中国水稻科学 ›› 2021, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (4): 383-395.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2021.200603
黄锦文1,#, 吴珈谊1,#, 陈鸿飞1, 张志兴1, 方长旬1, 邵彩虹2, 林伟伟1, 翁佩莹1, 林文雄1,*()
收稿日期:
2020-06-04
修回日期:
2020-08-30
出版日期:
2021-07-10
发布日期:
2021-07-10
通讯作者:
林文雄
作者简介:
#共同第一作者
基金资助:
Jinwen HUANG1,#, Jiayi WU1,#, Hongfei CHEN1, Zhixing ZHANG1, Changxun FANG1, Caihong SHAO2, Weiwei LIN1, Peiying WENG1, Wenxiong LIN1,*()
Received:
2020-06-04
Revised:
2020-08-30
Online:
2021-07-10
Published:
2021-07-10
Contact:
Wenxiong LIN
About author:
#These authors contributed equally to this work
摘要:
【目的】再生稻是头季稻生长的延续。本研究尝试从根际微生态系统的变化来阐明机械化栽培下头季稻氮肥管理对头季-再生季水稻产量形成的影响,为再生稻高产高效栽培提供参考。【方法】以“甬优1540”为材料,通过2年的田间试验,在头季总施氮量(225.00 kg/hm2)不变的前提下,设置头季不同氮肥运筹处理,分析了机械化栽培下再生稻产量、根系伤流强度、根际土壤酶活性及其微生物多样性的变化特点。【结果】头季前氮后移施肥处理(N1、N2)有助于根系保持较高活力,尤其在头季生长中后期N1处理(基肥∶一次分蘖肥∶二次分蘖肥∶孕穗肥=3∶1∶2∶4)根系伤流强度比对照(N0)和当地常规施肥处理(N4)显著提高;N1处理两季总产量最高,2年平均达17 351.23 kg/hm2,比当地常规施肥处理(N4)提高了23.00%。土壤酶活性分析表明,蔗糖酶活性在头季齐穗期表现为N2>N1>N3>N4>N0,之后则表现为N1>N2>N3>N4>N0;过氧化氢酶与硝酸还原酶活性在头季生长期均表现为N1>N2>N3>N4>N0;脲酶活性从头季齐穗期至再生季齐穗始终表现为N1>N2>N3>N4>N0;各生育时期土壤酶活性与根系伤流强度间均呈显著或极显著正相关。细菌 16S rDNA 测序表明,施肥与不施肥处理细菌群落结构多样性差异显著,N1处理细菌 Chao1 指数和香农指数显著高于其他处理。菌群结构分析表明,施肥处理增加了与土壤碳氮循环、有机质含量及抗逆性密切相关的细菌数量,尤其是N1、N2处理硝化螺旋菌属相对丰度较高,有利土壤氮素循环。【结论】机械化栽培下,头季氮肥适当后移有利于再生稻根际微生态系统的改善,从而提高根系活力,促进水稻生长,获得两季水稻的高产。
黄锦文, 吴珈谊, 陈鸿飞, 张志兴, 方长旬, 邵彩虹, 林伟伟, 翁佩莹, 林文雄. 头季稻氮肥运筹对再生稻根际机能及产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(4): 383-395.
Jinwen HUANG, Jiayi WU, Hongfei CHEN, Zhixing ZHANG, Changxun FANG, Caihong SHAO, Weiwei LIN, Peiying WENG, Wenxiong LIN. Nitrogen Fertilizer Management for Main Crop Rice and Its Carrying-over Effect on Rhizosphere Function and Yield of Ratoon Rice[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2021, 35(4): 383-395.
处理 Treatment | B∶T1∶T2∶RB | 头季稻 Main crop rice | 再生稻 Ratoon rice | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | T1 | T2 | RB | BP | SP | ||||
N0 | 0:0:0:0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
N1 | 3:1:2:4 | 67.50 | 22.50 | 45.00 | 90.00 | 86.25 | 86.25 | ||
N2 | 3:2:1:4 | 67.50 | 45.00 | 22.50 | 90.00 | 86.25 | 86.25 | ||
N3 | 3:3:0:4 | 67.50 | 67.50 | 0.00 | 90.00 | 86.25 | 86.25 | ||
N4 | 4:3:0:3 | 90.00 | 67.50 | 0.00 | 67.50 | 86.25 | 86.25 |
表1 头季-再生季水稻不同施氮比例处理
Table 1 Different nitrogen fertilizer management of the main-ratoon rice. kg/hm2
处理 Treatment | B∶T1∶T2∶RB | 头季稻 Main crop rice | 再生稻 Ratoon rice | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
B | T1 | T2 | RB | BP | SP | ||||
N0 | 0:0:0:0 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
N1 | 3:1:2:4 | 67.50 | 22.50 | 45.00 | 90.00 | 86.25 | 86.25 | ||
N2 | 3:2:1:4 | 67.50 | 45.00 | 22.50 | 90.00 | 86.25 | 86.25 | ||
N3 | 3:3:0:4 | 67.50 | 67.50 | 0.00 | 90.00 | 86.25 | 86.25 | ||
N4 | 4:3:0:3 | 90.00 | 67.50 | 0.00 | 67.50 | 86.25 | 86.25 |
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 头季稻产量 Yield of main crop rice | 再生季产量 Yield of ratoon rice | 两季总产量 Total yield |
---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | N0 | 6352.65 c | 3968.36 c | 10321.01 c |
N1 | 10576.36 a | 6563.98 a | 17140.34 a | |
N2 | 9812.34 ab | 6158.74 a | 15971.08 ab | |
N3 | 9236.65 b | 5963.01 ab | 15199.66 ab | |
N4 | 8516.35 b | 5528.24 b | 14044.59 b | |
2018 | N0 | 7098.58 c | 2836.32 d | 9934.90 d |
N1 | 10458.65 a | 7103.47 a | 17562.12 a | |
N2 | 9583.21 ab | 6700.40 ab | 16283.61 ab | |
N3 | 9178.23 b | 5919.18 bc | 15097.41 bc | |
N4 | 8845.52 b | 5324.15 c | 14169.67 c | |
F值 | Y | NS | NS | NS |
F value | N | ** | ** | ** |
N×Y | NS | NS | NS |
表2 头季稻氮肥运筹对头季-再生季水稻产量的影响
Table 2 Changes of rice yield under different nitrogen application levels of the main cropping rice. kg/hm2
年份 Year | 处理 Treatment | 头季稻产量 Yield of main crop rice | 再生季产量 Yield of ratoon rice | 两季总产量 Total yield |
---|---|---|---|---|
2017 | N0 | 6352.65 c | 3968.36 c | 10321.01 c |
N1 | 10576.36 a | 6563.98 a | 17140.34 a | |
N2 | 9812.34 ab | 6158.74 a | 15971.08 ab | |
N3 | 9236.65 b | 5963.01 ab | 15199.66 ab | |
N4 | 8516.35 b | 5528.24 b | 14044.59 b | |
2018 | N0 | 7098.58 c | 2836.32 d | 9934.90 d |
N1 | 10458.65 a | 7103.47 a | 17562.12 a | |
N2 | 9583.21 ab | 6700.40 ab | 16283.61 ab | |
N3 | 9178.23 b | 5919.18 bc | 15097.41 bc | |
N4 | 8845.52 b | 5324.15 c | 14169.67 c | |
F值 | Y | NS | NS | NS |
F value | N | ** | ** | ** |
N×Y | NS | NS | NS |
稻作类型 Cropping system | 处理 Treatment | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number /(×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 No. of grains per panicle | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 理论产量 Theoretical yield /(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
头季稻 Main cropping | N0 | 194.46 c | 183.72 c | 21.33 a | 93.29 a | 7104.38 c |
N1 | 273.17 a | 207.07 a | 20.81 a | 92.84 a | 10925.65 a | |
N2 | 252.02 ab | 212.99 a | 21.05 a | 92.96 a | 10504.02 a | |
N3 | 223.57 bc | 196.71 b | 21.35 a | 94.50 a | 8864.32 b | |
N4 | 226.23 bc | 189.20 c | 21.47 a | 93.68 a | 8593.92 b | |
再生稻 Ratoon cropping | N0 | 234.66 c | 95.96 b | 21.34 a | 74.94 c | 3675.70 d |
N1 | 346.98 a | 111.43 a | 21.23 a | 80.71 ab | 6565.22 a | |
N2 | 325.16 ab | 113.26 a | 21.17 a | 83.20 a | 6423.46 ab | |
N3 | 310.44 b | 108.66 ab | 21.44 a | 79.63 bc | 5699.54 bc | |
N4 | 297.58 b | 103.32 ab | 21.28 a | 82.69 a | 5350.69 c |
表3 头季-再生季水稻产量及产量构成因素变化(2年平均值)
Table 3 Grain yield and its components of main cropping and its ratoon rice.
稻作类型 Cropping system | 处理 Treatment | 有效穗数 Effective panicle number /(×104·hm-2) | 每穗粒数 No. of grains per panicle | 千粒重 1000-grain weight/g | 结实率 Seed setting rate/% | 理论产量 Theoretical yield /(kg·hm-2) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
头季稻 Main cropping | N0 | 194.46 c | 183.72 c | 21.33 a | 93.29 a | 7104.38 c |
N1 | 273.17 a | 207.07 a | 20.81 a | 92.84 a | 10925.65 a | |
N2 | 252.02 ab | 212.99 a | 21.05 a | 92.96 a | 10504.02 a | |
N3 | 223.57 bc | 196.71 b | 21.35 a | 94.50 a | 8864.32 b | |
N4 | 226.23 bc | 189.20 c | 21.47 a | 93.68 a | 8593.92 b | |
再生稻 Ratoon cropping | N0 | 234.66 c | 95.96 b | 21.34 a | 74.94 c | 3675.70 d |
N1 | 346.98 a | 111.43 a | 21.23 a | 80.71 ab | 6565.22 a | |
N2 | 325.16 ab | 113.26 a | 21.17 a | 83.20 a | 6423.46 ab | |
N3 | 310.44 b | 108.66 ab | 21.44 a | 79.63 bc | 5699.54 bc | |
N4 | 297.58 b | 103.32 ab | 21.28 a | 82.69 a | 5350.69 c |
相关因素 Correlative factor | 根系伤流强度 Root bleeding intensity | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
头季齐穗期 Full heading stage of main crop | 头季成熟期 Ripening stage of main crop | 再生季齐穗期 Full heading stage of ratoon rice | 再生季成熟期 Ripening stage of ratoon rice | |
有效穗数Number of productive panicles | 0.8705** | 0.8789** | 0.6712** | 0.6977** |
每穗粒数Number of spikelet per panicle | 0.3786 | 0.4912 | 0.1752 | 0.5793* |
结实率Seed setting rate | 0.2888 | 0.3533 | 0.3841 | 0.4579 |
千粒重1000-grain weight | 0.3668 | 0.3049 | 0.2369 | 0.0464 |
产量Grain yield | 0.8669** | 0.9651** | 0.6682** | 0.8395** |
表4 水稻根系伤流强度与再生季产量及其构成因素的相关性
Table 4 Analysis of correlation between root bleeding intensity and grain yield and its components.
