水稻开花的光温调控分子机理

doi:10.3969/j.issn.10017216.2012.04.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 水稻一生要经历营养生长和生殖生长两个阶段，只有顺利从营养生长向生殖生长转变，水稻才能开花结实。水稻的开花是环境因素与控制水稻开花基因网络相互作用的结果，光照和温度是调控水稻开花的两个重要的环境因子。关于水稻如何感知光照和温度变化，然后启动内部基因的表达来调控水稻开花，科学家提出了一些假说试图解释这个问题。近几年对水稻的开花调控途径的研究有了长足进展，人们对该问题有了新认识。结合前人的研究结果，分析了水稻在不同光温调控下的分子机理。

关键词: 水稻, 开花, 基因调控, 光周期, 温度

Abstract: The transition from vegetative growth to reproductive growth (the floral transition) is a crucial event in the life cycle of rice, which is regulated by both endogenous genes and environmental factors. Rice would not normally flower without this transition. Light and temperature are two important environmental factors to regulate the floral transition in rice. Interestingly, how could rice perceive the change in photoperiod or temperature, and then initiate the expression of endogenous genes to control this transition? Scientists had contributed to answer this question for many years.With great progresses in rice flowering regulation recently, new evidences and understanding for the regulatory pathways of rice flowering have been provided. Based on previous studies and our results, the latest research progresses involving in molecular mechanisms of rice flowering are summarized and analyzed.

Key words: rice, flowering, genetic regulation, photoperiod, temperature

中图分类号:

宋远丽,栾维江*. 水稻开花的光温调控分子机理[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2012, 26(4): 383-392.

SONG Yuanli, LUAN Weijiang*. Regulatory Pathways of Rice Flowering in Different Light and Temperature Conditions[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2012, 26(4): 383-392.

参考文献

\[1\]Garner W W, Allard H A. Effect of the relative length of day and night and other factors of the environment on growth and reproduction in plants. Agric Res, 1920, 18: 553606.

\[2\]Garner W W, Allard H A. Further studies in photoperiodism, the response of the plant to relative length of day and night. Agric Res, 1923, 23: 871920.

\[3\]种康,雍伟东,谭克辉. 高等植物春化作用研究进展. 植物学通报, 1999, 41(1): 3439.

\[4\]Lin H X, Yamamoto T, Sasaki T, et al. Characterization and detection of epistatic interactions of three QTLs, Hd1, Hd2, and Hd3, controlling heading date in rice using nearly isogenic lines. Theor Appl Genet, 1998, 101: 10211028.

\[5\]Lin H X, Yamamoto T, Sasaki T, et al. Identification and characterization of a quantitative trait locus, Hd9, controlling heading date in rice. Breed Sci, 2002, 52: 3541.

\[6\]Lin H X, Liang Z W, Sasaki T, et al. Fine mapping and characterization of quantitative trait loci Hd4 and Hd5 controlling heading date in rice. Breed Sci, 2003, 53: 5159.

\[7\]Lin S Y, Sasaki T, Yano M. Mapping quantitative trait loci controlling seed dormancy and heading date in rice,Oryza sativa L., using backcross inbred lines. Theor Appl Genet, 1997, 96: 9971003.

\[8\]Yano M. Genetic and molecular dissection of naturally occurring variation.Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2001, 4: 130135.

\[9\]Yano M, Harushima Y, Nagamura Y, et al. Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling heading date in rice using a high density linkage map. Theor Appl Genet, 1997, 95: 10251032.

\[10\]Yano M, Katayose Y, Ashikari M, et al. Hd1, a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering time gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell, 2000, 12: 24732483.

\[11\]Yamamoto T,Kuboki Y, Lin S Y, et al. Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci Hd1, Hd2, and Hd3, controlling heading date of rice, as single Mendelian factors. Theor Appl Genet, 1998, 97: 3744.

\[12\]Yamamoto T, Lin H X, Sasaki T, et al. Identification of heading date quantitative trait locus Hd6 and characterization of its epistatic interactions with Hd2 in rice using advanced backcross progeny. Genetics, 2000, 154: 885891.

\[13\]Kojima S, Takahashi Y, Kobayashi Y, et al. Hd3a, a rice ortholog of the Arabidopsis FT gene, promotes transition to flowering downstream of Hd1 under shortday conditions. Plant Cell Physiol, 2002, 43: 10961105.

\[14\]Takahashi Y,Shomura A, Sasaki T, et al. Hd6, a rice quantitative trait locus involved in photoperiod sensitivity, encodes thea subunit of protein kinase CK2. PNAS, 2001, 98: 79227927.

\[15\]Luan W, Chen H, Fu Y, et al. The effect of the crosstalk between photoperiod and temperature on the headingdate in rice. PLoS ONE, 2009, 4(6): e5891.

\[16\]Komiya R, Ikegami A, Tamaki S, et al. Hd3a and RFT1 are essential for flowering in rice. Development, 2008, 135: 767774.

