Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2022, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (2): 171-180.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2022.210208
• Research Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
LIANG Cheng, XIANG Xunchao*(), ZHANG Ouling, YOU Hui, XU Liang, CHEN Yongjun
Received:
2021-02-06
Revised:
2021-06-03
Online:
2022-03-10
Published:
2022-03-11
Contact:
XIANG Xunchao
通讯作者:
向珣朝
基金资助:
LIANG Cheng, XIANG Xunchao, ZHANG Ouling, YOU Hui, XU Liang, CHEN Yongjun. Analyses on Agronomic Traits and Genetic Characteristics of Two New Plant-architecture Lines in Rice[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(2): 171-180.
梁程, 向珣朝, 张欧玲, 游慧, 许亮, 陈永军. 两份新株型水稻品系的农艺性状与遗传特性分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(2): 171-180.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2022.210208
引物名称 Name of primer | 引物序列 Sequence of primer(5′-3′) | 产物大小 Product size/bp | 退火温度 Annealing temperature/℃ |
---|---|---|---|
IPA1扩增引物 IPA1 amplification primer | F: CGGTCGACTAGCTGCATCTGTTGG R: CATCGTGTTGCTGGTTTGGTCGAAG | 784 | 58.3 |
IPA1测序引物 IPA1 sequencing primer | F: GATCTCCGGTGGTATCCAGT R: GAAGTGGGCATGATGGCTA | 457 | 55.9 |
Wx M1 | F: CACAGCAACAGCTAGACAACCAC R: CACGACGACGGAGGGGAAC | 275/252 | 55.0 |
Table 1 Primer information.
引物名称 Name of primer | 引物序列 Sequence of primer(5′-3′) | 产物大小 Product size/bp | 退火温度 Annealing temperature/℃ |
---|---|---|---|
IPA1扩增引物 IPA1 amplification primer | F: CGGTCGACTAGCTGCATCTGTTGG R: CATCGTGTTGCTGGTTTGGTCGAAG | 784 | 58.3 |
IPA1测序引物 IPA1 sequencing primer | F: GATCTCCGGTGGTATCCAGT R: GAAGTGGGCATGATGGCTA | 457 | 55.9 |
Wx M1 | F: CACAGCAACAGCTAGACAACCAC R: CACGACGACGGAGGGGAAC | 275/252 | 55.0 |
生育期与材料 Growth stage and material | 叶长Leaf length/cm | 叶宽Leaf width/cm | 叶角度 Leaf angle/° | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
剑叶 Flag Leaf | 倒2叶 2nd leaf from top | 倒3叶 3rd leaf from top | 剑叶 Flag Leaf | 倒2叶 2nd leaf from top | 倒3叶 3rd leaf from top | 剑叶 Flag Leaf | 倒2叶 2nd leaf from top | 倒3叶 3rd leaf from top | |
乳熟期Milky maturity stage Milk-ripe stage | |||||||||
08yi | 26.80±2.89b | 43.17±1.45b | 40.20±0.73b | 2.58±0.03b | 1.85±0.03b | 1.64±0.02b | 10.80±1.18b | 9.77±0.37b | 22.50±0.71b |
08yc | 37.53±1.33a | 49.83±1.33a | 51.20±1.85a | 2.55±0.07b | 2.01±0.05b | 1.72±0.05b | 10.40±0.41b | 15.23±0.12a | 20.83±2.72b |
RIL60 | 28.57±0.54b | 46.37±0.88ab | 46.77±2.56a | 2.87±0.04a | 2.38±0.07a | 2.03±0.02a | 19.23±1.02a | 16.27±0.90a | 21.10±0.82b |
RILc | 31.67±2.15b | 46.43±2.72ab | 48.83±2.08a | 3.04±0.10a | 2.71±0.26a | 2.02±0.11a | 10.07±0.12b | 13.60±2.16a | 27.77±2.58a |
蜡熟期Dough maturity stage | |||||||||
08yi | 17.30±1.78b | 35.37±3.21b | 40.27±1.50c | 2.29±0.03b | 1.93±0.10a | 1.63±0.13b | 10.30±1.30c | 12.70±2.44b | 27.03±3.98a |
08yc | 30.97±3.81a | 47.83±1.57a | 50.03±0.82a | 2.21±0.22b | 1.81±0.07a | 1.47±0.10b | 10.03±0.87c | 10.87±0.66b | 17.07±1.32b |
RIL60 | 27.90±1.35a | 45.13±1.54a | 47.03±1.68b | 2.72±0.02a | 2.24±0.04b | 2.00±0.01a | 17.07±1.60b | 19.03±1.64a | 22.30±3.19ab |
RILc | 31.93±1.13a | 47.17±1.27a | 49.20±0.37ab | 2.80±0.01a | 2.32±0.02b | 2.06±0.04a | 30.77±2.87a | 22.93±3.07a | 22.47±0.77ab |
完熟期Full maturity stage | |||||||||
08yi | 12.33±1.03c | 28.50±1.51b | 39.83±0.29c | 2.33±0.12b | 2.01±0.09b | 1.49±0.06b | 10.07±0.12c | 15.60±1.37b | 28.10±3.04a |
08yc | 36.30±4.30a | 46.17±3.73a | 49.53±1.81a | 2.37±0.15b | 1.86±0.20b | 1.57±0.12b | 11.20±1.42c | 12.30±0.62b | 19.07±1.25b |
RIL60 | 27.17±1.66b | 44.37±1.11a | 45.33±2.10b | 2.74±0.07a | 2.21±0.05ab | 1.99±0.02a | 17.13±1.77b | 21.74±1.72a | 23.83±2.78ab |
RILc | 30.50±1.76ab | 47.37±1.05a | 49.47±0.54a | 2.80±0.05a | 2.32±0.03a | 2.07±0.03a | 29.27±2.74a | 22.97±1.84a | 23.37±0.96ab |
Table 2 Length, width and angle of functional leaves for different germplasms.
生育期与材料 Growth stage and material | 叶长Leaf length/cm | 叶宽Leaf width/cm | 叶角度 Leaf angle/° | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
剑叶 Flag Leaf | 倒2叶 2nd leaf from top | 倒3叶 3rd leaf from top | 剑叶 Flag Leaf | 倒2叶 2nd leaf from top | 倒3叶 3rd leaf from top | 剑叶 Flag Leaf | 倒2叶 2nd leaf from top | 倒3叶 3rd leaf from top | |
乳熟期Milky maturity stage Milk-ripe stage | |||||||||
08yi | 26.80±2.89b | 43.17±1.45b | 40.20±0.73b | 2.58±0.03b | 1.85±0.03b | 1.64±0.02b | 10.80±1.18b | 9.77±0.37b | 22.50±0.71b |
08yc | 37.53±1.33a | 49.83±1.33a | 51.20±1.85a | 2.55±0.07b | 2.01±0.05b | 1.72±0.05b | 10.40±0.41b | 15.23±0.12a | 20.83±2.72b |
RIL60 | 28.57±0.54b | 46.37±0.88ab | 46.77±2.56a | 2.87±0.04a | 2.38±0.07a | 2.03±0.02a | 19.23±1.02a | 16.27±0.90a | 21.10±0.82b |
RILc | 31.67±2.15b | 46.43±2.72ab | 48.83±2.08a | 3.04±0.10a | 2.71±0.26a | 2.02±0.11a | 10.07±0.12b | 13.60±2.16a | 27.77±2.58a |
蜡熟期Dough maturity stage | |||||||||
08yi | 17.30±1.78b | 35.37±3.21b | 40.27±1.50c | 2.29±0.03b | 1.93±0.10a | 1.63±0.13b | 10.30±1.30c | 12.70±2.44b | 27.03±3.98a |
08yc | 30.97±3.81a | 47.83±1.57a | 50.03±0.82a | 2.21±0.22b | 1.81±0.07a | 1.47±0.10b | 10.03±0.87c | 10.87±0.66b | 17.07±1.32b |
RIL60 | 27.90±1.35a | 45.13±1.54a | 47.03±1.68b | 2.72±0.02a | 2.24±0.04b | 2.00±0.01a | 17.07±1.60b | 19.03±1.64a | 22.30±3.19ab |
RILc | 31.93±1.13a | 47.17±1.27a | 49.20±0.37ab | 2.80±0.01a | 2.32±0.02b | 2.06±0.04a | 30.77±2.87a | 22.93±3.07a | 22.47±0.77ab |
完熟期Full maturity stage | |||||||||
08yi | 12.33±1.03c | 28.50±1.51b | 39.83±0.29c | 2.33±0.12b | 2.01±0.09b | 1.49±0.06b | 10.07±0.12c | 15.60±1.37b | 28.10±3.04a |
08yc | 36.30±4.30a | 46.17±3.73a | 49.53±1.81a | 2.37±0.15b | 1.86±0.20b | 1.57±0.12b | 11.20±1.42c | 12.30±0.62b | 19.07±1.25b |
RIL60 | 27.17±1.66b | 44.37±1.11a | 45.33±2.10b | 2.74±0.07a | 2.21±0.05ab | 1.99±0.02a | 17.13±1.77b | 21.74±1.72a | 23.83±2.78ab |
RILc | 30.50±1.76ab | 47.37±1.05a | 49.47±0.54a | 2.80±0.05a | 2.32±0.03a | 2.07±0.03a | 29.27±2.74a | 22.97±1.84a | 23.37±0.96ab |
Fig. 1. Comparison of functional leaves area for different germplasms at different developmental stages. A, Milky maturity stage; B, Drought maturity stage; C, Full maturity stage. Mean±SD. Bars superscripted by different lowercase letters are significantly different at 0.05 level among germplasms by F-test (n=4).
Fig. 2. Comparison of chlorophyll contents for different germplasms at different developmental stages. A, Milky maturity stage; B, Drought maturity stage. Mean±SD. Bars superscripted by different lowercase letters are significantly different at 0.05 level among germplasms by F-test (n=4).
Fig. 3. Comparison of dry matter content of different germplasms at different developmental stages. A, Milky maturity stage; B, Drought maturity stage; C, Full maturity stage. Mean±SD. Bars superscripted by different lowercase letters are significantly different at 0.05 level among germplasms by F-test (n=4).
年份 Year | 种质Germplasm | 穗重 Single panicle weight / g | 穗长 Panicle length / cm | 一次枝梗数 Primary rachis branch number | 一次枝梗总长 Total length of primary rachis branch number / cm | 二次枝梗总数 Secondary rachis branch number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 08yi | 4.46±0.45 d | 16.01±0.52 d | 16.32±0.18 b | 129.27±9.64 d | 66.23±3.78 d |
08yc | 6.14±0.68 c | 20.09±0.76 c | 16.07±0.95 bc | 168.39±2.53 b | 83.73±8.02 b | |
RIL60 | 7.34±0.26 b | 25.76±0.36 ab | 16.96±0.40 b | 203.35±2.10 a | 81.44±1.36 b | |
RILc | 9.44±1.19 a | 26.10±0.93 a | 17.73±0.53 ab | 200.00±14.17 a | 104.12±5.33 a | |
2020 | 08yi | 3.66±0.19 d | 16.05±0.97 d | 17.96±0.41 a | 123.46±6.50 d | 67.57±2.38 d |
08yc | 5.43±0.52 cd | 20.25±0.74 c | 16.99±0.71 b | 158.22±10.83 bc | 77.86±3.40 bc | |
RIL60 | 5.66±0.64 c | 24.79±0.42 b | 17.80±0.55 ab | 191.05±14.57 a | 66.37±8.15 d | |
RILc | 5.74±0.93 bc | 25.05±0.57 b | 15.22±0.20 c | 149.58±5.79 c | 71.93±2.66 c |
Table 3 Comparison of panicle characters for different germplasms.
