[1]Wu C J, Bordeos A, Madamba M R S, et al. Rice lesion mimic mutants with enhanced resistance to diseases. Mol Genet Gen, 2008, 279: 605-619.
[2]Dietrich R A, Delaney T P, Uknes S J, et al. Arabidopsis mutants simulating disease resistance response. Cell, 1994, 77: 565-577.
[3]Lorrain S, Vailleau F, Balague C, et al. Lesion mimic mutants: Keys for deciphering cell death and defense pathways in plants? Trends Plant Sci, 2003, 8: 263-271.
[4]Kiyosawa S. Inheritance of a particular sensitivity of the rice variety, SekiguchiAsahi, to pathogens and chemicals, and linkage relationship with blast resistance. Bull Nat Inst Agric Sci (Jpn): Ser D Physiol Genet, 1970, 21: 61-71.
[5]Bhat R N, Upadhyaya M, Chaudhury A, et al. Chemical and irradiation induced mutants and TILLING//Upadhyaya N M. Rice Functional Genomics: Challenges, Progress and Prospects. New York: Springer, 2007: 149-180.
[6]Wu J L, Lei C, Wu C, et al. Chemical and irradiationinduced mutants of indica rice IR64. Plant Mol Biol, 2005, 59: 85-97.
[7]Mittler R, Rizhsky L. Transgeneinduced lesion mimic. Plant Mol Biol, 2000, 44: 335-344.
[8]Krishnan A, Guiderdoni E, An G, et al. Mutant resources in rice for functional genomics. Plant Physiol, 2009, 149:165-170
[9]Ueno M, Shibata H, Kihara J, et al. Increased tryptophan decarboxylase and monoamine oxidase activities induce Sekiguchi lesion formation in rice infected with Magnaporthe grisea. Plant J, 2003, 36: 215-228.
[10]Yoshimura A, Ideta O, Iwata N. Linkage map of phenotype and RFLP markers in rice. Plant Mol Biol, 1997, 35: 49-60.
[11]Yin Z, Chen J, Zeng L, et al. Characterizing rice lesion mimic mutants and identifying a mutant with broadspectrum resistance to rice blast and bacterial blight. Mol Plant Microbe Interact, 2000, 13: 869-876.
[12]Yamanouchi U, Yano M, Lin H, et al. A rice spotted leaf gene, Spl7, encodes a heat stress transcription factor protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2002, 99(11): 7530-7535.
[13]Sanchez A C, Khush G S. Chromosomal localization of five mutant genes in rice, Oryza sativa, using primary trisomics. Plant Breeding, 2000, 119: 84-86.
[14]Singh K, Multani D S, Khush G S. A new spotted leaf mutant in rice. Rice Genet Newsl, 1995, 12: 192-193.
[15]Zeng L R, Yin Z, Chen J, et al. Fine genetic mapping and physical delimination of the lesion mimic gene Spl11 to a 160kb DNA segment of the rice genome. Mol Genet Gen, 2002, 268: 253-261
[16]Zeng L R, Qu S, Bordeos A, et al. Spotted leaf11, a negative regulator of plant cell death and defense, encodes a Ubox/armadillo repeat protein endowed with E3 ubiquitin ligase activity. Plant Cell, 2004, 16: 2795-2808.
[17]Mizobuchi R, Hirabayashi H, Kaji R, et al. Differential expression of disease resistance in rice lesionmimic mutants. Plant Cell Rep, 2002, 21: 390-396.
[18]Mori M, Tomita C, Sugimoto K, et al. Isolation and molecular characterization of a Spotted leaf 18 mutant by modified activationtagging in rice. Plant Mol Biol, 2007, 63: 847-860.
[19]Qiao Y L, Jiang W Z, Lee J H, et al. SPL28 encodes a clathrinassociated adaptor protein complex 1, medium subunit μ1(AP1M1) and is responsible for spooted leaf and early senescence in rice (Oryza sativa). New Phytol, 2009, 185(1): 258-274.
[20]Takahashi A, Kawasaki T, Henmi K, et al. Lesion mimic mutants of rice with alterations in early signaling events of defense. Plant J, 1999, 17: 535-545.
[21]Takahashi A, Kawasaki T, Wong H L, et al. Hyperphosphorylation of a mitochondrial protein, prohibitin, is induced by calyculin A in a rice lesionmimic mutant cdr1. Plant Physiol, 2003, 132: 1861-1869.
[22]Campbell M A, Ronald P C. Characterization of four rice mutants with alterations in the defense response pathway. Mol Plant Pathol, 2005, 6: 11-21.
[23]Arase S, Zhao C M, Akimitsu K, et al. A recessive lesion mimic mutant of rice with elevated resistance to fungal pathogens. J Gen Plant Pathol, 2000, 66: 109-116.
[24]王建军, 朱旭东, 王友林, 等. 水稻类病斑突变体的生理与遗传分析. 植物生理与分子生物学报, 2004, 30: 331-338.
[25]王建军, 朱旭东, 王友林,等. 水稻类病斑突变体lrd40的抗病性与细胞学分析. 中国水稻科学, 2005, 19: 111-116.
[26]Jung Y H, Lee J H, Agrawal G K, et al. The rice (Oryza sativa) blast lesion mimic mutant, blm, may confer resistance to blast pathogens by triggering multiple defenseassociated signaling pathways. Plant Physiol Biochem, 2005, 43: 397-406.
[27]刘道峰, 程祝宽, 刘国庆, 等. 水稻类病变突变体lmi的鉴定及其基因定位. 科学通报, 2003, 48: 831-835.
[28]王忠华, 贾育林. 水稻类病变突变体lmm1的诱发与初步分析. 核农学报, 2006, 20: 255-258.
[29]王忠华, 林卉, Valent B, 等. 水稻抗稻瘟病菌防卫反应的细胞学分析与防卫基因表达. 中国水稻科学, 2007, 21: 335-340.
[30]Wang L, Pei Z, Tian Y, et al. OsLSD1, a rice zinc finger protein, regulates programmed cell death and callus differentiation. Mol Plant Microbe Interact, 2005, 18: 375-384.
[31]Takahashi A, Agrawal G K, Yamazaki M, et al. Rice Pti1a negatively regulates RAR1dependent defense responses. Plant Cell, 2007, 19: 2940-2951.
[32]Buschges R, Hollricher K, Panstruga R, et al. The barley Mlo gene: A novel control element of plant pathogen resistance. Cell, 1997, 88: 695-705.
[33]Malamy J, Carr J P, Klessig D F, Salicylic acid: A likely endogenous signal in the resistance response of tobacco to viral infection. Science, 1990, 250: 1002-1004.
[34]Walbot V, Hoisington D A, Neuffer M G. Disease lesion mimics in maize//Kosuge T, Meredith C. Genetic Engineering of Plants. New York: Plenum, 1983: 431-442.
[35]Fuse T, Iba K, Satoh H, et al. Characterization of a rice mutant having an increased susceptibility to light stress at high temperature. Physiol Plant, 1993, 9: 799-804.
[36]Gray J, JanickBuckner D, Buckner B, et al. Lightdependent death of maize lls1 cells is mediated by mature chloroplasts. Plant Physiol, 2002, 30: 1894-1907.
[37]Hoisington D A, Neuffer M G, Walbot V. Disease lesion mimics in maize: Ⅰ. Effect of genetic background, temperature, developmental age, and wounding on necrotic spot formation with Les1. Dev Biol, 1982, 93: 381-388.
[38]陈健, 赵增琳, 张世宏, 等. 一个水稻TDNA插入类病斑突变体的初步研究. 吉林农业大学学报, 2008, 30(2): 133-137.
[39]郝中娜, 张红志, 陶荣祥. 水稻类病斑突变体的初步研究. 核农学报, 2007, 21: 328332.
[40]Greenberg J T, Silverman F P, Liang H. Uncopling salisalicdependent cell death and defenserelated response from disease resistance in the Arabidopsis mutant acd5. Genetics, 2000, 156: 341-350.
[41]Bowling S A, Clarke J D, Liu Y, et al. The cpr5 mutant of Arabidopsis expresses both NPRldependent and NPRlindependent resistance. Plant Cell, 1997, 9: 1573-1584.
[42]Jambunathan N, Siani J M, McNellis T W. A humiditysensitive Arabidopsis copine mutant exhibits precocious cell death and increased disease resistance. Plant Cell, 2001, 13: 2225-2240.
