太湖流域晚粳品种抽穗期的遗传分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2011.04.003

中国水稻科学 ›› 2011, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (4): 357-364.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7216.2011.04.003

太湖流域晚粳品种抽穗期的遗传分析

周振玲^{1, 2}, 江玲¹,徐大勇^{1, 2}, 魏祥进¹, 刘喜¹, 卢百关², 万建民^{1, 3, *}

¹南京农业大学作物遗传与种质创新国家重点实验室, 江苏南京 210095; ²连云港市农业科学院, 江苏连云港 222006; ³中国农业科学院
作物科学研究所, 北京 100081

收稿日期:2010-11-08 修回日期:2011-02-18 出版日期:2011-07-10 发布日期:2011-07-10
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目（30871497）；国家863计划资助项目（2009AA101101）；江苏省品种创新工程资助项目（BE20093013， BE2008354）；高等学校学科创新引智计划资助项目（B08025）

Genetic Analysis of Heading Date of Late Season Japonica Rice from Taihu Lake Region

ZHOU Zhen-Ling1^{, 2} , JIANG Ling¹,Xu Da-Yong^{1, 2} , WEI Xiang-Jin¹, LIU Xi¹, LU Bai-Guan², WAN Jian-Min^{1, 3 , *}

¹State Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China; ²Lianyungang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lianyungang 222006, China; ³ Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China

Received:2010-11-08 Revised:2011-02-18 Online:2011-07-10 Published:2011-07-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 设置人工长短日照、高低温环境对太湖流域20份晚粳水稻品种的光、温敏感性及基本营养生长期进行分析，结果表明，这20份晚粳品种都表现出强感光性，而且多数品种基本营养生长期较短，具有较强的感温性，抽穗期长短与品种的感光性呈显著正相关。利用一套抽穗期主基因近等基因系分析这些晚粳品种的抽穗期基因型，结果表明, 太湖流域晚粳品种几乎都同时携带主效显性感光等位基因E1和显性早熟等位基因Ef1，在E2位点主要为非感光等位基因e2，在E3位点，部分品种携带感光等位基因E3或E3t；在Se1位点，携带的主要是非感光等位基因Se1e，还有部分品种为主效显性感光等位基因Se1n；另外，大部分品种还携带可以部分抑制Se1、E1表达的隐性感光抑制因子hd2。

关键词: 晚粳稻, 抽穗期, 遗传分析, 感光性, 感温性, 基本营养生长期

Abstract: Heading dates of 20 late season japonica rice cultivars native to the Taihu Lake region of China were investigated, and their basic vegetative growth (BVG), photoperiodsensitivity (PS) and temperaturesensitivity (TS) were analyzed under artificial shortday and natural longday conditions in Nanjing, as well as artificial high temperature and natural low temperature conditions in winter in Hainan. The results showed that all the cultivars had strong PS, and most of the cultivars had strong TS and short BVG. Regression analysis showed a significant correlation between heading date and PS, indicating PS was the main factor affecting heading date of late season japonica rice cultivars from the Taihu Lake region. Genetic analyses were conducted by using a set of heading date near isogenic lines as tester lines. All these japonica cultivars carried the dominant photoperiod sensitivity allele E1 and the dominant earlyheading gene Ef1. At the E2 and E3 loci, most of the late season japonica cultivars carried the photoperiod insensitivity alleles e2 and e3, but some carried the photoperiod sensitivity alleles E2 and E3 or E3t. At the Se1 locus, these late season japonica cultivars mainly carried recessive photoperiod insensitivity gene Se1e, others carried Se1n. In addition, some of the late season japonica cultivars carried the recessive allele hd2, inhibiting the expressions of E1 and Se-1.

Key words: late season , japonica rice, heading date, genetic analysis, photoperiod sensitivity, temperature sensitivity, basic vegetative growth

中图分类号:

周振玲1, 2, 江玲1,徐大勇1, 2, 魏祥进1, 刘喜1, 卢百关2, 万建民1, 3, *. 太湖流域晚粳品种抽穗期的遗传分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2011, 25(4): 357-364.

ZHOU Zhen-Ling1, 2 , JIANG Ling1,Xu Da-Yong1, 2 , WEI Xiang-Jin1, LIU Xi1, LU Bai-Guan2, WAN Jian-Min1, 3 , * . Genetic Analysis of Heading Date of Late Season Japonica Rice from Taihu Lake Region[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science, 2011, 25(4): 357-364.

