Chinese Journal OF Rice Science ›› 2019, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (5): 447-456.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2019.9021
• Research Papers • Previous Articles Next Articles
Haiyue WANG1,2, Qiao ZHANG1, Yunxia WU1, Fengjun YAN1, Changchun GUO1, Yongjian SUN1,*(), Hui XU1, Zhiyuan YANG1, Jun MA1,*(
)
Received:
2019-02-14
Revised:
2019-05-13
Online:
2019-09-10
Published:
2019-09-10
Contact:
Yongjian SUN, Jun MA
王海月1,2, 张桥1, 武云霞1, 严奉君1, 郭长春1, 孙永健1,*(), 徐徽1, 杨志远1, 马均1,*(
)
通讯作者:
孙永健,马均
基金资助:
CLC Number:
Haiyue WANG, Qiao ZHANG, Yunxia WU, Fengjun YAN, Changchun GUO, Yongjian SUN, Hui XU, Zhiyuan YANG, Jun MA. Effects of Reduced Urea Application on Yield and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Mechanically-transplanted Rice Under Different Planting Spaces[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2019, 33(5): 447-456.
王海月, 张桥, 武云霞, 严奉君, 郭长春, 孙永健, 徐徽, 杨志远, 马均. 不同株距下氮肥减量配施运筹对机插杂交稻的产量及光合特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(5): 447-456.
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://www.ricesci.cn/EN/10.16819/j.1001-7216.2019.9021
处理 Treatment | 施氮量 N application rate | 基肥 Basal manure | 追肥-倒4叶期(常规氮肥) Topdressing(conventional urea) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
缓释氮肥 Slow-release urea | 常规氮肥 Conventional urea | |||
N0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
N1 | 120 | 96 | 24 | 0 |
N2 | 120 | 96 | 0 | 24 |
N3 | 150 | 96 | 54 | 0 |
N4 | 150 | 96 | 30 | 24 |
Table 1 Nitrogen managements. kg/hm2
处理 Treatment | 施氮量 N application rate | 基肥 Basal manure | 追肥-倒4叶期(常规氮肥) Topdressing(conventional urea) | |
---|---|---|---|---|
缓释氮肥 Slow-release urea | 常规氮肥 Conventional urea | |||
N0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
N1 | 120 | 96 | 24 | 0 |
N2 | 120 | 96 | 0 | 24 |
N3 | 150 | 96 | 54 | 0 |
N4 | 150 | 96 | 30 | 24 |
处理 Treatment | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Grain number per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 实际产量 Grain yield /(kg·hm-2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1N0 | 186.99 c | 144.23 b | 93.77 a | 33.16 a | 8 192.67 e | |
D1N1 | 214.03 b | 147.66 b | 93.31 a | 34.03 a | 9 811.97 d | |
D1N2 | 216.67 b | 159.37 a | 93.19 ab | 32.21 b | 10 117.09 c | |
D1N3 | 220.30 b | 160.36 a | 92.16 bc | 33.21 a | 10 558.64 b | |
D1N4 | 237.96 a | 165.05 a | 91.82 c | 32.13 b | 11 326.29 a | |
平均 Average | 215.19 | 155.33 | 92.85 | 32.95 | 10 001.34 | |
D2N0 | 187.18 c | 147.18 c | 94.10 a | 33.46 ab | 8 596.79 e | |
D2N1 | 207.10 b | 160.12 b | 92.95 ab | 33.12 ab | 10 081.51 d | |
D2N2 | 209.05 b | 165.01 ab | 92.35 b | 34.18 a | 10 699.25 c | |
D2N3 | 228.93 a | 167.41 ab | 92.08 b | 32.36 b | 11 249.35 b | |
D2N4 | 232.76 a | 168.18 a | 90.94 c | 33.10 ab | 11 681.56 a | |
平均 Average | 213.00 | 161.58 | 92.48 | 33.25 | 10 461.69 | |
D3N0 | 185.00 b | 150.79 c | 92.03 a | 32.21 b | 8 086.98 e | |
D3N1 | 208.48 a | 163.73 b | 92.27 a | 31.61 b | 9 760.95 d | |
D3N2 | 214.15 a | 165.39 ab | 92.14 a | 31.85 b | 10 098.75 c | |
D3N3 | 218.83 a | 168.96 ab | 89.05 b | 32.71 b | 10 663.29 b | |
D3N4 | 219.31 a | 171.49 a | 88.57 b | 34.26 a | 11 079.20 a | |
平均 Average | 209.16 | 164.07 | 90.81 | 32.53 | 9 937.83 | |
F值 | 株距Plant spacing(D) | 0.55 | 5.14 | 33.19** | 1.67 | 35.83** |
F value | 氮肥用量Nitrogen level(N) | 23.39** | 21.28** | 10.78** | 0.33 | 710.11** |
D×N | 0.75 | 0.60 | 1.15 | 3.99** | 1.75 |
Table 2 Effects of reduced urea application combined with slow-release urea on yield and its components in mechanically- transplanted rice under different plant spacing.
处理 Treatment | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number/(×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 Grain number per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate/% | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 实际产量 Grain yield /(kg·hm-2) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D1N0 | 186.99 c | 144.23 b | 93.77 a | 33.16 a | 8 192.67 e | |
D1N1 | 214.03 b | 147.66 b | 93.31 a | 34.03 a | 9 811.97 d | |
D1N2 | 216.67 b | 159.37 a | 93.19 ab | 32.21 b | 10 117.09 c | |
D1N3 | 220.30 b | 160.36 a | 92.16 bc | 33.21 a | 10 558.64 b | |
D1N4 | 237.96 a | 165.05 a | 91.82 c | 32.13 b | 11 326.29 a | |
平均 Average | 215.19 | 155.33 | 92.85 | 32.95 | 10 001.34 | |
D2N0 | 187.18 c | 147.18 c | 94.10 a | 33.46 ab | 8 596.79 e | |
D2N1 | 207.10 b | 160.12 b | 92.95 ab | 33.12 ab | 10 081.51 d | |
D2N2 | 209.05 b | 165.01 ab | 92.35 b | 34.18 a | 10 699.25 c | |
D2N3 | 228.93 a | 167.41 ab | 92.08 b | 32.36 b | 11 249.35 b | |
D2N4 | 232.76 a | 168.18 a | 90.94 c | 33.10 ab | 11 681.56 a | |
平均 Average | 213.00 | 161.58 | 92.48 | 33.25 | 10 461.69 | |
D3N0 | 185.00 b | 150.79 c | 92.03 a | 32.21 b | 8 086.98 e | |
D3N1 | 208.48 a | 163.73 b | 92.27 a | 31.61 b | 9 760.95 d | |
D3N2 | 214.15 a | 165.39 ab | 92.14 a | 31.85 b | 10 098.75 c | |
D3N3 | 218.83 a | 168.96 ab | 89.05 b | 32.71 b | 10 663.29 b | |
D3N4 | 219.31 a | 171.49 a | 88.57 b | 34.26 a | 11 079.20 a | |
平均 Average | 209.16 | 164.07 | 90.81 | 32.53 | 9 937.83 | |
F值 | 株距Plant spacing(D) | 0.55 | 5.14 | 33.19** | 1.67 | 35.83** |
F value | 氮肥用量Nitrogen level(N) | 23.39** | 21.28** | 10.78** | 0.33 | 710.11** |
D×N | 0.75 | 0.60 | 1.15 | 3.99** | 1.75 |
Fig. 1. Effects of reduced urea application combined with slow-release nitrogen on the dynamic changes of number of stems and tillers in mechanically-transplanted rice under different plant spacing.
