中国水稻科学 ›› 2020, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (2): 181-190.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2020.9089
• 研究报告 • 上一篇
廖莎1,2, 谭雪明1, 李木英1,*(), 胡凯1, 潘晓华1, 石庆华1
收稿日期:
2019-08-06
修回日期:
2019-09-23
出版日期:
2020-03-10
发布日期:
2020-03-10
通讯作者:
李木英
基金资助:
Sha LIAO1,2, Xueming TAN1, Muying LI1,*(), Kai HU1, Xiaohua PAN1, Qinghua SHI1
Received:
2019-08-06
Revised:
2019-09-23
Online:
2020-03-10
Published:
2020-03-10
Contact:
Muying LI
摘要:
【目的】筛选出机插水稻基质育秧芸薹素内酯(BR)适宜的施用方法及最佳用量。【方法】以中早39为供试材料,采用稻草基质旱育秧方式,探究BR不同处理方式和浓度对机插早稻秧苗生理特性及栽后生长的影响。【结果】施用BR可以提高秧苗的抗氧化保护酶活性,降低丙二醛含量,增加可溶性蛋白含量、总糖含量及C/N,秧苗根系活力提高了13.24%~48.31%,利于形成抗性强的健壮秧苗;喷施方式对提高秧苗超氧化物歧化酶、过氧化物酶、过氧化氢酶活性效果最佳,基施方式对降低秧苗丙二醛含量效果最好。施用适量BR也可促进秧苗机插后长出新叶、新根及返青,喷施方式效果最好;浸种、喷施方式还能增强秧苗机插后20~30 d的单株分蘖力。【结论】播种前和出苗后进行两次适量的BR处理,有利形成壮苗和栽后活棵返青及分蘖,以播前0.15 mg/L浸种和秧苗1叶1心期0.10 mg/L喷施效果为好。
中图分类号:
廖莎, 谭雪明, 李木英, 胡凯, 潘晓华, 石庆华. 芸薹素内酯对稻草基质育秧水稻秧苗生理特性及栽后生长的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(2): 181-190.
Sha LIAO, Xueming TAN, Muying LI, Kai HU, Xiaohua PAN, Qinghua SHI. Effects of Brassinolide on Physiological Characteristics and Growth of Straw Substrate-cultured Rice Seedlings After Transplanting[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2020, 34(2): 181-190.
处理方式 Treatment | 浓度 Concentration/(mg·L-1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
浸种Seed soaking(J) | 0 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.20 |
喷施Spraying(P) | 0 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.20 |
基施Basal application(B) | 0 | 0.20 | 0.40 | 0.60 |
表1 芸薹素内酯试验处理
Table 1 Brassinolide experiment design.
处理方式 Treatment | 浓度 Concentration/(mg·L-1) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
浸种Seed soaking(J) | 0 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.20 |
喷施Spraying(P) | 0 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.20 |
基施Basal application(B) | 0 | 0.20 | 0.40 | 0.60 |
图1 不同芸薹素内酯处理对秧苗根系活力的影响图中横坐标字母J、P、B分别表示浸种、喷施、基施处理,字母下标数字表示相应处理浓度(mg/L)。不同小、大写字母表示相同处理方式不同浓度间差异分别达邓肯氏新复极差测验5%、1%显著水平(下同)。
Fig. 1. Effect of diverse brassinollide (BR) treatments on root vigor of rice seedlings. In the figure, J, P and B below the horizontal coordinates represent seed soaking, spraying and basal application of BR, respectively, and the subscript numbers represent the corresponding treatment concentration(mg/L). Common lowercase and uppercase letters indicate that the difference between different concentrations is not significant at the 0.05 and 0.01 levels by Duncan’s test (the same below).