参考文献

[1]Kinoshita T. Report of committee on gene symbolization, nomenclature and linkage groups. Rice Genet Newsl, 1995, 12: 25-125.
[2]Maheswaran M, Mackill D J, Huang N, et al. Identification of RAPD markers linked to Se-3(t), a gene enhancing the level of photoperiod sensitivity in rice. Rice Genet Newsl, 1995, 12: 219-221.
[3]Ohshima I, Watanabe Y, Asahic C. Genetic analysis of heading time in cross between two indica varieties with two inhibitor genes for photoperiod sensitivity. Jpn J Breed, 1993, 43: 101-106.
[4]Okumoto Y, Tanisaka T, Yamagata H. Heading-time genes of the rice varieties grown in the Tohoku-Hokuriku region in Japan. Jpn J Breed, 1992, 42: 121-135.
[5]Okumoto Y, Tanisaka T. Trisomic analysis of a strong photoperiod-sensitivity gene E1 in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Euphytica, 1997, 95: 301-307.
[6]Yokoo M, Okuno K. Genetic analysis of earliness mutations induced in the rice cultivar Norin 8. Jpn J Breed, 1993, 43: 1-11.
[7]Shen B, Qian H R, Wang J L. Tagging genes for heading date in rice via linkage to RFLP markers. Acta Agron Sin,1994, 20(1): 1-7.
[8]Ichitani K, Okumoto Y, Tanisaka T. Photoperiod sensitivity gene of Se-1 locus found in photoperiod insensitive rice cultivars of the northern limit region of rice cultivation. Breed Sci, 1997, 47: 145-152.
[9]Okumoto Y, Ichitani K, Inoue H. Photoperiod insensitivity gene essential to the varieties grown in the northern limit region of paddy rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivation. Euphytica, 1996, 92: 63-66.
[10]Yamagata H, Okumoto Y, Tanisaka T. Analysis of genes controlling heading time in Japanese rice//Rice Genetics. Manila, Philippines: IRRI, 1986: 351-359.
[11]李和标, 邹江石. 水稻籼粳亚种间F1生育期超亲表现与遗传分析. 江苏农业学报, 1992, 8(1): 7-12.
[12]Ohshima I, Kikuchi F. Identification of a recessive inhibitor for photoperiod-sensitive gene, Se-1, in photoperiod-insensitive varieties of indica type rice. Proceeding of 7th International Congress SAERAO, 1994: 93-100.
[13]Tsai K H. Gene loci and alleles controlling the duration of basic vegetative growth of rice//Rice Genetics. Manila, Philippines: IRRI, 1986: 339-349.
[14]Inoue I, Nishida H, Okumoto Y, et al. Identification of an early heading time gene found in the Taiwanese rice cultivar Taichung 65. Breed Sci, 1998, 48: 103-108.
[15]Ichitani K, Okumoto Y, Tanisaka T. Genetic analyses of low photoperiod sensitivity of rice cultivars from the northern most regions of Japan. Plant Breed, 1998, 117: 543-547.
[16] Wei X J, Jiang L, Xu J F, et al. Genetic analyses of heading date of japonica rice cultivars from Northeast China. Field Crops Res, 2008, 107: 147-154.
[17]魏祥进, 江玲, 徐俊锋, 等. 我国华北地区粳稻品种抽穗期遗传分析. 中国水稻科学, 2009, 23(6): 595-603.
[18]Wei X J, Jiang L, Xu J F, et al. Genetic analyses of heading date of japonica rice cultivars in the lower region of the Yangtze River valley. J Integr Plant Biol, 2009, 51(10): 922-932.
[19]Xu J F, Jiang L, Wei X J. Genotypes of heading date of middle indica rice in the mid-lower region of the Yangtze River. J Integr Plant Biol, 2007, 49(12): 1772-1781.
[20]徐俊锋, 魏祥进, 江玲, 等. 我国部分早籼品种及杂交早籼骨干亲本抽穗期遗传分析. 中国水稻科学, 2010, 24(3): 215-222.
[21]Ichitani K, Okumoto Y, Tanisaka T. Genetic analysis of the rice cultivar Kasalath with special reference to two photoperiod sensitivity loci E1 and Se-1. Breeding Sci， 1998, 48: 51-57.
[22] Lin H X, Yamamoto T, Sasaki T, et al. Characterization and detection of epistatic interaction three QTLs, Hd-1， Hd-2 and Hd-3, controlling heading date of rice using nearly isogenic lines. Theor Appl Genet, 2000, 101: 1021-1028.
[23]Yamamoto T, Kuboki Y, Lin S Y. Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci Hd-1， Hd-2 and Hd-3， controlling heading date of rice, as single Mendellian factors. Theor Appl Genet， 1998, 97: 37-44.
[24]Nishida H, Okumoto Y, Nakagawa H, et al. Analysis of tester lines for rice (Oryza sativa L.) heading-time genes using reciprocal photoperiodic transfer treatments. Ann Bot, 2001, 88: 527-536.
[25]Okumoto Y, Yoshimura A, Tanisaka T, et al. Analysis of a rice variety Taichung 65 and its isogenic early-heading lines for late-heading genes E1， E2 and E3.Jpn J Breed， 1992, 42: 415-429.
[26] Yokoo M, Kikuchi F. Multiple allelism of the locus controlling heading time of rice, detected using the close linkage with the blast-resistance. Jpn J Breed， 1977, 27: 123-130.
[27]Yano M, Katayose Y, Ashikari M, et al. Hd1， a major photoperiod sensitivity quantitative trait locus in rice, is closely related to the Arabidopsis flowering line gene CONSTANS. Plant Cell， 2000, 12: 2473-2483.
[28]Yano M, Harushima Y, Nagamura Y, et al. Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling heading date in rice using a high-density linkage map. Theor Appl Genet， 1997, 95: 1025-1032.
[29]罗林广, 徐俊锋, 翟虎渠, 等. 水稻雄性不育恢复系明恢63的感光基因分析. 遗传学报, 2003, 30(9): 804-810.
[30]Chang T T, Vergara B S. Component analysis of duration from seeding to heading in rice by the basic vegetative phase and the photoperiod-sensitive phase. Euphytica， 1969, 18: 79-91.
[31]张旭. 水稻光温生态与品种选育利用. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 24-45.

太湖流域晚粳品种抽穗期的遗传分析

Genetic Analysis of Heading Date of Late Season Japonica Rice from Taihu Lake Region

PDF

可视化

被引次数

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

[1]	廉院训, 韦子芸, 张强, 李清, 任德勇, 胡江, 朱丽, 高振宇, 张光恒, 郭龙彪, 曾大力, 钱前, 沈兰. 水稻斑马叶突变体zl7的鉴定与基因的精细定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2023, 37(2): 113-124.
[2]	王婧莹, 赵广欣, 邱冠凯, 方军. 水稻抽穗期途径基因的磷酸化、泛素化研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2022, 36(3): 215-226.
[3]	褚晓洁, 芦涛, 叶涵斐, 王盛, 林晗, 吴先美, 何瑞, 严钢, 王跃星, 李三峰, 路梅, 胡海涛, 杨窑龙, 饶玉春. 水稻叶片衰老基因LPS1的克隆与功能研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(5): 427-438.
[4]	王玉博, 王悦, 刘雄, 唐文帮. 水稻光周期调控开花的研究进展[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2021, 35(3): 207-224.
[5]	熊涛, 聂元元, 毛方明, 雷建国, 毛凌华, 朱珊, 黄仁良, 沈显华, 严松. 水稻东野型不育系异交不亲和性的鉴定和遗传分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(6): 520-524.
[6]	张立成, 李懿星, 王天抗, 邱牡丹, 宋书锋, 董皓, 李磊, 刘建丰, 李莉. 水稻抽穗期基因OsDof6功能的初步研究[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(5): 397-405.
[7]	魏秀彩, 刘金栋, 刘利成, 黎用朝, 潘孝武, 董铮, 刘文强, 熊海波, 闵军, 李小湘. 基于MAGIC群体的水稻抽穗期和产量相关性状全基因组关联分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2020, 34(4): 325-331.
[8]	农保选, 秦碧霞, 夏秀忠, 杨行海, 张宗琼, 曾宇, 邓国富, 蔡健和, 李战彪, 刘丕庆, 李丹婷. 南方水稻黑条矮缩病抗性的遗传分析及主效QTL的精细定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2019, 33(2): 135-143.
[9]	吕凤, 唐倩莹, 王启明, 郑海, 尤世民, 柏文婷, 肖晏嘉, 赵志刚, 万建民. 水稻雌性败育基因FA的图位克隆[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(6): 519-528.
[10]	刘小云, 李晓, 李腾飞, 苏鲁方. 水稻OsENO2-2基因过表达对水稻抽穗期的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2018, 32(1): 12-22.
[11]	涂政军, 邹国兴, 黄李超, 陈龙, 代丽萍, 高易宏, 冷语佳, 朱丽, 张光恒, 胡江, 任德勇, 高振宇, 董国军, 陈光, 郭龙彪, 钱前, 曾大力. 水稻淡绿叶基因PGL11的鉴定与精细定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(5): 489-499.
[12]	王军, 朱金燕, 陶亚军, 周勇, 范方军, 李文奇, 王芳权, 仲维功, 杨杰, 梁国华. 基于重测序的染色体片段代换系定位水稻抽穗期QTL[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(4): 364-370.
[13]	许作鹏, 仲崇元, 张丽佳, 刘巧泉. 水稻脆秆突变体bc1-wu3的鉴定与基因克隆[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2017, 31(2): 157-165.
[14]	叶卫军, 胡时开, 吴立文, 郭龙彪, 钱前. 水稻迟抽穗突变体dth9的遗传分析与基因定位[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(3): 232-238.
[15]	王军, 朱金燕, 周勇, 杨杰, 范方军, 李文奇, 王芳权, 仲维功, 梁国华. 不同温光条件下水稻抽穗期QTL的定位与分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2016, 30(3): 247-255.