处理 Treatment | 叶面积指数 LAI | 齐穗期高效 叶面积指数 High effective LAI at full heading stage | 齐穗期高效 叶面积率 High effective LAI rate at full heading stage/% | 拔节-齐穗期光合势Photosynthetic potential of jointing-full heading /(×104 m2d·hm-2) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期 Jointing stage | 齐穗期 Full heading stage | |||||
D1N0 D1N1 D1N2 D1N3 D1N4 | 2.28 c | 3.09 d | 1.96 d | 63.25 b | 125.30 d | |
3.59 a | 4.74 c | 3.17 c | 67.06 a | 194.47 c | ||
3.27 b | 5.70 b | 3.65 b | 64.07 b | 209.35 b | ||
3.78 a | 6.44 a | 4.11 a | 63.83 b | 238.34 a | ||
3.62 a | 6.64 a | 4.25 a | 64.11 b | 239.32 a | ||
平均 Average | 3.31 | 5.32 | 3.43 | 64.46 | 201.35 | |
D2N0 D2N1 D2N2 D2N3 D2N4 | 2.46 d | 3.30 d | 2.16 d | 65.12 a | 136.25 d | |
3.84 b | 5.26 c | 3.52 c | 66.93 a | 214.82 c | ||
3.55 c | 5.98 b | 3.73 b | 62.39 b | 225.02 b | ||
4.21 a | 7.12 a | 4.36 a | 61.31 b | 267.86 a | ||
4.02 ab | 7.42 a | 4.58 a | 61.68 b | 270.18 a | ||
平均 Average | 3.62 | 5.82 | 3.67 | 63.49 | 222.83 | |
D3N0 D3N1 D3N2 D3N3 D3N4 | 2.29 d | 2.94 e | 1.86 d | 63.16 b | 121.33 c | |
3.38 bc | 4.57 d | 3.02 c | 66.04 a | 184.40 b | ||
3.26 c | 5.01 c | 3.23 c | 64.44 ab | 191.79 b | ||
3.75 a | 5.55 b | 3.52 b | 63.59 ab | 215.59 a | ||
3.53 ab | 6.31 a | 3.93 a | 62.32 b | 228.42 a | ||
平均 Average | 3.24 | 4.88 | 3.11 | 63.91 | 188.31 | |
F 值 F value | D | 20.28** | 61.55** | 40.37** | 1.35 | 181.46** |
N | 98.22** | 262.05** | 237.89** | 7.80** | 326.74** | |
D×N | 0.53 | 2.63* | 1.55 | 1.29** | 2.58* |
Table 3 Effects of reduced urea application combined with slow-release urea on photosynthetic production in mechanically- transplanted rice under different plant spacing.
处理 Treatment | 叶面积指数 LAI | 齐穗期高效 叶面积指数 High effective LAI at full heading stage | 齐穗期高效 叶面积率 High effective LAI rate at full heading stage/% | 拔节-齐穗期光合势Photosynthetic potential of jointing-full heading /(×104 m2d·hm-2) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
拔节期 Jointing stage | 齐穗期 Full heading stage | |||||
D1N0 D1N1 D1N2 D1N3 D1N4 | 2.28 c | 3.09 d | 1.96 d | 63.25 b | 125.30 d | |
3.59 a | 4.74 c | 3.17 c | 67.06 a | 194.47 c | ||
3.27 b | 5.70 b | 3.65 b | 64.07 b | 209.35 b | ||
3.78 a | 6.44 a | 4.11 a | 63.83 b | 238.34 a | ||
3.62 a | 6.64 a | 4.25 a | 64.11 b | 239.32 a | ||
平均 Average | 3.31 | 5.32 | 3.43 | 64.46 | 201.35 | |
D2N0 D2N1 D2N2 D2N3 D2N4 | 2.46 d | 3.30 d | 2.16 d | 65.12 a | 136.25 d | |
3.84 b | 5.26 c | 3.52 c | 66.93 a | 214.82 c | ||
3.55 c | 5.98 b | 3.73 b | 62.39 b | 225.02 b | ||
4.21 a | 7.12 a | 4.36 a | 61.31 b | 267.86 a | ||
4.02 ab | 7.42 a | 4.58 a | 61.68 b | 270.18 a | ||
平均 Average | 3.62 | 5.82 | 3.67 | 63.49 | 222.83 | |
D3N0 D3N1 D3N2 D3N3 D3N4 | 2.29 d | 2.94 e | 1.86 d | 63.16 b | 121.33 c | |
3.38 bc | 4.57 d | 3.02 c | 66.04 a | 184.40 b | ||
3.26 c | 5.01 c | 3.23 c | 64.44 ab | 191.79 b | ||
3.75 a | 5.55 b | 3.52 b | 63.59 ab | 215.59 a | ||
3.53 ab | 6.31 a | 3.93 a | 62.32 b | 228.42 a | ||
平均 Average | 3.24 | 4.88 | 3.11 | 63.91 | 188.31 | |
F 值 F value | D | 20.28** | 61.55** | 40.37** | 1.35 | 181.46** |
N | 98.22** | 262.05** | 237.89** | 7.80** | 326.74** | |
D×N | 0.53 | 2.63* | 1.55 | 1.29** | 2.58* |
处理 Treatment | 净光合速率 Pn/(μmol·m-2 s-1) | 气孔导度 Gs/(mol·m-2 s-1) | 胞间CO2浓度 Ci/(μmol·mol-1) | 表观叶肉导度 AMC/(mmol·m-2 s-1) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
齐穗期 FHS | 齐穗后15 d 15 d after FHS | 齐穗期 FHS | 齐穗后15 d 15 d after FHS | 齐穗期 FHS | 齐穗后15 d 15 d after FHS | 齐穗期 FHS | 齐穗后15 d 15 d after FHS | |||||
D1N0 D1N1 D1N2 D1N3 D1N4 | 17.41 c | 16.85 b | 0.70 b | 0.40 c | 280.86 ab | 329.06 a | 62.62 b | 51.20 c | ||||
17.51 c | 17.02 b | 0.78 a | 0.41 bc | 286.77 a | 327.87 a | 61.04 b | 51.92 c | |||||
17.86 c | 17.32 b | 0.79 a | 0.44 ab | 286.30 a | 323.08 ab | 62.44 b | 53.63 bc | |||||
20.25 b | 17.67 ab | 0.82 a | 0.44 ab | 273.30 bc | 321.47 bc | 74.41 a | 55.78 ab | |||||
22.65 a | 18.71 a | 0.85 a | 0.46 a | 265.68 c | 316.86 c | 85.30 a | 58.20 a | |||||
平均 Average | 19.14 | 17.51 | 0.79 | 0.43 | 278.58 | 323.67 | 69.16 | 54.15 | ||||
D2N0 D2N1 D2N2 D2N3 D2N4 | 18.85 b | 17.59 c | 0.72 b | 0.38 b | 282.65 a | 319.72 a | 66.74 b | 55.06 d | ||||
19.25 b | 18.49 b | 0.79 a | 0.38 b | 280.94 a | 313.46 ab | 68.55 b | 59.02 c | |||||
19.27 b | 20.07 a | 0.82 a | 0.40 b | 277.37 a | 310.82 b | 69.56 b | 69.42 a | |||||
20.62 ab | 20.81 a | 0.84 a | 0.45 a | 275.04 a | 307.15 bc | 75.03 ab | 64.60 b | |||||
22.96 a | 21.15 a | 0.86 a | 0.48 a | 274.76 a | 304.73 c | 83.53 a | 67.90 ab | |||||
