杂交稻“大青棵”现象遗传基础剖析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2013.06.001

中国水稻科学 ›› 2013, Vol. 27 ›› Issue (6): 559-568.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2013.06.001

• 研究报告 • 下一篇

杂交稻“大青棵”现象遗传基础剖析

曲丽君^1,2,张宏军²,项超²,王辉³,夏加发³,李泽福³,高用明^2,* ,石英尧^1,*

¹安徽农业大学农学院，合肥 230036； ²中国农业科学院作物科学研究所，北京 100081； ³安徽省农业科学院水稻研究所，合肥 230031；

收稿日期:2013-05-03 修回日期:2013-07-12 出版日期:2013-11-10 发布日期:2013-11-10
通讯作者: 高用明2,*,石英尧1,*
基金资助:
盖茨基金资助项目(OPP51587)；国家星火计划资助项目（2011GA710008）；安徽省自然科学基金资助项目（090411016）。

Study on the Genetic Basis for Abnormal Heading in Hybrid Rice

QU Lijun^1,2, ZHANG Hongjun ², XIANG Chao ², WANG Hui ³, XIA Jiafa ³, LI Zefu ³, GAO Yongming ^2,* , SHI Yingyao ^1,*

¹College of Agronomy, Anhui Agricultural University, Hefei 230036,China; ² Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081,China; ³ Rice Research Institute, Anhui Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Hefei 230031, China;

Received:2013-05-03 Revised:2013-07-12 Online:2013-11-10 Published:2013-11-10
Contact: GAO Yongming2,*, SHI Yingyao1,*

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 杂交稻的大青棵现象给我国水稻生产带来了巨大的经济损失，但大青棵产生的遗传基础相关研究尚未见报道。利用蜀恢527/辐恢838群体中的38个导入系为父本，以四个核心不育系II32A、协青早A、冈46A和金23A为母本，构建4个测交群体。在合肥、杭州和广州3个晚稻环境下，对其进行抽穗期和产量相关性状表型评价，结合基因型分析，利用单向（oneway ANOVA）和双向方差分析（twoway ANOVA）检测与感光性相关的QTL及QTL间互作。表型分析表明，55个组合在合肥表现为大青棵，相比之下，这些组合在杭州和广州表现为正常抽穗，但抽穗期延迟。利用单向方差分析，在多个环境或者群体中检测到12个标记与感光性QTL紧密连锁。通过双向方差分析，共检测到31对感光性上位性QTL，其中4对在不同群体和环境下稳定表达。结合基因型分析和上位性分析，发现位点RM331RM2、RM331RM5346、RM3395RM16和RM3325RM53间互作是导致导入系WD57、WD71、WD77、WD78、WD80、WD85和WD88与4个不育系测交组合产生大青棵的主要遗传基础。

关键词: 杂交稻, 大青棵, 抽穗期, 感光性, QTL定位

Abstract: The problem of abnormal heading in hybrid rice caused great economic losses in recent years. The genetic basis of this phenomenon is still ambiguous and not documented up to now. Four testcrossing populations were constructed using 38 introgression lines (ILs) from Shuhui 527/Fuhui 838 population as male parents and four male sterile lines (II32A, XieqingzaoA, Gang 46A and Jin 23A) as female parents. The phenotypic evaluation was conducted in Hefei, Hangzhou and Guangzhou in late season. QTL associated with photosensitivity (PS) was identified using oneway analysis of variance (ANOVA) and twoway ANOVA methods with the genotypic and phenotypic data. Progeny testing showed that 55 combinations did not head in Hefei, but normally headed with delayed heading date in Hangzhou and Guangzhou. A total of 12 QTL for PS was found in more than two environments or populations. Using twoway ANOVA, 31 epistatic QTLs affecting PS were detected in Hangzhou and Guangzhou, five of which were stably expressed in different populations and environments. The loci interaction between RM331RM2, RM331RM5346, RM3395RM16 and RM3325RM53 played an important role in controlling the formation of Daqingke for combinations from testcrossing WD57, WD71, WD77, WD78, WD80, WD85 and WD88 with fourtypes of male sterile lines.

Key words: hybrid rice, abnormal heading, heading date, photosensitivity, QTL mapping

中图分类号:

曲丽君1,2,张宏军2,项超2,王辉3,夏加发3,李泽福3,高用明2,*,石英尧1,*. 杂交稻“大青棵”现象遗传基础剖析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(6): 559-568.

QU Lijun1,2, ZHANG Hongjun2, XIANG Chao2, WANG Hui3, XIA Jiafa3, LI Zefu3, GAO Yongming2,*, SHI Yingyao1,*. Study on the Genetic Basis for Abnormal Heading in Hybrid Rice[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2013, 27(6): 559-568.

