗倒伏生理机制与评价方法研究[D]. 合肥: 安徽农业大学, 2008. |
Shen G L. Study on physiological mechanisms of lodging resistance and evaluating method in rice[D]. Hefei: Anhui Agricultural University, 2008. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | Islam M S, Peng S, Visperas R M. Lodging-related morphological traits of hybrid rice in a tropical irrigated ecosystem[J]. Field Crops Research, 2007,101(2):240-248. |
[20] | 王文霞, 周燕芝, 曾勇军, 吴自明, 谭雪明, 潘晓华, 石庆华, 曾研华. 不同机直播方式对南方优质晚籼稻产量及抗倒伏特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020,34(1):46-56. |
Wang W X, Zhou Y Z, Zeng Y J, Wu Z M, Tan X M, Pan X H, Shi Q H, Zeng Y H. Effects of different mechanical direct seeding patterns on yield and lodging resistance of high-quality late indica rice in south China[J]. Chinese Journa Rice Science, 2020,34(1):46-56. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 蒋明金, 王海月, 何艳, 王春雨, 李娜, 杨志远, 孙永健, 马均. 氮肥管理对直播杂交水稻抗倒伏能力的影响[J]. 核农学报, 2020,34(1):157-168. |
Jiang M J, Wang H Y, He Y, Wang C Y, Li N, Yang Z Y, Sun Y J, Ma J. Effects of nitrogen management on lodging resistance of direct-seeded rice[J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2020,34(1):157-168. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 李杰, 张洪程, 龚金龙, 常勇, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕. 不同种植方式对超级稻植株抗倒伏能力的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2011,44(11):2234-2243. |
Li J, Zhang H C, Gong J L, Chang Y, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y. Effects of different planting methods on the culm lodging resistance of super rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2011,44(11):2234-2243. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 许俊伟, 孟天瑶, 荆培培, 张洪程, 李超, 戴其根, 魏海燕, 郭保卫. 机插密度对不同类型水稻抗倒伏能力及产量的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2015,41(11):1767-1776. |
Xu J W, Meng T Y, Jing P P, Zhang H C, Li C, Dai Q G, Wei H Y, Guo B W. Effect of mechanical-transplanting density on lodging resistance and yield in different types of rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2015,41(11):1767-1776. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 龚金龙, 邢志鹏, 胡雅杰, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 高辉. 籼、粳超级稻茎秆抗倒支撑特征的差异研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2015,29(3):273-281. |
Gong J L, Xing Z P, Hu Y J, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Gao H. Different in lodging resistance of culm between indica and japonica super rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2015,29(3):273-281. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 李国辉, 钟旭华, 田卡, 黄农荣, 潘俊峰, 何庭蕙. 施氮对水稻茎秆抗倒伏能力的影响及其形态和力学机理[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013,46(7):1323-1334. |
Li G, Zhong X H, Tian K, Huang N R, Pan J F, He T H. Effect of Nitrogen Application on stem lodging resistance of rice and its morphological and mechanical mechanisms[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2013,46(7):1323-1334. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 吴海兵, 刘道红, 钟鸣, 汪友元. 水分管理和钾肥施用对水稻产量和抗倒伏性的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2019(1):127-133. |
Wu H B, Liu D H, Zhong M, Wang Y Y. Effects of water management and potash application on grain yield and lodging resistance of rice[J]. Crops, 2019(1):127-133. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 夏敏, 胡群, 梁健, 张洪程, 郭保卫, 曹利强, 陈厚存. 壮秆剂及用量对水稻产量和抗倒伏能力的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2017,43(2):296-306. |
Xia M, Hu Q, Liang J, Zhang H C, Guo B W, Cao L Q, Chen H C. Effect of variety and application amount of stalk strengthening agent on yield and lodging resistance in rice[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2017,43(2):296-306. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 张明聪, 刘元英, 罗盛国, 彭显龙, 陈丽楠, 李宗云, 李佳. 养分综合管理对寒地水稻抗倒伏性能的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2010,43(21):4536-4542. |
