稻田冬季保护性耕作条件下的土壤酶活性与水稻成熟期叶片衰老和籽粒产量之间的关系

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究稻田冬季保护性耕作不同种植模式对土壤酶活性以及水稻成熟期叶片衰老的影响，设计了5种种植模式：免耕直播稻草全程覆盖马铃薯（T1）、免耕直播黑麦草（T2）、免耕直播油菜（T3）、免耕直播燕麦草（T4）和空闲（CK），供试品种为杂交组合国稻6号。与对照（CK）相比,T1、T2和T3处理均可显著提高土壤蛋白酶、中性磷酸酶、过氧化氢酶以及转化酶活性，尤其是T1处理，其土壤酶活性明显高于其他处理，而T4处理与对照相比，差异不明显。T1、T2和T3处理均可有效延缓水稻成熟期剑叶的衰老，主要表现为成熟期剑叶中的超氧化物歧化酶、过氧化物酶活性、可溶性蛋白质和叶绿素含量下降缓慢，丙二醛含量上升的幅度较小，相对于对照（CK），差异均达显著水平。在本试验条件下，土壤酶对水稻叶片衰老的影响程度依次为蛋白酶>过氧化氢酶>中性磷酸酶>转化酶。叶片衰老对水稻产量的影响主要表现在灌浆中后期。

关键词: 水稻, 保护性耕作, 土壤酶活性, 叶片衰老

Abstract: Five planting modes of winter conservation tillage in paddy field, including potato with straw mulching under zerotillage(T1), ryegrass direct seeding under zerotillage (T2), rape direct seeding under zerotillage (T3), oat grass direct seeding under zerotillage（T4） and the control (CK), were designed to study the changes in the soil enzyme activities and their effects on leaf senescence of hybrid rice Guodao 6 during grain filling. Compared to the control (CK), T1, T2 and T3 treatments could significantly increase the soil proteinase, neutral phosphatase, catalase and invertase activities with the highest soil enzyme activity under T1 treatment. T1, T2 and T3 treatments could effectively delay the rice leaf senescence during grain filling. Further study showed that the degradation of chlorophyll and the decline of the soluble protein content were slowed down, and the superoxide dismutase and peroxidase activities were higher as well as the malondialdehyde content were lower under T1, T2 and T3 treatments than those in control (CK). Among the soil enzymes, soil proteinase had the largest influence on the rice leaf senescence, followed by catalase, neutral phosphatase and invertase. Rice leaf senescence index during the middlelate grain filling stage was significantly correlated with rice yield.

Key words: rice, conservation tillage, soil enzyme activity, leaf senescence, relationship

符冠富.王丹英.徐春梅.彭建.韩博.陶龙兴.章秀福. 稻田冬季保护性耕作条件下的土壤酶活性与水稻成熟期叶片衰老和籽粒产量之间的关系[J]. 中国水稻科学 2009,23(1): 43-43～50 . .

FU Guanfu,WANG Danying,XU Chunmei,PENG Jian,HAN Bo,TAO Longxing,ZHANG Xiufu*. Relationships Between Soil Enzyme Activities and Rice Grain Yield, Leaf Senescence During Grain Filling under Winter Conservation Tillage in Paddy Field[J]. Chinese Journal of Rice Science 2009,23(1): 43-43～50 ..

参考文献

[1]王晓燕, 高焕文, 李洪文, 等. 保护性耕作对农田地表径流与土壤水蚀影响的试验研究. 农业工程学报, 2000, 16(3): 66-69.

[2]曾希柏, 关光复. 稻田不同耕作制下有机质和氮磷钾的变化研究. 生态学报, 1999, 19（1）: 90-95.

[3]杨学明, 张晓平, 方华军, 等. 北美保护性耕作及对中国的意义. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(2): 335-340.

[4]高明, 张磊, 魏朝富, 等. 稻田长期垄作免耕对水稻产量及土壤肥力的影响研究. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2004, 10(4): 343-348.

[5]Monreal C M, Bergstrom D W. Soil enzymatic factors expressing the influence of land use, tillage system and texture on soil biochemical quality. Can J Soil Sci, 2000, 80: 419-428.

[6]Singh J S, Raghubanshi A S, Singh R S, et al. Microbial biomass act as a source of plant nutrients in dry tropical forest and savanna. Nature, 1989, 338: 499-500.

[7]Srivastava S C, Singh J S. Microbial C, N and P in dry tropical forest soils: Effects of alternate landuses and nutrient flux. Soil Biol Biochem, 1991, 23(2): 117-124.

[8]Decker K L M, Boerner R E J, Morris S J. Scale dependent patterns of soil enzyme activity in a forest landscape. Can J For Res, 1999, 29(2): 232-241.

[9]王芸, 韩宾, 史忠强, 等. 保护性耕作对土壤微生物特性及酶活性的影响. 水土保持学报, 2006, 20（4）: 120-123.

[10]李腊梅, 陆琴, 严蔚东, 等. 太湖地区稻麦二熟制下长期秸秆还田对土壤酶活性的影响. 土壤, 2006, 38(4): 422-428.

[11]刘道宏. 植物叶片的衰老. 植物生理学通讯, 1983, 19(2): 14-19.

[12]曹显祖. 提高杂交稻结实率的中间试验. 江苏农业科学, 1981(5): 56-61.

[13]严昶升. 土壤肥力研究方法. 北京: 农业出版社, 1988.

[14]白宝璋. 植物生理学实验技术. 北京: 中国科学技术出版社, 1993.

[15]Dhindsa R S, PlumbDhindsa P, Thorpe T A. Leaf senescence: Correlated with increased levels of membrane permeability and lipid peroxidation and decreased levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase. J Exp Bot, 1981, 32: 91-101.

[16]张露欣. 四种菜叶衰老期间呼吸、乙烯产生、IAA和过氧化物酶的变化及其相互关系. 植物生理学报, 1988, 14(1): 81-87.

[17]张海林, 高旺盛, 陈阜, 等. 保护性耕作研究现状、发展趋势及对策. 中国农业大学学报, 2005, 10(1): 16-20.

[18]李向东, 陈源泉, 隋鹏. 中国南方集约多熟稻田保护性耕作制度. 生态学杂志, 2007, 26(10): 1653-1656.

[19]方敏瑜, 张建锋, 陈益泰, 等. 发展坡地农用林业治理农业面源污染. 湖北林业科技, 2007（2）: 34-38.

[20]张志剑, 胡勘海, 朱荫湄. 农业面源污染与水体保护. 科技与发展, 1999(6): 23-24.

[21]谢建昌. 世界肥料使用的现状与前景. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1998, 4(4): 321-330.

[22]濮小英. 浙江省农村生态环境的主要问题及其保护对策. 环境污染与防治, 2002, 24(2): 109-111.

[23]李明祥. 高寒山区横坡绿肥聚垄免耕的效果与技术关键. 中国水土保持, 1994（10）: 34-35.

[24]刘国顺, 罗贞宝, 王岩, 等. 绿肥翻压对烟田土壤理化性状及土壤微生物量的影响. 水土保持学报, 2006, 20（2）: 95-98.

[25]朱华龙, 刘明. 发展绿肥促进桂林农业持续发展. 广西农学报, 2002（4）: 56-59.

[26]吴传云. 绿肥作物轮作覆盖在免耕中的重要性. 农机科技推广, 2005（1）: 45-46.

[27]王人民, 陈锦新. 稻田年内水旱轮作的后效应研究. 中国水稻科学, 1999, 13(4): 223-228.

[28]章秀福, 王丹英, 符冠富, 等. 南方稻田保护性耕作的研究进展与研究对策. 土壤通报, 2006, 37(2): 346-351.

[29]陈启德, 曾庆曦, 刘志明.稻田种植绿肥的增产效果及对土壤肥力的影响. 西南农业学报, 1995, 8(1): 117-123.

[30]霍株, 王璞, 付晋峰. 秸秆还田与氮肥施用对夏玉米物质生产的影响研究. 中国生态农业学报, 2006, 15（2）: 95-98.

[31]任祖淦, 陈玉水, 唐福钦. 有机无机肥料配施对土壤微生物和酶活性的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1996, 2(6): 179-283.

[32] Mittler R, Shulaev V, Lam E. Coordinated activation of programmed cell death and defense mechanisms in transgenic tobaco plants expressing a bacterial proton pump. Plant Cell, 1995, 7: 29-42.

[33]中国农业科学院. 中国稻作学. 北京：农业出版社， 1985： 197-204.

[34] Bergstrom D W, Monreal C M. Increased soil enzyme activities under two row crops. Soil Sci Soc Am J, 1998, 62: 1295-1301.

[35]高明, 周保同, 魏朝富. 不同耕作方式对稻田土壤动物、微生物及酶活性的影响研究. 应用生态学报, 2004, 15(7)： 1177-1181.

[36]樊军, 郝明德. 黄土高原旱地轮作与施肥长期定位试验研究:Ⅰ. 长期轮作与施肥对土壤酶活性的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2003, 9(1): 9-13.