参考文献

\[1\]Cheng S H, Zhuang J Y, Fan Y Y, et al. Progress in research and development on hybrid rice: A superdomesticate in China. Ann Bot, 2007, 100(5): 959966.

\[2\]李开平, 康艳琼.大青棵在杂交稻田中的发生特点与防控对策. 云南农业科技, 2010, 29(4): 5254.

\[3\]Taeko S, Yasunori N, Nozomi O, et al. Genetic interactions involves in the inhibition of heading by heading date QTL, Hd2 in rice under longday conditions. Theor Appl Genet, 2011, 123: 11331143.

\[4\]Xue W, Xing Y, Weng X, et al. Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice. Nat Genet, 2008, 40: 761767.

\[5\]Yan W H, Wang P, Chen H X, et al. A major QTL, Ghd8,    plays pleiotropic roles in regulating grain productivity, plant height, and heading date in rice. Mol Plant, 2011, 4: 319330.

\[6\]Wei X, Xu J, Guo H, et al. DTH8 suppresses flowering in rice, influencing plant height and yield potential simultaneously. Plant Physiol, 2010, 153: 17471758.

\[7\]Yano M, Katayose Y, Ashikari M, et al. Hd1,    a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering time gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell, 2000, 12(12): 24732483.

\[8\]Kojima S, Takahashi Y, Kobayashi Y, et al. Hd3a,    a rice ortholog of the Arabidopsis FT gene, promotes transition to flowering down stream of Hd1 under shortday conditions. Plant Cell Physiol, 2002, 43(10): 10961105.

\[9\]Takahashi Y, Shomura A, Sasaki T, et al. Hd6,    a rice quantitative trait locus involved in photoperiod sensitivity, encodes the α subunit of protein kinase CK2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2001, 98(14): 79227927.

\[10\]Doi K, Izawa T, Fuse T, et al. Ehd1,    a Btype response regulator in rice, confers shortday promotion of flowering and controls FTlike gene expression. Genes Dev, 2004, 18: 926936.

\[11\]Matsubara K, Yamanouchi U, Wang Z X, et al. Ehd2,    a rice ortholog of the maize INDETERMI NATE1 gene, promotes flowering by upregulating Ehd1 . Plant Physiol, 2008, 148: 14251435.

\[12\]Dai C， Xue H W. Rice early flowering1,    a CKI, phosphory lates DELLA protein SLR1 to negatively regulate gibberellin signalling. EMBO J, 2010, 29: 19161927.

\[13\]Komiya R, Ikegami A, Tamaki S, et al. Hd3a and RFT1 are essential for flowering in rice. Development, 2008, 135: 767774.

\[14\]Izawa T, Oikawa T, Tokutomi S, et al. Phytochromes confer the photoperiodic control of flowering in rice(a shortday plant). Plant J, 2000, 22(5): 391399.

\[15\]Lim J, Moon Y H, An G, et al. Two rice MADS domain proteins interact with OsMADS1. Plant Mol Biol, 2000, 44: 513527.

\[16\]Kikuchi S, Satoh K, Nagata T, et al. Collection, mapping, and annotation of over 28, 000 cDNA clones from japonica rice. Science, 2003, 301 (5631)： 376379.

\[17\]Shinozuka Y, Kojima S, Shomura A, et al. Isolation and characterization of rice MADS box gene homologues and their RFLP mapping. DNA Res, 1999, 6 (2)： 123129.

\[18\]Lee S, Kim J, Han J J, et al. Functional analyses of the flowering time gene OsMADS50,    the putative SUPP RESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CO1/AGAMOUSLIKE20 ( SOC1/AGL20 ) ortholog in rice. Plant J, 2004, 38(5): 754764.

\[19\]Kim S L, Lee S, Kim H J, et al. OsMADS51 is a shortday flowering promoter that function supstream of Ehd1 , OsMADS14,    and Hd3a . Plant Physiol, 2007, 145: 14841494.

\[20\]Ryu C H, Lee S, Cho L H, et al. OsMADS50 and OsMADS56 function antagonistically in regulating long day (LD) dependent flowering in rice. Plant Cell Environ, 2009, 32: 14121427.

\[21\]Hayama R, Izawa T, Shimamoto K, et al. Isolation of rice genes possibly involved in the photoperiodic control of flowering by a fluorescent differential display method. Plant Cell Physiol, 2002, 43(5): 494504.

\[22\]Li D, Yang C, Li X, et al. Functional characterization of rice OsDof12.   Planta, 2009, 229: 1159 1169.

\[23\]Kim S K, Yun C H, Lee J H, et al. OsCO3, a CONSTANS LIKE gene, controls flowering by negatively regulating the expression of FTlike gene sunder SD conditions in rice. Planta, 2008, 228: 355365.