平均 Average | 20.19 | 19.62 | 0.80 | 0.42 | 278.15 | 311.17 | 72.68 | 63.20 | ||||
D3N0 D3N1 D3N2 D3N3 D3N4 | 17.14 c | 17.06 b | 0.66 c | 0.39 b | 283.34 a | 331.57 a | 60.54 c | 51.45 b | ||||
17.73 bc | 17.36 b | 0.79 ab | 0.41 ab | 279.71 a | 323.31 ab | 63.85 bc | 54.65 ab | |||||
18.24 abc | 17.80 ab | 0.75 b | 0.42 ab | 276.28 a | 319.09 bc | 66.25 abc | 56.67 a | |||||
19.95 ab | 18.17 ab | 0.81 ab | 0.43 ab | 274.79 a | 317.91 bc | 72.63 ab | 56.97 a | |||||
20.96 a | 19.07 a | 0.87 a | 0.45 a | 272.93 a | 314.16 c | 76.80 a | 59.00 a | |||||
平均 Average | 18.80 | 17.89 | 0.78 | 0.42 | 277.41 | 321.21 | 68.02 | 55.75 | ||||
F 值 F value | D | 4.96 | 6.60 | 1.25 | 0.35 | 0.11 | 18.32** | 2.47 | 8.65* | |||
N | 10.16** | 10.38** | 8.08** | 7.47** | 2.55 | 11.95** | 8.74** | 11.38** | ||||
D×N | 0.24 | 1.04 | 0.26 | 0.70 | 0.56 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 1.57 |
Table 4 Effects of reduced urea application combined with slow-release urea on photosynthetic parameters in mechanical- transplanted rice under different plant spacing.
处理 Treatment | 净光合速率 Pn/(μmol·m-2 s-1) | 气孔导度 Gs/(mol·m-2 s-1) | 胞间CO2浓度 Ci/(μmol·mol-1) | 表观叶肉导度 AMC/(mmol·m-2 s-1) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
齐穗期 FHS | 齐穗后15 d 15 d after FHS | 齐穗期 FHS | 齐穗后15 d 15 d after FHS | 齐穗期 FHS | 齐穗后15 d 15 d after FHS | 齐穗期 FHS | 齐穗后15 d 15 d after FHS | |||||
D1N0 D1N1 D1N2 D1N3 D1N4 | 17.41 c | 16.85 b | 0.70 b | 0.40 c | 280.86 ab | 329.06 a | 62.62 b | 51.20 c | ||||
17.51 c | 17.02 b | 0.78 a | 0.41 bc | 286.77 a | 327.87 a | 61.04 b | 51.92 c | |||||
17.86 c | 17.32 b | 0.79 a | 0.44 ab | 286.30 a | 323.08 ab | 62.44 b | 53.63 bc | |||||
20.25 b | 17.67 ab | 0.82 a | 0.44 ab | 273.30 bc | 321.47 bc | 74.41 a | 55.78 ab | |||||
22.65 a | 18.71 a | 0.85 a | 0.46 a | 265.68 c | 316.86 c | 85.30 a | 58.20 a | |||||
平均 Average | 19.14 | 17.51 | 0.79 | 0.43 | 278.58 | 323.67 | 69.16 | 54.15 | ||||
D2N0 D2N1 D2N2 D2N3 D2N4 | 18.85 b | 17.59 c | 0.72 b | 0.38 b | 282.65 a | 319.72 a | 66.74 b | 55.06 d | ||||
19.25 b | 18.49 b | 0.79 a | 0.38 b | 280.94 a | 313.46 ab | 68.55 b | 59.02 c | |||||
19.27 b | 20.07 a | 0.82 a | 0.40 b | 277.37 a | 310.82 b | 69.56 b | 69.42 a | |||||
20.62 ab | 20.81 a | 0.84 a | 0.45 a | 275.04 a | 307.15 bc | 75.03 ab | 64.60 b | |||||
22.96 a | 21.15 a | 0.86 a | 0.48 a | 274.76 a | 304.73 c | 83.53 a | 67.90 ab | |||||
平均 Average | 20.19 | 19.62 | 0.80 | 0.42 | 278.15 | 311.17 | 72.68 | 63.20 | ||||
D3N0 D3N1 D3N2 D3N3 D3N4 | 17.14 c | 17.06 b | 0.66 c | 0.39 b | 283.34 a | 331.57 a | 60.54 c | 51.45 b | ||||
17.73 bc | 17.36 b | 0.79 ab | 0.41 ab | 279.71 a | 323.31 ab | 63.85 bc | 54.65 ab | |||||
18.24 abc | 17.80 ab | 0.75 b | 0.42 ab | 276.28 a | 319.09 bc | 66.25 abc | 56.67 a | |||||
19.95 ab | 18.17 ab | 0.81 ab | 0.43 ab | 274.79 a | 317.91 bc | 72.63 ab | 56.97 a | |||||
20.96 a | 19.07 a | 0.87 a | 0.45 a | 272.93 a | 314.16 c | 76.80 a | 59.00 a | |||||
平均 Average | 18.80 | 17.89 | 0.78 | 0.42 | 277.41 | 321.21 | 68.02 | 55.75 | ||||
F 值 F value | D | 4.96 | 6.60 | 1.25 | 0.35 | 0.11 | 18.32** | 2.47 | 8.65* | |||
N | 10.16** | 10.38** | 8.08** | 7.47** | 2.55 | 11.95** | 8.74** | 11.38** | ||||
D×N | 0.24 | 1.04 | 0.26 | 0.70 | 0.56 | 0.29 | 0.34 | 1.57 |
处理 Treatment | 群体干物质量 Population dry matter/(t·hm-2) | 群体生长率 Population growth rate/(g·m-2 d-1) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
分蘖盛期 TS | 拔节期 JS | 齐穗期 FHS | 成熟期 MS | 分蘖-拔节 TS-JS | 拔节-齐穗 JS-FHS | 齐穗-成熟 FHS-MS | |||
D1N0 D1N1 D1N2 D1N3 D1N4 | 0.51 e | 2.25 e | 8.78 d | 13.23 e | 12.45 e | 18.66 b | 10.87 b | ||
1.03 d | 3.52 d | 10.45 c | 16.86 d | 17.85 d | 19.78 ab | 15.63 a | |||
1.17 c | 3.88 c | 10.88 bc | 17.33 c | 19.37 c | 19.99 ab | 15.75 a | |||
1.32 b | 4.34 b | 11.30 b | 17.92 b | 21.54 b | 19.90 ab | 16.14 a | |||
1.45 a | 4.75 a | 12.29 a | 19.41 a | 23.61 a | 21.54 a | 17.36 a | |||
平均 Average | 1.09 | 3.75 | 10.74 | 16.95 | 18.9 | 19.98 | 15.15 | ||
D2N0 D2N1 D2N2 D2N3 D2N4 | 0.52 e | 2.30 e | 9.10 c | 13.59 d | 12.76 d | 19.41 b | 10.97 c | ||
1.05 d | 3.62 d | 10.61 b | 17.18 c | 18.34 c | 19.98 b | 16.02 b | |||
1.18 c | 4.04 c | 10.94 b | 17.92 b | 20.38 b | 19.73 b | 17.02 ab | |||
1.35 b | 4.45 b | 12.36 a | 19.17 a | 22.13 ab | 22.59 a | 16.63 ab | |||
1.50 a | 4.83 a | 12.59 a | 19.93 a | 23.82 a | 22.17 a | 17.89 a | |||
平均 Average | 1.12 | 3.85 | 11.12 | 17.56 | 19.49 | 20.78 | 15.71 | ||
D3N0 D3N1 D3N2 D3N3 D3N4 | 0.49 e | 2.17 e | 8.60 d | 13.08 d | 12.00 d | 18.38 b | 10.92 b | ||
1.01 d | 3.27 d | 10.33 c | 16.67 c | 16.13 c | 20.19 ab | 15.44 a | |||
1.11 c | 3.74 c | 10.62 bc | 17.31 bc | 18.83 b | 19.64 ab | 16.31 a | |||
1.29 b | 4.12 b | 11.19 ab | 18.01 b | 20.25 ab | 20.18 ab | 16.64 a | |||
1.42 a | 4.43 a | 11.95 a | 18.98 a | 21.52 a | 21.48 a | 17.15 a | |||
平均 Average | 1.06 | 3.55 | 10.54 | 16.81 | 17.75 | 19.97 | 15.29 | ||
F值 F value | D | 2.88 | 2.59 | 3.38 | 6.05 | 2.08 | 2.09 | 1.53 | |
N | 429.11** | 280.50** | 55.22** | 220.98** | 89.77** | 5.01** | 36.75** | ||
D×N | 0.19 | 0.36 | 0.52 | 0.60 | 0.30 | 0.55 | 0.14 |
Table 5 Dry matter accumulation of population in mechanically-transplanted rice under different plant spacing at reduced urea application combined with slow-release urea.
处理 Treatment | 群体干物质量 Population dry matter/(t·hm-2) | 群体生长率 Population growth rate/(g·m-2 d-1) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
分蘖盛期 TS | 拔节期 JS | 齐穗期 FHS | 成熟期 MS | 分蘖-拔节 TS-JS | 拔节-齐穗 JS-FHS | 齐穗-成熟 FHS-MS | |||
D1N0 D1N1 D1N2 D1N3 D1N4 | 0.51 e | 2.25 e | 8.78 d | 13.23 e | 12.45 e | 18.66 b | 10.87 b | ||
1.03 d | 3.52 d | 10.45 c | 16.86 d | 17.85 d | 19.78 ab | 15.63 a | |||
1.17 c | 3.88 c | 10.88 bc | 17.33 c | 19.37 c | 19.99 ab | 15.75 a | |||
1.32 b | 4.34 b | 11.30 b | 17.92 b | 21.54 b | 19.90 ab | 16.14 a | |||
1.45 a | 4.75 a | 12.29 a | 19.41 a | 23.61 a | 21.54 a | 17.36 a | |||
平均 Average | 1.09 | 3.75 | 10.74 | 16.95 | 18.9 | 19.98 | 15.15 | ||
D2N0 D2N1 D2N2 D2N3 D2N4 | 0.52 e | 2.30 e | 9.10 c | 13.59 d | 12.76 d | 19.41 b | 10.97 c | ||
1.05 d | 3.62 d | 10.61 b | 17.18 c | 18.34 c | 19.98 b | 16.02 b | |||
1.18 c | 4.04 c | 10.94 b | 17.92 b | 20.38 b | 19.73 b | 17.02 ab | |||
1.35 b | 4.45 b | 12.36 a | 19.17 a | 22.13 ab | 22.59 a | 16.63 ab | |||
1.50 a | 4.83 a | 12.59 a | 19.93 a | 23.82 a | 22.17 a | 17.89 a | |||
平均 Average | 1.12 | 3.85 | 11.12 | 17.56 | 19.49 | 20.78 | 15.71 | ||
D3N0 D3N1 D3N2 D3N3 D3N4 | 0.49 e | 2.17 e | 8.60 d | 13.08 d | 12.00 d | 18.38 b | 10.92 b | ||
1.01 d | 3.27 d | 10.33 c | 16.67 c | 16.13 c | 20.19 ab | 15.44 a | |||
1.11 c | 3.74 c | 10.62 bc | 17.31 bc | 18.83 b | 19.64 ab | 16.31 a | |||
1.29 b | 4.12 b | 11.19 ab | 18.01 b | 20.25 ab | 20.18 ab | 16.64 a | |||
1.42 a | 4.43 a | 11.95 a | 18.98 a | 21.52 a | 21.48 a | 17.15 a | |||
平均 Average | 1.06 | 3.55 | 10.54 | 16.81 | 17.75 | 19.97 | 15.29 | ||
F值 F value | D | 2.88 | 2.59 | 3.38 | 6.05 | 2.08 | 2.09 | 1.53 | |
N | 429.11** | 280.50** | 55.22** | 220.98** | 89.77** | 5.01** | 36.75** | ||
D×N | 0.19 | 0.36 | 0.52 | 0.60 | 0.30 | 0.55 | 0.14 |
指标 Index | 生育期 Growth stage | 成熟期干物质量 Dry biomass at MS | 有效穗数 No. of effective panicles | 穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate | 千粒重 1000-grain weight | 产量 Grain yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶面积指数LAI | 拔节期 JS | 0.88** | 0.69** | 0.64** | -0.32* | 0.05 | 0.88** |
齐穗期 FHS | 0.94** | 0.80** | 0.67** | -0.42** | 0.03 | 0.96** | |
净光合速率Net photosynthetic rate | 齐穗期 FHS | 0.59** | 0.50** | 0.45** | -0.27 | 0.11 | 0.64** |
齐穗15 d 15 d FHS | 0.62** | 0.51** | 0.44** | -0.31* | 0.07 | 0.64** | |
群体生长率Population growth rate | 分蘖盛期-拔节期TS-JS | 0.94** | 0.82** | 0.63** | -0.39** | -0.01 | 0.94** |
拔节-齐穗期JS-FHS | 0.62** | 0.79** | 0.13 | -0.32* | -0.18 | 0.60** | |
齐穗-成熟期FHS-MS | 0.89** | 0.63** | 0.72** | -0.42** | 0.07 | 0.86** | |
光合势 Photosynthetic potential | 拔节-齐穗期JS-FHS | 0.94** | 0.79** | 0.67** | -0.39** | 0.05 | 0.96** |
Table 6 Correlation coefficients of leaf area index(LAI) and photosynthetic production with yield in different plant spacing at reduced urea application combined with slow-release urea.
指标 Index | 生育期 Growth stage | 成熟期干物质量 Dry biomass at MS | 有效穗数 No. of effective panicles | 穗粒数 Spikelet number per panicle | 结实率 Seed-setting rate | 千粒重 1000-grain weight | 产量 Grain yield |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
叶面积指数LAI | 拔节期 JS | 0.88** | 0.69** | 0.64** | -0.32* | 0.05 | 0.88** |
齐穗期 FHS | 0.94** | 0.80** | 0.67** | -0.42** | 0.03 | 0.96** | |
净光合速率Net photosynthetic rate | 齐穗期 FHS | 0.59** | 0.50** | 0.45** | -0.27 | 0.11 | 0.64** |
齐穗15 d 15 d FHS | 0.62** | 0.51** | 0.44** | -0.31* | 0.07 | 0.64** | |
群体生长率Population growth rate | 分蘖盛期-拔节期TS-JS | 0.94** | 0.82** | 0.63** | -0.39** | -0.01 | 0.94** |
拔节-齐穗期JS-FHS | 0.62** | 0.79** | 0.13 | -0.32* | -0.18 | 0.60** | |
齐穗-成熟期FHS-MS | 0.89** | 0.63** | 0.72** | -0.42** | 0.07 | 0.86** | |
光合势 Photosynthetic potential | 拔节-齐穗期JS-FHS | 0.94** | 0.79** | 0.67** | -0.39** | 0.05 | 0.96** |