\[17\]Doi K, Izawa T, Fuse T, et al. Ehd1, a Btype response regulator in rice, confers shortday promotion of flowering and controls FTlike gene expression independently of Hd1. Genes Dev, 2004, 18: 926936.

\[18\]Hayama R, Yokoi S, Tamaki S, et al. Adaptation of photoperiodic control pathways produces shortday flowering in rice. Nature, 2003, 422: 719722.

\[19\]Kim S L, Lee S, Kim H J, et al. OsMADS51 is a shortday flowering promoter that functions upstream of Ehd1, OsMADS14, and Hd3a. Plant Physiol, 2007, 145: 14841494.

\[20\]Wu C, You C, Li C, et al. RID1, encoding a Cys2/His2type zinc finger transcription factor, acts as a master switch from vegetative to floral development in rice. PNAS, 2008, 105: 1291512920.

\[21\]Matsubara K, Yamanouchi U, Wang X, et al. Ehd2, a rice ortholog of the maize INDETERMINATE1 gene, promotes flowering by upregulating Ehd1. Plant Physiol, 2008, 148: 14251435.

\[22\]Park S J, Kim S L, Lee S,et al. Rice indeterminate 1 (OsId1) is necessary for the expression of Ehd1 (early heading date 1) regardless of photoperiod. Plant J, 2008, 56: 10181029.

\[23\]Matsubara K, Yamanouchi U, Nonoue Y, et al.Ehd3, encoding a plant homeodomain fingercontaining protein, is a critical promoter of rice flowering. Plant J, 2011, 66: 603612.

\[24\]Izawa T, Oikawa T, Tokutomi S, et al. Phytochromes confer the photoperiodic control of flowering in rice (a short day plant). Plant J, 2000, 22: 391399.

\[25\]Andre′s F, Galbraith D W, Talo′n M, et al. Analysis of PHOTOPERIOD SENSITIVITY 5 sheds light on the role of phytochromes in photoperiodic flowering in rice. Plant Physiol, 2009, 151: 681690.

\[26\]Komiya R, Yokoi R, Shimamoto K. A gene network for longday flowering activates RFT1 encoding a mobile flowering signal in rice. Development, 2009, 136: 34433450.

\[27\]Xue W, Xing Y, Weng X, et al. Natural variation in Ghd7 is an important regulator of heading date and yield potential in rice. Nat Genet, 2008, 40: 761767.

\[28\]Wei X, Xu J, Guo H, et al. DTH8 suppresses flowering in rice, influencing plant height and yield potential simultaneously. Plant Physiol, 2010, 153:17471758.

\[29\]Yan W, Wang P, Chen H, et al. A major QTL, Ghd8, plays pleiotropic roles in regulating grain productivity, plant height, and heading hate in rice. Mol Plant, 2010, 112.

\[30\]Hamner K C, Bonner J. Photoperiodism in relation to hormones as factors in floral initiation and development. Bot Gaz, 1938, 100: 388431.

\[31\]Ishikawa R, Tamaki S, Yokoi S, et al. Suppression of the floral activator Hd3a is the principal cause of the night break effect in rice. Plant Cell, 2005, 17: 33263336.

\[32\]Itoh H, Nonoue Y, Yano M, et al. A pair of floral regulators sets critical day length for Hd3a florigen expression in rice. Nat Genet, 2010, 42(7): 635639.

\[33\]Izawa T,OikawaT, Sugiyama N, et al. Phytochrome mediates the external light signal to repress FT orthologs in photoperiodic flowering of rice. Genes Dev, 2002, 16: 2006 2020.

\[34\]Takano M, Inagaki N,Xie X, et al. Distinct and cooperative functions of phytochromes A, B, and C in the control of deetiolation and flowering in rice. Plant Cell, 2005, 17: 33113325.

\[35\]Takano M, Inagaki N, Xie X, et al. Phytochromes are the sole photoreceptors for perceiving red/farred light in rice. PNAS, 2009, 106(34): 1470514710.

\[36\]Ishikawa R, Aoki M, Kurotani K, et al. Phytochrome B regulates heading date 1(Hd1)mediated expression of rice florigen Hd3a and critical day length in rice. Mol Genet Genom, 2011, 285: 461470.

\[37\]Zhang Y, Gong S, Li Q, et al. Functional and signaling mechanism analysis of rice CRYPTOCHROME 1. Plant J, 2006, 46: 971983.

\[38\]Hirose F, Shinomura T, Tanabata T et al. Involvement of rice cryptochromes in deetiolation responses and flowering. Plant Cell Physiol, 2006, 47 (7): 915925.

\[39\]Michaels S D,Amasino R M. FLOWERING LOCUS C encodes a novel MADS domains protein that acts as a repressor of flowering. Plant Cell, 1999, 11:949956.

\[40\]Searle I, He Y H,Turck F, et al. The transcription factor FLC confers a flowering response to verbalization by repressing meristem competence and systemic signaling in Arabidopsis. Genes & Dev, 2006, 20: 898912.