\[24\]Zhang H J, Wang H, Qian Y, et al. Simultaneous improvement and genetic dissection of grain yield and its related traits in a backbone parent of hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.) using selective introgression. Mol Breeding， 2013, 31: 181194.

\[25\]Moncada P, Martinez C P, Borrero J, et al. Quantitative trait loci for yield and yield components in an Oryza sativaOryza rufipogon BC2F2 population evaluated in an upland environment. Theor Appl Genet, 2001, 102: 4152.

\[26\]SAS Institute Inc.   SAS/STAT V9.2 User’s Guide. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA, 2008： 24302611.

\[27\]Thomson M J, Tai T H, McClung A M, et al. Mapping quantitative trait loci for yield, yield components and morphological traits in an advanced backcross population between Oryza rufipogon and the Oryza sativa cultivar Jefferson. Theor Appl Genet, 2003, 107: 479493.

\[28\]陆作楣, 马崇云. 杂交稻的杂株与对策. 种子, 1987（27）: 38, 39.

\[29\]白和盛, 王宝和. 杂交稻青棵的成因及对策. 种子世界, 1991 （9）: 35.

\[30\]水清. 稻田里的“大青棵”从哪里来的. 江苏农业科技报, 2008（1）: 30.

\[31\]戴剑. 杂交稻亲本SSR指纹图谱构建及两系杂交稻和大青棵鉴定的研究\[D\]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2011.

\[32\]于振文. 作物栽培学各论. 北京：中国农业出版社, 2003: 154155.

\[33\]南京农学院. 作物栽培学. 上海：上海科学技术出版社, 1979: 3435.

[1]	曾波, 龚俊义, 张芳. 我国优质杂交稻主要品种推广情况与展望[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(5): 439-446.
[2]	王婧莹, 赵广欣, 邱冠凯, 方军. 水稻抽穗期途径基因的磷酸化、泛素化研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(3): 215-226.
[3]	李杰, 田蓉蓉, 白天亮, 朱春艳, 宋佳伟, 田蕾, 马帅国, 吕建东, 胡慧, 王震宇, 罗成科, 张银霞, 李培富. 水稻回交群体剑叶性状综合评价及QTL定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(6): 573-585.
[4]	陈喜娜, 袁泽科, 胡珍珍, 赵全志, 孙红正. 利用QTL-Seq定位粳稻整精米率QTL[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(5): 449-454.
[5]	王亚梁, 朱德峰, 陈惠哲, 张玉屏, 向镜, 王志刚, 张义凯. 籼粳杂交稻精准条播育秧机插减氮增产的效应研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(5): 495-502.
[6]	王玉博, 王悦, 刘雄, 唐文帮. 水稻光周期调控开花的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(3): 207-224.
[7]	季芝娟, 曾宇翔, 梁燕, 杨长登. 水稻恶苗病抗性研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(1): 1-10.
[8]	张立成, 李懿星, 王天抗, 邱牡丹, 宋书锋, 董皓, 李磊, 刘建丰, 李莉. 水稻抽穗期基因OsDof6功能的初步研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(5): 397-405.
[9]	魏秀彩, 刘金栋, 刘利成, 黎用朝, 潘孝武, 董铮, 刘文强, 熊海波, 闵军, 李小湘. 基于MAGIC群体的水稻抽穗期和产量相关性状全基因组关联分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(4): 325-331.
[10]	王亚梁, 朱德峰, 向镜, 陈惠哲, 张玉屏, 徐一成, 张义凯. 杂交稻低播量精量播种育秧及机插取秧特性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(4): 332-338.
[11]	孟天瑶, 葛佳琳, 张徐彬, 韦还和, 周桂生, 戴其根. 甬优中熟籼粳杂交稻栽后植株磷素积累特征与模型分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(3): 256-265.
[12]	彭志芸, 向开宏, 杨志远, 唐源, 谌洁, 张宇杰, 何艳, 严田蓉, 孙永健, 马均. 麦/油-稻轮作下秸秆还田与氮肥管理对直播杂交稻氮素利用特征的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(1): 57-68.
[13]	赵正洪, 戴力, 黄见良, 潘晓华, 游艾青, 赵全志, 陈光辉, 周政, 胡文彬, 纪龙. 长江中游稻区水稻产业发展现状、问题与建议[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(6): 553-564.
[14]	吕川根, 李霞, 宗寿余, 邹江石. 超级杂交稻两优培九的广适性分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(3): 191-205.
[15]	张安鹏, 钱前, 高振宇. 水稻种子活力的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(3): 296-303.

杂交稻“大青棵”现象遗传基础剖析

Study on the Genetic Basis for Abnormal Heading in Hybrid Rice

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics