中国水稻科学 ›› 2018, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (3): 207-218.DOI: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2018.7120
• 研究报告 • 下一篇
周梦玉, 宋昕蔚, 徐静, 付雪, 李婷, 朱雨晨, 肖幸运, 毛一剑, 曾大力, 胡江, 朱丽, 任德勇, 高振宇, 郭龙彪, 钱前, 吴明国, 林建荣*(), 张光恒*()
收稿日期:
2017-09-27
修回日期:
2018-01-23
出版日期:
2018-05-10
发布日期:
2018-05-10
通讯作者:
林建荣,张光恒
基金资助:
Mengyu ZHOU, Xinwei SONG, Jing XU, Xue FU, Ting LI, Yuchen ZHU, Xingyun XIAO, Yijian MAO, Dali ZENG, Jiang HU, Li ZHU, Deyong REN, Zhenyu GAO, Longbiao GUO, Qian QIAN, Mingguo WU, Jianrong LIN*(), Guangheng ZHANG*()
Received:
2017-09-27
Revised:
2018-01-23
Online:
2018-05-10
Published:
2018-05-10
Contact:
Jianrong LIN, Guangheng ZHANG
摘要:
【目的】本研究旨在挖掘水稻粒型新基因、探索其分子机理,解析籽粒发育调控遗传网络奠定基础,并为通过分子标记聚合有利基因开展超级稻分子设计育种提供理论依据。【方法】以植株和籽粒形态差异较大的晚粳稻品种春江16B(CJ16B)和广亲和中籼稻背景恢复系C84为亲本构建含有188个家系的重组自交系为作图群体,利用158对在双亲中存在多态性差异的分子标记,构建了遗传连锁图谱,总遗传距离为1428.40cM,平均标记间距为9.04cM。在构建遗传图谱的基础上,完成RIL188个株系籽粒的粒长、粒宽、粒厚、长宽比和千粒重等5个性状考查并进行QTL定位。【结果】在海南陵水和浙江杭州两地共检测到籽粒相关主效QTL30个,包括籽粒QTL新座位18个,解释遗传变异3.51%~17.25%。其中粒长、粒宽、粒厚和长宽比QTL位点分别为9个、5个、5个和6个,千粒重QTL位点5个。经基因座位比对,发现有5个QTL区间与已克隆的调控籽粒形态相关基因座位相近,我们通过对双亲目标基因的测序并根据差异位点设计dCAPs分子标记进行验证。【结论】该RIL群体及其遗传图谱可用于水稻重要农艺性状主效QTL基因的定位和克隆,新定位的18个粒型QTL可以为水稻籽粒发育调控网络提供补充和资料积累。
中图分类号:
周梦玉, 宋昕蔚, 徐静, 付雪, 李婷, 朱雨晨, 肖幸运, 毛一剑, 曾大力, 胡江, 朱丽, 任德勇, 高振宇, 郭龙彪, 钱前, 吴明国, 林建荣, 张光恒. 籼稻C84和粳稻春江16B重组自交系遗传图谱构建及籽粒性状QTL定位与验证[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(3): 207-218.
Mengyu ZHOU, Xinwei SONG, Jing XU, Xue FU, Ting LI, Yuchen ZHU, Xingyun XIAO, Yijian MAO, Dali ZENG, Jiang HU, Li ZHU, Deyong REN, Zhenyu GAO, Longbiao GUO, Qian QIAN, Mingguo WU, Jianrong LIN, Guangheng ZHANG. Construction of Genetic Map andMapping andVerification of Grain TraitsQTLs Using Recombinant Inbred LinesDerived from a Cross BetweenindicaC84 andjaponicaCJ16B[J]. Chinese Journal OF Rice Science, 2018, 32(3): 207-218.
性状 Trait | 地点 Site | 亲本Parent | 重组自交系群体RIL population | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C84 | 春江16BCJ16B | 平均Mean | 范围Range | ||||
粒长 Grain length / mm | 杭州 Hangzhou | 8.2±0.2 | 7.4±0.2** | 7.74 | 6.4~9.0 | ||
陵水Lingshui | 7.8±0.1 | 7.0±0.1** | 7.56 | 6.5~8.7 | |||
粒宽Grain width / mm | 杭州 Hangzhou | 2.9±0.1 | 3.2±0.0** | 3.11 | 2.6~3.8 | ||
陵水Lingshui | 3.1±0.1 | 3.2±0.1* | 3.22 | 2.6~3.7 | |||
粒厚Grain thickness / mm | 杭州 Hangzhou | 1.98±0.01 | 2.26±0.04** | 2.06 | 1.79~2.38 | ||
陵水Lingshui | 2.03±0.04 | 2.28±0.04** | 2.08 | 1.75~2.34 | |||
长宽比Lengthtowidth ratio | 杭州 Hangzhou | 2.8±0.1 | 2.3±0.1* | 2.52 | 2.0~3.4 | ||
陵水Lingshui | 2.5±0.3 | 2.2±0.1** | 2.37 | 1.9~3.0 | |||
千粒重1000-grain weight / g | 杭州 Hangzhou | 23.7±0.4 | 25.1±0.3* | 22.17 | 13.8~33.2 | ||
陵水Lingshui | 24.1±0.1 | 25.2±0.1* | 22.98 | 13.3~30.8 |
表1 双亲(C84和春江16B)及其RIL群体2016年在杭州和陵水的粒长、粒宽、粒厚、长宽比及千粒重
Table 1 Grain length, width, thickness, length-to-width ratio and 1000-grain weight inC84 and CJ16Band their recombinant inbred line population in Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province and Lingshui, Hainan Province, China in 2016.