[1] | 蒋鹏, 熊洪, 张林, 朱永川, 周兴兵, 刘茂, 郭晓艺, 徐富贤. 不同生态条件下施氮量和移栽密度对杂交稻氮、磷、钾吸收积累的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(2): 342-350. |
Jiang P, Xiong H, Zhang L, Zhu Y C, Zhou X B, Liu M, Guo X Y, Xu F X.Effects of N rate and planting density on nutrient uptake and utilization of hybrid rice under different ecological conditions.Plant Nutr & Fert Sci, 2017, 23(2): 342-350. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 徐新朋, 周卫, 梁国庆, 孙静文, 王秀斌, 何萍, 徐芳森, 余喜初. 氮肥用量和密度对双季稻产量及氮肥利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(3): 763-772. |
Xu X P, Zhou W, Liang G Q, Sun J W, Wang X B, He P, Xu F S, Yu X C.Effects of nitrogen and density interactions on grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency of double-rice systems.Plant Nutr & Fert Sci, 2015, 21(3): 763-772. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 陈海飞, 冯洋, 蔡红梅, 徐芳森, 周卫, 刘芳, 庞再明, 李登荣. 氮肥与移栽密度互作对低产田水稻群体结构及产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014, 20(6): 1319-1328. |
Chen H F, Feng Y, Cai H M, Xu F S, Zhou W, Liu F, Pang Z M, Li D R.Effects of the interaction of nitrogen and transplanting density on the rice population structure and grain yield in low-yield paddy fields.Plant Nutr & Fert Sci, 2014, 20(6): 1319-1328.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 陈佳娜, 谢小兵, 伍丹丹, 曹放波, 单双吕, 高伟, 李志斌, 邹应斌. 机插密度与氮肥运筹对中嘉早17产量形成及氮肥利用率的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2015, 29(6): 628-636. |
Chen J N, Xie X B, Wu D D, Cao F B, Shan S L, Gao W, Li Z B, Zou Y B.Effects of nitrogen application and mechanical transplanting density on yield formation and nitrogen use efficiency of conventional rice Zhongjiazao 17.Chin J Rice Sci, 2015, 29(6): 628-636. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 郭保卫, 周兴涛, 曹利强, 张洪程, 许珂, 霍中洋, 魏海燕, 戴其根. 钵苗类型和摆栽密度对粳型超级稻植株抗倒伏能力的影响. 扬州大学学报: 农业与生命科学版, 2016, 37(3): 87-94. |
Guo B W, Zhou X T, Cao L Q, Zhang H C, Xu K, Huo Z Y, Wei H Y, Dai Q G.Effects of different bowl types and densities on the culm lodging resistance of bowl seedling transplanting japonica super rice.J Yangzhou Univ: Agric & Life Sci Ed, 2016, 37(3): 87-94.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 左文刚, 黄顾林, 陈亚斯, 朱晓雯, 沈袁玲, 柏彦超, 单玉华, 封克. 氮肥运筹对秸秆全量还田双季稻氮产量及氮素吸收利用的影响. 扬州大学学报: 农业与生命科学版, 2017, 38(2): 75-81. |
Zuo W G, Huang G L, ChenY S, Zhu X W, Sheng Y L, Bai Y C, Shan Y H, Feng K. Effects of nitrogen management on grain yield and nitrogen use of double cropping rice system with all rice straw returned to the field.J Yangzhou Univ: Agric & Life Sci Ed, 2017, 38(2): 75-81. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 李玥, 李应洪, 赵建红, 孙永健, 徐徽, 严奉君, 谢华英, 马均. 缓控释氮肥对机插稻氮素利用特征及产量的影响. 浙江大学学报: 农业与生命科学版, 2015, 41(6): 673-684. |
Li Y, Li Y H, Zhao J H, Sun Y J, Xu H, Yan F J, Xie H Y, Ma J.Effects of slow and controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer on nitrogen utilization characteristics and yield of machine- transplanted rice.J Zhejiang Univ: Agric & Life Sci, 2015, 41(6): 673-684. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 张敬昇, 李冰, 王昌全, 向毫, 周杨洪, 尹斌, 梁靖越, 付月君. 控释氮肥与尿素掺混比例对作物中后期土壤供氮能力和稻麦产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(1): 110-118. |
Zhang J S, Li B, Wang C Q, Xiang H, Zhou Y H, Yin B, Liang J Y, Fu Y J.Effects of the blending ratio of controlled release nitrogen fertilizer and urea on soil nitrogen supply in the mid-late growing stage and yield of wheat and rice.Plant Nutr & Fert Sci, 2017, 23(1): 110-118. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 张敬昇, 李冰, 王昌全, 罗晶, 古珺, 龙思帆, 何杰, 向毫, 尹斌. 控释掺混尿素对稻麦产量及氮素利用率的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(3): 288-298. |
Zhang J S, L i B, Wang C Q, Luo J, Gu J, Long S F, He J, Xiang H, Yin B. Effects of controlled release blend bulk urea on the yield and nitrogen use efficiency of wheat and rice.Chin J Rice Sci, 2017, 31(3): 288-298. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 彭玉, 孙永健, 蒋明金, 徐徽, 秦俭, 杨致远, 马均. 不同水分条件下缓/控释氮肥对水稻干物质量和氮素吸收、运转及分配的影响. 作物学报, 2014, 40(5): 859-870. |
Peng Y, Sun Y J, Jiang M J, Xu H, Qin J, Yang Z Y, Ma J.Effects of water management and slow/controlled release nitrogen fertilizer on biomass and nitrogen accumulation, translocation, and distribution in rice.Acta Agron Sin, 2014, 40(5): 859-870. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 胡剑锋, 杨波, 周伟, 张培培, 张强, 李培程, 任万军, 杨文钰. 播种方式和播种密度对杂交籼稻机插秧节本增效的研究. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(1): 81-90. |