年份 Year | 种质Germplasm | 穗重 Single panicle weight / g | 穗长 Panicle length / cm | 一次枝梗数 Primary rachis branch number | 一次枝梗总长 Total length of primary rachis branch number / cm | 二次枝梗总数 Secondary rachis branch number |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 08yi | 4.46±0.45 d | 16.01±0.52 d | 16.32±0.18 b | 129.27±9.64 d | 66.23±3.78 d |
08yc | 6.14±0.68 c | 20.09±0.76 c | 16.07±0.95 bc | 168.39±2.53 b | 83.73±8.02 b | |
RIL60 | 7.34±0.26 b | 25.76±0.36 ab | 16.96±0.40 b | 203.35±2.10 a | 81.44±1.36 b | |
RILc | 9.44±1.19 a | 26.10±0.93 a | 17.73±0.53 ab | 200.00±14.17 a | 104.12±5.33 a | |
2020 | 08yi | 3.66±0.19 d | 16.05±0.97 d | 17.96±0.41 a | 123.46±6.50 d | 67.57±2.38 d |
08yc | 5.43±0.52 cd | 20.25±0.74 c | 16.99±0.71 b | 158.22±10.83 bc | 77.86±3.40 bc | |
RIL60 | 5.66±0.64 c | 24.79±0.42 b | 17.80±0.55 ab | 191.05±14.57 a | 66.37±8.15 d | |
RILc | 5.74±0.93 bc | 25.05±0.57 b | 15.22±0.20 c | 149.58±5.79 c | 71.93±2.66 c |
年份 Year | 种质 Germplasm | 单株有效穗数 Effective panicle number per plant | 结实率 Seed setting rate / % | 千粒重 1000-grain weight /g | 着粒数 Number of grain per panicle | 实粒数 Filled grains per panicle |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 08yi | 6.33±0.58 ab | 79.42±6.95 ab | 20.88±0.58 c | 233.36±18.64 c | 185.08±17.76 cd |
08yc | 5.00±0.00 bc | 73.97±7.48 b | 22.38±0.76 b | 309.53±44.62 b | 226.87±21.66 c | |
RIL60 | 5.67±0.58 b | 83.54±4.69 a | 25.04±0.84 a | 325.21±5.71 b | 271.84±16.10 b | |
RILc | 4.33±0.58 c | 79.49±3.69 ab | 24.61±0.25 a | 441.72±31.77 a | 351.78±36.12 a | |
2020 | 08yi | 7.00±0.00 a | 64.34±1.33 c | 20.00±0.31 c | 273.38±10.63 bc | 175.86±6.94 d |
08yc | 5.67±0.58 b | 68.71±4.48 bc | 22.27±0.40 b | 306.58±31.12 b | 211.30±31.98 cd | |
RIL60 | 5.67±0.58 b | 76.08±1.29 ab | 24.99±0.29 a | 273.20±37.18 bc | 207.52±24.52 cd | |
RILc | 4.67±0.58 c | 63.39±3.30 c | 24.51±0.47 a | 293.42±14.70 b | 185.72±4.79 cd |
Table 4 Comparison of yield characters per plant of different germplasms.
年份 Year | 种质 Germplasm | 单株有效穗数 Effective panicle number per plant | 结实率 Seed setting rate / % | 千粒重 1000-grain weight /g | 着粒数 Number of grain per panicle | 实粒数 Filled grains per panicle |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2019 | 08yi | 6.33±0.58 ab | 79.42±6.95 ab | 20.88±0.58 c | 233.36±18.64 c | 185.08±17.76 cd |
08yc | 5.00±0.00 bc | 73.97±7.48 b | 22.38±0.76 b | 309.53±44.62 b | 226.87±21.66 c | |
RIL60 | 5.67±0.58 b | 83.54±4.69 a | 25.04±0.84 a | 325.21±5.71 b | 271.84±16.10 b | |
RILc | 4.33±0.58 c | 79.49±3.69 ab | 24.61±0.25 a | 441.72±31.77 a | 351.78±36.12 a | |
2020 | 08yi | 7.00±0.00 a | 64.34±1.33 c | 20.00±0.31 c | 273.38±10.63 bc | 175.86±6.94 d |
08yc | 5.67±0.58 b | 68.71±4.48 bc | 22.27±0.40 b | 306.58±31.12 b | 211.30±31.98 cd | |
RIL60 | 5.67±0.58 b | 76.08±1.29 ab | 24.99±0.29 a | 273.20±37.18 bc | 207.52±24.52 cd | |
RILc | 4.67±0.58 c | 63.39±3.30 c | 24.51±0.47 a | 293.42±14.70 b | 185.72±4.79 cd |
Fig. 4. Comparison of yield per plant and its components for different germplasms. Mean±SD. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference at P<0.05 by F-test (n=8).
[1] | 吴比, 胡伟, 邢永忠. 中国水稻遗传育种历程与展望[J]. 遗传, 2018,40(10):841-857. |
Wu B, Hu W, Xing Y Z. The history and prospect of rice genetic breeding in China[J]. Hereditas (Beijing), 2018,40(10):841-857. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 胡娟, 林晗, 徐娜, 焦然, 戴志俊, 鲁草林, 饶玉春, 王跃星. 水稻叶倾角分子机制及育种应用的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019,33(5):391-400. |
Hu J, Lin H, Xu N, Jiao R, Dai Z J, Lu C L, Rao Y C, Wang Y X. Advances in molecular mechanisms of rice leaf inclination and its application in breeding[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2019,33(5):391-400. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 李红, 何炜, 连玲, 魏毅东, 蔡秋华, 王颖姮, 谢华安, 张建福. 水稻株型的研究进展[J]. 福建稻麦科技, 2020,38(4):61-66. |
Li H, He W, Lian L, Wei Y D, Cai Q H, Wang Y H, Xie H A, Zhang J F. Research advances on plant type of rice[J]. Fujian Science and Technology of Rice and Wheat, 2020,38(4):61-66. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | Guo W, Chen L, Herrera-Estrella L, Cao D, Tran L S P. Altering plant architecture to improve performance and resistance[J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2020,25(11):1154-1170. |
[5] | Donald C M. The biological yield and harvest index of cereals as agronomic and plant breeding criteria[J]. Agronomy, 1976,28(4):361-405. |
[6] | Khush G S. Prospects and approaches to increasing the genetic yield potential of rice[M]// Evenson R E, Herdt R N, Hossain M. Rice Research in Asia: Progress and Priorities. CAB International and IRRI, 1996: 59-71. |
[7] | 杨守仁, 张龙步, 陈温福, 徐正进, 王进民. 水稻超高产育种的理论和方法[J]. 中国水稻科学, 1996,10(2):115-120. |
Yang S R, Zhang L B, Cheng W F, Xun Z J, Wang J M. Theories and methods of rice breeding for maximum yield[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 1996,10(2):115-120. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 马梦影, 巩文靓, 康雪蒙, 段海燕. 水稻理想株型改良的研究进展[J]. 中国农学通报, 2020,36(29):1-6. |
Ma M J, Gong W J, Kang X M, Duan H Y. The improvement of ideal plant type of rice: A review[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2020,36(29):1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | Chen W F, Xu Z J, Zhang W Z, Zhang L B, Yang S R. Creation of new plant type and breeding rice for super high yield[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2001,27(5):665-672. |
[10] | Zhao S, Xiang J, Xue H. Studies on the rice LEAF INCLINATION1(LC1), an IAA-amido synthetase, reveal the effects of auxin in leaf inclination control[J]. Molecular Plant, 2013,6(1):174-187. |
[11] | Jiao Y Q, Wang Y H, Xue D W, Wang J, Yan M, Liu G, Dong G, Zeng D, Lu Z, Zhu X. Regulation of OsSPL14 by OsmiR156 defines ideal plant architecture in rice[J]. Nature Genetics, 2010,42(6):541-544. |
[12] | Miura K, Ikeda M, Matsubara A, Song X J, Ito M, Asano K, Matsuoka M, Kitano H, Ashikari M. OsSPL14 promotes panicle branching and higher grain productivity in rice[J]. Nature Genetics, 2010,42(6):545-549. |
[13] | Wang J, Zhou L, Hui S, Mawsheng C, Hong Y, Hong Y, Min H, Yin J, Zhu X, Li Y. A single transcription factor promotes both yield and immunity in rice[J]. Science, 2018,361(6406):1026-1028. |
[14] | Jeng T L, Wang C S, Tseng T H, Wu M T, Sung J M. Nucleotide polymorphisms in the waxy gene of NaN3-induced waxy rice mutants[J]. Journal of Cereal Science, 2009,49(1):112-116. |
[15] | 刘巧泉, 王兴稳, 陈秀花, 王宗阳. 转反义Wx基因糯稻的显性遗传及对稻米粒重的效应分析. 中国农业科学, 2002,35(2):117-122. |
Liu Q Q, Wang X Y, Chen X H, Wang Z Y. Effect of dominant waxy character on kernel weight of transgenic rice with antisense Wx gene. Scientia Agriculture Sinica, 2002,35(2):117-122. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 丁维龙, 谢涛, 徐利锋, 张义凯. 基于虚拟模型的水稻冠层叶面积计算方法[J]. 农业工程学报, 2017,33(2):192-198. |
Ding W L, Xie T, Xu L F, Zhang Y K. Calculation method of rice canopy leaf area based on virtual model[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017,33(2):192-198. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 周振翔, 李志康, 陈颖, 王志琴, 杨建昌, 顾骏飞. 叶绿素含量降低对水稻叶片光抑制与光合电子传递的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(19):3709-3720. |
Zhou Z X, Li Z K, Chen Y, Wang Z Q, Yang J C, Gu J F. Effects of reduced chlorophyll content on photo- inhibition and photosynthetic electron transport in rice leaves[J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2016,49(19):3709-3720. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 陈家润. 水稻品种试验田间记载及室内考种项目与标准[J]. 湖北农业科学, 1957(2):146-148. |
Chen J R. Field records and laboratory test items and standards of rice variety test[J]. Hubei Agricultural Science, 1957(2):146-148. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | Wendland J, Lengeler K B, Kothe E. An instant preparation method for nucleic acids of filamentous fungi[J]. Fungal Genetics Reports, 1996,43(1):54-55. |
[20] | 田志喜, 严长杰, 钱前, 严松, 谢会兰, 王芳, 徐洁芬, 刘贵富, 王永红, 刘巧泉, 汤述翥, 李家洋, 顾铭洪. 水稻淀粉合成相关基因分子标记的建立[J]. 科学通报, 2010,55(26):2591-2601. |
Tian Z X, Yan C J, Qian Q, Yan S, Xie H L, Wang F, Xu J F, Liu G F, Wang Y H, Liu Q Q, Tang S Z, Li J Y, Gu M H. Establishment of molecular markers of rice starch synjournal related genes[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2010,55(26):2591-2601. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 徐静, 王莉, 钱前, 张光恒. 水稻叶片形态建成分子调控机制研究进展[J]. 作物学报, 2013,39(5):767-774. |
Xu J, Wang L, Qian Q, Zhang G H. Research advance in molecule regulation mechanism of leaf morphogenesis in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Acta Agronomica Sinica, 2013,39(5):767-774. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 杨从党, 袁平荣, 周能, 朱德峰, 杨爱兵, 郑学玉, 黄庆宇, 应继锋. 叶型特性与产量构成因素的相关分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2001,15(1):71-73. |
Yang C D, Yuan P R, Zhou N, Zhu D F, Yang A B, Zheng X Y, Huang Q Y, Ying J F. Analysis on relationship between characters of leaf type and yield components[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2001,15(1):71-73. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 贺勇, 孙焕良, 孟桂元. 水稻叶片形态研究进展[J]. 作物研究, 2008(S1):378-380. |
He Y, Sun H L, Meng G Y. Advances in leaf morphology of rice[J]. Crop Research, 2008(S1):378-380. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 罗赣丰, 马雪梅, 程建峰. 水稻剑叶角度与氮营养效率的关系[J]. 中国农学通报, 2014,30(18):29-34. |
Luo G F, Ma X M, Cheng J F. The relationships between flag leaf angles of various rice germplasms and their nitrogen nutrition efficiencies[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2014,30(18):29-34. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | Easterling W, Apps M. Assessing the consequences of climate change for food and forest resources: A view from the IPCC[J]. Climate Change, 2005,70:165-189. |
[26] | 孔飞扬, 江立庚, 文娟, 郝向阳. 直播水稻产量、产量构成因子和干物质积累的变化特点及其相互关系[J]. 华中农业大学学报, 2018,37(5):11-17. |
Kong F Y, Jiang L G, Wen J, Hao X Y. Changes and relationships of yield, yield components and dry matter accumulation of direct-seeded rice[J]. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University, 2018,37(5):11-17. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | Peng S B, Li Y, Cui K H, Yu T T, Wang T, Xu L, Zhan X W, Huang J L, Nie L X. Yield performance of direct-seed, double-season rice using varieties with short growth durations in central China[J]. Field Crops Research, 2018,227:49-55. |
[28] | 武玲, 向珣朝, 杨博文, 许亮, 颜李梅. 水稻籼爪交重组自交系穗部性状变异分析[J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2017,22(10):26-35. |
Wu L, Xiang X C, Yang B W, Xu L, Yan L M. Analysis on the panicle traits variation of recombinant inbred line derived from the hybridization of indica and javanica[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2017,22(10):26-35. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 陈小荣, 陈志彬, 贺浩华, 朱昌兰, 彭小松, 贺晓鹏, 傅军如, 欧阳林娟. 水稻单株有效穗数主基因+多基因混合遗传分析[J]. 生物数学学报, 2011,26(3):555-562. |
Chen X R, Chen Z B, He H H, Zhu C L, Peng X S, He X P, Fu J R, OuYang L J. Genetic analysis of panicles per plant in rice by the major genes plus polygenes mixed inheritance model[J]. Journal of Biomathematics, 2011,26(3):555-562. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 刘坚, 陶红剑, 施思, 叶卫军, 钱前, 郭龙彪. 水稻穗型的遗传和育种改良[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2012,26(2):227-234. |
Liu J, Tao H J, Shi S, Ye W J, Qian Q, Gu L B. Genetics and breeding improvement for panicle type in rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2012,26(2):227-234. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | Li X, Qian Q, Fu Z, Wang Y, Xiong G, Zeng D, Wang X, Liu X, Sheng T, Hiroshi F. Control of tillering in rice[J]. Nature, 2003,422:618-621. |
[32] | Jin J, Huang W, Gao J P, Yang J, Lin H X. Genetic control of rice plant architecture under domestication[J]. Nature Genetics, 2008,40:1365-1369. |
[33] | Fan C, Xing Y, Mao H, Lu T, Zhang Q. GS3, a major QTL for grain length and weight and minor QTL for grain width and thickness in rice, encodes a putative transmembrane protein[J]. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2006,112:1164-1171. |
[34] | Feng Z, Wu C, Wang C, Roh J, Zhang L, Chen J, Zhang S, Zhang H, Yang C, Hu J, You X, Liu X, Yang X, Guo X, Zhang X, Wu F, Terzaghi W, Kim S K, Jiang L, Wan J. SLG controls grain size and leaf angle by modulating brassinosteroid homeostasis in rice[J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2016,67(14):4241-4253. |
[35] | Huang X, Qian Q, Liu Z, Sun H, He S, Luo D, Xia G, Chu C, Li J, Fu X. Natural variation at the DEP1 locus enhances grain yield in rice[J]. Nature Genetics, 2009,41:494-497. |
[1] | HOU Xiaoqin, WANG Ying, YU Bei, FU Weimeng, FENG Baohua, SHEN Yichao, XIE Hangjun, WANG Huanran, XU Yongqiang, WU Zhihai, WANG Jianjun, TAO Longxing, FU Guanfu. Mechanisms Behind the Role of Potassium Fulvic Acid in Enhancing Salt Tolerance in Rice Seedlings [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 409-421. |
[2] | FENG Aiqing, WANG Congying, SU Jing, FENG Jinqi, CHEN Kailing, LIN Xiaopeng, CHEN Bing, LIANG Meiling, YANG Jianyuan, ZHU Xiaoyuan, CHEN Shen. Development and Agronomic Traits Analysis of New Rice Resistance Lines to Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzicola [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(6): 587-596. |
[3] | LI Xiaoxiu, LÜ Qiming, YUAN Dingyang. Research Progress on the Effects of OsNramp5 Mutation on Important Agronomic Traits in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2022, 36(6): 562-571. |
[4] | Shengfeng QIAO, Yaping DENG, Hanbing QU, Weiyang ZHANG, Junfei GU, Hao ZHANG, Lijun LIU, Zhiqin WANG, Jianchang YANG. Differences in Response to Low Phosphorus Stress Among indica Rice Varieties and Their Agronomic and Physiological Characteristics [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2021, 35(4): 396-406. |
[5] | Yujun ZHU, Ziwei ZUO, Zhenhua ZHANG, Yeyang FAN. A New Approach for Fine-mapping and Map-based Cloning of Minor-Effect QTL in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2021, 35(4): 407-414. |
[6] | Yali ZHENG, Linchuang YU, Xiaoxiao AN, Xinle CHENG, Lijun REN, Zilong SU, Xiaoya ZHENG, Tao LAN. Identification of a Knockout Mutant of OsWOX3B Gene in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2021, 35(2): 112-120. |
[7] | Xiaolong YANG, Jianping CHENG, Benfu WANG, Yang LI, Zhisheng ZHANG, Jinlan LI, Ping LI. Effects of Drought Stressat Grain Filling Stage on Rice Physiological Characteristics and Yield [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2021, 35(1): 38-46. |
[8] | Yiwei KANG, Yuyu CHEN, Yingxin ZHANG. Research Progress and Breeding Prospects of Grain Size Associated Genes in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2020, 34(6): 479-490. |
[9] | Yongbin PENG, Xianzhi XIE. Application of Phenomics in Rice Research [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2020, 34(4): 300-306. |
[10] | Ke LI, Qing YU, Yunji XU, Jianchang YANG. Research Progress in Agronomic and Physiological Traits of Early Leaf Senescence Mutants in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2020, 34(2): 104-114. |
[11] | Yanhua CHEN, Yaliang WANG, Defeng ZHU, Qinghua SHI, Huizhe CHEN, Jing XIANG, Yikai ZHANG, Yuping ZHANG. Mechanism of Exogenous Brassinolide in Alleviating High Temperature Injury at Panicle Initiation Stage in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2019, 33(5): 457-466. |
[12] | Chuangen LÜ, Xia LI, Shouyu ZONG, Jiangshi ZOU. Analysis of the Eurytopicity of Super Hybrid Rice Liangyoupeijiu [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2019, 33(3): 191-205. |
[13] | Jingfang LI, Yunlu TIAN, Xi LIU, Shijia LIU, Liangming CHEN, Ling JIANG, Wenwei ZHANG, Dayong XU, Yihua WANG, Jianmin WAN. The Guanylate Kinase OsGK1 is Essential for Seed Development in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2018, 32(5): 415-426. |
[14] | Peng-yi PAN, Jian-ping ZHU, Yun-long WANG, Yuan-yuan HAO, Yue CAI, Wen-wei ZHANG, Ling JIANG, Yi-hua WANG, Jian-min WAN. Phenotyping and Gene Cloning of a Floury Endosperm Mutant ws in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2016, 30(5): 447-457. |
[15] | Min XI, Zhao-miao LIN, Yan-ling ZHAO, Xin-cheng ZHANG, Xiao-yu YANG, Zheng-hui LIU, Gang-hua LI, Shao-hua WANG, Yan-feng DING. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Application on the Formation of White-belly and White-core as Well as Biochemical Composition of japonica Rice Grains [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2016, 30(2): 193-199. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||