Zhang M C, Liu Y Y, Luo S G, Peng X L, Chen L N, Li Z Y, Li J. Effects of integrated nutrient management on lodging resistance of rice in cold area[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2010,43(21):4536-4542. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 陈桂华, 邓化冰, 张桂莲, 唐文帮, 黄璜. 水稻茎秆性状与抗倒性的关系及配合力分析[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(3):407-417. |
Chen G H, Deng H B, Zhang G L, Tang W B, Huang H. The correlation of stem characters and lodging resistance and combining ability analysis in rice[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016,49(3):407-417. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 孙永健, 陈宇, 孙园园, 徐徽, 许远明, 刘树金, 马均. 不同施氮量和栽插密度下三角形强化栽培杂交稻抗倒伏性与群体质量的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2012,26(2):189-196. |
Sun Y J, Chen Y, Sun Y Y, Xu H, Xu Y M, Liu S J, Ma J. Relationship between culm lodging resistance and population quality of hybrids under triangle-planted system of rice intensification at different nitrogen application rates and planting densities[J]. Chinese Journa Rice Science, 2012,26(2):189-196. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | Thomas G C, William C Y, Silberstein T B, Carol J G. Performance of trinexapac-ethyl on Lolium perenne seed crops in diverse lodging environments[J]. Field Crops Research, 2014,157:65-70. |
[32] | 孙旭春. 抗倒酯等3种生长调节剂对多花黑麦草种子生产影响的研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2011. |
Sun X C. A Study on the Effect of growth regulator on seed production of Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum)[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2011. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[33] | 胡雅杰, 曹伟伟, 钱海军, 等. 钵苗机插密度对不同穗型水稻品种产量、株型和抗倒伏能力的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2015,41(5):743-757. |
HU Y J, CAO W W, QIAN H J, et al. Effect of planting density of mechanically transplanted pot seedlings on yield,plant type and lodging resistance in rice with different panicle types[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2015,41(5):743-757. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[34] | 蒋傲男, 闫静琦, 卢海博, 赵海超, 黄智鸿. 不同春玉米品种茎秆显微结构对抗折强度的响应[J]. 玉米科学, 2020,28(5):53-59. |
Jiang A N, Yan J Q, Lu H B, Zhao H C, Huang Z H. Response of stem microstructure of different spring maize varieties to bending strength[J]. Journal of Maize Sciences, 2020,28(5):53-59. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[35] | 赵新勇, 邵在胜, 吴艳珍, 赵轶鹏, 王余龙, 王云霞, 杨连新. 花后人为模拟倒伏对超级稻生长、产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2018,26(7):980-989. |
Zhao Z Y, Shao Z S, Wu Y Z, Zhao Y P, Wang Y L, Wang Y X, Yang L X. Influence of artificial lodging at grain-filling stage on plant growth, yield and quality of super rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2018,26(7):980-989. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | LI Gang, GAO Qingsong, LI Wei, ZHANG Wenxia, WANG Jian, CHEN Baoshan, WANG Di, GAO Hao, XU Weijun, CHEN Hongqi, JI Jianhui. Directed Knockout of SD1 Gene Improves Lodging Resistance and Blast Resistance of Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 359-367. |
[2] | HUANG Yaru, XU Peng, WANG Lele, HE Yizhe, WANG Hui, KE Jian, HE Haibing, WU Liquan, YOU Cuicui. Effects of Exogenous Trehalose on Grain Filling Characteristics and Yield Formation of japonica Rice Cultivar W1844 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[3] | DONG Liqiang, YANG Tiexin, LI Rui, SHANG Wenqi, MA Liang, LI Yuedong, SUI Guomin. Effect of Plant-row Spacing on Rice Yield and Root Morphological and Physiological Characteristics in Super High Yield Field [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 392-404. |