相关因素 Correlative factor | 根系伤流强度 Root bleeding intensity | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
头季齐穗期 Full heading stage of main crop | 头季成熟期 Ripening stage of main crop | 再生季齐穗期 Full heading stage of ratoon rice | 再生季成熟期 Ripening stage of ratoon rice | |
有效穗数Number of productive panicles | 0.8705** | 0.8789** | 0.6712** | 0.6977** |
每穗粒数Number of spikelet per panicle | 0.3786 | 0.4912 | 0.1752 | 0.5793* |
结实率Seed setting rate | 0.2888 | 0.3533 | 0.3841 | 0.4579 |
千粒重1000-grain weight | 0.3668 | 0.3049 | 0.2369 | 0.0464 |
产量Grain yield | 0.8669** | 0.9651** | 0.6682** | 0.8395** |
测定指标 Item | 处理 Treatment | 生育时期Stage of growth | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
头季齐穗期 Full heading stage of main crop | 头季成熟期 Ripening stage of main crop | 再生季齐穗期 Full heading stage of ratoon rice | 再生季成熟期 Ripening stage of ratoon rice | ||
蔗糖酶活性 Sucrase activity /(mg·kg-1d-1) | N0 | 12.95 e | 1.04 d | 5.87 d | 3.23 c |
N1 | 32.61 b | 7.15 a | 11.61 a | 7.48 a | |
N2 | 35.11 a | 3.37 b | 10.84 ab | 4.29 b | |
N3 | 18.92 c | 2.22 c | 9.95 b | 4.93 b | |
N4 | 14.83 d | 1.82 c | 7.46 c | 5.10 b | |
过氧化氢酶活性 Hydrogen peroxidase activity /(mL·g-1) | N0 | 1.29 d | 1.19 c | 1.33 b | 1.16 b |
N1 | 1.78 a | 1.57 a | 1.60 a | 1.40 a | |
N2 | 1.72 ab | 1.54 a | 1.60 a | 1.37 a | |
N3 | 1.64 bc | 1.41 b | 1.57 a | 1.35 a | |
N4 | 1.55 c | 1.32 bc | 1.52 a | 1.34 a | |
脲酶 Urease activity /(μg·g-1d-1) | N0 | 209.24 d | 168.87 c | 152.27 d | 125.11 b |
N1 | 393.72 a | 235.20 a | 263.19 a | 179.82 a | |
N2 | 375.15 a | 227.52 a | 249.72 ab | 170.45 a | |
N3 | 343.38 b | 198.88 b | 220.24 b | 168.44 a | |
N4 | 311.29 c | 188.56 b | 219.70 c | 160.45 a | |
硝酸还原酶 Nitrate reductase activity /(μg·g-1d-1) | N0 | 6.40 d | 3.51 d | 3.84 b | 1.59 b |
N1 | 10.37 a | 7.50 a | 8.27 a | 4.36 a | |
N2 | 9.85 ab | 6.91 ab | 7.84 a | 4.41 a | |
N3 | 8.60 bc | 6.07 b | 7.37 a | 4.31 a | |
N4 | 7.19 cd | 5.65 c | 7.33 a | 4.17 a |
表5 根际土壤酶活性随水稻生育时期变化情况
Table 5 Changes of enzymatic activities in rhizosphere soil during rice growth period.
测定指标 Item | 处理 Treatment | 生育时期Stage of growth | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
头季齐穗期 Full heading stage of main crop | 头季成熟期 Ripening stage of main crop | 再生季齐穗期 Full heading stage of ratoon rice | 再生季成熟期 Ripening stage of ratoon rice | ||
蔗糖酶活性 Sucrase activity /(mg·kg-1d-1) | N0 | 12.95 e | 1.04 d | 5.87 d | 3.23 c |
N1 | 32.61 b | 7.15 a | 11.61 a | 7.48 a | |
N2 | 35.11 a | 3.37 b | 10.84 ab | 4.29 b | |
N3 | 18.92 c | 2.22 c | 9.95 b | 4.93 b | |
N4 | 14.83 d | 1.82 c | 7.46 c | 5.10 b | |
过氧化氢酶活性 Hydrogen peroxidase activity /(mL·g-1) | N0 | 1.29 d | 1.19 c | 1.33 b | 1.16 b |
N1 | 1.78 a | 1.57 a | 1.60 a | 1.40 a | |
N2 | 1.72 ab | 1.54 a | 1.60 a | 1.37 a | |
N3 | 1.64 bc | 1.41 b | 1.57 a | 1.35 a | |
N4 | 1.55 c | 1.32 bc | 1.52 a | 1.34 a | |
脲酶 Urease activity /(μg·g-1d-1) | N0 | 209.24 d | 168.87 c | 152.27 d | 125.11 b |
N1 | 393.72 a | 235.20 a | 263.19 a | 179.82 a | |
N2 | 375.15 a | 227.52 a | 249.72 ab | 170.45 a | |
N3 | 343.38 b | 198.88 b | 220.24 b | 168.44 a | |
N4 | 311.29 c | 188.56 b | 219.70 c | 160.45 a | |
硝酸还原酶 Nitrate reductase activity /(μg·g-1d-1) | N0 | 6.40 d | 3.51 d | 3.84 b | 1.59 b |
N1 | 10.37 a | 7.50 a | 8.27 a | 4.36 a | |
N2 | 9.85 ab | 6.91 ab | 7.84 a | 4.41 a | |
N3 | 8.60 bc | 6.07 b | 7.37 a | 4.31 a | |
N4 | 7.19 cd | 5.65 c | 7.33 a | 4.17 a |
相关因素 Correlative factors | 根系伤流强度Root bleeding intensity | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
头季齐穗期 Full heading stage of main crop | 头季成熟期 Ripening stage of main crop | 再生季齐穗期 Full heading stage of ratoon rice | 再生季成熟期 Ripening stage of ratoon rice | |
蔗糖酶活性Sucrase activity | 0.8263** | 0.7572** | 0.8096** | 0.6776** |
过氧化氢酶活性Hydrogen peroxidase activity | 0.9077** | 0.9012** | 0.8023** | 0.7778** |
脲酶Urease activity | 0.8817** | 0.8999** | 0.8299** | 0.8073** |
硝酸还原酶Nitrate reductase activity | 0.8843** | 0.9272** | 0.6319* | 0.7565** |
表6 根系伤流强度与土壤酶活性的相关性分析
Table 6 Analysis of correlation between root bleeding intensity and soil enzyme activities.
相关因素 Correlative factors | 根系伤流强度Root bleeding intensity | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
头季齐穗期 Full heading stage of main crop | 头季成熟期 Ripening stage of main crop | 再生季齐穗期 Full heading stage of ratoon rice | 再生季成熟期 Ripening stage of ratoon rice | |
蔗糖酶活性Sucrase activity | 0.8263** | 0.7572** | 0.8096** | 0.6776** |
过氧化氢酶活性Hydrogen peroxidase activity | 0.9077** | 0.9012** | 0.8023** | 0.7778** |
脲酶Urease activity | 0.8817** | 0.8999** | 0.8299** | 0.8073** |
硝酸还原酶Nitrate reductase activity | 0.8843** | 0.9272** | 0.6319* | 0.7565** |
处理 Treatment | 丰富度指数 Chao1 | 测序深度指数 Coverage/% | 多样性指数 Observed_species | 谱系多样性指数PD_whole_tree | 多样性指数 Shannon index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N0 | 2360.54 c | 95.99 a | 1806.17 a | 153.99 c | 8.9740 b |
N1 | 2573.01 a | 95.79 a | 1831.97 a | 158.68 a | 9.1347 a |
N2 | 2485.21 ab | 95.93 a | 1787.54 a | 157.97 ab | 9.0994 ab |
N3 | 2387.45 bc | 96.15 a | 1780.33 a | 155.56 bc | 9.0424 ab |
N4 | 2412.10 bc | 96.06 a | 1783.77 a | 155.03 c | 9.0004 b |
表7 头季水稻生长后期根际土壤细菌群落多样性指数
Table 7 Diversity index of bacterial community in rhizosphere soil at the late stage of main rice.
处理 Treatment | 丰富度指数 Chao1 | 测序深度指数 Coverage/% | 多样性指数 Observed_species | 谱系多样性指数PD_whole_tree | 多样性指数 Shannon index |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
N0 | 2360.54 c | 95.99 a | 1806.17 a | 153.99 c | 8.9740 b |
N1 | 2573.01 a | 95.79 a | 1831.97 a | 158.68 a | 9.1347 a |
N2 | 2485.21 ab | 95.93 a | 1787.54 a | 157.97 ab | 9.0994 ab |
N3 | 2387.45 bc | 96.15 a | 1780.33 a | 155.56 bc | 9.0424 ab |
N4 | 2412.10 bc | 96.06 a | 1783.77 a | 155.03 c | 9.0004 b |
图3 头季稻生长后期根际土壤细菌韦恩图圆圈相交部分表示共有微生物数目,非相交部分表示特有微生物数目
Fig. 3. Venn graph of bacterial OTUs in rhizosphere soil at the late stage of main rice. The intersecting part of the circles represents the number of common microorganisms, and the non-intersecting part represents the number of specific microorganisms.
图5 头季水稻生长后期根际土壤主要细菌相对丰度变化A–门水平差异;B–纲水平差异;C–属水平差异。
Fig. 5. Changes in the relative abundance of main bacteria in the rhizosphere soil at the late growth stage of main crop rice. A, Phylum level; B, Class level; C, Genus level.