\[41\]Blázquez M A, Ahn J H, Weigel D. A thermosensory pathway controlling flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature Genet, 2003, 33: 168171.

\[42\]Yan L,Loukoianov A, Tranquilli G, et al. Positional cloning of the wheat vernalization gene VRN1. PNAS, 2003, 100: 62636268.

\[43\]Yan L, Loukoianov A, Blechl A, et al. The wheat VRN2 gene is a flowering repressor downregulated by vernalization. Science, 2004, 303: 16401644.

\[44\]Yan L, Fu D, Li C,et al. The wheat and barley vernalization gene VRN3 is an orthologue of FT. PNAS, 2006, 103: 1958119586.

\[45\]Sheldon C C, Burn E J, Perez P P, et al. The FLF MADS box gene: A repressor of flowering in Arabidopsis regulated by vernalization and methylation. Plant Cell, 1999, 11:445458.

\[46\]Sheldon C C, Rouse D T, Finnegan E J, et al. The molecular basis of vernalization: The central role of FLOWERING LOCUS C (FLC). PNAS, 2000, 97: 37533758.

\[47\]Lee J H,Yoo S J, Park S H, et al. Role of SVP in the control of flowering time by ambient temperature in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev, 2007, 21: 397402.

\[48\]Trevaskis B, Tadege M, Hemming M N, et al. Short vegetative phaselike MADS box genes inhibit floral meristem identity in barley. Plant Physiol, 2007, 143: 225235.

\[49\]Lee S, Choi S C, An G. Rice SVPgroup MADSbox proteins,OsMADS22 and OsMADS55,are negative regulators of brassinosteroid responses. Plant J, 2008, 54: 93105.

[1]	任志奇, 薛可欣, 董铮, 李小湘, 黎用朝, 郭玉静, 刘文强, 郭梁, 盛新年, 刘之熙, 潘孝武. 水稻外卷叶突变体ocl1的鉴定及基因定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 337-346.
[2]	肖乐铨, 李雷, 戴伟民, 强胜, 宋小玲. 转cry2A/bar*基因水稻与杂草稻杂交后代的苗期生长特性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 347-358.
[3]	李刚, 高清松, 李伟, 张雯霞, 王健, 程保山, 王迪, 高浩, 徐卫军, 陈红旗, 纪剑辉. 定向敲除SD1基因提高水稻的抗倒性和稻瘟病抗性[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 359-367.
[4]	汪胜勇, 陈宇航, 陈会丽, 黄钰杰, 张啸天, 丁双成, 王宏伟. 水稻减数分裂期高温对苯丙烷类代谢及下游分支代谢途径的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 368-378.
[5]	董立强, 杨铁鑫, 李睿, 商文奇, 马亮, 李跃东, 隋国民. 株行距配置对超高产田水稻产量及根系形态生理特性的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 392-404.
[6]	韩聪, 何禹畅, 吴丽娟, 郏丽丽, 王磊, 鄂志国. 水稻碱性亮氨酸拉链(bZIP)蛋白家族功能研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(4): 436-448.
[7]	沈雨民, 陈明亮, 熊焕金, 熊文涛, 吴小燕, 肖叶青. 水稻内外稃异常发育突变体blg1 (beak like grain 1)的表型分析与精细定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 225-232.
[8]	段敏, 谢留杰, 高秀莹, 唐海娟, 黄善军, 潘晓飚. 利用CRISPR/Cas9技术创制广亲和水稻温敏雄性不育系[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 233-243.
[9]	程玲, 黄福钢, 邱一埔, 王心怡, 舒宛, 邱永福, 李发活. 籼稻材料570011抗褐飞虱基因的遗传分析及鉴定[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 244-252.
[10]	王文婷, 马佳颖, 李光彦, 符卫蒙, 李沪波, 林洁, 陈婷婷, 奉保华, 陶龙兴, 符冠富, 秦叶波. 高温下不同施肥量对水稻产量品质形成的影响及其与能量代谢的关系分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 253-264.
[11]	刘嫒桦, 李小坤. 不同肥料施用与稻米品质关系的整合分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 276-284.
[12]	杨晓龙, 王彪, 汪本福, 张枝盛, 张作林, 杨蓝天, 程建平, 李阳. 不同水分管理方式对旱直播水稻产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 285-294.
[13]	魏晓东, 宋雪梅, 赵凌, 赵庆勇, 陈涛, 路凯, 朱镇, 黄胜东, 王才林, 张亚东. 硅锌肥及其施用方式对南粳46产量和稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 295-306.
[14]	林聃, 江敏, 苗波, 郭萌, 石春林. 水稻高温热害模型研究及其在福建省的应用[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 307-320.
[15]	郑承梅, 孙金秋, 刘梦杰, 杨永杰, 陆永良, 郭怡卿, 唐伟. 水稻田糠稷种子萌发和出苗特性及化学防除药剂筛选[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(3): 321-328.