性状 Trait | 地点 Site | 亲本Parent | 重组自交系群体RIL population | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C84 | 春江16BCJ16B | 平均Mean | 范围Range | ||||
粒长 Grain length / mm | 杭州 Hangzhou | 8.2±0.2 | 7.4±0.2** | 7.74 | 6.4~9.0 | ||
陵水Lingshui | 7.8±0.1 | 7.0±0.1** | 7.56 | 6.5~8.7 | |||
粒宽Grain width / mm | 杭州 Hangzhou | 2.9±0.1 | 3.2±0.0** | 3.11 | 2.6~3.8 | ||
陵水Lingshui | 3.1±0.1 | 3.2±0.1* | 3.22 | 2.6~3.7 | |||
粒厚Grain thickness / mm | 杭州 Hangzhou | 1.98±0.01 | 2.26±0.04** | 2.06 | 1.79~2.38 | ||
陵水Lingshui | 2.03±0.04 | 2.28±0.04** | 2.08 | 1.75~2.34 | |||
长宽比Lengthtowidth ratio | 杭州 Hangzhou | 2.8±0.1 | 2.3±0.1* | 2.52 | 2.0~3.4 | ||
陵水Lingshui | 2.5±0.3 | 2.2±0.1** | 2.37 | 1.9~3.0 | |||
千粒重1000-grain weight / g | 杭州 Hangzhou | 23.7±0.4 | 25.1±0.3* | 22.17 | 13.8~33.2 | ||
陵水Lingshui | 24.1±0.1 | 25.2±0.1* | 22.98 | 13.3~30.8 |
地点Site 性状Trait | HZ-GL | HZ-GW | HZ-GT | HZ-LWR | HZ-TGW | LS-GL | LS-GW | LS-GT | LS-LWR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
杭州 | 粒宽 GW | –0.104** | ||||||||
Hangzhou | 粒厚 GT | 0.073** | 0.396** | |||||||
(HZ) | 长宽比LWR | 0.672** | –0.801** | –0.248** | ||||||
千粒重TGW | 0.441** | 0.443** | 0.404** | –0.066** | ||||||
陵水 | 粒长 GL | 0.809** | ||||||||
Lingshui | 粒宽 GW | 0.817** | –0.016** | |||||||
(LS) | 粒厚 GT | 0.270** | 0.117** | 0.164** | ||||||
长宽比LWR | 0.854** | 0.660** | –0.758** | –0.030** | ||||||
千粒重 TGW | 0.529** | 0.438** | 0.508** | 0.287** | –0.094** |
表2 C84/CJ16B重组自交系群体粒型性状间相关性分析
Table 2 Correlationship analysis on grain shape traits in C84/CJ16B recombinant inbred lines.
地点Site 性状Trait | HZ-GL | HZ-GW | HZ-GT | HZ-LWR | HZ-TGW | LS-GL | LS-GW | LS-GT | LS-LWR | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
杭州 | 粒宽 GW | –0.104** | ||||||||
Hangzhou | 粒厚 GT | 0.073** | 0.396** | |||||||
(HZ) | 长宽比LWR | 0.672** | –0.801** | –0.248** | ||||||
千粒重TGW | 0.441** | 0.443** | 0.404** | –0.066** | ||||||
陵水 | 粒长 GL | 0.809** | ||||||||
Lingshui | 粒宽 GW | 0.817** | –0.016** | |||||||
(LS) | 粒厚 GT | 0.270** | 0.117** | 0.164** | ||||||
长宽比LWR | 0.854** | 0.660** | –0.758** | –0.030** | ||||||
千粒重 TGW | 0.529** | 0.438** | 0.508** | 0.287** | –0.094** |
染色体 Chromosome | 物理距离 Physical distance/Mb | 遗传距离 Genetic distance /cM | 平均物理距离 Mean physical distance /Mb | 平均遗传距离 Mean genetic distance /cM | 标记数 Number of markers |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 46.15 | 192.8 | 2.71 | 11.34 | 17 |
2 | 35.93 | 128.0 | 2.57 | 9.14 | 14 |
3 | 36.41 | 145.9 | 2.28 | 9.12 | 16 |
4 | 35.28 | 148.5 | 1.96 | 8.25 | 18 |
5 | 29.89 | 106.9 | 1.99 | 7.13 | 15 |
6 | 31.25 | 104.8 | 2.84 | 9.53 | 11 |
7 | 29.69 | 128.5 | 2.12 | 9.18 | 14 |
8 | 28.44 | 107.2 | 2.59 | 9.75 | 11 |
9 | 23.01 | 77.5 | 2.30 | 7.75 | 10 |
10 | 23.13 | 72.5 | 2.57 | 8.06 | 9 |
11 | 28.51 | 115.5 | 2.38 | 9.63 | 12 |
12 | 27.49 | 100.3 | 2.50 | 9.12 | 11 |
合计 Total | 375.18 | 1428.4 | 2.40 | 9.04 | 158 |
表3 本研究所用的标记在水稻12条染色体上分布
Table 3 Distribution of the markers used in the study on 12chromosomes of rice.
染色体 Chromosome | 物理距离 Physical distance/Mb | 遗传距离 Genetic distance /cM | 平均物理距离 Mean physical distance /Mb | 平均遗传距离 Mean genetic distance /cM | 标记数 Number of markers |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 46.15 | 192.8 | 2.71 | 11.34 | 17 |
2 | 35.93 | 128.0 | 2.57 | 9.14 | 14 |
3 | 36.41 | 145.9 | 2.28 | 9.12 | 16 |
4 | 35.28 | 148.5 | 1.96 | 8.25 | 18 |
5 | 29.89 | 106.9 | 1.99 | 7.13 | 15 |
6 | 31.25 | 104.8 | 2.84 | 9.53 | 11 |
7 | 29.69 | 128.5 | 2.12 | 9.18 | 14 |
8 | 28.44 | 107.2 | 2.59 | 9.75 | 11 |
9 | 23.01 | 77.5 | 2.30 | 7.75 | 10 |
10 | 23.13 | 72.5 | 2.57 | 8.06 | 9 |
11 | 28.51 | 115.5 | 2.38 | 9.63 | 12 |
12 | 27.49 | 100.3 | 2.50 | 9.12 | 11 |
合计 Total | 375.18 | 1428.4 | 2.40 | 9.04 | 158 |
性状 Trait | QTL | 标记区间 Marker interval | 位置 Position | 加性效应 Additive effect | 贡献率 EPV/% | 已克隆基因 Genecloned | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HZ | LS | HZ | LS | HZ | LS | |||||||||||
粒长 | qGL1 | RM3252 | –RM1247 | 2.0 | 0.0925 | 5.75 | ||||||||||
Grain length | qGL2.1 | H2-2 | –H2-3 | 28.1 | –0.1539 | 9.01 | FUWA | |||||||||
qGL2.2 | H2-5 | –H2-6 | 39.8 | –0.0804 | 7.05 | |||||||||||
qGL5 | M17954R | –H5-7 | 32.5 | –0.1272 | 7.52 | JMJ703;SRS3/ OsKinesin-13A/sar1 | ||||||||||
qGL7.1 | RM11 | –RM3826 | 81.0 | –0.1675 | 10.09 | |||||||||||
qGL7.2 | RM3826 | –RM1132 | 90.7 | –0.1868 | 14.40 | |||||||||||
qGL10 | RM6370 | –RM5689 | 14.0 | 18.0 | –0.1912 | –0.1794 | 11.97 | 10.33 | OsPCR1 | |||||||
qGL11 | H11 | –4-H11-5 | 59.7 | 0.0768 | 5.89 | |||||||||||
qGL12 | RM1337 | –RM3739 | 59.7 | 0.2160 | 11.04 | |||||||||||
粒宽 | qGW1 | H1-5 | –RM8097 | 141.6 | –0.0396 | 3.51 | ||||||||||
Grain width | qGW2.1 | H2-6 | –H2-7 | 47.0 | 0.1134 | 9.58 | ||||||||||
qGW2.2 | H2-7 | –RM262 | 52.7 | 0.0977 | 9.34 | |||||||||||
qGW5 | RM17954 | –H5-7 | 27.5 | 23.5 | 0.1202 | 0.1143 | 12.28 | 11.44 | qGW5;JMJ703 | |||||||
qGW6 | H6-2 | –RM3496 | 47.0 | 0.0728 | 7.06 | |||||||||||
粒厚 | qGT1 | RM8097 | –RM6703 | 163.5 | 163.5 | –0.1074 | –0.0907 | 12.75 | 12.59 | |||||||
Grain thickness | qGT2.1 | H2-3 | –H2-4 | 33.2 | 0.0919 | 9.01 | ||||||||||
qGT2.2 | H2-5 | –H2-6 | 41.8 | 0.0823 | 9.51 | |||||||||||
qGT6 | wgwl | –RM3183 | 35.2 | 0.0708 | 8.21 | |||||||||||
qGT9 | RM242 | –H9-6 | 69.3 | 0.0830 | 9.69 | |||||||||||
长宽比 | qGLW2.1 | H2-4 | –RM300 | 34.9 | –0.0787 | 13.88 | ||||||||||
Length to width | qGLW2.2 | H2-5 | –H2-6 | 42.8 | –0.1332 | 15.61 | ||||||||||
qGLW2 | H2-6 | –H2-7 | 50.0 | –0.0496 | 12.95 | |||||||||||
qGLW5 | RM17954 | –H5-7 | 28.5 | 27.5 | –0.1598 | –0.1302 | 17.25 | 12.75 | ||||||||
qGLW11 | RM167 | –H11-2 | 30.9 | 0.0519 | 7.79 | |||||||||||
qGLW12 | RM1337 | –RM3739 | 51.7 | 0.0975 | 6.25 | |||||||||||
千粒重 | qTGW1.1 | H1-5 | –RM8097 | 144.6 | –1.1430 | 8.17 | OsTRBF3 | |||||||||
1000-grain | qTGW1.2 | RM8097 | –RM6703 | 148.5 | –1.0656 | 8.43 | ||||||||||
weight | qTGW4 | RM317 | –RM5879 | 113.5 | 1.1454 | 7.41 | ||||||||||
qTGW5 | RM18751 | –RM3476 | 85.1 | –1.2472 | 10.55 | |||||||||||
qTGW9 | H9-4 | –RM3700 | 52.6 | –0.8719 | 4.55 |
表4 RILs的粒型相关性状的QTL定位结果
Table 4 QTLs for grain shape-related traits of recombinant inbred lines.
性状 Trait | QTL | 标记区间 Marker interval | 位置 Position | 加性效应 Additive effect | 贡献率 EPV/% | 已克隆基因 Genecloned | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HZ | LS | HZ | LS | HZ | LS | |||||||||||
粒长 | qGL1 | RM3252 | –RM1247 | 2.0 | 0.0925 | 5.75 | ||||||||||
Grain length | qGL2.1 | H2-2 | –H2-3 | 28.1 | –0.1539 | 9.01 | FUWA | |||||||||
qGL2.2 | H2-5 | –H2-6 | 39.8 | –0.0804 | 7.05 | |||||||||||
qGL5 | M17954R | –H5-7 | 32.5 | –0.1272 | 7.52 | JMJ703;SRS3/ OsKinesin-13A/sar1 | ||||||||||
qGL7.1 | RM11 | –RM3826 | 81.0 | –0.1675 | 10.09 | |||||||||||
qGL7.2 | RM3826 | –RM1132 | 90.7 | –0.1868 | 14.40 | |||||||||||
qGL10 | RM6370 | –RM5689 | 14.0 | 18.0 | –0.1912 | –0.1794 | 11.97 | 10.33 | OsPCR1 | |||||||
qGL11 | H11 | –4-H11-5 | 59.7 | 0.0768 | 5.89 | |||||||||||
qGL12 | RM1337 | –RM3739 | 59.7 | 0.2160 | 11.04 | |||||||||||
粒宽 | qGW1 | H1-5 | –RM8097 | 141.6 | –0.0396 | 3.51 | ||||||||||
Grain width | qGW2.1 | H2-6 | –H2-7 | 47.0 | 0.1134 | 9.58 | ||||||||||
qGW2.2 | H2-7 | –RM262 | 52.7 | 0.0977 | 9.34 | |||||||||||
qGW5 | RM17954 | –H5-7 | 27.5 | 23.5 | 0.1202 | 0.1143 | 12.28 | 11.44 | qGW5;JMJ703 | |||||||
qGW6 | H6-2 | –RM3496 | 47.0 | 0.0728 | 7.06 | |||||||||||
粒厚 | qGT1 | RM8097 | –RM6703 | 163.5 | 163.5 | –0.1074 | –0.0907 | 12.75 | 12.59 | |||||||
Grain thickness | qGT2.1 | H2-3 | –H2-4 | 33.2 | 0.0919 | 9.01 | ||||||||||
qGT2.2 | H2-5 | –H2-6 | 41.8 | 0.0823 | 9.51 | |||||||||||
qGT6 | wgwl | –RM3183 | 35.2 | 0.0708 | 8.21 | |||||||||||
qGT9 | RM242 | –H9-6 | 69.3 | 0.0830 | 9.69 | |||||||||||
长宽比 | qGLW2.1 | H2-4 | –RM300 | 34.9 | –0.0787 | 13.88 | ||||||||||
Length to width | qGLW2.2 | H2-5 | –H2-6 | 42.8 | –0.1332 | 15.61 | ||||||||||
qGLW2 | H2-6 | –H2-7 | 50.0 | –0.0496 | 12.95 | |||||||||||
qGLW5 | RM17954 | –H5-7 | 28.5 | 27.5 | –0.1598 | –0.1302 | 17.25 | 12.75 | ||||||||
qGLW11 | RM167 | –H11-2 | 30.9 | 0.0519 | 7.79 | |||||||||||
qGLW12 | RM1337 | –RM3739 | 51.7 | 0.0975 | 6.25 | |||||||||||
千粒重 | qTGW1.1 | H1-5 | –RM8097 | 144.6 | –1.1430 | 8.17 | OsTRBF3 | |||||||||
1000-grain | qTGW1.2 | RM8097 | –RM6703 | 148.5 | –1.0656 | 8.43 | ||||||||||
weight | qTGW4 | RM317 | –RM5879 | 113.5 | 1.1454 | 7.41 | ||||||||||
qTGW5 | RM18751 | –RM3476 | 85.1 | –1.2472 | 10.55 | |||||||||||
qTGW9 | H9-4 | –RM3700 | 52.6 | –0.8719 | 4.55 |
图2 水稻粒型相关性状QTL在染色体上的分布染色体左端红色标注为2016年杭州检测到的QTL位点;蓝色标注为2016年陵水检测到的QTL位点;右侧绿色标注为该区间内已报道水稻相关克隆基因。
Fig.2. Distribution of QTLs related to grain shape traits in rice chromosome. Red labels indicated the QTLs detected in Hangzhou in 2016, and the blue labelsthe QTLs detected in Lingshui in 2016, the green labels indicated rice-related cloned genes in the interval.
基因名称基因登录号 Gene name Gene ID | 位置 Location | 春江16B CJ16B | 春江16B-AA CJ16B-AA | C84 | C84-AA | 变异类型 Variation type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUWALOC_Os02g13950 | 9-11 | CCT | Pro | F | ||
120 | A | AAA/Lys | G | AAG/Lys | Si | |
qSW5 LOC_Os05g09520 | 986 | C | CCG/Pro | T | CTG/Leu | S |
1014 | G | CGC/Arg | T | CTC/Leu | S | |
1072 | G | GCG/Ala | A | ACG/Thr | S | |
1100 | C | GCG/Ala | T | GTG/Val | S | |
OsPCR1 LOC_Os10g02300 | 172 | G | GCC/Ala | T | TCC/Ser | S |
467 | A | CAC/His | T | CTC/Leu | S | |
507-509 | GAG | F | ||||
559-561 | TAA | STOP | CAC | His | S | |
SRS3LOC_Os05g06280 /Kinesin-13A /Sar1 | 1189 | C | CTG/Leu | T | TTG/Leu | Si |
2420 | G | CGT/Arg | A | CAT/His | S | |
2505 | A | GAA/Glu | C | GAC/Asp | S | |
OsTRBF3 LOC_Os01g51154 | 542 | G | TGA/STOP | T | TTA/Leu | S |
547-548 | CC | CCA/Pro | AG | AGA/Arg | S | |
554 | T | TTT/Phe | A | TAT/Tyr | S | |
556-557 | TG | TGG/Trp | GT | GTG/Val | S | |
561 | T | CAT/His | G | CAG/Gln | S | |
565 | G | GGG/Gly | A | AGG/Arg | S |
表5 双亲(C84和春江16B)已克隆粒型主效QTL等位基因序列差异分析
Table 5 Sequence variance analysis of the cloned grain shape main effect QTL allele in the two parents (C84 and CJ16B).
基因名称基因登录号 Gene name Gene ID | 位置 Location | 春江16B CJ16B | 春江16B-AA CJ16B-AA | C84 | C84-AA | 变异类型 Variation type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FUWALOC_Os02g13950 | 9-11 | CCT | Pro | F | ||
120 | A | AAA/Lys | G | AAG/Lys | Si | |
qSW5 LOC_Os05g09520 | 986 | C | CCG/Pro | T | CTG/Leu | S |
1014 | G | CGC/Arg | T | CTC/Leu | S | |
1072 | G | GCG/Ala | A | ACG/Thr | S | |
1100 | C | GCG/Ala | T | GTG/Val | S | |
OsPCR1 LOC_Os10g02300 | 172 | G | GCC/Ala | T | TCC/Ser | S |
467 | A | CAC/His | T | CTC/Leu | S | |
507-509 | GAG | F | ||||
559-561 | TAA | STOP | CAC | His | S | |
SRS3LOC_Os05g06280 /Kinesin-13A /Sar1 | 1189 | C | CTG/Leu | T | TTG/Leu | Si |
2420 | G | CGT/Arg | A | CAT/His | S | |
2505 | A | GAA/Glu | C | GAC/Asp | S | |
OsTRBF3 LOC_Os01g51154 | 542 | G | TGA/STOP | T | TTA/Leu | S |
547-548 | CC | CCA/Pro | AG | AGA/Arg | S | |
554 | T | TTT/Phe | A | TAT/Tyr | S | |
556-557 | TG | TGG/Trp | GT | GTG/Val | S | |
561 | T | CAT/His | G | CAG/Gln | S | |
565 | G | GGG/Gly | A | AGG/Arg | S |
基因名称 Gene name | 位置 Location | 限制性内切酶Restriction enzyme | 酶切位点Enzyme cutting site | 引物Primer |
---|---|---|---|---|
FUWA | 120 | SalⅠ | GTCGAC | F: ACGACGACGACGACGACGAAGGAACCCGCGTCGA |
R: CCTCCTCCTCCTCCTCCTC | ||||
OsPCR1 | 467 | StuⅠ | AGGCCT | F: TCGCACAGATGCACCGTGAGCTCAAGAACCGAGGCC |
R: GTGTTGGGGAGGAGTCATCA | ||||
OsTRBF3 | 565 | MaeⅡ | ACGT | F: ATCCTTCTTTGGACTTGGAGACTTATTTGCTTACG |
R: TGCTTCTAGGGCAGGACTCG | ||||
qGW5 | 986 | HaeⅢ | GGCC | F: CGAGGACTGGTGCGCCAACTCCATGTCGTGGC |
R: GTTGGACATGTAGTTCGGGC | ||||
SRS3/OsKinesin-13A/sar1 | 1189 | HindⅢ | AAGCTT | F: CGCCGCGCAGCTCGAGCTCTAAAGCT |
R: GGTTTCAGCATCGCCTCAAA |
表6 双亲目标基因差异位点dCAPs分子标记引物设计
Table 6 dCAPsmolecular marker designed according totarget gene differencesite of the two parents C84 and CJ16B.
基因名称 Gene name | 位置 Location | 限制性内切酶Restriction enzyme | 酶切位点Enzyme cutting site | 引物Primer |
---|---|---|---|---|
FUWA | 120 | SalⅠ | GTCGAC | F: ACGACGACGACGACGACGAAGGAACCCGCGTCGA |
R: CCTCCTCCTCCTCCTCCTC | ||||
OsPCR1 | 467 | StuⅠ | AGGCCT | F: TCGCACAGATGCACCGTGAGCTCAAGAACCGAGGCC |
R: GTGTTGGGGAGGAGTCATCA | ||||
OsTRBF3 | 565 | MaeⅡ | ACGT | F: ATCCTTCTTTGGACTTGGAGACTTATTTGCTTACG |
R: TGCTTCTAGGGCAGGACTCG | ||||
qGW5 | 986 | HaeⅢ | GGCC | F: CGAGGACTGGTGCGCCAACTCCATGTCGTGGC |
R: GTTGGACATGTAGTTCGGGC | ||||
SRS3/OsKinesin-13A/sar1 | 1189 | HindⅢ | AAGCTT | F: CGCCGCGCAGCTCGAGCTCTAAAGCT |
R: GGTTTCAGCATCGCCTCAAA |
[1] | TianZ X,QianQ, LiuQ Q, YanM X, LiuX F, Yan C J, Liu G F, Gao Z Y, Tang S Z, Zeng D L, Wang Y H, Yu J M, Li J Y.Allelic diversities in rice starch biosynthesis lead to a diverse array of rice eating and cooking qualities.Proc NatlAcadSciUSA,2009, 106(51): 21760-21765. |
[2] | 李孝琼, 韦宇, 高国庆, 邓国富, 郭嗣斌. 水稻遗传图谱构建及粒形相关性状的QTL定位. 南方农业学报, 2014, 45(7): 1154-1159. |
Li X Q, Wei Y, Gao G Q, Deng G F, Guo C B.Construction of genetic map and mapping quantitative trait loci for grain shape-related traits in rice.JSouthAgric,2014, 45(7):1154-1159.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[3] | McCouch S R,Teytelman L,Xu Y,Lobos K B, Clare K,Walton M, Fu B, Maghirang R, Li Z, Xing Y, Zhang Q, Kono L, Yano M, Fjellstrom R, DeClerck G, Schneider D, Cartinhour S, Ware D, Stein L.Development and mapping of 2240 new SSR markers for rice (Oryza sativa L.) .DNA Res, 2002, 9(6):257-279. |
[4] | Xu J C,Zhu L, Chen Y,LuC F, CaiH W.Construction of a rice molecular linkage map using a double hploid (DH) population.JGenGenom, 1994,21(3):205-214. |
[5] | 张启军, 叶少平, 虞德容, 李平, 吕川根, 邹江石. 六张水稻遗传连锁图谱的比较分析. 西南农业学报,2005, 18(5): 584-592. |
Zhang Q J, Ye S P, Yu D R, Li P, Lu C G, Zou J S.Comparison of six rice genetic linkage maps.Southwest China JAgricSci, 2005, 18(5): 584-592.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[6] | 庄杰云, 施勇烽, 应杰政, 鄂志国, 曾瑞珍, 陈洁, 朱智伟. 中国主栽水稻品种微卫星标记数据库的初步构建. 中国水稻科学, 2006, 20(5):460-468. |
Zhuang J Y, Shi Y F, Ying J Z, Dong Z G, Zeng R Z, Chen J, Zhu Z W.Construction and testing of primary microsatellite database of major rice varieties in China.Chin J Rice Sci, 2006, 20(5): 460-468.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[7] | Xu J J, Zhao Q, Du P N, Xu C W,LiuQ Q, FengQ, WangB H, Tang S Z, Gu M H, Han B, Liang G H. Developing high throughput genotyped chromosome segment substitution lines based on population whole-genome re-sequencing in rice (Oryza sativa L.).BMC Genomics, 2010,11(1): 656. |
[8] | 沈利爽, 何平, 徐云碧, 谭震波, 陆朝福, 朱立煌.水稻DH群体的分子连锁图谱及基因组分析. 植物生态学报,1998, 40(12):1115-1122. |
Shen L S, He P, Xu Y B, Tan Z B, Lu C F, Zhu L H.Genetic molecular linkage map construction and genome analysis of rice doubled.Plant ActaEcol Sin, 1998, 40(12):1115-1122. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[9] | Huang R Y, Jiang L G, Zheng J S, Wang T S, Huang Y M, Wang H C, Hong Z L.Genetic bases of rice grain shape: So many genes, so little known.TrendsPlant Sci, 2013, 18(4):218-226. |
[10] | 方先文,张云辉, 肖西林,张所兵,林静,汪迎节.基于重组自交系群体的水稻粒形QTL定位. 江苏农业学报, 2017, 33(2): 241-247. |
Fang X W, Zhang Y H, Xiao X L, Zhang S B, Lin J, Wang Y J.Mapping of QTLs for grain shape using recombinant inbred lines in rice ( Oryza sativa L.).ActaAgric Jiangsu, 2017,33(2): 241-247.(in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[11] | Xia D, Zhou H, Qiu L, Jiang H, Zhang Q L, Gao G J, He Y Q.Mapping and verification of grain shape QTLs based on an advanced backcross population in rice.PloS One, 2017, 12(11):e0187553. |
[12] | Zhao D, Li P B, Wang L Q, Sun L, Xia D, Luo L J, Gao G J, He Y Q, Zhang Q L.Genetic dissection of large grain shape in rice cultivar ‘Nanyangzhan’ and validation of a grain thickness QTL (qGT3.1) and a grain length QTL(qGL3.4).MolBreed, 2017, 37(3):42. |
[13] | Zhou L Q,Wang Y P, Li S G.Genetic analysis and physical mapping of Lk-4 (t), a major gene controlling grain length in rice, with a BC2F2 population.Acta GenSin, 2006,33(1):72-79. |
[14] | Wang Y X, Xiong G S, Hu J, JiangL, YuH, Fang Y X, Xu E B, Ye W J, Liu R F, Jing Y H, Zhu X D, Qian Q, Jing Y H, Xu J, Zeng L J, Xu J, Meng X B, Chen H Q, Wang Y H, Li J Y. Copy number variation at the GL7 locus contributes to grain size diversity in rice.NatGenet, 2015, 47(8):944-948. |
[15] | Wu T, Shen Y Y, Zheng M, ChenY L, FengZ M, Liu X, Chen Z J, Wang J L, Wan J M, Yang C Y, Liu S J, Lei C L, Jiang L. Gene SGL SGL.Plant Cell Rep, 2014, 33(2):235-244. |
[16] | Takano-Kai N, Doi K, Yoshimura A. GS3# participates in stigma exsertion as well as seed length in rice. BreedSci#, 2011, 61(3):244-250. |
[17] | Qi P, Lin Y S, Song X J, ShenJB, HuangW, Shan J X, Zhu M Z, Jiang L W, Gao J P, Lin H X. The novel quantitative trait locus GL3.1 controls rice grain size and yield by regulating Cyclin-T1;3.Cell Res, 2012, 22(12):1666-1680. |
[18] | Wu W,Liu X, Wang M,MeyerRS, LuoX, NdjiondjopMN, Tan L, Zhang J, Wu J, Cai H, Sun C, Wang X, Wing R A, Zhu Z.A single-nucleotide polymorphism causes smaller grain size and loss of seed shattering during African rice domestication.NatPlants, 2017, 3:17064. |
[19] | Li Y B, Fan C C, Xing Y Z, JiangY H, LuoL J,SunL, Shao D, Xu C J, Li X H, Xiao J X, He Y Q, Zhang Q F.Natural variation in GS5 plays an important role in regulating grain size and yield in rice.NatGenet,2011, 43(12):1266-1292. |
[20] | Song X J, Huang W, Shi M, ZhuMZ, LinHX.A QTL for rice grain width and weight encodes a previously unknown RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase.NatGenet, 2007, 39(5):623-630. |
[21] | Yan S, Zou G H, Li S J, Wang H, LiuH Q, ZhaiG W, Guo P, Song H M, Yan C J, Tao Y Z. Seed size is determined by the combinations of the genes controlling different seed characteristics in rice.TheorApplGenet, 2011, 123(7):1173-1181. |
[22] | Liu J F, Chen J, Zheng X M, Wu F Q, Lin Q B, Heng Y Q, Tian Peng, Cheng Z J, Yu X W, Zhou K N, Zhang X, Guo X P, Wang J L, Wang H Y, Wan J M.GW5 acts in the brassinosteroidsignalling pathway to regulate grain width and weight in rice. NatPlants, 2017, 3:17043. |
[23] | Xue W Y, Xing Y Z, Weng X Y, Zhao Y, Tang W J, Zhou H J, Yu S B, Xu C B, Li X H, Zhang Q F.Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice.NatGenet, 2009, 40(6):761-767. |
[24] | LiJ,ThomsonM, McCouchSR. Fine mapping of a grain-weight quantitative trait locus in the pericentromeric region of rice chromosome 3.Genetics, 2004,168(4): 2187. |
[25] | Bai X F, Luo L J, Yan W H,Mallikarjuna R K, Zhan W, Xing Y Z.Genetic dissection of rice grain shape using a recombinant inbred line population derived from two contrasting parents and fine mapping a pleiotropic quantitative trait locus qGL7.BMC Genet, 2010, 11(1): 16. |
[26] | Shao G N, Tang S Q, Luo J, Jiao G A, Wei X J, Tang A, Wu J L, Zhuang J Y, Hu P S.Mapping of qGL7-2, a grain length QTL on chromosome 7 of rice.JGenGenom, 2010, 37(8):523-531. |
[27] | Liu T M, Shao D, Kovi M R, Zhong X Y.Mapping and validation of quantitative trait loci for spikelets per panicle and 1,000-grain weight in rice ( Oryza sativa L.).TheorApplGenet, 2010, 120(5):933-942. |
[28] | Xie X, Jin F, Song M H, Suh J P, Hwang H G.Fine mapping of a yield-enhancing QTL cluster associated with transgressive variation in an Oryza sativa ×O. rufipogoncross. TheorApplGenet, 2008, 116(5):613-622. |
[29] | 陈建华, 姚青, 谢绍军,孙成效,朱智伟. 机器视觉在稻米粒型检测中的应用.中国水稻科学, 2007, 21(6):669-672. |
Chen J H,Yao Q, Xie S J,Sun C X, Zhu Z W.Detection of rice shape based on machine vision.Chin J Rice Sci, 2007, 21(6):669-672. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[30] | 刘仁虎, 孟金陵. MapDraw在Excel中绘制遗传连锁图的宏.遗传, 2003, 25(3):317-321. |
Liu R H, Meng J L.MapDraw: Amicro for drawing genetic linkage maps based on given genetic linkage data.Hereditas, 2003, 25(3):317-321. (in Chinese with English abstract) | |
[31] | McCouch S R. Genenomenclaturesystem forrice.Rice,2008, 1(1):72-84. |
[32] | Song W Y, Lee H S, Jin S R, KoD, Martinoia E, LeeY. RicePCR1 influences grain weight and Zn accumulation in grains. Plant Cell & Environ,2015, 38(11):2327-2339. |
[33] | Chen J, Gao H, Zheng X M, JinM, WengJF, MaJ. An evolutionarily conserved gene, FUWA, plays a role in determining panicle architecture, grain shape and grain weight in rice.Plant J, 2015, 83(3):427-438. |
[34] | Liu X Y, Zhou S L, Wang W T, YeY R, ZhaoY, XuQ T, Zhou C, Tan F, Cheng S F, Zhou D X.Regulation ofhistone methylation and reprogramming of gene expression in the rice inflorescence meristem. Plant Cell, 2015, 27(5):1428-1444. |
[35] | ZhuYD,LingTL,TangL, SongY, BaiJK, ShanJH, Chang J Y, Tai W.OsKinesin-13A is an active microtubule depolymerase involved in glume length regulation via affecting cell elongation.SciRep, 2015, 5(10):9457. |
[36] | Byun M Y, Hong J P, KimW T. Identification and characterization of three telomere repeat-binding factors in rice.BiochemBiophyResComm, 2008, 372(1):85-90. |
[37] | Cui X K, Jin P, Cui X,Gu L F, Lu Z K, Xue Y M, Wei L Y, Qi J F, Song X W, Luo M, An G, Cao X F.Control of transposon activity by a histone H3K4 demethylase in rice.Proc NatlAcadSci USA, 2013, 110(5):1953-1958. |
[38] | Kitagawa K, Kurinami S, Oki K, Abe Y, Ando T, Kono I, Yano M, Kitano H, Iwasaki Y.A novel Kinesin 13 protein regulating rice seed length.Plant & Cell Physiol, 2010, 51(8):1315-1329. |
[39] | Yoshida S, Ikegami M, Kuze J, Sawada K, Nashimoto Z, Nakamura C, Ishii T, Kamijima O.QTL analysis for plant and grain characters of sake-brewing rice using a doubled haploid population.Breed Sci, 2002, 52(4):309-317. |
[40] | Li Z F, Wan J M, Xia J F,Zhai H Q.Mapping quantitative trait loci underlying appearance quality of rice grains (Oryza sativa L.). JGenGenom,2003, 30(3):251-259. |
[41] | Huang N, Parco A, Mew T,Magpantay G, McCouch S, Guiderdoni E, Xu J, Subudhi P, Angeles E R, Khush G S. RFLP mapping of isozymes, RAPD and QTLs for grain shape, brown planthopper resistance in a doubled haploid rice population.MolBreed, 1997, 3(2):105-113. |
[42] | Wan X Y, Wan J M, Weng J F,Jiang L, Bi J C, Wang C M, Zhai H Q.Stability of QTLs for rice grain dimension and endosperm chalkiness characteristics across eight environments.TheorApplGenet, 2005, 110(7):1334. |
[43] | Hittalmani S, Huang N, Courtois B,Venuprassad R, Shashidhar H E, Zhuang J Y, Zheng K L, Liu G F, Wang G C, Sidhu J S, Srivantaneeyakul S, Sinqh V P, Baqali P G, Prasanna H C, McLaren G, Khush G S. Identification of QTL for growth- and grain yield-related traits in rice across nine locations of Asia.TheorApplGenet, 2003, 107(4):679-690. |
[44] | GaoYM, ZhuJ, SongYS, He C X, Shi C H, Xing Y Z. Analysis of digenic epistatic effects and QE interaction effects QTL controlling grain weight in rice.JZhejiang UnivSci, 2004, 5(4):371-377. |
[45] | Lin H X, Qian H R, Zhuang J Y, Lu J, Min S K, Xiong Z M, Huang N, Zheng K L.RFLP mapping of QTLs for yield and related characters in rice ( Oryza sativa L.).TheorApplGenet, 1996, 92(8):920-927. |
[46] | ChoYC, SuhJP, ChoiIS, Hong H C, Baek M K, Hong H C, Kim Y G, Choi H, Moon H P, Hwang G H. QTLs analysis of yield and its related traits in wild rice relative Oryzarufipogon.TreatCropRes, 2003(4): 19-29. |
[47] | Hua J, Xing Y, Wu W, Xu C, Sun X, Yu S, Zhang Q.Single-locus heterotic effects and dominance by dominance interactions can adequately explain the genetic basis of heterosis in an elite rice hybrid.Proc NatlAcadSciUSA, 2003, 100(5):2574. |
[48] | Zhuang J Y, Fan Y Y, Rao Z M, Wu J L, Xia Y W, Zheng K L.Analysis on additive effects and additive-by-additive epistatic effects of QTLs for yield traits in a recombinant inbred line population of rice.TheorApplGenet, 2002, 105(8):1137-1145. |
[49] | Hua J P, Xing Y Z, Xu C G, Sun X L, Yu S B, Zhang Q.Genetic dissection of an elite rice hybrid revealed that heterozygotes are not always advantageous for performance.Genetics, 2003, 162(4):1885-1895. |
[50] | 谭震波, 沈利爽, 陆朝福, 陈英, 朱立煌, 周开达, 袁祚廉. 水稻再生能力和头季稻产量性状的QTL定位及其遗传效应分析. 作物学报, 1997, 23(3): 289-295. |
Tan Z B,Shen L S, Yuan Z L, Lu C F, Chen Y, Zhou K D, Zhu L H, Zuo W X B. Identification of QTLs for ratooning ability and grain yield traits of rice and analysis of their genetic effects.ActaAgronSin, 1997, 23(3):289-295. (in Chinese with English abstract) |
[1] | 任志奇, 薛可欣, 董铮, 李小湘, 黎用朝, 郭玉静, 刘文强, 郭梁, 盛新年, 刘之熙, 潘孝武. 水稻外卷叶突变体ocl1的鉴定及基因定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 337-346. |
[2] | 肖乐铨, 李雷, 戴伟民, 强胜, 宋小玲. 转cry2A*/bar基因水稻与杂草稻杂交后代的苗期生长特性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 347-358. |
[3] | 李刚, 高清松, 李伟, 张雯霞, 王健, 程保山, 王迪, 高浩, 徐卫军, 陈红旗, 纪剑辉. 定向敲除SD1基因提高水稻的抗倒性和稻瘟病抗性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 359-367. |
[4] | 汪胜勇, 陈宇航, 陈会丽, 黄钰杰, 张啸天, 丁双成, 王宏伟. 水稻减数分裂期高温对苯丙烷类代谢及下游分支代谢途径的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 368-378. |
[5] | 董立强, 杨铁鑫, 李睿, 商文奇, 马亮, 李跃东, 隋国民. 株行距配置对超高产田水稻产量及根系形态生理特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 392-404. |
[6] | 韩聪, 何禹畅, 吴丽娟, 郏丽丽, 王磊, 鄂志国. 水稻碱性亮氨酸拉链(bZIP)蛋白家族功能研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 436-448. |
[7] | 沈雨民, 陈明亮, 熊焕金, 熊文涛, 吴小燕, 肖叶青. 水稻内外稃异常发育突变体blg1 (beak like grain 1)的表型分析与精细定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 225-232. |
[8] | 段敏, 谢留杰, 高秀莹, 唐海娟, 黄善军, 潘晓飚. 利用CRISPR/Cas9技术创制广亲和水稻温敏雄性不育系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 233-243. |
[9] | 程玲, 黄福钢, 邱一埔, 王心怡, 舒宛, 邱永福, 李发活. 籼稻材料570011抗褐飞虱基因的遗传分析及鉴定[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 244-252. |
[10] | 王文婷, 马佳颖, 李光彦, 符卫蒙, 李沪波, 林洁, 陈婷婷, 奉保华, 陶龙兴, 符冠富, 秦叶波. 高温下不同施肥量对水稻产量品质形成的影响及其与能量代谢的关系分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 253-264. |
[11] | 刘嫒桦, 李小坤. 不同肥料施用与稻米品质关系的整合分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 276-284. |
[12] | 杨晓龙, 王彪, 汪本福, 张枝盛, 张作林, 杨蓝天, 程建平, 李阳. 不同水分管理方式对旱直播水稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 285-294. |
[13] | 魏晓东, 宋雪梅, 赵凌, 赵庆勇, 陈涛, 路凯, 朱镇, 黄胜东, 王才林, 张亚东. 硅锌肥及其施用方式对南粳46产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 295-306. |
[14] | 林聃, 江敏, 苗波, 郭萌, 石春林. 水稻高温热害模型研究及其在福建省的应用[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 307-320. |
[15] | 郑承梅, 孙金秋, 刘梦杰, 杨永杰, 陆永良, 郭怡卿, 唐伟. 水稻田糠稷种子萌发和出苗特性及化学防除药剂筛选[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 321-328. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||