属编号 Genus number | 微生物相对丰度Microbial relative abundance/% | 属名 Generic name | 功能 Function | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N0 | N1 | N2 | N3 | N4 | |||
OTU_12 | 0.6884 | 0.8200 | 0.8715 | 1.0069 | 0.9402 | 红假单胞菌属Rhodopseudomonas | 固氮作用Nitrogen fixation |
OTU_20 | 0.2081 | 0.3250 | 0.3108 | 0.2937 | 0.2822 | 硝化螺旋菌属Nitrospira | 硝化作用Nitrification |
OTU_192 | 0.0458 | 0.0744 | 0.0591 | 0.0915 | 0.1163 | 罗氏菌属Rothia | 还原硝酸盐Reduced nitrate |
OTU_40 | 0.3013 | 0.3432 | 0.3341 | 0.3757 | 0.3700 | 土壤杆菌属Agrobacterium | 改善土壤质地Improve soil texture |
OTU_143 | 0.1812 | 0.3375 | 0.3299 | 0.2918 | 0.2212 | 酸杆菌菌属Acidobacteria | 有机质Organic matter |
OTU_199 | 0.0782 | 0.2002 | 0.1850 | 0.2498 | 0.3833 | 黏细菌属Myxobacteria | 抗逆性Resistance |
OTU_472 | 0.0667 | 0.0362 | 0.0114 | 0.0191 | 0.0286 | 厌氧绳菌属Anaerolineae | 降解碳水化合物Degraded carbohydrates |
OTU_106 | 0.2155 | 0.1602 | 0.1621 | 0.1316 | 0.1744 | 假双头斧形菌属Pseudolabrys | 耐药性Drug resistance |
OTU_298 | 0.1564 | 0.0629 | 0.0191 | 0.0420 | 0.0515 | 嘉利翁氏铁柄杆菌Gallionella | 浓缩和积累铁素Concentrate and accumulate iron |
表8 头季水稻生长后期根际土壤中主要功能菌及其相对丰度
Table 8 Main functional bacteria in rhizosphere soil and their relative abundance at the late growth stage of main crop rice.
属编号 Genus number | 微生物相对丰度Microbial relative abundance/% | 属名 Generic name | 功能 Function | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N0 | N1 | N2 | N3 | N4 | |||
OTU_12 | 0.6884 | 0.8200 | 0.8715 | 1.0069 | 0.9402 | 红假单胞菌属Rhodopseudomonas | 固氮作用Nitrogen fixation |
OTU_20 | 0.2081 | 0.3250 | 0.3108 | 0.2937 | 0.2822 | 硝化螺旋菌属Nitrospira | 硝化作用Nitrification |
OTU_192 | 0.0458 | 0.0744 | 0.0591 | 0.0915 | 0.1163 | 罗氏菌属Rothia | 还原硝酸盐Reduced nitrate |
OTU_40 | 0.3013 | 0.3432 | 0.3341 | 0.3757 | 0.3700 | 土壤杆菌属Agrobacterium | 改善土壤质地Improve soil texture |
OTU_143 | 0.1812 | 0.3375 | 0.3299 | 0.2918 | 0.2212 | 酸杆菌菌属Acidobacteria | 有机质Organic matter |
OTU_199 | 0.0782 | 0.2002 | 0.1850 | 0.2498 | 0.3833 | 黏细菌属Myxobacteria | 抗逆性Resistance |
OTU_472 | 0.0667 | 0.0362 | 0.0114 | 0.0191 | 0.0286 | 厌氧绳菌属Anaerolineae | 降解碳水化合物Degraded carbohydrates |
OTU_106 | 0.2155 | 0.1602 | 0.1621 | 0.1316 | 0.1744 | 假双头斧形菌属Pseudolabrys | 耐药性Drug resistance |
OTU_298 | 0.1564 | 0.0629 | 0.0191 | 0.0420 | 0.0515 | 嘉利翁氏铁柄杆菌Gallionella | 浓缩和积累铁素Concentrate and accumulate iron |
[1] | 林文雄, 陈鸿飞, 张志兴, 徐倩华, 屠乃美, 方长旬, 任万军. 再生稻产量形成的生理生态特性与关键栽培技术的研究与展望[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2015, 23(4): 392-401. |
Lin W X, Chen H F, Zhang Z X, Xu Q H, Tu N M, Fang C X, Ren W J.Research and prospect on physio-ecological properties of ratoon rice yield formation and its key cultivation technology[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2015, 23(4): 392-401. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 施能浦, 焦世纯. 中国再生稻栽培[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1999. |
Shi N P, Jiao S C.Ratooning rice cultivation in China. Beijin: China Agriculture Press, 1999. (in Chinese) | |
[3] | 林文, 李义珍, 姜照伟, 郑景生. 再生稻根系形态和机能的品种间差异及与产量的关联性[J]. 福建农业学报, 2001, 16(1): 1-4. |
Lin W, Li Y Z, Jiang Z W, Zheng J S.Morphologic and functional difference of root systems among ratooning rice varieties and its correlation with yield[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2001, 16(1): 1-4. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 林文, 张上守, 姜照伟, 郑景生, 李义珍.再生稻产量与根系机能的相关性[J].福建稻麦科技, 2001, 19(4): 9-11. |
Lin W, Zhang S S, Jiang Z W, Zheng J S, Li Y Z.Correlation between yield and root function of ratooning rice[J]. Fujian Science and Technology of Rice and Wheat, 2001, 19(4): 9-11. (in Chinese) | |
[5] | 郑景生, 林文, 卓传营, 方宣钧, 林文雄. 再生稻根干物质量及根系活力与产量的相关性研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2004, 12(4): 106-109. |
Zheng J S, Lin W, Zhuo C Y, Fang X J, Lin W X.The correlation of dry biomass and activity of root system with grain yield in raton rice(Oryza sativa L)[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2004, 12(4): 106-109. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 张林, 郭晓艺, 刘茂, 熊洪, 朱永川, 周兴兵, 徐富贤. 杂交中稻再生芽生长的影响因素研究[J]. 西南农业学报, 2010, 23(2): 309-314. |
Zhang L, Guo X Y, Liu M, Xiong H, Zhu Y C, Zhou X B, Xu F X.Factors for promoting rationing bud growth of mid-season hybrid rice[J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 23(2): 309-314. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 饶鸣钿, 陈少庭, 郑履端, 廖朝阳. 头季稻栽培因素对两优2186再生稻产量的影响[J]. 河南职业技术师范学院学报, 2002, 30(4): 12-15. |
Rao M D, Chen S T, Zheng L D, Liao C Y.The effect of cultural factor of first seasonal rice to yield in ratoon rice of Liangyou 2186[J]. Journal of Henan Vocation- Technical Teachers College, 2002, 30(4), 12-15. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 陈鸿飞, 杨东, 梁义元, 张志兴, 梁康迳, 林文雄. 头季稻氮肥运筹对再生稻干物质积累、产量及氮素利用率的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2010, 18(1): 50-56. |
Chen H F, Yang D, Liang Y Y, Zhang Z X, Liang K J, Lin W X.Effect of nitrogen application strategy in the first cropping rice on dry matter accumulation, grain yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency of the first cropping rice and its ratoon rice crop[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco- Agriculture, 2010, 18(1), 50-56. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 杨东, 陈鸿飞, 卓传营, 林文雄. 头季不同施氮方式对再生稻生理生化的影响[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2009, 17(4): 643-646. |
Yang D, Chen H F, Zhuo C Y, Lin W X.Effect of different N application modes in the first cropping rice on the physiobiochemistry of the first cropping rice and its ratoon rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2009, 17(4), 643-646.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 杨东. 再生稻不同施氮方式的增产效应研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2007. |
Yang D.Study on the effect of different nitrogen application methods on increasing yield of ratooning rice[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2007. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 王森, 莫菁华, 汪洋, 游秋香, 任涛, 丛日环, 李小坤. 水稻-再生稻体系干物质积累及氮磷钾养分的吸收利用[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(1): 67-77. |
Wang S, Mo J H, Wang Y, You Q X, Ren T, Cong R H, Li X K.Dry matter accumulation and N, P, K absorption and utilization in rice-ratoon rice system[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2018, 32(1): 67-77. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | 郑景生, 林文雄, 李义珍, 姜照伟, 卓传营. 再生稻头季不同施氮水平的双季氮素吸收及产量效应研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2004, 12(3): 78-82. |
Zheng J S, Lin W X, Li Y Z, Jiang Z W, Zhuo C Y.Nitrogen uptake and grain yield effects of double-cropping rice at different nitrogen application rates in the first crop of ratoon rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture. 2004, 12(3): 78-82. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[13] | 任天举, 李经勇, 唐永群, 邹亚兰. 15N示踪研究再生稻施用氮肥的吸收分配和效应[J]. 西南师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2009, 34(3): 132-136. |
Ren T J, Li J Y, Tang Y Q, Zou Y L.15N Tracer study ratooning rice applied nitrogen absorption, assignment and effect[J]. Journal of Southwest China Normal University: Natural Science Edition. 2009, 34(3): 132-136. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 林燕, 邓学东, 李泽林. 促芽肥施用时间与施肥量对再生稻的影响[J]. 农技服务, 2015, 32(4): 93-94. |
Lin Y, Deng X D, Li Z L.Effects of application time and dosage of shoot-promoting fertilizer on regenerated rice[J]. Agricultural Technical Services, 2015, 32(4): 93-94. (in Chinese). | |
[15] | 王森. 水稻—再生稻体系养分需求特性及氮肥合理运筹初探[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2017. |
Wang S.Characteristics of nutrient requirements and reasonable management of nitrogen fertilizer in rice-ratoon rice system[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2017. (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[16] | 于林惠. 对机插水稻生育特点及管理对策的初步探讨[J]. 中国农机化, 2002 (1): 29-31. |
Yu L H.Preliminary discussion on the growth characteristics and management measures of machine- transplanted rice[J]. Chinese Agricultural Mechanization, 2002, 1: 29-31. (in Chinese) | |
[17] | 徐红, 李成, 于凤翠, 唐钧, 徐晓青, 唐玮, 马卉. 机插水稻生育特性及高产配套技术[J]. 安徽农学通报, 2011, 17(23): 150-151. |
Xu H, Li C, Yu F C, Tang J, Xu X Q, Tang W, Ma H.Growth characteristics of machine-transplanted rice and its high yield cultivation technique[J]. Anhui Agriculture Science Bulletin, 2011, 17(23):150-151. (in Chinese) | |
[18] | 茅弼华, 王和平, 王志林. 机插水稻的生育特性和有关农艺技术[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2006, 3: 27-30. |
Mao B H, Wang H P, Wang Z L.Growth characteristics and related agronomic techniques of machine- transplanted rice[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2006, 3: 27-30. (in Chinese) | |
[19] | 兰陆寿. 机插水稻生育特性及栽培技术[J]. 现代农业科技, 2011, 18: 56-57. |
Lan L S.Growth characteristics of machine-transplanted rice and its cultivation technique[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2011, 18: 56-57. (in Chinese) | |
[20] | Zhang R, Jorge M Vivanco, Shen Q.The unseen rhizosphere root-soil-microbe interactions for crop production[J]. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 2017, 37: 8-14. DOI: 10.1016/ j.mib. 2017. 03. 008 |
[21] | 李鸿波, 吴朝晖. 水稻根际微生物的影响因素研究进展[J]. 杂交水稻, 2018, 33(4): 1-6, 54. |
Li H B, Wu Z H.Research progress on factors influencing rhizosphere microorganisms of rice[J]. Hybrid Rice, 2018, 33(4): 1-6, 54. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 王孝林, 王二涛. 根际微生物促进水稻氮利用的机制[J]. 植物学报 2019, 54(3): 285-287. |
Wang X L, Wang E T.NRT1.1B connects root microbiota and nitrogen use in rice[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2019, 54(3): 285-287. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000. |
Li H S.Principles and techniques of plant physiology and biochemistry experiments[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000. | |
[24] | 关松荫, 张德生, 张志明. 土壤酶及其研究方法[M]. 北京: 农业出版社, 1986. |
Guan S Y, Zhang D S, Zhang Z M.Soil enzymes and its research methods[M]. Beijing: Agricultural Press, 1986. | |
[25] | Alef K, Nannipieri P.Methods in applied soil microbiology and biochemistry[M]. New York: Academic Press, 1995. |
[26] | Wang Y, Sheng H F, He Y, Wu J Y, Jiang Y X, Tam N F, Zhou H W. Comparison of the levels of bacterial diversity in fresh water, intertidal wetland, and marine sediments by using millions of illumina tags.Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2012, 78(23): 8264. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01821-12. |
[27] | 张晶, 林先贵, 尹睿. 参与土壤氮素循环的微生物功能基因多样性研究进展[J]. 中国农业生态学报: 2009, 17(5), 1029-1034. |
Zhang J, Lin X G, Yin R.Advances in functional gene diversity of microorganism in relation to soil nitrogen cycling[J]. Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture, 2009, 17(5), 1029-1034. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[28] | 中国科学院微生物研究所《伯杰细菌鉴定手册》翻译组译. 伯杰细菌鉴定手册(第八版)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1984. |
Translation team of Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology (Eighth edition)[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 1984. | |
[29] | 林超峰, 龚骏. 嗜中性微好氧铁氧化菌研究进展[J]. 生态学报, 2012, 32(18): 5889-5899. |
Lin C F, Gong J.Recent progress in research on neutrophilic, microaerophilic iron(II) -oxidizing bacteria[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2012, 32(18): 5889-5899. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 刘富贵, 王学栋, 吴跃进. 再生稻根系栽培生理初探[J]. 安徽农业科学, 1990(2): 105-109. |
Liu F G, Wang X D, Wu Y J.A preliminary study on the root culture physiology of ratoon rice[J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 1990(2): 105-109. (in Chinese) | |
[31] | 潘晓华, 王永锐, 傅家瑞. 水稻根系生长生理的研究进展[J]. 植物学通报, 1996, 13(2): 13-20. |
Pan X H, Wang Y R, Fu J R.Advance in the study on the growth-physiology in rice of root system(Oryza sativa)[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 1996, 13(2): 13-20. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] | 邱莉萍, 刘军, 王益权, 孙慧敏, 和文祥. 土壤酶活性与土壤肥力的关系研究[J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2004, 10(3): 277-280. |
Qiu L P, Liu J, Wang Y Q, Sun H M, He W X.Research on relationship between soil enzyme activities and soil fertility[J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science, 2004, 10(3): 277-280. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[33] | 陈军, 黄珊瑜, 刘冰, 吴林坤, 林文雄. 不同氮肥运筹对水稻根际土壤理化性质及代谢物质的影响[J]. 福建农业学报, 2015, 30(11): 1082-1089. |
Chen J, Huang S Y, Liu B, Wu L K, Lin W X.Effects of different nitrogen regimes on soil physico-chemical properties and metabolites in rice rhizosphere[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 30(11): 1082-1089. (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[34] | 陈龙怀. 氮肥运筹调控下水稻根际土壤生物学特性分析[D]. 福州:福建农林大学, 2012. |
Chen L H.Biological characteristics of rice rhizosphere soil under the control of nitrogen fertilizer application[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2012. (in Chinese with English abstract). | |
[35] | 张玉, 秦华东, 黄敏, 江立庚, 徐世宏. 氮肥运筹对免耕水稻根系生长、根际土壤特性及产量的影响[J]. 广西植物, 2014, 34(5): 681-685. |
Zhang Y, Qin H D, Huang M, Jiang L G, Xu S H.Effect of different nitrogen application modes on root growth,rhizosphere soil characteristics and rice yield under no-tillage[J]. Guihaia, 2014, 34(5): 681-685. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[36] | 张福锁, 王激清, 张卫峰, 崔振岭, 马文奇, 陈新平, 江荣风.中国主要粮食作物肥料利用率现状与提高途径[J]. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(5): 915-924. |
Zhang F S, Wang J Q, Zhang W F, Cui Z L, Ma W Q, Chen X P, Jiang R F.Nutrient use efficiencies of major cereal crops in China and measures for improvement[J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2008, 45(5): 915-924. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[37] | Men S, Ding F, Zhang H, Ke C, Zhang S, Huang Z.Effects of Nano-carbon humic acid water-retaining fertilizer on citrus growth and the soil bacterial community in citrus field[J]. Meteorological and Environmental Research, 2018, 9(6): 84-89. |
[38] | Zhang Q, Li Y, He Y, Liu H, Dumont M G, Brookes P, Xu J.Nitrosospira cluster 3-like bacterial ammonia oxidizers and Nitrospira-like nitrite oxidizers dominate nitrification activity in acidic terrace paddy soils[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. soilbio.2019.01.006 |
[39] | Han S, Zeng L, Luo X, Xiong X, Wen S, Wang B, Chen W, Huang Q.Shifts in Nitrobacter- and Nitrospira-like nitrite-oxidizing bacterial communities under long-term fertilization practices[J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2018, 124: 118-125. |
[40] | Jin S, Chen Z, Li Y, Xia T, Ren Z, Yin L.Study on endophytic bacteria diversity in the root of peperomia dindygulensis Miq. by applying clone library construction method[J]. Medicinal Plant, 2017, 8(6): 13-16. |
[41] | Li H, Chi Z, Yan B.Long-term impacts of graphene oxide and Ag nanoparticles on anammox process:Performance, microbial community and toxic mechanism.Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2019, 79(5): 239-247. |
[1] | 高欠清, 任孝俭, 翟中兵, 郑普兵, 吴源芬, 崔克辉. 头季穗肥和促芽肥对再生稻再生芽生长及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 405-414. |
[2] | 黄锦文, 李日坤, 陈志诚, 张汴泓, 雷涵, 潘睿欣, 杨铭榆, 潘美清, 唐莉娜. 不同稻草还田技术对烟-稻轮作系统土壤养分、有机碳及微生物多样性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 415-426. |
[3] | 王敏羽, 戴志刚, 余德芳, 王向平, 关绍华, 邵远刚, 张家学, 李小坤. “水稻-再生稻”种植模式专用肥轻简施用对产量、肥料利用率及经济效益的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(5): 531-542. |
[4] | 黄奇娜, 江苏, 汪利民, 张燕, 俞林飞, 李春福, 丁利群, 邵国胜. 低温胁迫后水分对水稻幼苗根系活力和水孔蛋白相关基因表达的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(4): 367-376. |
[5] | 蒋艳方, 陈基旺, 崔璨, 王晓玉, 陈平平, 周文新, 易镇邪. 杂交稻头季与再生季镉积累分配特性差异研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(1): 55-64. |
[6] | 杨晨, 郑常, 袁珅, 徐乐, 彭少兵. 再生稻肥料管理对不同品种产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(1): 65-76. |
[7] | 武云霞, 郭长春, 孙永健, 刘芳艳, 杨志远, 孙园园, 王明田, 马均. 水氮互作下直播稻结实期冠层小气候与米质的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(3): 269-278. |
[8] | 汪浩, 刘祥臣, 张强, 余贵龙, 张文地, 黄健, 朱安, 刘立军. 豫南地区头季和再生季水稻产量与品质差异分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(5): 425-434. |
[9] | 汪浩, 张强, 张文地, 李思宇, 黄健, 朱安, 刘立军. 腋芽萌发能力对再生稻产量影响的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(3): 205-216. |
[10] | 彭志芸, 向开宏, 杨志远, 唐源, 谌洁, 张宇杰, 何艳, 严田蓉, 孙永健, 马均. 麦/油-稻轮作下秸秆还田与氮肥管理对直播杂交稻氮素利用特征的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(1): 57-68. |
[11] | 晏军, 吴启侠, 朱建强, 张露萍. 适雨灌溉下氮肥运筹对水稻光合特性、氮素吸收及产量形成的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(4): 347-356. |
[12] | 解振兴, 张居念, 林祁, 刘锋, 张初长, 卓芳梅, 姜照伟, 卓传营. 植物生长调节剂对再生稻头季抗倒伏能力和两季产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(2): 158-166. |
[13] | 何爱斌, 于朋超, 陈乾, 姜广磊, 王慰亲, 聂立孝. 甬优4949和超优1000在华中地区再生稻种植的氮肥运筹研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(1): 47-56. |
[14] | 王森, 莫菁华, 汪洋, 游秋香, 任涛, 丛日环, 李小坤. 水稻-再生稻体系干物质积累及氮磷钾养分的吸收利用[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(1): 67-77. |
[15] | 段门俊, 田玉聪, 吴芸紫, 金涛, 陈阜, 刘章勇. 叶面喷施亚硒酸钠对再生稻产量及品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(1): 96-102. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||