[43]Mach J M, Castillo A R, Hongstraten R, et al. The Arabidopsis accelerated cell death gene acd2 encodes red chlorophyll catabolite reductase and suppresses the spread of disease symptoms. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2001, 265: 302-310.
[44]Rate D N, Cuenca J V, Bowman G R, et al. The gainoffunction Arabidopsis acd6 mutant reveals novel regulation and function of the salicylic acid signaling pathway in controlling cell death, defenses, and cell growth. Plant Cell, 1999, 11: 1695-1708.
[45]Yu I C, Parker J, Bent F A. Geneforgene disease resistance without the hypersensitive response in Arabidopsis dnd1 mutant. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1998, 95: 7819-7824.
[46]Balague C, Lin B, Alcon C, et al. HLM1, an essential signaling component in the hypersensitive response, is a member of the cyclic nucleotidegated channel ion channel family. Plant Cell, 2003, 15: 365-379.
[47]Lee J C, Peter M E. Regulation of apoptosis by ubiquitination. Immunol Rev, 2003, 193: 39-47.
[48]Sullivan J A, Shirasu K, Dong X W. The diverse roles of ubiquitin and the 26S proteasome in the life of plants. Nat Rev Genet, 2003, 4: 885-898.
[49]VegaSanchez M E, Zeng L, Chen S, et al. SPIN1, a K homology domain protein negatively regulated and ubiquitinated by the E3 ubiquitin ligase SPL11, is involved in flowering time control in rice. Plant Cell, 2008, 20: 1456-1469.
[50]Dietrich R A, Richberg M H, Schmidt R, et al. A novel zinc finger protein is encoded by the Arabidopsis LSD1 gene and functions as a negative regulator of plant cell death. Cell, 1997, 88: 685-694.
[51]Epple P, Mack A A, Morris V R F, et al. Antagonistic control of oxidative stressinduced cell death in Arabidopsis by two related plantspecific zinc finger proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2003, 100: 6831-6836.
[52]Kachroo A, Lapchyk L, Fukushige H, et al. Plastidial fatty acid signaling modulates salicylic acid and jasmonic acidmediated defense pathways in the Arabidopsis ssi2 mutant. Plant Cell, 2003, 15: 2952-2965.
[53]Kachroo A, Venugopal S C, Lapchyk L, et al. Oleic acid levels regulated by glycerolipid metabolism modulate defense gene expression in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2004, 101: 5152-5157.
[54]Huang L, Sun Q, Qin F, et al. Downregulation of a SILENT INFORMATION REGULATOR2related histone deacetylase gene, OsSRT1, induces DNA fragmentation and cell death in rice. Plant Physiol, 2007, 144: 1508-1519.
[55]Brodersen P, Petersen M, Pike H M, et al. Knockout of Arabidopsis acceleratedcelldeath11 encoding a sphingosine transfer protein causes activation of programmed cell death and defense. Genes Dev, 2002, 16: 490-502.
[56]Kachroo P, Shanklin J, Shah J, et al. A fatty acid desaturase modulates the activation of defense signaling pathways in plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2001, 98: 9448-9453.
[57]Hu G, Yamada K, Briggs S P, et al. A porphyrin pathway impairment is responsible for the phenotype of a dominant disease lesion mimic mutant of maize. Plant Cell, 1998, 10: 1095-1105.
[58]Ishikawa A, Okamoto H, Iwasaki Y, et al. A deficiency of coproprophyrinogen: Ⅲ. oxidase causes lesion formation in Arabidopsis. Plant J, 2001, 27: 89-99.
[59]Gray J, Close P S, Briggs S P, et al. A novel suppressor of cell death in plants encoded by the Lls1 gene of maize. Cell, 1997, 89: 25-31.
[60]Jabs T, Dietrich R A, Dangl J L. Initiation of runaway cell death in an Arabidopsis mutant by extracellular superoxide. Science, 1996, 273: 1853-1856.
[61]Zhang C, Czymmek K J, Shapiro A D. Nitric oxide does not trigger early programmed cell death events but may contribute to celltocell signaling governing progression of the Arabidopsis hypersensitive response. Mol Plant Microbe Interact, 2003, 16: 962-972.
[62]Delledonne M. NO news is good news for plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2005, 8: 390-396. |