Hu J F, Yang B, Zhou W, Zhang P P, Zhang Q, Li P C, Ren W J, Yang W Y.Effect of seeding method and density on the benefit of mechanical transplanting in indica hybrid rice.Chin J Rice Sci, 2017, 31(1): 81-90. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 胡雅杰, 曹伟伟, 钱海军, 邢志鹏, 张洪程, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 许轲, 魏海燕, 郭保卫, 高辉, 沙安勤, 周有炎, 刘国林. 钵苗机插密度对不同穗型水稻品种产量、株型和抗倒伏能力的影响. 作物学报, 2015, 41(5): 743-757. |
Hu Y J, Cao W W, Qian H J, Xing Z P, Zhang H C, Dai Q G, Huo Z Y, Xu K, Wei H Y, Guo B W, Gao H, Sha A Q, Zhou Y Y, Liu G L.Effect of density of mechanically transplanted plot seedings on yield, plant type and lodging resistance in rice with different panicle types.Acta Agron Sin, 2015, 41(5): 743-757. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 谢小兵, 王玉梅, 黄敏, 赵春容, 陈佳娜, 曹放波, 单双吕, 周雪峰, 李志斌, 范龙, 高伟, 邹应斌. 单本密植机插对杂交稻生长和产量的影响. 作物学报, 2016, 42(6): 924-931. |
Xie X B, Wang Y M, Huang M, Zhao C R, Chen J N, Cao F B, Shan S L, Zhou X F, Li Z B, Fan L, Gao W, Zou Y B.Effect of mechanized transplanting with high hill density and single seeding per hill on growth and grain yield in hybrid rice.Acta Agron Sin, 2016, 42(6): 924-931.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 许俊伟, 孟天瑶, 荆培培, 张洪程, 李超, 戴其根, 魏海燕, 郭保卫. 机插密度对不同类型水稻抗倒伏能力及产量的影响. 作物学报, 2015, 41(11): 1767-1776. |
Xu J W, Meng T Y, Jing P P, Zhang H C, Li C, Dai Q G, Wei H Y, Guo B W.Effect of mechanical-transplanting density on lodging resistance and yield in different types of rice. Acta Agron Sin, 2015, 41(11): 1767-1776.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 孙永健, 马均, 孙园园, 杨志远, 徐徽, 熊洪, 徐富贤. 施氮量和株距对机插杂交稻结实期养分转运和产量的影响. 核农学报, 2014, 28(8): 1510-1520. |
Sun Y J, Ma J, Sun Y Y, Yang Z Y, Xu H, Xiong H, Xu F X.Effects of nitrogen application rates and plant spacing on nutrient translocation during filling stage and yield of mechanical-transplanted hybrid rice. J Nuc Agric Sci, 2014, 28(8):1510-1520.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 邓中华, 明日, 李小坤, 郑磊, 徐维明, 杨运清, 任涛, 丛日环, 鲁剑巍. 不同密度和氮肥用量对水稻产量、构成因子及氮肥利用率的影响. 土壤, 2015, 47(1): 20-25. |
Deng Z H, Ming R, Li X K, Zheng L, Xu W M, Yang Y Q, Ren T, Cong R H, Lu W J.Effects of nitrogen application rate and planting density on grain yields, yield components and nitrogen use efficiencies of rice.Soils, 2015, 47(1): 20-25. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 孙永健, 陈宇, 孙园园, 徐徽, 许远明, 刘树金, 马均. 不同施氮量和栽插密度下三角形强化栽培杂交稻抗倒伏性与群体质量的关系. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(2): 189-196. |
Sun Y J, Chen Y, Sun Y Y, Xu H, Xu M Y, Liu S J, Ma J.Relationship between culm lodging resistanceand population quality of hybrids under triangle-planted system of rice intensification at different nitrogen application ratesand planting densities.Chin J Rice Sci, 2012, 26(2): 189-196. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 王斌, 万运帆, 郭晨, 李玉娥, 秦晓波, 任涛, 赵婧. 控释尿素、稳定性尿素和配施菌剂尿素提高双季稻产量和氮素利用率的效应比较. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21(5): 1104-1112. |
Wang B, Wan Y F, Guo C, Li Y E, Qin X B, Ren T, Zhao J.A comparison of the effects of controlled release urea, stable urea and microorganisms increasing double rice yield and nitrogen use efficiency.Plant Nutr & Fert Sci, 2015, 21(5): 1104-1112. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 鲁艳红, 廖育林, 聂军, 周兴, 谢坚, 杨曾平. 紫云英与尿素或控释尿素配施对双季稻产量及氮钾利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(2): 360-368. |
Lu Y H, Liao Y L, Nie J, Zhou X, Xie J, Yang Z P.Effect of different incorporation of Chinese milk vetch coupled with urea or controlled release urea on yield and nitrogen and potassium nutrient use efficiency in double-cropping rice system.Plant Nutr & Fert Sci, 2017, 23(2): 360-368. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 王海月, 李玥, 孙永健, 李应洪, 蒋明金, 王春雨, 赵建红, 孙园园, 徐徽, 严奉君, 马均. 不同施氮水平下缓释氮肥配施对机插稻氮素利用特征及产量的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(1): 50-64. |
Wang H Y, Li Y, Sun Y J, Li Y H, Jiang M J, Wang C Y, Zhao J H, Sun Y Y, Xu H, Yan F J, Ma J.Effects of slow-release urea combined with conventional urea on characteristics of nitrogen utilization and yield in mechanical-transplanted rice under different nitrogen application rates.Chin J Rice Sci, 2017, 31(1): 50-64. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 王海月, 殷尧翥, 孙永健, 李应洪, 杨志远, 严奉君, 张绍文, 郭长春, 马均. 不同株距和缓释氮肥配施量下机插杂交稻的产量及光合特性. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(4): 843-855. |