[4] | WANG Wenting, MA Jiaying, LI Guangyan, FU Weimeng, LI Hubo, LIN Jie, CHEN Tingting, FENG Baohua, TAO Longxing, FU Guanfu, QIN Yebo. Effect of Different Fertilizer Application Rates on Rice Yield and Quality Formation and Its Relationship with Energy Metabolism at High Temperature [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
[5] | LIU Aihua, LI Xiaokun. Meta-analysis of Relationship Between Fertilizer Application and Rice Quality [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 276-284. |
[6] | YANG Xiaolong, WANG Biao, WANG Benfu, ZHANG Zhisheng, ZHANG Zuolin, YANG Lantian, CHENG Jianping, LI Yang. Effects of Different Water Management on Yield and Rice Quality of Dry-seeded Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
[7] | WEI Xiaodong, SONG Xuemei, ZHAO Ling, ZHAO Qingyong, CHEN Tao, LU Kai, ZHU Zhen, HUANG Shengdong, WANG Cailin, ZHANG Yadong. Effects of Silicon and Zinc Fertilizer and Their Application Ways on Yield and Grain Quality of Rice Variety Nanjing 46 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 295-306. |
[8] | LIN Dan, JIANG Min, MIAO Bo, GUO Meng, SHI Chunlin. Research on Simulation Model of High Temperature Stress on Rice and Its Application in Fujian Province [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 307-320. |
[9] | YAO Shu, ZHAO Chunfang, CHEN Tao, LU Kai, ZHOU Lihui, ZHAO Ling, ZHU Zhen, ZHAO Qingyong, LIANG Wenhua, HE Lei, WANG Cailin, ZHANG Yadong. Nutritional Quality and Cooking and Eating Quality Characteristics of Low Glutelin Semi-glutinous japonica Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(2): 178-188. |
[10] | PEI Feng, WANG Guangda, GAO Peng, FENG Zhiming, HU Keming, CHEN Zongxiang, CHEN Hongqi, CUI Ao, ZUO Shimin. Evaluation of New japonica Rice Lines with Low Cadmium Accumulation and Good Quality Generated by Knocking Out OsNramp5 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(1): 16-28. |
[11] | CHEN Tao, ZHAO Qingyong, ZHU Zhen, ZHAO Ling, YAO Shu, ZHOU Lihui, ZHAO Chunfang, ZHANG Yadong, WANG Cailin. Development of New Low Glutelin Content japonica Rice Lines with Good Eating Quality and Fragrance by Molecular Marker-Assisted Selection [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(1): 55-65. |
[12] | YANG Taotao, ZOU Jixiang, WU Longmei, BAO Xiaozhe, JIANG Yu, ZHANG Nan, ZHANG Bin. Effect of Free Air Temperature Increase on Grain Quality of Double-cropping Rice in South China [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(1): 66-77. |
[13] | ZHANG Lu, LIANG Qingduo, WU Longlong, HUANG Jing, TIAN Cang, ZHANG Junhua, CAO Xiaochuang, ZHU Chunquan, KONG Yali, JIN Qianyu, ZHU Lianfeng. Effects of Nitrogen-reducing and Oxygen-increasing Irrigation on Rice Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(1): 78-88. |
[14] | WANG Yingheng, CHEN Lijuan, CUI Lili, ZHAN Shengwei, SONG Yu, CHEN Shian, XIE Zhenxing, JIANG Zhaowei, WU Fangxi, ZHUO Chuanying, CAI Qiuhua, XIE Huaan, ZHANG Jianfu. Effects of Nitrogen Rate on Photosynthesis, Yield and Grain Quality of Superior Quality Rice “Fuxiangzhan” [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(1): 89-101. |
[15] | REN Weichen, CHANG Qingxia, ZHANG Yajun, ZHU Kuanyu, WANG Zhiqin, YANG Jianchang. Characteristics and Physiological Mechanism of Carbon and Nitrogen Accumulation and Translocation of japonica Rice Varieties Differing in Nitrogen Use Efficiency [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(6): 586-600. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||