处理 Treatment | 全氮含量 Total nitrogen content /(mg·g-1) | 可溶性糖含量 Soluble sugar content /(mg·g-1) | 淀粉含量 Starch content /(mg·g-1) | 总糖含量 Total sugar content /(mg·g-1) | C/N |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
J0.00 | 41.77±0.00 aA | 12.70±0.44 bB | 27.97±0.21 cC | 40.67±0.23 dD | 0.97±0.01 cC |
J0.10 | 30.30±0.14 dD | 14.83±0.53 aA | 32.81±0.07 bB | 47.64±0.59 aA | 1.57±0.02 aA |
J0.15 | 36.47±0.23 bB | 12.44±0.06 bB | 33.53±0.17 aA | 45.97±0.11 bB | 1.26±0.01 bB |
J0.20 | 35.17±0.57 cC | 10.97±0.06 cC | 33.82±0.03 aA | 44.79±0.03 cC | 1.27±0.02 bB |
P0.00 | 41.77±0.00 aA | 12.70±0.44 cC | 27.97±0.21 bB | 40.67±0.23 cB | 0.97±0.01 cB |
P0.10 | 39.68±0.44 bB | 14.69±0.06 aA | 29.33±0.66 aA | 42.02±0.59 aA | 1.11±0.02 aA |
P0.15 | 38.61±0.54 cC | 13.54±0.23 bB | 28.19±0.12 bB | 41.73±0.35 bB | 1.08±0.02 bA |
P0.20 | 39.47±0.40 bB | 13.69±0.20 bB | 24.07±0.04 cC | 37.76±0.24 dC | 0.96±0.01 cB |
B0.00 | 41.77±0.00 bB | 12.70±0.44 dD | 27.97±0.21 dD | 40.67±0.23 dD | 0.97±0.01 cC |
B0.20 | 38.55±0.03 cC | 14.60±0.37 cC | 39.58±0.44 aA | 54.18±0.57 aA | 1.41±0.02 aA |
B0.40 | 44.56±0.28 aA | 15.70±0.44 bB | 36.49±0.47 bB | 52.19±0.03 bB | 1.17±0.01 bB |
B0.60 | 41.97±0.44 bB | 17.87±0.39 aA | 31.10±0.37 cC | 48.97±0.28 cC | 1.17±0.02 bB |
表2 不同芸薹素内酯处理对秧苗碳氮含量的影响
Table 2 Effect of diverse brassinollide treatments on carbon and nitrogen contents of seedlings.
处理 Treatment | 全氮含量 Total nitrogen content /(mg·g-1) | 可溶性糖含量 Soluble sugar content /(mg·g-1) | 淀粉含量 Starch content /(mg·g-1) | 总糖含量 Total sugar content /(mg·g-1) | C/N |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
J0.00 | 41.77±0.00 aA | 12.70±0.44 bB | 27.97±0.21 cC | 40.67±0.23 dD | 0.97±0.01 cC |
J0.10 | 30.30±0.14 dD | 14.83±0.53 aA | 32.81±0.07 bB | 47.64±0.59 aA | 1.57±0.02 aA |
J0.15 | 36.47±0.23 bB | 12.44±0.06 bB | 33.53±0.17 aA | 45.97±0.11 bB | 1.26±0.01 bB |
J0.20 | 35.17±0.57 cC | 10.97±0.06 cC | 33.82±0.03 aA | 44.79±0.03 cC | 1.27±0.02 bB |
P0.00 | 41.77±0.00 aA | 12.70±0.44 cC | 27.97±0.21 bB | 40.67±0.23 cB | 0.97±0.01 cB |
P0.10 | 39.68±0.44 bB | 14.69±0.06 aA | 29.33±0.66 aA | 42.02±0.59 aA | 1.11±0.02 aA |
P0.15 | 38.61±0.54 cC | 13.54±0.23 bB | 28.19±0.12 bB | 41.73±0.35 bB | 1.08±0.02 bA |
P0.20 | 39.47±0.40 bB | 13.69±0.20 bB | 24.07±0.04 cC | 37.76±0.24 dC | 0.96±0.01 cB |
B0.00 | 41.77±0.00 bB | 12.70±0.44 dD | 27.97±0.21 dD | 40.67±0.23 dD | 0.97±0.01 cC |
B0.20 | 38.55±0.03 cC | 14.60±0.37 cC | 39.58±0.44 aA | 54.18±0.57 aA | 1.41±0.02 aA |
B0.40 | 44.56±0.28 aA | 15.70±0.44 bB | 36.49±0.47 bB | 52.19±0.03 bB | 1.17±0.01 bB |
B0.60 | 41.97±0.44 bB | 17.87±0.39 aA | 31.10±0.37 cC | 48.97±0.28 cC | 1.17±0.02 bB |
处理 Treatment | 漏插率 Turnover seedling rate/% | 漂秧率 Floating seedling rate/% | 伤秧率 Damaged seedling rate/% | 死苗率 Dead seedling rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
J0.00 | 5.0±0.8 aA | 4.3±0.9 aA | 3.3±0.5 aA | 0.7±0.5 aA |
J0.10 | 4.7±0.5 aAB | 3.0±0.8 abA | 2.7±0.5 aA | 0.7±0.5 aA |
J0.15 | 4.3±0.5 aAB | 3.3±0.5 abA | 2.3±0.5 aA | 0.0±0.0 bA |
J0.20 | 2.3±0.5 bB | 2.0±0.8 bA | 3.3±0.5 aA | 1.0±0.0 aA |
P0.00 | 5.0±0.8 aA | 4.3±0.9 aA | 3.3±0.5 aA | 0.7±0.5 aA |
P0.10 | 3.3±0.5 aA | 1.7±0.9 bB | 1.0±0.0 bB | 0.3±0.5 aA |
P0.15 | 4.0±0.8 aA | 2.3±0.5 bAB | 2.7±0.5 aAB | 0.3±0.5 aA |
P0.20 | 4.0±0.8 aA | 1.3±0.5 bB | 2.3±0.4 abAB | 0.0±0.0 aA |
B0.00 | 5.0±0.8 aA | 4.3±0.9 aA | 3.3±0.5 aA | 0.7±0.5 aA |
B0.20 | 4.3±0.5 abA | 1.3±0.5 bB | 0.3±0.5 cB | 0.0±0.0 bA |
B0.40 | 2.7±0.8 bA | 2.3±0.5 bAB | 2.3±0.5 bA | 0.0±0.0 bA |
B0.60 | 4.7±0.5 aA | 1.7±0.5 bB | 2.7±0.5 abA | 0.0±0.0 bA |
表3 不同芸薹素内酯处理对秧苗机插质量的影响
Table 3 Effect of diverse brassinollide treatments on the quality of machine-transplanted seedlings.
处理 Treatment | 漏插率 Turnover seedling rate/% | 漂秧率 Floating seedling rate/% | 伤秧率 Damaged seedling rate/% | 死苗率 Dead seedling rate/% |
---|---|---|---|---|
J0.00 | 5.0±0.8 aA | 4.3±0.9 aA | 3.3±0.5 aA | 0.7±0.5 aA |
J0.10 | 4.7±0.5 aAB | 3.0±0.8 abA | 2.7±0.5 aA | 0.7±0.5 aA |
J0.15 | 4.3±0.5 aAB | 3.3±0.5 abA | 2.3±0.5 aA | 0.0±0.0 bA |
J0.20 | 2.3±0.5 bB | 2.0±0.8 bA | 3.3±0.5 aA | 1.0±0.0 aA |
P0.00 | 5.0±0.8 aA | 4.3±0.9 aA | 3.3±0.5 aA | 0.7±0.5 aA |
P0.10 | 3.3±0.5 aA | 1.7±0.9 bB | 1.0±0.0 bB | 0.3±0.5 aA |
P0.15 | 4.0±0.8 aA | 2.3±0.5 bAB | 2.7±0.5 aAB | 0.3±0.5 aA |
P0.20 | 4.0±0.8 aA | 1.3±0.5 bB | 2.3±0.4 abAB | 0.0±0.0 aA |
B0.00 | 5.0±0.8 aA | 4.3±0.9 aA | 3.3±0.5 aA | 0.7±0.5 aA |
B0.20 | 4.3±0.5 abA | 1.3±0.5 bB | 0.3±0.5 cB | 0.0±0.0 bA |
B0.40 | 2.7±0.8 bA | 2.3±0.5 bAB | 2.3±0.5 bA | 0.0±0.0 bA |
B0.60 | 4.7±0.5 aA | 1.7±0.5 bB | 2.7±0.5 abA | 0.0±0.0 bA |
图5 不同芸薹素内酯处理对机插后秧苗出叶的影响图中多重比较是在同一时期相同处理不同浓度间进行的比较(下同)。
Fig. 5. Effect of diverse brassinollide treatments on leaves emergence of seedlings after transplanting. The multiple comparisons in the figure were conducted between different concentrations of the same treatment during the same period(the same below).
[1] | 章玲芬, 张建民, 孙健. 早稻机插秧不同育秧土试验[J]. 福建农业科技, 2013(5): 57-59. |
Zhang L F, Zhang J M, Sun J.Test of different soils for nursing mechanically transplanted seedlings[J]. Fujian Agricultural Science and Technology, 2013(5): 57-59. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[2] | 胡润, 王佳佳, 秦叶波, 王子民, 欧阳由男. 连作晚稻无土基质育秧机插效果[J]. 中国稻米, 2013(4): 103-105. |
Hu Y, Wang J J, Qin Y B, Wang Z M, Ou Y Y N. Effect of soil-free matrix after machine transplantation of late rice[J]. China Rice, 2013(4): 103-105. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | 何永红, 缪斌. 不同秧土对水稻盘育秧苗素质的影响初报[J]. 上海农业科技, 2012(5): 45. |
He Y H, Miao B.The influence of different soil on the quality of rice plate seedlings[J]. Shanghai Agricultural Science and Technology, 2012(5): 45. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[4] | 沈建辉, 曹卫星, 朱庆森, 薛艳凤, 景启坚. 不同育秧方式对水稻机插秧苗素质的影响[J]. 南京农业大学学报, 2003(3): 7-9. |
Shen J H, Cao W X, Zhu Q S, Xue Y F, Jing Q J.Effects of different seedling raising methods on rice seedling quality by mechanical transplanting[J]. Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University, 2003(3): 7-9. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[5] | 张国良, 周青, 韩国路, 王其传, 吴秀琴. 三种育秧方式对水稻机插秧苗素质的影响[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2005(1): 19-20. |
Zhang G L, Zhou Q, Han G L, Wang Q C, Wu X Q.The effect of three ways on the quality of rice transplanting seedlings[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Science, 2005(1): 19-20.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 龙瑞平, 邓安凤, 刘冲发, 祁春,夏琼梅, 李贵勇, 杨从党. 播种量对机插稻产量和生物学特性的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2013(4): 109-110. |
Long R P, Deng A F, Liu C F, Qi C, Xia Q M, Li G Y, Yang C D.Effects of sowing amount on yield and biological characteristics of mulched rice[J]. China Rice, 2013(4): 109-110. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | 张卫星, 朱德峰, 林贤青, 徐一成, 林兴军, 陈惠哲, 张玉屏. 不同播量及育秧基质对机插水稻秧苗素质的影响[J]. 扬州大学学报: 农业与生命科学版, 2007(1): 45-48. |
Zhang W X, Zhu D F, Lin X Q, Xu Y C, Lin X J, Chen H Z, Zhang Y P.The sffects of different sowing densities and raising materials on seedling quality of mechanical transplanting rice[J]. Journal of Yangzhou University: Agricultural and Life Science Edition, 2007(1): 45-48. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[8] | 王强盛. 水稻旱育秧壮苗生理及肥水管理[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2000: 88. |
Wang Q S.Physiology and management of fertitlizer and water of rice seedlings under dryland nursery[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2000: 88. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | 高德泉, 刘英灿. 水稻苗期常见危害[J]. 农业开发与装备, 2012(6): 170-171. |
Gao D Q, Liu Y C.Common hazards in rice seedling stage[J]. Agricultural Development & Equipments, 2012(6): 170-171. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[10] | 童裕丰, 叶培根, 周书君. 水稻机械育插秧技术[M]. 北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2009. |
Tong Y F, Ye P G, Zhou S J.Technology of Mechanical Cultivation and Transplanting of Rice[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2009. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | 吴一梅, 张洪程. 秧龄对机插水稻秧苗素质及产量的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2009(1): 36-38. |
Wu Y M,Zhang J C.Effects of seedling age on seedling quality and yield of machine-inserted rice[J]. China Rice, 2009(1): 36-38. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[12] | Huang H M, Wu M J, Wang N, Liu X H, Jin F Y, Cao C X.Effects of SSA dosages on seedling quality and yield by mechanical transplanting[J] Agricultural Science & Technology, 2013, 14(10): 1429-1431. |
[13] | 樊继伟, 秦德荣, 方兆伟, 卢百关, 陈庭木, 李健, 迟铭, 徐大勇. 多效唑对不同类型水稻秧苗素质及其产量的影响[J]. 农业科技通讯, 2009(5): 37-38. |
Fan J W, Qin D R, Fang Z W, Lu B G, Chen T M, Li J, Chi M, Xu D Y.Effects of polytriazole on seedling quality and yield of different types of rice[J]. Bulletin of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2009(5): 37-38. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[14] | 孙振令, 张红雨. 芸薹素内酯的研究进展及其在农业生产中的应用[J]. 淄博学院学报: 自然科学与工程版, 2001(2): 80-83. |
Sun Z L, Zhang H Y.Research progress of brassinolide and its application in agricultural production[J]. Journal of Zibo University: Natural Science and Engineering Edition, 2001(2): 80-83. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[15] | 陈秀, 方朝阳. 植物生长调节剂芸薹素内酯在农业上的应用现状及前景[J]. 世界农药, 2015(2): 34-36. |
Chen X, Fang C Y.Application status and prospect of brassinolide in agriculture[J]. World Pesticides, 2015(2): 34-36. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[16] | 谭雪明, 胡凯, 李木英, 廖莎, 潘晓华, 石庆华. 稻草基质的制备处理对水稻秧苗生长的影响[J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(16): 1-6. |
Tang X M, Hu K, Li M Y, Liao S, Pan X H, Shi Q H.Effect of preparation treatment of rice straw substrate on rice seedling growth[J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(16): 1-6. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[17] | 廖莎, 谭雪明, 李木英, 胡凯, 潘晓华, 石庆华. 稻草基质育秧不同水分管理对水稻秧苗生长的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2017, 23(4): 71-74. |
Liao S, Tang X M, Li M Y, Hu K, Pan X H, Shi Q H.Effects of different water management on seedling growth of rice in straw substrates[J]. China Rice, 2017, 23(4): 71-74. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[18] | 朱宁, 谭雪明, 李木英, 潘晓华, 石庆华. 稻草基质育秧不同有机肥处理对水稻秧苗生长的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2018, 40(2): 286-294. |
Zhu N, Tang X M, Li M Y, Pan X H, Shi Q H.Effects of different organic fertilizers on growth of rice seedlings raised in straw substrates[J]. Acta Agricultural Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2018, 40(2): 286-294. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[19] | 谭雪明, 胡凯, 李木英, 廖莎, 潘晓华, 石庆华. 稻草基质育秧的氮肥管理对水稻秧苗素质的影响[J]. 杂交水稻, 2018, 33(3): 59-63. |
Tang X M, Hu K, Li M Y, Liao S, Pan X H, Shi Q H.Effects of nitrogen fertiliers management on seedling quality in raising seedling with rice straw sybstrate[J]. Hybrid Rice, 2018, 33(3): 59-63. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[20] | 黄再萍. 芸薹素内酯复配制剂的开发与应用[J]. 江西农业大学, 2013: 38. |
Huang Z P.Development and application of brassinolide mixture preparation[J]. Jiangxi Agricultural University, 2013: 38. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[21] | 季建刚, 夏孝勤. 芸薹素内酯对稻谷根芽长度及发芽率的影响[J]. 现代农业科技, 2013(10): 130-136. |
Ji J G,Xia X Q.Effect of brassinolide on root bud length and germination rate of rice[J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2013(10): 130-136. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[22] | 廖莎, 谭雪明, 李木英, 胡凯, 潘晓华, 石庆华. 稻草基质育秧不同芸薹素内酯处理对水稻秧苗生长的影响[J]. 江西农业大学学报, 2017, 39(5): 851-858. |
Liao S, Tang X M, Li M Y, Hu K, Pan X H, Shi Q H.Effects of different treatments of brassinolide on seedling growth of rice in straw substrates[J]. Acta Agricultural Universitatis Jiangxiensis, 2017, 39(5): 851-858. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[23] | 张志良, 瞿伟菁. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2003. |
Zhang Z L, Qu W J.Plant Physiology Experiment Guide[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2003. (in Chinese) | |
[24] | 李合生. 植物生理生化实验原理与技术[M]. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2000: 167-169. |
Li H S.Principles and Techniques of Plant Physiological and Biochemical Experiments[M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press, 2000: 167-169. (in Chinese) | |
[25] | 陈建勋, 王晓峰. 植物生理学模块实验指导[M]. 广州: 华南理工大学出版社, 2002: 120-123. |
Chen J X, Wang X F.Plant Physiology Module Experiment Guide[M]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology Press, 2002: 120-123. (in Chinese) | |
[26] | 李玲. 植物生理学模块实验指导[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009: 95-97. |
Li L.Plant Physiology Module Experiment Guide[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2009: 95-97. (in Chinese) | |
[27] | 赵世杰. 植物生理学实验指导[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2004: 26-34. |
Zhao S J.Plant Physiology Experiment Guide[M]. Beijing: China Agricultural Science and Technology Press, 2004: 26-34. (in Chinese) | |
[28] | Shouichi Y, Douglas A F, James H C, Kwanchai A G.Laboratory Manual for Physiological Studies of Rice. Philippines: International Rice Research Institution, 1976. |
[29] | 侯雷平, 李梅兰. 油菜素内酯(BR)促进植物生长机理研究进展[J]. 植物学通报, 2001(5): 560-566. |
Huo L P, Li M L.Progress of studies on the plant growth promoting mechanism of brassinolide (BR)[J]. Chinese Bulletin of Botany, 2001(5): 560-566. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 李生. 不同育秧方式和壮秧剂对水稻生长生理的影响[D]. 南京: 广西大学, 2013: 73. |
Li S.Growth and physiology effects of rice under the seedling strenthen agent and seedling breeding ways[D]. Nanjing: Guangxi University, 2013: 73. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | 杨舒贻, 陈晓阳, 惠文凯, 任颖, 马玲. 逆境胁迫下植物抗氧化酶系统响应研究进展[J]. 福建农林大学学报: 自然科学版, 2016, 45(5): 481-489. |
Yang S Y, Chen X Y, Hui W K, Ren Y, Ma L.Progress in responses of antioxidant enzyme systems in plant to environmental stresses[J]. Journal of Fujuang Agriculture and Forestry University: Natural Scicence Edition, 2016, 45(5): 481-489. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[32] | 黄穗华, 罗昊文, 黄兴革, 范平珊, 孔雷蕾, 钟卓君, 唐湘如. 药剂拌种对直播稻秧苗生长和生理特性的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018(2): 171-176. |
Huang S H, Luo H W, Huang X G, Fan P S, Kong L L, Zhong Z R, Tang X R.Effects of seeds dressing agent on morphology and biochemical characteristics of direct-sowing rice seedling[J]. Crops, 2018(2): 171-176. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[33] | 韩休海, 王涛, 侯国强. 水稻育插秧机械化技术研究[J]. 农机化研究, 2009(11): 250-252. |
Han X H,Wang T, Huo G Q.Study on mechanization technology of rice transplanting[J]. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization Research, 2009(11): 250-252. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[34] | 陈晔. 机插水稻返青至分蘖期的栽培措施[J]. 黑龙江农业科学, 2006(4): 103. |
Chen Y.Gultivation measurernt of grow paddy rice from the green period to the lillering period by farm machines[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Scicence, 2006(4): 103. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[35] | 凌励. 机插水稻分蘖发生特点及配套高产栽培技术改进的研究[J]. 江苏农业科学, 2005(3): 14-19. |
Ling L.Study on the characteristics of tiller production and improvement of high yield cultivation techniques in machine-inserted rice[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Scicence, 2005(3): 14-19. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[36] | 韩正光, 韩国华, 于秀梅, 吕元荣, 王登宇. 机插水稻分蘖发生特点及其成穗规律研究[J]. 上海农业科技, 2003(5): 24-25. |
Han Z G, Han G H,Yu X M, Lv Y R,Wang D Y.Study on the characteristics of tiller production and panicle formation in machine-inserted rice[J]. Shanghai Agricultural Science and Technology, 2003(5): 24-25. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 董立强, 杨铁鑫, 李睿, 商文奇, 马亮, 李跃东, 隋国民. 株行距配置对超高产田水稻产量及根系形态生理特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 392-404. |
[2] | 徐青山, 黄晶, 孙爱军, 洪小智, 朱练峰, 曹小闯, 孔亚丽, 金千瑜, 朱春权, 张均华. 低温影响水稻发育机理及调控途径研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(2): 118-130. |
[3] | 唐先干, 谢金水, 徐昌旭, 刘佳, 袁福生, 刘光荣, 李祖章. 红壤性稻田紫云英与化肥减施对早稻品质与养分吸收的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(5): 466-474. |
[4] | 柳开楼, 韩天富, 李文军, 余喜初, 胡志华, 叶会财, 胡丹丹, 宋惠洁, 李大明, 黄庆海. 紫云英不同翻压年限下驱动水稻产量变化的土壤理化因子 分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(3): 291-302. |
[5] | 王文霞, 陈丽明, 王海霞, 刘有清, 吴自明, 曾勇军, 谭雪明, 潘晓华, 石庆华, 曾研华. 淹水缓解直播早籼稻苗期低温冷害的生理特性研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(2): 166-176. |
[6] | 杨晓龙, 程建平, 汪本福, 李阳, 张枝盛, 李进兰, 李萍. 灌浆期干旱胁迫对水稻生理性状和产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(1): 38-46. |
[7] | 张玉屏, 王军可, 王亚梁, 陈燕华, 朱德峰, 陈惠哲, 向镜, 张义凯, 刘小军, 朱艳, 曹卫星. 水稻淀粉合成对夜温变化的响应[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(6): 525-538. |
[8] | 李可, 禹晴, 徐云姬, 杨建昌. 水稻叶片早衰突变体的农艺与生理性状研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(2): 104-114. |
[9] | 陈苏, 谢建坤, 黄文新, 陈登云, 彭晓剑, 付学琴. 根际促生细菌对干旱胁迫下水稻生理特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(5): 485-492. |
[10] | 朱宽宇1 展明飞1 陈静1 王志琴1 杨建昌1 赵步洪2,*. 不同氮肥水平下结实期灌溉方式对水稻弱势粒灌浆及产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(2): 155-168. |
[11] | 朱宽宇, 展明飞, 陈静, 王志琴, 杨建昌, 赵步洪. 不同氮肥水平下结实期灌溉方式对水稻弱势粒灌浆及产量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 1(1): 155-168. |
[12] | 戴冬青, 张华丽, 张萌, 李西明, 马良勇. 长江流域主要常规双季早籼稻的遗传相似性分析及指纹图谱构建[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(1): 40-49. |
[13] | 李应洪, 王海月, 严奉君, 李娜, 孙永健, 代邹, 谢华英, 马均. 剪根处理对不同秧龄杂交稻幼苗生长及生理特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(6): 626-636. |
[14] | 兰旭, 顾正栋, 丁艳菲, 王珂, 江琼, 朱诚. 花期高温胁迫对水稻颖花生理特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(6): 637-646. |
[15] | 姬静华, 霍治国, 唐力生, 杜尧东, 胡飞. 早稻灌浆期淹水对剑叶理化特性及产量和品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(2): 181-192. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||