Wang H Y, Yin Y Z, Sun Y J, Li Y H, Yang Z Y, Yan F J, ZhangG S W, Guo C C, Ma J.Yield and photosynthetic characteristics of mechanical-transplanted rice under different slow-release nitrogen fertilizer rates and plant population.Plant Nutr & Fert Sci, 2017, 23(4): 843-855.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 薛亚光, 王康君, 颜晓元, 尹斌, 刘立军, 杨建昌. 不同栽培模式对杂交粳稻常优3号产量及养分吸收利用效率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2011, 44(23): 4781-4792. |
Xue Y G, Wang K J, Yan X Y, Yin B, Liu L J, Yang J C.Effects of different cultivation patterns on grain yield and nutrient absorption and utilization efficiency of japonica hybrid rice Changyou 3.Sci Agric Sin, 2011, 44(23): 4781-4792.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 范立慧, 徐珊珊, 侯朋福, 薛利红, 李刚华, 丁艳锋, 杨林章. 不同地力下基蘖肥运筹比例对水稻产量及氮肥吸收利用的影响. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(10): 1872-1884. |
Fan L H, Xu S S, Hou P F, Xue L H, Li G H, Ding Y F, Yang L Z.Effect of different ratios of basal to tiller nitrogen on rice yield and nitrogen utilization under different soil fertility.Sci Agric Sin, 2016, 49(10): 1872-1884. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[24] | 赵锋, 程建平, 张国忠, 徐得泽, 吴建平, 吴继洪, 杨兆林. 氮肥运筹和秸秆还田对直播稻氮素利用和产量的影响. 湖北农业科学, 2011, 50(18): 3701-3704. |
Zhao F, Cheng J P, Zhang G Z, Xu D Z, Wu J P, Wu J H, Yang Z L.Effect of nitrogen fertilizer regimes and returning straw on N availability and forming yield of direct-sowing rice.Hubei Agric Sci, 2011, 50(18): 3701-3704. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[25] | 石丽红, 纪雄辉, 朱校奇, 李洪顺, 彭华, 刘昭兵. 提高超级杂交稻库容量的施氮数量和时期运筹. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(6): 1274-1281. |
Shi L H, Ji X H, Zhu X Q, Li H S, Peng H, Liu Z B.A preliminary study on optimizing nitrogen fertilization amount at different phases to enhance the storage capacity of super hybrid rice.Sci Agric Sin, 2010, 43(6): 1274-1281.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[26] | 程建平, 张旅峰, 吴建平, 柯传勇, 金卫兵, 范绍斌, 罗又红, 程磊. 播种量与氮肥运筹方式对直播早稻生物学特性和产量的影响. 湖北农业科学, 2010, 49(10): 2362-2365. |
Cheng J P, Zhang L F, Wu J P, Ke C Y, Jin W B, Fan S B, Luo Y H, Cheng L.The influence of different seeding rate and nitrogen application on yield and biological characteristics of direct seeding early rice.Hubei Agric Sci, 2010, 43(10): 2362-2365. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[27] | 程建平, 张再君, 赵锋, 汪光友, 杨如辉, 李家普, 王启均. 机械插秧密度和氮肥运筹对两优1528群体动态和产量的影响. 杂交水稻, 2011, 26(6): 69-73. |
Cheng J P, Zhang Z J, Zhao F, Wang G Y, Yang R H, Li J P, Wang Q J.Effects of planting density and nitrogen fertilizer management on population formation and yield of Liangyou 1528 under mechanized transplanting conditions.Hybrid Rice, 2011, 26(6): 69-73. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 张小翠, 戴其根, 胡星星, 朱德建, 丁秀文, 马克强, 张洪程, 朱聪聪. 不同质地土壤下缓释尿素与常规尿素配施对水稻产量及其生长发育的影响. 作物学报, 2012, 38(8): 1494-1503. |
Zhang X C, Dai Q G, Hu X X, Zhu D J, Ding X W, Ma K Q, Zhang H C, Zhu C C.Effects of slow-release urea combined with conventional urea on rice output and growth in soils of different textures. Acta Agron Sin, 2012, 38(8): 1494-1503. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[29] | 赵黎明, 李明, 郑殿峰, 顾春梅, 那永光, 解保胜. 灌溉方式与种植密度对寒地水稻产量及光合物质生产特性的影响. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(6): 159-169. |
Zhao L M, Li M, Zheng D F, Gu C M, Na Y G, Xie B S.Effects of irrigation methods and rice planting densities on yield and photosynthetic characteristics of matter production in cold area.Trans CSAE, 2015, 31(6): 159-169. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 朱懿, 江青山, 孙永健, 赵德明, 马均. 宜香1A系列组合的光合生产及产量形成特点. 杂交水稻, 2014, 29(4):68-72. |
Zhu Y, Jiang Q S, Sun Y J, Zhao D M, Ma J.Photosynthetic production and yield formation of Yixiang 1A series of combinations.Hybrid Rice, 2014, 29(4): 68-72. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | 李敏, 郭熙盛, 叶舒娅, 刘枫, 袁嫚嫚, 黄义德. 硫膜和树脂膜控释尿素对水稻产量、光合特性及氮肥利用率的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(4): 808-815. |
Li M, GUO X S, Ye S Y, Liu F, Yuan M M, Huang Y D.Effects of sulfur-and polymer-coated controlled release urea on yield,photosynthetic characteristics and nitrogen fertilizer efficiency of rice.Plant Nutr & Fert Sci, 2013, 19(4): 808-815. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] | 邢晓鸣, 李小春, 丁艳锋, 王绍华, 刘正辉, 唐设, 丁承强, 李刚华, 魏广彬. 缓控释肥组配对机插常规粳稻群体物质生产和产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2015, 48(24): 4892-4902. |
Xing X M, Li X C, Ding Y F, Wang S H, Liu Z H, Tang S, Ding C Q, Li G H, Wei G B.Effects of types of controlled released nitrogen and fertilization modes on Yield and Dry Mass Production.Sci Agric Sin, 2015, 48(24): 4892-4902. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | GUO Zhan, ZHANG Yunbo. Research Progress in Physiological,Biochemical Responses of Rice to Drought Stress and Its Molecular Regulation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 335-349. |
[2] | WEI Huanhe, MA Weiyi, ZUO Boyuan, WANG Lulu, ZHU Wang, GENG Xiaoyu, ZHANG Xiang, MENG Tianyao, CHEN Yinglong, GAO Pinglei, XU Ke, HUO Zhongyang, DAI Qigen. Research Progress in the Effect of Salinity, Drought, and Their Combined Stresses on Rice Yield and Quality Formation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 350-363. |
[3] | LÜ Zhou, YI Binghuai, CHEN Pingping, ZHOU Wenxin, TANG Wenbang, YI Zhenxie. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Transplanting Density on Yield Formation of Small Seed Hybrid Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(4): 422-436. |
[4] | ZHAO Yiting, XIE Keran, GAO Ti, CUI Kehui. Effects of Drought Priming During Tillering Stage on Panicle Development and Yield Formation Under High Temperature During Panicle Initiation Stage in Rice [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 277-289. |
[5] | ZHOU Tian, WU Shaohua, KANG Jianhong, WU Hongliang, YANG Shenglong, WANG Xingqiang, LI Yu, HUANG Yufeng. Effects of Planting Patterns on Starch Content and Activities of Key Starch Enzymes in Rice Grains [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(3): 303-315. |
[6] | LIU Huimin, ZHOU Jieqiang, HU Yuanyi, TIAN Yan, LEI Bin, LI Jianwu, WEI Zhongwei, TANG Wenbang. Super-high Yield Characteristics of Two-line Hybrid Rice Zhuoliangyou 1126 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(2): 160-171. |
[7] | PENG Xianlong, DONG Qiang, ZHANG Chen, LI Pengfei, LI Bolin, LIU Zhilei, YU Cailian. Effects of Straw Return Rate on Soil Reducing Substances and Rice Growth Under Different Soil Conditions [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(2): 198-210. |
[8] | JING Xiu, ZHOU Miao, WANG Jing, WANG Yan, WANG Wang, WANG Kai, GUO Baowei, HU Yajie, XING Zhipeng, XU Ke, ZHANG Hongcheng. Effect of Drought Stress on Root Morphology and Leaf Photosynthetic Characteristics of Good Taste japonica Rice from Late Stage of Panicle Differentiation to Early Stage of Grain Filling [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2024, 38(1): 33-47. |
[9] | ZHU Wang, ZHANG Xiang, GENG Xiaoyu, ZHANG Zhe, CHEN Yinglong, WEI Huanhe, DAI Qigen, XU Ke, ZHU Guanglong, ZHOU Guisheng, MENG Tianyao. Morphological and Physiological Characteristics of Rice Roots Under Combined Salinity-Drought Stress and Their Relationships with Yield Formation [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(6): 617-627. |
[10] | ZOU Yuao, WU Qixia, ZHOU Qianshun, ZHU Jianqiang, YAN Jun. Response of Middle-season Hybrid Rice to Flooding Stress at the Booting Stage [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(6): 642-656. |
[11] | YUAN Pei, ZHOU Xuan, YANG Wei, YIN Lingjie, JIN Tuo, PENG Jianwei, RONG Xiangmin, TIAN Chang. Effects of Combined Application of Chemical Fertilizers and Nitrogen Reduction on the Yield of Double-cropping Rice and the Risk of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loss in Field Water in Dongting Lake Area [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(5): 518-528. |
[12] | XIAO Dakang, HU Ren, HAN Tianfu, ZHANG Weifeng, HOU Jun, REN Keyu. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Consumption and Operation on Rice Yield and Its Components in China:A Meta-analysis [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(5): 529-542. |
[13] | HUANG Yaru, XU Peng, WANG Lele, HE Yizhe, WANG Hui, KE Jian, HE Haibing, WU Liquan, YOU Cuicui. Effects of Exogenous Trehalose on Grain Filling Characteristics and Yield Formation of japonica Rice Cultivar W1844 [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 379-391. |
[14] | DONG Liqiang, YANG Tiexin, LI Rui, SHANG Wenqi, MA Liang, LI Yuedong, SUI Guomin. Effect of Plant-row Spacing on Rice Yield and Root Morphological and Physiological Characteristics in Super High Yield Field [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(4): 392-404. |
[15] | WANG Wenting, MA Jiaying, LI Guangyan, FU Weimeng, LI Hubo, LIN Jie, CHEN Tingting, FENG Baohua, TAO Longxing, FU Guanfu, QIN Yebo. Effect of Different Fertilizer Application Rates on Rice Yield and Quality Formation and Its Relationship with Energy Metabolism at High Temperature [J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||